English LCCC Newsbulletin For Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For August 22/2026
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news


The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

https://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2026/english.August 22.26.htm

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006 

Click On The Below Link To Join Elias Bejjaninews whatsapp group
https://chat.whatsapp.com/FPF0N7lE5S484LNaSm0MjW

اضغط على الرابط في أعلى للإنضمام لكروب Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group

Elias Bejjani/Click on the below link to subscribe to my youtube channel
الياس بجاني/اضغط على الرابط في أسفل للإشتراك في موقعي ع اليوتيوب

https://www.youtube.com/@eliasbejjani8036

Bible Quotations For today
‘Salt is good; but if salt has lost its taste, how can its saltiness be restored? It is fit neither for the soil nor for the manure heap; they throw it away.
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke 14/25-35/:”Large crowds were travelling with him; and he turned and said to them, ‘Whoever comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and even life itself, cannot be my disciple. Whoever does not carry the cross and follow me cannot be my disciple. For which of you, intending to build a tower, does not first sit down and estimate the cost, to see whether he has enough to complete it? Otherwise, when he has laid a foundation and is not able to finish, all who see it will begin to ridicule him, saying, “This fellow began to build and was not able to finish.”Or what king, going out to wage war against another king, will not sit down first and consider whether he is able with ten thousand to oppose the one who comes against him with twenty thousand? If he cannot, then, while the other is still far away, he sends a delegation and asks for the terms of peace. So therefore, none of you can become my disciple if you do not give up all your possessions. ‘Salt is good; but if salt has lost its taste, how can its saltiness be restored? It is fit neither for the soil nor for the manure heap; they throw it away. Let anyone with ears to hear listen!’

Titles For The English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on August 21-22/2026
Erdogan, detached from reality, is hallucinating about an Ottoman empire buried in the dustbin of history./Elias Bejjani/August 21 August/2026
General Labor Confederation President Bechara Al-Asmar Appointed Chairman of the Social Security Fund Board… What a Choice/Elias Bejjani/August 18/2026
A Political Class Hatched by the Incubators of Occupations/Elias Bejjani/August 18/2026
Salam visits army's South Litani headquarters in Tyre
Hezbollah doesn't intend to cede Ali al-Taher but open to 'compromise'
Ali al-Taher escalation: Israel weighs airstrikes and ground operations
Drone flies at low altitude over Beirut’s southern suburbs: Report
US Embassy welcomes Lebanon’s updated Media Law, urges further reforms
New US Sanctions Tighten Grip on Hezbollah, Test Lebanon
US Hits Hezbollah with Fresh Sanctions, Says Iran Controls it
World Bank Projects Lebanon Economy to Contract by 6.4% Due to War
State Return to South Lebanon Extends Beyond Security to Services, Recovery
Arab League Chief Condemns Israeli Violations in Palestinian, Syrian, Lebanese Territories
Hezbollah says doesn't need validation of its 'patriotism' after US sanctions
Inside One of Lebanon’s Pilot Zones, Hezbollah Has Returned/Claudia Groeling & Ralph Atrach/This Is Beirut/August 21/2026

Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on August 21-22/2026
Trump Warns of 'Economic D-Day' against Iran, but Tehran is Well Acquainted with Sanctions
Iran President Says Time to End War while in Position of Strength
Iran's Qalibaf Says Tehran Must Plan to Overcome 'Unjust Sanctions', Following US Threats
Economic pressure ‘most effective tool’ against Iran: US VP Vance
NATO members discuss Strait of Hormuz options without alliance involvement
Israel PM calls Turkey's Erdogan 'antisemitic dictator'
Türkiye to Seek Interpol Notice for Netanyahu in Gaza Flotilla Case
Iran Vows 'Devastating' Response to US Threat to Cut off its Economic Lifelines
UN Warns 94% of Gaza's Population Urgently Needs Shelter and Basic Aid
UK, Canada, Australia Slam Israel Ending Probe into Aid Worker Killings
Baghdad Implicitly Backtracks on Deadline to Confine Weapons to the State
Iran President Says Time to End War while in Position of Strength
US, Kuwait agree to deepen military cooperation and integration, Pentagon says
Abdi Announces Completion of SDF’s Civil, Military Integration with Damascus
Ukraine allies to meet Monday co-chaired by France, UK, Germany leaders: French presidency
Zelensky slams 'cynical' Russian attack on shopping centre
Saudi Crown Prince departs for France on official visit

Titles For The Latest English LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on August 21-22/2026
Where geopolitics meets the global economy/Cornelia Meyer/Al-Arabiyia English/21 August ,2026
The UN on the Way to the Unknown/Amir Taheri/Asharq Al-Awsat/August 21/2026
Qalibaf and the Confining of Two States to the Hands of the Weapons/Mustafa Fahs/Asharq Al-Awsat/August 21/2026
I Have a Dream/Dr. Abdelhak Azzouzi/Asharq Al-Awsat/August 21/2026
Ankara occupies Syria and then lectures Israel about sovereignty/A NATO member that refuses to designate Hamas, hosts its leadership does not get to lecture a state which has legitimate terrorism concerns/Sinan Ciddi/The Jerusalem Post/August 21/2026
Beware Iran’s most devious weapon — another ‘October surprise’/Mark Dubowitz/New York Post/August 21/2026
Israel strikes military airbase in Syria while warning Turkey/Seth J. Frantzman/FDD's Long War Journal/August 21/2026
Washington Should Not Reduce Military Exercises With South Korea/Logan Rolleigh and Ryan Brobst/FDD- Policy Brief/August 21/2026
Resistance to Taliban rule persists in Afghanistan/Will Selber/FDD's Long War Journal/August 20, 2026
Democratic Socialists of America: The Secret Stooges/Peter Huessy/Gatestone Institute/August 21, 2026
Question:What did Jesus mean by “upon this rock I will build my church” in Matthew 16:18/GotQuestions.org/August 21/2026
Selected Face Book & X tweets on August 21/2026

Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published oon August 21-22/2026
Erdogan, detached from reality, is hallucinating about an Ottoman empire buried in the dustbin of history.
Elias Bejjani/August 21 August/2026
Erdogan is a despicable Muslim Brotherhood sick creature, obsessed with delusions and hallucinations of a bygone Ottoman Empire, which history has buried in its dustbin. A monstrous creature, more dangerous than Satan himself.

Israel will expose and dismantle Erdogan's Ottoman illusions and ambitions, just as it exposed and defeated the hallucinations of the Iranian axis of evil.
Elias Bejjani/August 20/2026
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/08/156826/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqIzZHNWY4I
The state of Israel, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has proven its exceptional ability to completely alter the face of the region, thereby exposing the ugly reality of jihadist political Islam and the Iranian axis of evil, which was long built upon illusions, hallucinations, populist daydreams, and wishful thinking. By delivering precise intelligence and military strikes, Israel succeeded in eliminating the core of the mullahs' axis of evil. The assassination of Hassan Nasrallah and all Hezbollah leaders from the first, second, and third tiers proved beyond a doubt that Israeli intelligence knows the inner workings of this Iranian terrorist organization better than its own leaders, masters, and patrons among the mullahs of Iran. The exact same firm policy was applied to the jihadist Hamas, culminating in forcing it to accept in principle to surrender power in Gaza and lay down its arms, regardless of its ongoing attempts to hide behind taqiyya (dissimulation) or temporary political maneuvering.
This visionary and leading Israeli approach did not stop at shattering the myth of the mullahs' regime and dismantling its false slogans through the assassination of its political, military, and nuclear scientific leaders—carried out in cooperation with the United States under President Trump. Rather, it dragged the jihadist mullahs' regime in Iran into a state of absolute strategic weakness. This weakness will inevitably open the door soon for the oppressed and persecuted Iranian people to overthrow the criminal mullahs' regime, which is obsolete, rooted in the darkness of eras of raids and ignorance, and utterly disconnected from the demands of the modern age.
In the same context, Israel is firmly moving today to expose and dismantle the dreams, schemes, incursions, and illusions of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who seeks to revive Ottoman ambitions and acts as the prominent patron of Islamist jihadists. Just as the Iranian illusion collapsed, the failure of Erdogan's Turkish gambits will come as a shock to several regional capitals—foremost among them Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt, and Pakistan—that were fooled by the deception that Erdogan is a strong, effective leader capable of ending Israel's regional role or casting it into the sea.
As part of containing these expansive, delusional, deceitful, and populist Ottoman plots, Israeli warplanes carried out precise strikes deep inside Syrian territory on August 18, targeting the "Abu Duhur airbase" in the Idlib governorate, roughly 70 kilometers south of the Turkish border. Eight strikes hit the base's runway and storage facilities.
This decisive military action came after intelligence and satellite surveillance detected the entry of a high-level, highly experienced Turkish military and intelligence delegation into the "Abu Duhur airbase" in Syria's Idlib governorate, in preparation for the Turkish military to seize control of it and threaten the freedom of Israeli aerial navigation. The Israeli forces waited until the Turkish delegation departed before striking the base, thereby drawing a definitive red line against Erdogan and his evil ambitions. While the Israeli Prime Minister's Office indicated that a previous security understanding existed with Damascus to prevent breaches of the status quo by allowing Turkish forces to deploy, Syrian jihadist officials rushed—to save face regionally, nationally, and islamically—to deny the existence of any such understanding, condemning the strikes as a violation of sovereignty. Meanwhile the U.S. Ambassador to Turkey, Thomas Barrack—who is a personal supporter of Erdogan's project and entirely ignorant of the region's history—expressed his concern over this escalation.
Israel, which has always been clear regarding its red lines, has maintained a secure buffer zone inside Syria since the collapse of "Bashar al-Assad's regime" in December 2024, and has executed preemptive strikes against bases slated for Turkish occupation, such as the T4 airbase in February 2025.
There is no doubt that the current Syrian leadership, led by al-Golani (Ahmed al-Sharaa), falls under direct Turkish hegemony and control; Ankara occupies a third of Syrian territory via 12 military bases, and its overt objective is to reach the Israeli border through terrorist jihadist organizations, mirroring the role played by the Jihadist-Iranian terrorist Hezbollah along the Lebanese-Israeli border.
In conclusion, Erdogan—with his jihadist, Islamist, and expansionist Ottoman illusions and schemes—represents the real and operational threat looming over the Middle East. This rancorous Islamist, dreaming of reviving an empire buried in the depths of time, poses a grave strategic threat that dwarfs the danger of Iran's mullahs and their criminal regime. He openly flaunts his blatant hostility toward the state of Israel while exploiting regional alliances to advance his agenda. His expansionist, Ottoman-minded Muslim Brotherhood project threatens Arab nations collectively, not just Israel, especially given that Israel's objective is to forge peace and cooperative agreements with regional states through the civilized, peaceful, and economic Abraham Accords, rather than threatening them, occupying their lands, and spreading jihadist organizations as Erdogan and the Iranian mullahs' regime do.
Consequently, a strong, visionary Israel dedicated to peace, stability, openness, freedom, and a dignified life will unquestionably not allow Erdogan to execute his expansionist and radical Islamist project. It will not hesitate to apply the exact same rigorous military rules used to subdue the mullahs' regime and its evil proxies—Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis—to shatter Erdogan's illusions and expose the reality of his power and capabilities.

General Labor Confederation President Bechara Al-Asmar Appointed Chairman of the Social Security Fund Board… What a Choice!
Elias Bejjani/August 18/2026
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/08/156755/
With each passing day, enlightened, free, and sovereignty-minded Lebanese become increasingly convinced that the tenure of Joseph Aoun and the government of Nawaf Salam, along with most of those who revolve within the orbit of power, the owners of the country’s political parties enterprises and political parties agencies, and their networks of vested interests, is nothing more than a blatant and transparent continuation of the approach that ruled Lebanon throughout the years of Syrian and Iranian occupations.
From this perspective, the election of Bechara Al-Asmar, President of the General Labor Confederation, as Chairman of the Board of the National Social Security Fund can only be understood within the context of the continuation of the same ruling establishment that brought the country to collapse and whose real levers of power remain firmly in the hands of Nabih Berri and Hezbollah.
It is well known that the General Labor Confederation, which was supposed to serve as the umbrella defending the rights of Lebanese workers, has for many years been transformed into an instrument subordinate to the political establishment and its apparatuses, losing both its independence and its genuine trade-union role. In the eyes of large numbers of Lebanese workers, the Confederation no longer represents their interests or aspirations. Instead, it has become part of a system of political patronage and dependency that has stripped national institutions of their true purpose and national character.
The experience of past decades confirms that the majority of labor and professional unions that fell under the domination of the traditional political parties—the poisonous legacy of successive occupations—have been transformed into tools of political and electoral mobilization rather than institutions dedicated to defending the rights of their members.
In this context, the names of Bechara Al-Asmar and Bassam Tlais stand out as prominent figures within a union structure that has become closely associated with the projects and interests of the forces dominating Lebanon’s political decision-making, foremost among them the Amal Movement and Hezbollah.
If the National Social Security Fund constitutes the last social safety net for hundreds of thousands of Lebanese citizens, then placing it under the management of figures affiliated with the same political establishment raises legitimate concerns among citizens who have suffered from corruption, waste, and political patronage throughout the past decades. Genuine reform begins by removing public institutions from the influence of political parties and occupation forces and restoring them to competent, experienced, and independent leadership.
In recent years, the Lebanese people have endured an unprecedented financial and economic collapse, while the official union leadership remained largely absent from any serious and effective defense of workers, retirees, and low-income citizens. It also failed to prevent the erosion of wages, protect social security and mutual assistance funds, or confront policies that pushed hundreds of thousands of Lebanese into poverty and forced many into emigration.
Accordingly, what is required is not merely opposition to the appointment of this individual, Rather, it is a fundamental reassessment of Lebanon’s labor movement, its liberation from partisan and political tutelage and from subservience to occupation forces, and the enactment of modern laws that guarantee its independence and transparency, thereby restoring its natural role as the foremost defender of workers’ rights and interests.
In conclusion, the heresy of installing Bechara Al-Asmar at the head of the National Social Security Fund Board under the false pretense and deception of an “election” constitutes yet another indication that the mentality of political quotas and patronage still controls the state and its institutions, and that the presidency tenure of Joseph Aoun and the government of Nawaf Salam serves merely as a façade for Iranian domination as represented by Nabih Berri and Hezbollah.
Real reform will begin only when Lebanon frees itself from occupation and when competence, integrity, and independence become the sole criteria for assuming public office, free from partisan loyalties and regional agendas.
The author, Elias Bejjani, is a Lebanese expatriate activist
Author’s Email: Phoenicia@hotmail.com
Author’s Website: https://eliasbejjaninews.com


A Political Class Hatched by the Incubators of Occupations
Elias Bejjani/August 18/2026
The entire political class, from top to bottom, from the middle to the seventies, is a scumbag, hatched by the incubators of occupations... emasculated, with fabricated files, opportunists, corrupt, narcissistic, with no vision or cause. And there are no exceptions... politicians, party-owning companies, religious figures, and rulers who are themselves ruled. And of course, the flocks of sheep belonging to the party-owning companies.

Aoun reportedly seeking military cooperation agreement with EU
Naharnet/August 21/2026 
President Joseph Aoun is leading an effort, in cooperation with Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, to pursue a military cooperation agreement between Lebanon and the European Union with the aim of bringing in a European military force to replace UNIFIL, whose mandate expires at the end of this year, al-Akhbar newspaper reported.“Aoun appears to be operating on the premise that such an agreement requires neither a Cabinet decision nor a law passed by Parliament ... and he is relying on strong support from the United States, which still prefers that European participation be limited to specific countries, with a particular focus on Italy,” the daily said. According to the report, Aoun's latest visit to Rome aims to discuss this matter with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, within the context of the role the United States and Israel envision for Italy, which is led by a right-wing government supported by the Trump administration. “Aoun is seeking to convince the Italians to provide the necessary European funding to lead the European force, which is supposed to be formed from countries such as Germany and Scandinavian nations, with an American-Israeli desire to exclude France and Spain in particular, and leave a special role for Germany,” al-Akhbar added.

Salam visits army's South Litani headquarters in Tyre

Naharnet/August 21/2026 
Prime Minister Nawaf Salam and Defense Minister Michel Menassa visited Friday the Lebanese Army's South Litani headquarters in the southern city of Tyre. Salam urged the army to maintain its unity, assuring the soldiers that his government is mobilizing all available Arab and international support to enhance human capabilities, modernize equipment, and improve living conditions for military personnel. He said the army's presence in the south represents the state itself and with every new military position, the state restores its sovereignty. "We want the South, as with all of Lebanon, to fall under the authority of one unified state," Salam said, adding that strengthening the army is "a strategic choice" at the heart of the government's mission to rebuild the state. The visit comes after a violent night of strikes and demolitions in the border villages of Mayfadoun, Zawtar al-Sharqiyeh, Ali al-Taher, Taybeh, Mays al-Jabal, al-Mansouri, Hadatha, Teereh, and al-Khiam. While Salam was delivering his speech, explosions from detonations in nearby al-Mansouri were heard, and Israeli artillery was shelling al-Mansouri and Majdalzoun. A strike also targeted a house on the outskirts of Baraashit. Later in the day, detonations were carried out in Arnoun-Kfartebnit. Defense Minister Menassa reaffirmed Lebanon's commitment to full sovereignty over every inch of its territory, adding that negotiations with Israel remain the best path out of the current crisis. "We will not rest until the South returns to Lebanon," he said.

Hezbollah doesn't intend to cede Ali al-Taher but open to 'compromise'

Naharnet/August 21/2026 
Amid conflicting reports about the situation in the Ali al-Taher area, which continues to come under Israeli airstrikes, a prominent Hezbollah source confirmed that the group "has no intention of surrendering the Ali al-Taher hill to the Lebanese Army, the enemy, or any other party.”
“Such a surrender carries significant risks, the most important being that it would embolden the enemy to seize other positions at any cost. Furthermore, this area lies north of the Litani River, and the exclusive right to bear arms is governed by U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701, which addresses only the area south of the Litani," the source told al-Joumhouria newspaper in remarks published Friday.The source added: "Ultimately, the enemy could take the hill, but only through a battle, because the culture of surrender and capitulation is not part of the resistance's culture. Moreover, our young men are not expected to commit suicide. Therefore, the matter could be subject to a compromise, the terms of which Lebanon has set, beginning with the most crucial point: a cessation of hostilities and withdrawal."

Ali al-Taher escalation: Israel weighs airstrikes and ground operations
LBCI/August 21/2026
Israeli security officials have decided to expand attacks on Ali al-Taher hill in southern Lebanon, including airstrikes by warplanes and drones, as well as special ground operations by Israeli army units surrounding the area. The decision comes amid Israeli reports that a number of Hezbollah fighters have managed to emerge from tunnels surrounded on the hill, while others have entered the tunnels to reinforce fighters who remain trapped inside. According to Israeli security assessments, fewer than 30 Hezbollah and Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps fighters are believed to be inside the tunnels on the hill. If accurate, the reports would present the Israeli army with growing challenges in an area it has heavily targeted with airstrikes in recent hours. Entering the fortified tunnel network could pose significant risks to Israeli troops. The army is therefore operating under what it calls a strategy of “gradual pressure” on those trapped inside. The reported presence of Iranian personnel, according to the Israeli narrative, also adds regional and political sensitivity to the situation. Despite the challenges, the Israeli army says it is prepared to address the situation and is awaiting political approval.
The escalation in Ali al-Taher also followed a security assessment claiming that Hezbollah was planning to target Israeli forces by planting explosives and carrying out large-scale attacks. With Israel’s elections about two months away, Tel Aviv is using the Ali al-Taher issue as a potential lever that could reshape the situation on the ground — and possibly the political landscape — amid Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s need to project an achievement on the northern border.

Drone flies at low altitude over Beirut’s southern suburbs: Report

LBCI/August 21/2026
A drone was seen flying at low altitude over Beirut’s southern suburbs on Friday, according to local reports.

US Embassy welcomes Lebanon’s updated Media Law, urges further reforms

LBCI/August 21/2026
The U.S. Embassy in Lebanon welcomed Parliament’s approval of the updated Media Law, describing it as an opportunity to advance Lebanon’s media landscape. The embassy said effective implementation and further reforms, including ending the criminal prosecution of journalists simply for carrying out legitimate professional duties, are essential to protecting journalists, safeguarding press freedom and promoting a pluralistic and independent media environment. It reaffirmed that the United States remains firmly committed to supporting Lebanon’s efforts to protect freedom of expression, shield journalists from political pressure and maintain a vibrant and independent media sector.

New US Sanctions Tighten Grip on Hezbollah, Test Lebanon
Beirut: Youssef Diab/Asharq Al Awsat/August 21/2026
New US sanctions on Hezbollah go beyond targeting money-transfer networks, signaling a broader shift in Washington’s approach to the group and its relationship with the Lebanese state. By relisting Hezbollah on its sanctions list and targeting a network accused of moving millions of dollars to the group, Washington is stepping up pressure on Hezbollah while putting Lebanese institutions to a sensitive test: whether they can tighten oversight of money flows and transfers and meet their obligations without worsening the country’s internal crisis. The US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions on 10 people “that are part of a network responsible for transferring cash to Hezbollah.”“The network utilizes couriers travelling on commercial airline flights between Lebanon, Türkiye, the UAE, and Iran to move up to hundreds of millions of dollars between jurisdictions, providing an avenue outside the formal financial system for Hezbollah to obtain foreign currency and evade sanctions,” it said. OFAC also re-designated Hezbollah “for service to the Iranian regime under the command of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force (IRGC-QF).”
Lebanese institutions under scrutiny
The US move is unlikely to stop with the targeted individuals and entities. It puts Lebanese banks, financial institutions, and regulatory bodies under closer US scrutiny, testing their ability to detect financial activity that could be linked to Hezbollah, its institutions, or its networks. An official Lebanese source told Asharq Al-Awsat that the sanctions “pose challenges for the Lebanese state and its security, judicial and financial institutions.”The source said the “tough US measures require tighter oversight of any assets linked to Hezbollah and its institutions, because any delay in doing so could leave the state facing consequences it can ill afford.”OFAC said that “Hezbollah and its allies exploit financing schemes including oil smuggling, illicit shipping, commodities sales, and bulk cash smuggling to generate and move funds across the region.”The US Treasury linked the targeted network to Behnam Shahriyari, a former Quds Force finance official, saying it was “one example of the methods used to funnel support to terrorist proxy groups throughout the region.”
Beyond Lebanese framework
But the strongest message in the sanctions, according to one Lebanese political reading, is directed at Lebanon itself. Sami Nader, director of the Levant Institute for Strategic Affairs, said the latest measures differ from previous sanctions because Washington is “dealing with Hezbollah under a new classification that places it outside the traditional Lebanese framework and presents it as an Iranian faction and part of the broader US confrontation with Iran.” Nader told Asharq Al-Awsat that the shift “will have repercussions inside Lebanon and for the authorities and official institutions, particularly in light of the political and even financial relationship linking the group to some Lebanese factions.”Under the new US approach, he said, Hezbollah “is no longer viewed as a representative of the Shiite community, but as an Iranian faction occupying Lebanon.”He said the implications could extend well beyond financial sanctions.“Any party dealing with Hezbollah could be viewed by the United States as being involved in dealings with Iran’s Revolutionary Guards,” Nader said, adding that this could trigger “political and legal repercussions that go beyond direct financial sanctions.”The effects of the new approach also extend into the political and diplomatic sphere, particularly Lebanese-Israeli negotiations.Nader said tougher sanctions “could give Washington greater room to manage negotiations with Israel, allowing it to pressure Hezbollah” and “keeping the issue of ending Hezbollah’s influence part of the broader US confrontation with Iran.”
Europe’s response in focus
Attention is also turning to Europe and whether it will follow Washington’s lead. Nader pointed to what he called “the recent hardening of the French and British positions toward Iran.”“If the US approach extends to Europe, Lebanon could find itself entering a more complicated phase,” he said.
In that case, compliance with international sanctions would become “not merely a political choice, but an additional test of the state’s ability to protect its financial system and institutions from the repercussions of a regional and international conflict that extends beyond its borders,” he explained.
Hezbollah rejects US designation
Hezbollah rejected the US position, saying the claim that it is under the control of the Quds Force was merely a pretext for relisting it under sanctions. The party described the move as “part of the continued policies of US administrations to target the resistance, its community, its support base and to besiege them and exert political, financial and security pressure on them.”Hezbollah said Washington “continues to deal with Lebanon from a position of tutelage.” It accused the US of choosing, instead of pressuring Israel to withdraw from southern Lebanon and halt its attacks, to “besiege the Lebanese and work to strip Lebanon of all sources of strength.”On its relationship with Iran, Hezbollah said: “Our close and brotherly relationship with Iran is one we cherish and take pride in.”But it stressed that it “does not await anyone’s certification of its Lebanese identity or patriotism.” The party said sanctions and designations “will not deter us from adhering to the option of resistance and to the right of Lebanon and the Lebanese people to defend their land, sovereignty, and resources.”

US Hits Hezbollah with Fresh Sanctions, Says Iran Controls it

Asharq Al Awsat/August 21/2026
The United States announced new sanctions Thursday against a Hezbollah financing network, while highlighting the Lebanese armed group's close ties to Iran's Revolutionary Guards. Hezbollah's legal designation as a terrorist organization has been amended to note that it operates in "service to the Iranian regime under the command of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps," particularly the elite Quds Force, the Treasury Department said in a statement. The new redesignation "specifies that Hezbollah is an Iranian proxy, not a stand-alone operation as implied by the previous designation," a State Department official said. "This underscores that Hezbollah operates with little to no regard for Lebanese sovereignty, the Lebanese people, or the Lebanese state." Hezbollah drew Lebanon into the broader Middle East war in March with rocket fire at Israel in support of its backer Iran.Israel responded with a heavy air campaign and ground invasion that Lebanese authorities say have killed more than 4,300 people. "This action builds on years of US designations that have repeatedly documented the operational, financial, and logistical integration between Hezbollah and the IRGC-QF," the State Department official said, calling Hezbollah "an extension" of the latter. "It is not a Lebanese resistance movement," as Hezbollah describes itself, the official said. The new sanctions target 10 people who are allegedly part of a network that transfers cash to Hezbollah, which has already been punished with US sanctions many times, the Treasury statement said. The network utilizes couriers travelling on commercial airline flights “to move up to hundreds of millions of dollars between jurisdictions, providing an avenue outside the formal financial system for Hezbollah to obtain foreign currency and evade sanctions," the statement said. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said earlier on Thursday that he would hold a press conference on Monday about "the toughest sanctions in history" that Washington plans to impose on Iran. He said that a plan to sharply increase pain from economic sanctions on Iran aims to "collapse" the country's government. "It is going to work in Iran and we are going to collapse this regime," he told CNBC. "This is going to be the greatest coordinated economic isolation in the history of the world."

World Bank Projects Lebanon Economy to Contract by 6.4% Due to War

Asharq Al Awsat/August 21/2026
The World Bank on Friday projected that Lebanon's economy would contract by 6.4 percent this year, as the latest Israel-Hezbollah war derailed the country's efforts at recovery. Lebanon has been dealing with an unprecedented financial crisis since 2019 and was still reeling from the 2024 Israel-Hezbollah war when the Iran-backed group drew it into the Middle East conflict by attacking Israel in March. Israel responded with a heavy air campaign and ground invasion that Lebanese authorities say have killed more than 4,300 people. Due to the war, "real GDP is projected to contract by 6.4 percent in 2026, reflecting the collapse in tourism, weaker consumption, disrupted supply chains, heightened insecurity, and prolonged displacement," the World Bank said in a report. Inflation is also expected to rise to 17.5 percent this year, according to the report.The World Bank said Lebanon's economy had strengthened before the latest conflict, with an estimated real GDP growth of 4.2 percent in 2025, "the fastest since the onset of the 2019 financial crisis". "Advancing reforms -- particularly on banking sector restructuring and fiscal management -- will be critical to restoring confidence, protecting stability, and mobilizing the financing needed for reconstruction and recovery," Dahlia Khalifa, the World Bank's Middle East director, said. The international community has been demanding that Lebanese authorities enact financial reforms in order to secure much-needed economic aid. Last week, parliament passed amendments to a bank resolution law aimed at restructuring troubled banks and addressing the country's banking crisis.The International Monetary Fund welcomed the law, describing it as "a very good step that reflects Lebanon's commitment to aligning its legislation with the best international practices".
Lebanon has been in discussions with the IMF, which said it would resume its meetings in Beirut next month.

State Return to South Lebanon Extends Beyond Security to Services, Recovery
Beirut: Soubhi Amhaz/Asharq Al Awsat/August 21/2026
Lebanon’s push to reassert the state’s presence in the south is moving beyond security deployments to a harder test: restoring schools, services, and livelihoods in communities battered by war. Recovery programs are beginning to take shape, but a wide funding gap threatens efforts to keep residents in their towns and revive areas where infrastructure, agriculture, and education have sustained extensive damage.
A framework for return, but funding lags
In 2026, the government launched the “National Framework for Return, Early Recovery and Restoration of Basic Services,” covering the return of residents, social protection, the restoration of services and livelihoods, and preparations for reconstruction. No consolidated budget has been announced yet.One of its main financing tools is the Lebanon Emergency Assistance Project (LEAP), implemented by the Council for Development and Reconstruction. The project was designed to scale up to $1 billion. So far, only $250 million has been secured, leaving a $750 million funding gap. Of the available financing, $50 million is earmarked for immediate response measures, including debris removal, securing buildings, and reopening roads. Another $175 million is allocated to restoring water, energy, transport, health, and education services, while $15 million is set aside for studies and designs, and $10 million for project management. Under the full framework, $455 million is allocated for reconstruction, most of it still unfunded. In a parallel effort, the government launched a program in May worth about 32 million euros for southern Lebanon and the Bekaa, running through 2029. The European Union is providing 24.8 million euros, Denmark 5.35 million euros, and the French Development Agency 2 million euros. The program targets local authorities, small businesses, and the agricultural sector, while seeking to create jobs. Lebanese ministerial sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that “the new response framework provides a basis for attracting funding, but it is still not fully financed.” They said the Ministry of Social Affairs was “continuing to work intensively to secure additional funding to help respond to the needs of affected groups.”
A safety net for more than one million people
Social protection is a central part of efforts to keep residents in their communities and support their return. The sources said one of the main response measures was cash assistance provided by the Ministry of Social Affairs, covering about 230,000 families through the ministry’s shock-responsive social safety net.Based on the average household size, more than 1 million people receive support. The assistance is particularly significant in areas where returning home still depends on families' ability to repair their homes, restore access to services, and find work. That makes social support part of the effort to re-establish communities, rather than simply an emergency measure.
Agriculture: getting farmers back to their land
The Ministry of Agriculture has divided its response plan into five tracks: emergency support for farmers; protection of food supply chains and markets; protection of livestock production and assets; continuity of programs and services; and coordination and needs assessment. Measures include monitoring food supply chains, accelerating imports of plant products, extending import deadlines for some essential goods, and monitoring markets and prices in coordination with the Ministry of Economy. The plan also provides emergency assistance to farmers in high-risk areas and steps up operations at ports, border crossings, quarantine centers, and laboratories to speed the entry of goods.The report does not set an overall budget for the agricultural response.Instead, it says the ministry is working with partners and donors to identify priorities, assess possible interventions, and secure resources. Resources reported by the ministry’s network of agricultural partners that are being mobilized include $1,650,150 in cash assistance targeting 4,840 farmers. In-kind assistance is expected to reach 1,850 farmers and includes solar-powered irrigation pump kits, agricultural inputs, animal feed, treatment support, and infrastructure.The ministry has also launched a platform with the food security sector to identify and track available resources.
Schools face a September test
Education is emerging as one of the clearest tests of whether state institutions can resume normal operations in the South and Nabatieh governorates. Sources at the Ministry of Education and Higher Education told Asharq Al-Awsat that the ministry aims to start the 2026-2027 academic year with in-person classes at schools that meet safety and readiness requirements, starting Sept. 15. Schools in the affected areas of the South and Nabatieh will temporarily rely on remote learning until technical and operational assessments are completed. The scale of the challenge is substantial. Of 267 schools in the two governorates, 198 have been damaged. Eighty-nine sustained very minor damage, 64 moderate damage, and 15 severe damage. Another 30 were completely destroyed. The ministry is using a “school cluster” model for planning, grouping schools and alternative learning spaces within the same geographical area. Each cluster will have a file detailing student and teacher numbers, building conditions, capacity, and the locations of displaced students.Students whose schools cannot reopen will remain enrolled in their original schools while temporarily attending a host school or alternative learning space.Schools being used as shelters will operate under conditions designed to ensure the safe separation of their educational and shelter functions. The ministry is also building an operational database to track schools and students and setting up a hotline. Each school will receive an official operational decision specifying how classes will resume. The ministry has also expanded its use of “Teaching Hubs,” or teaching and learning centers, aimed at restoring teachers’ roles in affected areas while providing students with places to receive support and continue their education. The sources said the objective went beyond repairing damaged buildings. “The goal is not limited to rehabilitating damaged school buildings, but also includes preserving the school as an existing institution even if its building has been destroyed, by maintaining its administration, teachers, and students,” they said. That, they added, would ensure that each school retains its identity and educational role until it can be rehabilitated or rebuilt.

Arab League Chief Condemns Israeli Violations in Palestinian, Syrian, Lebanese Territories

Asharq Al Awsat/August 21/2026
Secretary-General of the Arab League Nabil Fahmy denounced Israel’s violations against Palestinian, Syrian, and Lebanese territories saying they cannot be viewed as isolated incidents or justified by fabricated security claims. He said these actions reflect a persistent approach marked by the use of force, the imposition of a fait accompli, and violations of states' sovereignty and territorial integrity, the Saudi Press Agency said on Thursday. In a statement, Fahmy asserted that Israel continues to act as a state that disregards international law. He called on the UN Security Council and the international community to take responsibility and implement practical measures to stop these violations and end the policy of impunity. Fahmy underscored that Israel's actions not only threaten countries in the region but also undermine the credibility of the international legal order. He said they reinforce the notion that force can serve as an alternative to international legitimacy.

Hezbollah says doesn't need validation of its 'patriotism' after US sanctions

Naharnet/August 21/2026 
Hezbollah on Friday hit back at the U.S. administration over its announcement that the group is under the control of Iran’s Quds Force, the expeditionary arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. "The U.S. administration, through the Treasury Department and the State Department, claimed yesterday that the party is under the control of the Quds Force, using this as justification for its re-inclusion on the sanctions list. This decision is nothing more than another link in the chain of U.S. administrations' ongoing policies to target the resistance, its community, its environment, and its supporters,” Hezbollah said in a statement.
It emphasized that it "does not need anyone to validate its Lebanese identity and patriotism,” noting that “the sacrifices of thousands of martyrs who gave their lives for Lebanon and its people, and the long history of resistance, confronting occupation, and defending the land and sovereignty, are the true testament to its Lebanese identity."As for the relation with Iran, Hezbollah added: "Our close and fraternal relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran is one we cherish and are proud of, because it stood with Lebanon, supported it, and assisted it in liberating its land and restoring its sovereignty and rights.”“It remained by Lebanon's side through every stage and crisis, and was among the first countries to contribute to the reconstruction of what was destroyed by the Zionist aggression during the July 2006 war," Hezbollah pointed out. It stressed that "all these unjust sanctions and designations will not deter us from adhering to the option of resistance and the right of Lebanon and the Lebanese people to defend their land, sovereignty and resources.”“The resistance has been, is, and will remain an integral part of Lebanon's history, present and future," Hezbollah emphasized. The United States announced new sanctions Thursday against an alleged Hezbollah financing network, while highlighting the Lebanese armed group's close ties to Iran's Revolutionary Guards. Hezbollah's legal designation as a “terrorist” organization has been amended to note that it operates in "service to the Iranian regime under the command of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps," particularly the elite Quds Force, the U.S. Treasury Department said in a statement. Washington designated Hezbollah as a "foreign terrorist organization" in 1997, and in 2001 updated its label to a "specially designated global terrorist" group.
The new redesignation "specifies that Hezbollah is an Iranian proxy, not a stand-alone operation as implied by the previous designation," a State Department official said. "This underscores that Hezbollah operates with little to no regard for Lebanese sovereignty, the Lebanese people, or the Lebanese state," the official added."It is not a Lebanese resistance movement," as Hezbollah describes itself, the official said.

Inside One of Lebanon’s Pilot Zones, Hezbollah Has Returned
Claudia Groeling & Ralph Atrach/This Is Beirut/August 21/2026

https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/08/156842/
As the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) deployed to Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh following Israel’s withdrawal, Hezbollah-affiliated personnel and organizations returned to the town, one of the pilot zones aimed at dismantling the militia’s security infrastructure. During a July 23 visit as the LAF began the pilot zone program, This is Beirut observed ambulances affiliated with Hezbollah’s Islamic Health Organization being allowed into Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh on the stated grounds that they were providing humanitarian aid.
By contrast, ambulances from the Red Cross and the Amal Movement-affiliated Risala Scouts were refused entry. A security source confirmed to This is Beirut that only emergency vehicles from the Hezbollah-run group were being allowed into the pilot zone. Later that day, an Israeli drone carried out a guided-missile strike on an Islamic Health Organization ambulance on the main road through Nabatieh al-Fawqa, near Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh.
Hezbollah’s presence in Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh reflects a broader nationwide pattern in which personnel from the Iran-backed militia are granted access to sensitive areas before Lebanon’s official security forces. Whenever a security incident occurs, Hezbollah typically arrives on the scene first, followed by the LAF, other security services, and humanitarian actors, according to a Lebanese intelligence official, who described the sequence as standard procedure.
The account is consistent with a publicly reported incident during the 2026 Israel-Hezbollah war. After an Israeli strike on the Comfort Hotel in Beirut’s Hazmieh suburb on March 4, local officials said that Hezbollah’s Islamic Health Organization established a security cordon around the site, restricting access by municipal personnel. The Lebanese army subsequently deployed to the scene.
All the Hezbollah members he knows from the town have returned. Among them was Hezbollah’s “rabet,” a local representative responsible for military affairs.
Local source familiar with Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh to TIB
Hezbollah’s Return to Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh
The pilot zone project, which so far includes Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh, Frown and Ghandouriyeh, is intended to launch a gradual process under which Israel withdraws its troops as the LAF dismantles Hezbollah’s military infrastructure.
The June 26 Trilateral Framework between Lebanon, Israel, and the U.S. has stalled over disagreements on how to independently verify Hezbollah’s disarmament. So far, the LAF has been unable to prevent Hezbollah personnel from returning to Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh, the first pilot zone from which Israel has withdrawn. A local source familiar with Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh said that all the Hezbollah members he knows from the town have returned. Among them was Hezbollah’s “rabet,” a local representative responsible for military affairs, the source said.
The Israeli military considers Hezbollah’s “rabet” officers to be central pillars of the group’s dispersed security architecture, carrying out tasks such as smuggling weapons and preparing private property for military use. Hezbollah’s “rabet” in Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh continues to move openly around the town, the source said.Hezbollah personnel are entering Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh under the cover of their affiliation with the Islamic Health Organization and the “Wa Taawanou” NGO, according to the source. Fewer than 10 percent of residents have returned, the source added, amid fears that Hezbollah combatants remain widely present in the area. The Lebanese army has been ordered to establish checkpoints on the main roads leading to Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh and control access to the town while monitoring movements to ensure that residents do not bring weapons or military equipment into the pilot zone, an LAF officer told This is Beirut. However, the local source said the LAF was not enforcing these security measures. Residents seeking to enter the pilot zone are generally asked only whether they are from Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh. Those who confirm they are residents are allowed to proceed without being inspected further.
So far, the LAF has not conducted inspections of homes or other private property in the pilot zone, the source said. Private property inspections have become another point of contention in Lebanon-Israel talks over the pilot zone program, with the LAF opposing such searches. A Framework Without Enforcement
The LAF officer told This is Beirut that the Lebanese army lacks the mandate to confront Hezbollah. “The army does not operate independently from the Lebanese political authorities,” he said. “We receive our mandate from the Lebanese state.”
If Hezbollah obstructed an LAF disarmament operation, the officer explained, Lebanese army troops on site could not decide independently to challenge the militia. Instead, the LAF unit would report the situation through the chain of command, leaving the government to determine how to respond. “If we can remove weapons and military infrastructure without a confrontation, that is preferable,” the LAF source said. “Nobody wants to turn a southern village into another battlefield.”
Retired LAF Brig. Gen. Maroun Hitti told This is Beirut that the army needs a clear mandate, including rules of engagement and the authority to enforce them, warning that without these, the Trilateral Framework could fail “by design.”
If the LAF discovers Hezbollah’s military infrastructure, it should destroy, dismantle and confiscate it in accordance with its mandate and Lebanese law, Hitti said. Such infrastructure, the LAF general explained, directly violates Lebanese sovereignty and the state’s monopoly on the use of force.
Lebanon has fallen short in implementing its disarmament decisions, with the LAF’s claimed progress south of the Litani in January 2026 disputed by Israel. Lebanon’s cabinet on March 2, 2026, banned Hezbollah’s military activities and tasked the LAF with disarming the militia nationwide. LAF commander Rodolphe Haykal, however, balked at implementing the decision, citing concerns over civil peace.
For Khaled Hamadeh, a retired LAF general, the Trilateral Framework’s disarmament goals have not been pursued, with the Lebanese army neither searching for Hezbollah’s military infrastructure nor confiscating its weapons.
“The Lebanese army’s deployment in these areas amounts to little more than a routine security operation of the kind the army conducts elsewhere in Lebanon,” he said. “For the Americans, this has effectively turned the mission into a traditional security operation that does not correspond to the substance of the [Trilateral] Framework agreement.”
The Lebanese army can effectively confront Hezbollah only if it operates under unified political authority and receives clear government orders to confiscate weapons, arrest those disrupting security and dismantle Hezbollah’s infrastructure, the former LAF general said.
The army has the capability to act against Hezbollah in the pilot zones, Hamadeh said. “What it lacks, however, is the political will to carry out this mission and the political space required for the military to act effectively.”
https://thisisbeirut.com.lb/features/reports/inside-one-of-lebanons-pilot-zones-hezbollah-has-returned

The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on August 21-22/2026
Trump Warns of 'Economic D-Day' against Iran, but Tehran is Well Acquainted with Sanctions
Asharq Al Awsat/21 August 2026
Nearing the six-month mark of the Iran war and facing diminishing stockpiles of key weapons, the Trump administration is touting a crushing financial campaign against Tehran, promising an “economic D-Day” against a country that has so far withstood nearly five decades of punishing American sanctions.
With sparse details, President Donald Trump announced this week that the US would be imposing an “unprecedented” level of economic warfare and isolation on Iran, aiming to force its leadership to cave to demands to end its nuclear program and fully reopen the crucial Strait of Hormuz to oil and natural gas tankers, The Associated Press said. It reflects the dire reality Trump faces with an increasingly unpopular war he can't seem to end just months before pivotal midterm elections that will decide whether his Republican Party keeps control of Congress. Whether out of desperation or strategy, the president is refocusing America's might on bringing Iran to its knees through an accelerated sanctions campaign against one of the most economically penalized countries in the world. The immediate response from Iran hawks has been praise and a call for patience as it plays out, while other analysts warn that Trump is refusing to learn the lessons of his predecessors.In an interview Thursday on CNBC, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent offered a small glimpse of what may be ahead, threatening secondary sanctions on nations and companies that conduct business with Iran.He did not say exactly whom would be targeted as part of this next phase of the administration’s “ Operation Economic Fury, ” which earlier had focused on entities and individuals that buy oil from or bank with Iran. China and India, however, are major buyers of Iranian oil. “If you insist on doing business with them, then the US Treasury and US government will put its full might and force against you,” Bessent said. “It’s time for our allies and the rest of the world to make a decision."
Some experts see ‘uncharted waters’ that could force Iran's hand
Despite decades of US sanctions against Iran, the Trump administration is arguing that it’s only a matter of time and that striking the right economic target would get Tehran to its breaking point.Richard Goldberg, who coordinated efforts to put diplomatic pressure on Iran in Trump's first term, said the consequences of US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites last year, the war this year and the American naval blockade on Iranian ports have created the perfect storm for capitulation — one that didn't previously exist. “I think we’re watching a strategy, whether it takes a short time or a long time, that is very much about fundamentally changing the future of the world by seeing the end of this regime," said Goldberg, who is now at the hawkish Washington think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “I caution everyone — including myself, who has worked on sanctions, who’s worked on financial warfare — to have the humility to admit that we are in uncharted waters,” he said.He said the decision this week by the United Arab Emirates — once one of Tehran's most important trading partners — to suspend trade with Iran over a missile attack will only further isolate the government.
Targeting allies and partners comes at a price
With nearly all of Iran's energy, financial and transportation sectors already covered by US sanctions, Trump’s aim appears to be to apply secondary sanctions on countries, including allies and partners, that have not cut all ties with Iran to starve the country of any remaining income it may still be receiving.
In many ways, it is a redux of Trump’s first-term “maximum pressure” campaign, which he has ramped up during his second term to include military action. But as Trump and his allies discovered during his first administration, it can be difficult to enforce secondary sanctions without harming US interests and provoking reciprocal measures. There were numerous instances of the administration granting sanctions waivers to countries, particularly those that rely on Iranian oil for their energy needs. “Trump’s strategy now rests on targeting Tehran directly by impeding its touch points and access to the formal financial system and international economy,” said Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior director of FDD’s Iran program. “This will require making the Iran issue more important in US bilateral relations with countries in Europe and Asia.”Iran doesn't see an ‘open door’ at the end of the sanctions campaign Iranian officials and analysts have accused the Republican president of flip-flopping with his latest pivot to economic pressure against Iran. Trump has long derided past leaders who used sanctions to limit Iran’s ability to pay for its military and nuclear development.In a post last week on X, Esmail Baghaei, spokesman for Iran’s Foreign Ministry, wrote that Washington's pattern of retreating to sanctions when it doesn't want to pursue diplomacy has proven to be futile. “Iran has demonstrated over decades that it will not be strangled by these exhausted refrains,” he said. “The real risk is that American politicians, clinging to this bad habit, will instead strangle their own remaining chances of a less humiliating exit from a crisis of their own making.”Ali Vaez, Iran director at the International Crisis Group, said the Trump administration's decision to take its own “maximum pressure” policy to new heights with military action seems to ignore years of US foreign policy lessons that show Iran does not respond well to pressure. If anything, he says, the latest economic campaign has only “hardened Iran's position.”“I think (Trump's) blind spot is the fact that the only thing that the Iranian regime views as more dangerous than suffering from US sanctions is surrendering to US terms," Vaez said. Plus, the past year of start-stop diplomacy has only worsened the already fragile dynamic between the longtime adversaries, Vaez says, adding that Iranian officials' lack of trust in Trump and his mediators has created an untenable foundation. “They believe that even if they capitulate to US terms under economic duress, Trump would move the goalposts and ask for more,” he said. “And this is really the fundamental problem: Pressure without an open door is an exercise in futility.”

Iran President Says Time to End War while in Position of Strength
Asharq Al Awsat/21 August 2026
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Friday it was time to end the months-long Middle East war with the United States because Tehran appeared to be in a stronger position than Washington. Tehran is keeping the key Strait of Hormuz partially shut and Washington is persisting with a naval counter-blockade of Iran. "It is better that we bring the war to an end now as we are in a position of power and dignity," Pezeshkian said in a meeting with doctors. "The whole world acknowledges our victory and emphasises that America has attacked our schools, hospitals and infrastructure in violation of all regulations and is hated around the world."Pezeshkian also defended a memorandum of understanding agreed with the US in June aimed at ending the war, claiming it did not signal a defeat for Tehran."They cannot find even a single clause in this agreement that indicates capitulation. All the commitments concern the other side," he said.His remarks come weeks after Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei said he had approved the deal to end the war despite having "different views". Hardline lawmakers in Iran's parliament have also criticized the government over the deal, accusing it of giving concessions to the US, mostly over the re-opening of the strategic Hormuz Strait. According to reports in US media, the American navy has been organizing and protecting secret convoys of tankers through the southern sector of the Strait of Hormuz enabling between five and 10 million barrels a day of oil to be exported. As Tehran claimed to be in the stronger position, the US has said it would ramp up sanctions to heap pressure on Tehran. The American plan drew condemnation from Iran's foreign ministry, which accused the US of "economic terrorism" and "crimes against humanity". "The perpetrators and instigators of these sanctions are deserving of trial and punishment for committing such heinous crimes," it said in a statement carried by state media. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Thursday vowed Washington would "collapse" the Iranian regime with its threatened campaign nearly six months since their war began.
The comments underscored how the Trump administration is shifting to economic rather than military pressure on Tehran as the US president's unpopular war drags on. China also criticized Washington's economic plan, saying that US "sanctions and pressure" would not resolve the Middle East conflict.

Iran's Qalibaf Says Tehran Must Plan to Overcome 'Unjust Sanctions', Following US Threats
Asharq Al Awsat/21 August 2026
Iranian parliament speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf said ‌Iran ‌must plan ‌to ⁠overcome the "unjust sanctions", ⁠after US Treasury Secretary ⁠Scott ‌Bessent announced ‌what he described ‌as ‌the toughest sanctions ‌ever imposed on Iran, according ⁠to ⁠Qalibaf's channel on Telegram.
Bessent said the United States will impose "the toughest sanctions in history" on Iran, a move he suggested would lessen the need for new major military operations, reported Reuters. Bessent's comments on Thursday followed President Donald Trump's threat a day earlier of "Economic Warfare" and warning of economic consequences against any country that provided "any type ‌of lifeline to Iran." Bessent promised details next week.Iran has weathered near-continuous, punishing economic sanctions for nearly 50 years, since the Iranian Revolution of 1979. Before Bessent spoke, Iran's foreign ministry said it condemned US economic and trade sanctions, calling them "economic terrorism" that would not "create even the slightest hesitation in Iranians’ determination to safeguard Iran’s independence, dignity and national sovereignty."Bessent told CNBC he would share more details on the latest package and "talk about exactly what we're going to do" on Iran at a press conference on Monday.

Economic pressure ‘most effective tool’ against Iran: US VP Vance

Joanne Serrieh, Al Arabiya English/August 21/2026
Applying economic pressure is the “most effective tool” the US can use against Iran, Vice President JD Vance said on Thursday. Speaking on the Clay and Buck Show podcast, Vance described the move as “a delicate dance” with both sides applying pressure on each other.However, he said, “what has been true over the last couple of weeks is they felt a lot more pressure than we have.”On Friday, Iranian parliament speaker Mohammed Bagher Ghalibaf said Tehran must plan to overcome the “unjust sanctions.”The statement came one day after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced what he described as the toughest sanctions ever imposed on Iran. Bessent said on Thursday the measures would be detailed on Monday, suggesting they could lessen the need for further major military operations.With Reuters

NATO members discuss Strait of Hormuz options without alliance involvement
LBCI/August 21/2026
NATO's top commander convened a videoconference earlier this week to facilitate possible contributions to support freedom of navigation in the Strait of ‌Hormuz, his spokesperson told Reuters, adding that this is not a NATO mission. “Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe hosted a meeting of interested Allies at the chief of defence level on Wednesday, 19 Aug 26, ⁠in order to facilitate their possible contributions to support freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz," a spokesperson for the alliance's top commander U.S. Air Force General Alexus Grynkewich said on Friday. "To be clear, this is not a NATO mission. But given NATO’s unique strengths in its ability to bring together Allies and understand the ‌capabilities ⁠they bring to bear, it makes sense for NATO to facilitate in this way," the spokesperson added. NATO allies have sought to avoid direct involvement in the Iran conflict, instead focusing ⁠on plans outside the alliance to reopen the strait, which before February carried about a fifth of all traded oil. France and ⁠Britain have led efforts to build a coalition among roughly a dozen countries to guarantee safe passage ⁠through the strait once tensions ease or the conflict is resolved, though any long-term arrangement would ultimately require Iranian acquiescence. Reuters

Israel PM calls Turkey's Erdogan 'antisemitic dictator'
LBCI/August 21/2026
The office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday called Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan an "antisemitic dictator", and vowed Israel would "continue to act forcefully against Turkey's attempts to destabilise the region". "Erdogan is an antisemitic dictator who massacred Kurds, supports the massacre of the Hamas terrorist organisation, and oppresses his own people," Netanyahu's office said in a statement. "Israel will continue to act forcefully against Turkey's attempts to destabilise the region and against any threat to its security."AFP

Türkiye to Seek Interpol Notice for Netanyahu in Gaza Flotilla Case
Asharq Al Awsat/August 21/2026
Türkiye said on Friday it would seek an Interpol red notice for the arrest of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as part of a domestic criminal case linked to an attack on activists seeking to deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza. NATO member Türkiye has been one of the fiercest critics of Israel's assault on Gaza and has previously issued domestic arrest warrants for Netanyahu over the war there. It has repeatedly called for international measures against Israel ‌over what Ankara calls ‌its violations of human rights and international law. Israel ‌denies ⁠those charges. In May, ⁠Israeli forces opened fire on at least two vessels from the Global Sumud Flotilla sailing towards Gaza as it was making a renewed attempt to deliver aid to the enclave after earlier missions were intercepted by Israel in international waters. In a post on X, Turkish Justice Minister Akin Gurlek said arrest warrants had been issued for Netanyahu and another suspect on charges that included genocide, crimes against humanity ⁠and torture as part of a case against 35 ‌people over the Israeli interception in international ‌waters. "In line with the arrest warrants issued against Benjamin Netanyahu ... our justice ministry has requested ‌that the interior ministry issue (Interpol) red notices for them so that they may ‌be sought internationally," Gurlek said. Türkiye will use all available legal mechanisms to ensure Israel is held accountable for its crimes in Gaza, he added. A red notice is a request to police forces worldwide to locate and provisionally arrest a person pending extradition. Interpol ‌reviews requests submitted by member states before deciding whether to issue red notices. Asked about Gurlek's statement, Netanyahu's ⁠office said: "(Turkish ⁠President Tayyip) Erdogan's pathetic attempt to intimidate the leaders and soldiers of Israel, the only true democracy in the Middle East, will go nowhere."
Türkiye and Israel also traded barbs this week over Syria, where Israel carried out airstrikes on an air base it said Turkish troops could be deployed to, drawing condemnation from Ankara and criticism from the United States. Syria has said there were no plans to deploy Turkish troops to the base.
Ankara has said Israeli rhetoric against Türkiye and its actions in Syria are fueled by the approach of a parliamentary election in Israel in October.

Iran Vows 'Devastating' Response to US Threat to Cut off its Economic Lifelines

Asharq Al Awsat/August 21/2026
Iran said on Friday that its response to any new US threats would be "devastating" after Washington pledged to impose the toughest financial penalties in history with the aim of toppling the Iranian leadership. Washington prepared for sanctions that US Treasury chief Scott Bessent said he would detail on Monday. President Donald Trump earlier warned of economic consequences against any country that provided "any type of lifeline to Iran."The chief of staff of Iran's Armed Forces, Major General Ali Abdollahi, said the Islamic Republic's reaction would be broad and decisive. "With preparedness across land, sea, air, air defense and cyberspace, Iran's armed forces will respond to the enemy's new threats with crushing, punishing and devastating responses," Abdollahi was quoted as saying by Iranian media. The US and Iran have twice announced ceasefire deals, in April and June, aiming to restore the free flow of ships through Hormuz on a path towards ending the nearly six-month-old conflict, but both quickly crumbled. Bessent told CNBC he would "talk about exactly what we're going to do" on Iran at a press conference on Monday. "We are going to collapse this regime. It is time for our allies and the rest of the world to make a decision," he said, describing a naval blockade reimposed on Iran in July and the "toughest sanctions in history" as a "one-two punch".Iran has weathered near-continuous economic sanctions for nearly 50 years, since the Islamic Revolution of 1979, but its people are suffering high inflation, a weakening currency and energy shortages along with damaged infrastructure.Some Iranians interviewed by Reuters have said more economic punishment could increase hardship, weaken the clerical establishment and prompt unrest, although there has been no sign of that since a deadly crackdown on protests in January. Before Bessent spoke, Iran's foreign ministry said US sanctions would not "create even the slightest hesitation in Iranians’ determination to safeguard Iran’s independence, dignity and national sovereignty."

UN Warns 94% of Gaza's Population Urgently Needs Shelter and Basic Aid

Asharq Al Awsat/21 August 2026
The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) warned that civilians in the Gaza Strip continue to face severe risks from airstrikes, shelling, and gunfire, reporting ongoing casualties, including child deaths, SPA reported.OCHA stated that the remains of 50 people, including 19 children, were recently recovered and buried after being discovered under rubble in Gaza City, where they had remained trapped for over two years, SPA reported. The office highlighted that 94% of Gaza's 2.1 million residents require urgent shelter and basic household assistance, with nearly two-thirds of families enduring rapidly deteriorating conditions in tents or temporary shelters.

UK, Canada, Australia Slam Israel Ending Probe into Aid Worker Killings
Asharq Al Awsat/21 August 2026
Britain, Canada, and Australia on Friday condemned as "shameful" Israel's decision to close an investigation into the death of seven aid workers killed in Gaza in 2024. The World Central Kitchen employees -- three Britons, a dual US-Canadian national, a Pole, an Australian, and a Palestinian -- died in a drone strike on their vehicle convoy after overseeing the unloading of a food aid shipment. Israel's military called the incident a "tragic mistake". "In the more than two years since, we have been pressing for Israel to swiftly and thoroughly consider the case and hold those responsible to account," the three nations said in a joint statement. "The announcement by the Israeli army on 19 August 2026 that it would not pursue criminal investigations into this strike, without further explanation, is shameful," it said. The incident in April 2024 sparked global outrage and renewed calls to ensure the safety of aid workers in Gaza. "Announcing this decision on World Humanitarian Day, while the world honored the courage and sacrifice of humanitarians, was particularly egregious," the joint statement added. The Israeli military acknowledged a series of errors at various levels of command, but a preliminary investigation concluded on Wednesday that there was no "reasonable suspicion of criminal misconduct". The US-based World Central Kitchen condemned the decision calling it "inconsistent with the full truth and deeply offensive". It demanded an independent commission to investigate the airstrikes "because the Israeli army cannot credibly investigate its own conduct". On Thursday, Australia expressed outrage at the closure of the investigation and summoned Israel's ambassador to the country.

Baghdad Implicitly Backtracks on Deadline to Confine Weapons to the State

Asharq Al Awsat/21 August 2026
The Iraqi government on Friday showed signs of backpedaling on the previously scheduled September 30 deadline to restrict weapons to the state. In statements to local media, government spokesperson Haider al-Aboudi said: "September 30 is the date for the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq, not the final deadline for factions to surrender their weapons."Speaking on the sidelines of the Baghdad Dialogue Conference, which was attended by Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi, al-Aboudi stressed that "dialogue with the factions is proceeding regularly and has made significant progress because it stems from the fundamentals of state sovereignty and the interests of the Iraqi people, two pillars that are not disputed."Al-Aboudi acknowledged "anxiety and disagreement over the mechanisms," though he noted that "this file is subject to dialogue that is moving in the right direction." Al-Zaidi spoke about these "disagreements" without revealing their details during a panel discussion at the Baghdad Dialogue. "All political forces completely agree on moving forward with restricting weapons to the state, and work is underway on the mechanisms for handing over weapons and ending this situation entirely," the PM said. "There is an ongoing dialogue, directly with opposing factions and indirectly with others," he added, pointing out that "most concerned parties have become convinced of the need to hand over weapons, but the dispute is over the mechanism.""There is no problem with this (dispute) as long as the goal is ultimately achieved," he stressed.
Al-Zaidi said the "weapons restriction mechanism" begins with a faction declaring its cessation of military activity, followed by surrendering its arms to the government, and concluding with disengagement. When asked what he meant by disengagement, al-Zaidi replied: "The faction will no longer be able to mobilize or direct its fighters; instead, the federal government will do so through the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF)."He stressed that authorities had no intention of becoming embroiled in a military confrontation with any party. The implicit backpedaling from the September 30 deadline took place amid significant political pressure by factions and leaders within the ruling Shiite Coordination Framework and coincided with Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf’s visit to Iraq. Upon his arrival in Baghdad on Wednesday, Qalibaf declared that "the resistance in Iraq has become an essential element of global power," noting that relations between Baghdad and Tehran are moving toward establishing a "new order" free from foreign interference. Sources said late last week that Qalibaf carried Iranian proposals to avoid a direct confrontation between the Iraqi government and Tehran-aligned factions, including ideas related to "freezing" or concealing heavy weaponry until a political settlement about the future of the factions' arms is reached. The details of the proposals could not be independently verified, and no official announcement about them has been made by either Tehran or the Iraqi government.

Iran President Says Time to End War while in Position of Strength

Asharq Al Awsat/21 August 2026
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Friday it was time to end the months-long Middle East war with the United States because Tehran appeared to be in a stronger position than Washington. Tehran is keeping the key Strait of Hormuz partially shut and Washington is persisting with a naval counter-blockade of Iran. "It is better that we bring the war to an end now as we are in a position of power and dignity," Pezeshkian said in a meeting with doctors. "The whole world acknowledges our victory and emphasises that America has attacked our schools, hospitals and infrastructure in violation of all regulations and is hated around the world."Pezeshkian also defended a memorandum of understanding agreed with the US in June aimed at ending the war, claiming it did not signal a defeat for Tehran."They cannot find even a single clause in this agreement that indicates capitulation. All the commitments concern the other side," he said. His remarks come weeks after Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei said he had approved the deal to end the war despite having "different views".Hardline lawmakers in Iran's parliament have also criticized the government over the deal, accusing it of giving concessions to the US, mostly over the re-opening of the strategic Hormuz Strait. According to reports in US media, the American navy has been organizing and protecting secret convoys of tankers through the southern sector of the Strait of Hormuz enabling between five and 10 million barrels a day of oil to be exported. As Tehran claimed to be in the stronger position, the US has said it would ramp up sanctions to heap pressure on Tehran. The American plan drew condemnation from Iran's foreign ministry, which accused the US of "economic terrorism" and "crimes against humanity". The perpetrators and instigators of these sanctions are deserving of trial and punishment for committing such heinous crimes," it said in a statement carried by state media. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Thursday vowed Washington would "collapse" the Iranian regime with its threatened campaign nearly six months since their war began. The comments underscored how the Trump administration is shifting to economic rather than military pressure on Tehran as the US president's unpopular war drags on.China also criticized Washington's economic plan, saying that US "sanctions and pressure" would not resolve the Middle East conflict.

US, Kuwait agree to deepen military cooperation and integration, Pentagon says
Al Arabiya English/22 August ,2026
The US and Kuwait have agreed to deepen military cooperation and integration, with a focus on countering drones, strengthening air and missile defenses and expanding maritime security cooperation, the Pentagon said on Friday. Senior officials from both countries met at the Pentagon this week for the 16th US-Kuwait Joint Military Commission, where they formalized new operational roadmaps to strengthen Kuwait’s defense capabilities and interoperability with US forces.The talks were co-chaired by the Pentagon’s top official for the Middle East, Mike DiMino, and Kuwait’s Chief of the General Staff Lt. Gen. Khaled al-Shriaan. Officials from the US Central Command (CENTCOM), the Joint Staff, State Department and Maryland National Guard also participated. The proliferation of drones and unmanned aircraft systems featured prominently in the discussions, with officials highlighting how the technology has transformed modern warfare and increased the need for greater military integration. Earlier this year, Washington announced its approval of a $1.98 billion arms sale to Kuwait, one of the several Gulf countries hit by Iranian strikes during the Middle East war. The sale would allow Kuwait to buy counter-drone technology from defense company Anduril. During this week’s talks, the US and Kuwait also discussed improving regional integrated air and missile defenses, expanding maritime security cooperation and streamlining US arms transfers to Kuwait. Separately, DiMino announced that Kuwait had formally joined the US State Partnership Program and will be paired with the Maryland National Guard, providing another avenue for long-term military-to-military cooperation. Kuwait is a major non-NATO ally of the United States and hosts thousands of US troops, making the Gulf country a key component of Washington’s regional military posture.

Abdi Announces Completion of SDF’s Civil, Military Integration with Damascus

Asharq Al Awsat/21 August 2026
The integration of the Kurdish administration within Syria's state institutions is now complete, Syrian Kurdish leader Mazloum Abdi said on Thursday. The announcement follows months of negotiations between the two sides after a January agreement that called for the full integration of Kurdish civil and military institutions into the state -- a move Washington deemed "historic.”"I want to say that the phase of integrating military, security and administrative institutions into national state institutions is complete and finished," Abdi, who heads the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, said at an event in Qamishli in northeastern Syria. "From now on, we begin a new phase," he added. "Our struggle will continue, to cement our people's rights in the constitution." The January agreement, signed by Abdi and Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, followed clashes between Syrian Kurdish fighters and the new authorities' forces that saw the Kurds lose swathes of territory they held in the oil-rich north and northeast. Amid the violence, al-Sharaa signed on January 16 a decree enshrining the Kurds' national rights and recognizing Kurdish as a national language.In February, Noureddine Ahmed Eissa, a Kurd from the city of Qamishli, was appointed governor of Hasakeh. In March, senior Kurdish military official Sipan Hamo was appointed regional assistant defense minister. As part of the deal's implementation, government forces entered the cities of Hasakeh and Qamishli, and Damascus took over the management of Qamishli airport and key oil fields.US troops also transferred more than 5,700 ISIS detainees in previously Kurdish-controlled camps to neighboring Iraq.

Ukraine allies to meet Monday co-chaired by France, UK, Germany leaders: French presidency
LBCI/August 21/2026
Countries allied with Ukraine in its war with Russia will meet on Monday to reaffirm support for Kyiv, in talks held symbolically on Ukraine's independence day, the French presidency said Friday.
The meeting of the Coalition of the Willing will be co-chaired by French President Emmanuel Macron -- joining via video link -- German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and, for the first time, the new British Prime Minister Andy Burnham, the Elysee Palace said. Around 10 participants will be in Kyiv for the independence day celebrations, an EU official said. AFP

Zelensky slams 'cynical' Russian attack on shopping centre
LBCI/August 21/2026
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday blasted Russia for a "cynical and despicable" attack on a shopping centre in his home town that killed at least five people and wounded more than 50. "An absolutely cynical and despicable strike was carried out by the Russians against an ordinary shopping center in Kryvyi Rig," he said on X, adding: "Five deaths have been reported".AFP

Saudi Crown Prince departs for France on official visit
Al Arabiya English/21 August ,2026
Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman departed for France on an official visit, the Saudi Press Agency (SPA) reported on Friday.French President Emmanuel Macron will host the Crown Prince to discuss current tensions in the Middle East, the French president’s office announced on Thursday.The visit, scheduled for Aug. 23-Aug. 24, will be an opportunity for MBS and Macron to discuss regional issues within the framework of close collaboration between France and its Gulf partners, Macron’s office said.The Crown Prince’s visit also comes at a time when Western and Gulf leaders try to mediate an end to the US-Iran war, which started in February when joint US-Israeli airstrikes bombarded Iran.Western and Gulf leaders are also working to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. During his trip to Paris, MBS is expected to attend the E-Sports World Cup on Aug. 23.
MBS last visited France in December 2024.The first Franco-Saudi Strategic Partnership Council meeting is scheduled to be held during the visit as well. Read more: MBS meets top US general for Middle East to discuss defense cooperation, reducing tensions

The Latest LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on August 21-22/2026
Where geopolitics meets the global economy
Cornelia Meyer/Al-Arabiyia English/21 August ,2026
The US-Iran MoU officially expired on Monday, August 17. It had set the framework under which Iran and the US were supposed to negotiate peace, or at least a more lasting absence of hostilities. In reality, both sides had vastly different understandings of what the document stood for, which did not bode well for negotiations. As the agreement gradually unravelled, the US took aim at Iranian infrastructure targets, while Iran retaliated by attacking US installations in the Gulf and other targets in the territories of Washington’s GCC allies. What has emerged since the start of the war is that Iran’s real leverage over the global economy lies in its chokehold on the Strait of Hormuz. The waterway is not only critical to oil and LNG flows, but also carries around 30 percent of nitrogen-based fertilizer, large quantities of sulphuric acid required to produce fertilizer from phosphate, and eight percent of aluminium, to name just a few commodities vital to maintaining global supply chains.
Oil markets
How many barrels actually reached the market over the last two months remains widely debated. Oil continued to flow through Hormuz, but at sharply reduced levels compared with before the war. Saudi Arabia’s East-West pipeline can theoretically transport 5 million barrels of crude per day from the Eastern Province for export through the port of Yanbu. That option was constrained when the Houthis effectively closed off the Bab al-Mandeb. Exports from the Arabian Sea then had to be rerouted through the SUMED pipeline and the Suez Canal. Volumes were smaller, while the detour added around 40 days before crude could reach Asian markets. The UAE also has its 1.8 million-barrel-per-day Habshan-Fujairah pipeline, which bypasses the Strait of Hormuz. Over the past month, there has also been an increase in ships transiting Hormuz with their transponders switched off. Some passed through the strait before transferring cargo ship-to-ship onto global tankers in the relatively safer waters of the Gulf of Oman. It remains unclear exactly how many barrels were transported this way. Some analysts put the volume at more than 4 million barrels per day. US Energy Secretary Chris Wright put the figure at 9 million barrels per day, according to Bloomberg. That may be an optimistic estimate. What is clear, however, is that the volume remains nowhere near the roughly 20 million barrels per day of crude and petroleum products that passed through the strait before the Iran war. Saudi Aramco Chief Executive Amin Nasser put the amount of oil “lost” to the market since the beginning of the war at 2.6 billion barrels. Many newspapers and publications have devoted extensive coverage to crude flows. However, the war has also severely affected global petroleum product flows. Refiners have received less crude from the Gulf, while global markets have also been cut off from efficient refineries on the other side of Hormuz. In that respect, strikes on Russian oil infrastructure during the war in Ukraine have also been unhelpful from a global supply perspective.
Rising tensions and sanctions
Tensions rose markedly over the weekend after Iranian projectiles targeted a UAE ship and two Chinese tankers made U-turns. What brought matters to a head was not the threat of further US sanctions, but renewed Iranian targeting of assets in the UAE.Over the past three decades, the UAE and other GCC countries have worked diligently to project themselves as havens of stability in a sea of instability and as attractive places to do business. When Dubai came under repeated Iranian rocket and drone attacks at the start of the conflict, some businesspeople and tourists chose to leave the city. International financiers later returned, and a sense of normalcy came back to Dubai, the DIFC and Abu Dhabi. There are now fears that renewed Iranian attacks could undermine the UAE’s broader business model. Against this backdrop, it is understandable that the UAE government reacted strongly, announcing that it would cut all economic and financial ties with Iran. This is a blow to the Iranian economy because, until now, the UAE had been Tehran’s largest trading partner, followed by China. China matters. Before the war, 90 percent of Iranian crude exports were bound for China, even though Iran was not among the country’s top 10 oil suppliers in 2025, according to China’s General Administration of Customs. Chinese state-owned companies generally tended to stay away from sanctioned Iranian oil, while smaller so-called teapot refineries bought the crude. These refineries operate largely outside the dollarized economy, giving them greater leeway. According to Bloomberg, the Chinese government also ordered Chinese companies to ignore US sanctions on five refiners. nAs tensions continue to rise, China’s foreign ministry has expressed concern over whether sanctions can effectively resolve the conflict in the Middle East. In the medium term, sanctions may, if anything, strengthen China’s ties with Iran. In that context, it is important that US President Donald Trump is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the G20 summit. Both countries will most likely try to avoid outright confrontation until then.
In the meantime, while tensions among the various players, including Iran, the US, GCC countries and China, may become more pronounced, it is important not to lose sight of the central issue: respect for maritime law is pivotal. Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan pointed out during a meeting with Japan’s Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi that maritime security is at the forefront of shared priorities.That is true not only for Saudi Arabia and Japan, but for all countries bordering the Arabian Gulf and for the wider global economy. Ignoring these principles carries a high cost, not only for GCC countries but for the world as a whole. In that context, the possibility of regional and international cooperation, and the creation of frameworks that could help defuse the situation, should not be overlooked.

The UN on the Way to the Unknown

Amir Taheri/Asharq Al-Awsat/August 21/2026
As Antonio Guterres, the United Nation’ Secretary-General, will soon start clearing his desk and prepare for retirement, assessments of his tenure vary between “passable” and “mediocre”. There are those who appreciate his passionate defense of the Palestinians and critical stance on the Israel-US war against Iran. Then there are those who castigate him for precisely those controversial positions. The real issue, however, is the decline in the status and authority of what was once seen as the world’s highest diplomatic position. The post was created when the post-World War order was edging towards the Cold War with the idea that a diplomatic buffer between the two emerging blocs could absorb shocks and prevent another armed conflict. One key idea was to make war unless specially sanctioned by the United Nation’s Security Council practically impossible. The US-led intervention in the Korean Peninsula was the first war sanctioned by the UNSC.But even then UN Secretary-General Trygve Li, a Norwegian trade union leader turned diplomat, was openly critical of Washington’s position, a stance chosen to show that the secretary-general wasn’t a mere rubber stamp for the Security Council. Li also adopted an independent stance during the Iran oil nationalization crisis when Great Britain threatened to invade Iran.
Interestingly, neither the US nor Britain took umbrage at Li’s stance. The unwritten rule was that the UN Secretary-General must be seen as an institution above the interests of member states. That unwritten rule was more or less observed when Dag Hammarskjold, a Swedish diplomat succeeded Li. That enabled Hammarskjold to take an active role in encouraging the decolonization process, especially in black Africa, a special interest that may have caused his death in a mysterious plane crash blamed on the CIA and/or Belgian mercenaries.
Hammarskjold attracted criticism for his equivocal stance on a series of tragic events, including popular uprisings in Soviet-dominated Poland and Hungary and the British-French-Israeli invasion of Egypt in 1956.
The Burmese diplomat U Thant, who succeeded Hammarskjold, reinterpreted the position as a basically bureaucratic one. He presided over the UN’s expansion into new domains, recruited more staff and helped organize more conferences.
Of those who succeeded Thant, only the Peruvian diplomat Javier Peres de Cuellar managed to end his tenure without controversy - not to say scandal. The Austrian Kurt Waldheim, an early supporter of the Khomeinist evolution in Iran, was exposed as a former Nazi officer involved in rounding up Jews in Greece. The Egyptian Butros Butros Ghali managed to turn almost everyone against himself by rattling some cupboard hiding skeletons and ended up with a single term. The Ghanaian Kofi Annan put up a good show at a very difficult time, but ended up sullied with the oil-for-food scandal in Iraq.
Under an understanding by member states, the secretary-general must be chosen from states other than the five that have a veto in the Security Council. Last year, the General Assembly tightened the rules and established a greater measure of transparency in the process of selecting the secretary-general.
By tradition the next secretary-general should come from outside Europe and Asia, which leaves Latin America and Africa as the two main fishing fields. Latin American nations have fielded several candidates, only two of them with the profile needed for such a post.
One is Rafael, the Argentinian director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency. His problem is that Javier Milei the current ultra-right President of Argentina isn’t a fan. And Milei being a favorite of US President Donald Trump that could also mean hostility by Washington.
Former Chilean President Michelle Bachelet Jeria faces a similar problem. The new Chilean President Jose Antonio Kast is from the opposite side of the political spectrum and also close to Trump, who regards Bachelet as a rabid leftie.
Africa has two key candidates.
The first is former Senegal President Macky Sall and a champion of the so-called “global south”. European nations regard Sall with misgiving if only because of his courting of Vladimir Putin in the midst of the war in Ukraine. Worse still, Sall faces the Senegalese justice on a range of allegations related to his controversial presidency. Until last month, Dakar was reluctant to back his candidacy.The second heavy-weight African candidate is Olara Otunnu, a Ugandan economist whose resume includes service at international agencies. The cherry on top of that resume is a brief friendship with former US President Bill Clinton in bygone days. The question is whether Uganda is able to mobilize support for Otunnu beyond its own borders.  Some members are canvassing for the selection of a woman as secretary-general. The idea was first raised with former Pakistani premier Benazir Bhutto as the favorite. But she scripted herself out by insisting she would try to regain the premiership of Pakistan. She was assassinated on her way to reaching her goal in Islamabad.
But what about a dark horse emerging before the General Assembly meets in New York next month?
Two women are talked about.
One putative candidate could be Audrey Azoulay, the Moroccan-French former Director-General of UNESCO who also served as France’s Minister of Culture. She could win support from both the African Union and the European Union, not to mention the Arab League. However, her dual nationality may pose a problem. In any case, she needs to be nominated by Rabat or Paris or both. Rebecca Grynspan Mayufis is the other possibility talked about. As a diplomat from Costa Rica - the least controversial nation in the New World and a woman - she could benefit from broad consensus.
Even then a rabbit may be brought out of the magician’s hat at the last minute. That has happened before. Regardless of who gets the job, the real issue is what the job is for? Whatever his shortcomings, Guterres wasn’t even consulted about any of the big events during his tenure, let alone offered a tripod at the high table. Targeting him for personal attacks is unfair to say the least. What can the secretary-general do when veto-holding nations, such as Russia and US, start wars, or like China, threaten to do so?
If the job is to be part of the décor, as was the case with Kofi Annan, any photogenic multilingual man or woman would do. And if managerial skills are needed to run a sprawling and costly gravy train, one must look beyond diplomats to a new younger generation of business leaders.
On the eve of the General Assembly, the world and the UN with it are still moving toward the unknown.

Qalibaf and the Confining of Two States to the Hands of the Weapons

Mustafa Fahs/Asharq Al-Awsat/August 21/2026
Tehran shows intense concern for the geography of its influence — the near geography that abuts it in Iraq, and the far, which abuts Israel from Lebanon, in the south. Inside the national borders of the two countries, Iraq and Lebanon, Tehran sets its own frontier: one that overrides the idea of the near or distant neighborhood, of shared interests and social and spiritual commonalities, and even overrides those countries' own internal national interests — all in the service of its regional system of interests. In Baghdad, once again, the speaker of the Iranian parliament and its chief negotiator, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, reminded the ruling Iraqi political elite of the constants of the relationship between Iraq and Iran — of the nature of what Iran requires of a Baghdad it entered through the gate of weapons, under the loose banner of "resistance." At the outset of a visit that is his most important to Iraq in both its domestic and its external timing, he said that the resistance in Iraq had become an essential component of global power, holding that the Iraqi experience had exceeded the bounds of the two countries to become an influential force at the regional and global levels.
This announcement — of the birth of a new regional order, which Qalibaf proclaimed to the world from Baghdad — had been preceded days earlier by a statement matching his Iraqi remarks in geographic and strategic sensitivity, when he declared, roughly a week ago, that he was in direct contact with Hezbollah fighters on the front lines. And the front lines are, in practice, the operational boundary between Tehran and Tel Aviv, where the two engage directly inside Lebanese territory, far from the will of Lebanon as a state and a people — the people of the south in particular — since October 8, 2023.
From Baghdad to Beirut; from the weapons of the Iraqi armed factions that raise the banner of "resistance" to the weapons of a party that raises the same banner, Tehran persists — through Qalibaf, or Esmail Qaani, or other commanders versed in the geography of Iranian interests — in confining the decision of the two states to the hands of the weapons, rather than the reverse. What it is trying to impose on the Iraqi government is what the Lebanese government already confronts and what Lebanon has been unable to carry out, Iraq will find it impossible to carry out.
For by the substance of Qalibaf's regional order — new and old at once — the priority in Iraq and Lebanon is not the state, nor helping Iraq's political system past its crises, nor easing the catastrophe borne by the people of southern Lebanon, but the continuation of confrontation by invoking the idea of a permanent "resistance."
Iraq is entering the challenge of the coming September 30: the date for the complete withdrawal of American forces and for the factions to surrender their weapons, amid a sharp split within the ruling Iraqi Shiite political house over the utility of those weapons, their slogans, and their role once the last American soldier has left. At that point, a real test begins between the state and what lies beneath it — between weapons that protect the state and weapons that protect the nature of the system.
The scene repeats itself in Lebanon, though its heading now is the anticipated confrontation at the Ali al-Taher position in the Nabatieh governorate, and the Israeli plan to occupy it, which would mean occupying the city of Nabatieh and its surroundings, or destroying them outright. The Lebanese state stands powerless to spare the south and Nabatieh the catastrophe. The Israeli enemy is determined to seize the position, and the Iranians are determined on confrontation, which has led to the failure, or the deliberate frustration, of attempts to hand it over to the Lebanese army.
For the Israeli enemy, this approach failed before, in clearing the areas south of the Litani river of weapons; on the other side there is total Iranian rejection of any withdrawal from Ali al-Taher, and impossible conditions attached to surrendering Hezbollah's weapons.
Meanwhile the authorities in Lebanon try to impose their sovereignty over their own territory while avoiding an internal confrontation — the more so since Israel is not prepared to honor its commitments and withdraw in stages, and Iran is not disposed to accept the party's retreat or any partial relinquishing of its weapons. All of which, once again, confines the decision on the security and stability of the south to the hands of the Iranian negotiator.
Between Qalibaf and the two governments in Baghdad and Beirut lie commitments, deadlines, and borders abutting confrontation, from the Strait of Hormuz to the hill of Ali al-Taher — confrontations in which it is hard to give up weapons, whatever the consequences of holding on to them. In Iraq, where the divisions run through a single house of power and the government carries external commitments, matters may lead to crises of extreme gravity, ones that threaten the edifice of the 2003 system and end in strife and chaos. Lebanon, meanwhile, lies between two risks: the confrontation at Ali al-Taher and what follows it, and an internal confrontation with its own aftermath. Accordingly, the two governments are convinced of the need to avoid a confrontation that could lead to internal fighting and chaos. And since those holding on to the weapons, and their backer, are not disposed even to maneuver — since Tehran prefers a confrontation at Ali al-Taher to handing the position to the Lebanese army, while the Iraqi factions prefer to conceal their weapons rather than fold them into the state — it is clear that confining weapons to the hands of the state is difficult, while the truth is that the weapons are besieging the decision of the two states.

I Have a Dream

Dr. Abdelhak Azzouzi/Asharq Al-Awsat/August 21/2026
The American writer Simon Sinek has a valuable book titled Start with Why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action. Among the telling stories Sinek recalls is that of the famous American leader Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., with all the lessons it carries about leadership, inspiration, and building trust.
On August 28, 1963, some 250,000 people gathered in Washington, D.C., to hear Martin Luther King's historic speech, "I Have a Dream." There were no social networks, no internet, and no digital means capable of mobilizing crowds within a few hours. Nor did the organizers send out a quarter of a million invitations. Yet people came from across the United States, on the same day and at the same time, because the man was not merely an accomplished orator. He was the bearer of a message, he enjoyed people's trust and credibility, and above all, he knew why he was struggling, why he was speaking, and why he was calling people to change. The United States at that stage was living through acute racial and social tensions, and racial discrimination and inequality affected broad segments of society. King was not the only person who believed in equality, nor the only one who knew where the failures lay in the system of civil, political, and social rights. There were many who shared his convictions and called for a society that brings people together rather than divides them, and treats them equally rather than discriminates against them. But the essential difference was that King possessed clarity of purpose and a deep sense of mission, and that clarity gave him enormous energy and the ability to persist despite difficulties and setbacks.
In the midst of that struggle, debate raged over the means: How could civil rights be guaranteed? What should be done? Groups emerged with different strategies. Some saw violence as a means of change, while others preferred compromise, gradualism, and the search for conciliatory solutions.
Martin Luther King chose another path, founded on belief in a just cause and on the ability to make others feel that they were part of it.
He would repeat, in the spirit of a man who believed in his message: "I believe... I believe... I believe." His words were not confined to legal demands or narrow political arrangements. They addressed human dignity itself. He distinguished between just laws and unjust laws, holding that a just law is one that accords with moral law and elevates the human being, while an unjust law degrades his dignity. From this standpoint, segregation was considered an injustice because it distorts the human soul and harms a person's character and dignity.
For this reason, King's message went beyond the bounds of the civil rights movement. It became a discourse about the human being and about the way people ought to treat one another. His words reached deep into people because they did not hear ideas that were foreign to them. Instead, they found in them a truthful expression of what they already believed. They passed those words among themselves, from friend to friend, until the cause was transformed from the demand of one group into the cause of an entire nation.
Herein lies the power of his immortal phrase, "I Have a Dream." He did not say, "I Have a Plan." He did not offer his audience a technical document or a detailed administrative program. He offered them a purpose, a meaning, and an image of the future that everyone could believe in. Plans matter, but a plan without belief does not inspire, and means without a clear end do not move hearts. From this story, we draw a lesson of great importance in leadership, whether in leading states, institutions, or companies: the greatest thing a leader can offer people is not orders alone, nor figures, tables, and plans, but clarity about what he believes in, sincerity in what he calls for, and the ability to make others share with him in the meaning and purpose.
In a time when transformations are accelerating and challenges are becoming more complex, societies need even more those who possess clarity of vision, sincerity of purpose, and the courage of commitment. An inspiring leader does not content himself with managing the present. He gives people meaning for the future, and turns shared values into energy for action, trust into collective strength, and the dream into a path capable of producing real and lasting change.
People do not rally around positions for long. They rally around values. And trust is not built by polished rhetoric alone, but by sincerity, credibility, and steadfastness in principle. On that day in 1963, people who differed in color, affiliation, class, and age came together around a single dream and a shared faith. That faith was the water that nourished the roots of a movement that helped change the face of America. True leadership, therefore, always begins with the simplest and, at the same time, deepest question: why? We believe... we believe... we believe.

Ankara occupies Syria and then lectures Israel about sovereignty/A NATO member that refuses to designate Hamas, hosts its leadership does not get to lecture a state which has legitimate terrorism concerns.

Sinan Ciddi/The Jerusalem Post/August 21/2026
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-906129
Before dawn on August 18, Israeli aircraft cratered the runway and storage facilities at the Abu al-Duhur airbase in eastern Idlib, approximately 70 kilometers from the Turkish border, resulting in eight strikes, significant material damage, but no casualties.
Condemnations arrived faster than the damage assessment after Damascus declared the operation a flagrant violation of its sovereignty. Ankara accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of pursuing “expansionist and destabilizing” policies ahead of Israel’s October 27 election. Washington’s own ambassador, Tom Barrack, in Ankara pronounced it an “unnecessary escalation” that does nothing for regional peace. Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office confirmed that Jerusalem and Damascus had agreed to a security status quo, but that Syria was “on the verge of breaching” it by permitting Turkish troops to deploy at an airbase near Aleppo. Israel had warned Damascus repeatedly, but Damascus chose to proceed anyway.
No one should take Turkey or Barrack’s protestations seriously.
In March 2025, Turkish military teams surveyed runways and hangars at the T4 and Palmyra airbases in Homs province and the main airfield in Hama, as Ankara negotiated a joint defense arrangement with Syria’s new rulers. A follow-up inspection scheduled for March 25 never happened, because Israeli jets had struck both sites hours earlier. Israel then struck T4 again in early April, leaving it, by one regional intelligence assessment, unusable. The message was identical then and now: Israel will not permit another air force, particularly one belonging to a government that has threatened it with invasion, to erode its freedom of action over Syria. Israel’s perception that Ankara’s military footprint in Syria endangers Israeli security is not a novel proposition in Jerusalem. The Israeli government has argued this for well over a year.
Israel’s red lines in Syria are not a mystery, and they are not about Ahmad al-Sharaa’s rhetoric. They are about capability and trust. Sharaa is a former al-Qaeda commander who has been received warmly in Western capitals on the hope that he has changed. Perhaps he has. But his army still houses foreign jihadist formations, including units drawn from the Turkistan Islamic Party, whose leadership has been linked to al-Qaeda’s Shura Council. Islamic State is meanwhile reconstituting as the American footprint shrinks. Israel does not have the luxury of assuming that a state built on those foundations, armed and air-covered by Ankara, will remain permanently non-belligerent. Sober analysts have remarked that a functional Syria-Israel security understanding is achievable — which is precisely why a Turkish garrison inside the deal’s perimeter is so corrosive.
Ankara’s rebuttal is that its presence in Syria is lawful because Damascus consents, while Israel’s is not. Turkey has also flatly denied that any deployment to Abu al-Duhur was underway, calling the Israeli claim a manufactured pretext, though Israeli officials say highly sensitive intelligence on that deployment was shared with Washington beforehand. The consent argument still deserves scrutiny on its own terms, because it is a remarkable piece of retroactive legalism.
Turkey has seldom waited for permission when it entered Syria. It launched three major cross-border operations — Euphrates Shield in 2016, Olive Branch against Afrin in 2018, and Peace Spring across Ras al-Ain and Tell Abyad in 2019 — each justified by Ankara as self-defense against terrorism, each conducted over Damascus’s explicit objection. It armed and paid Islamist and jihadist militias throughout the war. It still effectively controls swaths of the north and continues paying the salaries of former Syrian National Army factions now folded into the new Syrian military — factions documented as detaining, extorting, and abusing civilians.
So the operative Turkish doctrine is this: Ankara may cross borders and occupy foreign territory when it perceives a national security threat, and everyone else must accept it, however, Israel may not. Turkey spent a decade dismantling Syrian sovereignty and has spent the past twenty months invoking Syria’s “territorial integrity” as though it were a founding principle. This is not law, but regional positioning dressed as law.
We do not know precisely what specific asset or activity the IDF destroyed at Abu al-Duhur. Israel has stated its rationale without exposing its intelligence, which is standard practice when sources and methods are at stake. But the Turkish general staff almost certainly knows exactly what was there, knows Israel would not tolerate it, and has strong reasons to prefer the conversation stay at the level of Netanyahu’s electoral motives. The election argument, notably, is Ankara’s centerpiece, and it conveniently substitutes a claim about Israeli intent for any account of Turkish conduct.
Ankara also prefers not to discuss a Syrian constituency. In July 2024, anti-Turkish riots swept the Turkish-controlled north; protesters burned Turkish facilities and five people were killed. That resentment has not evaporated. Ordinary Syrians increasingly grasp that Turkish expansion inside their country reliably invites Israeli bombs onto Syrian runways, and that they absorb the costs of a rivalry they did not choose.Consent from Damascus, in any case, settles nothing regarding Israel. A NATO member that refuses to designate Hamas, hosts its leadership, and on whose soil Israeli intelligence recently exposed an Iranian-directed Hamas finance network moving hundreds of millions of dollars, does not get to lecture a state which has legitimate terrorism concerns. Nor is Erdogan’s escalatory rhetoric a product of October 7. It runs from the “one minute” confrontation with Shimon Peres at Davos in 2009, through the Mavi Marmara, to his 2024 boast that Turkey might enter Israel “just as we entered Karabakh, just as we entered Libya” — a line he repeated in April 2026. Washington’s instinct to de-escalate is sound, and a trilateral deconfliction mechanism is worth building; however, earlier attempts produced little. But reflexively blaming Jerusalem, before the intelligence picture is public, tells Ankara that escalation is cost-free and that American pressure flows in one direction. Erdogan has spent years being told his threats are mere rhetoric. Israel declined to make that assumption at T4, and declined again at Abu al-Duhur. Tom Barrack should ask why a base near Aleppo mattered enough to strike before concluding it should not have been struck.
**Sinan Ciddi is a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and director of the Turkey program.

Beware Iran’s most devious weapon — another ‘October surprise’

Mark Dubowitz/New York Post/August 21/2026
The October surprise was born in Iran — and 46 years later, the Islamic Republic may be preparing to launch another one. In 1980, the hostage crisis — 52 Americans seized at the US embassy in Tehran the year before during Iran’s Islamic Revolution — dominated the presidential race between incumbent Jimmy Carter and challenger Ronald Reagan. Reagan’s campaign manager Bill Casey, assuming Iran would dread his hawkish boss’ victory, worried that Iran might release the hostages right before Election Day — and hand Carter a last-minute win.
Seeking to short-circuit what he dubbed an “October surprise,” Casey told the press of his concern, and the phrase stuck.
Today it’s used for any late-breaking event timed to swing an election.
But Casey was wrong: Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini had his own reasons to want Carter defeated. Carter had admitted the hated Shah to the United States, making him the face of Washington’s decades-long support for the monarchy; Carter had frozen Iranian assets, imposed sanctions and broken diplomatic relations with Tehran. In Khomeini’s eyes, humiliating Carter and denying him the political triumph of the hostages’ homecoming served the Islamic Revolution’s interests.
He held the hostages through Election Day and beyond, releasing them within minutes of Reagan’s inauguration on Jan. 20, 1981 — extraordinary timing that fueled allegations of a secret Reagan-Iran deal, which exhaustive congressional investigations eventually debunked.
By letting the hostages dangle, Khomeini successfully manipulated American politics. We may soon face another Iranian ploy aimed at leveraging foreign elections to weaken the regime’s enemies. Israel’s election is scheduled for Oct. 27; the US midterms are Nov. 3, exactly one week later.
That makes the end of October a potentially dangerous window for regime mischief. Tehran could attack Israel directly or engineer a serious escalation through one of its terror proxies — calculating that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, days before an election, would have little choice but to respond forcefully.Imagine a ballistic missile barrage, massive enough to overwhelm Israeli defenses, killing scores of civilians in Tel Aviv or Haifa. Or an Iranian terrorist proxy carrying out a mass-casualty attack against an Israeli population center. The precise scenario is unknowable, but the calculation is not: Inflict enough carnage that no Israeli prime minister could allow it to go unanswered.
But Tehran would be counting on that response.
A powerful Israeli retaliation could trigger a broader regional escalation, drive the Iran war to the top of the news, spike oil and gasoline prices, and create serious political and economic complications for President Donald Trump and Republicans fighting to retain the House and Senate just days later.
In the regime’s ideal scenario, Tehran would absorb the Israeli blow, play the victim, and wait to see if Republicans lose. If they do, Iran gets exactly the narrative it wants: Israel helped cost Republicans Congress. Tehran could then exploit the ensuing recriminations to deepen divisions between Washington and Jerusalem, counting on American critics of Israel, on both the right and the left, to hammer home that message. That makes the days immediately preceding the Israeli election a particularly attractive window for an Iranian provocation.
We should be thinking about this now — because there’s little doubt Tehran is already doing so.
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps knows our political system well; it studies our divisions and looks for opportunities to exploit them. The Treasury Department sanctioned IRGC-linked entities in 2020 and again in 2024 for using disinformation and hacked material to interfere in US elections.
Countering an October surprise — whether this scenario or others — requires close US-Israel coordination over the next two months to war-game the possibilities. American and Israeli political, military and intelligence officials should agree on potential responses before missiles are flying, emotions are high, oil prices are spiking, poll numbers are dropping and both governments are working at cross-purposes — straight into the Islamic Republic’s trap .
One option should at least be considered: Revenge may be a dish better served cold.
If Iran launches an attack deliberately designed to provoke Israel before the elections, Israel could defend itself, absorb what it can, establish Iranian responsibility, and wait — until after both elections — to retaliate at a time of its choosing.
But Trump would need to give Netanyahu the political cover necessary not to respond immediately, and a commitment that the IDF could act after the midterms. Trump could also make clear publicly, well before October, that Washington is aware of the potential regime trick, saying that an election-season provocation will fail to divide the United States and Israel, and retaliation will inevitably follow. Forty-six years ago, an ayatollah exploited an American election and helped hobble a sitting American president. The current ayatollah should not be allowed to run the same playbook on this one.
**Mark Dubowitz is chief executive of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
https://nypost.com/2026/08/20/opinion/beware-irans-most-devious-weapon-a-new-october-surprise/
Read in New York Post

Israel strikes military airbase in Syria while warning Turkey
Seth J. Frantzman/FDD's Long War Journal/August 21/2026
Israel conducted airstrikes on the Abu al Duhur military airport in northern Syria during the evening of August 17–18. Syria condemned the strikes as a violation of its sovereignty, while Israel’s Prime Minister’s Office said that “Israel and Syria agreed to a status quo in security matters, which Syria was on the verge of breaching by permitting Turkish troops to deploy at an airbase near Aleppo.” The strikes come amid increasing tensions between Israel and Turkey. The US has worked to reduce tensions and broker trilateral talks between Syria, Israel, and the US.
On August 19, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned Turkey against increasing its military role in Syria. “Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asserted on Wednesday that Israel had already warned Turkey against any military activity in Syria before Israel bombed an airbase that Ankara had been eyeing,” The Times of Israel reported. “The message was conveyed, but apparently they didn’t hear it, so we made sure they understood it more clearly,” Netanyahu said.
“Israel repeatedly warned Syria that such a deployment would pose a threat to Israel’s security. Syria chose to ignore these warnings. Israel will not tolerate threats to its security, and would welcome a return to the status quo,” Netanyahu’s office added. The Israeli prime minister has indicated that Israel views a Turkish presence south of current Turkish positions in northern Syria as a threat.
Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, chief of the general staff of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), visited Israeli troops on the Golan on August 19 in the wake of the strikes. “We see what is happening and are monitoring the changes on the Syrian front; we will not allow hostile forces to establish themselves on our borders, and we will know how to use our operational capabilities precisely where and when needed,” Zamir said, according to a statement distributed by the IDF.
“Syria condemned Israeli airstrikes on Abu al-Duhur Military Airbase in Idlib as a violation of its sovereignty and territorial integrity, the [Syrian] Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates said Tuesday,” the state-run Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) reported on August 18. Abu al Duhur is in Idlib Governorate, south of the city of Aleppo. Syria views the strikes as an unjustified act of aggression.
“[The Syrian foreign ministry] said continued Israeli attacks since December 8, 2024, while Syria exercises restraint and works to consolidate stability and avoid escalation, reveal attempts by the Israeli occupation to undermine those efforts and push the region toward further tension and instability,” SANA added.
US Ambassador to Turkey Tom Barrack, who is also the US envoy to Iraq and Syria, wrote that the US was deeply concerned by the strikes. “The Al-Sharra [sic] government has neither adopted a predatory posture nor maintained proxy forces. It has, in fact, repeatedly indicated a preference for de-escalation with Israel. The United States has in the past, and will continue in the future, to host discussions to encourage diplomatic cadence over kinetic frustration for both nations,” Barrack stated.
Tensions between Israel and Syria have grown over the last year and a half since the fall of the Bashar al Assad regime. Israeli officials have described Syria’s president, Ahmad al Sharaa, who formerly led Al Qaeda’s branch in Syria before heading Hayat Tahrir al Sham (HTS), as a “jihadist.”
“They were jihadists and remain jihadists, even if some of their leaders have donned suits,” Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said in March 2025. In July 2025, Amichai Chikli, Israel’s minister of diaspora affairs, advocated assassinating Sharaa and warned that war could break out with Syria. Sharaa, formerly known as Abu Mohammad al Jolani, was a US- and UN-designated terrorist before the US and UN rescinded his designations in November 2025.
Israel launched a ground incursion into Syria, including seizing the summit of Mount Hermon, when the Assad regime fell in December 2024. Since the end of that year, the IDF has maintained a presence in what was previously the buffer zone of the 1974 ceasefire lines on the Golan Heights.
The IDF has been accused by Turkish media of carrying out raids into Syria along the buffer zone. Israel’s foreign ministry has responded by highlighting Turkey’s role in northern Syria. Turkey invaded parts of northern Syria between 2016 and 2019 as part of its support for Syrian rebel groups and its opposition to the Kurdistan Workers Party and the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces.
Reuters reported on August 19 that days before the recent Israeli strike on Abu al Duhur military airport, Roman Gofman, the head of Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency, spoke with Syrian Foreign Minister Assad al Shaibani and relayed Israel’s concerns about Turkey’s presence. Shaibani also met with US Envoy Barrack in Turkey on August 17, hours before the strike. Turkish media reports over the last few weeks had indicated that there were rising tensions with Israel.
The US has sought to engage Syria and Israel in trilateral talks to ease tensions. In January, there was a meeting between the three countries. “Both Sides [sic] have decided to establish a joint fusion mechanism—a dedicated communication cell—to facilitate immediate and ongoing coordination on their intelligence sharing, military de-escalation, diplomatic engagement, and commercial opportunities under the supervision of the United States,” the US Department of State said at the time. It is unclear how Israel’s recent airstrike will affect US policy and whether deconfliction in Syria may result.
Reporting from Israel, Seth J. Frantzman is an adjunct fellow at FDD and a contributor to FDD’s Long War Journal. He is the senior Middle East correspondent and analyst at The Jerusalem Post, and author of The October 7 War: Israel’s Battle for Security in Gaza (2024).

Washington Should Not Reduce Military Exercises With South Korea

Logan Rolleigh and Ryan Brobst/FDD- Policy Brief/August 21/2026
President Donald Trump ordered the Department of Defense to “substantially reduce” military exercises between the U.S. and South Korean militaries on Sunday. These regularly occurring combined exercises enhance the readiness and interoperability of U.S. and South Korean armed forces and increase their ability to deter and, if necessary, defeat North Korea. Reducing the scope or frequency of these exercises, or ending them altogether, will erode the alliance’s readiness, undermine deterrence, and increase the risk of North Korean aggression against American and allied troops and civilians on the Korean Peninsula.
Exercises Bolster U.S. and South Korean Combat Power
American and South Korean combined exercises ensure that the militaries of both countries can operate together from the command level down to the squad level. The ability to integrate processes and procedures while overcoming obstacles that inevitably emerge in combat situations is especially important given the difficulty of working across language barriers. Combined military operations in wartime will be less effective if the allies fail to train together in peacetime. Two large U.S. and South Korean combined military exercises are held each year. Freedom Shield and Ulchi Freedom Shield are comprehensive exercises typically beginning in spring and summer, respectively. The current iteration of Ulchi Freedom Shield began on Monday, August 17. Other exercises regularly take place as well, but they are generally smaller and not as comprehensive. U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) states that the two central exercises are defensive in nature and are intended to, in part, validate combined readiness levels and improve communication and coordination between U.S. and South Korean forces. In addition to providing indispensable training opportunities, the exercises send an important deterrent message to America and South Korea’s shared enemy — North Korea.
North Korea Is the Aggressor
Despite South Korean President Lee Jae-myung’s attempts to bring stability by proposing peace talks and aiming to secure a nuclear-free peninsula, North Korea continues to ramp up its aggression. The North has not reciprocated any of the South’s repeated gestures of reconciliation and peace since Lee took charge in June 2025. Earlier this year, Pyongyang removed all references to reunification with Seoul from its constitution. On August 14, the Kim regime denounced the upcoming Ulchi Freedom Shield. The Trump administration’s echoing of Pyongyang’s stance on U.S.-South Korea exercises is likely to embolden Kim instead of deterring him. These developments come amid a North Korean military buildup. This buildup has included launching two nuclear-armed destroyers, hardening southern border defenses, updating and expanding military bases, improving ballistic missile accuracy with Russian help, and modernizing the North Korean Army’s tactics based on lessons learned by veterans of Russia’s war against Ukraine. The danger from Pyongyang is growing due to Russian assistance modernizing North Korea’s military capabilities, which increases the probability they could be used against the United States and South Korea.
Strong Alliances Are Needed
Instead of reducing the size and frequency of combined exercises with South Korea, the Trump administration should expand them and work to integrate Japanese forces into the combined exercises at all levels as well. This will strengthen combined deterrence against North Korean aggression and make it less likely that a future conflict breaks out.On Capitol Hill, Congress should oppose any efforts to reduce U.S. military posture on the peninsula, making clear that it expects the administration to fully follow Section 1255 of the fiscal year (FY) 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) which is designed to limit troop reductions on the peninsula. Congress should also require reports on both Russia-North Korea security cooperation and whether U.S. war plans on the peninsula account for growing North Korean capabilities.
Trump should also include the South Korean president in any negotiations he might undertake with Kim Jong Un. He should also convene a summit with Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi and South Korea’s Lee to reaffirm U.S.-Japan-South Korea trilateral security cooperation. These steps would signal that Washington has the political will and military capabilities to punish and defeat any aggression from North Korea.
*Logan Rolleigh is a research assistant for the Center on Military and Political Power (CMPP) at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD). Ryan Brobst is the deputy director of CMPP. For more analysis from the authors and FDD, please subscribe HERE. Follow FDD on X @FDD and @FDD_CMPP. Follow Logan on X @L_Rolleigh and Ryan on X @RyanBrobst_. FDD is a Washington, DC-based, nonpartisan research institute focusing on national security and foreign policy.

Resistance to Taliban rule persists in Afghanistan

Will Selber/FDD's Long War Journal/August 20, 2026
As the Taliban’s reign over Afghanistan enters its sixth year, the Taliban remains stronger, more unified, and better equipped than it was before September 11, 2001. Today, its flag flies across all 34 provinces and roughly 400 districts. Yet beneath an appearance of uncontested control, the Taliban faces its most serious combination of challenges since Kabul fell. Relations with Pakistan have worsened, producing intermittent cross-border clashes and military operations. Islamabad accuses the Taliban of sheltering the Pakistani Taliban (TTP), which is waging an escalating insurgency inside Pakistan. The Taliban also continues to battle the Islamic State’s Khorasan Province, which has survived more than a decade of sustained pressure from the Taliban, the former Afghan government, and the United States.
At the same time, a persistent anti-Taliban resistance has expanded. The resistance began early, after the fall of Kabul, as forces aligned with the previous government tried but failed to hold territory in Panjshir province. After their initial defeat in September 2021, forces that would become the National Resistance Front (NRF), a major anti-Taliban resistance group, began guerrilla attacks. Now, dozens of organizations have announced their opposition to Taliban rule, while a smaller number regularly claim attacks. These groups have endured despite lacking territorial sanctuary or overt state sponsorship, two advantages previously enjoyed by the Northern Alliance, the Taliban, and many of the mujahideen factions that fought the Soviet Union.
“Our greatest achievement is that the resistance survived and expanded,” Ali Nazary, head of foreign relations for the NRF, told FDD’s Long War Journal. “The resistance is indigenous. The NRF is not an army sitting somewhere outside the country waiting to cross the border.”
As the anti-Taliban resistance enters its sixth year, the NRF, led by Ahmad Massoud, the son of Ahmad Shah Massoud, and former Chief of General Staff Yasin Zia’s Afghanistan Freedom Front (AFF) remain the two most active groups on the battlefield.
“The NRF has conducted more than 2,000 military operations against Taliban forces since the resistance began in 2021,” Nazary told Long War Journal. This NRF attack claim is substantially higher than the 300-plus attacks the group has claimed on X. According to their posts, the NRF has focused most of its operations in Kabul, Herat province, and northern Afghanistan. In early August, the group claimed an attack in Herat, killing two Taliban fighters, followed by a claimed rocket attack on Taliban forces in Kunduz.
“We have increasingly emphasized intelligence, mobility, survivability, and the ability to strike Taliban security where they believe they are secure,” Nazary told Long War Journal.
As the NRF’s commander, Massoud is likely the most internationally recognized face of the anti-Taliban resistance. He travels frequently throughout Europe, the United States, and the Middle East, most recently attending the Iranian state funeral for Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Massoud’s travels are likely not only an attempt to garner resources, but also to remind the world that there is an alternative to the Taliban.
“Much of the world is exhausted by Afghanistan,” Nazary said. “This is an international political challenge.”
Yasin Zia’s AFF, while not as well-known internationally as the NRF, has actively fought the Taliban since 2022. It has focused its attacks in Kabul and the provinces of Baghlan, Parwan, Kapisa, Takhar, Kunduz, and, most recently, Badakhshan, where it has engaged in sustained fighting with Taliban forces in Zebak district. “The AFF has now reached a stage where it is capable of organizing larger, front-line military operations against the Taliban,” Dawood Naji, head of the AFF’s political committee, told LWJ.
The AFF has also publicly claimed at least 20 operations in Kandahar province since 2022, underscoring its geographic reach. Kandahar, the spiritual homeland of the Taliban, is in southern Afghanistan and is majority Pashtun, which is not a natural base of support for a group led by a Tajik.
“The AFF is active in several parts of the country,” Naji said. “In the coming weeks and months, you will see our presence expanded into additional areas.”
Although the AFF and NRF have been the most active resistance groups over the past five years, two former Islamic Republic of Afghanistan officials of the previous regime have recently entered the battlefield. Former Vice President Amrullah Saleh’s Afghan Green Trend, which spent much of the past four years releasing sensitive Afghan government documents, began publicly claiming attacks against the Taliban this year. It most recently claimed attacks against Taliban oil tankers in the Salang Valley.
Former 215th Corps commander Lieutenant General Sami Sadat’s Afghan United Front (AUF) also commenced operations this year, launching its first attack on August 1 in Kandahar province. Since then, the AUF has claimed nearly 20 attacks across the country, focusing largely on Helmand and Kandahar provinces. “Our preparation over the past three years has had only one purpose,” Sadat told LWJ. “So that when we start, we do not stop until Afghanistan is free.”
Other smaller anti-Taliban resistance groups have also been active across the battlefield. In mid-July, Sepahiyan-e Mihan, or the Homeland Soldiers Front, led by former Afghan commando Qayum Malang, commenced operations by briefly capturing the Yaftali Sufla district center in Badakhshan. Other groups, including the National Mobilization Front, the Freedom and Justice Movement, and the Afghan Liberation Movement, have also publicly claimed attacks across Afghanistan.
“Since beginning operations in September 2022, the ALM has conducted 59 operations,” Naser Waziri, an advisor to the Afghan Liberation Movement, told LWJ. “Countering the narcotics trade has been one of our principal focuses.”
With new groups claiming attacks more frequently, some analysts have expressed concern that the resistance could fragment further, leaving the battlefield crowded with organizations but lacking an overarching political or military strategy. However, resistance leaders contend that while they are not working under the same organizations, they are all working for the same goal: the removal of the Taliban regime. “We regard the Afghanistan Freedom Front, or any resistance movement seeking to liberate Afghanistan, as partners in a common struggle rather than competitors,” Nazary said.
Afghanistan has a grim history of armed factions uniting against a common enemy but dividing over what should follow. After the collapse of Mohammad Najibullah’s Soviet-backed government in 1992, rival mujahideen factions fought for control of Kabul, devastating the capital and helping create the conditions for the Taliban’s rise. Nevertheless, resistance leaders say that they can succeed despite Afghanistan’s bloody history.
“We are united by the purpose of freeing Afghanistan from Taliban tyranny,” Sadat said. “We see no issues operating with different organizations, since we are all fighting under the tricolor flag and for a united Afghanistan.”
Shared opposition to the Taliban, however, does not by itself constitute a unified strategy. If the resistance is to become more than a persistent security challenge, its factions will need to improve operational coordination, expand the frequency and sophistication of their attacks, develop sustainable logistical networks, and articulate a credible political order to replace Taliban rule. The eventual ability to contest and hold territory would represent a far more consequential stage, but one that remains difficult without sanctuary, sustained resources, or meaningful outside support.
“Our ultimate objective is not simply the defeat of one group,” Nazary said. “It is the establishment of a legitimate political order based on the consent of the people.”
For now, the resistance remains far from an existential threat to Taliban rule. But its continued survival is significant. Despite lacking territorial sanctuary and receiving little overt foreign assistance, armed groups continue to strike a Taliban regime that is pursuing greater international recognition while denying Afghans meaningful political participation. “People should know that there is another Afghanistan,” Nazary said. “There are men and women resisting the Taliban inside the country despite receiving almost no international assistance.”
*Will Selber is a retired US CENTCOM foreign area officer with over 4 years in Iraq and Afghanistan. He is the owner of Grumpy Combat Veteran on Substack.
https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2026/08/afghanistans-resistance-persists-despite-taliban-rule.php
Read in FDD's Long War Journal

Democratic Socialists of America: The Secret Stooges

Peter Huessy/Gatestone Institute/August 21, 2026
Who doesn't like free stuff? Capitalism, however, is not the villain. Without capital (funding), there would be no economy, free or state-run. The issue, therefore, is not between capitalism and socialism. It is between free enterprise and economic liberty on the one hand and a state-run, often totalitarian, market on the other. North Korea and Cuba also use capital. Both are, in a way, state capitalisms: the state has all the money; the citizens are the oppressed serfs. The state provides for them, to an extent, but is careful to do so as stingily as possible. The socialist or communist state's first concern will not be delivering services; it will be cutting costs. As the money that comes in becomes scarcer -- who is making money, the state? The first casualty invariably ends up being quality. Yes, there is free healthcare -- if you can wait months for an operation, and if you qualify for it under the state's cost-cutting rationing. Are you too old or too sick, or too medically compromised in some other way, and is someone younger and healthier more worthy of receiving the care than you?
Yes, you receive free housing, but who will guarantee that there will be sufficient heat in the winter, clean running water, that the garbage will be collected, that there will be no vermin, or that the elevator will work. Under communism, land belongs only to the state. The price is immaterial. Ask the "kulaks," peasant farmers in Ukraine whose land and grain were stolen by Stalin's Soviet Union during the Holodomor in 1932-33, with the result that five million people in Ukraine starved to death.
The DSA candidates do not describe themselves as communists. What does that mean, however, when many of the DSA's official policies are the essence of communism?
Unlike the DSA, communist leaders from Lenin to Mao to Castro did not aspire to abolish the police, the military or the border patrol. If anything, these totalitarian rulers expanded the police, the prisons, and the military. They were more than happy to put millions in prison or the gulags while widening the powers of the police and security forces...
What is being overlooked at the moment is that the current communist rulers from Cuba to China would love the DSA to abolish the police and border patrol in America, empty the prisons, open the borders, and shut down oil and gas production. Those moves would thoroughly cripple the United States and significantly weaken its ability to defend itself -- both internally and externally. No self-respecting communist government would ever adopt such crazy policies.
Commentator Ryan Mauro notes that New York City's DSA Mayor Zohran Mamdani and "chaos" funder George Soros both admire Slavoj Žižek, whose In Defence of Lost Causes calls for the return of the French Revolution's guillotine and what he calls "emancipatory terror." The goal, it seems, is the destruction of the West, to be replaced with Stalinist communism. Pictured: US Senator Bernie Sanders (R) speaks to the crowd at a rally for Mamdani (L) in New York City on April 12, 2026. (Photo by Jason Alpert-Wisnia/Hans Lucas/AFP via Getty Images)
The country is debating whether the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is the new face of the Democrat Party. There are two impediments, however, to accurately discussing what the DSA is all about. The first is that Americans are learning about DSA through the lens of the dominant media -- what Rush Limbaugh often called "the drive-by media." Largely missing is a balanced media source despite the almost universal use of the term "mainstream media" to describe the current collection of highly partisan and slanted journalists from whom most Americans get their news. While "mainstream" implies balanced and informative, most of the dominant media of today are neither.
The second impediment is an assumption that advocates of the DSA are simply against a "capitalist" system they associate with greed, and instead favor of what they consider a benign, compassionate "socialist" economy where stuff is largely free. Who doesn't like free stuff? Capitalism, however, is not the villain. Without capital (funding), there would be no economy, free or state-run. The alternative is to go back to a barter system: I'll paint your apartment, you give me wood for heating my house.
The issue, therefore, is not between capitalism and socialism. It is between free enterprise and economic liberty on the one hand and a state-run, often totalitarian, market on the other.
Capitalism is not synonymous with free enterprise or economic liberty. The 1776 economic manifesto The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith never used the word. It was Karl Marx who used "capitalism" as a highly pejorative description of the economies of the affluent West. North Korea and Cuba also use capital. Both are, in a way, state capitalisms: the state has all the money; the citizens are the oppressed serfs. The state provides for them, to an extent, but is careful to do so as stingily as possible.
The socialist or communist state's first concern will not be delivering services; it will be cutting costs. As the money that comes in becomes scarcer -- who is making money, the state? The first casualty invariably ends up being quality. Yes, there is free healthcare -- if you can wait months for an operation, and if you qualify for it under the state's cost-cutting rationing. Are you too old or too sick, or too medically compromised in some other way, and is someone younger and healthier more worthy of receiving the care than you? Yes, you receive free housing, but who will guarantee that there will be sufficient heat in the winter, clean running water, that the garbage will be collected, that there will be no vermin, or that the elevator will work.
Under communism, land belongs only to the state. The price is immaterial. Ask the "kulaks," peasant farmers in Ukraine whose land and grain were stolen by Stalin's Soviet Union during the Holodomor in 1932-33, with the result that five million people in Ukraine starved to death.
The DSA candidates do not describe themselves as communists. What does that mean, however, when many of the DSA's official policies are the essence of communism?:
"[C]ollectively own the key economic drivers that dominate our lives, such as energy production and transportation..." (source)
"[N]ationalize and socialize (through worker and community ownership and control) institutions of monetary policy, insurance, real estate, and finance..." (source)
"Social housing must first be a redistribution of land from landowners to the landless... Social housing must expropriate property from capitalists and deliver it to the working class..." (source)
Members of the DSA, while not precisely following what communist enemies of the USA want to see happen in America, are nevertheless stooges -- dupes -- of our communist enemies -- what during the Cold War were known as "useful idiots." Walter Duranty of the New York Times wrote from the Soviet Union in the 1930s that "no actual starvation or deaths from starvation" in Ukraine and "there is no famine," and he treated the Moscow Trials as justified and credible. Prior to this, shamefully, Duranty had won the 1932 Pulitzer Prize, still unrevoked, for his reporting of fabrications from the Soviet Union.
Unlike the DSA, communist leaders from Lenin to Mao to Castro did not aspire to abolish the police, the military or the border patrol. If anything, these totalitarian rulers expanded the police, the prisons, and the military. They were more than happy to put millions in prison or the gulags while widening the powers of the police and security forces, whether the KGB, MININT or MMS. Certainly, they all markedly enlarged their military and security forces. How else could communist nations have killed some 120 million of their own people, just to secure and sustain power?
What is being overlooked at the moment is that the current communist rulers from Cuba to China would love the DSA to abolish the police and border patrol in America, empty the prisons, open the borders, and shut down oil and gas production. Those moves would thoroughly cripple the United States and significantly weaken its ability to defend itself -- both internally and externally. No self-respecting communist government would ever adopt such crazy policies.
Supporters of the DSA appear to think that mob violence -- such as was used in the summer of 2020 and currently characterizes the assault on immigration law enforcement -- will enable them to seize control of the House of Representatives, then the Senate, then the presidency itself. If the Supreme Court is a barrier to the totalitarian plans of the DSA -- whose plans would be so easy to implement if all that were needed was a simple majority vote in the House -- the logical plan is to abolish the checks and balances of in the US constitution to fundamentally transform the US.
The DSA appears impatient with the world. Their utopia cannot wait. A thoughtful discussion of America's future or reasonable analysis of the DSA's objectives will not happen. Any such debate would leave these candidates in the ditch. They argue for abolishing the police on Monday, they deny they said it on Tuesday. No discussion of ramifications. The drive-by media remain complicit in the rise of the DSA by ignoring or covering for them.
What can we expect? Commentator Ryan Mauro notes that New York City's DSA Mayor Zohran Mamdani and "chaos" funder George Soros both admire Slavoj Žižek, whose In Defence of Lost Causes calls for the return of the French Revolution's guillotine and what he calls "emancipatory terror." The goal, it seems, is the destruction of the West, to be replaced with Stalinist communism. Apart from their projected multiple trillions of dollars in new government spending that they cannot pay for, the DSA foreign policy agenda is also scary. The DSA seems to be pushing a global intifada, an embrace of Hamas terrorism, a wholesale rejection of Israel, and on top of all that, "defunding" the US Department of Defense.
The goals of the former Soviet Union are still being pursued -- not by the KGB or the Red Army but by DSA hucksters who sadly are nothing but suckers promising a false utopia to be built on the ruins of America.
**Peter Huessy is president of Geostrategic Analysis.
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22785/democratic-socialists-of-america
© 2026 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute.

Question:What did Jesus mean by “upon this rock I will build my church” in Matthew 16:18?
GotQuestions.org/August 21/2026
Answer: Jesus’ words in Matthew 16:18 are the focus of an ongoing debate over who or what “the rock” is that Jesus mentions. The immediate context contains a question that Jesus put to His disciples: “Who do you say I am?” (verse 15). Peter answers, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God” (verse 16), to which Jesus replies, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it” (verses 17–18).
Is “this rock” on which Christ promised to build His church Peter? Is it Peter’s faith? Is it the truth of Peter’s statement? Or is the rock Jesus Himself? In all honesty, there is no way for us to be 100 percent sure which view is correct.
First view: the rock is Peter
One view is that Jesus was declaring that Peter would be the “rock” on which He would build His church. Jesus appears to be using a play on words. “You are Peter [petros] and on this rock [petra] I will build my church.” Since Peter’s name means “rock,” and Jesus is going to build His church on a rock, it appears that Christ means to link Peter with the founding of the church. It’s true that God used Peter greatly in the foundation of the church. It was Peter who first proclaimed the gospel on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:14–47). Peter was also the first to take the gospel to the Gentiles (Acts 10:1–48). In a sense, Peter was the rock “foundation” of the church.
Second view: the rock is the truth contained in Peter’s statement
Another popular interpretation is that the rock Jesus was referring to is not Peter, but Peter’s statement in Matthew 16:16: “You are the Christ, the son of the living God.” In this view, the “rock” is the truthfulness of that statement—the church is built on the rock-solid truth that Jesus is God’s Chosen One and the eternal Son of God. In confessing Jesus as the Christ, Peter, the “rock,” was demonstrating his own stability as he stood on that truth. He was, in a way, showing his character and why Jesus nicknamed him “Cephas” or “Peter” (see John 1:42).
Third view: the rock is Peter’s faith
Jesus had never explicitly taught the disciples the fullness of His identity, and so it was God who had sovereignly opened Peter’s eyes to that revelation. Jesus marks the source of that truth in Matthew 16:17. Peter’s confession of Jesus as the Messiah and Son of God poured forth from him as a heartfelt declaration of personal faith. Since personal faith in Christ is the hallmark of the true Christian, those who place their faith in Christ, as Peter did, are the church. Peter, writing to believers dispersed through the ancient world, likens them to stones used to build the church: “As you come to him, the living Stone—rejected by humans but chosen by God and precious to him—you also, like living stones, are being built into a spiritual house to be a holy priesthood, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ” (1 Peter 2:4–5). The faith of believers is what makes them “living stones” able to be built into the church.
Fourth view: the rock is Jesus
After Jesus declares that God the Father had revealed the truth to Peter, He says, “You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church” (Matthew 16:18). The word for “Peter,” Petros, is a masculine noun that means “a detached stone, a stone that might be thrown or easily moved” (Zodhiates, S., The Complete Word Study Dictionary: New Testament, AMG Publishers, 1992, p. 1,154). The word for “rock” next mentioned is a different Greek word, petra, a feminine noun that means “a mass of rock” or “a cliff” and therefore something foundational (ibid.; see also Matthew 7:24–25). The difference in the two terms may suggest that Jesus was contrasting Peter with Himself. That is, Jesus was saying, “You are the small rock, but I am the foundation of the church.” This view finds support in other passages that present Christ, not Peter, as the foundation of the church (1 Corinthians 3:11) and the life-giving rock (1 Corinthians 10:4).
Of course, the apostles played a foundational role in the building of the church, but the role of primacy is reserved for Christ alone. So, Jesus’ words in Matthew 16:18 are best interpreted as a simple play on words: a boulder-like, foundational truth came from the mouth of one who was called a small stone.
Christ Himself is called the “chief cornerstone” (1 Peter 2:6–7; cf. Matthew 21:42). The chief cornerstone of any building was that upon which a building is anchored. If Christ declared Himself to be the cornerstone, how could Peter be the rock upon which the church was built? Believers are the stones that make up the church. They are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets (not just Peter) and anchored to the Cornerstone (Ephesians 2:20). “The one who trusts in [Christ] will never be put to shame” (1 Peter 2:6).
The Roman Catholic Church argues that Peter is the rock upon which Jesus built His church, confers upon Peter the title of pope, and claims to be the one true church. As we have seen, however, identifying the rock as Peter is not the only valid interpretation of Matthew 16:18. Even if Peter is the rock upon which Jesus promised to build His church, it does not give the Roman Catholic Church any authority. What is clearer is that Scripture never describes Peter as being supreme over the other apostles. The New Testament does not describe Peter as being the all-authoritative leader of the early church. The origin of the Catholic Church is not in the teachings of Peter or any other apostle. If Peter truly was the founder of the Roman Catholic Church, it would be in full agreement with what Peter taught (Acts 2, 1 Peter, 2 Peter).

Selected Face Book & X tweets on August 21/2026
Dr Walid Phares
Hezbollah quicksands
As I projected many weeks ago, the so called "Pilot zones" in south Lebanon are failing
1. Hezbollah was not removed from the zones
2. Hezbollah is all around the zones
3. Hezbollah has penetrated the regular units that were deployed to replace Hezbollah in these zones.
The pilot zones are sinking in Hezbollah quicksands. The initial concepts of such plan were a failure by itself

Hussain Abdul-Hussain
Quick remarks on this episode:
1- Arabs and Muslims find themselves always at liberty of correcting the collective narrative of others -- Jews, Maronites, etc -- and NEVER accept any revision to their own history, whose evidence is flimsy and relies on revision literature (the source of the story of Prophet Muhammad comes from Abbasid literature compiled 200 years after his death) and is extremely thin on epigraphic (ancient inscriptions) and numismatic (coins) evidence. Even the name Al-Quds, for Jerusalem, Muslims invented it like a month ago (Muslim sources originally called it Iliya -- the Arabization of the name of the Roman colony).
2- On Phoenicians. This was a civilization that shared language, religion, traditions and social customs was spread along a vast area that extended from Lisbon in Portugal to Homs in Syria and dominated the Mediterranean basin. The Phoenician civilization lived for some 1400 years (roughly the age of Islam today), which means the Phoenician civilization evolved until it mutated beyond being recognizable in its earliest form. Like the Arabs today who never had a country called Arabia (Arabs had Islamic empires, but never Arab ones) Phoenicians were also one civilization that lived in competing states (like Muslims and Arabs today). For example, the Phoenicians of Tyre colonized Carthage while the Phoenicians of Sidon colonized Banazert (both are coastal towns in today's Tunisia). The two Phoenician powers were competitors.
3- It does not matter that they did not call themselves Phoenicians and that this ethnonym was coined by modern historians. The Byzantines too never called themselves Byzantine but called themselves Roman (and the Arabs similarly called them room, and from them we still have today the Room Orthodox sect in Arabic that is translated into Greek Orthodox in English).
4- The Phoenician story of Lebanon was constructed after Lebanon's independence to reinforce national identity. Lebanon was not the only one that did it. The Egyptians revived their ancient Pharaoh-ic history as the basis of their national identity, and so did the Iraqis and their Mesopotamia and others. Every nation state invents imaginary history and integrates into its modern identity. When Lebanon invented Phoenicianism, it did not restrict it to Christians but was supposed to include all the Lebanese (costal cities were rarely predominantly Christian, and they were the most Phoenician).
5- My own thinking about the Phoenicians is this: They were a civilization -- not a political entity. Some of their empires established empires whose capital relocated (Tyre to Carthage). The Phoenicians were polyglots (multilingual) just as the Lebanese are today because they use such asset to help them expand their trade and business or advance their careers. As empires rose and fell, the Phoenicians changed their language and culture, first to Roman (the Severus dynasty of Roman Empire was Phoenician port-Arab) then to Arab when Arabic started taking over as the lingua franca of the trade coalition that connected India to Spain, with the Phoenicians playing a major role in this intercontinental network.

Prime Minister of Israel
The Prime Minister's Office:
Erdoğan is an antisemitic dictator who has massacred Kurds, harbors Hamas terrorists, occupies half of Cyprus, and jails record numbers of journalists and politicians who oppose him. He now seeks to extend his aggression against Israel into Syria. Israel will not tolerate it. Erdoğan’s pathetic attempt to intimidate the leaders and soldiers of Israel, the only true democracy in the Middle East, will go nowhere.

Harry Theocharous

BREAKING: ERDOGAN REQUESTS INTERPOL RED NOTICE FOR PM NETANYAHU🚨
The Turkish Justice Ministry just announced that Turkey has formally requested an Interpol red notice for PM Benjamin Netanyahu for the flopilla interception and for “crimes against humanity”
Erdogan is not seeking justice, he’s escalating legal and political warfare against Israel as part of his neo Ottoman ambitions.He’s pushing hard, testing limits and appearing eager for a wider confrontation but will soon discover this was a very bad idea. Israel does not play these games the way Erdogan hopes.

Diliman Abdulkader

We gotta admit, Turkey was isolated and sidelined for the most part under the previous administration—they only acted tough against the Kurds and even then they were limited in what they could do.
Now thanks to Barrack, Turkey feels emboldened and untouchable. They undermine U.S. national security every opportunity they get because they know it won’t impact its ties with the White House and the President. In fact they feel so emboldened they’re even trying to test the U.S. alliance with Israel. The only reason it hasn’t gotten to the point of Turkey physically attacking Israel is because they know Israel won’t tolerate it and will respond immediately. Turkey wishes it could join Iran in the war, even President Trump admitted this. The White House has given Turkey a free pass, a total policy change compared to Trump 1.0 and even the Biden administration. The Turks are itching to ignite conflicts to destabilize the region so it can expand its territory. Two more years of a free pass from the White House is exactly what they want.

Hussain Abdul-Hussain

Aisha Wahab has been just elected to Congress to finish the term of Eric Swalwel (D-CA), who resigned over allegations of sexual misconduct. I looked up Aisha, and, like I argue in my book The Arab Case for Israel, Muslim-Americans and Arab-Americans are neither Muslim nor Arab (and in her case, not Afghani).
These Muslims in America use their heritage (and add to it Western antisemitism that aligns with Muslim Palestine) as a winner in identity politics.
Aisha, for example, says as someone "who has traveled to Afghanistan and witnessed the consequences of decades of conflict," then she goes on to reiterate the most common Democratic and DSA anti-American foreign policy platform. She's entitled to run on such a platform, but what's the value added of her Afghani heritage in this case?
If her lived Afghanistan experience was the issue, then, as an American of Afghani stock, and as a woman, Aisha's foreign policy would have centered on helping out the Afghani women (thus, engaging in imperialism at the expense of cultural relativism). Afghanistan is the worst country, on the planet, for women. This is how the UN describes it:
---- It is now five years since the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan – the second time they seized power in the country. Since August 2021, the de facto authorities (DFA) have issued more than 100 decrees affecting women and girls, stripping them of their rights and institutionalizing discrimination against them.
In the past year, this organized exclusion of women and girls from education, health services, and work – and restrictions on their movement and access to public life – has only intensified.
No other country in modern times has dismantled the rights of half its population through law, policy, and practice to the same extent. At the same time, overlapping humanitarian and economic crises and deepening poverty are also having a disproportionate impact on women and girls.
Half a decade in, the most severe women’s rights crisis in the world is being normalized. ---