English LCCC Newsbulletin For Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For  June 08/2026
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2026/english.june08.26.htm

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006 

Click On The Below Link To Join Elias Bejjaninews whatsapp group
https://chat.whatsapp.com/FPF0N7lE5S484LNaSm0MjW

اضغط على الرابط في أعلى للإنضمام لكروب Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group

Elias Bejjani/Click on the below link to subscribe to my youtube channel
الياس بجاني/اضغط على الرابط في أسفل للإشتراك في موقعي ع اليوتيوب
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAOOSioLh1GE3C1hp63Camw

Bible Quotations For today
But now I am going to him who sent me; and not one of you says to me, Where are you going
John 16/04-11: I have said these things to you so that when the time comes, what I have said may come to your mind. I did not say them to you at the first, because then I was still with you. But now I am going to him who sent me; and not one of you says to me, Where are you going? But your hearts are full of sorrow because I have said these things. But what I am saying is true: my going is for your good: for if I do not go away, the Helper will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you. And he, when he comes, will make the world conscious of sin, and of righteousness, and of being judged: Of sin, because they have not faith in me; Of righteousness, because I go to the Father and you will see me no more; Of being judged, because the ruler of this world has been judged.

Titles For Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on 07-08 June/2026
The terrorist group Hezbollah and its demented mullah masters understand only the language of force/Elias Bejjani/June 07/2026
Rudolf Heikal's visit to Pakistan: A huge bundle of questions and doubts/Elias Bejjani/June 06/2026
Aoun's anti Hezbollah stances: it's all just talk/Elias Bejjani/June 05/2026
Elias Bejjani/My audio personal analysis with the Hebrew "Makan" radio station addressed peace between Lebanon and Israel and Hezbollah's occupation/June 02/2026
Israeli Military Issues Evacuation Warning to Residents of Lebanon’s Tyre
Trump tells Axios he will ask Netanyahu not to strike back at Iran
Israel Army Says Intercepted Two Projectiles Fired from Lebanon
Lebanese Officials Slam Iran FM’s Remarks against Aoun, Back Negotiations
Total Toll of the War Caused by the Terrorist Hezbollah
An Agreement Between Israel and Lebanon... Is It Close?
Trump supports an operation against Hezbollah and speaks of US support or coordination with Syria for its execution.
Rezaei after the bombing of the southern suburbs: Watch the skies over the occupied territories tonight.
Trump calls on Israel to be “more precise” in its strikes on Hezbollah... He stressed that he will not lift the freeze on Iranian assets within any agreement... and he may resort to the military option to obtain uranium.
Two killed, 20 wounded in Israeli airstrike on Beirut suburb
Israel: Hezbollah Tunnel Network Found Under Beaufort Castle
Iran Vows to Target US Interests Over Escalation in Lebanon
Qalibaf: US and Israel Have Shown They Only Understand the Language of Force
Three Options Facing Lebanon/Dr. Nassif Hitti/Asharq Al-Awsat/June 07/2026
Lebanon and the Mines of Negotiation/Eyad Abu Shakra/Asharq Al-Awsat/June 07/2026

Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on 07-08 June/2026
Israel Intercepts Missiles Fired from Iran... Sirens Sound in Several Areas
Revolutionary Guard: Missile barrage against Israel could last a week… First shelling since a fragile ceasefire came into effect at the beginning of April
Iran Launches Missile Attacks Against Israel
Pakistani Interior Minister Holds Talks in Iran to Promote Dialogue with the US / Mohsen Naqvi to Deliver Message from Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir to Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei
One person killed in attack in central Israel
Israel reports incoming Iranian missiles in first since Mideast war ceasefire
Trump to Iran: You launched your missiles... return to negotiations and I will ask Netanyahu not to retaliate
Trump: I am not happy about the Israeli strike on Beirut
Trump says he would not unfreeze Iran’s assets before peace deal is done
Pentagon Raises Threat of Israeli Spying to 'Critical', According to US Media
More sanctions could be imposed on Israeli settlers in ‘coming days,’ France says
New Round of Talks in Cairo Seek to Push Forward Stalled Gaza Ceasefire
Israel military opens probe into West Bank baby’s killing
Iraqi Faction Warns against Dismantling of the PMF
Over 1.2 Million People Attend Pope's Mass in Madrid
Russian Drone Hits Nuclear-Fuel Storage Facility Near Chornobyl, Ukraine Says
Zelenskyy meets allies in UK after strike hits Ukraine nuclear site
Russian drone hits nuclear-fuel storage facility near Chornobyl, Ukraine says
US resolution draft at IAEA demands Iran open up on sites, uranium stocks

Titles For The Latest English LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on 07-08 June/2026
Is Saving Europe Still Possible?/Guy Millière/ Gatestone Institute/June 07/2026
True strategic wisdom for Iran is restraint toward the Gulf states/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/AlArabiya/June 08/2026
Trump and Iran’s proxies: Transitional deals and risk of legitimizing the proxy doctrine/Raghida Dergham/AlArabiya/June 07/2026
The founding king’s advice to the Tunisian leader/Mohamed Hadi Hannachi/AlArabiya/June 08/2026
Selected Face Book & X tweets on 07 June/2026

Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on 07-08 June/2026
The terrorist group Hezbollah and its demented mullah masters understand only the language of force.
Elias Bejjani/June 0
7/2026
The demented rulers of Iran understand only Netanyahu's language: force, humiliation, and assassinations. Trump remains ignorant of Iran's culture of delusions, fantasies, and empty bravado.

Rudolf Heikal's visit to Pakistan: A huge bundle of questions and doubts
Elias Bejjani/June 06/2026
Rudolf Heikal's surprise visit to Pakistan to appease Iran and its Hezbollah terrorist gang undermines Aoun's statements with CNN and raises many doubts and questions.

Aoun's anti Hezbollah stances:  it's all just talk
Elias Bejjani/June 05/2026
Aoun's stances are excellent, but they haven't translated into action yet. He needs to move from words to deeds, fire his Hezbollah advisors, purge the army of agents, issue arrest warrants for Hezbollah leaders, and dismiss the duo's ministers... otherwise, it's all just talk.

Elias Bejjani/My audio personal analysis with the Hebrew "Makan" radio station addressed peace between Lebanon and Israel and Hezbollah's occupation
June 02/2026

https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/06/155042/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAyK3MmY45U
Elias Bejjani/My audio intervention by phone on June 01 with the Hebrew "Makan" radio station, as part of the "Morning Tour" program, addressed the latest military developments in southern Lebanon following the Israeli army's liberation of the Beaufort Citadel (Castle of the High Rocks) from the terrorist and Persian Hezbollah. It also covered my stance regarding the State of Israel, the aspirations of the majority of Lebanese for peace with it, ending the state of absurd conflict, closing the Lebanese arena to the impostors, hypocrites, and merchants of the so-called "resistance," and achieving salvation from the Iranian occupation.

Israeli Military Issues Evacuation Warning to Residents of Lebanon’s Tyre
Asharq Al Awsat/June 07/2026
The Israeli military issued an evacuation warning to the residents of the southern Lebanese city of Tyre and its surrounding areas on Sunday ahead of possible strikes as clashes between Israel and Hezbollah continue. The military said earlier it had ‌intercepted two ‌projectiles that crossed into Israeli ‌territory ⁠from Lebanon, after ⁠sirens sounded in the areas of Yiftah and Ramot Naftali. Lebanese group Hezbollah has not claimed responsibility for the launches. The Iran-backed group rejected proposals linking a ceasefire to its disarmament, ⁠saying Israel must first halt ‌its attacks ‌and withdraw its forces from southern Lebanon. Iran ‌has made a ceasefire in Lebanon ‌between its close ally and Israel a condition for any peace deal with the United States. Hezbollah entered the war ‌on March 2, saying it was retaliating for the killing ⁠of ⁠Iran's Supreme Leader at the start of a conflict that has since killed thousands in Lebanon and displaced more than a million people. Israel continued to carry out strikes in Lebanon even before March 2, despite a US-brokered ceasefire that took effect in November 2024. It said its attacks are aimed at Hezbollah members and infrastructure.

Trump tells Axios he will ask Netanyahu not to strike back at Iran
Barak Ravid/Axios/June 07/2026
President Trump will call Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and press him not to retaliate for Iran's missile attack, Trump tells Axios.
"I am going to call Bibi right now and tell him not to retaliate. Each of them had their fun. Israel had its strike, and Iran had its strike. We don't need another one," Trump said. Why it matters: The ceasefire in the Middle East is teetering after Israel struck Beirut and Iran fired multiple waves of missiles in response. Trump is racing to stop the escalations from killing his hopes at a lasting deal with Iran. Netanyahu's answer will measure how much sway the American president still holds over Israel. Driving the news: Iran fired missiles at Israel on Sunday in retaliation for the Israeli strike on Beirut's southern suburbs. It's Iran's first direct attack since the April 8 ceasefire. Israel says it has intercepted the missiles. Trump's demand that Israel not retaliate is highly unusual. Without U.S. support, any Israeli strike in Iran will be much more difficult and risky. A U.S. official told Axios: "We are not part of this," but it is unclear whether Trump will order the U.S. military not to assist Israel in a strike in Iran, especially when it comes to air refueling and other kinds of military coordination.
What he's saying: Trump played down the Iranian strikes.
"The Iranian strikes didn't hurt anybody," Trump tells Axios. "Hopefully Israel is not going to retaliate. If Bibi strikes them back, it's just gonna keep going like the last 47 years — or the last 3,000 years."Trump added: "We are very close to a final deal with Iran. It is going to be a good deal. I don't want it to blow up because of what is happening now."
The other side: The Israel Defense Forces chief of staff "is approving military plans right now," IDF spokesman Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin said in a statement. "The Iranian regime has made a grave mistake," Defrin said. "… We will not allow the Iranian regime to establish a new equation. We will continue striking Hezbollah targets in Beirut."
Editor's note: This is a breaking news story and will be updated.

Israel Army Says Intercepted Two Projectiles Fired from Lebanon
Asharq Al Awsat/June 07/2026
20Israel's military said Sunday that it had intercepted two projectiles launched from Lebanon into Israeli territory, despite a new ceasefire agreement announced this week aimed at ending hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah. "Following the sirens that sounded a short while ago in the areas of Yiftah and Ramot Naftali, two projectiles that crossed from Lebanon into Israeli territory were intercepted," the military reported. Israel and Lebanon agreed to a new US-brokered ceasefire on Wednesday. However, Hezbollah has rejected the agreement.

Lebanese Officials Slam Iran FM’s Remarks against Aoun, Back Negotiations
Beirut: Asharq Al Awsat/June 07/2026
Lebanese officials slammed on Saturday Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi for criticizing President Joseph Aoun’s comments against Tehran and its meddling in his country.
Aoun, in an interview broadcast Friday by CNN, called on Iran to stop "interfering" in Lebanon's affairs following the collapse of a new truce announced by Washington between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah movement. "This is not your country. It is our country, our responsibility, and your role is not to interfere in our affairs," Aoun said. "It is our people who are being killed, and our homes that are being destroyed."Araghchi on Saturday urged Aoun to save Lebanon from its "real foe," Israel. "Based on Mr. Aoun's comments, one would think it's Iran that has occupied one-fifth of Lebanon, displaced one-quarter of its population and is bombing the country on a daily basis," Araghchi wrote on X. "If Lebanon were a bargaining chip for Iran, we would have reached an agreement long ago. Save Lebanon from your real foe, Mr. President," he added. Aoun has faced fierce opposition from Hezbollah since the launch of direct negotiations between Lebanon and Israel that are the first in decades between the countries that have no diplomatic ties.
Lebanese officials were quick to condemn Araghchi and throw their backing behind Aoun and the negotiations. Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea said: "Aoun’s stances, which reject Iran’s continued use of Lebanon as a bargaining chip in its negotiations with the US so that it can remain an open arena for conflict, underscore the president’s clear will to end this flawed situation that has caused turmoil in Lebanon for decades."In a statement, he added that Aoun’s stance reflects the position of the majority of the Lebanese people who want the establishment of a capable state.
"His stance is directed primarily at the two parties who are treating Lebanon as an open arena for their own agendas against the will of the Lebanese people: Iran and Hezbollah," he stressed.
"The Lebanese and Iranian people never had any problems between them, but the Iranian regime, since the revolution, has sought to use Lebanon as a card in its regional agenda. So, it armed a military proxy for it on Lebanese soil that operates outside the constitution, laws and national will.""This has caused grave harm to Lebanon, its people, economy and stability and kept the country an open ground for conflicts and war," Geagea remarked. On Hezbollah’s criticism against Aoun, he noted that the president’s statements again "highlight that the existence of weapons outside state control is a flagrant violation of the constitution and law.""His latest stance is decisive in saying that this deadly situation in Lebanon can no longer continue," he said. "Therefore, Iran must once and for all cease interfering in Lebanon’s affairs and respect its sovereignty and independent decision-making. Hezbollah must also immediately comply with the decision of the state and hand over its weapons, end its armed project and dismantle its military and security wings," he demanded. "Should Iran refuse to comply, then the Lebanese government must execute its own orders, starting with physically removing the Iranian ambassador for Lebanon," who has continued to defy his expulsion order from months ago. This must culminate in the state imposing monopoly over arms, Geagea stressed. Head of the Kataeb party MP Sami Gemayel slammed Iranian officials, demanding that they "take their hands off Lebanon. Lebanon is not an Iranian province.""Our president does not ask for permission to defend our sovereignty," he added in a post on X.
"The period of hegemony is over. Our decisions are made in Beirut, not Tehran," he declared.
Israel strikes Beirut despite truce, Iran threatens to retaliate
Reuters/07 June ,2026
Israel struck the outskirts of Beirut on Sunday for the first time since the US announced a truce plan for Lebanon last week, and an Iranian lawmaker threatened to retaliate, putting talks to end the wider war into new jeopardy. Iran has long said any peace deal with the United States would depend on a ceasefire also holding in Lebanon, which Israel invaded in March in pursuit of Iran-backed Hezbollah fighters who fired across the border in solidarity with Tehran. Iran’s chief negotiator, Parliamentary Speaker Mohammed Bagher Ghalibaf, said US bases and Israeli assets were legitimate targets because of hostile acts including the “violation of agreements over Lebanon.”“They showed that they only understand the language of power,” he wrote on X. Influential hardline Iranian lawmaker Ebrahim Rezaei posted on X that Iran would deliver a “decisive and painful response.” “Look at the sky of the occupied territories tonight,” wrote Rezaei, who serves as the spokesperson for parliament’s national security committee. Washington and Tehran have shown little progress in reaching a deal to end the war that President Donald Trump launched in February with a campaign of airstrikes alongside Israel against Iran. Trump has repeatedly threatened to restart the strikes unless there is an agreement soon.“We’re very close to a deal, or I’m going to blow the hell out of them,” Trump told NBC News in an interview, broadcast to mark 100 days of the conflict. The comments were recorded on Friday and broadcast on Sunday as Trump visited his New Jersey golf course.
Trump leans on Netanyahu
Trump has leaned on Israel to scale back its campaign in Lebanon to allow room for a peace deal with Iran, including rebuking Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with obscenities in a phone call last week. After the call, Netanyahu called off airstrikes on Beirut and agreed the latest truce plan with the Lebanese government. But Israel has never fully halted its campaign in Lebanon, which has killed thousands of people and driven hundreds of thousands from their homes. Hezbollah, which was not party to the truce and would be dismantled under its terms, has also continued attacks and says it will not give up its weapons unless Israel halts fighting and withdraws. Netanyahu said Sunday’s strike on Beirut’s southern outskirts, a district known as Dahiyeh that has long been a Hezbollah stronghold, was ordered in response to Hezbollah firing toward Israel. The Israeli military had earlier said it had intercepted two projectiles fired over the border. It issued an evacuation order for the southern Lebanese city of Tyre and surrounding areas ahead of possible strikes there. Elsewhere in Beirut on Sunday, mourners held a military funeral for Brigadier General Wissam Sabra, a senior military officer killed in a strike on his vehicle in the south the previous day. The wider war has been stalemated since the United States and Israel paused their attacks on Iran in early April, with Tehran blocking most shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, the main transit route for Middle East oil. Washington has imposed its own blockade of Iranian ports. Though the sides have both said they are close to a preliminary agreement that would reopen the strait, they have repeatedly traded strikes, with escalations in recent days that have included attacks on nearby Arab states hosting US bases. US forces struck Iranian coastal radar sites in Goruk and Qeshm Island, both in the Strait of Hormuz, early on Saturday after shooting down drones launched by Iran that US Central Command (CENTCOM) said posed a threat to maritime traffic. Two more Iranian attack drones that were threatening shipping in the strait were shot down, the US military said late on Saturday. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said it retaliated against US bases in Kuwait and Bahrain. Kuwait’s army said it engaged seven ballistic missiles that passed over residential areas, resulting in material damage but no casualties.

Total Toll of the War Caused by the Terrorist Hezbollah
Coordination/June 7, 2026
The Lebanese Ministry of Health reported that the number of victims has reached 1,316 dead and 11,072 wounded.

An Agreement Between Israel and Lebanon... Is It Close?
Central/June 7, 2026
The newspaper "Israel Hayom" quoted a diplomatic source as saying that "reaching an agreement between Israel and Lebanon is close." The newspaper added: "The Lebanese leadership has passed the point of no return and is committed to reaching an agreement, and understands that rebuilding the state requires ending Hezbollah's influence."

Video link: Commentary by journalist Ali Hamada from his YouTube channel / Israeli media reports movements of missile platforms in Iran / Battle of Jabal Ali al-Taher - Nabatieh looms
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11NhRFEg1sI
June 7, 2026
Iran, through its National Security Committee in Parliament, announced that it will respond decisively and painfully to Israel's bombing of Beirut's southern suburbs. Committee spokesman Ibrahim Rezaei said, "This rabid dog must be disciplined and put back in its place. Watch the skies over the occupied territories tonight." In response to rocket fire towards the north, Israel launched an attack on the Hawta al-Ghadir area in the southern suburbs, resulting in three deaths and several injuries. President Donald Trump: We support further surgical strikes against Hezbollah. Israeli media: Missile platforms spotted moving in Iran. Battle of Jabal Ali al-Taher - Nabatieh looms. The Israeli army announces the discovery of a massive Hezbollah military infrastructure near Beaufort Castle. Trump: I want a better life for Lebanon.

Trump supports an operation against Hezbollah and speaks of US support or coordination with Syria for its execution.
Al-Markazia/June 7, 2026
US President Donald Trump said he supports Israel carrying out a precise military operation targeting Hezbollah, adding that the United States might provide the necessary support for such an operation, or that coordination with Syria would take place.
Trump added: I want a better life for Lebanon.

Rezaei after the bombing of the southern suburbs: Watch the skies over the occupied territories tonight.
Al-Markazia/June 7, 2026
Ebrahim Rezaei, spokesman for the National Security Committee in the Iranian Parliament, announced that the Islamic Republic would not hesitate to respond to any Zionist aggression against the southern suburbs, stressing that the response would be "decisive and painful," and emphasizing the need to "discipline this rabid dog and put it back in its place." He added: Watch the skies over the occupied territories tonight.

Trump calls on Israel to be “more precise” in its strikes on Hezbollah... He stressed that he will not lift the freeze on Iranian assets within any agreement... and he may resort to the military option to obtain uranium.
Riyadh: Al Arabiya.net and agencies/June 7, 2026
President Donald Trump called on Israel to be more precise in its strikes that it says target Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Trump told NBC's "Meet the Press" program, in an interview recorded Friday and broadcast Sunday, "I would like to see Lebanon have a better life. I would like to see a more precise attack on Hezbollah," expressing his belief that this attack should be "more surgical." The US President stressed that he does not demand that Lebanon be part of a short-term agreement with Iran. He added in his statements to NBC that he would not lift the freeze on Iranian assets or any sanctions in advance within any agreement with Tehran. Trump stressed that "if Iran behaves well, and if it does a good job, then we will start talking," noting that he wants "a clause that guarantees that Iran will not circumvent the potential agreement." Trump expressed his desire for Iran to give up its nuclear ambitions and “for Iran to pledge not to develop or purchase nuclear weapons,” stressing that Iran has agreed not to develop nuclear weapons, “but I want a clause that guarantees that,” as he put it. He added, "Iran has no choice but to agree and deliver enriched uranium." He said in his interview: “We will weaken the Iranian army until we obtain the uranium safely if the agreement fails. We may resort to the military option to obtain Iranian uranium if it refuses to cooperate.” The Trump administration has been seeking for weeks to negotiate a possible peace agreement. “We are very close to reaching an agreement, or I will destroy them,” Trump told the network. Trump also expressed his willingness to speak to Iranian Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, who has not appeared in public since he was injured in US raids at the beginning of the conflict. He said: "I don't want to say whether I know where he is or not, but there is a high probability that I know him." The war in Iran entered its 100th day today, Sunday, in light of escalating tensions and exchange of fire between Washington and Tehran, and in light of a stalemate prevailing in the negotiations. Since the ceasefire on April 8, the United States and Iran have been engaged in Pakistani-brokered talks that have been the subject of debate and mutual threats, in addition to intermittent military skirmishes, without the two parties succeeding in reaching an understanding to end the war that Washington and Israel launched against the Islamic Republic on February 28. Iran War: A report reveals Iran’s readiness for the post-war phase...a collapse that threatens a widespread social explosion
Today, Sunday, Pakistani Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi, whose country is leading the mediation between the two parties in this war, handed officials in Tehran a message from Islamabad to the Iranian leadership. A diplomatic source told Al Arabiya and Al Hadath that the Pakistani Interior Minister, Mohsen Naqvi, carried a message to Iran regarding America’s agreement to ease sanctions. In a related matter, Reuters quoted sources that the United States would allow the use of Iranian assets to rebuild the damage caused by Tehran in the Gulf. The source added that Washington is also examining the possibility of using the assets to support the repair of any future damage. The agency said that US Treasury Secretary Scott Besent directed a team to assess the costs of the damage that Iran has already inflicted on allies in the Gulf. Although those concerned confirm that the discussions have achieved progress recently, many points of disagreement remain between Washington and Tehran, including the issue of the Strait of Hormuz, Iran's nuclear program, and Israel's continuation of the war in Lebanon against Hezbollah, Iran's ally.

Two killed, 20 wounded in Israeli airstrike on Beirut suburb

Beirut: Asharq Al-Awsat / June 7, 2026
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yisrael Katz said in a joint statement that the Israeli army launched an attack today (Sunday) on a "terrorist" headquarters in Beirut's southern suburbs in response to Hezbollah's firing toward Israel. The Lebanese Ministry of Health reported that two people were killed and 20 others wounded in the airstrike. The ministry stated: "The Israeli enemy's airstrike on the Marjeyoun area in Beirut's southern suburbs resulted in two martyrs and 20 wounded, including four children and four women." The southern suburbs are considered a stronghold of the group, according to Reuters. The Israeli army spokesperson announced via the social media platform X that the IDF was attacking Hezbollah infrastructure. This comes a day after the US-brokered Lebanese-Israeli agreement in Washington, which stipulated a gradual Israeli withdrawal from areas in southern Lebanon and the deployment of the Lebanese army to play a key role in maintaining security and implementing deployment arrangements in the border areas.

Israel: Hezbollah Tunnel Network Found Under Beaufort Castle
Tel Aviv: Asharq Al-Awsat/June 7, 2026
The Israeli army announced today (Sunday) that it had discovered a network of Hezbollah tunnels under Beaufort Castle in southern Lebanon. The army indicated that the tunnels were built to provide the group with capabilities to target Israeli forces and Israel. Israeli forces entered Beaufort Castle in the early hours of May 31, after having evacuated it following their withdrawal from Lebanon in 2000. This followed a battle between them and Hezbollah, which had been entrenched in the area. An Israeli military statement read: “The tunnel network was constructed within a civilian area, in a location that allows for operational control over the Galilee Panhandle, and is no more than 6 kilometers from the town of Metula. It served as a major hub for the Hezbollah terrorist organization in the region.” The military noted that the tunnels “were planned and financed by the Iranian regime” and designed to accommodate hundreds of fighters. The statement continued: “In one of the tunnels, which is about one kilometer long, forces found six underground shafts, a weapons storage room, an anti-tank missile launcher, anti-tank missiles, hand grenades, ammunition, combat equipment, advanced medical equipment, and several living quarters, including showers, toilets, an operating room, and kitchens.” Footage released by the Israeli military showed a narrow tunnel, similar to those found in Gaza, equipped with toilets, clothing boxes, beds, a wheelchair, and other items. The castle dates back to the Crusader era and has witnessed invasions and battles over the centuries. It overlooks vast areas of southern Lebanon and northern Israel, all the way to the Golan Heights, and served as a military base for the Israeli army after its invasion of Lebanon in 1982 until its withdrawal in 2000.

Iran Vows to Target US Interests Over Escalation in Lebanon
Qalibaf: US and Israel Have Shown They Only Understand the Language of Force

Riyadh: Al-Arabiya.net/June 7, 2026
Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf stated on Sunday that US and Israeli interests in the region have become "legitimate targets" following the Israeli military's raid on Beirut's southern suburbs. Qalibaf wrote on the "X" platform that the US and Israel "do not respect ceasefires, do not believe in dialogue, and through the naval blockade (of Iran) and the violation of agreements regarding Lebanon, they have shown that they only understand the language of force." He added, "The naval blockade imposed on Iran, and the green light given today by the United States (to Israel to attack the southern suburbs of Beirut), make US and Israeli bases and positions in the region legitimate targets. Our armed forces are, as always, ready." Qalibaf's remarks come in the wake of Israeli attacks on the southern suburbs of Beirut, a stronghold of Hezbollah, Iran's ally in Lebanon. The southern suburbs of Beirut, a Hezbollah stronghold backed by Iran, had remained largely untouched by Israeli strikes, which continued despite a ceasefire declared in April. Earlier this week, Israel warned that it would strike the suburbs if Hezbollah targeted its northern areas, prompting Iranian officials to warn that this could negatively impact talks with the United States to end the war in the region. The office of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced in a statement Sunday, "Following the directives of Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister (Yisrael) Katz, IDF forces carried out an airstrike targeting militant positions in the southern suburbs of Beirut, in response to Hezbollah's firing toward Israeli territory." The Israeli military said in a statement that it had "precisely targeted" a Hezbollah position. This is the first strike on the southern suburbs since the announcement of a new ceasefire agreement between Israel and Lebanon following talks held in Washington this week by envoys from both governments. The agreement is conditional on Hezbollah halting its attacks, which it says are in retaliation for Israel's continued occupation of territory, its ground advance in the south, and its airstrikes.

Three Options Facing Lebanon
Dr. Nassif Hitti/Asharq Al-Awsat/June 07/2026
On the eve of the launch of Lebanese-Israeli negotiations under full US auspices and, we might add, with US “engineering” of the launching and management of the negotiation track, Lebanon was facing three possible scenarios amid both vertical - in terms of firepower - and horizontal - with the Israeli war expanding across Lebanese geography - escalation on the ground.
The first of these scenarios is a trajectory of attrition: management of the explosive and open military conflict. This conflict could witness escalation, de-escalation, and truces in different forms and formulas, all of them remaining fragile and vulnerable to collapse, with constant renewed efforts to regulate or contain the ongoing war, offering what is known as a warrior’s respite with the specter of open war remaining on the horizon.
In this scenario, Lebanon becomes a forgotten cause, apart from the diplomacy of ineffective appeals and pleas on the margins. One of the greatest threats of this trajectory is its implications for Lebanon’s economic and society; the country cannot withstand or resist a war of this kind, which would lead to multiple and successive collapses at every level of society and the state. This would render Lebanon into a glaring case of a failed state.
The second scenario would be to halt the collapse, or contain it, through a settlement among the regional and international forces confronting or contending over Lebanon. Such an understanding would translate into political coexistence and a direct or indirect division of the spoils of influence through their allies. This, in turn, would also pressure Israel to indirectly accept a formula of coexistence or political understanding among the parties competing for influence in Lebanon, so long as its security interests are taken into account.
The situation that prevailed after the 2006 war and the issuance of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which established “UNIFIL 2.0,” follows this model. Despite its importance, the status quo it created remained fragile whenever one of the parties to the conflict on the ground decided to bring it down in the service of a strategic goal at a particular moment. This is what happened with the “support war” that Hezbollah waged for regional strategic reasons within a “power game” that goes beyond Lebanon. Lebanon thus returned to its role as a stage for other people’s wars, or as a “mailbox” in the competition among regional powers.
This war has provided Israel with a golden opportunity to launch its war against Lebanon as part of the confrontation with Iran in the inflamed strategic stage of the Levant, amid change in Syria, the Israeli war in Gaza and the West Bank, and the growing importance of the Lebanese stage following the shifts in broader Levant. It bears recalling that in the conflicts of the recent and distant past, even when the players and the names of the game changed, Lebanon was always an arena for other people’s wars and conflicts, even if the labels of those wars changed.
The third scenario was to move toward direct negotiations under full US sponsorship despite the challenges facing this track. This also entails Lebanon strengthening its contacts with Arab states and other friendly countries to strengthen the Lebanese position in the negotiation process.
This scenario aligns with the return to the state in Lebanon, a course that enjoys broad support in Lebanese society. It is not an easy path and does not offer rapid progress in concrete and practical terms. It faces many different challenges that reflect the nature and balance of the conflict with Israel; challenges that have taken root and become entrenched over time in reality and practice.
The process of recovering Lebanon and preventing the country from being used as a bargaining chip in the regional game of nations in the region - though under guise of grandiose and slogans always used the parties involved - and restoring it to the role of a state is a fundamental challenge to the state’s return to its natural role in all areas of national responsibility.
Naturally, among the most important of these responsibilities, or challenges, is genuine rather than merely formal negotiation over issues related to national security in all its aspects and dimensions, as is currently the case. Nor can we overlook the enormous challenges facing this path in the context of the conflict with Israel: first, achieving a full ceasefire, despite attempts to introduce a gradualist logic in this regard; then successfully and effectively dealing with the proposed formulas; securing the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon; and consolidating the 1949 Armistice Agreement, which was drawn along Lebanon’s internationally recognized borders, with the need to demarcate these borders because of the existence of certain disputed points.
The Lebanese approach is based on a gradual, interconnected, and realistic strategy that takes, before any talk of peace, the complete end of the Israeli occupation and Lebanese authorities’ retention of decisions of war and peace, as its starting point. It must also always be recalled that Lebanon remains committed to the Arab Peace Initiative adopted in Beirut in 2002 concerning comprehensive, permanent, and just peace. Its provisions, along with the relevant Security Council resolutions, remain at the heart of Lebanon’s negotiating frame of reference, which helps provide the additional support Lebanon needs from its Arab family.
In sum, Lebanon faces a challenge that I would call existential. It can no longer remain an arena for other people’s wars, as though this were its fate, at the expense of the role that is required and more than necessary: rebuilding the state of institutions, a state that embraces everyone, and that strengthens, in deed and in practice, the concepts of citizenship and national unity at the expense of the statelets of sects and de facto powers in politics, society, the economy, and all aspects of national life.

Lebanon and the Mines of Negotiation
Eyad Abu Shakra/Asharq Al-Awsat/June 07/2026
I remember how we learned of Imruu al-Qais’s response to the news that Banu Asad had killed his father, the king of Kindah at school: “Today, wine; tomorrow, serious matters...” In a sense, there is a parallel, though not identical, saying in the Levant: “The drunken stupor is gone, and now the idea comes-” the day after a long night of drinking...
These sayings come to me amid split opinions in Lebanon over the outcome of the latest round of Israeli-Lebanese “direct talks.” It was not long before statements were issued by Hezbollah Secretary-general Sheikh Naim Qassem, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, and his prime minister, Nawaf Salam, affirmed the chasm between those optimistic about the round’s outcome and those fearful of it and its consequences.
Regardless of my personal position, I believe we must account for several important facts without which no objective analysis can disregard. First, the “direct talks” were imposed by the US administration. Second, Washington’s relationship with the two negotiating sides is not neutral, since it is a strategic ally of Israel. Third, the round of talks in question was held while Israel was waging, and still is waging, a fierce war on Lebanese territory. This “war” has killed more than 3,500 people, destroyed homes, and displaced more than 1.2 million people from over 60 cities, towns, and villages stretching from the border to the districts of Sidon, Jezzine, Western Beqaa, and Hasbaya.
What, then, about the outcome? The official statement released by the US State Department mentions the following:
1- While the Israeli and Lebanese sides reached an understanding in which both would work to create conditions conducive to lasting peace between the two countries, full recognition of each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and establishing genuine security along their shared border, the statement noted Israel’s inherent right to self-defense (!) without any reference to a ceasefire or to Lebanon’s right to defend its land.
2- The statement said that the two countries recognize the significant challenges faced by the Lebanese state from non-state armed groups, which undermine Lebanon’s sovereignty and threaten regional stability. Both countries understand that those groups’ activities must be curtailed. In other words, the Lebanese negotiator officially accuses—despite the continuing occupation—a Lebanese component, Hezbollah, of threatening regional stability.
3- Despite the deaths of thousands of victims, both Israel and Lebanon affirm that the two countries are not at war, and commit to engaging in good-faith direct negotiations, facilitated by the United States, with the objective of achieving a comprehensive agreement that ensures lasting security, stability, and peace between the two countries. They also agree to a cessation of hostilities, under US sponsorship, for an initial period of ten days, as a gesture of goodwill by the Government of Israel, intended to enable good-faith negotiations toward a permanent security and peace agreement between Israel and Lebanon.
4- Extending this initial period is conditioned on tangible progress in the negotiations, and as Lebanon effectively demonstrates its ability to assert its sovereignty; that is, to confront Hezbollah, which is effectively the group accused of undermining the situation internally and threatening it regionally.
5- Israel shall preserve its right to take all necessary measures in self-defense, at any time, against any planned, imminent, or ongoing attacks, and the cessation of hostilities shall not be impeded by this right. This sentence explicitly declares the right to preemptive self-defense. This preemptive self-defense is what has so far allowed the Gaza Strip to be wiped off the map, and accounts for most of the destruction that has taken place in southern Lebanon.
6- The Lebanese government will take meaningful steps to prevent Hezbollah and all other rogue non-state armed groups inside Lebanese territory from carrying out any attacks, operations, or hostile activities against Israeli targets. That is, it will play the role of border guards. Washington, Tel Aviv, and Beirut will recognize Lebanon’s security forces as having exclusive responsibility for Lebanon’s sovereignty and national defense, and that no other country or group has claim to be the guarantor of Lebanon’s sovereignty.
7- The Lebanese and Israeli sides ask Washington to facilitate further direct negotiations between the two countries with the objective of resolving all remaining issues, including demarcation of the international land boundary, with a view to concluding a comprehensive agreement that ensures lasting security, stability, and peace between the two countries.
An agreement of this spirit and background would not have been reached if it not for the residues of Lebanon’s chronic sectarian and political divisions. Indeed, its most dangerous symptoms come out when efforts are made to strengthen one’s position against a domestic partner through an external enemy.
The Lebanese have neither learned nor drawn lessons from the tragedies of the past. Indeed, over the past few years, Shiite-Sunni tension has compounded what had originally been a Christian-Muslim conflict. This tension rose steadily with the assassination of Rafik Hariri, Hezbollah’s security dominance over Lebanon, and Iran’s participation in the Syrian war in support of the Assad regime.
For this reason, many Lebanese, including Shiites, today see no harm in naively betting on Netanyahu’s “goodwill” toward them and toward Lebanon.
Of course, today’s fresh wound will cool. The terms demanded for “normalization,” which will cover school curricula, the banking system, and the security apparatus, and that “Israeli hegemony” will impose on the Lebanese by force, may disappoint most of them. Unfortunately, the regret will come only after it is already too late.
Doesn’t the Gospel of Mark say that “a house divided against itself... cannot stand”?

The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on 07-08 June/2026
Israel Intercepts Missiles Fired from Iran... Sirens Sound in Several Areas
Riyadh: Al-Arabiya.net and Agencies/June 7, 2026
The Israeli army announced Sunday evening that it had detected the launch of three volleys of missiles from Iran toward Israeli territory, adding that "defense systems are working to intercept the threat." Sirens sounded in several areas following the missile launches from Iran, while Israel's Channel 12 reported that a number of them had been intercepted. Israeli media outlets reported that fragments of Iranian missiles fell in Tiberias. This marks the first time Iran has launched missiles toward Israel since the ceasefire declared on April 8. The Iranian Revolutionary Guard commented on the missile launches, stating that "the Israeli army must stop its attacks on Lebanon... If it expands them or responds to Iran's actions, it will face crushing and regrettable strikes." This comes as the Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, declared on Sunday that US and Israeli interests in the region have become "legitimate targets" following the Israeli airstrike on Beirut's southern suburbs. Qalibaf wrote on the “X” platform that the United States and Israel “do not respect the ceasefire, do not believe in dialogue, and through the naval blockade (on Iran) and the violation of agreements regarding Lebanon, they have shown that they understand only the language of force.” He added, “The naval blockade imposed on Iran, and the green light given today by the United States (to Israel to attack the southern suburbs of Beirut), make the bases and positions of the United States and the (Israeli) regime in the region legitimate targets. Our armed forces, as always, are ready.” For his part, Iranian parliamentarian Ebrahim Rezaei said on Sunday that Tehran would respond “harshly” to the Israeli attack on the southern suburbs of Beirut, after the Israeli army announced it had targeted Hezbollah facilities in the area.


Revolutionary Guard: Missile barrage against Israel could last a week… First shelling since a fragile ceasefire came into effect at the beginning of April
Al-Arabiya.net and agencies/June 7, 2026
The Iranian Revolutionary Guard said on Sunday that the missile barrage against Israel could last a week. The Revolutionary Guard added that the attack on Israel was a warning and that the response would be broader if the attacks were repeated, targeting all American and Israeli interests in the region. The Iranian armed forces command stated on Sunday that Israel had "crossed all red lines" by striking Beirut's southern suburbs, emphasizing the need to halt Israeli attacks on Lebanon. Ali Abdullah Aliabadi, commander of the Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters, the central operations room of the Iranian armed forces, said, "The Israeli army must stop its attacks on southern Lebanon and the southern suburbs. If it expands its attacks or responds to the Iranian action, it will face even more crushing and destructive strikes," without directly mentioning the missile barrages that Israel claimed to have intercepted. Israel announced that Iran had launched missiles toward it, the first such attack since a fragile ceasefire took effect in early April, further complicating mediation efforts to reach an agreement to end the war. Tehran had warned of retaliation after Israel launched airstrikes on Beirut's southern suburbs on Sunday, ignoring a US request made days earlier to refrain from escalation. Israel described its attacks on the southern suburbs of Beirut as a response to Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed group, firing rockets into northern Israel earlier that day. The Israeli strikes on Beirut came just days after the Lebanese and Israeli governments agreed to a ceasefire during US-brokered talks, despite Hezbollah's rejection of the agreement. The Lebanese Health Ministry said the airstrike on a residential building killed two people and wounded 20 others.

Iran Launches Missile Attacks Against Israel
Al-Markazia/June 7, 2026
The Israeli army announced Sunday evening that it had detected the launch of three volleys of missiles from Iran toward Israeli territory, adding that "defense systems are working to intercept the threat." Sirens sounded in several areas following the missile launches from Iran, while Israel's Channel 12 reported that a number of them were intercepted. Israeli media outlets reported that fragments of Iranian missiles fell in Tiberias. This marks the first time Iran has launched missiles toward Israel since the ceasefire declared on April 8. The Iranian Revolutionary Guard commented on the missile launches, stating that "the Israeli army must stop its attacks on Lebanon... If it expands them or responds to Iran's actions, it will face crushing and regrettable strikes." This comes as the Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, declared on Sunday that US and Israeli interests in the region have become "legitimate targets" following the Israeli airstrike on Beirut's southern suburbs. Qalibaf wrote on the “X” platform that the United States and Israel “do not respect ceasefires, do not believe in dialogue, and through the naval blockade (of Iran) and the violation of agreements regarding Lebanon, they have shown that they understand only the language of force.” He added, “The naval blockade imposed on Iran, and the green light given today by the United States (to Israel to attack the southern suburbs of Beirut), make the bases and positions of the United States and the (Israeli) regime in the region legitimate targets. Our armed forces, as always, are ready.” For his part, Iranian parliamentarian Ebrahim Rezaei said on Sunday that Tehran would respond “harshly” to the Israeli attack on the southern suburbs of Beirut, after the Israeli army announced it had targeted Hezbollah facilities in the area. Meanwhile, Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir escalated his rhetoric, saying, “Tehran must burn tonight.” From the Iranian side, the commander of the Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters called on Israel to halt its attacks on southern Lebanon and Beirut's southern suburbs. The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) also asserted that the Israeli army must cease its attacks on Lebanon, warning that if it expands them or retaliates against Iranian actions, it will face "crushing and devastating blows." Simultaneously, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi posted a picture on his Instagram account featuring the Lebanese and Iranian flags, coinciding with Iran's launch of missiles toward Israel in response to the targeting of Beirut's southern suburbs

Pakistani Interior Minister Holds Talks in Iran to Promote Dialogue with the US / Mohsen Naqvi to Deliver Message from Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir to Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei
Riyadh: Al-Arabiya.net and Agencies / June 7, 2026
Iranian state media reported that Pakistani Interior Minister Mohsen Naqvi met with his Iranian counterpart, Eskandar Momeni, on Saturday evening and held talks on Sunday morning with Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi. The correspondent for Al-Arabiya and Al-Hadath channels in Islamabad stated that the Pakistani Interior Minister "carried a warning to Tehran against escalating tensions in the maritime corridors," adding that he "urged Iran to clarify its position on US demands as quickly as possible." The correspondent also reported that "the Pakistani Army Chief called on Iran to seize the current opportunity to reach an agreement." Naqvi traveled to Tehran on Saturday as part of Islamabad's ongoing diplomatic efforts to promote dialogue between Iran and the United States amidst renewed attacks. Pakistani security and diplomatic sources told the German Press Agency (dpa) on Saturday that high-level meetings with Iranian government officials were planned to bolster dialogue between Iran and the United States. Iranian state television reported after Naqvi's arrival in Tehran late Saturday that meetings with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian had been scheduled. The ISNA news agency reported that the Pakistani Interior Minister was also expected to deliver a message from Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir to Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei during his trip. No details were provided regarding the message's contents. Pakistani authorities have stated that Islamabad, with the support of regional countries including Qatar, Turkey, and Egypt, is working to bridge the gap between the United States and Iran, encouraging efforts to de-escalate tensions and ensure the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Naqvi is considered close to Army Chief Asim Munir, who has also visited Iran as part of Islamabad's mediation efforts between the warring parties. The Interior Minister has been shuttling between Tehran and Islamabad since the first round of direct talks between Iran and the United States. The visit follows meetings between Naqvi and his Iranian counterpart, Eskandar Momeni, on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) interior ministers' meeting in Kyrgyzstan on Thursday and Friday. The Pakistani Interior Ministry said in a statement after the meeting, "The two interior ministers emphasized the need to continue diplomatic efforts steadily for lasting peace in the region." The United States and Iran recently resumed hostilities in the Gulf region despite a ceasefire that had been in place for nearly two months following the outbreak of hostilities on February 28

One person killed in attack in central Israel
Reuters/07 June ,2026
A 35-year-old man was killed and five others injured in a series of shootings on Sunday in central Israel near the occupied West Bank that police described as a suspected terror attack.A police spokesperson said the suspected gunman, an Israeli Arab from the nearby Israeli city Tayibe, was also killed and a firearm was found in his possession. Israeli media reported a second suspect was also killed.“Large police forces remain at the scene, and searches are continuing,” the police said in an earlier statement, urging the public to remain vigilant. Local media identified the 35-year-old dead man as an Israeli citizen.
Israeli soldiers deployed
Israel’s ambulance service said the man died from gunshot wounds. It described the incident as a drive-by shooting, with five others injured in shootings at three nearby locations, two of them seriously. Police said they had located the suspected vehicle used. The shootings took place near the Palestinian West Bank city of Qalqilya. Palestinian militant group Hamas praised the attack but did not claim responsibility.Israeli soldiers were deployed to one of the sites in central Israel and to a nearby Israeli settlement in the West Bank after the shootings, the military said. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been briefed, his office said in a statement. Hardline Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich called for a “profound change” among Israel’s Arab community, saying they are a “dangerous and extremist breeding ground for terrorism is growing that seeks to destroy the State of Israel.”

Israel reports incoming Iranian missiles in first since Mideast war ceasefire
AFP/07 June ,2026
Air raid sirens sounded in Israel on Sunday as its military worked to intercept barrages of incoming Iranian missiles for the first time since an April ceasefire took hold in the Middle East war.
The Israeli army reported the attack just hours after Tehran had threatened to retaliate for a new Israeli strike on Beirut. An April 8 ceasefire had halted major hostilities between Iran, Israel and the US, but efforts to turn the truce into a settlement have repeatedly stalled, and Sunday’s launches were sure to further dampen hopes for a lasting peace, as the Middle East war reached its 100th day. Tehran has insisted any deal to permanently end the war must also halt the parallel conflict in Lebanon, where Israel is pursuing a campaign against the Iran-backed movement Hezbollah, and had warned that any new attacks on Beirut would trigger a “full-scale resumption” of hostilities. On Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office announced that the army had “struck a militant command center in Beirut’s Dahiyeh district, in response to Hezbollah’s fire toward Israeli territory.”The raid killed two people and wounded 20 more, Lebanon’s health ministry said. Israel had warned it would hit the area should Hezbollah attack northern Israel, and the group later confirmed having launched missiles and drones at a pair of Israeli army barracks on Sunday morning. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran’s parliament speaker and its chief negotiator in talks with Washington, accused the United States of having given a “green light” for the Beirut attack, saying US and Israeli assets were now “legitimate targets.”Hours later, the Israeli military reported at least three waves of incoming missiles, saying its air defenses were “currently identifying and intercepting threats.”The head of Iran’s military central command said Israel had “crossed all red lines” with the Beirut strike, demanding it halt its campaign in Lebanon. “The Israeli army must stop its attacks on southern Lebanon and the suburbs, and if it expands its attacks to that region or responds to Iran’s action, it will face more devastating and regrettable blows,” General Ali Abdollahi said.
‘Gone numb’
The sharp escalation came as Iranians were already feeling the strain of weeks of uncertainty.
Fitness trainer Elaheh from Ahvaz told AFP: “I really have gone numb.”“Daily life? It’s a joke. Everything is horrible. We only try to survive,” the 32-year-old added, pointing to rising prices. Farhad, a 35-year-old chef, also said life was becoming “increasingly difficult,” noting economic hardship had set in even before the war. “Things that just a few months ago you might have considered buying have now become dreams and fairy tales,” he told AFP. There were some signs of ongoing diplomatic efforts over the weekend, with Pakistan’s interior minister Mohsin Naqvi visiting Tehran. Naqvi said upon his arrival Saturday that he would deliver a “special letter” from Pakistan’s army chief to Iran’s supreme leader, as well as a message from the prime minister, according to Iranian state television. Pakistani military leader Syed Asim Munir has played a key role in mediating between Iran and the US following an initial round of direct negotiations in Islamabad. Also on Saturday, Lebanese army chief Rodolphe Haykal traveled to Pakistan for his own talks with Munir, and a source with knowledge of his visit said it was “linked to the Pakistani mediation” between Tehran and Washington.
‘Deadlock’
Mohsen Rezaei, military adviser to Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, had told CNN negotiations with the US “are at a deadlock, and Trump must break this deadlock,” calling for the release of some $24 billion in frozen Iranian assets. But Trump said in the same interview that he would not unfreeze Iranian assets before reaching an initial agreement with Tehran. “If they behave, if they do a good job, we start talking,” he said. In fact, Washington may seek to use those funds to pay for damage wrought by Iranian strikes on Gulf allies, according to a source familiar with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s thinking. Meanwhile, US Central Command (CENTCOM) said overnight that it destroyed two Iranian drones “that threatened international maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz.”A previous drone interception and strikes on Iranian radar sites had prompted Tehran on Saturday to fire a salvo of missiles at US allies Bahrain and Kuwait.

Trump to Iran: You launched your missiles... return to negotiations and I will ask Netanyahu not to retaliate
Trump: I am not happy about the Israeli strike on Beirut

Al-Arabiya.net and agencies/June 7, 2026
US President Donald Trump commented on the missiles launched by Iran towards Israel, calling on Tehran to de-escalate and return to negotiations. Trump told Fox News, "You launched your missiles... that's enough," adding that what he is proposing to Iran is "to return to the negotiating table and reach an agreement." The US president affirmed that Washington is "close to reaching an agreement with Iran," at a time when the region is witnessing escalating tensions following the recent Iranian attacks and the threat of possible Israeli retaliation. Trump added, "I am not happy about the Israeli strike on Beirut." Axios also quoted Trump as saying that he "will call Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu now and ask him not to retaliate (to the Iranian attacks)." Earlier, Axios, citing a US official, reported that Trump had been briefed on the latest developments and the escalation between Israel and Iran. On Sunday, Israel bombed Beirut's southern suburbs for the first time since the United States announced a ceasefire plan for Lebanon last week. Later that day, Iran launched missiles at Israeli targets, further jeopardizing talks aimed at ending the wider war. Iran has long maintained that any peace agreement with the United States must include a ceasefire in Lebanon, which Israel invaded in March to pursue Hezbollah fighters who had fired rockets into Israel in solidarity with Tehran. Israeli military officials said late Sunday that they detected missile launches from Iran and that Israeli defense systems intercepted them. Details on whether Israel suffered any damage were not immediately available. Axios reported that U.S. President Donald Trump, who is spending the weekend at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, was briefed on the escalation between Iran and Israel. Iran's chief negotiator and parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, said that U.S. bases and Israeli interests are legitimate targets because of the hostilities, including "violations of agreements regarding Lebanon." Qalibaf added on the X website, in a clear reference to the United States and Israel, "They do not adhere to a ceasefire and do not believe in dialogue. Through the naval blockade and the violation of agreements related to Lebanon, they have shown that they understand only the language of force."Iranian lawmaker Ebrahim Rezaei, a hardliner, said earlier today via the X platform that Iran would have a "decisive and painful response" to Israel's attacks in Lebanon on Sunday. Rezaei, who serves as the spokesman for the parliament's National Security Committee, wrote, "Look at the skies over the occupied territories tonight." In response to this apparent threat, an Israeli official told Reuters that Israel would retaliate against any attacks on its territory from Iran and would consider it "an opportunity to renew its (military) campaign." Washington and Tehran have made little progress toward reaching an agreement to end the war that Trump launched in February with a campaign of airstrikes alongside Israel against Iran. Trump has repeatedly threatened to resume the strikes unless an agreement is reached soon. "We are very close to a deal, or I will destroy them," Trump told NBC News in an interview broadcast on the 100th day of the conflict. The remarks were recorded on Friday and aired on Sunday while Trump was visiting his golf course in New Jersey. Trump pressured Israel to scale back its campaign in Lebanon to make room for a peace deal with Iran, reportedly including a verbal rebuke of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a phone call last week. Following the call, Netanyahu halted airstrikes on Beirut and agreed to the latest ceasefire plan with the Lebanese government. However, Israel has not completely ended its campaign in Lebanon, which has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands. Hezbollah has also continued its attacks, asserting that it will not relinquish its weapons unless Israel stops fighting and withdraws. Hezbollah was not a party to the ceasefire agreement, which includes its disarmament. Netanyahu said that Sunday's attack on Beirut's southern suburbs, a long-standing Hezbollah stronghold, was in retaliation for the group's rocket fire into Israel. The Israeli military said earlier on Sunday that it had intercepted two projectiles fired across the border. The military issued an evacuation order for the southern Lebanese city of Tyre and surrounding areas in anticipation of possible airstrikes there. Elsewhere in Beirut, mourners held a military funeral today for Brigadier General Wissam Sabra, who was killed in an airstrike that targeted his car in southern Lebanon on Saturday. The wider war has been at a stalemate since the United States and Israel halted their attacks on Iran in early April, with Tehran blockading most shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, the Middle East's main oil transit route. Washington also imposed a blockade on Iranian ports. Although both sides have announced they are close to a preliminary agreement to reopen the strait, they have repeatedly exchanged fire, with recent escalations including attacks on Arab countries hosting U.S. bases. U.S. forces bombed Iranian coastal radar sites at Goruk and Qeshm Island, both in the Strait of Hormuz, early Saturday morning after shooting down drones launched by Iran that U.S. Central Command said posed a threat to maritime traffic. The U.S. military said late Saturday that it had also shot down two more Iranian attack drones that were threatening shipping in the strait. Iran's Revolutionary Guard said it retaliated by shelling U.S. bases in Kuwait and Bahrain. The Kuwaiti military said it intercepted seven ballistic missiles that flew over residential areas, causing material damage but no casualties. The missiles landed over residential areas. Trump said any agreement to end the war must prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. The US president is under pressure to offer stricter terms than those agreed upon in 2015 under former President Barack Obama, an agreement from which Trump later withdrew. Tehran's demands include lifting US and international sanctions, recognizing its control over the Strait of Hormuz, and releasing billions of dollars in frozen assets. A source familiar with US plans said on Saturday that Washington might make Iranian assets available to neighboring Gulf states to compensate them for damages caused by Iranian attacks. However, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said on Sunday that the region's governments "are not in a position to demand compensation." He added in a post on the X platform that Iranian assets "are not spoils of war for Washington, nor a fund to pay its allies."

Trump says he would not unfreeze Iran’s assets before peace deal is done
Agencies/07 June ,2026
US President Donald Trump said in an interview with NBC News’ “Meet the Press” that he would not unfreeze Iranian assets or lift any sanctions before a peace deal is reached. Trump said he would consider those steps after an agreement is done. “Comes after,” he said. “Yeah. If they behave, if they do a good job, we start talking. Yeah.”Trump also said that he was not demanding that Lebanon be a part of a short-term deal with Tehran. “I think they’d like to see it, but I’m not demanding,” Trump said in the interview recorded on Friday.He called for more “surgical” strikes against Hezbollah in Lebanon, saying: “I’d like to see Lebanon have a better life. I’d like to see a more surgical attack on Hezbollah. I think it should be more surgical.”US and Israeli forces began strikes on Iran on February 28. The Trump administration has been trying to negotiate a potential peace deal for weeks. “We’re very close to a deal, or I’m going to blow the hell out of them,” Trump told NBC News. The president also said he would be willing to speak with Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, who has not been seen in public since being wounded in US strikes at the beginning of the conflict. “I don’t want to say whether or not I know where he is, but there’s a good probability that I do,” Trump said. Top Trump administration officials such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio insist a temporary ceasefire agreement has been holding up despite recent US strikes on Iran, telling lawmakers last week those are defensive actions.

Pentagon Raises Threat of Israeli Spying to 'Critical', According to US Media
Asharq Al Awsat/June 07/2026
The Pentagon has raised its counterintelligence threat level for Israel to its highest level, US media reported on Saturday. The Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) said Israel's "ability to conduct human espionage and technical collection is at a 'critical level'," NBC News said, citing US officials. The move came after concerns that Israel had been attempting to spy on top US officials to get information on "the Trump administration's internal deliberations and decision-making on the conflicts in the Middle East," the American network said.
The New York Times cited reports of Israeli efforts to eavesdrop on senior officials, including President Donald Trump's top negotiator, Steve Witkoff, and the Pentagon's top policy official, Elbridge Colby. The United States and Israel launched joint strikes on Iran on February 28, triggering the war. Since then, Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's relationship appears to be under strain, AFP says. Trump unleashed a profanity-laced tirade over the phone at Netanyahu over Israel's threats to bomb the Lebanese capital Beirut, fearing it would undermine talks with Tehran, the Axios news outlet and ABC News reported earlier in the week.

More sanctions could be imposed on Israeli settlers in ‘coming days,’ France says
Reuters/07 June ,2026
Israeli settlers could face further sanctions in coming days in protest at the escalation of illegal settlements in the West Bank and a surge in violence by settlers against Palestinians, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said on Sunday. The European Union imposed sanctions on Israeli settlers and organizations that support them late last month.Speaking to Public Senat television and RTL radio, Barrot did not name the European countries he said could impose further measures. But in a reference to the previous EU sanctions, he said: “We could go further, and in the coming days, further sanctions could be imposed.”His remarks follow escalating violence by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank and underscore anger in many Western countries toward Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, which has expanded settlements. Diplomats say that expansion is aimed at undermining prospects for a Palestinian state. Reuters reported on Saturday, citing European diplomats, that France is working with several countries to step up pressure on Israel by pressing ahead with coordinated national sanctions targeting individuals linked to violence in the West Bank. “I am extremely concerned about the escalation of illegal settlement activity in the West Bank and the surge in violence by Israeli settlers against Palestinians,” Barrot said. “This is why I have pushed for sanctions to be imposed not only on those responsible for this violence, but also on the entities, companies and organizations in Israel that are providing these extremist settlers with the means to drive Palestinians from their land, burn their crops and destroy their public buildings,” he said. He said the previous measures were “a way of calling on the Israeli government to face up to its responsibilities regarding this violence which, in my view, also undermines the authority of the state to some extent.”On May 22 seven major Western nations called on Israel to halt the expansion of settlements in the West Bank and curb growing settler violence. “Over the past few months, the situation in the West Bank has deteriorated significantly,” Britain, Italy, France, Germany, Canada, Australia and New Zealand said in a joint statement.

New Round of Talks in Cairo Seek to Push Forward Stalled Gaza Ceasefire

Cairo: Mohamed Mahmoud/Asharq Al Awsat/June 07/2026
Cairo is hosting a new round of talks between Hamas and Palestinian factions in an effort to move forward the stalled Gaza ceasefire agreement. Cairo has hosted at least five rounds of talks in less than two months. Experts told Asharq Al-Awsat that the discussions aim to reach understandings and guarantees that both the Palestinian factions and Israel can commit to. Efforts to move forward with the phases of the ceasefire agreement have stalled for months and the impasse has grown deeper with the eruption of the US-Israel war on Iran in February. Talks are focused on the second phase that is focused on Hamas’ disarmament and Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza. Hamas has been demanding that Israel respect its first phase commitments before moving on to the second. The first phase calls for Israel to increase the entry of aid into the enclave, reopen crossings and cease expanding its control in Gaza. Tel Aviv has been demanding that Hamas disarm, saying it is a priority before moving forward with the ceasefire. In televised remarks, Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem said Saturday that the movement was kicking off its meetings in Cairo with Palestinian factions to “reach national agreements”. The movement is also holding talks with mediators to “truly execute the ceasefire on the ground and complete the first phase,” he added. “Discussions will be held to reach reasonable and acceptable understandings with all parties on the second phase, including the deployment of international forces and the weapons of armed factions,” he said. The Hamas delegation, headed by Khalil al-Hayya, arrived in Cairo on Friday for a new round of negotiations that should last several days, said the movement. Saeed Okasha, an Israeli affairs expert at Cairo's Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, said the latest Cairo talks aim to end the impasse and prevent the continued Israeli escalation in Gaza. He described the talks as “very important given their timing and agenda. They aim to reach decisive results to throw the ball in the court of the Board of Peace and Israel to prevent any escalation by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is bracing for elections in months.”Palestinian analyst Abdulhadi Mutaweh said: “It appears that Hamas will stall over the ceasefire until the negotiations between the US and Iran reach their conclusion.”The Cairo talks will focus on moving from the first phase to the second, arrangements related to the disarmament of factions and on who will run Gaza in the future, he added. A Palestinian source told Asharq Al-Awsat on Saturday that six Palestinian factions, including Hamas and the Islamic Jihad, but not Fatah, are present in Cairo. Talks will focus on “not giving Israel on excuse to launch a new war on Gaza,” he said.

Israel military opens probe into West Bank baby’s killing
AFP/07 June ,2026
The Israeli military has opened an investigation into the killing of a seven-month-old infant by Israeli gunfire in the occupied West Bank, it said Sunday. Sam Fahd Abou Haikal died and his parents sustained light injuries when Israeli forces opened fire on the family’s car in the city of Hebron, according to Palestinian sources.Shortly after Friday’s incident, the military said its forces had fired after “soldiers perceived a vehicle accelerating toward them.”However, an initial inquiry found the three Palestinians were “uninvolved civilians.”On Sunday, the military said it was opening an investigation into the incident. “Based on the findings of the preliminary examination, it was decided to open an investigation by the Military Police Criminal Investigation Division,” the military said in a statement. “Upon its conclusion, the findings will be transferred to the Military Advocate General’s Office.”Since the war in Gaza broke out in October 2023 with Hamas’s attack on Israel, near-daily violence has also rocked the West Bank, which Israel has occupied since 1967. Israeli soldiers or settlers have killed at least 1,080 Palestinians since then, including both militants and civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Palestinian health ministry data.Official Israeli figures show that at least 46 Israelis, both civilians and soldiers, have been killed in Palestinian attacks or during Israeli military operations in the same period.

Iraqi Faction Warns against Dismantling of the PMF

Baghdad: Hamza Mustafa/Asharq Al Awsat/June 07/2026
The Iraqi government renewed its commitment to imposing state monopoly over weapons, while some factions continue to resist the move, saying it targets the “arms of the resistance.”
In televised remarks, government spokesman Haider al-Aboudi said: “Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi's government has set as a priority Iraq’s sovereignty and security and imposing state monopoly over arms.”“Iraq is a sovereign nation and its higher authority is not subject to foreign and internal dictates,” he stressed, in reference to the debate over armed factions, some of which are affiliated with the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) that is tied to the state, and others that operate under the banner of so-called “resistance”.Deputy Commander of Joint Operations Qais al-Mohammedawi, who is also head of the committee tasked with limiting the possession of arms to the state, said the efforts cover factions connected to the PMF. He denied claims that the efforts will target other groups, saying the authorities are focused on ending possession of weapons that are tied to religious or political affiliations. The process will take time, he said in statements to the press. He also revealed that authorities busted attacks against neighboring countries, declaring that Iraq will not act as a platform for assaults on others. He did not offer more details. Meanwhile, President Nizar Amedi hailed the factions that chose to hand over their weapons and to cooperate with the authorities over this file. Speaking at an economic forum in Sulaimaniyah city in the Kurdistan region, he added that efforts are ongoing to reach understandings over the disarmament of factions. These moves bolster security and stability and will help in building and construction, he added. “Stability is no longer a domestic target, but a main condition for local, regional and international development,” he stated. He underlined the need for “practical and productive dialogue” to address challenges and limit mounting dangers. “Iraq must not allow current challenges to hinder its ambitions for development and prosperity,” Amedi urged.
Resistance
The official stances over disarmament have been repeatedly met with defiance from the Kataib Hezbollah and al-Nujaba movement that are staunchly pro-Iran. The movement said the efforts “target the weapons of the resistance and PMF.”Head of its executive council Nazem al-Saeedi said from Najaf city that any serious discussions about the weapons “must be comprehensive and subject to unified standards that are applied to all parties without exception.”He warned that the current demands about the weapons may later extend to the abilities of the security and military institutions, expressing concern over the “politicization of the PMF and involving it in the political power-sharing system,” which may impact its role and standing. Head of the al-Nujaba movement Akram al-Kaabi had claimed on Wednesday that disarmament efforts are being “directly driven by Israel” and the US Charge d’Affaires in Iraq. The Kataib Hezbollah, meanwhile, said it will not lay down its weapons and that tackling this issue will be possible after its goals are met. Kataib security official Abu al-Mujahid al-Assaf warned of attempts to stoke strife over the disarmament efforts. On the other side of the divide, Sunni clerics welcomed the government’s drive to impose state monopoly over weapons. During Friday sermons, they hoped the move would achieve stability, security, peace and coexistence in Iraq. There can be no security so long as several parties carry weapons, while others do not, they added.

Over 1.2 Million People Attend Pope's Mass in Madrid
Asharq Al Awsat/June 07/2026
More than 1.2 million people filled the streets of Madrid on Sunday for a mass by Pope Leo XIV at which he called for a renewal of the Catholic faith in Spain. King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia joined throngs of devotees waving Spanish and Vatican flags in Cibeles Square for a service filled with religious symbolism. In his homily, Pope Leo said Spaniards should not look at religion as "a museum of the past to be visited, but a school of faith from which to draw even today".The mass comes on day two of Pope Leo's seven-day visit to Spain, a traditional Catholic bastion where religious observance has been declining sharply in recent years as in much of western Europe. A huge logistical and security operation was in place for the event, after which the pope led a traditional procession along a route lined with white and yellow carnations -- the Vatican flag colors, AFP said. Organizers said there were more than 1.2 million people attending in the square and the surrounding area. Nico Aldeanueva, 28, who was visiting from Philadelphia in the United States, said the pope was "a very unifying force in a moment where we have division across so many different fronts". "We have, it seems like, never-ending conflict and for the time being here you get to hit pause and get to enjoy the moment and feel the faith."Ana Milagros, 64, who was waving a Vatican flag, said she thought the US-born pope seemed "approachable" and "very sincere"."There is a lot of polarization and differences in politics, in social matters, in the economy," she said, adding: "The pope is trying with this visit... to help all of us."
Focus on migration -
Later on Sunday, Leo will meet the leading lights of culture, sport and the economy at an arena, with the aim of fostering dialogue between faith and modern civil society. Around 56 percent of Spaniards identify as Catholic compared to 90 percent in the 1970s, according to a survey last month by the Center for Sociological Research, an autonomous government body. On Saturday, 500,000 mostly young attendees congregated with Leo outside Real Madrid's Bernabeu stadium for a prayer vigil that stretched into the night. Leo kicked off his visit with pomp and ceremony at a reception in Madrid's royal palace, where he called for an end to "polarizing narratives" and "sterile simplifications".The pope also praised Spain, whose left-wing government has sparred with his native United States as well as Israel over wars in the Middle East, for its "active commitment to peace and solidarity among peoples".Leo is due to visit Barcelona on Tuesday and Wednesday, where he will notably bless the Sagrada Familia basilica's recently completed tower, which made it the world's tallest church. His trip will end with a focus on migration on Thursday and Friday in the Canary Islands, a key destination for irregular arrivals, with thousands dying in the Atlantic Ocean trying to reach them.

Russian Drone Hits Nuclear-Fuel Storage Facility Near Chornobyl, Ukraine Says
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 07/2026
Russian forces deliberately struck a storage facility for spent nuclear fuel near Ukraine's Chornobyl power plant, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Sunday, in an "extremely vile" attack that did not lead to a spike in radiation. The strike significantly damaged a fuel-reception building meters away from where "large amounts of nuclear material" is stored, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, which said it had ‌been briefed ‌by Ukraine. Kyiv's state atomic agency ‌Energoatom ⁠said no spent ⁠fuel had been stored in the building at the time of the attack. A resulting fire was extinguished, and no injuries were reported. Russia has not publicly commented on the alleged strike on the facility, which is located around ⁠15 km (9 miles) from the Chornobyl ‌plant, the site ‌of the world's worst nuclear disaster. "An extremely critical infrastructure ‌facility – and an extremely vile Russian strike," ‌Zelenskiy wrote on X, adding that Russia had used a Shahed attack drone. "As of now, there are no readings exceeding normal background radiation levels. But ‌there is certainly an increase in Russia's brazenness, which long ago went off ⁠the ⁠charts." In a statement, the IAEA said a team would soon visit the site "to inspect the impact". In February 2025, a Russian Shahed drone damaged a containment arch over the Chornobyl reactor that was destroyed in the April 1986 explosion and meltdown. Russia, which regularly attacks Ukrainian cities and infrastructure with drones and missiles, denied responsibility. Kyiv and Moscow have also traded accusations of attacking the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in southeastern Ukraine, Europe's largest.

Zelenskyy meets allies in UK after strike hits Ukraine nuclear site
AFP/07 June ,2026
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy arrived in Britain Sunday for defense talks with leaders of the UK, France and Germany after new Russian strikes killed five people and hit a nuclear site in Ukraine.Zelenskyy said in an online post he was in London and would meet British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Kyiv is asking its Western allies for more ammunition deliveries for its anti-air defenses as Ukraine endures daily Russian strikes. Zelenskyy is also seeking ways for the allies to further pressure Russia to end the fighting. On Sunday, Russia fired waves of drones and other munitions at Ukraine, with one of the attacks damaging a nuclear storage facility in the Chernobyl exclusion zone, Ukrainian officials said.
Radiation levels at the facility remained within normal limits following the attack, although its fuel reception building was “partially destroyed”, according to Ukraine’s nuclear energy operator, Energoatom. Moscow and Kyiv have intensified drone strikes on each other in recent months, as US-led diplomatic efforts to end the war -- now in its fifth year -- remain stalled and sidetracked by the conflict in the Middle East. Russian leader Vladimir Putin has rejected direct peace talks proposed by his Ukrainian counterpart. Zelenskyy, in an earlier online post, said Russia had used an Iranian-designed Shahed drone to “hit one of the buildings of the Centralized Spent Fuel Storage Facility” in the Chernobyl exclusion zone. “As of now, there are no readings exceeding normal background radiation levels. But there is certainly an increase in Russia’s brazenness, which long ago went off the charts,” he said. The International Atomic Energy Agency said it was dispatching a team to inspect the damage, calling the incident “deeply concerning.”The facility is located in a remote area of forest around a dozen kilometres (seven miles) from the site of the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster, and is designed to house spent fuel from Ukraine’s three active nuclear plants.
Deadly strikes
Both sides accused each other of renewed attacks on civilians Sunday. A Russian bombardment of a public transport stop in Ukraine’s southern Zaporizhzhia region left at least two people dead, while a nearby drone strike killed a 56-year-old minibus driver, authorities said. Separate Russian attacks on the central Dnipropetrovsk region killed two men, governor Oleksandr Ganzha posted on Telegram. In Russia, a Ukrainian drone strike on a car in the Belgorod border region killed a woman and injured her husband, local authorities said.Hundreds of thousands have been killed and millions forced to flee their homes since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Russia now occupies around a fifth of its neighbour: the Crimean peninsula, which it annexed in 2014, most of the eastern regions of Donetsk and Lugansk -- collectively referred to as the Donbas -- and large parts of the southern Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions.

Russian drone hits nuclear-fuel storage facility near Chornobyl, Ukraine says
Reuters/07 June ,2026
Russian forces deliberately struck a storage facility for spent nuclear fuel near Ukraine’s Chornobyl power plant, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Sunday, in an “extremely vile” attack that did not lead to a spike in radiation. The strike significantly damaged a fuel-reception building metres away from where “large amounts of nuclear material” is stored, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, which said it had been briefed by Ukraine. Kyiv’s state atomic agency Energoatom said no spent fuel had been stored in the building at the time of the attack. A resulting fire was extinguished, and no injuries were reported. Russia has not publicly commented on the alleged strike on the facility, which is located around 15 km (9 miles) from the Chornobyl plant, the site of the world’s worst nuclear disaster. “An extremely critical infrastructure facility – and an extremely vile Russian strike,” Zelenskyy wrote on X, adding that Russia had used a Shahed attack drone. “As of now, there are no readings exceeding normal background radiation levels. But there is certainly an increase in Russia’s brazenness, which long ago went off the charts.”In a statement, the IAEA said a team would soon visit the site “to inspect the impact.”In February 2025, a Russian Shahed drone damaged a containment arch over the Chornobyl reactor that was destroyed in the April 1986 explosion and meltdown. Russia, which regularly attacks Ukrainian cities and infrastructure with drones and missiles, denied responsibility.Kyiv and Moscow have also traded accusations of attacking the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in southeastern Ukraine, Europe’s largest.

US resolution draft at IAEA demands Iran open up on sites, uranium stocks
Reuters/07 June ,2026
The United States is lobbying other countries on the UN nuclear watchdog's Board of Governors to back a draft resolution ordering Iran to inform the agency of the fate of its bombed nuclear sites and the enriched uranium that was stored there. The text of the US draft resolution seen by Reuters on Sunday and circulated ahead of this week's quarterly meeting of the 35-nation board risks further complicating current talks between the US and Iran because Iran bristles at resolutions against it at the International Atomic Energy Agency. While previous IAEA board resolutions against Iran have passed by a clear margin, this text could meet stiffer resistance since it is the US that, along with Israel, bombed Iran's nuclear sites last June, since when the agency has been unable to return to those sites.Iran must “provide the Agency with precise information on nuclear material accountancy and safeguarded nuclear facilities in Iran” and “grant the Agency all access it requires to verify this information,” the text seen by Reuters said, saying both must happen “without delay” and are “essential and urgent.”The text refrains, however, from reporting Iran to the UN Security Council, as some diplomats had said was being considered, which would have been a follow-up to a resolution the board passed on June 12, 2025, declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations. Israel started bombing Iran's nuclear sites on June 13. The US mission to the IAEA has declined to comment on its pursuit of a resolution this time.

The Latest LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on 07-08 June/2026
Is Saving Europe Still Possible?
Guy Millière/ Gatestone Institute/June 07/2026
The massacre of thousands of Israelis by the terrorist group Hamas on October 7, 2023 triggered an explosion of attacks on Jews in the United Kingdom.
"London has become a no-go zone for Jews...." — UK Commissioner for Countering Extremism Robin Simcox, BBC, March 8, 2024.
After every attack, the British government, along with other political leaders, take great care to condemn antisemitism. They also take great care each time to avoid saying who the perpetrators are. Their condemnations therefore amount to empty words. If you do not identify the source of the Jew-hate, how can you combat it?
In July 2025, on behalf of the United Kingdom, Starmer agreed to the publication of a communiqué — also signed by 28 other countries — falsely accusing Israel of depriving Palestinians of "human dignity" and perpetrating the "inhumane killing of civilians." The communiqué was – no surprise -- exploited by all of Israel's enemies, particularly those also falsely accusing Israel of genocide.
Starmer was just warming up. As if that were not odious enough, Starmer went on, in the name of the UK, officially to recognize a non-existent "State of Palestine."
Starmer recognized this fictitious "State of Palestine" even as Hamas still held power and hostages in Gaza. His weakness cannot be overstated.
He was -- along with the current leaders of France, Belgium, Ireland, Spain, Norway and Sweden -- just among the too many countries also recognizing an imaginary Palestinian State.
"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality, today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism. For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan." — Zoheir Mohsen, senior official of Palestine Liberation Organization, Trouw, March 31, 1977.
Meanwhile, Muslims continue to enter the UK, both legally and illegally. As their population continues to grow, they have been integrating less and less. Many appear to have come not only for employment opportunities and welfare benefits, but also to transform Great Britain into a country indistinguishable from the ones they left.
Some people might call that imperialism. The Portuguese and Spanish displaced the cultures of South America; England tried to bring its customs to its colonies, and so on. At the time, the countries overtaken did not have the means to stop these invasions. Today's Britons are not Aztecs.
Hatred of Israel and Jews, doctrinally imposed by the Qur'an and the hadith, is deeply entrenched within Muslim communities in Western Europe, and accommodated by much of non-Muslim society there.
Hatred of Israel and Jews, doctrinally imposed by the Qur'an and the hadith, is deeply entrenched within Muslim communities in Western Europe, and accommodated by much of non-Muslim society there. Almost all antisemitic acts in Britain are carried out by radicalized Muslims, yet it has become a problem to state that openly. Britons who question Muslim antisemitism are accused of "stirring up racial or religious hatred."
London. Sunday, May 10. A protest against rising anti-Semitism is organized in front of the prime minister's residence. About 20,000 people are present, mostly Jews. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Pat McFadden, who addressed them, was jeered and booed. "I feel your pain," he told the crowd. The reply was, "Action, no more words."
When British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, a few days before the protest, visited Golders Green, a heavily Jewish area of London where two Jews had been stabbed on April 29, he was greeted with chants of "Keir Starmer, Jew Harmer."
Jews in the United Kingdom are no longer safe. The year 2025 saw 3,700 anti-Semitic incidents recorded — approximately ten a day. By the end of 2026, it looks as if the figures will be at least as high. In 2023, the figures were even higher. The massacre of thousands of Israelis by the terrorist group Hamas on October 7, 2023 triggered an explosion of attacks on Jews in the United Kingdom.
Violent attacks against Jews and Jewish institutions in London are on the rise. On March 23, an arson attack destroyed four ambulances belonging to a Jewish volunteer emergency medical service, Hatzola Northwest. On April 18, the Kenton United Synagogue in northwest London was firebombed. On April 29, there were the stabbings in Golders Green.
Jewish children are harassed on their way to school. It is dangerous to display any Jewishness. Men hide their skullcaps and women conceal the Star of David pendants they wear.
"London has become a no-go zone for Jews," UK Commissioner for Countering Extremism Robin Simcox said on March 8.
What is happening in London is happening throughout the UK, wherever Jewish communities exist. On October 2, 2025 — during the Yom Kippur holiday — a 35-year-old Syrian, Jihad Al-Shamie, plowed his car into a gathering of Jews who had come to pray at a synagogue in Manchester, then began slashing and stabbing them, and finally tried to force his way into the synagogue. He left two dead and three wounded.
Almost all antisemitic acts in Britain are carried out by radicalized Muslims, yet it has become a problem to state that openly. Britons who question Muslim antisemitism are accused of "stirring up racial or religious hatred."
After every attack, the British government, along with other political leaders, take great care to condemn antisemitism. They also take great care each time to avoid saying who the perpetrators are. Their condemnations therefore amount to empty words. If you do not identify the source of the Jew-hate, how can you combat it?
Hatred of Jews, of course, goes hand in hand with hatred of Israel. It is a sentiment shared by a large segment of the UK population.
Starmer, who, a few years ago, claimed to have purged antisemites and anti-Israel elements from the Labour Party – and for five minutes appeared to be a friend of Israel — now sharply criticizes country as well as its democratically elected government.
In July 2025, on behalf of the United Kingdom, Starmer agreed to the publication of a communiqué — also signed by 28 other countries — falsely accusing Israel of depriving Palestinians of "human dignity" and perpetrating the "inhumane killing of civilians." The communiqué was – no surprise -- exploited by all of Israel's enemies, particularly those also falsely accusing Israel of genocide.
Starmer was just warming up. As if that were not odious enough, Starmer went on, in the name of the UK, officially to recognize a non-existent "State of Palestine."
In the words of Zoheir Mohsen, wo was a senior Palestine Liberation Organization official from 1971-1979:
"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality, today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism.
"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."
Starmer recognized this fictitious "State of Palestine" even as Hamas still held power and hostages in Gaza. His weakness cannot be overstated.
He was -- along with the current leaders of France, Belgium, Ireland, Spain, Norway and Sweden -- just among the too many countries also recognizing an imaginary Palestinian State.
Stamer was also quick to declare on April 1, "This is not our war" -- as if Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons and the threats through terrorism that the Iranian regime poses to the West are not matters of concern to the UK. Starmer must surely be aware that at least one Iranian group — Harakat Ashab al-Yamin al-Islamia (HAYI) — is directly responsible for numerous antisemitic attacks in the country. Starmer has never publicly condemned HAYI or any similar group.
Starmer further sought to deny the U.S. Air Force access to the joint US-UK airbase on Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire. His consent included the pitiful stipulation that the bases should be used for "defensive" missions only.
Several countries in Europe -- Spain, Italy, France, and Austria -- also barred U.S. Air Force aircraft from using their bases and airspace.
Many in the UK now see that unless a course correction is undertaken -- and fast --, the country is facing an extremely bleak future. British civilization itself appears positioned to perish.
On March 10, 2025, a protest march was organized by political activist Tommy Robinson -- one of the very few people in England consistently to speak out on behalf of the tens of thousands of British children who have been raped and trafficked by gangs of "Asian" migrants (a euphemism for Pakistani as well as others).
On May 16, 2026, Robinson organized a "Unite the Kingdom" march, which drew another massive crowd -- tens of thousands. Starmer claimed that Robinson and those who work with him peddle "hatred and division."
The day before the march, Starmer announced that "We've already blocked visas for far-right agitators who want to come here to spew their extremist views," -- but not, of course, for potential rapists.
The local elections on May 7 -- described in several British newspapers as an unofficial referendum on Starmer -- were a disaster for Starmer's Labour Party -- and a huge victory for Reform UK, the anti-immigration party created in 2018 as the "Brexit Party" by Nigel Farage. Labour lost more than 1,100 of the 2,300 council seats it had held. It also lost control of 35 councils it had held for decades. Reform UK won more than 1,400 council seats and gained control of 14 councils.
After such a rout, it was expected that Starmer would resign. So far, he has chosen to remain in his post. Four members of the British government, however, did resign; more than 80 Labour MPs urged him to quit.
The next elections for parliament are scheduled for 2029. If the government falls before then, elections would be held sooner. If they were held today, Reform UK would likely win, accompanied by a recovery of the endlessly mismanaged country (such as here, here and here).
Meanwhile, Muslims continue to enter the UK, both legally and illegally. As their population continues to grow, they have been integrating less and less. Many appear to have come not only for employment opportunities and welfare benefits, but also to transform Great Britain into a country indistinguishable from the ones they left.
Some people might call that imperialism. The Portuguese and Spanish displaced the cultures of South America; England tried to bring its customs to its colonies, and so on. At the time, the countries overtaken did not have the means to stop these invasions. Today's Britons are not Aztecs.
There are now officially almost four million Muslims in the UK (6% of the population). In 2001, there were only 1.59 million Muslims in the country (2.7% of the total population).
A Pew Research Center study estimated that under just a "medium" migration scenario, the Muslim population in the UK by 2050 could be around 16.7%–17.2%, approximately 13–13.5 million people.
Jews continue to leave Britain. According to the Institute for Jewish Policy Research, there are 313,000 Jews left in the UK (0.4% of the population), and the number falls every year.
The problem, in addition to the sharp shift in demographics, is also one of determination. In 404 BCE, it took only 30 men working on behalf of Sparta to bring down Athens, one of the great foundational civilizations of Western culture.
Even among non-radicalized Muslims, there is widespread acceptance of Sharia practices, such as the continual cover-up of sexual abuse crimes. There has been a consistently permissive attitude toward rape gangs by the police, the government and the judiciary -- all of whom are apparently terrified of being labeled racist. There has also been an increasing suppression of free speech -- the cousin of blasphemy laws -- as well as the rejection of Judeo-Christian traditions, such as Christmas, and a subversion of common law (such as finding that terrorists just have "mental health" problems. All this has been accompanied by a rise in hatred of Jews, of Israel, and of the culture of the West.
Meanwhile, the British economy continues to fall. The official unemployment rate is low, 4.9%. Mostly people seem to be exiting the labor market and becoming economically inactive, apparently content to live off welfare benefits and "free stuff." Almost 14 million British citizens (21% of the population) live in poverty, have an income below 60% of the national median, and struggle to afford food, housing and essential services.
As in the UK, the economies of most Western European countries are in decline. In 2000, the member states of the European Union collectively accounted for 20% of global GDP. By 2024, they represented only 15.2 %.
The birthrate among Muslim women everywhere in Western Europe is far higher than the birth rate among non-Muslim women.
In France, the birthrate is 1.56. In Germany, 1.35. In Italy, 1.14, and in Spain, 1.10.
The birthrate in the United Kingdom has also been falling. It is now 1.41 children per woman, well below the replacement level of 2.1. The birthrate among Muslim women is far higher. In the UK, even if polygamy is not allowed, a Muslim man's extra wives receive extra welfare benefits. If the polygamous marriage took place overseas, you see, that makes it all right. There are reports that sometimes each of the four wives has her own house -- presumably at the British taxpayers' expense.
What is happening in the United Kingdom is also happening throughout Western Europe -- and has established a foothold in the United States.
In France, antisemitic acts may not be as frequent as in the United Kingdom, yet they remain common: 1,320 incidents recorded in 2025—more than 3.5 each day. Jews in France make up slightly less than 1% of the population, yet, year after year, they are the victims of more than 50% of all anti-religious hate crimes.
In Belgium, the Jewish population is even smaller -- fewer than 30,000 -- but the number of antisemitic incidents nevertheless jumped from 57 in 2022 to 277 in 2024, a more than fourfold increase. A survey conducted in 2024 for the European Jewish Congress showed that many Belgians apparently do not even consider it antisemitic to scrawl graffiti on a synagogue, or to insult or threaten a Jew or person thought to be a "Zionist": 22% of respondents said they regarded such acts to be understandable, acceptable and legitimate.
In Germany, the Jews account for less than 0.2 percent of the total population, yet suffer a disproportionate number of anti-religious attacks – also on an upward trend: from 1,824 antisemitic attacks recorded in 2024 to 2,267 in 2025.
The same pattern can be seen across all of Western Europe. For years, virtually all antisemitic acts — as in the United Kingdom – have been perpetrated by radicalized Muslims. Again, most Western European politicians condemn "antisemitism" but without mentioning who the perpetrators are.
Hatred of Israel and Jews, doctrinally imposed by the Qur'an and the hadith, is deeply entrenched within Muslim communities in Western Europe, and accommodated by much of non-Muslim society there.
Every current Western European leader, just like Starmer, has stated — in varying terms —that the war in Iran is "not their war."
Lately in Western Europe, political parties with platforms like that of the right-of-center Reform UK are gaining ground. Several appear poised to win elections. They see -- and say aloud -- that in Europe, Western civilization could die. They are calling for national renewal.
The governments of some Central European countries -- Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia -- have adopted a firm stance against immigration -- for which the European Union thoroughly excoriated them. Hungary experienced being occupied by the Ottoman Empire for nearly 200 years. Former Prime Minister Viktor Orbán -- who just lost an election -- did not want to see another Islamic occupation.
Central Europe still has one of the world's lowest Muslim populations (roughly between 0.1% and 1% of the total population). Jews living there face virtually no violent antisemitic attacks. Central Europe, however, is also seeing declining birthrates. In the Czech Republic, it fell to 1.28 children per woman. In Hungary, it now stands at 1.31; in Poland, the figure is 1.1.
Is saving Europe still possible? If the political parties that are seeking to preserve Western civilization prevail, probably yes -- but time is just about up.
*Dr. Guy Millière, a professor at the University of Paris, is the author of 27 books on France and Europe.
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22577/saving-europe
© 2026 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute.

True strategic wisdom for Iran is restraint toward the Gulf states
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/AlArabiya/June 08/2026
Iran’s recent launches of ballistic missiles and drones toward Kuwait and Bahrain – amid escalating tensions with the United States and Israel – represent not just a dangerous escalation but a profound strategic miscalculation. By violating the sovereignty of its Gulf neighbors, Iran is isolating itself regionally, damaging its international standing, alienating potential partners, and undermining its own long-term interests more severely than any external pressure could.In Kuwait, strikes damaged the international airport, killing at least one person and injuring dozens, while Bahrain reported interceptions of missiles and drones aimed at civilian and military sites. Such moves not only broaden the conflict unnecessarily but also expose Iran’s misjudgment of regional dynamics and its own vulnerabilities.
Gulf states as constructive players in a volatile region
In the broader conflict involving the US, Israel, and Iran, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states – Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman – have largely positioned themselves as voices of restraint and diplomacy rather than belligerents. They have repeatedly called for de-escalation, mediation, and dialogue to prevent the war from spiraling further.These countries have absorbed the fallout from interceptions, civilian impacts, and economic disruptions while advocating for resolutions that could benefit the entire region. Gulf leaders have engaged in intensive diplomatic consultations and emphasized defensive postures to maintain stability. Oman, for example, has historically facilitated back-channel talks between Iran and the US, demonstrating a commitment to peaceful off-ramps even under pressure.Iran’s missile and drone strikes on Kuwait and Bahrain, which Kuwaiti and Bahraini authorities condemned as flagrant violations of sovereignty, directly contradict this constructive approach. By targeting neighbors focused on mediation, Iran undermines the very actors best positioned to help de-escalate its confrontation with the US and Israel.
Regional isolation and self-inflicted alienation
Iran shares a neighborhood with these Gulf states. Long-term economic ties, shared waterways like the Strait of Hormuz, and historical relations exist despite political frictions. Attacking them drives a wedge that isolates Iran further at a critical moment when regional solidarity or neutrality could provide diplomatic leverage. In a conflict where Iran already faces significant military and economic pressures, alienating proximate neighbors who could offer breathing room is profoundly counterproductive. This self-isolation compounds Iran’s challenges against the US and Israel by deepening Tehran’s encirclement and limiting its maneuverability in future negotiations. The strikes also risk fracturing any remaining goodwill from past rapprochement efforts. Gulf states had pursued diplomatic engagement with Iran, but these attacks burn bridges that Iran may desperately need as the war drags on and its economy strains under sanctions and disruptions.
Damage to international image and global standing
By launching strikes at countries with no direct role in the core US-Israel-Iran hostilities, Iran broadcasts a message to the international community: it is willing to drag uninvolved parties into the fray. Gulf condemnations from the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and others highlight this as a threat to regional and global security. Such actions erode any sympathy or neutrality Iran might otherwise garner. They portray Iran as an aggressor targeting peaceful neighbors focused on stability and energy flows, rather than a defender in a limited conflict. This shift in perception weakens Iran’s diplomatic leverage worldwide and justifies stronger countermeasures or sanctions from the broader international community. The civilian toll, including deaths and airport disruptions in Kuwait, further amplifies the narrative of recklessness. International observers note that these moves extend the conflict beyond legitimate self-defense, inviting unified opposition and complicating Iran’s efforts to claim victimhood on the global stage.
Alienating key allies: China, Russia, and beyond
Iran’s strikes also risk distancing its major backers. Disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz and attacks on energy interests directly harm global oil and LNG markets. China, a massive importer reliant on Gulf stability, faces significant energy security threats from these escalations.
Beijing and Moscow have called for de-escalation and respect for Gulf sovereignty. They may find it increasingly difficult to provide robust support when Iran’s moves destabilize a region vital to their economic interests, leading to observable strains and preferences for diplomacy over confrontation.
By endangering shared economic lifelines, Iran pushes even its allies toward greater distance. It seems that China, in particular, prioritizes energy security and regional stability, making continued unconditional backing of provocative Iranian actions less tenable.
Jeopardizing economic ties and long-term interests
Beyond immediate geopolitics, Iran risks long-term economic self-harm. Historical and potential trade relations with Gulf states, regional connectivity, and stability in energy markets are all undermined by these violations. Jeopardizing these relationships harms Iran’s own economy at a time when sanctions, conflict damage, and isolation already bite deeply. The attacks on civilian infrastructure, such as airports and energy facilities, further erode trust and close doors to future economic cooperation that Iran desperately needs for recovery and resilience. Disruptions to the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for Iranian oil exports, compound these self-inflicted wounds by reducing revenue streams essential for Iran. In the longer term, alienating Gulf neighbors could diminish prospects for post-conflict reconstruction or sanctions relief, as these states wield considerable influence in international forums and energy markets that Iran relies upon.
Restraint is true strategic wisdom
In conclusion, Iran should confine its conflict to direct adversaries – the US and Israel – and respect the sovereignty of Gulf states that have done little except advocate for peaceful resolutions and de-escalation. These neighbors have been constructive players trying to mitigate tensions, not fuel them.
By launching missiles and drones into their territory, Iran is shooting itself in the foot: isolating itself regionally, tarnishing its global image, straining alliances with powers like China and Russia, disrupting energy markets to its own detriment, and weakening its position for any future negotiations or recovery. True strategic wisdom lies in restraint toward the Gulf. Respecting their sovereignty would preserve options for diplomacy, reduce self-inflicted isolation, and demonstrate the constructive regional role Iran claims to seek. Continued violations only deepen the hole Iran is digging for itself.

Trump and Iran’s proxies: Transitional deals and risk of legitimizing the proxy doctrine
Raghida Dergham/AlArabiya/June 07/2026
President Donald Trump risks granting Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) what it failed to secure through war: Renewed political legitimacy for its regional proxies, from Hezbollah in Lebanon to the Popular Mobilization factions in Iraq, and from the Houthis in Yemen to Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza. This is not a passing negotiating maneuver. It may well mark the beginning of a dangerous American shift from a policy of containing Iranian influence to one of coexisting with it in the name of realism and the avoidance of war. The problem is not that Washington is negotiating with Tehran. States negotiate with their adversaries when circumstances require it. The problem is that transitional agreements can become a vehicle for postponing the core issues rather than resolving them. If the nuclear file is deferred, if missiles and drones are deferred, if proxies and Iran’s regional conduct are deferred, then the United States will have granted Tehran time without extracting the concessions that justify it. The IRGC is not behaving like a force that has truly won. Yet it is acting as though it has. It is promoting the illusion of victory, convinced that Donald Trump’s hesitation and fear of war—and of Iranian retaliation—offer an opportunity to transform military and economic setbacks into political gains. This is a dangerous illusion. Iran is not in a position of overwhelming strength. It faces a suffocating economic dilemma, from inflation and sanctions to financial and maritime pressure. The Islamic Republic’s principal vulnerability today is its economy, not revolutionary rhetoric and not the missiles of the IRGC.
That is precisely why transitional agreements are a double-edged sword. They may buy Trump political time and spare the region another military confrontation, but they may also constrain Washington’s ability to deepen the economic pressure that is finally inflicting real pain on Tehran. If Trump eases that pressure before obtaining clear and enforceable commitments, he will be giving Iran the breathing space the IRGC needs to finance its proxies, rebuild its networks, and revive its regional project. The proxies are not a secondary component of that project. They are its essence. The nuclear program is its head. Missiles and drones are its military arm. But the proxies constitute its political and security body across the region. Through them, Tehran destabilizes when it chooses, negotiates when it chooses, and denies responsibility when it chooses. Postponing the proxy file is therefore no less dangerous than postponing the nuclear file. It may be even more dangerous because it directly affects Arab sovereignty, Gulf security, and the future of Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen.
Lebanon remains the most painful example, but it is not the only one. The Lebanese-Israeli negotiations under American sponsorship are important because they offer the Lebanese state an opportunity to reclaim its role, assert its sovereignty, and pursue an end to Israeli occupation. Yet those negotiations become dangerous if they evolve into a process that implicitly recognizes Hezbollah as an indispensable actor in Lebanon’s future. At that point, Washington would not be helping Lebanon recover its decision-making authority. It would be helping the IRGC consolidate its influence through diplomatic means. Hezbollah will inevitably market any negotiating channel—direct or indirect—as recognition of its status. It will claim that Washington itself is compelled to deal with it. It will tell Tehran that military losses do not prevent political gains. In that way, Hezbollah risks being transformed from an instrument that weakened the state into an actor rewarded for having weakened it.
Iraq offers an equally revealing test. Muqtada al-Sadr’s decision to integrate Saraya al-Salam into state institutions has placed other factions before a fundamental question: does loyalty belong to the Iraqi state or to the IRGC’s regional axis? Yet the groups most closely aligned with Tehran show little willingness to surrender their military or political autonomy. Here the proxy problem appears in its clearest form. The state seeks a monopoly over arms, while the IRGC insists on maintaining parallel armed structures ready for use whenever necessary.
Iraq is not a peripheral arena. It is one of the most important pillars of Iranian influence. What happens there will help determine whether Washington is serious about supporting the principle that states alone should control weapons, or whether it is prepared to settle for arrangements that leave real military power outside state institutions. Yemen represents the maritime face of the same doctrine. Just as Tehran uses the Strait of Hormuz as a direct pressure point, it uses the Houthis and Bab al-Mandab as an indirect one. The Houthis are not merely a Yemeni actor in a civil conflict. They are an Iranian instrument capable of threatening one of the world’s most vital trade and energy routes and turning the Red Sea into a theater of strategic coercion whenever Tehran seeks to raise the cost of pressure against it.
That is why no agreement with Iran can be considered sufficient if it addresses freedom of navigation in Hormuz while leaving Bab al-Mandab outside the equation. Nor is it enough for Washington to demand restraint from Tehran while its proxies remain capable of escalation on its behalf. The genius of Iran’s proxy doctrine lies precisely in its ability to strike without bearing the full cost and then negotiate over crises created by its own networks as though it were a mediator rather than the source of the problem. Donald Trump’s concern about Iranian retaliation is understandable. Iran often prefers to retaliate against Arab Gulf states and through Arab arenas penetrated by its proxies rather than confront the United States directly. Yet allowing that fear to become the foundation of American policy only strengthens the IRGC. Tehran invests in fear. The more convinced it becomes that Washington fears escalation more than Tehran fears economic collapse, the more confident it becomes in its ability to delay, maneuver, and extract concessions.
Trump’s strongest card is not optimism designed to reassure financial markets, nor the steady stream of leaks surrounding draft understandings. His strongest card remains economic, financial, and maritime pressure, reinforced by sanctions targeting the IRGC’s funding networks. Washington should not surrender that leverage in exchange for an interim arrangement that postpones the core issues while allowing Iran to regain its footing.
If Trump ultimately hopes to secure a final agreement that compels Iran to abandon its proxy strategy, what guarantees that Tehran will later accept what it refuses today? What guarantees that the IRGC and the Quds Force—whose doctrine is built upon the use of proxies—will willingly abandon the very foundation of their regional project after obtaining time, resources, and legitimacy?
The problem is not that Donald Trump is negotiating with Iran. The problem is that the IRGC increasingly believes it is negotiating from a position of advantage because the American president fears the costs of decisive action more than Tehran fears the costs of delay.
If these negotiations end by institutionalizing Iran’s proxies as a political reality, then the IRGC will have achieved through diplomacy what it failed to achieve through war. If, however, Washington insists that any agreement address the nuclear program, missiles, drones, regional conduct, and proxies together, only then can one speak of a coherent American strategy. The real equation is no longer one between war and peace. It is one between America’s patience with Iranian obstruction and the spirit of revenge that continues to shape the calculations and doctrine of the IRGC. Between patience and revenge stand the Arab states penetrated by proxy networks, with Lebanon foremost among them—not as footnotes to negotiations, but as potential casualties of them.

The founding king’s advice to the Tunisian leader
Mohamed Hadi Hannachi/AlArabiya/June 08/2026
Around this time in June 1951, a Dakota aircraft arriving from Cairo landed in Riyadh. Among its passengers was Habib Bourguiba, leader of Tunisia’s national movement, accompanied by fellow party officials Mohamed Masmoudi and Ali Zlitni.
The delegation spent several days of Ramadan in a government guesthouse in Riyadh, enduring the city’s intense summer heat in a building that had never known air conditioning. They were waiting for an audience with King Abdulaziz.
The meeting would prove pivotal in the context of Tunisia’s struggle against French colonial rule. At the time, Bourguiba had found little support from the Arab League. Its secretary-general, Abdul Rahman Azzam Pasha, had effectively sidelined Tunisia’s cause, arguing that the organization was preoccupied with Palestine. Ahmad al-Shuqairi, then the League’s assistant secretary-general, responded to Bourguiba’s request for support by saying: “A person who is occupied cannot be occupied with something else. Once we resolve the Palestinian issue, we will resolve the Tunisian issue.”
Bourguiba and his colleagues found themselves with few options. France, emboldened by its victory in World War II, had become increasingly harsh toward its colonies, carrying out brutal repression and committing massacres in places such as Algeria and Madagascar.
The Tunisian leader and his companions were surprised by King Abdulaziz’s extensive knowledge of colonial methods, his deep understanding of the region’s political landscape, and his vision for confronting colonial rule. The king advocated a strategy of gradual stages combined with targeted operations designed to wear down the occupying power over time.
The Riyadh meeting marked a decisive turning point in the political career of Bourguiba, a lawyer educated at the University of Paris and the Paris Institute of Political Studies (Sciences Po), from which he graduated in 1927.
Bourguiba was deeply impressed by King Abdulaziz. Turning to Masmoudi, he said in French: “C’est formidable, ce monsieur-là” – “This man is remarkable, extraordinary. He never attended the Sorbonne or Harvard, yet he taught me something I did not know.”
King Abdulaziz believed strongly in the justice of Tunisia’s cause and its people’s right to freedom. He instructed Saudi diplomats to support Tunisia internationally. More than that, when the delegation returned to its residence, they found gifts waiting for them: complete Saudi traditional outfits and three small bags filled with gold sovereigns. The money was intended to help arm the resistance and support Bourguiba’s international campaign to raise awareness of Tunisia’s struggle.
This royal contribution became the starting point for arming Tunisian resistance fighters.
The gold was exchanged through Egypt’s foreign minister at the time, Mohamed Salah al-Din Pasha.
Ali Zlitni then purchased a plot of land in Tripoli, Libya, where a training camp was established to arm and prepare revolutionaries. From that base, the Tunisian uprising was launched on January 12, 1952.
The fallaqa – Tunisian resistance fighters – subsequently exhausted French colonial authorities, following King Abdulaziz’s strategy of gradual pressure and attrition.
Bourguiba retained his affection and gratitude toward King Abdulaziz and his sons for the rest of his life. Yet, this story has largely disappeared from history books and attracted little scholarly attention. French historians and Francophone intellectuals worked to obscure such episodes in order to weaken the connection between North Africa and the Arabian Peninsula.
They promoted narratives portraying North Africa as fundamentally Berber, with Arabs cast as later arrivals and France presented as culturally and geographically closer to the region. Although the Maghreb’s diverse identity survived many ideological currents from the Middle East, it proved more vulnerable to a sustained cultural campaign. It was a long campaign waged by colonial France against Arab tribes descended from migrants originating in Najd, the Hejaz, Banu Hilal, Banu Sulaym, and other Arabian tribes whose descendants today number in the millions across North Africa.
Colonial authorities in Algeria and Tunisia confiscated tribal lands, burned tents, seized livestock, deported tribal leaders and scholars to distant colonies, altered family names, and recorded them under different identities in official registers. These policies were designed to sever links between North African Arabs and their ancestral roots in the Arabian Peninsula.
French Orientalist scholars depicted their customs and culture negatively despite their similarities to traditions still practiced in Arabia. Italy pursued a similar policy in Libya, attempting through settler colonialism to erase the country’s Arab identity and revive an idealized Roman past by portraying Libya as a “Fourth Shore” of Rome. Colonial powers were not alone in creating barriers between North Africa and Arabia.
During the 1960s and 1970s, the media apparatuses associated with Nasserism and Baathism divided the Arab world into two camps: a supposedly progressive camp championing Arab nationalism and revolutionary ideals, and a traditional camp portrayed as disconnected from modernity and liberation.
This political division deepened psychological and cultural barriers between Arab peoples. Transnational ideologies overshadowed a more nuanced understanding of regional realities.
The divide was further reinforced by populist discourse, much of it influenced by leftist and nationalist movements. Some emphasized economic disparities with the Gulf, while others treated Gulf wealth as a collective Arab entitlement without recognizing the efforts that had contributed to that prosperity.
As a result, a widespread perception emerged depicting the Gulf primarily through stereotypes: camels, tents, oil wealth, and dependence on Western – especially American – support.
Educational curricula across the region presented an oversimplified image of the Gulf.
Gulf history was often reduced to its religious significance, represented mainly by Mecca and Medina. Generations of students were taught to imagine empty deserts populated by camel-riding tribes reciting poetry, little different from pre-Islamic times.
Modern Gulf states were frequently portrayed as passive entities lacking agency, moved and directed by great powers according to external interests. Geography lessons focused heavily on oil while largely ignoring Gulf social history before the discovery of petroleum. Despite strong political ties between Arab states, there are virtually no research centers in North Africa dedicated specifically to Gulf affairs. This is despite the existence of numerous academic studies dealing with historical migrations from Najd and the Hejaz to North Africa and the wider Maghreb region.
These barriers have gradually begun to erode in recent years.
As they weaken, forgotten chapters of history have resurfaced, highlighting Gulf societies’ struggles, achievements, and resilience. Gulf states were not passive observers of Arab affairs but managed complex political challenges with wisdom, patience, and strategic foresight.
At the same time, they focused on developing their societies by investing in education, healthcare, transportation, and living standards. The Gulf governments pursued long-term development strategies and built significant soft power in global economic and political affairs.
By contrast, ideological slogans and political rhetoric transformed other countries in the region into societies that drove their citizens abroad – whether through dangerous migration routes to Europe or migration to Gulf states themselves. As a result, younger generations, freed from colonial-era narratives and ideological influences, encountered a reality that differed from what they had previously been taught. A new generation has emerged in North Africa amid the decline of French cultural influence – a trend acknowledged even by French President Emmanuel Macron.
French-language publishing and writing have diminished significantly, replaced by Arabization policies in Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, alongside a growing desire to engage with an increasingly English-speaking global economy. This generation has become more open to the Gulf states, which have offered opportunities to tens of thousands of North African professionals.
This is undeniably a fortunate generation because it views the Gulf without the “dark glasses” and “thick curtains” that once obscured reality and shaped public perceptions.
This generation has moved beyond artificial barriers.
Alongside a new cohort of intellectuals, writers, and historians, it is reassessing historical narratives and correcting what they see as distortions of history. Millions increasingly recognize that North Africa’s relationship with the Arabian Peninsula is not simply a matter of shared membership in the Arab League but also one of genuine historical and familial ties.
It is hoped that this generation will rethink politics through the lesson that so impressed Bourguiba during his meeting with King Abdulaziz seventy-five years ago. The king conveyed that confronting great powers is a long battle requiring patience, wisdom, and progress made one step at a time. Bourguiba, the founder of independent Tunisia, later embraced this approach and described it in his speeches as the “policy of stages.”

Selected Face Book & X tweets on 07 June/2026
Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו
https://x.com/netanyahu/status/2063659110860566997/video/1
Just this week: Our fighters conquered the Beaufort and eliminated 350 terrorists. We are continuing.

Gideon Sa'ar | גדעון סער
Great to host a distinguished delegation of @POTUS Trump Administration legal advisors and senior officials at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Jerusalem. We had a good discussion on mutual challenges to Israel and the US, including the distorted legal and economic warfare. We also held a good meeting earlier at the office of @IsraeliPM Netanyahu. We appreciate the support of the President and his Administration!


Michael Kerzner

Today, I joined over 60,000 incredible participants from the #Ontario Jewish and Persian communities in allyship at the #WalkForIsrael, proud and unapologetic!I am grateful to @UJAFederation and the sponsors for hosting the walk and for reminding us that our umbilical tie to the state of #Israel is unbreakable, unshakable, and forever. I also want to thank our incredible police services that came out to help protect our community and #ProtectOntario.I am inseparable from our Jewish community and Israel, today and always! Am Yisrael Chai!

Nadine Barakat
The 2030 Illusion: Why BDL’s Recovery Timeline is a Mathematical Mirage
In the vocabulary of central banking, there is a fine line between maintaining market psychological stability and propagating absolute fiction. The recent pronouncements out of the Banque du Liban (BDL)—reassuring a battered nation that the systemic banking crisis will be decisively resolved by 2030—cross that line with alarming audacity. To look at Lebanon’s current macro-financial landscape is to witness an economic structure being squeezed from every conceivable angle. The nation is navigating the catastrophic human and physical toll of war. The economy is contracting at a devastating rate of negative 10% GDP growth. A 10% inflation rate continues to erode remaining domestic purchasing power, even as the central bank aggressively chokes off local currency liquidity to maintain an artificial, static exchange rate. Yet, against this grim backdrop of default, institutional paralysis, and international isolation, the #governor promises an orderly exit from the abyss within four years. The math does not check out. The sociology of leadership does not check out. The 2030 timeline is not a strategic roadmap; it is a balance-sheet illusion designed to substitute accounting maneuvers for actual financial recovery. The Liquidity Vacuum vs. The 4-Year Phased Fantasy
The fundamental flaw of the state’s draft recovery architecture lies in its primary assumption that liquidity will magically materialize to finance the initial restructuring.
The proposed framework dictates a phased 4-year horizon to resolve smaller deposits under the $100,000 threshold, while dumping larger liabilities into multi-decade central bank bonds.
But where, precisely, does this near-term cash come from? The plan leans heavily on a bankrupt commercial banking sector to fund 40% of this immediate cash payout. This is a mathematical impossibility.
- Lebanon’s commercial banks have no revenue-generating operations;
- they are functional zombies trapped in a post-default freeze.
- Their remaining foreign currency assets are tied up in mandatory reserves at the central bank—reserves that BDL continues to deplete simply to defend its currency peg.
Furthermore, any hope of external capital injection is completely paralyzed by Lebanon’s recent placement on the Financial Action Task Force (#FATF) gray list.
This status acts as a regulatory chokehold.
International correspondent banks are not looking to pour liquidity into Beirut; they are actively de-risking, cutting ties, and escalating #compliance costs to shield themselves from institutional liability.
With the state in a #sovereign_default and international donors withholding funds until genuine, painful #reforms are passed, the formal financial system is a closed loop of zero fresh capital.
@FATFWatch

ישראל כ”ץ Israel Katz

@Israel_katz
To the Turkish Interior Minister who threatens and dreams of ruling Jerusalem - I say this: Jerusalem is not Constantinople, and the State of Israel is not the crumbling Crusader Empire, but a strong and determined nation that has proven its ability to defend itself against any threat.
Jerusalem has been the capital of the Jewish people for 3,000 years and will continue to be the capital of Israel forever, while the Ottoman Empire that you and Erdogan dream of collapsed and will never return. It's a shame you haven't learned anything from the legacy of Ataturk, who worked to turn Turkey into a modern state, and yet you are working to return Turkey to an era of darkness and backwardness.

Hussain Abdul-Hussain
Tom Barrack was the first one who suggested tasking Syria with taking on Hezbollah. If this ever happens, every single Lebanese will rally around Hezbollah against Syria.
President Trump to NBC News: I don't agree with Netanyahu on some things. Regarding Lebanon? I would like to see Lebanon have a better life. I would like to see a more surgical attack on Hezbollah. I think it should be more surgical. We can help them with that, or we can recommend Syria.
Syria is doing a very good job cleaning up its affairs. They have a very good leader. They have a leader who has done a very good job in a short period of time, and he would be happy to help.

Lynn Traboulsi

No narrative can serve Hezbollah as much as this one. I said it many times, yes all or most Lebanese will rally around Hezbollah against Syria, because after the last 50 years no Lebanese will ever accept to get threatened by another Syrian interference in Lebanon. That will be yet another mistake from Trump.

Barak Ravid
More quotes from my phone call with president Trump: “The Iranian strikes didn’t hurt anybody. Hopefully Israel is not going to retaliate. If Bibi strikes them back it’s just gonna keep going like the last 47 years, or the last 3000 years"
Trump added: "We are very close to a final deal with Iran. It is going to be a good deal. I don’t want it to blow up because of what is happening now"
Trump stressed: "I am going to call Bibi right now and tell him not to retaliate. Each of them had their fun. Israel had its strike and Iran had its strike. We don't need another one"
Quote
Barak Ravid
@BarakRavid
President Trump tells me: I am going to call Netanyahu right now and tell him not to strike back

Israeli Air Force
https://x.com/IAFsite/status/2063666949125750960/video/1
The Air Force carried out a targeted strike earlier today on a Hezbollah terrorist organization's headquarters in Dahiyeh where terrorists from the organization were operating.
The headquarters that was struck served Hezbollah terrorist organization operatives in advancing terror plots against the citizens of the State of Israel and IDF forces operating in southern Lebanon.
The strike was carried out after earlier today, the Hezbollah terrorist organization fired rockets toward the citizens of the State of Israel. The Hezbollah terrorist organization continues to advance terror plots against the citizens of the State of Israel and IDF forces. The IDF will not allow firing toward civilians and communities in the territory of the country, and will continue to operate to remove any threat to the State of Israel and IDF forces. Prior to the strike, steps were taken to reduce harm to civilians, including the use of precision weaponry and aerial observations.

צבא ההגנה לישראל
@idfonline

https://x.com/idfonline/status/2063663785026388132/video/1
In recent days, IDF forces have been operating to destroy a central underground Hezbollah infrastructure in the Beaufort Ridge area. This involves an underground network consisting of several levels dug deep into the rocky soil. The entire network was built with full funding and planning by the Iranian terror regime, over more than a decade. "Our goal has been and remains one - protecting the northern settlements, creating a new security reality, and deepening the damage to Hezbollah. The operation in the Beaufort Ridge, like other operations we have carried out, proves this. We will not stop, we will not pause, and we will not relent, until this goal is fully achieved."

Hiba Nasr
Iranian Speaker : The naval blockade against the Iranian nation and America's green light today to the Zionist regime turn American and regime bases and assets in the region into legitimate targets. The hand of our armed forces is open, as always.

Hiba Nasr
US/ Lebanon/ Israel:
Following President Trump’s recent statement indicating that the United States had communicated with Hezbollah, sources subsequently confirmed to me that a communication channel involving Hezbollah existed beyond Washington’s official contacts with Lebanese state representatives, although they did not confirm that it was a direct channel between U.S. officials and Hezbollah.
The possibility of such contacts drew attention because, prior to the latest round of U.S.-facilitated negotiations, Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri publicly appealed to President Trump in an interview with The New York Times to help broker a ceasefire, saying Trump was the only person capable of doing so. Berri’s adviser, Ali Hamdan, later told Barak Ravid that Berri had proposed a ceasefire on land, at sea, and in the air, under which Israel would also commit to halting the demolition of homes in southern Lebanon. Notably, Berri did not condition such a ceasefire on a prior withdrawal of Israeli forces from southern Lebanon.
Following another round of negotiations, a ceasefire framework was announced. According to the U.S. description of the arrangement, it was conditioned on Hezbollah’s withdrawal from the area south of the Litani River — a provision that had already been included in the November 2024 cessation of hostilities agreement.
However, both Berri and Hezbollah publicly rejected the proposal and criticized the wording of the U.S. statement. President Trump subsequently stated that they had not, in fact, rejected it.
Before the latest round of talks, President Trump personally spoke with Lebanon's ambassador to Washington, Nada Hamadeh Moawad. He later posted on Truth Social:
"I had a very productive call with Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, of Israel, and there will be no Troops going to Beirut, and any Troops that are on their way, have already been turned back. Likewise, through highly placed Representatives, I had a very good call with Hezbollah, and they agreed that all shooting will stop."
Sources familiar with the matter said a communication channel involving Hezbollah existed. However, the administration has neither confirmed the existence of such a channel nor clarified its nature, including whether any communication was direct or conducted through intermediaries.
The question has drawn additional attention because last month U.S. Ambassador to Turkey Tom Barrack said the US acknowledge that within Lebanon itself, the Hezbollah political party is differentiated from Hezbollah the terrorist group, which holds parliamentary seats within the Lebanese government, adding that political trust in that regard will have to be earned.
At the same time, Barrack reiterated that Hezbollah remains a designated terrorist organization responsible for the deaths of Americans and numerous acts of destabilization.
The State Department didn’t respond to requests for comment on whether there has been any change in the U.S. government's characterization of Hezbollah. They also did not respond to questions about whether any U.S. official has been granted the necessary legal authorization or waiver to engage in contacts involving a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization.
The Lebanon portfolio is currently overseen by U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Michel Issa.
Barrack has nevertheless tried to remain involved in Lebanon-related diplomacy. Some in Lebanon have said he has a role in facilitating a call involving Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa, and French President Emmanuel Macron.

Zéna Mansour ܙܺܝܢܵܐ ܡܲܢܨܘܪ
Mr President Trump
Should the US proceed with plans to employ frozen Iranian assets for regional reconstruction in the Gulf, we respectfully urge that $30 billion be designated to support Lebanon’s recovery from sustained damages. We appreciate your leadership and consideration.

Israel Now

https://x.com/neveragainlive1/status/2063653490690314628/video/1
The Toronto Jewish Community is a model Jewish community. Over Sixty Thousand Jews marching for Israel at the Walk for Israel in Toronto. Enjoy.