English LCCC Newsbulletin For Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For June 13/2025
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2025/english.june13.25.htm

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006 

Click On The Below Link To Join Elias Bejjaninews whatsapp group
https://chat.whatsapp.com/FPF0N7lE5S484LNaSm0MjW

اضغط على الرابط في أعلى للإنضمام لكروب Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group

Elias Bejjani/Click on the below link to subscribe to my youtube channel
الياس بجاني/اضغط على الرابط في أسفل للإشتراك في موقعي ع اليوتيوب
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAOOSioLh1GE3C1hp63Camw

Bible Quotations For today
If the owner of the house had known at what hour the thief was coming, he would not have let his house be broken into
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke 12/35-44/:”‘Be dressed for action and have your lamps lit; be like those who are waiting for their master to return from the wedding banquet, so that they may open the door for him as soon as he comes and knocks. Blessed are those slaves whom the master finds alert when he comes; truly I tell you, he will fasten his belt and have them sit down to eat, and he will come and serve them. If he comes during the middle of the night, or near dawn, and finds them so, blessed are those slaves. ‘But know this: if the owner of the house had known at what hour the thief was coming, he would not have let his house be broken into. You also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an unexpected hour.’Peter said, ‘Lord, are you telling this parable for us or for everyone? ’ And the Lord said, ‘Who then is the faithful and prudent manager whom his master will put in charge of his slaves, to give them their allowance of food at the proper time? Blessed is that slave whom his master will find at work when he arrives. Truly I tell you, he will put that one in charge of all his possessions.”

Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on June 12-13/2025
The “Government of the Advisors’ Battalion” at Baabda Palace Complements Hezbollah’s Battalions of Civilians, Media, and Clans/Elias Bejjani/June 11/2025
Video Interview Link from the "Transparency" Platform with Writer and Director Youssef Y. El Khoury
Titles of the Interview with Writer and Director Yousef Y. El Khoury on the Transparency Website
Lebanon’s Deep State Has a Name: Nabih Berri/Peter Germanos/X Platform/June 12/2025
Hanin Ghaddar: MP Paula Yaakobian Stupidity
Amine Bar-Julius Iskandar/The Dhimmitude Maronites
Lebanese President Aoun to meet Pope Leo XIV during Rome visit
Wave of Israeli airstrikes targets south Lebanon as drones overfly Dahieh
Israeli drone strike targets motorcycle in Deir Seryan, injuring one
Lebanese Army inspects building in Dahieh
Report: Araghchi told Qassem to show leniency, even on arms
Tenenti dubs US-Israel agreement to end UNIFIL's mission 'rumors'
Berri and Nassar lock horns over new financial prosecutor
Defense Minister visits UNIFIL in Naqoura, condemns attacks and calls for mandate renewal
Major General Abdallah receives Army Commander; stress importance of coordination between security agencies
With eyes on Iran, US sharpens Lebanon focus in high-stakes visit
Jeita Grotto set to reopen soon as tourism ministry, municipality reach deal
Lebanon risks losing US support over delays on Hezbollah, economic reforms/Senior Trump envoy to travel to Beirut next week, officials say
Blue helmets and blind spots: The tragedy of UNIFIL in Hezbollah’s shadow/Makram Rabah/Al Arabiya English/13 June/2025
'Adults' star Malik Elassal: Add Canadian comedian, actor and writer to the list of comedy sensations/Elisabetta Bianchini/Yahoo News Canada/June 12, 2025

Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on June 12-13/2025
Israel attacks Iran’s capital with explosions booming across Tehran
Israel says it strikes Iran amid nuclear tensions
Rubio says US not involved in Israeli strikes against Iran
Israel says it launched ‘preemptive strike’ on Iran
Israel mulls solo strike on Iran’s nuclear sites as US-Iran talks set to resume
Trump says Israel should not strike Iran as nuclear deal ‘close’
Israeli official says strike on Iran may come 'as soon as Sunday'
IRGC commander warns Israel that Iran’s retaliation to any attack will be unprecedented
Iran threatens nuclear escalation after UN watchdog board finds it in breach of obligations
UN nuclear watchdog board censures Iran, which retaliates by announcing a new enrichment site
Explainer-How Iran's network of Middle East power faded
US warns Iran over support for Houthis, asks UN Security Council for stricter arms embargo
Hamas faces leadership vacuum at critical time with demise of Gaza 'War Council'
Islamic State reactivating fighters, eying comeback in Syria and Iraq
UN General Assembly overwhelmingly votes for Gaza ceasefire resolution amid US, Israeli opposition
Egypt deports dozens planning pro-Palestinian march, organisers say
Egypt blocks activists aiming to march to Gaza to draw attention to humanitarian crisis
Israel says it detained Hamas members during an operation in southern Syria
UN to vote on resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire, hostage release and aid access
Israel is deporting 6 more activists detained on Gaza aid boat, rights group says
Hamas says it killed 12 Israeli-backed fighters. Israeli-supported group says they were aid workers
Netanyahu's government survives vote to dissolve Israel's parliament - AP explains
Humanitarian workers killed in Gaza bus ambush that Israel blames on Hamas
US says airstrike killed Daesh official in Syria
In Armenia, rising ceasefire violations bring fears of war with Azerbaijan
Turkey to export 48 of its nationally produced fighter jets to Indonesia
Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary
Oklahoma executes a man who was transferred from federal custody by Trump officials
Trump administration tells immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela they have to leave
260 confirmed dead as London-bound plane crashes in India

Titles For The Latest English LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources on June 12-13/2025
Israel Unveils New Proof of Qatar and Hamas’s Close Collaboration/Natalie Ecanow/FDD-Policxy Brief/June 12/2025
Did The Palestinian Authority President Really Condemn the Hamas Attack of October 7, 2023/Bassam Tawil/Gatestone Institute/June 12/2025
Reconstruction and the Need for Disarmament/Fahid Suleiman al-Shoqiran/Asharq Al Awsat/June 12/2025
The Attack on the Army and the Threats Facing Sudan/Osman Mirghani/Asharq Al Awsat/June 12/2025
The Biggest Mystery of Elon Musk/The New York Times/Asharq Al Awsat/June 12/2025
Can Iranian Intelligence Target President Trump on U.S. Soil? Are Iranian Agents Stirring Unrest in San Francisco?/Colonel Charbel Barakat/ June 12, 2025
Supporting Syria’s entrepreneurs a regional responsibility/Khalid Abdulla-Janahi/Arab News/June 12, 2025

The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on June 12-13/2025
The “Government of the Advisors’ Battalion” at Baabda Palace Complements Hezbollah’s Battalions of Civilians, Media, and Clans
Elias Bejjani/June 11/2025
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2025/06/144128/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xut7DmwPhWQ&t=4s
Every Lebanese has the right to ask: Has President Joseph Aoun decided to govern through a “government of advisors” assembled at Baabda Palace, instead of relying on the constitutional cabinet led by Prime Minister Nawaf Salam?
The president has turned the palace into a hub for advisors—most of whom are either remnants of the previous regime or politically affiliated with Hezbollah—as if we are reliving the era of Syrian occupation, when puppet cabinets were overshadowed by real centers of power hidden in the shadows.
More troubling is Aoun’s comfort with appointing figures directly tied to Hezbollah. Case in point: former Minister Ali Hamieh, a loyalist of Hezbollah who served in Najib Mikati’s cabinet, now inexplicably named “advisor for reconstruction.”
Has even the file of reconstruction become a Hezbollah domain? Are national matters now run through the so-called “advisors’ battalion” in Baabda, under the command of the Shiite duo?
Reviewing the names of many of these advisors, reveals a lineup either closely tied to former President Michel Aoun, or directly aligned with the so-called “Resistance Axis.” In this context, this is not a presidency; it is a Hezbollah proxy. These “advisors” are not neutral technocrats—they are political operatives embedded to advance the Hezbollah’s agenda.
Are we facing a new shadow government? Has the president surrendered his constitutional responsibilities to a clique of unelected influencers? Has the presidency become merely another Hezbollah tool after it failed to seize full control through the Grand Serail?
Since assuming office, Joseph Aoun has demonstrated a staggering disconnect between the solemn vows of his presidential oath, and the political choices he has made. He pledged to protect the constitution and assert sovereignty, yet has set no timetable for the disarmament of Hezbollah. He has completely ignored UN Security Council Resolutions 1559, 1701, and 1680—all of which mandate the disarmament of all militias and the exclusive control of arms by the state. These resolutions do not speak of dialogue with armed groups. The state does not negotiate over its sovereignty. It imposes it.
By proposing “dialogue” and “a national defense strategy,” Joseph Aoun is merely playing for time. These are evasions—designed to accommodate Hezbollah, not confront it. They strengthen its grip and prolong the occupation of state institutions. This is not leadership. It is appeasement.
Let us be frank: Hezbollah’s battalions are no longer limited to media propagandists, tribal militias, or civilians used as human shields in attacks—such as those on UNIFIL forces in the South. Today, a new battalion has joined the fray: the “advisors’ battalion” at Baabda Palace. Under Joseph Aoun, the presidency has morphed into an outpost for Hezbollah, where decisions are made not in service of the Lebanese constitution, but in loyalty to the occupying power’s interests.
It is deeply disheartening that Joseph Aoun has, thus far, proven to be a disappointment. He has relinquished even the appearance of independence, becoming yet another decorative president in the mold of his post-Taif predecessors: Elias Hrawi, Emile Lahoud, and Michel Aoun. They all wore the presidential sash, but the real power was never theirs—and it certainly isn’t now.
In conclusion: there can be no resurrection of Lebanon, no sovereignty, no independence, and no reconstruction, so long as the country is governed by men who are either incapable or unwilling to exercise their constitutional mandate—presidents who lack the courage to stand up, and the clarity to lead. Those who cannot say “no” to Hezbollah must step aside…. Lebanon will not be saved by advisors, nor by battalions, but by leaders.

Video Interview Link from the "Transparency" Platform with Writer and Director Youssef Y. El Khoury
A bold and unconventional reading of Lebanon’s current situation, the ambiguous stance of its rulers, the prospects of coming peace, the reality of Hezbollah’s collapse and the need for its trial, the meaning of the “Lebanese idea” and the Minister of Information’s ignorance of it, and the illusion of what is falsely called a “new presidential tenure”

Titles of the Interview with Writer and Director Yousef Y. El Khoury on the Transparency Website
Transcription, drafting, and translation by Elias Bejjani – complete editorial Freedom/June 12, 2025
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2025/06/144167/

*I do not wish to evaluate the so-called ““new presidential tenure”, because many Lebanese people already did so through their overwhelming outrage at the appointment of former Hezbollah-aligned minister Ali Hamieh as presidential advisor for reconstruction affairs.
*Personally, I see no reason for optimism under the leadership of a former army officer and a former leftist. I don’t understand the logic that presents them as Lebanon’s “saviors.”
*I was not surprised by the complete contradiction between the grand rhetoric of the presidential oath speech and the government’s policy statement. Words and texts remained ink on paper — and apparently will continue to do so.
*My advice to the rulers: move toward peace and begin implementing the tasks for which you were brought to power.
*Let’s be clear: what is described as a “new presidential tenure" ” is neither new nor promising. It is merely a continuation of the same ruling political system and class, dressed in new faces.
*Army officers who assumed the presidency in Lebanon have all failed — including Fouad Chehab.
*Lebanon’s current “insane asylum” status is a direct extension of the entrenched power of the ruling class, the remnants of the National Movement, and the hypocrisy and deception of the so-called “resistance.”
*This chaos will not end unless Hezbollah collapses, is put on trial, its financial, cultural, and media institutions dismantled, and all those who remained silent about its crimes, corruption, and Persian loyalty are held accountable.
*We ask: whom is the government even negotiating with? Don’t they realize that Hezbollah’s role is over, that it is exhausted, and that its military might is no longer taken seriously?
*The Lebanese Army must confront Hezbollah and implement the ceasefire and international resolutions — otherwise, why does the army even exist?
*What is certain beyond doubt is that the culture of the "Lebanese Front" was based on liberation, freedom, statehood, sovereignty, and independence. Meanwhile, the ideology and practices of the “National Movement",”in all its forms and tools, have always been anti-state — producing only defeat, destruction, chaos, ignorance, and desolation.
*The non-Lebanese nature of Hezbollah and its alignment with Israeli interests is evident: in 1984, Israel and the South Lebanon Army supported Hezbollah militarily in its war against "Amal Shiites Movement".
*Israel tolerated Hezbollah for decades because it served its strategic agenda — it was merely a tool. But today, its mission is over. Israel is now in the Gulf, and the Gulf is in Israel.
*Hezbollah has been militarily defeated, but Lebanon’s politicians and rulers are still trapped in the illusion of its strength and dominance.
*Netanyahu has ended Hezbollah’s role and is continuing — through military enforcement of international resolutions — what Lebanon’s leadership has failed to do.
*Joseph Aoun, Nawaf Salam, and the current ruling class came to power after Hezbollah’s defeat and exposure. Their mission was to implement international resolutions and the ceasefire agreement — but they failed. They are not a “new tenture”; they are a recycled extension of the old one.
*All the change that occurred was the result of Hezbollah’s defeat and the termination of its role — credit goes to Netanyahu, while Lebanon’s ruling system and political elites absurdly thank Syria's Al-Charaa!
*Our destiny now hangs on Netanyahu’s mood. He has been granted full freedom of action in Lebanon by Trump — while the world couldn’t care less about our fate.
*Al-Charaa' is crawling to please Israel. His situation is miserable — may God help him.
*The terms of UNIFIL’s mandate renewal — whether extended or terminated — will be a clear indicator of the nature of the next phase: peace or war.
*Minister of Information Paul Morcos, it seems, is clueless and ignorant of the very essence of the “Lebanese idea,” which is freedom. His resignation is necessary, as he is unfit for the position he holds.
*Bachir Gemayel was a unique phenomenon, and the positive impact of his leadership emerged just days after his election.

Lebanon’s Deep State Has a Name: Nabih Berri
Peter Germanos/X Platform/June 12/2025
The Real Power in Lebanon: Nabih Berri and the Erosion of Democracy
In Lebanon, the true center of power is not the rotating heads of state, but rather one man: Nabih Berri. Since 1983, Berri's political ascent has never wavered. His strength lies in his unparalleled ability to maintain control across decades, outlasting presidents, governments, and crises. He has, in effect, come to personify the "deep state" in Lebanon — a state within the state.
Consider the timeline: while presidents have come and gone — Amine Gemayel, Elias Hrawi, Emile Lahoud, Michel Sleiman, Michel Aoun, and now the commander-in-chief Joseph Aoun — Berri has remained untouched. He has presided over Parliament since 1992, anchoring himself at the heart of legislative authority and extending his influence across all branches of government, especially in administrative and judicial appointments. His grip on Beirut, Lebanon’s capital and symbolic seat of power, is ironclad.
This longevity, far from being a symbol of institutional strength, has hollowed out Lebanon’s democratic fabric. What was once hailed as one of the Arab world’s most vibrant democracies has become a veneer of democracy masking a deeply entrenched oligarchic system. Under Berri’s dominance, Lebanon mirrors the political dynamics of Algeria or Egypt: elections are held, institutions exist, but the outcomes are controlled, and the power structure is immutable.
Berri’s reign is not just a symptom of the Lebanese system's failure; it is a major cause of it. His uninterrupted presence has normalized clientelism, obstructed reform, and turned Parliament into a tool of preservation rather than progress. What remains is a political regime that is democratic in form but authoritarian in substance — a system that keeps rotating faces at the top, while true power rests, decade after decade, in the hands of one man.
In a country defined by its pluralism and constitutional promise, Nabih Berri stands as a symbol of stalled transition, representing how individual endurance in office, when left unchecked, can become the greatest enemy of democratic renewal.

Hanin Ghaddar: MP Paula Yaakobian Stupidity
https://x.com/i/status/1932933517911920820
This Lebanese (allegedly reformist) MP Paula Yaakobian says she was felt sad when Hezbollah’s leader Hassan Nasrallah was killed - then she goes into a rabbit hole of stupid justification and childhood analysis. Then the bomb: that Lebanon is under an Israeli and US mandate. Walla! Not Iranian - no, Israeli and American lol - ايمتى رح نرتاح من هيك اشكال

Amine Bar-Julius Iskandar/The Dhimmitude Maronites
Michel Aflak and Fares Chidiaq were more honest than Naufal Daou and Fares Souaid,because,by fully assuming their Arab identity, they have courageously converted to Islam
This is better than the schizophrenia that grants itself the privilege of redefining Arabism and Christianity.

Lebanese President Aoun to meet Pope Leo XIV during Rome visit
LBCI/June 12, 2025
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and First Lady Nehmat Aoun arrived at Ciampino military airport on the outskirts of Rome, marking the start of their official and family visit to the Vatican. Pope Leo XIV is scheduled to receive President Aoun on Friday for a private meeting, after which the first lady and family members will join to receive the papal blessing. Following the meeting with the Pope, the Lebanese president is set to hold talks with the Vatican Secretary of State, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, as part of the visit’s agenda.

Wave of Israeli airstrikes targets south Lebanon as drones overfly Dahieh
Agence France Presse/June 12, 2025
A wave of Israeli airstrikes targeted several areas deep in south Lebanon on Thursday evening, as Israeli drones overflew Beirut's southern suburbs. The strikes hit the al-Rihan heights in the Jezzine district, the Tebna area in the Sidon district and the outskirts of the Jezzine district town of al-Aishiyeh, which is President Joseph Aoun's hometown. Strikes also targeted the West Bekaa area of al-Srayra. Earlier in the day one person was killed by an Israeli drone strike on a motorcycle in the town of Nabatiyeh al-Fawqa near the city of Nabatiyeh. Israel did not immediately comment on the strikes.
Israel has repeatedly bombed Lebanon despite a November ceasefire that sought to end over a year of hostilities with Hezbollah, including two months of full-blown war. According to the agreement, Hezbollah must withdraw its fighters to the north of the Litani river, roughly 30 kilometers (20 miles) from the border with Israel, leaving the Lebanese Army and United Nations peacekeepers as the only armed parties in the area. Last week, Israel said it would continue to strike Lebanon until Hezbollah was disarmed. The ceasefire requires Israel to fully withdraw its troops from Lebanon, but it has kept them in five positions it deems "strategic".

Israeli drone strike targets motorcycle in Deir Seryan, injuring one
Naharnet/June 12, 2025
An Israeli drone strike targeted Thursday a motorcycle in the southern town of Deir Seryan. The Health Ministry one person was injured in the strike. On Wednesday a person was killed in an Israeli strike on Beit Lif also in south Lebanon and a father and his son were killed Tuesday in Shebaa. Israel has regularly bombed Lebanon since the November ceasefire that sought to end more than a year of hostilities, including two months of full-blown war. The agreement required Hezbollah fighters to withdraw north of the Litani river, about 30 kilometers from the Israeli border, and dismantle all military infrastructure to its south. It also required Israel to withdraw its troops from Lebanon, but it has kept them in five positions it deems "strategic".

Lebanese Army inspects building in Dahieh
Naharnet/June 12, 2025
The Lebanese Army headed Thursday to Beirut's southern suburbs to inspect a building at the request of the five-member committee supervising the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire, media reports said. On Wednesday, Army forces bulldozed the site of a building they had searched Tuesday at the request of the committee in the densely populated Sainte-Therese street in Hadath in Beirut's southern suburbs. The building had been targeted by an Israeli strike during the 14-month Israel-Hezbollah war. On Friday, Israel warned that it would keep up its strikes on Hezbollah targets across Lebanon, after it struck four locations in Dahieh on the eve of the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha. The Lebanese army condemned the airstrikes, warning that such attacks are weakening the role of Lebanon’s armed forces that might eventually suspend cooperation with the committee monitoring the truce that ended the Israel-Hezbollah war. It said it had tried to convince Israel not to carry out the strikes and to instead let Lebanese officials go in to search the area under the mechanism laid out in the ceasefire agreement, but that the Israeli army refused, so Lebanese soldiers moved away from the locations after they were sent.

Report: Araghchi told Qassem to show leniency, even on arms
Naharnet/June 12, 2025
In his latest meeting with Hezbollah chief Sheikh Naim Qassem, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi relayed a message from Iran’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei that “Hezbollah should observe vigilance and caution and adapt to the new situation in the region,” sources close to Hezbollah said.
Araghchi also told Qassem that Hezbollah’s “religious duty” at the moment is to “protect itself until the situations change,” advising the group’s leadership to “soften its rhetoric and seek rapprochement with the Lebanese state during this period,” the Asharq al-Awsat newspaper quoted the sources as saying. “Qassem responded by saying that Israel want to eradicate Hezbollah through the removal of arms, prompting Araghchi to say that the arms can be recovered if they were handed over and that what’s important is Hezbollah’s survival, which led to uncomfortable silence during the meeting that eventually ended in a tepid fashion,” the sources added.

Tenenti dubs US-Israel agreement to end UNIFIL's mission 'rumors'

Naharnet/June 12, 2025
UNIFIL spokesperson Andrea Tenenti denied Thursday in an interview with Al-Jadeed an alleged agreement between the U.S. and Israel to end the peacekeeping mission in southern Lebanon, calling such reports "rumors."Tenenti stressed that UNIFIL's commitment to support the Lebanese Army, urging the Israeli military to withdraw from Lebanese territory. Tenenti accused "Some parties" of hindering UNIFIL’s movements in southern Lebanon, after several confrontations between people in south Lebanon, where Hezbollah holds sway, and U.N. peacekeepers in recent weeks.
Confrontations are typically defused by the Lebanese army and rarely escalate. The November ceasefire agreement, which sought to end over a year of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah, states that only Lebanese troops and U.N. peacekeepers may be deployed in the country's south.
On Tuesday, United Nations peacekeepers said rock-throwing individuals confronted them during a patrol in south Lebanon, calling repeated targeting of their troops "unacceptable".The U.N. Interim Forces in Lebanon (UNIFIL), deployed since 1978 to separate Lebanon and Israel, sits on a five-member committee to supervise the ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah.In a statement, UNIFIL said peacekeepers conducting "a planned patrol" coordinated with the Lebanese army were "confronted by a group of individuals in civilian clothing". Residents appeared in a video telling UNIFIL soldiers that they can't enter private property without being accompanied by the Lebanese Army.Tenenti said that Resolution 1701 allows patrols to operate without the Lebanese Army. Also on Thursday, Lebanese Defense Minister Michel Menassa visited the UNIFIL headquarters in Naqoura and stressed the importance of renewing the UNIFIL’s mandate -- which is set to expire at the end of August -- in order "to restore stability" in south Lebanon and "start the reconstruction" of war-hit regions. He said he hopes the renewal will be done without any amendments.

Berri and Nassar lock horns over new financial prosecutor

Naharnet/June 12, 2025
A dispute between Speaker Nabih Berri and Justice Minister Adel Nassar of the Kataeb Party is still delaying the new judicial appointments, sources told Al-Jadeed TV overnight. “Berri is insisting on naming Judge Zaher Hamadeh for the financial prosecutor post, which is being opposed by Nassar,” the sources said. Shiite Duo sources also told Al-Jadeed that Berri is insisting on Hamadeh, quoting him as saying: “Let me know if he has committed any violations. If not, my choice is Zaher, Zaher, Zaher.”The sources added that President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam are mediating between Berri and Nassar to “reach solutions that allow for the approval of these appointments.”Outgoing financial prosecutor Ali Ibrahim, whose term has ended, was known for being close to Berri.

Defense Minister visits UNIFIL in Naqoura, condemns attacks and calls for mandate renewal
LBCI/June 12, 2025
Defense Minister Michel Menassa visited the UNIFIL headquarters in Naqoura and met with UNIFIL Force Commander Aroldo Lázaro. Several UNIFIL and Lebanese Army officers were present, and a meeting was held to discuss recent tensions between UNIFIL and residents. Menassa condemned the attacks on UNIFIL, which he said serves Israel while stressing the importance of renewing UNIFIL's mandate.

Major General Abdallah receives Army Commander; stress importance of coordination between security agencies

LBCI/June 12, 2025
Internal Security Forces Director General Major General Raed Abdallah received Army Commander General Rodolph Haykal at his office in the General Directorate headquarters. During the visit, General Haykal congratulated Major General Abdallah on the occasion of the 164th anniversary of the Internal Security Forces. The two officials discussed the general situation in the country and stressed the importance of cooperation and coordination among all security agencies.

With eyes on Iran, US sharpens Lebanon focus in high-stakes visit
LBCI/June 12, 2025
The Lebanese border file—regarding both Syria and Israel—has been placed in the hands of U.S. Envoy Tom Barrack, who is of Lebanese origin. The Israeli-related part of the file will remain under Barrack's responsibility until Michel Issa is confirmed as Washington’s ambassador to Beirut. Issa is also of Lebanese descent. Lebanese American Massad Boulos, U.S. Senior Advisor for Africa, is also expected to be involved. Barrack is scheduled to visit Beirut next week following talks in Israel that will address the situation in Lebanon and Syria. Sources say Barrack’s discussions with Lebanese officials will focus on Lebanese-Syrian relations, particularly on the demarcation of the eastern and southeastern land borders, as well as the northern border between the two countries and the maritime boundary. U.S. officials aim to resolve the Lebanese-Syrian dispute over sovereignty in the Shebaa Farms area and to find a solution to the expansion of the occupied Syrian village of Ghajar into Lebanese territory. The talks will also cover how to address the issue of Syrian refugees in Lebanon. In addition, Barrack may raise—at Syria’s request—the matter of Syrian deposits in Lebanese banks. On the Lebanese-Israeli front, Barrack is expected to clearly convey the U.S. position on the necessity of disarming Hezbollah in accordance with U.N. Resolution 1701 and the ceasefire agreement. According to sources, Barrack will tell Lebanese officials that actions—not words—will determine whether serious negotiations can begin regarding Israel’s withdrawal from remaining occupied Lebanese territories and the resolution of outstanding issues along the Blue Line. U.S. sources emphasized the significance of the timing of Barrack's visit to Lebanon, which comes amid a regional climate that could see dramatic developments involving Iran—raising the level of U.S. pressure on all regional files, including Lebanon.

Jeita Grotto set to reopen soon as tourism ministry, municipality reach deal

LBCI/June 12, 2025
Lebanon’s Ministry of Tourism announced on Instagram that Tourism Minister Laura Lahoud and Jeita Mayor Walid Baroud reached an amicable agreement allowing the municipality to temporarily operate, maintain, and manage the Jeita Grotto.
The ministry said the popular tourist site will reopen to visitors “very soon” for the summer season, once final legal procedures—now in their final stages—are completed.

Lebanon risks losing US support over delays on Hezbollah, economic reforms/Senior Trump envoy to travel to Beirut next week, officials say
Al Arabiya English/13 June/2025
The Trump administration remains hopeful that Lebanon’s government will fulfill its commitments to the international community—chiefly disarming Hezbollah and implementing key economic and financial reforms. But without tangible progress, Beirut risks losing US support, American officials and sources familiar with internal deliberations told Al Arabiya English. Several US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, pushed back on speculation that Washington is shifting its Lebanon policy. However, they stressed that patience within the administration is wearing thin. Among the rumors circulating is that the US and Israel have agreed not to renew the mandate for the UN peacekeeping force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), which comes up for a vote in August. A State Department official rejected the claim, calling it inaccurate, although US officials are considering changes to the mandate’s language, citing the need for more effective enforcement. A delegation from the State Department’s Bureau of International Organization Affairs is set to visit Beirut this week as part of ongoing policy discussions in the lead-up to the UN vote. Meanwhile, Lebanon’s defense minister has called for an unconditional renewal of UNIFIL’s mandate. In a separate development, Tom Barrack—US ambassador to Turkey and recently appointed special envoy for Syria—will travel to Lebanon next week, according to officials familiar with his plans. Barrack, a close ally of President Donald Trump who previously held Lebanese citizenship, is expected to assess progress on disarmament and reform. He will also explore the possibility of initiating border demarcation talks between Lebanon and Syria following his meetings with Syria’s interim president, Ahmed al-Sharaa.
Focus on Hezbollah’s weapons
Deputy Special Envoy for Middle East Peace Morgan Ortagus recently underscored the Lebanese government’s responsibility to disarm Hezbollah. Despite unconfirmed reports that she had been removed from her post, Ortagus remains in her role, according to the State Department website. While the LAF has deployed to areas it previously was unwilling or incapable of deploying to, “there’s a lot more to go,” Ortagus said. She said Lebanese authorities had done “more in the last six months than they probably have in the last 15 years.”Under a ceasefire agreement reached last November, Hezbollah was to withdraw its fighters north of the Litani River while Israel pulled out of southern Lebanon. Yet Hezbollah says it will not discuss its remaining weapons until the Israeli occupation of five border points ends. Washington maintains that Hezbollah must fully disarm and dismantle its military infrastructure throughout Lebanon, not just the south. Officials welcomed Beirut’s recent decision to enter and demilitarize Palestinian refugee camps—long governed by the 1969 Cairo Agreement—but remain wary that this move could be a diversion from the more pressing Hezbollah file. “We need to see more than declarations,” a US official said. “The issue of Hezbollah’s arms must be addressed swiftly.”
Economic reform and foreign aid
The Trump administration also continues to press Lebanon to enact long-awaited economic reforms following its financial collapse, the recent Hezbollah-Israel war, and decades of systemic corruption. US officials noted a broad consensus among Washington, Gulf allies, and international financial institutions that aid will only increase once Lebanon enacts clearly defined reforms. The US is clear-eyed about the challenges due to, among other things, the fact that Parliament is run by Hezbollah ally Nabih Berri, who has long been seen as a face of corruption in Lebanon. Berri’s control over the finance ministry has enabled him to block key reform efforts. Still, the US expects concrete movement on reform measures in the near term. “We want to see results, and we want to see them quickly,” another US official said.

Blue helmets and blind spots: The tragedy of UNIFIL in Hezbollah’s shadow
Makram Rabah/Al Arabiya English/13 June/2025
It is perhaps ironic and tragic when two bitter enemies find themselves aligned on the same side of a cause—one that reveals malicious and self-destructive tendencies. The recent developments in southern Lebanon involving Israel, Hezbollah, and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) serve as a stark example. Over the past few years, the 10,000-strong UN peacekeeping force, stationed in the south since 1978, has come under intense political pressure from Israel and the United States. Its funding has been challenged, with accusations that UNIFIL is complicit with Hezbollah, allegedly allowing the group to use the UN’s presence as cover to arm itself and expand its vast network of tunnels and bunkers. Conversely, Hezbollah openly denounces UNIFIL, branding it a spy network and a tool of Israel, whose sole purpose, they claim, is to monitor and report on Iranian-backed militias. As a result, mobs of Hezbollah supporters have assaulted UN patrols, going so far as to ambush and kill Irish peacekeeper Seán Rooney in December 2022. Most recently, a mob of villagers confronted Finnish peacekeepers. These so-called village attacks on peacekeepers have noticeably intensified in recent months, coinciding with efforts by the Lebanese government, Israel, and the international community to enforce UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1701. This resolution calls for the complete disarmament of Hezbollah and its allied factions.
In reality, both Israel and Hezbollah are aggressively working to undermine UNIFIL’s mandate. Given the momentum of recent events, the dissolution of UNIFIL’s presence may not be difficult to achieve.
Israel has publicly advocated for defunding UNIFIL on multiple occasions, arguing that its operations provide Hezbollah and its surrounding communities with political and economic cover. Currently, UNIFIL’s budget is around $500 million, allocated partly to military operations and partly to socio-economic programs, such as healthcare and education, serving the southern Lebanese population—a majority of whom vocally support Hezbollah. Israel maintains that despite UNIFIL’s presence since 1978, Hezbollah has continued to operate freely, even building tunnels mere feet from UN observation posts.
The exit of UNIFIL would also have significant humanitarian consequences. Many communities in southern Lebanon, particularly among the Shiite population, have benefited from the UN’s medical and educational services. With their departure, residents would become even more reliant on Hezbollah’s social service networks—services that are both politicized and strategically designed to foster dependency. This outcome would be counterproductive to the broader goal of diminishing Hezbollah’s influence and achieving lasting disarmament.
Hezbollah, for its part, publicly antagonizes UNIFIL yet does not genuinely wish for their departure. The peacekeepers serve as human shields and a distraction from Hezbollah’s growing militarization—an issue that is not only of international concern but increasingly a domestic Lebanese one. In truth, peacekeepers should not be tasked with disarming a powerful militia responsible for provoking war and devastation in southern Lebanon. This responsibility lies squarely with the Lebanese state, which must exercise full sovereignty over its territory and borders.
The ongoing attacks on UNIFIL, carried out by supposedly outraged villagers, are exacerbated by the weak and symbolic condemnations issued by the Lebanese government. Despite official statements denouncing such violence, authorities have consistently failed to prevent their recurrence. UNIFIL peacekeepers are, in theory, under the protection of the Lebanese state and its armed forces. Therefore, any assault by so-called disgruntled villagers should be met with decisive accountability—a standard sorely lacking in Lebanon’s political leadership.
Looking ahead, if UNIFIL is to remain operational in Lebanon, it must do so under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, which allows for immediate action without requiring consent or cooperation from the Lebanese state or its army.
Whatever the future holds for Lebanon, and the people of the south, the chaos surrounding these attacks cannot obscure the root issue—Hezbollah’s weapons, which represent a clear and immediate threat to Lebanon’s sovereignty and stability. UNIFIL has long functioned as training wheels on a child’s bicycle—supportive yet temporary. However, the time has come for Lebanon, now a sovereign adult, to assume full responsibility and move forward without external crutches. The blue-helmeted peacekeepers can only be effective if the villagers come to understand who their true enemies are. Allowing Hezbollah—or any future militant entity—to manipulate and use them will only lead to further marginalization and make them dangerously expendable.

'Adults' star Malik Elassal: Add Canadian comedian, actor and writer to the list of comedy sensations
Elisabetta Bianchini/Yahoo News Canada/June 12, 2025
https://youtu.be/dIUyP-tKWbw

"I'm really lucky that I get to have my dreams come true," Elassal said
For decades, comedy has been considered one of Canada's greatest exports, including notable talents like Eugene Levy, Martin Short, Catherine O'Hara and the late John Candy. Adding to that legacy is Malik Elassal, who stars in the popular new show Adults (on Disney+ in Canada, Hulu in the U.S.), created by Ben Kronengold and Rebecca Shaw (The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon).
Making the move from Alberta to the U.S., incredibly skilled in hysterical stand-up comedy, with moments from his sets going viral, Elassal is set to be among Canada's comedy legends. And what makes Adults a great introduction to him, for many, is that the show really showcases each cast member's unique strengths."We all come from these different places. ... Amita [Rao] is an improviser, Lucy [Freyer] was an actor in Juilliard. But then when we come together, we sort of have our our own rhythm that's outside of improv training, outside of more standard actors training, or outside of TikTok," Elassal told Yahoo Canada. In Aults, a group of friends move in together in Samir's (Malik Elassal) childhood home in New York. Samir is trying, at least sometimes, to take on more responsibility in life, Billie (Lucy Freyer) is pursuing a career in journalism, Anton (Owen Thiele) was Samir's college roommate who can be friends with anyone. Issa (Amita Rao) is taking on odd jobs with her infectious personality, and she's dating Paul Baker (Jack Innanen), who she convinces Samir to let move in with the rest of the group.
The show in intensely funny in a way that leans into absurdity at times, awkwardness at others, and navigates different elements and styles of comedy effortlessly, largely thanks to this impressive cast.
With Elassal already receiving positive feedback from the show, he's really just happy to make people smile and laugh.
"It feels like it falls in line with my love language, to give somebody this big thing and for them to enjoy it," he said.
Lucy Freyer, Owen Thiele, and Amita Rao attend FX's "Adults" premiere event at Highland Park Bowl on May 20, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Phillip Faraone/Getty Images for FX Networks) (Phillip Faraone via Getty Images)
How 'Adults' cast informed the show's story
As Elassal described, a lot of the brilliant on-screen chemistry we see between this group of friends in Adults was informed by the natural evolution of the group's off-screen dynamic.
"[When] we started hanging out and started being on set, you just realize that somebody has been on the same version of the internet as you," Elassal said about his friendship with fellow Canadian Jack Innanen. "We just really became close."
With Samir having a particularly close frienship with Billie in the show, Elassal added that even just taking walks with Lucy Freyer and ribbing each other in real life help develop what we see on-screen.
Additionally, Kronengold and Shaw looked to the actors to add to their scripts.
"We started to find out that things from our lives would end up in the script," Elassal said. "So we'd have takes where we got to add things in there, and that was always really fun."
A particularly hysterical moment in the show is Episode 6, where Billie is hosting her boyfriend, and her former high school teacher, played by Charlie Cox, for dinner. As Billie tries to get all of her roommates in line, with the hopes of a more sophisticated evening, things quickly take an unexpected and hysterical turn when Cox's character shows up high on a "pony dose" of ketamine, and Paul Baker's friend, who happens to be Julia Fox (who's playing herself), comes over for the meal.
"We were block shooting the whole series, so every episode was over the span of like four or five days, or so. And usually we have different locations and we were going to different places, but ... for like four or five days in a row we're just in this house, basically," Elassal explained about that epiosde. "And I'm in this giant suit looking ridiculous and running around, and it just felt like a day that never ended."
"It really kind of led into this dreary, looming feeling that the episode has. ... Charlie would show up, and then me and Charlie would have scenes together at like 2:00 a.m., after everybody went home, and he was kissing me on the forehead. It's all just very surreal. ... And then one day they're like, 'Oh, hey, Julia Fox is coming today.' ... You see my reaction to Julia Fox being on my couch in the episode, ... it's basically just how I felt."
'I'm really lucky that I get to have my dreams come true'
In terms of what drew Elassal to a career in comedy, there wasn't necessarily a specific "breakthrough" moment, but he can identify the time that he understood the feeling of being able to make people laugh.
"I remember a moment watching my older cousin, when I was younger, stand up and do an impression of his dad to all of the aunts and uncles, ... and him making them all laugh so hard," Elassal said. "And I was like, 'Oh, this is the coolest person I've ever seen.'"
"I think something from that time might have gotten in my head of like, that's a real, worthwhile thing to do in your life, is to be able to make a group of people that happy."
While a Canadian making the move to the U.S. always feels like a big professional step, it was a "culture shock" for the Calgary-raised Lebanese Canadian talent.
"It's insane. It's such a culture shock," Elassal said. "You're going to the airport in America and they have signs up like, hey please don't bring your gun on the plane. And I'm like, are people doing that?"
"I mean, there's a craziness to America. And it's fun to live there. But whenever I come back to Canada, I still feel at home, even though New York is home right now."
As Elassal's career progresses, from stand-up comedy to TV, and even joining projects from other famed comedians, like an episode of Pete Holmes' podcast, "You Made It Weird," we certainly can't wait to see what Elassal does next.
"It's unbelievable. I'm consistently so happy to get to meet all these people that I was already such a fan of, and it's amazing to get to work with them," he said. "It's such a dream come true. ... I'm really lucky that I get to have my dreams come true."
https://ca.yahoo.com/news/adults-star-malik-elassal-add-canadian-comedian-actor-and-writer-to-the-list-of-comedy-sensations-040316740.html

The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on June 12-13/2025
Israel attacks Iran’s capital with explosions booming across Tehran
AP/June 13, 2025
JERUSALEM: Israel attacked Iran’s capital early Friday, with explosions booming across Tehran as Israel said it targeted nuclear and military sites. The attack comes as tensions have reached new heights over Tehran’s rapidly advancing nuclear program. The Board of Governors at the International Atomic Energy Agency for the first time in 20 years on Thursday censured Iran over it not working with its inspectors. Iran immediately announced it would establish a third enrichment site in the country and swap out some centrifuges for more-advanced ones. Israel for years has warned it will not allow Iran to build a nuclear weapon, something Tehran insists it doesn’t want — though official there have repeatedly warned it could build them. The US has been preparing for something to happen, already pulling some diplomats from Iraq’s capital and offering voluntary evacuations for the families of US troops in the wider Middle East.Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in an address on YouTube that the attacks will continue “for as many days at it takes to remove this threat.” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Israel took “unilateral action against Iran” and that Israel advised the US that it believed the strikes were necessary for its self-defense. “We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,” Rubio said in a statement released by the White House. Rubio also issued a warning to Iran that it should not target US interests or personnel. People in Tehran awoke to the sound of the blast. State television acknowledged the blast. It wasn’t immediately clear what had been hit, though smoke could be rising from Chitgar, a neighborhood in western Tehran. There are no known nuclear sites in that area — but it wasn’t immediately clear if anything was happening in the rest of the country. An Israeli military official says that his country targeted Iranian nuclear sites, without identifying them. The official spoke to journalists on condition of anonymity to discuss the ongoing operation, which is also targeting military sites. Benchmark Brent crude spiked on the attack, rising nearly 5 percent on the news. Israel’s Defense Minister Israel Katz said that his country carried out the attack, without saying what it targeted. “In the wake of the state of Israel’s preventive attack against Iran, missile and drone attacks against Israel and its civilian population are expected immediately,” he said in a statement.The statement added that Katz “signed a special order declaring an emergency situation in the home front.”“It is essential to listen to instructions from the home front command and authorities to stay in protected areas,” it said. Both Iran and Israel closed their airspace. As the explosions in Tehran started, President Donald Trump was on the lawn of the White House mingling with members of Congress. It was unclear if he had been informed but the president continued shaking hands and posing for pictures for several minutes. Trump earlier said he was urging Netanyahu to hold off from taking action for the time being while the administration negotiated with Iran. “As long as I think there is a (chance for an) agreement, I don’t want them going in because I think it would blow it,” Trump told reporters.


Israel says it strikes Iran amid nuclear tensions
Reuters/June 12, 2025
JERUSALEM/TEHRAN/WASHINGTON -Israel said early on Friday that it struck Iran, and Iranian media said explosions were heard in Tehran as tensions mounted over U.S. efforts to win Iran's agreement to halt production of material for an atomic bomb. Israel said it was declaring a state of emergency in anticipation of a missile and drone strike by Tehran.An Israeli military official said Israel was striking "dozens" of nuclear and military targets. The official said Iran had enough material to make 15 nuclear bombs within days. "Following the preemptive strike by the State of Israel against Iran, a missile and UAV (drone) attack against the State of Israel and its civilian population is expected in the immediate timeframe," Defence Minister Israel Katz said in a statement. Two U.S. officials who spoke on condition of anonymity said Israel had begun carrying out strikes on Iran and there was no U.S. assistance or involvement in the operation. CNN reported that U.S. President Donald Trump was convening a cabinet meeting. Crude oil prices jumped more than $3 a barrel on the news. Iran's state TV said several explosions were heard in Tehran and the country's air defence system was on full alert. U.S. and Iranian officials were scheduled to hold a sixth round of talks on Tehran's escalating uranium enrichment programme in Oman on Sunday, according to officials from both countries and their Omani mediators. But the talks have appeared to be deadlocked. Trump said on Thursday an Israeli strike on Iran "could very well happen" but reiterated his hopes for a peaceful resolution. U.S. intelligence had indicated that Israel was making preparations for a strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, and U.S. officials said on condition of anonymity that Israel could attack in the coming days.Israel has long discussed striking its longtime foe Iran in an effort to block Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon. The U.S. military is planning for the full range of contingencies in the Middle East, including the possibility that it might have to help evacuate American civilians, a U.S. official told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity.
(Reporting by Reuters; Writing by Cynthia Osterman; Editing by Stephen Coates)

Rubio says US not involved in Israeli strikes against Iran
Reuters/June 12, 2025
WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Thursday the United States was not involved in Israel’s strikes against Iran while also urging Tehran not to target US interests or personnel in the region. “Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,” Rubio said in a statement. “Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel,” he added.

Israel says it launched ‘preemptive strike’ on Iran
Al Arabiya English/June 12, 2025
Israel launched a “preemptive strike” on Iran, the country’s defense minister said early Friday, after US President Donald Trump had warned that Israel could soon strike Iran’s nuclear sites. “Following the State of Israel’s preemptive strike against Iran, a missile and drone attack against the State of Israel and its civilian population is expected in the immediate future,” Israel Katz said. Two US officials told Reuters that Israel has begun carrying out strikes on Iran, adding that there was no US assistance or involvement in the operation. The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, declined to provide further information. Iranian state TV reported that explosions were heard Friday morning in the Iranian capital Tehran, but the reason behind the blasts was not immediately clear. “Loud explosions being heard in different locations of the capital Tehran,” state TV reported without providing details.

Israel mulls solo strike on Iran’s nuclear sites as US-Iran talks set to resume
Al Arabiya English/13 June/2025
https://youtu.be/-S586M06O1Q
In this episode of W News, presented by Leigh-Ann Gerrans, we report on media claims that Israel is considering military action against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure in the coming days – without US support. This comes as the US and Iran prepare for a sixth round of nuclear talks in Oman, with sharp divisions over uranium enrichment: Iran calls it a “non-negotiable” right for civilian use, while the US says it could lead to nuclear weapons development.
Guests:
Doron Spielman – Israeli military International Spokesman (res.)
Harald Troch – Former Austrian MP
Halyna Yanchenko – Ukrainian MP
Camile Nedelec – Correspondent


Trump says Israel should not strike Iran as nuclear deal ‘close’
AFP/12 June/2025
On whether Israel could attack Iran, Trump said: “I don’t want to say imminent, but it looks like it’s something that could very well happen.” US President Donald Trump called Thursday on ally Israel not to strike Iran’s nuclear sites, saying a deal remained close if Tehran compromises. Trump acknowledged that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was considering a strike, which he said could spark a “massive conflict” – leading to a US decision to draw down embassy staff in the region. “We are fairly close to a pretty good agreement,” Trump told reporters. Asked about his discussions with Netanyahu, Trump said: “I don’t want them going in, because I think it would blow it.”Trump quickly added: “Might help it actually, but it also could blow it.”Trump’s Middle East pointman Steve Witkoff is set to hold a sixth round of talks on Sunday in Oman with Iran, which defiantly said it would raise levels of uranium enrichment – the key sticking point in talks. Trump again described himself as a man of peace and said he would prefer a negotiated settlement with Iran. “I’d love to avoid the conflict. Iran’s going to have to negotiate a little bit tougher – meaning they’re going to have to give us some things that they’re not willing to give us right now,” he said. On whether Israel could attack Iran, Trump said: “I don’t want to say imminent, but it looks like it’s something that could very well happen.”

Israeli official says strike on Iran may come 'as soon as Sunday'
Naharnet/12 June/2025
Israel is prepared to attack Iran in the coming days if Tehran rejects a U.S. proposal that would place tough limits on its nuclear program, Trump administration and Israeli officials told the Wall Street Journal. A senior Israeli official warned in remarks to the U.S. newspaper that a strike could come as soon as Sunday unless Iran agrees to halt production of fissile material that can be used to make an atomic bomb.

IRGC commander warns Israel that Iran’s retaliation to any attack will be unprecedented
Al Arabiya English/12 June/2025
Iran’s retaliation to any Israeli aggression will be “more forceful and destructive” than in past offensives, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commander Hossein Salami told state media on Thursday, after Tehran said it had been alerted of a potential attack. Israel and Iran exchanged fire twice last year, the first such direct attacks between the region’s most entrenched enemies. US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday US personnel were being moved out of the Middle East because it could become a dangerous place, adding that the United States would not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. A senior Iranian official told Reuters on Thursday that a “friendly” regional country had alerted Tehran over a potential military strike by Israel. The official also said that Iran will not abandon its right to uranium enrichment because of mounting frictions in the region. “We don’t want tensions and prefer diplomacy to resolve the (nuclear) issue, but our armed forces are fully ready to respond to any military strike,” the Iranian official said.With Reuters

Iran threatens nuclear escalation after UN watchdog board finds it in breach of obligations
Mostafa Salem and Frederik Pleitgen, CNN/June 12, 2025
Iran has warned it will ramp up its nuclear activities after the United Nations nuclear watchdog’s 35-member board of governors adopted a resolution Thursday declaring it in breach of its non-proliferation obligations. Tehran retaliated by announcing the launch of a new uranium enrichment center and the installation of advanced centrifuges – an escalatory move likely to complicate nuclear talks with the United States set to resume this weekend. Nations attending the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) board meeting in Vienna voted on the resolution, with 19 in favor, 3 against and 11 abstentions, Reuters reported. The IAEA has previously accused Iran of non-cooperation but Thursday’s move marks an official finding of non-compliance and raises the prospect of escalating the issue to the UN Security Council. The resolution was tabled by European countries and the US after a May 31 IAEA report found Iran to be non-compliant in its nuclear duties, including failing to answer questions on uranium particles found in undeclared sites in the country, and its stockpiling of uranium enriched to nearly weapons grade. Iran says the IAEA report was politicized. Uranium is a nuclear fuel that, when highly enriched, can be used to make a bomb. Iran maintains that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. Tehran condemned the US, the United Kingdom, France and Germany for tabling the resolution and said it has “no option but to respond.” A day ahead of the vote, a senior Iranian official told CNN that “Iran intends to launch a series of retaliatory nuclear measures as soon as the resolution is adopted at the IAEA.”“These measures include scaling back cooperation with the agency and imposing certain restrictions, activating advanced and new-generation centrifuges, and removing monitoring cameras from the Isfahan facility,” the official said.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on X last week: “Mark my words, as Europe ponders another major strategic mistake: Iran will react strongly against any violation of its rights.”In 2022, the IAEA censured Iran over uranium particles found at the undeclared sites. Iran also dismissed that motion as “politicized,” and responded by removing surveillance cameras from key sites – depriving negotiators of up-to-date information on its enrichment program.
Heightened tensions
The IAEA board resolution comes as Tehran and Washington are in the midst of complicated negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program. The two nations will hold indirect talks in the Omani capital, Muscat, on Sunday for the sixth time, Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi said on X Thursday. Despite multiple rounds of negotiations over a new nuclear deal, a major sticking point remains: Iran’s insistence on its right to enrich uranium. Trump has said he’s grown less confident in being able to strike a deal with Iran, saying in a new interview that Tehran could be “delaying” striking an agreement. “I’m getting more and more less confident about it. They seem to be delaying, and I think that’s a shame, but I’m less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago,” Trump said in an interview with a New York Post podcast that was released on Wednesday. Regional tensions have escalated significantly ahead of the next round of talks. On Wednesday night, the US State and Defense departments made efforts to arrange the departure of non-essential personnel from locations around the Middle East, according to US officials and sources familiar with the efforts. It’s not clear what caused the change in posture, but a defense official said US Central Command is monitoring “developing tension in the Middle East.”Trump said the personnel are being moved out “because it could be a dangerous place, and we’ll see what happens. But they have been or we’ve given notice to move out, and we’ll see what happens.”On Thursday, the US embassy in Jerusalem also issued a security alert restricting US government staff and their families from traveling outside of Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and Be’er Sheva until further notice.

UN nuclear watchdog board censures Iran, which retaliates by announcing a new enrichment site
Stephanie Liechtenstein And Jon Gambrell/The Associated Press/June 12, 2025
VIENNA (AP) — The U.N. nuclear watchdog’s board of governors on Thursday formally found that Iran isn’t complying with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years, a move that could lead to further tensions and set in motion an effort to restore United Nations sanctions on Tehran later this year.
Iran reacted immediately, saying it will establish a new enrichment facility “in a secure location” and that “other measures are also being planned.”“The Islamic Republic of Iran has no choice but to respond to this political resolution,” the Iranian Foreign Ministry and the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran said in a joint statement. U.S. President Donald Trump previously warned that Israel or America could carry out airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities if negotiations failed — and some American personnel and their families have begun leaving the region over the tensions, which come ahead of a new round of Iran-U.S. talks Sunday in Oman. In Israel, the U.S. Embassy ordered American government employees and their families to remain in the Tel Aviv area over security concerns. Nineteen countries on the International Atomic Energy Agency’s board, which represents the agency’s member nations, voted for the resolution, according to diplomats who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the outcome of the closed-doors vote. Russia, China and Burkina Faso opposed it, 11 abstained and two did not vote.In the draft resolution seen by The Associated Press, the board of governors renews a call on Iran to provide answers “without delay” in a long-running investigation into uranium traces found at several locations that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites. Western officials suspect that the uranium traces could provide further evidence that Iran had a secret nuclear weapons program until 2003.
The resolution was put forward by France, the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States.
Iran lists steps in retaliation for the IAEA vote
Speaking to Iranian state television after the vote, the spokesman for the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran said that his agency immediately informed the IAEA of “specific and effective” actions Tehran would take. “One is the launch of a third secure site” for enrichment, spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi said. He did not elaborate on the location, but the organization's chief Mohammad Eslami later described the site as "already built, prepared, and located in a secure and invulnerable place.”Iran has two underground sites at Fordo and Natanz and has been building tunnels in the mountains near Natanz since suspected Israeli sabotage attacks targeted that facility. The other step would be replacing old centrifuges for advanced ones at Fordo. “The implication of this is that our production of enriched materials will significantly increase,” Kamalvandi said. According to the draft resolution, “Iran’s many failures to uphold its obligations since 2019 to provide the Agency with full and timely cooperation regarding undeclared nuclear material and activities at multiple undeclared locations in Iran ... constitutes non-compliance with its obligations under its Safeguards Agreement.”Under those obligations, which are part of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran is legally bound to declare all nuclear material and activities and allow IAEA inspectors to verify that none of it is being diverted from peaceful uses. The draft resolution also finds that the IAEA’s “inability ... to provide assurance that Iran’s nuclear program is exclusively peaceful gives rise to questions that are within the competence of the United Nations Security Council, as the organ bearing the main responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security.” The draft resolution made a direct reference to the U.S.-Iran talks, stressing its “support for a diplomatic solution to the problems posed by the Iranian nuclear program, including the talks between the United States and Iran, leading to an agreement that addresses all international concerns related to Iran’s nuclear activities, encouraging all parties to constructively engage in diplomacy.”
Still a chance for Iran to cooperate with IAEA. A senior Western diplomat last week described the resolution as a “serious step,” but added that Western nations are “not closing the door to diplomacy on this issue.” However, if Iran fails to cooperate, an extraordinary IAEA board meeting will likely be held in the summer, during which another resolution could get passed that will refer the issue to the Security Council, the diplomat said on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to discuss the issue with the media. The three European nations have repeatedly threatened in the past to reinstate, or “snapback,” sanctions that have been lifted under the original 2015 Iran nuclear deal if Iran does not provide “technically credible” answers to the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s questions. The authority to reestablish those sanctions by the complaint of any member of the original 2015 nuclear deal expires in October, putting the West on a clock to exert pressure on Tehran over its program before losing that power. The resolution comes on heels of the IAEA’s so-called “comprehensive report” that was circulated among member states last weekend. In the report, the U.N. nuclear watchdog said that Iran’s cooperation with the agency has “been less than satisfactory” when it comes to uranium traces discovered by agency inspectors at several locations in Iran. One of the sites became known publicly in 2018, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu revealed it at the United Nations and called it a clandestine nuclear warehouse hidden at a rug-cleaning plant. Iran denied this, but in 2019, IAEA inspectors detected the presence of uranium traces there as well as at two other sites.

Explainer-How Iran's network of Middle East power faded
Reuters/June 12, 2025
At previous moments of tension over decades of rivalry with Western foes, Iran was able to project power across the Middle East using a network of close allies that meant any strikes against it threatened to trigger a formidable response. Now, with talks deadlocked over its nuclear programme and U.S. President Donald Trump saying an Israeli strike on Iran "could very well happen," Tehran must face a fresh crisis with those capabilities greatly diminished. The United States killed the mastermind of Iran's regional network in 2020 and since the war in Gaza began 20 months ago, Israel has hammered Tehran's closest ally Hezbollah while rebels ousted its main regional partner, Syria's President Bashar al-Assad. Here is how Iran built up its "Axis of Resistance", how that network has come undone, and the regional resources Tehran can still count on.
HOW DID IRAN BUILD UP SUCH A WIDE REGIONAL NETWORK?
Iran spent decades after its 1979 Islamic Revolution developing a network of allies across the Middle East that accepted Tehran's leadership and shared its regional vision of fighting what they described as Western imperialism. This "Axis of Resistance", as it was dubbed, drew on the appeal of Iran's revolutionary theocratic ideas to traditionally marginalised fellow Shi'ite Muslims across the region, and on its staunch support for Palestinian nationalism. It grew to include Hezbollah in Lebanon, President Bashar al-Assad's government in Syria, Shi'ite Muslim armed groups in Iraq, the Houthis in Yemen and the Palestinian militant group Hamas - extending Iran's influence to both the Mediterranean and Red Sea. The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and its elite Quds Force lay at the heart of the axis. The IRGC answers to the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and was set up soon after the revolution as an ideologically committed counterweight to the regular armed forces. The Quds Force operates as the IRGC's overseas wing, working closely with allies in the Axis of Resistance to train and arm them, and to provide direction and guidance in their military operations. Its tough, shrewd commander Major-General Qassem Soleimani was killed by a U.S. drone attack in Iraq in 2020 after decades spent knitting together groups across the region and Iran has struggled to replace him.
WHY HAVE KEY PARTS OF IRAN'S NETWORK CRUMBLED?
When Hamas attacked Israeli communities on October 7, 2023, it triggered massive military retaliation that has killed much of the group's top leadership including political chief Ismail Haniyeh, who was assassinated in Tehran last summer. Hamas is still fighting in Gaza and retains a significant presence in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, but it does not presently boast a military force capable of posing a realistic threat to Israel. The war quickly spread as Iran's most important regional ally Hezbollah fired on Israel from Lebanon in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza, leading to months of cross-border fire between the group and Israel. That conflict suddenly escalated in September 2024 when Israel detonated thousands of booby-trapped pagers used by Hezbollah operatives, killing and maiming hundreds of them. Over the following weeks a string of Israeli airstrikes killed Hezbollah's top leadership including overall chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, dealing the group a stunning blow and revealing how far it had been infiltrated. Hezbollah accepted a ceasefire with Israel in November and remains far from the powerful organisation that once threatened Israeli security. Syria's Assad was ousted soon afterwards. Israel had targeted top Iranian commanders in Syria with airstrikes over the summer, causing a partial IRGC pullout. Without Iranian and Hezbollah support, and ally Russia bogged down with war in Ukraine, Assad's army crumbled when rebels mounted an offensive in late November and he fled in December.
WHAT REMAINS OF THE AXIS OF RESISTANCE?
With Hamas and Hezbollah greatly weakened, Iran can still turn to the Shi'ite militias it supports in Iraq and to the Houthis in Yemen. Iraq has a constellation of Iran-aligned armed groups but just a handful count among the most loyal and powerful to Tehran, including Kataib Hezbollah and the Nujaba group. These groups receive arms and directives from Iran and have pledged allegiance to Iran's supreme leader but retain a degree of autonomy on their operations inside Iraq. They have all but ceased attacks targeting U.S. forces and Israel since last year. Analysts question how far they would go to protect Iran if an attack was aimed at its nuclear sites rather than as part of an effort to topple the Islamic Republic given that would pose an existential threat to their main source of support. The Houthis have continued to fire missiles at Israel, but their ability to pose a significant threat from their distant base in Yemen is in doubt. Their attacks on Red Sea shipping have cooled since striking a deal with the U.S. after weeks of bombings in the spring.

US warns Iran over support for Houthis, asks UN Security Council for stricter arms embargo
Ephrem Kossaify/Arab News/June 12, 2025
NEW YORK CITY: The US sharply criticized Iran on Thursday over its backing of the Houthis in Yemen, accusing Tehran of violating UN arms embargoes and enabling attacks against Arab nations and Israel. Speaking during a UN Security Council briefing on the situation in Yemen, the acting US ambassador, Dorothy Shea, said Iranian support is allowing the Houthis to threaten Israel, Gulf countries, and broader regional stability. “This council must not tolerate Iran’s repeated violations of its resolutions,” she told fellow members. Shea condemned the Houthis for ongoing cross-border attacks, including missile strikes on Israel’s Ben Gurion airport, and threats of air and naval blockades targeting Port of Haifa, as well as human rights abuses within Yemen itself. “Israel has the right to defend itself,” she said. “We stand with Israel against Iranian-backed terrorist groups, including the Houthis.”
The US envoy also highlighted what she described as evidence that the Houthis were acquiring dual-use technology from Chinese sources, specifically the Chang Guang Satellite Technology Company, which is linked to China’s military and Communist Party leadership. In addition, she called for closer scrutiny of the Houthis’ expanding ties to Somalian insurgent group Al-Shabaab, including an investigation by expert UN panels. Shea highlighted the important role of the UN’s Verification and Inspection Mechanism for Yemen as a critical tool for preventing illicit arms shipments to the Houthis, and praised recent interceptions of containers headed for rebel-controlled ports. She urged member states to increase funding for the mechanism and provide naval assets so that it can fully enforce its mandate. Shea also reiterated that even vessels cleared by the mechanism might still face consequences under US law, given that Washington has designated the Houthis as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, and warned that any form of aid to the group could violate US antiterrorism statutes. The ambassador condemned the Houthis for the prolonged detention of employees of the UN and nongovernmental organizations, and diplomatic personnel, including Americans, for more than a year on “fabricated espionage charges,” and called for their immediate and unconditional release. “The Houthis bear overwhelming responsibility for the deterioration in the well-being and safety of the Yemeni people,” Shea added, as she accused the group of terrorizing civilians, obstructing humanitarian aid, and profiting from illicit commercial activities. The briefing came as UN efforts to address Yemen’s protracted conflict and humanitarian crisis continue, with the organization’s special envoy to the country, Hans Grundberg, and Assistant Secretary-General Joyce Msuya on Thursday calling on council members to put pressure on the Houthis for a peace agreement and the release of all detainees.

Hamas faces leadership vacuum at critical time with demise of Gaza 'War Council'

Rushdi Abualouf - Gaza correspondent/BBC/June 12, 2025
With the confirmed killing of Hamas's top military commander Mohammad Sinwar in an Israeli strike, a chapter has closed on the elite leadership group in Gaza that orchestrated the events of 7 October, 2023. Sinwar's demise follows the confirmed killings of other central figures who sat on what came to be known inside Hamas as the War Council. Sinwar, his brother Yahya, Marwan Issa and a fifth unidentified figure formed the clandestine core that decided on and directed the unprecedented assault on Israel - one which shook the region and set off the conflict still unfolding in Gaza. The War Council, sometimes also known as the Quintet Council, operated under conditions of extreme security and secrecy. Direct meetings between its members were exceedingly rare. Instead, communication occurred through older technology deemed more secure, like cable phones, or via trusted intermediaries, all in an effort to minimise the risk of interception or detection. This level of secrecy was not just tactical: it reflected the council's critical role in Hamas's strategic decision-making, especially in preparation for what became the most complex and deadly attack in the organisation's history.The known members of the council included: Mohammed Deif - the commander of Hamas's military wing, the Izzedine al-Qassam Brigades, who is believed to have masterminded the 7 October attack. He was killed in an Israeli air strike in July 2024. Yahya Sinwar - the political leader of Hamas in Gaza and its most influential decision-maker in recent years. He was killed in a firefight with Israeli troops in October 2024. Mohammad Sinwar - a senior military figure and Deif's trusted lieutenant. Israel said this week that it had identified his body in Gaza following an air strike in May.A fifth figure - whose identity remains unknown to the public - who was in charge of organising Hamas's security apparatus. He was targeted in assassination attempts before the war and an air strike during it, and suffered such severe injuries that he can no longer communicate or carry out any activities, according to one source
The 7 October attack marked a seismic shift in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The scale and brutality of the attack stunned observers worldwide - not just for its immediate impact, but for its unprecedented scale. Hamas's military preparations took years - including extensive tunnel construction and the steady accumulation of rockets and weapons - but few analysts, regional actors, or even rival Palestinian factions foresaw the magnitude of the offensive. The group had long maintained strict control over Gazans and had often imposed harsh economic measures, including heavy taxes, on an already impoverished population to fund its military build-up. Yet even within the movement, there appears to have been a limited understanding of the scale and consequences of the plan hatched by the War Council. Its demise raises a profound question: what exactly drove its members to pursue a course that many Palestinians have described as politically suicidal? With Israel's overwhelming military response and the international isolation that followed, the 7 October attack has increasingly been viewed as a desperate gamble - one that lacked a clear political exit strategy and led to massive suffering for Gaza's civilian population. Now, with most of the core decision-makers dead, uncovering the deeper motivations and strategic calculus behind the attack may no longer be possible. What internal debates occurred within the council? Were there dissenting voices? Was this a bid for regional relevance, a provocation timed with regional shifts, or a last-ditch effort to break a long-standing siege?Answers to these questions may have died with the men who conceived the plan. The dismantling of the war council leaves Hamas facing a potential leadership vacuum at a critical time. Its military capabilities have been severely degraded, its political leadership - who operated out of Qatar until November 2024, after which their whereabouts became unclear - is under intense pressure, and its traditional mechanisms of control within Gaza have been deeply disrupted. The absence of a centralised strategic command may lead to fragmentation within Hamas, or the rise of new, perhaps more radical factions. Alternatively, it may open a pathway for recalibration - if not by Hamas, then by other Palestinian actors seeking to fill the void left behind. The fall of Hamas's War Council marks the end of a shadowy but powerful inner circle that shaped one of the most consequential decisions in the movement's history. Whether their legacy will be seen by Palestinians as one of bold resistance or catastrophic miscalculation, one thing is certain: with their departure, a defining era in the leadership of Hamas has come to a close.

Islamic State reactivating fighters, eying comeback in Syria and Iraq
Ahmed Rasheed, Timour Azhari and Michael Georgy/Reuters/June 12, 2025
DAMASCUS - Middle East leaders and their Western allies have been warning that Islamic State could exploit the fall of the Assad regime to stage a comeback in Syria and neighbouring Iraq, where the extremist group once imposed a reign of terror over millions. Islamic State (IS) has been attempting just that, according to more than 20 sources, including security and political officials from Syria, Iraq, the U.S. and Europe, as well as diplomats in the region. The group has started reactivating fighters in both countries, identifying targets, distributing weapons and stepping up recruitment and propaganda efforts, the sources said. So far, the results of these efforts appear limited. Security operatives in Syria and Iraq, who have been monitoring IS for years, told Reuters they foiled at least a dozen major plots this year. A case in point came in December, the month Syria’s Bashar Assad was toppled. As rebels were advancing on Damascus, IS commanders holed up near Raqqa, former capital of their self-declared caliphate, dispatched two envoys to Iraq, five Iraqi counter-terrorism officials told Reuters. The envoys carried verbal instructions to the group’s followers to launch attacks. But they were captured at a checkpoint while travelling in northern Iraq on December 2, the officials said. Eleven days later, Iraqi security forces, acting on information from the envoys, tracked a suspected IS suicide bomber to a crowded restaurant in the northern town of Daquq using his cell phone, they said. The forces shot the man dead before he could detonate an explosives belt, they said. The foiled attack confirmed Iraq’s suspicions about the group, said Colonel Abdul Ameer al-Bayati, of the Iraqi Army’s 8th Division, which is deployed in the area. “Islamic State elements have begun to reactivate after years of lying low, emboldened by the chaos in Syria,” he said.Still, the number of attacks claimed by IS has dropped since Assad's fall.  IS claimed responsibility for 38 attacks in Syria in the first five months of 2025, putting it on track for a little over 90 claims this year, according to data from SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors militants' activities online. That would be around a third of last year's claims, the data shows. In Iraq, where IS originated, the group claimed four attacks in the first five months of 2025, versus 61 total last year. Syria's government, led by the country’s new Islamist leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa, did not answer questions about IS activities. Defence Minister Murhaf Abu Qasra told Reuters in January the country was developing its intelligence-gathering efforts, and its security services would address any threat. A U.S. defence official and a spokesperson for Iraq's prime minister said IS remnants in Syria and Iraq have been dramatically weakened, unable to control territory since a U.S.-led coalition and its local partners drove them from their last stronghold in 2019. The Iraqi spokesperson, Sabah al-Numan, credited pre-emptive operations for keeping the group in check. The coalition and partners hammered militant hideouts with airstrikes and raids after Assad’s fall. Such operations captured or killed “terrorist elements,” while preventing them from regrouping and carrying out operations, Numan said. Iraq’s intelligence operations have also become more precise, through drones and other technology, he added. At its peak between 2014 and 2017, IS held sway over roughly a third of Syria and Iraq, where it imposed its extreme interpretation of Islamic sharia law, gaining a reputation for shocking brutality. None of the officials who spoke with Reuters saw a danger of that happening again. But they cautioned against counting the group out, saying it has proven a resilient foe, adept at exploiting a vacuum. Some local and European officials are concerned that foreign fighters might be travelling to Syria to join jihadi groups. For the first time in years, intelligence agencies tracked a small number of suspected foreign fighters coming from Europe to Syria in recent months, two European officials told Reuters, though they could not say whether IS or another group recruited them.
EXPLOITING DIVISIONS
The IS push comes at a delicate time for Sharaa, as he attempts to unite a diverse country and bring former rebel groups under government control after 13 years of civil war. U.S. President Donald Trump’s surprise decision last month to lift sanctions on Syria was widely seen as a win for the Syrian leader, who once led a branch of al Qaeda that battled IS for years. But some Islamist hardliners criticised Sharaa’s efforts to woo Western governments, expressing concern he might acquiesce to U.S. demands to expel foreign fighters and normalise relations with Israel. Seizing on such divides, IS condemned the meeting with Trump in a recent issue of its online news publication, al-Naba, and called on foreign fighters in Syria to join its ranks. At a May 14 meeting in Saudi Arabia, Trump asked Sharaa to help prevent an IS resurgence as the U.S. begins a troop consolidation in Syria it says could cut its roughly 2,000-strong military presence by half this year. The U.S. drawdown has heightened concern among allies that IS might find a way to free some 9,000 fighters and their family members, including foreign nationals, held at prisons and camps guarded by the U.S.-backed, Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). There have been at least two attempted jailbreaks since Assad's fall, the SDF has said. Trump and President Tayyip Erdogan of neighbouring Turkey want Sharaa’s government to assume responsibility for these facilities. Erdogan views the main Kurdish factions as a threat to his country. But some regional analysts question whether Damascus has the manpower needed. Syrian authorities have also been grappling with attacks by suspected Assad loyalists, outbreaks of deadly sectarian violence, Israeli airstrikes and clashes between Turkish-backed groups and the SDF, which controls about a quarter of the country. “The interim government is stretched thin from a security perspective. They just do not have the manpower to consolidate control in the entire country,” said Charles Lister, who heads the Syria program at the Middle East Institute, a U.S. think tank. Responding to a request for comment, a State Department spokesperson said it is critical for countries to repatriate detained nationals from Syria and shoulder a greater share of the burden for the camps' security and running costs. The U.S. defence official said Washington remains committed to preventing an IS resurgence, and its vetted Syrian partners remain in the field. The U.S. will “vigilantly monitor” Sharaa’s government, which has been “saying and doing the right things” so far, the official added. Three days after Trump's meeting with Sharaa, Syria announced it had raided IS hideouts in the country’s second city, Aleppo, killing three militants, detaining four and seizing weapons and uniforms. The U.S. has exchanged intelligence with Damascus in limited cases, another U.S. defence official and two Syrian officials told Reuters. The news agency could not determine whether it did so in the Aleppo raids. The coalition is expected to wrap up operations in Iraq by September. But the second U.S. official said Baghdad privately expressed interest in slowing down the withdrawal of some 2,500 American troops from Iraq when it became apparent that Assad would fall. A source familiar with the matter confirmed the request.
The White House, Baghdad and Damascus did not respond to questions about Trump’s plans for U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria.
REACTIVATING SLEEPER CELLS
The United Nations estimates IS, also known as ISIS or Daesh, has 1,500 to 3,000 fighters in the two countries. But its most active branches are in Africa, the SITE data shows. The U.S. military believes the group’s secretive leader is Abdulqadir Mumin, who heads the Somalia branch, a senior defence official told reporters in April. Still, SITE’s director, Rita Katz, cautioned against seeing the drop in IS attacks in Syria as a sign of weakness. “Far more likely that it has entered a restrategising phase,” she said. Since Assad’s fall, IS has been activating sleeper cells, surveilling potential targets and distributing guns, silencers and explosives, three security sources and three Syrian political officials told Reuters. It has also moved fighters from the Syrian desert, a focus of coalition airstrikes, to cities including Aleppo, Homs and Damascus, according to the security sources. "Of the challenges we face, Daesh is at the top of the list," Syrian Interior Minister Anas Khattab told state-owned Ekhbariya TV last week. In Iraq, aerial surveillance and intelligence sources on the ground have picked up increased IS activity in the northern Hamrin Mountains, a longtime refuge, and along key roads, Ali al-Saidi, an advisor to Iraqi security forces, told Reuters. Iraqi officials believe IS seized large stockpiles of weapons left behind by Assad’s forces and worry some could be smuggled into Iraq. Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein said Baghdad was in contact with Damascus about IS, which he told Reuters in January was growing and spreading into more areas.
"We hope that Syria, in the first place, will be stable, and Syria will not be a place for terrorists," he said, “especially ISIS terrorists."

UN General Assembly overwhelmingly votes for Gaza ceasefire resolution amid US, Israeli opposition
Ephrem Kossaify/Arab News/June 12, 2025
US describes the result as a reward for Hamas, says it does nothing to relieve the suffering of Gazans or secure release of hostages, and undermines negotiations
The UN General Assembly on Thursday overwhelmingly voted to adopt a draft resolution demanding an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, the release of all hostages and Palestinian prisoners, the unrestricted flow of aid to the starving population of the territory, and the full withdrawal of Israeli forces. The resolution was introduced by Spain in coordination with the Palestinian delegation and a bloc of more than 30 nations, including Saudi Arabia. A total of 149 nations voted in favor of the resolution, and 12 against, including Israel and the US. Nineteen abstained, including India. The resounding support for the measure came despite lobbying from Israel against what it described as a “politically motivated, counter-productive charade.”Danny Danon, Israel’s permanent representative to the UN, said the resolution “rewards the terrorists responsible for the suffering of our hostages. This is not a peace proposal. It is surrender.” General Assembly resolutions are nonbinding on member states but they carry significant moral and political weight as a reflection of prevailing global opinion. The president of the General Assembly, Philemon Yang, opened the session by calling on member states to transform their commitment to international law and justice into “meaningful action on the ground … and end the horrors in Gaza.”Palestine’s ambassador to the UN, Riyad Mansour, urged the international community to take “requisite actions to end this genocide” and secure the release of the hostages. He said: “Israel’s blatant contempt for international law and UN resolutions must lead to resolute action, and it has to be done now. “No arms, no money, no trade to oppress Palestinians, ethnically cleanse them and steal their land. This illegal, immoral situation cannot continue. It has to stop and stop immediately.
“We reject attacks on civilians, whether Palestinians or Israelis. Enough bloodshed, enough suffering.
“The actions you take today to stop the killing, displacement and famine will determine how many more Palestinian children die a horrific death. The actions you take today will determine if Palestinian children ever get a chance at life.”
Speaking of behalf of Gulf Cooperation Council member states, Kuwait’s permanent representative to the UN, Tarek Albanai, accused Israel of committing genocide and using starvation as a weapon of war. He called on the international community to uphold its responsibilities and “end these atrocities.”
The GCC has urged all countries to officially recognize the State of Palestine at a summit that will take place in New York next week on a two-state solution to the wider conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. “It is high time Palestine became a full-fledged member of the UN,” Albanai said. Palestine has held the status of Permanent Observer State at the UN since 2012 but is denied full membership. The General Assembly vote came a week after the US vetoed a similar resolution in the Security Council, arguing that it would undermine Washington-led negotiations aimed at brokering a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas. The remaining 14 members of the council members backed the resolution. Spain’s permanent representative to the UN, Hector Gomez Hernandez, introduced the draft resolution to the General Assembly and called on the international community to send “a robust message with the regard to Gaza.”The text of the resolution, presented under the Uniting for Peace framework during the resumption of an Emergency Special Session on Palestine, went further than previous resolutions on the issue. It included language that underscored the need for accountability to ensure Israeli compliance with the rule of international law, a provision that drew a sharp rebuke from Israel and concern from the US.
“This is both false and defamatory,” Danon said in a letter to member states this week, in which he described the draft resolution as “immensely flawed and harmful.”He warned that its undermines hostage negotiations, and criticized its failure to condemn the Hamas attacks in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, in which 1,200 people were killed and about 250 were taken hostage. The vote on the resolution followed stark warnings from UN agencies that famine is looming in Gaza, which is home to more than 2 million people. Israeli authorities lifted an 11-week humanitarian blockade on the enclave in mid-May but aid deliveries remain sporadic. The text of the resolution supports a UN-coordinated plan to resume deliveries of humanitarian aid and urges all states to always protect aid workers, UN personnel and medical staff in accordance with the principles of international law.
The resolution, the text of which was seen by Arab News, explicitly states that it “strongly condemns the use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare,” and demands that Israel end its blockade on Gaza and “open all border crossings” to ensure aid reaches the Palestinian population “immediately and at scale.”It calls on UN member states to “individually and collectively take all measures necessary,” consistent with the rule of international law and the UN Charter, to ensure Israeli compliance with its legal obligations. It also reaffirms the UN’s permanent responsibility for the Palestinian question until a two-state solution is achieved. The vote on Thursday was the fourth on a Gaza ceasefire resolution by the General Assembly since the war in Gaza began in October 2023. The US has vetoed several ceasefire resolutions within the Security Council, even as support in the General Assembly has grown and abstentions from such votes have steadily dropped. Dorothy Shea, the US envoy to the UN, described the Spanish-backed resolution as “yet another failure of the UN to condemn Hamas.” She said it does nothing to help free the hostages, improve lives of civilians in Gaza or move closer to a ceasefire, and instead sends message to Hamas that it was being rewarded.
“We will not support resolutions that do not call for violent terrorist groups to disarm and leave Gaza, and fail to recognize Israel’s right to defend itself,” Shea said. “This resolution falsely accuses Israel of the use of starvation as a method of warfare, while at the same time ignoring Gaza Humanitarian Foundation efforts to cut out Hamas and deliver aid consistent with the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence.”The vote took place in the run-up to a UN conference next week that aims to revive the international push for a two-state solution, which will be co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France. The US warned that countries who back “anti-Israel actions” in connection with the conference could be seen to be opposing US foreign policy and might face diplomatic consequences. Despite the US efforts to dissuade support for the Spanish resolution, it gathered wide sponsorship ahead of the vote. Alongside Spain, the initiators included Chile, Egypt, Iceland, Indonesia, Ireland, Jordan, Malaysia, Norway, Qatar, Slovenia, South Africa, Turkiye and the State of Palestine. Additional sponsors, numbering more than 30, included Brazil, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela and Pakistan. Palestinian casualties during the ongoing war in Gaza have surpassed 55,000. Thousands more are believed to be dead under the rubble of countless destroyed buildings. The resolution explicitly condemns the destruction of civilian infrastructure and stresses the importance of protecting humanitarian operations and medical facilities. It also references Security Council Resolution 2735, adopted a year ago, which outlines a US-backed road map for a phased ceasefire, hostage release, and eventual Israeli withdrawal, but has yet to be implemented.

Egypt deports dozens planning pro-Palestinian march, organisers say
Reuters/June 12, 2025
CAIRO (Reuters) -Egyptian authorities have deported dozens of foreign nationals who arrived in Egypt to take part in a pro-Palestinian march and dozens more face deportation, the organisers and airport and security sources said on Thursday. Hundreds of people came to Egypt this week for the Global March to Gaza, an international initiative intended to exert pressure for an end to an Israeli blockade of the Palestinian enclave and draw attention to the humanitarian crisis there. Organisers said people from 80 countries were set to begin the march to Egypt's Rafah Crossing with Gaza, and confirmed some had been deported or were detained at the airport. Three airport sources told Reuters at least 73 foreign nationals had been deported on a flight to Istanbul on Thursday after authorities said they violated entry protocols, and that about 100 more were at the airport awaiting deportation. The Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. It had earlier said visits to the Rafah border region must be coordinated in advance with Egyptian embassies or government entities, and underlined the need to follow official procedures to ensure safety and security. The organisers said in a statement late on Wednesday they had complied with all the stated requirements. "In the two months leading up to the march, organisers coordinated directly with Egyptian embassies in over 15 countries and with the Foreign Ministry to ensure transparency at every stage," the organisers said, urging Egypt to free all those who had been detained. Israel's defence minister told the Israeli military on Wednesday to prevent demonstrators entering Gaza from Egypt, and said the march was a threat to Israeli and regional security. Egyptian officials have said the Rafah crossing is closed by Israel on the Gaza side and want international pressure applied on Israel to open it to allow in aid.

Egypt blocks activists aiming to march to Gaza to draw attention to humanitarian crisis
Sam Metz/The Associated Press/June 12, 2025
RABAT, Morocco (AP) — Egypt blocked activists planning to take part in a march to Gaza, halting their attempt to reach the border and challenge Israel’s blockade on humanitarian aid to the Palestinian territory before it could begin. To draw attention to the humanitarian crisis afflicting people in Gaza, marchers have for months planned to trek 30 miles (48 kilometers) across the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt's border with the enclave on Sunday to “create international moral and media pressure” to open the crossing at Rafah and lift a blockade that has prevented aid from entering. Authorities have deported more than three dozen activists, mostly carrying European passports, upon their arrival at the Cairo International Airport in the past two days, an Egyptian official said Thursday. The official said the activists aimed to travel to Northern Sinai “without obtaining required authorizations.” The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to brief the media. Egypt has publicly denounced the restrictions on aid entering Gaza and repeatedly called for an end to the war. It has said that the Egyptian side of the Rafah crossing remains open, but access to the strip has been blocked since Israel seized the Palestinian side of the border as part of its war with Hamas that began in October 2023. Food security experts warn the Gaza Strip will likely fall into famine if Israel doesn’t lift its blockade and stop its military campaign. Nearly half a million Palestinians are facing possible starvation, and 1 million others can barely get enough food, according to findings by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, a leading international authority. Israel has rejected the findings, saying the IPC’s previous forecasts had proven unfounded.
Sensitivities and security
The Egyptian government has for years clamped down on dissidents and activists when their criticism touches on Cairo’s political and economic ties with Israel, a sensitive issue in neighboring countries where governments maintain diplomatic relations with Israel despite broad public sympathy for Palestinians.
Egypt had earlier warned that only those who received authorization would be allowed to travel the planned march route, acknowledging it had received “numerous requests and inquiries.”“Egypt holds the right to take all necessary measures to preserve its national security, including the regulation of the entry and movement of individuals within its territory, especially in sensitive border areas,” its foreign ministry said in a statement on Wednesday. Israel Katz, Israel’s defense minister, yesterday referred to the protestors as “jihadists” and called on Egypt to prevent them from reaching the border with Gaza. He said they “endanger the Egyptian regime and constitute a threat to all moderate Arab regimes in the region.”The march is set to begin just days after a large convoy, which organizers said included thousands of activists, traveled overland across North Africa to Egypt.
Marchers detained in Cairo
Activists and attorneys said airport detentions and deportations began Wednesday with no explicit reason given by Egyptian authorities.Algerian attorney Fatima Rouibi wrote on Facebook that Algerians, including three lawyers, were detained at the airport on Wednesday before being released and ultimately deported back to Algiers on Thursday. Bilal Nieh, a Tunisian activist who lives in Germany, said he was deported along with seven others from northern Africa who also hold European passports. He wrote on Facebook early Thursday that authorities “didn’t give any reason or document stating the reason for deportation.”Governments of countries whose citizens were reportedly detained or deported, including France, had not issued any public comment on the activists as of Thursday morning. Organizers said in a statement that they had received reports that at least 170 participants had been delayed or detained in Cairo. They said they had followed the protocols laid out by Egyptian authorities, met with them and urged them to let march participants into the country. "We look forward to providing any additional information the Egyptian authorities require to ensure the march continues peacefully as planned to the Rafah border," they said in a statement. The Global March to Gaza is the latest civil society effort pressing for the entry of food, fuel, medical supplies, and other aid into Gaza. Israel imposed a total blockade in March in an attempt to pressure Hamas to disarm and to release hostages taken in Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023 attack that ignited the war in the Gaza Strip. It slightly eased restrictions last month, allowing limited aid in, but experts warn the measures fall far short. Israel’s offensive has killed over 52,000 Palestinians, more than half of them women and children, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, whose count does not distinguish between civilians or combatants.

Israel says it detained Hamas members during an operation in southern Syria

The Associated Press/June 12, 2025
DAMASCUS, Syria (AP) — Israeli forces conducted an operation in southern Syria to detain several members of Hamas, the military said Thursday. Syria TV, a local station, reported that a force of about 100 Israeli troops stormed the southern Syrian village of Beit Jin near the border with Lebanon and called the names of several people through loud speakers who were detained. Syria TV said one person was shot dead by the Israeli force. The Israeli military said that the detained people were Hamas members who were planning attacks against Israel, and that they were taken to Israel for questioning, adding that its forces also found weapons in the area. The detained people were not identified. Since the fall of President Bashar Assad ’s government in early December, Israeli forces have moved into several areas in southern Syria and conducted hundreds of airstrikes throughout the country, destroying much of the assets of the Syrian army. The claim that the detainees were Hamas members could not be independently verified. There was no immediate comment from Hamas or Syrian authorities. During a visit to France last month, Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa said that his country is holding indirect talks with Israel to prevent hostilities from getting out of control.

UN to vote on resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire, hostage release and aid access
Edith M. Lederer/The Associated Press/June 12, 2025
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. General Assembly is expected to vote Thursday on a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the release of all hostages held by Hamas, and the opening of all Israeli border crossings for deliveries of desperately needed food and other aid.
The resolution, drafted by Spain and obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press, “strongly condemns any use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare.”Experts and human rights workers say hunger is widespread in Gaza and some 2 million Palestinians are at risk of famine if Israel does not fully lift its blockade and halt its military campaign, which it renewed in March after ending a ceasefire with Hamas. Last week, the U.N. Security Council failed to pass a resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza and calling on Israel to lift all restrictions on the delivery of aid. The United States vetoed the resolution because it was not linked to the release of the hostages, while all 14 other members of the council voted in favor. There are no vetoes in the 193-member General Assembly, where the resolution is expected to pass overwhelmingly. But unlike in the Security Council, assembly resolutions are not legally binding, though they are seen as a barometer of world opinion. After a 10-week blockade that barred all aid to Gaza, Israel is allowing the United Nations to deliver a trickle of food assistance and is backing a newly created U.S. aid group, which has opened several sites in the center and south of the territory to deliver food parcels.
But the aid system rolled out last month by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has been troubled by near-daily shootings as crowds make their way to aid sites, while the longstanding U.N.-run system has struggled to deliver food because of Israeli restrictions and a breakdown of law and order.
The draft resolution being voted on Thursday references a March 28 legally binding order by the top United Nations court for Israel to open more land crossings into Gaza for food, water, fuel and other supplies. The International Court of Justice issued the order in a case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of acts of genocide in its war in Gaza, charges Israel strongly denies.
The resolution stresses that Israel, as an occupying power, has an obligation under international law to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches those in need. It reiterates the assembly's commitment to a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with the Gaza Strip as part of a Palestinian state. The assembly is holding a high-level meeting next week to push for a two-state solution, which Israel has rejected. The resolution supports mediation efforts by Egypt, Qatar and the United States aimed at implementing a January ceasefire agreement. When the U.S. vetoed last week’s Gaza resolution, acting Ambassador Dorothy Shea said it would have undermined the security of Israel and diplomatic efforts to reach a ceasefire “that reflects the realities on the ground.” Like the failed Security Council resolution, the resolution to be voted on Thursday also does not condemn Hamas’ deadly attack in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza. Both are U.S. demands. The Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 hostage. About 55 hostages are still being held. Israel’s military campaign has killed over 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry. It says women and children make up most of the dead, but doesn’t distinguish between civilians and combatants. Israel says it has killed more than 20,000 militants, without providing evidence.

Israel is deporting 6 more activists detained on Gaza aid boat, rights group says

The Associated Press/June 12, 2025
JERUSALEM (AP) — Israel is deporting six more activists who were detained when it seized an aid boat bound for the war-ravaged Gaza Strip, according to the rights group representing them. The six include Rima Hassan, a French member of the European parliament who Israel had previously barred from entering Israel and the Palestinian territories, citing her support for boycotts of the country. They were among 12 passengers, including climate campaigner Greta Thunberg, aboard the Madleen, a boat that sought to break Israel's blockade of Gaza and deliver a symbolic amount of aid. Israel seized the vessel early Monday and deported Thunberg and three others the following day. The last two activists are expected to be deported on Friday, according to Adalah, a local human rights group representing them. It said the activists were subjected to “mistreatment, punitive measures, and aggressive treatment, and two volunteers were held for some period of time in solitary confinement.”Israeli authorities declined to comment on their treatment. Israel says it treats detainees in a lawful manner and investigates any allegations of abuse. Israel portrayed the voyage as a media spectacle, dubbing it the “selfie yacht."It says the blockade, which it has imposed in various forms along with Egypt since Hamas seized power in 2007, is needed to prevent the militant group from importing arms. Critics view it as collective punishment of Gaza's roughly 2 million Palestinians. The Israeli Foreign Ministry said those activists who signed deportation documents would be deported immediately while those who refused would be brought before a judicial authority to authorize their deportation in keeping with Israeli law. The activists have protested that they had no intention of entering Israel and were brought there against their will. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition, which organized the journey, said it was aimed at protesting Israel's blockade of Gaza and ongoing military campaign there, which experts say has pushed the territory to the brink of famine more than 20 months into the Israel-Hamas war.

Hamas says it killed 12 Israeli-backed fighters. Israeli-supported group says they were aid workers
Samy Magdy And Kareem Chehayeb/The Associated Press/June 12, 2025
CAIRO (AP) — A unit of Gaza's Hamas-run police force said it killed 12 members of an Israeli-backed militia after detaining them early Thursday. Hours earlier, an Israel-supported aid group said Hamas attacked a bus carrying its Palestinian workers, killing at least eight of them.
The militia, led by Yasser Abu Shabab, said its fighters had attacked Hamas and killed five militants but made no mention of its own casualties. It also accused Hamas of detaining and killing aid workers. It was not immediately possible to verify the competing claims or confirm the identities of those killed.
The Israeli military circulated the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation 's statement on its social media accounts but declined to provide its own account of what happened. Separately, at least 13 people were killed and 170 wounded when Israeli forces fired toward a crowd of Palestinians near a GHF food distribution site in central Gaza, according to the al-Awda Hospital, which received the casualties. The military said it fired warning shots overnight at a gathering that posed a threat, hundreds of meters (yards) from the aid site. Internet and phone lines were meanwhile down across Gaza, according to telecom provider Paltel and the Palestinian telecoms authority. They said a key line was severed during an Israeli operation and that the military would not allow technicians into the area to repair it. The Israeli military said it was looking into the reports. Previous blackouts have deepened Gaza’s isolation and made it difficult for people to call first responders after airstrikes.
Aid initiative already marred by controversy and violence
The aid group's operations in Gaza have already been marred by controversy and violence since they began last month, with scores of people killed in near-daily shootings as crowds headed toward the food distribution sites inside Israeli military zones. Witnesses have blamed the Israeli military, which has acknowledged firing only warning shots near people it said approached its forces in a suspicious manner. Earlier this week, witnesses also said Abu Shabab militiamen had opened fire on people en route to a GHF aid hub, killing and wounding many. The United Nations and major aid groups have rejected the Israeli and U.S.-backed initiative, accusing them of militarizing humanitarian aid at a time when experts say Gaza is at risk of famine because of Israel's blockade and renewed military campaign. Last week, Israel acknowledged it is supporting armed groups of Palestinians in what it says is a move to counter Hamas. Abu Shabab's militia, which calls itself the Popular Forces, says it is guarding the food distribution points set up by the Israeli- and U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in southern Gaza. Aid workers say it has a long history of looting U.N. trucks.
GHF has denied working with the Abu Shabab group.
‘They were aid workers’
The foundation said Hamas had attacked a bus carrying more than two dozen of its local Palestinian aid workers near the southern city of Khan Younis, killing at least eight and wounding others. It said it feared some had been taken hostage.
“We condemn this heinous and deliberate attack in the strongest possible terms,” it said. “These were aid workers. Humanitarians. Fathers, brothers, sons, and friends, who were risking their lives everyday to help others.”
Rev. Johnnie Moore, a Christian evangelical advisor to U.S. President Donald Trump who was recently appointed head of GHF, called the killings “absolute evil” and lashed out at the U.N. and Western countries over what he said was their failure to condemn them. “The principle of impartiality does not mean neutrality. There is good and evil in this world. What we are doing is good and what Hamas did to these Gazans is absolute evil,” he wrote on X. Israel and the United States say the new system is needed to prevent Hamas from siphoning off aid from the long-standing U.N.-run system, which is capable of delivering food, fuel and other humanitarian aid to all parts of Gaza. U.N. officials deny there has been any systematic diversion of aid by Hamas, but say they have struggled to deliver it because of Israeli restrictions and the breakdown of law and order in Gaza.
U.N. officials say the new system is unable to meet mounting needs, and that it allows Israel to use aid as a weapon by controlling who has access to it and by essentially forcing people to relocate to the aid sites, most of which are in the southernmost city of Rafah, now a mostly uninhabited military zone. Some fear this could be part of an Israeli plan to coerce Palestinians into leaving Gaza.
Hamas says it killed traitors
Hamas has also rejected the new system and threatened to kill any Palestinians who cooperate with the Israeli military. The killings early Wednesday were carried out by the Hamas-run police's Sahm unit, which Hamas says it established to combat looting. The unit released video footage showing several dead men lying in the street, saying they were Abu Shabab fighters who had been detained and killed for collaborating with Israel. It was not possible to verify the images or the claims around them. Mohammed Abu Amin, a Khan Younis resident, said he was at the scene of the killings and that crowds were celebrating them, shouting “God is greatest” and condemning those killed as traitors to the Palestinian cause and agents of Israel. Ghassan Duhine, who identifies himself as a major in the Palestinian Authority's security forces and deputy commander of the Abu Shabab group, posted a statement online saying they clashed with Sahm and killed five. He denied that the images shared by Sahm were of Abu Shabab fighters. The Palestinian Authority, led by rivals of Hamas and based in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, has denied any connection to the Abu Shabab group, but many of the militiamen identify themselves as PA officers.
Mounting lawlessness as Israel steps up military campaign
Israel renewed its offensive in March after ending a ceasefire with Hamas and imposed a complete ban on imports of food, fuel, medicine and other aid before easing the blockade in mid-May. The ongoing war and mounting desperation have plunged Gaza into chaos, with armed gangs looting aid convoys and selling the stolen food. The Hamas-run police force has largely gone underground as Israel has repeatedly targeted its forces. The military now controls more than half of the territory. The war began when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 hostage. They are still holding 53 captives, less than half of them believed to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel's military campaign has killed over 55,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which has said women and children make up more than half of the dead. It does not say how many of those killed were civilians or combatants. Israel's offensive has flattened large areas of Gaza and driven around 90% of the population of roughly 2 million Palestinians from their homes. The territory is almost completely reliant on humanitarian aid because nearly all of its food production capabilities have been destroyed.

Netanyahu's government survives vote to dissolve Israel's parliament - AP explains
Canadian Press Videos/Canadian Press Videos/June 12, 2025
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government survived an attempt to dissolve Israel's parliament early Thursday morning, with most of his ultra-Orthodox coalition partners joining him in voting against a bill that would have forced them to register for military service while the country is at war. The vote was the most serious challenge to Netanyahu’s government since the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which was the biggest security failure in Israel’s history and triggered the ongoing war in Gaza.

Humanitarian workers killed in Gaza bus ambush that Israel blames on Hamas
Crispian Balmer and Nidal al-Mughrabi/Reuters/June 12, 2025
JERUSALEM/CAIRO (Reuters) -Israel accused Hamas militants of killing five Palestinians who worked for the U.S-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in an apparent effort to disrupt their food distribution operations. GHF said in a statement that one of its buses was ambushed late on Wednesday as it headed to an aid centre near the southern city of Khan Younis, carrying local men who worked alongside a U.S. team to deliver critical supplies. "Hamas murdered five humanitarian workers from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation with others being kidnapped," said COGAT, the Israeli defence agency that coordinates humanitarian matters with the Palestinians. "The international community can not ignore Hamas's crimes against humanitarian workers," it added. Hamas declined to comment on the shootings. Social media channels in Gaza said Hamas had targeted the bus because it was allegedly carrying people affiliated with Yasser Abu Shabab, the leader of a large clan which has challenged Hamas's supremacy in the enclave and is being armed by Israel. Elsewhere in Gaza, the local health authority said at least 30 Palestinians had been killed by Israeli gunfire and airstrikes on Thursday, as the small coastal enclave continued to be roiled by violence and destruction. The IDF said it had killed three militants who fired an anti-tank missile towards Israeli soldiers. It also said it had arrested several Hamas members in Syria overnight, accusing them of planning to attack Israeli civilians and IDF forces. Israel has fought for more than 20 months to eliminate Hamas after it launched deadly attacks October 7, 2023 that ignited the war. All efforts to end the conflict through negotiations have failed. Despite the bus attack, GHF said it was continuing its distribution efforts on Thursday, handing out food boxes early at one of its sites, before shutting its gates there.
CHAOS AND TERROR
The GHF has handed out more than 16 million meals since it started operations in Gaza at the end of May, overseeing a new model of food distribution which the United Nations says is neither impartial nor neutral. Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry says more than 160 people have been killed by Israeli fire near the aid centres, as the aid effort repeatedly degenerated into chaos and terror with ravenous locals scrabbling for limited supplies."This model will not address the deepening hunger. The dystopian 'Hunger Games' cannot become the new reality," Philippe Lazzarini, the chief of the U.N. Palestinian refugee agency (UNRWA), wrote on X. "The UN including @UNRWA have the knowledge, expertise & community trust to provide dignified & safe assistance. Just let the humanitarians do their jobs," he added. Israel has repeatedly called for UNRWA to be disbanded, accusing it of having ties with Hamas. UNRWA has denied this. Besides the GHF distribution effort, Israel is also letting into Gaza trucks carrying flour for the handful of bakeries that are still operating. For the first time in months, Israel allowed humanitarian trucks to enter northern Gaza directly overnight -- with 56 lorries carrying supplies from the U.N.'s World Food Programme crossing into the largely devastated region.

US says airstrike killed Daesh official in Syria
AFP/June 13, 2025
WASHINGTON: The US military announced Thursday that a recent airstrike had killed an Daesh group official in northwest Syria. In a post to social media, US Central Command said its forces “conducted a precision airstrike in northwest Syria killing Rakhim Boev, a Syria-based Daesh official,” using another name for Daesh.The post on X said Boev was “involved in planning external operations threatening US citizens, our partners, and civilians.” The accompanying image depicts an SUV vehicle with a bashed-in windshield and roof. AFP previously reported that two people were killed in separate drone strikes Tuesday, on a car and a motorcycle, in the northwestern bastion of the Islamist former rebels who now head the Syrian government. A call to CENTCOM seeking confirmation that the incidents are related was not immediately returned. The twin drone strikes in the Idlib region mirror the US-led coalition’s past strikes on jihadists in the area. During a meeting in Riyadh last month, US President Donald Trump called on his Syrian counterpart Ahmed Al-Sharaa to help Washington prevent a resurgence by Daesh.

In Armenia, rising ceasefire violations bring fears of war with Azerbaijan

Felix Light/Reuters/June 12, 2025
KHNATSAKH, Armenia (Reuters) -Nightfall is an anxious time for residents of Khnatsakh. Every evening at around 10 p.m., automatic gunfire echoes through the tiny village in Armenia, locals say – the sound of Azerbaijani troops firing into the night sky from their positions across the border, high above.
The bullets regularly hit houses, though no-one has been hurt, so far, the villagers say. Azerbaijan denies its troops have been shooting across the border, and has accused Armenian troops of violating the ceasefire. "It's very tense because at home we have the children, the little ones, and the elderly," said Karo Andranyan, 66, a retired mechanic. A hundred metres from his front door, on the hillside, an Azerbaijani military position with a flag fluttering in the breeze is a reminder of the proximity of Armenia’s bitter rival. The heavily militarized, 1,000-km border has been closed since the early 1990s. The countries have fought two major wars in the past 40 years, destabilising the Caucasus - a region that carries major oil and gas pipelines toward Europe, and is strategically important to Russia, Iran and Turkey. Rising tensions along the border are increasing the risk of new clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan as they approach a critical juncture in a tortuous peace process, two experts told Reuters. In March, the two sides said they had agreed the outline of a peace treaty that could be signed in 2026, raising hopes of reconciliation. The draft envisions the two sides demarcating their shared border, and requires Armenia to amend its constitution before Azerbaijan ratifies the deal. But since then, reports of ceasefire violations along the border have surged, following months of relative quiet. Andranyan said he thought the nighttime gunfire was meant to intimidate the villagers and the small garrison of Armenian troops stationed there. The village - which census data said had a population of 1,000 - was emptying as locals feared a return to conflict, he said.
"What are we supposed to do?"
Though there have been no fatalities on the border since last year, incidents of cross-border gunfire are reported regularly. Most of the accusations since March, which describe cross-border gunfire and occasional damage to property, have been made by Azerbaijan against Armenia. Both sides have repeatedly denied allegations of ceasefire violations. The simmering conflict has shifted decisively in Azerbaijan's favour since 2020, as the oil and gas producer recaptured territory lost in the 1990s and progressively re-established control over the breakaway Azerbaijani region of Nagorno-Karabakh where ethnic Armenians had established de facto independence since the collapse of the Soviet Union. In 2023, it retook all of Karabakh, prompting the territory’s 100,000 ethnic Armenians to flee en masse to Armenia. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told a congressional hearing last month there was a "real risk" of war between the two. He said that the U.S. wanted Azerbaijan "to agree to a peace agreement that does not cause them to invade a neighboring country, Armenia." Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, in power since 2003, said in January that Armenia presented a "fascist threat" that needed to be destroyed.
Laurence Broers, an expert on Armenia and Azerbaijan at London's Chatham House think tank, said that though a return to full-scale war was possible, more localised skirmishes were more likely. He said Azerbaijan, whose population of 10 million is three times Armenia's, has few incentives to agree swiftly to a peace treaty and may instead rely on smaller scale escalations to force its neighbour to make further concessions in the talks. “Escalation and militarization has been a very successful strategy for Ilham Aliyev,” he said. Armenian authorities have repeatedly insisted there will be no war. In a speech last month, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said that the two countries would not resume fighting, “despite all the arguments, all the provocations”. In response to questions about the border tensions, Azerbaijan's Foreign Ministry referred Reuters to its previous public comments. In a statement in May, it said that Baku is committed to peace and has no territorial claims on Armenia. It said that Yerevan's actions "call into question Armenia's commitment to peace". Azerbaijan's Defence Ministry has consistently denied Armenian reports of cross-border gunfire.
TENSIONS IN THE SOUTH
Armenia's southernmost province of Syunik is at the heart of the dispute and is where most ceasefire violations are reported. Syunik separates the main body of Azerbaijan to the east from the Azerbaijani exclave of Nakhchivan to the west. It also provides a vital trade route for Armenia to Iran, which it borders to the south. Azerbaijan has since 2020 demanded Armenia provide it with a corridor through Syunik to Nakhchivan. Baku has said that the passage would remain Armenian territory but have minimal controls from the capital Yerevan. Some Azerbaijani officials have also suggested that southern Armenia is historically Azerbaijani territory, though they have not pressed a formal territorial claim. In addition to its border with Azerbaijan, Armenia’s frontier with Turkey – a close ally of Baku’s – is also closed, making its boundary with Iran a lifeline for trade. A corridor through Syunik could risk shutting off its access to the remote, mountainous border. Armenia and Iran have warm ties, despite Armenia’s Christian religion, and increasingly pro-Western orientation. In 2022, Iran was Armenia’s fourth-largest source of imports. In May, Tehran’s defence minister visited Yerevan, with Iranian media quoting him as expressing Iran’s opposition to redrawing borders in the region. The dilemma is heightened by Armenia’s strained ties with traditional ally Russia, which opposes Armenia’s bid to draw closer to the West, and which has deepened its links with Azerbaijan. "Armenia has two open borders, one with Georgia, and the other one with Iran. And this keeps the country going,” said Tigran Grigoryan, director of the Regional Centre for Democracy and Security think tank, in Yerevan. Grigoryan said that Azerbaijan’s demands for the corridor could be the spark for future military escalation. He suggested that the ceasefire violations may be an effort to force Armenia into making concessions on the issue. "If Armenia loses its border with Iran, that would be a catastrophe,” he said. The Iranian and Russian foreign ministries did not reply to requests for comment. Throughout Armenia’s isolated south, the importance of the Iranian connection is clear. Along the single route that links the two countries, Iranian road workers are labouring to expand a narrow, zig-zagging mountainside road clogged with lorries from south of the border, heading north towards Georgia and Russia. Along the way, some locals sell plastic bottles full of red wine to truckers newly arrived from Iran, where alcohol is banned. At Armenia’s southernmost tip sits the historic town of Meghri, the gateway to Iran. Only 16 km away from Azerbaijan, the town of 4,000 has seen its daily life overshadowed by tensions with Baku, deputy mayor Bagrat Zakaryan said.
“Given the recent events in Karabakh, and what the president of Azerbaijan has been saying, there is this feeling of fear,” he said.
OPPORTUNITY FOR PEACE
Others are more optimistic about the prospect of peace. Until 1993, Armen Davtyan was the deputy director of Meghri’s railway station, which sat at a crossroads connecting Yerevan to Baku, and Iran to the Soviet Union, until the latter’s 1991 dissolution. But after the 1988-1994 Karabakh war and the closure of the frontier, the tracks connecting Armenia to Azerbaijan were ripped up and Davtyan went to work as a border guard. A rusted train, emblazoned with a Soviet emblem, lingers outside the station building, now a derelict shell metres from the Iranian border. Davtyan said he fondly remembered the pre-war days, when Armenians and Azerbaijanis worked together on the railways, and hopes that one day cross-border trains might again pull into Meghri station. "I do understand that some people are scared that if the railway reopens, the Azerbaijanis will return," he said. "But if in 2025, people are still scared of us opening transport links, I think that’s a little absurd."

Turkey to export 48 of its nationally produced fighter jets to Indonesia
The Associated Press/June 12, 2025
ANKARA, Turkey (AP) — Turkey will export 48 of its nationally produced KAAN fighter jets to Indonesia, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan announced Wednesday, marking the first export deal for the advanced aircraft that is still in the development stage. The 48 KAAN fighter jets would be manufactured in Turkey and exported to Indonesia, Erdogan said in an X post, adding that Indonesia’s “local capabilities” would be integrated into the production process. The Turkish leader did not elaborate or disclose the agreement's financial details. The deal came on the sidelines of the defense industry exposition, Indo Defence 2025, in Jakarta, Turkey’s Sabah newspaper reported. “This agreement showcases the progress and achievements of our domestic and national defense industry,” Erdogan said. He also praised Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto for his role in securing the agreement.
Subianto on Wednesday also witnessed Indonesia’s Defense Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin and Turkish Defense Industry Secretary Haluk Gorgun sign the KAAN purchase plan agreement, the State Secretariat Ministry said. Analysts consider Indonesia’s defense a priority for Subianto. He wants to expand the military by buying submarines, frigates and fighter jets and initiate more defense cooperation with various countries. “No sane nation wants war,” Subianto said in his opening speech at the four-day arms exhibition. “But history has taught us that a nation that does not want to invest in its defense (system) will lose its independence and become a slave nation,” he said. Request for comments and financial details about Erdogan’s announcement has yet to receive a response from the Defense Ministry. However, local media reports said the agreement is worth $10 billion. Indonesia has embarked on a drive to upgrade and modernize its arsenal and strengthen the domestic defense industry. Subianto has crisscrossed the globe since he was appointed defense minister in 2019, traveling to China, France, Russia, Turkey and the U.S. in a bid to acquire new military weapon systems and surveillance and territorial defense capabilities. The Indonesian Air Force operates a mix of fighter jets made in different countries, including the U.S., Russia and Britain. Some of the aircraft have reached or are approaching the phase when they will need to be replaced or upgraded. Turkey’s first indigenous fifth-generation fighter jet, the KAAN successfully completed its maiden flight in 2024. Its first units are expected to be delivered in 2028. The deal came amid growing economic and defense ties between Turkey and Indonesia. Earlier this year, the countries agreed on the joint development of a Baykar combat-drone factory in Indonesia. Pakistan and Azerbaijan, which also have strong defense ties with Turkey, are reported to be interested in purchasing KAAN fighters.

Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary
Lolita C. Baldor And Tara Copp/The Associated Press/June 12, 2025
WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared to acknowledge that the Pentagon has developed plans to take over Greenland and Panama by force if necessary but refused to answer repeated questions at a hotly combative congressional hearing Thursday about his use of Signal chats to discuss military operations. Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee repeatedly got into heated exchanges with Hegseth, with some of the toughest lines of questioning coming from military veterans as many demanded yes or no answers and he tried to avoid direct responses about his actions as Pentagon chief. In one back-and-forth, Hegseth did provide an eyebrow-raising answer. Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., asked whether the Pentagon has developed plans to take Greenland or Panama by force if necessary. “Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any contingency,” Hegseth said several times. It is not unusual for the Pentagon to draw up contingency plans for conflicts that have not arisen, but his handling of the questions prompted a Republican lawmaker to step in a few minutes later. “It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct?” said Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio. As Hegseth started to repeat his answer about contingency plans, Turner added emphatically, “I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony.”“We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats,” Hegseth responded. Time and again, lawmakers pressed Hegseth to answer questions he has avoided for months, including during the two previous days of hearings on Capitol Hill. And frustration boiled over. "You’re an embarrassment to this country. You’re unfit to lead," Rep. Salud Carbajal snapped, the California Democrat's voice rising. “You should just get the hell out.”GOP lawmakers on several occasions apologized to Hegseth for the Democrats' sharp remarks, saying he should not be subject to such “flagrant disrespect.” Hegseth said he was “happy to take the arrows” to make tough calls and do what's best.
Questions emerge on Signal chats and if details Hegseth shared were classified
Hegseth's use of two Signal chats to discuss details of the U.S. plans to strike Houthi rebels in Yemen with other U.S. leaders as well as members of his family prompted dizzying exchanges with lawmakers. Hegseth was pressed multiple times over whether or not he shared classified information and if he should face accountability if he did.Hegseth argued that the classification markings of any information about those military operations could not be discussed with lawmakers. That became a quick trap, as Hegseth has asserted that nothing he posted — on strike times and munitions dropped in March — was classified. His questioner, Rep. Seth Moulton, a Massachusetts Democrat and Marine veteran, jumped on the disparity. “You can very well disclose whether or not it was classified,” Moulton said. “What’s not classified is that it was an incredible, successful mission,” Hegseth responded. A Pentagon watchdog report on his Signal use is expected soon. Moulton asked Hegseth whether he would hold himself accountable if the inspector general finds that he placed classified information on Signal, a commercially available app. Hegseth would not directly say, only noting that he serves “at the pleasure of the president.”He was asked if he would apologize to the mother of a pilot flying the strike mission for jeopardizing the operation and putting her son’s life at risk. Hegseth said, “I don’t apologize for success.”Trump's speech at Fort Bragg raises Democratic concerns about politics in the military. Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who appeared along Hegseth, was questioned about Trump's speech at Fort Bragg this week and whether the military was becoming politicized. The Defense Department has a doctrine that prohibits troops from participating in political activity while in uniform. Members of the 82nd Airborne Division were directed to stand behind Trump at Fort Bragg, and they booed and cheered during his incendiary remarks, including condemnation of his predecessor, Joe Biden. There also was a pop-up MAGA merchandise stand selling souvenirs to troops in uniform. Caine repeatedly said U.S. service members must be apolitical but that he was unaware of anything that happened at Fort Bragg. Hegseth is pressed about policies on women in uniform and transgender troops
Hegseth got into a sharp debate about whether women and transgender service members should serve in the military or combat jobs. He said he has worked to remove diversity programs and political correctness from the military. He said he has not politicized the military but simply wants the most capable troops.
Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa., demanded to know if Hegseth believes that both men and women can pull a trigger, cause death, operate a drone or launch a missile. “It depends on the context,” Hegseth said, adding that “women carry equipment differently, a 155 round differently, a rucksack differently.”
Hegseth, who has previously said women “straight up” should not serve in combat, asserted that women have joined the military in record numbers under the Trump administration. He said the military “standards should be high and equal.” He also was asked about three female service members — now being forced out as part of the Pentagon's move to ban transgender troops. Hegseth agreed that their accomplishments — which Rep. Sara Jacobs, D-Calif., read out — were to be celebrated, until he learned they were transgender. Republican lawmakers jumped to his defense, criticizing any Pentagon spending on gender transition surgery. Democrats ask about plans for action against Greenland and Panama .president Donald Trump has said multiple times that he wants to take control of Greenland, a strategic, mineral-rich island and long a U.S. ally. Those remarks have been met with flat rejections from the leaders of Greenland, an autonomous territory that is part of Denmark. “Greenland is not for sale,” Jacob Isbosethsen, Greenland’s representative to the U.S, said Thursday at a forum in Washington sponsored by the Arctic Institute. In an effort not to show the Pentagon’s hand on its routine effort to have plans for everything, Hegseth danced around the direct question from Smith, leading to the confusion. “Speaking on behalf of the American people, I don’t think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland,” Smith said.

Oklahoma executes a man who was transferred from federal custody by Trump officials
Sean Murphy/The Associated Press/June 12, 2025
McALESTER, Okla. (AP) — Oklahoma executed a man Thursday whose transfer to state custody was expedited by the Trump administration. John Fitzgerald Hanson, 61, received a three-drug lethal injection at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester and was pronounced dead at 10:11 a.m., prison officials said. Hanson was sentenced to die after he was convicted of carjacking, kidnapping and killing a Tulsa woman in 1999. “Peace to everyone,” Hanson said while strapped to a gurney inside the prison's death chamber. The execution began at 10:01 a.m. After the lethal drugs began to flow, a doctor entered the death chamber at 10:06 a.m. and declared him unconscious. Hanson, whose name in some federal court records is George John Hanson, had been serving a life sentence in federal prison in Louisiana for several unrelated federal convictions. Federal officials transferred him to Oklahoma custody in March to follow through on President Donald Trump’s sweeping executive order to more actively support the death penalty. Hanson’s attorneys argued in a last-minute appeal that he did not receive a fair clemency hearing last month, claiming that one of the board members who denied him clemency was biased because he worked for the Tulsa County District Attorney’s Office when Hanson was prosecuted. A district court judge this week issued a temporary stay halting the execution, but that was later vacated. Prosecutors alleged Hanson and accomplice Victor Miller kidnapped Mary Bowles from a Tulsa shopping mall. Prosecutors alleged the pair drove Bowles to a gravel pit near Owasso, where Miller shot and killed property owner Jerald Thurman. The two then drove Bowles a short distance away, where Hanson shot and killed Bowles, according to prosecutors. Miller received a no-parole life prison sentence for his role in the crimes. Thurman's son, Jacob Thurman, witnessed Thursday's execution and said it was the culmination of “the longest nightmare of our lives.”
“All families lose in this situation,” he said. “No one's a winner.”
Bowles' niece, Sara Mooney, expressed frustration at the litigation over Hanson's death sentence that dragged on for decades, calling it an “expensive and ridiculous exercise.”“Capital punishment is not an effective form of justice when it takes 26 years,” she said. During last month’s clemency hearing, Hanson expressed remorse for his involvement in the crimes and apologized to the victims’ families. “I’m not an evil person,” Hanson said via a video link from the prison. “I was caught in a situation I couldn’t control. I can’t change the past, but I would if I could.”Hanson’s attorneys acknowledged he participated in the kidnapping and carjacking, but said there was no definitive evidence that he shot and killed Bowles. They painted Hanson as a troubled youth with autism and who was controlled and manipulated by the domineering Miller. Both Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond and his predecessor, John O’Connor, had sought Hanson’s transfer during President Joe Biden’s administration, but the U.S. Bureau of Prisons denied it, saying the transfer was not in the public interest.

Trump administration tells immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela they have to leave
Gisela Salomon/The Associated Press/June 12, 2025
MIAMI (AP) — The Department of Homeland Security said Thursday that it has begun notifying hundreds of thousands of Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans that their temporary permission to live and work in the United States has been revoked and that they should leave the country. The termination notices are being sent by email to people who entered the country under the humanitarian parole program for the four countries, officials said. Since October 2022, about 532,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela were allowed to enter the U.S. under the program created by the Biden administration. They arrived with financial sponsors and were given two-year permits to live and work in the U.S. DHS said that the letters informed people that both their temporary legal status and their work permit was revoked “effective immediately." It encouraged any person living illegally in the U.S. to leave using a mobile application called CBP Home and said that individuals will receive travel assistance and $1,000 upon arrival at their home country. The department did not provide details on how the U.S. government will find or contact the people once they leave or how they will receive the money.
Trump promised during his presidential campaign to end what he called the “broad abuse” of humanitarian parole, a long-standing legal tool presidents have used to allow people from countries where there’s war or political instability to enter and temporarily live in the U.S. Trump promised to deport millions of people who are in the U.S. illegally, and as president he has been also ending legal pathways created for immigrants to come to the U.S. and to stay and work. His decision to end the parole program for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans was challenged at the courts, but the Supreme Court last month permitted the Trump administration to revoke those temporary legal protections. Immigration advocates expressed concern over the Trump administration decision to send the notices to more than a half million individuals. It “is a deeply destabilizing decision,” said Krish O'Mara Vignarajah, president of Global Refuge, a nonprofit organization that supports refugees and migrants entering the U.S. “These are people that played by the rules... they passed security screenings, paid for their own travel, obtained work authorization, and began rebuilding their lives.”Zamora, a 34-year-old Cuban mother who arrived under the sponsorship of an American citizen in September 2023, said she fears deportation. However, for now, she has no plans to leave the country. “I am afraid of being detained while my son is at school,” said Zamora, who asked to be identified only by her last name out of fear of being deported. “I’m afraid to return to Cuba, the situation is very difficult there.” Zamora said she has sought other ways to remain in the U.S. legally through the Cuban Adjustment Act, a law that allows Cubans who have arrived legally to the U.S. and meet certain requirements to apply to get a green card. Although her process has not been approved yet, she is hopeful it may allow her to remain legally in the U.S. In the meantime, she said that she will stop working at a clinic if needed. “I’m going to wait quietly without getting into trouble,” the Cuban said.

260 confirmed dead as London-bound plane crashes in India
Reuters/June 12, 2025
AHMEDABAD: More than 200 people were killed when an Air India plane bound for London with 242 people on board crashed minutes after taking off from the western city of Ahmedabad on Thursday, authorities said, in the world’s worst aviation disaster in a decade. The plane came down in a residential area, crashing on to a medical college hostel outside the airport during lunch hour. It was headed for Gatwick Airport, south of the British capital. City police chief G.S. Malik told Reuters that 204 bodies had been recovered from the crash site. Initial reports said no survivors had been found, and the Indian Express newspaper said all 242 on board had perished, citing police. Malik said the bodies recovered could include both passengers and people killed on the ground. Relatives had been asked to give DNA samples to identify the dead, state health secretary Dhananjay Dwivedi said.
However, a British father has walked away from the disaster. Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, 40, spoke to media from the safety of a hospital bed hours after making an incredible escape. “The building on which it has crashed is a doctors’ hostel... we have cleared almost 70 percent to 80 percent of the area and will clear the rest soon,” a senior police officer told reporters. Parts of the plane’s body were scattered around the building into which it crashed, photographs and videos from the area showed. The tail of the plane was stuck on top of the building. India’s CNN News-18 TV channels said the plane crashed on top of the dining area of state-run B.J. Medical College hostel, killing many medical students as well. The passengers included 217 adults, 11 children and two infants, a source told Reuters. Of them, 169 were Indian nationals, 53 were Britons, seven Portuguese, and one Canadian, Air India said. Aviation tracking site Flightradar24 said the plane was a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, one of the most modern passenger aircraft in service. It was the first crash for the Dreamliner, which began flying commercially in 2011, according to the Aviation Safety Network database. The plane that crashed on Thursday flew for the first time in 2013 and was delivered to Air India in January 2014, Flightradar24 said. “At this moment, we are ascertaining the details and will share further updates,” Air India said on X. The crash occurred just after the plane took off, television channels reported. One channel showed the plane taking off over a residential area and then disappearing from the screen before a huge jet of fire can be seen rising into the sky from beyond the houses. Visuals also showed debris on fire, with thick black smoke rising up into the sky near the airport. They also showed people being moved in stretchers and being taken away in ambulances. “My sister-in-law was going to London. Within an hour, I got news that the plane had crashed,” Poonam Patel, a relative of one of the passengers, told news agency ANI at the government hospital in Ahmedabad.
Ramila, the mother of a student at the medical college, told ANI her son had gone to the hostel for his lunch break when the plane crashed. “My son is safe, and I have spoken to him. He jumped from the second floor, so he suffered some injuries,” she said. According to air traffic control at Ahmedabad Airport, the aircraft departed at 1:39 p.m. (0809 GMT) from runway 23. It gave a “Mayday” call, signalling an emergency, but thereafter there was no response from the aircraft. Flightradar24 also said that it received the last signal from the aircraft seconds after it took off. US aerospace safety consultant Anthony Brickhouse said one problematic sign from videos of the aircraft was that the landing gear was down at a phase of flight when it would typically be up. “If you didn’t know what was happening, you would think that plane was on approach to a runway,” Brickhouse said.
Boeing said it was aware of initial reports and was working to gather more information. Boeing shares fell 6.8 percent to $199.13 in pre-market trade. Aircraft engine-maker GE Aerospace said that it would put a team together to go to India and analyze cockpit data, India’s CNBC TV18 reported.
Britain was working with Indian authorities to urgently establish the facts around the crash and to provide support to those involved, the country’s foreign office said in a statement posted on its website. “The tragedy in Ahmedabad has stunned and saddened us,” Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi posted on X. “It is heartbreaking beyond words.” British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said images emerging of the crash were “devastating,” and that he was being kept informed as the situation developed. A Buckingham Palace spokesperson said King Charles was also being kept updated. “My wife and I have been desperately shocked by the terrible events in Ahmedabad this morning,” the monarch said in a statement.
Modi’s home state
The Indian aviation minister’s office said Prime Minister Narendra Modi had directed it to ensure all support was extended to the rescue efforts immediately. Ahmedabad is the main city in Modi’s home state of Gujarat. Ahmedabad Airport, which suspended all flight operations after the crash, said it was operational again but with limited flights. The airport is operated by India’s Adani Group conglomerate. “We are shocked and deeply saddened by the tragedy of Air India Flight 171,” Gautam Adani, founder and chairman of the group, posted on X. “Our hearts go out to the families who have suffered an unimaginable loss. We are working closely with all authorities and extending full support to the families on the ground,” he said. The last fatal plane crash in India, the world’s third largest aviation market and its fastest growing, was in 2020 and involved Air India Express, the airline’s low-cost arm. The airline’s Boeing-737 overshot a “table-top” runway at Kozhikode International Airport in southern India. The plane skidded off the runway, plunging into a valley and crashing nose-first into the ground. Twenty-one people were killed in that crash. The formerly state-owned Air India was taken over by Indian conglomerate Tata Group in 2022, and merged with Vistara — a joint venture between the group and Singapore Airlines – in 2024.

The Latest English LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources on June 12-13/2025
Israel Unveils New Proof of Qatar and Hamas’s Close Collaboration
Natalie Ecanow/FDD-Policxy Brief/June 12/2025
Despite longstanding evidence to the contrary, Qatar has long maintained that it is not a “sponsor of Hamas,” claiming that no “aid has ever been delivered to Hamas’s political or military wing.” But new documents discovered by the Israeli military in Gaza show even more collaboration between the Gulf nation and the terrorist group than previously known. Israel’s Channel 12 first reported the discovery on June 8.
In a document dated 2019, Hamas political chief Ismail Haniyeh reportedly told Qatar’s foreign minister that Doha was “Hamas’s main artery” for fundraising. Another reportedly details an undated meeting between Qatari intelligence officials and a Hamas representative to discuss potential Hamas training camps in Qatar and Turkey. The documents also suggest that Hamas collaborated with Qatar to oppose the first Trump administration’s Middle East agenda and position Qatar as Israel’s preferred mediator over Egypt.
Documents Suggest That Qatar Directly Funded Hamas Terrorism
In 2021, Haniyeh reportedly wrote to Yahya Sinwar, who masterminded the October 7 massacre against Israel, that Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani had “agreed in principle to supply the resistance discreetly but he does not want anyone in the world to know.” Haniyeh continued: “Until now, $11 million has been raised from the emir for the leadership of the movement.” Israel killed Haniyeh and Sinwar in July and October of 2024, respectively.
If true, this written understanding refutes Qatar’s assertions that it provided exclusively humanitarian aid and funding for civil projects in Gaza and that it does not subsidize Hamas’s military operations. The documents further buttress the Israeli Shin Bet security agency’s March 2025 finding that “the flow of money from Qatar to Gaza and its delivery to Hamas’s military wing” was one of the key reasons Hamas was able to amass offensive power ahead of October 7.
Qatar and Hamas Teamed Up to Derail U.S. Policy
The documents recovered in Gaza also indicate a coordinated effort between Qatar and Hamas to oppose the Abraham Accords and the first Trump administration’s Middle East peace plan, which Trump had dubbed the “Deal of the Century.” In June 2019 — 14 months before the Abraham Accords debuted — Al Thani reportedly told Hamas officials during an emergency meeting that Oman was open to normalizing relations with Israel. “Oman is on one side, and we are on the other side,” the emir said.
At the same meeting, Hamas chief Khaled Meshal encouraged Doha to “work together” with his group “to oppose the Deal of the Century and eliminate it.” Meshal is one of the few surviving members of Hamas’s politburo. He has been based in Qatar since 2012.
Washington Should Consider Revoking Qatar’s Major Non-NATO Ally Status
Successive American administrations have subscribed to the view that Qatar is a friend of the United States. Qatar hosts Al Udeid Air Base, the largest U.S. military base in the Middle East. Doha also provides diplomatic services to Washington and enjoys the economic and defense privileges of its Major Non-NATO Ally status. But Qatar’s record of enabling terrorist groups is growing harder to ignore and should disqualify Doha from American friendship.
If anything, Qatar’s apparent effort to spoil the first Trump administration’s Middle East agenda should spur the current Trump administration to reconsider its Qatar policy. It is not too late to correct course, beginning with a review of Qatar’s Major Non-NATO Ally status. Washington should also consider replicating elsewhere in the region some of the capabilities and functions housed at Al Udeid Air Base.
**Natalie Ecanow is a senior research analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD). For more analysis from Natalie and FDD, please subscribe HERE. Follow Natalie on X @NatalieEcanow. Follow FDD on X @FDD. FDD is a Washington, DC-based, nonpartisan research institute focusing on foreign policy and national security.

Did The Palestinian Authority President Really Condemn the Hamas Attack of October 7, 2023?
Bassam Tawil/Gatestone Institute/June 12/2025
In all his speeches in Arabic since October 7, 2023, Abbas has very carefully avoided condemning the attack and the murder of a large number of Israelis and foreign nationals.
The official Palestinian news agency Wafa, which regularly reports on Abbas's meetings, statements, and diplomatic events, also did not report about the letter, including Abbas's alleged condemnation of the October 7 massacres against Israel.
If Abbas actually did condemn October 7 in his letter, he did so only to appease France and encourage it to recognize a Palestinian state. The Palestinian public knows absolutely nothing about the letter or Abbas's supposed "condemnation."
If France really wanted a condemnation of the October 7 atrocities, they should have asked Abbas to issue a statement in Arabic to his own people, and not send a letter (in French) to French President Emmanuel Macron. Such a statement should have been issued by Abbas's office in Ramallah, not the Élysée Palace in Paris. Macron and his government are.... are apparently trying to show the world that Abbas deserves a Palestinian state because he has purportedly "condemned" the Hamas-led massacres. Unfortunately, however, this is the same Abbas, however, who still pays salaries to families of convicted terrorists who murder Jews, and who consistently glorifies terrorists by calling them heroes and martyrs.
France and the European Union are actually planning to reward the Islamist jihadists who slaughtered hundreds of Jews by giving them a terrorist state funded and armed by Iran's mullahs.
This conference, to recognize a genocidal terrorist state, is evidently Macron's way of appeasing the Muslim jihadists who are now rioting on the streets of French cities. The same holds true for other European leaders: they are willing to sacrifice Jews to placate their Muslim communities.
France and the European Union are actually planning to reward the Islamist jihadists who slaughtered hundreds of Jews by giving them a terrorist state funded and armed by Iran's mullahs.
France claimed this month that Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas had condemned the invasion of Israel on October 7, 2023 by Hamas, the Iran-backed terrorist group. During the attack, Hamas terrorists and other Palestinians murdered 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals, wounded thousands. They kidnapped another 251 people to the Gaza Strip, where 52 – dead and alive – remain in captivity.
Paris said in a statement that the purported condemnation was included in a letter Abbas sent to France on the eve of a United Nations conference in New York, scheduled for this month, to push for recognizing the establishment of a Palestinian state. The conference is to be co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia.In his letter, Abbas also reportedly called on Hamas to immediately release all Israeli hostages it had kidnapped on October 7, 2023. He also reportedly pledged to hold general elections and reform the Palestinian Authority.
The Élysée Palace did not provide details about Abbas's alleged condemnation of the worst massacre against Jews since the Holocaust. Notably, Abbas has refrained from denouncing the October 7 atrocities, although he has, on a number of occasions, denounced Hamas for giving Israel an excuse to attack the Gaza Strip.
It is no secret that Abbas despises Hamas, especially after the terror group staged a violent coup against his PA and seized control of the Gaza Strip in 2007. During the coup, Hamas brutally killed hundreds of Abbas loyalists, some of whom were reportedly thrown to their death from rooftops of high buildings in the Gaza Strip. So, Abbas is apparently critical of Hamas not because its men murdered, raped, beheaded, and burned alive many Israelis and others on October 7. Rather, he is furious with the terror group because its attack on Israel triggered an Israeli response that has brought death and destruction on the two million residents of the Gaza Strip. In a recent speech in Arabic, the 89-year-old Abbas went as far as describing Hamas as "sons of dogs" and called for the release of the hostages in order not to give Israel an excuse to continue its military operations in the Gaza Strip. In all his speeches in Arabic since October 7, 2023, Abbas has very carefully avoided condemning the attack and the murder of a large number of Israelis and foreign nationals..Abbas has actually never come forward to tell his people that murdering men, women, children and the elderly is wrong and reprehensible. Why? Because the victims are Israelis. Abbas has never said that kidnapping and murdering an Israeli mother and her two small children is an act of terrorism. He has never reached out to the families of the victims to offer condolences. This, despite the fact that several Israelis who were murdered by Hamas terrorists were known as peace activists who supported the Palestinians and had volunteered to drive many of them from the Gaza Strip to Israeli hospitals. Unsurprisingly, Abbas's letter to France did not appear as a news item in the PA's official media outlets. The official Palestinian news agency Wafa, which regularly reports on Abbas's meetings, statements, and diplomatic events, also did not report about the letter, including Abbas's alleged condemnation of the October 7 massacres against Israel.
This means that the letter (and the purported condemnation) was intended for only Western ears. If Abbas actually did condemn October 7 in his letter, he did so only to appease France and encourage it to recognize a Palestinian state. The Palestinian public knows absolutely nothing about the letter or the supposed "condemnation."
Abbas has good reason not to publicly condemn October 7. Public opinion polls published by a Palestinian research center during the past 20 months have shown that a majority of Palestinians support the Hamas attack on Israel and view it as "correct." The polls, in addition, have found that at least 40% of the Palestinians support Hamas. Abbas may be correct to assume that if he condemns the murder of Jews, his people will accuse him of being a "traitor." If France really wanted a condemnation of the October 7 atrocities, they should have asked Abbas to issue a statement in Arabic to his own people, and not send a letter (in French) to French President Emmanuel Macron. Such a statement should have been issued by Abbas's office in Ramallah, not the Élysée Palace in Paris.
Macron and his government are clearly trying to use this questionable letter to justify their sudden rush to recognize a Palestinian state.
They are apparently trying to show the world that Abbas deserves a Palestinian state because he has purportedly "condemned" the Hamas-led massacres. This is the same Abbas, however, who still pays salaries to families of convicted terrorists who murder Jews, and who consistently glorifies terrorists by calling them heroes and martyrs.
The French President is undoubtedly aware of Abbas's support for terrorism and refusal to condemn (in Arabic) the October 7 massacres. It is hard to believe that Macron & Co. are being duped by the Palestinian leader. Macron most likely does not care: like many European leaders, he wants to create a Palestinian terror state that would pose an existential threat to Israel and pave the way for more massacres of Jews. France and the European Union are actually planning to reward the Islamist jihadists who slaughtered hundreds of Jews by giving them a terrorist state funded and armed by Iran's mullahs.
This conference, to recognize a genocidal terrorist state, is evidently Macron's way of appeasing the Muslim jihadists who are now rioting on the streets of French cities. The same holds true for other European leaders: they are willing to sacrifice Jews to placate their Muslim communities.
**Bassam Tawil is a Muslim Arab based in the Middle East. His work is made possible through the generous donation of a couple of donors who wished to remain anonymous. Gatestone is most grateful.
© 2025 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21683/abbas-condemn-hamas

Reconstruction and the Need for Disarmament
Fahid Suleiman al-Shoqiran/Asharq Al Awsat/June 12/2025
The question of the future has gradually begun to outweigh the poetry and ruins of the past since schisms ripped through parts of the region (whether in Lebanon, Yemen, or Syria, where things have radically shifted) and the rogue militias waged their so-called “support war.”
Dithering is not tenable at this momentous juncture. Every opportunity has a window, and every window eventually expires.
Judging by Lebanese officials’ statements, reconstruction appears to be the ultimate national priority. They have watched their Syrian neighbor lay the groundwork for a transition from impossibility to possibility, reopening its doors to key regional actors committed to development and dynamism. This is not an end but the beginning: a tipping point that will determine whether hopes for the future are realized.
These opportunities, once granted, are not permanent. Their lifespan depends on the resolve and choices of those who receive it, and development and reconstruction demand a firm commitment to implementation.
The question of Hezbollah’s disarmament has dominated the public discourse in Lebanon over the past week. There is no doubt that it is a crucial issue: without disarmament, Lebanon cannot become a coherent political state that others can engage with on an equal footing. Lebanon’s statehood will remain lacking so long as Hezbollah retains its weapons. This debate cannot be resolved without domestic determination to put Lebanon on a clear track: bringing arms under the authority of the state, an objective endorsed by the President.
The bigger challenge is the wily dithering of other actors who continue to stoke sectarian tensions, play political tricks, and spread panic by insisting that disarmament would trigger civil war. These tactics are intolerable. There has never been a more opportune time for Lebanon to dismantle its militias than the present: Hezbollah has been seriously weakened, and the Assad regime has been toppled. There is no justification for delaying disarmament any further.
The turmoil resulting from the militias’ adventurism over the past year, and beyond, has caused immense pain on a human level, drained economies, and devastated the region. Nonetheless, we must study its aftermath. There are elements that can be amended and corrected: ending the era of rogue militias, changing the trajectories of troubled states, and ensuring that such crises are not repeated.
Political Islamist movements are inherently hostile to the concept of the state. They must be confronted and criminalized. That is what the governments of moderate Arab states have done through decrees and legislation that have made such movements illegal. During this harrowing period, we heard the wounded prioritize life over death, health over illness, and development over fragility, disorientation, displacement, and loss. The existential decline we are currently witnessing is deeply dangerous. I believe the solution will not come from ideologues or sloganeers, but from those committed to building. That is the path Saudi Arabia has pursued, striving to salvage what remains after the overwhelming catastrophe.
In short, restoring state authority, that of any state, is the key to serious dialogue with others. No country can diplomatically engage with a state whose institutions are compromised by the operations of militias. The growing developmental discourse presents a genuine opportunity, but unless these visions are acted upon, the underlying challenges will persist. How can an armed faction that unilaterally decides questions of war and peace be part of the government?
Political leaders must face up to a profound reckoning: an era has ended. That time has passed. We are now in an age of rising visions, ambitious development, and new ideas. But who is ready to grasp this shift?

The Attack on the Army and the Threats Facing Sudan
Osman Mirghani/Asharq Al Awsat/June 12/2025
A brutal civil war continues to wreak havoc in Sudan, and foreign actors are clearly fueling the conflict. Most recently, we saw the campaign to weaken the Sudanese army at the border triangle between Sudan, Libya, and Egypt. Some are now openly hoping for its defeat and others, behind the veil of calls for “restructuring” it, are seeking to break the army apart.
One broad theme of this campaign is that the Sudanese armed forces are the former regime’s (the National Congress Party) army and that it is a partisan militia rather than a national institution.
While the army does include figures affiliated with the NCP, men from across the political spectrum are also part of the army. Some have no political affiliations or ties to the former regime. Many of those fighting alongside the army today, including members of the joint forces and the newly mobilized battalions, fall into this category. Some of the youths had participated in the December Revolution and long opposed the previous regime. They cannot be labeled “NCP”.
Despite political divergences, many international and regional actors agree that there is a fundamental need to preserve Sudan’s state institutions, chief among them the armed forces. Indeed, the collapse of the army would not simply mean one faction’s defeat in an armed conflict. It would mean the collapse of the state itself and introduce chaos and fragmentation. This consensus was not reached out of sentiment but a sober assessment of recent history.
There are many tragic cases of nations descending into violent turmoil following the disintegration of their national armies. The violence seen in Iraq after the 2003 invasion stands out: Paul Bremer’s dissolution of the Iraqi army created a massive security vacuum that was quickly filled by non-state actors like al-Qaeda and ISIS. Iraqi cities became battlegrounds, state institutions crumbled, and the country drowned in sectarian bloodshed.
In Libya, overthrowing Gaddafi’s regime without a plan to build a unified army left rival factions fighting a devastating war fueled by foreign intervention. In Somalia, the state collapsed after Siad Barre's regime fell, turning the country into several spheres of influence controlled by warlords. This led to a devastating civil war that went on for nearly two decades and eventually led to the emergence of extremist organizations such as Al-Shabaab.
In Africa, this catastrophe has taken a variety of forms. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire), the collapse of Mobutu Sese Seko's army led to the First and Second Congo Wars. Nine African countries took part in the hostilities that claimed the lives of millions. In Liberia, the disintegration of the army led to a civil war that killed nearly a quarter of a million people.
The lesson from these precedents is that the national army is the "pillar of the state:" If it collapses, the entire state collapses. If the Sudanese army collapses or is dismantled- whether due to internal conflicts, external pressures, or wrong political decisions- the country would find itself in one of the following catastrophic scenarios:
- Security and police agencies would become non-existent, leading to chaos and mass criminality.
- The security vacuum would unleash militias vying for power and wealth, and dangerous tribal and regional conflicts would open the door to new demands for secession, especially given the exploitation of marginalized regions.
- Cross-border conflicts would be inflamed as militias or armed groups seek refuge or resources.
- Terrorist groups would emerge, finding fertile ground for their activity in the chaos and insecurity. They are becoming increasingly active in the Sahel, not far from Sudan's borders.
- Instability would pose a threat to neighboring countries in the region.
- All of this unrest would lead to unprecedented humanitarian disasters, fueling famine and a refugee crisis.
In conclusion, the Sudanese army is the "last line of defense" against the state’s collapse. Precedents show that dismantling national armies does not lead to democracy, but rather to chaos, especially in a volatile climate of aggravating regional and global conflicts.
Reforming the army is essential, and many other Sudanese state institutions must also be reformed. The military top brass has stressed the need for reform in light of the war, the integration of armed movements that signed the peace agreement, ending the era when there were multiple armed movements and armies in the county, and leaving weapons monopolized by the state. However, this reform should not, under any circumstances, entail dismantling the army or restructuring it in a manner that weakens it.
Sudan needs a strong army more than ever, to protect against conspiracies and foreign ambitions. A strong national army that ignores politics and devotes itself to protecting the homeland is the only bulwark against the aggravating assaults on Sudan.

The Biggest Mystery of Elon Musk
The New York Times/Asharq Al Awsat/June 12/2025
Must any pair of would-be great men of history always find a path to conflict? Ask Caesar and Pompey, Octavian and Antony, Lennon and McCartney. But the specific thing they fight about is less predictable. I would not have guessed, six months ago, that Elon Musk and Donald Trump’s version of the Battle of Actium would be fought over the budget deficit.
That’s because six months ago I understood Musk’s interest in politics, his long march away from Obama-era liberalism and his reinvention of himself as the prince of the very online right, as reflecting two key goals: his newfound desire to defeat cultural progressivism, rooted in the experience of his child’s gender transition, and his long-term, career-shaping desire to get human explorers to Mars.
These interests reinforced each other. Musk was already moving rightward on cultural issues when his purchase of Twitter, a particular Rubicon, led him to shed the leftward political alliances that once yielded Democratic patronage and support. This strengthened his financial incentives to go all in for Trump and the Republicans, because it was clear that a Kamala Harris administration would be unremittingly hostile to his technological projects. He had already been willing to make all kinds of wild business gambles for those projects, the dream of Mars-bound rockets above all, so placing a stark political bet was second nature.
Given that reading of his intentions, I assumed that Musk’s role in a second Trump administration would be some combination of first technologist, deregulator in chief and anti-woke crusader — a space and tech focus with a side of culture war.
But that isn’t what happened. We did get the third role to some extent in some of the ideological justifications for the DOGE campaign against U.S.A.I.D., but Musk wasn’t really the point man for the White House’s anti-woke battles.
Nor did Musk assume a leading role in the administration’s deregulatory efforts. That seemed to be part of the initial plan for DOGE, but it went into abeyance when Musk forced out Vivek Ramaswamy.
Instead, the Tesla tycoon cast his great project as a budget-cutting effort, draped in the kind of apocalyptic rhetoric about immediate fiscal crises that went out of style on the right when Trump came down the escalator in 2015.
The extremity of this rhetoric, paired with the obvious difficulty of achieving trillions of dollars of savings through head-count reductions at federal agencies, led many people to assume that it was all a smoke screen — that DOGE was just a mechanism to help Trump’s inner circle understand how to take full control of the executive branch.
Certainly, there are people in the White House who appreciate how DOGE helped them see inside the administrative state. But in terms of what Musk himself thought he was doing, I mostly take him at his word: He seemed to have bought into a vision of his role in Washington as a one-man version of the Simpson-Bowles commission but with a mind-set and energy that would enable him to succeed where prior deficit hawks had failed.
But I’m very curious as to why he embraced that specific role. Anti-deficit mania was not a big part of the edgelord identity that Musk adopted on social media; on the New Right, deficit issues were seen as fusty, old-guard.
Was it just a natural C.E.O.’s reaction to being handed power in D.C. — that the first thing you do after a takeover is try to fix the cash flow? To the extent that drug use reportedly played a role, is there something about ketamine that makes federal budgeting seem unusually alluring? Or did someone convince him that fiscal improvidence was the major impediment to humans becoming a multiplanetary species, the great filter that would prevent our escape into the stars?
If so, that someone did us all a disservice. It’s not that the deficit is unimportant. But it’s a place where Musk has no special competency, and a Silicon Valley tool kit honed in private industry doesn’t translate especially well to the political challenge of taming entitlement spending.
Clearly, Musk didn’t stop caring about the space program: The Trump White House decision (itself a bit of a mystery) to withdraw the nomination of his choice to head NASA seems to have helped tip him over into full opposition to its tax legislation.
But in the rhetorical war that he’s waging (for now, pending a temporary truce) against his former presidential BFF, Musk is not playing the disappointed futurist, the dynamist let down by populist blunders. He’s playing the deficit scold, a position historically occupied by dorks and killjoys. (I’ve been one of them at times, trust me.) It’s a poor platform from which to relaunch his interplanetary ambitions.
“Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years,” Musk predicted as the feud got hot. My own prediction is that the productivity of those four decades will be amplified if he realizes that fixing the federal deficit is one ambitious project that should be left to someone else.

Can Iranian Intelligence Target President Trump on U.S. Soil? Are Iranian Agents Stirring Unrest in San Francisco?
Colonel Charbel Barakat/ June 12, 2025
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/2025/06/144163/
The unrest unfolding in San Francisco—prompting President Trump to deploy the National Guard and threaten to bring in Marine units—does not resemble ordinary protests or isolated, containable incidents. On the contrary, these events seem orchestrated and dangerous. The state governor and the city’s mayor appear to have allowed demonstrators to escalate their assaults on police officers and to continue destroying public and private property. The result looks less like protest and more like an open revolt against the state. The use of slogans such as "No king in this land," circulated widely on social media to incite further violence, adds to this impression. The presence of Mexican, Palestinian, and other foreign flags among the protesters suggests a diverse mix of agitators, many seemingly united by a common aim: to sow chaos.
The questions that come to mind with such realm: could Iranian intelligence be behind the incitement of such confrontations? Is the nuclear-deal lobbying money still in circulation—funding subversive networks—especially now, as Iran finds itself cornered and pressured to halt uranium enrichment and dismantle its equipment?
Such questions become more urgent as unrest spreads to Los Angeles. Radical leftist groups may exploit the situation for their own agendas, using the Hispanic issue—centered on communities of Mexican and South American descent—and symbolic displays like the Mexican flag to inflame passions in the immigrant-heavy American West. This is despite the fact that most of these communities consist of lawful U.S. citizens who enjoy full rights and are unaffected by deportation policies aimed specifically at criminal gangs hiding behind undocumented immigrant populations.
Even Americans who oppose President Trump’s policies do not condone the manipulation of legitimate concerns to spark chaos. The Democratic Party, for instance, cannot openly support behavior that undermines the nation’s stability and promotes thuggery and lawlessness. However, extremist groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood—and global terrorist organizations like Hezbollah, Hamas, and other Iranian proxies—have every interest in destabilizing American society. They aim to trigger unrest and activate sleeper cells to force U.S. leadership to focus inward, rather than confront international threats—especially those emanating from the Middle East, where Iran’s regime continues to kill its own people, destabilize neighboring countries, and use sabotage and violence to preserve its power.
Would the Iranian regime hesitate to cause turmoil in the homeland of its most formidable adversary—particularly a U.S. president determined to dismantle its expansionist project?
That is why the U.S. administration, Department of Homeland Security, and national intelligence agencies must closely monitor these groups, track their links to protest leaders, and act swiftly. Moreover, state and city officials must recognize the risk posed by intelligence operatives, terrorist organizations, and smuggling networks that exploit grassroots movements for strategic disruption. They must avoid reckless rhetoric that fans the flames and instead uphold the principles of lawful, peaceful protest—encouraging citizens to reject vandalism and cooperate with law enforcement in restoring calm and safeguarding national security.

Supporting Syria’s entrepreneurs a regional responsibility
Khalid Abdulla-Janahi/Arab News/June 12, 2025
Six months after the fall of the Assad regime, and weeks after the formal lifting of US sanctions, there is now an open door for a potential economic and social revival that could reshape Syria’s future. But the path ahead remains fraught with challenges, competing interests and proxy battles — and the question of how Syria rebuilds, and which stakeholders lead that process, is more urgent than ever.
At the heart of Syria’s recovery is its youth — more than half of the population is under 25, a generation defined by years of conflict and deprivation but also incredible resilience. Traditional employment opportunities have collapsed, pushing many young Syrians to seek alternative livelihoods. Entrepreneurship has become not only a means of survival but a vital response to soaring unemployment and widespread poverty.
The entrepreneurial spirit among Syrians is unmistakable. In a survey conducted in 2024 by Ahmad Sufian Bayram, a general partner at Blackbox and advocate for entrepreneurship in conflict zones, more than 80 percent of Syrians described entrepreneurship as “extremely important.” This is a dramatic rise from just 26 percent in 2015. However, only 3 to 5 percent are actively involved in starting or running businesses — a participation rate well below international norms and one that highlights an enormous gap between ambition and opportunity.
Despite these challenges, a remarkable wave of startups has emerged, reflecting the urgent needs of Syrian society. Fintech companies like Cashi are revolutionizing digital payments in a cash-strapped economy. Educational technology firms such as Quizat are expanding access to learning in a country where schools have been devastated. E-commerce platforms like Tajir.Store are connecting local merchants with customers, fostering commerce in a fractured market. Entrepreneurship has become not only a means of survival but a vital response to soaring unemployment and widespread poverty
In addition to these sectors, entrepreneurship in agriculture, healthcare and energy is critical. The destruction of infrastructure has left food security, basic health services and energy supply in urgent need of innovation and investment. Startups addressing these challenges not only create jobs but also lay the groundwork for rebuilding essential services. Yet the obstacles are immense. Syria’s economy has shrunk to less than half its preconflict size. Nine out of every 10 Syrians live in poverty and unemployment has tripled since the onset of war. Infrastructure remains severely damaged, regulatory environments are complex and often opaque, and logistics chains are fragile. Most pressingly, international sanctions and funding constraints have severely limited access to capital. Many foreign investors and support organizations are either unable or unwilling to send funds into Syria, choking off growth opportunities for startups and limiting their ability to scale.Although the easing of some EU restrictions in February and the partial lifting of US sanctions have sparked cautious optimism, the financing gap remains vast. While some startups have secured small investments — ranging from $5,000 to $100,000 — these amounts fall far short of the capital required for scaling and sustaining businesses in a difficult environment. In a report titled “The Impact of the Conflict in Syria” issued in February, the UN Development Programme estimated that Syria’s economy would need to grow between 5 and 13.9 percent annually to recover to preconflict levels within a reasonable time frame. At current rates, some projections suggest Syria may not regain its pre-war gross domestic product until well into the latter half of the century. Political instability, fragmented governance and ongoing security risks further complicate the investment landscape and business operations.
In this challenging context, grassroots initiatives like startup bootcamps, hackathons and mentorship programs — including organizations such as Sanad ScaleUp and Takween — have been critical in nurturing entrepreneurial talent and fostering resilience. The involvement of the Syrian diaspora and international impact investors is also increasingly being recognized as vital to supporting ecosystem growth.
Yet, for the rebuilding effort to be truly sustainable, leadership and investment must come from within the region. While international partners play a valuable role, regional actors have the greatest stake in Syria’s success. Efforts led by the Arab world — backed by private capital and focused on creating jobs that strengthen local economies — offer the best chance of sustainable recovery. There are roles for both the private sector and state capital to play, particularly in the case of the Gulf Cooperation Council states that are supporting the interim government.
For the rebuilding effort to be truly sustainable, leadership and investment must come from within the region
While the Gulf states are seeking confidence-building measures, they are also well placed, not only in terms of capital but also in terms of technical assistance, to lend expertise and intellectual capital from their vibrant community of innovators and diverse ecosystem of corporate sponsors, startups and investors who have been developing “Silicon Wadis” in the Gulf for years. Examples include the Misk Accelerator, the King Abdullah University for Science and Technology Entrepreneurship Center and Flat6Labs in Saudi Arabia, Hub71 in Abu Dhabi, Area 2071 in Dubai and the Fazaa Center for Business Incubators and Accelerators across the UAE, and Tamkeen in Bahrain. The establishment of dedicated funds with sovereign and state-owned companies and the support they can offer can also benefit Syria’s entrepreneur cohorts.
The Arab world has a responsibility that extends beyond economic opportunity. Supporting Syrian entrepreneurs is a strategic imperative for regional stability and peace. While the sanctions were removed on Syria from the outside, the solutions for the future must come from within both Syria and the wider region. The entrepreneurial generation represents Syria’s most promising resource for creating inclusive growth, social cohesion and resilience in a postconflict society. Moreover, entrepreneurship serves as an incubator for responsible leadership and bootstrapping in business. It nurtures individuals who are proactive, adaptable and capable of addressing the complex challenges facing Syria. These qualities are essential for guiding the nation through its next chapter. The future of Syria rests with its next generation — and now is the time for those in positions of leadership across the region to empower them to build that future.
**Khalid Abdulla-Janahi is a leading financier, global strategy pundit and philanthropist. He is co-founder of the Maryam Forum Foundation (UK). He previously served as co-chair of the World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council on the Middle East and North Africa and vice chair of the Arab Business Council.