STL hears about claim of responsibility for Hariri killing
Elise Knutsen/The Daily Star/ June. 24, 2015
BEIRUT: Less than an hour after the massive explosion that tore through the Beirut Marina killing Rafik Hariri and 21 others, an editor at Al- Jazeera’s Beirut office received a cryptic phone call from a man she did not know. Speaking in what she believed to be a feigned Lebanese accent, the man hurriedly began reading a declaration claiming responsibility for Hariri’s assassination.The editor testified before the Special Tribunal for Lebanon Tuesday, telling the court about the cryptic phone call and the almost Hollywoodian events that unfolded later that afternoon in February 2005. With her face obscured and her voice altered to conceal her identity from the public, the editor recalled the first phone call she received. The man on the other end of the line was speaking in “a high pitched tone and was tense,” the witness told the STL. “My impression was that he was trying to speak with a Lebanese accent but it was very clear that he was not Lebanese.” While he sounded like a native Arabic speaker, the editor testified that she was unable to determine the man’s nationality. The caller “just asked me to get a piece of paper a pen and he started reading a statement in classic Arabic,” the editor told the court. “When I was unable to [keep up with his dictation], he started telling me, ‘If you’re not going to write quickly, I’m going to hang up.’”
The editor gave the phone to journalist Ghassan bin Jeddo, who was Al-Jazeera’s bureau chief in Lebanon at the time. Not long after the first call, Al-Jazeera received a second call, ostensibly from the same individual. The editor picked up the phone and the man on the other end asked her to pass the phone to someone else and she once again passed the phone to bin Jeddo. After hanging up, bin Jeddo told the editor that the caller had informed him of a VHS tape stashed in a tree in Downtown Beirut. Another Al-Jazeera employee was dispatched to the site but found nothing. Soon after, the editor recalled that yet another Al-Jazeera employee went to the location described by the mysterious caller and returned to the Al-Jazeera offices with an envelope. A VHS tape was discovered inside. After loading the VHS into a player, the editor was faced with a bearded man seated before an Islamic flag. “Relying on God, we decided to hand the just punishment to the agent of [the Saudi] regime and its cheap tool in greater Syria … Rafik Hariri … through carrying out this martyrdom operation,” the man said, reading from a script. The editor testified Tuesday that the script read by the man in the video was identical to the declaration the mysterious caller had begun dictating to her a few hours prior.
According to the prosecution, the video was part of an elaborate effort to throw Lebanese authorities off the scent of Hariri’s true killers. The claim of responsibility delivered to Al-Jazeera was completely fake, the prosecution claims. The man in the video was ultimately identified as Ahmad Abu Adass, a Palestinian who had recently disappeared under mysterious circumstances. While he claimed in the video that he was the driver of the truck bomb, his parents later told U.N. investigators that Abu Adass had never before driven a vehicle. No trace of Abu Adass’ remains were discovered at the crime scene. The court is scheduled to hear more testimony related to the delivery of the tape in the coming days and weeks.
Burning the Books of Hassan Al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb
Mshari Al-Zaydi/Asharq Al Awsat/Wednesday, 24 Jun, 2015
There have been insistent demands for the renewal of religious discourse in several Muslim countries, including Egypt, which is known as “the Mother of the World” and home to the Al-Azhar university, its highest religious authority. Ever since the toppling of Egypt’s former Muslim Brotherhood-led government, which led to a surge in terrorist attacks and pro-Brotherhood propaganda campaigns, there has been much talk about the need for religious reform, whether inside or outside Egypt. The discourse the Brotherhood, Al-Qaeda, or the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) employ to recruit people is based on specific religious texts and Islamic Shari’a concepts that lost touch with reality a long time ago. Although easier said than done, asking Al-Azhar clerics to reform and revolutionize the Islamist discourse, as Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi recently did, is not enough. The problem of religious discourse is too divergent and therefore solving it should involve several factors, most importantly addressing issues such as collective psyche and upbringing.
The solution lies in revisiting the religious concepts and ideas people were brought up upon. Similar attempts have been done by many of the great Muslim scholars in Iraq, Egypt, and Andalusia. It is understood that in such uncertain circumstances it is difficult to find the right point of departure for bringing about religious change and reform. Last week, Egypt’s Ministry of Religious Endowments ordered mosques to remove from their shelves books that encourage extremism, particularly those authored by Brotherhood leaders. According to the Egyptian daily newspaper Al-Masry Al-Youm, Minister of Religious Endowments Mohamed Mokhtar Gomaa has ordered the burning of all the books written by clerics who incite violence, such as Hassan Al-Banna, Sayyid Qutb, and Yusuf Al-Qaradawi.
There is no doubt about the corruption of the Brotherhood’s ideology; however, does burning a few books constitute a real and effective solution? Those books must be available elsewhere outside Egypt and on the Internet. Moreover, some sides are spending millions on their publication. This is not to mention that thousands of the Brotherhood’s disciples reiterate Qutb and Banna’s ideas in a way that makes them more attractive and appealing to a 21st-century audience, using state-of-the-art technology. Burning books cannot be the solution despite the fact that the close monitoring of mosques is among the duties of the ministries of religious endowments.
However, governments should adopt a more comprehensive and sustainable plan that affects all aspects of life. A few years ago I asked an Arab information minister about the purpose of banning books, since they are available online. He answered: “We know those books are available online but by banning them we would be registering a position and sending a political message.”What really need to be burned are the extremist ideas that control the public conscience not mere words on paper. Ibn Hazm, the Andalusian Imam, responded to the burning of his books by saying: Even if you burn the paper, you will not burn what The paper contains, for it is in my heart In fact, the problem is in what the hearts contain not what books say.
