English LCCC Newsbulletin For Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For  February 15/2026
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2026/english.february15.26.htm

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006 

Click On The Below Link To Join Elias Bejjaninews whatsapp group
https://chat.whatsapp.com/FPF0N7lE5S484LNaSm0MjW
اضغط على الرابط في أعلى للإنضمام لكروب Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group

Elias Bejjani/Click on the below link to subscribe to my youtube channel
الياس بجاني/اضغط على الرابط في أسفل للإشتراك في موقعي ع اليوتيوب
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAOOSioLh1GE3C1hp63Camw

Bible Quotations For today
Cana Wedding Miracle
John/02/01-11: On the third day, there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee. Jesus’ mother was there. Jesus also was invited, with his disciples, to the marriage. When the wine ran out, Jesus’ mother said to him, “They have no wine.”  Jesus said to her, “Woman, what does that have to do with you and me? My hour has not yet come.” His mother said to the servants, “Whatever he says to you, do it.”  Now there were six water pots of stone set there after the Jews’ way of purifying, containing two or three metretes apiece.  Jesus said to them, “Fill the water pots with water.” They filled them up to the brim.  He said to them, “Now draw some out, and take it to the ruler of the feast.” So they took it.  When the ruler of the feast tasted the water now become wine, and didn’t know where it came from (but the servants who had drawn the water knew), the ruler of the feast called the bridegroom,  and said to him, “Everyone serves the good wine first, and when the guests have drunk freely, then that which is worse. You have kept the good wine until now!” This beginning of his signs Jesus did in Cana of Galilee, and revealed his glory; and his disciples believed in him.

Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on February 14-15/2026
Fasting is prayer, contemplation, repentance, forgiveness, and reconciliation with God/Elias Bejjani  
Elias Bejjani/Link to the video and text of my interview with the Transparency YouTube platform: A Constitutional Exposure and Explanation of the Heresies Imposed by Hezbollah on Lebanon
Video Linl Interview with Brigadier General Khaled Hamade: Berri Tramples on the Constitution Every Day
A Special Interview: The Liberal Thinker Ahmed Al-Sarraf
Hariri in a Chat with Journalists: Lebanon Needs Stability and Reforms Before Any Elections
Israeli Raids Target Wadi Barghaz and Al-Rayhan in South Lebanon
Legislation Committee Confirms: Expats Can Vote for All 128 MPs From Abroad
Raad and Presidential Advisor Discuss Field Conditions in Lebanon
Syrian Army Foils Drug Smuggling Attempt Coming from Lebanon
On the Anniversary of February 14: Statement from the US Embassy
Ahmad Hariri: "Harirists" Will Be at the Ballot Boxes!
Partial Building Collapse in Choueifat and Immediate Evacuation in Beddawi
Berri Opens Candidate Registration; Washington Calls for Comprehensive Financial Restructuring
Lebanon Remembers Rafik Hariri; Diplomats at Beit Al-Wasat
Salam from Munich: We Won't Allow Our Land to Be Used to Target Arabs
This Is Beirut and MIND Israel Make History at Munich Security Conference 2026

Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 14-15/2026
Video Link and Arabic English text of U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s keynote address at the Munich Security
Crown prince urges the world to stand with the people of Iran as 250,000 rally in Munich
Tens of thousands march in Toronto rally in support of Iran protests
'Canadians are with you. We will always be with you': PM addresses vigil for Tumbler Ridge shooting victims
US launches airstrikes on dozens of Islamic State targets in Syria

Titles For The Latest English LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 14-15/2026
English text of U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's keynote address at the Munich Security Conference on February 14, 2026.
Iran's Strategy/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute
Trump, Like Eisenhower, Solves Problems by First Making Them Bigger/J.B. Shurk/Gatestone Institute
X Platform Selected twittes for 14/2026

The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on February 14-15/2026
Fasting is prayer, contemplation, repentance, forgiveness, and reconciliation with God
Elias Bejjani/February 15/2025  
The Lenten (Fasting) period begins with the Holy Miracle at the Wedding of Cana and culminates in the glorious celebration of Easter. In the Maronite Church, Lent starts on Ash Monday, with the preceding Sunday known as Al-Marfah Sunday (أحد المرفع) or Forgiveness Sunday (أحد الغفران).
Lent is a sacred season meant to be dedicated to deep contemplation, self-humility, repentance, penance, forgiveness, prayer, and reconciliation with oneself and others. It is a privileged time of interior pilgrimage toward Jesus, the fountain of all love, mercy, and salvation. During this spiritual journey, Christ Himself accompanies us through the desert of our human frailty, sustaining us as we move toward the profound joy of Easter.
Lent is a spiritual battle, a conscious choice to resist bodily desires and earthly temptations, striving instead for purity in thought and deed. It is a time to fortify our faith and hope, resisting the snares of Satan and keeping far from the despair and corruption of sin. Through prayer and contemplation, we affirm that Almighty God is our protector, guiding our steps throughout this sacred period.
By fasting and praying, we carve out time for God, embracing His eternal truth: "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away." (Mark 13:31). In this sacred practice, we enter into profound communion with Jesus, ensuring that no force can shake our faith and hope.
Fasting is a spiritual discipline through which we seek to emulate Christ, who, during His time of fasting in the wilderness, overcame Satan’s temptations. Inspired by His victory, we endeavor to purify our hearts, minds, and souls, striving for holiness and unwavering devotion.
With trust in the Lord as our Shepherd, we hold firm to the words of Psalm 23:4:"Though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for You are with me; Your rod and Your staff comfort me."
Reading the Holy Bible and engaging in deep prayer immerse us in the divine Word of God, strengthening our souls and minds with His truth. By meditating on His teachings and listening attentively to His voice, we nourish the faith that was instilled in us at Baptism.
Through fasting and prayer, we gain a renewed understanding of time, redirecting our steps toward boundless hope, divine joy, and eternal salvation.

Elias Bejjani/Link to the video and text of my interview with the Transparency YouTube platform: A Constitutional Exposure and Explanation of the Heresies Imposed by Hezbollah on Lebanon
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/02/152078/
An Affirmation of the Heroism and Patriotism of Our People Refuged in Israel, Demanding Their Return with Honor and Dignity, Led by the Honorable, Clean-Handed Leader and Distinguished Resistance Figure, Etienne Sakr (Abu Arz).
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/02/152078/
A constitutional explanation of the reality of the formation of the Mullah-aligned, terrorist, and jihadist Hezbollah in Lebanon: An illegal organization, a gang of villains, and a mercenary army that is ideologically, financially, and culturally subordinate to the Mullah rulers of Iran—relying on them for its decisions, authority, and lifestyle. This is accompanied by an emphasis on the necessity of Lebanese negotiations with Iran, under Arab, international, and American supervision, to withdraw this gang, its members, and its weapons from Lebanon. It further calls for the dismantling of all its military, media, and educational institutions to liberate the Shiite community and, with it, all of Lebanon.
Elias Bejjani/Selected headlines from my interview from Transparency youtube platform
February 12/2026
Literally, this is what Hassan Nasrallah said: “Our project, which we have no choice but to adopt as ideological believers, is the project of an Islamic state and Islamic rule, and for Lebanon not to be a single Islamic republic but rather part of the greater Islamic Republic, ruled by the Imam of the Age and his rightful deputy, the Supreme Jurist, Imam Khomeini.”
*Legally, Lebanon must negotiate with Iran, under Arab, international, and U.S. supervision, regarding Hezbollah’s weapons, presence, and institutions that are subordinate to and take orders from Tehran.
*The “Army, People, Resistance” formula is unconstitutional and was imposed in ministerial statements by force. Legislation comes from Parliament, not from a ministerial statement, which is merely a proposed action plan.
*Perpetual hostility is a sick sectarian ideology promoted by Sunni and Shiite political Islam to justify their continued existence.
*Hezbollah’s decision-making lies in Iran, with religious authorization.
*The Shiite community has been kidnapped and held hostage since 1982.
*Hezbollah is an Iranian army composed of Lebanese mercenaries.
*Hezbollah has never been legitimate, Lebanese, or a resistance movement; it is terrorist in its clerical ideological structure.
*The Lebanese Army is capable of disarming Hezbollah if mandated by the state.
*Israel has not attacked Lebanon even once; rather, it has always responded to attacks launched against it from Lebanon by Syrian, Arab, Iranian, jihadist, and leftist actors.
*There are no real parties in Lebanon, but rather party-companies, foreign agencies, and fundamentalists from Sunni and Shiite political Islam.
*Christians are caught between a criminal leader, a corrupt one, and a Pharisaic, Judas-like figure, alongside a political class incubated by occupations.
*true measure of any leader’s credibility and patriotism appears when he gains money and power.
*Those who abandoned expatriates were not Hezbollah or Berri, but the Lebanese Forces and Michel Aoun’s movement in 2016 when they celebrated the current hybrid electoral law tailored to Hezbollah, originally proposed under the Syrian occupation.
*There can be no genuine political work under occupation. Anyone operating under occupation has no choice but to become its tool and cover. The options under occupation are: armed resistance, steadfast political opposition, civil disobedience, or working through influential states to compel the occupier to withdraw.
*The South Lebanon Army were heroes and should return with heads held high and be apologized to, especially their distinguished leader Etienne Saqr (Abu Arz).
*Hezbollah did not liberate the South, is not part of the Lebanese fabric, and does not represent the Shiites; it is a fully-fledged Iranian army composed of Lebanese mercenaries.
*The Lebanese Constitution does not mention Israel as an enemy. Rather, it contains provisions that define the concept of the enemy and others that apply to those who collaborate with the enemy. These criteria do not apply to Israel, but rather to the three occupations that have devastated Lebanon since the imposition of the Cairo Agreement: the Baathist Syrian regime, Palestinian terrorist organizations, and Iran’s terrorist army — namely, Hezbollah.
*Any elections held under occupation are null and illegitimate.
*Governance in Lebanon to this day remains hostage to Hezbollah.
*What is required today, not tomorrow, is to close Lebanon as an open arena — since the Cairo Agreement — for those who trade in what they falsely call “resistance” and “liberation of Palestine.”
*The only solution is full peace with the State of Israel; whoever wishes to fight it should do so from his own country.
*The Lebanese Army is defensive, not offensive, and the majority of Lebanese do not see Israel as an enemy but as a neighbor. There are no existing problems between Lebanon and Israel, and Israel has no ambitions in Lebanon.

Video Linl Interview with Brigadier General Khaled Hamade: Berri Tramples on the Constitution Every Day
Voice Of Lebanon/Al-Markazia/February 14/ 2026
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/02/152167/
On the 21st anniversary of the assassination of Martyr Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, Brigadier General Khaled Hamade, strategic expert and head of the Regional Forum for Consultation, spoke during the "Bil Awal" (In the Beginning) program on Voice of Lebanon and VDL24.
The Legacy of Rafik Hariri
Hamade stated: "The anniversary of Hariri's assassination is painful for all Lebanese. His era was full of contributions, and his experience in terms of prosperity was brilliant. Prime Minister Hariri suffered from restrictions and opposition to his work, which eventually led to his assassination. He collided with the Iranian project."He added, "What does it mean for the US and France to lead the international effort to remove the Syrian occupation under Resolution 1559, followed by a significant stage in our modern history—from the Syrian withdrawal in 2005 to what we are witnessing today in Iran, where we are on the brink of war against it?" Critique of the Future Movement Hamade questioned the Future Movement: "Have you learned from all the previous lessons following the martyrdom? Will there be a return to concluding negative agreements, such as the signing of the current election law that destroyed political life in Lebanon?" He stressed that the Future Movement cannot form any alliance with Hezbollah today before the latter apologizes for the murders of free thinkers in Lebanon. "Any alliance before such an apology is considered a downfall and an assault on the Lebanese people."
The Sovereign Stance and the Iranian Project
Hamade emphasized that Lebanese sovereign forces must say "No" to Hezbollah’s project, calling it an assault on the country. He noted that Hezbollah must admit its mistake toward Lebanon, as its subservience to Iran has brought disasters to the country.
"Addressing the Lebanese is one thing, but assuming that communication with the people in the South or the Bekaa must pass through Hezbollah is a mistake," he argued, criticizing the "tripartite agreement" that brought President Michel Aoun to power.
Elections and Domestic Policy Regarding the upcoming elections, Hamade noted that while no official can claim elections won't happen, the next Parliament must correct the current "unjust" electoral law. He took a sharp tone toward Speaker Nabih Berri: "Berri tramples on the Constitution every day. How can he say he will not hold a parliamentary session to discuss the election law?"
Regional Outlook: 2026, The Year of Great Change
Regionally, Hamade believes we are headed toward war. He warned against looking at international shifts with a "village mentality."
On Syria & Venezuela: He noted that the Assad regime failed to buy time and fell, similar to the scenes of President Maduro’s arrest in Venezuela.
On Gaza: He mentioned that Trump told Netanyahu to join the "Peace Council," despite previous rhetoric about displacing Gazans.
On Iran: He suggested the US might pursue a scenario for Iran that mixes the regime changes seen in Syria and Venezuela. He predicted potential strikes on Iran and suggested the US—not Iran—might move to close the Arabian Gulf.
He concluded: "We are facing an unstable agenda from Trump. Operationally, there is a distraction of the Iranian mind, and American statements are part of a misleading strategy. 2026 is the year of great change in the region."

A Special Interview: The Liberal Thinker Ahmed Al-Sarraf
Interviewed by Antoine Saad/February 14/2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYBJXT7_B5g
A distinguished, philosophical, and enlightening interview with Ahmed Al-Sarraf is available on the "Sayer Al-Mashreq" YouTube channel. Al-Sarraf discusses his humanitarian philosophy, his life journey, and the challenges he continues to face with honesty and boldness.
Latest Book: "The Secret of Lebanon Through Kuwaiti Eyes"
Publisher: Dar Sayer Al-Mashreq (Lebanon).
Core Content: The book distills Al-Sarraf’s thoughts on the Lebanese experience. He believes the "Secret of Lebanon" lies in its pluralism, represented by the Christian presence and Islamic partnership—a model he believes must be fiercely defended.
On the Christian Presence: Al-Sarraf repeats his famous quote: "Lebanon without Christians is just another desert," defending their historical role in crafting the concepts of freedom and the Renaissance (Nahda) in the East.
Political Vision: The book attacks forces that tried to "hijack" Lebanon from its Arab surroundings and liberal identity.
Why Sayer Al-Mashreq? Al-Sarraf chose this publisher and journalist Antoine Saad because of their shared focus on Levantine issues, pluralism, and the active role of Christians, which aligns perfectly with Al-Sarraf's enlightenment agenda.

Hariri in a Chat with Journalists: Lebanon Needs Stability and Reforms Before Any Elections
Al-Markazia/February 14, 2026  (Translated from Arabic)
Former Prime Minister Saad Hariri stated during a conversation with media professionals that Lebanon must avoid entering into any Arab-Arab disputes. He emphasized that the current situation in Lebanon does not warrant an escalation of internal disagreements, stressing that the current atmosphere is not conducive to holding elections. Hariri added, "The reason for my exit from politics was the absence of a true partner in the country," noting that he had hoped to be able to form a government of specialists similar to the current one. He underscored that the country is in dire need of reforms and that the Saudi role in Lebanon has had a significant impact on stabilizing the Taif Agreement and supporting national stability. Regarding the events in Southern Lebanon, Hariri described them as a "war crime," noting that the situation in the South closely resembles what is happening in Gaza. He continued, "After everything that has transpired, it has become clear that it is the State that protects everyone." He pointed out that government efforts to confine weapons are a positive step and that the primary goal is to enhance Lebanon’s stability while strengthening the role of the State.Hariri noted that despite a full year passing under the current circumstances, the country has not witnessed real reforms; instead, the focus has been solely on stability, which is what Lebanon needs at this stage.Addressing rumors, Hariri confirmed that all news regarding a meeting with Hezbollah has been denied and no such meeting took place. He stated, "Hezbollah is a part of Lebanese politics and is present in the government; the Shia ministers stand together on any position. Consequently, there is an ongoing dialogue in the country with Hezbollah—others are talking to them, but we are not. However, if a certain tension arises on the streets that leads to a larger problem, then communication would be conducted 'out in the open' (on the rooftop)."In another context, Hariri clarified that he had planned to visit Syria, but the war with Iran that broke out at the time led to the postponement of that visit.

Israeli Raids Target Wadi Barghaz and Al-Rayhan in South Lebanon
Al-Arabiya Net/February 14/2026    (Translated from Arabic)
Israeli warplanes launched raids today on areas in southern Lebanon, targeting Wadi Barghaz, the heights of Iqlim al-Tuffah, and Houmin al-Faouqa. The Al-Arabiya/Al-Hadath correspondent reported two Israeli strikes on the Al-Rayhan area in the south, in addition to raids on Wadi Barghaz and other southern regions. For its part, the Israeli army announced it is attacking Hezbollah infrastructure in southern Lebanon.
Non-Stop Raids
It is worth noting that since the cessation of hostilities agreement between Lebanon and Israel took effect on November 27, 2024, Israeli forces have continued their raids on various Lebanese areas in the south and east, stating they are targeting Hezbollah sites.
Additionally, the Israeli army has refused to withdraw from five hilltops inside Lebanese territory that overlook both sides of the border. Meanwhile, the Lebanese Army has deployed throughout all areas south of the Litani River, working to confine illegal weapons outside the state's framework within that zone. However, Israel has declared these actions insufficient, noting that Hezbollah is rebuilding its military capabilities.

Legislation Committee Confirms: Expats Can Vote for All 128 MPs From Abroad
Al-Markazia/February 14/ 2026    (Translated from Arabic)
Information from "Voice of All Lebanon" radio reported that the Legislation and Consultations Committee responded to a request from the Minister of Interior and Municipalities, Ahmed Al-Hajjar, regarding expatriate voting. The committee’s response stated that expatriates have the right to vote from abroad for all 128 members of parliament. Minister Al-Hajjar had previously submitted two questions to the committee: Is it permissible for registered expats to vote for the 128 MPs from abroad, or must they travel to Lebanon to do so?

Raad and Presidential Advisor Discuss Field Conditions in Lebanon
Al-Markazia/February 14/2026    (Translated from Arabic)
The head of the "Loyalty to the Resistance" bloc, MP Mohammad Raad, received the Advisor to the President of the Republic, Andre Rahhal, as part of a series of ongoing agreed-upon meetings. During the meeting, views were exchanged regarding the latest developments on the local scene across political and field levels.

Syrian Army Foils Drug Smuggling Attempt Coming from Lebanon
Al-Markazia/February 14/ 2026    (Translated from Arabic)
The Media and Communication Directorate of the Syrian Ministry of Defense reported that Border Guard forces managed to seize a massive drug shipment. The haul included 135 kg of narcotics plus more than 300 "palms" (blocks) of hashish, following a clash with smugglers coming from Lebanon toward Syrian territory near the city of Zabadani, west of Damascus. A Kalashnikov rifle was also seized during the operation. The Ministry confirmed the smuggling attempt was thwarted as authorities continue to tighten security measures on the border.

On the Anniversary of February 14: Statement from the US Embassy
Al-Liwaa/February 14/2026    (Translated from Arabic)
The US Embassy stated via the "X" platform that "Ambassador Issa placed a wreath this morning on the grave of the late Prime Minister Rafik Hariri." The statement added: "As Lebanon stands at a crucial crossroads, Rafik Hariri’s legacy of building peace and prosperity continues to resonate years later, gaining renewed importance." It concluded: "Today’s commemoration also emphasizes the necessity of achieving justice and accountability for all those targeted by non-state actors in defense of Lebanon’s sovereignty."

Ahmad Hariri: "Harirists" Will Be at the Ballot Boxes!
Al-Liwaa/February 14/ 2026   (Translated from Arabic)
The Secretary-General of the "Future Movement," Ahmad Hariri, clarified that "the Movement is in the process of ensuring the elections will take place," adding: "Our positions will evolve after that, and today there was a confirmation that 'Harirists' will be voters in the upcoming milestone." Speaking to MTV, he added: "We have developed several scenarios regarding the elections awaiting the leadership's decision; Lebanon faces an opportunity to emerge from the dark tunnel."

Partial Building Collapse in Choueifat and Immediate Evacuation in Beddawi
Al-Markazia/February 14/2026   (Translated from Arabic)
The Choueifat area in the Aley District witnessed a partial collapse of a building located near the municipality building today, Saturday. Preliminary information indicates the incident was limited to material damage, including a parked car. Additionally, an order for the immediate evacuation of the "Al-Raidani" building on the Beddawi highway in northern Lebanon was issued; families fled in haste without being provided alternative shelter.

Berri Opens Candidate Registration; Washington Calls for Comprehensive Financial Restructuring
Lebanon Remembers Rafik Hariri; Diplomats at Beit Al-Wasat
Salam from Munich: We Won't Allow Our Land to Be Used to Target Arabs
Al-Markazia/February 14/2026    (Translated from Arabic)
The passing of three days since the start of the parliamentary candidacy period without a single application was not the only indicator of political forces' skepticism regarding holding the elections as scheduled in May. Information about potential legal challenges to the process, due to unamended laws, has reinforced the belief that elections might not occur. However, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, who closed the doors to any legislative amendments, took the lead by officially filing his candidacy for the Shia seat in Sidon, becoming the first candidate in Lebanon. He was followed by bloc member MP Kabalan Kabalan for the Shia seat in West Bekaa. As Berri stirred the electoral waters, several internal files remain pending for Monday's Cabinet session, ranging from the Army’s plan to confine weapons to military salaries and public sector grants, amid the state's inability to secure funding.
Berri’s Warning
After filing his candidacy, Speaker Berri reaffirmed his commitment to holding elections on May 10. During a meeting with the Beirut Bar Association, he stated: "I have informed President Joseph Aoun and the government that it is unacceptable to hinder the start of a new era by delaying the most important constitutional milestone."
Regarding the "Financial Gap Law," Berri described it as the cornerstone of recovery, noting Parliament aims to finalize it in March, provided it guarantees depositors' rights. He warned: "Beware of touching the gold; Lebanon is not a bankrupt country. There are many ways to reach a solution without compromising depositors’ rights or the gold reserves."
Geagea’s Envoy at Baabda
President Joseph Aoun received Minister of Telecommunications Charles El-Hajj, who briefed him on the ministry’s 90-day plan. Additionally, the President met with MP Melhem Riachy, an envoy from Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea, who shared details of the LF delegation’s recent visit to Damascus and their talks with Syrian officials.
Remembering Rafik Hariri
On the eve of the 21st anniversary of Rafik Hariri’s assassination, President Joseph Aoun stated: "Today we miss a man who dedicated his life to the state project and rebuilding Lebanon. Loyalty to his memory lies in renewing our commitment to a strong, just state that puts Lebanon’s interest above all."
Diplomatic Meetings at "Beit Al-Wasat"
Former PM Saad Hariri, having arrived in Beirut, held a series of meetings at Beit Al-Wasat. He met with US Ambassador Michael Issa, UN Special Coordinator Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, and the ambassadors of France, Spain, and Russia. Russian Ambassador Alexander Rudakov emphasized that holding elections on time is a vital signal to the world that the Lebanese state remains governed by constitutional rules.
Kuwaiti Interest and Salam in Munich
On the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference, PM Nawaf Salam met with Yemeni Presidential Leadership Council Chairman Rashad al-Alimi. Salam assured him that Lebanon would not allow its territory to be used to target Arab nations. Salam also met with Kuwaiti PM Sheikh Ahmad Abdullah Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah, who reaffirmed Kuwait's support for Lebanon’s stability and its participation in the Paris conference to support the Lebanese Army.
Financial Restructuring
The US Embassy posted on "X": "Achieving a stable future for Lebanon requires comprehensive financial restructuring." Ambassador Michael Issa discussed with IMF mission chief Ernesto Ramirez Rigo ways to restore Lebanon's international credibility and attract global investment.
Field Developments: Shelling and Strikes
In the south, Israeli artillery targeted the outskirts of Beit Lif and Aita al-Shaab. An Israeli drone dropped sound bombs near Aita al-Shaab, and machine-gun fire was directed toward Yaroun. Israeli military spokesperson Avichay Adraee announced the elimination of a Hezbollah member in Al-Tiri, claiming he was attempting to rebuild military infrastructure in violation of current understandings.
Regional: New Aircraft Carrier
Following President Trump’s one-month ultimatum to Iran regarding its nuclear program, reports indicate the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier has been ordered to move from the Caribbean to the Middle East to join the USS Abraham Lincoln, as the administration considers potential military actions against Iran.

This Is Beirut and MIND Israel Make History at Munich Security Conference 2026
This is Beirut/February 14/2026
In an unprecedented moment at the Munich Security Conference 2026, Lebanese organization This Is Beirut and Israeli organization MIND Israel co-hosted a landmark panel discussion on regional integration, marking the first-ever formal cooperation between Lebanese and Israeli civil society groups at the conference.The event, titled “Conversation on Regional Integration: Perspectives in the Middle East”, placed a spotlight on Lebanon and Israel and examined the shifting dynamics of the region in the aftermath of the Gaza war. Held Saturday evening at the historic Bayerischer Hof in Munich, the panel drew conference participants and a global audience following via livestream.
Post-Gaza Regional Landscape
Panelists assessed the evolving regional order following the November 2024 ceasefire in Lebanon, addressing both progress and setbacks. Central to the discussion were the challenges surrounding Hezbollah’s disarmament, ongoing indirect talks between Lebanon and Israel, and the broader prospects for regional integration. Speakers explored the structural, political and security conditions necessary to move from fragile de-escalation toward sustainable peace. The conversation emphasized that regional integration cannot be reduced to diplomatic symbolism, but must instead be grounded in institutional reform, credible security arrangements and economic opportunity.
Distinguished Speakers
The panel featured a high-level and diverse group of policymakers and experts:
Amos Yadlin, Major General (Ret.), former head of Israeli Military Intelligence, former Deputy Commander of the Israeli Air Force, former Israeli Defense Attaché in Washington, and President and Founder of MIND Israel.
Ted Deutch, former U.S. Representative from Florida and current CEO of the American Jewish Committee. Hagar Chemali, former Director for Syria and Lebanon at the U.S. National Security Council, Non-resident Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council, and Adjunct Associate Professor at Columbia University.
The discussion was moderated by Melody Sucharewicz, strategic communications and counter-extremism expert and former foreign affairs adviser to Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz.
A Symbolic and Strategic Milestone
Beyond policy substance, the event carried significant symbolic weight. At a time of heightened polarization across the Middle East, the cooperation between a Lebanese and an Israeli organization at one of the world’s most prominent security forums underscored a growing recognition that dialogue and regional integration are no longer abstract aspirations, but strategic imperatives. While profound political and security obstacles remain, the panel signaled that civil society actors are increasingly willing to test new frameworks for engagement, even amid ongoing tensions.As Munich 2026 continues, this conversation may be remembered not only for what was said on stage, but for what it represented: the possibility of reimagining regional relationships through structured dialogue, accountability and long-term vision.

The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 14-15/2026
Video Link and Arabic English text of U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s keynote address at the Munich Security
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/02/152133/
We gather here today as members of a historic alliance—an alliance that saved and changed the world. You know, when this conference began in 1963, it was in a nation—actually, it was on a continent—that was divided against itself. The line between communism and freedom ran through the heart of Germany. The first barbed fences of the Berlin Wall had gone up just two years prior. And just months before that first conference, before our predecessors first met here in Munich, the Cuban Missile Crisis had brought the world to the brink of nuclear destruction.

Crown prince urges the world to stand with the people of Iran as 250,000 rally in Munich
Stanislav Hodina/AP/February 14, 2026
MUNICH (AP) — About 250,000 people demonstrated on Saturday against Iran's government on the sidelines of a gathering of world leaders in Germany, police said, answering a call from Iran ’s exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi for cranked-up international pressure on Tehran. Banging drums and chanting for regime change, the giant and boisterous rally in Munich was part of what Pahlavi described as a “global day of action" to support Iranians in the wake of deadly nationwide protests. He also called for demonstrations in Los Angeles and Toronto. Police said in a post on X that the number of protesters reached some 250,000, more than the organizers had expected. “Change, change, regime change” the huge crowd chanted, waving green-white-and-red flags with lion and sun emblems. Iran used that flag before its 1979 Islamic Revolution that toppled the Pahlavi dynasty. At a news conference, Pahlavi warned of more deaths in Iran if “democracies stand by and watch" following Iran’s deadly crackdown on protesters last month. “We gather at an hour of profound peril to ask: Will the world stand with the people of Iran?” he asked. He added that the survival of Iran's government “sends a clear signal to every bully: kill enough people and you stay in power.”An estimated 350,000 people marched on the streets of Toronto as part of the Global Day of Action Rally, Toronto Police spokesperson Laura Brabant said. At the Munich rally, demonstrators sported “Make Iran Great Again" red caps, mimicking the MAGA caps worn by U.S. President Donald Trump 's supporters. Among those sporting the caps was U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina who gave a speech to the crowd during which he was photographed holding up the headwear.
Many at the rally waved placards showing Pahlavi, some that called him a king. The son of Iran’s deposed shah has been in exile for nearly 50 years but is trying to position himself as a player in Iran’s future. The crowd chanted “Pahlavi for Iran,” and “democracy for Iran" as drums and cymbals sounded. “We have huge hopes and (are) looking forward that the regime is going to change hopefully,” said Daniyal Mohtashamian, a demonstrator who traveled from Zurich, in Switzerland, to speak for protesters inside Iran who faced repression. “There is an internet blackout, and their voices are not going outside of Iran,” he said. About 500 protesters also rallied outside the presidential palace in Nicosia, Cyprus, with many holding up banners with slogans against Iran's government and in favor of Pahlavi. The U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency says at least 7,005 people were killed in last month's protests, including 214 government forces. It has been accurate in counting deaths during previous rounds of unrest in Iran and relies on a network of activists inside Iran to verify deaths. Iran’s government offered its only death toll on Jan. 21, saying 3,117 people were killed. Iran’s theocracy in the past has undercounted or not reported fatalities from past unrest. The Associated Press has been unable to independently assess the death toll, given authorities have disrupted internet access and international calls in Iran. Iranian leaders are facing renewed pressure from Trump, who has threatened U.S. military action. Trump wants Iran to further scale back its nuclear program. He suggested Friday that regime change in Iran “would be the best thing that could happen." Iran was also the focus of protests in Munich on Friday, the opening day of an annual security conference in the city gathering European leaders and global security figures. Supporters of the Iranian opposition group People’s Mujahedeen Organization of Iran, also known as the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq, demonstrated.

Tens of thousands march in Toronto rally in support of Iran protests
Kathryn Mannie/The Canadian Press/February 14, 2026
TORONTO — Tens of thousands of people marched down Yonge Street to the beat of drums and chants of “King Reza Pahlavi” at a rally in North York, as similar protests took place in major cities around the world. Protesters held aloft and draped themselves in red, white and green flags emblazoned with a golden lion — the flag Iran used before the Islamic Republic came to power in 1979, toppling the previous monarchy.
Demonstrators called for an end to government repression in Iran as widespread protests inside the country have been met with violent crackdowns. “It's hard to see that our friends and families in Iran are being kept in prison for no reason, being shot in the head for (using) their democratic voice,” said Nima Najafi. Najafi said he attended a protest two weeks ago in solidarity with anti-government protesters in Iran that took place at Toronto’s Sankofa Square. He said Saturday's protest is twice as large. Toronto police said 150,000 people attended the Sankofa Square rally and that they were expecting 200,000 to march down Yonge Street on Saturday. Najafi and others called for the return of Iran’s exiled crown prince Reza Pahlavi, saying he is only leader capable of helping Iran eventually transition to a democracy. Thousands of protesters held pictures of Pahlavi at the march, alongside photos of people killed in Iran.
Arshia Aghdasi, a protester who said he flew to Toronto from Florida to join the rally, called on foreign powers to intervene in Iran, specifically the U.S. U.S. President Donald Trump has suggested the U.S. could attack Iran over the killing of peaceful demonstrators in the country. Some protesters Saturday held signs with Trump's face on them, calling on the U.S. President to end nuclear negotiations with Iran and take military action. Najafi said he was initially against calls for foreign powers to intervene in Iran but now he believes it is the only path forward. “I had a friend who got shot in the head. He died. He was a pharmacist … a high school friend," he said. “I had another friend who is imprisoned because he was a doctor treating patients.”Iran has been gripped by countrywide protests since late December, sparked by an ongoing economic crisis that has sent the country's currency into freefall. While protesters were initially focused on Iran's economy, demonstrators pivoted to calling for an end to Iran’s Islamic Republic, with some supporting the return of the ousted monarchy to power. Iran’s government, which has cracked down on protests and implemented an internet blackout, said more than 3,000 people have been killed since protests broke out. The U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency, which has been accurate in counting deaths during previous rounds of unrest in Iran, put the death toll at over 7,000.Arash Karimi said he was protesting on Yonge Street in solidarity with unarmed civilians who have been killed in Iran, calling government crackdowns a “one-sided war against the people.”“Every Iranian knows someone, relatives or friends, (who have been) killed,” he said. Amirali Ahzan, a protester who wore an Iranian lion and sun flag as well as a rainbow pride flag on his back, said he hopes the current unrest in Iran leads to political change that will guarantee more rights for the Iranian people. Ahzan said he fled Iran three years ago because he feared for his safety as a member of the LGBTQ community. Homosexuality is criminalized in Iran. Before he fled, Ahzan said he was briefly jailed in Iran for attending a party where alcohol was present. Consuming alcohol is also banned in Iran. Ahzan said it's unclear how many LGBTQ Iranians have been killed or imprisoned since protests broke out. He said he was marching Saturday in their honour. "I think it's my duty to be their voice," he said. "There are so many people like me who have been marginalized and criminalized. I do want to stand up for them." Ahzan said he wants Pahlavi to lead a "free Iran" and called on the exiled crown prince to improve women's rights, trans rights and human rights in the country. Saturday’s rally is one of many happening worldwide as part of what Pahlavi has labelled a Global Day of Action. Pahlavi said Toronto, Munich and Los Angeles would be the main gathering points for Iranians living abroad to protest and call for regime change in Iran. A protest in Munich was attended by more than 200,000 people, according to German news agency dpa. Police warned the public to steer clear of the area around Saturday's protest, which they said would cause extreme traffic and transit delays. Police closed roads, including portions of Yonge Street and North York Boulevard, ahead of the rally.

'Canadians are with you. We will always be with you': PM addresses vigil for Tumbler Ridge shooting victims
CBC/February 13/2026
Prime Minister Mark Carney led federal, provincial and local leaders in praising the resilience and grace of Tumbler Ridge residents at a vigil in memory of the victims of Tuesday's mass shooting in the B.C. community. The shooting, in which eight people were killed including six children, has rocked the tight-knit community in northeast B.C., as well as the country as a whole. Partisan politics were put aside as federal leaders joined Friday's vigil. Carney was joined by Gov. Gen. Mary Simon, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, Green Party Leader Elizabeth May, Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet and NDP interim Leader Don Davies, among others. In his remarks at the vigil, Carney said it was important for leaders to be present for the people of Tumbler Ridge, and not just through a screen from Ottawa. "We wanted you to hear that Canadians are with you. We will always be with you," he said. "We wanted you to hear that whatever portion of your sadness that Canadians can bear to help to ease your heavy load, we will gladly do so." The vigil started with attendees singing O Canada, followed by Tumbler Ridge Mayor Darryl Krakowka asking for a moment of silence to honour the victims. "None of us walks through this alone," Krakowka said during his opening speech "This evening is about remembrance, it's about reflection, it's about love." Leaders of local First Nations then addressed the vigil with remarks, a prayer and a song. Carney began his remarks by acknowledging previous crises in Tumbler Ridge — tough economic times and wildfires — and how the community came together to support each other then. "And when the unimaginable happened on Tuesday, you were there again," he said. "First responders at the school in less than two minutes. Teachers shielding their children. "You held each other — as you’re holding each other right now."Carney went on to remember some of the victims in the shooting, and offered prayers to those who are fighting for their lives. He said Canada was with the people of Tumbler Ridge, a community that relied on each other's grace. "When we leave here tonight, some you will go back to quiet houses, some of you will go home to empty rooms. Please know that you’re not alone."In his remarks, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said each of the victims had stories, and that they would live on in this world through everyone's memories of them. Referring to his federal counterparts, he made very clear that this was not a time for politics. "We all lead political parties. But today? There are no Conservatives. There are no Liberals, New Democrats, Greens or Bloc Québécois," he said. Poilievre said the people of Tumbler Ridge were the "backbone of our nation" and had survived great hardship by leaning on each other. "You fight your own battles, but you're never, never far away from helping a neighbour in need," he said. "Some might call these ordinary people. But there is nothing ordinary about the people in this town. You are extraordinary." Poilievre concluded by reciting the poem If Tomorrow Starts Without Me by David Romano, which reflects on bereavement. Other speakers at the vigil included Simon, B.C. Lt.-Gov. Wendy Cocchia and B.C. Premier David Eby. Eby shared a powerful tale of how a high school science class banded together as gunshots were heard all around them on Tuesday. He talked about how older kids protected younger kids and tried to keep the mood light, and how a teacher administered first aid to a critically injured student. "In those actions, in those heroic actions, are the seeds of the recovery of this community," Eby said.
"The future of Tumbler Ridge is in that school, we know that." Mayor Krakowka concluded the vigil by asking everyone to step forward and light a candle in honour of the victims.
Shared grieving
Earlier in the day, having flown into Tumbler Ridge together, the federal leaders laid flowers at a growing memorial for the victims of one of Canada's worst mass shootings. Speaking to CBC's Power and Politics, May told host David Cochrane that the prime minister had invited all the party leaders to travel to B.C. in the same plane, a gesture she appreciated. "There was nothing but shared grieving and shared sense that there's no other place for us to be but together," the Saanich-Gulf Islands MP said. "I think if every Canadian could be here, people would say, 'Yeah, I'd like to be in Tumbler Ridge and comfort people.' It's just so unbearable."

US launches airstrikes on dozens of Islamic State targets in Syria
William Christou/The Guardian/February 14, 2026
The US military conducted 10 strikes on more than 30 Islamic State targets in Syria between 3 and 12 February as part of a campaign against the extremist group in Iraq and Syria. US Central Command (Centcom) said in a statement on Saturday that the US had struck IS infrastructure and weapons storage targets.The attacks formed part of Operation Hawkeye Strike, in which the US killed or captured what it said were IS fighters and hit more than 100 IS targets. The campaign began after a member of Syria’s general security forces affiliated with IS ambushed US and Syrian forces in the city of Palmyra, killing two US soldiers and an interpreter, and wounding three members of the Syrian government forces. The US has led the international coalition to defeat IS in Syria and Iraq since 2014, partnering with the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) to defeat the radical group. In November, Syria officially joined the coalition and Washington has since turned towards Damascus as its principal anti-IS ally. Analysts warn that the group has been trying to reconstitute itself since the fall of Assad in December 2024, exploiting the security vacuum and weapons that flooded the country when Assad’s soldiers abandoned their posts. On Saturday, the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, praised Damascus for its participation in the anti-IS coalition, welcoming the Syrian government’s commitment to fully cooperate with the US and the global coalition.
The US has steadily been evacuating male detainees accused of being IS fighters out of north-east Syria over the past month, announcing on Friday it had successfully transported 5,700 detainees to Iraq, where they are expected to stand trial. The US military is reducing its troop presence in Syria, evacuating its base in al-Tanf this week after nearly a decade there. Damascus took control of key IS prisons and camps last month as part of its offensive against the SDF, in which the SDF lost 80% of its territory. Among the camps Damascus now controls is al-Hawl camp, which previously held about 25,000 family members of suspected IS fighters. Humanitarians said on Friday that almost the entire foreigners’ annexe of the camp, which had held about 6,000 women and children from 42 different countries, had been emptied over the past month. It is unclear where the foreign residents went or who removed them from the camp.

The Latest LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 14-15/2026
English text of U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's keynote address at the Munich Security Conference on February 14, 2026.
Remarks by Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the Munich Security Conference
Video Link and Arabic English text of U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s keynote address at the Munich Security
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2026/02/152133/
Bayerischer Hof, Munich, Germany
February 14, 2026
"Thank you. Thank you very much.
We gather here today as members of a historic alliance—an alliance that saved and changed the world. You know, when this conference began in 1963, it was in a nation—actually, it was on a continent—that was divided against itself. The line between communism and freedom ran through the heart of Germany. The first barbed fences of the Berlin Wall had gone up just two years prior. And just months before that first conference, before our predecessors first met here in Munich, the Cuban Missile Crisis had brought the world to the brink of nuclear destruction.
Even as World War II still burned fresh in the memory of Americans and Europeans alike, we found ourselves staring down the barrel of a new global catastrophe—one with the potential for a new kind of destruction, more apocalyptic and final than anything before in the history of mankind. At the time of that first gathering, Soviet communism was on the march. Thousands of years of Western civilization hung in the balance. At that time, victory was far from certain. But we were driven by a common purpose. We were unified not just by what we were fighting against; we were unified by what we were fighting for. And together, Europe and America prevailed and a continent was rebuilt. Our people prospered. In time, the East and West blocs were reunited. A civilization was once again made whole. That infamous wall that had cleaved this nation into two came down, and with it, an evil empire, and the East and West became one again.
But the euphoria of this triumph led us to a dangerous delusion: that we had entered, quote, 'the end of history'; that every nation would now be a liberal democracy; that the ties formed by trade and by commerce alone would now replace nationhood; that the rules-based global order—an overused term—would now replace the national interest; and that we would now live in a world without borders where everyone became a citizen of the world.
This was a foolish idea that ignored both human nature and the lessons of over 5,000 years of recorded human history. And it has cost us dearly. In this delusion, we embraced a dogmatic vision of free and unfettered trade, even as some nations protected their economies and subsidized their companies to systematically undercut ours, shuttering our plants, resulting in large parts of our societies being deindustrialized, shipping millions of working- and middle-class jobs overseas, and handing control of our critical supply chains to both adversaries and rivals.
We increasingly outsourced our sovereignty to international institutions while many nations invested in massive welfare states at the cost of maintaining the ability to defend themselves. This, even as other countries have invested in the most rapid military buildup in all of human history and have not hesitated to use hard power to pursue their own interests. To appease a climate cult, we have imposed energy policies on ourselves that are impoverishing our people, even as our competitors exploit oil and coal and natural gas and anything else—not just to power their economies, but to use as leverage against our own. And in pursuit of a world without borders, we opened our doors to an unprecedented wave of mass migration that threatens the cohesion of our societies, the continuity of our culture, and the future of our people.
We made these mistakes together. And now, together, we owe it to our people to face those facts and to move forward to rebuild. Under President Trump, the United States of America will once again take on the task of renewal and restoration, driven by a vision of a future as proud, as sovereign, and as vital as our civilization’s past. And while we are prepared, if necessary, to do this alone, it is our preference and it is our hope to do this together with you, our friends here in Europe.
For the United States and Europe, we belong together. America was founded 250 years ago, but the roots began here on this continent long before the men who settled and built the nation of my birth arrived on our shores, carrying the memories and the traditions and the Christian faith of their ancestors as a sacred inheritance—an unbreakable link between the old world and the new. We are part of one civilization: Western civilization. We are bound to one another by the deepest bonds that nations could share, forged by centuries of shared history, Christian faith, culture, heritage, language, ancestry, and the sacrifices our forefathers made together for the common civilization to which we have fallen heir.
And so, this is why we Americans may sometimes come off as a little direct and urgent in our counsel. This is why President Trump demands seriousness and reciprocity from our friends here in Europe. The reason why, my friends, is because we care deeply. We care deeply about your future and ours. And if at times we disagree, our disagreements come from our profound sense of concern about a Europe with which we are connected—not just economically, not just militarily. We are connected spiritually, and we are connected culturally.
We want Europe to be strong. We believe that Europe must survive, because the two great wars of the last century serve for us as history’s constant reminder that ultimately, our destiny is and will always be intertwined with yours. Because we know that the fate of Europe will never be irrelevant to our own.
National security—which this conference is largely about—is not merely a series of technical questions: how much we spend on defense or where or how we deploy it. These are important questions, they are, but they are not the fundamental one. The fundamental question we must answer at the outset is: what exactly are we defending? Because armies do not fight for abstractions. Armies fight for a people. Armies fight for a nation. Armies fight for a way of life. And that is what we are defending: a great civilization that has every reason to be proud of its history, confident of its future, and aims to always be the master of its own economic and political destiny.
It was here in Europe where the ideas that planted the seeds of liberty that changed the world were born. It was here in Europe where the world—which gave the world the rule of law, the universities, and the scientific revolution. It was this continent that produced the genius of Mozart and Beethoven, of Dante and Shakespeare, of Michelangelo and Da Vinci, of the Beatles and the Rolling Stones. And this is the place where the vaulted ceilings of the Sistine Chapel and the towering spires of the great cathedral in Cologne—they testify not just to the greatness of our past or to a faith in God that inspired these marvels; they foreshadow the wonders that await us in our future. But only if we are unapologetic in our heritage and proud of this common inheritance can we together begin the work of envisioning and shaping our economic and our political future.
Deindustrialization was not inevitable. It was a conscious policy choice—a decades-long economic undertaking that stripped our nations of their wealth, of their productive capacity, and of their independence. And the loss of our supply-chain sovereignty was not a function of a prosperous and healthy system of global trade. It was a foolish but voluntary transformation of our economy that left us dependent on others for our needs and dangerously vulnerable to crisis. Mass migration was not, is not, some fringe concern of little consequence. It was and continues to be a crisis which is transforming and destabilizing societies all across the West.
Together, we can reindustrialize our economies and rebuild our capacity to defend our people. But the work of this new alliance should not be focused just on military cooperation and reclaiming the industries of the past. It should also be focused on, together, advancing our mutual interests in new frontiers, unshackling our ingenuity, our creativity, and the dynamic spirit to build a new Western century: commercial space travel and cutting-edge artificial intelligence, industrial automation and flex manufacturing, creating a Western supply chain for critical minerals not vulnerable to extortion from other powers, and a unified effort to compete for market share in the economies of the Global South. Together, we can not only take back control of our own industries and supply chains—we can prosper in the areas that will define the 21st century.
But we must also gain control of our national borders. Controlling who and how many people enter our countries—this is not an expression of xenophobia, it is not hate. It is a fundamental act of national sovereignty. And the failure to do so is not just an abdication of one of our most basic duties owed to our people; it is an urgent threat to the fabric of our societies and the survival of our civilization itself.
And finally, we can no longer place the so-called 'global order' above the vital interests of our people and our nations. We do not need to abandon the system of international cooperation we authored, and we don’t need to dismantle the global institutions of the old order that together we built. But these must be reformed. These must be rebuilt.
For example, the United Nations still has tremendous potential to be a tool for good in the world, but we cannot ignore that today, on the most pressing matters before us, it has no answers and has played virtually no role. It could not solve the war in Gaza. Instead, it was American leadership that freed captives from barbarians and brought about a fragile truce. It has not solved the war in Ukraine. It took American leadership, in partnership with many of the countries here today, just to bring the two sides to the table in search of a still-elusive peace. It was powerless to constrain the nuclear program of radical Shia clerics in Tehran. That required 14 bombs dropped with precision from American B-2 bombers. And it was unable to address the threat to our security from a narcoterrorist dictator in Venezuela. Instead, it took American special forces to bring this fugitive to justice.
In a perfect world, all of these problems and more would be solved by diplomats and strongly worded resolutions. But we do not live in a perfect world. And we cannot continue to allow those who blatantly and openly threaten our citizens and endanger our global stability to shield themselves behind abstractions of international law which they themselves routinely violate.
This is the path that President Trump and the United States has embarked upon. It is the path we ask you here in Europe to join us on. It is a path we have walked together before, and hope to walk together again. For five centuries before the end of the Second World War, the West had been expanding—its missionaries, its pilgrims, its soldiers, its explorers pouring out from its shores to cross oceans, settle new continents, build vast empires extending out across the globe. But in 1945, for the first time since the age of Columbus, it was contracting. Europe was in ruins. Half of it lived behind an Iron Curtain, and the rest looked like it would soon follow. The great Western empires had entered into terminal decline, accelerated by godless communist revolutions and by anti-colonial uprisings that would transform the world and drape the red hammer and sickle across vast swaths of the map in the years to come.
Against that backdrop, then as now, many came to believe that the West’s age of dominance had come to an end and that our future was destined to be a faint and feeble echo of our past. But together, our predecessors recognized that decline was a choice. And it was a choice they refused to make.
This is what we did together once before. And this is what President Trump and the United States want to do again now, together with you. And this is why we do not want our allies to be weak, because that makes us weaker. We want allies who can defend themselves, so that no adversary will ever be tempted to test our collective strength. This is why we do not want our allies to be shackled by guilt and shame. We want allies who are proud of their culture and of their heritage, who understand that we are heirs to the same great and noble civilization, and who together with us are willing and able to defend it.
And this is why we do not want allies to rationalize the broken status quo rather than reckon with what is necessary to fix it. For we in America have no interest in being polite and orderly caretakers of the West’s managed decline. We do not seek to separate, but to revitalize an old friendship and renew the greatest civilization in human history.
What we want is a reinvigorated alliance that recognizes that what has ailed our societies is not just a set of bad policies, but a malaise of hopelessness and complacency. The alliance that we want is one that is not paralyzed into inaction by fear—fear of climate change, fear of war, fear of technology. Instead, we want an alliance that boldly races into the future. And the only fear we have is the fear of the shame of not leaving our nations prouder, stronger, and wealthier for our children.
An alliance ready to defend our people, to safeguard our interests, and to preserve the freedom of action that allows us to shape our own destiny. Not one that exists to operate a global welfare state and atone for the purported sins of past generations. An alliance that does not allow its power to be outsourced, constrained, or subordinated to systems beyond its control. One that does not depend on others for the critical necessities of its national life. And one that does not maintain the polite pretense that our way of life is just one among many and that asks for permission before it acts.
And above all, an alliance based on the recognition that we—the West—have inherited together what we have inherited together is something that is unique and distinctive and irreplaceable. Because this, after all, is the very foundation of the transatlantic bond.
Acting together in this way, we will not just help recover a sane foreign policy—it will restore to us a clearer sense of ourselves. It will restore a place in the world. And in so doing, it will rebuke and deter the forces of civilizational erasure that today menace both America and Europe alike.
So in a time of headlines heralding the end of the transatlantic era, let it be known and clear to all that this is neither our goal nor our wish. Because for us Americans, our home may be in the Western Hemisphere, but we will always be a child of Europe.
Our story began with an Italian explorer whose adventure into the great unknown to discover a new world brought Christianity to the Americas and became the legend that defined the imagination of our pioneer nation. Our first colonies were built by English settlers to whom we owe not just the language we speak, but the whole of our political and legal system. Our frontiers were shaped by Scots-Irish—that proud, hardy clan from the hills of Ulster that gave us Davy Crockett and Mark Twain and Teddy Roosevelt and Neil Armstrong. Our great Midwestern heartland was built by German farmers and craftsmen who transformed empty plains into a global agricultural powerhouse—and by the way, dramatically upgraded the quality of American beer.
Our expansion into the interior followed the footsteps of French fur traders and explorers whose names, by the way, still adorn the street signs and towns’ names all across the Mississippi Valley. Our horses, our ranches, our rodeos—the entire romance of the cowboy archetype that became synonymous with the American West—these were born in Spain. And our largest and most iconic city was named New Amsterdam before it was named New York.
And you know that in the year that my country was founded, Lorenzo and Catalina Giraldi lived in Casale Monferrato in the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia, and Jose and Manuel Arena lived in Sevilla, Spain. I don’t know what, if anything, they knew about the 13 colonies which had gained their independence from the British Empire. But here is what I’m certain of: they could have never imagined that 250 years later, one of their direct descendants would be back here today on this continent as the chief diplomat of that infant nation.
And yet here I am, reminded by my own story that both our histories and our fates will always be linked together. We rebuilt a shattered continent in the wake of two devastating world wars. When we found ourselves divided once again by the Iron Curtain, the free West linked arms with the courageous dissidents struggling against tyranny in the East to defeat Soviet communism. We have fought against each other, then reconciled, then fought, then reconciled again. And we have bled and died side-by-side on battlefields from Kapyong to Kandahar.
And I am here today to make it clear that America is charting the path for a new century of prosperity and that once again, we want to do it together with you, our cherished allies and our oldest friends. We want to do it together with you—with a Europe that is proud of its heritage and of its history; with a Europe that has the spirit of creation and liberty that sent ships out into uncharted seas and birthed our civilization; with a Europe that has the means to defend itself and the will to survive.
We should be proud of what we achieved together in the last century. But now, we must confront and embrace the opportunities of a new one. Because yesterday is over. The future is inevitable. And our destiny together awaits.
Thank you."

Iran's Strategy
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/February 14, 2026
If Iran can drag negotiations across months and years, it no doubt hopes to reach a moment when U.S. pressure weakens, priorities shift, or its leadership changes. In that sense, diplomacy becomes a defensive weapon, an end in itself.
Iran's regime has refined its tactics, learned its opponents' weaknesses, and mastered the art of procedural diplomacy: how to slow talks without collapsing them, how to offer symbolic concessions while protecting core interests, and how to appear reasonable while remaining fundamentally intransigent.
For the mullahs, President Barack Obama's 2015 "nuclear deal" was a triumph.... Obama's illegitimate Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), rather than permanently dismantling Iran's nuclear capabilities, enshrined them. The deal conveniently contained sunset clauses with expiration dates, so that restrictions on Iran's nuclear program would magically vanish – poof! -- four months ago, on October 18, 2025, in fact.
Iran, however, does appear to appreciate that, for the moment at least, it cannot win a direct military confrontation with the United States, especially under a president who has not demonstrated a helpful fear of escalation.
Every day that talks continue without decisive pressure is a day the regime can use to strengthen its rule. It can import and build more deadly weapons, refine its ballistic missiles, reinforce its regional proxy militias, and tighten its grip internally.
Time overwhelmingly favors the Iranian regime. Even just the act of sitting across the negotiating table, for Iranian officials, signifies recognition and endurance.
For ordinary, unarmed Iranians, however, who have suffered the regime's savagery - its mass murder, blindings, rapes, mass arrests, and deadly crackdowns, seeing their rulers treated as legitimate diplomatic interlocutors has to be unbearably demoralizing. It sends the message that the countries of the West are willing to engage with those who oppress them, and -- as long as the comfort of foreigners is at stake -- actually leave their tormentors in place.
Beyond immediate tactics, Iran's approach must be understood as part of a much larger messianic project. This is a regime that sees itself as engaged in a major religious-historical mission. Its leaders believe they are guardians of a revolutionary system with religious and ideological foundations that transcend generations, uprisings and even the visage of Trump.
The regime is willing to absorb blows, retreat temporarily, and compromise tactically if, in doing so, it believes its long-term survival is secured.
The central danger is that the longer negotiation process drags on... the greater the risk of consolidating the very system that the process claims to moderate. Every additional day Iran buys through talks is another day the regime survives, adapts, prepares for war.
If the Trump administration's goal is to prevent the Iranian regime from emerging more brutal and more entrenched, the greatest mistake would be to give it what it really wants: time to wait out Trump.
If Iran can drag negotiations across months and years, it no doubt hopes to reach a moment when U.S. pressure weakens, priorities shift, or its leadership changes. In that sense, diplomacy becomes a defensive weapon, an end in itself.
Iranian leaders have emerged from their latest contacts with the Trump administration sounding upbeat, even enthusiastic. Senior officials have described the talks as a "good start," constructive engagement, and delight at the prospect of continuing negotiations. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi's tone has been deliberately reassuring, projecting calm confidence and a sense that diplomacy is moving in the perfect direction.
From the Iranian regime's perspective, any talks are preferable to sanctions, sustained military pressure, the threat of escalation, and the prospect that US President Donald J. Trump might choose confrontation over an agreement.
Trump, for his part, has repeatedly emphasized that he prefers a deal, but that "all options" remain on the table.
Iranian leaders understand this language very well. They know that the Trump administration is willing to use force, impose maximum pressure, and act unilaterally if it believes diplomacy is being abused or exhausted. Faced with this reality, Tehran has every incentive to appear cooperative, compliant and eager to continue discussions, even if it has no intention of making the slightest concession.
Iran's strategy is clear. The regime does not necessarily see negotiations as a path to resolution; it sees them as a tool for delay. The most valuable currency is time. Every additional round of talks, every agreement to meet again, every statement about "progress" or "positive momentum" buys the regime more breathing space. Its central objective is not to reach an agreement with Trump, but to stretch the process long enough to outlast his term of office. If Iran can drag negotiations across months and years, it no doubt hopes to reach a moment when U.S. pressure weakens, priorities shift, or its leadership changes. In that sense, diplomacy becomes a defensive weapon, an end in itself.
Iran's is not a new government improvising on the world stage. It is the same Islamic Republic that has been negotiating with foreign powers for more than four decades. The individual representatives may change, but the method does not. The regime has negotiated with Democrats and Republicans, with hawks and doves, with allies and adversaries. Iran's regime has refined its tactics, learned its opponents' weaknesses, and mastered the art of procedural diplomacy: how to slow talks without collapsing them, how to offer symbolic concessions while protecting core interests, and how to appear reasonable while remaining fundamentally intransigent.
For the mullahs, President Barack Obama's 2015 "nuclear deal" was a triumph. Under intense international pressure, Iran entered negotiations. Sanctions were immediately lifted, billions of dollars were released, and Iran was reintegrated into the global economy. Obama's illegitimate Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), rather than permanently dismantling Iran's nuclear capabilities, enshrined them. The deal conveniently contained sunset clauses with expiration dates, so that restrictions on Iran's nuclear program would magically vanish – poof! -- four months ago, on October 18, 2025, in fact.
From Iran's perspective, this was not only an economic and diplomatic windfall; it was a validation of its long-term strategy. By holding firm, negotiating patiently, and exploiting the political timelines in Washington and the US voters' distaste for war, the Iranian regime extracted maximum benefits while preserving its future options.
This history undoubtedly shapes how Iran views the current moment. The regime seems to believe, with total justification, that negotiating, when it is used strategically, works. It sees talks as a method, when direct confrontation might be too costly, as a method not just of survival but of advancement. If Iran possessed overwhelming military power, and were not constrained by sanctions, internal unrest, and external pressure, it would not be sitting at the negotiating table. It would be openly projecting force, just as it has done for nearly half a century and as, across the region, it encourages its proxies to do.
Iran, however, does appear to appreciate that, for the moment at least, it cannot win a direct military confrontation with the United States, especially under a president who has not demonstrated a helpful fear of escalation.
At the same time, despite the regime's defiant rhetoric, it doubtless understands that it is under enormous strain. Economically, sanctions have hollowed out growth and opportunity. Politically, legitimacy has eroded. Waves of protests -- despite the murder of tens of thousands of protesters, blinding thousands of others, and the long prison terms that the regime has inflicted on its citizens -- continue to challenge the system from within.
Socially, anger and despair have spread among an oppressed population. The regime survives not because it is strong, but because it is patient, adaptive and ruthless. Diplomatic negotiations, at such a moment, reduce the immediate pressure of external threats and allow Iran's military to regroup, reinforce its internal security apparatus, and repress its citizens with even greater brutality.
Every day that talks continue without decisive pressure is a day the regime can use to strengthen its rule. It can import and build more deadly weapons, refine its ballistic missiles, reinforce its regional proxy militias, and tighten its grip internally.
Time overwhelmingly favors the Iranian regime. Even just the act of sitting across the negotiating table, for Iranian officials, signifies recognition and endurance.
For ordinary, unarmed Iranians, however, who have suffered the regime's savagery - its mass murder, blindings, rapes, mass arrests, and deadly crackdowns, seeing their rulers treated as legitimate diplomatic interlocutors has to be unbearably demoralizing. It sends the message that the countries of the West are willing to engage with those who oppress them, and -- as long as the comfort of foreigners is at stake -- actually leave their tormentors in place.
Beyond immediate tactics, Iran's approach must be understood as part of a much larger messianic project. This is a regime that sees itself as engaged in a major religious-historical mission. Its leaders believe they are guardians of a revolutionary system with religious and ideological foundations that transcend generations, uprisings and even the visage of Trump. From this perspective, waiting out another three years is not difficult; it is expected. American administrations come and go. Pressure rises and falls. What matters is resilience, maintaining the course. The regime is willing to absorb blows, retreat temporarily, and compromise tactically if, in doing so, it believes its long-term survival is secured.
Each time the regime regains strength, it emerges more hardened, more aggressive, and more confident that its methods work. The regime uses negotiations to reset the board and prepare for the next phase of confrontation — whether military, political or diplomatic.
The central danger is that the longer negotiation process drags on that rewards delay, and that prioritizes short-term stability over long-term accountability, the greater the risk of consolidating the very system that the process claims to moderate. Every additional day Iran buys through talks is another day the regime survives, adapts, prepares for war.
Iran's current enthusiasm for negotiations is not evidence of transformation or moderation. It is merely evidence of calculation. The regime is waiting for pressure to fade and opportunities to resurrect. Iran's regime, by now a master of this game, plays it patiently, relentlessly, and without illusion. If the Trump administration's goal is to prevent the Iranian regime from emerging more brutal and more entrenched, the greatest mistake would be to give it what it really wants: time to wait out Trump.
*Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, is a political scientist, Harvard-educated analyst, and board member of Harvard International Review. He has authored several books on the US foreign policy. He can be reached at dr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu
*Follow Majid Rafizadeh on X (formerly Twitter)
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22268/iran-strategy
© 2026 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Trump, Like Eisenhower, Solves Problems by First Making Them Bigger
J.B. Shurk/Gatestone Institute/February 13/2026
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22266/trump-eisenhower-principle
What those critics miss is Trump's rather unique set of problem-solving skills that allow him to tackle complex problems in unorthodox ways.
Peace in Gaza. Peace in Ukraine. U.S. energy independence. U.S. trade parity with the rest of the world. Enhanced partnerships with Japan. Economic collaboration with Russia. Economic decoupling from China. Border walls. Immigration enforcement. Military supremacy. Technological superiority. Free speech. Nationalism. Panama. Venezuela. Cuba. Iran. Greenland. The list goes on and on.... Rather than treating them as distinct problems that must be navigated one at a time, Trump looks at them as valuable pieces of property on one big game board.
While the president makes nice with China's Xi Jinping and talks publicly about how China and the United States are economically tied together for the foreseeable future, he simultaneously destroys China's investments in Panama and energy partnerships in Venezuela and Iran. While the president sends emissaries Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin and his representatives, he secures a strategic trade deal with Indian President Narendra Modi that could end India's importation of Russian oil.
What his critics miss is President Donald Trump's rather unique set of problem-solving skills that allow him to tackle complex problems in unorthodox ways.
President Dwight D. Eisenhower made an important observation about finding answers to difficult questions. "Whenever I run into a problem I can't solve," the five-star general reportedly remarked, "I always make it bigger. I can never solve it by trying to make it smaller, but if I make it big enough, I can begin to see the outlines of a solution."
As an example, as Europe's first Supreme Allied Commander, Eisenhower suggested that a problem resupplying troops in Italy might be about much more than simple logistics. A problem-solver must consider the wider map and examine how convoy movements in northern Europe affect supply distribution in the South, whether resources for the whole continent are being allocated efficiently, and whether leadership decisions a thousand miles away might be a more pressing problem than finding enough mechanics to fix run-down trucks stuck in the mud.
Eisenhower's principle has been passed down over time: "If a problem cannot be solved, enlarge it."
Interestingly, this same principle aptly captures the governing style of President Donald J. Trump. The president became a famous public figure many decades ago partly because of his penchant for going "bigly". He transformed dilapidated properties into prime real estate. He adorned building entrances in marble, crystal, and gold. He acquired historic architectural achievements and placed the Trump name atop them in bright lights for the whole world to see. Both in his real estate and reality television careers, Trump has long had a reputation for being bold, self-promoting, pugnacious, and ostentatious.
For his critics, showmanship and braggadocio are the limits of Trump's "bigness." They see a man who enjoys flattery, celebrity, and the sight of his own name towering high above city lights. What those critics miss is Trump's rather unique set of problem-solving skills that allow him to tackle complex problems in unorthodox ways.
Peace in Gaza. Peace in Ukraine. U.S. energy independence. U.S. trade parity with the rest of the world. Enhanced partnerships with Japan. Economic collaboration with Russia. Economic decoupling from China. Border walls. Immigration enforcement. Military supremacy. Technological superiority. Free speech. Nationalism. Panama. Venezuela. Cuba. Iran. Greenland. The list goes on and on. Although these might first appear as unrelated subjects, every single one is inextricably connected to the rest. Rather than treating them as distinct problems that must be navigated one at a time, Trump looks at them as valuable pieces of property on one big game board.
While the president makes nice with China's Xi Jinping and talks publicly about how China and the United States are economically tied together for the foreseeable future, he simultaneously destroys China's investments in Panama and energy partnerships in Venezuela and Iran. While the president sends emissaries Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin and his representatives, he secures a strategic trade deal with Indian President Narendra Modi that could end India's importation of Russian oil.
While Trump is pushing Putin to halt his ongoing military offensive in Ukraine, Trump is threatening Russia's strategic partnership with Cuba by cutting off critical energy supplies to the communist island nation. While the president assures NATO allies that the American military is prepared to defend Europe from any perceived Russian threats, he also funds free speech initiatives to counter Europe's online censorship, maneuvers around Europe's "coalition of the willing" to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine directly with Putin, and threatens European countries that get in the way of the United States's eventual acquisition of Greenland.
While Trump withdraws the U.S. from 31 United Nations entities and 35 other international organizations dedicated to "climate," "peace," and "social justice," he lays the foundations for a Board of Peace that might not only bring some stability to the Gaza Strip but also eventually supersede the UN as the most important institutional body working for broad international cooperation and lasting peace.
When Trump first introduced the framework for a Board of Peace to end bloodshed between Israel and Hamas, few could have guessed that he would use that framework as a hook for creating a potentially more consequential organization. By inviting geopolitical adversaries such as Putin and Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko to join this incipient board, Trump is not only creating a new global institution but also forging partnerships among foes. By ensuring that everybody has "skin in the game," Trump seems to hope that national self-interest will promote regional stability.
When Trump first declared that he would achieve peace in Ukraine, few could have guessed that he might seek economic cooperation with Russia or set his sights on the islands of Greenland and Cuba as part of a "carrot and stick" approach for keeping both the European Council and Russia motivated to end the fighting. When the president signaled to the world that the United States would do whatever it could to avoid direct military confrontation with China, few could have guessed that he would cut off China's expanding tentacles in South and Central America and the Middle East. While returning America's focus to the Western Hemisphere and rededicating American resolve to upholding the Monroe Doctrine, Trump uses that focus and resolve to weaken both China and Russia. In addition, while focusing on security in the Western Hemisphere, he strengthens economic and military alliances with Israel, India, and Japan — indispensable allies whose help will be critical in containing Russia, China, and Iran.
Trump's critics see a distracted and mercurial mind unwilling to stay on subject. They portray him as an emotional loose cannon temperamentally unsuited for the obligations of his office. What they ignore is how much Trump relishes manufacturing and churning out chaos. For a man constantly in the public eye — especially a man whom the assorted members of the corporate news media love to hate — the appearance of chaos provides a cover of thick fog that keeps his enemies off balance and his critics guessing. This frenetic style represents a marked departure from typical White House operations of the past.
At least since the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt, White House staffs have prepared carefully tailored public messages. Communications experts occupy an entire suite of West Wing offices because their role in the modern political world is considered critical. For decades, those experts guided presidents how best to repeat important messages ad nauseam and how dexterously to minimize distractions.
President Lyndon B. Johnson's White House imprinted the "War on Poverty" upon Americans' minds. President Ronald W. Reagan's White House convinced Americans of the importance of the nation's "War on Drugs." Under President Barack H. Obama, White House staff fed young reporters a steady diet of stories on the virtues of Obamacare and the Iran "nuclear deal," while dismissing questions or concerns about most anything else. For modern White House staffs, staying "on message" is a "golden rule" for effective public communication.
Trump has his own "golden rules". He prefers to flood the media landscape with many subjects, themes, distractions, and objectives all at once. He might start the day with a message on his Truth Social platform warning Iran not to kill protesters in the streets of Tehran. Minutes later, he could point out to reporters that the U.S. Navy has "quarantined" vital shipping lanes around Cuba. While walking to Marine One, he might field 20 questions on the White House lawn about diverse, unrelated, and even contradictory subjects, including: why he should have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, why he might be forced to attack Iran, if he will join NATO partners in providing security guarantees in post-war Ukraine, and whether he will ignore the concerns of NATO partners and seize Greenland for the United States. Like a skilled juggler impressing his audience with how many lit Molotov cocktails, revving chainsaws, and live grenades he can keep in the air all at once, Trump makes it supremely difficult for any member of the press corps to prioritize one newsworthy story over the rest.
There is tremendous value in Trump's smorgasbord communication strategy. First, by discussing so many topics that are newsworthy, provocative, and important to the American people, the president prevents his fiercest critics in the press from focusing Americans' attention on any one story. A cable news channel that wishes to paint the president's capture of Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro as reckless or illegal finds it difficult to convince the American people of that thesis when Trump has already turned his sights toward Cuba, Iran, and Greenland. As much as any single reporter or news publication might prefer to highlight the broader issues related to any one White House policy, only so much time can be allocated to discrete stories when Trump is making news half a dozen times each day.
Second, by being an agent of chaos or the juggler-in-chief extraordinaire, Trump makes it clear that he alone decides executive policy. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt plays a major role in faithfully articulating the president's daily messages, but nobody doubts that it is Trump's message being communicated. By affording the press so much personal interaction, Trump really is his own press secretary. The whole communications staff in the White House takes its cues from him, and those trusted staff members adjust their words to amplify his message accordingly. Anyone watching events unfolding on a video screen — whether a lawmaker on Capitol Hill, a prime minister in a foreign capital, a foreign national protesting his country's own rulers, or an ordinary American citizen at home — knows that "the buck stops with Trump" at all times.
Lastly, Trump's machine-gun fire approach to communication keeps America's competitors, adversaries, and enemies on their back feet. During the 2024 presidential campaign, Trump repeatedly promised that he would aggressively use tariffs to recalibrate America's trade position in the world. Prominent executives at Wall Street firms, members of European parliaments, and foreign heads of state disparaged Trump's plans and assured the public that they would never come to fruition. Nevertheless, in 2025, Trump and his economic advisors applied tariff leverage against both economic allies and foes to reorient the global system of trade toward America's advantage.
Seven and a half years ago, the German delegation to the UN General Assembly appeared to laugh at Trump when he suggested that they would regret being so dependent upon Russian energy. After Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine and the sabotage of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline used to transport natural gas from Russia to Germany, however, Europe's disregard for Trump's blunt warning proved to be hubristically dimwitted.
Similarly, when Trump publicly expressed interest in purchasing Greenland from Denmark back in 2019, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen dismissed Trump's offer as "absurd." Many Danish and European Union politicians scoffed at the notion, as well. Nobody doubts the seriousness of Trump's words today.
Late last spring, Trump repeatedly warned Iran's leaders to negotiate faithfully with the United States concerning the operation of its key nuclear enrichment facilities. When Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and President Masoud Pezeshkian dismissed Trump's warnings as bluster, America's commander-in-chief sent stealth bombers into Iran and dropped "bunker buster" bombs on Iran's most important nuclear facilities just a few days into summer.
When the illegitimate Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro, refused Trump's offer of exile, America's elite Delta Force operators crashed through Maduro's fortress stronghold and flew the tyrant to New York to face a range of narco-terrorism charges in court.
In 2026, political and economic leaders around the world hang on Trump's every word. They know what he says shifts the direction of stock markets. They know his warnings are prescient. They know both his promises and threats are real. They also know that the president is willing to do unconventional things to achieve success for the United States. He is willing to offer friendship to enemies, and he is willing to handle friends sternly. He is capable of looking at protracted conflicts from many different angles. He is willing to throw out the customary playbooks and play by his own rules.
When necessary, Trump is quite comfortable employing the Eisenhower Principle by first making problems much bigger before their ultimate solutions come into clear focus. Then, when those solutions do appear, Trump swiftly acts.
*JB Shurk writes about politics and society, and is a Gatestone Institute Distinguished Senior Fellow.
© 2026 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

X Platform Selected twittes for 14/2026
TurLevnon
@MarounTurLevnon
Saad Hariri and Walid Jumblatt share a lot in common:
- Both their fathers were assassinated by syrians after they realised the Maronites were correct.
- Both of them bended over after the death of their fathers
- Both are selling their communities to outside forces.

Math Files
@Math_files
Bayes’ theorem is probably the single most important thing any rational person can learn.
So many of our debates and disagreements that we shout about are because we don’t understand Bayes’ theorem or how human rationality often works.
Bayes’ theorem is named after the 18th-century Thomas Bayes, and essentially it’s a formula that asks: when you are presented with all of the evidence for something, how much should you believe it? Bayes’ theorem teaches us that our beliefs are not fixed; they are probabilities. Our beliefs change as we weigh new evidence against our assumptions, or our priors. In other words, we all carry certain ideas about how the world works, and new evidence can challenge them. For example, somebody might believe that smoking is safe, that stress causes mouth ulcers, or that human activity is unrelated to climate change. These are their priors, their starting points. They can be formed by our culture, our biases, or even incomplete information. Now imagine a new study comes along that challenges one of your priors. A single study might not carry enough weight to overturn your existing beliefs. But as studies accumulate, eventually the scales may tip. At some point, your prior will become less and less plausible. Bayes’ theorem argues that being rational is not about black and white. It’s not even about true or false. It’s about what is most reasonable based on the best available evidence. But for this to work, we need to be presented with as much high-quality data as possible. Without evidence—without belief-forming data—we are left only with our priors and biases. And those aren’t all that rational.

Captain Allen
@CptAllenHistory
https://x.com/i/status/2022326224740061290
Jews and Christians in the Middle East and North Africa were forced to live as humiliated, inferior “dhimmis” after the Arab Muslim conquest.
Watch first-hand accounts of what it was like to be a dhimmi from Mizrahi Jews before 800k-1 million of them were ethnically cleansed.

Nadim Koteich: ’y Top 5 Analytical Points
US Secretary of State @marcorubio
gave a keynote speech at the #MSC2026 Security Conference, in which he outlined the Trump administration's vision for a new transatlantic alliance based on civilizational identity, reindustrialization, border sovereignty, and a new international order premised on America’s power.
The speech was an invitation as well as a charge sheet, indicting the post-Cold War consensus as a series of voluntary errors in deindustrialization, migration, and institutional dependency, which must be collectively reversed under American leadership.
Rubio's speech was, however, far warmer and more strategically conceding in tone compared to last year's Munich speech by US Vice President
@JDVance
which was openly confrontational and made no attempt whatsoever to seduce its audience.
Rubio wraps around the same demands of "spend more, shed your guilt culture, and follow our lead", yet in ancestral affection and civilizational flattery, which presents America as a concerned family member rather than an impatient creditor.
Nevertheless, beneath this velvet glove, there's a prosecutorial tone, in which Europe is the defendant, post-Cold War liberalism is the crime, and American hard power, from B2 strikes against Iran to special forces operations in Venezuela, is the only evidence of anything being done.
Here are my Top 5 Analytical Points
1. Civilizational framing replaces institutional framing. Rubio redefines the transatlantic relationship around shared Christian heritage, culture, and ancestry rather than rules-based order or institutional architecture. This is a fundamental rhetorical change, as it reorients the relationship around identity rather than treaties, which justifies selective engagement with international law and institutions.
Worth noting though, Rubio’s civilizational references, from Dante to Beatles, from Italian explorers to German farmers, are exclusively Western European, leaving Eastern Europe as a passive recipient of liberation in the Cold War. This is surprising, given that Poland, Baltic states, and Eastern Europe in general are America’s highest defense spenders and most loyal NATO partners.
2. The UN and multilateral system is being demoted, not dismantled. Rubio does not propose leaving the UN or multilateral system, he merely states it is irrelevant, positioning unilateral American hard power as the only thing that delivers results. This is the intellectual underpinning of a transactional foreign policy.
3. “Decline is a choice” is a central thesis. By redefining deindustrialization, migration, and energy as a series of political errors, Rubio is arguing that these trends can be reversed through willpower. This oversimplifies complex global dynamics as a story of elite betrayal and national resurgence.
4. The speech is directed at American and European leaders, but at European publics as well. The themes of Rubio’s speech, of anti-migration, anti-climate, cultural pride, and elite betrayal, mirror current trends in right-wing parties across Europe. Rubio is signaling that the Trump administration’s natural partners in Europe are not necessarily the current establishment, but rather leaders like Meloni, Orbán, and AfD.
5. Conspicuous absence of China and Russia is a strategic design. Rubio never directly identifies his primary adversaries in his argument, instead using such phrases as "adversaries and rivals" and "the most rapid military buildup in human history." This maintains a focus on Western renewal rather than reaction to threats, making a subtle argument that internal civilizational weakness is a greater threat than any external one.

Tom Harb
https://x.com/i/status/2022354653925572878
Iranians in the diaspora are marching worldwide—from Los Angeles to Munich, Toronto to Berlin—in a powerful global wave demanding the end of the Islamic Republic and true regime change.
With over 168 protests across 73 cities and 30 countries already amplifying the cries of their brothers and sisters inside Iran, the message is unmistakable.
Meanwhile, President Trump is decisively moving the full might of the U.S. war machine into the region, deploying a second aircraft carrier strike group—including the USS Gerald R. Ford—alongside existing forces to ramp up maximum pressure on the mullahs.
To the clerical regime in Tehran: your days of tyranny are numbered, your grip is slipping, and the clock is ticking fast.”
The Iranian diaspora and organizers are framing this date as a powerful symbol of love for Iran and its people, turning a day of romance into one of solidarity, freedom, and revolution ( Happy Valentine’s day).

Yasma Fuleihan
21 years have passed and the memory is still alive.
On February 14, 2005, the nation lost Prime Minister Rafic Hariri and my husband Basil Fuleihan, a brilliant economist and statesman who spent his final years at Hariri’s side, a partner in vision, work, and the rebuilding of hope. With them, innocent martyrs also fell that day, part of a wound still carried in the nation’s conscience. From that day, Basil fought for 64 days with third-degree burns covering 95% of his body, a 64-day struggle he endured until the very end. Basil was not simply a minister. He was strategic thought, a living conscience, and a voice of truth that did not compromise. He believed in a just state and an economy that serves its people. Those who knew him understand that such an impact cannot be assassinated. It endures as a moral benchmark in public life.
Rayna and Rayan grow carrying his legacy: quiet strength, free thinking, and a love untouched by hatred. A true legacy continues. Those who lived through that time know the value of the men and martyrs who were lost. Some names are engraved in a nation’s conscience. We remember them today with love and gratitude.May Prime Minister Rafic Hariri, my husband Basil Fuleihan, and all the martyrs of that day rest in peace.

Department of State
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1mnGeNNPqBvJX
WATCH: Secretary Rubio Delivers Remarks to the Munich Security Conference in Munich, Germany. https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1mnGeNNPqBvJX

Tur Levnon ܛܘܪ ܠܒܢܢ
https://x.com/i/status/2022337896313925904
Syriac is the core of Lebanon’s language.
It is the breath of Maronite history and spirituality
In Said Akl’s great Lebanese-language “Missa Solemnis”, the Trinitarian invocation is absolutely in Syriac.
Linguistics Department
♱ ܚܘܝܕܐ ܣܘܪܝܝܐ ܡܪܘܢܝܐ
#الاتحاد_الماروني_طور_لڤنن

Roberta Metsola
@EP_President
The next chapter for Iran must be defined by freedom. The regime clinging on to power by massacring Iranians demanding liberty, by torturing dissidents and cutting off communication, is a desperate regime that knows its days of repression are numbered.
The people of Iran have endured enough. They deserve freedom.

Martin
@Martin_Sedi
A Masterclass in Diplomacy: King Reza Pahlavi’s Defining Response
At the Munich Security Conference, King Prince Reza Pahlavi delivered a lesson in composure, clarity, and democratic conviction.
When the interviewer attempted to steer the discussion toward historical grievances to cast doubt on the future of a constitutional monarchy, King Reza Pahlavi didn’t take the bait. He calmly redirected the focus to what truly matters:
The future of Iran.
The Moment That Defined It:
“Aren’t we talking about the future? So why are you talking about the past?
Democracy is not about exclusion, it is about inclusion. Unless you are not in conformity with democratic principles, there are multiple options on the table. Why should we eliminate one option all of a sudden?”
Why This Was the Perfect Answer:
Logic Over Emotion
He dismantled the “exclusion” trap. Democracy means the people decide not journalists, not political elites, not foreign governments.
System ≠ Governance
For every failed monarchy, there is a failed republic. The issue is not labels. The issue is principles, institutions, and accountability.
Trust in the Iranian People
His answer reflected confidence in the intelligence and maturity of Iranians to determine their own future without being imprisoned by history.
The Verdict
This wasn’t just a rebuttal.
It was statesmanship.
By refusing to relitigate the past and instead defending pluralism, inclusion, and democratic choice, King Reza Pahlavi demonstrated that his focus is forward toward a modern, democratic Iran built on the will of its people.
He isn’t looking back.
He’s looking ahead.
@PahlaviReza

Mary Salvadori reposted
Robert Spencer
Zahir Muhsein, the “Palestinian” leader of the jihad terror group As-Saiqa, said in a 1970 interview with the Dutch newspaper Die Trouw: “The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian people’ to oppose Zionism.”
Hafez al-Assad, Bashar's father, once told Yasser Arafat: “You do not represent Palestine as much as we do. Never forget this one point: There is no such thing as a Palestinian people, there is no Palestinian entity, there is only Syria. You are an integral part of the Syrian people, Palestine is an integral part of Syria. Therefore it is we, the Syrian authorities, who are the true representatives of the Palestinian people.” Prince Hassan of the Jordanian National Assembly said on February 2, 1970: “Palestine is Jordan and Jordan is Palestine; there is only one land, with one history and one and the same fate.” Abdul Hamid Sharif, the Prime Minister of Jordan, said in 1980: “The Palestinians and Jordanians do not belong to different nationalities. They hold the same Jordanian passports, are Arabs and have the same Jordanian culture.”
King Hussein of Jordan put it most succinctly of all in 1981: “The truth is that Jordan is Palestine and Palestine is Jordan.” Even Arafat himself admitted this, saying in 1993: “The question of borders doesn’t interest us…. From the Arab standpoint, we mustn’t talk about borders. Palestine is nothing but a drop in an enormous ocean. Our nation is the Arabic nation that stretches from the Atlantic Ocean to the Red Sea and beyond it…. The P.L.O. is fighting Israel in the name of Pan-Arabism. What you call ‘Jordan’ is nothing more than Palestine.”