English LCCC Newsbulletin For
Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For August 07/2024
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news
The Bulletin's Link on the
lccc Site
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2024/english.august07.24.htm
News Bulletin Achieves
Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Click On
The Below Link To Join Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group
https://chat.whatsapp.com/FPF0N7lE5S484LNaSm0MjW
اضغط
على الرابط في
أعلى للإنضمام
لكروب
Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group
Elias Bejjani/Click
on the below link to subscribe to my youtube channel
الياس
بجاني/اضغط
على الرابط في
أسفل للإشتراك في
موقعي ع اليوتيوب
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAOOSioLh1GE3C1hp63Camw
Bible Quotations For today
He will dwell with them; they will be his peoples, and God himself will be with
them; & will wipe every tear from their eyes.
Book of Revelation 21/01-12.14: "Then I saw a new heaven and a
new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea
was no more. And I saw the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of
heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud
voice from the throne saying, ‘See, the home of God is among mortals. He will
dwell with them; they will be his peoples, and God himself will be with them; he
will wipe every tear from their eyes. Death will be no more; mourning and crying
and pain will be no more, for the first things have passed away.’ And the one
who was seated on the throne said, ‘See, I am making all things new.’ Also he
said, ‘Write this, for these words are trustworthy and true.’Then he said to me,
‘It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. To the
thirsty I will give water as a gift from the spring of the water of life. Those
who conquer will inherit these things, and I will be their God and they will be
my children. But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the polluted, the
murderers, the fornicators, the sorcerers, the idolaters, and all liars, their
place will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulphur, which is the second
death.’Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls full of the seven
last plagues came and said to me, ‘Come, I will show you the bride, the wife of
the Lamb.’And in the spirit he carried me away to a great, high mountain and
showed me the holy city Jerusalem coming down out of heaven from God. It has the
glory of God and a radiance like a very rare jewel, like jasper, clear as
crystal. It has a great, high wall with twelve gates, and at the gates twelve
angels, and on the gates are inscribed the names of the twelve tribes of the
Israelites; And the wall of the city has twelve foundations, and on them are the
twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
Titles For The Latest English LCCC
Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on August 06-07/2024
Gantz urges targeting Lebanon's
infrastructure, increasing military pressure
Israeli sonic booms rattle Lebanese capital after Hezbollah launches drones
Five Hezbollah members dead in ‘vacuum bomb’ attacks; 17 Israelis injured in
drone attack
Six Hezbollah fighters killed in Israeli strikes on Mayfadoun, Odaisseh
Hezbollah drone attack on Nahariya wounds at least 7
UN peacekeepers on Israel-Lebanon border 'fundamental', says chief
Bou Habib says govt asking Hezbollah to be careful in its response against
Israel
Lebanon receives emergency medical supplies from WHO
De-escalation efforts persist ahead of expected Iran-Hezbollah response
Air France and Transavia extend Beirut flight suspension
China urges citizens to take 'caution' in Lebanon travel
A preemptive strike on Iran and Hezbollah - the strategic vs the tactical/Yonah
Jeremy Bob/Jerusalem Post/August 06/2024
Lebanon aims to ensure Hezbollah response to Israeli attack does not cause wider
war
Residents shocked, angry after at least 18 injured in Hezbollah drone strike in
Nahariya area of Western Galilee/Yair Kraus, Hassan Shaalan/Ynetnews/August 06,
2024
Sayyed Nasrallah Speech: Hezbollah Response Inevitable despite Israeli Calming
Notices
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published
on August 06-07/2024
US sends ship-based Navy fighter jets to a
base in the Middle East to help protect Israel
The US Navy is on its fourth aircraft carrier as its warships react to fighting
in the Middle East
Palestinian officials say 12 dead in Israel West Bank raids
Hamas names Yahya Sinwar, mastermind of the Oct. 7 attacks, as its new leader in
show of defiance
Israel FM calls to ‘swiftly eliminate’ new Hamas chief Sinwar
Egyptian FM holds phone call with US secretary of state
US destroys Houthi missiles, drones, drone boats in Red Sea, Gulf of Aden
Jordan’s King Abdullah speaks with European, Canadian and Egyptian leaders on
Gaza
Putin asks Iran to avoid civilian casualties in Israel response, sources say
Defense, intelligence heads meet with air force pilots, intelligence soldiers
over Iran crisis
Israeli minister says it may be ‘moral’ to starve 2 million Gazans, but ‘no one
in the world would let us’
Iran prepping attack on Israel in response to Hamas leader assassination in
Tehran
‘Going to a very bad place’: Israeli reservists who refuse to return to Gaza
cite military’s destructive approach
Iran executes man accused of murder during Mahsa Amini unrest
US personnel injured in rocket attack on Iraq base
Kamala Harris chooses Tim Walz as Vice Presidential running mate
Titles For The Latest English LCCC analysis & editorials from miscellaneous
sources on August 06-07/2024
UNRWA Is Complicit in Terror; Disband It/Gregg Roman/The Middle East Forum
Observer/August 6, 2024
Mourning the Children Killed in Majdal Shams/Hillel Kuttler/The Tablet/August
06, 2024
What kind of future awaits Hamas after the killing of Ismail Haniyeh in
Tehran?/Jonathan Gornall/Arab News/August 06, 2024
Hamas And Al-Jazeera, A Decades-Long Symbiotic Relationship/Yigal Carmon and Amb.
Alberto M. Fernandez/MEMRI/August 06, 2024
Trump is Finished. His Demented Antics Show he Does Not Believe he'll Win/Hanibaal
Atheos/Lebanon Iznogood/Tuesday, August 6, 2024
Israel prepares for several scenarios as it waits for Iran, Hezbollah
retaliation/Itamar Eichner/Ynet News/Tuesday, August 6, 2024
Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published
on August 06-07/2024
Gantz urges targeting Lebanon's
infrastructure, increasing military pressure
Jerusalem Post/August 06/2024
Benny Gantz called for intensified military action on Lebanon amid rising
tensions, praised the Druze community, and advocated for national unity. Benny
Gantz, chairman of the National Unity Party, called for a dramatic escalation in
military pressure on Lebanon on Tuesday, including targeting its infrastructure,
in response to recent terrorist attacks and escalating tensions along Israel’s
northern border. Gantz delivered his remarks at a tribute conference for the
Druze community in Tel Aviv. “We are stronger than our enemies. Israel has
security superiority and strong regional alliances that will withstand any
attack. But our use of force must not be wasted,” Gantz stated, emphasizing the
need for decisive action to restore normalcy in northern Israel. He argued for a
strategic increase in military pressure on Lebanon to allow life in the North to
return to normal. Gantz also highlighted the role of international actors in
achieving long-term security for the region. “We must leverage the tension and
involvement of international actors to achieve results that will provide
security for the residents of the North,” he added, underscoring the importance
of global cooperation. The speech came amid a series of violent incidents,
including a terrorist attack in which 12 teenagers from Majdal Shams were
killed, and a stabbing attack at the Tunnels Checkpoint south of Jerusalem,
where a border police officer was lightly wounded. The attacker, identified as
Mohammed Razak Ibrahim Hamash, was eliminated by IDF troops. Gantz assured broad
political support for responsible military operations. “The government will have
broad backing, even from the opposition, for any offensive and responsible
action,” he said. Reflecting on the Druze community’s contributions, Gantz
praised their resilience and achievements despite numerous challenges. “Despite
language challenges, living in the periphery, and lack of resources, the Druze
education system achieves unprecedented successes,” he noted. Consensus and
legislation amid Gaza conflict. Gantz’s call for national consensus and
legislative changes to enshrine the value of equality in Israel’s Basic Laws
comes at a critical time. He pointed to recent events, such as the assassination
of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, which has intensified the conflict in Gaza and
fueled regional tensions. “The next government that needs to be formed, which I
intend to form, must be a government of national consensus, and make the
significant social correction in the state,” Gantz asserted. He concluded by
sharing a poignant moment from a visit to the family of fallen Druze soldier
Lt.-Col. Salman Khabbaka, expressing pride in the Druze community’s dedication
and sacrifice.
Israeli sonic booms rattle Lebanese capital after
Hezbollah launches drones
Reuters/August 06, 2024
BEIRUT: Israeli warplanes swooped low over the Lebanese capital Beirut on
Tuesday, setting off a series of sonic booms that rattled windows across the
city minutes before the head of Lebanon’s Hezbollah was set to give an address.
The loud booms sent residents rushing to open their windows to prevent the glass
from shattering, or standing on their balconies to get a glimpse of the planes
flying over. There was no comment from the Israeli military.
In the capital’s southern suburbs, a Hezbollah stronghold, members and
supporters of the Lebanese armed group had gathered to watch a televised speech
by its leader to mark the one-week anniversary of Israel’s killing of a senior
military commander. As he began, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said the sonic booms
were intended to provoke those gathered for the memorial. The strike that killed
commander Fuad Shukr was the second time Israel had struck the southern suburbs
in 10 months of hostilities between Hezbollah and the Israeli military that are
taking place in parallel with the Gaza war. Hezbollah earlier on Tuesday said it
launched a swarm of attack drones at two military sites near Acre in northern
Israel and also attacked an Israeli military vehicle in another location. The
Israeli military said a number of hostile drones were identified crossing from
Lebanon and one was intercepted. Israeli medical officials said seven people
were evacuated to hospital, to the south of the coastal city of Nahariya, one in
critical condition. The Israeli military said an initial investigation indicated
the injuries were caused by an interceptor that “missed the target and hit the
ground, injuring several civilians.” It said the incident was still under
review. Reuters journalists saw one impact site near a bus stop on a main road
outside Nahariya. The Israeli military said in a statement sirens sounded around
Acre, but that turned out to be a false alarm. It said its air force struck two
Hezbollah facilities in south Lebanon. Fears are rising that the Middle East
could tip into full-blown war following vows by Hezbollah to avenge Shukr’s
killing, and by Iran to respond to the assassination in Tehran last week of the
head of Palestinian militant group Hamas. A Hezbollah source told Reuters that
“the response to the assassination of commander Fuad Shukr has not yet
come.”Earlier on Tuesday, four Hezbollah fighters were killed in a strike on a
home in the Lebanese town of Mayfadoun, nearly 30 km (19 miles) north of the
border, medics and a security source said.
Five Hezbollah members dead in ‘vacuum bomb’ attacks; 17
Israelis injured in drone attack
NAJIA HOUSSARI/Arab News/August 06, 2024
BEIRUT: Confrontations between Hezbollah and the Israeli army continued to
escalate and grow in intensity on on Tuesday. Five members of Hezbollah were
killed in an Israeli airstrike on a three-story building in the village of
Mayfadoun in Nabatieh district, which was carried out with the involvement of
the Israeli Security Agency, commonly known as the Shin Bet. Three of the dead
were said to have “responsibilities” within the party. Lebanon’s caretaker prime
minister, Najib Mikati, called on “the international community to stop the
Israeli attacks and threats against Lebanon,” warning that “the Israeli
aggression in Beirut’s southern suburbs has heightened fears of confrontations
that could lead to a full-scale war.” In a message posted on social media
platform X, Israeli army spokesperson Avichay Adraee confirmed that “air force
warplanes, guided by intelligence from Shin Bet and military intelligence”
attacked a military building in the Nabatieh area used by Hezbollah forces on
the southern front. Smoke could be seen rising from the target of the Mayfadoun
strike, which was said to have been reduced to a concrete skeleton. Security
reports indicated that the Israeli army used “highly destructive vacuum bombs,”
more formally known as thermobaric weapons, which are particularly lethal to
anyone caught in the blast zone. In another post, Adraee said Israeli warplanes
also carried out an airstrike “on a Hezbollah military building” in the town of
Khiam. In response, Hezbollah launched a series of operations that caused
emergency sirens to sound in Western and Upper Galilee, Acre and Haifa, where
explosions were heard for the first time in this conflict. Israeli media
reported that armed drones hit a vehicle and military base in Nahariya, causing
injuries. Israeli Army Radio said “17 people were injured in a Hezbollah drone
attack” on Nahariya and the outskirts of Acre. Hezbollah said the attack was “a
response to a specific aggression,” which seemed to confirm that there would be
further retaliation to the targeting of Mayfadoun and Khiam, and that this was
separate from its response to the assassination of senior Hezbollah military
commander Fuad Shukr in a southern suburb of Beirut last week. The Lebanese
people continue to fear that the fighting between Hezbollah and Israel will
continue to escalate into a full-blown war. Their concerns were articulated by
Mikati, who said: “The recent Israeli aggression in the southern suburbs of
Beirut has exacerbated the complexities of the current circumstances and
heightened concerns about possible confrontations that could lead to a
comprehensive war. “The threats posed by Israel towards Lebanon are part of a
psychological warfare strategy aimed at the Lebanese populace. Regrettably, some
people are exacerbating this situation by discussing potential dates for attacks
and justifying their objectives. “It is widely acknowledged that the fundamental
solution lies in halting Israeli aggression and assaults, as well as stopping
the aggression against the Palestinian people and giving them their legitimate
rights.”He added: “We will spare no effort to halt the Israeli aggression and
threats, and restore stability to Lebanon. Additionally, the relevant government
agencies are actively engaged in various fields to keep pace with all
developments.” Hezbollah said several members were killed in southern Lebanon on
Tuesday, including Hassan Mansour from Jebchit; Ali Mustafa Shams Al-Din, said
to have been born in 2003, from Majdal Selm; and Hussein Ali Yassin, born in
1993, from Sultaniyah.
Six Hezbollah fighters killed in Israeli strikes on
Mayfadoun, Odaisseh
Naharnet/August 06/2024
Israeli warplanes raided Tuesday the southern village of Mayfadoun in the
Nabatiyeh district, killing five Hezbollah fighters. Another person was injured
in a separate strike on al-Khiam and a child was wounded in artillery shelling
on al-Wazzani. Lebanon's health ministry said an "Israeli enemy raid on a house
in the town of Mayfadoun", near the southern city of Nabatiyeh, killed five
people. Requesting anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, a security source
told AFP "they were all Hezbollah fighters". Hezbollah announced five fighters
had been killed, without specifying where they died. The Israeli military said
its air force "struck a Hezbollah military structure in the area of Nabatiyeh"
that was being used "to advance terror attacks" against Israel. Israeli
warplanes later raided a region between Odaisseh and Rab Tlatine in south
Lebanon, killing one person and wounding another. Hezbollah, for its part, said
it targeted a building used by Israeli soldiers in Avivim in northern Israel, in
response to Israeli attacks on civilians in south Lebanon. The group later
targeted a group of soldiers in the Berkat Risha post with Burkan rockets, the
al-Marj post with artillery shells, and an armored personnel carrier in the
occupied Shebaa Farms. Israeli strikes had killed three people Monday, two
Hezbollah fighters and a paramedic. Since last week, tensions have soared as
Iran and Tehran-backed groups, including Hezbollah, vowed revenge for the
killing of Hamas's political leader in Tehran and Israel's killing of the
Lebanese group's military chief in Beirut.
Hezbollah has traded near-daily fire with Israel in support of its ally Hamas
since the Palestinian militant group's October 7 attack on Israel triggered the
Gaza war. The twin killings have raised fears of full-blown war between Israel
and Hezbollah, which last went to war in the summer of 2006.
Hezbollah drone attack on Nahariya wounds at least 7
Associated Press/August 06/2024
Hezbollah attacked Tuesday with an array of suicide drones an Israeli town near
the border between Akka and Nahariya, wounding at least seven people, in
response to the killing of one of its fighters in an Israeli airstrike. Sirens
sounded in Nahariya before a loud blast was heard and smoke began rising from an
intersection. Earlier, an Associated Press reporter saw a drone flying over the
city. The reporter later saw emergency crews rushing to the scene.Gal Zaid,
spokesperson for Galilee Medical Center, said it was treating one severely
wounded person and four others with mild injuries. Israel’s Magen David Adom
rescue service said it was treating seven wounded in three locations in Western
Galilee. Hezbollah claimed several attacks on Israel on Tuesday, including the
drone attack that the group said targeted a command center in a barracks north
of the coastal town of Akka. Hezbollah said the attack was in response to the
Monday "assassination" of Ali Jamaleddine Jawad whom Israel said was from the
group's elite Radwan unit. Jawad was killed in a drone strike on his motorcycle
in the southern village of Ebba. Hezbollah confirmed that he was killed "on the
road to Jerusalem" without giving details about his job within the group. The
Israeli military said a number of drones entered from Lebanon, one of which was
intercepted. It said several civilians were wounded near the coastal town of
Nahariya, some 6 kilometers south of the border, without giving a precise
number. It later said an initial inquiry indicated that one of its interceptor
missiles "missed the target and hit the ground, injuring several civilians",
adding that "the incident is under review." Hezbollah has launched near-daily
drone and rocket attacks along the border since the start of the Israel-Hamas
war in what it says is an act of solidarity with the Palestinians. Israel has
responded with airstrikes, one of which killed four people in southern Lebanon
earlier Tuesday, according to Lebanese authorities.
UN peacekeepers on Israel-Lebanon border 'fundamental',
says chief
Agence France Presse/August 06/2024
U.N. peacekeepers on the Israeli-Lebanese border have never been more crucial,
the force's global chief Jean-Pierre Lacroix said Tuesday, as fears soared of an
escalation in the Middle East. Worry has grown of a wider regional conflict,
especially after the killing, blamed on Israel, of a top Hamas leader in Iran
and an Israeli air strike that killed a Hezbollah commander in the Beirut
southern suburbs last week. The role of the U.N. peacekeeping force in Lebanon,
UNIFIL, was today "more important than ever", Under Secretary-General for Peace
Operations Jean-Pierre Lacroix told AFP. "It's the only liaison channel between
the Israeli side and the Lebanese side in all its components, such as
Hezbollah," he said. "It's fundamental because it allows us to clarify certain
things and avoid misunderstandings... miscalculations, uncontrolled and unwanted
escalations," he said. UNIFIL, which has around 10,000 troops based in south
Lebanon, was also key in informing all sides "when, for example, there are
people who have been wounded or even killed in the area and someone needs to go
in to rescue them or remove the bodies". The troops also continued to carry out
regular patrols "in liaison with the Lebanese army", he said. Lacroix said the
peacekeepers were staying in place for now, and only if it became impossible for
them to carry out their mission or if there were "very, very serious threats" to
their security would their presence be reconsidered. The peacekeeping force had
already seen several of its members wounded, and damage done to some of its
camps, he said. In the past, UNIFIL patrols have occasionally faced harassment,
and in December 2022 an Irish soldier with the force was killed and three
colleagues wounded when their convoy came under fire in south Lebanon.
'Absolutely terrible risk' -
The U.N. peacekeeping chief said a Gaza ceasefire was key to de-escalation on
the Israeli-Lebanon border. "What we want is a cessation of hostilities in Gaza
as well as between Lebanon and Israel straight away, because each day that goes
by brings its batch of victims, destruction and displacements, and it cannot
last," he said. "Every day that goes by also compounds an absolutely terrible
risk of uncontrolled escalations, of conflagrations in the entire region."
Almost 10 months of cross-border violence has killed at least 555 people in
Lebanon, most of them fighters but also including 116 civilians, according to an
AFP tally. On the Israeli side, 22 soldiers and 25 civilians have been killed
including 12 children in Majdal Shams in the occupied Golan Heights. "Probably,
after what has happened in the past days, the chances of progress towards a Gaza
deal, at least in the short term, are weak," he added.
"But it is hoped that a cessation of hostilities in Gaza would lead to the same
thing between Israel and Lebanon."Once a ceasefire was in place, both sides
would have to return to a "substantial negotiation process" to finally implement
U.N. Security Council resolution 1701. That decision ended a 2006 war between
Israel and Hezbollah and called for the Lebanese army and U.N. peacekeepers to
be the only armed forces deployed in the country's south. Lacroix said he was
optimistic the U.N. Security Council would renew UNIFIL's mandate, which runs
out at the end of the month, for another year.
Bou Habib says govt asking Hezbollah to be careful in its
response against Israel
Naharnet/August 06/2024
Caretaker Foreign Minister Abdallah Bou Habib on Tuesday said the Lebanese
government is trying to prevent Hezbollah from launching a harsh response
against Israel that might trigger a wide war. “We are working so that any
response does not lead to an all-out war,” Bou Habib said during a joint press
conference with his Egyptian counterpart in Cairo. Egyptian Foreign Minister
Badr Abdelatty for his part condemned the brazen Israeli attack that killed
Hezbollah military chief Fouad Shukur and six other people in Beirut’s southern
suburbs.
Hezbollah has vowed a “real” and “well-thought-out” response to the killing.
Lebanon receives emergency medical supplies from WHO
Agence France Presse/August 06/2024
Lebanon has received 32 tons of emergency medical supplies from the World Health
Organization for "treating war wounds" in efforts to increase readiness for
"escalation in the Israeli aggression on Lebanon", a health ministry statement
said. Health Minister Firas Abiad said another supply shipment was due to arrive
in the coming days. Lebanon is ill-prepared for war, with public services
including the health sector hit hard by a more than four-year-long economic
crisis that has also pushed many medical professionals to emigrate. The
cross-border violence since October has killed at least 550 people in Lebanon,
mostly fighters but also including at least 116 civilians, according to an AFP
tally. On the Israeli side, including the annexed Golan Heights, 22 soldiers and
25 civilians have been killed, according to army figures.
De-escalation efforts persist ahead of expected Iran-Hezbollah response
Agence France Presse/August 06/2024
Diplomatic pressure has mounted to avert an escalation between Iran and Israel
following high-profile killings that have sent regional tensions soaring. United
States President Joe Biden, whose country has sent extra warships and fighter
jets to the region in support of Israel, held crisis talks on Monday with his
national security team. The head of the U.S. military command covering the
Middle East, General Michael Kurilla, arrived in Israel and met Israel's
military chief Lieutenant-General Herzi Halevi for a security assessment, an
Israeli military statement said. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken on
Monday urged all sides in the Middle East to avoid "escalation," his spokesman
said. U.S. news site Axios earlier reported that Blinken told his counterparts
from the G7 nations that any attack by Iran and Hezbollah could happen as early
as Monday.
- 'Playing with fire' -
A European diplomat in Tel Aviv said "a coordinated response" from Iran and its
proxies was expected but de-escalation efforts persisted. "We're telling them
they have to stop playing with fire, because the risk of flare-ups is higher
than at any time since October 7," he said, declining to be named as he was not
authorized to speak on the issue. The Jeddah-based Organization of Islamic
Cooperation is to meet on Wednesday at the request of "Palestine and Iran," to
discuss developments in the region, an OIC official said. Israeli government
spokesman David Mencer said his country is "preparing for any scenario both
offensively and defensively". In the northern port city of Haifa, shop owner
Yehuda Levi, 45, told AFP that Israelis are used to conflict, but facing a
multi-pronged attack "is a little tricky". "It's difficult, but we believe we're
a strong country. We're going to win this war." Turkey on Monday joined multiple
nations calling on their citizens to leave Lebanon, where Hezbollah is based.
Numerous airlines have suspended flights to the country or limited them to
daylight hours. Germany's Lufthansa, which has already suspended flights to the
region including Tel Aviv, said its planes would avoid Iraqi and Iranian
airspace until at least Wednesday. Royal Jordanian Airlines said it would be
operating three flights this week to transport nationals out of Beirut.
'Act urgently' -
The United Nations' rights chief Volker Turk called on "all parties, along with
those states with influence, to act urgently to de-escalate what has become a
very precarious situation". Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani and his
Iraqi counterpart Fuad Hussein in a joint statement Monday "agreed to make every
effort to avoid a regional escalation". Italy currently holds the rotating
presidency of the G7 group of countries. French President Emmanuel Macron also
appealed for "restraint" in the Middle East, during conversations with the
leaders of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. In Tel Aviv on Monday
thousands of Israelis gathered to mark the fifth birthday of child hostage Ariel
Bibas, and to call for the liberation of him and his family. Netanyahu
repeatedly promises to bring the hostages home but is facing a growing chorus of
sceptics who worry he's not interested in a ceasefire and hostage-release deal
with Hamas, which U.S., Egyptian and Qatari mediators have for months been
trying to reach. "The hostages have no time and it seems like some people in
Israel, including the prime minister, are taking their time," said Gil Dickman,
whose cousin Carmel Gat is among the captives. As the region braced for further
escalation, Hezbollah and Israel kept up their near-daily exchanges of fire. The
Lebanese health ministry said three people were killed Monday in Israeli strikes
on the country's south. Israel's military said it had struck militants operating
a drone in the Mays al-Jabal area.Hezbollah later said two fighters had been
killed, one from Mays al-Jabal. Tehran has said it expects Hezbollah to hit
deeper inside Israel and no longer be confined to military targets. Far from the
Lebanese border, the Israeli military said around 15 rockets had crossed from
the southern Gaza Strip into Israel on Monday, with medics reporting one injury.
Air France and Transavia extend Beirut flight suspension
Agence France Presse/August 06/2024
Air France said Tuesday that its flights and that of its low-cost subsidiary
Transavia to Beirut will be suspended through at least Thursday because of fears
that the Gaza war could spread. The resumption of flights to Lebanon's capital,
which have been halted since July 29, "will be subject to a new assessment of
the local situation," the airline told AFP. The two French airlines first
stopped servicing the route after Israel vowed to retaliate following rocket
fire from Lebanon that killed 12 people in the Israeli-annexed Golan Heights.
Tensions have soared further in the past week as Iran and its allies vowed
revenge for the high-profile killings of Hezbollah's top military commander
Fouad Shukur in Lebanon and Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh in Iran, both
blamed on Israel. Hezbollah has been exchanging near-daily fire with Israeli
forces across the border between Lebanon and Israel. Air France said it "is
constantly monitoring developments in the geopolitical situation of the
territories served and overflown by its aircraft, to ensure the highest level of
flight safety and security." The airline added "the safety of its customers and
crews is its number one priority." Air France said customers with reservations
for flights to or from Beirut scheduled before and including August 18 to
postpone or cancel their trip free of charge. German carrier Lufthansa has
suspended flights to Beirut, Tehran and Tel Aviv until August 12. Air France
said its flights to and from Tel Aviv are operating normally.
China urges citizens to take 'caution' in Lebanon travel
Agence France Presse/August 06/2024
China's embassy in Beirut urged citizens to "travel with caution" should they
visit Lebanon, warning they face "higher security risks" as fears of a regional
conflict soar. In a statement issued Monday evening Beijing time, the embassy
warned citizens the situation in the country was "grave and complex".
"The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Chinese Embassy in Lebanon remind
Chinese citizens to closely monitor the evolution of the local situation and to
travel with caution in Lebanon in the near future," the embassy said on its
official WeChat account. As Israel's war against Iran-backed Hamas in Gaza nears
the 11th month, the Tehran-aligned "Axis of Resistance" is widely expected to
retaliate after the killing of two senior figures. Palestinian armed group
Hamas's political leader Ismail Haniyeh was killed in Tehran last week in an
attack blamed on Israel, which has not directly commented on it. The killing
came hours after an Israeli strike on Beirut killed the military chief of
Lebanon's Hezbollah movement, Fouad Shukur. Hezbollah and Israel have continued
near-daily exchanges of fire. Multiple nations called on Monday for their
citizens to leave Lebanon, where Hezbollah is based.Beijing's embassy also
advised Chinese to "remain very vigilant" should they travel to the country. "If
Chinese citizens insist on going (to Lebanon) despite the warning, they may face
higher security risks," it cautioned.
A preemptive strike on Iran and Hezbollah - the strategic
vs the tactical - analysis
Yonah Jeremy Bob/Jerusalem Post/August 06/2024
Israel appears to be in a defensive posture to maintain the benefits of US and
allied defensive assistance, but it is open to narrow tactical and limited
attacks to prevent imminent strikes.There is non-stop talk of Israeli preemptive
strikes on Iran and on Hezbollah, given that Jerusalem has been waiting since
the July 31 killings of Hezbollah’s military chief and Hamas’s political chief
(while he was in Tehran) for an expected massive retaliation from Lebanon and
from the Islamic Republic. As time has dragged on and the certainty of
retaliation also grows, more and more analysts have asked why Israel should wait
to be hit with unprecedented power from these two enemy states if it can instead
hit them first and reduce the effectiveness of the expected attacks. With rife
speculation about what preemptive strikes might look like, The Jerusalem Post
dug into the issue and found that a variety of factors must be treated
differently in the IDF’s thinking, rather than be lumped together. First, there
is much more IDF support for preemptively striking Hezbollah than for
preemptively striking Iran. Many IDF officials have wanted to strike Hezbollah
since October 11, and Lebanon is a much smaller and closer territory, and one
that the IDF can relatively easily enter with ground forces simultaneously with
a massive air attack. Also, while Hezbollah in some ways can strike Israel’s
northern areas with greater likelihood of success by virtue of being so close to
the Jewish state’s border, its weapons are still far less powerful and
sophisticated than Iran’s huge arsenal of ballistic missiles. This does not mean
that Israel will preemptively strike Hezbollah, as Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu is generally firmly against such a strike, and even the defense
establishment is less sure about it now than they were on October For one thing,
Israel has much less international support now than it did four days after the
October 7 massacre of Israelis and others in southern Israel.
How can Israel eliminate all, or most, of Iran's aerial threats?
Iran is also a huge territory and it is unclear whether an Israeli preemptive
strike could eliminate all or even most of the Islamic Republic’s aerial threats
before they could hit Israel. This is especially true now that Tehran is already
highly mobilized, such that there would be no major strategic surprise
advantage.
According to this thinking, while the benefits of preemptively striking
Hezbollah might debatably outweigh the costs, this is less likely with Iran, and
a preemptive strike might only be a tactical advantage that would make an even
harsher Iranian response more likely. There are also questions about what kinds
of targets to hit preemptively. It would be quite a different matter for Israel
to make a narrow preemptive strike on a single or small series of Hezbollah or
Iranian rocket or missile launch sites that were literally about to fire on
Israel. Such attacks could be seen by the US as limited self-defense that would
not give Hezbollah or Iran any additional “right” or motivation to make their
retaliation larger, nor would it necessarily make a general war more likely. In
contrast, a preemptive strike against Iranian nuclear facilities or sources of
power for either Hezbollah or Iran, which was not connected to an imminent
attack, would be seen by the US as an aggressive move that could make a general
war more likely. Such attacks could reduce US and allied concrete support for
Israel’s defense against retaliation from the Jewish state’s enemies. This is
why Israeli sources are emphasizing a need to get American sign-offs on
intelligence of imminent attacks by Iran and Hezbollah. Overall, Israel appears
to be in a defensive posture in order to keep the benefits of US and allied
defensive assistance, but with some openness to narrow tactical and limited
attacks to prevent imminent strikes, especially from Hezbollah, with even such
tactical attacks being less likely against Iran – given that its distance also
gives more time to shoot down any aerial threats.
Lebanon aims to ensure Hezbollah response to Israeli
attack does not cause wider war
Reuters/August 06, 2024
DUBAI: Lebanon is working to ensure any response to the Israeli killing of a top
Hezbollah commander in Beirut does not trigger total war in the Middle East, its
Foreign Minister Abdallah Bou Habib said on Tuesday. Tensions in the region have
spiraled in the last week following the killing in Tehran of Palestinian
militant group Hamas’ leader, and an Israeli strike on Beirut’s suburbs that
killed the senior commander Fuad Shukr. Hezbollah said last week that the
Iran-backed group will respond in a studied manner. Israel and Hezbollah have
been trading fire since Hamas attacked Israel on Oct.7 and ignited a war in
Gaza.
Residents shocked, angry after at least 18 injured in
Hezbollah drone strike in Nahariya area of Western Galilee
Yair Kraus, Hassan Shaalan/Ynetnews/August 06, 2024
Hezbollah launched a barrage of drones that caused damage and many injuries,
including one person in critical condition, in the Nahariya area; Residents
complain: 'There are not enough shelters'; IDF says the interceptor missed the
explosives-laden droneand hit the ground
"We heard the whistle of the drone, suddenly there was an explosion." Residents
of Nahariya and the surrounding area of the Western Galilee reacted with shock
to the Hezbollah drone attack south of Nahariya, which critically injured a
30-year-old man and injure 17 others. An eyewitnesses said at noon on Tuesday
that "all the communities in the north are suffering", and called on Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to find a way to halt the attacks, including
invading Lebanon. At least two unmanned aerial vehicles penetrated Israeli
territory, following a series of alarms that were triggered in communities in
the Western Galilee, including Nahariya and Acre. One of the unmanned aerial
vehicles was intercepted, and the other exploded at an intersection near the
town of Mazra’a. The injured were evacuated to the Galilee Medical Center in
Nahariya with shrapnel injuries, as well as those who suffered from anxiety and
head injuries. Hezbollah claimed responsibility for the attack, and said that it
had launched a "swarm of drones" in response to an Israeli strike south Lebanon
town of Mayfadoun near Nabatieh, some 30 kilometers (19 miles) north of
Lebanon's border with Israel, reportedly killing at least five men. Hours later,
sirens sounded in the areas of Sha'al and Kela Alon and the IDF Aerial Defense
Array successfully intercepted a suspicious aerial target that crossed from
Lebanese territory. No injuries were reported. The siren was activated as a
result of the launch of the interceptor toward the target and due to the
possibility of falling shrapnel from the interception. Israel Fire Services are
currently operating to extinguish fires that were ignited in several areas by
fallen shrapnel from the interception. Avi Ezran from Nahariya told Ynet that he
was at the intersection when the drone exploded. "I approached the traffic
lights and saw people on the ground. I stopped the car and suddenly I hear an
alarm and see a UAV in front of me, at a height of six or seven meters. It
started swinging and after that we heard a boom, from an intercepted or a fall.
Did you realize that you were under attack by Hezbollah?
"I thought it had started but I didn't understand what happened here, and the
alarms don't stop."
Ten months into the war, what are your feelings?
"This is what I have to say to the government. Right now you are a failed
government. I am nervous. My children are suffering, all of Nahariya, all of the
north, all of the communities in the north are suffering. We must solve this
problem. Please. Bibi will solve this problem for us. All our businesses are
closed, we have nothing to in town, what to do? Tell us, Bibi, what to do?"
What is your requirement?
"We demand that we enter Lebanon. I am a 49-year-old human being, an engineer,
now volunteering for the reserves. Take me now, I am ready to enter Lebanon.
Nasrallah only understands force. The people know that. Who can get up in the
morning when you don't know if you are coming back? What is that? "Every day, 12
of our children are killed." (The massacre in Majdal Shams). Residents shocked,
angry after at least 18 injured in Hezbollah drone strike in Nahariya area of
Western Galilee
Hezbollah launched a barrage of drones that caused damage and many injuries,
including one person in critical condition, in the Nahariya area; Residents
complain: 'There are not enough shelters'; IDF says the interceptor missed the
explosives-laden droneand hit the ground
"We heard the whistle of the drone, suddenly there was an explosion." Residents
of Nahariya and the surrounding area of the Western Galilee reacted with shock
to the Hezbollah drone attack south of Nahariya, which critically injured a
30-year-old man and injure 17 others. An eyewitnesses said at noon on Tuesday
that "all the communities in the north are suffering", and called on Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to find a way to halt the attacks, including
invading Lebanon.
At least two unmanned aerial vehicles penetrated Israeli territory, following a
series of alarms that were triggered in communities in the Western Galilee,
including Nahariya and Acre. One of the unmanned aerial vehicles was
intercepted, and the other exploded at an intersection near the town of Mazra’a.
The injured were evacuated to the Galilee Medical Center in Nahariya with
shrapnel injuries, as well as those who suffered from anxiety and head injuries.
Hezbollah claimed responsibility for the attack, and said that it had launched a
"swarm of drones" in response to an Israeli strike south Lebanon town of
Mayfadoun near Nabatieh, some 30 kilometers (19 miles) north of Lebanon's border
with Israel, reportedly killing at least five men.
Hours later, sirens sounded in the areas of Sha'al and Kela Alon and the IDF
Aerial Defense Array successfully intercepted a suspicious aerial target that
crossed from Lebanese territory. No injuries were reported. The siren was
activated as a result of the launch of the interceptor toward the target and due
to the possibility of falling shrapnel from the interception. Israel Fire
Services are currently operating to extinguish fires that were ignited in
several areas by fallen shrapnel from the interception.
The injured were evacuated to the Galilee Medical Center in Nahariya, most with
shrapnel injuries(Photo: Yair Kraus)
Avi Ezran from Nahariya told Ynet that he was at the intersection when the drone
exploded. "I approached the traffic lights and saw people on the ground. I
stopped the car and suddenly I hear an alarm and see a UAV in front of me, at a
height of six or seven meters. It started swinging and after that we heard a
boom, from an intercepted or a fall.
Did you realize that you were under attack by Hezbollah?
"I thought it had started but I didn't understand what happened here, and the
alarms don't stop."
Ten months into the war, what are your feelings?
"This is what I have to say to the government. Right now you are a failed
government. I am nervous. My children are suffering, all of Nahariya, all of the
north, all of the communities in the north are suffering. We must solve this
problem. Please. Bibi will solve this problem for us. All our businesses are
closed, we have nothing to in town, what to do? Tell us, Bibi, what to do?"
The Hezbollah drone in the sky over Nahariya
What is your requirement?
"We demand that we enter Lebanon. I am a 49-year-old human being, an engineer,
now volunteering for the reserves. Take me now, I am ready to enter Lebanon.
Nasrallah only understands force. The people know that. Who can get up in the
morning when you don't know if you are coming back? What is that? "Every day, 12
of our children are killed."Maor Amsalem , a resident of Krayot, happened to be
driving at the time of the explosion. "There was alarm after alarm. On the third
we already got it, and of course we listened to the instructions."
Did you see the UAV?
"Really, a meter above me. We heard a whistle and then there was an explosion.
All the parts flew, glass, stones, everything just flew in all directions and
luckily we were standing across the road and survived. I personally came out
with a miracle."
How do you feel now? Did you think that would be the case after ten months?
"I am shaking. I never imagined it would come to me. I said it would be fine,
I'm at home with two children. If you don't listen to the instructions and stay
in the car, that's not what you should do."
A eyewitness to the explosion told Ynet that he saw a woman who was hit and was
evacuated from the scene. "She was injured in her leg and was in shock." When
asked about his feelings about the fact that the war had also reached Mazra’a, a
place relatively far from the border, he replied that "the feelings are not
good. Me and my daughters, they are all screaming. I have a daughter, five years
old, she screams all day. The situation is difficult, the situation is not
good."
Nassim Nas , a resident of Mazra’a, shared that after 10 months of war "we have
to end it, 10 months is too much". When asked how he thinks the problem can be
solved, he replied: "I don't know how to do it. We little people don't know how
to do it. Let's hope it will be all right."
Coral , who was slightly injured and arrived at the Galilee Medical Center in
Nahariya, said: "I was driving on the road with my child (three months old) and
the drone fell right next to us. My rear window was shattered by a shard and we
pulled over. Thank God we are fine. I arrived from the direction of Krayot and
did not hear the siren. It was a great miracle."The IDF announced later on
Wednesday that "an initial inquiry indicates that an interceptor missed the
target and hit the ground, injuring several civilians. The incident is under
review."
Hezbollah said it aimed its fire at a military base near Acre after an Israeli
strike Monday on the South Lebanon town of Mayfadoun near Nabatieh, some 30
kilometers (19 miles) north of Lebanon's border with Israel, reportedly killing
at least five men. According to a report in the Saudi Al-Hadath channel, a
senior member of the Iran-backed group was among the dead.
Mazra’a does not have enough shelters: 'We have no safe places'
Against the backdrop of the Hezbollah attack, the residents of Mazra’a harshly
criticized the lack of shelters to protect against the missiles and drones
launched from southern Lebanon. "The residents of the village live in great
danger, while Nahariya, which is a minute away, enjoys shelters that are
sufficient for all residents," they noted. "The
village has a shelter at the school and another one at the community center, but
this is only enough for a very small number of people," Mohammad Awad, a
resident of Mazra’a, said. "We are facing a danger that threatens our lives and
we have no safe places to protect us from the missiles. Today the explosions
were very close to us, if it had happened in a residential neighborhood we would
have seen victims, injuries and very significant damage."
Another young man said that "our village is a minute away from Nahariya, and
there are shelters to protect everyone, just because it's a Jewish city, while
we Arabs don't seem to deserve these services." According to him, "the
responsible authorities must provide shelters and raise this issue not only in
times of war, but also in calm days without any wars."
Sayyed Nasrallah Speech: Hezbollah Response Inevitable
despite Israeli Calming Notices
Al-Manar English Website./August 06/2024
Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah stressed on Tuesday that
Hezbollah response to the Israeli crime of assassinating the martyred Islamic
Resistance commander Sayyed Fuad Shokr in Beirut’s Dahiyeh is inevitable
regardless of all the consequences. “We are keen on the Lebanese national
interests, but no one can ask us to act with the Zionist aggression on Dahiyeh
as a a normal incident in the context of the ongoing battle.”Addressing
Hezbollah ceremony held at Sayyed Al-Shuhada Complex in Beirut’s Dahiyeh to
commemorate the martyred commander Sayyed Shokr one week after his martyrdom,
Sayyed Nasrallah indicated that the “Israeli” enemy is the one that chose to
escalate the confrontation with Lebanon and Iran.
Sayyed Nasrallah indicated that Hezbollah response may be individual or
coordination with the Resistance Front, affirming that the Islamic Republic and
Yemen are committed to responding to the Zionist aggression.
“Our response is certainly coming and will be strong, impactful, and
effective. There are still days and nights ahead of us, and we await the
battlefield.”Today we speak with responsibility about a future that we will
build together through our patience, endurance, reliance on God, and the blood
of our martyrs, Sayyed Nasrallah said, adding that the enemy’s resources in the
north can be targeted within half an hour. Commenting on the war possibilities,
Sayyed Nasrallah clarified that, after the aggression on Beirut’s Dahiyeh, the
Israelis notified Lebanon via the Americans that they do not seek an all-out
military confrontation. “The enemy’s calculations for
going to a broad war are complex, and when it wants to go to war, it does not
need a pretext, Sayyed Nasrallah underscored. “The
Americans are asking for more time to work on stopping the war in Gaza, but who
can trust the Americans, who have been hypocritical and deceitful for the past
ten months?”“Our drones reached east of Acre, and one of the Iron Dome missiles
failed to intercept one of the targets and fell in Nahariya, where 19 people
have been injured so far,” Sayyed Nasrallah said, “The enemy’s army is obligated
to clarify the situation in Nahariya as it must respond, while it did not
acknowledge the attack in Majdal Shams because it targeted our Arab Syrian Druze
brethren, reflecting misinformation and a divisive project.”
Hezbollah, Iran, and Yemen are obligated to respond, and the enemy
anticipates this response considering every sign of it as part of the
retaliation, according to Sayyed Nasrallah who added that the Resistance acts
carefully, courageously and deliberately. Affirming that the enemy’s week-long
waiting is part of the punishment, Sayyed Nasrallah said, “In the past, the
enemy was positioned with one and a half feet near the Lebanese border; today,
the threat from Hezbollah and Iran has made entire “Israel” stand on one and a
half feet.Iran was obligated to respond after the attack on the Iranian
consulate in Damascus and is now also committed to fighting following the
assassination of martyr Haniyeh in Tehran, although it is not required for Iran
and Syria to enter the combat directly, Hezbollah leader maintained. “Iran and
Syria are required to provide the resistance groups with all kinds of support,
away from any direct engagement in the battle.” Sayyed Nasrallah addressed that
anti-resistance parties in Lebanon, stressing that they must fear any Israeli
victory in the current battle. “The Resistance does not need your support, but
just avoid backstabbing it.”
We are in a battle with a broad horizon
Hezbollah Secretary General also called on the resistance in Gaza and the West
Bank, from the perspective of shared blood, fight, and future, and to honorable
people, for more patience and steadfastness, urging the support fronts in
Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen to continue supporting Gaza despite the sacrifices.
Sayyed Nasrallah further called on Arab countries to wake up to the
danger threatening the region. What if ‘Israel’ emerges victoriousز
Sayyed Nasrallah warned that if Netanyahu’s government succeeds in Gaza
and the West Bank, it means that Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Palestinian cause will
be in great danger. The true project of Netanyahu and his allies is to make
Jordan a substitute homeland for the Palestinians, Sayyed Nasrallah underlined.
“If the resistance in Gaza is defeated, which it will not be, ‘Israel’
will not leave any Islamic or Christian sanctities, and there will be no
Palestine, Jordan, or its ruling regime, or Syria extending to
Egypt.”“Confrontation and resistance are required, without hesitation or
submission; this is a humanitarian and religious duty,” Sayyed Nasrallah said,
“Every honorable person must confront, and the goal of this battle is to prevent
‘Israel’ from winning and to eliminate the Palestinian cause. This confrontation
has a significant historic prospect for victory.”Sayyed Nasrallah maintained
that the assassination of leaders Shokr and Haniyeh is an Israeli achievement,
but that it does not change the nature of the battle and has made the enemy’s
position more difficult. “Operations in the West Bank
have escalated, reverse migration has increased, and there has been damage on
all fronts.” Sayyed Nasrallah underlined that the United States has been silent
for 31 years, and that its current talk about establishing a Palestinian state
is false and hypocritical because any vote on a Palestinian state in the
Security Council is met with an American veto. “The US pretends to be
dissatisfied with Netanyahu’s conduct during the war and claims to pressure him,
but this is a lie as they are supplying him with tons of weapons.”
Israel’s diminishing power
Hezbollah Chief maintained that the American defense of “Israel” indicates that
it is no longer as powerful or prestigious as it once was. “When Iran and
Hezbollah spoke of retaliating against ‘Israel’ for its atrocities, the US
affirmed its commitment to defend the Zionist entity,” Sayyed Nasrallah said,
“The occupation relies on the United States and Western countries for protection
as it is unable to defend itself.” “Israel” is no longer as strong as it once
was; during Operation Protective Edge, several countries defended the Zionist
entity, Sauued Nasrallah added. “Israel, which fought in 1967 and 1973 with the
strongest armies in the region, is now fearful of Iranian and Hezbollah
responses and seeks Western countries to defend it.”
Gaza and West Bank
Sayyed Nasrallah mentioned that Netanyahu does not want a ceasefire in Gaza and
insists on this in every negotiation round, aiming to displace the people of
Gaza.“The Israeli position is against a Palestinian state even in Gaza, viewing
it as an existential threat, even if recognized only internationally for
Gaza.”“The plan for the West Bank, following the Flood of Al-Aqsa”, involves
displacing its inhabitants through killing, operations, and airstrikes. The West
Bank is being bombed by air and drones, with the aim of expanding settlements
and displacing Palestinians towards Jordan, officially annexing it.”Sayyed
Nasrallah highlighted the international silence about the remarks of Israeli
minister of finance Bezalel Smotrich who said “its is moral all people in
Gaza”.“Israeli ministerial remarks about nuking Gaza and Knesset’s resolution on
rejecting a Palestinian state reflect the essence of the ongoing battle.”
The Israeli enemy has annexed Golan Heights and Lebanon’s Shebaa Farms in order
complete the entity’s map-from the river to the sea, Sayyed Nasrallah said.
“There is a Zionist project that denies the possibility of a Palestinian
state, while the resistance front seeks a unified Palestine from the sea to the
river. All interim projects will dissolve as they have no future and are
unrealistic.”
Martyr Sayyed Mohsen
“We meet today to honor one of those men who have proven true to what they
pledged to Allah, Sayyed Nasrallah started his speech.
Martyr Fuad Shokr, Sayyed Mohsen, is one of the key leaders behind the victory
in 2000, Sayyed Nasrallah said. “During the July War, the main operations room
was under his command, and he played a crucial role in rebuilding and enhancing
our capabilities after the war.”“In managing the Lebanese support front, Sayyed
Mohsen would follow up, lead, direct, and continue the work. Sayyed Fouad was
one of the strategic minds in the resistance and an exceptional tactician.”
“Intellectually, Sayyed Mohsen had extensive religious knowledge, as well
as a broad general culture and excellent expressive abilities. Sayyed Mohsen was
a educator who shaped men and had a profound impact on those around him.”
The martyr leader Sayyed Fouad Shukr is from the founding generation of
the resistance, and in addition to that, he is one of the founding leaders,
Sayyed Nasrallah said. Commenting on the Zionist act of creating sonic booms
over Dahiyeh just before the speech, Sayyed Nasrallah said, “The enemy may
resort to breaking the sound barrier over the southern suburbs to provoke and
scare those present at the ceremony. If that happens, we will respond with the
appropriate slogan.”We acknowledge the magnitude of the loss, and the martyrdom
of Sayyed Mohsen is a significant loss, but this does not shake us or stop us,
Sayyed Nasrallahs stressed.
Source: Al-Manar English Website.
The Latest English LCCC
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on August 06-07/2024
US sends ship-based Navy fighter jets to a base in the Middle East to help
protect Israel
Lolita C. Baldor/WASHINGTON (AP)/August 6, 2024
About a dozen F/A-18 fighter jets from the USS Theodore Roosevelt aircraft
carrier have flown to a military base in the Middle East, as part of the
Pentagon’s effort to help defend Israel from possible attacks by Iran and its
proxies and to safeguard U.S. troops, according to a U.S. official. The F/A-18s
and a E-2D Hawkeye surveillance aircraft took off from the carrier in the Gulf
of Oman and arrived at the undisclosed base on Monday, said the official. U.S.
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin ordered the increased military presence in the
region as officials worry about escalating violence in the Middle East in the
wake of the killings last week of a senior Hezbollah commander in Lebanon and
Hamas’ top political leader in Iran, in suspected Israeli strikes. Both groups
are backed by Iran. The Navy jets' land-based deployment is expected to be
temporary, because a squadron of Air Force F-22 fighter jets is enroute to the
same base from their home station in Alaska. The roughly dozen F-22s are
expected to arrive in the Middle East in the coming days, said the official, who
spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss troop movements. It’s not clear how
long all of the aircraft will remain together at the base, and that may depend
on what — if anything — happens in the next few days. The troop movements come
as U.S. officials released more details about the rocket attack that hit a
military base in Iraq on Tuesday, injuring American personnel. Officials said
five U.S. service members and two contractors were hurt when two rockets hit the
base. The officials said five of those injured were being treated at the al-Asad
airbase and two were evacuated, but all seven are in stable condition. They did
not provide details on who was evacuated. The rocket attack is the latest in
what has been an uptick in strikes on U.S. forces by Iranian-backed militias. It
comes as tensions across the Middle East are spiking but is not believed to be
connected to the Hezbollah and Hamas killings. The officials spoke on condition
of anonymity to discuss military operations. In recent weeks, Iranian-backed
Iraqi militias have resumed launching attacks on bases housing U.S. forces in
Iraq and Syria after a lull of several months, following a strike on a base in
Jordan in late January that killed three American soldiers and prompted a series
of retaliatory U.S. strikes. Between October and January, an umbrella group
calling itself the Islamic Resistance in Iraq had regularly claimed attacks that
it said were in retaliation for Washington’s support of Israel in its war
against Hamas in Gaza and were aimed at pushing U.S. troops out of the region.
The US Navy is on its fourth aircraft carrier as its warships react to fighting
in the Middle East
Jake Epstein/Business Insider/August 6, 2024 .
The US on Saturday dispatched an aircraft carrier, USS Abraham Lincoln, to the
Middle East. It's the fourth US carrier sent to respond to ongoing crises in the
Middle East since October. The change has come as the region braces for a
potential attack on Israel by Iran and its proxies. The US Navy is sending
another aircraft carrier to the Middle East. It's the fourth sent to respond to
ongoing crises in the tumultuous region in the past 10 months. With this move,
more than a third of the carrier fleet will have been involved at one point or
another. The Pentagon on Saturday announced that the USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier
Strike Group, which was recently in the Pacific, was moving into the Middle East
amid a broader shake-up of the US military's force posture in the region. The
change has come as the US, its allies and partners, and the broader Middle East
brace for a potential attack on Israel by Iran and its proxies. They've blamed
Israel for the stunning assassination of Hamas' political chief in Tehran,
Iran's capital, last week and vowed to take revenge for the killing. It's not
immediately clear when the Lincoln and the other ships in the carrier strike
group will arrive in the region. When they do, the strike group will be the
fourth to be deployed to the Middle East or nearby Eastern Mediterranean since
Hamas staged its brutal October 7 attack in Israel, igniting a war and fueling
regional tensions. A large ship at sea on the right and a smaller ship in the
background on the left. The massacre triggered a retaliatory war in Gaza
and sparked conflict involving other Iranian proxy groups across the region,
including the Houthis in Yemen, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and various militias in
Iraq and Syria. The US, in October, initially directed the USS Gerald R. Ford
Carrier Strike Group to the Eastern Mediterranean to prevent the fighting from
spiraling and signal its support for Israel. A carrier strike group consists of
a carrier, its air wing, and other warships such as destroyers and cruisers.
It's a tremendous and flexible show of force that provides lots of firepower for
both offensive and defensive operations. The US also deployed the Dwight D.
Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group to the Eastern Mediterranean as regional
tensions flared. It then pivoted to the Middle East to defend merchant shipping
lanes in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden from Houthi attacks. The Ford returned
home in January. And after months of battling the Houthis in what has been
described as the Navy's most intense combat operations since World War II, the
Eisenhower finally left the Middle East in June, returning to the US. The
carrier was replaced last month by the USS Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike
Group, which was previously operating in the Indo-Pacific region, where the US
doesn't currently have a forward-deployed carrier presence. Now, the Lincoln
carrier strike group is set to replace the Roosevelt, which was operating in the
Persian Gulf as of last week, according to the USNI News Fleet and Marine
Tracker. It's unclear where the Roosevelt is headed next.
"The United States' global defense is dynamic and the Department of Defense
retains the capability to deploy on short notice to meet evolving national
security threats," a Pentagon spokesperson said on Saturday. The Pentagon said
the US was dispatching additional warships capable of intercepting ballistic
missiles to the US Central Command and US European Command areas of
responsibility as tensions soar between Israel and Iran and its proxies. US
warships helped down Iranian ballistic missiles during Tehran's massive attack
on Israel in April. It's unclear what a retaliatory Iranian attack could
involve, but analysts say Iran and its proxies could modify that strike package
as they continue to signal their intent to retaliate against Israel in the
coming days.
Palestinian officials say 12 dead in Israel West Bank
raids
Reuters/August 06, 2024
WEST BANK, Palestine: Israeli forces killed at least four people in the volatile
city of Jenin in the occupied West Bank, medics said on Tuesday, following a
night of violence in which four others were killed in clashes near Tubas, close
to the border with Jordan. The Israeli military said it conducted two separate
air strikes in the West Bank, hitting armed militants, but gave no details. The
Palestinian Red Crescent confirmed that four people were killed in the strikes
against two vehicles in Jenin, one of the most explosive flashpoints in the West
Bank. Another person was critically wounded. The strikes came during an
operation in Jenin in which footage shared on social media showed a column of
armoured personnel carriers entering the city and armoured bulldozers digging up
roads. With Israel bracing for an expected Iranian response to the assassination
of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran last week, the West Bank violence
underscored the multi-front security challenge facing Israeli forces, 10 months
after the start of the war in Gaza. Israeli forces have killed hundreds of
Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem since the start of the war,
many of them armed fighters but many also stone-throwing youths or uninvolved
civilians. At the same time, at least 13 Israelis have been killed in attacks by
Palestinian attackers. On Tuesday, a female border guard was wounded in a
stabbing attack by a Palestinian man using a screwdriver during an inspection of
a bus at a chackpoint on the outskirts of Jerusalem. The attacker was shot dead,
the police said. Overnight, the Palestinian health ministry said at least four
Palestinians were killed and seven others injured by Israeli fire in the town of
Aqaba, close to the city of Tubas. Two of the injured were in critical
condition. The official Palestinian news agency WAFA said the clashes occurred
after Israeli forces surrounded a house in Aqaba and clashed with a group of
young men.
Hamas names Yahya Sinwar, mastermind of the Oct. 7 attacks, as its new leader in
show of defiance
The Associated Press/August 6, 2024
Hamas on Tuesday named Yahya Sinwar, its top official in Gaza who masterminded
the Oct. 7 attacks in Israel, as its new leader in a dramatic sign of the power
of the Palestinian militant group's hardline wing after his predecessor was
killed in a presumed Israeli strike in Iran. The selection of Sinwar, a
secretive figure close to Iran who worked for years to build up Hamas' military
strength, was a defiant signal that the group is prepared to keep fighting after
10 months of destruction from Israel's campaign in Gaza and after the
assassination of Sinwar's predecessor, Ismail Haniyeh. It is also likely to
provoke Israel, which has put him at the top of its kill list after the Oct. 7
attack, in which militants killed 1,200 people in southern Israel and took about
250 as hostages. The announcement comes at volatile moment. Fears are high of an
escalation into a wider regional war, with Iran vowing revenge against Israel
over Haniyeh's killing and Lebanon's Hezbollah threatening to retaliate over
Israel's killing of one of its top commanders in an airstrike in Beirut last
week. American, Egyptian and Qatari mediators are trying to salvage negotiations
over a cease-fire and hostage release deal in Gaza, shaken by Haniyeh' killing.
Hamas said in a statement it named Sinwar as the new head of its political
bureau to replace Haniyeh, who was killed in a blast that Iran and Hamas blamed
on Israel. Israel has not confirmed or denied responsibility. Also last week,
Israel said it had confirmed the death of the head of Hamas’ military wing,
Mohammed Deif, in a July airstrike in Gaza. Hamas has not confirmed his death.
In reaction to the appointment, Israeli military spokesman Rear Adm. Daniel
Hagari told Saudi-owned Al-Arabiya televsion, “There is only one place for Yahya
Sinwar, and it is beside Mohammed Deif and the rest of the October 7th
terrorists. That is the only place we’re preparing and intending for him.”
Israel's killings of multiple senior officials in Hamas over recent months left
Sinwar as the most prominent figure in the group. His selection signals that the
leadership on the ground in Gaza — particularly the armed wing known as the
Qassam Brigades — has taken over from the leadership in exile, which has
traditionally maintained the position of the overall leadership to navigate
relations with foreign allies and diplomacy. Haniyeh, who had lived in
self-imposed exile in Qatar since 2019, had played a direct role in negotiations
over a cease-fire in Gaza through U.S., Qatari and Egyptian negotiators — though
he and other Hamas officials always ran proposals and positions by Sinwar.
Speaking to Al-Jazeera television after the announcement, Hamas spokesman Osama
Hamdan said Sinwar would continue the cease-fire negotiations. “The problem in
negotiations is not the change in Hamas,” he said, blaming Israel and its ally
the United States for the failure to seal a deal. But he said said Sinwar's
selection was a sign the group's will had not been broken. Hamas “remains
steadfast in the battlefield and in politics," he said. "The person leading
today is the one who led the fighting for more than 305 days and is still
steadfast in the field.”Hamas' allies Iran and Hezbollah issued statements
praising Sinwar's appointment.
Hamas' representative in Iran, Khaled Kaddoumi, called Sinwar a “consensus
choice” popular among all factions and involved in the group’s decision-making
throughout, including in negotiations. In a voice message to the AP, he said
Sinwar knows the political aspirations of the Palestinians for a state and the
return of refugees but he is also a “fierce fighter on the
battlefield.”Mediators have been struggling to push through a U.S.-backed
outline for a deal, but talks have hit obstacles, particularly over its
centerpiece terms — a release of all of Hamas' remaining hostages in return for
an end to the war and a full withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza. Hamas has
demanded guarantees from mediators that an initial cease-fire will continue
until terms for that exchange are worked out. Israeli leaders have threatened to
resume fighting to eliminate Hamas after an initial partial hostage release.
Speaking Monday, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said, “Escalation is not
in anyone’s interest, it will only only lead to more conflict, more violence,
more insecurity, ... It is also critical that we break this cycle by reaching a
cease-fire in Gaza. That, in turn, will unlock possibilities for more enduring
calm, not only in Gaza itself but in other areas where the conflict could
spread.” White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters Tuesday
at a press briefing that she had no comment on the announcement of Sinwar's
appointment.As Hamas' leader inside Gaza since 2017, Sinwar rarely appeared in
public but kept an iron grip on Hamas' rule over the territory. Close to Deif
and Qassam Brigades, he worked to build up the group's military capabilities. In
one of his few appearances, Sinwar ended a public speech in Gaza by inviting
Israel to assassinate him, proclaiming, “I will walk back home after this
meeting.” He then did so, shaking hands and taking selfies with people in the
streets.
He has been in deep hiding since the Oct. 7 attacks, which triggered Israel's
campaign of bombardment and offensives aimed at destroying Hamas. The death toll
among Palestinians is now nearing 40,000, most of the population of 2.3 million
has been driven from their homes, and large swaths of Gaza's towns and cities
have been destroyed. In May, prosecutors at the International Criminal Court
sought an arrest warrant against Sinwar on charges of war crimes over the Oct. 7
attack, as well as against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and
Israel's defense minister for war crimes. Hugh Lovatt, an expert on the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict at the European Council on Foreign Relations. said
the elimination of other top figures cleared the way for Sinwar. “Two weeks ago,
few would have expected Sinwar to be the group’s next leader despite the strong
influence he exerts from Gaza,” he said. The killing of Haniyeh, a relative
moderate, “not only opened the path for Sinwar to claim full control of Hamas,
but also appears to have tipped the group into a more hardline direction,” he
said.
Israel FM calls to ‘swiftly eliminate’ new Hamas chief
Sinwar
Saeed Al-Batati/Arab News/August 06, 2024
AL-MUKALLA, Yemen: The US military has destroyed a number of Houthi drones,
remotely operated boats and ballistic missiles aimed at ships in international
commercial channels. The US Central Command said in a statement on Tuesday
morning Yemen time that its forces had destroyed three drones fired by the
Houthis from Yemen over the Gulf of Aden, as well as another drone destroyed in
a Houthi-controlled Yemeni territory. The US military also destroyed one drone
boat, a drone, and an anti-ship ballistic missile fired by the Houthis in the
Red Sea before they could reach their intended targets along the critical
maritime route. “These weapons presented a clear and imminent threat to US and
coalition forces, and merchant vessels in the region. This reckless and
dangerous behavior by Iranian-backed Houthis continues to threaten regional
stability and security,” the US Central Command said in the statement.
In Sanaa, the Houthis did not claim credit for fresh assaults on ships in the
Red Sea or the Gulf of Aden on Tuesday, as they regularly do hours or days after
they strike ships. On Saturday, the Houthis restarted a two-week hiatus in their
anti-ship campaign by shooting missiles at a commercial ship in the Gulf of
Aden. According to the Joint Maritime Information Center, the Liberian-flagged
cargo freighter Groton came under two missile attacks on Saturday afternoon
while traveling east of Aden, Yemen’s southern port city. In a statement issued
by the militia’s military spokesman, Yahya Sarea, the Houthis claimed that the
Groton was targeted because the ship’s parent company violated their ban on
going to Israeli ports. Houthi attacks on ships have been halted since July 20,
when Israeli jets targeted oil storage facilities and other targets in Hodeidah,
a Houthi-held city in western Yemen. Despite their frequent threats to retaliate
for the Israeli bombings, the Houthis have not claimed any further assaults on
Israel or its ships in the past two weeks. Since November, the Houthis have
seized a commercial ship, sunk two others, and launched dozens of missile, drone
and drone boat attacks on commercial and naval ships in international shipping
lanes off Yemen, claiming to be acting in solidarity with the Palestinian people
against Israel’s war in Gaza. Meanwhile, Rashad Al-Alimi, the chairman of
Yemen’s Presidential Leadership Council, said on Monday that his government
reversed its harsh economic actions against Sanaa banks to promote “people’s
interests.” In a surprise move that sparked outrage in Yemen, the Yemeni
government agreed to a UN-brokered agreement with the Houthis to lift sanctions
on banks in Sanaa and allow Yemenia Airways, the country’s national airline, to
increase flights from the Houthi-held Sanaa airport to Jordan, Egypt and India,
reversing previous strong pledges to punish banks in Sanaa that refuse to
relocate their headquarters to the government-controlled Aden, the interim
capital. “We are in an economic fight, and the Presidential Leadership Council
has decided with full conviction that these choices may need to be reversed in
order to prioritize the interests of the Yemeni people above all other
interests,” Al-Alimi said in an interview with state-run Hadhramaut. The Yemeni
leader also said that his government had accepted the UN-brokered peace plan,
known as the roadmap, to end the war in Yemen, and praised the Saudi-led
Coalition to Restore Legitimacy in Yemen for assisting the Yemeni government and
ally troops in liberating Yemeni regions from the Houthis. “We agreed to the
roadmap and now the ball is in the Houthis’ court, who continue to resist
peace,” he said, adding: “If it hadn’t been for Operation Decisive Storm and the
Yemenis’ resistance and sacrifices, the militia would already dominate all of
Yemen.”
Egyptian FM holds phone call with US secretary of state
Gobran Mohamed/Arab News/August 06, 2024
CAIRO: Egypt’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Emigration and Egyptian Expatriates
Badr Abdelatty held a phone call with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken to
discuss the ongoing escalation of tensions in the Middle East. Abdelatty briefed
his US counterpart on the discussions he held with the foreign ministers of Iran
and Lebanon, as well as those of several European states, regarding the regional
escalation, the recent Israeli assassinations, and the fallout, which threatens
to expand the scope of the conflict in an unprecedented manner.The foreign
minister stressed the necessity of all parties exercising self-restraint,
sparing the region from the dangers of instability, and called on his US
counterpart to pressure Israel into ceasing its aggression and engaging
seriously in the ceasefire negotiations in Gaza. The two parties discussed the
ceasefire negotiations and the Egyptian-Qatari-US efforts in this regard,
agreeing to continue coordinating in order to reach a ceasefire agreement as
soon as possible and defuse the crisis.'
US destroys Houthi missiles, drones, drone boats in Red
Sea, Gulf of Aden
Saeed Al-Batati/Arab News/August 06, 2024
AL-MUKALLA, Yemen: The US military has destroyed a number of Houthi drones,
remotely operated boats and ballistic missiles aimed at ships in international
commercial channels. The US Central Command said in a statement on Tuesday
morning Yemen time that its forces had destroyed three drones fired by the
Houthis from Yemen over the Gulf of Aden, as well as another drone destroyed in
a Houthi-controlled Yemeni territory. The US military also destroyed one drone
boat, a drone, and an anti-ship ballistic missile fired by the Houthis in the
Red Sea before they could reach their intended targets along the critical
maritime route. “These weapons presented a clear and imminent threat to US and
coalition forces, and merchant vessels in the region. This reckless and
dangerous behavior by Iranian-backed Houthis continues to threaten regional
stability and security,” the US Central Command said in the statement. In Sanaa,
the Houthis did not claim credit for fresh assaults on ships in the Red Sea or
the Gulf of Aden on Tuesday, as they regularly do hours or days after they
strike ships. On Saturday, the Houthis restarted a two-week hiatus in their
anti-ship campaign by shooting missiles at a commercial ship in the Gulf of
Aden. According to the Joint Maritime Information Center, the Liberian-flagged
cargo freighter Groton came under two missile attacks on Saturday afternoon
while traveling east of Aden, Yemen’s southern port city. In a statement issued
by the militia’s military spokesman, Yahya Sarea, the Houthis claimed that the
Groton was targeted because the ship’s parent company violated their ban on
going to Israeli ports. Houthi attacks on ships have been halted since July 20,
when Israeli jets targeted oil storage facilities and other targets in Hodeidah,
a Houthi-held city in western Yemen. Despite their frequent threats to retaliate
for the Israeli bombings, the Houthis have not claimed any further assaults on
Israel or its ships in the past two weeks. Since November, the Houthis have
seized a commercial ship, sunk two others, and launched dozens of missile, drone
and drone boat attacks on commercial and naval ships in international shipping
lanes off Yemen, claiming to be acting in solidarity with the Palestinian people
against Israel’s war in Gaza.Meanwhile, Rashad Al-Alimi, the chairman of Yemen’s
Presidential Leadership Council, said on Monday that his government reversed its
harsh economic actions against Sanaa banks to promote “people’s interests.” In a
surprise move that sparked outrage in Yemen, the Yemeni government agreed to a
UN-brokered agreement with the Houthis to lift sanctions on banks in Sanaa and
allow Yemenia Airways, the country’s national airline, to increase flights from
the Houthi-held Sanaa airport to Jordan, Egypt and India, reversing previous
strong pledges to punish banks in Sanaa that refuse to relocate their
headquarters to the government-controlled Aden, the interim capital. “We are in
an economic fight, and the Presidential Leadership Council has decided with full
conviction that these choices may need to be reversed in order to prioritize the
interests of the Yemeni people above all other interests,” Al-Alimi said in an
interview with state-run Hadhramaut. The Yemeni leader also said that his
government had accepted the UN-brokered peace plan, known as the roadmap, to end
the war in Yemen, and praised the Saudi-led Coalition to Restore Legitimacy in
Yemen for assisting the Yemeni government and ally troops in liberating Yemeni
regions from the Houthis. “We agreed to the roadmap and now the ball is in the
Houthis’ court, who continue to resist peace,” he said, adding: “If it hadn’t
been for Operation Decisive Storm and the Yemenis’ resistance and sacrifices,
the militia would already dominate all of Yemen.”
Jordan’s King Abdullah speaks with European, Canadian and Egyptian leaders on
Gaza
Arab News/August 06, 2024
LONDON: Jordan’s King Abdullah II, in separate phone calls on Tuesday, spoke
with French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. The king discussed international efforts
towards regional deescalation, according to Jordan News Agency. King Abdullah
warned against a regional expansion of the Israel-Hamas conflict, stressing the
need to safeguard security and stability in the region. He also highlighted the
importance of reaching an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, as well as
protecting civilians and preventing a further deterioration of the humanitarian
situation. King Abdullah also discussed the same issues with Egyptian President
Abdel Fattah El-Sisi on Tuesday, Jordan News Agency said. The Jordanian and
Egyptian leaders both agreed on the need to achieve peace in the Palestinian
territories on the basis of the two-state solution, guaranteeing the
establishment of an independent Palestinian state on 1967 lines with East
Jerusalem as its capital.
Putin asks Iran to avoid civilian casualties in Israel
response, sources say
Reuters/August 06, 2024
MOSCOW: Russian President Vladimir Putin has asked Iran’s Supreme leader
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei for a restrained response to Israel’s suspected killing
of the leader of Hamas, advising against attacks on Israeli civilians, two
senior Iranian sources said.The message, according to the sources, was delivered
on Monday by Sergei Shoigu, a senior ally of the Kremlin leader, in meetings
with top Iranian officials as the Islamic Republic weighs its response to the
assassination of Ismail Haniyeh. Tehran also pressed Moscow for the delivery of
Russian made Sukhoi Su-35 fighter jets, the two Iranian sources, privy to the
meeting in Tehran, the sources told Reuters. In Moscow, the Kremlin did not
respond to a request for comment. State-run RIA news agency reported on Tuesday
that Shoigu said he discussed Haniyeh’s killing on his Tehran visit. The two
sources with knowledge of the matter did not provide further details on the
talks with Shoigu, who was defense minister before becoming the secretary of
Russia’s security council in May. They said Shoigu’s visit was one of several
avenues Moscow had used to relay to Iran the need for restraint while at the
same time condemning Haniyeh’s killing as “a very dangerous assassination,” in a
bid to prevent a Middle East war. The Middle East, the sources said, was on the
brink of a major war and those behind the assassination were clearly trying to
trigger such a conflict. Russia has cultivated closer ties with Iran since the
start of its war with Ukraine and has said it is preparing to sign a
wide-ranging cooperation agreement with Tehran. There was no immediate comment
from Iran’s Foreign ministry. On Monday it said Tehran did not seek to raise
regional tensions but needed to punish Israel to prevent further instability.
DIPLOMACY NO LONGER AN OPTION
In Washington, an official from the Biden administration warned on Monday of the
risks of a major regional conflict. The official, who spoke on condition of
anonymity, emphasized that the scale of Iran’s and Hezbollah’s response would be
a key factor in determining the extent of a potential conflict.
Despite efforts by Western and regional states to persuade Iran to retaliate in
a measured way, or not at all, Tehran has told foreign officials it will respond
“severely” to the killing of Haniyeh in Tehran, where he attended President
Masoud Pezeshkian’s inauguration, four Iranian sources independently confirmed.
In Lebanon, a prominent Lebanese source close to Hezbollah said “a retaliatory
strike is inevitable and diplomacy is no longer a viable option,” adding Iran
wants the strike to be “severe” but not lead to a regional war. However, he
said, this does not rule out the possibility of a war in Lebanon between
Iran-backed Hezbollah and Israel.
A Middle East-focused senior US official said Washington was doing all it can
“to dissuade all parties from going to a place they can’t get back from,”
stressing that other states in the region and Europe should do more. A Qatari
official said Doha was in constant discussion with Iran to lessen tensions.
Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant warned on Monday that Israel must be
prepared for anything, including a swift transition to offense.
The country’s response to any attack by Hezbollah or Iran would likely depend
more on the damage caused rather than the scale of the attack, according to two
sources familiar with recent Israeli assessments.
Israeli officials have not claimed responsibility for the killing. Iran backs
Hamas, which is at war with Israel in Gaza, and also Hezbollah, with whom Israel
has been trading fire since Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7 and ignited the Gaza
conflict.
Defense, intelligence heads meet with air force pilots,
intelligence soldiers over Iran crisis
Jerusalem Post/August 06/2024
Both visits by the Defense Minister and the Head of the Intelligence Directorate
come amid continuous tensions between Israel, Iran, and Iran's proxy militias.
In light of developments in the Middle East and the potential Iranian attack on
Israel, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant visited the Tel Nof airbase, while
Intelligence head Aharon Haliva was briefed by soldiers of the Intelligence
Directorate on Tuesday. In his visit, Gallant spoke with pilots led by the 133
squadron commander, Lt. Col. E, drone operators, mechanics, and electronic unit
personnel. Gallant, in a conversation with these soldiers, said, "Every day that
passes, we are improving our defense readiness and sharpening our attack
capabilities." Gallant speaks of preparing for possible Iranian responses
He also added, "I look at the foundation by which we operate - courage,
determination, and perseverance. Take advantage of the time - planning,
training, discussions, especially about the least expected, because usually the
least expected happens." Additionally, the Head of the Intelligence Directorate
(J2), Major General Aharon Haliva, visited two Intelligence Directorate bases,
the IDF stated on Tuesday. During the visit, Haliva was briefed on intelligence
efforts emphasizing developments in Iran and the northern front and insisted on
the Intelligence Directorate's readiness for all scenarios.
Israeli minister says it may be ‘moral’ to starve 2
million Gazans, but ‘no one in the world would let us’
Dana Karni/Bloomberg/ August 6, 2024
Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said “it may be just and moral” to
starve 2 million Gaza residents until Israeli hostages are returned, but “no one
in the world would let us.”In a speech on Monday at the Katif Conference for
National Responsibility in the town of Yad Binyamin, the far-right minister said
Israel should take control of distributing aid inside Gaza and claimed that
Hamas was in control of distribution channels within the strip. “It is
impossible in today’s global reality to wage war – no one in the world would let
us starve and thirst two million citizens, even though it may be just and moral
until they return our hostages,” he said, adding that if Israel controlled aid
distribution instead of Hamas, the war would have ended by now and the hostages
would have returned. “You cannot fight Hamas with one hand and give them aid
with the other. It’s his (Hamas’) money, it’s his fuel, it’s his civilian
control of the Gaza Strip. It just doesn’t work,” he said. Israel has control
over aid that enters Gaza and aid groups are in charge of distributing it. While
there have been some anecdotal reports from Gazans of Hamas stealing aid, it’s
unclear how rampant it is. US Special Envoy David Satterfield said in February
that no Israeli official had presented him or the Biden administration with
“specific evidence of diversion or theft of assistance.”Israel is facing
mounting criticism from aid groups and international organizations for
restricting food aid to the besieged Gaza Strip. A United Nations statement,
citing independent experts, indicated last month that famine has spread across
the entire enclave. The experts accused Israel of conducting an “intentional and
targeted starvation campaign,” which they termed a “form of genocidal
violence.”The International Criminal Court’s prosecutor is seeking arrest
warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav
Gallant on charges of “starvation as a weapon of war,” among other allegations.
Netanyahu has strongly denied the allegations, saying they are based on a “pack
of lies.” He has said that if Palestinians in Gaza aren’t getting enough food,
“it’s not because Israel is blocking it, it’s because Hamas is stealing
it.”Israel has stated that it will not end the war until all hostages are freed
and Hamas is eliminated. The conflict began after Hamas attacked Israel on
October 7, killing around 1,200 people and taking more than 250 hostages,
according to Israeli authorities. The war has resulted in the deaths of more
than 39,000 people in Gaza, according to Palestinian authorities. Smotrich on
Monday advocated for Israeli control of the aid effort “as a part or as an
essential means of realizing the defined goals of the war,” and said only
minimal aid is needed in Gaza in the months and years to come. “No one talks
about (Israeli) military rule (of Gaza) now. No need to unclog sewers, no need
for education, no need for welfare. Gaza in the next two years is (going to be)
a war zone. You need food, some medicine and a minimum of sanitation – water,
sewage. That’s it,” he said.
Iran prepping attack on Israel in response to Hamas leader
assassination in Tehran
Tom Vanden Brook, USA TODAY/August 6, 2024
U.S. officials have detected signs that Iran is preparing an attack on Israel in
response to the assassination in Tehran last week of a senior Hamas leader,
although the scope and timing of the retaliation remained unclear Tuesday,
according to two U.S. officials.
Among the concerns: Iran may seek to weave an unconventional attack, such as an
assassination, into a conventional assault with missiles because Iran's barrage
of 300 missiles and drones unleashed against Israel in April was largely
ineffective, said one of the officials, both of whom were not authorized to
speak publicly. Another worry is that Iranian-backed Hezbollah militants in
Lebanon will join in the attack, one of the officials said. They have an arsenal
of rockets and missiles capable of inflicting significant damage in Israel and
they did not fully participate in April's attack. A rocket attack by an
Iranian-linked militant group in Iraq on a base on Monday wounded seven U.S.
troops, according to a third U.S. official who also spoke on condition of
anonymity. Those troops were in stable condition Tuesday. That attack may be a
precursor to the larger assault on Israel and western targets, one of the
officials said. Responding to concerns about Iran on Friday, Defense Secretary
Lloyd Austin ordered a buildup of the already-stout U.S. military presence in
the Middle East. U.S. Navy cruisers and destroyers capable of shooting down
ballistic missiles and F-22 warplanes have been dispatched to the Middle East,
an official said.
They will join other troops operating there, including the USS Wasp, a Marine
expeditionary unit operating in the eastern Mediterranean. The Pentagon has
maintained a more robust presence in the Middle East since the Oct. 7 Hamas
attack on Israel that killed about 1,200 people. The aim is to prevent the
conflict from spiraling, and to protect Israel in the event of an attack from
Iran or other adversaries. In April, Israel’s sophisticated air defense system,
combined with a U.S.-led allied effort, intercepted the missiles and drones
fired by Iran. Ali Kahmeni, Iran’s supreme leader, ordered the attack after
blaming Israel for an airstrike on an Iranian embassy compound in Syria that
killed several people, including a to Revolutionary Guards commander. Iran has
vowed to respond to the latest assassination, although Israel has not claimed
responsibility for it. For now, U.S. officials remain watchful and maintain an
attack does not appear imminent. The uncertainty may be intentional on Iran's
part as it keeps Israel and its allies on edge, one of the officials said..
‘Going to a very bad place’: Israeli reservists who
refuse to return to Gaza cite military’s destructive approach
Zeena Saifi and Jeremy Diamond, CNN/August 6, 2024
Hear why some Israeli reservists would rather risk prison than go back to fight
in GazaScroll back up to restore default view. Every day for two months, Michael
Ofer Ziv spent hours watching grainy, black-and-white footage of the Gaza Strip
from a tiny room across the border.As an operations commander, he was tracking
Israeli forces inside Gaza and approving airstrikes.Every day, he said, his unit
had a certain quota to fill. “They will tell us, today you have seven, today you
have nine… you sometimes argue for more, but you will never fire less than
you’re given,” he told CNN in an interview. CNN has reached out to the Israeli
military for comment on his claims. One by one, buildings blew up on his screen
like a hypnotic reel of destruction. At first, it was easy to forget that those
images were real, and not just a video game playing on a screen. But the more he
stepped out of that war room, the more he was exposed to the reality of those
strikes. One minute, he was looking at soundless footage of airstrikes he
ordered; the next, he was on his phone watching unfiltered videos of
Palestinians shrieking, carrying their loved ones who had been killed because of
the Israeli military. “This is happening in real life and has an actual effect
on those people… at some point, your brain kind of cannot disconnect those two
things anymore,” he said.
Once he connected those dots, there was no going back.
Asked for comment, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) told CNN that Ofer Ziv’s
claims around targeting were “baseless, unfounded, and misrepresent the
sensitivity, precaution, and strict obligation to international law with which
the IDF selects and pursues its targets.” Like thousands of Israeli reservists,
Ofer Ziv was called up to war following the Hamas-led attacks on Israel on
October 7, in which at least 1,200 people were killed and more than 250 others
taken hostage, Israeli authorities said. He knew the army had to respond but was
concerned about what that response might look like because of how widespread the
language of revenge was.
His concerns were soon validated, he said. In May, he and 40 other reservists
signed an open letter declaring they would refuse to serve Israel’s war in Gaza
again after the IDF launched a military offensive in Rafah, southern Gaza, where
many of the civilians displaced by the conflict had fled. They readily
acknowledge that they represent a tiny minority of reservists who oppose the
war, but they hope that their decision to take a public stand will spark a
debate in Israeli society and put pressure on the government to prioritize a
ceasefire deal. “If we are deciding to go into Rafah instead of making a deal, I
felt like it was a statement of us saying we care more about killing
Palestinians and destroying Gaza than we (do) about actually finishing this,
actually having a long-term solution, actually releasing the hostages,” Ofer Ziv
said. His conscience just wouldn’t allow him to continue. He couldn’t fathom the
colossal number of casualties inflicted upon Palestinian civilians. “There is
also a decision here to not be as careful as we can be, or even be careless and
disregard human life,” he said. “I can count on my hand the amount of times we
were told we are not allowed to shoot at something… the main vibe was we shoot
first, ask questions later,” he added.In its comment to CNN, the IDF said it was
“fully committed to respecting all applicable international legal obligations”
and “to mitigating civilian harm” during military operations. “The IDF does not
aim to inflict excessive damage to civilian infrastructure and strikes
exclusively on the grounds of military necessity and in strict accordance with
international law,” it said.
‘Going to a very bad place’
And while Ofer Ziv was watching Gaza’s destruction from behind a screen, Yuval
Green was witnessing it happen in real life. Green served as a combat medic in
Gaza between October and December last year. But a day before he was recruited
for reserve duty, he was planning on leaving the army, he says, objecting to its
treatment of Palestinians and the occupation of the West Bank. The October 7
attacks made him delay his decision for the sake of his comrades. “When I went
inside Gaza, I had a moment of realization that right now, I’m here only for my
friends. No political reasons. I don’t believe we need to be here at all,” he
told CNN. Green said he felt his role was to protect the civilians who had been
attacked on October 7 and thought the Israeli military would go in and target
Hamas. He didn’t expect it to go on for as long as it did. Just like Ofer Ziv,
he was concerned before the war began about where it might go, because of how
“furious” Israelis were. “Ideas like killing the entire population of Gaza
suddenly became almost normal… suddenly hearing our commanders say that we’re
not going to be merciful this time… I felt like we were going to a very bad
place,” he said. Green recalled the immeasurable level of destruction he
observed. While some commanders would order the demolition of houses for
military purposes, most times it was because “they want to ruin Palestinian
houses and they think that’s the right thing to do,” he said. “They don’t really
care about the lives of Palestinians… we’ve inflicted so much damage upon Gaza,
something that would be beyond the imagination of any reasonable person… I can’t
imagine how people would go back to living there,” he continued. The final blow
for him was when his commander ordered their platoon to burn down a house in the
city of Khan Younis, southern Gaza, that he was sure would be rehabilitated
after the war. “I was trying to understand the reasons for that, if there is any
military reason… and the commander just didn’t have good enough answers,” he
said. The next day, he hopped into a vehicle making a supply run out of Gaza,
and never came back.
‘Losing so much’
Reservists who refuse to serve again, like Ofer Ziv and Green, could face
serious consequences. Disobeying an order and refusing to serve is both a
disciplinary and criminal offense, according to Israeli human rights lawyer
Michael Sfard.
As a criminal offense, it carries up to three years in prison, but sometimes
more than that in times of war, Sfard told CNN. In normal circumstances,
reservists are not called up for more than a month at a time, so they are
usually not tried consecutive times, he added. “What it really boils down to is
who your commander is and how they will react to your decision,” Sfard, who is a
former refuser himself, said. “There is a very delicate balance here between two
interests the army has. One is, punish severely those who refuse to serve to
deter others from doing the same. The other is not to give too much publicity to
those who are not ready to serve, because then it causes others to follow them
too.”
Despite the risks, both Green and Ofer Ziv are committed to their decision.
Green lamented the way Israel’s military culture has dominated the public
sphere, making anyone who criticizes the war or refuses to serve be viewed as a
traitor. Those in his platoon have heard him speak out against the war and the
military’s conduct since he’s left Gaza. Some respect his opinion, even if they
disagree with it. Others have said he is “darkening their names,” he said. “I
felt this was a really stupid idea. How can I harm your names by saying the
truth? You harmed your name yourself by doing the type of things that were done
there,” he said. Even though he risked his life in Gaza, he is dumbfounded by
the fact that his friends and family are more concerned about his safety now
he’s spoken out than they were back then. “We could end the war today. Israel as
the stronger player… could choose to do it and is choosing not to for several
reasons… we’re losing so much, the Palestinians are losing so much, for every
minute it’s not being signed,” he said. Similarly, Ofer Ziv thinks bringing the
issue of refusing military service into the public debate might “wake people up”
and let them know that it’s an option not to participate. “We have so many
systems that are built so we won’t have to question the position we are in… I do
prefer to go to jail than to participate in what we’re doing in Gaza, but I
prefer to do neither if it’s possible.”
Iran executes man accused of murder during Mahsa Amini
unrest
Reuters/August 6, 2024
Iran executed a 34-year-old man accused of killing a security officer during
unrest over the death of Kurdish-Iranian woman Mahsa Amini, state media said,
the first known protest-related execution since a relatively moderate president
took office. The September 2022 death in police custody of Amini, who was
arrested for allegedly flouting Iran's mandatory dress code, sparked months of
anti-government protests in the biggest show of opposition to the Shi'ite
clerical authorities in years. In November 2022, Reza Rasaei joined the "Woman,
Life, Freedom" protests in his hometown of Sahneh, in the western province of
Kermanshah, during which security agent Nader Bayrami was fatally stabbed.
According to the semi-official Tasnim news agency, Bayrami was the intelligence
chief for the Islamic Republic's elite Revolutionary Guards in Sahneh county.
Rasaei, a Kurdish member of a religious minority according to rights group
Hengaw, was charged with Bayrami's murder and sentenced to death in October
2023. He was executed on Tuesday, the official judiciary news agency Mizan
reported. "After four court sessions, and based on the opinion of the forensic
pathologist as well as confessions of the accused, it was proven that the
fatality was caused by a knife belonging to Rasaei," Mizan quoted the Kermanshah
regional prosecutor as saying. Amnesty International said on its website that
Rasaei was sentenced to death after "a grossly unfair trial that relied on his
forced confessions obtained under torture". Masoud Pezeshkian, who won election
as president in July, had in 2022 demanded clarification from authorities about
Amini's death and made promises during his election campaign to better protect
the rights of women and minorities.
US personnel injured in rocket attack on Iraq base
Associated Press/August 06/2024
Several U.S. personnel were injured in a suspected rocket attack at a military
base in Iraq, U.S. defense officials said Monday, in what has been a recent
uptick in strikes on American forces by Iranian-backed militias. The attack
comes as tensions across the Middle East are spiking following the killings last
week of a senior Hezbollah commander in Lebanon and Hamas' top political leader
in Iran, in suspected Israeli strikes. Both groups are backed by Iran. The U.S.
defense officials said troops at al-Asad air base were still assessing the
injuries and damage, and it appeared that as many as seven military troops and
civilians were injured. Earlier Monday, Iraqi security officials confirmed the
attack, but no group has claimed responsibility. The American officials said the
U.S. looked into reports of a possible second attack at the base but determined
there had not been another one. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to
discuss military operations. The White House said the president and vice
president were briefed on the attack. In recent weeks, Iranian-backed Iraqi
militias have resumed launching attacks on bases housing U.S. forces in Iraq and
Syria after a lull of several months, following a strike on a base in Jordan in
late January that killed three American soldiers and prompted a series of
retaliatory U.S. strikes. Between October and January, an umbrella group calling
itself the Islamic Resistance in Iraq had regularly claimed attacks that it said
were in retaliation for Washington's support of Israel in its war against Hamas
in Gaza and were aimed at pushing U.S. troops out of the region.
Kamala Harris chooses Tim Walz as Vice Presidential running
mate
Reuters/August 06/2024
Kamala Harris selected Tim Walz as her running mate to appeal to rural voters
and strengthen her campaign for presidency.
Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris selected Minnesota Governor Tim
Walz to be her running mate on Tuesday, choosing a progressive policy champion
and a plain speaker from America's heartland to help win over rural, white
voters.
Harris announced the selection in a text message to supporters. "I’m pleased to
share that I’ve made my decision: Minnesota Governor Tim Walz will join our
campaign as my running mate," she said. "Tim is a battle-tested leader who has
an incredible track record of getting things done for Minnesota families. I know
that he will bring that same principled leadership to our campaign, and to the
office of the vice president." was elected to a Republican-leaning district in
the US House of Representatives in 2006 and served 12 years before being elected
governor of Minnesota in 2018.
As governor, Walz has pushed a progressive agenda that includes free school
meals, goals for tackling climate change, tax cuts for the middle class and
expanded paid leave for Minnesota workers. Walz has long advocated for women's
reproductive rights but also displayed a conservative bent while representing a
rural district in the US House, defending agricultural interests and backing gun
rights. Harris, the daughter of immigrants from Jamaica and India, is adding a
popular Midwestern politician whose home state votes reliably for Democrats in
presidential elections but is close to Wisconsin and Michigan, two crucial
battlegrounds. Such states are seen as critical in deciding the Nov. 5 election,
and Walz is widely seen as skilled at connecting with white, rural voters who in
recent years have voted broadly for Republican Donald Trump, Harris' rival for
the White House.
Harris chose Walz over Josh Shapiro, the popular governor of Pennsylvania, who
had been seen as helpful to delivering his crucial battleground state. Harris,
59, became the Democratic Party's standard bearer after President Joe Biden, 81,
ended his reelection campaign under party pressure last month. Since then, she
has raised hundreds of millions of dollars and recast the race against Trump
with a boost of energy from her party's base. Harris was expected to appear with
her running mate at an event in Philadelphia on Tuesday evening. The Harris
campaign hopes Walz's extensive National Guard career, coupled with a successful
run as a high school football coach, and his Dad joke videos will attract rural
voters who are not yet dedicated to a second Trump term in the White House. Walz
was a relative unknown nationally until the Harris "veepstakes" heated up, but
his profile has since surged. A popular member of Congress, he reportedly had
the backing of powerful former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who was instrumental
in persuading Biden to leave the race. Harris and Walz will face Trump and his
running mate JD Vance, also a military veteran from the Midwest, in the November
election.
The George Floyd factor in Walz's tenure
Walz's tenure as governor was marked by the May 2020 killing of George Floyd, a
Black man, by a white Minneapolis police officer who was convicted of murder.
Walz assigned the state's attorney general to lead the prosecution in the case,
saying people "don't believe justice can be served." Rev. Al Sharpton, founder
and president of National Action Network, said Walz had heard calls for justice
for Floyd by tapping the attorney general. "I learned then that he was a man who
will listen and do what is right by those he represents," Sharpton said in a
statement. "We can count on Governor Walz to take that same kind of open
approach as Kamala Harris’ vice president." Trump campaign officials and
surrogates quickly went to work trying to define Walz as a hardcore leftist
whose values are out of touch with most Americans.
They criticized his handling of violent riots in Minneapolis following Floyd's
death. "It’s no surprise that San Francisco Liberal Kamala Harris wants West
Coast wannabe Tim Walz as her running-mate – Walz has spent his governorship
trying to reshape Minnesota in the image of the Golden State," the Trump
campaign said in a statement, a reference to California, Harris' home state.
Walz on the attack
Walz has attacked Trump and Vance as "weird," a catchy insult that has been
picked up by the Harris campaign, social media and Democratic activists. Walz
gave the nascent Harris campaign the new attack line in a late July interview:
"These are weird people on the other side: They want to take books away. They
want to be in your exam room," referring to book bans and women's reproductive
consultations with doctors. Walz has also assailed claims by Trump and Vance of
having middle class credentials. "They keep talking about the middle class. A
robber baron real estate guy and a venture capitalist trying to tell us they
understand who we are? They don't know who we are," Walz said in an MSNBC
interview. That approach has struck a chord with the young voters Harris needs
to reengage. David Hogg, the co-founder of the gun safety group March for Our
Lives, described him as a "great communicator."Walz is "somewhat of a unicorn,"
said Ryan Dawkins, a political science professor at Minnesota's Carleton College
- a man born in a small town in rural Nebraska capable of conveying Harris'
message to core Democratic voters, and those that the party has failed to reach
in recent years. Dawkins praised his ability to connect with rural voters. It is
a group the Biden administration has tried to reach with infrastructure spending
and other pragmatic policies, but with little show of messaging success so far.
In the 2016 election, Trump won 59% of rural voters; in 2020 that number rose to
65% even though Trump lost the election, according to Pew Research.In the 2022
governor's race, Walz won with 52.27% to his Republican opponent's 44.61%,
although swaths of rural Minnesota voted for the opponent. While Walz has
supported Democratic Party orthodoxy on issues ranging from legalized abortion
and same-sex marriage to the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, he also
racked up a centrist voting record during his congressional career. He was a
staunch defender of government support for farmers and military veterans, as
well as gun-owner rights that won praise from the National Rifle Association,
according to The Almanac of American Politics.
He subsequently registered a failing grade with the NRA after supporting
gun-control measures during his first campaign for governor. Walz's shift from a
centrist representing a single rural district in Congress to a more progressive
politician as governor may have been in response to the demands of voters in
major cities like Minneapolis-St. Paul. But it leaves him open to Republican
attacks, Dawkins said in a telephone interview."He runs the risk of reinforcing
some of the worst fears people have of Kamala Harris being a San Francisco
liberal," Dawkins said.
Walz has a ready counter-attack.
"What a monster. Kids are eating and having full bellies, so they can go learn
and women are making their own healthcare decisions," Walz said in a July CNN
interview. "So if that's where they want to label me, I'm more than happy to
take the label."As the state's top executive, Walz mandated the use of face
coverings during the COVID-19 pandemic and signed a law making marital rape
illegal. He presided over several years of budget surpluses in Minnesota on the
road to his 2022 reelection. During that campaign, Walz touted the backing of
several influential labor unions, including the state AFL-CIO, firefighters,
Service Employees International Union (SEIU), teachers and others
The Latest English LCCC analysis & editorials from
miscellaneous sources on August 06-07/2024
UNRWA Is Complicit in Terror; Disband It
Gregg Roman/The Middle East Forum Observer/August 6, 2024
https://www.meforum.org/66018/unrwa-is-complicit-in-terror-disband-it
The UN's August 5 announcement that it fired additional employees from the
United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA)
for possible involvement in Hamas's Oct. 7 attacks against Israel is meaningless
propaganda. UNRWA has supported Palestinian terrorism for years before Oct. 7 by
allowing Hamas to tunnel under its facilities, producing viciously antisemitic
curricular material advocating violence against Jews, and supporting a workforce
in which ten percent of employees have ties to terrorist groups, according to
Israeli estimates.
When the United Nations established UNRWA in 1949, it envisioned a temporary
agency that would help resettle Palestinian refugees and then disband within a
couple of years. Rather than resolve the refugee problem and disband, UNRWA
perpetuated it and grew increasingly complicit in terror.
The UN's August 5 announcement that it fired additional employees from UNRWA for
possible involvement in Hamas's Oct. 7 attacks against Israel is meaningless
propaganda.
By its own bylaws, UNRWA commits to neutrality and mandates that humanitarian
actors must not take sides in hostilities or engage in political, racial,
religious, or ideological controversies. Between October 2023 and April 2024,
however, UNRWA official statements violated this principle more than 250 times
as outlined in a new Middle East Forum report, The Neutrality Mirage: UNRWA's
Violations of Humanitarian Principles. More than 80 percent of reviewed
statements violated neutrality or included tendentious language and
unsubstantiated claims predominantly directed against Israel, while ignoring
Hamas violations of the laws of war. Many of the statements' accusations later
proved to be exaggerated or false.
To address these concerns, the UN secretary-general appointed former French
Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna to lead an Independent Review Group to assess
UNRWA's compliance with its neutrality obligations. The UN leadership undercut
the review by omitting political advocacy from its neutrality review. While the
UN review identified eight areas in which UNRWA could improve, omitting its
political advocacy was the equivalent of a doctor advocating for treatment for a
hangnail but ignoring the sucking chest wound.
UNRWA's political advocacy is problematic. It embraces a biased narrative and
supports a "right of return" based on a contentious interpretation of UN General
Assembly Resolution 194, which worded its settlement calls to encourage
compromise. Additionally, as Daniel Pipes writes, UNRWA's definition of
Palestine refugees differs significantly from standard international refugee
definitions, particularly in how refugee status is inherited across generations
and maintained even after obtaining citizenship elsewhere. Castigating Israeli
military actions without context demonstrates bias inconsistent with UNRWA's
humanitarian mandate. UNRWA's policy of perpetuating Palestinian refugee status
for 75 years epitomizes the agency's failure. This unprecedented approach has
inflated the number of registered refugees from 700,000 in 1950 to over 5
million today, granting refugee status even to newborns in 2024. UNRWA diverts
resources from genuine needs and obstructs peace by creating unrealistic
expectations. By maintaining this expansive definition, UNRWA not only fails its
mandate but actively perpetuates the conflict. The international community must
demand alignment of Palestinian refugee status with global norms to pave the way
for a genuine resolution.Many organizations confuse politics with principle and
stray from their original missions. What makes UNRWA more dangerous is its
support for Hamas, a US-, EU-, UK-, Canadian- and Japanese-designated terrorist
organization. Part of the problem is that UNRWA hires locally in far greater
numbers than other UN agencies. It then comes to reflect more the society it
serves than the principles its charter outlines. UNRWA staff affiliations with
Hamas and other terrorist organizations breach neutrality. Such affiliations
compromise the agency's integrity and endanger the safety of the population it
serves. By allowing individuals affiliated with Hamas to operate within its
framework, UNRWA effectively provides support and legitimacy to Hamas. This
support extends beyond cheerleading; Hamas has used UNRWA facilities to store
weapons and launch attacks against Israel.
Given the inability or unwillingness of UNRWA to reform, it behooves its donors
to hold UNRWA accountable. Continued funding should be contingent upon a
complete cessation of political advocacy and adherence to stringent neutrality.
The agency also must undergo an independent and comprehensive review that
includes all aspects of its activities.
The rot is so deep that reform no longer may be possible. The international
community should also consider disbanding UNRWA and transferring its
responsibilities to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), an
experienced agency that assists refugees worldwide. Not all Palestinians may
qualify for refugee status under UNHCR criteria, but local organizations can
fill the gap. Allowing UNHCR to assume responsibility may enable the
international community to address the needs of Palestine refugees without
entrenched biases and systemic issues that plague UNRWA. This approach would
streamline aid delivery, ensure compliance with international standards of
neutrality, redefine Palestine refugee status, and remove the undue political
influence currently exerted by UNRWA's operations.
*Gregg Roman is director of the Middle East Forum.
Mourning the Children Killed in Majdal Shams
Hillel Kuttler/The Tablet/August 06, 2024
After a Hezbollah rocket murdered 12 kids on a soccer field, a Druze town in the
Golan Heights comes together to grieve
ilar Shaar, 10, was a sweet boy with a round face who treated everyone
respectfully and excelled academically.
In the living room of his home in Majdal Shams in the Golan Heights sit two
trophies for being his class’s top pupil. Milar adored Marvel characters and
slept with a stuffed Spider-Man. He wrote “I love you” notes to his mother. He
dreamed of becoming a professional soccer player. When his teacher gave each
child a white T-shirt to decorate before the 2022 World Cup, Milar went
all-Lionel Messi, painting the soccer star’s name in English, his No. 10 within
a heart, and a uniformed Messi at play. The extended family watched Argentina’s
World Cup victory on television at Milar’s grandmother’s house, the boy wearing
a Messi jersey to cheer on his hero.
“He was jumping. He was smiling,” said his cousin Ivan Ibraheem. “It was one of
the best days for Milar.”
Soccer, and war, ended Milar’s life on Saturday evening, July 27. The family was
at a barbecue, and Milar wanted to leave for practice. His mother, Lena,
refused. Milar persisted. His sister drove him home to change from the purple
Emirates jersey and shorts he wore into his local team’s uniform, and on to the
field. Practice began at 6 p.m. At 6:18, an Iranian-produced Falaq rocket shot
from Lebanon by Hezbollah struck the field. It killed 12 children ages 10–16,
all Druze. Eleven of the 12 lived in Majdal Shams.
Mayar Shufi, who is dating Milar’s sister, rushed from the barbecue to a clinic
to which several of the gravely wounded people—all children but for their
coach—were taken. In one room, Shufi saw two boys and two girls dead, some
missing limbs. He entered another room and found Milar, intact but barely alive,
his body punctured by shrapnel.
He held the boy’s hand. “Milar, don’t be scared,” he said.
“He opened his eyes and looked at me,” Shufi told me. “He took a deep breath,
and I knew he died.”
Ibraheem and Shufi spoke with me last Thursday morning at an outdoor
ground-floor parking area cleared of cars. It’s where the Shaar family received
visitors, men and women sitting on plastic chairs on opposite sides of a wooden
divider. Above was the building housing the clinic where Milar died.
He lived two buildings away. Black flags of mourning fly everywhere in Majdal
Shams, a town of 12,000 people built into Mt. Hermon and populated almost
entirely by Druze, a sect that broke from Islam a millennium ago. Three traffic
circles display posters of the names and faces of the 12 murdered children. In
one circle, jerseys with the children’s names in English are draped atop 12
plastic chairs. Black strings secure soccer balls on 10 of the chairs; on the
others were basketballs, the preferred sport of Alma Aldein, 11, and Ezel Ayoub,
12, two of the three girls murdered.
Unseen anywhere are Israeli or Syrian flags. The situation is complicated.
Syria’s defeat in 1967’s Six-Day War brought the Golan Heights under Israeli
sovereignty, and Druze attained the right to citizenship—but most opt not to
become Israeli citizens and are stateless, preferring “permanent resident”
status and going abroad with Israeli travel documents rather than passports.
Some volunteer to serve in the Israel Defense Forces, whereas Druze in the rest
of Israel, who are citizens, are drafted.
In northern Israel, Galilee Medical Center is already moving patients, canceling
procedures, and training doctors in anticipation of a second front opening
byHillel Kuttler
The best way to explain the distinction might be that Druze in the Galilee are
Israeli, and often patriotic; Druze in the Golan Heights are not anti-Israel,
but consider themselves Syrian.
Whatever their location, Druze are a tribal people. Teens and young adults are
as committed to Druze peoplehood as are their elders. Leaving the group or
intermarrying is almost unheard of. Druze people who say that they’re all
family, as some did during my two-day visit last week, often mean it literally.
A woman I met at the field, Samya Ibraheem, didn’t know any of the victims, but
said, “They’re all my kids.” Her subdued tones rendered her voice nearly
inaudible. She lives just down the street from the field and was at home when
the missile struck. But only now, five days later, could she bring herself to
visit. She approached a barrier, held it, and looked at the victims’ faces on a
poster. She left after less than five minutes. Samya Ibraheem appeared in black
slacks and a black sleeveless blouse. Nearly everyone I encountered wore black.
A white sash looped around one’s neck and hanging down toward the belt signified
the closest relatives of the victims, someone explained. Multiple white sashes
were visible at the beit ha’am (people’s building) in the center of town, where
bereaved families gathered as one unit each afternoon during the week of
mourning between 4 and 7 p.m. to receive people coming to comfort them. Some of
the visitors there and at the mourners’ homes were Jews who’d traveled from
throughout Israel. One was Simcha Rothman, a member of Knesset from the
Religious Zionism party, who visited several of the bereaved families. “This
tragedy, involving children, touched everyone’s heart—children playing soccer,”
he said. “The entire town was struck because everyone is one big family. It’s
something Jews and Druze share as small ethnic groups.”
At two houses of mourning, the extended families drew me in, urging me to stay
longer to listen to their stories, to speak to more relatives, to see their
child’s room. Begging off invitations to stay for lunch was fruitless. Declining
would be insulting, someone said. I accepted.
That didn’t occur at a third house of mourning, because the family soon had to
leave for the daily gathering at the beit ha’am. But it was there that I lucked
into witnessing a third, and most poignant, form of the community’s comforting
customs: mourners coming en masse to comfort another bereaved family.
It occurred in the nearby village of Ein Kinye, where one of the 12 children
lived: Nazem Saab, 15. More than 50 men from nearly all of the 11 other
families, including fathers of the dead children, drove over from Majdal Shams.
They assembled in a line down the sloped street beside the Saabs’ home. Nazem’s
parents, Faher and Mona, and relatives lined up opposite them. The first group
uttered a scripted greeting, similar to what I’d seen at the two other homes:
“We feel your pain. Your son is like our son. We all lost him.” The family’s
response went something like this: “Thank you. We hope you don’t endure what
we’re enduring.”
The visit “helps me, it strengthens me,” Faher Saab told me after the delegation
departed. He was called away before he could say more about his late son other
than that they’d spent time together in the family’s side business of growing
and selling plums, and that Nazer dreamed of a career in engineering.
Faher’s brother Rawnak said his nephew was quiet and friendly, always helping
teachers and classmates, and doing a lot for his 17-year-old brother with
special needs. “We didn’t know he had so many friends until they came to comfort
us,” he said. “Everything in life starts small and grows, just like people.
Except for grief. It starts big and gradually lessens.”
In Majdal Shams, signs appear in Hebrew, Arabic, and English, and many people
speak all three languages. Its streets are hilly, its homes and shops
attractive, its residents high-achieving professionals and businesspeople. Much
of its economy depends on tourism, almost nonexistent throughout northern Israel
since Hezbollah, which controls much of southern Lebanon and is a party in the
country’s government, began attacking the day after Hamas’s Oct. 7 invasion of
the Negev. Unlike communities in the Galilee and northern Golan Heights whose
residents Israel evacuated, Druze have stayed put in Majdal Shams and the
Golan’s three other Druze villages: Buqata (pop. 7,000), Mas’ada (pop. 4,000),
and Ein Kinye (pop. 2,800). Druze don’t abandon their land, people explained.
Risk endures. The head of Majdal Shams’ town council, Dolan Abu Saleh, estimated
that two Israeli air-raid sirens, warning of incoming missiles or drones, have
sounded each week since Hezbollah’s attacks began on Oct. 8.
Several Majdal Shams residents I asked question Israel’s claim, supported by the
United States, that Hezbollah fired the fatal missile. It could have been
Hezbollah, they said, but maybe not. Some wondered why Israel’s vaunted Iron
Dome laser-guided interception system didn’t fire. One man suggested that Israel
shot the rocket at Majdal Shams, but didn’t explain why it would’ve done that.
Everything in life starts small and grows, just like people. Except for grief.
It starts big and gradually lessens.
I asked Abu Saleh whether he doubts that Hezbollah is responsible.
“No, it was their missile that came from Shebaa,” a nearby Lebanese village, he
said.
People seem to think the source of their pain is unimportant, because the
tragedy can’t be undone. More than that, person after person told me, revenge is
antithetical to the Druze.
“We don’t want to take revenge, because then, what—we’re going to kill children
on the other side?” said Nadeem Welly, owner of an eponymous restaurant on the
main street of Mas’ada.
Underlying their resignation is the fundamental Druze belief in fate. For
reasons no one, certainly not the grieving families, can comprehend, God
determined to take the 12 children at this time and in this manner, the
explanation goes. At least outwardly, no one asks: Why me?
Milar wanted to attend practice, his mother pushed back, he prevailed—and he’s
dead. Alma, Ezel, and Venes Al-Safadi, 11, played basketball that afternoon,
bought ice cream, declined a request from Ezel’s grandmother, who lived across
from the store, to stop in for a few minutes, continued to the field—and are
dead. The detour would have saved the three girls’ lives.
Fate, however, can also save lives, said some residents. For instance:
I heard of two boys who left the field moments before the missile strike to get
a snack.
Ehab Abu Jabar showed me a picture of his son Omry, 3. They were playing at the
field, and would have stayed much longer, but left at 5:50 p.m. because Omry was
hungry.
Entering the field together four nights after the attack, a man blurted out to
me, motioning to his 9-year-old son, whose hand he held: “We were supposed to
play here that afternoon, but he had an earache, so I took him to get it looked
at.”
A social worker, Handa Ayoub, mentioned a father who pressed his son to go
outside to play at the field rather than sit bored at home. The boy refused, the
father noodged. The boy refused, the father noodged. The boy won out—and the
father “now wants to give the son a prize for not listening to him,” said Ayoub,
who volunteers at a mental health resiliency center established after the
attack. “We wondered if anyone would come,” she said as the center closed at 9
p.m. on Wednesday. “Yesterday, maybe 100 people came.” Two were another father
and his son, 16 or 17. Four of the son’s friends were murdered in the attack;
the son would have been, too, but was delayed leaving and didn’t go to the
field.
Ayoub said she often urges her 10-year-old daughter to go to the playground, the
one filled with children frolicking that fateful moment, just 50 feet or so from
where the missile landed. “Now, I won’t encourage her to play there. It’s
overprotectiveness on my part. Now, every parent knows how to protect his child,
knows the treasure in his hand, knows to keep him safe, so he won’t get hurt,”
she said. “It’s a kind of compassion parents have for kids they didn’t have
before.”
Along with fate, the Druze belief in reincarnation is powerful and provides
comfort now. The Druze see a body as merely the soul’s repository—so much so
that even after burying a child, a person never again visits the gravesite.
“That they’re living new lives inside the bodies of kids born now—this gives us
strength and patience,” said Ameer Braik, an uncle of one victim, Hazem Abu
Saleh, 15. Hazem’s cousin Fajr, 15, was murdered at the field, too.
“We believe that when a Druze child dies, he goes to other Druze parents,” said
Ivan Ibraheem, Milar Shaar’s cousin. I asked whether he believes that Milar’s
soul has already entered another family’s baby. “Yes,” he said. “I hope those
parents treat him as well as we treated him.”
I related that quotation to a friend later that day, and choked on the words.
I had been to Majdal Shams before, most recently on New Year’s Day 2023. Along
with friends visiting from Scotland on that cold and peaceful morning, I’d
enjoyed hot drinks and pastries at Dam Caffe, overlooking a regulation-size
soccer field adjacent to the smaller one where the Hezbollah rocket fell.
The café is closed now, its door handle twisted, its front glass pane—Coffee:
Take a cup of kindness. Mix it well with love, it reads—shattered, four upstairs
windows blown out next to where we’d sat, two air conditioners ripped. Bark was
stripped off a branch of a tree next to the door. The explosion on the field
caused this damage from about 75 yards away, just beyond one of the goals.
Closer in, the effects were far more severe. Standing near the opposite goal and
pointing at an adjacent building, a fire fighter related that body parts were
blown into and on top of the structure. To a goalkeeper’s left and a few yards
downfield was a shallow hole, the spot where the rocket landed, apparently
pointing down. It tore the synthetic turf and mangled that section of fence
enclosing the field. The resulting fire blackened the fence’s gray poles and
wiring, and melted parts of the scooters and battery-powered bicycles that
likely transported some of the murdered and wounded children to the field. It
also shot millions of crushed-rubber pellets lying under the playing surface and
past the fence. Farther along, one of several makeshift memorials decorated the
fence and turf, black ribbons specking the wire and a dozen trophies with the
victims’ images, a soccer ball behind and a plastic poppy before each trophy,
standing upon the green sideline. Wreaths leaned onto a barrier, sent from
far-off and nearby communities: Kibbutz Kfar Blum, Kibbutz Snir, Kibbutz Merom
Golan, Kisra-Sumei (a Druze town in the Galilee), the Ramat Hanegev regional
council, the UJA-Federation of New York. Mourning with you, brothers and sisters
in arms, read a message on one wreath. We hurt your hurt, from the mayor and
council of Raanana, said another. And: Druze and Jews are brothers.
At the field’s center mark, I happened to lock onto three spots: the missile’s
impact point, a small side door near that corner, and, about 4 yards beyond the
open door, a migunit: a mobile concrete room about the size of a tool shed,
offering refuge from an enemy attack. Miguniot appear alongside some roads,
intersections, and in other public places throughout the country as shelter for
when a siren sounds.
A Majdal Shams worker had told me that three additional miguniot he’d ordered
arrived on Monday, July 22. He’d placed one of them here, just outside the small
side entrance to the soccer field. The firefighter had said that when the siren
sounded that fatal afternoon, the coach, 21-year-old Aram Shker, ordered the
children to run for the migunit. They had less than 10 seconds to reach safety.
Some succeeded.
Focusing on the three spots, I imagined the moment the siren went off on July 27
at 6:18 p.m.
The light bulb illuminated in my head, a painful and crushing realization.
I realized that taking any direct or indirect line from anywhere on the field
toward the gate opening and through to the migunit, the children’s legs were
actually propelling them not toward shelter, but death. They had no way to know
that, with the Falaq rocket, Iran’s gift to its Hezbollah proxy, coming from
behind them. It landed on and amid the fleeing, terrified children.
Had the migunit not arrived, the children would’ve been told to stop and lie
prone where they were, covering their heads—standard procedure in the absence of
any shelter. They’d have been farther from the missile’s impact point. Many of
the 12 would be alive now.
After running into the father and son entering the field late that Wednesday
night, I walked around the rectangle, absorbing the site and the scene. Lamp
stanchions provided light as they do when kids played there at night. This time,
clusters of adolescents sat on the field, silent but for occasional whispers.
As I circled back toward the goal near the main gate, a man rushed up and
pressed into my hands five tiny tin-encased candles, each containing a half-inch
depth of wax, at most. I stepped to a memorial of pictures and objects, and
crouched beside a white shelf lying upon the turf. I took several larger candles
there and arrayed them in a circle around my baby tins as shields from the
breeze, took a lighter sitting there, flicked it to produce a weak flame, and
touched it to a wick.
The wind snuffed out the fire, then another and another. I cupped a hand around
the lighter’s head to shield each flame. I moved the large candleholders into a
tighter circle, a more protective wall. I tried other lighters. At best, here
and there, a wick remained lit for two seconds before the wind extinguished it.
I departed, unable to protect the tiny candles.
Hillel Kuttler, a writer and editor, can be reached at
hk@HillelTheScribeCommunications.com.
What kind of future awaits Hamas after the killing of
Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran?
Jonathan Gornall/Arab News/August 06, 2024
LONDON: It has been 14 years since Israeli agents carried out one of Mossad’s
most audacious, controversial and, perhaps, pointless assassinations.
On Jan. 19, 2010, Mahmoud Al-Mabhouh, the man responsible for procuring weapons
for Hamas, was murdered in a hotel bedroom in Dubai. It was a big operation,
with many moving parts, involving almost 30 Mossad operatives who entered Dubai
on false passports. It ended with Al-Mabhouh being overpowered in his room at
the Al-Bustan Rotana and given a fatal dose of suxamethonium chloride, a drug
used in anesthetic cocktails. To avoid leaving a tell-tale needle mark, the drug
was administered with a device that used ultrasound to deliver it through the
skin. The drug causes paralysis and, still conscious but with his lungs unable
to function, Al-Mabhouh asphyxiated to death. The assassins put him to bed and
left, using a Mossad-developed device for putting hotel-door security chains in
place from the outside of the room, hoping that Al-Mabhouh’s death would be
attributed to natural causes.
It might have been, but for the vigilance of Dubai’s police chief. He suspected
foul play and, by having the comings and goings through Dubai airport before and
after the hit analyzed, and days of hotel security-camera footage examined in
detail, put together a damning portfolio of evidence.
At the time, the killing was big news. Images of two Mossad agents posing as
tennis players, emerging from an elevator behind Al-Mabhouh, appeared on
televisions and newspapers around the world.
Today, however, for few outside Hamas or Mossad will the name Al-Mabhouh have
any resonance. Certainly, his killing failed to have any appreciable impact on
the flow of arms to the group.
This week, the killing of Ismail Haniyeh, chairman of the Hamas political
bureau, is also big news — as was the killing on July 13 of Hamas military
leader Mohammed Deif. But soon, says Ahron Bregman, a former officer in the
Israeli army and a senior teaching fellow in the Department of War Studies at
King’s College London, the disruption caused by their deaths to the activities
and ambitions of Hamas will disappear, as the ripples caused by a small pebble
thrown into a large lake quickly vanish. “The killing of Ismail Haniyeh will not
change much as far as Hamas is concerned,” said Bregman, author of “The Fifty
Years War: Israel and the Arabs” and the memoir “The Spy Who Fell to Earth,” an
account of his part in the exposure of an Egyptian alleged double agent. “Hamas
is more than rifles, rockets and even leaders. Hamas is an idea. “If Israel
wants to defeat it, it must offer the Palestinians a better idea — say, a
Palestinian state. “If such an idea is not put forward, then Hamas will remain
in place and rebuild itself for future battles with Israel.”
KEY HAMAS FIGURES
Yahya Sinwar, Hamas’ Gaza leader, has just been named Ismail Haniyeh’s
successor. Khaled Meshaal, a founding member, has mostly operated from the
relative safety of exile. Khalil Al-Hayya, Doha-based deputy leader of Hamas, is
said to have the backing of Iran. Musa Abu Marzouk lived for 14 years in the US
before becoming deputy chairman of Hamas’ political bureau. Hamas is an Islamist
militant group that spun off from the Palestinian branch of the Muslim
Brotherhood in the late 1980s. It took over the Gaza Strip after defeating its
rival political party, Fatah, in elections in 2006.The sheer number of killings
of key Hamas figures carried out by Israel over the past quarter-century, and
the negligible impact of these killings on the organization’s capabilities or
objectives, speaks of a policy being carried out despite a lack of success — or,
perhaps, in accordance with a less obvious, and probably domestically focused
agenda. Killing high-profile Hamas targets, and perpetuating the war in the
process, makes it harder for Israelis inclined toward peace to criticize or plot
to remove their wartime Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Certainly, it is not difficult for Netanyahu’s critics to see the killing of
Haniyeh as a deliberate tactic to derail peace talks. Qatari Prime Minister
Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani put it succinctly on X, writing: “How
can mediation succeed when one party assassinates the negotiator on the other
side?”
Israel’s list of assassinations and attempted assassinations of Hamas leaders is
a long one, and the killings have not always been as subtly carried out as the
necessarily low-key Mossad hit on Al-Mabhouh in Dubai.
One of the first high-profile targets to be killed was Salah Shehadeh, the
leader of Hamas’ military wing, who was targeted in Gaza on July 23, 2002, by an
Israeli F-16 that dropped a massive bomb on his home. Such was the cost in
collateral damage — 14 others died, including Shehadeh’s wife and nine children
— that 27 Israeli Air Force pilots had a fit of conscience, denouncing such
attacks as “illegal and immoral” and “a direct result of the ongoing occupation
which is corrupting all of Israeli society.” The soul-searching did not last
long, however. The toll of senior Hamas leaders has continued more or less
unabated ever since.
Those who have been killed include Ahmed Yassin, who founded Hamas in 1987. He
died 20 years ago, on March 22, 2004, in a hail of missiles fired from Israeli
helicopters as he returned home from morning prayers in Gaza.
He was succeeded by Abdel Aziz Al-Rantisi, who died in similar fashion just 26
days later. Ahmed Al-Jabari, second-in-command of Hamas’ Al-Qassam Brigades, was
targeted unsuccessfully five times before succumbing in Gaza City in November
2012 to a missile fired from a drone. This year, unsurprisingly, has been a
particularly busy one in terms of Hamas assassinations carried out by Israel.
Hamas deputy and Haniyeh’s right-hand man Salah Al-Arouri was killed on Jan. 7
in an airstrike in Lebanon that also claimed the lives of several other senior
Hamas commanders. On March 11, Marwan Issa, deputy commander of Al-Qassam
Brigades and Hamas No. 3, died in an airstrike in Gaza. But none of these deaths
— individually or taken together — has managed to turn Hamas from its path or
hamper its ability to continue doggedly pursuing its aims militarily. Haniyeh’s
death is likely to have no greater immediate impact on Hamas’ capabilities than
the assassinations that have gone before, said John Jenkins, former UK
ambassador to Saudi Arabia and Iraq and a Middle East expert with the Centre for
Geopolitics at Cambridge University.
But it might signal a change of strategy that bodes ill for any hopes of an
immediate end to conflict. “In the past, decapitation hasn’t worked — not with
Hamas, nor with Hezbollah, nor Iran,” he said. “Or, at least, it has disrupted
rather than interrupted.” Israel, he added, “undoubtedly knows that. But it’s
also thought for two decades that ‘mowing the grass’ is the best way to manage
the conflict.”That policy of simply keeping a lid on the problem “is now over —
it collapsed on Oct. 7, 2023. “So, the game now is destruction — of Hamas’
offensive capabilities and its ability to function as a significant political
actor within the occupied Palestinian territories.“That doesn’t mean killing the
idea; that’s not possible. It means killing the capability. That’s why a
ceasefire is a long way off. “Spectacular assassinations are now part of a wider
strategy of dismantling tunnels, command and control functions, logistics, and
so on. That’s the only context in which they make sense.”
It is, however, a very dangerous game, with the killings of Haniyeh and Deif in
Tehran and Beirut condemned by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres last week
as “a dangerous escalation.”Instead of Israel rampaging around the region on a
killing spree — let alone assassinating Hamas’ Qatar-based negotiators, such as
Haniyeh — “all efforts should instead be leading to a ceasefire in Gaza, the
release of all Israeli hostages, a massive increase of humanitarian aid for
Palestinians in Gaza and a return to calm in Lebanon and across the Blue Line,”
said Guterres.
“This endless cycle,” he added, “needs to stop.”
In an interview with a British newspaper over the weekend, Amjad Iraqi, an
associate fellow with Chatham House’s Middle East and North Africa program,
warned that Israel’s increasingly audacious killings were indeed edging the
region dangerously close to a regional war. “People are not understanding the
gravity of what this is,” he told the Independent. “There is a kind of
egotistical, unstable dance that all these actors are making with missiles and
with people’s lives, while trying to explain it as calibrated responses.”
Only a ceasefire could cool things down, but as things stand, “we are at a very,
very dangerous point.”The reality of imminent escalation, said Burcu Ozcelik,
senior research fellow for Middle East security at the Royal United Services
Institute, “means that the ‘day after’ and the path to statehood seems even
farther away now, with all sides focusing on the military outcome of the here
and now, at the expense of immense civilian suffering and a viable political
solution.”
For its part, Hamas, “to project resilience and the resolve of its leadership
despite the assassination of Haniyeh, is trying to pivot quickly to appoint a
new political bureau chief.” A consultative process is under way “and, until a
decision is made, such as the appointment of Khaled Mashal, for example,
ceasefire negotiations cannot realistically recommence.”As it has done many
times before, in other words, Hamas will quickly grow a new limb to replace one
that has been amputated.
But “a more urgent obstacle to restarting talks is that Hamas cannot be
authorized to re-enter a diplomatic phase until Iran declares that the regime
and its proxies have sufficiently retaliated against Israel for the series of
high-profile assassinations, with much speculation around when that might
happen.”
The killing of Haniyeh has, she believes, “cornered Hamas into a dilemma that
will determine how the organization evolves over time.
“On the one hand, the loss of a recognizable political leader will trigger
radicalization among some Hamas supporters and embolden hardliners among the
military faction such as Yahya Sinwar, his brother and their inner circle.
“On the other, with Hamas fighters suffering losses inside Gaza and its military
infrastructure downgraded, Hamas will be looking for a lull in the fighting to
recoup and plan ahead. “But for Hamas, this is a long game, and it is far from
over — key figures inside and outside Gaza will continue to struggle to
consolidate Hamas and its victory narrative and position it for a role in
post-war Gaza.”Ahron Bregman agrees that the killing of Haniyeh “might lead to a
regional war in which Iran and Hezbollah could become involved. If the latter
happens, it will play straight into the hands of Hamas’ leader, Yahya Sinwar,
whose dream has always been that his Oct. 7 attack on Israel triggers a regional
war.”
The assassination will also “put on ice any hostage deal, as both leaders,
Netanyahu and Sinwar, are not interested in such a deal at the moment.
“For Netanyahu, a deal could spell the end of his coalition government. As for
Sinwar, he will wait to see if the assassination at the heart of Tehran, which
humiliated Iran, could lead to a regional war.”
It is true, Bregman added, that “in recent months, Israel has managed to
assassinate many of the Hamas leaders. Sinwar is quite on his own now, and I’m
sure he’s got very few of the old guard to consult with.
“But Hamas is bigger and larger than any leader or leaders. When this war is
over, there will still be Hamas — battered, leaner, but still standing and able
to send rockets into Israel. “The assassinations are tactical victories for
Israel, but there is nothing strategic in it, not even in the possible killing
of Sinwar himself.”Ultimately, the cost of Israel’s campaign of assassinations
could be borne by Israelis and Palestinians alike. The details of the operation
to kill Al-Mabhouh in Dubai in 2010 emerged in the book “Rise and Kill First:
The Secret History of Israel’s Targeted Assassinations,” published by Israeli
historian and investigative journalist Ronen Bergman in 2018. Bergman concluded
that, because Israel’s intelligence community had always “provided Israel’s
leaders sooner or later with operational responses to every focused problem they
were asked to solve,” that very success had “fostered the illusion among most of
the nation’s leaders that covert operations could be a strategic and not just a
tactical tool — that they could be used in place of real diplomacy to end the
geographic, ethnic, religious, and national disputes in which Israel is mired.”
As a result, Israel’s leaders “have elevated and sanctified the tactical method
of combating terror and existential threats at the expense of the true vision,
statesmanship, and genuine desire to reach a political solution that is
necessary for peace to be attained.”
Hamas And Al-Jazeera, A Decades-Long Symbiotic Relationship
Yigal Carmon and Amb. Alberto M. Fernandez/MEMRI/August
06, 2024
As the conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza went on day after day, Al-Jazeera
dubbed it "Gaza Resists" and used the phrase in all of its advertising and
promos for continuing news coverage. Once the war seemed to die down and even
end, the Qatari pan-Arab broadcaster switched from "Gaza Resists" to "Gaza has
triumphed."
But this was not the current war in Gaza unleashed by Hamas on October 7, 2023,
but a war a decade earlier – Operation Protective Edge – waged in July-August
2014. In this earlier conflict, the symbiotic relationship between Al-Jazeera
and Hamas was in sharp relief as the broadcaster followed closely Hamas's own
guidelines to the media on how to portray the conflict. The Hamas Ministry of
the Interior and National Security had issued a video directive for "Facebook
activists" to follow on reporting the war.[1] As The National Interest reported
at the time, "the channel's Gaza coverage seems to have taken its cues from
Hamas' own media playbook."[2]
The network not only provided wall-to-wall coverage of the war but also gave
unstinting, positive, uncut, and premium coverage to Hamas leaders. This
included a 40-minute speech and press conference by Hamas political leader
Khalid Meshaal but also messages from Hamas's military wing and from the allied
Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) group. Such a scenario of collaboration between
Hamas and Al-Jazeera would be repeated in subsequent years. In May 2021, after
the end of two weeks of fighting between Hamas in Israel, Hamas political chief
in Gaza Yahya Sinwar would be seen on Al-Jazeera giving a victory speech while
praising the Qatari broadcaster as "the best pulpit to give the accurate voice
to our position."[3]
Origins
But the historical record of Al-Jazeera's open support for Palestinian terrorist
operations goes back much further. As early as November 1999, Al-Jazeera had
invited Hamas leaders to talk about their "resistance" operations against
Israel, and in doing so shattered the long-standing Arab media hegemony of Fatah
and the PLO. In 2005, after the full Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, Al-Jazeera
carried footage of Hamas Friday sermons and military parades held in the
abandoned Israeli compounds to celebrate the withdrawal.[4] This included
remarks by Sheikh Nizar Rayyan, a cleric who was also a senior official in the
military wing of Hamas: "The vanquishing of the enemy in Gaza does not mean that
this stage has ended. We still have Jerusalem and the pure West Bank. We will
not rest until we liberate all our land, all our Palestine. We do not
distinguish between what was occupied in the 1940s and what was occupied in the
1960s. Our Jihad continues, and we still have a long way to go. We will continue
until the very last usurper is driven out of our land."
At the same 2005 event, Hamas spokesman Mushir Al-Masri commented on Al-Jazeera
that liberating Gaza was like liberating Tel Aviv, both were the same. He added
a phrase that would become quite famous in the West in 2023: "the weapons of the
resistance that you see here will remain, Allah willing, so that we can liberate
Palestine – all of Palestine – from the [Mediterranean] Sea to the [Jordan]
River, whether they like it or not."[5]
Indeed, the cause of Palestine would be a staple of Al-Jazeera coverage and the
media campaigns built by the network around conflict in the Holy Land would be a
constant. Other causes would come and go. In 2006, Al-Jazeera's championing of
Hezbollah and Hassan Nasrallah during the Tammuz War with Israel succeeded in
making the cleric a famous and beloved figure in the region, if only for a few
years until Nasrallah sent his fighters into the Syrian Civil War on the side of
the Assad regime.
Other media campaigns, especially in the early years after 2001, focused on
fawning coverage of Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda and later the head of Al-Qaeda
in Iraq (later to become the Islamic State or ISIS) Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi. Just
as there was a moment when Lebanon was the issue, Iraq had its moment, as did
Egypt when Hosni Mubarak was overthrown and the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood came
to power. In all these incidences – Palestine, Lebanon, Iraq, Egypt, and many
others – Al-Jazeera was always consistent, taking the side of the Islamist,
anti-Western, and anti-Israel part, the hero in the network's narrative. And yet
even when it came to Palestine, Palestinian officials, from the time of Arafat
to this day, would sometimes complain that the Qatari network preferred the
Islamists (Hamas) over the Palestinian Authority and its security forces.[6]
The bias should come as no surprise. It was baked in from the beginning. Both
Hamas and Al-Jazeera come from the same root, from various iterations of the
regional Muslim Brotherhood political organization. Hamas, officially dating
from December 1987, was a Palestinian offshoot of local Islamist groups heavily
influenced by the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. Al-Jazeera, launched in November
1996, began from a cell of staffers initially hired and then fired by BBC
Arabic.
Early Al-Jazeera staffers had ties to the Syrian and Egyptian Muslim
Brotherhood. The network's director for many of those early formative years
(2003-2011) was Palestinian Wadah Khanfar. A subsequent director, the Jordanian
Yasir Abu Hilaleh (2014-2018) was a well-known Islamist.[7] And looming over all
the channel's staff, no matter their personal preference or orientation, was
Qatar's openly Islamist foreign policy, not just strongly pro-Palestinian but
strongly Palestinian Islamist as it favored similar causes elsewhere, from
Turkey's Erdoğan to Afghanistan's Taliban.[8] The support and the bias in favor
of Hamas and Islamist causes is both institutional and personal.[9]
And the cross-fertilization on the screen among Al-Jazeera's (and Qatar's)
various pet causes and favorites – Hamas, Erdoğan's Turkey, Jihadism, Political
Islam, antisemitism – was always there through the years. You might see Erdoğan
on Palestine, Hamas's Khalid Meshaal praising Al-Jazeera cleric Yussef Al-Qaradawi
or Hamas speaking on antisemitism. So, for example, a 2016 Al-Jazeera interview
with Hamas leader Mahmoud Al-Zahhar included the charge that President-Elect
Trump was possibly a Jew, but that even if he was not, "he loves the Jewish
religion and even more, Jewish money."[10] Sinwar was not mistaken when he
called Al-Jazeera, the best of pulpits.
More War, More Popularity
Al-Jazeera was deeply interested in and invested in the cause of Palestine but
what was the receptivity of the Palestinians themselves to the influence of the
Qatari network? The most recent Shikaki (PCPSR) Poll (carried out May 26-June 1,
2024) reported that "Al-Jazeera is the most-watched TV station in Palestine with
68% selecting it as the one they watched the most during the past two months.
West Bankers are more likely than Gazans to watch Al-Jazeera, 82% and 46%
respectively [partly due to the inability of many in Gaza to watch TV]. The
distant second most popular TV station is Hamas's own Al-Aqsa (4%) followed by
Palestine TV (3%), Palestine Today, Saudi-owned Al Arabiya, Ma'an and
pro-Iranian Al-Mayadeen (2% each)."[11] Similarly, the previous Shikaki poll,
published in March 2024, found Al-Jazeera to be the most watched (61%) with the
second-place station at only 4% (Palestine Today).[12]
While all polling in the Middle East, even the well-respected PCPSR polls,
should always be treated with caution, these results generally ring true. The
latest results are even more striking if one looks at the last poll before the
current war, from early September 2023, we see that Al-Jazeera was still then
most watched station at that time but the figures were much lower – 28% with
Hamas's Al-Aqsa a distant second at 11% (4% on the West Bank, 22% in Gaza).[13]
The percentage of Palestinians watching Al-Jazeera has more than doubled since
the outbreak of the war – 28% in September 2023, 61% in March 2024, and 68% in
May 2024.
Covering the Gaza War has been a priority for the channel from October 7. A key
part of Al-Jazeera's effectiveness as a media or propaganda outlet is its
willingness to lavishly devote airtime and resources to breaking news,
particularly to news events of its own choosing. So that the network in a sense
does not just cover the news, it makes it, working closely with its political
and militarized partners (in this specific case, Hamas and its allies). This is
especially true in covering live events that conform with and shape a previously
expressed narrative. As Brussels-based Palestinian activist Amjad Abu Koush has
noted: "It seems that five months of annihilation are not enough for Al-Jazeera
TV, in its efforts to garner as much viewers and like-clicks as possible."[14]
It is that specific combination of breaking news and propagandistic spin that
has made Al-Jazeera so popular among Palestinian audiences. That is the likely
reason why its viewership seems to have more than doubled. It is telling its
viewers both what they think they need to know, in terms of coverage, and also
what they want to hear, in terms of an overall narrative.
A Consistent Narrative
And what is Al-Jazeera's narrative, specifically when it comes to Palestine?
There is a sturdy consistency going back more than two decades to the current
Al-Aqsa Flood War of 2023-2024.
First of all, in the Al-Jazeera narrative on Palestine, Palestine is not
"winning" (it is certainly not losing) but rather it (in this case "Gaza") has
already won.[15] The "victory" in the current war was not achieved, as in other
conventional conflicts, with the situation at the end of the war but rather
announced at the beginning. October 7 is portrayed as a victory in a way as if
December 7, 1941, was both the beginning and the defining moment of the conflict
between Japan and the United States. As if the conflict had ended with the
deterrence or shock inflicted on the Americans on that day.
Al-Jazeera fired the first media shots of the war. The October 7 war was
formally first announced in a recording by Hamas military commander Muhammad
Deif on Al-Jazeera, a fact that shows a high level of coordination and
appreciation by Hamas of the role Al-Jazeera had played in previous conflicts
and would play in this one. In that recording Deif called on all Palestinians
elsewhere, not just in Gaza but also on the West Bank and inside Israel to rise
up with any weapon they had on hand.
Since that date Al-Jazeera has essentially functioned as Hamas TV around the
clock, making it, unsurprisingly, essential watching for Palestinians trying to
understand what is happening on the ground.[16] That thirst for knowledge comes
with a price as information is filtered through the Hamas and Al-Jazeera
ideological lens.[17]
The Qatari channel's direct material support and service to the Hamas war effort
are both massive and multi-faceted and have included:
• Broadcasting threats by Hamas leaders and leaders of other terror
organizations;
• Celebrating and praising the terror attack and missile attacks on Israel;
• Airing hostage videos to exert pressure on the Israeli government;
• Broadcasting military announcements on an almost daily basis;[18]
• Airing footage on military encounters and the killing of IDF soldiers;
• Broadcasting near IDF troops and airing analysis by military experts to advise
Hamas fighters on recommended tactics and maneuvers;
• Pinpointing potential Israeli quality targets;
• Fabricating anti-Israel propaganda;
• Fabricating information designed to thwart Israel's instructions to the Gaza
population;
• Silencing any criticism of Hamas, and constantly rebroadcasting Hamas war
propaganda focusing on IDF soldiers killed in the fighting; Hamas statements in
Hebrew inciting the Israeli public against its government, including scenes from
the current hostage families' demonstrations in Israel; and Hamas propaganda
referring to every city, town, and community inside Israel as a "settlement";
• Describing the hostages abducted by Hamas on October 7 as "convicted
prisoners" – equating them with the convicted Hamas terrorists in Israeli
prisons – and referring to the young Palestinian adults in Israeli custody as
"children";
• and Propagating the lie that IDF soldiers raped Palestinian women during the
attack on Hamas terrorists at Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza.[19]
As Al-Jazeera columnist Hani Ismail Muhammad, an Egyptian Islamist based in
Turkey, wrote on the channel's website on October 12, 2023, "to complete the
victory, Muslims in the east and west of the globe must and should show
solidarity with Palestine and Gaza and with the Resistance and its battle."[20]
The late Ismail Haniyeh, the head of Hamas's Political Bureau, underscored the
already-won victory in remarks broadcast live by Al-Jazeera on January 9, 2024:
"We should hold on to the victory that took place on October 7 and build upon
it," and he added: "Time is on our side."[21]
One key part of the victory narrative on Al-Jazeera in this war (2023-2024) has
been the skewed commentary provided by its chief military analyst Fayiz Al-Dwairi,
a retired Jordanian Major General and military engineer.[22] In a glowing
profile written by Al-Jazeera staff and posted on its website in January 2024,
Al-Dwairi is described as "the Analyst of the Resistance," beloved and eagerly
followed by Hamas fighters. And it should be no surprise that he is popular. The
piece goes on to gush that Al-Dwairi "was known for his optimistic assessment of
the performance of the Palestinian resistance after the Al-Aqsa flood."[23]
According to the article, while praising the qualities of the Hamas fighter over
the IDF soldier, and pointing out the supposed inadequacies of Israeli
equipment, Al-Dwairi rhapsodized about Hamas's military prowess, "there is
nothing like it in military history from Alexander the Great until today."[24]
The victory narrative has real power to inspire the masses but it is not fool
proof. What Al-Jazeera has been doing is similar to what the organization
calling itself the Islamic State or ISIS did in its own propaganda from 2013 on
– projecting the image of victory. The presentation of a narrative of success –
whether military advances or political progress or steadfastness, etc. – is
compelling and attractive but only as long as it is somewhat tethered to
reality. If the propaganda gets too far away from the reality on the ground,
then it produces a reverse reaction where it is not believed. This is somewhat
like the boasting of Arab regimes in the June 1967 war with Israel, which then
turned out to be false and exposed these regimes to ridicule. Arab regimes – one
may remember Iraqi Information Minister "Baghdad Bob" (Muhammad Said Al-Sahhaf)
during the 2003 American invasion of Iraq – and terrorist groups have tended to
exaggerate, if not actually fabricate events involving military success against
the enemy.
But while both Al-Jazeera and Hamas do exaggerate and fabricate, they also know
that they cannot fabricate an entirely false reality out of whole cloth. The
spin must be selective. So, a Hamas victory narrative must be based on some
objective truths, even if clothed in layers of exaggeration. For such an image
to be sustained, the war must end in a way that the claims of victory seem
somewhat plausible, even if many or most observers know that this is not really
true.
The Hamas/Al-Jazeera victory narrative would find its climax in a visual endgame
that included something like a defiant and triumphant Yahya Sinwar coming out of
a bunker and speaking to the masses in a public event in the ruins of Gaza. Even
if the words are empty and the masses rented, such an event would provide a
fitting visual conclusion to the victory narrative. Another relatively effective
way of doing it would be, of course, an exchange of Palestinian prisoners for
Israeli hostages with scenes of public jubilation as the prisoners raise their
hands in victory while exalting national and political symbols. Defiance by the
living, claims of steadfastness – surviving the conflict – and mass prisoner
releases are the tangible badges of victory that have already been used in past
wars between terrorist groups and Israel. They were used by Hizbullah and Al-Jazeera
in 2006 and by Hamas and Al-Jazeera in 2014.
Still another Al-Jazeera columnist, Yasser Saad Al-Din, put it this way in April
2024: "Israel has been defeated, but has the Resistance won?" The author relied
heavily on Israeli opinions about the war and particularly on criticism by
internal opponents of the current Israeli government. But on the Palestinian
side, there was no criticism but rather conformity, "the resistance has
triumphed militarily, morally and even politically over the occupation
army."[25]
A new element in the victory narrative, in contrast with past Gaza conflicts,
has been the rise of the pro-Gaza protest movement, especially in the United
States, a surprising factor that has not been missed by Hamas or Al-Jazeera.
Indeed, even the Houthis in Yemen and Iran's Supreme Leader have praised the
movement. Saad Al-Din depicted Israel as "dismantled as an occupation state in
the eyes of Western public opinion."
An even more tangible example of victory would have been if the war would have
brought Hamas to power on the West Bank, replacing Fateh and the PLO. This was
certainly one of the reasons for the October 7 war in the first place. It was a
possibility dear to the hearts of both Erdoğan's Turkey and Qatar, two of
Hamas's closest supporters. But this was never something that would have
happened immediately once the current conflict concludes. The fact that the
destruction in Gaza has been so widespread, and that so many leaders, like
Muhammad Deif and Ismail Haniyeh, have been eliminated by the Israelis will make
the final attempted selling of that victory narrative so much harder at the end
of the day. It was a lot easier to push the victory story earlier in the
conflict, less so in August 2024. But some sort of effort will be made
nevertheless.
In seeming stark contrast to the victory narrative, but actually complementary
to it is the "Palestinians are Victims" narrative. Just as a martyr is in a very
real sense both a victor and a victim, so do both Al-Jazeera and Hamas seek to
highlight as much as possible the suffering of the Palestinian people,
highlighting real events, exaggerating others and fabricating still others.
This narrative also requires the playing down of military casualties while
highlighting civilian ones. An entire process of linguistic alchemy is required
to be put into action in order to make such an approach work. Teenage gunmen
become children, Hamas members become independent journalists, Palestinian
profiteering becomes Israeli starvation tactics, collateral damage become
intentional targeting, failed Hamas/PIJ missiles falling on Gaza facilities
become Israeli airstrikes, as in the notorious blood libel about the Al-Ahli
Hospital on October 17, only ten days after the beginning of the war.
No story is complete without a villain and, coupled with the segments on
"Palestinians as Victors" and – simultaneously – "Palestinians as Victims,"
there is a third stool in the narrative: the "Israel is
Lacking/Defeated/Finished" component. Military analyst Al-Dwairi on Al-Jazeera
describes the Israelis in Gaza as "advancing towards death, fighting without
protection against an adversary willing to do anything for victory" and "with
great fear for his life, which exposes him to great psychological pressure." It
does not matter that Al-Dwairi's analysis of this factor or anything else turned
out to be wrong, what mattered is that, in the moment, he provided the cover of
supposed expert analysis to what was actually advocacy and confirming the
preconceived notions of his Arab and, especially Palestinian, audience: Hamas
was winning and the Israelis, as soldiers and as people, were losing, lacking or
inferior, solely propped up, if that, by technological prowess given to them by
the Americans. As Arab-American columnist Hussain Abdul-Hussain said recently,
if you follow Al-Jazeera and other Islamist media, there are "76 years of
Israeli failure and Palestinian successes."[26]
Given these factors and the sheer weight and breadth of Al-Jazeera coverage on
the Gaza War (analyst Al-Dwairi was featured almost daily for months), it is
then not so surprising that Palestinian audiences have responded by tuning in
and by expressing views that are broadly in sync with Al-Jazeera's narrative.
One might ask, what came first? The Al-Jazeera "chicken" or the Hamas "egg" in
shaping and influencing public opinion? The reality being that, as we have
shown, both entities came from a common root and shared a common, deeply held,
worldview. And both reflect views already held by a significant percentage of
the Palestinian population. When asked in a May 2023 poll what has been the most
positive or the best thing that has happened to the Palestinian people since
1948, the largest percentage (24%) said that it was the establishment of Islamic
movements, such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad and their participation in armed
struggle; 21% said that the best thing was the eruption of the first and second
intifada. Only 9% saw the establishment of Fateh as the best thing that had
happened.[27] The propaganda work of Al-Jazeera on behalf of Hamas was half-done
even before the war began.
But important questions remain for the day after. Once the war does end, will
Al-Jazeera's numbers decline, from 68% in the latest poll back to 28% in
September 2023? It is quite likely that other conflicts or events will rise
elsewhere to capture the channel's attention – that is the nature of the news
business – although Palestine has been a staple of the channel for decades.
What could fill the information gap if Al-Jazeera's numbers decrease? Can the
channel's stranglehold on Palestinian public opinion be challenged? And will
there ever be a final reckoning for Al-Jazeera's shameless and deadly promotion
of Hamas and other terrorist groups, not among Palestinian public opinion but,
more importantly, by policymakers in Washington? That is the ultimate question.
* Yigal Carmon is President of MEMRI. Alberto M. Fernandez is Vice President of
MEMRI.
[1] Youtube.com/watch?v=VxzZ5cm8ZCw, July 10, 2014.
[2] Nationalinterest.org/feature/the-problem-al-jazeera-11239, September 10,
2014.
[3] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 11037, Hamas Leader In Gaza Yahya Sinwar,
Israel's Most Wanted – In His Own Words: 'We Support The Eradication Of Israel
Through Armed Jihad And Struggle; This Is Our Doctrine'; 'The Brothers In Iran
And Hizbullah Spared Us Nothing', December 22, 2023.
[4] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 991, >Hamas Friday Sermons in Abandoned Gaza
Settlements on Al-Jazeera TV: ‘We Can Liberate Palestine – From the
Mediterranean to the Jordan River’, September 21, 2005.
[5] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 991, Hamas Friday Sermons in Abandoned Gaza
Settlements on Al-Jazeera TV: ‘We Can Liberate Palestine – From the
Mediterranean to the Jordan River’, September 21, 2005.
[6] X.com/KhaledAbuToameh/status/1817408090246967320, July 27, 2024.
[7] Al-ain.com/article/resignation-qatar-yasser-al-jazeera, May 10, 2018.
[8] See MEMRI Inquiry & Analysis No. 1527, Al-Jazeera Unmasked: Political Islam
As A Media Arm Of The Qatari State, August 12, 2020.
[9] See Special Dispatch No. 10879, Presenters, Reporters From Qatar's Al-Jazeera
Praise Hamas Attack, Celebrate Israel's Disaster, October 17, 2023.
[10] See MEMRI TV Clip No. 5758, Hamas Leader Mahmoud Al-Zahhar: Trump Possibly
a Jew; Money Is the Jewish Religion, Key to U.S. Decision-Making, November 8,
2016.
[11] Pcpsr.org/en/node/985, May 26-June 1, 2024.
[12] Pcpsr.org/en/node/973, March 5-10, 2024.
[13] pcpsr.org/en/node/955, September 6-9, 2023.
[14] See MEMRI TV Clip No. 10944, Brussels-Based Palestinian Activist Amjad
AbuKoush: We Are Paying The Price For 17 Years Of Hamas Policies; Al-Jazeera TV
Wants The Bloodshed To Continue So It Can Garner More Viewers And More 'Likes';
Qatar Has Taken Over Palestinian Decision-Making, March 7, 2024.
[15] See MEMRI JTTM report Canada-Based Pro-Al-Qaeda Cleric: Hamas' Claims Of
Victory Are Absurd, Its Only Accomplishment Is Increasing The Suffering Of
Palestinians, February 27, 2024.
[16] See MEMRI Inquiry & Analysis Report No. 1751, Al-Jazeera Arabic: The
Qatari-Owned TV Channel That Promotes Islamist Terrorism Worldwide – UPDATED,
May 6, 2024.
[17] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 10872, Qatar Enabling Hamas' War Against
Israel, October 15, 2023.
[18] See MEMRI TV Clip No. 11011, Al-Jazeera Airs Hamas's Al-Qassam Brigades
Video Calling On Muslims To Join Jihad; Shows Ambush Against Israeli Soldiers,
April 10, 2024.
[19] See MEMRI Daily Brief No. 587, Al-Jazeera's Gaza Script Sabotaged By Their
Ally Hamas, April 1, 2024.
[20] Aljazeera.net/blogs/2023/10/12/7-%d8%a3%d9%83%d8%aa%d9%88%d8%a8%d8%b1-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%88%d8%b9%d8%af-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%85%d9%86%d8%aa%d8%b8%d8%b1-%d9%88%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%88%d9%87%d9%85-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b6%d8%a7%d8%a6%d8%b9,
October 12, 2023.
[21] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 11072, Hamas Leader Ismail Haniyeh: We
Should Hold On To The Moment Of The Victory Of October 7 And Build Upon It; Time
Is On Our Side; Donations To Gaza Are Not 'Humanitarian Aid' But 'Financial
Jihad', January 10, 2024.
[22] See MEMRI TV Clip No. 11089, Al-Jazeera Military Analyst Fayez Al-Dwairi
Explains Anti-Tank Missile Used By Hamas In Gaza, Adds: It Can Penetrate
Israel's Namer APC And Merkava Tank, January 1, 2024.
[23] Aljazeera.net/encyclopedia/2024/1/4/%d9%81%d8%a7%d9%8a%d8%b2-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%af%d9%88%d9%8a%d8%b1%d9%8a-%d9%85%d8%ad%d9%84%d9%84-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%85%d9%82%d8%a7%d9%88%d9%85%d8%a9,
January 23, 2024.
[24] Aljazeera.net/encyclopedia/2024/1/4/%d9%81%d8%a7%d9%8a%d8%b2-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%af%d9%88%d9%8a%d8%b1%d9%8a-%d9%85%d8%ad%d9%84%d9%84-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%85%d9%82%d8%a7%d9%88%d9%85%d8%a9,
January 23, 2024.
[25] Aljazeera.net/opinions/2024/4/14/%D9%87%D8%B2%D9%85%D8%AA-%D8%A5%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%8A%D9%84-%D9%81%D9%87%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AA%D8%B5%D8%B1%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%85%D8%A9,
April 14, 2024.
[26] X.com/hahussain/status/1818983797553078667, August 1, 2024.
[27] Pcpsr.org/en/node/944, June 7-11, 2023.
Trump is Finished. His Demented Antics Show he Does Not
Believe he'll Win
Hanibaal Atheos/Lebanon Iznogood/Tuesday, August 6, 2024
The wild unhinged demented antics of Donald Dumb mean two things at the same
time:
1- He's old and losing grip on reality. "I'm old", he tells himself, "and I
don't care". That is desperation.
2- He knows he'll lose in November. Like in 2016 when he ran "for the fun of it"
and didn't believe he'd win and was stunned that he won thanks to the defective
Electoral College that distorts the will of the people because of a few
unelected delegates. This time, he knows deep down that he'll lose in November
to a much better, articulate, steady candidate Kamala Harris, and it irks the
world out of him that he will lose not to a white woman (Hillary), not to a
white man (Biden, 2020), but to a colored smart woman.
This explains his unhinged sexist attacks on her as "Low IQ", or racist attacks
on her as "not really Black", etc. The moron is scared and is on the edge of a
mental breakdown precipice and is already regretting choosing an unstable idiot
weirdo by the fake name of JD Vance who changes his mind about anything and
everything, including about his own opinions of Donald Dumb himself.
I watch D. Dumb on stage, running his inane verbal diahhreas off the carefully
scripted mature (though full of falsehoods and lies) language his handlers write
for him, making faces like a 3-year old and I fear for the future. Then I wonder
who are the jackass republicans who let this Blond Capuchin or Orang-utan monkey
out of his cage?
I watch Harris on stage and I feel secure and confident for the future, hearing
her words, seeing her demeanor and her uplifting smile.
What more does any resonable American need to make up their minds between the
two? Unless one is an imbecile like Donald Dumb, or unless one believes that the
moron is going to save white America from its multi-colored population, or
unless one has some other deep-seated pathological hatred... there are no
reasons that can convince a moderately reasonable, common sense, person to vote
for this convicted felon maniac.
Kamala Harris is the sitting vice president of the United States. She's an
educated and formidable prosecutor. She's a former U.S. senator, and this white
trash moron calls her “Crazy Kamala”, a “lunatic”, a "low IQ", “a radical left
freak”. He insults the popular Republican Georgia governor Brian Kemp, "Little
Brian", and launches a vitriolic attack on his wife because the decent man
refused to be an accessory to overturning the laws of his state and the country.
All of this, and three more months to go, I predict that Donald Dumb will not be
shot in the ear by a republican imbecile like him this time. This time, the
coward will have a heart attack or be seized by an episode of "delirium
tremens", right on stage, as the adrenaline levels in his blood continue to rise
at the rage of having to lose to a woman of immigrant colored background. The
coward. The jerk. The feeble man. We thought Biden was an old geezer who refuses
to let go, but he did. Now we have to endure the spectacle of this old criminal
moron reeking of hatred and rage, dragging the entire country into a psychotic
episode of depression and dark negativity. To his followers: What happened to
positive thinking? What happened to decency? We always believed in the American
Dream, not the American Nightmare this psychotic Leatherface is serving his ever
dwindling audiences.
It's clear that Trump is on edge and losing it. Spewing insults no longer works.
Even his followers are ditching him. "Republicans for Harris" is the first wagon
in a long train of those republicans who are sick and tired of the deranged
creep. For many Americans, Republicans and Democrats, it’s all getting a bit
tiresome. We need to remove this miserable angry and criminal old man out of our
lives. Right now, in November and forever.
Israel prepares for several scenarios as it waits for Iran,
Hezbollah retaliation
Itamar Eichner/Ynet News/Tuesday, August 6, 2024
Hamas leadership's secret correspondence on cease-fire: 'We are suffering heavy
losses, situation in Gaza is terrible'
US says Iran is readying its attack and Canada has evacuated diplomats' families
from Israel, but the Homefront Command instructions have not changed; Meanwhile,
Hezbollah and Iran say civilians will not be harmed
Israel continues to wait for responses from Hezbollah and Iran to the
assassinations of top terror leaders in Tehran and Beirut. While the world is
making efforts to moderate the Iranian 'Axis of Resistance' and prevent it from
reacting in a way that would harm civilians, Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan
Nasrallah and Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei have made efforts in recent
days to make it clear that they do not want the current escalation to slide into
war. The messages conveyed by Iran and Hezbollah saying that they do not plan to
harm civilians should be taken with a grain of salt by Israel, but the
understanding is that neither side is interested in war, and after the
retaliatory actions we are likely to find ourselves in the exact same situation
as before the assassinations. But first there may still be several days of
fighting, and Hezbollah and Iran are keeping their cards close to their chests -
and unlike the last time, it is not clear what exactly the nature of the
response will be. The Iranian axis can choose to respond with separate attacks
against Israel, with Hezbollah attacking certain targets, while at the same time
(or before) Iran will attack other targets. The Houthis, with whom Israel has an
"open account" following the attack in the port of Hodeidah, also are expected
to participate in the attack in one way or another, as are the pro-Iranian
militias in Syria and Iraq. Nasrallah addressed this in his public speech on
Tuesday night, saying that Hezbollah's action could come together with the
entire Iranian axis - and could also come separately.
Israel's waiting is part of our response, the battle is also psychological,"
Nasrallah said Tuesday, adding that "we will act cautiously and carefully." The
message conveyed in his speech is that Hezbollah's goal has not changed, which
is to prevent Israel from winning the war in the Gaza Strip while not entering
into an all-out war with Israel, one that could deal a fatal blow to Lebanon.
In recent days, Russia has also entered the picture , demanding that Iran,
according to various reports, avoid an unrestrained reaction - and especially to
avoid harming civilians.
55% of Americans oppose sending troops
Israel is currently avoiding making a pre-emptive strike, while various sources
have repeatedly stated in recent days that such an attack will lead to a severe
response. IDF spokesman Lt. Col. Daniel Hagari on Tuesday told Al-Arabiya that
"we have proven that we will not be proportional in our reactions if civilians
are harmed. We will not tolerate any harm to civilians. Nasrallah is taking the
entire region to an escalation and he will bear responsibility for it. We are
also looking at Iran, and we are not alone but with our partners, fully prepared
to deal with it. I will not give details to our enemies about our plans."
Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said at Tel Nof air force base Tuesday that Israel
is improving readiness to "defend and attack" and is also alert to the
possibility that the attack will begin "in a short time."
CNN reported on Tuesday that signs of Iranian preparations for an attack are
beginning to be detected in the U.S., while in the meantime the situation on the
northern border has heated up, with barrages of dozens of rockets and drones
toward the Golan and the Galilee, which have led to a great deal of damage and
injuries. Israeli experts are working to analyze how Iran and Hezbollah will
ultimately choose to respond, and in the meantime they are careful not to play
into the hands of the "axis of evil" and there has been no change in the
instructions of the Homefront Command that would restrict the public.
Behind the scenes, the U.S. is working together with the countries of the
regional coalition to repel the Iranian attack. Biden himself spoke today with
the leaders of Qatar and Egypt, and according to the White House he discussed
with them "efforts to ease tensions in the region, and bring about a cease-fire
agreement and the release of hostages in Gaza."
The U.S. fears that the Iranians have learned a lesson from its attack in April,
when 99% of the UAVs and missiles they launched were intercepted. This time,
Iran may well use Hezbollah and other affiliates in the region to overwhelm the
air defense system. One of the expected difficulties in dealing with the
combined attack, according to the Wall Street Journal, is the need to quickly
identify the many different targets and decide, in real time, which of them to
shoot down. Despite this, commentators estimate that Israel's multi-layered air
defense system, large parts of which it developed alongside the U.S., is built
for such an event.
Meanwhile, an alarming survey published in the Washington Post indicates that,
for the first time in 14 years, a majority of Americans oppose sending troops to
defend Israel in case it is attacked by its neighbors. According to the survey,
conducted by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, 55% of Americans oppose
sending U.S. military forces, while 41% support it. Among Republicans, 55% are
in favor of sending the forces, while only 35% of Democrats are in favor.
The online survey was conducted from June 21 to July 1, before the assassination
in Tehran of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, and Iran's threat of a response that
followed. The newspaper noted that the share of Americans who support sending
troops is the lowest measured since 2010. In that year, 47% of Americans said
they support sending troops.
The scenarios in Israel
Among the targets in Israel the Iranians and Hezbollah may target are symbols of
government such as the Knesset, the Prime Minister's Office, the Prime
Minister's residence, the Kirya defense headquarters in Tel Aviv, air force
bases, intelligence bases, the Mossad base and the Shin Bet base. In addition,
there is fear that there will be serious damage to infrastructure sites such as
power plants, ports, airports, fuel and ammonia storage, interchanges and main
roads. However, Hezbollah and Iran know very well that the Israeli Air Force has
the ability to respond strongly to such attacks and fatally damage Iran's oil
reserves, for example, or civilian infrastructure in Lebanon.
If Hezbollah and Iran want to harm the civilian population as well and not focus
on infrastructure and military facilities, they may also harm city centers in
Tel Aviv, Haifa and other large cities. But such an action will almost certainly
lead to an escalation that Israel believes they want to avoid and is therefore
less likely. Cyber incidents that will try to damage the alert system and
disrupt cellular communications also can be expected.
As part of the preparations, the IDF decided to cancel the Holy Ari religious
celebration that was planned to take place in Safed between August 8 and 10. In
addition, the Canadian Embassy in Israel informed the Foreign Ministry Tuesday
evening that it will evacuate the family members of its diplomats to Jordan on
Wednesday, the first country to do so. On Monday, Ireland's Foreign Minister
Michael Martin called on his country's citizens not to travel to Israel at all.
Another serious concern in Israel concerns the possibility that Iran and
Hezbollah will try to carry out attacks against Israelis abroad, or harm Israeli
diplomats and Israeli embassies around the world. Therefore, since the
assassinations, the Foreign Ministry has declared the highest security alert,
similar to the level introduced after October 7. Diplomats have been placed
under strict precautionary rules, And some of them were instructed to break
their routine, not to attend public events, and to work from home.
"Our situation is very dangerous as far as the envoys are concerned," according
to a senior Israeli diplomat, who said that many Israeli representatives feel
threatened. "We saw that a person was harmed in a governmental compound, so
there is a chance that they will want to damage symbols of government. ... This
includes, among other things, our representatives around the world."
"Taking down an embassy or an ambassador is relatively easier," he added.
"Definitely the Israeli embassies are a governmental symbol and they are in the
crosshairs. The vigilance for the diplomats is really high. There are severe
restrictions on their movements. At the same time, we continue to function as
usual."
An Israeli ambassador abroad said: "We went on a mission to represent the State
of Israel in the good times and also in the difficult ones. It is part of our
reality and will probably be the same in the future. You have to be vigilant,
follow instructions, take care of family members and the children of the
emissaries and take precautions, but I am personally proud to represent the
country abroad and these threats will not deter us. On the southern and northern
borders the situation is no less dangerous and the citizens of the country and
our children are under no less serious threat. We are all at the front, in
Israel and abroad, and we will hold the Israeli flag strong and steady and with
a confident hand."