English LCCC Newsbulletin For
Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For May 27/2025
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news
The Bulletin's Link on the
lccc Site
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2025/english.May27.25.htm
News Bulletin Achieves
Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Click On
The Below Link To Join Elias Bejjaninews whatsapp group
https://chat.whatsapp.com/FPF0N7lE5S484LNaSm0MjW
اضغط
على الرابط في
أعلى للإنضمام
لكروب
Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group
Elias Bejjani/Click
on the below link to subscribe to my youtube channel
الياس
بجاني/اضغط
على الرابط في
أسفل للإشتراك في
موقعي ع اليوتيوب
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAOOSioLh1GE3C1hp63Camw
Bible Quotations For today
Mary and her sister Martha sent a message to Jesus saying, ‘Lord,
Lazarus whom you love is ill
Those who walk during the day do not stumble, because they see the light of this
world. But those who walk at night stumble, because the light is not in them
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John
11/01-16/:”Now a certain man was ill, Lazarus of Bethany, the village of Mary
and her sister Martha. Mary was the one who anointed the Lord with perfume and
wiped his feet with her hair; her brother Lazarus was ill. So the sisters sent a
message to Jesus, ‘Lord, he whom you love is ill.’ But when Jesus heard it, he
said, ‘This illness does not lead to death; rather it is for God’s glory, so
that the Son of God may be glorified through it.’ Accordingly, though Jesus
loved Martha and her sister and Lazarus, after having heard that Lazarus was
ill, he stayed two days longer in the place where he was. Then after this he
said to the disciples, ‘Let us go to Judea again.’The disciples said to him,
‘Rabbi, the Jews were just now trying to stone you, and are you going there
again?’ Jesus answered, ‘Are there not twelve hours of daylight? Those who walk
during the day do not stumble, because they see the light of this world. But
those who walk at night stumble, because the light is not in them.’ After saying
this, he told them, ‘Our friend Lazarus has fallen asleep, but I am going there
to awaken him.’ The disciples said to him, ‘Lord, if he has fallen asleep, he
will be all right.’ Jesus, however, had been speaking about his death, but they
thought that he was referring merely to sleep. Then Jesus told them plainly,
‘Lazarus is dead. For your sake I am glad I was not there, so that you may
believe. But let us go to him.’ Thomas, who was called the Twin, said to his
fellow-disciples, ‘Let us also go, that we may die with him.’”
Titles For The
Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published
on May 26-27/2025
The Possible Appointment of Nejad Fares as Lebanon’s Ambassador to
Washington Raises Serious Questions/Elias Bejjani/May 26/2025
Video and Text: The “Liberation of the South Day” Is a Lie, a Distortion of
History, and Must Be Cancelled and Forgotten/Elias Bejjani/May 25/ 2025
Video link to an interview with Dr. Imad Murad on MTV titled “Palestinians in
Lebanon”
President Aoun Meets Raad Amid Arms Handover Tensions
President Aoun Urges UN Aid Shift to Syria, Tackles Arms in Palestinian Camps
Syrian Authorities Seize Weapons Cache Allegedly Bound for Hezbollah
Three Israeli airstrikes target outskirts of Brital
Hezbollah captives may be freed as part of deal involving Israeli-Russian
researcher
Aoun confirms disarmament to start mid-June in 3 Palestinian camps in Beirut
New proposal involves release of 10 Gaza hostages, 70-day truce
Salam Launches Economic Recovery Plan and Renews Ties with UAE
Salam: We won't remain silent over any arms outside state control
Two wounded in overnight strikes on Beit Leef and Majdalzoun
Israel Reconfigures Northern Border Defenses
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published
on May 26-27/2025
Canadians welcome King Charles after Trump takeover threats
Trump hints at announcement in 'next two days' on Iran nuclear talks
Sykes-Picot divided Syria and the broader region for imperial gain
Hamas-led groups execute four for looting aid trucks amid some Gaza dissent
French journalists call on France to help evacuate collaborators from Gaza
Head of controversial Israel-backed Gaza aid group resigns
Israeli far-right police minister visits Al-Aqsa mosque site ahead of Jerusalem
rally
Syria's government and Kurds reach agreement on returning families from
notorious camp
US envoy says Gaza ceasefire deal is on the table, as Israel prepares for
‘unprecedented attack’
Palestinian official says Hamas agrees to Gaza proposal, Israel dismisses it
Israeli strike on Gaza school sheltering displaced Palestinians kills dozens,
officials say
A new aid system in Gaza has started operations, a US-backed group says
Chanting 'Death to Arabs,' Israeli nationalists gather for annual march in
Jerusalem
Kremlin on Trump's remark about Putin being 'crazy': there is some emotional
overload
President Donald Trump says Russian leader Vladimir Putin 'has gone absolutely
CRAZY!'
These women are defying Iran's hijab laws — despite fear of reprisal
Macron plays down apparent shove from wife in Vietnam
Tens of thousands flock to see a Spanish saint's remains more than 440 years
after her death
Daesh cell ‘planning attacks’ held in Damascus
Jordan eyes new economic partnership with Syria during official visit
Titles For
The Latest English LCCC analysis &
editorials from miscellaneous sourceson
on May 26-27/2025
Do Not Be Fooled by Iran: What They Really Want Is to Destroy America,
Israel Is Just in the Way/Bassam Tawil/Gatestone Institute/May 26/2025
The 'Two-State Solution' to Kill Jews, Destroy Israel/Bassam Tawil/Gatestone
Institute/May 26, 2025
The Syrian uplift/Dana Hourany/Now Lebanon/May 26/2025
Boko Haram's resurgence: Why Nigeria's military is struggling to hold the line/Taiwo
Adebayo/The Associated Press/May 26, 2025
Sykes-Picot Agreement and Political Islam/Colonel Charbel Barakat/May 27/2025
Washington attack was wrong and does not help Palestine/Daoud Kuttab/Arab
News/May 26, 2025
UK in long overdue change of tune on Gaza/Chris Doyle/Arab News/May 26, 2025
The Latest English LCCC
Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published
on May 26-27/2025
The
Possible Appointment of Nejad Fares as Lebanon’s Ambassador to Washington Raises
Serious Questions
Elias Bejjani/May 26/2025
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2025/05/143687/
Last week, social media platforms circulated news about intensive deliberations
taking place at the highest levels in Lebanon to choose a new ambassador to the
United States. The leading candidate appears to be Mr. Nejad Fares, a prominent
figure in the "American Task Force for Lebanon" (ATFL), who is reportedly
receiving special backing from president Joseph Aoun. As discussions around this
appointment intensify, it is essential to pause and raise a number of questions
and observations—not out of personal suspicion, but from a standpoint rooted in
Lebanon’s national interest, its sovereignty, and the ongoing regional shifts
and domestic challenges Lebanon faces in its struggle to reclaim its
independence and liberate itself from the Iranian-Hezbollah occupation.
The first and most obvious question is this, why is a dual U.S. citizen being
considered for this crucial post, when Lebanon and the Lebanese diaspora are
home to hundreds of highly qualified, sovereign-minded individuals who meet all
legal requirements and do not need to renounce any foreign citizenship to comply
with Lebanese laws?
Doesn't this indicate a troubling narrowness in the selection process—especially
in president's Aoun’s choices?
And why, during such a critical and sensitive period, the focus is on nominating
figures who spark political controversy and raise many questions?
If it is indeed true that president Aoun is pushing for Mr. Nejad Fares to be
appointed to this position, then it is Mr. Fares’s duty—first and foremost—to
clearly and publicly declare to the Lebanese people, and to the regional and
international actors striving to help Lebanon break free from Iranian
occupation:
Where does he stand on the key United Nations Security Council resolutions
related to Lebanon, particularly:
Resolution 1559, which calls for the disarmament of all militias,
Resolution 1701, which ended the 2006 war and reasserted the sovereignty of the
Lebanese state,
Resolution 1680, which called for the demarcation of borders with Syria.
And most importantly, his clear stance on all the provisions of the ceasefire
agreement issued following the end of the war that Hezbollah launched against
the State of Israel—on orders from Iran, not Lebanon—in support of Hamas’s
terrorist war.
We must ask: Does Mr. Fares support the full implementation of these
resolutions? Or does he, like president Joseph Aoun, adhere to the failed notion
of “dialogue with Hezbollah”—a theory that has proven disastrous over the past
two decades? Hezbollah has never once abandoned its weapons. It has rejected
every call for dialogue, broken every national accord, and each time it sat at
the dialogue table, it later returned to impose its terms on the Lebanese people
by force of arms.
The national and moral responsibility falls on Mr. Fares—if he truly intends to
take on this diplomatic post—to issue an unambiguous and public statement
detailing his position on Hezbollah and the aforementioned international
resolutions. He must express his full commitment to these resolutions and affirm
his belief that only the Lebanese state should possess arms—no one else.
Ultimately, if the reports of Mr. Nejad Fares’s nomination are accurate, then
many inside Lebanon and within the diaspora view this choice as highly
unfortunate, one that raises serious doubts about its timing and implications.
In conclusion, Lebanon today needs ambassadors with a sovereign and independent
track record—diplomats committed to confronting the Iranian project and ending
Hezbollah’s occupation. It is time to appoint ambassadors who genuinely
represent a Lebanon that seeks peace, liberation, and an end to Hezbollah’s grip
and to all forms of violence and hostility.
Video and Text: The “Liberation of the South Day”
Is a Lie, a Distortion of History, and Must Be Cancelled and Forgotten
Elias Bejjani/May 25/ 2025
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2025/05/143643/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_sxlCM-F4Y&t=104s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77eZt5HiaXc
May 25, 2000, was portrayed as a turning point for South Lebanon. The Israeli
army withdrew, fulfilling a promise made by then- Isaeli Prime Minister Ehud
Barak ahead of the Israeli elections. But what followed was not liberation—it
was betrayal. A secret deal between Israel, Iran, and Syria sealed the fate of
the "Southern Security Zone", and handed it over to terrorist and Jihadist armed
forces.
The Lebanese citizens of the "Southern Security Zone", along with their defender
the South Lebanon Army—were abandoned to the Syrian Ba'athist occupiers and
Iranian jihadist militias operating under the deceptive and blasphemous name
“Hezbollah.”
Though Barak’s move was packaged as a fulfillment of a democratic promise, the
reality was far darker. Hidden negotiations took place behind the scenes,
brokered through envoys from Germany, Sweden, and Jordan. These talks led to an
arrangement with the authoritarian regimes in Syria and Iran that effectively
delivered the "Southern Lebanon Security Zone"—and its people—into Hezbollah’s
hands.
This deal dismantled the South Lebanon Army and sealed the border with Israel,
leaving the region vulnerable to Hezbollah’s violence and domination.
What Hezbollah falsely markets as “liberation” was nothing more than a
calculated political maneuver, based on lies, betrayal, and international
hypocrisy. The annual celebration of May 25 by both the Lebanese government and
Hezbollah, under the name “Liberation Day,” is a national disgrace and a
historical fabrication.
Let us not forget that, just days before the Israeli withdrawal, Hezbollah’s
leader Hassan Nasrallah appeared on every available media outlet to issue direct
threats to the people of the "Southern Security Zone". He terrorized them with
blood-curdling warnings about beheadings and revenge killings. These threats
forced tens of thousands of innocent civilians to flee to Israel, where they
continue to be unjustly labeled as “collaborators” and are forbidden from
returning to their homes.
The reality is clear: the so-called “liberation” was not the result of heroic
resistance, but a consequence of foreign-brokered deals and Syria’s military
occupation. The myth of Hezbollah’s victory was crafted in Damascus and
Tehran—not on the battlefields of the South.
The people of the "Southern Security Zone" were betrayed and abandoned. They
deserve justice—not propaganda, not fear, and certainly not lies wrapped in the
flag of so-called resistance.
We firmly assert that the so-called “Liberation Day” must be abolished from
Lebanon’s national calendar and erased from the collective memory of its people.
Hezbollah is not a resistance movement—it is a terrorist, criminal, and jihadist
militia operating as a proxy of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps. Its
killed leader, Hassan Nasrallah, has repeatedly admitted this affiliation with
pride, acting as a Trojan horse within Lebanon’s borders.
On October 8, 2023, Hezbollah dragged Lebanon into a war by attacking Israel on
orders from Iran. This reckless act was carried out without the consent of the
Lebanese people or its government. Therefore, Hezbollah bears full
responsibility for the devastating retaliation that has followed and still going
on—the deaths, destruction, and displacement.
Despite the loss of many of its leaders and suffering crushing blows in the
ongoing conflict, Hezbollah still hijacks the Lebanese state. It is not
Lebanese. It is not Arab. It is not a representative of Lebanon’s Shiite
community. It has taken the Shiites hostage—killing their youth, destroying
their towns, and disfiguring their history and identity.
This Iranian armed Jihadist proxy is not just a political problem; it is a
national, ethical, and civilizational disaster. It engages in terrorism,
smuggling, assassinations, and organized crime. It is one of the most dangerous
mafias on Earth. Accordingly, Lebanon will never be saved until the Hezbollah
occupation is ended—politically, militarily, culturally, and institutionally.
For all these reasons, President Joseph Aoun, the Lebanese government, and all
political leaders—regardless of sect or affiliation—must summon the courage to
speak the truth. They must name Hezbollah for what it truly is: a terrorist
Iranian proxy militia. The false label of “resistance” must be stripped away,
and Lebanon must fully and publicly support the implementation of all relevant
United Nations resolutions and the recent ceasefire agreement.
The military, security, and political structure of Hezbollah must be
dismantled—by force if necessary—to liberate the Shiite community and the rest
of Lebanon from this foreign-imposed nightmare.
No Hezbollah member should ever be allowed to serve in the Lebanese Armed Forces
or any state security agency. The group’s remaining leaders must be prosecuted
and permanently banned from political life. The time for hollow dialogue has
passed. Hezbollah must be disarmed, and its intelligence networks and parallel
state apparatus dismantled.
In conclusion: A draft resolution must be urgently submitted to Parliament to
abolish the lie of “Liberation Day.” This toxic myth must be buried, so that
Lebanon may finally begin to heal.
Video link to an interview with Dr. Imad
Murad on MTV titled “Palestinians in Lebanon”
A historical and current reading of
the Palestinian presence in Lebanon and the developments in the region that
facilitated the decision to demilitarize the Palestinian camps and place them
under Lebanese authority.
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2025/05/143675/
May 25, 2025
President Aoun Meets Raad Amid Arms
Handover Tensions
This is Beirut/May 26, 2025
President Joseph Aoun received MP Mohammad Raad, the head of the Loyalty to the
Resistance Bloc, at the Presidential Palace in Baabda on Monday, as Lebanon
moves forward with its plan to disarm Palestinian camps by mid-June. The issue
of weapons and the restoration of full Lebanese sovereignty was at the heart of
their meeting, which lasted almost an hour and marked the first visit by a
senior figure from Hezbollah to President Aoun since his election in January
2025. The timing of the encounter is particularly significant, coming just one
day after Hezbollah’s Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem delivered a speech
stating that “weapons are a tool to be used, when necessary, in the appropriate
way and with proper judgment.”“Don’t ask anything of us anymore, let Israel
withdraw, end its aggression, and release the captives. After that, we’ll talk,”
he added. His remarks stand in stark contrast to the official Lebanese position,
with both President Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam reiterating on Monday
the state’s commitment to ending the presence of unauthorized weapons and
restoring state authority across all Lebanese territory. The message appears to
have struck a nerve. In an interview with Sky News Arabia, Salam reiterated the
government’s position, saying, “The era of exporting the Iranian revolution is
over,” and emphasizing public support for a strong, centralized state. Following
the meeting, Raad declined to comment on Prime Minister Salam’s statements. In
response, Raad said, “I prefer not to comment… to preserve what remains of
mutual goodwill,” highlighting the resistance bloc’s rejection of the
disarmament initiative. However, he did describe his talks with the president as
“positive.” He stated that there was “a broad space for understanding” with the
president, adding that his bloc would “continue to support efforts that promote
sovereignty and fair representation.”In a measured response to the disarmament
debate, MP Raad signaled a willingness to engage – though on his own terms. “We
are not bound by timing, locations or mechanisms to engage in dialogue,” he
said, emphasizing that what truly matters is the president’s “sincere
commitment” to national priorities, including political and administrative
reforms, and securing essential rights and services for all Lebanese citizens.
On the contentious issue of Hezbollah’s arms and the state’s exclusive control
over weapons, Raad maintained a cautious openness: “There are no closed doors
when it comes to exchanging views with the president. This openness has existed
since the presidential election and will continue.” However, he added a pointed
caveat: “The state cannot demand privileges without fulfilling its duties.
Mutual understanding comes when responsibilities and obligations are equally
met.”Earlier on Monday, President Aoun assured a visiting US Congressional
delegation, led by Senator Angus King, that the implementation of the
disarmament plan would proceed “step by step,” adding, “The decision has been
made and there is no turning back.” Three camps have already been dismantled,
and joint committees are supervising the process. According to al-Anbaa news
channel, Lebanon has been given an eight-month deadline to resolve the issue of
illegal arms and restore full state control. International aid and
reconstruction funds are reportedly being withheld until the process is
completed.
US Congressional Delegation Expresses Support
Beyond the disarmament issue, President Aoun affirmed to the US delegation that
Lebanon remains committed to UN Resolution 1701 and has already deployed troops
south of the Litani River. He also accused Israel of non-compliance, citing its
ongoing occupation of Lebanese territory and refusal to release detainees. On
Syria, Aoun welcomed recent US sanctions relief, suggesting it could facilitate
refugee return and enhance border security through renewed cooperation with
Damascus.
President Aoun Urges UN Aid Shift to Syria, Tackles Arms in Palestinian Camps
This is Beirut/May 26, 2025
President Joseph Aoun called on the international community to reconsider its
approach to the Syrian refugee crisis, urging the United Nations to focus aid
efforts inside Syria rather than in Lebanon. “The United Nations should deliver
assistance to displaced persons within their own country, not in Lebanon,” Aoun
stated during a meeting on Monday with a US congressional delegation led by
Senator Angus King. He highlighted that easing US sanctions on Syria could be a
key step toward resolving the refugee issue. “Lifting US sanctions on Syria is a
positive move,” he said, explaining that a stronger Syrian economy would
encourage refugees to return home and contribute to rebuilding their country. On
internal security, President Aoun announced the creation of joint
Lebanese-Palestinian committees aimed at tackling the ongoing problem of armed
groups in Palestinian refugee camps. “Work is set to begin mid-next month in
three Palestinian camps in Beirut to address the presence of weapons,” he added,
without specifying the camps involved.
Syrian Authorities Seize Weapons Cache Allegedly Bound for Hezbollah
This is Beirut/May 26, 2025
Syrian media reported on Monday that internal security forces in the city of
Homs had seized a significant cache of weapons and rockets near the
Syrian-Lebanese border, in what is believed to be a foiled smuggling operation
coordinated with Hezbollah.
According to reports, the intercepted shipment included automatic weapons and
rockets, which were allegedly intended for Hezbollah. The seizure took place in
a rural area near the border, though specific details about the location and
those involved remain unclear. The discovery followed an earlier announcement by
Al-Hadath TV channel on Sunday evening, which reported the unearthing of a
weapons depot close to the Lebanese border. The cache reportedly included a wide
array of military-grade equipment stored in preparation for cross-border
transfer. While initial reports pointed to Hezbollah as the intended recipient
of the arms, Syrian authorities have not yet issued an official statement
confirming the identities of those responsible for the stockpile or providing
further information on the scope of the operation. The incident has once again
raised alarms about the continued movement of arms across the porous
Syrian-Lebanese border.
Three Israeli airstrikes target outskirts of Brital
Naharnet/May 26, 2025
Israeli warplanes on Monday carried out three airstrikes on the Sraj area in the
outskirts of the Baalbek district town of Brital, the state-run National News
Agency said. Two people were injured in overnight strikes on the southern towns
of Beit Leef and Majdal Zoun, the Health Ministry said Monday. Israel has
continued to launch near-daily airstrikes in southern and eastern Lebanon and
sometimes in Beirut’s suburbs despite a November 27 truce that sought to halt
more than a year of hostilities with Hezbollah including two months of
full-blown war. Under the terms of the ceasefire deal, the only armed bodies in
southern Lebanon are meant to be U.N. peacekeepers and Lebanon's army, though
Israel has retained its forces in five areas it has declared strategic. Speaking
Sunday on the anniversary of Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon in 2000,
Hezbollah leader Sheikh Naim Qassem reiterated the Lebanese group’s stance that
it will not discuss giving up its remaining weapons until Israel withdraws from
the five border points it occupies in southern Lebanon and stops its airstrikes.
"We adhered completely" to the agreement, Qassem said, adding: "Don’t ask us for
anything else from now on. Let Israel withdraw, stop its aggression, release the
prisoners and fulfill all obligations under the agreement. After that, we will
discuss each new development."
Hezbollah captives may be freed as part of deal involving Israeli-Russian
researcher
Naharnet/May 26, 2025
There is an available chance to reactivate the file of the release of Lebanese
captives held by Israel in conjunction with the expected release of
Israeli-Russian researcher Elizabeth Tsurkov, who was kidnapped by Iraq in 2023
by the Iran-backed Ketaeb Hezbollah group, which is not linked to Lebanon’s
Hezbollah, Western diplomatic sources said. The sources told Asharq al-Awsat
newspaper that Hezbollah’s leadership prepared a list containing the names of 15
Lebanese captives, of whom seven were captured during the latest
Israel-Hezbollah war and eight were detained during the ceasefire period. The
daily added that the deal also involves an Iranian citizen and a Palestinian
national. Sky News had reported Saturday that an agreement was reached to
exchange prisoners between Iraq, Iran and Israel, which involves “Hezbollah
members, a Lebanese sea captain, an Israeli-Russian academic and an Iranian
citizen.”
Aoun confirms disarmament to start mid-June in 3 Palestinian camps in Beirut
Agence France Presse/May 26, 2025
The disarmament of the first Palestinian camps in Lebanon will begin in mid-June
in three Beirut camps, President Joseph Aoun confirmed Monday. A joint
Lebanese-Palestinian committee met for the first time last week following an
accord between Lebanese and Palestinian leaders on disarming Palestinian camps
as Lebanon seeks to impose its authority on all its territory. The Lebanese and
Palestinian sides agreed on starting a plan "to remove weapons from the camps,
beginning mid-June in the Beirut camps, and other camps will follow," a Lebanese
government official told AFP on Friday. Lebanon hosts about 222,000 Palestinian
refugees, according to the United Nations agency UNRWA, many living in 12
overcrowded official camps. Most are descendants of Palestinians who fled or
were expelled from their land during the creation of Israel in 1948.
New proposal involves release of 10 Gaza hostages, 70-day truce
Agence France Presse/May 26, 2025
A Palestinian source familiar with negotiations aimed at securing a truce
between Israel and Hamas in Gaza said Monday that a new proposal involved the
release of 10 hostages, a 70-day ceasefire and a partial Israeli withdrawal. The
outline of the new potential deal comes as Israel ramps up its offensive in the
Palestinian territory, and follows previous rounds of talks that have failed to
reach a breakthrough ever since a two-month ceasefire fell apart in mid-March.
"The new proposal, which is considered a development of the path and vision of
U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff, includes the release of 10 living Israeli hostages
held by Hamas in exchange for a 70-day truce, a partial withdrawal from the Gaza
Strip (and) the release of a number of Palestinian prisoners," the source close
to negotiations told AFP.The source added that mediators presented the proposal
"over the past few days", without specifying whether it came from the United
States, Egypt or Qatar, all of which have been involved in the ceasefire talks
throughout the war. The proposal would involve the release of "five living
Israeli hostages during the first week of the agreement's implementation, and
five others before the end of the truce period". A second Palestinian source
familiar with the talks told AFP that "Israel and Hamas will study the proposal
and both sides will respond to the mediators".
Israel said last week that it was recalling its senior Gaza hostage negotiators
from Doha "for consultation", while leaving some of its team in the Qatari
capital. Israel has recently intensified its campaign in Gaza, calling it an
"expansion of the battle" against Palestinian militant group Hamas. mThe last
ceasefire between the sides fell apart amid disagreements over how to move
forward, with Israel resuming its operations in Gaza on March 18. On March 2,
Israel imposed a total aid blockade on the territory that it said was aimed at
forcing concessions with Hamas, with U.N. agencies since warning it has created
critical shortages of food, clean water, fuel and medicines. Israel partially
eased the blockade last week, and aid trucks have begun to trickle back into
Gaza, though humanitarian groups have urged it to allow more supplies to enter
faster.
Salam Launches Economic Recovery Plan and Renews Ties with UAE
This is Beirut/May 26, 2025
Prime Minister Nawaf Salam announced Monday that Lebanon has launched an
ambitious economic and financial recovery plan, signaling a renewed commitment
to structural reform and stronger cooperation with the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
The announcement came during the opening of the UAE-Lebanon Government Knowledge
Exchange Forum held at the Grand Serail in Beirut. In his remarks, Salam
underscored the historical and ongoing support of the Abu Dhabi Fund for
Development, which he described as a “trusted partner” in Lebanon’s development
journey since the late 1970s. “We look forward to reactivating this historic
relationship in line with our national priorities,” Salam said. The Prime
Minister highlighted that the forum, organized for the first time in Lebanon,
offers a strategic opportunity for Lebanese officials to benefit from the UAE’s
pioneering experience in public sector innovation, digital governance,
artificial intelligence, competitiveness, and institutional reform.
Additionally, he outlined three key pillars of the government’s recovery agenda:
achieving economic and financial stability, enhancing governance and
institutional performance, and investing in human capital, particularly in
education, healthcare, and job creation. Acknowledging the devastating impact of
recent years, including economic collapse, currency devaluation, soaring
inflation, and destruction caused by conflict, Salam reiterated his government’s
determination to push forward with “serious structural reforms” under the
leadership of President Joseph Aoun. He also called on Arab partners, especially
the UAE, to engage in long-term strategic investments in Lebanon’s
reconstruction, infrastructure, and public sector renewal, affirming Lebanon’s
intent to rejoin the Arab fold with full force. Representing the UAE government,
Abdullah Lootah – Assistant Minister for Competitiveness and Knowledge Exchange
– conveyed greetings from UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan and
Vice President Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum. He emphasized that the
Emirati delegation’s visit, made at the instruction of UAE leadership, marks the
start of a “long-term cooperation” aimed at supporting Lebanon’s government
modernization. Furthermore, Lootah affirmed the UAE’s readiness to collaborate
closely with Lebanon, describing his team as “an extension of the Lebanese
public administration.”He expressed confidence that the forum’s sessions would
leave a lasting impact on Lebanon’s governmental efficiency and quality of
public services.The event was attended by senior Emirati officials,
representatives from the Abu Dhabi Fund for Development, and Lebanon’s key
ministers and public administrators, marking a significant step toward renewed
bilateral cooperation.
Salam: We won't remain silent over any arms outside state
control
Naharnet/May 26, 2025
Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said “the region has grown tired of Iranian-U.S.
polarization,” hoping Arabs will return to Lebanon. “We will not remain silent
over any arms outside the state’s control,” Salam added, in an interview with
Sky News Arabia.
“The majority of the Lebanese people stands by us and my strength comes from
regaining the people’s confidence in the state and my project is the rebuilding
of the state,” the premier said. Asked about the chants that accused him of
being a “Zionist” during a recent football match, Salam said he was not
“provoked” by the chants, noting that “treason accusations in Lebanon have
become political weapons.”“I’m sad because a part of Lebanon is occupied and we
are advocates of peace, but we want a just and sustainable peace,” the PM added.
As for the Palestinian arms in Lebanon’s refugee camps, Salam said: “What’s
dangerous about the camps’ arms is that they may lead to an inter-Palestinian
strife, and Palestine’s strength today does not come from arms, but rather from
international recognition and diplomacy.”
Two wounded in overnight strikes on Beit Leef and
Majdalzoun
Associated Press/May 26, 2025
Two people were injured in overnight strikes on the southern towns of Beit Leef
and Majdalzoun, the Health Ministry said Monday. The overnight strikes targeted
two motorcycles, one in Tyre's Majdalzoun and the other in Beit Leef in the
district of Bint Jbeil. On Monday, an Israeli drone overflew Beirut's southern
suburbs for several hours. Israel has continued to launch near-daily airstrikes
in southern Lebanon and sometimes in Beirut’s suburbs despite the November 27
truce that sought to halt more than a year of hostilities with Hezbollah
including two months of full-blown war.Under the terms of the ceasefire deal,
the only armed bodies in southern Lebanon are meant to be U.N. peacekeepers and
Lebanon's army, though Israel has retained its forces in five areas it has
declared strategic.Speaking Sunday on the anniversary of Israel’s withdrawal
from southern Lebanon in 2000, Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem reiterated the
Lebanese militant group’s stance that it will not discuss giving up its
remaining weapons until Israel withdraws from the five border points it occupies
in southern Lebanon and stops its airstrikes."We adhered completely" to the
agreement, Qassem said, adding: "Don’t ask us for anything else from now on. Let
Israel withdraw, stop its aggression, release the prisoners and fulfill all
obligations under the agreement. After that, we will discuss each new
development."
Israel Reconfigures Northern Border Defenses
This is Beirut/May 26, 2025
Six months after the November 2024 ceasefire with Lebanon, Israel is adjusting
its military deployment along the northern frontier, signaling a shift toward a
more routine defensive posture. According to Israeli military radio, the Israeli
Army Northern Command has reassigned control of the Lebanese border to the 91st
Division, also known as the Galilee Division. This unit will now oversee the
entire stretch from Ras Naqoura on the Mediterranean coast to Mount Hermon in
the east, taking over from the 146th Armored Division. The 91st Division had
been the primary force along the border prior to the October 2023 war. However,
amid escalating hostilities with Hezbollah, its responsibilities were split with
the 146th Division, one of Israel’s largest reserve units, typically deployed
during high-intensity operations. The re-deployment of the Galilee Division and
the withdrawal of the 146th mark a significant moment, the first return to a
more standard defensive configuration since the outbreak of the war. Despite
this normalization, Israeli officials remain on high alert due to the continued
threat of escalation along the Lebanese frontier. The 146th Division played a
pivotal role during the war, having been deployed to counter Hezbollah’s elite
Radwan forces in southern Lebanon. Initially assigned to Gaza operations, its
command also oversaw military efforts in the West Bank and northern regions. In
October 2024, the Israeli army confirmed the unit’s involvement in “limited,
localized, and targeted” missions in southwest Lebanon.
The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News
published
on May 26-27/2025
Canadians welcome King Charles after Trump takeover threats
AFP/May 27, 2025
OTTAWA: King Charles III was given an enthusiastic welcome on Monday by
Canadians who turned out in droves to see their monarch on his historic visit to
open parliament, as part of the pushback against US President Donald Trump’s
annexation threats. The 76-year-old king, who is Canada’s head of state as part
of the Commonwealth, was greeted at the airport by Prime Minister Mark Carney,
who has invited him to give an address opening Canada’s new legislature on
Tuesday. “This historic honor matches the weight of our times,” Carney said. On
their first stop in the Canadian capital, the royals visited a farmer’s market,
where they were cheered by thousands of Canadians. The king also dropped the
puck for a street hockey game. The so-called throne speech outlining the
government’s priorities is typically given by the British monarch’s
representative in Canada, the governor general. Queen Elizabeth II, the king’s
late mother, delivered a throne speech in Canada just twice during her long
reign, in 1957 and 1977. Charles, making his first visit to Canada since his
coronation, has never commented on Trump’s repeated talk of making Canada the
51st US state. But he will be closely watched for any comments on Canada’s
sovereignty, and on trade. Trump has slapped tariffs on Canadian goods including
sector-specific levies on autos, steel and aluminum, rattling the Canadian
economy, although he has suspended some of them pending negotiations. Queen
Camilla is accompanying Charles on the 24-hour visit to Ottawa. Carney has said
his newly-elected government has been given a mandate “to define a new economic
and security relationship with the United States,” a neighbor he believes Canada
“can no longer trust.”He has promised to curb reliance on trade with the United
States by boosting internal commerce while forging deeper economic ties with
allies overseas. The government’s path to build up Canada and create new
relationships will be outlined in Charles’s speech, Carney said Monday. A
government statement described the visit as “a momentous and historic occasion
that underscores Canada’s identity and sovereignty as a constitutional
monarchy.”Trump repeatedly returned to his annexation musings during Carney’s
Oval Office visit earlier this month, insisting it would be a “wonderful
marriage.” Carney stood his ground, saying Canada was “never for sale.”Trump’s
envoy to Canada, Ambassador Pete Hoekstra, dismissed the notion that inviting
Charles to open parliament was an effective way to make a statement on
annexation. According to him, the annexation issue is “over.”But, among the
throngs that showed up to welcome the royals, Robert Brown, 64, said: “I think
it’s a very subtle form of diplomacy. A good one.”After Charles and Camilla
landed in Ottawa in the afternoon, they were received by Governor General Mary
Simon and other dignitaries before meeting community organizations. They also
planted a tree at the governor general’s estate, and Charles held audiences with
Carney and Indigenous leaders.
At the Senate on Tuesday, the monarch will receive full military honors before
delivering the throne speech. Noah Marshall told AFP he couldn’t miss this “once
in a lifetime opportunity to come see the royals.” The 24-year-old also noted
that because Trump seems to respect the King, “that’s a good kind of signal to
him.” Gaelle Hortop, 46, said she is “optimistic that it’ll be positive for
Canadian morale” too.
Trump hints at announcement
in 'next two days' on Iran nuclear talks
Associated Press/May 26, 2025
U.S. President Donald Trump has indicated there was progress with Iran on its
nuclear program and hinted that an announcement could come in the "next two
days." He was notably more upbeat than the Omani mediator of the talks between
the United States and Iran, who said Friday that the two nations made "some but
not conclusive" progress in the fifth round of negotiations in Rome. "We've had
some very, very good talks with Iran," Trump told reporters in northern New
Jersey after leaving his golf club, where he spent most of the weekend. "And I
don't know if I'll be telling you anything good or bad over the next two days,
but I have a feeling I might be telling you something good."He emphasized that
"we've had some real progress, serious progress" in talks that took place on
Saturday and Sunday. "Let's see what happens, but I think we could have some
good news on the Iran front," Trump said. Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff and
Michael Anton, the State Department's policy planning director, represented the
U.S. at the talks at the Omani Embassy in Rome. The two countries are discussing
how to curb Iran's nuclear program in exchange for lifting some economic
sanctions that the U.S. has imposed on the Islamic Republic.
Sykes-Picot divided Syria and
the broader region for imperial gain
Ambassador Tom Barrack/X platform/May 26, 2025
A century ago, the West imposed maps, mandates, penciled borders, and foreign
rule. Sykes-Picot divided Syria and the broader region for imperial gain—not
peace. That mistake cost generations. We will not make it again.
The era of Western interference is over. The future belongs to regional
solutions, but partnerships, and a diplomacy grounded in respect. As President
Trump emphasized in his May 13th address in Riyadh, ”Gone are the days when
Western interventionalists would fly to the Middle East to give lectures on how
to live, and how to govern your own affairs."Syria’s tragedy was born in
division. Its rebirth must come through dignity, unity, and investment in its
people. That starts with truth, accountability—and working with the region, not
around it. We are standing with Türkiye, the Gulf, and Europe—this time not with
troops and lectures, or imaginary boundaries, but shoulder-to-shoulder with the
Syrian people themselves. With the fall of the Assad regime the door is open to
peace—by eliminating sanctions we are enabling the Syrian people to finally open
that door and discover a path to renewed prosperity and security.
Hamas-led groups execute four for looting aid trucks amid some Gaza dissent
Nidal al-Mughrabi/Reuters/May 26,
2025
CAIRO -Hamas has executed four men for looting some of the aid trucks that have
begun entering Gaza, sources familiar with the incident said on Monday, as a
clan leader in southern Gaza issued a challenge to the militant group over
guarding the convoys. One source said the four were involved in an incident last
week when six security officials were killed by an Israeli airstrike as they
were working to prevent gang members from hijacking aid trucks. "The four
criminals, who were executed, were involved in the crimes of looting and causing
the death of members of a force tasked with securing aid trucks," one of the
sources told Reuters. Seven other suspects were being pursued, according to a
statement issued by an umbrella group identifying itself as the "Palestinian
Resistance". Humanitarian assistance began trickling into Gaza last week after
Israel yielded to international pressure and lifted a blockade it imposed in
early March that has left half a million people facing starvation, according to
a global hunger monitor. Aid groups have said that deliveries have been hampered
by looting, but they have blamed Israel for creating a situation in which
hundreds of thousands of people have been driven to desperation by the blockade.
Israel has accused Hamas of stealing aid, which the group denies, and the issue
of control over the aid trucks has been hotly disputed. Israeli military
officials say the security teams put in place by Hamas are there to take
delivery of the supplies not to protect them, but it has provided no evidence of
Hamas looting since it eased its blockade last week. Hamas, which took power in
Gaza in 2007, has long cracked down hard on signs of dissent among Palestinians
in Gaza but it has faced sizeable protests in recent months over the war and
faced challenges to its control by armed groups of looters, some of whom it has
punished by shooting them in the legs in public. Yasser Abu Shabab, a leader of
a large clan in the Rafah area, now under full Israeli army control, said he was
building up a force to secure aid deliveries into some parts of the enclave. He
published images of his armed men receiving and organising the traffic of aid
trucks. Hamas, which is unable to operate in the Rafah area where Abu Shabab has
some controls, has accused him of looting international aid trucks in previous
months and maintaining connections with Israel. On a Facebook page in his name
Abu Shabab denies that he has acted as an alternative to the government or other
institutions and rejects accusations of looting. On the page Abu Shabab is
described as a "grassroots leader who stood up against corruption and looting"
and who protected aid convoys. But a Hamas security official called Abu Shabab a
"tool used by the Israeli occupation to fragment the Palestinian internal
front". Asked if the U.N. was working with Abu Shabab, a spokesperson for the
U.N. humanitarian agency OCHA said it did not pay anyone to guard aid trucks.
"What we do is talk to communities regularly, build trust and engage with the
authorities on the urgent need for more aid to come in through more routes and
more crossings," the spokesperson said.
French journalists call on France to help evacuate
collaborators from Gaza
RFI/May 26, 2025
Several French journalist associations are calling on the French government to
help the evacuation of Palestinian journalists, fixers and drivers who have been
covering or helping to cover the war in Gaza for the past 18 months. “Without
them, Gaza would be a black hole of news,” reads a statement signed by
associations of journalists of about 20 French media organisations, including
RFI. French news organisations have relied on local journalists and support
staff for reporting from Gaza, which has been under bombardment from Israel
since Hamas attacked Israel on 7 October 2023, killing over 1,200 people and
abducting over 250. Local journalists “keep you informed about the ongoing
horror in the territory, while the Israeli government has constantly hindered
coverage of the war by the international press by denying access to the Gaza
Strip”, the statement continues. The journalist associations have called on the
French government to help evacuate the employees, much like it did for Afghan
interpreters and other support staff for the French army. The journalists are in
particular danger now that Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu has
threatened to take control of Gaza, the journalist associations warn."Our
colleagues and their families are in mortal danger," the statement reads.
Head of controversial Israel-backed Gaza aid group resigns
Tom Bennett - BBC News/May 26, 2025
The head of an organisation set up to distribute aid in Gaza as part of a
controversial Israel-backed plan has resigned, saying it could not work in a way
that adhered to "humanitarian principles". Jake Wood quit the Gaza Humanitarian
Foundation (GHF) late on Sunday, saying it would not be able to fulfil the
principles of "humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence". The plan,
also backed by the US, envisions private contractors delivering aid to
Palestinians via Israel-designated distribution sites. It was heavily criticised
by the United Nations, which says it will not participate. Israel insists the
plan is needed to stop Hamas stealing aid, which the armed group denies doing.
Under the GHF plan, Palestinians would be expected to collect boxes weighing up
to 20kg (44lbs) containing food and basic hygiene items from four distribution
points in southern Gaza. It is unclear how the weak or injured would be able to
collect the aid. UN aid chief Tom Fletcher said it would force further
displacement, restrict aid to only one part of Gaza and make "starvation a
bargaining chip."'Situation is dire' - BBC returns to Gaza baby left hungry by
Israeli blockade
Israeli strikes across Gaza kill 54, officials say
In his resignation statement, Wood, a former US marine, said: "Two months ago, I
was approached about leading GHF's efforts because of my experience in
humanitarian operations. "Like many others around the world, I was horrified and
heartbroken at the hunger crisis in Gaza and, as a humanitarian leader, I was
compelled to do whatever I could to help alleviate the suffering." He said he
was "proud of the work I oversaw, including developing a pragmatic plan that
could feed hungry people, address security concerns about diversion, and
complement the work of longstanding NGOs in Gaza."
But, he said, it had become "clear that it is not possible to implement this
plan while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity,
neutrality, impartiality, and independence, which I will not abandon." In
response, the GHF said it would "not be deterred" by Wood's resignation and
would begin delivering aid on Monday, with an aim to reach one million
Palestinians by the end of the week. The group said that critics "who benefit
from the status quo have been more focused on tearing this apart than on getting
aid in, afraid that new, creative solutions to intractable problems might
actually succeed."
It added: "Our trucks are loaded and ready to go."An Israeli official said "the
goal of this new approach is to eliminate the Gazan population's dependence on
Hamas". Israeli media reported that the first of four distribution centres would
be opened by GHF on Monday morning. Last week, Israel eased an 11-week blockade
on all food, fuel, medicine and other supplies entering Gaza, with the first aid
trucks reaching civilians in recent days - but the UN has said it's a "drop in
the ocean of what's needed".It says 57 children died from malnutrition during
Israel's blockade - while the World Food Programme (WFP) warned last week that
Gaza's entire population was "on the brink of starvation".
A young child being treated at hospital in Gaza.
Jan Egeland, Secretary General of the Norwegian Refugee Council, told the BBC's
Today Programme that the GHF is "militarised, privatised, politicised" and "not
in conformity with neutrality". "The people behind it are military – they are
ex-CIA and ex-military people… Let's go back to the system that worked" he said.
The GHF has also come under intense scrutiny around its funding, origins and
backing. Over the weekend, an investigation by The New York Times suggested the
group may have been conceived in Israel by a group of Israeli officials and
military officers and their partners in the Israeli business sector. Responding
to the plan earlier this month, UN children's fund spokesperson Jonathan Crick
said: "How is a mother of four children, who has lost her husband, going to
carry 20kg back to her makeshift tent, sometimes several kilometres away?" "The
most vulnerable people, including the elderly, people with disabilities, the
sick and wounded, and orphans, will face huge challenges to access aid."Israel
launched a military campaign in Gaza in response to Hamas's cross-border attack
on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were
taken hostage.
At least 53,939 people, including at least 16,500 children, have been killed in
Gaza since then, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry.
Chaos spreads as desperate Gazans wait for food to arrive
Investigating Israel's strike on Gaza's European Hospital
As Israel faces diplomatic 'tsunami', Trump is staying quiet
Israeli far-right police minister visits Al-Aqsa mosque
site ahead of Jerusalem rally
Reuters/May 26, 2025
JERUSALEM -Israeli far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir visited
the Al-Aqsa mosque compound on Monday, known to Jews as the Temple Mount, ahead
of an annual rally marking Israel's capture of East Jerusalem in a 1967 war.
“Many Jews flooding the Temple Mount, what a joy to see it. Today, thank God, it
is already possible to pray on the Temple Mount,” Ben Gvir said. Ben Gvir has
long pushed for Jewish prayer rights at the flashpoint site, which is sacred to
both Muslims and Jews. Under a decades-old arrangement, the compound is
administered by a Jordanian Islamic trust. Jews are allowed to visit but not
pray there. The Al-Aqsa mosque is Islam's third holiest site. Tens of thousands
of Jewish Israelis were expected to participate in the Flag March, an annual
rally through Jerusalem that attracts many Israeli ultranationalists. The march
frequently stokes tension as ultranationalists stream into Palestinian areas of
Jerusalem's walled Old City en route to the Western Wall, one of Judaism’s
holiest sites. Ahead of the rally, Palestinian shopkeepers shuttered their
stores. Those who stayed past noon were harassed by marchers before having to
close, a Reuters witness said, adding that in one case, Israeli police pushed
marchers away from a storefront. The marchers, mostly young Israelis who live in
settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, were also seen harassing and
assaulting some Palestinians, journalists and left-wing Israeli activists, the
Reuters witness said. Israel captured East Jerusalem, including the Old City,
from Jordan in the 1967 Middle East war. Palestinians seek East Jerusalem as the
capital of a future state that would include the West Bank and Gaza. Most
countries consider East Jerusalem to be occupied territory and do not recognise
Israeli sovereignty over it. Israel deems Jerusalem as its eternal, indivisible
capital. In 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump recognised all of Jerusalem as
Israel’s capital and moved the U.S. embassy there from Tel Aviv. On Sunday, U.S.
Ambassador Mike Huckabee, an evangelical Christian, congratulated Israel on what
he called the reunification of the city 58 years ago.
This year’s rally again coincides with continued war in Gaza, now in its 20th
month, and an escalating Israeli military campaign against Palestinian militants
in the West Bank, where violent settler attacks targeting Palestinians are on
the rise.
Syria's government and
Kurds reach agreement on returning families from notorious camp
Hogir Abdo/The Associated Press/May 26, 2025
QAMISHLI, Syria — Kurdish authorities in northeast Syria announced Monday they
have reached an agreement with the transitional government in Damascus to
evacuate Syrian citizens from a sprawling camp in the desert that houses tens of
thousands of people with alleged ties to the militant Islamic State group.
Sheikhmous Ahmed, an official in the Kurdish-led authority that controls the
country’s northeast, said an agreement was reached on a “joint mechanism” for
returning the families from al-Hol camp after a meeting among local authorities,
representatives of the central government in Damascus and a delegation from the
U.S.-led international coalition fighting IS. Ahmed denied reports that
administration of the camp will be handed over to Damascus in the near future,
saying “there was no discussion in this regard with the visiting delegation or
with the Damascus government."Human rights groups for years have cited poor
living conditions and pervasive violence in the camp, which houses about 37,000
people, mostly wives and children of IS fighters as well as supporters of the
militant group. They also include Iraqis as well as nationals of Western
countries who traveled to join IS. The U.S. military has been pushing for years
for countries that have citizens at al-Hol and the smaller, separate Roj Camp to
repatriate them. Iraq has taken back increasing numbers of citizens in recent
years, but many other countries have remained reluctant.As for Syrians housed in
the camp, a mechanism has been in place for several years to return those who
want to go back to their communities in the Kurdish-controlled areas, where
centers have been opened to reintegrate them. Before now, however, there had not
been an agreement with the government in Damascus to return them to areas under
the central government’s control. The new agreement comes amid attempts to
increase the cooperation between Kurdish authorities and the new leaders in
Damascus after former President Bashar Assad was unseated in a rebel offensive
in December. Under a deal signed in March between Syria’s interim President
Ahmad al-Sharaa and Mazloum Abdi, the commander of the U.S.-backed, Kurdish-led
Syrian Democratic Forces, the SDF is to be merged into the new government armed
forces. All border crossings with Iraq and Turkey and airports and oil fields in
the northeast are to come under the central government’s control. Prisons where
about 9,000 suspected members of the Islamic State group are held are also
expected to come under central government control. The deal marked a major step
toward unifying the disparate factions that had carved up Syria into de facto
mini-states during its civil war that began in 2011 after the brutal crackdown
by Assad's government on massive anti-government protests. However,
implementation has been slow. Washington has been pushing for its enactment and,
in particular, for Damascus to take over management of the prisons in northeast
Syria.
US envoy says Gaza
ceasefire deal is on the table, as Israel prepares for ‘unprecedented attack’
Jeremy Diamond, Abeer Salman and Oren Liebermann, CNN/May 26, 2025
US special envoy Steve Witkoff has told CNN that a ceasefire-hostage deal for
Gaza is currently on the table with a pathway to end the war, and urged Hamas to
accept it.
The proposal would see the release of half of the living hostages and half of
those who have died in exchange for a temporary ceasefire before negotiations
begin for a comprehensive agreement to end the war. He declined to specify how
long that temporary truce would last, which has been a key issue in the
negotiations. “Israel will agree to a temporary ceasefire/hostage deal that
would see half of the living and half of the deceased return and lead to
substantive negotiations to find a path to a permanent ceasefire, which I have
agreed to preside over,” Witkoff told CNN on Monday. “That deal is on the table.
Hamas should take it.”
He said Hamas has yet to accept the deal.
Reuters reported earlier on Monday that Hamas had agreed to a proposal that
would see the release of 10 hostages in two groups in exchange for a 70-day
truce. Witkoff told CNN that was not his proposal. “What I have seen is
completely unacceptable,” Witkoff said, referring to the report. Meanwhile, a
Palestinian official close to the negotiations also told CNN that Hamas has
agreed to Witkoff’s proposal, but did not provide additional details about what
the deal entailed. A US official told CNN Witkoff has not met directly with
Hamas. According to a source familiar with the matter, Palestinian-American
businessman Bishara Bahbah met with Hamas in Doha about the proposal. Bahbah,
who led the group “Arab Americans for Trump” during the 2024 presidential
campaign, has been working on behalf of the administration. Witkoff’s comments
to CNN mark the first time he has said he would preside over negotiations for an
end to the war during the temporary ceasefire. Hamas has long sought assurances
that Israel seriously engages in negotiations to end the war if it agrees to
another temporary ceasefire, after Israel refused to do so during the last
truce. Witkoff’s involvement in negotiating a permanent ceasefire appears to be
aimed at providing Hamas with assurances from Washington that Israel will engage
in such negotiations in the future.
CNN has reached out to the Israeli government for comment.
In a video message posted to social media on Monday night, Netanyahu said
getting the hostages released is a top priority. “I very much hope we’ll have
something to announce on that front,” he said. “And if not today, then tomorrow
– we are not giving up.”Two Israeli officials later clarified that there was “no
progress” in the negotiations for a ceasefire and hostage release deal and that
“Hamas continued to hold firm in its refusal.”“The prime minister meant that a
breakthrough could happen only if Hamas aligns with the Israeli position,” one
of the officials said.
Plans for an ‘unprecedented attack’
The proposal comes at a crucial point in the war, as the Israeli military issued
evacuation orders for most of southern Gaza ahead of what its spokesperson said
would be an “unprecedented attack” on the territory. The order covers the city
of Khan Younis and much of the surrounding area, according to Israel Defense
Forces (IDF) Arabic language spokesperson Avichay Adree. He described the Khan
Younis governorate as a “dangerous fighting zone that has been warned several
times.”The evacuation zone goes all the way south to the Gaza-Egypt border where
Israeli forces have occupied the Philadelphi Corridor, a 14-kilometer (8-mile)
strip along the frontier. It appears to include the entirety of Khan Younis, a
densely packed city with many displaced Palestinians. The order instructs
Palestinians to move to the Al-Mawasi area, a narrow strip of land along the
Mediterranean Sea. Earlier Monday, the IDF said three rockets were fired from
southern Gaza, two of which landed within the Gazan territory and one of which
was intercepted. The order, which also cover parts of eastern Gaza, comes after
the military laid out its strategy to take control of the territory, where it
has been fighting a war since October 2023 to eradicate Hamas following the
militant group’s attack on Israel. An Israeli military official told CNN on
Monday that Israel plans to occupy 75% of Gaza within two months as part of its
new offensive. If carried out, the plan would force more than two million
Palestinians into a quarter of the coastal enclave, surrounded on nearly all
sides by Israeli forces. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said this
month the entire population would be displaced to southern Gaza. The IDF now has
five divisions operating in Gaza, the military said Friday, totaling tens of
thousands of troops. On a visit to troops in Khan Younis Sunday, IDF Chief of
Staff Eyal Zamir said, “You are fighting on the central front of the state of
Israel. This is a prolonged, multi-arena war.”
On Monday, Hamas’ Government Media Office said Israel already “effectively”
controls 77% of Gaza through “heavy firepower that prevents Palestinian
civilians from accessing their homes, areas, lands, and properties, or through
oppressive forced evacuation policies.”Israel is under growing international
pressure – including from long standing allies – over its decision to expand the
war and, in the words of one Israeli minister, “conquer” the territory. The
United Kingdom has paused trade talks and sanctioned extremist settlers in the
West Bank. Canada and France have threatened sanctions. And the European Union –
Israel’s biggest trade partner – is reviewing its landmark Association Agreement
with the country. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told German public
broadcaster ARD on Monday that the actions of the Israeli military in Gaza “can
no longer be justified on the grounds of a fight against Hamas terrorism.”US
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, however, reiterated US support for
Israel on Sunday. She met with Netanyahu and expressed appreciation for the
prime minister’s conduct of the war, according to a statement from the Israeli
Government Press Office.
Palestinian official says Hamas agrees to Gaza proposal,
Israel dismisses it
Reuters/May 26, 2025
CAIRO (Reuters) -A Palestinian official said on Monday that Hamas has agreed to
a proposal by U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff for a Gaza ceasefire, only for an
Israeli official to deny that the proposal was Washington's and add that no
Israeli government could accept it. Witkoff also rejected the notion that Hamas
had accepted his offer for a hostage deal and a ceasefire in Gaza, telling
Reuters that what he had seen was "completely unacceptable" and the proposal
being discussed was not the same as his. The Palestinian official, who is close
to Hamas, had told Reuters that the proposal would see the release of 10
hostages and a 70-day ceasefire and was received by Hamas through mediators.
"The proposal includes the release of 10 living Israeli hostages held by Hamas
in two groups in return for a 70-day ceasefire and a partial withdrawal from the
Gaza Strip," the source said. It also included the release of a number of
Palestinian prisoners by Israel, including hundreds serving lengthy prison
terms. An Israeli official dismissed the proposal, saying no responsible
government could accept such an agreement and rejecting the assertion that the
deal matched one proposed by Witkoff. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
later said in a recorded message on social media he "hoped very much" he would
be able to deliver developments on the subject of Israel's fight against Hamas
and releasing the hostages, "today and if not today then we will tomorrow".His
office did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the video. On
March 18, Israel effectively ended a January ceasefire agreement with Hamas and
renewed its military campaign in Gaza. Hamas and allied factions began firing
rockets and attacks two days later. Hamas has said it is willing to free all
remaining hostages seized by its gunmen in attacks on communities in southern
Israel on October 7, 2023, and agree to a permanent ceasefire if Israel pulls
out completely from Gaza. Netanyahu has said Israel would only be willing to
agree to a temporary ceasefire in return for the release of hostages, vowing
that war can only end once Hamas is eradicated. Israel launched an air and
ground war in Gaza after the Hamas-led militants' cross-border attack, which
killed 1,200 people by Israeli tallies, with 251 hostages abducted into Gaza.
The conflict has killed nearly 54,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health
authorities, and devastated the coastal strip. Aid groups say signs of severe
malnutrition are widespread.
Israeli strike on Gaza school sheltering displaced
Palestinians kills dozens, officials say
Rushdi Abualouf - Gaza correspondent, Cairo and Raffi Berg - BBC News,
London/May 26, 2025
At least 54 Palestinians have been killed - most of them in a school building
sheltering displaced families - during Israeli air strikes on Gaza overnight,
hospital directors have told the BBC. Fahmi Al-Jargawi School in Gaza City was
housing hundreds of people from Beit Lahia, currently under intense Israeli
military assault. At least 35 were reported to have been killed when the school
was hit. Gaza's Hamas-run Civil Defence said multiple bodies, including those of
children, were recovered – many severely burned, after fires engulfed two
classrooms serving as living quarters.The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said it
had targeted "a Hamas and Islamic Jihad command and control centre" there. The
IDF said the area was being used "by the terrorists to plan... attacks against
Israeli civilians and IDF troops", and accused Hamas of using "the Gazan
population as human shields".Video footage shared online showed large fires
consuming parts of the school, with graphic images of severely burned victims,
including children, and survivors suffering critical injuries. Faris Afana,
Northern Gaza ambulance service manager, said he arrived at the scene with crews
to find three classrooms ablaze.
"There were sleeping children and women in those classrooms," he said. "Some of
them were screaming but we couldn't rescue them due to the fires. "I cannot
describe what we saw due to how horrific it was."Local reports said the head of
investigations for the Hamas police in northern Gaza, Mohammad Al-Kasih, was
among the dead, along with his wife and children. Separately, a strike on a
house in Jabalia in northern Gaza killed 19 people, according to the director of
al-Ahli hospital Dr Fadel el-Naim. The Israeli military has not yet commented on
what was being targeted. The twin attacks are part of a broader Israeli
offensive that has escalated in the northern part of the enclave over the past
week. The IDF said it hit 200 targets across Gaza in 48 hours as it continued
its operations against what it called "terrorist organisations".The interior of
a building, damaged walls and rubble. A teenage boy looks down at the damage.
Israeli strike kills nine of Gaza doctor's children
On Friday, an Israeli strike on the home of a Palestinian doctor in Gaza killed
nine of her 10 children. Dr Alaa al-Najjar's 11-year-old son was injured, along
with her husband, Hamdi al-Najjar, who is in critical condition. The nine
children - Yahya, Rakan, Raslan, Gebran, Eve, Rival, Sayden, Luqman and Sidra -
were aged between just a few months old and 12. The Israeli military has said
the incident is under review. Meanwhile, the International Committee of the Red
Cross (ICRC) said two of its staff were killed in a strike on their home in Khan
Younis on Saturday.
The killing of Ibrahim Eid, a weapon contamination officer, and Ahmad Abu Hilal,
a security guard at the Red Cross Field Hospital in Rafah "points to the
intolerable civilian death toll in Gaza", the ICRC said, repeating its call for
a ceasefire.
'Situation is dire' - BBC returns to Gaza baby left hungry by Israeli blockade
On Sunday, the head of a controversial US and Israeli-approved organisation
planning to use private firms to deliver aid to Gaza resigned. In a statement by
the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), executive director Jake Wood said it had
become apparent that plans to set up distribution hubs would not meet the
"humanitarian principles" of independence and neutrality. The GHF said in
response that it was disappointed at his resignation, but insisted it would
"begin direct aid delivery in Gaza" on Monday. "Our trucks are loaded and ready
to go," it said in a statement, adding that the new aid operation would reach
"over one million Palestinians by the end of the week" and that there were plans
to "scale rapidly to serve the full population in the weeks ahead". The UN and
various humanitarian organisations have said they will not co-operate with the
GHF, accusing it of being discriminatory over who will receive food.
Israel imposed a total blockade on Gaza on 2 March that lasted 11 weeks before
it allowed limited aid to enter the territory in the face of warnings of famine
and mounting international outrage. The Israeli military body responsible for
humanitarian affairs in Gaza, Cogat, said 107 lorries carrying aid were allowed
into Gaza on Sunday. The UN says much more aid - between 500 to 600 lorries a
day - is needed. Meanwhile, 20 countries and organisations met in Madrid on
Sunday to discuss ending the war in Gaza. Spanish Foreign Minister Jose Manuel
Albares called for an arms embargo on Israel if it did not stop its attacks.
Israel launched a military campaign in Gaza in response to Hamas's cross-border
attack on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others
were taken hostage. At least 53,939 people, including at least 16,500 children,
have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's health
ministry.
A new aid system in Gaza
has started operations, a US-backed group says
AP/May 27, 2025
DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip: A new aid system in Gaza opened its first
distribution hubs Monday, according to a US-backed group that said it began
delivering food to Palestinians who face growing hunger after Israel’s nearly
three-month blockade to pressure Hamas. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is
taking over the handling of aid despite objections from United Nations. The
desperately needed supplies started flowing on a day that saw Israeli strikes
kill at least 52 people in Gaza. The group said truckloads of food — it did not
say how many — had been delivered to its hubs, and distribution to Palestinians
had begun. It was not clear where the hubs were located or how those receiving
supplies were chosen. “More trucks with aid will be delivered tomorrow, with the
flow of aid increasing each day,” the foundation said in a statement. The UN and
aid groups have pushed back against the new system, which is backed by Israel
and the United States. They assert that Israel is trying to use food as a weapon
and say a new system won’t be effective. Israel has pushed for an alternative
aid delivery plan because it says it must stop Hamas from seizing aid. The UN
has denied that the militant group has diverted large amounts.
The foundation began operations a day after the resignation of its executive
director. Jake Wood, an American, said it had become clear the foundation would
not be allowed to operate independently. It’s not clear who is funding the
group, which said it had appointed an interim leader, John Acree, to replace
Wood, The organization is made up of former humanitarian, government and
military officials. It has said its distribution points will be guarded by
private security firms and that the aid would reach a million Palestinians —
around half of Gaza’s population — by the end of the week. Under pressure from
allies, Israel began allowing a trickle of humanitarian aid into Gaza last week
after blocking all food, medicine, fuel or other goods from entering since early
March. Aid groups have warned of famine and say the aid that has come in is
nowhere near enough to meeting mounting needs.
Hamas warned Palestinians on Monday not to cooperate with the new aid system,
saying it is aimed at furthering those objectives.
Airstrikes hit shelter
The Israeli airstrikes killed at least 36 people in a school-turned-shelter that
was hit as people slept, setting their belongings ablaze, according to local
health officials. The military said it targeted militants operating from the
school. Israel renewed its offensive in March after ending a ceasefire with
Hamas. It has vowed to seize control of Gaza and keep fighting until Hamas is
destroyed or disarmed, and until it returns the remaining 58 hostages, a third
of them believed to be alive, from the Oct. 7, 2023, attack that ignited the
war. Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and
abducted 251 people in the 2023 attack. Israel’s retaliatory offensive has
killed around 54,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. It
says more than half the dead are women and children but does not distinguish
between civilians and combatants in its count. Israel says it plans to
facilitate what it describes as the voluntary migration of over 2 million people
in Gaza, a plan rejected by Palestinians and much of the international
community. Israel’s military campaign has destroyed vast areas of Gaza and
internally displaced some 90 percent of its population. Many have fled multiple
times.
Rescuers recover charred remains
The strike on the school in the Daraj neighborhood of Gaza City also wounded
dozens of people, said Fahmy Awad, head of the ministry’s emergency service. He
said a father and his five children were among the dead. The Shifa and Al-Ahli
hospitals in Gaza City confirmed the overall toll. Awad said the school was hit
three times while people slept, setting fire to their belongings. Footage
circulating online showed rescuers struggling to extinguish fires and recovering
charred remains. The military said it targeted a militant command and control
center inside the school that Hamas and Islamic Jihad used to gather
intelligence for attacks. Israel blames civilian deaths on Hamas because it
operates in residential areas. A separate strike on a home in Jabalya in
northern Gaza killed 16 members of the same family, including five women and two
children, according to Shifa Hospital, which received the bodies. Palestinian
militants meanwhile fired three projectiles from Gaza, two of which fell short
within the territory and a third that was intercepted, according to the Israeli
military. Ultranationalists march in east Jerusalem, break into UN compound.
Ultranationalist Israelis gathered Monday in Jerusalem for an annual procession
marking Israel’s 1967 conquest of the city’s eastern sector. Some protesters
chanted “Death to Arabs” and harassed Palestinian residents. Police kept a close
watch as demonstrators jumped, danced and sang. The event threatened to inflame
tensions that are rife in the restive city amid nearly 600 days of war in Gaza.
Hours earlier, a small group of protesters, including an Israeli member of
parliament, stormed a compound in east Jerusalem belonging to the UN agency for
Palestinian refugees, which Israel has banned. The compound has been mostly
empty since January, when staff were asked to stay away for security reasons.
The UN says the compound is protected under international law.
Chanting 'Death to Arabs,'
Israeli nationalists gather for annual march in Jerusalem
Julia Frankel/The Associated Press/May 26, 2025
JERUSALEM — Chanting “Death to Arabs” and singing “May your village burn,”
groups of young Israeli Jews made their way through Muslim neighborhoods of
Jerusalem's Old City on Monday ahead of an annual march marking Israel's
conquest of the eastern part of the city. Palestinian shopkeepers had closed up
early and police lined the narrow alleys ahead of the march that often becomes a
rowdy and sometimes violent procession of ultranationalist Jews. A policeman
raised his arms in celebration at one point, recognizing a marcher and going in
for a hug. A small group of protesters, including an Israeli member of
parliament, meanwhile, stormed a compound in east Jerusalem belonging to the
U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees, known as UNRWA. The march commemorates
Jerusalem Day — which marks Israel’s capture of east Jerusalem, including the
Old City and its holy sites sacred to Jews, Christians and Muslims, in the 1967
Mideast war. The event, set to begin later in the day, threatens to inflame
tensions that are already rife in the restive city amid nearly 600 days of war
in Gaza. Jerusalem lies at the heart of the conflict between Israelis and
Palestinians, who each see the city as a key part of their national and
religious identity. It is one of the most intractable issues of the conflict and
often emerges as a flashpoint. Last year’s procession, which came during the
first year of the war in Gaza, saw ultranationalist Israelis attack a
Palestinian journalist in the Old City and call for violence against
Palestinians. Four years ago, the march helped set off an 11-day war in Gaza.
Tour buses carrying young ultranationalist Jews lined up near entrances to the
Old City, bringing hundreds from outside Jerusalem, including settlements in the
Israeli-occupied West Bank. Police said they had detained a number of
individuals, without specifying, and “acted swiftly to prevent violence,
confrontations, and provocations.”Volunteers from the pro-peace organizations
Standing Together and Free Jerusalem tried to position themselves between the
marchers and residents to prevent violence.
“This is our home, this is our state," shouted one protester at a Palestinian
woman. “Go away from here!" she responded, in Hebrew. Increased Jewish visits to
a flashpoint holy site. Israel's far-right National Security Minister Itamar
Ben-Gvir, who oversees the country’s police force, visited a flashpoint hilltop
compound holy to Jews and Muslims, where the Al Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the
Rock are located today. One Israeli lawmaker, Yitzhak Kroizer, could be seen
praying. Perceived encroachments by Jews on the site have set off widespread
violence on a number of occasions going back decades. “We are marking a holiday
for Jerusalem,” Ben-Gvir said Monday at the site, accompanied by other lawmakers
and a rabbi. “There are truly many Jews flooding the Temple Mount. How nice to
see that.”Beyadenu, an activist group that encourages Jewish visits to the site,
said dozens of people had ascended to the holy compound Monday draped in the
Israeli flag, and had prayed there. Since Israel captured the site in 1967, a
tenuous understanding between Israeli and Muslim religious authorities at the
compound has allowed Jews — who revere the site as the Temple Mount, the
location of the biblical temples — to visit but not pray there.Ben-Gvir says he
is changing that status quo. Palestinians already say it has long been eroding
because of an increase in Jewish visits to the site. “Today, thank God, it is
possible to pray on the Temple Mount,” Ben-Gvir said at the site, according to a
statement from his office. The office of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said
there has been no change to the status quo. Police said that Monday's march
would not enter the site. Israel considers all of Jerusalem to be its eternal,
undivided capital. Its annexation of east Jerusalem is not internationally
recognized. Palestinians want an independent state with east Jerusalem as its
capital. For many in Israel, Jerusalem Day is a joyous occasion that marks a
moment of redemption in their country's history, when access to the key Jewish
holy site of the Western Wall was restored and the city was unified. But over
recent years, the Jerusalem Day march in the city has become dominated by young
nationalist and religious Israelis and on some occasions has descended into
violence.
Protesters storm UN compound in Jerusalem
UNRWA West Bank coordinator Roland Friedrich said around a dozen Israeli
protesters, including Yulia Malinovsky, one of the legislators behind an Israeli
law that banned UNRWA, forcefully entered the compound, climbing its main gate
in view of Israeli police. Israel has accused the agency, which is the biggest
aid provider in Gaza, of being infiltrated by Hamas, allegations denied by the
U.N. There was no immediate comment from Israeli police. The compound has stood
mainly empty since the end of January, after UNRWA asked staff not to work from
there, fearing for their safety. The UN says it has not vacated the compound and
that it is protected under international law.
Kremlin on Trump's remark about Putin being 'crazy': there is some emotional
overload
Reuters/May 26, 2025
MOSCOW (Reuters) -The Kremlin on Monday said that U.S. President Donald Trump's
claim that Vladimir Putin had "gone absolutely CRAZY" might be due to emotional
overload, but thanked the U.S. leader for his assistance in launching Ukraine
peace negotiations. Trump said Putin had "gone absolutely CRAZY" by unleashing
the largest aerial attack of the war on Ukraine and said he was weighing new
sanctions on Moscow, though he also scolded Ukrainian President Volodymyr
Zelenskiy. "We are really grateful to the Americans and to President Trump
personally for their assistance in organising and launching this negotiation
process," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said when asked about the Trump
remarks about Putin. "Of course, at the same time, this is a very crucial
moment, which is associated, of course, with the emotional overload of everyone
absolutely and with emotional reactions."
President Donald Trump says Russian leader Vladimir Putin 'has gone absolutely
CRAZY!'
Seung Min Kim/The Associated Press/May 26, 2025
WASHINGTON —President Donald Trump made it clear he is losing patience with
Vladimir Putin, leveling some of his sharpest criticism at the Russian leader as
Moscow pounded Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities with drones and missiles for a
third straight night. “I’ve always had a very good relationship with Vladimir
Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely
CRAZY!” Trump wrote in a social media post on Sunday night. Trump said Putin is
“needlessly killing a lot of people,” pointing out that “missiles and drones are
being shot into Cities in Ukraine, for no reason whatsoever.”The attack was the
largest aerial assault since Russia’s full-scale invasion of the country in
February 2022, according to Ukrainian officials. At least 12 people were killed
and dozens injured. The U.S. president warned that if Putin wants to conquer all
of Ukraine, it will “lead to the downfall of Russia!” But Trump expressed
frustration with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as well, saying that he
is “doing his Country no favors by talking the way he does.”“Everything out of
his mouth causes problems, I don’t like it, and it better stop,” Trump wrote on
social media. The president has increasingly voiced irritation at Putin and the
inability to resolve the now three-year-old war, which Trump promised he would
promptly end as he campaigned to return to the White House. He had long boasted
of his friendly relationship with Putin and repeatedly stressed that Russia is
more willing than Ukraine to reach a peace deal. But last month, Trump urged
Putin to “STOP!” assaulting Ukraine after Russia launched another deadly barrage
of attacks on Kyiv, and he has repeatedly expressed his frustration that the war
in Ukraine is continuing. “I’m not happy with what Putin’s doing. He’s killing a
lot of people. And I don’t know what the hell happened to Putin,” Trump told
reporters earlier Sunday as he departed northern New Jersey, where he spent most
of the weekend. “I’ve known him a long time, always gotten along with him, but
he’s sending rockets into cities and killing people and I don’t like it at all.
”A peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine remains elusive. Trump and Putin
spoke on the phone this past week, and Trump announced after the call that
Russia and Ukraine will “immediately” begin ceasefire talks. That conversation
occurred after Russian and Ukrainian officials met in Turkey for the first
face-to-face talks since 2022. But on Thursday, the Kremlin said no direct talks
were scheduled. The European Union has slapped new sanctions on Russia this
month in response to Putin's refusal to agree to a ceasefire. But while Trump
has threatened to step up sanctions and tariffs on Russia, he hasn’t acted so
far.
These women are defying Iran's hijab laws — despite fear of reprisal
CBC/May 26, 2025
The face of Tehran has been undergoing an extraordinary transformation in recent
months, some neighbourhoods seeming to channel Beirut as much as the capital of
the Islamic Republic where headscarves — or hijabs — have been mandatory for
women for 45 years. Less than three years after the brutal crackdown on the
protests that followed the death of Mahsa Amini in police custody for an alleged
dress code violation, a growing number of women are daring to bare their heads
in public. They're not a majority, but on any given day in north Tehran's
popular Tajrish Square, you'll find a mixture of women with and without
headscarves. Some don't even wear them around their necks anymore, where they
could be pulled up quickly if the decision to go bare-headed is challenged. "We
young people have decided to live the way we like," said Laylah, a 30-year-old
self-employed woman out shopping with her mother. The authorities "need to
understand that we want to be free, comfortable and liberated."Like all the
women interviewed in this story who were not wearing a headscarf, Laylah did not
provide her last name for fear of repercussions for defying her country's hijab
laws. Some analysts believe the Woman, Life, Freedom protest movement sparked by
Amini's death in 2022 is here to stay. That the number of women — young and old
— defying the hijab law is so great the regime will be unable to reverse it.
Others say Iran's ruling clerics are allowing what's happening to continue
because it suits their purposes at this time, noting that stories like this one,
which highlight the seemingly dramatic change on the streets, actually distract
from the draconian and often sinister ways the state continues to punish women
who disobey. "I think that the authorities, frankly, are getting more clever
about how they carry out their reprisals," said Nassim Papayianni, a senior Iran
campaigner with Amnesty International based in London.
The white vans used by Iran's controversial morality police are still visible on
the streets of Tehran. But on a recent — and rare — reporting trip to the city,
our crew didn't witness police make any arrests or bully those women not wearing
the hijab. "What they're doing is just trying to adapt in a system that they
think won't draw as much international attention," Papayianni said. "I think
they know if they arrest women's rights defenders or women and girls for defying
compulsory veiling that there will be a lot of international attention on that."
It was after the Islamic Revolution in 1979, and the replacement of a secular
monarchy with a theocratic regime, that wearing the hijab became mandatory for
women in Iran. In some neighbourhoods of Tehran, particularly at Friday prayers,
you will not see unveiled women. It was after the Islamic Revolution in 1979,
and the replacement of a secular monarchy with a theocratic regime, that wearing
the hijab became mandatory for women in Iran.
The methods regularly used by authorities to enforce a dress code in place since
just after the 1979 Islamic Revolution range from financial penalties to
lashings or jail terms. And just because women are choosing to defy the law
doesn't mean they are not afraid of repercussions. "I am afraid; I have
concerns," said Saha, a 33-year-old human resources worker wearing her long
curly hair uncovered while out in public. "But I'm doing this because I want
[any future child of mine] not to have the same fear as I do," she said,
speaking in Farsi. The feeling on the street is different now, she said, because
more men are supporting women in these actions — as are older generations. "My
mother is quite religious," she said. "She observes the hijab dress code. But at
a protest she was standing next to me." Saha said she'd already been arrested
once, after being photographed driving her car while not wearing a headscarf.
New surveillance techniques
Surveillance methods employed by state security forces are growing increasingly
sophisticated. A United Nations report released in March found that drones,
facial recognition technology and security cameras were being employed to
monitor women's compliance. There is also an app the public can apply to the
police to use that allows approved citizens to report on women deemed to be
flouting the rules, said the report, authored by the Independent International
Fact-finding Mission on the Islamic Republic of Iran. The same body determined
in 2024 that the state was responsible for the "physical violence" that led to
Amini's death in 2022. There are other societal pressures at play. Many
restaurants in Tehran put up signs requesting that women comply with headscarf
rules, reminding customers that the restaurant could be closed down if women
refused. "They're trying to pull in, you know, private business owners to
essentially police women's bodies," said Amnesty's Papayianni. One woman who was
happy to talk to a foreign news crew off the record said she couldn't have her
picture taken without a headscarf for fear it would ruin her chances for a job
in the public school system. Another woman said she didn't want any photos taken
that "the mullahs" — the Islamic clergy leaders — could use to harass her.
Stiffer penalties
Last fall, Iran's parliament approved a new hijab and chastity law that would
impose even tougher punishments on women violating dress codes: steeper fines
and prison sentences of up to 15 years. So far, Iranian President Masoud
Pezeshkian has shied away from putting the legislation forward with his
signature. He campaigned for last year's presidential election with promises to
ease restrictions on women. A man in Iran reads a newspaper with Mahsa Amini's
image emblazoned on the front in this 2022 file photo. The death of the woman in
police custody following a dress code violation sparked protests across Tehran
and around the world. A man in Iran reads a newspaper with Mahsa Amini's image
emblazoned on the front in this 2022 file photo. The death of the woman in
police custody following a dress code violation sparked protests across Tehran
and around the world. (Stephanie Jenzer/CBC)
But conservative hardliners close to Iran's ultimate power, the Supreme Leader
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, have been pushing for the legislation to be implemented.
"Unfortunately [unveiled women] have been influenced by Western culture," said
Fatemeh Hojat, a 43-year-old mother wearing a full chador. "And the fact that
the hijab law is not implemented properly in the country has exacerbated this
issue," she said. The undercurrent of fear that many of the women ignoring the
hijab laws say they still carry with them could suggest a calm before the
proverbial storm. Some analysts say the regime isn't cracking down harder on
these daily acts of defiance because, right now, it can't afford the mass
protests that might spark. Many of Iran's regional allies or proxies have
suffered hits over the past year, just as Washington is exerting pressure on
Iran in pursuit of a nuclear agreement to its liking. But there's also no doubt
that the actions of an increasing number of Iranian women are seen as a
challenge to Iran's theocracy. And periods of perceived reform or liberalism in
the past have often been met with violent crackdowns. Laylah from Tajrish Square
admits it's a possibility. "Good things will happen again," she said. "If they
want to take away our freedom, we will try again to win freedom [...] and to
live the way we want to live."
Macron plays down apparent shove from wife in Vietnam
Thinh Nguyen and Elizabeth Pineau/Reuters/May 26, 2025
HANOI -French President Emmanuel Macron played down on Monday an incident in
which his wife, Brigitte, pushed him in the face as the couple arrived in
Vietnam to begin a tour of Southeast Asia. In a video, Brigitte Macron appeared
to shove her husband before he descended from the presidential plane late on
Sunday, causing him to step back before he recovered and waved to the cameras on
the tarmac below. She remained momentarily hidden behind the plane's fuselage,
blocking any view of her body language. The couple, who have been married since
2007, then descended the steps together, with Brigitte refusing her husband's
arm. "I was bickering, or rather joking, with my wife," Macron told reporters in
Hanoi. "It's nothing."He cautioned that this was not the first time in recent
weeks that the content of videos of him had been twisted by people he described
as "crackpots". Macron cited a video shared on social media that showed him
removing a crumpled white object from a table on a train during a visit to
Ukraine. Some social media users suggested - without providing evidence - that
the object was a bag of cocaine. Macron said it was a tissue and his office
accused France's enemies of spreading fake news. Earlier on Monday, an Elysee
official said of the latest video: "It was a moment when the president and his
wife were relaxing one last time before the start of the trip by having a
laugh."
"It was a moment of closeness."
Macron's visit to Vietnam, the first by a French president in almost a decade,
comes as he aims to boost France's influence in its former colony. Vietnam,
which has a heavily export-driven economy, has made concessions to the U.S. in
trade talks in a bid to avoid 46% tariffs. But Brussels has concerns that
Vietnam's efforts to buy more American goods could come at Europe's expense.
U.S. President Donald Trump threatened on Friday to impose 50% tariffs on
imports from the European Union, but softened his stance two days later,
restoring a July 9 deadline for talks between Washington and Brussels.
Tens of thousands flock to see a Spanish saint's remains
more than 440 years after her death
Suman Naishadham And Alicia Leon/The Associated Press/May 26, 2025
ALBA DE TORMES, Spain — They lined up to see her, silent and wonderstruck:
Inside an open silver casket was Saint Teresa of Ávila, more than 440 years
after her death. Catholic worshippers have been flocking to Alba de Tormes, a
town ringed by rolling pastures in western Spain where the remains of the
Spanish saint, mystic and 16th-century religious reformer were on display this
month. “It gave me a feeling of fulfillment, of joy, and of sadness,” said
Guiomar Sánchez, who traveled from Madrid with her two daughters on Sunday, the
last full day of the exhibit. Inspired by her mother’s belief in the Carmelite
nun, Sánchez praised the mystic’s writings as being ahead of her time. Sánchez
said she also came in part to honor her mother. “Seeing her was an inexplicable
experience,” Sánchez added. On Monday morning, the casket of the saint who died
in 1582 was resealed and carried through the town streets, with pilgrims
following the procession. It is unclear how many years — or decades — will pass
before the church once again makes St. Teresa's remains visible to the public.
Teresa was last displayed in 1914, when devotees had a single day to see the
saint. This time, the display drew almost 100,000 visitors over two weeks, said
Miguel Ángel González, the prior of the Discalced Carmelites of Salamanca.
The casket that holds the saint's remains is barely 1.3 meters (4 feet) long.
What is visible is a skull dressed in a habit with vestments covering other
parts of the body, not all of which is intact. The saint’s heart is kept in
another part of the church, officials said. Other body parts — fingers, a hand
and a jaw — are kept as relics in churches across Europe.
Teresa is a towering figure from Spain’s Golden Age and 16th-century
Counter-Reformation. Her explorations of the inner life and meditations on her
relationship with God were controversial, yet they have been held up over the
centuries as a “profound treatise on spirituality," said José Calvo, a professor
of theology at the Pontifical University of Salamanca who specializes in
Medieval history. Many have worshipped her. Former Spanish dictator Gen.
Francisco Franco is believed to have kept a relic of the saint’s hand next to
his bed. Last September, the newly elected Pope Leo XIV visited the saint's
birthplace in Avila, an hour's drive from Alba de Tormes. Teresa's remains have
also spawned memes online about the macabre nature of crowding around her
centuries-old skull. In Alba de Tormes, church officials and experts downplayed
such reactions, saying the display was nothing out of the ordinary for how
Catholics have revered their saints for centuries. “It was just something people
always did when they thought somebody might be a saint,” said Cathleen Medwick,
who wrote the book “Teresa of Avila, The Progress of a Soul.”“And the fact that
her body hadn’t decayed very much was also considered a sign of her sanctity,"
Medwick added. Some worshippers this month were visibly moved. On Sunday, a
group of nuns from India wiped away tears as they stood by the side of the
casket and looked at the saint's remains behind a glass case. Gregoria Martín
López, 75, climbed to an elevated part of the church behind the altar, hoping to
get a better view from above of the diminutive saint's skull. “The saint for me
is a thing of great strength. If they close her, I can say that I saw her,”
Martín said and with tears in her eyes, blew a kiss down to Teresa's relic as
organ music filled the space.
Daesh cell ‘planning
attacks’ held in Damascus
AFP/May 27, 2025
DAMASCUS: Syrian security forces arrested armed members of a Daesh cell near
Damascus on Monday accused of preparing attacks against the country. The gang
were carrying “light, medium and heavy weaponry” and “explosive devices and
suicide vests they were planning to use to destabilize security and stability,”
the Interior Ministry said. The operation follows a similar incident this month
in the northern city of Aleppo in which a security forces officer and three
Daesh members were killed. Once in control of swaths of Syria and Iraq, Daesh
were territorially defeated in Syria in 2019 largely due to the efforts of
Kurdish-led forces supported by an international coalition. But the group have
continued to carry out attacks, particularly against Kurdish-led forces in
northeastern Syria. During his meeting with Syrian President Ahmad Al-Sharaa in
Riyadh this month, US President Donald Trump called on him to “help the US to
prevent to resurgence” of Daesh, the White House said. Meanwhie, Syria’s Kurds
will insist on decentralized government in forthcoming talks with the new
authorities in Damascus, Kurdish official Badran Ciya Kurd said. The Kurdish-led
administration signed an agreement in March to integrate into Syria’s state
institutions.
Jordan eyes new economic partnership with Syria during
official visit
Arab News/May 26, 2025
DAMASCUS: The Jordan Chamber of Commerce has used a visit to the Syrian Arab
Republic to lay the groundwork for a renewed economic partnership, with a focus
on deepening cooperation and supporting Syria’s reconstruction and economic
recovery. During an official visit to Damascus on Monday, Senator Khalil Al-Haj
Tawfiq, head of the Jordanian delegation, said his country was mobilizing its
capabilities and private sector expertise to aid Syria’s economic development,
the Jordan News Agency reported. The JCC held talks with the Federation of
Syrian Chambers of Commerce to explore collaboration across key sectors,
including trade, transport, logistics, agriculture, industry, food, banking and
shipping. The two sides agreed to draft a comprehensive road map to guide future
cooperation, with an emphasis on investment, joint ventures and reconstruction
initiatives. “Our delegation seeks to launch a new phase of economic cooperation
that serves both countries’ interests,” Tawfiq said. “We are committed to
facilitating trade and transport and enhancing private sector engagement to
support Syria’s path forward.”The Jordanian delegation, comprising leaders from
the commercial and service sectors, will also hold a series of meetings with
Syrian officials and business representatives over three days. The talks aim to
revive the Jordanian-Syrian Joint Business Council and set the stage for an
upcoming economic forum in Amman. FSCC President Alaa Ali welcomed Jordan’s
support, highlighting the strong historic ties between the two countries, the
report said. He called for boosting product competitiveness and reevaluating
trade agreements, particularly in light of recent moves to ease international
sanctions on Syria. Ali praised the recent signing of a memorandum of
understanding between the Jordanian and Syrian governments to establish a Higher
Coordination Council, describing it as a vital step toward enhanced economic
integration. The visit was coordinated with Jordan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs
and the Jordanian Embassy in Damascus and marks a significant step toward
rebuilding economic bridges between the two neighbors.
The Latest English LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous
sources
on May 26-27/2025
Do Not Be Fooled by Iran: What They Really Want Is to Destroy America,
Israel Is Just in the Way
Bassam Tawil/Gatestone Institute/May 26/2025
The real nakba [catastrophe, for Palestinians] was that they started a war and
lost it. Well, if you start a war, that is what can happen.
The Trump administration should beware of countries where the mouth says one
thing but the legs do the opposite. Believe the legs. The Iranians and
Palestinians have not given up their dream of eliminating Israel and America.
Iran's leaders do the same thing. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian reassures
Americans that "We are not seeking war, we favor negotiation and dialogue."
Meanwhile, Khamenei calls for the elimination of the "Zionist regime" and
endorses "Death to America."
It is time for the Trump administration and other Westerners to see that the
Palestinians and the Iranian regime do not want Israel or America in the Middle
East -- period -- and are prepared to do anything to achieve this goal,
including with nuclear weapons.
In many respects, Hamas, the Iran-backed terror group, has always been more
forthright and honest about its goals regarding Israel than its rivals in the
Palestinian Authority (PA). When one listens to leaders of the PA and the
leaders of Hamas in Arabic, it is almost impossible to tell the difference
between them. Their rhetoric, for instance, to vilify Israel, is identical: "The
Zionist Enemy", "the Zionist Entity", the State of Occupation", and "the
Apartheid State".
Hamas and the PA both view the establishment of Israel as a "catastrophe"
(nakba) and call for flooding it with millions of Palestinian "refugees" so that
Jews become a minority to eliminate or cast out.
Hamas makes clear to everyone that its primary goal is to wage jihad (holy war)
against Israel with the intention of replacing it with an Islamist state. The
terror group's covenant proudly quotes Hassan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim
Brotherhood organization, as stating: "Israel will exist and continue to exist
until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it."
In mid-May, the PA and Hamas marked the 77th anniversary of "Nakba Day"
("Catastrophe Day"), a reference to the establishment of Israel in 1948.
Hamas, in a statement, said:
"The occupation [Israel] has no legitimacy or sovereignty over any part of our
occupied land, and our people will continue to themselves through comprehensive
resistance until the liberation of all of Palestine."
The terror group vowed that the "resistance" against Israel will continue until
Palestinian refugees achieve the "right of return" to their former homes inside
Israel.
Most of the so-called refugees are not real refugees. Most are descendants --
now quite distant -- of refugees who lost their homes when five Arab armies
attacked Israel in 1948 in an attempt to prevent it from coming into existence.
For Hamas and other Palestinians and Arabs, the fact that they failed to thwart
the establishment of Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people is a
"catastrophe."
The real nakba was that they started a war and lost it. Well, if you start a
war, that is what can happen.
The PA and its president, Mahmoud Abbas, share Hamas's view. In a speech marking
"Nakba Day," Abbas, bizarrely referred to by some Westerners as a "moderate
leader" even though he handsomely pays his people to murder Jews, described the
establishment of Israel as a "tragedy" and as "the catastrophe of catastrophes."
Like Hamas, Abbas called for flooding Israel with millions of Palestinian
"refugees":
"On behalf of the steadfast Palestinian people, and in the name of more than 15
million Palestinians, including seven million Palestinian refugees, we renew our
pledge that we will remain adherent to our rights and will continue our
legitimate struggle for freedom and independence until they are realized. Today,
we commemorate not only this somber anniversary, but renew the pledge that the
Nakba was not and will not be the permanent and inevitable fate of our people,
and that the right of return, the right to self-determination, and the
independence of the Palestinian State are steady and inalienable rights and will
not be forsaken by our people."
Such statements by Hamas and Abbas show why the talk about a peace process
between Israel and the Palestinians is, unfortunately, just a sick joke. If the
Palestinians consider the establishment and existence of Israel a "catastrophe"
and "tragedy," this means that they have not – and will not – recognize Israel's
right to exist.
By demanding the "right of return" for so-called refugees, Hamas and Abbas are
clearly stating their intention to turn Israel into a country with an Arab
Muslim majority. In this country, perhaps for a price – required Arab jizya
payments are actually protection money -- some Jews might be allowed to live on
sufferance, as dhimmis, tolerated residents of a land conquered by Islam.
Those who continue to advocate for the creation of a Palestinian state need to
consider that such a state would be backed, politically and militarily, by Iran
and its ruling mullahs, whose declared goal is to eliminate the "Zionist entity"
Israel, as well as the United States.
As Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has stated about the "Little Satan":
"'Death to Israel' is not just a slogan, it is a policy." The same goes for the
"Great Satan" and "Death to America."
In the years leading up to its invasion of Israel on October 7, 2023, Hamas
developed a concrete plan to destroy the Jewish state, in full coordination with
Iran and its Lebanon-based terror proxy, Hezbollah. According to classified
documents published by the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information
Center, Iran was a critical player in funding Hamas's plan to destroy Israel.
On May 15, Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei reminded us, once again, that in
his view, as he posted on X: "The Zionist regime is illegitimate, and the
formation of this regime was based on a false premise." He is actually repeating
what he knows is the false claim that Jews have no religious, emotional or
historical attachment to their homeland.
His post came on the occasion of "Nakba Day." Many Arabs and Muslims, including
Khamenei, continue to dream of the day when they would be able to destroy it.
They do not conceal their support for the use of violence to achieve this goal.
Furthermore, they never conceal their hatred for the "Little Satan" Israel, and
the "Great Satan", the U.S.
On May 4, Khamenei wrote:
"When we, the Muslim Ummah [nation], are detached from each other, the colonial
powers – the US, the Zionist regime, and some European and non-European
countries – impose their own interests over the interests of other nations."
Iran's supreme leader is telling Arabs and Muslims that they must unite to
confront not only Israel, but also the US and other non-Muslims.
In another post on May 15, Khamenei wrote:
"Palestinian political, military and cultural fight should continue until those
[Jews] who have usurped Palestine submit to the vote of the Palestinian nation."
For Iran's mullahs, the "military fight" means unleashing terrorism against
Israel by their Palestinian, Lebanese, and Yemeni terror proxies: Hamas,
Hezbollah, and the Houthis.
In the context of his anti-US rhetoric and policy, Khamenei recently scoffed at
US President Donald J. Trump's visit to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab
Emirates and his talk about achieving peace and prosperity. "Trump said he wants
to use power for peace," Khamenei wrote on May 17:
"Some of the remarks made during the US President's trip to the region aren't
even worth a response at all. The level of those remarks is so low that they are
a source of shame for the American nation."
He later added:
"Trump said he wants to use power for peace. He's lying."
The Trump administration should beware of countries where the mouth says one
thing but the legs do the opposite. Believe the legs. The Iranians and
Palestinians have not given up their dream of eliminating Israel and America.
The Trump administration also should realize that Palestinian and Iranian
leaders tell Westerners one thing -- what they like to hear -- in English, while
addressing their people with completely different messages in Arabic and Farsi.
Believe the Arabic and Farsi.
Mahmoud Abbas has long been telling Westerners about his desire to make peace
and establish a Palestinian state next to Israel; at the same time, he keeps
calling for Israel's destruction.
Iran's leaders do the same thing. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian reassures
Americans that "We are not seeking war, we favor negotiation and dialogue."
Meanwhile, Khamenei calls for the elimination of the "Zionist regime" and
endorses "Death to America."
The Palestinians and Iran's mullahs believe that Americans and most Westerners
are gullible enough to unreservedly swallow any lie – they so often have in the
past.
It is time for the Trump administration and other Westerners to see that the
Palestinians and the Iranian regime do not want Israel or America in the Middle
East -- period -- and are prepared to do anything to achieve this goal,
including with nuclear weapons.
*Bassam Tawil is a Muslim Arab based in the Middle East. His work is made
possible through the generous donation of a couple of donors who wished to
remain anonymous. Gatestone is most grateful.
© 2025 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
The 'Two-State Solution' to Kill Jews, Destroy Israel
Bassam Tawil/Gatestone Institute/May 26, 2025
After the 2007 Hamas takeover, the Gaza Strip became an independent Palestinian
state controlled by Hamas, with its own government, parliament, police force,
and multiple armed groups. The Hamas rulers of the Gaza Strip, in addition, had
exclusive control over the border with Egypt, which was also abandoned by
Israel.
In the absence of any Israeli military or civilian presence inside Gaza, Hamas
had a chance to turn the coastal strip into a prosperous area, a "Singapore" or
"Dubai" on the Mediterranean. Instead, the terror group chose to manufacture and
smuggle weapons, including rockets and missiles, and invest tens of millions of
dollars in building a vast network of tunnels for stockpiling its weapons,
facilitating the concealed movement of terrorists, and providing shelter for its
leaders and members.
[T]he war is continuing because of Hamas's refusal to release the remaining
Israeli hostages, relinquish control over the Gaza Strip and lay down its
weapons. Hamas, backed and armed by Iran, is determined to fight to the last
Palestinian because its primary goal is to destroy Israel and replace it with an
Islamist state.For more than a decade, these payments [to the Palestinian
"pay-for-slay" program] have amounted to more than $300 million annually. Last
year, the PA's payments increased by $1.3 million per month. The murder of Jews
is what the European Union and many European countries have been funding.
By advocating a "two-state solution," France, Canada and Britain are essentially
authorizing a genocide.
Before reviving their idea, the French, Canadians and British need to look at
the results of all of the polls. They consistently show that most Palestinians
support Hamas and the armed struggle against Israel. The last thing Palestinians
and Israelis need now is to transplant the failed Gaza model onto the West Bank.
As the Hamas-Israel war in the Gaza Strip enters its 20th month, France, Britain
and Canada have revived the talk about the need to establish a Palestinian
state. In a joint statement in mid-May, the leaders of the three countries
proclaimed:
"We are committed to recognizing a Palestinian state as a contribution to
achieving a two-state solution and are prepared to work with others to this
end."
Next month, the United Nations is scheduled to host an international conference,
co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia, to advance the idea of a "two-state
solution" between Israel and the Palestinians.
According to the UN:
"As outlined in General Assembly resolution 79/81, the Conference will produce
an action-oriented outcome document entitled 'Peaceful settlement of the
question of Palestine and implementation of the two-State solution.'"
"Indeed, only the implementation of a two-state solution will restore peace,
prosperity and security for Israelis, Palestinians, and the entire region,"
Anne-Claire Legendre, advisor to the French president for the Middle East and
North Africa, said in a statement on May 23.
"The June [UN] Conference must mark a transformative milestone for the effective
implementation of the two-state solution. Within the framework of this
conference, we will work with everybody who wishes to be involved to craft a
roadmap for peace and security for all, based on two states, Israel and
Palestine, living side by side in peace and security within secure and
recognized borders."
Any talk about a "two-state solution" in the aftermath of the October 7, 2023
Hamas-led attack on Israel is a sick joke. The "two-state solution" died on that
day, when thousands of Hamas terrorists and "ordinary" Palestinians from the
Gaza Strip invaded Israel, murdered 1,200 people and wounded thousands. Another
251 Israelis were kidnapped to the Gaza Strip, where 58 – dead and alive – are
still held as hostages.
In many respects, before October 7, the Gaza Strip was an independent and
sovereign Palestinian state controlled by the Iran-backed terrorist group,
Hamas.
In 2005, Israel withdrew from the entire Gaza Strip and handed it over,
unconditionally, to the Palestinian Authority (PA) headed by Mahmoud Abbas. Less
than two years later, Hamas staged a violent coup, toppling the PA and seizing
full control over Gaza and its two million Palestinian residents.
After the 2007 Hamas takeover, the Gaza Strip became an independent Palestinian
state controlled by Hamas, with its own government, parliament, police force,
and multiple armed groups. The Hamas rulers of the Gaza Strip, in addition, had
exclusive control over the border with Egypt, which was also abandoned by
Israel.
In the absence of any Israeli military or civilian presence inside Gaza, Hamas
had a chance to turn the coastal strip into a prosperous area, a "Singapore" or
"Dubai" on the Mediterranean. Instead, the terror group chose to manufacture and
smuggle weapons, including rockets and missiles, and invest tens of millions of
dollars in building a vast network of tunnels for stockpiling its weapons,
facilitating the concealed movement of terrorists, and providing shelter for its
leaders and members.
On October 7, during a de facto ceasefire, Hamas terrorists and thousands of
"ordinary" Palestinians breached the border with Israel with the purpose of
slaughtering and abducting as many Jews as possible.
The Israeli towns and villages near the border with the Gaza Strip that were
invaded by the Palestinians were not "illegal settlements." Rather, they were in
Israel proper, within its internationally recognized borders. The Israelis
murdered and wounded on that day were not "illegal settlers." Rather, they were
Israeli citizens residing within Israel's borders.
To many Palestinians, any Israeli is considered a "settler" and an appropriate
target for murder, especially under the Palestinian Authority's lucrative
"pay-for-slay" jobs-program set up under Mahmoud Abbas. The more Jews you
murder, the larger the payments. For more than a decade, these payments have
amounted to more than $300 million annually. Last year, the PA's payments
increased by $1.3 million per month. The murder of Jews is what the European
Union and many European countries have been funding (see, for instance, here and
here).
Ironically and tragically, many of the Israelis who were butchered and kidnapped
on October 7 were peace activists. They believed in the "two-state solution."
Some had even volunteered driving sick Palestinians from the Gaza Strip for
medical treatment in Israeli hospitals.
Yocheved Lifschitz, an 85-year-old Israeli peace activist who was kidnapped and
later freed by Hamas, confronted Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar during a visit to
hostages in a tunnel. She asked him: "Aren't you ashamed of having done this to
people who have always worked for peace with the Palestinians?"
Vivian Silver, a Canadian-Israeli peace activist, was murdered in the Hamas-led
attack on October 7. For many years, she worked within her kibbutz, Be'eri, to
organize programs to help Gazans, such as job training, and ensuring that Gazan
construction workers at the kibbutz were paid fairly. Silver was also the
co-founder of Women Wage Peace, a grassroots interfaith organization. She also
volunteered with Road to Recovery and Project Roxana to transport Gazan patients
to Israeli hospitals.
The Palestinians who invaded Israel on October 7 did not distinguish between one
Israeli and another. They did not care whether the Israelis they murdered
supported a "two-state solution" or not. They did not even distinguish between
Israeli Jews and Israeli Arabs. Notably, 20 Israeli Arabs were murdered during
the attacks or by Hamas rocket launches in the ensuing days. There were also 71
foreign victims on October 7, mostly Thai workers.
The October 7 invasion should be seen as a declaration of war on Israel by the
Hamas-controlled Palestinian state in the Gaza Strip. Hamas planned and
initiated this war since before 2020. It has brought death and destruction not
only on Israelis, but also on the Palestinian residents of the Gaza Strip.
Twenty months later, the war is continuing because of Hamas's refusal to release
the remaining Israeli hostages, relinquish control over the Gaza Strip and lay
down its weapons. Hamas, backed and armed by Iran, is determined to fight to the
last Palestinian because its primary goal is to destroy Israel and replace it
with an Islamist state.
Under the current circumstances, those who talk about a "two-state solution" to
achieve peace and prosperity between Israelis and Palestinians are actually
seeking to reward Hamas for perpetrating the worst crime against Jews since the
Holocaust.
By pushing for a "two-state solution," France, Canada and Britain are sending a
message to Hamas and other Palestinians that October 7 was worthwhile because it
will bring them an independent and sovereign state.
By advocating a "two-state solution," France, Canada and Britain are essentially
authorizing a genocide.
There is another problem: Can these countries or the UN guarantee that a
Palestinian state in the West Bank would not be used in the future as a
launching pad to attack Israel? Of course not.
Whether Hamas will officially admit it or not, that is the main reason it, and
its backers in Iran and Qatar, want a "state." Do you think they want it to grow
avocadoes?
There is no doubt that a Palestinian state would be controlled by Hamas or other
extremist Palestinians who do not believe in Israel's right to exist. A poll
published earlier this month showed that if presidential elections in the
Palestinian Authority were held today, Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal would win 68%
of the votes, compared to 25% for the incumbent Mahmoud Abbas. When asked which
political party or movement they supported, the largest percentage (32%) said
they preferred Hamas, followed by Abbas's ruling Fatah faction (21%). Twelve
percent selected third parties, and 34% said they do not support any of them or
do not know.
If new PA parliamentary elections were held today, the poll showed, Hamas would
win 43% of the votes as opposed to 28% for Fatah. The poll also found that 40%
of the Palestinians believe that Hamas is the most deserving of representing and
leading the Palestinian people, while only 19% believe that Fatah is the most
deserving.
The so-called two-state solution, sadly, is only a recipe for more violence,
terrorism and bloodshed -- not security, stability and peace.
Before reviving their idea, the French, Canadians and British need to look at
the results of all of the polls. They consistently show that most Palestinians
support Hamas and the armed struggle against Israel. The last thing Palestinians
and Israelis need now is to transplant the failed Gaza model onto the West Bank.
Bassam Tawil is a Muslim Arab based in the Middle East. His work is made
possible through the generous donation of a couple of donors who wished to
remain anonymous. Gatestone is most grateful.
© 2025 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21650/two-state-solution
The Syrian uplift
Dana Hourany/Now Lebanon/May 26/2025
As Syria enters a new era marked by the lifting of sanctions, the question
arises: how will this shift impact Lebanon—a country still uncertain about its
own future?
In a striking reversal of long-standing policy, US President Donald Trump has
announced the lifting of American sanctions on Syria, a move signaling renewed
engagement with Damascus just months after the ouster of former leader Bashar
al-Assad. Speaking during a visit to Saudi Arabia, Trump described Syria’s new
leadership under President Ahmed al-Sharaa as holding “an extraordinary
opportunity” to bring peace and stability to the war-torn country. The
announcement came after Trump’s historic meeting with Sharaa — a one-time
jihadist and former adversary of U.S. forces — marking the first face-to-face
between Syrian and American leaders in a quarter century.
The landmark encounter, held alongside Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman
ahead of a Gulf Cooperation Council summit, underscores a dramatic pivot in US
foreign policy. Trump, who called Sharaa a “tough guy” with a “very strong
past,” said the sanctions rollback would give Syria “a chance at greatness.” For
many Syrians, the televised images of their president flanked by the leaders of
the US and Saudi Arabia were seen as a sign that 15 years of international
isolation may finally be ending.
The European Union is poised to follow Washington’s lead, with EU diplomats
confirming a preliminary deal to lift most economic sanctions on Syria. The
move, expected to be finalized by foreign ministers in Brussels, would
reintegrate Syrian banks into the global financial system and unfreeze the
country’s central bank assets. While core sanctions on arms sales and
individuals linked to past human rights abuses will remain, the shift reflects
what Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad Al-Shaibani called “a regional and
international will to support Syria’s rebirth.”
Sharaa, 42, welcomed the American move in a televised speech as a “historic and
courageous decision” that would ease public suffering and lay the groundwork for
national reconstruction. He cautioned, however, that the path ahead would be
long. In Damascus, the mood was celebratory, with stalls near the Umayyad Mosque
now selling both Syrian and Saudi flags — a tribute to Riyadh’s role in
brokering the Trump-Sharaa meeting. As international recognition grows, Syria’s
new leadership faces the monumental task of rebuilding a fractured nation while
managing the legacy of a brutal civil war.
History of sanctions
Sanctions against Syria stretch back decades, beginning with the US designating
the country a “State Sponsor of Terrorism” in 1979. This early move brought an
arms embargo and restrictions on financial aid. Tensions escalated in 2004 when
the US introduced additional economic sanctions, limiting trade and further
isolating Syria’s financial system.
The outbreak of Syria’s civil war in 2011 marked a turning point. As the Assad
regime violently cracked down on protests, the US and others expanded their
sanctions. Measures included freezing Syrian government assets abroad, banning
US investments, and blocking petroleum imports. Washington also targeted
individuals linked to the regime and designated groups like Hayat Tahrir al-Sham
(HTS)—formerly connected to al-Qaeda—as terrorist organizations. A $10 million
reward was also placed on the capture of Syria’s current leader, al-Sharaa.
These sanctions were primarily motivated by human rights concerns, particularly
the regime’s use of chemical weapons, and by Syria’s association with terrorism.
Despite the fall of Bashar al-Assad in late 2024, many of these sanctions have
remained in place due to lingering concerns over security and governance.
Following Assad’s departure, some easing occurred. The US issued a temporary
six-month license (GL 24) in January 2025, allowing limited transactions with
Syrian institutions and exempting personal remittances, although most US banks
remained cautious. The EU lifted select restrictions in sectors like energy and
transport and allowed banking transactions tied to humanitarian aid. The UK
adopted a similar path but went further, lifting more financial sector
restrictions and removing sanctions from the Syrian Central Bank and other
entities.
Despite these moves, core international sanctions remain. UN Security Council
Resolution 1267 continues to impose asset freezes and travel bans on HTS and al-Sharaa,
with delisting requiring broad international consensus—a process stalled by
Russian opposition.
Efforts to fully lift US sanctions are complicated by legal mechanisms.
Sanctions imposed through presidential orders can be reversed by the president,
but those passed by Congress, like the Caesar Act (renewed in 2025), require new
legislation to repeal. While the Act allows for waivers and temporary
suspensions based on national security or progress on US demands, only full
repeal would offer the certainty needed for long-term investment.
Policymakers are debating whether the current piecemeal and conditional approach
is the most effective. Some argue that a clean slate—with all outdated laws
repealed and replaced by a targeted, transparent system—might better support
Syria’s recovery while maintaining leverage.
What happens now?
According to some analysts, easing sanctions offers limited short-term relief,
potentially boosting small-scale agriculture and services, but a broad economic
revival remains unlikely. It may signal the start of Syria’s reintegration into
regional markets, encouraging some trade and tourism ties, though progress
depends on unresolved sanctions and political dynamics. Analysts view the move
as a strategic gesture tied to regional negotiations or domestic political
interests.
For political analyst Sam Mnassa, the lifting of sanctions on Syria is not just
a bureaucratic or economic measure—it’s the gateway to a fundamental
geopolitical shift. “The issue isn’t the Caesar Act or American sanctions. These
are logistical details,” he told NOW. “The essence lies in the political process
of lifting sanctions, which marks the end of one era in Syria and the beginning
of another.”
Mnassa sees this move as Syria’s quiet departure from the Iranian-led “axis of
resistance” toward alignment with Gulf countries. The goal, he explains, is to
stabilize a new political order in Damascus—one more open to Arab and possibly
even Western engagement.
In practical terms, the economic benefits of this political thaw may begin to
materialize within a year. Aid from Arab states, particularly the Gulf, is
expected to arrive faster than Western investments, which are more cautious and
conditional. Qatar, for instance, is already paying public sector salaries in
Syria (excluding defense and foreign ministries), hinting at growing Arab
involvement in Syria’s recovery.
Lebanon stands to benefit from this recovery—if it plays its cards right. A
stabilizing Syria means fewer refugees and renewed cross-border economic
activity. “Lebanese contractors, entrepreneurs, and small and medium businesses
could find work in Syria’s reconstruction,” Menassa noted. “This would help
revive Lebanon’s own stagnant economy, but only if we have a functioning
government ready to capitalize on these opportunities.”
However, Lebanon’s deep political paralysis threatens its ability to benefit.
Mnassa warns that while individual Lebanese may profit from Syria’s opening, the
Lebanese state may miss out altogether. “Lebanon hasn’t taken a clear political
decision about where it stands regionally. Is it aligned with Iran or Saudi
Arabia? What about its relationship to the West? Is it stuck in neutral?” he
asked. “Without that clarity, without real reform and rule of law, foreign
investors won’t come.”
The issue of Syrian refugees in Lebanon—estimated at nearly two million—could
also be reshaped by Syria’s rehabilitation. “With better conditions in Syria,
some may return,” Mnassa said. “Of course, not all can or should, especially
those at risk.”
Still, Mnassa cautions against simplistic or xenophobic narratives. “We need to
be honest—many Lebanese rely on Syrian labor. But we also need to recognize the
immense strain on Lebanon’s infrastructure, electricity, water, and social
services.”
Ultimately, he argues, Lebanon’s fate is closely tied to Syria’s. But while
Syria appears to be carving a new regional role for itself, Lebanon remains
adrift. “The question isn’t whether Syria will play a bigger role in the region
than Lebanon–because that’s highly plausible,” Mnassa said. “The question is
whether Lebanon can define its own role, reform its institutions, and regain the
trust of its people and the world.”
The easing of sanctions opens a new chapter for Syria, but significant economic
and political challenges remain. Recovery will likely be slow and dependent on
regional and internal dynamics.
For Lebanon, Syria’s gradual reopening offers potential economic opportunities
and relief on refugee pressures. Yet Lebanon’s own political and economic
instability may limit its ability to benefit. How Lebanon positions itself amid
these changes—and whether it undertakes needed reforms—will shape its role in a
shifting regional landscape.
Boko Haram's resurgence: Why Nigeria's military is struggling to hold the line
Taiwo Adebayo/The Associated Press/May 26, 2025
ABUJA, Nigeria — A resurgence of Boko Haram attacks is shaking Nigeria’s
northeast, as Islamic extremists have repeatedly overrun military outposts,
mined roads with bombs and raided civilian communities since the start of the
year, raising fears of a possible return to peak Boko Haram-era insecurity
despite the military's claims of successes. Boko Haram, Nigeria’s homegrown
jihadis, took up arms in 2009 to fight Western education and impose their
radical version of Islamic law. The conflict has spilled into Nigeria’s northern
neighbors and resulted in the death of around 35,000 civilians and the
displacement of more than 2 million others, according to the United Nations. In
the latest attack last week in the village of Gajibo in Borno state, the
epicenter of the crisis, extremists killed nine members of a local militia that
supports the Nigerian military, after soldiers deserted the base when becoming
aware of the insurgents’ advance, according to the group’s claim and local aid
workers. That is in addition to roadside bombs and deadly attacks on villages in
recent months. Nyelni Kwari's area of Borno, Hawul, includes some of the
affected villages, and returning home has become unsafe. “Unfortunately, the
situation hasn't improved for me to feel secure,” said Kwari, a graduate student
in Borno's capital, Maiduguri.
Two factions
Boko Haram has split into two factions over the years. One is backed by the
Islamic State group and is known as the Islamic State West Africa Province, or
ISWAP. It has become notorious for targeting military positions and has overrun
the military on at least 15 occasions this year, killing soldiers and stealing
weapons, according to an Associated Press count, experts and security reports.
In May, ISWAP struck outposts in Gajibo, Buni Gari, Marte, Izge and Rann and
launched an assault on the Nigeria-Cameroon joint base in Wulgo and Soueram in
Cameroon. Other attacks this year have hit Malam Fatori, Goniri, Sabon Gari,
Wajiroko and Monguno, among others. The group often attacks at night. The other
faction, Jama’atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda’awati wal-Jihad, or JAS, has increasingly
resorted to attacking civilians and perceived collaborators, and thrives on
robberies and abductions for ransom.
Expansion and decentralization
Malik Samuel, senior researcher at nonprofit Good Governance Africa, said
ISWAP’s success is a result of its territorial expansion following gains against
rival JAS as well as a decentralized structure that has enhanced its ability to
conduct “coordinated, near-simultaneous attacks across different regions.”“The
unpredictability of attacks under this framework illustrates ISWAP’s growing
strategic sophistication,” Samuel said. External support from IS in Iraq and
Syria is also a critical resource, said Samuel, who has interviewed ex-fighters.
Such support is evident in ISWAP’s evolving tactics, including nighttime raids,
rapid assaults with light but effective weaponry and the use of modified
commercial drones to drop explosives, Samuel said.
Outgunned and outnumbered military
Ali Abani, a local nonprofit worker familiar with military operations in Borno's
strategic town of Dikwa, said army bases are understaffed and located in remote
areas, making them vulnerable to attacks. "When these gunmen come, they just
overpower the soldiers,” Abani said. Reinforcements, in the form of air support
or nearby ground troops, are often too slow to arrive, allowing militants time
to strip the outposts of weapons needed to bolster their arsenal, he added,
recalling a May 12 attack during which soldiers fled as they were outnumbered,
leaving the extremists to cart away weaponry. There also have been reports of
former militants who continued to work as informants and logistics handlers
after claiming to have repented.
Nigeria losing ground ‘almost on a daily basis’
At its peak in 2013 and 2014, Boko Haram gained global notoriety after
kidnapping 276 Chibok schoolgirls and controlling an area the size of Belgium.
While it has lost much of that territory because of military campaigns, the new
surge in Boko Haram attacks has raised fears about a possible return to the
gloomy past. Borno Gov. Babagana Zulum warned recently of lost gains after
raising concerns that military formations in the state are being dislodged
“almost on a daily basis without confrontation.” Federal lawmakers highlight the
extremists' growing sophistication and advanced weaponry, calling on the
government to bolster military capabilities.
The Nigerian military didn't respond to a request for comment. Last Friday,
senior commanders visited one troubled area, Gamboru on the border with
Cameroon, promising the deployment of more troops to combat Boko Haram.
Sykes-Picot Agreement and Political Islam
Colonel Charbel Barakat/May 27/2025
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2025/05/143692/
Some remnants of the Ottoman Sultanate and today's neo-Islamists still dream of
dominating others under flimsy slogans. They draw inspiration from the
oppression once practiced by the Mamluks, who expelled native populations from
their lands, followed by the Ottomans who defeated the Mamluks and imposed their
own brutal control. Under Ottoman rule, populations were reduced to obedient
subjects, expected to pay taxes in return for "protection and stability."
These dreamers and their ideological successors constantly invoke the
Sykes-Picot Agreement as a scapegoat for the failures of modern regimes—regimes
that have ruled for over seventy years since the so-called colonial era ended.
They blame the agreement, which merely divided the Ottoman Empire’s legacy
between France and Britain, for the ongoing dysfunction in their societies.
France, before implementing its mandate, conducted in-depth studies of the
region and the suffering endured by its people under Ottoman rule. It envisioned
giving these people the right to self-determination. This vision came after a
series of tragedies: the genocidal massacres of Armenians in Cilicia, the
“Seyfo” massacres of Syriacs and Assyrians in southern Turkey (1915), the Great
Famine in Mount Lebanon (1915–1918), and later, the population exchanges between
Greece and Turkey (1923) following the so-called “War of Liberation.” That war
was aided by Soviet intervention, driven by fears that the Allies might reach
Russia’s borders and restore the Tsarist regime. The Soviets even occupied
Armenia shortly after.
The French also learned from the experience of Yusuf al-Azma, former secretary
to Anwar Pasha, the Ottoman Minister of War. Azma had contributed to thwarting
King Faisal’s short-lived rule in Damascus through military confrontation. As a
result, General Gouraud of France declared the establishment of Greater Lebanon
in 1920 and proposed a union of federated states in Syria, based on local
minorities. Meanwhile, Britain facilitated the Jewish settlement in Palestine
through legal land purchases, a process already underway since the late 19th
century. Britain also restructured Iraq—composed of the Ottoman-era provinces of
Basra, Baghdad, and Mosul—into a constitutional monarchy under King Faisal in
1921, with a representative democratic government.
In contrast, the Ottoman and neo-Islamist vision, which never truly embraced
equality or freedom for all social components, sowed the seeds of internal
conflict. Rejectionist movements, sometimes under the guise of Arabism, adopted
sectarian tones and evolved into nationalist movements. These grew in parallel
with the rise of European ideologies like fascism and Nazism, which ultimately
led to World War II. Anti-Jewish sentiment intensified, allegedly in the name of
fighting British colonialism, and that hatred continues today.
Under the French mandate, Syria was organized in a way that respected its
long-standing sectarian diversity. The 1922 Syrian Union included:
Jabal al-Druze State in the south (Suwayda, pop. 50,000): 84% Druze, 14%
Christian, 1% Sunni.
Alawite State on the coast (Latakia, pop. 370,000): 71% Alawite, 13% Sunni, 12%
Christian, 4% Ismaili.
Alexandretta (Antioch, pop. 190,000): 40% Turkmen, 28% Alawite, 20% Christian,
11% Sunni Arab, with some Circassians and Kurds.
Aleppo State (Aleppo, pop. 600,000): 83% Sunni Arabs and Kurds, 9% Christian, 5%
Alawite, and a small Jewish minority.
Damascus State (Damascus, pop. 600,000): 75% Sunni, 12% Christian, 8% minorities
(Druze, Alawite, Jewish, Ismaili, Shiite).
In May 1935, France signed a defensive pact with the Soviet Union. Later that
year, the Comintern's Seventh Congress adopted the "Popular Front" strategy.
Following strikes and protests similar to those in France, Syria also erupted in
1936. The National Bloc led demonstrations demanding independence. A Syrian
delegation went to France for talks, possibly influenced by the Soviets who
sought to end Western hegemony in the region. These negotiations resulted in the
unratified 1936 Treaty—but more critically, Syria was reunified and the federal
model was scrapped.
This centralization mirrored two global currents: Soviet-style socialism and
European ultranationalism (as seen in Nazi and fascist regimes). Both promoted
the unification of ethnonational identities and suppression of sectarianism. In
secular Turkey, the heir to the Sultanate, Atatürk’s reforms imposed a hybrid
model blending aspects of communism and nationalism, curbing religious
authoritarianism and dismantling Islamic law-based governance.
Both the Soviets and the Islamists—Sunni or Shiite—opposed Western presence in
the region. After World War II, France and Britain, weakened and focused on
rebuilding, began to withdraw. This vacuum ushered in a series of revolutions
and coups: in Syria, Egypt (led by Nasser and the Free Officers), and the 1956
Suez Crisis, which shifted the Gulf–Europe trade route away from the Canal and
toward Lebanon and Syria.
This fueled more anti-colonial rhetoric. Sykes-Picot and the colonial legacy
became the focal points in speeches—most notably Nasser’s fiery orations, which
echoed Hitler’s style and ideology without understanding their inherent
contradictions. Nasserism merged socialist rhetoric with Islamist undertones,
particularly the Muslim Brotherhood’s call for a return to Sharia and the
Caliphate. The result was a hybrid model that adopted neither ideology fully—and
rejected none.
Meanwhile, Israel focused on building a cohesive society under a religious
identity, to protect itself from increasingly hostile neighbors.
Later, during the Vietnam War, the United States faced guerrilla warfare from
communists. The Soviet Union, in turn, faced Islamic resistance in Afghanistan,
which evolved into suicide jihad and global terrorism. These movements initially
targeted the Soviet Union but later shifted focus to Israel. From this chaos
emerged the Muslim Brotherhood’s militant offshoots and, eventually, the Iranian
Revolution in 1979, establishing the first Shiite theocracy—an Islamist regime
very different from its Sunni counterparts.
Yet both al-Qaeda and Iran’s mullahs share one slogan: fighting the Jews and
liberating Palestine. Their ultimate aim is to rally the masses to establish a
religious state governed by Islamic law—Sunni or Shiite—under which armies of "mujahideen"
would spread global Islamic rule.
More than seventy years after France and Britain left the Middle East,
Sykes-Picot is still invoked by theorists and politicians to deflect blame for
their own failures. Despite accusing colonialism of plundering their wealth,
these regimes have governed for over seven decades, yet continue to breed
poverty, misery, and endless conflict.
Take Syria, which was unified in 1936—against the supposed intent of
Sykes-Picot. Has that unity brought prosperity or peace? On the contrary: over
fifty-five years of Baathist rule, marked by Arab nationalism and military
dictatorship, led to mass killings, societal fragmentation, and millions
displaced by war. Is ISIS any better than the Baathists? What about Saddam
Hussein, the Assads, Gaddafi, or the mullahs of Iran?
Despite its flaws, Sykes-Picot and the French and British mandates remain
preferable to the nightmare of local authoritarianism. These modern regimes
didn't stop at prisons—they developed new horrors in torture and mass murder:
from Sednaya and Palmyra to the mustard gas in Iraq and Syria, to Iran’s proxy
wars and the devastation in Gaza.
As for the jihadist militias of today—cheered on by "Caliph" Erdogan—they will
be no more merciful to Alawites, Druze, Kurds, or any minority that refuses
Sharia rule. These groups seek only power, not peace or coexistence.
So, to the theorists and blame-shifters of the region, we say: enough with
vilifying Sykes-Picot. For all its faults, it still offered a better future than
the massacres and destruction born of your revolutions and ideologies.
Political Islam brought nothing but fear—first to Muslims, and then to everyone
else under its rule. For in their eyes, God is a murderer and an avenger. What
then of His so-called followers?
Washington attack was wrong and does not help Palestine
Daoud Kuttab/Arab News/May 26, 2025
The chant “Free Palestine” is powerful and appropriate at protests across the US
and around the world. But it is wholly inappropriate when shouted following a
violent, fatal attack in the American capital. Such an attack must be
unequivocally condemned. Palestinians, even as they endure unimaginable
suffering in Gaza, must find the moral clarity and courage to reject violence of
this kind. It does not matter that the victims were Israeli diplomats, nor that
one of them had tweeted a provocative message suggesting that Israel should
assassinate a Yemeni leader. The Palestinian cause demands international
pressure and Israeli accountability, not violence in a city thousands of miles
away from the conflict.Palestinians seek an end to Israel’s war, siege and
occupation of Palestinian territories. Targets outside the region are not, and
must never be, part of the Palestinian struggle. The demand to stop genocide and
war crimes — crimes prohibited under international law — must be pursued in the
proper arena: The Hague. Indeed, the Israeli government has deliberately
weaponized starvation against Palestinians in Gaza. This crisis must be urgently
addressed. But just as Western leaders were beginning to shift toward sanctions
and other measures against Israeli violations, this reprehensible attack on two
Israeli diplomats has served only to deflect attention — and relieve pressure on
Israel.
The Palestinian cause demands international pressure and Israeli accountability,
not violence in a city thousands of miles away
The condemnation of this act must be unequivocal. At the same time, we must
reject Israel’s attempt to frame it as an act against Jews or as part of a
global antisemitic campaign. While invoking “Free Palestine” in this context is
wholly inappropriate, support for Palestinian rights is not inherently
antisemitic. Israel is a state whose citizens include Jews, Muslims, Christians
and others. Zionism itself is not exclusive to Jews; it also includes some
Christians. To conflate criticism of Israel or Zionism with antisemitism is both
dishonest and dangerous.
Leaders in Europe, the UK, Canada, Australia and elsewhere should not allow this
act to deter them from their recent calls for an immediate ceasefire and an end
to the war on Gaza. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s inflammatory response —
blaming international opposition to Israel’s policies for inciting violence in
Washington — is unacceptable.
Netanyahu, currently facing multiple criminal charges for corruption and abuse
of power, is prolonging this war to preserve his political survival. By calling
international criticism antisemitic, he attempts to silence dissent and bully
world leaders into complicity. There should be no prohibition of justified
criticism of Israeli policies. Despite their legal obligations under
international law, most Western leaders have yet to act meaningfully. Article 1
of the Geneva Conventions requires signatories to “respect and to ensure
respect” for the conventions in all circumstances. That includes taking concrete
steps to prevent violations — steps that go beyond words. While recent
statements from Western leaders are welcome, they remain insufficient if not
followed up by action. This is precisely why the Netanyahu government wants to
shut them down — and why he is exploiting the Washington attack to do so.
Because of the publicity surrounding this case, the world now knows the names of
the two Israeli diplomats attacked in Washington — Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah
Lynn Milgrim. But how many people know the names of the tens of thousands of
Palestinians killed in Gaza?
According to UNICEF, after nearly 18 months of war, more than 15,000 Palestinian
children have been killed, about 34,000 injured and nearly 1 million repeatedly
displaced and denied access to basic services. Thanks to the courageous student
protesters at Columbia University, one name has broken through the silence: Hind
Rajab, a five-year-old Palestinian girl killed by Israeli forces during the
invasion of Gaza. Six of her family members and two paramedics trying to save
her were also killed.
At the same time, we must reject Israel’s attempt to frame it as an act against
Jews or as part of a global antisemitic campaign
The UN estimates that more than 28,000 women and girls have also been killed. On
International Women’s Day, Jordan’s Radio Al-Balad — the station I am involved
with — read the names of some of these women on air. Politicians, celebrities
and even a princess participated in the campaign, titled “We Are Not
Numbers.”This war must end immediately. According to multiple media reports,
Hamas has expressed a willingness to release all Israeli hostages if the
Netanyahu government agrees to end the war. The group has also reportedly
offered to relinquish control of Gaza to a transitional Palestinian committee
ahead of elections for a new unified Palestinian government. Any lasting
resolution must address the root of the conflict: Israel’s ongoing occupation of
the territories it captured in 1967. Palestinians must be allowed their
fundamental right to self-determination. Peace will only come through the
implementation of long-standing international resolutions, including the
creation of a sovereign and democratic Palestinian state alongside Israel and a
just solution for Palestinian refugees.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict must be resolved in the Middle East, with the
support of the international community. Justice — and peace — will only come
when the underlying injustices are addressed. What is needed now is persistent,
principled pressure from the global community, including peace-loving Israelis.A
violent attack against diplomats in Washington is not the way to free Palestine.
*Daoud Kuttab is an award-winning Palestinian journalist and former Ferris
Professor of Journalism at Princeton University. He is the author of “State of
Palestine NOW: Practical and logical arguments for the best way to bring peace
to the Middle East.” X: @daoudkuttab
UK in long overdue change of tune on Gaza
Chris Doyle/Arab News/May 26, 2025
For the first time in 19 months of genocide in Gaza, a senior British minister,
David Lammy, last week channeled some of the anger felt by much of the public at
Israeli actions. After 77 days of Israel blockading Gaza, denying water, food,
medicine, fuel and all aid to 2.3 million Palestinians under occupation, the
British foreign secretary finally spoke out and started to take some action.
This followed a tougher joint statement by the UK, France and Canada the day
before.
Lammy announced a series of small actions. London is suspending all talks on a
future free trade agreement with Israel, even though this was stalled anyhow.
The Israeli ambassador was formally summoned to the Foreign Office. And a
further three Israeli settlers, two illegal settler outposts and two settler
groups were sanctioned.
Lammy’s skills as a thespian are unlikely to put him in the running for an
Oscar. His furious tirade did not seem faked, but rather the outburst of a man
who had been waiting to speak his mind, shaken from his torpor, let off the
leash by a nervous Downing Street. No minister had previously used words such as
“intolerable,” “monstrous,” “appalling” or “egregious” to describe Israeli
actions.
Hearing the word “condemn” in regard to Israel’s conduct was a shock, as the “c”
world had not been permissible previously. Lammy lambasted Israeli Finance
Minister Bezalel Smotrich for speaking of Israeli forces “cleansing” Gaza, of
“destroying what’s left” and of resident Palestinians being “relocated to third
countries.” “I condemn it in the strongest possible terms,” he said. Strangely,
other genocidal comments from Israeli ministers over the last 19 months did not
receive the same treatment.
Lammy’s furious tirade did not seem faked, but rather the outburst of a man who
had been waiting to speak his mind
Back in March, Lammy had been roundly ticked off by No. 10 for daring to suggest
that Israel was violating international law. He was forced to backtrack to the
nauseating formulation that Israel was “at risk” of violating it. Quite what
Israel must do to convince the British government is not clear.
Watching the statement with two Palestinian human rights activists, their
understandable questions were: Why has this taken so long? Why only now? Is this
shift for real or just to assuage the mounting anger in the Labour Party and in
the country as a whole?
Why now? As is so often the case, it was probably a congregation of
circumstances, not one magic factor. The noncynical view is that the blockade of
Gaza and the deliberate starvation of Palestinian men, women and children over
11 weeks was too much. At a public level, Israel does not have even minimal
justification for this policy of starvation as a weapon of war. For those who
barely follow this conflict, it is blatantly apparent that this is morally
wrong.
Perhaps more importantly, the UK may have been emboldened by an awareness that
US President Donald Trump had become irritated with Netanyahu on many fronts,
from Iran to Syria and the Houthis to Gaza. Some speculate that Washington may
have given a diplomatic wink to the European powers.
On a more cynical level, the UK has just agreed a tariff deal with the US. This
takes the pressure off Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Just as importantly, parliamentary opinion was fuming. Senior sources informed
me that members of the Cabinet had been raising the need to push for a stronger
position. Notably, even backbench Conservative MPs had started speaking out, as
well as right-wing commentators in the media, who never normally criticize
Israel at all.
Why now? As is so often the case, it was probably a congregation of
circumstances, not one magic factor
Lammy’s words contrasted heavily with those of his opposite number, Priti Patel.
She once again failed to criticize the blockade, the starvation and the
genocidal comments of Israeli ministers. Since becoming shadow foreign secretary
last November, Patel has not once expressed any sympathy for Palestinians in
Gaza, even those being starved and bombed, or criticized Israeli conduct in any
way, shape or form. Lammy saved his most ferocious comments to tear into her —
again, the first time Labour has turned its guns on the lamentable Tory position
in 19 months.
Britain has shifted. It may not be a full U-turn, but a sharpish turn at least.
Having taken a condemnatory stance, the pressure will be on the government to do
more if Israel does not fully lift the blockade and halt its atrocities. The
actions are limited thus far, but more are in the pipeline, including the
possible sanctioning of extremist Israeli ministers Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir.
France and the UK are also both considering recognizing a Palestinian state. The
European powers will have to stand firmly against the egregious Israeli official
pushback — not least from Netanyahu — which blames these critical postures for
the awful killing of the two Israeli diplomats in Washington.
The bottom line is that all this is not enough. It is far too late. The genocide
continues. All this should have been said and done by the end of October 2023,
when Israel was clearly committing war crimes in Gaza and its ministers were
promoting genocide. But it is still better than nothing, with the promise of
more to come unless Israel stops the mass starvation and ends its genocide.
**Chris Doyle is director of the Council for Arab-British Understanding in
London. X: @Doylech