English LCCC Newsbulletin For Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News
& Editorials
For May 24/2026
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news
The Bulletin's Link on the
lccc Site
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2026/english.may24.26.htm
News Bulletin Achieves Since
2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Click On
The Below Link To Join Elias Bejjaninews whatsapp group
https://chat.whatsapp.com/FPF0N7lE5S484LNaSm0MjW
اضغط
على الرابط في
أعلى للإنضمام
لكروب
Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group
Elias Bejjani/Click on
the below link to subscribe to my youtube channel
الياس
بجاني/اضغط
على الرابط في
أسفل للإشتراك في
موقعي ع اليوتيوب
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAOOSioLh1GE3C1hp63Camw
Bible Quotations For today
Pentecost Sunday: If
you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will ask the Father, and he
will give you another Advocate, to be with you for ever.
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint
John 14/15-26/:”‘If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will ask
the Father, and he will give you another Advocate, to be with you for ever. This
is the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees
him nor knows him. You know him, because he abides with you, and he will be in
you. ‘I will not leave you orphaned; I am coming to you. In a little while the
world will no longer see me, but you will see me; because I live, you also will
live. On that day you will know that I am in my Father, and you in me, and I in
you. They who have my commandments and keep them are those who love me; and
those who love me will be loved by my Father, and I will love them and reveal
myself to them.’ Judas (not Iscariot) said to him, ‘Lord, how is it that you
will reveal yourself to us, and not to the world?’ Jesus answered him, ‘Those
who love me will keep my word, and my Father will love them, and we will come to
them and make our home with them. Whoever does not love me does not keep my
words; and the word that you hear is not mine, but is from the Father who sent
me. ‘I have said these things to you while I am still with you. But the
Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you
everything, and remind you of all that I have said to you.
Titles For Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related
News & Editorials published on 23-24 May/2026
Iran, US and mediator Pakistan report
progress in talks on ending war
Rubio says ‘chance’ of Iran accepting deal as soon as Saturday
Iran offers to reopen Strait of Hormuz in exchange for US compensation, sources
say
Iran weighs peace proposal, accuses US of 'excessive demands'
Trump tells CBS that US, Iran 'getting a lot closer' to agreement
Report: US prepares for new military strikes against Iran
US mulls new strikes on Iran: Media reports
Ghalibaf tells Munir Iran military rebuilt during ceasefire, warns Trump against
war
IRGC-trained operative plotted to assassinate Ivanka Trump: Report
France bans Israel’s Ben-Gvir from entering country, urges EU sanctions
Israeli strike kills Gaza boy and five police officers, police say
Taiwan security chief says China deployed ‘over 100 vessels’ in regional waters
China authorities lower mine blast death toll to 82: State media
Pakistan PM arrives for China visit overshadowed by Iran war
Uganda confirms new Ebola cases, linked to DR Congo
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous
Reports And News published
on 23-24 May/2026
Iran, US and mediator Pakistan report
progress in talks on ending war
Rubio says ‘chance’ of Iran accepting deal as soon as Saturday
Iran offers to reopen Strait of Hormuz in exchange for US compensation, sources
say
Iran weighs peace proposal, accuses US of 'excessive demands'
Trump tells CBS that US, Iran 'getting a lot closer' to agreement
Report: US prepares for new military strikes against Iran
US mulls new strikes on Iran: Media reports
Ghalibaf tells Munir Iran military rebuilt during ceasefire, warns Trump against
war
IRGC-trained operative plotted to assassinate Ivanka Trump: Report
France bans Israel’s Ben-Gvir from entering country, urges EU sanctions
Israeli strike kills Gaza boy and five police officers, police say
Taiwan security chief says China deployed ‘over 100 vessels’ in regional waters
China authorities lower mine blast death toll to 82: State media
Pakistan PM arrives for China visit overshadowed by Iran war
Uganda confirms new Ebola cases, linked to DR Congo
Titles For The Latest
English LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on 23-24 May/2026
President Trump: Please Do Not Leave the Iranian Regime in Place…We
Waited More Than Four Decades for You, We Will Not Get Another Break/Dr. Majid
Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/May 23, 2026Putin goes to Beijing: Why the
Russo-Chinese relationship matters/Cornelia Meyer/Al Arabiya English/23 May
,2026
China's Way of Capitalizing on Opportunity/Dr. Amal Moussa/Asharq Al-Awsat/May
23/2026
A Difficult American Victory and an Impossible Iranian One/Hazem Saghieh/Asharq
Al-Awsat/May 23/2026
Tehran’s Decision-Making Dilemma/Mohammed al-Rumaihi/Asharq Al-Awsat/May 23/2026
Selected Face Book & X tweets for May 23/2026
Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials
published
on 22-23 May/2026
Deifying Politicians Corrupts Them and
Turns Their Followers into Sheep and Slaves
Elias Bejjani/May 22/ 2026
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/05/154670/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7YiqrDWGDs
One of the most dangerous, disastrous, and destructive misfortunes facing a
large part of our "forgiving" Lebanese people—as the late Philemon Wehbe called
them in a Rahbani play—is that some people sanctify politicians and clergymen.
They treat them as followers, henchmen, slaves, and tools. This submissiveness
does not serve the leaders; instead, it corrupts their minds, fills them with
illusions of grandeur, and infects them with a pathological arrogance that
detaches them from their community and their humanity.
As a result of this unhealthy, unfaithful, and deeply humiliating deification,
these leaders turn into greedy, insatiable, and tyrannical creatures. In their
actions, they surpass the cruelty of wild predators. Here, the Holy Bible’s
warning against trusting humans and raising them to the status of gods rings
true: "Do not put your trust in princes, nor in a son of man, in whom there is
no help. His spirit departs, he returns to his earth; in that very day his plans
perish." (Psalm 146:3-4).
An objective review of all Lebanese politicians and leaders—the owners of family
and commercial "party corporations," both Muslim and Christian—reveals a clear
fact to anyone who still has their sanity, critical thinking, and a living
conscience. These leaders—and by that, I mean "all of them means all of
them"—are eternal on their feudal thrones. They never think of leaving them
unless they are forced to by death. Then their sons, daughters, or family
members inherit the leadership of these shops that are falsely called political
parties, without any exception.
Worst of all, most of these leaders, especially the Maronites among them, have
been sanctified and deified in total violation of all Christian values and
principles. In a supreme heresy, these corrupt individuals are portrayed as if
they were righteous saints. Praise poems are sung for them, and foolish chants
like "With our soul and blood, we sacrifice ourselves for you" are shouted. This
empty talk perfectly summarizes this state of voluntary slavery. These people
have forgotten the clear divine teaching: "Cursed is the man who trusts in man
and makes flesh his strength, whose heart departs from the Lord." (Jeremiah
17:5).
We boast—or rather, the majority boasts with disgusting arrogance and foolish
pride—that we are among the smartest, most civilized, and cultured people in the
world. We blindly repeat empty slogans like: "We gave the alphabet to the world,
and Hannibal, Cadmus, and Gibran came from our blood." Meanwhile, in reality, we
practice the exact opposite with a deadly selfishness and a shameful
short-sightedness. In the twenty-first century, we accept living submissively
among piles of garbage, unable even to clean our own country!
At the same time, we see large groups praising and glorifying the Iranian
occupier that is devouring our country and stealing our sovereignty. They
sanctify its invading weapons and mini-states, letting it destroy the entity and
message of Lebanon over skulls that are empty of everything except hypocrisy,
pretense, and submissiveness. Where do these people stand regarding the truth
and freedom given to us by the Creator? Jesus Christ warned us clearly:"And you
shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32) . How can
anyone who accepts the slavery of men ever taste freedom or truth?.
Because he who stays silent about his illness will be killed by it, we ask: How
can we correct the actions and alliances of any politician or clergyman if we
have already raised them to the level of gods and accepted the roles of henchmen
and sheep for ourselves?!
Indeed, our homeland, Lebanon, is in existential danger that threatens its
entity, identity, and message. It is our sacred duty to resist and push back the
wild beasts, whether they are local or foreign. But to be able to face them, we
must first free ourselves from the disease of dependency and blind followership,
and stop trying to be overly clever while hiding behind hypocrisy.
The most important thing today is to repent, make amends for the sin of
sanctifying humans and deifying politicians and clergymen, and bring forward
humble, faithful, and non-narcissistic leaders. True leadership in Christian
thought is service and sacrifice, not arrogance and enslavement, in line with
what Jesus Christ said:
"You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and those who are
great exercise authority over them. Yet it shall not be so among you; but
whoever desires to become great among you, let him be your servant." (Matthew
20:25-26).
Only then can the journey of a thousand miles toward salvation begin...
Otherwise, it is a hopeless case.
Saint Rita of Cascia: The Saint of the Impossible, and a Beacon
of Forgiveness and Endurance
Elias Bejjani/May 22/2026
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/05/143579/
In the heart of the Catholic tradition, few saints have touched as many hearts
or inspired as much devotion as Saint Rita of Cascia. Known as the Saint of the
Impossible, her life was not marked by miracles of grandeur, but by a quiet,
relentless perseverance through suffering, betrayal, loss, and spiritual trial.
Her sanctity lies in her unwavering faith, her ability to forgive the
unforgivable, and her profound commitment to peace and reconciliation.
A Life of Pain Transformed into Holiness
Born in 1381 in Roccaporena, a small village near Cascia in Italy, Rita was
raised in a devout Christian family. From childhood, she longed to join a
convent, but her parents arranged her marriage at the age of 12 to Paolo
Mancini, a violent and abusive man. Despite the hardship, Rita remained
faithful, praying for his conversion. Eventually, her patience bore fruit: Paolo
changed, only to be murdered later in a political feud.
As a widow and mother of two sons, Rita then faced another trial—her sons wanted
to avenge their father’s death. Fearing they would commit murder, Rita prayed
that God would intervene. Both sons died shortly afterward of natural causes,
and though heartbroken, Rita believed it was God’s way of saving their souls.
Having lost her husband and children, Rita sought to enter the Augustinian
convent in Cascia. Initially rejected due to her background, she was eventually
accepted after miraculous circumstances and acts of peacemaking between feuding
families. There, she lived a life of deep prayer, penance, and charity.
Marked by Christ’s Wounds
In the last years of her life, Rita received a mystical wound on her
forehead—believed to be a partial stigmata, symbolizing her union with Christ’s
suffering. For fifteen years, she bore the painful wound as a mark of her love
and sacrifice. She died on May 22, 1457, and her body remains incorrupt to this
day in the Basilica of Cascia.
She was canonized in 1900 by Pope Leo XIII, who recognized her extraordinary
sanctity and spiritual legacy.
Her Enduring Message: Peace, Forgiveness, and Hope
Saint Rita is revered not for political power or public preaching, but for her
quiet heroism—as a wife, mother, widow, nun, and intercessor. Her legacy lives
on in the hearts of those who suffer, especially women in difficult marriages,
victims of violence, and people praying for reconciliation.
She embodies values that transcend time:
Forgiveness: She forgave her husband’s killers and even prayed for the salvation
of her sons’ souls.
Endurance in Suffering: She did not escape pain—she transformed it into a path
of holiness.
Peacebuilding: Rita reconciled enemy families and brought healing where
vengeance once reigned.
Faith Against All Odds: Even when all seemed lost, she trusted in God’s plan.
Why We Still Need Saint Rita Today
In a world plagued by division, domestic strife, and despair, Saint Rita reminds
us that even the most broken life can become a vessel of grace. Her title, Saint
of the Impossible, is not a legend—it is a testimony to what faith, humility,
and perseverance can achieve when united with love.
Conclusion
On this day, May 22, as the Church celebrates Saint Rita of Cascia, we are
called to reflect on her life—not as distant history, but as a living witness of
Christ’s redemptive love. Let us ask her intercession for peace in our families,
healing in our hearts, and hope amid our most impossible trials.
“Saint Rita, advocate of the impossible, teach us to forgive, to hope, and to
never give up on the power of love.”
A Video
Link to an interview with Journalist Mohamed Salam in which he
demends "Foreign Guardianship" to Save Sunnis from Elimination!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24zU-5ZMoh0
May 23/2026
In a fiery, unfiltered, and highly provocative episode of #PowerOfLogic (#قوة_المنطق)
hosted by journalist Abdul Rahman Dernayka on the El Haweyah platform, veteran
political writer and journalist Mohamed Salam breaks all red lines, dropping
political bombshells that are set to spark widespread controversy across Lebanon
and the region.
With unprecedented boldness, Salam delivers a brutal reality check on the
Lebanese political scene, addressing highly sensitive and critical issues:
The Political Demise of Sunnis in Lebanon: Why does Salam believe the Sunni sect
has undergone a systematic elimination of its leaders, leaving it "orphaned" and
desperately searching for a foreign "guardian" or sponsor?
Hezbollah's Grip on the State: How has Hezb**ollah completely infiltrated and
hijacked the very "spinal cord" of the state, including its security and
judicial institutions? What is the truth behind the unchecked weapons smuggling
through the coast of Tyre?
The Sheikh Ahmad al-Assir Deal: Unveiling the backstage political maneuvers—is
there a secret "pardon and exile" deal being cooked up to release Al-Assir?
Which political factions in Sidon and Lebanon dread his return the most?
The Case for International Intervention: Why is Salam certain that the Lebanese
constitution has been utterly humiliated, and that the only remaining solution
is the deployment of joint international forces to enforce order and discipline
the ruling elite?
An extraordinary episode that uncovers the hidden truths and challenges the
status quo. Watch the full hard-hitting analysis now and subscribe for more
exclusive political confrontations.
Lebanese soldier wounded in
Israeli strike on Nabatieh barracks, army says
LBCI/May 23/2026
A Lebanese soldier was moderately injured following an Israeli strike that
targeted an army barracks in the city of Nabatieh, according to a statement by
the Lebanese army.
The army said one of its personnel sustained moderate injuries as a result of
what it described as a hostile Israeli attack on the facility
Israel warns of imminent strikes on 10 Lebanese villages
LBCI/May 23/2026
Israel warned the residents of 10 villages in southern Lebanon to evacuate their
homes immediately to avoid planned airstrikes against alleged Hezbollah targets.
"In light of Hezbollah's violation of the ceasefire agreement, the Israeli army
is compelled to act forcefully against it. The Israeli army does not intend to
harm you," military spokesman Avichay Adraee said. "For your safety, you must
evacuate your homes immediately and move away from the villages and towns by a
distance of no less than 1,000 meters into open areas."
Lebanon says 25 injured in Israeli strikes near Hiram
Hospital in Tyre
LBCI/May 23/2026
Lebanon’s Public Health Emergency Operations Center said 25 members of the
medical, nursing, and administrative staff at Hiram Hospital in the Tyre
district were injured in varying degrees after Israeli airstrikes hit the
immediate vicinity of the facility, causing significant damage.
The ministry said this is the second time in less than two months that the
hospital has been placed at risk due to repeated Israeli strikes nearby, which
it said constitute further evidence of violations of international humanitarian
law protecting medical facilities. The ministry praised the staff at Hiram
Hospital for continuing to carry out their duties despite the risks and
commended health workers across the country who remain on the front lines,
refusing to evacuate in order to continue providing emergency, medical, and
healthcare services to those in need.
Israel strikes Bekaa and Tyre as other raids kill 10
Agence France Presse/May 23/2026
Israel staged fresh airstrikes in Lebanon on Saturday after earlier raids killed
10 people, according to media and the government in Beirut, targeting an area
near the Syrian border. The state-run National News Agency said there were five
Israeli airstrikes shortly before midnight in the mountainous Nabi Sreij area on
the outskirts of Brital, which had been spared from attacks since an April 17
ceasefire with Hezbollah. An AFP correspondent in the southern city of Tyre
reported hearing two blasts as one building on the outskirts was struck, then
another inside the city, sending plumes of smoke into the air. Earlier, civil
defense rescuers and municipality police worked to evacuate people from the
neighborhood, using loudspeakers urging them to leave. Israel's military had
issued two evacuation warnings via its Arabic-language spokesman Avichay Adraee,
one for the Lebanese village of Burj Rahal, saying troops were acting against
Hezbollah. Residents of two areas of Tyre were also told to leave, as they were
"located near Hezbollah facilities that the (Israeli military) is about to
operate against", Adraee said on X.
Exchanges of fire
Lebanon's health ministry said Israeli strikes killed 10 people on Friday,
including six rescuers and a child in continued exchanges of fire. In a
statement, the ministry said "six people were martyred", including two rescuers
from the Risala Scouts association and a Syrian girl, in a strike on Deir Qanoun
al-Nahr village near the city of Tyre. The association is linked with the
Hezbollah-allied Amal Movement. An earlier strike on the southern town of
Hanaway on Friday killed four rescuers from the Hezbollah-linked Islamic Health
Committee, the ministry said. Separately, the Israeli military said early on
Friday morning that it had killed two people close to the border. "IDF (Israeli
army) surveillance identified two armed individuals moving in a suspicious
manner hundreds of meters from Israeli territory, in southern Lebanon," it said
in a Telegram post. "Following their identification and continuous monitoring by
the IDF, the armed individuals were struck and eliminated in an aerial strike,"
the post said.
'Rage, might and tyranny' -
Hezbollah, meanwhile, said it had targeted Israeli troops and positions inside
Lebanon and in northern Israel near the border. "We are fighting our enemy on
the battlefield, and it has grown frustrated by the strength and heroism of our
fighters... so it resorts to unleashing the hell of its rage, might and tyranny
to destroy your villages and displace you," the head of Hezbollah's
parliamentary bloc, Mohammad Raad, said in a message to supporters shared on
Friday. He also repeated the group's denunciation of direct talks between Israel
and Lebanon. It came after the United States announced sanctions against nine
Hezbollah-linked individuals it accused of "obstructing the peace process in
Lebanon". These included two Lebanese military officers accused of sharing
information with the group. Since April 17, Israel has continued to launch
strikes, carry out demolitions and issue evacuation orders in south Lebanon,
saying it is targeting Hezbollah, which has also kept up attacks. Hezbollah
launched rockets at Israel on March 2 in retaliation for the killing of Iran's
supreme leader in U.S.-Israeli strikes. Israel responded with a massive series
of airstrikes and a ground invasion in the country's south, where its troops are
operating inside an Israeli-declared "yellow line" running around 10 kilometers
(six miles) inside Lebanon along the border. Lebanon's health ministry said on
Friday that Israeli attacks have killed at least 3,111 people since the wider
regional war began.Israel's military has reported the death of 22 personnel
during the fighting. Last week, the fragile ceasefire was extended for 45 days
following a third round of direct talks between Lebanese and Israeli
representatives in Washington, discussions that Hezbollah staunchly opposes.
South Lebanon Hospital
Damaged in Israeli Strikes
Asharq Al Awsat/May 20/2026
Israel kept up strikes on Lebanon on Saturday, hours after overnight raids on
the country's south and east, including one that damaged a hospital, its chief
executive told AFP. Lebanon's state-run National News Agency (NNA) reported
Israeli airstrikes on around a dozen locations in the south on Saturday
including one targeting an agricultural area, "wounding several Syrian
workers".The NNA said an overnight strike in the southern city of Tyre that
targeted a site near the hospital caused "severe damage" to the facility. An AFP
correspondent saw shattered glass, ceiling panels blown out and damaged medical
equipment at the multi-storey Hiram hospital. The Israeli military late on
Friday night had issued evacuation warnings ahead of strikes on two locations in
Tyre, saying it would target "Hezbollah facilities".Accompanying maps advised
people to leave areas within 500 metres (yards) of the target buildings, with
the Hiram hospital shown within the advised evacuation area. The hospital's CEO
Dr Salman Aydibi told AFP that around 40 patients were in the facility when the
warning was issued, including seven in intensive care. "We took the patients to
a safer location" elsewhere inside the hospital, he said, adding that none were
harmed but some 30 staff sustained minor injuries. He said an evaluation of the
damage was ongoing and that the hospital has remained operational, though the
emergency department briefly closed. He said it was the third strike near the
facility since the latest Israel-Hezbollah war erupted on March 2. Israel's army
said Saturday that it had targeted "Hezbollah infrastructure sites in Tyre"
overnight where operatives from the Iran-backed group worked to "plan and
execute attacks" against Israeli soldiers. "Prior to the strike, steps were
taken to mitigate harm to civilians, including the issuing of advance warnings,
the use of precise munitions, and aerial surveillance," it added. Another AFP
correspondent saw heavy damage at both targeted sites in Tyre, with a man
searching for his belongings among the debris at one location. Israel's army
also targeted east Lebanon overnight, saying it struck a "Hezbollah underground
compound" used to manufacture weapons. Lebanon's Hamas-aligned Islamist group
Jamaa Islamiya and its armed wing the Al-Fajr Forces said Saturday in a
statement that one of its members was killed in an Israeli strike in east
Lebanon. Under the terms of the ceasefire published by Washington, Israel
reserves the right to act against "planned, imminent or ongoing attacks".
Hezbollah Says Message from Iran Shows it 'Will Not Give up' on Group
Asharq Al Awsat/May 23/2026
20Hezbollah said Saturday that a message from Tehran showed that Iran would not
abandon the Lebanese militant group and that the Islamic republic's latest
proposal to end the US-Iran war included a ceasefire in Lebanon. Iran-backed
Hezbollah said in a statement that its chief Naim Qassem had received a message
from Tehran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, which indicated that Iran "will
not give up its support for movements demanding justice and freedom, foremost
among them Hezbollah". In Iran's latest proposal through Pakistani mediators
aimed at achieving "a permanent and stable end to the war, the demand to include
Lebanon in the ceasefire was emphasised", the statement added.
Lebanon says Israeli strike targets army barracks, wounding
soldier
AFP/23 May ,2026
Lebanon’s military said Saturday an Israeli strike targeted an army barracks in
the country’s south, wounding a soldier, despite a ceasefire in the war between
Israel and militant group Hezbollah. “A soldier was moderately wounded due to
the hostile Israeli targeting of an army barracks in the city of Nabatieh,” the
army said, in a statement on social media. Israel had warned the residents of 10
villages in southern Lebanon to evacuate their homes immediately to avoid
planned air strikes against alleged Hezbollah targets. “In light of the
terrorist Hezbollah’s violation of the ceasefire agreement, the IDF is compelled
to act forcefully against it. The IDF does not intend to harm you,” military
spokesman Avichay Adraee said. “For your safety, you must evacuate your homes
immediately and move away from the villages and towns by a distance of no less
than 1,000 meters into open areas.”The communities listed by Adraee in a social
media post cover a large area of southern Lebanon, and lie on both the north and
south banks of the Litani river. Hezbollah and Israel accuse each other on a
daily basis of violating the truce that came into effect on April 17. At least
ten people, including six rescue workers and a girl, were killed Friday in a
series of Israeli strikes on southern Lebanon, according to the Lebanese
Ministry of Health. According to the Israeli military, these strikes targeted
Hezbollah fighters travelling by motorcycle and weapons-manufacturing
infrastructure.
Iran sends message to
Hezbollah chief reaffirming long-term support
LBCI/May 23/2026
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the Islamic Republic “will not
abandon support for movements seeking rights and freedom until the very last
moment,” naming Hezbollah as a key example. In a message addressed to Hezbollah
chief Naim Qassem, Araghchi said: “This is our pledge.”He added that from the
earliest stage of regional mediation efforts aimed at easing tensions between
Iran and the United States, Tehran had proposed linking any broader agreement to
a ceasefire in Lebanon. Araghchi said this position has remained a “firm
principle” and part of Iran’s official demands. He also noted that in Iran’s
latest proposal, delivered through a Pakistani mediator to achieve a lasting and
stable end to the conflict, Tehran again emphasized the need to include Lebanon
in any ceasefire arrangement.
Lebanon brings ceasefire and battlefield assessment to first direct military
talks with Israel—what will be on the table?
LBCI/May 23/2026
Next Friday, for the first time in the trajectory of direct negotiations between
Lebanon and Israel, expanded military delegations from both countries will meet
at the U.S. Department of War, days before a second round of direct political
talks scheduled for June 2–3.
The composition of the Lebanese delegation has been finalized. It will be headed
by the Lebanese army’s Director of Operations, Brig. Gen. Georges Rizkallah. Its
core will consist of specialists, including officers from the operations
directorate, military intelligence, international humanitarian law, and an
engineering officer.
So what will the Lebanese military delegation bring?
According to available information, the delegation’s file is comprehensive and
strictly technical in nature. It will first call for the consolidation of the
ceasefire. However, its main focus will be on presenting the scale of
achievements made by the Lebanese army in restricting weapons since it was
tasked by the Lebanese government with implementing this decision, supported by
evidence and documentation. The delegation will also explain why it has not
conducted searches of private homes and property. More importantly, it will
highlight the extensive work carried out despite limited logistical
capabilities, as well as what it has been able to gather through its own efforts
regarding sites and weapons in southern Lebanon in particular. From this
perspective, the Lebanese delegation will stress to the U.S. sponsor the need
for international financial support to strengthen the military institution and
enhance its capabilities. The inclusion of army officers is intended to reflect
their familiarity with conditions on the ground. They will present a field-based
assessment that includes Israeli violations, occupied, bulldozed, and mined
areas, as well as the scale of displacement and destruction. The delegation,
which is coordinating preparations for the session with its leadership and will
remain in contact with it, will also carry presidential directives. Lebanon
recognizes it has no option but to try to reduce the burdens of the war. It also
comes amid mounting pressure that has reached security and military
institutions, most recently the placement of two officers from the army and
General Security on the U.S. OFAC sanctions list, a move observers have linked
to the upcoming military and political negotiations aimed at shaping a roadmap
for the next phase.
What US sanctions on two officers mean for Lebanon
Agence France Presse/May 23/2026
The U.S. announced unprecedented sanctions on two Lebanese officers on Thursday,
accusing them of sharing intelligence with Hezbollah, which the Lebanese
government is trying to disarm. What are the implications of the move and its
repercussions, and will it contribute to isolating Hezbollah?
What is the justification?
The U.S. sanctions also cover Iran's ambassador to Lebanon, three Hezbollah
lawmakers and a former minister as well as two figures from the Hezbollah-allied
Amal Movement. They also target army colonel Samir Hamadi and Khattar
Nassereddine, an officer for General Security, marking the first time the United
States has sanctioned Lebanese officers. Washington said Hamadi, the army's
intelligence head in Beirut's southern suburbs, a Hezbollah stronghold, and
Nassereddine, the national security chief in the General Security service,
"shared important intelligence" with Hezbollah "during the ongoing conflict." In
separate statements, the Lebanese Army and General Security affirmed their
personnel's loyalty and their commitment to following orders without political
"considerations or pressures." The military and security services prohibit their
members from engaging in political or partisan activity. Hamadi holds a
sensitive position in Beirut's southern suburbs, in a country where appointments
within institutions are based on sectarian and political quotas. The army sent
Hamadi to the United States, its key backer, for three training courses. As for
Nassereddine, a security source who requested anonymity told AFP that he heads
the data analysis directorate of General Security, a surveillance and border
control agency. He was close to powerful former General Security chief Abbas
Ibrahim, and is on good terms with senior Hezbollah security official Wafiq Safa,
the source said.
How will it impact Lebanon's army?
The U.S. sanctions against the officers, both of whom have held their current
posts for less than a year, came at a sensitive time for Lebanon, as Washington
is ramping up pressure on Beirut to disarm Hezbollah and Israel continues to
strike the country and occupy parts of its south despite the truce. Hezbollah
drew Lebanon into the Middle East war on March 2, and a fragile truce began on
April 17. Lebanon and Israel, officially at war for decades, are preparing
military delegations for security talks at the Pentagon in the U.S. later this
month, followed by a fourth round of direct negotiations in Washington in June.
Hezbollah, weakened after a 2023-2024 war with Israel, and isolated following
the government's decision to disarm it, strongly opposes direct talks with
Israel and refuses to surrender its weapons. Military expert Riad Kahwaji said
the U.S. move will have "significant repercussions within Lebanon" as "the
prestige that was given to the Lebanese Army has been removed." The army is
widely respected domestically and has maintained its unity since the end of the
1975-1990 civil war in a country suffering from political and sectarian
divisions.
How will it impact Hezbollah?
The security source told AFP that the inclusion of the two officers on the
sanctions list "serves as a warning to any security or military official from
whom Hezbollah might request any information." "The sanctions are a continuation
of the tightening of the noose around Hezbollah, an attempt to separate it from
the state after it managed, over the past 20 years... to embed many elements" in
it, Kahwaji said. "These sanctions show today that no party is immune,
regardless of whether it is inside or outside state institutions." Kahwaji said
that it marks a new phase in which "everyone who facilitates Hezbollah's
activities from within the Lebanese state will be held accountable." U.S.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday the U.S. "will continue to
take action against officials who have infiltrated the Lebanese government". On
its front page, pro-Hezbollah newspaper Al-Akhbar wrote "Washington launches a
campaign to isolate the resistance," referring to Hezbollah.
Leaked names of Lebanese Pentagon delegation for first
military talks with Israel
Naharnet/May 23/2026
The Army Command has finalized a list of the Lebanese military delegation
scheduled to travel to the United States to meet with an Israeli military
delegation on May 29, pro-Hezbollah al-Akhbar reported Friday. The meeting will
be the first Lebanese-Israeli military meeting and will be held at the Pentagon.
On June 2 and 3, the State Department would hold diplomatic negotiations aimed
at reaching a permanent political agreement. It would be the fourth round of
talks between Lebanese and Israeli envoys. The Lebanese military delegation will
focus exclusively on the technical mechanisms to implement the ceasefire and
schedule Israel's withdrawal from occupied areas in south Lebanon. According to
al-Akhbar, the names proposed by the Army Command for the delegation include:
Brigadier General George Rizkallah (Christian), Brigadier General Ziad Rizkallah
(Christian), Brigadier General Omar Hlayhel (Sunni), Brigadier General-Engineer
Wael Abbas (Shia), Colonel Mazen Al-Hajj (Druze), and Colonel Wadih Rafoul
(Christian). Brigadier General Oliver Hakimeh, the military attaché at the
Lebanese Embassy in Washington, might also attend the meeting, the daily said.
The army command said Friday that media reports about a "sectarian distribution"
of the military delegation are against the principles of the military
institution. "The members of the delegation remain committed to national
constants, represent Lebanon as a nation and are committed to the Army’s
doctrine," the army command's statement said. Progressive Socialist Party leader
Walid Jumblat also criticized what he called "a six-member Army committee" as "a
heresy that we can do without". "We trust the military institution and the
constants built on the foundation of the armistice agreement, adherence to
international resolutions, and the Taif Accord," he posted on the X platform.
Report: More Lebanese individuals could face US sanctions
Naharnet/May 23/2026
Washington took a significant step Thursday by imposing sanctions on two
officers from the Lebanese Army and the General Security Directorate, accusing
them of "sharing intelligence with Hezbollah."The U.S. also slapped sanctions on
three Hezbollah MPs, a Hezbollah ex-minister, two Amal Movement security
officials, and the Iranian ambassador-designate to Lebanon. According to
information obtained by Al-Arabiya, the list of individuals recommended for
sanctions is much longer, and U.S. intelligence agencies possess a list of
"dozens of Lebanese Army officers proven to have collaborated with Hezbollah and
leaked information to them."The report also said that the matter is "not limited
to Lebanese Shiite officers, but includes some from other sects, such as
Christians." Sources told Al-Arabiya that U.S. security and intelligence
agencies accuse these officers of "two serious offenses: first, facilitating the
passage of weapons to the area south of the Litani River after the army
conducted large-scale operations to clear it of Hezbollah weapons and caches;
and second, assisting Hezbollah members in bypassing security checkpoints to
cross into the south and carry out new deployments."
The sources added that Iran and Hezbollah have managed, in recent weeks and
months, to exploit numerous loopholes to rearm and finance the party. One of the
sources also said that U.S. intelligence is aware of "the presence of at least
100 Iranian Revolutionary Guard officers who have arrived in Lebanon in recent
months, working to manage Hezbollah, including retraining, rearming, and
smuggling operations." The source explained that everything Hezbollah does north
of the al-Zahrani River is under the direct management of the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard, while south of this line, the party's members operate with
their Lebanese contingent. Furthermore, the source clarified that "the
Revolutionary Guard members carry Lebanese documents, including passports, and
sometimes their accents are indistinguishable from those of Lebanese citizens or
even Hezbollah members themselves."
Lebanon army says soldiers loyal after US sanctions one
over alleged Hezbollah links
Agence France Presse
Lebanon's military said Friday its soldiers were loyal to the institution after
the U.S. announced sanctions that included an officer accused of sharing
information with Hezbollah. The sanctions came after the U.S. hosted three
rounds of direct talks between Lebanon and Israel aimed at ending the war that
began after Hezbollah attacked Israel on March 2 and determining the future of
relations between the two countries. The sanctions include Iran's ambassador to
Lebanon, three Hezbollah lawmakers and a former minister and two figures from
the Hezbollah-allied Amal movement. They also target army colonel Samir Hamadi,
and Khattar Nasser Eldin, a general security officer, marking the first time
that officers are sanctioned in Lebanon. The U.S. accused them of "obstructing
the peace process in Lebanon". The army said that "all officers and members of
the military institution are performing their national duties with utmost
professionalism, responsibility, and discipline". It emphasized that "the
loyalty of military personnel is solely to the military institution and the
nation", also saying it was not informed of the sanctions beforehand. Washington
said Hamadi, the army's intelligence head in Beirut's southern suburbs, and
Nasser Eldin, the national security chief in the general security service,
"shared important intelligence" with Hezbollah "during the ongoing conflict". A
general security statement affirmed its trust in its personnel, adding that if
any "employee is found to have leaked any information outside the institution...
they will be subject to fair legal and judicial accountability".
'Obstruct lasting peace'
The sanctions come as Lebanon is forming a military delegation for security
talks with Israel at the Pentagon on May 29, a step that was agreed in the
latest round of direct talks earlier this month. A fourth round of negotiations
is planned for June. Hezbollah is opposed to the talks and refuses to surrender
its weapons as the government demands. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent
said on Thursday they "will continue to take action against officials who have
infiltrated the Lebanese government", insisting Hezbollah must be "disarmed".
Hezbollah called the sanctions "an attempt to intimidate the free Lebanese
people in order to bolster the Zionist aggression against our country".
Hezbollah lawmakers said the sanctions "will have no practical effect", though
the group faces internal pressure following two wars with Israel that caused
widespread destruction and pushed Lebanon to negotiate with Israel. Once a
dominant political force, Hezbollah was weakened by a 2023-2024 war with Israel.
The latest war has killed more than 3,000 people and displaced more than a
million. "The sanctions are a continuation of the tightening of the noose around
Hezbollah, an attempt to separate it from the state after it managed, over the
past 20 years... to embed many elements" in it, military expert Riad Kahwaji
told AFP. "These sanctions show today that no party is immune, regardless of
whether it is inside or outside state institutions."Israel meanwhile continues
to strike Lebanon despite a truce in place since April 17. Israeli strikes
killed at least 10 people on Friday, including six rescuers, according to the
Lebanese health ministry.
Le Drian warns of
'dangerous' situation in Lebanon, lauds leaders 'courage'
Naharnet/May 23/2026
French President's special envoy to Lebanon Jean-Yves Le Drian has warned of "a
dangerous situation" in Lebanon, pointing out to divisions inside the country,
regarding Israel and Hezbollah. In an interview Thursday, Le Drian said
Lebanon's unity and integrity are at risk, citing the Israeli occupation and
accusing Hezbollah of being an Iranian proxy and choosing Iran's interests over
Lebanon's. Le Drian said Israel refused to include France in the
Israeli-Lebanese negotiations despite the Lebanese requesting it but welcomed
the 45-day truce extension as a window to continue discussions. The French
diplomat lauded the "courage" of President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf
Salam for calling for direct negotiations with Israel.
Hezbollah drone threat persists as Israel reveals pager
operation details
LBCI/May 23/2026
Air raid sirens are sounding across northern settlements and the Galilee as
Hezbollah drones infiltrate the region’s airspace, while the Israeli army
acknowledges it is unable to counter them: this is Israel’s reality these days.
Faced with this situation, the Israeli army has introduced munitions to confront
the drone threat, in a move Israel hopes will protect it from what it considers
the most dangerous challenge currently on the battlefield. According to the
army, these munitions are used when a drone is detected at close range. At that
point, soldiers’ primary task is to take cover and move away from the drone’s
flight path before firing the ammunition, which has a wide dispersal range
reaching up to 100 meters. However, all this promotion has not eased the anger
prevailing inside Israel over its inability to decisively end the battle in
Lebanon. In another effort to improve the image of the confrontation with
Hezbollah, Israel revealed additional details about the pager explosions
operation. Among them, it said the Mossad relied on a sophisticated infiltration
of the supply chain through real individuals and companies that had previously
dealt with Hezbollah. One of them was a woman whom Israel claims was named
Theresa, who allegedly played a key role in convincing Hezbollah to increase its
order from 500 devices annually to 5,000 devices in March 2024. The effort was
reportedly part of a campaign led by a Mossad official, who operated under the
cover of a businesswoman named Layla. According to the Mossad report, extensive
discussions took place within Hezbollah regarding the purchase of the new
devices amid suspicions of a possible security breach. However, the need to
replace older communication devices pushed the group to proceed with the deal.
The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published
on 23-24 May/2026
Iran,
US and mediator Pakistan report progress in talks on ending war
Al Arabiya English/23 May ,2026:
Iran, the US and mediator Pakistan all said on Saturday that progress had been
made in talks on ending almost three months of war. Iran said it was focused on
finalizing a memorandum of understanding, or MOU, after its top officials met
Asim Munir, the army chief of Pakistan.
The Pakistani army said the negotiations had resulted in “encouraging” progress
toward a final understanding. Two Pakistani sources involved in negotiations
said the deal being negotiated is “fairly comprehensive to terminate the
war.”Sources have told Reuters the proposed framework would unfold in three
stages: formally ending the war, resolving the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz,
and launching a 30-day window for negotiations on a broader agreement, which can
be extended. US President Donald Trump said he would discuss the latest Iran
draft agreement with advisors and might make a decision on Sunday on whether to
resume attacks on Iran, Axios reported, citing an interview with Trump. “Either
we reach a good deal or I’ll blow them to a thousand hells,” Axios quoted him as
saying. Trump also told CBS in a phone interview on Saturday that the US and
Iran were “getting a lot closer” to an agreement to end the war.But in the
interview with the TV network, Trump also warned that if the US and Iran do not
come to an agreement, “we’re going to have a situation where no country will
ever be hit as hard as they’re about to be hit.” One of the Pakistani sources
said there was no guarantee the US would accept the memorandum. If the US and
Iran agree, the MOU would lead to further talks after the Eid holiday ends on
Friday.
Trump to speak with Middle East leaders
Trump, whose ratings have been hit by the war’s impact on energy prices for US
consumers, said on Friday he would not attend his son’s wedding this weekend,
citing Iran among the reasons he planned to stay in Washington. An Arab official
told Reuters that Trump would hold a phone call on Saturday with leaders from
Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE, Jordan, Egypt, Turkey and Pakistan. Pakistan’s
mediation push aims to narrow differences between Iran and the US after weeks of
war that have left the vital Hormuz waterway closed to most shipping despite a
nervous ceasefire, upending global energy markets. US Secretary of State Marco
Rubio repeated Trump’s demands: “Iran can never have a nuclear weapon. The
straits need to be open without tolls. They need to turn over their enriched
uranium.”
“Even as I speak to you now, there’s some work being done. There is a chance
that, whether it’s later today, tomorrow, in a couple days, we may have
something to say,” Rubio told reporters in New Delhi. Iran denies it is pursuing
nuclear weapons and says it has a right to enrich uranium for civilian purposes.
It has demanded supervision of the strait, an end to the US blockade on its
ports and the lifting of sanctions on Iranian oil sales. Iranian foreign
ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said: “The trend this week has been towards
a reduction in disputes, but there are still issues that need to be discussed
through mediators. We will have to wait and see where the situation ends in the
next three or four days.”Pakistan’s army chief Munir left Tehran on Saturday
after talks with Iran’s top negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and Foreign
Minister Abbas Araghchi. Baghaei said the issue of the US blockade on Iran’s
shipping was important, but that its priority was ending the threat of new US
attacks and the ongoing conflict in Lebanon, where Iran-allied Hezbollah
militants are fighting Israeli troops who have moved into the south.Ghalibaf
said Iran would pursue its “legitimate rights,” both on the battlefield and
through diplomacy, but added that it could not trust “a party that has no
honesty at all,” an allegation Iran has made several times before. He said
Iran’s armed forces had rebuilt their capabilities during the ceasefire and
that, if the US “foolishly restarts the war,” the consequences would be “more
forceful and bitter” than at the start of the conflict. Despite weeks of
conflict, Iran has preserved its stockpile of near-weapons-grade enriched
uranium as well as missile, drone and proxy capabilities. With Reuters
Rubio says ‘chance’ of Iran accepting deal as soon as Saturday
AFP/23 May ,2026
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said there was a chance Iran would accept a
deal to end the Middle East war as soon as Saturday. His comments came as
Pakistan’s powerful army chief arrived in Tehran to bolster mediation and US
President Donald Trump abruptly skipped his son’s wedding to stay in Washington
due to “circumstances pertaining to government,” fueling speculation that talks
had entered a sensitive stage. Rubio said there had been progress in
negotiations but did not rule out Trump resuming attacks on Iran. “There might
be some news a little later today. There may not be. I hope there will be,”
Rubio told reporters in New Delhi during his first visit to India.“There’s been
some progress done, some progress made. Even as I speak to you now, there’s some
work being done,” he said. “There is a chance that, whether it’s later today,
tomorrow, in a couple days, we may have something to say.” Rubio reiterated US
demands that Iran fully open the Strait of Hormuz, on which it has exerted
control in response to the US-Israeli attack, and that Iran hand over highly
enriched uranium. Trump’s “preference is always to solve problems such as these
through a negotiated diplomatic solution. That’s what we’re working on right
now,” Rubio said. “But this problem will be solved, as the president’s made...
clear, one way or the other.”
Iran offers to reopen Strait of Hormuz in exchange for US
compensation, sources say
Al Arabiya English/23 May ,2026
Iran presented two proposals during Pakistani army chief Asim Munir’s visit to
Tehran on Saturday, diplomatic sources told Al Arabiya, as Islamabad intensifies
efforts to mediate between Iran and the United States and prevent a renewed
outbreak of war. According to the sources, Tehran offered to reopen the Strait
of Hormuz in exchange for the US paying compensation to Iran. Tehran also
requested that discussions on sanctions relief and frozen Iranian funds take
place before any agreement is signed. Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil
Baghaei said on Saturday “we are both very far from and very close to an
agreement,” adding that the purpose of Pakistani army chief Asim Munir’s visit
to Tehran was to exchange messages between Iran and the US. He added that Tehran
is currently focused on finalizing a memorandum of understanding with
Washington. The diplomatic push comes amid renewed fears of escalation after US
media outlets Axios and CBS News reported that the White House was considering
new military strikes on Iran if talks fail. US officials have repeatedly warned
that military action remains an option if no agreement is reached. Iran’s chief
negotiator and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf warned on Saturday
that Iran would respond “more crushingly and bitterly” than on the first day of
the war if the US resumes hostilities. “Our armed forces have rebuilt themselves
during the ceasefire period in such a way that if [US President Donald] Trump
commits another act of folly and restarts the war, it will certainly be more
crushing and bitter for the United States than on the first day of the war,”
Ghalibaf wrote on social media after meeting Munir in Tehran.
The war began on February 28 after the US and Israel launched attacks on Iran.
Although an April 8 ceasefire halted the fighting, negotiations have yet to
produce a permanent settlement or fully restore shipping through the Strait of
Hormuz, through which a significant portion of global oil supplies passes.
Araghchi said in a call with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres that Tehran
remained engaged in diplomacy despite “repeated betrayals of diplomacy and
military aggression against Iran,” as well as “contradictory positions and
repeated excessive demands” by the US.
IRNA reported that Araghchi also held calls with his counterparts from Turkey,
Iraq, Qatar, and Oman. Meanwhile, Trump spoke with Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin
Hamad Al Thani, whose office said he expressed support for “all initiatives
aimed at containing the crisis through dialogue and diplomacy.”
Iran weighs peace proposal, accuses US of 'excessive demands'
Agence France Presse/23 May ,2026
Tehran accused the United States of "excessive demands", Iranian media said on
Saturday, as U.S. media reports raised the prospect that Washington was mulling
new strikes and leaders of the Islamic republic considered the latest peace
proposal. Pakistan's powerful army chief arrived in Tehran on Friday to bolster
mediation and U.S. President Donald Trump abruptly changed his plans to skip his
son's wedding to stay in Washington due to "circumstances pertaining to
government", fuelling speculation that the situation had entered a sensitive
stage.
Trump has described the stop-start negotiations this week as teetering on the
"borderline" between renewed attacks and a deal to end the war, which began with
U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28 and led to competing blockades
around the strategic Strait of Hormuz that have roiled the global economy. Weeks
of negotiations since an April 8 ceasefire -- including historic face-to-face
talks hosted by Islamabad -- have still not produced a permanent resolution or
restored full access to the strait, choking vast quantities of global oil
supply.
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a call with U.N.
Secretary-General Antonio Guterres that Tehran was engaged in the diplomatic
process despite "repeated betrayals of diplomacy and military aggression against
Iran, along with contradictory positions and repeated excessive demands" by the
United States, according to the ministry. U.S. media outlets Axios and CBS News,
citing unnamed sources, reported the White House was considering strikes on
Iran, although both added a final decision had not been made yet. U.S. officials
have repeatedly raised the prospect of renewed action against Iran if a deal
were not reached, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying on the sidelines of
a NATO conference in Sweden that there had been "some progress" towards a
peaceful resolution but "things were not there yet". "We're dealing with a very
difficult group of people. And if it doesn't change, then the president's been
clear he has other options," he said. Pakistan's army chief Asim Munir landed in
Tehran on Friday where he met with Araghchi late into the night to discuss "the
latest diplomatic efforts and initiatives aimed at preventing further
escalation", according to the official IRNA news agency. Iranian foreign
ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei cautioned that the visit did not mean "we have
reached a turning point or a decisive situation" with "deep and extensive"
disagreements remaining, according to Iran's ISNA news agency. Baqaei said a
delegation from Qatar had also held talks with the Iranian foreign minister on
Friday. "In recent days, many countries -- both regional and non-regional --
have been trying to help bring the war to an end ... However, Pakistan remains
the official mediator," he said. Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and
Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar -- who have played a crucial role in mediation
between the warring sides -- flew to China, Iran's top trading partner, for a
four-day visit in which efforts to resolve the Middle East crisis were expected
to be discussed.
Hormuz squeeze
Baqaei said the status of the Strait of Hormuz and a retaliatory U.S. blockade
of Iranian ports were also under discussion. The future of the strategic
maritime chokepoint remains a key sticking point, with fears growing that the
global economy will suffer as pre-war oil stockpiles run down. Markets
nevertheless took some comfort from the signs of diplomacy, with Wall Street
rising Friday and the Dow closing at a second straight record high as investors
bet talks could eventually produce an off-ramp. Oil prices also rose, however,
underscoring fears that disruption in Hormuz will keep feeding inflation. U.S.
consumer sentiment fell to its lowest level since records began in 1952, with
high prices eroding household finances. European Union nations on Friday deemed
Iran's blockade "contrary to international law" and made a technical change to
expand the scope of its existing Iran sanctions regime to target individuals
involved in the closure.
Trump tells CBS that US, Iran 'getting a lot closer' to
agreement
LBCI/23 May ,2026
U.S. President Donald Trump told CBS in a phone interview on Saturday that the
United States and Iran are "getting a lot closer" to an agreement to end the war
in the Middle East.
But in the interview with the TV network, Trump also warned that if the U.S. and
Iran do not come to an agreement, "we're going to have a situation where no
country will ever be hit as hard as they're about to be hit."AFP
Report: US prepares for new military strikes against Iran
Naharnet/23 May ,2026
The Trump administration was preparing Friday for a fresh round of military
strikes against Iran, sources with direct knowledge of the planning told U.S. TV
network CBS, even as diplomacy continued. No final decision on strikes had been
reached as of Friday afternoon Washington time.
"Circumstances pertaining to Government" are keeping President Trump from
attending his son Donald Trump Jr.'s wedding this weekend, he said in a social
media post. The president had planned to spend Memorial Day weekend at his golf
property in New Jersey but will now return to the White House. Some members of
the U.S. military and intelligence community canceled their plans for the
Memorial Day weekend in anticipation of possible strikes, several sources said.
Defense and intelligence officials began updating recall rosters for U.S.
installations overseas as tranches of troops stationed in the Middle East rotate
out of theater, part of an effort to reduce the American military footprint in
the region amid concern about possible Iranian retaliation. The U.S. and Iran
have largely refrained from striking each other since a temporary ceasefire
began in early April, buying time for indirect talks on a longer-term deal.
White House spokesperson Anna Kelly told CBS News that Trump has "made his
redlines abundantly clear: Iran can never possess a nuclear weapon, and they
cannot keep their enriched uranium." "The President always maintains all options
at all times, and it is the job of the Pentagon to be ready to execute any
decision the Commander-in-Chief could make," Kelly said. "The President has been
clear about the consequences if Iran fails to make a deal."Iran's Islamic
Revolutionary Guard Corps warned Wednesday that any further strikes against the
country from the United States or Israel could widen the conflict beyond the
Middle East, promising "crushing blows … in places you cannot even imagine."
Tehran is reviewing the latest U.S. proposal for a possible agreement to end the
nearly three-month war that has rattled energy markets and resulted in soaring
fuel prices. The proposal was transmitted to Iran on Wednesday, according to a
source who told CBS News that it was also accompanied by a warning that
rejecting this so-called final offer would mean military strikes would resume.
"Iran is dying to make a deal," Trump said Friday. "We'll see what happens." The
president said Wednesday he was prepared to give Tehran "a couple of days" to
respond to the latest U.S. offer. He added that his team was "pretty impressed"
by Iran's negotiators, but cautioned that the administration would need
assurances substantial enough to prevent the conflict from reigniting. A
response is imminently expected to be transmitted via Pakistan, which has been
acting as an intermediary. Before boarding a flight to India, Secretary of State
Marco Rubio told reporters that the U.S. expected to receive a response via the
Pakistani field marshal, who has acted as the primary conduit of communication
with Iran on behalf of the Trump administration. Rubio claimed that Trump
preferred diplomacy to strikes and said progress had been made, though he
indicated there was more work to be done. Rubio also referenced conversations
from meetings in Sweden with NATO members about how to reopen the Strait of
Hormuz through military force, an effort he referred to as "Plan B" if Iran did
not agree to do so itself.
In Washington, House Republicans on Thursday abandoned an effort to hold a vote
limiting President Trump's authority to conduct military operations against Iran
after concluding they lacked the votes needed to stop the resolution from
advancing.
US mulls new strikes on Iran: Media reports
AFP/23 May ,2026
The United States is weighing new military strikes on Iran, US media outlets
reported on Friday. The reports, from CBS and Axios, come just hours after US
President Donald Trump said he would not travel to attend his son’s wedding this
weekend due to “circumstances pertaining to government” and his “love for the
United States of America.”Trump said that it was “important for me to remain in
Washington, DC, at the White House during this important period of time.”Both
Axios and CBS said that a final decision on new strikes hasn’t been made.
Negotiations are said to be ongoing, with Pakistan – which is mediating between
the US and Iran – sending its military chief to Tehran in an attempt to seal a
deal. The White House did not comment on the reports when AFP inquired about
them. CBS said that a White House spokesperson, Anna Kelly, told them that “the
President has been clear about the consequences if Iran fails to make a deal.”
The White House earlier on Friday announced a change in Trump’s weekend plans,
saying he would not travel to his New Jersey golf resort as planned but would
stay in the US capital instead. Returning from a trip to New York state where he
gave a speech Friday, Trump did not take questions from reporters who travel
with him as he often does. Axios reported – citing two unnamed sources – that
Trump has “grown increasingly frustrated about the negotiations with Iran over
the past several days.”Axios said that his position through the week had shifted
from favoring diplomacy toward ordering a strike. CBS reported, citing unnamed
sources, that members of the US military and intelligence apparatus were
cancelling holiday weekend plans in anticipation of possible strikes.
Ghalibaf tells Munir Iran military rebuilt during
ceasefire, warns Trump against war
Al Arabiya English/23 May ,2026
Iran’s top negotiator and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf met
Pakistani army chief Asim Munir in Tehran on Saturday, Iranian state media
reported, as Islamabad steps up diplomatic efforts to help mediate between Iran
and the United States.
Ghalibaf told Munir that Iran’s armed forces had rebuilt themselves during the
ceasefire and would respond “more crushingly and bitterly” than on the first day
of the war if US President Donald Trump “acts foolishly and restarts the war,”
according to state media.
Munir also held separate meetings with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. His meeting with Araghchi was their second
since the Pakistani army chief arrived in Tehran on Friday. During their first
meeting, Munir and Araghchi exchanged views on the latest diplomatic initiatives
aimed at preventing further escalation and ending the US-Iran war in talks that
lasted late into the night, according to Iranian state media. Munir conveyed US
messages to Tehran, sources told Al Arabiya. The US messages included assurances
that disputed issues could be resolved later if Iran agrees to a deal, the
sources said. The US messages to Tehran warned of “negative consequences” if
Iran rejected an agreement, the sources added. Sources also told Al Arabiya that
a Pakistani technical and legal delegation was departing for Tehran to join
Munir in Tehran.
IRGC-trained operative plotted to assassinate Ivanka Trump: Report
Al Arabiya English/23 May ,2026
An alleged Iran-linked operative plotted to assassinate Ivanka Trump in
retaliation for the 2020 US killing of Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani, the
New York Post reported on Friday. Mohammad Baqer Saad Dawood al-Saadi, a
32-year-old Iraqi national, allegedly made a “pledge” to kill US President
Donald Trump’s daughter and had a blueprint of her Florida home, the newspaper
reported, citing sources. The New York Post said al-Saadi was targeting the
president’s family in response to the US drone strike in Baghdad that killed
Soleimani, the former head of Iran’s Quds Force. Entifadh Qanbar, a former
deputy military attaché at the Iraqi Embassy in Washington, reportedly told the
newspaper that al-Saadi had spoken of killing Ivanka Trump after Soleimani’s
death. The report also said al-Saadi posted a map showing the Florida enclave
where Ivanka Trump and her husband Jared Kushner own a home, alongside a threat
in Arabic. Al-Saadi was arrested in Turkey on May 15 and extradited to the
United States, where he is accused of involvement in 18 attacks and attempted
attacks in Europe and the US.
The report described him as an alleged operative of both Kata’ib Hezbollah and
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and said he was linked to
attacks on US and Jewish targets, including incidents in Amsterdam, London,
Toronto, Belgium and the Netherlands.
The newspaper also reported that al-Saadi allegedly used a religious travel
agency as a cover to travel internationally and connect with militant cells. The
New York Post said the White House did not respond to a request for comment. A
lawyer for al-Saadi also did not respond to the newspaper, according to the
report. Al-Saadi is being held in solitary confinement at the Metropolitan
Detention Center in Brooklyn.
France bans Israel’s Ben-Gvir from entering country, urges
EU sanctions
Al Arabiya English/23 May ,2026
France has banned Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir from
entering French territory, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said on
Saturday, citing what he described as the minister’s “unacceptable actions”
toward French and European citizens aboard the Global Sumud flotilla. “As of
this day, Itamar Ben-Gvir is banned from accessing French territory,” Barrot
said in a statement. This comes after the Israeli minister posted a video
mocking detained activists from a Gaza-bound flotilla kneeling with their hands
tied. The French minister said Paris disapproved of the flotilla’s approach,
saying it “produces no useful effect and burdens diplomatic and consular
services.” He also praised the professionalism and dedication of French
diplomatic staff involved in the matter. However, Barrot said France could not
tolerate French nationals being “threatened, intimidated, or brutalized in this
way, especially by a public official.”He added that Ben-Gvir’s actions had been
condemned by “a large number of Israeli government and political figures” and
said they followed “a long list of shocking statements and actions, incitements
to hatred and violence against Palestinians.”Barrot also called on the European
Union to impose sanctions on Ben-Gvir, echoing a similar appeal made by his
Italian counterpart. Ben-Gvir, a far-right member of Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition government, has previously drawn international
criticism over comments about Palestinians and the war in Gaza among other
things.
Israeli strike kills Gaza boy and five police officers, police say
Reuters/23 May ,2026
An Israeli air strike targeting a Palestinian police post in northern Gaza on
Saturday killed at least five police officers and a 13-year-old boy, and wounded
several others, Gaza police said, as Israel intensified attacks on the Hamas-run
force. In a statement, the Gaza police directorate, charged with maintaining
security in areas of Gaza that fell under Hamas control after a ceasefire
brokered by the US in October, said two missiles had hit a police post in the
Tawam area. The Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for
comment. Hamas’ nearly 10,000 police officers have emerged as a sticking point
in talks to advance US President Donald Trump’s plan for Gaza. Hamas wants them
included in a new police force envisaged under the plan. Israel objects to the
involvement of any officers with Hamas affiliations. Those talks have also been
deadlocked over Hamas’ refusal to lay down its weapons, as well as near-daily
Israeli attacks in the enclave, which health officials say have killed more than
880 Palestinians since the truce. At least four Israeli soldiers have been
killed in militant attacks over the same period.
Taiwan security chief says China deployed ‘over 100
vessels’ in regional waters
AFP/23 May ,2026
Taiwan’s security chief said Saturday that China has deployed more than 100
navy, coast guard and other vessels in regional waters stretching from the
Yellow Sea to the South China Sea and Western Pacific. The deployment happened
in the past few days after US President Donald Trump’s meeting with his Chinese
counterpart Xi Jinping in Beijing, National Security Council chief Joseph Wu
said on X. “In this part of the world,#China is the one & only PROBLEM wrecking
the #StatusQuo & threatening regional peace & stability,” Wu said in the post.
China claims Taiwan is part of its territory and has threatened to use force to
seize it. Wu’s remarks came after Trump on Wednesday referred to “the Taiwan
problem” when asked if he would speak to Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te about
arms sales to the democratic island. “I’ll speak to him. I speak to everybody,”
Trump said, adding that he had a great meeting with Xi during his state visit.
“We’ll work on that, the Taiwan problem,” Trump said. A Taiwan security official
told AFP on the condition of anonymity that Chinese vessels had been detected
before the summit in Beijing, but that the numbers went above 100 in recent
days.
China authorities lower mine blast death toll to 82: State
media
LBCI/23 May ,2026
Chinese authorities said on Saturday that 82 people had died in a coal mine
blast, revising an earlier death toll of 90, state media reported. "The incident
has resulted in 82 deaths. Two people are still missing, and all-out search
efforts are ongoing. Another 128 people were injured and hospitalised," said
Chen Xiangyang, mayor of Changzhi city in Shanxi province, according to state
broadcaster CCTV. AFP
Pakistan PM arrives for China visit overshadowed by Iran
war
AFP/23 May ,2026
Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif arrived in China on Saturday, Chinese
state media said, kicking off a four-day trip overshadowed by the Iran war. The
Chinese foreign ministry has yet to confirm whether the pair will discuss the
conflict in the Middle East, which Islamabad and Beijing have both sought to
mediate in. US President Donald Trump has described the stop-start negotiations
with Iran as teetering on the “borderline” between renewed attacks and a deal to
end the war, which began with US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February and has
engulfed the Middle East and roiled the global economy. Sharif “arrived in
Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, on Saturday to begin a four-day official visit to
China,” state news agency Xinhua said, without elaborating.Earlier in the week,
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said only that “issues of common
concern” would be discussed. Guo has said that China would work with Pakistan to
“make positive contributions to the early restoration of peace and stability in
the Middle East.”“China supports Pakistan in playing a fair and balanced
mediating role in promoting peace and ending the war,” he said. Pakistan has
emerged as a central mediator between the United States and Iran, hosting
historic face-to-face talks last month that failed to yield a lasting agreement.
Its army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir was due in Tehran on Thursday, Iranian
media reported. China has played a quieter role, shepherding phone calls and
meetings with officials of affected Gulf countries. After high-profile talks
with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing last week, Trump told Fox News the
Chinese leader had offered Beijing’s help to reopen the Strait of Hormuz – a key
oil route largely blocked since the war erupted. China’s Foreign Minister Wang
Yi urged Islamabad this month to “step up mediation efforts” in the Middle East,
speaking to his Pakistani counterpart Ishaq Dar in a call. In the past two
weeks, Beijing has hosted visits from Trump and Russian President Vladimir
Putin.
Uganda confirms new Ebola cases, linked to DR Congo
AFP/23 May ,2026
Three new Ebola cases have been confirmed in Uganda, health authorities said
Saturday, after the World Health Organization raised the risk from the deadly
outbreak to the highest level for neighboring Democratic Republic of Congo. The
new cases bring to five the total confirmed in Uganda since the current outbreak
was discovered in the east African country on May 15. It named the patients as a
Ugandan driver, a Ugandan health worker and a woman from the DRC, the epicenter
of the outbreak, which the WHO has declared an international emergency.
“Three new cases of the Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) have been confirmed in the
country,” the Ugandan health ministry said in a statement on X.
All three are alive.
On Friday, the WHO raised the risk from Ebola in the DRC to “very high.” The
United Nations health agency said the regional risk in central Africa was
“high,” though it maintained the global risk was “low.” Ebola is a deadly viral
disease that spreads through direct contact with bodily fluids. It can cause
severe bleeding and organ failure. There have been 82 confirmed cases and seven
confirmed deaths in the DRC, alongside almost 750 suspected cases and 177
suspected deaths, the WHO said. The outbreak, which experts suspect was
circulating under the radar for some time, is caused by the less common
Bundibugyo strain, for which there are no approved vaccines or treatments. On
Thursday, Uganda suspended all public transport to the DRC after confirming its
first two cases – one infection and one death – involving Congolese nationals
who crossed the border. It said the driver confirmed infected on Saturday had
been at the wheel of the vehicle in which one of the ill Congolese nationals had
travelled to Uganda.
The health worker was exposed to the virus when she was treating that Congolese
patient.
‘Especially challenging’
The third new case, the ministry said, was a Congolese woman who had been
treated in Kampala for abdominal pains and discharged “in good condition” on May
14. She tested positive for Ebola after she returned to the DRC. “All contacts
linked to the confirmed cases have since been identified and are being closely
monitored,” the health ministry said. WHO director general Tedros Adhanom
Ghebreyesus said on Friday the situation in the DRC was “especially
challenging.” Health workers were scrambling – in highly insecure, remote areas
– to catch up with the spread of the virus and track down contacts of everyone
thought to be infected, he said. The epicenter is in the eastern DRC –
neighboring several African countries, including Uganda – which has been plagued
for three decades by conflict involving a litany of armed groups. The DRC
epidemic was first detected in Ituri province and has now spread to South Kivu,
to an area controlled by the Rwanda-backed M23 militia. State services in rural
areas of Ituri have been largely absent for decades and its inhabitants are
increasingly blaming the Congolese government for the slow response to the
outbreak. In South Kivu, M23 has never had to manage the response to a serious
epidemic of a disease like Ebola, which has killed more than 15,000 people in
Africa in the past half-century.
The Latest
LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on 23-24 May/2026
President Trump: Please Do Not
Leave the Iranian Regime in Place…We Waited More Than Four Decades for You, We
Will Not Get Another Break
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/May 23, 2026
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/05/154737/
Iran's regime has been using two tactics. It says: "We need time. We
are, because of the strikes, fractured and our leadership divided." Or, as Vice
President J.D. Vance naively noted on its behalf, it says it does not know what
it wants. "The Iranians aren't themselves quite clear in what direction they
want to go," Vance, with a straight face, told reporters at the White House;
"they are also just a fractured country."
That is exactly what the regime wants: that you are dumb enough to believe that.
The Iranian regime knows precisely what it wants.
The supposed "moderates" will say, " Oh please wait for us. We are so fractured!
We just want to win over the hardliners -- and we are ALMOST there!" This dish
has been served up for years. It works.
If Iran's regime stays in power, it will break every agreement -- with full
vengeance. The world cannot wait another 50 years, hoping for maybe another
President Trump.
Do not listen to the liberal media outlets that are telling you to stop,
de-escalate, or accept 20-year fake "moratoriums" or other idiotic
half-measures.
Your trusted "negotiator," Pakistan, is a long-time supporter of Iran. Pakistan
wants to see the regime survive.
President Trump: For the world, for humanity, for Western civilization, please
do not leave this regime in place -- or a secular military one that is just as
fierce. We cannot wait another 50 years for someone like you again.
The Iranian regime is playing its game again: drag everything out to stay in
power until the American public grows tired of high gasoline prices; or until
the November midterm elections. Drag the deals. Drag the talks. Drag the
feedback. Drag the confusion. Or else: Put a deal out on the table and then take
it back. Then put out another deal. Then another one. Before you know it, the
West will be worn down.
The Iranian regime is playing its game again: drag everything out to stay in
power until the American public grows tired of high gasoline prices; or until
the November midterm elections, when the Democrats might win; or until 2029 when
President Donald J. Trump's term finally ends and he is replaced, with luck, by
an invertebrate.
Iran's regime has been using two tactics. It says: "We need time. We are,
because of the strikes, fractured and our leadership divided." Or, as Vice
President J.D. Vance naively noted on its behalf: it says it does not know what
it wants. "The Iranians aren't themselves quite clear in what direction they
want to go," Vance, with a straight face, told reporters at the White House;
"they are also just a fractured country."
That is exactly what the regime wants: that you are dumb enough to believe that.
The Iranian regime knows precisely what it wants. It wants to stay in power to
continue its anti-Americanism, anti-Semitism, anti-Westernism and
anti-its-own-people-ism. The regime wants to revive its nuclear weapons and
ballistic missiles programs; restore its terrorist proxies, Hamas, Hezbollah and
the Houthis; try to create another noose of death around Israel; threaten Europe
and eventually the United States; suppress, kill and execute its own people, and
continue to export its fanatic ideology and Islamist revolution.
The supposed "moderates" will say, " Oh please wait for us. We are so fractured!
We just want to win over the hardliners -- and we are ALMOST there!" This dish
has been served up for years. It works.
The second ploy is "Drag, Drag, Drag." Drag the deals. Drag the talks. Drag the
feedback. Drag the confusion. Or else: Put a deal out on the table and then take
it back. Then put out another deal. Then another one. Before you know it, the
West will be worn down.
Please, President Trump: No president has ever had the courage to take action as
you have done. You are different from everyone. It took more than four decades
for someone like you to show up to save the world. Iran's regime has killed
Americans, Arabs, Iranians. As the "top state sponsor of terrorism for 39 years
in a row," Iran has been terrorizing half the planet.
If this regime stays in power, essentially nothing has been accomplished. All
that you have historically done will be for naught. If Iran's regime stays in
power, it will break every agreement -- with full vengeance. The world cannot
wait another 50 years hoping for maybe another President Trump.
The regime -- with help from China, Russia, and North Korea -- will restart its
nuclear program. It will impose tolls in the Strait of Hormuz. There will be no
one with the guts to stop it. The regime will ramp up assassinations abroad,
support its proxies, attack Israel more aggressively, and race again toward
nuclear weapons.
The regime is hoping to wait out your term.
Please, President Trump, do not leave this regime in place or replace it with an
equally brutal military one. Continue the economic pressure. Do not give the
regime relief. Arm and support the Iranian people so they can stand up and not
be rounded up, tortured and executed again. Do not listen to the liberal media
outlets that are telling you to stop, de-escalate, or accept 20-year fake
"moratoriums" or other idiotic half-measures.
Your trusted "negotiator," Pakistan, is a long-time supporter of Iran (here,
here, here and here). It wants to see the regime survive.
President Trump: For the world, for humanity, for Western civilization, please
do not leave this regime in place -- or a secular military one that is just as
fierce. We cannot wait another 50 years for someone like you again.
**Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a political scientist, Harvard-educated analyst, and
board member of Harvard International Review. He has authored several books on
the US foreign policy. He can be reached at dr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu
**Follow Majid Rafizadeh on X (formerly Twitter)
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22538/president-trump-please-do-not-leave-the-iranian
© 2026 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Putin goes to Beijing: Why the Russo-Chinese relationship matters
Cornelia Meyer/Al Arabiya English/23 May ,2026
President Xi Jinping has become somewhat the “host with the mostest,” because
foreign leaders visit him as though walking through a revolving door. President
Donald Trump went to Beijing last week. Russia’s President Vladimir Putin
followed him hot on the heels earlier this week and Pakistan’s Prime Minister
Shehbaz Sharif will arrive over the weekend. (President Asif Ali Zardari had
already paid a visit at the end of April.) Since the beginning of the year,
Spain’s Pedro Sanchez, Canada’s Mark Carney, the UAE’s Sheikh Khaled bin
Mohammed, Germany’s Friedrich Merz and others had visited the Middle Kingdom.
China has always seen herself as the country in the middle (literal translation
of the Chinese characters) or more commonly referred to itself as the Middle
Kingdom. China takes an ever more prominent position on the world stage, which
should not be further surprising given it has become the second largest economy
in the world. China has to manage the relationship with the largest economy in
the world very carefully, which was reflected by Trump’s visit with Xi. It had
turned out to be as constructive as could have been hoped for.
Other than that, China wants to stand in good stead with all of the markets for
its goods, as well as its suppliers of energy and other industrial inputs. More
importantly, China wants to see itself in the center of an emerging multipolar
world. The Middle Kingdom started on that journey when then President Jiang
Zeimin founded the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in 2001 – a Eurasian pact
that has both an economic and a military dimension. It came as little surprise
that the People’s Republic bought into the concept of the BRICS. The idea was
developed by the then Goldman Sachs Chief Economist Jim O’Neill in the 2000s.
The Belt and Road Initiative can be seen as an economic extension of that
philosophy. The G20 serves as Beijing’s conduit to OECD nations. Such is the
backdrop against which President Putin went to see his Chinese counterpart.
Russia is an important neighbor for China. They share a long communal border,
which means that both governments have an interest in stability in what is
arguably their most important near neighbor. They also take a keen interest in
their relationship.
Putin’s visit coincided with the 25th anniversary of the Sino-Russian Treaty of
Friendship.
Energy loomed large: China is the biggest importer of hydrocarbons in the world
and Russia is its biggest supplier. Twenty percent of oil imports hail from
North of the border. Russia is also China’s largest supplier of natural gas via
pipelines and with LNG.
The People’s Republic and Russia had signed a construction agreement for the
behemoth 50 billion cubic meters Power of Siberia 2 pipeline project, which is
intended to run from the Yamal Peninsula via Siberia and Mongolia to China.
Russia is keen to sign on the dotted line, because it has needed additional
buyers for its hydrocarbons ever since it was put under sanctions by Europe and
the US because of the Ukraine war. China was cautious because it wants to buy at
the lowest possible price and is also cognizant not to be too dependent on one
single country when it comes to its energy supplies.
Russia hoped that the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz provided it with an
opportunity to close the deal: China gets one third of its crude oil and 25
percent of its LNG from the other side of the Strait of Hormuz. Still China has
huge crude oil inventories and can buy LNG from Asian suppliers and the US. As a
result the Power of Siberia contract was not yet signed during this trip – much
to the chagrin of Moscow.
Bilateral trade has grown by 20 percent during the first four month of the year
and we can expect this year’s volume to exceed the USD 245 billion of 2024. The
difference here is that while China is Russia’s primary trade partner, Russia is
just one among many trading partners for China, whose most important bilateral
relationship is with the United States.
Putin came in toe with eight ministers, the central bank governor, several vice
ministers and the CEOs of Gazprom, Rosneft, Rosatom as well as some other
business leaders. The delegations signed a good 40 agreements. The leaders
reiterated their stance that the Iran conflict needed to be ended and reaffirmed
their commitment to a multipolar world. The Ukraine war was not mentioned and
the US Golden Dome missile defense system was criticized as a “threat to global
strategic stability.”All in all, Russia needs China more than vice versa,
especially in light of the crippling OECD sanctions. However, China does
understand that Russia is its near-neighbor, biggest supplier of energy and its
best bet for access to the Arctic, which will become increasingly important when
the ice thaws due to global warming. At the same time both countries share a
wish to further a multipolar world order and position themselves prominently
therein. China and Russia maintain good relations with Iran, which in the case
of China, may become important when looking for an off ramp to the conflict.
From the perspective of both President Xi and Putin, the visit was a success,
although Russia did not get as far as it wanted with the all-important Power of
Siberia 2 pipeline project.
China's Way of Capitalizing on Opportunity
Dr. Amal Moussa/Asharq Al-Awsat/May 23/2026
The culture of pragmatism has long been associated with the United States of
America. With the current president, Donald Trump, we almost forgot this
association, given the prevalence of international dominance rhetoric. This has
made the White House's "interactions" with world events and Washington's "role"
in creating and "directing" events in recent years a distinct and unique chapter
in the book of American foreign policy. However, what is typically connected to
a nation's culture remains deeply rooted, even if it disappears from view and
becomes imperceptible. It appears to us that Trump's recent state visit to China
is an example of the deep-seated culture of pragmatism, which the President
himself invoked to manage what has come to be called the "Iranian crisis."
Just a few months ago, the White House was at the peak of tension in its
relationship with China, and a trade war was waged, employing the deadly weapon
that disrupted China's trade balance: tariffs. The visit generated considerable
discussion, with the US President adopting a remarkably different and striking
diplomatic demeanor. He was uncharacteristically diplomatically disciplined and
respectful of strict Chinese protocol. We did not see the US president
improvising, heedless of potential gaffes. He delivered a speech that fostered
friendship, closeness, and de-escalation, abandoning the tone of challenge and
confrontation that had characterized the relationship with China over the past
period. It was here, specifically, that the world saw the pragmatic Trump, eager
to de-escalate the situation in the Middle East and overcome the Iranian crisis
by allying with a rising and powerful nation, with all that this implies in
terms of trade concessions in the "tariff war."Thus, we observe a qualitative
shift in the White House's rhetoric towards China, which was previously
considered a threat to US national security. Moreover, the harsh increase in
tariffs was framed as protecting American products. The specific choice of the
trade issue in confronting China stems from the fact that trade is the backbone
of the Chinese economy. In contrast to this trade war, which has been evident
since 2018 - that is, since Trump's first term - anyone who believes it is based
on a rupture between the two countries misunderstands the balance of relations.
There is what is called "economic interdependence" and "stability of global
supply chains," both of which strongly characterize their exchanges: the United
States relies on China for electronic components, manufacturing, and rare
earths, while China, for its part, is the largest consumer of US agricultural
products, such as grains and others. Furthermore, the trade war did not negate
mediation efforts between them during crises. We believe that a deeper
understanding of this point, often obscured by the trade war with China, is
crucial to break free from ready-made templates for interpreting political
relations, and also to avoid exaggerating the relationship between China and
Iran. Among powerful nations, or those of comparable strength, even if they
contend and each power creates a camp of nations in its interest, in serious
international moments, the rapprochement that was brewed in the secret kitchen
of the club of powers will have its effect, however slight. The question is: In
whose fundamental interest is Washington's pursuit of rapprochement and
de-escalation of tensions with Beijing; and how will China play its winning
cards without letting a losing card slip?
There is no doubt that China is currently perplexed about how to manage this
opportunity without any loss. The United States' recourse to China will not be
without a price, and China is well aware of this. Indeed, it understands China's
preferred compensation: a reduction in tariffs and a complete, even if subtly
unstated, disengagement from the Taiwan issue.
The second question: Supposing the United States offers the necessary
concessions to resolve the Strait of Hormuz crisis and weaken Iran, would this
compensation be enough for China to completely turn its back on Iran, given that
it is the primary buyer of Iranian oil, purchasing it in Chinese currency? And
can the "Iran card" truly be dropped, with all that implies for abandoning the
Middle East, a vital region in the world? So far, China appears to be winning,
and it is certainly concerned with its own interests, but in the Chinese way and
its understanding of long-term interests. China is a future power, and every
step it takes calculates both the present and the future, in addition to its
approach to international relations differing from that of the White House.
The ball is in Beijing's court, and the task is to pass it, adopting a tactic of
"maximum profit" without loss or uncalculated risk.
A Difficult American Victory and an Impossible Iranian One
Hazem Saghieh/Asharq Al-Awsat/May 23/2026
It could be said, until further notice, that in the event of a resumption of the
American-Israeli war with Iran, whatever form it takes, an American victory
would be difficult and an Iranian victory would be impossible. Disregarding
wishful thinking and the marketing of rosy narratives, we find extensive
explanations of why an American victory is difficult presented in Western
commentary. Among the reasons are the improvised planning for this war and the
extent of the United States’ economic and electoral pain tolerance, to say
nothing of what the Iranians call “steadfastness,” which is sustained by
smuggling networks and Russian and Chinese assistance, that also raises the
costs of defeating Tehran. Accordingly, the distance between American-Israeli
military successes and their translation into political gains is unlikely to be
short, while Iran’s unyielding intransigence does not suggest the contrary.
Nonetheless, the theory that bestows victory on Iran is far more misguided than
the theory that is optimistic about an easy American victory. Those making this
claim insist on their view despite the catastrophic military blows that Iran has
been dealt and the destruction these attacks have left, in addition to the
enormous economic setbacks Iran has suffered, the difficulties it now faces in
exporting oil and, consequently, obtaining hard currency to finance imports, as
well as the death of its military and political top brass, along with its
scientists, the obscure conditions of its Supreme Leader, and the near-confirmed
reports of infighting among competing and conflicting factions of the ruling
establishment.
Even if the Iranian regime were to “win”- in the sense that it manages to remain
“steadfast” and survives the war, or according to the principle that America’s
failure to achieve a decisive victory amounts to a crushing defeat- Iran would
not be able to sustain this victory after the war.
In light of the remarkable extent to which the regime’s conditions have
deteriorated, feeding ninety million people, meeting their most basic needs, and
surviving predictable questions and demands for accountability by the public
would become challenges that the regime will not manage to confront. The
regime’s handling of recent popular protests adds credence to the assumption
that the challenges will intensify in the postwar period. Despite the closed
nature of its political system, internet shutdowns, and Iran’s tendency to deny
reality, its government acknowledged on January 2, through state media and
statements attributed to institutions for martyrs, veterans, and others, that
3,117 people had been killed in a few days between the end of 2025 and the start
of 2026. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
reported last April that Iran had executed 21 people and arrested more than four
thousand. Reports by groups linked to the Iranian opposition, meanwhile, have
spoken of between five thousand and seven thousand deaths and the detention of
over 26,000.
Under these circumstances, it does not help to draw parallels between the war in
Iran and the 1956 war in Egypt, when Gamal Abdel Nasser suffered military defeat
but attained a political victory. At the time, both the United States and the
Soviet Union firmly backed Cairo; China and Russia are not providing comparable
support today, be it in terms of relative power and influence or how far they
are willing to go in support of Iran. For his part, Nasser was part of a
movement that had been in the ascension within the broader context of
decolonization after the end of WW2, and that does not apply to Iran. Whichever
way one looks at current global conditions, with the alliances and military and
political balances that ensue from them, the factors that had once allowed
exhausted, occupied, divided, or near-collapsed states to emerge victorious
(Vietnam in its struggle against France and later the United States, of China in
its second war against Japan, and of Afghanistan in the face of the Soviet
invasion) are simply not there anymore.
Moreover, the indications that Iranian victory is impossible have already begun
to appear outside the country, in the wider region where victories and defeats
are ultimately translated.
In Lebanon, despite all the yelling and the furious insistence on relying on
Tehran to negotiate on behalf of the Lebanese, the Lebanese have proceeded with
direct negotiations with Israel in the United States, breaking a longstanding
taboo. With the formation of the government led by Ali al-Zaidi, who also
emphasizes the need to “restrict armament to the hands of the state,” the
factions in Iraq loyal to Tehran seem to have been the biggest losers, with
Nouri al-Maliki seeming to have been the biggest of the big losers after
parliament withheld confidence from his “State of Law Coalition” candidates for
the Interior and Education ministries. Maliki himself had previously failed to
return to the premiership, and the “Coordination Framework” now seems set to
fall apart after the maestro of the orchestra that had distributed “shares”
within the state was weakened.
Esmail Qaani’s visit to Baghdad during the negotiations on the government
formation failed to prevent these setbacks, despite that, as commander of the
Quds Force, he is the successor to Qasem Soleimani whose demands were never
defied.
Meanwhile, American security units arrested Mohammed Baqer al-Saadi, a commander
of Kataib Hezbollah whom Washington accuses of having planned attacks against
American and Jewish targets in Europe, Canada, and the United States. Through
the operation, the United States effectively introduced Iraq into the hunt for
such leaders- a “game” of war that Israelis have become famous for. Some would
also add the marked decline in the military activity of Yemen’s Houthis. And all
of this follows the elimination of Iran’s ability to project influence from
Syria with the fall of Bashar al-Assad. How can there be victory without an
imperial sphere of influence?
Tehran’s Decision-Making Dilemma
Mohammed al-Rumaihi/Asharq Al-Awsat/May 23/2026
In analyzing Iran’s position, it is not enough to say that what appears to be a
dispute within the ruling system is merely a distribution of roles. This phrase,
often used by some in our media, does not explain everything on the ground.
It is true that closed regimes are skilled at producing political theater, and
sometimes use apparent contradictions to widen their margin for maneuver. But
reading the Iranian experience from within, and through the testimonies of some
of its own figures, shows that the matter is deeper than stagecraft. There is an
old struggle between diplomacy and the field, between the state and the
revolution, between those seeking a settlement that preserves the system, and
those who see any settlement as a postponed defeat. In Mohammad Javad Zarif’s
memoirs, especially in his book The Resilience of Diplomacy, a striking image
emerges of a man who represented Iran at the United Nations, only to discover
that his government, during the Ahmadinejad era, did not treat him as the
primary channel of decision-making.
Instead, it opened side channels with the second-ranking official at the
mission. That episode reveals a culture of governance built on multiple centers
of power, suspicion of the other, even within the same camp, and a preference
for the security or ideological channel over the official one when the issue is
sensitive. If a later foreign minister, and a former ambassador to the United
Nations, felt exposed before his own government, how can one assume that Iran’s
decisions always come from one room and one mind? Hossein Amir-Abdollahian’s
book “Sobhe Sham” adds another dimension. The man presents himself as a witness
to Iran’s presence in Syria, but he reveals, whether intentionally or not, that
Iranian foreign policy is not made by the foreign ministry.
The ministry may propose, but there is the field, the Revolutionary Guards, and
the calculations of doctrine and influence. In such a bureaucratic structure,
the minister is not the decision-maker.
More often, he becomes its explainer or defender before the outside world.
Diplomacy here is not the factory of policy, but its verbal facade. That is why
Iranian discourse mixes promises of calm with acts of escalation, and why the
state appears to say one thing and do the opposite.
The difference between a “distribution of roles” and a “real dispute” is very
important. A distribution of roles means there is one center, and that multiple
voices are playing an agreed tune. A real dispute means each institution is
trying to pull the decision toward its own logic. That is what is happening in
Iran today. The presidency thinks about an exhausted domestic front, sanctions
and fear of a social explosion. The foreign ministry thinks about negotiations
and reducing pressure. The IRGC thinks about deterrence, prestige, networks of
influence and interests. The ideological establishment thinks about the survival
of the narrative on which the system was founded. In major crises, these minds
do not always complement one another. They clash, and decision-making stalls.
That is the scene now taking shape before us.
The episode everyone knows, when Iran’s current president, Masoud Pezeshkian,
came out to say that Iran would not fire on “friendly” Gulf states, only for
missiles to continue hours later, may be explained by some as a calculated
double message. But strategic logic says that double messages in wartime are not
skill, they are danger. A state that wants to reassure its neighbors does not
reassure them with words and then terrify them with action.
That not only weakens Gulf trust but also undermines the trust of any
international mediator trying to build an agreement that can be implemented. An
agreement with Iran does not require a single signature. The more serious
question is this: who has the right to obstruct after the signature? Can the
government bind the field? Can the foreign ministry guarantee the Revolutionary
Guards? Can the presidency control the arms? Can the supreme leadership, in a
moment of turmoil, prevent every center of power from protecting its own
interests? This is where negotiations become complicated, because the other side
is not only looking for a written text. It is looking for an authority capable
of implementing that text. This does not deny that some contradiction is
deliberate and used for negotiation. But it confirms that what is deliberate can
turn into chaos when centers of arms, money and legitimacy multiply. In normal
systems, politicians disagree and then institutions settle the matter. In the
Iranian case, the institutions themselves disagree, and each claims to be the
faithful guardian of the revolution. Therefore, it is not enough to ask: What
does Tehran want? The more accurate question is: Which Tehran is speaking, which
Tehran has its finger on the trigger, and which Tehran can honor what it has
promised?
That is why the assumption of a third military round does not seem remote, not
because it is inevitable, but because the structure of Iranian decision-making
repeatedly produces miscalculation.
The 12-day war, then the 40-day war, not only exposed the limits of power. They
also exposed the limits of political discipline inside the system. When the
military outbids the politician, when the politician fears being accused of
weakness, and when revolutionary rhetoric overtakes rational calculation,
escalation becomes an easier path than review.In the end, the dispute at the top
of the Iranian pyramid is not a media detail. It is the key to understanding the
entire predicament. The scene looks like this: Iran does not negotiate with the
world with one mind, does not fight with one hand, and does not reassure its
neighbors with one voice. That is the essence of the danger. When the head and
the arm are in conflict, agreements become fragile, war becomes closer, and the
entire region is left suspended between the promise of diplomacy and the missile
of the field. That is the trust gap that no speech or statement can bridge, no
matter how eloquent it sounds.Final word: A state that speaks with more than one
voice cannot build a lasting peace.
Selected Face
Book & X tweets for May 23/2026
Hussain Abdul-Hussain
Palestinians have been kicking up dust for decades, furious over
what they call the ongoing Judaization of the Abrahamic Mosque, known to
Israelis as the Cave of the Patriarchs. The irony is that this shrine contains
the tomb of the man who gave his name to Israel: the biblical Jacob. If Jews are
not permitted to “Judaize” the tomb of Israel’s own namesake, what exactly do
calls for equal rights for Muslims and Jews actually mean? (The imagined
coexistence model of the rubbish Ottoman Empire) I
personally doubt the historicity of Abraham or any of the other figures
supposedly buried at this spot. In Islamic tradition, the shrine only rose to
prominence during the Umayyad period in the seventh century CE—roughly 2,700
years after the presumed time of Abraham. The claim is further undermined by the
tendency to credit dynasty-founding patriarchs -- Abraham, Alexander the Great,
Imam Ali, and others -- with multiple tombs in different cities.What we can say
with confidence is that the fortified compound of the Abrahamic Mosque/Cave of
the Patriarchs was built around the same time as the Western Wall, near the
beginning of the Common Era. Islamic travelers begin mentioning the site as
early as the 12th century CE. For a time, this hill appears to have rivaled
Mount Moriah/Al-Aqsa in importance, until Jerusalem eventually prevailed (David
thus moved his capital from Hebron to Jerusalem). The two sites were
mythologically constructed along parallel lines: both centered on a sacred cave
beneath the shrine. In Hebron the cave is a grave; in Jerusalem it is the
dwelling place of undefined human souls.Now, the name Hebron itself. The Semitic
root ḥ-b-r conveys the idea of connection. In Hebrew it refers to human
relationships: khaver (friend), khevra (society). In Arabic, the same root
appears in khabour (connection between two objects); in Egyptian dialect, the ḥ
is softened and becomes kobri (bridge, connecting two banks of a river). The
identical root also appears in the Khyber Pass—the mountainous border crossing
between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Quranic Arabic vocalizes the root as ḥ-b-r to
mean “Jewish scholar” or “rabbi,” appearing in the plural as aḥbār al-Yahūd. In
Islamic tradition the root also surfaces as Khaybar, the name of the (largely
legendary) Jewish stronghold conquered by Muslim armies.
The city’s Arabic name, al-Khalil (or Khalil al-Rahman), is a direct
reference to Abraham as “the friend of God,” with khalil being the synonym of
Khaver/Khevron. Both Jews and Arabs continued to use the name ḥabron for the
city well into the mid-18th century, as documented in Nabulsi’s travel account.
The Quran gives Abraham considerable attention: his defiance of his father’s
idolatry, his willingness to sacrifice his son (spared at the last moment), and
the building of the Kaaba in Mecca with his son Ishmael. The other figures
associated with him receive far less prominence. Ishmael helps build the Kaaba;
Isaac is described as a great prophet who succeeds Abraham; Jacob appears, but
never in explicit connection with “Israel,” a name mentioned only twice as a
person and 39 times in the phrase Bani Israel (the Israelites). Abraham’s wives,
Sarah and Hagar, are entirely absent from the Quran, and so are the other wives
Rivka and Leah. The Abrahamic Mosque/Cave of the
Patriarchs contains the tombs of all these figures. The Quran mentions only the
four men, not the women, suggesting that Muslims took over an existing Jewish or
Christian shrine. Notably, the tombs of the women were left intact. This is most
likely because the Muslims who assumed control were Sufis, whose practices
diverged sharply from mainstream Sunni Islam. All four
schools of Sunni jurisprudence prohibit prayer at shrines containing tombs.
Palestinians are overwhelmingly Shafi‘i, which makes it improbable that the
Abrahamic shrine ever functioned as an active Palestinian mosque (a mosque being
a place of prayer). Sufi Islam, however, remained dominant across the
Mediterranean basin until the 19th century, when a more austere Sunni orthodoxy
reasserted itself. Even after their nominal conversion to Shafi‘i Sunnism,
Palestinians preserved the tombs and simply ceased praying around them.
Then Israel became independent and treated the site as one of the most
sacred places in Judaism. Suddenly the spot regained importance for
Palestinians—despite the fact that, even on strictly religious grounds, it holds
far less significance, nearing irrelevance, in Islam than it does in Judaism.
While half the figures interred in the cave are mentioned in the Quran, they
appear only as history parables of faith, not as part of Islam’s sacred
heritage.