English LCCC Newsbulletin For Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For  May 24/2026
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2026/english.may24.26.htm

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006 

Click On The Below Link To Join Elias Bejjaninews whatsapp group
https://chat.whatsapp.com/FPF0N7lE5S484LNaSm0MjW

اضغط على الرابط في أعلى للإنضمام لكروب Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group

Elias Bejjani/Click on the below link to subscribe to my youtube channel
الياس بجاني/اضغط على الرابط في أسفل للإشتراك في موقعي ع اليوتيوب
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAOOSioLh1GE3C1hp63Camw

Bible Quotations For today
Pentecost Sunday: If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Advocate, to be with you for ever.
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 14/15-26/:”‘If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Advocate, to be with you for ever. This is the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him. You know him, because he abides with you, and he will be in you. ‘I will not leave you orphaned; I am coming to you. In a little while the world will no longer see me, but you will see me; because I live, you also will live. On that day you will know that I am in my Father, and you in me, and I in you. They who have my commandments and keep them are those who love me; and those who love me will be loved by my Father, and I will love them and reveal myself to them.’ Judas (not Iscariot) said to him, ‘Lord, how is it that you will reveal yourself to us, and not to the world?’ Jesus answered him, ‘Those who love me will keep my word, and my Father will love them, and we will come to them and make our home with them. Whoever does not love me does not keep my words; and the word that you hear is not mine, but is from the Father who sent me. ‘I have said these things to you while I am still with you. But the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you everything, and remind you of all that I have said to you.

Titles For Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on 23-24 May/2026
Iran, US and mediator Pakistan report progress in talks on ending war
Rubio says ‘chance’ of Iran accepting deal as soon as Saturday
Iran offers to reopen Strait of Hormuz in exchange for US compensation, sources say
Iran weighs peace proposal, accuses US of 'excessive demands'
Trump tells CBS that US, Iran 'getting a lot closer' to agreement
Report: US prepares for new military strikes against Iran
US mulls new strikes on Iran: Media reports
Ghalibaf tells Munir Iran military rebuilt during ceasefire, warns Trump against war
IRGC-trained operative plotted to assassinate Ivanka Trump: Report
France bans Israel’s Ben-Gvir from entering country, urges EU sanctions
Israeli strike kills Gaza boy and five police officers, police say
Taiwan security chief says China deployed ‘over 100 vessels’ in regional waters
China authorities lower mine blast death toll to 82: State media
Pakistan PM arrives for China visit overshadowed by Iran war
Uganda confirms new Ebola cases, linked to DR Congo


Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on 23-24 May/2026
Iran, US and mediator Pakistan report progress in talks on ending war
Rubio says ‘chance’ of Iran accepting deal as soon as Saturday
Iran offers to reopen Strait of Hormuz in exchange for US compensation, sources say
Iran weighs peace proposal, accuses US of 'excessive demands'
Trump tells CBS that US, Iran 'getting a lot closer' to agreement
Report: US prepares for new military strikes against Iran
US mulls new strikes on Iran: Media reports
Ghalibaf tells Munir Iran military rebuilt during ceasefire, warns Trump against war
IRGC-trained operative plotted to assassinate Ivanka Trump: Report
France bans Israel’s Ben-Gvir from entering country, urges EU sanctions
Israeli strike kills Gaza boy and five police officers, police say
Taiwan security chief says China deployed ‘over 100 vessels’ in regional waters
China authorities lower mine blast death toll to 82: State media
Pakistan PM arrives for China visit overshadowed by Iran war
Uganda confirms new Ebola cases, linked to DR Congo

Titles For The Latest English LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on 23-24 May/2026
President Trump: Please Do Not Leave the Iranian Regime in Place…We Waited More Than Four Decades for You, We Will Not Get Another Break/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/May 23, 2026Putin goes to Beijing: Why the Russo-Chinese relationship matters/Cornelia Meyer/Al Arabiya English/23 May ,2026
China's Way of Capitalizing on Opportunity/Dr. Amal Moussa/Asharq Al-Awsat/May 23/2026
A Difficult American Victory and an Impossible Iranian One/Hazem Saghieh/Asharq Al-Awsat/May 23/2026
Tehran’s Decision-Making Dilemma/Mohammed al-Rumaihi/Asharq Al-Awsat/May 23/2026
Selected Face Book & X tweets for May 23/2026

Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on 22-23 May/2026
Deifying Politicians Corrupts Them and Turns Their Followers into Sheep and Slaves
Elias Bejjani/May 22/ 2026
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/05/154670/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7YiqrDWGDs
One of the most dangerous, disastrous, and destructive misfortunes facing a large part of our "forgiving" Lebanese people—as the late Philemon Wehbe called them in a Rahbani play—is that some people sanctify politicians and clergymen. They treat them as followers, henchmen, slaves, and tools. This submissiveness does not serve the leaders; instead, it corrupts their minds, fills them with illusions of grandeur, and infects them with a pathological arrogance that detaches them from their community and their humanity.
As a result of this unhealthy, unfaithful, and deeply humiliating deification, these leaders turn into greedy, insatiable, and tyrannical creatures. In their actions, they surpass the cruelty of wild predators. Here, the Holy Bible’s warning against trusting humans and raising them to the status of gods rings true: "Do not put your trust in princes, nor in a son of man, in whom there is no help. His spirit departs, he returns to his earth; in that very day his plans perish." (Psalm 146:3-4).
An objective review of all Lebanese politicians and leaders—the owners of family and commercial "party corporations," both Muslim and Christian—reveals a clear fact to anyone who still has their sanity, critical thinking, and a living conscience. These leaders—and by that, I mean "all of them means all of them"—are eternal on their feudal thrones. They never think of leaving them unless they are forced to by death. Then their sons, daughters, or family members inherit the leadership of these shops that are falsely called political parties, without any exception.
Worst of all, most of these leaders, especially the Maronites among them, have been sanctified and deified in total violation of all Christian values and principles. In a supreme heresy, these corrupt individuals are portrayed as if they were righteous saints. Praise poems are sung for them, and foolish chants like "With our soul and blood, we sacrifice ourselves for you" are shouted. This empty talk perfectly summarizes this state of voluntary slavery. These people have forgotten the clear divine teaching: "Cursed is the man who trusts in man and makes flesh his strength, whose heart departs from the Lord." (Jeremiah 17:5).
We boast—or rather, the majority boasts with disgusting arrogance and foolish pride—that we are among the smartest, most civilized, and cultured people in the world. We blindly repeat empty slogans like: "We gave the alphabet to the world, and Hannibal, Cadmus, and Gibran came from our blood." Meanwhile, in reality, we practice the exact opposite with a deadly selfishness and a shameful short-sightedness. In the twenty-first century, we accept living submissively among piles of garbage, unable even to clean our own country!
At the same time, we see large groups praising and glorifying the Iranian occupier that is devouring our country and stealing our sovereignty. They sanctify its invading weapons and mini-states, letting it destroy the entity and message of Lebanon over skulls that are empty of everything except hypocrisy, pretense, and submissiveness. Where do these people stand regarding the truth and freedom given to us by the Creator? Jesus Christ warned us clearly:"And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32) . How can anyone who accepts the slavery of men ever taste freedom or truth?.
Because he who stays silent about his illness will be killed by it, we ask: How can we correct the actions and alliances of any politician or clergyman if we have already raised them to the level of gods and accepted the roles of henchmen and sheep for ourselves?!
Indeed, our homeland, Lebanon, is in existential danger that threatens its entity, identity, and message. It is our sacred duty to resist and push back the wild beasts, whether they are local or foreign. But to be able to face them, we must first free ourselves from the disease of dependency and blind followership, and stop trying to be overly clever while hiding behind hypocrisy.
The most important thing today is to repent, make amends for the sin of sanctifying humans and deifying politicians and clergymen, and bring forward humble, faithful, and non-narcissistic leaders. True leadership in Christian thought is service and sacrifice, not arrogance and enslavement, in line with what Jesus Christ said:
"You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and those who are great exercise authority over them. Yet it shall not be so among you; but whoever desires to become great among you, let him be your servant." (Matthew 20:25-26).
Only then can the journey of a thousand miles toward salvation begin... Otherwise, it is a hopeless case.

Saint Rita of Cascia: The Saint of the Impossible, and a Beacon of Forgiveness and Endurance
Elias Bejjani/May 22/2026
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/05/143579/
In the heart of the Catholic tradition, few saints have touched as many hearts or inspired as much devotion as Saint Rita of Cascia. Known as the Saint of the Impossible, her life was not marked by miracles of grandeur, but by a quiet, relentless perseverance through suffering, betrayal, loss, and spiritual trial. Her sanctity lies in her unwavering faith, her ability to forgive the unforgivable, and her profound commitment to peace and reconciliation.
A Life of Pain Transformed into Holiness
Born in 1381 in Roccaporena, a small village near Cascia in Italy, Rita was raised in a devout Christian family. From childhood, she longed to join a convent, but her parents arranged her marriage at the age of 12 to Paolo Mancini, a violent and abusive man. Despite the hardship, Rita remained faithful, praying for his conversion. Eventually, her patience bore fruit: Paolo changed, only to be murdered later in a political feud.
As a widow and mother of two sons, Rita then faced another trial—her sons wanted to avenge their father’s death. Fearing they would commit murder, Rita prayed that God would intervene. Both sons died shortly afterward of natural causes, and though heartbroken, Rita believed it was God’s way of saving their souls.
Having lost her husband and children, Rita sought to enter the Augustinian convent in Cascia. Initially rejected due to her background, she was eventually accepted after miraculous circumstances and acts of peacemaking between feuding families. There, she lived a life of deep prayer, penance, and charity.
Marked by Christ’s Wounds
In the last years of her life, Rita received a mystical wound on her forehead—believed to be a partial stigmata, symbolizing her union with Christ’s suffering. For fifteen years, she bore the painful wound as a mark of her love and sacrifice. She died on May 22, 1457, and her body remains incorrupt to this day in the Basilica of Cascia.
She was canonized in 1900 by Pope Leo XIII, who recognized her extraordinary sanctity and spiritual legacy.
Her Enduring Message: Peace, Forgiveness, and Hope
Saint Rita is revered not for political power or public preaching, but for her quiet heroism—as a wife, mother, widow, nun, and intercessor. Her legacy lives on in the hearts of those who suffer, especially women in difficult marriages, victims of violence, and people praying for reconciliation.
She embodies values that transcend time:
Forgiveness: She forgave her husband’s killers and even prayed for the salvation of her sons’ souls.
Endurance in Suffering: She did not escape pain—she transformed it into a path of holiness.
Peacebuilding: Rita reconciled enemy families and brought healing where vengeance once reigned.
Faith Against All Odds: Even when all seemed lost, she trusted in God’s plan.
Why We Still Need Saint Rita Today
In a world plagued by division, domestic strife, and despair, Saint Rita reminds us that even the most broken life can become a vessel of grace. Her title, Saint of the Impossible, is not a legend—it is a testimony to what faith, humility, and perseverance can achieve when united with love.
Conclusion
On this day, May 22, as the Church celebrates Saint Rita of Cascia, we are called to reflect on her life—not as distant history, but as a living witness of Christ’s redemptive love. Let us ask her intercession for peace in our families, healing in our hearts, and hope amid our most impossible trials.
“Saint Rita, advocate of the impossible, teach us to forgive, to hope, and to never give up on the power of love.”

A Video Link to an interview  with Journalist Mohamed Salam in which he demends "Foreign Guardianship" to Save Sunnis from Elimination!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24zU-5ZMoh0

May 23/2026
In a fiery, unfiltered, and highly provocative episode of #PowerOfLogic (#قوة_المنطق) hosted by journalist Abdul Rahman Dernayka on the El Haweyah platform, veteran political writer and journalist Mohamed Salam breaks all red lines, dropping political bombshells that are set to spark widespread controversy across Lebanon and the region.
With unprecedented boldness, Salam delivers a brutal reality check on the Lebanese political scene, addressing highly sensitive and critical issues:
The Political Demise of Sunnis in Lebanon: Why does Salam believe the Sunni sect has undergone a systematic elimination of its leaders, leaving it "orphaned" and desperately searching for a foreign "guardian" or sponsor?
Hezbollah's Grip on the State: How has Hezb**ollah completely infiltrated and hijacked the very "spinal cord" of the state, including its security and judicial institutions? What is the truth behind the unchecked weapons smuggling through the coast of Tyre?
The Sheikh Ahmad al-Assir Deal: Unveiling the backstage political maneuvers—is there a secret "pardon and exile" deal being cooked up to release Al-Assir? Which political factions in Sidon and Lebanon dread his return the most?
The Case for International Intervention: Why is Salam certain that the Lebanese constitution has been utterly humiliated, and that the only remaining solution is the deployment of joint international forces to enforce order and discipline the ruling elite?
An extraordinary episode that uncovers the hidden truths and challenges the status quo. Watch the full hard-hitting analysis now and subscribe for more exclusive political confrontations.

Lebanese soldier wounded in Israeli strike on Nabatieh barracks, army says
LBCI/May 23/2026
A Lebanese soldier was moderately injured following an Israeli strike that targeted an army barracks in the city of Nabatieh, according to a statement by the Lebanese army.
The army said one of its personnel sustained moderate injuries as a result of what it described as a hostile Israeli attack on the facility

Israel warns of imminent strikes on 10 Lebanese villages
LBCI/May 23/2026
Israel warned the residents of 10 villages in southern Lebanon to evacuate their homes immediately to avoid planned airstrikes against alleged Hezbollah targets. "In light of Hezbollah's violation of the ceasefire agreement, the Israeli army is compelled to act forcefully against it. The Israeli army does not intend to harm you," military spokesman Avichay Adraee said. "For your safety, you must evacuate your homes immediately and move away from the villages and towns by a distance of no less than 1,000 meters into open areas."

Lebanon says 25 injured in Israeli strikes near Hiram Hospital in Tyre
LBCI/May 23/2026
Lebanon’s Public Health Emergency Operations Center said 25 members of the medical, nursing, and administrative staff at Hiram Hospital in the Tyre district were injured in varying degrees after Israeli airstrikes hit the immediate vicinity of the facility, causing significant damage.
The ministry said this is the second time in less than two months that the hospital has been placed at risk due to repeated Israeli strikes nearby, which it said constitute further evidence of violations of international humanitarian law protecting medical facilities. The ministry praised the staff at Hiram Hospital for continuing to carry out their duties despite the risks and commended health workers across the country who remain on the front lines, refusing to evacuate in order to continue providing emergency, medical, and healthcare services to those in need.

Israel strikes Bekaa and Tyre as other raids kill 10
Agence France Presse/May 23/2026
Israel staged fresh airstrikes in Lebanon on Saturday after earlier raids killed 10 people, according to media and the government in Beirut, targeting an area near the Syrian border. The state-run National News Agency said there were five Israeli airstrikes shortly before midnight in the mountainous Nabi Sreij area on the outskirts of Brital, which had been spared from attacks since an April 17 ceasefire with Hezbollah. An AFP correspondent in the southern city of Tyre reported hearing two blasts as one building on the outskirts was struck, then another inside the city, sending plumes of smoke into the air. Earlier, civil defense rescuers and municipality police worked to evacuate people from the neighborhood, using loudspeakers urging them to leave. Israel's military had issued two evacuation warnings via its Arabic-language spokesman Avichay Adraee, one for the Lebanese village of Burj Rahal, saying troops were acting against Hezbollah. Residents of two areas of Tyre were also told to leave, as they were "located near Hezbollah facilities that the (Israeli military) is about to operate against", Adraee said on X.
Exchanges of fire
Lebanon's health ministry said Israeli strikes killed 10 people on Friday, including six rescuers and a child in continued exchanges of fire. In a statement, the ministry said "six people were martyred", including two rescuers from the Risala Scouts association and a Syrian girl, in a strike on Deir Qanoun al-Nahr village near the city of Tyre. The association is linked with the Hezbollah-allied Amal Movement. An earlier strike on the southern town of Hanaway on Friday killed four rescuers from the Hezbollah-linked Islamic Health Committee, the ministry said. Separately, the Israeli military said early on Friday morning that it had killed two people close to the border. "IDF (Israeli army) surveillance identified two armed individuals moving in a suspicious manner hundreds of meters from Israeli territory, in southern Lebanon," it said in a Telegram post. "Following their identification and continuous monitoring by the IDF, the armed individuals were struck and eliminated in an aerial strike," the post said.
'Rage, might and tyranny' -
Hezbollah, meanwhile, said it had targeted Israeli troops and positions inside Lebanon and in northern Israel near the border. "We are fighting our enemy on the battlefield, and it has grown frustrated by the strength and heroism of our fighters... so it resorts to unleashing the hell of its rage, might and tyranny to destroy your villages and displace you," the head of Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc, Mohammad Raad, said in a message to supporters shared on Friday. He also repeated the group's denunciation of direct talks between Israel and Lebanon. It came after the United States announced sanctions against nine Hezbollah-linked individuals it accused of "obstructing the peace process in Lebanon". These included two Lebanese military officers accused of sharing information with the group. Since April 17, Israel has continued to launch strikes, carry out demolitions and issue evacuation orders in south Lebanon, saying it is targeting Hezbollah, which has also kept up attacks. Hezbollah launched rockets at Israel on March 2 in retaliation for the killing of Iran's supreme leader in U.S.-Israeli strikes. Israel responded with a massive series of airstrikes and a ground invasion in the country's south, where its troops are operating inside an Israeli-declared "yellow line" running around 10 kilometers (six miles) inside Lebanon along the border. Lebanon's health ministry said on Friday that Israeli attacks have killed at least 3,111 people since the wider regional war began.Israel's military has reported the death of 22 personnel during the fighting. Last week, the fragile ceasefire was extended for 45 days following a third round of direct talks between Lebanese and Israeli representatives in Washington, discussions that Hezbollah staunchly opposes.

South Lebanon Hospital Damaged in Israeli Strikes
Asharq Al Awsat/May 20/2026
Israel kept up strikes on Lebanon on Saturday, hours after overnight raids on the country's south and east, including one that damaged a hospital, its chief executive told AFP. Lebanon's state-run National News Agency (NNA) reported Israeli airstrikes on around a dozen locations in the south on Saturday including one targeting an agricultural area, "wounding several Syrian workers".The NNA said an overnight strike in the southern city of Tyre that targeted a site near the hospital caused "severe damage" to the facility. An AFP correspondent saw shattered glass, ceiling panels blown out and damaged medical equipment at the multi-storey Hiram hospital. The Israeli military late on Friday night had issued evacuation warnings ahead of strikes on two locations in Tyre, saying it would target "Hezbollah facilities".Accompanying maps advised people to leave areas within 500 metres (yards) of the target buildings, with the Hiram hospital shown within the advised evacuation area. The hospital's CEO Dr Salman Aydibi told AFP that around 40 patients were in the facility when the warning was issued, including seven in intensive care. "We took the patients to a safer location" elsewhere inside the hospital, he said, adding that none were harmed but some 30 staff sustained minor injuries. He said an evaluation of the damage was ongoing and that the hospital has remained operational, though the emergency department briefly closed. He said it was the third strike near the facility since the latest Israel-Hezbollah war erupted on March 2. Israel's army said Saturday that it had targeted "Hezbollah infrastructure sites in Tyre" overnight where operatives from the Iran-backed group worked to "plan and execute attacks" against Israeli soldiers. "Prior to the strike, steps were taken to mitigate harm to civilians, including the issuing of advance warnings, the use of precise munitions, and aerial surveillance," it added. Another AFP correspondent saw heavy damage at both targeted sites in Tyre, with a man searching for his belongings among the debris at one location. Israel's army also targeted east Lebanon overnight, saying it struck a "Hezbollah underground compound" used to manufacture weapons. Lebanon's Hamas-aligned Islamist group Jamaa Islamiya and its armed wing the Al-Fajr Forces said Saturday in a statement that one of its members was killed in an Israeli strike in east Lebanon. Under the terms of the ceasefire published by Washington, Israel reserves the right to act against "planned, imminent or ongoing attacks".

Hezbollah Says Message from Iran Shows it 'Will Not Give up' on Group

Asharq Al Awsat/May 23/2026
20Hezbollah said Saturday that a message from Tehran showed that Iran would not abandon the Lebanese militant group and that the Islamic republic's latest proposal to end the US-Iran war included a ceasefire in Lebanon. Iran-backed Hezbollah said in a statement that its chief Naim Qassem had received a message from Tehran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, which indicated that Iran "will not give up its support for movements demanding justice and freedom, foremost among them Hezbollah". In Iran's latest proposal through Pakistani mediators aimed at achieving "a permanent and stable end to the war, the demand to include Lebanon in the ceasefire was emphasised", the statement added.

Lebanon says Israeli strike targets army barracks, wounding soldier
AFP/23 May ,2026
Lebanon’s military said Saturday an Israeli strike targeted an army barracks in the country’s south, wounding a soldier, despite a ceasefire in the war between Israel and militant group Hezbollah. “A soldier was moderately wounded due to the hostile Israeli targeting of an army barracks in the city of Nabatieh,” the army said, in a statement on social media. Israel had warned the residents of 10 villages in southern Lebanon to evacuate their homes immediately to avoid planned air strikes against alleged Hezbollah targets. “In light of the terrorist Hezbollah’s violation of the ceasefire agreement, the IDF is compelled to act forcefully against it. The IDF does not intend to harm you,” military spokesman Avichay Adraee said. “For your safety, you must evacuate your homes immediately and move away from the villages and towns by a distance of no less than 1,000 meters into open areas.”The communities listed by Adraee in a social media post cover a large area of southern Lebanon, and lie on both the north and south banks of the Litani river. Hezbollah and Israel accuse each other on a daily basis of violating the truce that came into effect on April 17. At least ten people, including six rescue workers and a girl, were killed Friday in a series of Israeli strikes on southern Lebanon, according to the Lebanese Ministry of Health. According to the Israeli military, these strikes targeted Hezbollah fighters travelling by motorcycle and weapons-manufacturing infrastructure.

Iran sends message to Hezbollah chief reaffirming long-term support
LBCI/May 23/2026
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the Islamic Republic “will not abandon support for movements seeking rights and freedom until the very last moment,” naming Hezbollah as a key example. In a message addressed to Hezbollah chief Naim Qassem, Araghchi said: “This is our pledge.”He added that from the earliest stage of regional mediation efforts aimed at easing tensions between Iran and the United States, Tehran had proposed linking any broader agreement to a ceasefire in Lebanon. Araghchi said this position has remained a “firm principle” and part of Iran’s official demands. He also noted that in Iran’s latest proposal, delivered through a Pakistani mediator to achieve a lasting and stable end to the conflict, Tehran again emphasized the need to include Lebanon in any ceasefire arrangement.

Lebanon brings ceasefire and battlefield assessment to first direct military talks with Israel—what will be on the table?

LBCI/May 23/2026
Next Friday, for the first time in the trajectory of direct negotiations between Lebanon and Israel, expanded military delegations from both countries will meet at the U.S. Department of War, days before a second round of direct political talks scheduled for June 2–3.
The composition of the Lebanese delegation has been finalized. It will be headed by the Lebanese army’s Director of Operations, Brig. Gen. Georges Rizkallah. Its core will consist of specialists, including officers from the operations directorate, military intelligence, international humanitarian law, and an engineering officer.
So what will the Lebanese military delegation bring?
According to available information, the delegation’s file is comprehensive and strictly technical in nature. It will first call for the consolidation of the ceasefire. However, its main focus will be on presenting the scale of achievements made by the Lebanese army in restricting weapons since it was tasked by the Lebanese government with implementing this decision, supported by evidence and documentation. The delegation will also explain why it has not conducted searches of private homes and property. More importantly, it will highlight the extensive work carried out despite limited logistical capabilities, as well as what it has been able to gather through its own efforts regarding sites and weapons in southern Lebanon in particular. From this perspective, the Lebanese delegation will stress to the U.S. sponsor the need for international financial support to strengthen the military institution and enhance its capabilities. The inclusion of army officers is intended to reflect their familiarity with conditions on the ground. They will present a field-based assessment that includes Israeli violations, occupied, bulldozed, and mined areas, as well as the scale of displacement and destruction. The delegation, which is coordinating preparations for the session with its leadership and will remain in contact with it, will also carry presidential directives. Lebanon recognizes it has no option but to try to reduce the burdens of the war. It also comes amid mounting pressure that has reached security and military institutions, most recently the placement of two officers from the army and General Security on the U.S. OFAC sanctions list, a move observers have linked to the upcoming military and political negotiations aimed at shaping a roadmap for the next phase.

What US sanctions on two officers mean for Lebanon
Agence France Presse/May 23/2026
The U.S. announced unprecedented sanctions on two Lebanese officers on Thursday, accusing them of sharing intelligence with Hezbollah, which the Lebanese government is trying to disarm. What are the implications of the move and its repercussions, and will it contribute to isolating Hezbollah?
What is the justification?
The U.S. sanctions also cover Iran's ambassador to Lebanon, three Hezbollah lawmakers and a former minister as well as two figures from the Hezbollah-allied Amal Movement. They also target army colonel Samir Hamadi and Khattar Nassereddine, an officer for General Security, marking the first time the United States has sanctioned Lebanese officers. Washington said Hamadi, the army's intelligence head in Beirut's southern suburbs, a Hezbollah stronghold, and Nassereddine, the national security chief in the General Security service, "shared important intelligence" with Hezbollah "during the ongoing conflict." In separate statements, the Lebanese Army and General Security affirmed their personnel's loyalty and their commitment to following orders without political "considerations or pressures." The military and security services prohibit their members from engaging in political or partisan activity. Hamadi holds a sensitive position in Beirut's southern suburbs, in a country where appointments within institutions are based on sectarian and political quotas. The army sent Hamadi to the United States, its key backer, for three training courses. As for Nassereddine, a security source who requested anonymity told AFP that he heads the data analysis directorate of General Security, a surveillance and border control agency. He was close to powerful former General Security chief Abbas Ibrahim, and is on good terms with senior Hezbollah security official Wafiq Safa, the source said.
How will it impact Lebanon's army?
The U.S. sanctions against the officers, both of whom have held their current posts for less than a year, came at a sensitive time for Lebanon, as Washington is ramping up pressure on Beirut to disarm Hezbollah and Israel continues to strike the country and occupy parts of its south despite the truce. Hezbollah drew Lebanon into the Middle East war on March 2, and a fragile truce began on April 17. Lebanon and Israel, officially at war for decades, are preparing military delegations for security talks at the Pentagon in the U.S. later this month, followed by a fourth round of direct negotiations in Washington in June. Hezbollah, weakened after a 2023-2024 war with Israel, and isolated following the government's decision to disarm it, strongly opposes direct talks with Israel and refuses to surrender its weapons. Military expert Riad Kahwaji said the U.S. move will have "significant repercussions within Lebanon" as "the prestige that was given to the Lebanese Army has been removed." The army is widely respected domestically and has maintained its unity since the end of the 1975-1990 civil war in a country suffering from political and sectarian divisions.
How will it impact Hezbollah?
The security source told AFP that the inclusion of the two officers on the sanctions list "serves as a warning to any security or military official from whom Hezbollah might request any information." "The sanctions are a continuation of the tightening of the noose around Hezbollah, an attempt to separate it from the state after it managed, over the past 20 years... to embed many elements" in it, Kahwaji said. "These sanctions show today that no party is immune, regardless of whether it is inside or outside state institutions." Kahwaji said that it marks a new phase in which "everyone who facilitates Hezbollah's activities from within the Lebanese state will be held accountable." U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday the U.S. "will continue to take action against officials who have infiltrated the Lebanese government". On its front page, pro-Hezbollah newspaper Al-Akhbar wrote "Washington launches a campaign to isolate the resistance," referring to Hezbollah.

Leaked names of Lebanese Pentagon delegation for first military talks with Israel
Naharnet/May 23/2026
The Army Command has finalized a list of the Lebanese military delegation scheduled to travel to the United States to meet with an Israeli military delegation on May 29, pro-Hezbollah al-Akhbar reported Friday. The meeting will be the first Lebanese-Israeli military meeting and will be held at the Pentagon. On June 2 and 3, the State Department would hold diplomatic negotiations aimed at reaching a permanent political agreement. It would be the fourth round of talks between Lebanese and Israeli envoys. The Lebanese military delegation will focus exclusively on the technical mechanisms to implement the ceasefire and schedule Israel's withdrawal from occupied areas in south Lebanon. According to al-Akhbar, the names proposed by the Army Command for the delegation include: Brigadier General George Rizkallah (Christian), Brigadier General Ziad Rizkallah (Christian), Brigadier General Omar Hlayhel (Sunni), Brigadier General-Engineer Wael Abbas (Shia), Colonel Mazen Al-Hajj (Druze), and Colonel Wadih Rafoul (Christian). Brigadier General Oliver Hakimeh, the military attaché at the Lebanese Embassy in Washington, might also attend the meeting, the daily said. The army command said Friday that media reports about a "sectarian distribution" of the military delegation are against the principles of the military institution. "The members of the delegation remain committed to national constants, represent Lebanon as a nation and are committed to the Army’s doctrine," the army command's statement said. Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblat also criticized what he called "a six-member Army committee" as "a heresy that we can do without". "We trust the military institution and the constants built on the foundation of the armistice agreement, adherence to international resolutions, and the Taif Accord," he posted on the X platform.

Report: More Lebanese individuals could face US sanctions
Naharnet/May 23/2026
Washington took a significant step Thursday by imposing sanctions on two officers from the Lebanese Army and the General Security Directorate, accusing them of "sharing intelligence with Hezbollah."The U.S. also slapped sanctions on three Hezbollah MPs, a Hezbollah ex-minister, two Amal Movement security officials, and the Iranian ambassador-designate to Lebanon. According to information obtained by Al-Arabiya, the list of individuals recommended for sanctions is much longer, and U.S. intelligence agencies possess a list of "dozens of Lebanese Army officers proven to have collaborated with Hezbollah and leaked information to them."The report also said that the matter is "not limited to Lebanese Shiite officers, but includes some from other sects, such as Christians." Sources told Al-Arabiya that U.S. security and intelligence agencies accuse these officers of "two serious offenses: first, facilitating the passage of weapons to the area south of the Litani River after the army conducted large-scale operations to clear it of Hezbollah weapons and caches; and second, assisting Hezbollah members in bypassing security checkpoints to cross into the south and carry out new deployments."
The sources added that Iran and Hezbollah have managed, in recent weeks and months, to exploit numerous loopholes to rearm and finance the party. One of the sources also said that U.S. intelligence is aware of "the presence of at least 100 Iranian Revolutionary Guard officers who have arrived in Lebanon in recent months, working to manage Hezbollah, including retraining, rearming, and smuggling operations." The source explained that everything Hezbollah does north of the al-Zahrani River is under the direct management of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, while south of this line, the party's members operate with their Lebanese contingent. Furthermore, the source clarified that "the Revolutionary Guard members carry Lebanese documents, including passports, and sometimes their accents are indistinguishable from those of Lebanese citizens or even Hezbollah members themselves."

Lebanon army says soldiers loyal after US sanctions one over alleged Hezbollah links
Agence France Presse
Lebanon's military said Friday its soldiers were loyal to the institution after the U.S. announced sanctions that included an officer accused of sharing information with Hezbollah. The sanctions came after the U.S. hosted three rounds of direct talks between Lebanon and Israel aimed at ending the war that began after Hezbollah attacked Israel on March 2 and determining the future of relations between the two countries. The sanctions include Iran's ambassador to Lebanon, three Hezbollah lawmakers and a former minister and two figures from the Hezbollah-allied Amal movement. They also target army colonel Samir Hamadi, and Khattar Nasser Eldin, a general security officer, marking the first time that officers are sanctioned in Lebanon. The U.S. accused them of "obstructing the peace process in Lebanon". The army said that "all officers and members of the military institution are performing their national duties with utmost professionalism, responsibility, and discipline". It emphasized that "the loyalty of military personnel is solely to the military institution and the nation", also saying it was not informed of the sanctions beforehand. Washington said Hamadi, the army's intelligence head in Beirut's southern suburbs, and Nasser Eldin, the national security chief in the general security service, "shared important intelligence" with Hezbollah "during the ongoing conflict". A general security statement affirmed its trust in its personnel, adding that if any "employee is found to have leaked any information outside the institution... they will be subject to fair legal and judicial accountability".
'Obstruct lasting peace'
The sanctions come as Lebanon is forming a military delegation for security talks with Israel at the Pentagon on May 29, a step that was agreed in the latest round of direct talks earlier this month. A fourth round of negotiations is planned for June. Hezbollah is opposed to the talks and refuses to surrender its weapons as the government demands. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday they "will continue to take action against officials who have infiltrated the Lebanese government", insisting Hezbollah must be "disarmed". Hezbollah called the sanctions "an attempt to intimidate the free Lebanese people in order to bolster the Zionist aggression against our country". Hezbollah lawmakers said the sanctions "will have no practical effect", though the group faces internal pressure following two wars with Israel that caused widespread destruction and pushed Lebanon to negotiate with Israel. Once a dominant political force, Hezbollah was weakened by a 2023-2024 war with Israel. The latest war has killed more than 3,000 people and displaced more than a million. "The sanctions are a continuation of the tightening of the noose around Hezbollah, an attempt to separate it from the state after it managed, over the past 20 years... to embed many elements" in it, military expert Riad Kahwaji told AFP. "These sanctions show today that no party is immune, regardless of whether it is inside or outside state institutions."Israel meanwhile continues to strike Lebanon despite a truce in place since April 17. Israeli strikes killed at least 10 people on Friday, including six rescuers, according to the Lebanese health ministry.

Le Drian warns of 'dangerous' situation in Lebanon, lauds leaders 'courage'
Naharnet/May 23/2026
French President's special envoy to Lebanon Jean-Yves Le Drian has warned of "a dangerous situation" in Lebanon, pointing out to divisions inside the country, regarding Israel and Hezbollah. In an interview Thursday, Le Drian said Lebanon's unity and integrity are at risk, citing the Israeli occupation and accusing Hezbollah of being an Iranian proxy and choosing Iran's interests over Lebanon's. Le Drian said Israel refused to include France in the Israeli-Lebanese negotiations despite the Lebanese requesting it but welcomed the 45-day truce extension as a window to continue discussions. The French diplomat lauded the "courage" of President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam for calling for direct negotiations with Israel.

Hezbollah drone threat persists as Israel reveals pager operation details
LBCI/May 23/2026
Air raid sirens are sounding across northern settlements and the Galilee as Hezbollah drones infiltrate the region’s airspace, while the Israeli army acknowledges it is unable to counter them: this is Israel’s reality these days. Faced with this situation, the Israeli army has introduced munitions to confront the drone threat, in a move Israel hopes will protect it from what it considers the most dangerous challenge currently on the battlefield. According to the army, these munitions are used when a drone is detected at close range. At that point, soldiers’ primary task is to take cover and move away from the drone’s flight path before firing the ammunition, which has a wide dispersal range reaching up to 100 meters. However, all this promotion has not eased the anger prevailing inside Israel over its inability to decisively end the battle in Lebanon. In another effort to improve the image of the confrontation with Hezbollah, Israel revealed additional details about the pager explosions operation. Among them, it said the Mossad relied on a sophisticated infiltration of the supply chain through real individuals and companies that had previously dealt with Hezbollah. One of them was a woman whom Israel claims was named Theresa, who allegedly played a key role in convincing Hezbollah to increase its order from 500 devices annually to 5,000 devices in March 2024. The effort was reportedly part of a campaign led by a Mossad official, who operated under the cover of a businesswoman named Layla. According to the Mossad report, extensive discussions took place within Hezbollah regarding the purchase of the new devices amid suspicions of a possible security breach. However, the need to replace older communication devices pushed the group to proceed with the deal.

The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on 23-24 May/2026
Iran, US and mediator Pakistan report progress in talks on ending war

Al Arabiya English/23 May ,2026:
Iran, the US and mediator Pakistan all said on Saturday that progress had been made in talks on ending almost three months of war. Iran said it was focused on finalizing a memorandum of understanding, or MOU, after its top officials met Asim Munir, the army chief of Pakistan.
The Pakistani army said the negotiations had resulted in “encouraging” progress toward a final understanding. Two Pakistani sources involved in negotiations said the deal being negotiated is “fairly comprehensive to terminate the war.”Sources have told Reuters the proposed framework would unfold in three stages: formally ending the war, resolving the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz, and launching a 30-day window for negotiations on a broader agreement, which can be extended. US President Donald Trump said he would discuss the latest Iran draft agreement with advisors and might make a decision on Sunday on whether to resume attacks on Iran, Axios reported, citing an interview with Trump. “Either we reach a good deal or I’ll blow them to a thousand hells,” Axios quoted him as saying. Trump also told CBS in a phone interview on Saturday that the US and Iran were “getting a lot closer” to an agreement to end the war.But in the interview with the TV network, Trump also warned that if the US and Iran do not come to an agreement, “we’re going to have a situation where no country will ever be hit as hard as they’re about to be hit.” One of the Pakistani sources said there was no guarantee the US would accept the memorandum. If the US and Iran agree, the MOU would lead to further talks after the Eid holiday ends on Friday.
Trump to speak with Middle East leaders
Trump, whose ratings have been hit by the war’s impact on energy prices for US consumers, said on Friday he would not attend his son’s wedding this weekend, citing Iran among the reasons he planned to stay in Washington. An Arab official told Reuters that Trump would hold a phone call on Saturday with leaders from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE, Jordan, Egypt, Turkey and Pakistan. Pakistan’s mediation push aims to narrow differences between Iran and the US after weeks of war that have left the vital Hormuz waterway closed to most shipping despite a nervous ceasefire, upending global energy markets. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio repeated Trump’s demands: “Iran can never have a nuclear weapon. The straits need to be open without tolls. They need to turn over their enriched uranium.”
“Even as I speak to you now, there’s some work being done. There is a chance that, whether it’s later today, tomorrow, in a couple days, we may have something to say,” Rubio told reporters in New Delhi. Iran denies it is pursuing nuclear weapons and says it has a right to enrich uranium for civilian purposes. It has demanded supervision of the strait, an end to the US blockade on its ports and the lifting of sanctions on Iranian oil sales. Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said: “The trend this week has been towards a reduction in disputes, but there are still issues that need to be discussed through mediators. We will have to wait and see where the situation ends in the next three or four days.”Pakistan’s army chief Munir left Tehran on Saturday after talks with Iran’s top negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Baghaei said the issue of the US blockade on Iran’s shipping was important, but that its priority was ending the threat of new US attacks and the ongoing conflict in Lebanon, where Iran-allied Hezbollah militants are fighting Israeli troops who have moved into the south.Ghalibaf said Iran would pursue its “legitimate rights,” both on the battlefield and through diplomacy, but added that it could not trust “a party that has no honesty at all,” an allegation Iran has made several times before. He said Iran’s armed forces had rebuilt their capabilities during the ceasefire and that, if the US “foolishly restarts the war,” the consequences would be “more forceful and bitter” than at the start of the conflict. Despite weeks of conflict, Iran has preserved its stockpile of near-weapons-grade enriched uranium as well as missile, drone and proxy capabilities. With Reuters

Rubio says ‘chance’ of Iran accepting deal as soon as Saturday

AFP/23 May ,2026
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said there was a chance Iran would accept a deal to end the Middle East war as soon as Saturday. His comments came as Pakistan’s powerful army chief arrived in Tehran to bolster mediation and US President Donald Trump abruptly skipped his son’s wedding to stay in Washington due to “circumstances pertaining to government,” fueling speculation that talks had entered a sensitive stage. Rubio said there had been progress in negotiations but did not rule out Trump resuming attacks on Iran. “There might be some news a little later today. There may not be. I hope there will be,” Rubio told reporters in New Delhi during his first visit to India.“There’s been some progress done, some progress made. Even as I speak to you now, there’s some work being done,” he said. “There is a chance that, whether it’s later today, tomorrow, in a couple days, we may have something to say.” Rubio reiterated US demands that Iran fully open the Strait of Hormuz, on which it has exerted control in response to the US-Israeli attack, and that Iran hand over highly enriched uranium. Trump’s “preference is always to solve problems such as these through a negotiated diplomatic solution. That’s what we’re working on right now,” Rubio said. “But this problem will be solved, as the president’s made... clear, one way or the other.”

Iran offers to reopen Strait of Hormuz in exchange for US compensation, sources say
Al Arabiya English/23 May ,2026
Iran presented two proposals during Pakistani army chief Asim Munir’s visit to Tehran on Saturday, diplomatic sources told Al Arabiya, as Islamabad intensifies efforts to mediate between Iran and the United States and prevent a renewed outbreak of war. According to the sources, Tehran offered to reopen the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for the US paying compensation to Iran. Tehran also requested that discussions on sanctions relief and frozen Iranian funds take place before any agreement is signed. Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said on Saturday “we are both very far from and very close to an agreement,” adding that the purpose of Pakistani army chief Asim Munir’s visit to Tehran was to exchange messages between Iran and the US. He added that Tehran is currently focused on finalizing a memorandum of understanding with Washington. The diplomatic push comes amid renewed fears of escalation after US media outlets Axios and CBS News reported that the White House was considering new military strikes on Iran if talks fail. US officials have repeatedly warned that military action remains an option if no agreement is reached. Iran’s chief negotiator and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf warned on Saturday that Iran would respond “more crushingly and bitterly” than on the first day of the war if the US resumes hostilities. “Our armed forces have rebuilt themselves during the ceasefire period in such a way that if [US President Donald] Trump commits another act of folly and restarts the war, it will certainly be more crushing and bitter for the United States than on the first day of the war,” Ghalibaf wrote on social media after meeting Munir in Tehran.
The war began on February 28 after the US and Israel launched attacks on Iran. Although an April 8 ceasefire halted the fighting, negotiations have yet to produce a permanent settlement or fully restore shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant portion of global oil supplies passes. Araghchi said in a call with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres that Tehran remained engaged in diplomacy despite “repeated betrayals of diplomacy and military aggression against Iran,” as well as “contradictory positions and repeated excessive demands” by the US.
IRNA reported that Araghchi also held calls with his counterparts from Turkey, Iraq, Qatar, and Oman. Meanwhile, Trump spoke with Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, whose office said he expressed support for “all initiatives aimed at containing the crisis through dialogue and diplomacy.”

Iran weighs peace proposal, accuses US of 'excessive demands'

Agence France Presse/23 May ,2026
Tehran accused the United States of "excessive demands", Iranian media said on Saturday, as U.S. media reports raised the prospect that Washington was mulling new strikes and leaders of the Islamic republic considered the latest peace proposal. Pakistan's powerful army chief arrived in Tehran on Friday to bolster mediation and U.S. President Donald Trump abruptly changed his plans to skip his son's wedding to stay in Washington due to "circumstances pertaining to government", fuelling speculation that the situation had entered a sensitive stage.
Trump has described the stop-start negotiations this week as teetering on the "borderline" between renewed attacks and a deal to end the war, which began with U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28 and led to competing blockades around the strategic Strait of Hormuz that have roiled the global economy. Weeks of negotiations since an April 8 ceasefire -- including historic face-to-face talks hosted by Islamabad -- have still not produced a permanent resolution or restored full access to the strait, choking vast quantities of global oil supply.
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a call with U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres that Tehran was engaged in the diplomatic process despite "repeated betrayals of diplomacy and military aggression against Iran, along with contradictory positions and repeated excessive demands" by the United States, according to the ministry. U.S. media outlets Axios and CBS News, citing unnamed sources, reported the White House was considering strikes on Iran, although both added a final decision had not been made yet. U.S. officials have repeatedly raised the prospect of renewed action against Iran if a deal were not reached, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying on the sidelines of a NATO conference in Sweden that there had been "some progress" towards a peaceful resolution but "things were not there yet". "We're dealing with a very difficult group of people. And if it doesn't change, then the president's been clear he has other options," he said. Pakistan's army chief Asim Munir landed in Tehran on Friday where he met with Araghchi late into the night to discuss "the latest diplomatic efforts and initiatives aimed at preventing further escalation", according to the official IRNA news agency. Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei cautioned that the visit did not mean "we have reached a turning point or a decisive situation" with "deep and extensive" disagreements remaining, according to Iran's ISNA news agency. Baqaei said a delegation from Qatar had also held talks with the Iranian foreign minister on Friday. "In recent days, many countries -- both regional and non-regional -- have been trying to help bring the war to an end ... However, Pakistan remains the official mediator," he said. Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar -- who have played a crucial role in mediation between the warring sides -- flew to China, Iran's top trading partner, for a four-day visit in which efforts to resolve the Middle East crisis were expected to be discussed.
Hormuz squeeze
Baqaei said the status of the Strait of Hormuz and a retaliatory U.S. blockade of Iranian ports were also under discussion. The future of the strategic maritime chokepoint remains a key sticking point, with fears growing that the global economy will suffer as pre-war oil stockpiles run down. Markets nevertheless took some comfort from the signs of diplomacy, with Wall Street rising Friday and the Dow closing at a second straight record high as investors bet talks could eventually produce an off-ramp. Oil prices also rose, however, underscoring fears that disruption in Hormuz will keep feeding inflation. U.S. consumer sentiment fell to its lowest level since records began in 1952, with high prices eroding household finances. European Union nations on Friday deemed Iran's blockade "contrary to international law" and made a technical change to expand the scope of its existing Iran sanctions regime to target individuals involved in the closure.

Trump tells CBS that US, Iran 'getting a lot closer' to agreement
LBCI/23 May ,2026
U.S. President Donald Trump told CBS in a phone interview on Saturday that the United States and Iran are "getting a lot closer" to an agreement to end the war in the Middle East.
But in the interview with the TV network, Trump also warned that if the U.S. and Iran do not come to an agreement, "we're going to have a situation where no country will ever be hit as hard as they're about to be hit."AFP

Report: US prepares for new military strikes against Iran
Naharnet/23 May ,2026
The Trump administration was preparing Friday for a fresh round of military strikes against Iran, sources with direct knowledge of the planning told U.S. TV network CBS, even as diplomacy continued. No final decision on strikes had been reached as of Friday afternoon Washington time.
"Circumstances pertaining to Government" are keeping President Trump from attending his son Donald Trump Jr.'s wedding this weekend, he said in a social media post. The president had planned to spend Memorial Day weekend at his golf property in New Jersey but will now return to the White House. Some members of the U.S. military and intelligence community canceled their plans for the Memorial Day weekend in anticipation of possible strikes, several sources said. Defense and intelligence officials began updating recall rosters for U.S. installations overseas as tranches of troops stationed in the Middle East rotate out of theater, part of an effort to reduce the American military footprint in the region amid concern about possible Iranian retaliation. The U.S. and Iran have largely refrained from striking each other since a temporary ceasefire began in early April, buying time for indirect talks on a longer-term deal. White House spokesperson Anna Kelly told CBS News that Trump has "made his redlines abundantly clear: Iran can never possess a nuclear weapon, and they cannot keep their enriched uranium." "The President always maintains all options at all times, and it is the job of the Pentagon to be ready to execute any decision the Commander-in-Chief could make," Kelly said. "The President has been clear about the consequences if Iran fails to make a deal."Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps warned Wednesday that any further strikes against the country from the United States or Israel could widen the conflict beyond the Middle East, promising "crushing blows … in places you cannot even imagine." Tehran is reviewing the latest U.S. proposal for a possible agreement to end the nearly three-month war that has rattled energy markets and resulted in soaring fuel prices. The proposal was transmitted to Iran on Wednesday, according to a source who told CBS News that it was also accompanied by a warning that rejecting this so-called final offer would mean military strikes would resume.
"Iran is dying to make a deal," Trump said Friday. "We'll see what happens." The president said Wednesday he was prepared to give Tehran "a couple of days" to respond to the latest U.S. offer. He added that his team was "pretty impressed" by Iran's negotiators, but cautioned that the administration would need assurances substantial enough to prevent the conflict from reigniting. A response is imminently expected to be transmitted via Pakistan, which has been acting as an intermediary. Before boarding a flight to India, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that the U.S. expected to receive a response via the Pakistani field marshal, who has acted as the primary conduit of communication with Iran on behalf of the Trump administration. Rubio claimed that Trump preferred diplomacy to strikes and said progress had been made, though he indicated there was more work to be done. Rubio also referenced conversations from meetings in Sweden with NATO members about how to reopen the Strait of Hormuz through military force, an effort he referred to as "Plan B" if Iran did not agree to do so itself.
In Washington, House Republicans on Thursday abandoned an effort to hold a vote limiting President Trump's authority to conduct military operations against Iran after concluding they lacked the votes needed to stop the resolution from advancing.

US mulls new strikes on Iran: Media reports
AFP/23 May ,2026
The United States is weighing new military strikes on Iran, US media outlets reported on Friday. The reports, from CBS and Axios, come just hours after US President Donald Trump said he would not travel to attend his son’s wedding this weekend due to “circumstances pertaining to government” and his “love for the United States of America.”Trump said that it was “important for me to remain in Washington, DC, at the White House during this important period of time.”Both Axios and CBS said that a final decision on new strikes hasn’t been made. Negotiations are said to be ongoing, with Pakistan – which is mediating between the US and Iran – sending its military chief to Tehran in an attempt to seal a deal. The White House did not comment on the reports when AFP inquired about them. CBS said that a White House spokesperson, Anna Kelly, told them that “the President has been clear about the consequences if Iran fails to make a deal.” The White House earlier on Friday announced a change in Trump’s weekend plans, saying he would not travel to his New Jersey golf resort as planned but would stay in the US capital instead. Returning from a trip to New York state where he gave a speech Friday, Trump did not take questions from reporters who travel with him as he often does. Axios reported – citing two unnamed sources – that Trump has “grown increasingly frustrated about the negotiations with Iran over the past several days.”Axios said that his position through the week had shifted from favoring diplomacy toward ordering a strike. CBS reported, citing unnamed sources, that members of the US military and intelligence apparatus were cancelling holiday weekend plans in anticipation of possible strikes.

Ghalibaf tells Munir Iran military rebuilt during ceasefire, warns Trump against war
Al Arabiya English/23 May ,2026
Iran’s top negotiator and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf met Pakistani army chief Asim Munir in Tehran on Saturday, Iranian state media reported, as Islamabad steps up diplomatic efforts to help mediate between Iran and the United States.
Ghalibaf told Munir that Iran’s armed forces had rebuilt themselves during the ceasefire and would respond “more crushingly and bitterly” than on the first day of the war if US President Donald Trump “acts foolishly and restarts the war,” according to state media.
Munir also held separate meetings with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. His meeting with Araghchi was their second since the Pakistani army chief arrived in Tehran on Friday. During their first meeting, Munir and Araghchi exchanged views on the latest diplomatic initiatives aimed at preventing further escalation and ending the US-Iran war in talks that lasted late into the night, according to Iranian state media. Munir conveyed US messages to Tehran, sources told Al Arabiya. The US messages included assurances that disputed issues could be resolved later if Iran agrees to a deal, the sources said. The US messages to Tehran warned of “negative consequences” if Iran rejected an agreement, the sources added. Sources also told Al Arabiya that a Pakistani technical and legal delegation was departing for Tehran to join Munir in Tehran.

IRGC-trained operative plotted to assassinate Ivanka Trump: Report
Al Arabiya English/23 May ,2026
An alleged Iran-linked operative plotted to assassinate Ivanka Trump in retaliation for the 2020 US killing of Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani, the New York Post reported on Friday. Mohammad Baqer Saad Dawood al-Saadi, a 32-year-old Iraqi national, allegedly made a “pledge” to kill US President Donald Trump’s daughter and had a blueprint of her Florida home, the newspaper reported, citing sources. The New York Post said al-Saadi was targeting the president’s family in response to the US drone strike in Baghdad that killed Soleimani, the former head of Iran’s Quds Force. Entifadh Qanbar, a former deputy military attaché at the Iraqi Embassy in Washington, reportedly told the newspaper that al-Saadi had spoken of killing Ivanka Trump after Soleimani’s death. The report also said al-Saadi posted a map showing the Florida enclave where Ivanka Trump and her husband Jared Kushner own a home, alongside a threat in Arabic. Al-Saadi was arrested in Turkey on May 15 and extradited to the United States, where he is accused of involvement in 18 attacks and attempted attacks in Europe and the US.
The report described him as an alleged operative of both Kata’ib Hezbollah and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and said he was linked to attacks on US and Jewish targets, including incidents in Amsterdam, London, Toronto, Belgium and the Netherlands.
The newspaper also reported that al-Saadi allegedly used a religious travel agency as a cover to travel internationally and connect with militant cells. The New York Post said the White House did not respond to a request for comment. A lawyer for al-Saadi also did not respond to the newspaper, according to the report. Al-Saadi is being held in solitary confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.

France bans Israel’s Ben-Gvir from entering country, urges EU sanctions
Al Arabiya English/23 May ,2026
France has banned Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir from entering French territory, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said on Saturday, citing what he described as the minister’s “unacceptable actions” toward French and European citizens aboard the Global Sumud flotilla. “As of this day, Itamar Ben-Gvir is banned from accessing French territory,” Barrot said in a statement. This comes after the Israeli minister posted a video mocking detained activists from a Gaza-bound flotilla kneeling with their hands tied. The French minister said Paris disapproved of the flotilla’s approach, saying it “produces no useful effect and burdens diplomatic and consular services.” He also praised the professionalism and dedication of French diplomatic staff involved in the matter. However, Barrot said France could not tolerate French nationals being “threatened, intimidated, or brutalized in this way, especially by a public official.”He added that Ben-Gvir’s actions had been condemned by “a large number of Israeli government and political figures” and said they followed “a long list of shocking statements and actions, incitements to hatred and violence against Palestinians.”Barrot also called on the European Union to impose sanctions on Ben-Gvir, echoing a similar appeal made by his Italian counterpart. Ben-Gvir, a far-right member of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition government, has previously drawn international criticism over comments about Palestinians and the war in Gaza among other things.

Israeli strike kills Gaza boy and five police officers, police say

Reuters/23 May ,2026
An Israeli air strike targeting a Palestinian police post in northern Gaza on Saturday killed at least five police officers and a 13-year-old boy, and wounded several others, Gaza police said, as Israel intensified attacks on the Hamas-run force. In a statement, the Gaza police directorate, charged with maintaining security in areas of Gaza that fell under Hamas control after a ceasefire brokered by the US in October, said two missiles had hit a police post in the Tawam area. The Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Hamas’ nearly 10,000 police officers have emerged as a sticking point in talks to advance US President Donald Trump’s plan for Gaza. Hamas wants them included in a new police force envisaged under the plan. Israel objects to the involvement of any officers with Hamas affiliations. Those talks have also been deadlocked over Hamas’ refusal to lay down its weapons, as well as near-daily Israeli attacks in the enclave, which health officials say have killed more than 880 Palestinians since the truce. At least four Israeli soldiers have been killed in militant attacks over the same period.

Taiwan security chief says China deployed ‘over 100 vessels’ in regional waters
AFP/23 May ,2026
Taiwan’s security chief said Saturday that China has deployed more than 100 navy, coast guard and other vessels in regional waters stretching from the Yellow Sea to the South China Sea and Western Pacific. The deployment happened in the past few days after US President Donald Trump’s meeting with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping in Beijing, National Security Council chief Joseph Wu said on X. “In this part of the world,#China is the one & only PROBLEM wrecking the #StatusQuo & threatening regional peace & stability,” Wu said in the post. China claims Taiwan is part of its territory and has threatened to use force to seize it. Wu’s remarks came after Trump on Wednesday referred to “the Taiwan problem” when asked if he would speak to Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te about arms sales to the democratic island. “I’ll speak to him. I speak to everybody,” Trump said, adding that he had a great meeting with Xi during his state visit. “We’ll work on that, the Taiwan problem,” Trump said. A Taiwan security official told AFP on the condition of anonymity that Chinese vessels had been detected before the summit in Beijing, but that the numbers went above 100 in recent days.

China authorities lower mine blast death toll to 82: State media
LBCI/23 May ,2026
Chinese authorities said on Saturday that 82 people had died in a coal mine blast, revising an earlier death toll of 90, state media reported. "The incident has resulted in 82 deaths. Two people are still missing, and all-out search efforts are ongoing. Another 128 people were injured and hospitalised," said Chen Xiangyang, mayor of Changzhi city in Shanxi province, according to state broadcaster CCTV. AFP

Pakistan PM arrives for China visit overshadowed by Iran war
AFP/23 May ,2026
Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif arrived in China on Saturday, Chinese state media said, kicking off a four-day trip overshadowed by the Iran war. The Chinese foreign ministry has yet to confirm whether the pair will discuss the conflict in the Middle East, which Islamabad and Beijing have both sought to mediate in. US President Donald Trump has described the stop-start negotiations with Iran as teetering on the “borderline” between renewed attacks and a deal to end the war, which began with US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February and has engulfed the Middle East and roiled the global economy. Sharif “arrived in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, on Saturday to begin a four-day official visit to China,” state news agency Xinhua said, without elaborating.Earlier in the week, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said only that “issues of common concern” would be discussed. Guo has said that China would work with Pakistan to “make positive contributions to the early restoration of peace and stability in the Middle East.”“China supports Pakistan in playing a fair and balanced mediating role in promoting peace and ending the war,” he said. Pakistan has emerged as a central mediator between the United States and Iran, hosting historic face-to-face talks last month that failed to yield a lasting agreement. Its army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir was due in Tehran on Thursday, Iranian media reported. China has played a quieter role, shepherding phone calls and meetings with officials of affected Gulf countries. After high-profile talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing last week, Trump told Fox News the Chinese leader had offered Beijing’s help to reopen the Strait of Hormuz – a key oil route largely blocked since the war erupted. China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi urged Islamabad this month to “step up mediation efforts” in the Middle East, speaking to his Pakistani counterpart Ishaq Dar in a call. In the past two weeks, Beijing has hosted visits from Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Uganda confirms new Ebola cases, linked to DR Congo
AFP/23 May ,2026
Three new Ebola cases have been confirmed in Uganda, health authorities said Saturday, after the World Health Organization raised the risk from the deadly outbreak to the highest level for neighboring Democratic Republic of Congo. The new cases bring to five the total confirmed in Uganda since the current outbreak was discovered in the east African country on May 15. It named the patients as a Ugandan driver, a Ugandan health worker and a woman from the DRC, the epicenter of the outbreak, which the WHO has declared an international emergency.
“Three new cases of the Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) have been confirmed in the country,” the Ugandan health ministry said in a statement on X.
All three are alive.
On Friday, the WHO raised the risk from Ebola in the DRC to “very high.” The United Nations health agency said the regional risk in central Africa was “high,” though it maintained the global risk was “low.” Ebola is a deadly viral disease that spreads through direct contact with bodily fluids. It can cause severe bleeding and organ failure. There have been 82 confirmed cases and seven confirmed deaths in the DRC, alongside almost 750 suspected cases and 177 suspected deaths, the WHO said. The outbreak, which experts suspect was circulating under the radar for some time, is caused by the less common Bundibugyo strain, for which there are no approved vaccines or treatments. On Thursday, Uganda suspended all public transport to the DRC after confirming its first two cases – one infection and one death – involving Congolese nationals who crossed the border. It said the driver confirmed infected on Saturday had been at the wheel of the vehicle in which one of the ill Congolese nationals had travelled to Uganda.
The health worker was exposed to the virus when she was treating that Congolese patient.
‘Especially challenging’
The third new case, the ministry said, was a Congolese woman who had been treated in Kampala for abdominal pains and discharged “in good condition” on May 14. She tested positive for Ebola after she returned to the DRC. “All contacts linked to the confirmed cases have since been identified and are being closely monitored,” the health ministry said. WHO director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on Friday the situation in the DRC was “especially challenging.” Health workers were scrambling – in highly insecure, remote areas – to catch up with the spread of the virus and track down contacts of everyone thought to be infected, he said. The epicenter is in the eastern DRC – neighboring several African countries, including Uganda – which has been plagued for three decades by conflict involving a litany of armed groups. The DRC epidemic was first detected in Ituri province and has now spread to South Kivu, to an area controlled by the Rwanda-backed M23 militia. State services in rural areas of Ituri have been largely absent for decades and its inhabitants are increasingly blaming the Congolese government for the slow response to the outbreak. In South Kivu, M23 has never had to manage the response to a serious epidemic of a disease like Ebola, which has killed more than 15,000 people in Africa in the past half-century.

The Latest LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on 23-24 May/2026
President Trump: Please Do Not Leave the Iranian Regime in Place…We Waited More Than Four Decades for You, We Will Not Get Another Break
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/May 23, 2026
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/05/154737/
Iran's regime has been using two tactics. It says: "We need time. We are, because of the strikes, fractured and our leadership divided." Or, as Vice President J.D. Vance naively noted on its behalf, it says it does not know what it wants. "The Iranians aren't themselves quite clear in what direction they want to go," Vance, with a straight face, told reporters at the White House; "they are also just a fractured country."
That is exactly what the regime wants: that you are dumb enough to believe that. The Iranian regime knows precisely what it wants.
The supposed "moderates" will say, " Oh please wait for us. We are so fractured! We just want to win over the hardliners -- and we are ALMOST there!" This dish has been served up for years. It works.
If Iran's regime stays in power, it will break every agreement -- with full vengeance. The world cannot wait another 50 years, hoping for maybe another President Trump.
Do not listen to the liberal media outlets that are telling you to stop, de-escalate, or accept 20-year fake "moratoriums" or other idiotic half-measures.
Your trusted "negotiator," Pakistan, is a long-time supporter of Iran. Pakistan wants to see the regime survive.
President Trump: For the world, for humanity, for Western civilization, please do not leave this regime in place -- or a secular military one that is just as fierce. We cannot wait another 50 years for someone like you again.
The Iranian regime is playing its game again: drag everything out to stay in power until the American public grows tired of high gasoline prices; or until the November midterm elections. Drag the deals. Drag the talks. Drag the feedback. Drag the confusion. Or else: Put a deal out on the table and then take it back. Then put out another deal. Then another one. Before you know it, the West will be worn down.
The Iranian regime is playing its game again: drag everything out to stay in power until the American public grows tired of high gasoline prices; or until the November midterm elections, when the Democrats might win; or until 2029 when President Donald J. Trump's term finally ends and he is replaced, with luck, by an invertebrate.
Iran's regime has been using two tactics. It says: "We need time. We are, because of the strikes, fractured and our leadership divided." Or, as Vice President J.D. Vance naively noted on its behalf: it says it does not know what it wants. "The Iranians aren't themselves quite clear in what direction they want to go," Vance, with a straight face, told reporters at the White House; "they are also just a fractured country."
That is exactly what the regime wants: that you are dumb enough to believe that. The Iranian regime knows precisely what it wants. It wants to stay in power to continue its anti-Americanism, anti-Semitism, anti-Westernism and anti-its-own-people-ism. The regime wants to revive its nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles programs; restore its terrorist proxies, Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis; try to create another noose of death around Israel; threaten Europe and eventually the United States; suppress, kill and execute its own people, and continue to export its fanatic ideology and Islamist revolution.
The supposed "moderates" will say, " Oh please wait for us. We are so fractured! We just want to win over the hardliners -- and we are ALMOST there!" This dish has been served up for years. It works.
The second ploy is "Drag, Drag, Drag." Drag the deals. Drag the talks. Drag the feedback. Drag the confusion. Or else: Put a deal out on the table and then take it back. Then put out another deal. Then another one. Before you know it, the West will be worn down.
Please, President Trump: No president has ever had the courage to take action as you have done. You are different from everyone. It took more than four decades for someone like you to show up to save the world. Iran's regime has killed Americans, Arabs, Iranians. As the "top state sponsor of terrorism for 39 years in a row," Iran has been terrorizing half the planet.
If this regime stays in power, essentially nothing has been accomplished. All that you have historically done will be for naught. If Iran's regime stays in power, it will break every agreement -- with full vengeance. The world cannot wait another 50 years hoping for maybe another President Trump.
The regime -- with help from China, Russia, and North Korea -- will restart its nuclear program. It will impose tolls in the Strait of Hormuz. There will be no one with the guts to stop it. The regime will ramp up assassinations abroad, support its proxies, attack Israel more aggressively, and race again toward nuclear weapons.
The regime is hoping to wait out your term.
Please, President Trump, do not leave this regime in place or replace it with an equally brutal military one. Continue the economic pressure. Do not give the regime relief. Arm and support the Iranian people so they can stand up and not be rounded up, tortured and executed again. Do not listen to the liberal media outlets that are telling you to stop, de-escalate, or accept 20-year fake "moratoriums" or other idiotic half-measures.
Your trusted "negotiator," Pakistan, is a long-time supporter of Iran (here, here, here and here). It wants to see the regime survive.
President Trump: For the world, for humanity, for Western civilization, please do not leave this regime in place -- or a secular military one that is just as fierce. We cannot wait another 50 years for someone like you again.
**Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a political scientist, Harvard-educated analyst, and board member of Harvard International Review. He has authored several books on the US foreign policy. He can be reached at dr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu
**Follow Majid Rafizadeh on X (formerly Twitter)
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22538/president-trump-please-do-not-leave-the-iranian
© 2026 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Putin goes to Beijing: Why the Russo-Chinese relationship matters
Cornelia Meyer/Al Arabiya English/23 May ,2026
President Xi Jinping has become somewhat the “host with the mostest,” because foreign leaders visit him as though walking through a revolving door. President Donald Trump went to Beijing last week. Russia’s President Vladimir Putin followed him hot on the heels earlier this week and Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif will arrive over the weekend. (President Asif Ali Zardari had already paid a visit at the end of April.) Since the beginning of the year, Spain’s Pedro Sanchez, Canada’s Mark Carney, the UAE’s Sheikh Khaled bin Mohammed, Germany’s Friedrich Merz and others had visited the Middle Kingdom.
China has always seen herself as the country in the middle (literal translation of the Chinese characters) or more commonly referred to itself as the Middle Kingdom. China takes an ever more prominent position on the world stage, which should not be further surprising given it has become the second largest economy in the world. China has to manage the relationship with the largest economy in the world very carefully, which was reflected by Trump’s visit with Xi. It had turned out to be as constructive as could have been hoped for.
Other than that, China wants to stand in good stead with all of the markets for its goods, as well as its suppliers of energy and other industrial inputs. More importantly, China wants to see itself in the center of an emerging multipolar world. The Middle Kingdom started on that journey when then President Jiang Zeimin founded the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in 2001 – a Eurasian pact that has both an economic and a military dimension. It came as little surprise that the People’s Republic bought into the concept of the BRICS. The idea was developed by the then Goldman Sachs Chief Economist Jim O’Neill in the 2000s. The Belt and Road Initiative can be seen as an economic extension of that philosophy. The G20 serves as Beijing’s conduit to OECD nations. Such is the backdrop against which President Putin went to see his Chinese counterpart.
Russia is an important neighbor for China. They share a long communal border, which means that both governments have an interest in stability in what is arguably their most important near neighbor. They also take a keen interest in their relationship.
Putin’s visit coincided with the 25th anniversary of the Sino-Russian Treaty of Friendship.
Energy loomed large: China is the biggest importer of hydrocarbons in the world and Russia is its biggest supplier. Twenty percent of oil imports hail from North of the border. Russia is also China’s largest supplier of natural gas via pipelines and with LNG.
The People’s Republic and Russia had signed a construction agreement for the behemoth 50 billion cubic meters Power of Siberia 2 pipeline project, which is intended to run from the Yamal Peninsula via Siberia and Mongolia to China. Russia is keen to sign on the dotted line, because it has needed additional buyers for its hydrocarbons ever since it was put under sanctions by Europe and the US because of the Ukraine war. China was cautious because it wants to buy at the lowest possible price and is also cognizant not to be too dependent on one single country when it comes to its energy supplies.
Russia hoped that the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz provided it with an opportunity to close the deal: China gets one third of its crude oil and 25 percent of its LNG from the other side of the Strait of Hormuz. Still China has huge crude oil inventories and can buy LNG from Asian suppliers and the US. As a result the Power of Siberia contract was not yet signed during this trip – much to the chagrin of Moscow.
Bilateral trade has grown by 20 percent during the first four month of the year and we can expect this year’s volume to exceed the USD 245 billion of 2024. The difference here is that while China is Russia’s primary trade partner, Russia is just one among many trading partners for China, whose most important bilateral relationship is with the United States.
Putin came in toe with eight ministers, the central bank governor, several vice ministers and the CEOs of Gazprom, Rosneft, Rosatom as well as some other business leaders. The delegations signed a good 40 agreements. The leaders reiterated their stance that the Iran conflict needed to be ended and reaffirmed their commitment to a multipolar world. The Ukraine war was not mentioned and the US Golden Dome missile defense system was criticized as a “threat to global strategic stability.”All in all, Russia needs China more than vice versa, especially in light of the crippling OECD sanctions. However, China does understand that Russia is its near-neighbor, biggest supplier of energy and its best bet for access to the Arctic, which will become increasingly important when the ice thaws due to global warming. At the same time both countries share a wish to further a multipolar world order and position themselves prominently therein. China and Russia maintain good relations with Iran, which in the case of China, may become important when looking for an off ramp to the conflict.
From the perspective of both President Xi and Putin, the visit was a success, although Russia did not get as far as it wanted with the all-important Power of Siberia 2 pipeline project.

China's Way of Capitalizing on Opportunity
Dr. Amal Moussa/Asharq Al-Awsat/May 23/2026
The culture of pragmatism has long been associated with the United States of America. With the current president, Donald Trump, we almost forgot this association, given the prevalence of international dominance rhetoric. This has made the White House's "interactions" with world events and Washington's "role" in creating and "directing" events in recent years a distinct and unique chapter in the book of American foreign policy. However, what is typically connected to a nation's culture remains deeply rooted, even if it disappears from view and becomes imperceptible. It appears to us that Trump's recent state visit to China is an example of the deep-seated culture of pragmatism, which the President himself invoked to manage what has come to be called the "Iranian crisis."
Just a few months ago, the White House was at the peak of tension in its relationship with China, and a trade war was waged, employing the deadly weapon that disrupted China's trade balance: tariffs. The visit generated considerable discussion, with the US President adopting a remarkably different and striking diplomatic demeanor. He was uncharacteristically diplomatically disciplined and respectful of strict Chinese protocol. We did not see the US president improvising, heedless of potential gaffes. He delivered a speech that fostered friendship, closeness, and de-escalation, abandoning the tone of challenge and confrontation that had characterized the relationship with China over the past period. It was here, specifically, that the world saw the pragmatic Trump, eager to de-escalate the situation in the Middle East and overcome the Iranian crisis by allying with a rising and powerful nation, with all that this implies in terms of trade concessions in the "tariff war."Thus, we observe a qualitative shift in the White House's rhetoric towards China, which was previously considered a threat to US national security. Moreover, the harsh increase in tariffs was framed as protecting American products. The specific choice of the trade issue in confronting China stems from the fact that trade is the backbone of the Chinese economy. In contrast to this trade war, which has been evident since 2018 - that is, since Trump's first term - anyone who believes it is based on a rupture between the two countries misunderstands the balance of relations. There is what is called "economic interdependence" and "stability of global supply chains," both of which strongly characterize their exchanges: the United States relies on China for electronic components, manufacturing, and rare earths, while China, for its part, is the largest consumer of US agricultural products, such as grains and others. Furthermore, the trade war did not negate mediation efforts between them during crises. We believe that a deeper understanding of this point, often obscured by the trade war with China, is crucial to break free from ready-made templates for interpreting political relations, and also to avoid exaggerating the relationship between China and Iran. Among powerful nations, or those of comparable strength, even if they contend and each power creates a camp of nations in its interest, in serious international moments, the rapprochement that was brewed in the secret kitchen of the club of powers will have its effect, however slight. The question is: In whose fundamental interest is Washington's pursuit of rapprochement and de-escalation of tensions with Beijing; and how will China play its winning cards without letting a losing card slip?
There is no doubt that China is currently perplexed about how to manage this opportunity without any loss. The United States' recourse to China will not be without a price, and China is well aware of this. Indeed, it understands China's preferred compensation: a reduction in tariffs and a complete, even if subtly unstated, disengagement from the Taiwan issue.
The second question: Supposing the United States offers the necessary concessions to resolve the Strait of Hormuz crisis and weaken Iran, would this compensation be enough for China to completely turn its back on Iran, given that it is the primary buyer of Iranian oil, purchasing it in Chinese currency? And can the "Iran card" truly be dropped, with all that implies for abandoning the Middle East, a vital region in the world? So far, China appears to be winning, and it is certainly concerned with its own interests, but in the Chinese way and its understanding of long-term interests. China is a future power, and every step it takes calculates both the present and the future, in addition to its approach to international relations differing from that of the White House.
The ball is in Beijing's court, and the task is to pass it, adopting a tactic of "maximum profit" without loss or uncalculated risk.

A Difficult American Victory and an Impossible Iranian One

Hazem Saghieh/Asharq Al-Awsat/May 23/2026
It could be said, until further notice, that in the event of a resumption of the American-Israeli war with Iran, whatever form it takes, an American victory would be difficult and an Iranian victory would be impossible. Disregarding wishful thinking and the marketing of rosy narratives, we find extensive explanations of why an American victory is difficult presented in Western commentary. Among the reasons are the improvised planning for this war and the extent of the United States’ economic and electoral pain tolerance, to say nothing of what the Iranians call “steadfastness,” which is sustained by smuggling networks and Russian and Chinese assistance, that also raises the costs of defeating Tehran. Accordingly, the distance between American-Israeli military successes and their translation into political gains is unlikely to be short, while Iran’s unyielding intransigence does not suggest the contrary. Nonetheless, the theory that bestows victory on Iran is far more misguided than the theory that is optimistic about an easy American victory. Those making this claim insist on their view despite the catastrophic military blows that Iran has been dealt and the destruction these attacks have left, in addition to the enormous economic setbacks Iran has suffered, the difficulties it now faces in exporting oil and, consequently, obtaining hard currency to finance imports, as well as the death of its military and political top brass, along with its scientists, the obscure conditions of its Supreme Leader, and the near-confirmed reports of infighting among competing and conflicting factions of the ruling establishment.
Even if the Iranian regime were to “win”- in the sense that it manages to remain “steadfast” and survives the war, or according to the principle that America’s failure to achieve a decisive victory amounts to a crushing defeat- Iran would not be able to sustain this victory after the war.
In light of the remarkable extent to which the regime’s conditions have deteriorated, feeding ninety million people, meeting their most basic needs, and surviving predictable questions and demands for accountability by the public would become challenges that the regime will not manage to confront. The regime’s handling of recent popular protests adds credence to the assumption that the challenges will intensify in the postwar period. Despite the closed nature of its political system, internet shutdowns, and Iran’s tendency to deny reality, its government acknowledged on January 2, through state media and statements attributed to institutions for martyrs, veterans, and others, that 3,117 people had been killed in a few days between the end of 2025 and the start of 2026. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights reported last April that Iran had executed 21 people and arrested more than four thousand. Reports by groups linked to the Iranian opposition, meanwhile, have spoken of between five thousand and seven thousand deaths and the detention of over 26,000.
Under these circumstances, it does not help to draw parallels between the war in Iran and the 1956 war in Egypt, when Gamal Abdel Nasser suffered military defeat but attained a political victory. At the time, both the United States and the Soviet Union firmly backed Cairo; China and Russia are not providing comparable support today, be it in terms of relative power and influence or how far they are willing to go in support of Iran. For his part, Nasser was part of a movement that had been in the ascension within the broader context of decolonization after the end of WW2, and that does not apply to Iran. Whichever way one looks at current global conditions, with the alliances and military and political balances that ensue from them, the factors that had once allowed exhausted, occupied, divided, or near-collapsed states to emerge victorious (Vietnam in its struggle against France and later the United States, of China in its second war against Japan, and of Afghanistan in the face of the Soviet invasion) are simply not there anymore.
Moreover, the indications that Iranian victory is impossible have already begun to appear outside the country, in the wider region where victories and defeats are ultimately translated.
In Lebanon, despite all the yelling and the furious insistence on relying on Tehran to negotiate on behalf of the Lebanese, the Lebanese have proceeded with direct negotiations with Israel in the United States, breaking a longstanding taboo. With the formation of the government led by Ali al-Zaidi, who also emphasizes the need to “restrict armament to the hands of the state,” the factions in Iraq loyal to Tehran seem to have been the biggest losers, with Nouri al-Maliki seeming to have been the biggest of the big losers after parliament withheld confidence from his “State of Law Coalition” candidates for the Interior and Education ministries. Maliki himself had previously failed to return to the premiership, and the “Coordination Framework” now seems set to fall apart after the maestro of the orchestra that had distributed “shares” within the state was weakened.
Esmail Qaani’s visit to Baghdad during the negotiations on the government formation failed to prevent these setbacks, despite that, as commander of the Quds Force, he is the successor to Qasem Soleimani whose demands were never defied.
Meanwhile, American security units arrested Mohammed Baqer al-Saadi, a commander of Kataib Hezbollah whom Washington accuses of having planned attacks against American and Jewish targets in Europe, Canada, and the United States. Through the operation, the United States effectively introduced Iraq into the hunt for such leaders- a “game” of war that Israelis have become famous for. Some would also add the marked decline in the military activity of Yemen’s Houthis. And all of this follows the elimination of Iran’s ability to project influence from Syria with the fall of Bashar al-Assad. How can there be victory without an imperial sphere of influence?

Tehran’s Decision-Making Dilemma

Mohammed al-Rumaihi/Asharq Al-Awsat/May 23/2026
In analyzing Iran’s position, it is not enough to say that what appears to be a dispute within the ruling system is merely a distribution of roles. This phrase, often used by some in our media, does not explain everything on the ground.
It is true that closed regimes are skilled at producing political theater, and sometimes use apparent contradictions to widen their margin for maneuver. But reading the Iranian experience from within, and through the testimonies of some of its own figures, shows that the matter is deeper than stagecraft. There is an old struggle between diplomacy and the field, between the state and the revolution, between those seeking a settlement that preserves the system, and those who see any settlement as a postponed defeat. In Mohammad Javad Zarif’s memoirs, especially in his book The Resilience of Diplomacy, a striking image emerges of a man who represented Iran at the United Nations, only to discover that his government, during the Ahmadinejad era, did not treat him as the primary channel of decision-making.
Instead, it opened side channels with the second-ranking official at the mission. That episode reveals a culture of governance built on multiple centers of power, suspicion of the other, even within the same camp, and a preference for the security or ideological channel over the official one when the issue is sensitive. If a later foreign minister, and a former ambassador to the United Nations, felt exposed before his own government, how can one assume that Iran’s decisions always come from one room and one mind? Hossein Amir-Abdollahian’s book “Sobhe Sham” adds another dimension. The man presents himself as a witness to Iran’s presence in Syria, but he reveals, whether intentionally or not, that Iranian foreign policy is not made by the foreign ministry.
The ministry may propose, but there is the field, the Revolutionary Guards, and the calculations of doctrine and influence. In such a bureaucratic structure, the minister is not the decision-maker.
More often, he becomes its explainer or defender before the outside world. Diplomacy here is not the factory of policy, but its verbal facade. That is why Iranian discourse mixes promises of calm with acts of escalation, and why the state appears to say one thing and do the opposite.
The difference between a “distribution of roles” and a “real dispute” is very important. A distribution of roles means there is one center, and that multiple voices are playing an agreed tune. A real dispute means each institution is trying to pull the decision toward its own logic. That is what is happening in Iran today. The presidency thinks about an exhausted domestic front, sanctions and fear of a social explosion. The foreign ministry thinks about negotiations and reducing pressure. The IRGC thinks about deterrence, prestige, networks of influence and interests. The ideological establishment thinks about the survival of the narrative on which the system was founded. In major crises, these minds do not always complement one another. They clash, and decision-making stalls. That is the scene now taking shape before us.
The episode everyone knows, when Iran’s current president, Masoud Pezeshkian, came out to say that Iran would not fire on “friendly” Gulf states, only for missiles to continue hours later, may be explained by some as a calculated double message. But strategic logic says that double messages in wartime are not skill, they are danger. A state that wants to reassure its neighbors does not reassure them with words and then terrify them with action.
That not only weakens Gulf trust but also undermines the trust of any international mediator trying to build an agreement that can be implemented. An agreement with Iran does not require a single signature. The more serious question is this: who has the right to obstruct after the signature? Can the government bind the field? Can the foreign ministry guarantee the Revolutionary Guards? Can the presidency control the arms? Can the supreme leadership, in a moment of turmoil, prevent every center of power from protecting its own interests? This is where negotiations become complicated, because the other side is not only looking for a written text. It is looking for an authority capable of implementing that text. This does not deny that some contradiction is deliberate and used for negotiation. But it confirms that what is deliberate can turn into chaos when centers of arms, money and legitimacy multiply. In normal systems, politicians disagree and then institutions settle the matter. In the Iranian case, the institutions themselves disagree, and each claims to be the faithful guardian of the revolution. Therefore, it is not enough to ask: What does Tehran want? The more accurate question is: Which Tehran is speaking, which Tehran has its finger on the trigger, and which Tehran can honor what it has promised?
That is why the assumption of a third military round does not seem remote, not because it is inevitable, but because the structure of Iranian decision-making repeatedly produces miscalculation.
The 12-day war, then the 40-day war, not only exposed the limits of power. They also exposed the limits of political discipline inside the system. When the military outbids the politician, when the politician fears being accused of weakness, and when revolutionary rhetoric overtakes rational calculation, escalation becomes an easier path than review.In the end, the dispute at the top of the Iranian pyramid is not a media detail. It is the key to understanding the entire predicament. The scene looks like this: Iran does not negotiate with the world with one mind, does not fight with one hand, and does not reassure its neighbors with one voice. That is the essence of the danger. When the head and the arm are in conflict, agreements become fragile, war becomes closer, and the entire region is left suspended between the promise of diplomacy and the missile of the field. That is the trust gap that no speech or statement can bridge, no matter how eloquent it sounds.Final word: A state that speaks with more than one voice cannot build a lasting peace.

Selected Face Book & X tweets for May 23/2026
Hussain Abdul-Hussain
Palestinians have been kicking up dust for decades, furious over what they call the ongoing Judaization of the Abrahamic Mosque, known to Israelis as the Cave of the Patriarchs. The irony is that this shrine contains the tomb of the man who gave his name to Israel: the biblical Jacob. If Jews are not permitted to “Judaize” the tomb of Israel’s own namesake, what exactly do calls for equal rights for Muslims and Jews actually mean? (The imagined coexistence model of the rubbish Ottoman Empire) I personally doubt the historicity of Abraham or any of the other figures supposedly buried at this spot. In Islamic tradition, the shrine only rose to prominence during the Umayyad period in the seventh century CE—roughly 2,700 years after the presumed time of Abraham. The claim is further undermined by the tendency to credit dynasty-founding patriarchs -- Abraham, Alexander the Great, Imam Ali, and others -- with multiple tombs in different cities.What we can say with confidence is that the fortified compound of the Abrahamic Mosque/Cave of the Patriarchs was built around the same time as the Western Wall, near the beginning of the Common Era. Islamic travelers begin mentioning the site as early as the 12th century CE. For a time, this hill appears to have rivaled Mount Moriah/Al-Aqsa in importance, until Jerusalem eventually prevailed (David thus moved his capital from Hebron to Jerusalem). The two sites were mythologically constructed along parallel lines: both centered on a sacred cave beneath the shrine. In Hebron the cave is a grave; in Jerusalem it is the dwelling place of undefined human souls.Now, the name Hebron itself. The Semitic root ḥ-b-r conveys the idea of connection. In Hebrew it refers to human relationships: khaver (friend), khevra (society). In Arabic, the same root appears in khabour (connection between two objects); in Egyptian dialect, the ḥ is softened and becomes kobri (bridge, connecting two banks of a river). The identical root also appears in the Khyber Pass—the mountainous border crossing between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Quranic Arabic vocalizes the root as ḥ-b-r to mean “Jewish scholar” or “rabbi,” appearing in the plural as aḥbār al-Yahūd. In Islamic tradition the root also surfaces as Khaybar, the name of the (largely legendary) Jewish stronghold conquered by Muslim armies. The city’s Arabic name, al-Khalil (or Khalil al-Rahman), is a direct reference to Abraham as “the friend of God,” with khalil being the synonym of Khaver/Khevron. Both Jews and Arabs continued to use the name ḥabron for the city well into the mid-18th century, as documented in Nabulsi’s travel account. The Quran gives Abraham considerable attention: his defiance of his father’s idolatry, his willingness to sacrifice his son (spared at the last moment), and the building of the Kaaba in Mecca with his son Ishmael. The other figures associated with him receive far less prominence. Ishmael helps build the Kaaba; Isaac is described as a great prophet who succeeds Abraham; Jacob appears, but never in explicit connection with “Israel,” a name mentioned only twice as a person and 39 times in the phrase Bani Israel (the Israelites). Abraham’s wives, Sarah and Hagar, are entirely absent from the Quran, and so are the other wives Rivka and Leah. The Abrahamic Mosque/Cave of the Patriarchs contains the tombs of all these figures. The Quran mentions only the four men, not the women, suggesting that Muslims took over an existing Jewish or Christian shrine. Notably, the tombs of the women were left intact. This is most likely because the Muslims who assumed control were Sufis, whose practices diverged sharply from mainstream Sunni Islam. All four schools of Sunni jurisprudence prohibit prayer at shrines containing tombs. Palestinians are overwhelmingly Shafi‘i, which makes it improbable that the Abrahamic shrine ever functioned as an active Palestinian mosque (a mosque being a place of prayer). Sufi Islam, however, remained dominant across the Mediterranean basin until the 19th century, when a more austere Sunni orthodoxy reasserted itself. Even after their nominal conversion to Shafi‘i Sunnism, Palestinians preserved the tombs and simply ceased praying around them. Then Israel became independent and treated the site as one of the most sacred places in Judaism. Suddenly the spot regained importance for Palestinians—despite the fact that, even on strictly religious grounds, it holds far less significance, nearing irrelevance, in Islam than it does in Judaism. While half the figures interred in the cave are mentioned in the Quran, they appear only as history parables of faith, not as part of Islam’s sacred heritage.