English LCCC Newsbulletin For 
Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For May07/2025
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news
The Bulletin's Link on the 
lccc Site
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2025/english.May07.25.htm
News Bulletin Achieves 
Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006 
Click On 
The Below Link To Join Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group 
https://chat.whatsapp.com/FPF0N7lE5S484LNaSm0MjW
اضغط
على الرابط في
أعلى للإنضمام 
لكروب 
Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group 
Elias Bejjani/Click 
on the below link to subscribe to my youtube channel
الياس 
بجاني/اضغط
على الرابط في
أسفل للإشتراك في
موقعي ع اليوتيوب
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAOOSioLh1GE3C1hp63Camw
Bible Quotations For today 
I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will 
never be hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty.
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 06/34-40: “They said to 
him, ‘Sir, give us this bread always.’Jesus said to them, ‘I am the bread of 
life. Whoever comes to me will never be hungry, and whoever believes in me will 
never be thirsty. But I said to you that you have seen me and yet do not 
believe.Everything that the Father gives me will come to me, and anyone who 
comes to me I will never drive away; for I have come down from heaven, not to do 
my own will, but the will of him who sent me.And this is the will of him who 
sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up 
on the last day.This is indeed the will of my Father, that all who see the Son 
and believe in him may have eternal life; and I will raise them up on the last 
day.’
Titles For The 
Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published  
on May 06-07/2025
May 07, 2008 – The Barbaric Invasion of Beirut and Mount 
Lebanon/May 07, 2008 – The Barbaric Invasion of Beirut and Mount Lebanon/Elias 
Bejjani/May 07/2025
The Sacred Duty of Praying for Others/Elias Bejjani/May 06/2025
Video Link to a commentary by: Nadim Koteich/Peace is flawed, but resistance has 
become a crime against its own people
Video Link for an Interview with Journalist Ali Hamada
Link to a video interview with sovereign activist Marwan Hindi from the 
“Syriayo” website.
May 6, Day of Martyrs of Lebanese Press/Lokman Slim Foundation/May 06/2025
Lebanon says one killed in Israeli strike on south
Gulf countries to reportedly lift travel ban on Lebanon
UN Special Coordinator for Lebanon visits Saudi Arabia
Report: US pressing Israel to withdraw from Lebanon and respect ceasefire
Palestinian president confirms Beirut visit after disarmament call
Report: Turkey seized 1,300 pagers en route to Lebanon days after pager attack
Main political parties agree on coalition list for Beirut municipal elections
What do Catholics in Lebanon and around the world hope for from new pope?
Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Frightening Journey Through My Husband’s Ordeal/Roula 
Kehdy/Face Book/May 06/2025
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published
  
on May 06-07/2025
Trump says will make 'very, very big announcement' before Mideast 
trip
Oman announces US-Houthi ceasefire deal
Israel says it struck Yemen’s main airport in Sanaa
Druze near Damascus resist demand to turn in arms as tensions boil
Gazans desperately need food, water — ‘they’re getting bombs’: UN
Hamas dismisses further Gaza ceasefire talks amid Israel's 'hunger war'
Trump says only 21 hostages held by Hamas in Gaza now believed to be alive
India says it attacked nine sites in Pakistan, Pakistani Kashmir
UAE mediates deal for release of further 410 Russian and Ukrainian prisoners of 
war
Carney tells Trump Canada is not for sale, president praises PM as a 'very good 
person'
Titles For 
The Latest English LCCC analysis & 
editorials from miscellaneous sourceson   
on May 06-07/2025
Does The European Union Actually Expect Radical Islamists to Reform 
Themselves?/Nils A. Haug/Gatestone Institute/May 6, 2025 
Israel’s claim to protect Syria’s Druze is a smokescreen/Osama Al-Sharif/Arab 
News/May 06, 2025
The Druze experience … an opportunity for everyone to save Syria/Eyad Abu Shakra/Arab 
News/May 06, 2025
Perfect storm brings UK and EU together/Yossi Mekelberg/Arab News/May 06, 2025
How Africa should negotiate with Trump/Vera Songwe and Witney Schneidman/Arab 
News/May 06, 2025
Gaza’s famine and the erosion of our humanity/Dr. Ramzy Baroud/Arab News/May 06, 
2025
The Latest English LCCC 
Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published  
on May 06-07/2025
May 07, 2008 – The Barbaric Invasion of Beirut and Mount Lebanon
Elias Bejjani/May 07/2025
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2025/05/118016/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WOToQkmfMU&t=72s
May 7, 2008, is forever etched in Lebanon’s collective memory as a criminal day 
of shame—when murderers, invaders, and mercenary militias serving the Iranian 
regime launched a barbaric coup against the Lebanese state, its people, and its 
sovereignty.
Hezbollah, in collaboration with Amal Movement, the Syrian Social Nationalist 
Party (SSNP), and other armed groups loyal to the Syrian-Iranian axis of evil, 
invaded the capital Beirut and parts of Mount Lebanon. In this coordinated and 
premeditated assault, these militias violated the sanctity of the capital, 
terrorized its peaceful civilians, displaced families, looted properties, 
tortured innocents, and murdered the defenseless—all under the pretext of 
resisting “government decisions” that challenged Hezbollah’s illegal military 
communications network.
This day, now known infamously as the "Black 7th of May," marked a turning point 
in Lebanon’s modern history—a moment when the mask of so-called "resistance" 
fell and exposed the true face of Hezbollah: a terrorist militia acting on 
behalf of Tehran to subdue Lebanon through force and intimidation.
Michel Aoun, the political Iscariot of modern Lebanon, opportunistically 
justified and later benefited from this criminal invasion. His alliance with 
Hezbollah paved his path to the presidency in 2016. During his tenure, Aoun 
dismantled the state from within, surrendered its institutions to Hezbollah’s 
authority, and contributed to Lebanon’s total collapse—politically, 
economically, and morally.
The May 7 invasion was not just a military operation. It was an Iranian-led coup 
attempt against the legitimate Lebanese state. It desecrated Beirut’s freedom, 
targeted Sunni neighborhoods, occupied media outlets, and left dozens dead. Its 
goal: to prove that no Lebanese authority—civil or military—could ever stand 
against Hezbollah without paying a deadly price.
To this day, the invasion’s consequences remain: Hezbollah continues to act as 
an armed state within a state. Palestinian and Syrian armed elements still 
operate freely in their camps. The sovereignty of Lebanon remains hostage to 
Tehran's regional ambitions.
Justice Delayed Is Not Justice Denied
This criminal and barbaric invasion must not be forgotten. The 
perpetrators—local and foreign—must one day be brought to justice. The Lebanese 
people, especially those in the diaspora, must continue to demand 
accountability, justice, and full implementation of international resolutions 
that uphold Lebanon’s independence and sovereignty.
As the Prophet Isaiah (33:1) warned:
“Woe to you, O destroyer, you who have not been destroyed! Woe to you, O 
traitor, you who have not been betrayed! When you stop destroying, you will be 
destroyed; when you cease betraying, you will be betrayed.”
What Must Be Done
To ensure May 7 is never repeated, the following urgent measures must be taken:
Full disarmament of Hezbollah and all other Lebanese, Palestinian, and Syrian 
militias operating illegally within Lebanon.
Reclaiming all territories currently run as militia-controlled “mini-states,” 
including Hezbollah’s southern stronghold and armed Palestinian camps.
Immediate implementation of all relevant UN Security Council 
resolutions—particularly:
Resolution 1559 (2004): Calls for the disbanding and disarmament of all Lebanese 
and non-Lebanese militias.
Resolution 1701 (2006): Demands the cessation of hostilities and prohibits the 
presence of any armed forces in South Lebanon other than the Lebanese Army and 
UNIFIL.
Resolution 1680 (2006): Urges Lebanon and Syria to delineate their border and 
establish full diplomatic relations.
The 1949 Armistice Agreement with Israel: Must be revived and fully enforced to 
restore border stability and end militia cross-border provocations.
Declare Lebanon a failed state under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, enabling 
international intervention to restore state authority and protect civilians.
Empower UNIFIL with an expanded mandate to enforce disarmament and 
administrative restoration across all Lebanese territories—not only the South.
A Call to Action
All free and patriotic Lebanese—at home and abroad—must unite to rescue their 
homeland from occupation, collapse, and sectarian tyranny. We must raise our 
voices at the United Nations, in international forums, and in the global media 
to demand an end to Hezbollah’s armed rule and the restoration of Lebanese 
sovereignty.
May Almighty God protect Lebanon and its people, and may justice prevail.
The Sacred 
Duty of Praying for Others
Elias Bejjani/May 06/2025
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2025/05/143054/
The duty 
of praying for others—regardless of who they are, especially those in need of 
help, support, and compassion, whether family, relatives, strangers, or even 
enemies—is a deeply spiritual and emotional act. It reflects the mercy, 
tenderness, and love of the Almighty Creator who is capable of all things. This 
sacred practice is a genuine expression of the strength, depth, and resilience 
of the believer’s faith and hope. It demonstrates a steadfast belief that God is 
the loving Father of all, merciful and forgiving, who listens and responds to 
those who call upon Him and seek His mercy.
The Miracle of the Paralytic’s Healing
In the Gospel of Saint Mark (2:1–12), we read:
“When Jesus returned to Capernaum after some days, it was reported that he was 
at home. So many gathered around that there was no longer room for them, not 
even in front of the door; and he was speaking the word to them. Then some 
people came, bringing to him a paralyzed man, carried by four of them. And when 
they could not bring him to Jesus because of the crowd, they removed the roof 
above him; and after having dug through it, they let down the mat on which the 
paralytic lay. When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, ‘Son, your 
sins are forgiven.’ Now some of the scribes were sitting there, questioning in 
their hearts, ‘Why does this fellow speak in this way? It is blasphemy! Who can 
forgive sins but God alone?’ At once Jesus perceived in his spirit that they 
were discussing these questions among themselves; and he said to them, ‘Why do 
you raise such questions in your hearts? Which is easier, to say to the 
paralytic, “Your sins are forgiven,” or to say, “Stand up and take your mat and 
walk”? But so that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to 
forgive sins’—he said to the paralytic—’I say to you, stand up, take your mat 
and go to your home.’ And he stood up, and immediately took the mat and went out 
before all of them; so that they were all amazed and glorified God, saying, ‘We 
have never seen anything like this!’ Then he went out again beside the sea; the 
whole crowd gathered around him, and he taught them.”
This miracle, in its theological core, affirms without doubt that intercessory 
prayer and supplications on behalf of others are not only acceptable to God, but 
are heard and answered by Him. As recounted in the Gospel, the paralytic did not 
seek healing himself. He did not ask for mercy, nor did he seek forgiveness for 
his sins—even though, as many theologians suggest, Jesus frequently visited 
Capernaum, where the paralytic lived.
What’s even more striking is that it was the paralytic’s friends, relatives, or 
perhaps even some of Jesus’ disciples, who had such strong faith that they 
believed Jesus could heal the man simply by touching him. Their unwavering faith 
drove them to carry the man, push through the crowd, climb the roof, break it 
open, and lower him down to Jesus. Because of their faith and certainty in the 
Lord’s mercy and power, Jesus responded to their plea and healed the paralytic, 
acknowledging the strength of their belief.
Since sin is a form of eternal suffering and death in the fires of Hell—and 
because sin’s temptations, traps, and allurements paralyze a person morally, 
spiritually, and emotionally—Jesus first forgave the man’s sins, then healed his 
physical paralysis, saying: “Stand up, take your mat, and go.”
God never turns away those who seek Him with true faith and trust. With fatherly 
love and attentiveness, He hears our prayers and answers them. As the Lord 
Himself said: “Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, 
and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and the one 
who seeks finds, and to the one who knocks, it will be opened.” (Matthew 7:7–8)
From this, we understand that intercessory prayer—for both the living and the 
dead, for friends and enemies alike—is a holy obligation and is accepted by God, 
who is love, compassion, and mercy. He does not turn away those who ask 
sincerely, nor does He ignore the needs of the suffering.
In the Gospel of Matthew (18:19–20), Jesus confirms the power of collective 
prayer: “Again, truly I tell you, if two of you agree on earth about anything 
you ask, it will be done for you by my Father in heaven. For where two or three 
are gathered in my name, I am there among them.”
And Saint James says in his letter (5:16): “Pray for one another, so that you 
may be healed. The prayer of the righteous is powerful and effective.” He also 
adds (5:15): “The prayer of faith will save the sick, and the Lord will raise 
them up; and if they have committed sins, they will be forgiven.”
Praying for those in need is a sacred duty for every true believer—especially 
for those caught in the snares of sin and temptation, and for those mentally or 
emotionally unable to comprehend or resist sin’s consequences, such as the 
mentally ill, the psychologically distressed, and the physically or verbally 
impaired.
The miracle of the paralytic is not the only example in the Bible where Jesus or 
the apostles performed a miracle in response to someone else’s plea. For 
instance, Jesus healed the servant of the Roman centurion in Capernaum at the 
centurion’s request (Matthew 8:5–13). He also raised Lazarus from the dead in 
response to the plea of his sisters, Mary and Martha (John 11:1–44).
This rich spiritual understanding forms the foundation for asking the 
intercession of the Virgin Mary and the blessings of the saints in our prayers.
Let us pray for the healing of every person weakened by illness—whether 
physical, spiritual, or moral. God, who is love, never turns away those who come 
to Him in faith. Let us pray and ask the Lord Jesus to free us from the 
temptations of this perishable world and to guide us toward spiritual, moral, 
and cultural growth. Let us pray for our consciences to be cleansed and our 
hearts to be purified, that we may be freed from selfishness and base desires. 
May God grant us the grace of humility, that we may be messengers of love, 
freedom, and justice—true advocates of peace and harmony.
O Lord, grant us strength and patience to endure the shame of this passing 
world. We ask You in repentance and hope that we may not be disgraced on the Day 
of Judgment. God sees us, hears us, and is always with us—by our side and in our 
midst. Let us trust in Him, and fear Him in all our actions, words, and 
thoughts. 
Video Link to a 
commentary by: Nadim Koteich/Peace is flawed, but resistance has become a crime 
against its own people
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2025/05/143082/
Video Link for an Interview 
with Journalist Ali Hamada
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2025/05/143077/
Main tpocs discussed:
*Hezbollah’s refusal to surrender its weapons.
*The Issue of Illegal Naturalized Individuals: This part covers those who were 
unlawfully granted citizenship and the transfer of their records between regions 
to manipulate demographics.
*The Druze Situation in Syria: This section examines the circumstances and 
challenges faced by the Druze community in Syria.
*Berri and Hezbollah’s Delusions and Illusions: This heading refers to what are 
described as baseless claims by Berri and Hezbollah, suggesting they expect to 
gain something in the Lebanese political equation in exchange for their weapons, 
which are deemed worthless.
*The Potential Return of War: This final point addresses the possibility of 
renewed conflict in the region.
Link to a video interview 
with sovereign activist Marwan Hindi from the “Syriayo” website.
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2025/05/143088/
A courageous and patriotic reading in all issues that sum up the suffering of 
the Lebanese under the terrorist occupation of Hezbollah and the corruption and 
servility of the political class.
Arab identity was imposed on Lebanon by the Syrian regime in Taif.
What is required is the forcible withdrawal of Hezbollah’s weapons!
**Marwan Hindi, political activist, guest on the program “With All Freedom” with 
journalist Rania Zahra Charbel
May 6, 2025
May 6, Day of Martyrs of 
Lebanese Press. 
Lokman Slim Foundation/May 
06/2025
In December 1993, the United Nations General Assembly decided that 3 May would 
be World Press Freedom Day. But were they aware that, during its own civil war, 
Lebanon had already named 6 May as Martyrs of Lebanese Press Day in 1980? 
This became an annual tradition. It was started by Riad Taha, the head of the 
journalists' syndicate. Tragically, he was killed two months later. 
On this day, the Lebanese press would be blocked in defense of freedom of 
expression, only to be reinstated the following day. 
It was a day when the journalists of this small country wanted to honor the 
memory of the six journalists who were hanged in 1916 by Jamal Pasha, known as 
the Butcher, in what is now known as Martyrs' Square in Beirut. 
Mohammed Mahmassani, a political analyst and writer, was the first of them, so 
the story goes. 
It also says that, like Lebanon, the history of the world is full of bloodshed.
Dozens of names. A constellation of political affiliations. 
May Lokman Slim's assassination, who was silenced for not remaining silent, be 
the last in this dark series.
Lebanon says one killed in 
Israeli strike on south
AFP/May 06, 2025
BEIRUT: Lebanon’s health ministry said an Israeli strike Tuesday on a car in the 
country’s south killed one person, the latest attack despite a fragile ceasefire 
between Hezbollah militants and Israel. The ministry said in a statement that 
the “Israeli enemy” strike on Kfar Rumman killed one person and wounded three 
others. Lebanon’s state-run National News Agency said the car was hit with a 
“guided missile” on the road linking the town of Kfar Rumman with the nearby 
city of Nabatieh. There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military. 
Israel has continued to launch regular strikes in Lebanon despite the November 
27 truce which sought to halt more than a year of hostilities with Hezbollah 
including two months of all-out war, with a heavy Israeli bombing campaign and 
ground incursion. Under the deal, Hezbollah was to pull its fighters north of 
Lebanon’s Litani River, some 30 kilometers (20 miles) from the Israeli border, 
and dismantle any remaining military infrastructure to its south. Israel was to 
withdraw all its forces from south Lebanon, but it has kept troops in five 
positions that it deems “strategic.” A Lebanese security source told AFP that 
Hezbollah had withdrawn fighters from south of the Litani and dismantled most of 
its military infrastructure in that area. Lebanon says it has respected its 
commitments and has called on the international community to pressure Israel to 
end its attacks and withdraw from the five border positions.
Gulf countries to 
reportedly lift travel ban on Lebanon
Naharnet/May 6, 2025 
After the UAE allowed its citizens to travel to Lebanon, the fellow countries of 
the Gulf Cooperation Council are inclined to follow suit in the near future, 
Lebanon’s Nidaa al-Watan newspaper reported on Tuesday. “Intensive meetings are 
being held with political and security officials, most notably the meeting that 
PM Nawaf Salam will hold today with the GCC ambassadors to explain the measures 
that the Lebanese state has taken at the airport, its vicinity and along the 
road leading to it with the aim of reassuring these countries before they take 
the ban lifting decisions,” the daily quoted a “highly informed source” as 
saying. “Subsequent meetings will be held between a number of ambassadors and 
senior security officials to discuss the taken measures and remove any legal and 
security obstacles,” the source added. Emirati citizens will be able to visit 
Lebanon as of May 7 after a ban imposed during a diplomatic row in 2021 was 
lifted, the official WAM news agency has reported. The Emirati announcement came 
after President Joseph Aoun met with his UAE counterpart Mohamed bin Zayed in 
Abu Dhabi on Wednesday, after which it was announced that the ban would be 
lifted. In 2021, the United Arab Emirates imposed the travel ban and withdrew 
diplomats from Beirut in solidarity with Saudi Arabia, after a Lebanese minister 
criticized the Riyadh-led military intervention in Yemen. Lebanese citizens were 
not banned from traveling to the UAE, although some experienced difficulties 
obtaining visas. Ties between Beirut and Abu Dhabi had soured in the past decade 
over Hezbollah's influence on Lebanon. But with the group weakened by its recent 
war with Israel, the UAE is the latest Gulf country to renew its interest in 
Lebanon. In March, Saudi Arabia said it would review "obstacles" to resuming 
Lebanese imports and ending a ban on its citizens visiting Lebanon.
UN Special Coordinator for Lebanon visits Saudi Arabia
Naharnet/May 6, 2025 
United Nations Special Coordinator for Lebanon Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert has 
commenced an official visit to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, her office said on 
Tuesday. The trip is part of the Special Coordinator’s “ongoing consultations 
with regional and international stakeholders which focus, among other issues, on 
opportunities for the international community to support Lebanon in its efforts 
to advance the centrality and role of the State and to implement United Nations 
Security Council resolution 1701 (2006),” the office added in a statement.
Report: US pressing Israel to withdraw from Lebanon and 
respect ceasefire
Naharnet/May 6, 2025 
There are U.S. pressures on Israel to withdraw from the five border points and 
fully implement the ceasefire agreement to enable the Lebanese Army to extend 
its control over the whole of the South, informed sources said. This is aimed at 
allowing President Joseph Aoun to “move forward in his negotiations with 
Hezbollah over the issue of restricting arms to the hands of the state,” the 
sources told the al-Anbaa news portal of the Progressive Socialist Party. “U.S. 
envoy to Lebanon Morgan Ortagus is seriously working on finalizing this 
agreement prior to her return to Lebanon next month after the municipal 
elections to kickstart negotiations with Israel over the demarcation of the land 
border,” the sources added.
Palestinian president confirms Beirut visit after disarmament call
Agence France Presse/May 6, 2025
Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas will visit Lebanon on May 21 to discuss 
extending Beirut's authority to Palestinian camps, a Lebanese government 
official said Tuesday, as Abbas's office confirmed the date. The visit comes 
after President Joseph Aoun said late last month authorities were working to 
"withdraw (unauthorized) heavy and medium weapons from all Lebanese territory", 
and that he would raise disarmament of the camps with Abbas. The government 
official, requesting anonymity as they were not authorized to brief the media, 
said Abbas and Lebanese leaders would discuss "extending state authority to all 
Lebanese territory, including the Palestinian camps".By long-standing 
convention, Lebanon's army stays out of the Palestinian camps -- where Abbas's 
Fatah movement, militant group Hamas and other armed groups are present -- and 
leaves the factions to handle security.
Hamas claimed attacks on Israel from Lebanon during more than a year of 
hostilities between Israel and the Palestinian group's Lebanese ally Hezbollah 
that erupted over the Gaza war. A November ceasefire largely halted hostilities, 
but Israel has continued to carry out strikes on Lebanon, mainly targeting 
Hezbollah operatives and infrastructure but occasionally also Hamas members or 
other allies. After unclaimed rocket fire towards Israel from Lebanon on March 
22 and 28, Israel responded by bombing south Lebanon and Beirut's southern 
suburbs, strongholds of the Iran-backed Hezbollah which denied involvement in 
the launches. Lebanon's top security body the Higher Defense Council has warned 
Hamas against using the country for attacks on Israel. Prime Minister Nawaf 
Salam also said illegal weapons must be handed over and that Hamas and other 
factions must not "undermine security and national stability". Since then, 
Lebanon's army has said that Hamas has handed over three people suspected of 
involvement in the March rocket launches.  Last month, the army said it had 
arrested several Lebanese and Palestinians in connection with the rocket 
attacks, and a Lebanese security source told AFP three were Hamas members. Abbas 
last visited Lebanon in 2017.
Report: Turkey seized 1,300 pagers en route to Lebanon days 
after pager attack
Naharnet/May 6, 2025 
Turkish intelligence services intercepted a shipment of over 1,300 pagers in 
Istanbul that were en route to Lebanon, just days after an Israeli Mossad 
operation targeting similar devices held by Hezbollah members, Turkish news 
outlet Sabah reported Tuesday. According to the report, Turkey’s National 
Intelligence Organization (MIT) received information about the shipment and 
began inspecting ports and airports, eventually discovering that the delivery 
was scheduled for September 27.
The shipment reportedly arrived in Turkey on September 16, one day before a 
series of pager explosions occurred in Lebanon. It consisted of four pallets 
sent from Taiwan via a cargo flight from Hong Kong. The 61 boxes, weighing 
approximately 850 kilograms, were declared as “food processors” on the shipping 
manifest. Turkish security forces, accompanied by a bomb disposal unit, opened 
the boxes and discovered 1,300 pagers, including devices manufactured by 
Taiwanese company Gold Apollo, alongside about 710 detonators, batteries and 
cables. The shipment also contained 144 mini handheld blenders, cameras and 
additional electronic components. The pagers were immediately sent to a lab, 
where Turkish officials claimed they found “a highly flammable white explosive 
substance -- approximately 3 grams (0.1 oz) -- hidden inside the 
batteries.”Similar material was reportedly found in the associated detonators. 
The owner of the Istanbul-based company listed as the shipment’s recipient was 
questioned and claimed his firm provides customs consulting services rather than 
freight or shipping. Turkish media added that President Recep Tayyip Erdogan 
raised the issue in a December conversation with former Lebanese Prime Minister 
Najib Mikati, informing him of the seizure and destruction of the pagers. The 
Israeli Mossad’s so-called “pager operation” was launched on September 17 over 
concerns it would soon be exposed. On the operation’s first day, Hezbollah 
members’ pagers detonated in Lebanon and Syria. A day later, on September 18, 
their walkie-talkies exploded as well. According to a Reuters investigation 
published in October last year, the pagers sent to Lebanon in February 2023 
contained miniature plastic explosives embedded in batteries, along with a novel 
detonation system that was undetectable via standard X-ray screening. The rigged 
batteries were engineered to appear normal but held only about one-third the 
energy capacity expected for their size. Experts cited in the report noted that 
while a standard 35-gram (1.2 oz) battery would typically provide 8.75 
watt-hours, the modified battery held just 2.22 watt-hours -- suggesting much of 
the internal volume was taken up by explosives. On 17 and 18 September 2024, 
thousands of handheld pagers and hundreds of walkie-talkies intended for use by 
Hezbollah exploded simultaneously in two separate events across Lebanon and 
Syria, in an Israeli attack nicknamed Operation Grim Beeper. According to an 
unnamed Hezbollah official, the attack took 1,500 Hezbollah fighters out of 
action due to injuries. According to the Lebanese government, the attack killed 
42 people, including 12 civilians, and injured 4,000 civilians.
Victims’ injuries included losing fingers, hands and eyes, as well as brain 
shrapnel. The incident was described as Hezbollah's biggest security breach 
since the start of the Israel–Hezbollah conflict in October 2023.
Main political parties agree on coalition list for Beirut municipal elections
Naharnet/May 6, 2025 
The country’s main political parties have agreed on forming a unified electoral 
list for Beirut’s municipal vote, Al-Akhbar newspaper reported on Tuesday. “A 
meeting was held yesterday at MP Fouad Makhzoumi’s home in the presence of 
representatives of parties and Beiruti figures, which resulted in an agreement 
on forming a coalition list in Beirut,” the daily said. The list will comprise 
candidates nominated by Hezbollah, the Amal Movement, the Free Patriotic 
Movement, the Lebanese Forces, the Kataeb Party, al-Ahbash, the Tashnag Party 
and the Hunchak Party, the newspaper added. MP Nabil Bader and the Jamaa 
Islamiya meanwhile stayed outside the coalition, Al-Akhbar said. “Over the past 
hours, Bader contacted a number of figures trying to convince them to join a 
list that he intends to form in the face of the political forces’ list, but he 
is facing difficulty in convincing these figures, who believe that it will be a 
lost battle,” the daily added. The Beirut Madinati civil society coalition, 
which garnered one third of the votes in 2016, is meanwhile expected to form a 
third list.
What do Catholics in Lebanon and around the world hope for 
from new pope?
Associated Press
Among the roughly 1.4 billion Catholics worldwide, many are keenly anticipating 
the upcoming Vatican conclave at which members of the College of Cardinals will 
elect a successor to Pope Francis. At a grocery shop in Beirut, a university in 
the United States, a Black township in South Africa and other far-flung 
locations, The Associated Press asked nine of them what they hope to see from a 
new pope.
Bernard Anka, 65, a grocer and Maronite Catholic in Lebanon
Anka says he's concerned that Christians worldwide are moving away from the 
church and hopes the new pope strives to bring them back to the fold.
The owner of a grocery shop in Beirut, Anka worries that many young people in 
Lebanon and elsewhere are straying from the church as smartphones open a wider 
world to them.
"The church is very weak in the face of what we are living through," he said.
Christians make up a third of Lebanon's population of 6 million, the largest 
percentage of Christians in the Middle East. The country is coming out of the 
14-month Israel-Hezbollah war that left over 4,000 dead.
"The work of the new pope should be to bring back the happiness, confidence and 
internal peace," Anka said. "Christians used to go and face life without fear."
Nadia Makuc, 20, a junior at Princeton University in New Jersey
Makuc goes to Mass daily at the campus chapel. At a recent service, she joined 
other young Catholics in a prayer for the cardinals voting in the conclave.
"I'm hoping that we have a leader who can just really share the Christian 
message of mercy and forgiveness, as well as joy and hope," she said after the 
service, where a photo of Francis was displayed. "That's something Pope Francis 
was really good about — spreading the joy and hope found in Christ's 
resurrection."
She also hopes the next pope will fight for the protection of life from 
conception to natural death.
The new pope should be "someone who's really able to be a witness to the culture 
of life," said Makuc, co-president of the Aquinas Institute, the university's 
Catholic campus ministry.
"As a young American, there's a real want for guidance. ... We kind of look at 
the political system of America and neither party feels like a home to 
Catholics," she said. "As we face such a political division, a pope who can 
bring peace and unity is what's most important."
Alicler Medina, 35, a Venezuelan journalist living in Argentina
Medina said Francis sought to bring youth closer to the church, and his 
successor should be, even more so, "the pope of the young."
"I expect the same from the new pope: that he calls young people together, that 
he brings them closer to God, because I feel we live in a society that has lost 
many of its values; and that he brings them closer to their families, that he 
reminds them of their principles. … Now we see animal abuse, family abuse, 
bullying."The next pontiff, he added, should "have the openness of Francis but 
the love that John Paul II expressed."
Mercyline Bunoro, 64, a mother of 7 in Nairobi, Kenya
Buboiro has been a Catholic since birth. She hopes the next pope will continue 
to embrace everyone regardless of their background and sexual orientation.
Human rights groups in Kenya have expressed concerns about discrimination 
against LGBTQ+ people. But Bunoro says "being gay is God's wish" and they 
shouldn't be spurned by the church.
The mother of seven lives in a Nairobi slum, earning a living through menial 
work such as washing clothes and cleaning.
Bunoro says more cardinals should be appointed from Africa so the continent has 
more say in Vatican leadership decisions.
Christoph Rudinger, 49, an educator from Linz, Austria
Rudinger, who teaches at the university of education of the Diocese of Linz in 
Austria, was in Berlin to prepare a field trip for his students.
Sitting outside St. Hedwig's Cathedral in Berlin's historic center, Rudinger 
said his paramount hope for the next pope is to have an open mind.
"I expect the pope to have open arms, to have open hands for the concerns of the 
people who approach him, regardless of whether they're Catholic or not," he 
said.
He hopes the next pope will tackle difficult issues, such as the role of women 
in the church and whether they can become priests.
For many Austrian Catholics, he said, it's important the pope hear their 
concerns about a priest shortage in their region and the possible abolition of 
celibacy as a requirement for ordination.
Beatrice Rakoma, 64, a pensioner in Johannesburg, South Africa
Rakoma lives in Alexandra, a mostly Black township in Johannesburg, and is 
president of the Catholic Women's League of Alexandra. She spoke to the AP at a 
memorial service for Pope Francis at a Catholic church in Soweto last week, when 
she wore a dress adorned with his image.
Rakoma said she would celebrate if the new pope is the first ever from 
sub-Saharan Africa. But more important, she said, is that he continue with Pope 
Francis' message of encouraging unity among the world's people.
"It's not about color, race or gender," Rakoma said. "Whichever pope will be 
elected, it has to be about the glory of God, not about being whichever 
cultural, race or gender background you come from."
"The new pope must take over from Pope Francis, lead the way, and walk in his 
footsteps."
Carlo Caniglia, 60, a civil servant from Mantova, Italy
Caniglia said he's not a frequent churchgoer in his hometown of Mantova but goes 
for baptisms, weddings or funerals, plus Easter and Christmas services.
"If the Catholic Church wants to survive in this fast-changing world, it needs 
to change and the pope needs to lead that way," said Caniglia, adding that the 
new pope must address issues such as gender equality in the church and 
discrimination against gays and lesbians.
"Pope Francis did a good job regarding those topics and I want the next pope to 
continue that way," said Caniglia, who spoke to the AP while visiting Berlin 
with his wife. He thinks it would be nice if the next pope did not come from 
Europe, but perhaps from Asia or Africa.
"I know many Catholics would have a problem with a Black pope but I don't think 
it's a problem at all," he said.
Marlen Onal, 58, church volunteer from Quezon, Philippines
In Asia's largest Catholic nation, long plagued by poverty and inequality, Onal 
longs for a successor to Francis, who, like him, would reach out to society's 
margins.
Francis' embrace of the poor, sick and neglected refocused global attention on 
their plight and prompted many clergy to venture beyond church confines and 
emulate his example, Onal said.
"Hopefully the successor will be like him or somebody who can do even more," 
Onal said. "The next pope should be truly pro-poor, open-minded to all the 
issues in the world like poverty and the LGBTQ issue."
Onal serves as a volunteer leader for a church in the Manila region led by a 
locally prominent priest and human rights activist, the Rev. Robert Reyes. Onal 
and other volunteers have helped Reyes hold street Masses and Bible-reading 
sessions in slum neighborhoods.
Santiago Dijkstra, 36, a systems engineer in Buenos Aires
Dijkstra said he hopes the next pope "maintains the same culture" as his 
predecessor, Francis, "instead of going back 80 years and once again punish 
people who think differently or are different from what the Church believes."
He said the new leader of the Catholic Church should strive to be inclusive of 
the LGBTQ+ community, as the late Argentine pontiff did.
He also said he hoped for a pope with Francis' simpleness, that would advocate 
for a more accessible Church, free of "internal corruption."
"With the money the Vatican has, poverty would be easily resolved, and I don't 
see them using that money to help."
Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Frightening Journey Through My 
Husband’s Ordeal
Roula Kehdy/Face Book/May 06/2025
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2025/05/143064/
It began quietly—almost insignificantly. On the night of February 22, 2025, 
around 11:00 p.m., my husband mentioned a tingling sensation in his toes and 
some weakness in his feet. We brushed it off. Maybe it was a pinched nerve, or 
just frostbite from the snow day we’d had. But by 3:00 a.m., things took a 
terrifying turn. He tried to get up to use the restroom—but couldn’t walk. I 
held him up, helped him, and tried to stay calm. Something wasn’t right.
That’s when I called Dr. Sandra Sabbagh, a trusted neuro-pediatrician and the 
person I always go to for medical insight. I described the symptoms. She didn’t 
hesitate—“Take him to the emergency room. Now.”
We rushed to the ER. Hours passed in a blur—CT scans, X-rays, countless tests. 
The ER doctor returned with a baffling answer: “Everything looks normal. But... 
we can’t discharge him. He still can’t walk.”Something deep in my gut said to 
keep pushing. So I called Dr. Sandra again. She told me, urgently, “Ask them to 
test for Guillain-Barré syndrome.”The ER doctor resisted. “He still has 
sensation,” she said dismissively.I repeated this to Dr. Sandra—and she 
exploded. “Tell her to check his reflexes—NOW.”
They did. And just like that, the puzzle started to come together: 
Guillain-Barré syndrome.I had never even heard of it. I Googled it on the 
spot—an autoimmune condition where the body attacks its own nerves and sometimes 
the lungs. The treatments: IVIG or plasma exchange. Five rounds. No cure—just 
support, time, and hope.
Dr. Sandra urged me to start IVIG immediately. It took three agonizing hours for 
the pharmacy to prepare it. By then, my husband couldn’t stand. The weakness was 
climbing up his body like a shadow. It all happened so fast it didn’t feel real.
He was admitted to the ICU. Within 48 hours, his arms stopped moving. We began 
plasma exchange therapy. But then his breathing started to fail.On February 28, 
they intubated him. Just before they placed the tube, he tried desperately to 
speak. His voice was gone. He couldn’t move. He couldn’t write. I’ll never 
forget that moment—his eyes locked on mine, pleading. I was breaking inside, but 
I sat there, holding his hand, pretending to be strong. He was fully conscious, 
trapped inside a body that had shut down.
The five weeks in the ICU felt like an eternity. I watched my husband endure 
pain, fear, and silence. I became his voice, his advocate, his strength—when I 
had none left.He couldn’t speak, but he would blink or squeeze my hand—his way 
of reminding me, I’m still here.
The support from family abroad—on the phone minute by minute—and from our 
friends (now family) was overwhelming and sacred.The ICU nurses were kind, 
compassionate, steady. But some doctors... they leaned on a neurologist I didn’t 
trust. She painted a bleak future: “He may never move again... he may never get 
off the trach.” Her words stripped hope from the air. I refused to believe her.
Then, the tide began to turn.
He was weaned off the ventilator. On March 10, they performed a tracheotomy. Two 
days later, they placed a voice valve.The moment he spoke again—just one word—he 
wept. So did I. Then, slowly, he began to move. First a finger. Then a hand. 
Then an arm.It was like witnessing a rebirth—inch by inch, breath by breath.
On April 3, we moved to a rehabilitation center. The transition was seamless. 
The therapists, nurses, and CNAs were extraordinary. They helped transform him 
from immobile to walking—with a walker, yes—but walking.
On April 29, we came home. We celebrated. Our family gathered around him. And 
now we begin the next phase: home health therapy, followed by outpatient rehab.
Recovery is not linear. Some days are hopeful; others are hard.But we’ve left 
the darkness of the unknown behind. Now we walk the long road ahead—together.
Guillain-Barré changed everything. It cracked us open.But from the brokenness 
emerged a deeper strength, a fiercer love, and an immense gratitude—for every 
small step, every breath, and every moment.
The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News 
published 
  
on May 06-07/2025
Trump says will make 'very, very big announcement' before Mideast trip
Agence France Presse/May 06, 2025
U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday teased that he will make a major 
announcement ahead of his trip next week to the Middle East, without revealing 
what it would be. "We're going to have a very, very big announcement to make. 
Like, as big as it gets, and I won't tell you on what. And it's very positive," 
Trump said in the Oval Office. "It'll be one of the most important announcements 
that have been made in years about a certain subject," Trump said. Trump did not 
offer further clues. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who was opening a 
meeting with Trump, responded drily: "I'm on the edge of my seat." Trump heads 
next week to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates on the first 
foreign trip of his second term other than a brief stop in Rome for the funeral 
of Pope Francis.Diplomats say that the United States is hoping for progress 
ahead of Trump's trip on Gaza, where Israel has cut off shipments of food and 
other supplies for two months as it unleashes a renewed assault. Trump and his 
predecessor Joe Biden have both sought recognition of Israel by Saudi Arabia -- 
a landmark step as the kingdom is the guardian of Islam's two holiest sites -- 
but the Saudis have stated that they first need to see progress towards a 
Palestinian state. Israel has said it will further displace most of Gaza's 
population, with Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich vowing Tuesday that the 
territory "will be entirely destroyed," a year and a half after Gaza-based Hamas 
launched an unprecedented attack on Israel. The United States has stood by 
Israel but also held out hope of a new deal that would include the return of 
hostages from Gaza. Qatar, the key intermediary, has said it is keeping up 
efforts.Trump is also hoping for major business deals when he visits the three 
oil-rich monarchies.
Oman announces US-Houthi ceasefire deal
AFP/May 06, 2025
WASHINGTON: The United States and Yemen’s Houthis have reached a ceasefire 
agreement, mediator Oman announced Tuesday, saying the deal would ensure 
“freedom of navigation” in the Red Sea where the militia has attacked shipping. 
“Following recent discussions and contacts... with the aim of de-escalation, 
efforts have resulted in a ceasefire agreement between the two sides,” said 
Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi in a statement posted online, adding that 
“neither side will target the other... ensuring freedom of navigation and the 
smooth flow of international commercial shipping” in the Red Sea. Earlier on 
Tuesday, President Donald Trump said that the US will stop bombing the Houthis 
in Yemen after the Iran-aligned group agreed to stop interrupting important 
shipping lanes in the Middle East. In an Oval Office meeting with Canadian Prime 
Minister Mark Carney, Trump announced the Houthis have said that they no longer 
want to fight but did not elaborate on the message. “They said please don’t bomb 
us any more and we’re not going to attack your ships,” Trump said. The Houthis 
have been firing at Israel and at shipping in the Red Sea since Israel began its 
military offensive against Hamas in Gaza after the Palestinian militant group’s 
deadly attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. The US president said Washington 
will take the Houthis’ word that they would not be blowing up ships any longer. 
Tensions have been high since the Gaza war began, but have risen further since a 
Houthi missile landed near Israel’s Ben Gurion Airport on Sunday, prompting 
Israeli airstrikes on Yemen’s Hodeidah port on Monday. The Israeli military 
carried out an airstrike on Yemen’s main airport in Sanaa on Tuesday, its second 
attack in two days on the Houthis after a surge in tensions between the group 
and Israel.
Israel says it struck Yemen’s main airport in Sanaa
Reuters/May 06, 2025
ADEN: The Israeli military said it fired on Yemen’s main airport on Tuesday and 
witnesses said there were four strikes in the capital Sanaa, the latest 
hostilities as tensions rise between Israel and the Houthis. Israel had earlier 
warned people to leave the area around Sanaa International Airport, one day 
after Israeli forces carried out airstrikes on Hodeidah port in Yemen in 
response to a Houthi missile landing near Israel’s main air hub on Sunday. “Not 
evacuating puts you in danger,” the Israeli military said in its warning, and it 
published a map of the area surrounding the airport. Three airport sources told 
Reuters that Tuesday’s strikes targeted three civilian airplanes, the departures 
hall, the airport runway and a military air base under Houthi control. Tensions 
have been rising between Israel and the Houthis as the group presses on with 
attacks in response to Israel expanding its military operations in the Gaza 
Strip. The Houthis said on Sunday they would impose a “comprehensive” aerial 
blockade on Israel by repeatedly targeting its airports. The Israelis strikes 
around Hodeidah on Monday killed four people and wounded 39, the Houthi-run 
health ministry said. There was no immediate word of casualties in Tuesday’s 
hostilities. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to retaliate after 
a missile launched by Houthis landed near Israel’s Ben Gurion Airport, which led 
to European and US airlines canceling flights. The Houthis have been firing at 
Israel and shipping in the Red Sea since the beginning of the war between Israel 
and Hamas in Gaza, in what they say is solidarity with the Palestinians.
Druze near Damascus resist demand 
to turn in arms as tensions boil
Yamam Al Shaar and Firas Makdesi/Reuters/May 
6, 2025
JARAMANA, Syria - Druze residents near Syria's capital are resisting a demand by 
the Islamist-led government to hand in their light weapons, saying authorities 
have yet to address fears of new attacks by Sunni Muslim militants after days of 
sectarian violence. Clashes last week pitted Sunni fighters against armed Druze 
residents of the town of Jaramana southeast of Damascus, later spreading to 
another district near the capital and then south to the predominantly Druze 
province of Sweida. Such violence threatens the new government's control of 
Syria, where armed gangs are attacking religious minorities and Israel is 
stepping up its military intervention under the banner of protecting the Druze 
community. Syrian authorities have negotiated deals to allow Druze fighters to 
protect their own areas as enlisted members of Syria's security forces, but this 
week asked that all weapons held by residents of these areas be turned in to the 
state."We told them, as soon as there is a state capable of regulating its 
forces, we'll have no problem handing in our weapons," said Makram Obeid, a 
member of the Jaramana committee that is negotiating with the Syrian government. 
Obeid said his committee had told government officials it would be better for 
them to focus on disarming the gangs now harassing minorities. "It's our right 
to be scared, because we saw what happened in other areas," he told Reuters, an 
apparent reference to killings in March of hundreds of civilians from the 
Alawite minority to which former President Bashar al-Assad belongs. It was the 
deadliest episode of sectarian violence in years in Syria, where a 14-year war 
ended last December when rebels toppled Assad, who fled to Russia. "People want 
to feel safe. It's enough to have (more than) 11 years of killing, strikes, and 
worries," Obeid said. "And we're coming to another phase that we thought, with 
the collapse of the regime, would leave us in a much better place. But until 
now, we don't feel reassured."
Fahad Haydar, a resident of Jaramana, echoed those fears.
"These weapons that are turned against us - that's what we're afraid of. If 
those weapons get handed in, then we'll hand in ours," he told Reuters. Mowaffaq 
Abu Shash, a Druze cleric in Jaramana, said the Druze had already compromised 
enough. "We take one step, they ask for a second. We take the second step, they 
ask for a third," he said. "We ask for a guarantee that what happened on the 
coast will not happen to us."One influential Druze spiritual leader, Sheikh 
Hikmat Al-Hajri, has called for international intervention to protect his 
community from Syria's leaders, whom he has branded "terrorists". The Druze, an 
Arab minority sect who practise a religion originally derived from Islam, live 
in Syria, Lebanon, Israel and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. Israel has 
vowed to protect Syria's Druze militarily if they face threats. Last week's 
violence was ignited by a voice recording purportedly cursing the Prophet 
Mohammad, which Sunni militants suspect was made by a Druze. More than a dozen 
people were killed in Jaramana before the violence spread west and south. It 
also drew in Israel, which carried out a drone strike on what it said were 
fighters preparing to attack Druze in the town of Sahnaya, west of Jaramana. A 
Syrian security source told Reuters one member of the security forces was killed 
in the strike. As the clashes reached Sweida province, Israel bombed near the 
presidential palace in Damascus - the clearest sign yet of its hostility towards 
Syria's new leaders. Syria's interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa once headed a 
branch of al Qaeda before renouncing ties to the group in 2016.
Gazans desperately need food, 
water — ‘they’re getting bombs’: UN
AFP/May 06, 2025
GENEVA: The UN on Tuesday accused Israel of trying to “weaponize” the flow of 
aid into Gaza, leaving the population desperate for food and water while 
delivering them “bombs” instead. The United Nations’ humanitarian agency OCHA 
decried the worsening situation in the war-ravaged Palestinian territory after 
nearly nine weeks of a total Israeli blockade on Gaza. “The bottom line is that 
there’s no aid to distribute anymore because the aid operation has been 
strangled... There’s no more to give,” OCHA spokesman Jens Laerke told reporters 
in Geneva. In Gaza, “there’s a desperate need for food getting in; they’re 
getting bombs,” he said. “They need water; they’re getting bombs. They need 
health care; they’re getting bombs.” He voiced outrage at Israel’s recent verbal 
update to representatives of a grouping of around 15 UN agencies and 200 NGOs 
indicating plans to “shut down the existing aid distribution system” that the 
organizations run in Gaza. “The Israelis have asked them to instead deliver 
supplies through Israeli hubs under conditions set by the Israeli military,” 
Laerke said. The UN had flatly rejected that proposal, he said, stressing that 
such a plan would “not live up to the core fundamental humanitarian principles 
of impartiality, neutrality and independent delivery of aid.” Aid, he insisted, 
must be given “based on needs and nothing else.” “It appears to be a deliberate 
attempt to weaponize the aid,” he said, adding that the proposed system seemed 
“designed to further control and restrict supplies, which is the opposite of 
what is needed.” Instead, what was required to alleviate the suffering was for 
Israel to allow border crossings to reopen and for life-saving aid to go 
through, said Laerke. “We have aid pre-positioned outside of Gaza, ready to go 
in,” he added. Colleagues on the ground were describing people “rummaging 
through garbage trying to find something edible,” he said, slamming the “harsh, 
brutal, inhuman reality” in the territory. He said that despite the towering 
challenges in Gaza since the war erupted 18 months ago, the UN and its partners 
have largely managed to deliver aid, provide health care, and roll out 
vaccination campaigns. “The great frustration of all this is that it is 
possible, and it can be done,” he said. Laerke’s comments came a day after 
Israel’s military said expanded operations in Gaza would include displacing 
“most” of its residents, after the country’s security cabinet approved a plan 
that an Israeli official said would entail “the conquest of the Gaza Strip and 
the holding of the territories.” Nearly all of Gaza’s inhabitants have already 
been displaced, often multiple times, since the start of the war sparked by 
Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel. “Forced relocations of people: they’re 
not helpful, obviously,” Laerke said. “You need to know where people are in 
order to be able to provide aid to them... it’s another blow.”
Hamas dismisses further Gaza 
ceasefire talks amid Israel's 'hunger war'
FRANCE 24/May 6, 2025 
Hamas has rejected ongoing Gaza ceasefire talks as futile while Israel 
intensifies its military campaign and blockade, leading to mass displacement and 
looming famine. Despite international mediation efforts, the humanitarian crisis 
is deepening and prospects for a lasting truce are stalled. Hamas on Tuesday 
dismissed ceasefire talks with Israel as pointless, accusing it of waging a 
"hunger war" on Gaza as famine looms and Israel prepares for a broader assault 
on the war-ravaged Palestinian territory. The comments from a senior Hamas 
official followed Israel's approval of a military plan involving the "conquest" 
of Gaza, where nearly all 2.3 million people have been displaced and a two-month 
Israeli blockade has worsened the humanitarian crisis. "There is no sense in 
engaging in talks or considering new ceasefire proposals as long as the hunger 
war and extermination war continue in the Gaza Strip," Basem Naim told AFP. Naim, 
a Hamas political bureau member and former Gaza health minister, said the world 
must pressure Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government to end the 
"crimes of hunger, thirst, and killings". "Gaza is, and must remain, an integral 
part of a future Palestinian state," Farhan Haq said.
Trump says only 21 hostages held 
by Hamas in Gaza now believed to be alive
The Associated Press/May 6, 2025 
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said Tuesday that three hostages held by 
Hamas in Gaza have died, leaving only 21 believed to be still living. “As of 
today, it’s 21, three have died,” Trump said of the hostages being held by 
Hamas, noting until recently it had been 24 people believed to be living. He did 
not elaborate on the identities of those now believed to be dead, nor how he had 
come to learn of their deaths. “There’s 21, plus a lot of dead bodies," Trump 
said. One American, Edan Alexander, had been among the 24 hostages believed to 
be alive, with the bodies of several other Americans also held by Hamas after 
its Oct. 7, 2023 assault on Israel.The president’s comments came as Israel 
approved plans on Monday to seize the Gaza Strip and to stay in the Palestinian 
territory for an unspecified amount of time, in a bid to recover the hostages 
and try to fulfill its war aims of destroying Hamas. If implemented, the move 
would vastly expand Israel’s operations there and likely draw fierce 
international opposition.
India says it attacked nine sites in Pakistan, Pakistani Kashmir
Reuters/May 6, 2025
MUZAFFARABAD, Pakistan/NEW DELHI -Multiple loud explosions were heard in several 
places in Pakistan and Pakistani Kashmir on Wednesday as India said it had 
attacked "terrorist infrastructure" in nine sites and Pakistan vowed to respond 
to the attacks. After the explosions, power was blacked out in Muzaffarabad, the 
capital of Pakistani Kashmir, witnesses said. It was not immediately clear what 
the explosions were. "A little while ago, the Indian armed forces launched 
‘OPERATION SINDOOR’, hitting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and 
Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir from where terrorist attacks against India 
have been planned and directed," the Indian government said in a statement. "Our 
actions have been focused, measured and non-escalatory in nature. No Pakistani 
military facilities have been targeted. India has demonstrated considerable 
restraint in selection of targets and method of execution," it said. A spokesman 
for Pakistan's military told broadcaster ARY that India had attacked Pakistan 
with missiles in three places and that Pakistan would respond. The development 
comes amid heightened tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbours in the 
aftermath of an attack on Hindu tourists in Indian Kashmir last month. India 
blamed Pakistan for the violence in which 26 men were killed and vowed to 
respond. Pakistan denied that it had anything to do with the killings and said 
that it had intelligence that India was planning to attack.
UAE mediates deal for release of further 410 Russian and Ukrainian prisoners of 
war
Arab News/May 06, 2025
LONDON: The UAE has mediated the 15th in a series of agreements between Russia 
and Ukraine for the release of prisoners of war, as part of its ongoing 
diplomatic efforts to help resolve the conflict. Under the latest prisoner-swap 
deal, 205 Ukrainians and 205 Russians were freed on Tuesday, the Emirates News 
Agency reported. The Emirati Ministry of Foreign Affairs said a total of 4,181 
Russian and Ukrainian captives have now been released as a result of its 
mediation efforts, the continuing success of which reflects the level of trust 
Kyiv and Moscow have in the UAE. The UAE remains determined to find a peaceful 
resolution to the war in Ukraine, which began in February 2022, and to help ease 
the humanitarian suffering it has caused, the ministry added.
Carney tells Trump Canada is 
not for sale, president praises PM as a 'very good person'
CBC/May 6, 2025 
Prime Minister Mark Carney stepped into the lion's den Tuesday for his first 
face-to-face with his U.S. counterpart — a high-stakes meeting that appeared to 
go well with compliments exchanged on both sides as President Donald Trump 
conceded his dream of annexing Canada will likely never happen. Trump warmly 
welcomed Carney to the Oval Office, saying the two will discuss some "tough 
points" during their meeting but he said Carney is "a very talented, very good 
person" and the former central banker deserved to win the recent federal 
election.
Trump signalled from the start he wasn't going to give Carney a rough ride like 
he did with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy earlier this year when a 
similar meeting descended into chaos — a scenario Canadian officials were 
dreading.
"We had another little blow-up with somebody else," Trump joked. "That was much 
different — this is a very friendly conversation."Asked by reporters if he's 
still serious about Canada becoming part of the U.S., Trump said he was but 
acknowledged it's likely a non-starter.
"It takes two to tango," the president said, adding "as a real estate developer 
at heart" he would love to see the U.S. span from the Gulf Coast to the Arctic 
Circle. "I do feel it's much better for Canada," he said, claiming taxes would 
be lower and defence would be better if the two counties came together as one. 
Carney diplomatically shot down Trump's talk, saying that as a property 
developer he should know "there are some places that are never for sale.""Having 
met with the owners of Canada over the course of the campaign the last several 
months, it's not for sale and it won't be for sale ever," Carney said. Still, 
the president held out hope it might happen one day. He said "never say never," 
about uniting the two countries.
In response, Carney said: "Never, never, never, never, never" as reporters 
shouted questions at the president. Carney and Trump are agreeing to disagree on 
51st state talk, for now. Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald 
Trump spoke in the Oval Office on Tuesday before a scheduled working lunch in 
the Roosevelt Room. While respectful of Carney, Trump suggested he is not 
willing to budge on his punishing tariffs that already prompted job losses in 
Canada and a drop in southbound exports.
Asked why he won't change course, the protectionist president said: "Just the 
way it is."The president has imposed fentanyl-related tariffs on goods that are 
not compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) to punish Canada for 
supposedly lax border security. The country is also grappling with Trump's 
"Section 232" tariffs on Canadian-made steel, aluminum and autos, with some 
exceptions.
Carney pushed back at Trump's assertion the tariffs are here to stay, saying the 
levies are a violation of CUSMA. "Some things are going to have change," Carney 
said. Despite some of Trump's past heated rhetoric about Canada, the U.S. 
president was complimentary of the country throughout the press event as he sat 
side-by-side with Carney. "We're going to be friends with Canada. Canada is a 
very special place. I love Canada, I have a lot of respect for the Canadians," 
he said, touting his friendship with hockey great Wayne Gretzky as a sign that 
he means what he says about the northern neighbour. Trump praised Carney's 
election victory and seemed to take credit for it in part, saying the Liberal 
Party's turnaround after being down in the polls for the better part of two 
years was "one of greatest comebacks in the history of politics."
Trump also signalled he's willing to renegotiate CUSMA, saying "it's good for 
all countries," but there needs to be some unspecified tweaks — or they may have 
to do away with it altogether. "We're going to work on some subtle changes, 
maybe," Trump said, while acknowledging there's nothing concrete on the table at 
this stage. "We're dealing more with concepts right now." Carney agreed that the 
existing trilateral trade deal will "be the basis for a broader negotiation," 
and those talks will start today.
While the meeting started out on friendly ground, the president drifted into 
denigrating the Canadian economy with his threats to somehow do away with the 
country's auto industry. Trump also repeated his oft-cited falsehood that the 
U.S. somehow "subsidizes" this country by $200 billion a year. Carney disembarks 
a government plane as he arrives in Washington, D.C., on Monday. Carney has 
downplayed what could come of this first meeting with the U.S. president. The 
U.S. trade deficit with Canada — which is largely driven by cheap oil imports — 
is much smaller than that. A trade deficit is not a subsidy. It just means the 
U.S. buys more goods from Canada than this country does from them. And despite 
trade data that shows the U.S. relies on Canadian goods — notably importing some 
four million barrels of oil a day — Trump said that he doesn't need "anything" 
from Canada.
Working lunch in the West Wing
Next on Carney's agenda is a working lunch with Trump in the storied Roosevelt 
Room in the West Wing. Both will be accompanied by a cadre of high-level 
officials. Expected beside Trump is Vice-President JD Vance, a critic of Canada 
like his boss, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, 
— who blasted Canada yesterday as a "socialist regime" — and U.S. Trade 
Representative Jamieson Greer, among others. Carney will have International 
Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc, Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly, Public 
Safety Minister David McGuinty and Canada's ambassador to the U.S., Kirsten 
Hillman, with him along with top bureaucrats. A senior Canadian government 
official, speaking to CBC News on background ahead of the meeting, said this is 
the first of what will likely be more meetings between the leaders as the two 
sides start the work of crafting a new partnership. That lunch meeting, beyond 
the glare of the TV lights, is where the work of getting acquainted and 
improving relations will begin, the official said.
Carney boards a government plane Monday on his way to Washington.
Prime Minister Mark Carney landed in Washington, D.C., on Monday ahead of his 
White House meeting scheduled for Tuesday. He is seen here departing from 
Ottawa. The two sides will start the work of crafting a new economic and 
security arrangement now that the prime minister has said the last one is 
"over."Carney was setting the bar low even before this meeting began — saying 
Canadians shouldn't expect to see any "white smoke," a nod to what will happen 
when a Pope is chosen in Rome, after this sit-down.
Laura Dawson is a Canada-U.S. relations expert and the executive director of the 
Future Borders Coalition. She said there may not be a satisfactory end to these 
trade tensions until Carney and his team broker a new trade agreement with 
Trump. The current CUSMA deal is up for review next year. While it may be 
painful to endure tariffs until then, Dawson said it's in Canada's best interest 
not to rush into a deal. "Right now, Trump feels like he has all the cards. If 
we settle very, very quickly, it wouldn't be a good deal for Canada. You only 
get sharp and quick deals if the other side gives in," she said in an interview. 
Carney is an experienced global player and he will have been well briefed by the 
diplomats in Washington about a possible standoff, Dawson said. The president is 
wedded to tariffs as a revenue-generating tool and a way to bring manufacturing 
back to the U.S. and it may be hard to move him from that position, said Everett 
Eissenstat, who served as deputy director of Trump's National Economic Council 
during the president's first term."It's unlikely that the relationship will be 
sorted out within a single meeting, but it's certainly a good start," he said.
The Latest English LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous 
sources   
on May 06-07/2025
Does The European Union Actually Expect Radical 
Islamists to Reform Themselves?
Nils A. Haug/Gatestone Institute/May 6, 2025 
The European Union's decision to grant the Palestinian Authority (PA) a sum of 
$2 billion to assist them to "reform themselves" can only be the result of 
willful blindness, cognitive dissonance and what by now can only be ascribed to 
a proud European tradition of Jew-hate.
Israel's warnings of the PA continuing to seize Israel's land by phases -- as 
planned by the PLO 10-Point Program of 1974 and advanced by former PA Prime 
Minister Salman Fayyad's plan -- to "create facts on the ground" with illegal 
buildings -- are largely ignored by the West. So far, the PA, with the funding 
from the EU, has built more than 97,581 illegal structures on Israeli land that 
is still to be negotiated.
The Palestinian Authority also full-throatedly incites terrorism in its 
education system and bountifully funds terrorist acts. The total so far 
disbursed as remuneration for the PA's "Pay-for-Slay" program and acts of 
terrorism reportedly exceeds $1 billion. This transaction has been in place for 
decades.
The EU's naiveté (to be kind) is already bringing disaster upon many of its 
member nations by allowing unlimited Muslim migration, presumably in an 
unconditional desire for every vote imaginable.
Israelis are understandably against an untenable two-state solution -- which 
they accurately see as no solution at all.
The European Union's decision to grant the Palestinian Authority (PA) a sum of 
$2 billion to assist them to "reform themselves" can only be the result of 
willful blindness, cognitive dissonance and what by now can only be ascribed to 
a proud European tradition of Jew-hate. Pictured: French President Emmanuel 
Macron meets with PA President Mahmud Abbas during the 79th Session of the UN 
General Assembly in New York on September 25, 2024. (Photo by Ludovic Marin/AFP 
via Getty Images)
The European Union's decision to grant the Palestinian Authority (PA) a sum of 
$2 billion to assist them to "reform themselves" can only be the result of 
willful blindness, cognitive dissonance and what by now can only be ascribed to 
a proud European tradition of Jew-hate.
The PA, despite claiming to be secular, is saturated with an Islamist mentality 
in support of jihadists. The PA plays the West by displaying a veneer of 
reasonableness, victimhood and the bogus claim that it would, in an 
ever-extending future, accept some kind of peace with the Jews. This fiction is 
supposedly backed by an equally bogus claim that it would be willing -- under 
conditions which would always be suicidal for the Jews to accept -- to establish 
a two-state solution in Israel's ancestral homeland.
This romantic fantasy persists in the face of the Palestinian Authority's 
elaborate, extremely concrete programs with the European Union to appropriate 
land which, according to the 1993 and 1995 Oslo Accords, must still be 
negotiated, as well as a continuing jobs program that the PA offers, similar to 
Murder, Inc. The PA's "Pay for Slay" program lavishly rewards Palestinians who 
murder Israelis. The more Israelis they murder, the greater the sum. A 2024 
report notes that the PA disburses more than $16 million each month to the 
Palestinian murderers and their families.
The Palestinian Authority, located in the biblical Jewish heartland of Judea and 
Samaria, is a hugely corrupt, authoritarian, dictatorial, Islamist political 
entity whose sole agenda consists of ruling the entire State of Israel under 
Sharia law while ridding the land of its Jewish population.
Not surprisingly, the PA has yet to condemn Hamas's slaughter of 1,200 Israelis 
on October 7, 2023 and the kidnapping of 251 people - 59 of whom are still held 
hostage in Gaza. Fewer than 24 of them are thought still to be alive.
When PA President Mahmoud Abbas, now enjoying the 20th year of his four-year 
term, calls Hamas "sons of dogs," this does not mean that Hamas and the PA 
disagree on obliterating Israel. It only means the PA has not forgotten that 
Hamas forcibly expelled the PA from Gaza -- including by throwing at least one 
member of the PA to his death from the 15th floor -- after Hamas was elected in 
2006.
Abbas, notwithstanding his corrupt, despotic rule for two decades, is warmly 
received by Western leaders as he presents them with plans whereby the 
Palestinian Authority would once again govern Gaza after a make-believe peace is 
supposedly secured between Israel and Hamas.
According to the Times of Israel:
"'The Palestinian government, under President Abbas's directives, has completed 
all preparations to assume full responsibility in Gaza,' including the return of 
the displaced, providing basic services, crossings management, and 
reconstruction of the war-torn territory, according to a statement from the PA 
president's office."
In 2005, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, unconditionally gave the Gaza 
Strip to the PA, to be used as an independent home for Palestinians, and ruled 
by the PA. All Jews were physically forced out of their homes there by the 
Israel Defense Forces. Several American Jews had even bought greenhouses in the 
Gaza Strip from the expelled Jews, and gave them to the Palestinians as running 
start to transforming Gaza into a "Singapore on the Mediterranean." Within days 
of the transfer, all the greenhouses were looted and destroyed. It was two years 
later that Hamas vehemently escorted the PA out of Gaza.
To this day, the Palestinian Authority, with its double-standards and corrosive, 
corrupt governance, is deeply unpopular with Palestinians, and the reason so 
many had voted for Hamas in the first place. Israel maintains a superficial 
co-operation with the PA, mainly for matters of security. According to the EU, 
however, why not try the Gaza experiment all over again? Perhaps this time -- 
with more money -- it will work?
Oh absolutely! With our funds, the Palestinian Authority will surely reform 
itself and live peacefully and happily with all its neighbors, the way we do in 
Europe! Such is the inebriated view of the EU.
Israel's warnings of the PA continuing to seize Israel's land by phases -- as 
planned by the PLO 10-Point Program of 1974 and advanced by former PA Prime 
Minister Salman Fayyad's plan -- to "create facts on the ground" with illegal 
buildings -- are largely ignored by the West. So far, the PA, with the funding 
from the EU, has built more than 97,581 illegal structures on Israeli land that 
is still to be negotiated.
The Palestinian Authority also full-throatedly incites terrorism in its 
education system and bountifully funds terrorist acts. The total so far 
disbursed as remuneration for the PA's "Pay-for-Slay" program and acts of 
terrorism reportedly exceeds $1 billion. This transaction has been in place for 
decades.
Abbas is now calling for unity with Hamas, as "Hamas is part of the Palestinian 
people," and "Our arms and hearts are open" to Hamas. The PA would doubtless 
have liked to return to former PA President Yasser Arafat's Gaza Strip house, 
which Hamas looted in 2005, before IDF troops razed it in 2024.
In the view of the EU, the Palestinian Authority will reform itself even as it 
blames Israel for the horrific events of October 7, 2023, claiming Hama's 
massacre was an action in the "context of the defense war our people are 
waging," due to Israel's "aggression on all the Palestinian lands."
The jihadist ideology of Jew-hatred, apparently issuing from the Qur'an and the 
Hadith, and amplified by Adolf Hitler's collaborator Amin al-Husseini, the Grand 
Mufti of Jerusalem during much of the British Mandate for Palestine, is now 
enshrined in the PA-PLO charter. Fatah's Central Committee Secretary General 
Jibril Rajoub asserts that "Hamas is part of our political and social fabric and 
of our struggle, and their involvement is important." With Hamas's onslaught 
against civilians, many PA ministers "celebrated what happened."
According to Nan Jacques Zilberdik, a senior analyst at Palestinian Media Watch:
"[T]he Palestinian Authority (PA)'s Fatah leaders are confident that the PA and 
Fatah will unite with the Hamas and Islamic Jihad terror organizations and rule 
Gaza together.
Some PA and Fatah leaders have been adamant about joining forces with the terror 
organizations."
The EU's naiveté (to be kind) is already bringing disaster upon many of its 
member nations by allowing unlimited Muslim migration, presumably in an 
unconditional desire for every vote imaginable. This unvetted immigration brings 
with it the rise of violent political Islam combined with unmitigated 
Jew-hatred, and allows it to thrive in its midst. Europe's leaders, supposedly 
tasked with protecting Europe's Judeo-Christian culture, are selling out their 
nations to radical Islam for a mess of pottage.
In all this, no one seriously considers the views of Israel and its people 
concerning their neighbors and the two million Arab-Muslim Israeli citizens who 
live and work among them.
Israelis are understandably against an untenable two-state solution -- which 
they accurately see as no solution at all. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin 
Netanyahu replied to the EU's plans calling for an independent Palestinian 
state, and that Islamists should again rule Gaza, by saying:
"There was a Palestinian state. It was called Gaza. Look what we received. The 
biggest massacre since the Holocaust. I will not make any agreement that 
endangers the State of Israel. I will not do it."
In a mid-April telephone call, Abbas and French President Emmanuel Macron 
discussed "the possibility of the Palestinian Authority assuming 'full 
responsibility' in Gaza, including security duties, with the goal of 
'international legitimacy, one system, one law, and one legitimate source of 
arms.'"
According to a report in the Jerusalem Post last month:
"Macron said on Wednesday France could recognize a Palestinian state in June, 
adding that in turn some countries in the Middle East could recognize the state 
of Israel.
"'We need to move towards recognition (of a Palestinian state). And so over the 
next few months, we will. I'm not doing it to please anyone. I'll do it because 
at some point it will be right,' he said during an interview on France 5 
television."
Macron might possibly be the stimulating force behind the EU's intent to lavish 
a non-reforming PA with billions of euros.
A Biblical quotation describes the EU's futile endeavor to reform a dedicated 
Islamist organization such as the PA: "Can a leopard change its spots?" The 
question concludes with, "Neither can you do good who are accustomed to doing 
evil."
Jews and Israelis know this well, but the EU and others apparently do not or, 
more to the point, apparently do not care: So what, it is only a few Jews we are 
talking about.
**Nils A. Haug is an author and columnist. A Lawyer by profession, he is member 
of the International Bar Association, the National Association of Scholars, the 
Academy of Philosophy and Letters. Dr. Haug holds a Ph.D. in Apologetical 
Theology and is author of 'Politics, Law, and Disorder in the Garden of Eden – 
the Quest for Identity'; and 'Enemies of the Innocent – Life, Truth, and Meaning 
in a Dark Age.' His work has been published by First Things Journal, The 
American Mind, Quadrant, Minding the Campus, Gatestone Institute, National 
Association of Scholars, Jewish Journal, James Wilson Institute (Anchoring 
Truths), Jewish News Syndicate, Tribune Juive, Document Danmark, and many 
others.
© 2025 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do 
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No 
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied 
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21586/eu-palestinians-islamists
Israel’s claim to protect Syria’s Druze is a smokescreen
Osama Al-Sharif/Arab News/May 06, 2025
Israel will use any excuse to divide and weaken the region. That is the end 
game, precisely what Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu believes is the way to 
hammer together a new Middle East. The geopolitical fallout from the Oct. 7, 
2023, Hamas attack on Israel has provided him and his fellow fanatics with a 
golden opportunity to accelerate the process whose outcome would be a greater 
Israel that is the region’s uncontested superpower: a “Pax Judaica.”
Whether it is Iraq, Syria, Lebanon or Libya, Israel’s new generation of leaders 
— ultranationalists aligning themselves with ultrareligious extremists — believe 
that for Israel to become a regional hegemon, it must destroy the concept of 
multiethnic and multireligious nation states. The objective is for Israel, a 
primarily Jewish state, not to be the exception. For that to happen, it must 
fragment all nation states that stand in its way and create multiple 
ethnoreligious statelets in their stead. These statelets can then ally 
themselves with mighty Israel.
In their view, such a scenario can work best in Lebanon and Syria, with their 
diverse ethnic and religious minorities. The concept of partition and 
independence has been considered by minority groups in Lebanon, Iraq and Syria 
at various stages since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. Israel has used 
minority groups in the region to challenge and upset the existing nation-state 
structure, leading to or contributing to bloody civil and sectarian wars.
It is, therefore, ludicrous and quite cynical for Israel to threaten and attempt 
to destabilize the new regime in Syria using the pretext of protecting a 
minority group there — in this case, the Syrian Druze. It has used recent 
clashes between state security and Druze activists to issue a stern warning to 
President Ahmad Al-Sharaa and his government. That warning came in the form of 
an airstrike close to the presidential palace in Damascus last week.It has used 
recent clashes between state security and Druze activists to issue a stern 
warning to Al-Sharaa and his government
Last December, Israel did not need an excuse to send its tanks into the 1974 
buffer zone in the Golan Heights, days after the fall of Bashar Assad. Israel 
was not provoked or attacked, yet its army took over the remainder of the Syrian 
Golan and ventured deeper into parts of southern Syria, attempting to reach 
Suwayda, a province that the Druze predominantly inhabit. Netanyahu and his 
extremist government partners made it clear that Israel was in Syria to stay. 
Its air force carried out multiple strikes against key Syrian army targets, 
including airports, air defense batteries and naval bases. Israel’s invasion and 
aggression were deliberate and part of a larger scheme.
One does not need to look further for Israel’s real motives in Syria than 
Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, whose Religious Zionist Party is a 
major partner in the far-right coalition. At a pre-Memorial Day event in the 
West Bank last week, Smotrich declared that Israel would only stop fighting 
following the partition of Syria and the displacement of “hundreds of thousands” 
of Palestinians from Gaza.
Regardless of Israeli claims and warnings, the new regime in Damascus has the 
obligation and responsibility to assure minority groups that they are part of 
one Syria that is for all its citizens. That is the only way it can restore 
national unity and ensure the territorial integrity of Syria. So far, the regime 
has come under severe criticism for the bloody events that took place in March 
in Syrian coastal towns, where a significant number of Alawites live.
Accusations of sectarian infighting have been reported elsewhere in Syria. The 
new government in Damascus must safeguard all Syrians, regardless of ethnicity 
or religion.
So far, Al-Sharaa and his Foreign Minister Asaad Al-Shaibani have been saying 
the right things: underscoring national unity, distancing themselves from 
sectarian rhetoric and calling for Israel’s withdrawal from Syrian territory. In 
a speech at the UN last week, Al-Shibani said: “We have repeatedly announced our 
commitment that Syria will not constitute any threat to any of the neighboring 
countries or any country around the world, including to Israel.”
Israel is the clear aggressor in the case of Syria. Its claim that it is 
intervening to protect Syria’s Druze is both deceitful and ironic. The Syrian 
state protects its citizens and not any foreign country. Israel’s approach is 
neocolonial at heart.
One only has to look at Israel’s record in the treatment of its own minorities — 
non-Jewish citizens — to expose the hypocrisy and fallacy of its claims. While 
its Declaration of Independence mentions legal equality for all citizens, 
significant disparities undermine the country’s Palestinian, Druze and Bedouin 
populations. These disparities manifest themselves across multiple areas of 
public and private life, creating disadvantages for approximately 21 percent of 
Israel’s citizenry. These disparities appear in the country’s economic, social 
and political inequalities, mainly affecting Palestinians and Bedouins. One only 
has to look at Israel’s record in the treatment of its own minorities to expose 
the hypocrisy and fallacy of its claims
Perhaps Israel’s most discriminatory piece of legislation is the so-called 
Nation-State Law of 2018, which marked a significant constitutional shift by 
formally defining Israel as “the national home of the Jewish people,” without 
counterbalancing language about equality for all citizens. The law downgraded 
Arabic from an official language to one with “special status.” For many 
non-Jewish citizens, particularly the Druze, who serve in the military, this law 
formalized their perception of second-class citizenship.
A closer look at the disparities and segregation opens debate about the 
education system, in which Arab schools receive lower per-student funding than 
Jewish schools. The criminal justice system represents another area of 
inequality for Palestinian citizens, who are subjected to heightened police 
interventions, while experiencing inferior responses to intracommunity violence. 
This has contributed to a dramatic disparity in crime rates, with Palestinians 
accounting for 60 to 70 percent of murder victims, despite being only 21 percent 
of the population.
There are other issues in the social, economic and political fields, in which 
Palestinian, Druze and Bedouin minorities in Israel provide evidence of 
discrimination and inequality. Of course, one can always point to Israel’s 
apartheid system in dealing with more than 5 million Palestinians under brutal 
military occupation in the West Bank and Gaza. Israel’s track record in dealing 
with minorities is dismal, to say the least. Syria’s minorities should be aware 
of the dangerous game that Israel is trying to play, whose final objective 
transcends any local community interest or well-being. Syria’s Druze have 
overwhelmingly rejected Tel Aviv’s overtures. However, Israel’s determination to 
fulfill its grand desire will not be easy to stop. What it fears is a united 
Syria along its border.
**Osama Al-Sharif is a journalist and political commentator in Amman. X: 
@plato010
The Druze experience … an opportunity for everyone to save 
Syria
Eyad Abu Shakra/Arab News/May 06, 2025
I have been following the rapidly developing events in my beloved Syria over the 
past four days with a heavy heart, especially concerned by the events unfolding 
in the south, where my family’s branches stretch across no fewer than 10 
villages and towns. In my academic journey, I have studied the dynamics of 
integration and divergence in the Druze community during the last half-century 
of the Ottoman era, from the northwestern edge of Syria near the borders of 
Alexandretta to Mount Carmel in Palestine and the Azraq Oasis in northern 
Jordan.
This Druze community is more than 1,000 years old. It has survived the massive 
shifts that have unfolded in the region over this period: the succession of 
states, the rise of religious and sectarian groups and movements (some moderate, 
others extremist), several major wars, and various forms of colonization and 
occupation. Sensible decision-making is a pillar of this small, inward-looking 
community’s resilience. The Druze have endured because of their realism, 
contentment, dedication to intra-communal solidarity, and commitment to the 
truth and safeguarding brotherhood.
Even the major powers that have nothing in common with the Druze (neither 
sectarian nor ethnic), whose doctrine grew out of Fatimid Ismaili Shiism, 
eventually understood that they had a vested interest in accommodating and 
respecting the community’s priorities and concerns.
Following the initial Ismaili schism that ended the sect’s presence in Egypt, 
the Druze managed to find a place for themselves in the Levant. After the Sunni 
Ayyubid state replaced Fatimid rule in Egypt in 1250, it saw the utility of 
allying with the Druze for defending the Levant and Palestine from Crusader 
campaigns.
This pragmatism that transcended sectarian differences was sustained. The small 
sect, whose members are known as “Banu Maruf,” maintained its alliance with the 
non-Arab Sunni empires (the Mamluks and the Ottomans) that ruled the region in 
the centuries that followed. Indeed, they remained partners of the Ottomans 
until the First World War, after which the empire was replaced with foreign 
mandates and then independent states. The point, here, is that the Druze are not 
alien to the Arabs, Islam or the Levant. Even when they were offered a state of 
their own under the French Mandate, they chose to reject it, insisting on 
remaining an inseparable part of the larger Arab polity that includes all the 
regions in which Druze communities had a presence.
These facts of geography and national and religious identity must be recognized 
by anyone who seeks to safeguard Syria’s territorial integrity, unity and 
future. Otherwise, they will be swept away into the abyss of treason, 
excommunication and bloodshed.
Watching the protest in Homs a few days ago, in which ignorant and unhinged mobs 
chanted that they “want to exterminate the Alawites … to exterminate the Druze” 
was painful. It hurt because genocide is a criminal act that has no place in an 
ancient homeland striving to get back on its feet and build bridges, rather than 
raising walls of separation. Settling scores through collective retribution 
against innocent civilians is alien to Syria’s culture and the spirit of Islam, 
which teaches us that “no bearer of burdens shall bear another’s burden.”
Settling scores through collective retribution against innocent civilians is 
alien to Syria’s culture and the spirit of Islam. This is not the Homs of Hashim 
Al-Atassi and other great national statesmen: the Droubis, Hassamis and Sebais … 
nor is it the Homs of Diq Al-Jinn, Nasib Arida, Nadra Haddad, Abd Al-Masih 
Haddad, Maurice Salibi, Abd Al-Basit Al-Sufi, Abd Al-Basit Al-Sarout … Steve 
Jobs (who was from the Jandali family) or his cousin Malek Jandali. No, this is 
not the Homs we love. It is not the town that we have been following keenly and 
whose suffering and pain, at the hands of the criminal thugs in Deir Baalbeh, 
Al-Waer, Al-Khalidiyyeh and Baba Amr, left tears in our eyes. On the other hand, 
we continue to hear things that might calm the nerves of those eager to 
consolidate the new regime: “No areas are off-limits to state legitimacy” and 
“no special or exceptional cases.”
In principle, there is no reason to disagree. However, consolidating the new 
regime means prioritizing firm foundations and broad consensus, especially given 
the ambiguous posture of several international powers and Israel’s ongoing 
security and military blackmail. Accordingly, there is no harm in giving open 
wounds time to heal, allowing minds and hearts to recover, trust to be built and 
state-building to accelerate.
The truth is, no one (first and foremost the state) has an interest in ignoring 
fears nor in risking the exploitation of these fears by foreign forces to serve 
their own agendas.
Political experience has taught us that relying on and seeking foreign support 
is often a losing, and potentially suicidal, bet for minorities. Conversely, 
pushing minorities into such gambles has always drawn foreign intervention and 
occupation.
For those who are unfamiliar with the “Eastern Question” — European efforts to 
“protect” minorities in the Levant, the Balkans and North Africa — the 
repercussions of these historical episodes continue to influence our world to 
this day. Just as France made inroads in the Levant in the 19th century through 
sectarian and religious massacres between Christians and Druze in Mount Lebanon, 
and between Sunnis and Christians in Damascus, France’s colonial intervention in 
Algeria came under the pretext of protecting the Jews (specifically the Bakri 
and Bougna/Bushnaq families).
Accordingly, we must come to terms, across the region, with the frailty of our 
position, both domestically and internationally.
For international actors, we Arabs are the weakest players in the region. 
Regrettably, our states are the easiest to violate. Protecting the Druze does 
not keep the Israeli leadership up at night and the current Syrian regime has 
not been acquitted by Washington, nor has it received an open-ended mandate from 
the international community to do as it pleases in Syria.
A little wisdom can prevent immense bloodshed … and give Syria a far, far 
greater chance of surviving.
**Eyad Abu Shakra is managing editor of Asharq Al-Awsat, where this article was 
originally published. X: @eyad1949
Perfect storm brings UK and EU together
Yossi Mekelberg/Arab News/May 06, 2025
It is too early to predict the outcome of this month’s all-important EU-UK 
summit, but there has already been a sea change in terms of more cordial 
language and a spirit of cooperation between the two sides that has buried the 
toxicity of the dreadful Brexit years. While the time that has elapsed since the 
UK left Europe has helped to heal some of the wounds, it is the decisive UK 
general election victory last year of the more pro-European Labour Party — 
combined with the dangerously chaotic new US administration’s far-reaching 
implications for European security, prosperity and values — that has hastened 
the London-Brussels rapprochement.
In the years since Brexit, the necessity for a new kind of UK-EU partnership has 
become obvious to both sides. This will not be one that opens old wounds by 
floating the prospect of Britain returning to the EU, or even to the single 
market, anytime soon, despite about 55 percent of British voters consistently 
expressing in opinion polls their support for rejoining the EU. Support for 
staying out is about 40 percent.
However, last week’s success for the anti-European and anti-immigration Reform 
UK party in the local elections, and its winning another seat in Parliament by 
way of a by-election, is a warning sign that Labour’s declared reset of 
relations with Brussels must remain incremental, target specific areas of 
cooperation and bear tangible fruit for people up and down the country before 
any conversation about readmission to the EU can take place. The two sides are 
on the path to signing a formal declaration that commits to ‘free and open 
trade’
According to a leaked draft agreement, the UK-EU interlocutors preparing for the 
forthcoming summit are on the path to signing a formal declaration that commits 
to “free and open trade.” In a snub to the Trump administration’s declared trade 
war, this is a clear sign of trying to avert, or at least mitigate, the looming 
recession that is the consequence of Washington’s protectionist policies.
If, until very recently, the drive for resetting relations with the EU was more 
about economics, securing borders from illegal immigration and scientific and 
cultural cooperation, the return of Donald Trump to the White House and the 
president’s recent spat with Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky has shifted the center 
of gravity to defense and security. In the face of Russia’s expansionism and the 
sense that, at present, the US is no longer a reliable ally with regard to 
winning the war in Ukraine or in the bigger picture of the defense of Europe as 
a whole, the UK and the EU have already accelerated their defense cooperation 
measures and have immediately eased their fiscal restraints on military spending 
budgets. Germany and Poland are leading this approach, but France and the UK are 
not far behind.
The public show of support for Ukraine and for Zelensky personally by British 
Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron, who convened a 
summit to respond to the new and threatening situation, was an important turning 
point in the continent’s determination to develop a common foreign and security 
strategy to match external threats. Common interests derived from geography, 
history, enemies and shared values are almost self-evident, but it is also the 
conscious efforts to improve the general atmosphere between London and Brussels 
that is creating the conditions for close cooperation. Much of this is due to 
Britain’s current prime minister being the most Europe-friendly since Tony Blair 
and can be felt in the manner of his engagements with other European leaders.
For the slow-growing British economy, the issue of trade is crucial, even if 
under the pressing circumstances defense is topping the agenda in discussions 
with Europe. However, it is also a trickier issue in terms of the concessions 
Europe would expect it to make. In trade, figures rarely lie and, as a bloc, the 
EU is the UK’s largest trading partner, accounting for 41 percent of its exports 
and 51 percent of its imports. Meanwhile, for the EU, the UK is the 
second-largest trading partner, which makes the need to lay to rest any residue 
of bitterness and resentment that might still linger among EU officials over 
Brexit. Conscious efforts to improve the general atmosphere are creating the 
conditions for close cooperation
The circle that must be squared in the negotiations leading to this month’s 
summit is how to offset the damage Brexit has inflicted without being seen or 
suspected of toying with the idea of readmitting the UK to the EU by the back 
door, especially when it comes to freedom of movement. A major test for the UK’s 
reset readiness is bound to be agreeing to a “youth experience” program that 
would allow British and European 18 to 30-year-olds to travel and work freely 
for a limited time of one or two years.
For Europeans, freedom of movement is as much a symbol of what the EU is all 
about — in terms of constituting a single vibrant continent that shares similar 
values — as it is a tool of conflict prevention for liberal-democratic 
multilateralism. Agreeing to this is not reversing Brexit but reintroducing, on 
a limited scale, a scheme for young people to enjoy the benefits of working and 
traveling abroad with minimal barriers.
Should this scheme be approved, it would help create the good relations 
necessary to make progress on trade agreements. Considering that the UK is 
facing a blanket 10 percent US tariff while the EU faces 20 percent, an increase 
in trade between them has become more necessary and urgent.
But many other issues that were taken for granted when the UK was an EU member 
and were not agreed on in its “divorce” agreement also need to be reset. These 
include a veterinary services agreement to prevent unnecessary border checks and 
help tackle the cost of food; agreeing to the same agricultural standards; 
securing a mutual recognition agreement for professional qualifications to help 
open up markets for UK service exporters; and removing barriers that hinder 
traveling artists. Many of these issues were not contentious to begin with and 
hardly played a role in how people voted in the 2016 referendum and, with a new 
and more pro-European government in London, they can be resolved in the spirit 
of two allies.
The English Channel, or “La Manche” as the French call it, which physically 
separates the UK from mainland Europe, was until recently perceived to be much 
wider than its actual 34 km at its narrowest point. But now, 8,000 years after 
the British peninsula was separated from Europe, and following the more recent 
and nasty nationalist storm of Brexit, both sides are thankfully reaching 
agreement on the issues that matter for their common security and prosperity. 
The upcoming summit could be a crucial step in restoring long-term cooperation 
for the benefit of both.
**Yossi Mekelberg is a professor of international relations and an associate 
fellow of the MENA Program at Chatham House. X: @YMekelberg
How Africa should negotiate with Trump
Vera Songwe and Witney Schneidman/Arab News/May 06, 2025
In a recent interview, Fox News anchor Bret Baier asked Felix Tshisekedi, the 
president of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, how his government would 
balance continued ties with the US — including the negotiation of a critical 
minerals deal — with its deepening relationship with China. Tshisekedi responded 
that China’s influence is not so much “waxing” in Africa, as America’s influence 
is “waning.”
Tshisekedi is right. In 2000, the US was Africa’s largest trading partner; 
today, China’s total trade with Africa is more than four times larger than that 
of the US. Two US-Africa Leaders Summits have been held, in 2014 and 2022, and 
there is no date for a third, though Congress passed legislation late last year 
that would compel President Donald Trump to convene a summit this year and every 
two years thereafter.
Meanwhile, China is preparing to convene its 10th summit with African leaders, 
through the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, in 2027. A Gallup poll published 
last year showed that, for the first time, China’s approval rating in Africa (58 
percent) had surpassed that of the US (56 percent).
Speaking to Baier, Tshisekedi pointed out that his country would be “very happy” 
to see a renewed US commercial presence there. But Trump’s trade policies could 
have the opposite outcome. And persistent reports that the Trump administration 
plans to reduce the number of US embassies and consulates in Africa will only 
add to this decline in influence. African Growth and Opportunity Act countries 
are scrambling to salvage their preferential access to the US market.
Vera Songwe and Witney Schneidman
For the last 25 years, the cornerstone of America’s commercial relationship with 
Africa has been the African Growth and Opportunity Act, a nonreciprocal trade 
agreement that allows more than 6,000 African products into the US without 
duties or quotas. Between 2001 and 2022, African members of the agreement 
exported more than $100 billion of goods to the US. The trade was always 
supposed to be one-way, but that does not mean it did not benefit US companies — 
such as Levi’s, Gap and Walmart — and consumers. The African Growth and 
Opportunity Act was designed to help Africa transform its manufacturing base, 
thereby shifting the basis of its relationship with the US from aid to trade — a 
goal that one might expect the Trump administration, which has slashed foreign 
aid programs, to support. Participation was conditioned on African governments’ 
promotion of political pluralism, good governance and economic liberalization. 
And studies have shown that trade with the US increases value-added production, 
labor productivity and labor demand in Africa.
However, early last month, Trump introduced “reciprocal” tariffs on many African 
countries, with some of the African Growth and Opportunity Act’s strongest 
performers facing the highest rates: Lesotho (50 percent), Madagascar (47 
percent) and Mauritius (40 percent). Meanwhile, the 17 African countries that 
are ineligible for the benefits of the act, mainly due to poor governance, were 
effectively rewarded with far lower tariffs. Trump suspended most of these 
tariffs almost immediately, opening a 90-day window to strike new trade deals. 
And, to some extent, he is getting what he wanted, with African Growth and 
Opportunity Act countries scrambling to salvage their preferential access to the 
US market. Lesotho, for example, granted Trump ally Elon Musk’s Starlink a 
10-year license to operate its satellite network in the country.
Nonetheless, Trump’s tariffs are unlikely to deliver quick wins for the US. 
Already, African trade ministers have agreed to fast-track policies that will 
promote trade within the continent, as well as to diversify exports to reduce 
their countries’ dependence on particular foreign markets. Add to that the 
shuttering of the US Agency for International Development and the Millennium 
Challenge Corporation, the closure of Voice of America and the lapse of the 
President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, and America’s footprint in Africa is 
shrinking fast.
But there is a way for Africa to leverage the US administration’s interests to 
the benefit of both sides. Trump’s top priority in Africa is securing access to 
critical minerals. This makes countries like the Democratic Republic of the 
Congo — which boasts the world’s richest copper deposits and four of the world’s 
five largest cobalt mines — as well as Gabon, Zambia, South Africa and even 
Chad, strategically important. The US is already in talks over a minerals deal 
with Kinshasa and others.
African countries must do more to ensure that any critical minerals agreement 
provides a real boost to their economies.
Vera Songwe and Witney Schneidman
The only problem is that China is far ahead of the US on this front. Chinese 
state-owned companies and banks control 80 percent of the Democratic Republic of 
the Congo’s cobalt production and as much as 90 percent of the world’s supply is 
refined in China, whereas the US produces less than 1 percent. This imbalance 
drove former US President Joe Biden’s administration to develop the Lobito 
Corridor initiative, aimed at expanding the 800-mile rail line that extends from 
the Angolan port of Lobito on Africa’s Atlantic coast through the mineral-rich 
Democratic Republic of the Congo to Zambia. This initiative — for which the 
Trump administration has signaled its support — will upgrade African 
infrastructure by establishing partnerships between the US, African governments, 
African-led financing agencies such as the Africa Finance Corporation and the 
EU. But African countries must do more to ensure that any critical minerals 
agreement provides a real boost to their economies, especially by insisting that 
some value-add production occurs on the continent.
To complement access to Africa’s critical minerals, the US should also commit to 
processing them and adding value on the continent — for example, making cobalt 
into battery precursors before export. Since Chinese companies have shown no 
interest in doing this, such an exchange would position the US as a more 
valuable partner, thereby ensuring its long-term access to these vital 
resources. Given that Africa has all the minerals needed for production, spread 
across more than 10 countries in Central and Southern Africa, the development of 
local processing capabilities would also be consistent with the goals of the 
African Continental Free Trade Area.
Africa and the US are both seeking to strengthen their manufacturing sectors, 
but this is not a zero-sum game. On the contrary, by agreeing to help strengthen 
Africa’s industrial capabilities, the US could gain greater access to resources 
that its own industry needs, reverse the decline of its commercial influence on 
the continent and contribute to the revival of wider, mutually beneficial trade. 
This could lead to more balanced current accounts, just as Trump desires.
Vera Songwe, a former executive secretary of the Economic Commission for Africa 
and undersecretary-general at the UN, is a nonresident senior fellow at the 
Brookings Institution, Founder and Chair of the Liquidity and Sustainability 
Facility, and Co-Chair of the Expert Review on Debt, Nature and Climate.
*Witney Schneidman, a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, 
was US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs during the 
Clinton administration.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Gaza’s famine and the erosion of our humanity
Dr. Ramzy Baroud/Arab News/May 06, 2025
The situation in Gaza today starkly highlights Israeli exceptionalism. Israel is 
employing the starvation of 2 million Palestinians in the blockaded and 
devastated Gaza Strip as a tactic to extract political concessions from 
Palestinian groups operating there.
The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs last month described 
the humanitarian situation in Gaza as “the worst it has been” since the outbreak 
of war in October 2023. Despite the severity of such pronouncements, they often 
appear to be treated as routine, eliciting little concrete action or substantive 
discussion.
Israel’s violations of international and humanitarian laws regarding its 
occupation of Palestine are well-established facts. A new dimension of 
exceptionalism is emerging, as reflected in Israel’s ability to deliberately 
starve an entire population for an extended period, with some even defending 
this approach.
The population of Gaza continues to endure immense suffering, having already 
experienced the loss of about 10 percent of its number due to deaths, 
disappearances and injuries. The Gazans are confined to a small, largely 
destroyed area of about 365 sq. km, facing death from treatable diseases and 
lacking access to essential services, even clean water. For the people of Gaza, 
even fundamental needs now seem unattainable after decades of diminished 
expectations.
Despite these conditions, Israel continues to operate with impunity in what 
seems to be a brutal and protracted experiment, while much of the world observes 
with varying degrees of anger, helplessness or total disregard. The question of 
the international community’s role remains central. While enforcing 
international law is one aspect, exerting the necessary pressure to allow a 
population facing starvation access to basic necessities like food and water is 
another. For the people of Gaza, even these fundamental needs now seem 
unattainable after decades of diminished expectations.
During public hearings in The Hague that started on April 28, representatives 
from many nations appealed to the International Court of Justice to utilize its 
authority to mandate that Israel cease the starvation of Palestinians. Israel 
“may not collectively punish the protected Palestinian population,” stated the 
South African representative, Jaymion Hendricks. The Saudi envoy, Mohammed Saud 
Alnasser, added that Israel had transformed the Gaza Strip into an “unlivable 
pile of rubble, while killing thousands of innocent and vulnerable people.” 
Representatives from China, Egypt, Algeria and other nations echoed these 
sentiments, aligning with the assessment of Philippe Lazzarini, head of UNRWA, 
who stated in March that Israel is employing a strategy of “weaponization of 
humanitarian aid.”Even when aid was permitted, Israeli forces targeted desperate 
civilians, including children, who gathered to receive supplies
However, the assertion that the weaponization of food is a deliberate Israeli 
tactic requires no external proof; Israel itself has declared it. Then-Israeli 
Defense Minister Yoav Gallant publicly announced a “complete siege” on Gaza just 
two days after the start of the genocidal war. Gallant said: “I have ordered a 
complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no 
water, no fuel — everything is closed. We are fighting human animals and we are 
acting accordingly.” This was not an impulsive outburst but a policy rooted in 
dehumanizing rhetoric and implemented with extreme violence.
This “acting accordingly” extended beyond closing border crossings and 
obstructing aid deliveries. Even when aid was permitted, Israeli forces targeted 
desperate civilians, including children, who gathered to receive supplies, 
bombing them along with the aid trucks. A particularly devastating incident 
occurred in Gaza City in February last year, when reports indicated that Israeli 
fire killed 112 Palestinians and injured 750 more.
This event was the first of what became known as the “flour massacres.” 
Subsequent similar incidents took place and, in between, Israel continued to 
bomb bakeries, aid storage facilities and aid distribution volunteers. The 
intention was to starve Palestinians to a degree that would allow for coercive 
bargaining and potentially lead to the ethnic cleansing of the population.
Last April, an Israeli military drone struck a convoy of World Central Kitchen 
vehicles, resulting in the deaths of six international aid workers and their 
Palestinian driver. This led to a significant departure of international aid 
workers from Gaza.
A few months later, starting in October 2024, northern Gaza was placed under a 
strict siege, with the aim of forcing the population south, potentially toward 
the Sinai desert. Despite these efforts and the resulting famine, the will of 
the Gazan population did not break. Instead, hundreds of thousands began 
returning to their destroyed homes and towns in the north once a ceasefire came 
into effect in January.
When Israel reneged on that ceasefire agreement in March, it once again resorted 
to using starvation as a weapon. There were few consequences and little strong 
condemnation from Western governments regarding Israel’s return to war or its 
starvation policies. Using the starvation of civilians as a method of warfare is 
classified as a war crime under international law, as explicitly stated in the 
Rome Statute. However, the relevance of such legal frameworks is questioned when 
those who advocate for them and consider themselves guardians of these laws fail 
to uphold or enforce them. The inaction of the international community during 
this period of immense human suffering has significantly undermined the 
relevance of international law. The potential consequences of this failure to 
act are grave, extending beyond the Palestinian people to impact humanity as a 
whole.
Despite this, hope persists that fundamental human compassion, separate from 
legal frameworks, will compel the provision of essential supplies like flour, 
sugar and water to Gaza. Any inability to ensure this basic aid will lead to 
profound questions about our shared humanity for years to come.
**Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist and author. He is editor of “The Palestine 
Chronicle” and nonresident senior research fellow at the Center for Islam and 
Global Affairs. His latest book, co-edited with Ilan Pappe, is “Our Vision for 
Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak Out.” X: @RamzyBaroud