English LCCC Newsbulletin For Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For  June 09/2026
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2026/english.june09.26.htm

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006 

Click On The Below Link To Join Elias Bejjaninews whatsapp group
https://chat.whatsapp.com/FPF0N7lE5S484LNaSm0MjW

اضغط على الرابط في أعلى للإنضمام لكروب Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group

Elias Bejjani/Click on the below link to subscribe to my youtube channel
الياس بجاني/اضغط على الرابط في أسفل للإشتراك في موقعي ع اليوتيوب
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAOOSioLh1GE3C1hp63Camw

Bible Quotations For today
When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own, but will speak whatever he hears, and he will declare to you the things that are to come.
John 16/12-15: “‘I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own, but will speak whatever he hears, and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, because he will take what is mine and declare it to you. All that the Father has is mine. For this reason I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you.”The word of God continued to spread; the number of the disciples increased greatly in Jerusalem, and a great many of the priests became obedient to the faith.

Titles For Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on 08-09 June/2026
Yazed Bin Farhan's Remote control and the corrupted owners of all the Lebanese political parties/
Elias Bejjani/June 08/2026
The terrorist group Hezbollah and its demented mullah masters understand only the language of force/
Elias Bejjani/June 07/2026
Rudolf Heikal's visit to Pakistan: A huge bundle of questions and doubts/Elias Bejjani/June 06/2026
Aoun's anti Hezbollah stances: it's all just talk/Elias Bejjani/June 05/2026
Elias Bejjani/My audio personal analysis with the Hebrew "Makan" radio station addressed peace between Lebanon and Israel and Hezbollah's occupation/June 02/2026
Beware: Any retreat, hesitation, or submission to anticipated pressures will lead to a renewed loss of Lebanese public trust in the current administration and will be considered a crime against Lebanon and its people/Abu Arz - Etienne Saqr/June 08/ 2026
Trump calls on Israel and Iran to "immediately stop shooting" as ceasefire frays/Barak Ravid/AXIOS/June 08/2026
LIC Lauds President Aoun’s Recent Sovereignty Positions
Statement by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, this evening
Israeli strike hits vehicle in Tyre south Lebanon’s Tyre
Iran is ‘destroying’ for the sake of its own interests, Lebanese president says
Lebanon Health Ministry: Death toll rises to 3,637 killed and 11,188 injured since March 2
Lebanese Red Cross says 4 rescuers wounded in Israeli strike on Tyre
Issa tells Aoun US does not want Sunday escalation to expand further
US official urges Hezbollah to allow displaced's return, reconstruction instead of 'pointless war'
Israel vows to intensify attacks across Lebanon amid Iran missile barrages
Israel strikes south Lebanon as it trades fire with Iran
Israeli army warns residents of Zaqouq al-Mafdi in southern Lebanon to evacuate
Israel vows to press military campaign in Lebanon despite Iran's warnings
29 Lebanese army members have been killed in Israeli strikes since March
Tyre heritage site damaged by Israeli bombardment
Israel army says vast tunnel network uncovered under Beaufort castle
Regional escalation unfolds across Israel, Iran and Lebanon amid reciprocal strikes and diplomatic efforts
Qmati says Hezbollah had no direct contact with Trump
A Response to Mr. Walid Joumblatt: The Falsification of History Through Omission/Zéna Mansour/X platform/June 08/2026
Lebanon on the Brink. Again/Alberto M. Fernandez/National Catholic Register/June 08/2026
How Can Lebanon Succeed in the New Middle East?/Sam Menassa/Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
Lebanon Finally Says It Out Loud: Lebanon Does Not Belong to Iran, Iran Is the Problem/Khaled Abu Toameh/ Gatestone Institute/June 08/2026

Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on 08-09 June/2026
Trump calls Netanyahu after Israel-Iran clashes
Trump tells Israeli Channel 12 he warned Netanyahu against turning escalation into war with Iran
Trump warns Netanyahu: Be careful or you will be on your own
Trump Says Israel and Iran Must Immediately Stop 'Shooting'
US military helped defend against Iranian attack on Israel, officials say
Israel and Iran Trade Strikes, Threatening to Drag Region Back to Full-Scale War
Iran Says Return to Hostilities Will Affect Talks with US
Iran Halts Israel Operation after First Post-truce Clash
Israel Military Says Iran Fired Nearly 30 Missiles Since Sunday
US military shoots, disables unladen oil tanker headed to Iran
Iran top negotiator threatens to defeat US blockade on Iran
Dismissal of Operations Chief on Iran Leaves Shockwaves in Mossad
China Says Hopes Israel, Iran Maintain Ceasefire
Pentagon Sees Growing Espionage Threat from Israel
Poland Seizes Major Heroin Shipment from Iran
Pope Says Weapons Cannot Lead to ‘Lasting Peace’
Iran’s Revolutionary Guard says new “resistance security belt” to stretch from Gulf to Red Sea
Iran says it will turn US maritime pressure into “another defeat for the enemy”
Italy places Israeli minister Ben Gvir under investigation over Gaza flotilla treatment
Armenian PM Pashinyan Claims Victory Following General Election

Titles For The Latest English LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on 08-09 June/2026
S'agit il d'une nouvelle étape?/Dr. Charles Elias Chartouni/08 juin 2026
Is this a new step?/Dr. Charles Elias Chartouni/June 08/2026
From Putin to Saddam to Sinwar/Ghassan Charbel/Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
How Did Iran Pluck the Palestinian Fruit?!/Mishary Dhayidi/Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
Israel’s False Tales and the False Tales About It/Hazem Saghieh/Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
True strategic wisdom for Iran is restraint toward the Gulf states/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/AlArabya English/June 08/2026
Selected Face Book & X tweets on 08 June/2026

Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on 08-09 June/2026
Yazed Bin Farhan's Remote control and the corrupted owners of all the Lebanese political parties
Elias Bejjani/June 08/2026
The greatest service Saudi Arabia can offer Lebanon and the Lebanese is to stop funding the corrupted owners of all the Christian, Druze, and Sunni political parties, to let Lebanon make peace with Israel,end the heresy of the two-state solution, and also to stop Berri's posturing and sto welcoming his thug's mouthpiece, Ali Hassan Khalil, who is being sanctioned for corruption.

The terrorist group Hezbollah and its demented mullah masters understand only the language of force.
Elias Bejjani/June 0
7/2026
The demented rulers of Iran understand only Netanyahu's language: force, humiliation, and assassinations. Trump remains ignorant of Iran's culture of delusions, fantasies, and empty bravado.

Rudolf Heikal's visit to Pakistan: A huge bundle of questions and doubts
Elias Bejjani/June 06/2026
Rudolf Heikal's surprise visit to Pakistan to appease Iran and its Hezbollah terrorist gang undermines Aoun's statements with CNN and raises many doubts and questions.

Aoun's anti Hezbollah stances:  it's all just talk
Elias Bejjani/June 05/2026
Aoun's stances are excellent, but they haven't translated into action yet. He needs to move from words to deeds, fire his Hezbollah advisors, purge the army of agents, issue arrest warrants for Hezbollah leaders, and dismiss the duo's ministers... otherwise, it's all just talk.

Elias Bejjani/My audio personal analysis with the Hebrew "Makan" radio station addressed peace between Lebanon and Israel and Hezbollah's occupation
June 02/2026

https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/06/155042/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAyK3MmY45U
Elias Bejjani/My audio intervention by phone on June 01 with the Hebrew "Makan" radio station, as part of the "Morning Tour" program, addressed the latest military developments in southern Lebanon following the Israeli army's liberation of the Beaufort Citadel (Castle of the High Rocks) from the terrorist and Persian Hezbollah. It also covered my stance regarding the State of Israel, the aspirations of the majority of Lebanese for peace with it, ending the state of absurd conflict, closing the Lebanese arena to the impostors, hypocrites, and merchants of the so-called "resistance," and achieving salvation from the Iranian occupation.

Beware: Any retreat, hesitation, or submission to anticipated pressures will lead to a renewed loss of Lebanese public trust in the current administration and will be considered a crime against Lebanon and its people.
Abu Arz - Etienne Saqr/June 08/ 2026
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/06/155140/
A single, clear, and courageous stance against Iranian hegemony and its proxies in Lebanon was enough to restore some of the prestige and national standing of the presidency and to revive much of President Joseph Aoun's dwindling popularity.
This stance also restored the confidence of the international community, particularly the US administration, and put the country back on the right track after years of deviation and subservience.
What is required is to continue this courageous and sovereign approach to the end, until Lebanon regains its free decision-making power, security and peace are restored throughout the nation, and a peace agreement is reached with Israel that ends the artificial state of hostility between our two peoples.
Warning: Any retreat, hesitation, or submission to the anticipated pressures will lead to a renewed loss of Lebanese public trust in the government. It will be considered a crime against Lebanon and its people, and, God forbid, will plunge the country back into a spiral of war, destruction, and collapse…
So beware.
Labbayk Lebanon
Abu Arz

Trump calls on Israel and Iran to "immediately stop shooting" as ceasefire frays
Barak Ravid/AXIOS/June 08/2026
President Trump called on Israel and Iran to "immediately stop shooting" in a post on Truth Social on Monday.
Why it matters: The war between Israel and Iran resumed on Sunday after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defied Trump's request to stand down. Israel struck Tehran and other cities after Iran launched missiles toward Israel. The exchanges on Sunday night and Monday morning are the most significant escalation since the April 8 ceasefire. They are threatening to unravel the negotiations between the Trump administration and Iran and draw the U.S. back into the war. The latest: Trump called Netanyahu again on Monday morning and asked him to stop the strikes in Iran, an Israeli source said.
The source said Netanyahu told Trump he was ready to stop if Iran did not conduct more attacks against Israel. But a second Israeli source said Israel would continue striking Hezbollah targets in Lebanon. Earlier on Monday, Iran's armed forces had announced a suspension of its military operations but threatened "more severe and crushing measures than before" if the "aggression" continues, including Israel's operations in southern Lebanon. Catch up quick: Iran launched a barrage of missiles toward Israel on Sunday in retaliation for an Israeli attack in Lebanon, which it considered a violation of its ceasefire with the U.S. and Israel.Trump told Axios he would ask Netanyahu not to retaliate so as not to "blow up" the deal he's negotiating with Iran, and soon after he called Netanyahu with that message. Several hours later Netanyahu ordered strikes on several military targets in Iran, including in Tehran.
The Iranians then responded by launching more missiles, including toward Tel Aviv. Screenshot of a social post from a flag-avatar profile: "Israel and Iran must immediately stop shooting." Includes 520 ReTruths, 2.12k Likes, Jun 08, 2026, 5:36 AM; bottom icons.
Trump on Truth Social
An Israel Defense Forces official told reporters on Monday that Israel was preparing for several days of fighting, though that was before Iran announced its pause. Behind the scenes: A U.S. official said Sunday's Trump-Netanyahu call was "polite," but that Netanyahu pushed back on Trump's request.
"Netanyahu was expressly told the cycle needs to end. The U.S. didn't agree or support these strikes," the U.S. official said. While two U.S. officials said the U.S. military was not involved in the Israeli strikes on Iran, an Israeli official said the U.S. did help intercept Iranian attacks on Israel.
State of play: On Monday morning, the Israel Defense Forces said it attacked air defense systems the Iranians rebuilt during the ceasefire. Israel later attacked a big petrochemical facility in Iran, which the IDF claimed was used to produce raw materials for weapons manufacturing. The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps warned it could retaliate by attacking infrastructure facilities in Israel and in Gulf countries. The other side: The Iranian military fired more than 25 missiles at targets in Israel, including Tel Aviv. Most were intercepted. Prior to the Israeli strikes, Iran had threatened to expand its attacks and target U.S. bases in the region if Israel retaliated. The Houthi rebels in Yemen also joined the fighting, launching two missiles at Israel and announcing they would attack Israeli vessels in the Red Sea. Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said the U.S. was directly responsible for Israel's actions and stressed the developments "will only worsen the chaotic situation of the diplomatic process." What to watch: Trump claimed that despite the renewed fighting, negotiations with Iran should move "quickly," unless "ignorance or stupidity" get in the way. The other two parties to the war have expressed less optimism about a deal. Editor's note: This story has been corrected to reflect that the source said Israel would keep striking Hezbollah targets in Lebanon (not in Iran).

LIC Lauds President Aoun’s Recent Sovereignty Positions
June 6th, 2026
The Lebanese Information Center (LIC) strongly welcomes and supports the recent positions articulated by President Joseph Aoun affirming Lebanon's sovereignty, rejecting the continued use of Lebanon as a bargaining chip in Iran's negotiations with the United States, and emphasizing the necessity of placing all weapons exclusively under the authority of the Lebanese state.
The LIC further commends Prime Minister Nawaf Salam for his continued commitment to constitutional governance, state authority, and the protection of Lebanon's sovereignty and security. The alignment between the Lebanese presidency and premiership on these fundamental national priorities represents an important and long overdue step toward restoring the authority of the Lebanese state after decades of paralysis, foreign interference, and armed domination outside constitutional legitimacy.
President Aoun's recent statements, including his interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, make clear that Lebanon can no longer remain an arena for regional conflicts or a platform for external agendas pursued at the expense of the Lebanese people and the Lebanese state.
For decades, the Iranian regime has used Lebanon as a forward operating front for its regional project through Hezbollah, which it indoctrinated, armed, financed, trained, and directed outside the authority of the Lebanese state. Hezbollah's continued maintenance of an independent military and security apparatus has severely undermined Lebanese sovereignty, weakened state institutions, damaged Lebanon's economy and international standing, and repeatedly dragged Lebanon into destructive conflicts against the will and interests of the Lebanese people.
The LIC supports the full implementation of Lebanese government decisions affirming the state's exclusive monopoly over arms, calls for the dissolution of Hezbollah's military and security apparatus and the surrender of all weapons to the Lebanese state, urges continued support for the Lebanese Armed Forces and Internal Security Forces as the sole legitimate defenders of Lebanon's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and calls for an immediate end to Iranian interference in Lebanese affairs.
President Aoun's position, together with the policies advanced by Prime Minister Salam and the Lebanese government, represents a historic opportunity to restore the authority of the Lebanese state and place Lebanon on a path toward sovereignty, security, reform, and lasting peace.
Our mailing address is:
Lebanese Information Center
601 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20004

Statement by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, this evening
Prime Minister of Israel X platform/June 08/2026
https://x.com/IsraeliPM/status/2064031576519045372/video/1
"A year ago, we launched a historic preemptive strike against Iran’s intention to destroy us with atomic bombs. We thwarted this immediate threat – and we also eliminated the tyrant Khamenei. If we had not acted in time and with overwhelming force – we would not be here today. And I pledge again: Iran will not have nuclear weapons. With that same determination, we acted against Hezbollah as well. Hezbollah planned to invade the Galilee with thousands of terrorists, and at the same time, it planned to devastate Israel’s cities with 150,000 missiles and rockets. We thwarted this threat as well – and we eliminated Nasrallah. And I would like to tell you: our heroic fighters are tearing Hezbollah to pieces. We continue to destroy all of their terror infrastructure in the security zone, including massive underground facilities in the Beaufort Ridge. So massive that they are unlike anything I have ever seen.
Iran and Hezbollah are weaker than ever, and we are stronger than ever – but our battle against them is still not finished. In the last 24 hours, Iran and Hezbollah tried to impose a new equation upon us. And it is an equation I find intolerable and unacceptable. They thought they would fire at Israel from Lebanese territory and from Iran – and we would not act. That did not happen, and it will not happen. Not on my watch! Just as I have done for decades, I stand firmly on our right to act against our enemies. That is how we acted now as well. After Hezbollah fired into Israeli territory, I ordered the IDF to attack terror targets in Beirut, and to eliminate Hezbollah operatives there. We did that. After Iran attacked Israel, I instructed the IDF to attack military and economic targets throughout Iran. We did that, too. At the moment, we are holding our fire, because after we struck the terror regime in Tehran, it ceased attacking us. In the event that the terror regime in Iran makes the mistake of resuming attacks on us – we will respond with overwhelming force. Israel has a full right to self-defense, and we are exercising it to the extent necessary. I say this to you, just as I say this, with appreciation and respect, in my good conversations with my friend President Trump. With unity, determination and wisdom – we will protect the State of Israel. Together, with God's help, we will restore security to the north."

Israeli strike hits vehicle in Tyre south Lebanon’s Tyre
Reuters/08 June ,2026
An Israeli strike hit a vehicle in the city of Tyre, south Lebanon on Monday, Lebanese state media reported, as Israel attacked the country, despite an Iranian threat against such acts.
“An enemy airstrike targeted a car with a missile in the city of Tyre, near the Lebanese Red Cross building,” the state-run National News Agency said. Meanwhile, Israel’s military intercepted three projectiles fired from Lebanon, which were filmed by an AFP correspondent near the Israel-Lebanon border. The journalist filmed three explosions in the sky caused by the interceptions after warning sirens were activated in the area. The Israeli military said it had identified three projectiles launched from Lebanon toward troops operating in southern Lebanon. “Some of the projectiles were intercepted prior to crossing into Israeli territory, and an additional projectile fell near IDF soldiers,” the military said. “No injuries were reported,” the military added.

Iran is ‘destroying’ for the sake of its own interests, Lebanese president says
Al Arabiya English/08 June ,2026
Lebanon’s President Joseph Aoun said Iran was not allowed to interfere in his country’s internal affairs, accusing Tehran of “destroying the country for the sake of your own interests.”“Other countries are trying to help us, but you are not trying to help us. You are destroying the country for the sake of your own interests,” Aoun said in an interview with CNN. The second part of the interview, which took place last Friday, was aired on Monday. Aoun reiterated that Beirut was seeking a good relationship with Iran based on mutual respect and noninterference. “But remember, Lebanon is a sovereign state, and it has sovereign government. You want to talk to us, you're most welcome, but you do not interfere.”
Israel ceasefire
Aoun, the former Lebanese Armed Forces commander, said that Lebanon wanted an end to hostilities with Israel “forever.”He said Beirut was ready, willing, and committed to a diplomatic solution. “Are you? If you are, let's sit and talk," said Aoun, adding that a military solution "will never provide you with security and safety.”Asked if he would be willing to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Aoun said he would not do so before an agreement was reached to end the war. The current deal being discussed is more akin to a “non-aggression” pact, he said, rather than a full peace deal like those between Jordan and Israel.

Lebanon Health Ministry: Death toll rises to 3,637 killed and 11,188 injured since March 2
LBCI/June 08/2026
Lebanon’s Ministry of Public Health said on Monday that the cumulative toll from ongoing hostilities has reached 3,637 people killed and 11,188 injured since March 2. In a statement issued by the ministry, the figures cover casualties recorded through June 8.

Lebanese Red Cross says 4 rescuers wounded in Israeli strike on Tyre
LBCI/June 08/2026
The Lebanese Red Cross said an Israeli strike wounded four rescuers near their centre in the southern Lebanese city of Tyre. In a statement, the Red Cross said "the targeting that occurred in front of the Lebanese Red Cross centre in Tyre" wounded four paramedics. Lebanese state media had earlier reported an Israeli strike on a vehicle in front of the centre. AFP

Issa tells Aoun US does not want Sunday escalation to expand further
Naharnet/June 08/2026
U.S. Ambassador Michel Issa met Monday with President Joseph Aoun, as Israel and Iran traded fire after Israel's bombing of Beirut's southern suburb. Issa said the U.S. places great importance on Lebanon and has decided that Sunday's events must not expand further. "What happened yesterday is a political message, and we in the United States have decided that the confrontation must not expand any further," Issa said after meeting Aoun. He said he discussed with the Lebanese president the Lebanese-Israeli negotiations and praised Lebanon's negotiating team, noting that it "displays a high level of professionalism." Issa said U.S. President Donald Trump "always talks about Lebanon" and that negotiations are scheduled to resume in Washington. Issa later met with Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam who re-iterated in the meeting that "no one can negotiate on behalf of Lebanon except the Lebanese state." After meeting Berri, Issa informed journalists that the Speaker had "given him the response" regarding Hezbollah's acceptance of a ceasefire. He said Israel will not target Dahieh, if Hezbollah halts its attack on Israel, adding that Trump "almost got into a fight with Netanyahu over Lebanon." Issa assured the reporters that there will be a ceasefire, a complete withdrawal of Israeli troops from south Lebanon - including in the pilot zone - and a cessation of hostilities. He said the prisoners will also be freed. "Residents will return. The army will deploy in the pilot zone and Israel will halt its strikes. This point was previously unclear, as it makes no sense for the army to deploy there without any residents. Our priority is for the residents to return, for reconstruction to begin, and for roads and electricity to be restored, making it a model," he said.

US official urges Hezbollah to allow displaced's return, reconstruction instead of 'pointless war'
Naharnet/June 08/2026
Iran, Hezbollah, and others have repeatedly dragged both Israel and Lebanon into "pointless and destructive conflicts" and "Hezbollah has a simple choice: it can continue fighting a pointless war, or it can finally allow the return of the displaced and the reconstruction of Lebanon," a U.S. official said on Sunday. In remark to U.S. news portal Axios, the official claimed "the terms on the table are fair, have the consent of both sovereign governments, and provide a clear path to end the fighting." He was referring to a ceasefire agreement reached Tuesday in Washington which Hezbollah has rejected. "Hezbollah is exclusively to blame for any continuation of hostilities," the official added, stressing that "the U.S. supports Israel’s right to self-defense and stands with the legitimate Government of Lebanon as it works to deliver a better future for its citizens.""Hezbollah must stop firing immediately and allow these agreements to take effect," the official urged. According to the U.S. official, Hezbollah "continues to cynically use civilian infrastructure, particularly civilian homes, to hide and store weapons.""This endangers the lives and property of Lebanese civilians. All weapons must belong to the Government of Lebanon," the official emphasized, noting that "the U.S. fully supports Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity." "This process is intended to sustainably enable Lebanon to be a sovereign state for the first time in decades, which will benefit Israel’s security," the official added.

Israel vows to intensify attacks across Lebanon amid Iran missile barrages
Agence France Presse/June 08/2026
The Israeli military has vowed to press ahead with its military campaign in Lebanon and said it would step up operations against Hezbollah. "The (Iranian) regime is attempting to establish a new equation through direct attacks on Israeli territory in response to IDF operations in Dahieh," military spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin said Sunday, in a televised statement. We struck in Dahieh in response to Hezbollah’s relentless attacks on the communities of northern Israel. The IDF will continue to operate throughout Lebanon and will intensify its actions against the Hezbollah terrorist organization."
Iran's military central command had said Sunday that Israel's latest strike on the southern Beirut suburbs had "crossed all red lines", demanding a halt to its campaign in Lebanon. "The Israeli army must stop its attacks on southern Lebanon and the suburbs, and if it expands its attacks to that region or responds to Iran's action, it will face more devastating and regrettable blows," said General Ali Abdollahi, the head of the Khatam al-Anbiya command, without directly mentioning missile salvos that Israel said it was intercepting.

Israel strikes south Lebanon as it trades fire with Iran
Naharnet/June 08/2026
Israeli strikes targeted overnight into Monday Habboush, Srifa, Zefta, Yater, Nabatieh, Safad al-Battikh, Sojod, Jabal Safi, al-Mansouri, Ainqana, Qalaway, al-Sharqiyeh and al-Hallousieh, as Israel and Iran exchanged attacks over Israel's bombing of Dahieh. Four people were killed in the strike on Zefta, the national News Agency said, adding that several others were killed in Srifa. Hezbollah, for its part, said it targeted Israeli troops and equipment on the outskirts of the southern town of Beit Yahoun and around the Beaufort Castle, where the Israeli military claimed to have uncovered a sprawling tunnel network. Israel's military said it intercepted three projectiles targeting its forces in south Lebanon. "Some of the projectiles were intercepted prior to crossing into Israeli territory, and an additional projectile fell near IDF soldiers. No injuries were reported," the military said.

Israeli army warns residents of Zaqouq al-Mafdi in southern Lebanon to evacuate
LBCI/June 08/2026
Israel’s military spokesperson Avichay Adraee issued an urgent warning on Monday calling on residents in the village of Zaqouq al-Mafdi in Lebanon to evacuate immediately, according to a post on X. In the statement, Adraee said the warning was issued “in light of Hezbollah’s violation of the ceasefire agreement,” adding that Israeli forces were preparing to act against the group and “do not intend to harm civilians.”He urged residents to leave their homes immediately and move north of the Zahrani River “for their safety.”The warning also said that anyone near Hezbollah members, facilities, or weapons would be putting their lives at risk.

Israel vows to press military campaign in Lebanon despite Iran's warnings
LBCI/June 08/2026
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz vowed Monday to press Israel's military campaign in Lebanon, despite a warning from Iran that any such action would prompt the Islamic republic to take "severe" measures. "The Israeli army will continue to operate in Lebanon against the terrorist organisation Hezbollah," Katz said in a statement, adding that Israel would strike Beirut's southern suburbs in retaliation for every attack on northern Israel.Iran announced earlier Monday it was halting its latest attacks against Israel, but added that "should acts of aggression and hostility continue, including in southern Lebanon, much more severe and crushing measures than before will follow."AFP

29 Lebanese army members have been killed in Israeli strikes since March

Associated Press/June 08/2026
Lebanese Information Minister Paul Morcos said Monday that 29 Lebanese army members have been killed in Israeli strikes since March, two days after an Israeli airstrike on a vehicle in southern Lebanon killed three members of the Lebanese army, including a brigadier general and a captain. Morcos said that since the Israel-Hezbollah war began on March 2, three police, one member of the General Security Directorate and 13 state security members have been killed in Israeli attacks. Also killed was a member of the parliament’s security. A total of 3,613 people have been killed, according to the Lebanese Health Ministry. The Israeli military has said it operates against Hezbollah and not against the Lebanese army.

Tyre heritage site damaged by Israeli bombardment
Agence France Presse/June 08/2026
Lebanese Culture Minister Ghassan Salame on Monday appealed for historic sites to be spared as AFP correspondents saw damage to a World Heritage site in south Lebanon's Tyre after Israeli bombardment. One of the oldest cities on the Mediterranean coast, Tyre lies around 20 kilometers from the Israeli border, and its UNESCO World Heritage-listed ruins are located in two main areas of the city. Israel's military has heavily bombed Tyre since the latest war erupted with Hezbollah. On Sunday it did so again after issuing a further evacuation warning that covered districts including one of the archaeological areas, known as the city site, which is home to Roman ruins. "I am launching an appeal to avoid the targeting of archaeological sites in the country... in particular the ruins in Tyre which are part of the heritage of humanity," Salame told AFP. AFP correspondents on Monday saw dust and debris close to ancient columns after the previous day's bombardment, as well as twisted metal and broken tree branches near several stone artefacts. Concrete and metal debris also appeared to have been strewn onto a stone stairway. Ali Badawi, the culture ministry's regional director of archaeological sites for south Lebanon, said Sunday's bombardment had had "the worst impact" on Tyre's ancient areas since the war began. "The amount of debris and damage at the site is high," he said, noting both the direct impact, with the site's administrative office struck, and the indirect impact of debris strewn from nearby bombardment.
'Civilian site' -
"Some archaeological artefacts were damaged when rubble fell on them, as debris fell over a large area, impacting a large number of elements at the site -- columns, capitals, column bases, mosaics," he said. "This is a civilian site, a World Heritage site, it's not a military site at all, and there are no military activities there," Badawi said. He said a preliminary damage assessment was underway, noting that Tyre's other archaeological area, known as Al-Bass, had been damaged earlier in the conflict. Minister Salame said that authorities would evaluate Sunday's damage "once a ceasefire is in place and we can access the ruins without putting our archaeologists in danger". Israel "does not respect" the Hague convention on the protection of cultural property during armed conflicts, nor the "blue shields" placed for symbolic protection near the Tyre site and others by an organisation linked to UNESCO after the latest conflict erupted, he said. Since a previous round of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah erupted in 2023, UNESCO has granted more than 70 heritage sites in Lebanon, including Tyre, "provisional enhanced protection," the organization's highest level of legal protection, which is intended for sites at risk from conflict.

Israel army says vast tunnel network uncovered under Beaufort castle
Agence France Presse/June 08/2026
The Israeli military said Sunday it uncovered a sprawling tunnel network beneath the Beaufort castle in southern Lebanon, saying it was built to give Hezbollah a fortified strike hub just kilometers from Israeli territory. Israeli soldiers recaptured the crusader-era castle recently, giving the military a strategic toehold it once occupied for nearly two decades. "The tunnel network was constructed within a civilian area at a location that provides operational control over the Galilee Panhandle region, only six kilometers from Metula (in Israel), and served as a central Hezbollah terrorist organization hub in the area," the military said. It said the tunnel network was funded by Iran and engineered to shelter hundreds of fighters. "In one tunnel, approximately one kilometer in length, troops located six underground shafts, a storage room used for weapons, an anti-tank missile launcher, anti-tank missiles, grenades, ammunition, combat equipment, advanced medical equipment, and several living quarters, including shower facilities, restrooms, an operating room, and kitchens," the military said. Footage released by the military showed one narrow tunnel -- similar to those found beneath Gaza -- equipped with washrooms, trunks full of clothes, beds, a folded wheelchair and other household items. Beaufort castle's elevated position and location near the border with Israel has turned it once again into a desirable position as Israel pursues its ground invasion in Lebanon. Israel overran the fortress during its 1982 invasion of Lebanon, after a prolonged battle with the Palestinian fighters hidden in the castle's maze of historic underground tunnels. The castle was damaged by violent bombardment in the process. Israel used it as one of its main observation posts until its troops withdrew in 2000, particularly for electronic listening.

Regional escalation unfolds across Israel, Iran and Lebanon amid reciprocal strikes and diplomatic efforts

LBCI/June 08/2026
A brief phase of military escalation involving Israel and Iran, with spillover effects in Lebanon, unfolded over roughly 12 hours before both sides announced a halt to operations, according to statements attributed to Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya headquarters and Israeli officials.
The developments came amid reports of a phone call between U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, during which Trump said both sides were seeking a ceasefire and that peace talks were progressing unless obstructed by “ignorance or foolishness.”
Prior to the reported de-escalation, Israel carried out an airstrike on Beirut’s southern suburbs without prior warning, which it said was in response to continued Hezbollah rocket fire into northern Israel despite a ceasefire arrangement. Hezbollah, however, has rejected such claims regarding the agreement. The escalation follows a framework announced earlier this month that reportedly included an informal understanding under which strikes on Beirut’s southern suburbs would be avoided in exchange for a halt to attacks on northern Israeli settlements. Hezbollah has dismissed the existence of such an agreement. Iran, meanwhile, has maintained that its military response is guided by a principle of reciprocity, stating that any strike on Beirut’s southern suburbs would be met with attacks on northern Israel. Following Iranian missile strikes on Israel, several areas in the country came under ballistic missile fire, prompting further exchanges of fire between the two sides. Israel threatened to respond, but U.S. President Donald Trump reportedly urged restraint, telling Iranian officials to stop escalation and contacting Netanyahu to discourage further retaliation. However, Israeli forces later carried out strikes on Iranian air defense systems, military sites, and strategic infrastructure, including petrochemical facilities and airbases. Iran responded with additional missile launches targeting Israeli military positions, including air force bases, in what became a sustained cycle of reciprocal attacks. Amid the escalation, Lebanon was drawn into the wider confrontation, with both Washington and Tehran seen as attempting to leverage the country’s internal dynamics within the broader regional conflict. Iran later declared that it had fulfilled its response, according to statements attributed to the Khatam al-Anbiya command.
Subsequent exchanges included Iranian missile fire toward Israel, which expanded the scope of the confrontation and placed multiple Israeli areas within range of ballistic strikes. Israeli operations reportedly extended to areas in southern Lebanon, including strikes near Tyre and Nabatieh, while Hezbollah continued drone and rocket attacks against Israeli positions in occupied areas. Against this backdrop, state institutions were described as unable to enforce a ceasefire or contain armed actors, while regional powers remained divided over the conflict’s trajectory. U.S. officials have also been reported as considering diplomatic involvement by neighboring states, including Syria, in efforts related to disarmament issues in Lebanon. The overall escalation underscores the fragility of current arrangements, as Israel continues to carry out strikes while warning of further action, including against Beirut’s southern suburbs, amid a widening regional confrontation in which Lebanese territory remains a key flashpoint.

Qmati says Hezbollah had no direct contact with Trump
Agence France Presse/June 08/2026
A senior Hezbollah official told AFP on Monday that the Iran-backed group has had "no direct contact" with President Donald Trump, despite recent statements from the US leader suggesting otherwise. Washington considers Hezbollah a "terrorist" group, including both its military and political wings, and recently imposed sanctions on several of its lawmakers. Last Wednesday, referring to efforts to halt the latest war in Lebanon, Trump had told reporters that "we actually spoke with Hezbollah for the first time, ever." Two days earlier, after Israel threatened to again bomb Beirut's southern suburbs, a Hezbollah stronghold, Trump said that "through highly placed Representatives, I had a very good call with Hezbollah." Senior Hezbollah official Mahmoud Qmati told AFP in written remarks that "there has been no direct contact between President Trump and Hezbollah officials."
He said Trump "perhaps" was referring to the fact that parliament speaker Nabih Berri's adviser "communicates with the U.S. ambassador and passes on messages". Berri, who heads the Shia Amal movement and acts as an intermediary for ally Hezbollah, met U.S. Ambassador Michel Issa again on Monday. Trump's suggestion of direct contact with Hezbollah "shows to what extent the U.S. administration is ready to abandon the Lebanese authorities at the least indication of contact with strong and influential parties in Lebanon," Qmati said. Hezbollah rejects U.S.-sponsored direct negotiations between Israel and Lebanon, which began in April under U.S. auspices and seek to halt the violence. The two countries have no diplomatic relations. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam reiterated on Monday that "only the Lebanese state negotiates in the name of Lebanon". Iran insists a halt to the broader Middle East conflict must include a ceasefire in Lebanon, and on Sunday fired missiles at Israel in response to Israeli strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs earlier in the day.

A Response to Mr. Walid Joumblatt: The Falsification of History Through Omission
Zéna Mansour/X platform/June 08/2026
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/06/155152/
​Walid Joumblatt tells only a "half-truth" about history. When recalling a massacre, he blames only the Druze founders, deliberately erasing the most critical part of the historical narrative.
​He carefully avoids acknowledging this reality:
​"As the Ottoman arm of Kurdish roots and Muslim Brotherhood inclination in Mount Lebanon, we incited the rational Druze (historical founders) and their Maronite/Christian partners to fight each other. The goal? To divide this resilient, single Canaanite people—where many Druze families historically converted to Christianity due to the fascist Islamic colonialism that sought to erase Druze autonomy. By destroying Lebanon's symbolism as a safe haven for the East's persecuted, we aimed to weaken and subjugate both components to our terms." ​This behavior stems from an expansionist, Islamist settler-colonial ideology. It sought to drive Canaan’s indigenous peoples into the fold of Ottoman-Islamic colonialism—either directly or through local proxies like us—forcing them into a Sunni system that imposed four centuries of religious fascism on the Levant's non-Islamic minorities: Druze, Maronites, Christians, Jews, Yazidis, Syriacs, Chaldeans, and Assyrians.
​Joumblatt’s Blatant Contradiction
​This forgery manifests as a continuous political double standard: ​During Reconciliation: (backed by the social and religious consent of rational Druze), he adopts the persona of the regional Ottoman proxy, arrogantly stating: "I, the Ottoman with Kurdish arms, am the one who reconciled and forgave." ​During Bloodshed: He sheds his ruling cloak and blames Druze identity: "The Druze is the one who killed." He deliberately ignores that his own ancestors—mercenaries and Janjaweed for the Ottomans—fueled those original fires, and that he is merely their loyal extension today.
​Shifting Tools, Enduring Conspiracy
​This distortion defies logic. "Mr. Walid," you rewrite the Druze-Maronite conflict by ignoring the criminal, divisive role played by the Sultanate’s pawns, who pitted indigenous peoples against each other to ease colonial control in an era lacking media, books, or enlightenment.
​Conclusion
​The same game is being cloned today with new tools. After the plots of the 19th century, the 20th century recycled these divisions under the slogans of "the Left," "Arabism," and "the Palestinian Cause." These issues mean nothing to the Druze; they brought them only weakness, destruction, and the erasure of their identity and rights, serving as mere fuel for the Mountain War. ​In the 21st century, these narratives are thoroughly exposed. They are no longer fit for consumption, not even as ideological sedatives.

Lebanon on the Brink. Again.
Alberto M. Fernandez/National Catholic Register/June 08/2026
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/06/155158/'
COMMENTARY: The Trump administration and Pope Leo want peace in the war-torn country. Can their diplomacy deliver what they both, as well as the beleaguered Lebanese people, seek?
Exactly three months from when Pope Leo XIV left Lebanon as a messenger of peace on Dec. 2, the country was plunged into war.
But Lebanon’s entry into the U.S.-Israeli-Iran War didn’t just happen. In fact, the terrorist group Hezbollah resisted for about 48 hours the call of its Iranian masters to join in the conflict.
Hezbollah had already taken a pummeling during the 2023-2025 Hamas War. In the 2026 conflict, both the U.S. and Israel had sent messages through trusted intermediaries encouraging the group to sit this war out. In the end, Hezbollah couldn’t resist Iran’s pressure, although polls showed that most Lebanese didn’t want Lebanon in another war.
Three months after the beginning of this latest conflict, Lebanon is still at war, not because of a decision by Lebanon’s government but because of the actions of a heavily armed, foreign-funded militia outside of Lebanese government control.
The Hezbollah war with Israel has brought great suffering to the country. About one-quarter of the population (1.4 million people) has been displaced. More than 3,500 have been killed — many of them Hezbollah fighters but also many civilians.
Israel has declared 14% of Lebanon, particularly in the south where the two countries share a border, “free-fire non-civilian zones,” which means that any movement in those areas is extremely dangerous. About a dozen Lebanese Christian civilians have been killed in the south under just such conditions. On June 1, Dr. James Karam and his two children, Tony and Theodosia, were killed by an Israeli drone strike as they returned from university exams in Beirut to their village.
To its credit, the Trump administration has sought to save Lebanon, pushing the Lebanese and Israeli governments to negotiate directly for the first time in 46 years. The negotiations are a hopeful sign. They seemed to have made some real progress, as seen in the June 3 joint statement from the trilateral — U.S., Lebanon, Israel — meeting in Washington. As analyst Toni Nissi noted, the statement finally “places sovereignty at the center of the diplomatic process.”
But in the short run, securing a ceasefire in Lebanon does not really depend on the Lebanese state but rather on spoilers, Hezbollah and Iran.
One might say that Lebanon faces three tracks towards the future. The Hezbollah/Iran track seeks above everything else to preserve Lebanon as a rocket and drone launchpad against Israel, to keep the catastrophic status quo where the country is plunged into war at any point because of calculations made in Tehran. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun addressed this problem in a recent CNN interview, where he said to Iran, “It’s not your country, it’s our country.” He added that the Lebanese “are fed up, and we want to live in peace,” that “they deserve not seeing their homes being destroyed every five to 10 years.”
Not quite as destructive as the “Hezbollah/Iran track” is the sly agenda being pushed by Saudi Arabia and several other Sunni Arab and Muslim states, which essentially seeks to “keep Lebanon in play” for some future grand arrangement by blocking a long-term peace agreement. In a sense, it seeks to sacrifice Lebanon today for some sort of comprehensive Israeli-Palestinian-Arab regime agreement tomorrow.
The Saudis fear that if Lebanon makes a separate peace with Israel now, like Egypt and Jordan did, that it will weaken the ability of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and others to pressure the Jewish state later. In this scenario, Lebanon still pays the price now and a quite steep, ironic one given the role of the Palestinian cause in triggering the Lebanese Civil War of 1975-1990.
Only the third track, the American-Israeli one, offers Lebanon a potentially different perspective from the current grim reality, one that seeks to strengthen the Lebanese state and restore its sovereignty now. Yes, Israel also wins in this scenario, gaining calm along its northern border and peace with its neighbor. But ideally, Lebanon in this case would win something truly elusive, a break from the constant “war-destruction-pause-war-destruction-pause-war tool” fashioned by Iran and Hezbollah.
But given the obvious Hezbollah recalcitrance and the state’s weakness, something else will be needed to bring about a solution. As Nissi has emphasized, “Lebanon alone may not possess the political, military, economic, or diplomatic resources required” for such an agreement.
A May 2026 poll of Lebanese found that not only Christians, but Lebanon’s Druze and Sunni Muslims favor the disarmament of Hezbollah and some sort of peace with Israel. Not surprisingly, a large majority of Shiite Muslims, who are Hezbollah’s main supporters and beneficiaries, do not.
Both the Maronite Catholic Patriarch and the Maronite Bishop’s Council in Lebanon have endorsed negotiations. The council recently called for Lebanese neutrality; peace talks with Israel “under Arab and international sponsorship” and a return to the 1949 Armistice Agreement. “The priorities of the people are not armed conflicts, but security, stability, and the restoration of livelihoods,” the council affirmed.
A key part of such a peace would be the role of the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), a dubiously led and shaky institution. Another weakness of this track is that the U.S. and Israel are not completely aligned on Lebanon. Given the recent public controversy and criticism between the Vatican and the White House on Iran, it is often forgotten that, at least when it comes narrowly to Lebanon, the Trump administration and Pope Leo XIV are not far apart.
In his farewell address to Beirut on Dec 2, the Pope said that “armed struggle brings no benefit. While weapons are lethal, negotiation, mediation and dialogue are constructive. Let us all choose peace as a way, and not just as a goal!”
Lebanon today is both on the edge of still more destruction and on the edge of a path towards a radically different, and peaceful, future which has eluded it for decades. Can Trump deliver what both he and the Pope want there?
**Alberto M. Fernandez Alberto M. Fernandez is a former U.S. diplomat and a contributor at EWTN News.

How Can Lebanon Succeed in the New Middle East?
Sam Menassa/Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
Between France’s warning that Lebanon is approaching the brink of collapse, the domestic and foreign wars being waged against it, and its ongoing economic and political crisis, the Lebanese debate has become confined to how to avoid collapse or manage accumulated crises. Yet the more important question may not concern only Lebanon’s ability to survive, but its place in a region whose balances and priorities are being reshaped with unprecedented speed.
In a previous article, we addressed what the country needs internally to restore the state, sovereignty, and institutions. Internal reform, however, goes hand in hand with an understanding of the role Lebanon can play in the Middle East taking shape around it, on foundations different from those it knew over past decades.
For a long period of its modern history, Lebanon derived its importance from a set of functions that made it a pioneer. It was a regional financial and banking center, an Arab media and cultural platform, a hub for education, universities, and publishing, and an arena for Arab-international balances.
It also formed a meeting ground for East and West, and of political and intellectual pluralism in a region dominated by rigid military regimes. Regardless of the success or failure of this experience, it gave Lebanon a standing that exceeded its geographic and demographic size.
Most of these functions, however, have eroded in recent decades. The banking sector, which formed a pillar of the Lebanese economy, has collapsed, and the country’s ability to attract investment has declined. Many media, cultural, and educational functions have moved to other Arab centers that enjoy greater political stability and larger resources. Lebanon has also lost its monopoly as a bridge between East and West in a world that has become more open, interconnected, and less in need of traditional intermediaries.
In light of these transformations in Lebanon, the Middle East has entered a different phase from that which had prevailed since the Cold War. After decades of ideological conflict, proxy wars, and sharp polarization, the key powers of the region, especially Gulf states seeking to consolidate their role as global economic and investment centers, have adopted new priorities centered on economic development, attracting investment, technology, energy, trade connectivity, and building regional and international partnerships. At the same time, the region has been marked by the change in Syria, with the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, Iran as it faces unprecedented pressures, and the repercussions for its proxies, foremost among them Hezbollah.
Does the new Middle East still need Lebanon in the way it knew it over the past century? Lebanon’s challenge today lies in defining its place within a new regional system whose priorities and rules of operation have changed, and which is not necessarily looking for the old roles Lebanon once played. What, then, can Lebanon offer today to a Middle East moving toward economics, technology, and stability?
Lebanon has not lost all elements of its strength. Its essential advantage was never purely economic, but also lay in its ability to produce a space of pluralism, openness, and cultural and intellectual interaction that remains difficult to find elsewhere in the region, despite all the changes it has witnessed.
In spite of everything, Lebanon still possesses a wealth of human capital, a large global diaspora, a distinctive educational and cultural legacy, the ability to interact with different environments and cultures, rare social and linguistic pluralism, as well as a resilient private sector and accumulated expertise in education, healthcare, services, and the knowledge economy. All of these elements are the foundations of the role it can formulate to build its standing in the region politically, economically, and culturally.
Alongside its human resources, Lebanon’s geopolitical location offers opportunities to take part in regional economic and trade connectivity networks. It can also play a diplomatic role grounded in its historical experience in managing diversity, in a region still searching for more stable formulas for coexistence and partnership among its different components. If Lebanon succeeds in rebuilding its state, it may have the opportunity to reposition itself as a center for talent and creative minds, a platform for openness and intellectual and cultural exchange, and a space for dialogue and multicultural engagement.
States do not preserve their importance by yearning for past roles or by trying to freeze history at a particular moment. This depends on their capacity to read transformations, adapt to them, and create new functions. Perhaps the test Lebanon faces today is not only the test of survival, or of returning to what it once was, but the test of finding a new justification for its importance in the region, offering value that others cannot offer, and discovering a new place suited to the transformations underway.
But the deeper question may be this: does Lebanon need an exceptional new role at all? The real challenge, perhaps for the first time since the entity’s creation, may be to move from the logic of “Lebanon the message” and “exception” to the mindset of a normal state: a stable and effective state, integrated into its surroundings, and capable of turning the capacities of its people into added value.

Lebanon Finally Says It Out Loud: Lebanon Does Not Belong to Iran, Iran Is the Problem
Khaled Abu Toameh/ Gatestone Institute/June 08/2026
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22589/lebanon-does-not-belong-to-iran
"You are not trying to help us; the people of Lebanon are paying the price for your own interests.... Our interests do not align with yours.... This is not your country, it is our country." — Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, directly addressing Iran's regime; CNN, June 5, 2026
Aoun's remarks amount to a public admission that Hezbollah has effectively created a state within a state, one that decides when Lebanon goes to war and when it agrees to a ceasefire, regardless of the wishes of the elected government of the Lebanese people.
"Spare our South, and cease treating it and its people as mere bargaining chips to improve your negotiation terms.... this war is not ours, that it is not fought for us, but on our soil and at the expense of our people." —Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, June 5, 2026.
The Lebanese leaders are finally saying publicly what many observers have argued for years: Hezbollah is not defending Lebanon. It is defending Iran's regional interests.
The tragedy of Lebanon closely resembles the tragedy of the Gaza Strip.
The Palestinians in Gaza are paying the price for decisions made by Hamas, another Islamist terrorist organization acting in accordance with Iran's broader regional agenda.
All terrorist roads lead first to Tehran.
Without Iran's interference in Lebanese and Palestinian affairs, both peoples would likely be focused on building their economies, strengthening their institutions, and improving the lives of their citizens instead of enduring endless cycles of war and destruction.
[Iran's] goal is always the same: expand Iranian influence while keeping the region in a permanent state of confrontation.
The ceasefire agreements brokered by the Trump Administration were also supposed to strengthen Lebanese sovereignty and curb Hezbollah's military power.
Why, then, is Hezbollah still armed? Why does it continue to decide matters of war and peace? Why is the Lebanese government still unable, or unwilling, to assert full authority over its territory?
The same questions apply to Hamas. Why is Hamas still in control of large parts of the Gaza Strip? Why is the Trump Administration's "Board of Peace" still talking about the disarmament of Hamas instead of insisting upon it? Why do mediators continue to negotiate with terrorist organizations that openly reject disarmament?
Washington needs to demand the immediate and unconditional disarmament of Hezbollah and Hamas -- terrorist organizations that seek Israel's destruction. The Trump Administration would greatly help its agenda if it insisted that the Lebanese government alone exercise control over decisions of war and peace. It would help to stress that no sovereign state can tolerate an armed militia operating outside government authority.
So long as Hezbollah and Hamas remain armed and in power, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps remains ruling Iran, there will be no lasting peace or stability in the Middle East. All three remain deeply committed to their jihad (holy war) against Israel and are prepared to pursue it indefinitely.
Lebanon's leaders have finally identified the problem. The question is whether they have the courage, and the whole-hearted, committed support of the United States to back it up.
Perhaps for the first time in such direct and uncompromising language, Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam are openly acknowledging that Iran, through its proxy Hezbollah, has hijacked Lebanon's sovereignty, transformed the country into a battlefield, and dragged its people into repeated wars with Israel.
For years, many Lebanese politicians avoided publicly confronting the obvious truth: Iran, through its proxy Hezbollah, has hijacked Lebanon's sovereignty, transformed the country into a battlefield, and dragged its people into repeated wars with Israel.
Now, perhaps for the first time in such direct and uncompromising language, Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam are openly acknowledging what many Lebanese have known for decades. Their statements are significant because they expose the central role played by the Iranian regime and Hezbollah in destroying what was once one of the most prosperous and stable countries in the Middle East.
Aoun accused Iran of using Lebanon as a "bargaining chip" in its conflict with the United States and demanded that Tehran stop interfering in Lebanese affairs. Addressing the Iranian regime directly, Aoun declared:
"You are not trying to help us; the people of Lebanon are paying the price for your own interests.... Our interests do not align with yours.... This is not your country, it is our country."
Aoun also rejected Hezbollah's claim to speak on behalf of Lebanon and said that Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem "does not represent the Lebanese people."
The Lebanese president emphasized that his people are exhausted by the endless conflict initiated by Hezbollah: "The Lebanese are fed up with the war between Israel and Hezbollah."
He revealed that Lebanese from various religious communities, including Shiites, had told him they were tired of Hezbollah's wars.
Aoun's remarks amount to a public admission that Hezbollah has effectively created a state within a state, one that decides when Lebanon goes to war and when it agrees to a ceasefire, regardless of the wishes of the elected government of the Lebanese people.
Salam was equally blunt.
Speaking at the launch of a United Nations humanitarian appeal, Salam called on Iran to stop exploiting Lebanon for its own regional ambitions:
"Spare our South, and cease treating it and its people as mere bargaining chips to improve your negotiation terms. We are a nation that refuses to become a mailbox for others' messages or an open arena for their wars. Lebanon is no one's pawn on a table, and the South is no one's reserve front."
Perhaps most remarkably, Salam openly acknowledged that Iran's rejection of a ceasefire agreement exposed the true nature of the conflict:
"[T]he Lebanese were stunned yesterday to find the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as the first to reject it, before any other party. This is yet another confirmation that this war is not ours, that it is not fought for us, but on our soil and at the expense of our people."
Those words represent a devastating indictment of Hezbollah and its Iranian sponsors.
For years, Hezbollah has justified its military activities by claiming to "defend Lebanon." Yet Lebanon's own prime minister is now effectively saying publicly that Hezbollah's war serves foreign interests, not Lebanese ones.
The Lebanese leaders are finally saying publicly what many observers have argued for years: Hezbollah is not defending Lebanon. It is defending Iran's regional interests.
The consequences have been catastrophic.
Once known as the "Switzerland of the Middle East," Lebanon has become a failed state plagued by economic collapse, political paralysis, corruption, and recurring warfare.
Hundreds of thousands of Lebanese civilians have paid a heavy price for Hezbollah's decisions. Entire communities have been displaced. Homes have been destroyed. Businesses have collapsed. Families have lost loved ones.
"The Lebanese people," Aoun noted, "have placed on me the task of ending the war, and they do not deserve to see their homes destroyed every five or ten years."
The tragedy of Lebanon closely resembles the tragedy of the Gaza Strip.
Just as Hezbollah serves as Iran's proxy in Lebanon, Hamas serves as Iran's proxy among the Palestinians. Like Hezbollah, Hamas receives funding, weapons, training, and political backing from Tehran. Like Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas launched a war that brought devastation upon its own people in the Gaza Strip.
After Hamas's October 7, 2023 massacre in Israel, the Gaza Strip suffered unimaginable destruction and humanitarian hardship. The Palestinians in Gaza are paying the price for decisions made by Hamas, another Islamist terrorist organization acting in accordance with Iran's broader regional agenda.
All terrorist roads lead first to Tehran.
Without Iran's interference in Lebanese and Palestinian affairs, both peoples would likely be focused on building their economies, strengthening their institutions, and improving the lives of their citizens instead of enduring endless cycles of war and destruction.
The Iranian regime has consistently used its proxies to spread instability throughout the Middle East: Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in the Gaza Strip, the Houthis in Yemen, and Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria.
The goal is always the same: expand Iranian influence while keeping the region in a permanent state of confrontation.
The statements of Aoun and Salam, however, raise a serious question. If Lebanon's leaders recognize that Iran and Hezbollah are responsible for much of their country's suffering, why have they not acted decisively against Hezbollah?
United Nations Security Council resolutions have long called for the disarmament of all militias in Lebanon.
The ceasefire agreements brokered by the Trump Administration were also supposed to strengthen Lebanese sovereignty and curb Hezbollah's military power.
Why, then, is Hezbollah still armed? Why does it continue to decide matters of war and peace? Why is the Lebanese government still unable, or unwilling, to assert full authority over its territory?
The same questions apply to Hamas. Why is Hamas still in control of large parts of the Gaza Strip? Why is the Trump Administration's "Board of Peace" still talking about the disarmament of Hamas instead of insisting upon it? Why do mediators continue to negotiate with terrorist organizations that openly reject disarmament?
Complaining about Iranian interference alone will not restore Lebanon's sovereignty or bring stability to the Gaza Strip.
The Trump Administration would do itself a great service if it could recognize that the source of much of the region's instability remains the Iranian regime and its proxies. Washington needs to demand the immediate and unconditional disarmament of Hezbollah and Hamas -- terrorist organizations that seek Israel's destruction. The Trump Administration would greatly help its agenda if it insisted that the Lebanese government alone exercise control over decisions of war and peace. It would help to stress that no sovereign state can tolerate an armed militia operating outside government authority.
Aoun is right when he says that Lebanon does not belong to Iran. The challenge now is to translate these words into action.
So long as Hezbollah and Hamas remain armed and in power, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps remains ruling Iran, there will be no lasting peace or stability in the Middle East. All three remain deeply committed to their jihad (holy war) against Israel and are prepared to pursue it indefinitely.
Lebanon's leaders have finally identified the problem. The question is whether they have the courage and the whole-hearted, committed support of the United States to back it up.
**Khaled Abu Toameh is an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem.
**Follow Khaled Abu Toameh on X (formerly Twitter)
© 2026 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on 08-09 June/2026
Trump calls Netanyahu after Israel-Iran clashes
AFP/08 June ,2026
US President Donald Trump called Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday, a White House official told AFP, after the first exchanges of fire between Israel and Iran since an April ceasefire. The call came amid reports of an increasingly testy relationship between the US leader and Netanyahu, with Trump calling his ally “crazy” during another recent phone call between the two.Iran fired missiles at Israel overnight and Israel responded by targeting military sites in the Islamic Republic, sparking fears of a new full-scale conflict.“Israel and Iran must immediately stop ‘shooting’,” Trump wrote earlier Monday on social media. A White House official confirmed Trump and Netanyahu spoke on Monday without giving further details.

Trump tells Israeli Channel 12 he warned Netanyahu against turning escalation into war with Iran
LBCI/08 June ,2026
U.S. President Donald Trump said he warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that if the current escalation develops into a full-scale war, Israel would face Iran alone. Speaking to Israel's Channel 12, Trump said he had sought to limit the scale of Israel's response to Iran and revealed that five countries had asked him to pressure Netanyahu to avoid further escalation. “I warned Netanyahu that if he turns the escalation into a war, he will remain alone against Iran,” Trump was quoted as saying. Trump added that he had worked to reduce the scope of Israel's retaliatory actions against Iran amid growing concerns about a wider regional conflict.

Trump warns Netanyahu: Be careful or you will be on your own
Al Arabiya English/09 June ,2026
US President Donald Trump said Monday that he had warned embattled Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against further escalating tensions with Iran. “I said, ‘Bibi, you better be careful, or you will be on your own very soon,’” Trump was quoted as telling an Israeli media outlet.
Trump, who has grown increasingly exasperated with Netanyahu, had earlier urged both Iran and Israel to stop “shooting” and said that “final negotiations” towards peace would proceed “subject to ignorance or stupidity getting in its way.”The Israeli premier, though, said in a televised statement he had told Trump that “Israel has a full right to self-defense, and we are exercising it as required.”Last week, Trump was asked whether he had called the longtime Israeli leader “effing crazy” and accused him of ingratitude. “I did,” Trump told the “Pod Force One” podcast. “I wouldn’t say angry. I was a little bit perturbed at his constantly fighting with Lebanon, you know.”

Trump Says Israel and Iran Must Immediately Stop 'Shooting'
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
US President Donald Trump in a Truth Social post on Monday said that "Israel and Iran ⁠must immediately stop 'shooting.’”Israel earlier ⁠said it hit a petrochemical ⁠plant in Iran's southwest, along with strikes elsewhere on military targets, after Trump reportedly told Israeli Prime ⁠Minister ⁠Benjamin Netanyahu to refrain from further attacks. Israeli authorities said three waves of Iranian missiles targeted the country. Tehran warned of retaliation after Israel struck Beirut’s southern suburbs on Sunday in defiance of Washington’s request days ago to stand down.

US military helped defend against Iranian attack on Israel, officials say
Al Arabiya English/09 June ,2026
The US military helped defend Israel against this week's Iranian missile attack, attempting to intercept some of the ballistic missiles launched by Tehran, US officials told Al Arabiya English. Initial assessments remain ongoing, but officials speaking on condition of anonymity, said it is believed that US forces successfully intercepted multiple ballistic missiles during the attack. Both land- and sea-based US military assets were involved in the operation, officials said, underscoring Washington's continued commitment to helping protect Israel from regional threats. Hundreds of US servicemembers are currently deployed in Israel. Some are part of the multinational mechanism established to monitor the Gaza ceasefire following the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel, while others support air and missile defense operations. Military officials and experts are still assessing the effectiveness of the US contribution to the latest operation. The Israeli military has said Iran launched approximately 30 ballistic missiles during the attack, while Yemen's Iran-backed Houthi movement fired an additional two missiles toward Israel. The latest operation marks another instance of direct US military involvement in helping defend Israel against Iranian missile and drone attacks over the past two years. In April 2024, US forces played a major role in helping intercept more than 300 missiles and drones launched by Iran at Israel in Tehran's first-ever direct attack on Israeli territory. American fighter aircraft, naval vessels and air defense systems were deployed alongside Israeli and allied forces to shoot down the vast majority of incoming projectiles before they reached their targets. Later that year, US military assets again assisted Israel in defending against an Iranian missile barrage, with American destroyers in the eastern Mediterranean and other regional assets helping track and intercept incoming threats. The United States maintains a substantial military presence across the Middle East, including advanced air defense systems, fighter aircraft, naval vessels and over 50,000 troops stationed throughout the region. US officials have repeatedly said those forces are positioned both to protect American personnel and interests and to support regional partners facing missile and drone threats. The Pentagon has not yet released a detailed breakdown of the assets involved in this week's operation, and officials cautioned that assessments could change as additional information becomes available.

Israel and Iran Trade Strikes, Threatening to Drag Region Back to Full-Scale War
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
Israel and Iran traded fire early Monday in retaliatory strikes that threatened to drag the wider Middle East back into a full-scale regional war, while Yemen’s Houthi militants also fired at Israel and warned they would target Israel-affiliated ships in the Red Sea, further escalating tension.
Israel launched strikes on central and western Iran early Monday in response to missile fire from Tehran, in the most serious crossfire since an April 8 ceasefire was reached in the Iran war. Iran retaliated with waves of attacks, and explosions could be heard in central Israel as Israeli air defenses sought to intercept incoming Iranian fire. Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard said it had targeted two military bases in Israel, describing the attack as being part of Operation Nasr, or “Victory.” The Guard said it launched the missiles after Israel targeted radar sites in three areas of Iran.
Tehran warned of retaliation on Sunday after Israel struck Beirut’s southern suburbs without warning in defiance of Washington’s request days ago to stand down. Monday marked the 100th day of the Iran war, launched Feb. 28 when Israel and the United States killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and other senior Iranian leaders. The war raged until reaching a nominal ceasefire on April 8, but a permanent end to the hostilities have been challenged by Iran's chokehold on the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of all traded oil and natural gas once passed in peacetime, as well as fighting between Israel and the Lebanese Iran-backed Hezbollah group. With global energy supplies threatened, Iran still holding a vast stockpile of highly enriched uranium and even the Houthis getting involved in the fighting Monday, the risks of the war fully erupting again appears to be rising.
Houthis claim attack on Israel
Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthis claimed an attack on Israel and said Israel-affiliated vessels would again be a target in the Red Sea, putting the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden and the narrow Bab el-Mandeb Strait connecting them in danger. The statement from Brig. Gen. Yahya Saree was broadcast on the Houthis’ al-Masirah satellite news channel. During the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip, the Houthis killed at least nine mariners and sunk four ships in over 100 attacks, often targeting vessels with tangential or no ties at all to Israel. The assaults upended shipping in the Red Sea, through which about $1 trillion of goods passed each year before the war. They also greatly disrupted transits through Egypt’s Suez Canal, which links the Red Sea to the Mediterranean. The canal remains one of the top providers of hard currency for Egypt, providing it $10 billion in 2023 as its wider economy struggles.
Israel strikes Iran
Iranian state television reported the sound of explosions being heard in Isfahan, Karaj, Tabriz and Tehran, without immediately elaborating. A witness in Tehran described hearing at least one large blast somewhere to the west of the country’s capital city. Iran closed the airspace around Tehran’s Imam Khomeini International Airport, the country’s main airfield, after the Israeli attack. Officials offered no details on what had been struck, nor any damage information. The Revolutionary Guard said that Israel used air-launched ballistic missiles in its attack Monday morning, without elaborating. The semiofficial Fars and Mehr news agencies said Israeli strikes had hit a petrochemical factory in city of Mahshahr in Khuzestan province. It did not elaborate on damage. The Israeli military later confirmed the strike on the petrochemical plant. Earlier Monday, sirens sounded across Israel after its military said a missile launched from Yemen targeted the country, without elaborating. Israel’s rescue services said there were no reports of casualties or impacts from the launch from Yemen.
Trump says ‘I call the shots,’ not Israel
The White House did not respond to messages about the Israeli strikes and whether they were done in coordination with the US. A senior US official on Sunday said US President Donald Trump had called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to urge him not to retaliate immediately for the Iranian missile attack. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe a private phone call, said that Trump believed he had convinced Netanyahu to wait. Trump “got Bibi to hold off for the time being,” the official said. The official would not offer any other details of the call, and there was no immediate comment from Netanyahu’s office. For days, negotiations between Iran and the United States over the fragile ceasefire in the war had been stalled by the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah. Israel now occupies southern Lebanon and had moved into areas of the country it hadn't held in a quarter century, leading to fears about them further widening their campaign. On Sunday, Israel launched airstrikes in Beirut's southern suburbs. Iran retaliated with its own strike on Israel, which led to Monday morning's attack by Israel on Iran. Trump earlier told a Fox News Channel reporter that he wanted the Iranians to stop firing missiles and return to the negotiating table. He also said that Israel’s strikes in Lebanon earlier Sunday were not coordinated with the US and “I’m not happy about it.” Speaking to The Financial Times before the Israeli strikes on Iran, Trump insisted he dictated terms to Netanyahu on how the war should be prosecuted. “He won’t have any choice,” Trump told the newspaper in a telephone interview. “I call the shots. I call all the shots. He (Netanyahu) doesn’t call the shots.”

Iran Says Return to Hostilities Will Affect Talks with US
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
Iran said Monday that the resumption of hostilities in the Middle East war will have consequences for ongoing talks with the United States to reach peace in the region. "It is perfectly natural that the diplomatic process initiated to put an end to this imposed war would be affected," Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said at a press conference in Tehran attended by AFP. He added that the United States held responsibility for the resumption of fighting with Israel, saying Israel's actions "cannot be separated" from US policy. "Without a doubt, as I said, the actions of the Zionist regime in the region cannot be separated from US policies," he stressed. "No one believes that the Zionist regime would carry out any action without prior coordination and cooperation with the United States," he said. Baqaei added, however, that Pakistan's mediation efforts to end the war with the US were continuing. "Diplomatic consultations are naturally continuing in all circumstances," he said.

Iran Halts Israel Operation after First Post-truce Clash
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
Iran on Monday said it was ending its latest military operation against Israel after the first exchanges of fire between the foes since a shaky ceasefire began, but warned it could inflict a more "crushing" response. Iran fired dozens of missiles at Israel overnight and Israel responded by targeting military sites in the Islamic republic, sparking fears the escalation could usher in a new full-scale conflict after the April 8 truce. "Israel and Iran must immediately stop 'shooting.' President DONALD J. TRUMP," the US leader wrote on his Truth Social network.Minutes later, he added in a new post that "final negotiations" towards peace were proceeding "subject to ignorance or stupidity getting in its way."Iran's military command then said it was halting the operation against Israel after delivering a "painful response".But it warned "that should acts of aggression and hostility continue, including in southern Lebanon, much more severe and crushing measures than before will follow".Shortly after, Israel's army intercepted three projectiles fired from Lebanon, according to an AFP journalist near their shared border, with the military confirming the munitions had targeted its forces operating in Lebanon's south. "Some of the projectiles were intercepted prior to crossing into Israeli territory, and an additional projectile fell near -army- soldiers. No injuries were reported," the military said. Tehran's earlier strikes followed attacks by Israel against targets of the Iran-backed Lebanese group Hezbollah in the southern suburbs of Beirut. Iran had repeatedly warned it would strike Israel if the Lebanese capital was targeted. No casualties have been reported in either Israel or Iran after the exchange of fire. The Israeli military said it struck and dismantled Iranian defense systems deployed across several areas in the country. Iran fired nearly 30 missiles towards Israel since Sunday night, an Israeli military official said. An AFP correspondent also saw a missile fall in agricultural land in the area of Najha, in the countryside of the Syrian capital Damascus, causing a fire around the impact site but no reported human casualties. "Material damage is minor, but the psychological impact is significant. The area is home to children, farm caretakers, livestock and solar power installations," said Fadil Ataya, a local farmer. A military source told the Tasnim news agency that "Iran is prepared for a long-term war with the Zionist regime and for strikes against US interests" in the region.
It also remains unclear who is leading decision-making in Tehran with Mojtaba Khamenei, said to have been wounded in a US-Israeli strike, yet to appear in public after taking over from his father Ali Khamenei who was killed on the first day of the war on February 28.
The European Union's top diplomat Kaja Kallas called on both sides to "sit down to a negotiation table and agree", adding that "the region does not need an escalation."

Israel Military Says Iran Fired Nearly 30 Missiles Since Sunday
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
An Israeli military official said Iran fired nearly 30 missiles towards Israel since Sunday night, in the first exchange of fire between the two countries since a truce in April. "Last night the Iranian regime began firing ballistic missiles towards Israel... they fired close to 30 ballistic missiles towards Israel," the official told journalists on Monday, adding that Yemen's Houthi militants separately fired two missiles at the country. Israel's military said earlier Monday it had struck several targets at a petrochemical complex in Mahshahr in southwestern Iran in retaliation. "In this complex, chemical materials are produced and used for ballistic missiles that are fired towards here, towards the state of Israel," the official said. "The strikes and the damage to the complex disrupts their ability to manufacture various types of weapons." The Israeli military said it also struck Iranian air defense systems. The official said the Israeli military chief Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir had spoken twice to the head of US Central Command (CENTCOM) over the past day. "Over the past day, the Israeli army chief of the general staff has spoken twice to the commander of CENTCOM and they are discussing the situation," the official said, without elaborating. Air raid sirens sounded across large areas of northern and central Israel, with explosions heard over Jerusalem earlier on Monday, AFP journalists reported.The exchange of fire between the two countries is the first such since a truce was announced on April 8 in the Middle East War.

US military shoots, disables unladen oil tanker headed to Iran

Al Arabiya English/08 June ,2026
The US military shot and disabled an oil tanker in the Gulf of Oman on Monday for violating the blockade on Iran, the United States Central Command (CENTCOM) said. CENTCOM disabled Palau-flagged M/T Marivex as it transited international waters in the Gulf of Oman toward Iran, according to the statement. “An F/A-18 Super Hornet from USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) fired a precision munition into the ship’s engineering and steering spaces after the crew failed to comply with directions from US forces,” CENTCOM said. “Marivex is no longer sailing to Iran.”Since the blockade started on April 13, CENTCOM has disabled seven non-compliant vessels, redirected 134 ships and allowed 42 vessels supporting humanitarian aid to pass.

Iran top negotiator threatens to defeat US blockade on Iran
Reuters/08 June ,2026
Tehran will turn the naval blockade established by the United States into another defeat for the “enemy,” Iran's top negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said in a message posted on his Telegram channel on Monday. “We are not going to either just fight or just negotiate; rather, we are going to fight at our own time and negotiate at our own time,” Ghalibaf said.“Our goal is the end of the war and stable security and we have no trust toward the opposing party.”

Dismissal of Operations Chief on Iran Leaves Shockwaves in Mossad

Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
Israel’s foreign intelligence agency, the Mossad, is experiencing a major upheaval following a decision by its new director, Roman Gofman, to dismiss his deputy, known publicly only by the initial “A.”The outgoing Mossad chief, David Barnea, had reportedly viewed “A” as his preferred successor. According to sources close to Gofman, the move was carefully planned and coordinated with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The sources said the purpose was to deliver a “preemptive blow” to “A,” who was allegedly planning to organize an internal bloc against the new director that could hinder his work and undermine his chances of success. Agency officials have sought to reassure personnel that Gofman intends to appoint a new deputy from within the Mossad. That assurance, however, has done little to appease senior officials, many of whom have reportedly expressed their intention to resign, arguing that the degree of political interference in the agency’s management is unprecedented. “A” was considered one of Barnea’s closest associates, and Barnea reportedly regarded him as the natural heir to the top post. The dismissed official played a central role in Mossad efforts aimed at bringing down Iran’s regime, an effort that has so far failed to achieve its objectives and, according to people close to Barnea, requires continued leadership and commitment. Barnea described the dismissal as “an irresponsible act,” warning that it could disrupt the functioning of the Mossad, particularly with respect to operations concerning Iran. During his career at the agency, “A” has held several high-profile positions. Among them, he oversaw a special project related to the case of missing Israeli airman Ron Arad. He has also headed and significantly expanded the Mossad’s “Influence” Division as part of preparations for the possibility that the agency might become involved in efforts to destabilize the Iranian regime. In addition, “A” has led the Iranian portfolio within the Mossad and supervised planning for operations against Iran during two rounds of warfare, including efforts aimed at weakening the regime there, according to the Israeli news outlet Ynet. He reportedly received four decorations for daring operations carried out in Iran and several other countries in the region.
Criticism of Gofman has emerged from within the agency, particularly over the speed with which he removed his deputy. Because Gofman assumed leadership from outside the Mossad and lacks a background in intelligence work, critics argue that he should have retained “A” during a transition period in order to benefit from his experience and institutional knowledge.According to informed sources within the agency, Gofman used his authority in a manner reminiscent of Netanyahu, seeking to establish control over the Mossad before anyone could limit his influence.
Israeli journalist and analyst Ronen Bergman said Mossad employees learned of the dismissal through an internal email on Friday morning. He expressed surprise that such a blow would be directed at “A,” who had generally been regarded as close to Netanyahu. Bergman added that the decision came after assessments suggesting that “A” had a strong chance of becoming Mossad chief if Israel’s Supreme Court overturned Gofman’s appointment. Once the court approved Gofman’s appointment, however, there appeared to be little reason to open additional internal battles within the agency while Israel remained engaged in conflict with Iran and confronted significant strategic challenges. Meanwhile, American reports alleging an expansion of Israeli espionage activities targeting senior US officials have raised further questions about whether the agency’s internal crisis is also tied to a broader struggle over management of the Iran portfolio and the sensitive relationship between Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump’s administration. The allegations that Israel spied on American officials involved in negotiations with Iran have generated significant concern in Tel Aviv. Israeli security agencies, together with former minister Ron Dermer, Netanyahu’s representative in relations with Washington, have reportedly launched intensive efforts to contain the political and intelligence fallout. Israel’s immediate objective is to persuade Trump that the surveillance was not directed against him personally and that it began during the administration of former President Joe Biden. Israeli sources claim that Biden’s administration withheld information and worked against Netanyahu’s government. They argue that any continuation of such activities under Trump resulted from “unintentional negligence” rather than an official policy decision.
The key question in both Tel Aviv and Washington is whether Trump will accept that explanation and move forward—as often occurs between allies—or view the episode as an act of disrespect and ingratitude, particularly given his support for Israel and Netanyahu on issues involving Iran, Lebanon, and Gaza.

China Says Hopes Israel, Iran Maintain Ceasefire
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
China said it was "deeply concerned" Monday by fresh attacks between Israel and Iran, expressing hope that a fragile truce in the Middle East war would be respected. "Resuming hostilities is not in any party's interest," foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian told a news briefing, adding: "It is hoped all relevant parties will fulfil their commitment to a ceasefire."Israel and Iran traded fire early Monday in retaliatory strikes that threatened to drag the wider Middle East back into a full-scale regional war, while Yemen’s Houthi militants also fired at Israel and warned they would target Israel-affiliated ships in the Red Sea, further escalating tension. Israel launched strikes on central and western Iran early Monday in response to missile fire from Tehran and Iran retaliated with waves of attacks, in the most serious crossfire since an April ceasefire was reached.Explosions could be heard in central Israel as air defenses sought to intercept incoming Iranian fire. Tehran warned of retaliation on Sunday after Israel struck Beirut’s southern suburbs without warning in defiance of Washington’s request days ago to stand down. Monday marked the 100th day of the Iran war, launched Feb. 28 when Israel and the United States killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and other senior Iranian leaders. The war raged until the two sides reached a ceasefire on April 8, but efforts at a permanent end to the hostilities have been challenged by Iran's chokehold on the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of all traded oil and natural gas once passed in peacetime, as well as fighting between Israel and the Iran-backed Lebanese Hezbollah group.

Pentagon Sees Growing Espionage Threat from Israel
Washington: Julian E Barnes, Eric Schmitt/The New York Times/Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
Recent US intelligence reports have raised concerns about Israeli spy agencies eavesdropping on American negotiators working on a peace deal with Iran, amid rising concern over a more general counterintelligence threat by Israel. Israel and the United States have long known, and tolerated, that each was spying on the other. But an intensified Israeli effort to learn about US positions in talks with Iran has crossed a line, according to some American officials. The reports include concerns that Israel has stepped up its efforts to eavesdrop on senior American officials, including Steve Witkoff, President Trump’s top negotiator, Elbridge A Colby, the Pentagon’s top policy official, and one of his main deputies, Michael P DiMino IV. Another report, written by the Defense Intelligence Agency and other military intelligence offices and focused on earlier events going back several years, said that the counterintelligence threat level posed by Israel had been increased in recent weeks to the top level, from high to critical. The report, to which the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency contributed, outlines various efforts by Israel to spy on American military personnel and government officials. The reports and the intensified concern about Israeli spying come at an especially sensitive time.Israel and the US have been fighting the war against Iran together, and have never had such close military coordination as they do now, with Israeli military officers working side-by-side with their American counterparts at US Central Command. The US military is sharing huge amounts of tactical and operational information with its Israeli counterparts. But senior American officials said that Israel is looking for insights into Trump’s strategy and shifting stances on the peace talks.
The new warning could potentially complicate efforts to further integrate military war planning between US Central Command and Israel, especially if the Pentagon makes a decision to place new restrictions on information shared with Israeli officers. There has already been tension between the two nations as Trump pursues a peace deal even as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel seeks to further degrade Iran’s capabilities, weaken or topple its regime and assault Tehran’s proxy in Lebanon, Hezbollah. The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report was drafted after incidents in which American defense personnel in Israel detected that software to tap their communications had been surreptitiously installed on their phones. The existence of the Defense Intelligence Agency report and the increased threat level were reported earlier by NBC News. The Defense Department declined to comment. A White House official, speaking on the condition their name not be used, said the account was false.
A spokesperson for the Israeli embassy in Washington also disputed claims that Israel poses a counterintelligence threat, saying that Israel does not spy on American officials or entities.
The developments were described by several current and former US officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence matters. They said that in some respects the counterintelligence warning is no surprise. Israel has long engaged in aggressive intelligence collection operations against both its enemies and its allies, as does the United States. Still, Israel’s counterintelligence threat level is now higher than any other ally and higher than some adversarial countries. Of American allies, only South Korea, which is rated at high in certain situations, approaches the concern with Israel’s espionage efforts, the officials said. The aggressiveness of the Israeli intelligence collection on top US officials during the second Trump administration has been “unhinged,” one senior official said. Two senior US military officials said that American personnel, particularly those serving in Israel or with Israeli counterparts, were well aware of the counterintelligence risks before the new report. The officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal assessments, said US personnel employ a range of security procedures and protocols to help counter the threat and to protect their cellphones and other electronic devices, especially while traveling in Israel, but declined to describe those measures in detail for security reasons. Cooperation between the two militaries is very close, but each side also needs to keep its most sensitive information secret.
At the US-led Civil-Military Coordination Center in Kiryat Gat, Israel, for instance, American and Israeli military and diplomatic personnel work side-by-side to enforce the Gaza cease-fire and facilitate humanitarian efforts. But the building also has a US-only floor and an Israeli-only floor where personnel from each country can discuss the most sensitive topics. The report says counterintelligence incidents began increasing in late 2024, as the Biden administration pressed Israel to curb its attacks on Gaza, and continued into 2025, as the Trump administration weighed options to attack Iran.
The report, which incorporated contributions from a number of military intelligence agencies, also details several episodes in recent years. In 2021, Israeli military intelligence officers were caught planting listening devices at DIA headquarters. Last year, officers from Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic intelligence agency, were discovered to have tried to plant a listening device in a Secret Service vehicle. While the DIA document does not explicitly discuss the peace negotiations, other recent intelligence reports have raised concern about Israelis’ listening to Witkoff and other top negotiators as they try to reach a long-term agreement for a peace deal between the US and Iran.The tendency of some senior Trump administration officials to fly on private aircraft, to conduct national security business on their personal phones and to reject staffing from US embassies abroad made them especially vulnerable targets for the spy services of allies and adversaries alike, said a former senior US official who has dealt extensively with Israel. Other current officials also acknowledged the use of personal cellphones by top American officials has made them easy targets for eavesdropping. US and Israel were largely aligned at the beginning of the Iran war, with Trump endorsing Netanyahu’s long-sought goal to push the theocratic government from power. But the war aims quickly diverged, as the United States focused more on trying to erode Iran’s military capabilities to force concessions at the bargaining table, while Israel hoped the Iranian hard-line government would lose its grip on power. It is not entirely clear why Colby, who is in charge of Pentagon policy, would be a target. But he is one of the most prominent proponents inside the US government of a restrained foreign policy. DiMino is in charge of Pentagon policy for the Middle East, making him a person of natural interest to Israel.

Poland Seizes Major Heroin Shipment from Iran
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
Polish authorities said Monday they had seized over a ton of heroin from Iran, hidden in a shipment of decorative bricks, at the Baltic port of Gdynia. "This is the largest operation of its kind in over a decade," Interior Minister Marcin Kierwinski said at a press conference.
The drugs, worth 220 million zlotys (51.8 million euros), were concealed in the brick shipment coming and were first flagged by British customs officials The drugs originated from Iran, Chief of Police Marek Boron said. Last month, three Polish nationals were detained in connection with the investigation, and later charged by prosecutors in Gdansk. Since 2022, the quantity of drugs seized by Poland's Central Investigation Bureau has increased by 650 percent, according to the Ministry of the Interior. More than 83 tons of drugs worth 600 million zlotys (141.4 million euros) were confiscated since the start of 2026 alone, compared with 29 tons in the whole of last year.

Pope Says Weapons Cannot Lead to ‘Lasting Peace’

Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
Pope Leo XIV on Monday called global peace a "true moral imperative" and said weapons could only lead to a "temporary silence" not a "genuine and lasting peace". "Peace emerges as a political aspiration and, even more so, as a true moral imperative," he said in a speech to the Spanish parliament, calling for "patient dialogue" instead of rearmament in Europe and beyond. "Weapons may impose a temporary silence but they can never build a genuine and lasting peace," he said. He said that escalating conflicts and polarization were ‌pushing the ‌world into a "profound ‌spiritual ⁠and cultural crisis".He also firmly ‌reiterated his opposition to increased European ⁠military ⁠spending - calling it "troubling" - and urged help for the world's migrants.

Iran’s Revolutionary Guard says new “resistance security belt” to stretch from Gulf to Red Sea
LBCI/June 08/2026
Iran’s Revolutionary Guard said a new “resistance security belt” will be established extending from the Strait of Hormuz to the Bab al-Mandab Strait off Yemen’s coast, and from the Gulf to the Red Sea, according to Iranian state media on Monday. Ismail Qaani, commander of the Quds Force of the Revolutionary Guard, was quoted as saying the initiative would span key maritime routes in the region.
Iranian officials use the term “resistance” or “axis of resistance” to refer to allied groups in the region, including Yemen’s Houthi movement. Reuters

Iran says it will turn US maritime pressure into “another defeat for the enemy”
LBCI/June 08/2026
Iran’s senior negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said on Monday that Tehran will turn what he described as a U.S. maritime blockade into “another defeat for the enemy.”In a message posted on his Telegram channel, Ghalibaf said Iran would “not limit itself to fighting or negotiating,” adding that it would “fight when it suits us and negotiate when it suits us.”He said Iran’s objective is to end the war and achieve security and stability, adding that Tehran does not trust the other side. Reuters

Italy places Israeli minister Ben Gvir under investigation over Gaza flotilla treatment
LBCI/June 08/2026
Italian prosecutors have placed Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir under investigation over the treatment of activists involved in a Gaza flotilla last month, a judicial source said on Monday.
The source said prosecutors are examining allegations related to how activists were treated during the incident. Reuters

Armenian PM Pashinyan Claims Victory Following General Election
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan early Monday claimed victory in the country’s general election, as preliminary results showed his governing Civil Contract party came first with 49.81% of the vote. Pashinyan and the governing Civil Contract party are looking for a strong mandate for a new geopolitical course for Armenia, including distancing the South Caucasus country from Moscow and seeking to join the European Union. His main opponent, Samvel Karapetyan, is a billionaire who made his fortune in Russia and is under house arrest for allegedly advocating for the government’s overthrow. Karapetyan, whose Strong Armenia bloc was the runner-up with 23.29% of the vote, has rejected the charge as politically motivated. According to Armenia’s Central Election Commission, four parties polled above the 4% electoral threshold and will enter parliament following Sunday’s election, including some that are vocally pro-Russia. Karapetyan's Strong Armenia party seeks to develop business ties with Russia and has accused Pashinyan of attempting to start a war with the Kremlin. Two other parties, Armenia and Blossoming Armenia, also made it into parliament with 9.94% and 4% of votes, respectively. According to the election commission, turnout stood at 59.97%. Before the results came in, Pashinyan spoke to journalists at his headquarters, claiming his party won the elections with a record result and would form the government on its own. Top EU officials congratulated Pashinyan following the tightly contested race, seen in Europe as a litmus test of Russia’s influence in the former Soviet republic. “The spirit of the Velvet Revolution you led in 2018 is alive and well,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Monday in a social media post, referring to the mass protests sparked by Pashinyan's activism that unseated Armenia's former Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan. “We deeply value our partnership with a democratic Armenia that is drawing ever closer to Europe. Armenia can count on us," von der Leyen added. European Council President António Costa also congratulated Pashinyan. In a post on X, Costa talked about a greater role for the EU in Armenia and the broader South Caucasus region, which bridges Europe's hungry energy markets and Central Asia's gas fields. “Together, the EU and Armenia are building stronger links between people and creating new opportunities in energy, trade, and digitalization. Our strong partnership is an investment in a more peaceful and prosperous future for the region as a whole," he said. French President Emmanuel Macron congratulated Pashinyan, saying his victory would boost the "momentum toward closer ties with Europe". "I look forward to continuing, by your side, the work we have begun to further strengthen our cooperation in the service of our peoples, to support peace and Armenia's sovereignty, and to accompany the momentum toward closer ties with Europe," Macron said in a post on X.

The Latest LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on 08-09 June/2026
S'agit il d'une nouvelle étape ?
Dr. Charles Elias Chartouni/08 juin 2026
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/06/155145/
La réunion de Washington marque-t-elle l’amorce d’une nouvelle étape dans un conflit aux évolutions abruptes et contrastées ? Nous sommes sans doute dans une nouvelle étape qui tranche de manière décisive par rapport aux passés récent et de moyenne durée. Les prises de position du président de la République et du Premier ministre rompent sans ambages avec l’attentisme politique et la complicité qui ont prévalu tout au long de la transition de pouvoir effectuée en 2024. Le pouvoir exécutif a fait preuve de lenteur, d’incompréhension des enjeux internationaux, d’incompétence et de complicité à l’endroit de la politique de domination chiite.
Cependant, il avait manqué délibérément aux ouvertures diplomatiques et aux médiations qui lui ont été suggérées tout au long de cet intervalle court mais intense. Une conduite qui s’explique par la peur, les préjugés de tous ordres, la rigidité intellectuelle et le manque de courage. Il a fallu des mutations géostratégiques, une intensification de la guerre sur les frontières du sud-est libanais et dans la capitale, la turpitude criminelle du Hezbollah et la détermination de l’administration américaine pour venir à bout de la récalcitrance de l’exécutif libanais. La dextérité diplomatique américaine et la fermeté militaire d’Israël ont joué de manière complémentaire un rôle décisif.
Le Hezbollah et ses alliés, nommément Nabih Berri et Walid Joumblatt, étaient dans la manœuvre la plus cynique en vue de déjouer la trame inédite. En réalité, ils souhaitaient déplacer les enjeux de l’action politique et consolider l’emprise du régime iranien sur le Liban transformé en relais stratégique. Il n’y a aucun doute que la détermination de l’administration américaine est celle qui a permis ce retournement spectaculaire qui est à même de changer la donne politique de manière irréversible. Reste à savoir si le changement de cap opéré va être poursuivi selon les axes posés par la nouvelle dynamique impulsée dans les négociations en cours.
Les axes posés opèrent à partir d’une triple coupure qui met fin à des décennies de mécaniques conflictuelles et de tropes idéologiques qui rendaient impossible toute négociation rationnelle avec l’État israélien. La diplomatie en cours a mis fin à l’état d’hostilité entre les États libanais et israélien, au statut de l’État-lige et à la vassalité vis-à-vis du régime iranien. Elle a aussi mis fin aux verrouillages imposés aux relations de voisinage avec l’État d’Israël. C’est cette séparation de principe, imposée par le président Trump grâce à sa diplomatie interpersonnelle, à la nomination d’un ambassadeur d’origine libanaise et à sa médiation personnelle, qui a infléchi la dynamique des négociations. Il a cassé des blocages idéologiques, stratégiques et politiques qui ont empêché toute évolution tout au long des sept dernières décennies.
Il ne s’agit pas d’un changement de circonstances, mais de paradigme. Le pouvoir exécutif est sommé d’opérer des changements sur le terrain et de rompre avec le quiétisme complice d’un pouvoir faible et entièrement subordonné aux diktats alternés des politiques de domination syrienne et iranienne. Il doit également rompre avec l’instrumentalisation du contexte libanais par une stratégie saoudienne jouant sur les marges d’un ordre régional éclaté et d’un État failli. Ce dernier est subordonné aux règles de jeu des oligarchies criminelles qui se sont succédé tout au long du régime de Taef (1990-?).
La politique américaine a remis en cause l'ensemble de la trame politique qui a régi le Liban, notamment celle liée à l’hypothétique fin de guerre (1975-1990), des narrativités périmées des nationalismes et des islamismes totalitaires, du communisme, des marxismes tiers-mondistes et de leurs dynamiques conflictuelles endogènes. Nous sommes face à des bouleversements géostratégiques et politiques qui vont redonner un nouvel élan à une diplomatie de résolution des conflits déliée des enfermements idéologiques d’une ère révolue. Les deux tenants du pouvoir exécutif semblent opérer un virage substantiel, ne serait-ce qu’au niveau de la perception des enjeux, des schémas diplomatiques et des modalités d’action.
Le passage à l’acte suppose une nouvelle hiérarchisation des priorités militaires et politiques :
1/ Il faudrait nommément prendre en charge la zone du Nord-Litani quel qu’en soit le coût et les aléas et procéder à la sanctuarisation du reste du territoire.
2/ Inviter les chiites à rejoindre le processus diplomatique piloté par l’État libanais, car toute défaillance à cet égard constitue un casus belli.
3/ Mettre en exécution le plan des zones pilotes en coordination avec les partenaires israéliens afin d’éviter les dérapages et les tentatives de sabotage.
4/ Poursuivre les programmes de réhabilitation de l’armée dans le cadre des partenariats renouvelés.
5/ Conclure un traité de paix qui sera formellement scellé lors de la réunion entre le président Joseph Aoun et le premier ministre israélien Benjamin Netanyahu ou son successeur à la Maison-Blanche.
Ce à quoi l'on assiste relève du retournement révolutionnaire. Ainsi, on espère que les responsables en place vont se positionner en fonction de cette grande et noble tâche qu’est la fin de l’état de guerre entre le Liban et Israël. Cela marquerait la fin d’une ère où l’obscurantisme idéologique éclipsait toute approche alternative à un conflit qui aurait pu prendre une voie beaucoup plus réaliste et équitable. À défaut d'un infléchissement politique de cette ampleur, le Liban encourt le risque de faire les frais d'une politique de la terre brûlée diligentée par le régime islamique en Iran. Nous sommes face à des bouleversements révolutionnaires qui exigent un renouvellement au sein des élites politiques. La rupture doit s'opérer à un double niveau, celui de la conscience et du rejet des oligarchies qui ont détruit ce pays au gré de leurs intérêts et de leurs complicités avec les politiques de puissance régionales alternées.

Is this a new step?

Dr. Charles Elias Chartouni/June 08/2026
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/06/155145/
Does the Washington meeting mark the beginning of a new step in a conflict of abrupt and contrasting developments? We are undoubtedly in a new stage that decisively decisively compared to the past recent and medium-term. The positions of the President of the Republic and the Prime Minister break without boundaries with the political attentiveness and complicity that have prevailed throughout the transition of power in 2024 The Executive Power has shown slowness, lack of understanding of international issues, incompetence and complicity in place of Shiite domination politics.
However, he had deliberately missed the diplomatic openings and mediation offered to him throughout this short but intense interval. Conduct that is explained by fear, prejudice of all orders, intellectual rigidity and lack of courage. It took geostrategic mutations, an intensification of war on the southeastern Lebanese borders and in the capital, Hezbollah’s criminal turpitude and the determination of the US administration to end the Lebanese executive’s recalcitrance. The American diplomatic dexterity and Israel's military firmness have played a decisive role in addition.
Hezbollah and his allies, namely Nabih Berri and Walid Joumblatt, were in the most cynical maneuver to twist the untold plot. In reality, they wanted to move the issues of political action and consolidate the Iranian regime's grip on Lebanon, transformed into a strategic relay. There is no doubt that the determination of the American administration is what has enabled this spectacular turnaround that is capable of reversing the political game. It remains to be known whether the change of direction will be pursued according to the new dynamics driven by the ongoing negotiations.
The laid axes operate from a triple cut that ends decades of conflicting mechanics and ideological tropes that made any rational negotiation with the Israeli state impossible. Ongoing diplomacy has ended the hostility between the Lebanese and Israeli states, the League State status and the vassality towards the Iranian regime. It also ended the lockdown imposed on neighboring relations with the State of Israel. It is this separation of principle, imposed by President Trump through his interpersonal diplomacy, the appointment of an ambassador of Lebanese origin and his personal mediation, that affected the dynamics of negotiations. He has broken down ideological, strategic and political blocks that have prevented any evolution over the last seven decades.
This is not a change of circumstances, but a paradigm. The executive power is about operating changes on the ground and breaking with the complicit quietism of a weak power wholly subordinated to alternate dictatorships of Syrian and Iranian domination policies. It must also break with the instrumentalization of the Lebanese context by a Saudi strategy playing on the margins of a broken regional order and a bankrupt state. The latter is subordinated to the rules of the game of criminal oligarchies that occurred throughout the Taef regime (1990-? ).
American politics has brought into question the entire political plot that ruled Lebanon, including the hypothetical end of the war (1975-1990), outdated narratives of nationalisms and totalitarian Islamisms, communism, third-world Marxisms, and their endogenous conflict dynamics. We are facing geostrategic and political upheaval that will give new impetus to conflict resolution diplomacy tied to ideological lockdowns of a bygone era. The two incumbents of the executive power seem to be undergoing a significant turn, even if only in terms of perception of issues, diplomatic schemes and methods of action.
The move to the act entails a new hierarchization of military and political priorities:
1/ The area of North-Litani should be nominally taken care of whatever the cost and the means and the sanctification of the rest of the territory should be carried out.
2/ Invite the Shiites to join the diplomatic process piloted by the Lebanese state, because any failure in this regard constitutes a casus belli.
3/ Implement the pilot zone plan in coordination with Israeli partners to avoid skips and sabotage attempts.
4/ Continue the army rehabilitation programs within the framework of renewed partnerships.
5/ Conclude a peace treaty that will be formally sealed during the meeting between President Joseph Aoun and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or his successor at the White House.
What we are witnessing is a revolutionary turnaround. Thus, it is hoped that the officials in place will position themselves on the basis of this great and noble task that is the end of the war between Lebanon and Israel. This would mark the end of an era when ideological obscurantism overshadowed any alternative approach to conflict that could have taken a much more realistic and equitable path. In the absence of a political influx of this magnitude, Lebanon is risking the cost of a diligent scorched-earth policy by the Islamic regime in Iran. We are facing revolutionary upheaval that requires a renewal within the political elites. The breakup must operate on a double level, that of consciousness and rejection of the oligarchies that have destroyed this country at the expense of their interests and complicity with alternated regional power policies.

From Putin to Saddam to Sinwar
Ghassan Charbel/Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
I asked a friend, a diplomat in Moscow, about the scale of Russian losses in Ukraine. He replied that discussing this matter is forbidden, and that the figure is considered a state secret. Russia is different from America, he explained. The mother of a soldier killed in the war, for example, does not have the right to shed her tears on television or to demand an end to the war, or the prosecution of whoever decided to send the army there. The priority is victory, regardless of the costs, and the war’s justifications or utility is considered treason.
He added that President Vladimir Putin’s popularity remains high, at around 60 percent, though a decrease from the 80 percent he enjoyed in previous years. The law prohibits discussion of the number of dead and wounded, as well as the number of mercenaries Russia has recruited from countries near and far to die on behalf of the Russian army, including Arabs, even if it should be noted that thousands of mercenaries are also fighting alongside the Ukrainian army.
The war and Western sanctions have not brought down the Russian economy because of the country’s immense wealth of resources, as well as the recent rise in oil prices. Goods have not disappeared from the stores, but they are of lower quality. Russians are tired of the war, but they have not taken to the streets to say so openly.
I asked who had made the decision to launch the war that began in the last week of February 2022. The answer was that the decision had been taken by a very small group around the president, and that prominent official learned of it only after it had been made. He noted that the prevailing impression among the Kremlin officials had been that Putin’s so-called “special military operation” would be a swift and decisive campaign, and that Ukraine’s collapse would be rapid.
It did not occur to many that the war could go on for so long or that convoys of coffins would return from Zelensky’s country at such a high pace. In the first days of the war, I too misjudged the situation, perhaps because of Putin’s life story. Putin’s biography suggested that he is a man of information and reports - an agent of the KGB, which had penetrated capitals near and far. Then there was his success in suppressing the winds of disintegration that had begun to blow across the Russian Federation itself. Finally, Western decision-makers had celebrated this man for years, receiving him and visiting him.
I was struck by the diplomat’s remark that when the powerful make mistakes, they are usually immense. The decision to invade Ukraine may later fall under the category of costly decisions; those behind it had never imagined they would be bogged down in the swamps of war for so long. He said those around the president never imagined that Ukraine would turn into “Ukrainistan,” or that it would cause such massive bleeding.
The term “costly decisions” stopped me in my tracks and raised questions. Was Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov part of the narrow circle that helped make the decision? Did it escape the mind of this seasoned and shrewd diplomat that the West would not easily accept such a blow and that it would find a way to make the decision-maker pay the price for what he had done? Did the generals’ opinion prevail over that of the foreign minister, just as the loyalty of the members of the “Regional Command” prevailed over Tariq Aziz’s timid reservations? Could Lavrov have learned of the decision only after it had been taken?
In this bitter region, journalists are haunted by the curse of comparisons. One day, “Mr. Leader” Saddam Hussein decided that the Iranian Revolution was an imminent threat, and that because it was in disarray and vulnerable, invading Iran could fragment the country. He ordered his army to cross the border and became mired in war; the convoys of coffins continued to arrive for eight years.
The decision to go to war is far easier than the decision to leave. This applies to the Iran-Iraq War, and the Russian-Ukrainian war. I do not mean to say that Putin resembles Saddam, or that the student of Iraq’s Baath Party resembles KGB pupils. The point here is that hubris leads to mistakes, and those mistakes are often costly. The obsession with the image one wants to leave in history helps ignite vast fires in geography, consuming soldiers and billions alike.
The illusions of the powerful are a tragedy. Saddam Hussein imagined that the world would tolerate the blow of the Kuwait invasion. On its first day, he presented the invasion as a “special military operation.” He told King Hussein, who called him that day, that it was an “operation to break noses,” a disciplinary campaign against the Kuwaiti authorities.
I was thinking of costly decisions when I asked a Palestinian leader about his total silence amid the horrors witnessed by the Gaza Strip and the grave dangers surrounding the West Bank. He said he was silent out of respect for the sea of blood that had overflowed because of the brutality of the Israeli army, and out of respect for the victims’ families.
He said he fears “the current Nakba may be more severe than the first.” He added that since the Al-Aqsa Flood Operation, he has been asking himself why Yahya Sinwar did not kidnap a soldier or a handful of soldiers instead of deciding to launch a fully-fledged war that exceeded the capacity of Gaza and the Axis of Resistance, presenting the operation as “the largest suicide operation in history.”
He stressed that Palestinians have the right to confront the Israeli occupation with arms, but that no leader has the right to make decisions without understanding the limits of their costs. He noted that “the world is now preoccupied with Hormuz and the Iranian issue, n

How Did Iran Pluck the Palestinian Fruit?!

Mishary Dhayidi/Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
The Quds Force is the most important Khomeinist Iranian arm holding the threads of chaos and running the puppet theater in the Middle East. The Iranian regime has a solemn annual holiday called “Quds Day”. A Palestinian keffiyeh around the neck is among the “accessories” of the leaders of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), indeed of the Supreme Leader himself.
These offensive signs of Palestine’s appropriation go back to the emergence of Iran’s fundamentalist revolutionary regime. Palestine was not, for most of the Iranian people, and has perhaps never become, a central cause.
How did this interest begin?! We will not say why it began, because the reason is clear and the objective obvious.
In an intriguing review of previous interviews by Ghassan Charbel, republished here in a new form, on this point, we find some striking insights. One of them is with the young Lebanese revolutionary Anis Naccache: a non-Shiite and comrade-in-arms of Wadie Haddad and the Venezuelan Carlos in the 1970s and 1980s. He told my colleague Ghassan that, when demonstrations broke out in Iran in 1978, Naccache obtained permission from the historic Palestinian leader “Abu Jihad” to train Iranians opposed to the Shah’s regime in centers established by Fatah in Lebanon. Naccache said in his interview with Ghassan Charbel that the idea of creating the IRGC emerged in a meeting he had taken part in with a handful of others in an apartment in Beirut. The idea was conveyed to the leaders of the revolution, who adopted it on the basis of “not trusting regular armies.”
On July 18, 1980, Naccache and his team set out to assassinate Iran’s last prime minister on behalf of the Iranian regime. Shapour Bakhtiar was in Paris, the operation failed, and Naccache was arrested. Later, a group affiliated with Iran abducted French hostages in Lebanon to ransom Naccache.
The Lebanese-Iranian icon Imad Mughniyeh was a guard of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat before joining Hezbollah. Naccache says he personally trained Mughniyeh.
The Palestinian-Iranian icon Fathi Shaqaqi was the dutiful son of Khomeinism. In fact, Khomeini himself received him in 1988 and pledged to support Islamic Jihad with weapons and funding.
Shaqaqi’s successor, Ramadan Shallah, told colleague Ghassan that Shaqaqi admired Hassan Nasrallah. He recalled that at the end of 1989, Shaqaqi told a number of comrades that “if this man is destined to live, he will be the Khomeini of the Arabs.”
Yahya al-Sinwar, and all the Sinwar-like figures in Hamas, became the most precious and most coveted piece in the necklace of Iranian adornment and influence on the altar of the Palestinian house.
The only one who refused to place Palestine under the Khomeinist cloak, even though he was the first to visit Khomeini and congratulate him, was Arafat, as our colleague Ghassan explained.
All of this to say that Iran’s grasp of the Palestine card, and the Palestinian military movement leaders’ use of the Iranian revolution card from the beginning, was an “accidental” relationship. The students, the Iranian revolutionary elements, became the teachers, the guides of the leaders of the Palestinian revolution. Each sang his own song, but the tune was the same

Israel’s False Tales and the False Tales About It
Hazem Saghieh/Asharq Al-Awsat/June 08/2026
In its defense of Israel’s founding as a state, the Zionist movement spun countless false tales: from “A land without a people for a people without a land,” to the claim that the Palestinians had sold their land and thereby left their country voluntarily in 1948. We know that the “New - Israeli - Historians,” who began their undertaking in the 1980s, did more to expose these lies than anyone else.
Such misrepresentations often reflect the desires or fears of those behind them, or what they seek to legitimize and present as the truth. Since the Jewish state is currently waging an overwhelmingly criminal war that many seek to justify, false tales are a commodity churned out on a weekly basis at the Israeli factory.
For its part, Hezbollah has also excelled in spinning false tales for political and ideological ends. Its greatest and most widespread lie is that Israel has constituted a danger to Lebanon since its establishment in 1948 and the 1949 armistice agreement that followed, showing relentless aggression. The function of this falsehood has been, and remains, to render the very idea of a political settlement impossible in principle, and to reduce thinking about this question politically to an act of gratuitous treason. It also renders the armed resistance that is supposedly needed to “protect Lebanon” into a pressing and vital need.
Israel, the enemy, does not change. It remains what it is regardless of whether or not it is subjected to operations by the Palestinian resistance or Hezbollah. It makes no difference when Israelis swing to the nationalist and religious right or to supporting the “peace camp.” Not a thing distinguished what it had been before October 7 and what it has been since, or before and after the wars of “support.” Its occupation of southern Lebanon between 1982 and 2000, during which it did not systematically destroy homes and turn the land into scorched earth, is identical to its current occupation, during which it has ripped out and erased all signs of life.
But was Israel always as hostile to Lebanon as it is today?
Of course, Lebanon and Israel were not dolling over one another after the Rhodes Armistice. Lebanon had taken part in the 1948 war, and it was natural for the two peoples not to feel warmly about one another, especially since the creation of the Jewish state was coupled with the mass expulsion and displacement of Palestinians. Those of them who sought refuge in Lebanon and neighboring countries recounted some of their painful experiences to the locals with whom they shared a lot.
Looking back at the archives, our shared border, with its limited military presence and more substantial international armistice observer presence, there were individual attempts at illegal crossings, some of them shepherds, some smugglers, and others Palestinian refugees seeking to return to their homeland. Such attempts occasionally led to scattered clashes that quickly subsided after shots were fired, and limited Israeli raids were conducted either in retaliation for border incidents or in pursuit of a larger share of water resources. Southern Lebanon contained, or bordered on, water sources feeding river systems that had been of considerable importance to Israel at the time.
We are therefore talking about the sort of problems familiar to many countries that share borders and a history of conflict. The claim that such incidents constitute “a war of existence not borders,” in which we must either kill or be killed, does withstand any serious scrutiny.
We also know that Israeli literature and political discourse, some of which expressed ambitions regarding the West Bank or advocated retaining the Syrian Golan Heights because of its strategic value, did not generate comparable scenarios regarding Lebanon. Accordingly, the notion of Israel’s “ambitions in Lebanon” was more a marginal and hysterical opinion than it was part of the mainstream of Israeli political life and its proposals.
More importantly, if we regard the disputes to be as grave as Hezbollah and its supporters insist they are, we arrive at a standard that cannot be applied to relations between any two neighboring countries. Indeed, we would then have to apply this same standard to Lebanese-Syrian relations during the same period, between the late 1940s to the late 1960s. For the very idea of Lebanon being an independent country and sovereign state was, in the eyes of Syrian nationalists, a heresy imposed by colonialism in order to fragment Syria.
Following Husni al-Za'im’s 1949 coup, Damascus encouraged the leader of the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, Antoun Saadeh, to launch his own coup and overthrow Lebanon’s elected government. In 1957, Syrian intelligence assassinated the Syrian officer and SSNP partisan Ghassan Jadid in Beirut after he had sought refuge in Lebanon. In 1958, when Syria was part of the United Arab Republic, Interior Minister Abdel Hamid al-Sarraj flooded Lebanon with weapons that would be used against the legitimate government of Camille Chamoun. In 1965, the Baathist regime dispatched the officer Jalal Marhej to carry out bombings in the Chouf region to intimidate President Fuad Chehab, whose policies were more aligned with those of Cairo.
In this sense, the challenge posed by Syria during this period was far more existential than that of Israel, especially since it was rooted in the center of the country rather than its periphery. By the logic of the false tales propagated by Hezbollah, the Lebanese people should therefore resent Syrians and translate this hatred into a “war of existence not borders.”
But would such a conception be at all sensible? Or would it simply be a fast-track to reckless policies haunted by dark intentions that ultimately lead to self-destruction?

True strategic wisdom for Iran is restraint toward the Gulf states
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/AlArabya English/June 08/2026
Iran’s recent launches of ballistic missiles and drones toward Kuwait and Bahrain – amid escalating tensions with the United States and Israel – represent not just a dangerous escalation but a profound strategic miscalculation. By violating the sovereignty of its Gulf neighbors, Iran is isolating itself regionally, damaging its international standing, alienating potential partners, and undermining its own long-term interests more severely than any external pressure could.
In Kuwait, strikes damaged the international airport, killing at least one person and injuring dozens, while Bahrain reported interceptions of missiles and drones aimed at civilian and military sites. Such moves not only broaden the conflict unnecessarily but also expose Iran’s misjudgment of regional dynamics and its own vulnerabilities.
Gulf states as constructive players in a volatile region
In the broader conflict involving the US, Israel, and Iran, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states – Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman – have largely positioned themselves as voices of restraint and diplomacy rather than belligerents. They have repeatedly called for de-escalation, mediation, and dialogue to prevent the war from spiraling further.
These countries have absorbed the fallout from interceptions, civilian impacts, and economic disruptions while advocating for resolutions that could benefit the entire region. Gulf leaders have engaged in intensive diplomatic consultations and emphasized defensive postures to maintain stability. Oman, for example, has historically facilitated back-channel talks between Iran and the US, demonstrating a commitment to peaceful off-ramps even under pressure.
Iran’s missile and drone strikes on Kuwait and Bahrain, which Kuwaiti and Bahraini authorities condemned as flagrant violations of sovereignty, directly contradict this constructive approach. By targeting neighbors focused on mediation, Iran undermines the very actors best positioned to help de-escalate its confrontation with the US and Israel.
Regional isolation and self-inflicted alienation
Iran shares a neighborhood with these Gulf states. Long-term economic ties, shared waterways like the Strait of Hormuz, and historical relations exist despite political frictions. Attacking them drives a wedge that isolates Iran further at a critical moment when regional solidarity or neutrality could provide diplomatic leverage. In a conflict where Iran already faces significant military and economic pressures, alienating proximate neighbors who could offer breathing room is profoundly counterproductive. This self-isolation compounds Iran’s challenges against the US and Israel by deepening Tehran’s encirclement and limiting its maneuverability in future negotiations.
The strikes also risk fracturing any remaining goodwill from past rapprochement efforts. Gulf states had pursued diplomatic engagement with Iran, but these attacks burn bridges that Iran may desperately need as the war drags on and its economy strains under sanctions and disruptions.
Damage to international image and global standing
By launching strikes at countries with no direct role in the core US-Israel-Iran hostilities, Iran broadcasts a message to the international community: it is willing to drag uninvolved parties into the fray. Gulf condemnations from the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and others highlight this as a threat to regional and global security. Such actions erode any sympathy or neutrality Iran might otherwise garner. They portray Iran as an aggressor targeting peaceful neighbors focused on stability and energy flows, rather than a defender in a limited conflict. This shift in perception weakens Iran’s diplomatic leverage worldwide and justifies stronger countermeasures or sanctions from the broader international community. The civilian toll, including deaths and airport disruptions in Kuwait, further amplifies the narrative of recklessness. International observers note that these moves extend the conflict beyond legitimate self-defense, inviting unified opposition and complicating Iran’s efforts to claim victimhood on the global stage.
Alienating key allies: China, Russia, and beyond
Iran’s strikes also risk distancing its major backers. Disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz and attacks on energy interests directly harm global oil and LNG markets. China, a massive importer reliant on Gulf stability, faces significant energy security threats from these escalations.
Beijing and Moscow have called for de-escalation and respect for Gulf sovereignty. They may find it increasingly difficult to provide robust support when Iran’s moves destabilize a region vital to their economic interests, leading to observable strains and preferences for diplomacy over confrontation.
By endangering shared economic lifelines, Iran pushes even its allies toward greater distance. It seems that China, in particular, prioritizes energy security and regional stability, making continued unconditional backing of provocative Iranian actions less tenable.
Jeopardizing economic ties and long-term interests
Beyond immediate geopolitics, Iran risks long-term economic self-harm. Historical and potential trade relations with Gulf states, regional connectivity, and stability in energy markets are all undermined by these violations. Jeopardizing these relationships harms Iran’s own economy at a time when sanctions, conflict damage, and isolation already bite deeply. The attacks on civilian infrastructure, such as airports and energy facilities, further erode trust and close doors to future economic cooperation that Iran desperately needs for recovery and resilience. Disruptions to the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for Iranian oil exports, compound these self-inflicted wounds by reducing revenue streams essential for Iran. In the longer term, alienating Gulf neighbors could diminish prospects for post-conflict reconstruction or sanctions relief, as these states wield considerable influence in international forums and energy markets that Iran relies upon.
Restraint is true strategic wisdom
In conclusion, Iran should confine its conflict to direct adversaries – the US and Israel – and respect the sovereignty of Gulf states that have done little except advocate for peaceful resolutions and de-escalation. These neighbors have been constructive players trying to mitigate tensions, not fuel them.
By launching missiles and drones into their territory, Iran is shooting itself in the foot: isolating itself regionally, tarnishing its global image, straining alliances with powers like China and Russia, disrupting energy markets to its own detriment, and weakening its position for any future negotiations or recovery. True strategic wisdom lies in restraint toward the Gulf. Respecting their sovereignty would preserve options for diplomacy, reduce self-inflicted isolation, and demonstrate the constructive regional role Iran claims to seek. Continued violations only deepen the hole Iran is digging for itself.

Selected Face Book & X tweets on 08 June/2026
Nadim Koteich
 Israel struck Hezbollah's assets in Beirut's southern suburbs. Iran retaliated against Israel, to establish itself as Lebanon's strategic guardian, despite Lebanon's president stating days earlier: we don't need Iran to negotiate for us, we don't need Iran to defend us. x.com/barakravid/sta…
Israel struck Hezbollah's assets in Beirut's southern suburbs. Iran retaliated against Israel, to establish itself as Lebanon's strategic guardian, despite Lebanon's president stating days earlier: we don't need Iran to negotiate for us, we don't need Iran to defend us.
Israel hit back hard. Iran de-escalated.  That's the right outcome, even if it is an acutely uncomfortable way for Lebanon to find liberation from a hegemon it never chose, through a conflict it never wanted.
Yet, this moment may be the most strategically useful one Lebanon has had in years.

Christiane Amanpour
https://x.com/amanpour/status/2064039461193765124/video/1
After over four decades in the army, Lebanon’s President Joseph Aoun tells me, “I’ve been in combat situations many times. I was wounded twice. I’ve seen the hardship of war. That’s why I hate wars. That’s why I prefer negotiation… I don’t want my children, I don’t want the people, to live the same hardship.”

Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו
https://x.com/netanyahu/status/2064006656128684130/video/1
Important update to you, citizens of Israel >>

Anita Anand
Canada is deeply concerned by the resumption of conflict between Iran and Israel. We call on both parties to exercise maximum restraint, de-escalate tensions, and ensure that civilians are protected. A return to dialogue to advance a diplomatic solution is essential to resolving

Hussain Abdul-Hussain
If you're Lebanese and still don't understand that your national interests are aligned with Israel and undermined by Iran, I don't know what to tell you. Now, you probably think that you hate Israel because "Palestine." But remember, Palestinians seek their own interests and so should you.
Lebanese and Palestinian interest can converge or diverge. This time it happens that they diverge. No shame. No foul. Lebanon should seek its interests with the Jewish state. Be realistic. Be smart. Think of your interests, and let Palestinians (and Iranians) figure out their own.

Dennis Ross

Sitting in a Tel Aviv shelter, I see a new test of wills. Iran wants to show that Israel cannot hit Hezbollah without Iran hitting Israel. Israel cannot accept that it cannot respond to threats. Trump wants this to end, but Iran’s feels no pressure from him. So he focuses on Bibi

Hussain Abdul-Hussain

https://x.com/hahussain/status/2064023004292501711/video/1
Mona Jahamy is a philosophy teacher, a Shia from the southern coastal city of Tyre. She's been displaced for months, and she's speaking up against Hezbollah.
CNN: But Israel...

Hananya Naftali

If Iran laid down its weapons tomorrow, there would be peace.
If Israel laid down its weapons tomorrow, there would be no Israel.
That's the difference.