English LCCC Newsbulletin For 
Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For October 23/2020
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news
The Bulletin's Link on the 
lccc Site
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2021/english.october23.21.htm
News 
Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations For today
The Parable of the king who gave a wedding banquet 
for his son, but those he invited did not come...For many are called, but few 
are chosen.
Matthew 22/01-14: “Once more Jesus spoke to them 
in parables, saying: ‘The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a king who gave a 
wedding banquet for his son. He sent his slaves to call those who had been 
invited to the wedding banquet, but they would not come. Again he sent other 
slaves, saying, “Tell those who have been invited: Look, I have prepared my 
dinner, my oxen and my fat calves have been slaughtered, and everything is 
ready; come to the wedding banquet.” But they made light of it and went away, 
one to his farm, another to his business, while the rest seized his slaves, 
maltreated them, and killed them. The king was enraged. He sent his troops, 
destroyed those murderers, and burned their city. Then he said to his slaves, 
“The wedding is ready, but those invited were not worthy. Go therefore into the 
main streets, and invite everyone you find to the wedding banquet.” Those slaves 
went out into the streets and gathered all whom they found, both good and bad; 
so the wedding hall was filled with guests. ‘But when the king came in to see 
the guests, he noticed a man there who was not wearing a wedding robe, and he 
said to him, “Friend, how did you get in here without a wedding robe?” And he 
was speechless. Then the king said to the attendants, “Bind him hand and foot, 
and throw him into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing 
of teeth.” For many are called, but few are chosen.
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials 
published on 
October 22-23/2021
Question: "Could God create a rock so heavy He could not lift it?"/GotQuestions.org?/October 
22/2021
Aoun Returns Bill Amending Electoral Law to Parliament
Geagea Says He's Under Law but Urges Military Court to be Fair
Putin Suggests 'Profits' Dispute behind Keeping Nitrates at Beirut Port
Hochstein Urges Fast Lebanon-Israel Talks, Says 'Common Reservoirs' Not an 
Option
‘Like slaves’: Lebanon's delivery riders struggle as economic crisis bites
Oueidat Denies Suspending Decision to Summon Geagea
US mediator urges quick talks on Lebanon-Israel maritime borders
Shea Inaugurates Pop Up Space Training Program in Sidon
Nasrallah Says Tayyouneh Probe 'Brave', Warns Israel over Oil and Gas
Lebanon’s Hezbollah warns Israel against drilling in disputed maritime border 
area
Israeli Defense Minister signs seizure order against Lebanese company for 
helping Hezbollah
Lebanon…war and Hezbollah!/Jameel Altheyabi/Saudi Gazate 
US mediator says Lebanon-Israel maritime talks need to be quick
Syrians abandon Lebanon as new migrant route to Europe beckons
Nissan ex-Chair Ghosn Set on Restoring Reputation
Titles For The Latest English LCCC 
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on 
October 22-23/20211
Putin Hosts Israeli PM Bennett
France urges Iran to curb nuclear activity, resume talks
U.S. Iran Envoy to Hold Nuclear Talks with Europe Powers
Iran nuclear talks ‘on life support’ as Tehran drags feet
Syria constitution talks stall at UN
Israel designates six Palestinian civil society groups as terrorists
Turkish counter-espionage against foreign spy networks leads to multiple 
In South Sudan, flooding called ‘worst thing in my lifetime’
Rare Libya Conference Seeks Support ahead of Landmark Elections
Titles For The Latest The Latest LCCC 
English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on 
October 22-23/2021
In His Second Term, Trudeau Must Fix His 
Iran Policy/Alireza Nader/FDD-Insight/October 22, 2021
Biden's Afghanistan Withdrawal Unleashes a Lethal Terrorist Cocktail/Richard 
Kemp/Gatestone Institute./October 22, 2021
Iraqi election results confirm Iran’s unpopularity/Hussain Abdul-Hussain/Arab 
News/October 22/2021
Iraqi elections signal stronger Ankara-Baghdad ties/Sinem Cengiz/Arab 
News/October 22/2021
Taliban powerless to stop Afghanistan’s decline/Luke Coffey/Arab News/October 
22/2021
The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & 
Lebanese Related News & Editorials published 
on October 22-23/2021
Question: "Could God create a rock so heavy He 
could not lift it?"
GotQuestions.org?/October 22/2021
Answer: This question is frequently asked by skeptics of God, the Bible, 
Christianity, etc. If God can create a rock that He cannot lift, then God is not 
omnipotent. If God cannot create a rock so heavy that He cannot lift it, then 
God is not omnipotent. According to this argument, omnipotence is 
self-contradictory. Therefore, God cannot be omnipotent. So, the question, could 
God create a rock so heavy He could not lift it? The quick answer is “No.” But 
the explanation is far more important to understand than the answer...
This question is based on a popular misunderstanding about the definitions of 
words like “almighty” or “omnipotent.” These terms do not mean that God can do 
anything. Rather, they describe the amount of God’s power. Power is the ability 
to effect change - to make something happen. God (being unlimited) has unlimited 
power, and the Bible affirms this (Job 11:7-11, 37:23; 2 Corinthians 6:18; 
Revelation 4:8; etc.). Therefore, God can do whatever is possible to be done. 
God cannot, however, do that which is actually impossible. This is because true 
impossibility is not based on the amount of power one has, it is based on what 
is really possible. The truly impossible is not made possible by adding more 
power. Therefore, unless context indicates otherwise (e.g. Matthew 19:26 where 
man’s ability is being shown in contrast to God’s), impossibility means the same 
thing whether or not God is involved.
So, the first part of the question is based on a false idea—that God being 
almighty means that He can do anything. In fact, the Bible itself lists things 
God cannot do - like lie or deny Himself (Hebrews 6:18; 2 Timothy 2:13; Titus 
1:2). The reason He cannot do these things is because of His nature and the 
nature of reality itself. God cannot do what is not actually possible to be 
done, like creating a two-sided triangle, or a married bachelor. Just because 
words can be strung together this way does not make the impossible 
possible—these things are contradictions, they are truly impossible in reality. 
Now, what about this rock? A rock would have to be infinitely large to defeat an 
infinite amount of lifting power. But an infinite rock is a contradiction since 
material objects cannot be infinite. Only God is infinite. There cannot be two 
infinites. So the question is actually asking if God can make a 
contradiction—which He cannot.
Aoun Returns Bill Amending Electoral Law to Parliament
Naharnet/22 October ,2021 
President Michel Aoun on Friday returned a bill amending some articles of the 
electoral law to parliament for reevaluation, the Presidency said. The President 
cited “violations” contained in the bill, such as bringing forward the elections 
date from May to March and depriving segments of voters from their electoral 
rights. Aoun argued that holding the elections on March 27 might prevent some 
voters from casting ballots in mountainous areas due to possible storms and bad 
weather. He also said that bringing the date forward would shorten the timeframe 
for the registration of expat voters while lamenting that the bill 
extraordinarily suspends the implementation of the electronic card system and 
axes the six new seats dedicated to expats. Moreover, Aoun noted that the 
proposed date would deprive 10,685 citizens who turn 21 between Feb. 1 and March 
30 from their right to vote. Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri later in the day 
called on the joint parliamentary committees to meet on Tuesday to study Aoun’s 
returning of the bill.
Geagea Says He's Under Law but Urges Military Court to be 
Fair
Naharnet/22 October ,2021 
Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea on Friday commented anew on the the Military 
Court’s decision to summon him for testimony regarding the deadly Tayyouneh-Ain 
al-Remmaneh incidents. “As the head of a legitimate Lebanese party, I’m under 
the law,” Geagea tweeted. “But for justice to be correct, the judiciary must 
deal with all parties in the country as them being under the law,” he added. 
Geagea also lamented that “it seems that the main party in the Ain al-Remmaneh 
incidents considers itself to be above the law” and that “so far, the military 
judiciary is agreeing with it in this belief.”
The LF leader had overnight stressed that he will not appear before the Military 
Court if Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah is not also summoned. “The days 
of the Our Lady of Salvation Church are over and we will never allow a return to 
those days,” he emphasized.
Seven people were killed on October 14 -- mostly Hizbullah and Amal Movement 
members -- during a protest organized by the two groups to demand Tarek Bitar, 
the judge investigating Beirut's devastating port blast, be removed. Hizbullah 
and Amal accused the Lebanese Forces, which supports the probe, of being 
responsible for sniper fire against the protesters that ignited street clashes. 
The LF denies the charges. Fadi Akiki, a representative of the military court, 
has "instructed the army intelligence to summon Geagea and take his statement 
based on information provided by arrested LF members," a judicial official said. 
Twenty-six people were arrested after the violence in the Tayyouneh-Ain al-Remmaneh 
area, most of them LF members, the official added on Thursday. The exact 
circumstances of the violence remain unclear. Geagea has denied responsibility 
for the deaths, saying that residents of Ain al-Remmaneh had "defended" 
themselves against "Hizbullah militiamen who tried to enter their homes."
Putin Suggests 'Profits' Dispute behind Keeping Nitrates at 
Beirut Port
Naharnet/22 October ,2021 
Russian President Vladimir Putin has suggested that disagreements over who 
should make financial gains had been the reason behind keeping the huge 
stockpile of ammonium nitrate at Beirut port for seven years before it 
eventually exploded in August 2020. "Years ago they brought the ammonium 
(nitrate) substance to this (Beirut) port, and according to what I understood, 
they wanted to sell it for a profitable price," Putin said at a press conference 
in response to a reporter's question. He did not specify who he was referring 
to. "But the desire to achieve profits faced several contradictions related to 
who wanted to benefit from those profits," the Russian leader added. "I think 
this is what this tragedy was related to," he went on to say. As for Lebanon's 
request for satellite images from several nations, Putin said: "As for the 
investigations, I don't understand how we can offer help, or how the satellite 
images can help. Yes, we have them, and I will make inquiries. If they are of 
any use, of course we will provide these images.""We must first ask our 
colleagues if they need these images," he added. Asked about the latest 
incidents in Lebanon, Putin said Hizbullah is "considered to be an important 
political force" in the country. "We always call for resolving any crisis in 
Lebanon through dialogue," he said. "We are in contact with all political forces 
in Lebanon and we will continue this communication to prevent any bloodshed 
which would be in no one's interest," he added. "We will exert utmost effort to 
convince all political forces in Lebanon to remain rational and engage in 
dialogue," Putin went on to say.
Hochstein Urges Fast Lebanon-Israel Talks, Says 'Common Reservoirs' Not an 
Option
Naharnet/22 October ,2021
U.S. Senior Advisor for Global Energy Security and the newly appointed mediator 
in the U.S.-sponsored border talks between Israel and Lebanon, Amos Hochstein, 
has called for swift negotiations over the demarcation of the maritime border. 
He said that the visit he made this week to Lebanon was aimed at determining “if 
we can achieve some breakthrough and to move forward on the demarcation 
efforts.”Asked whether his visit means that the talks are “resuming,” the U.S. 
official told Al-Hadath TV: “I hope so.”He added: “I came here today, really, 
first to listen, and to listen to the three presidents and to other ministers 
and the Chief of Staff of the military, and to understand the position that the 
Lebanese government has, and its views as to what's the best way to move 
forward.”“As far as the question of whether or not this will be in Naqoura or in 
shuttle diplomacy, I think the meetings in the framework that was achieved 
between Israel and Lebanon with the support of the United States was an 
incredibly important milestone of having a framework that could facilitate talks 
and having indirect talks that are in person in Naqoura between the two sides, 
in the presence of the United States and the United Nations, was really 
important,” he went on to say. Asked whether the process “will take lots of 
time,” Hochstein said: “No. I hope not. I think that in these kinds of efforts 
what we've learned is that if you take a lot of time, it doesn't happen. So we 
need to be focused, and we need to move quickly and efficiently to address 
really the needs of what this negotiation entails.”
The U.S. official also noted that he did not visit Lebanon “in an effort for 
normalization” between Lebanon and Israel. “That's not on the table. It is just 
to address this one area. So to do that, you need someone that can talk to both 
parties, and to see if we can help the sides to narrow their gaps and ultimately 
reach a solution,” he pointed out. “I hope that, and trust, and everything I've 
heard today, is that there's a commitment and a desire to reach a resolution,” 
he added. Commenting on Lebanon’s electricity crisis and its relation to oil 
resources, Hochstein said: ”In 2016, when I was here, had we reached a 
resolution in 2016, today, you wouldn't have any blackouts in Lebanon. The 
lights would be going on and you would be paying the cheapest gas prices, 
because you need, paying consumers, Lebanese people, would be paying producer 
prices and you'd likely be exporting.”
“Remarkably, we're sitting down here and we're in an energy crisis around the 
world. And natural gas prices are the most expensive they have ever been in 
history. So instead of buying gas on, the most expensive gas, in the world, 
you'd be selling gas into the most expensive market,” he added. “What I want is 
to have Lebanon as a producer, having billion -- multibillion dollar investments 
from foreign companies here in Lebanon, creating jobs, creating opportunity, 
creating economic stability,” the U.S. official said. Responding to a question 
about recent media reports, Hochstein said: “I'm not looking at common 
reservoirs as an option. That was never my plan, nor is it now.”As for 
Hizbullah’s announcement that it broke a “siege” on Lebanon by bringing diesel 
tankers from Iran, the U.S. official said: “Do you know why Hizbullah did not 
break the noose, or the blockade, or any of the other scary words? We never had 
a blockade. There was never a noose. So they didn't break anything.” “We never 
attempted to stop fuel tankers from coming here. In fact, we have repeatedly -- 
our ambassador here in Beirut, and our senior officials -- we have always said: 
we want to see Lebanon succeed. We want to see fuel,” he added. He also stressed 
that Washington has “a sanctions regime against Syria… not against Lebanon.”“It 
has nothing to do with Lebanon.”
‘Like slaves’: Lebanon's delivery riders struggle as 
economic crisis bites
Reuters, Beirut/22 October ,2021
His motorbike's tank almost empty, Ahmad had barely enough fuel to make one more 
delivery and get home for the night. When the 24-year-old Syrian's phone pinged 
with a food order in a distant suburb of the Lebanese capital Beirut, his heart 
sank. Ahmad could ill afford to lose the work he picked up through local 
delivery app Toters - a precarious lifeline as Lebanon's economic meltdown 
destroys thousands of jobs and plunges three-quarters of the population into 
poverty.
"If I don't work, I don't eat," said Ahmad, who like other workers asked to be 
identified only by his first name. Freelance delivery work from app-based 
platforms has boomed worldwide as COVID-19 lockdowns kept people at home, 
prompting demands for better pay and conditions from workers around the world, 
from New York and Amsterdam to Johannesburg. In Lebanon, eight riders for 
leading delivery apps Toters and India's Zomato Ltd told the Thomson Reuters 
Foundation they were struggling to make ends meet with the additional strains of 
fuel rationing, petrol queues, power cuts, and price hikes. Although gig work is 
promoted as flexible, the riders said they found their jobs stressful and 
exploitative as they lack the protections of formal employment.
Lebanon's labour minister did not respond to an interview request and Zomato 
declined to comment. Toters co-founder and chief operating officer Nael Halwani 
defended the company's model, saying it allowed "shoppers" to decline orders as 
they wished.
But Ahmad said his managers at Toters refused to reassign his late-night order 
some 10 km (6 miles) outside the capital.
After siphoning gasoline from his friend's motorbike to make the delivery, a 
power cut left Ahmad stuck in the apartment building's lift for 30 minutes 
before he could finally head home. "Remember what it was like in the past when 
everyone had slaves? That's what this job is like," he said. Two Toters drivers 
shared a list of working conditions they had received in September that stated: 
"A driver cannot refuse an order for any reason." The instructions said drivers 
who declined orders too often or did not wear their uniform would have their 
accounts temporarily closed. 
Halwani said drivers had the "freedom" to decline orders and go offline as they 
wished, but acknowledged that mid-level supervisors may have communicated such 
instructions to drivers.
Halwani added that Toters had raised drivers' rates above those of competitors 
to account for rising prices, as well as the usual factors of driver 
availability and order volume.
A driver who worked "more than eight hours per day for either five or six days a 
week" could bring home 4 million Lebanese pounds per month, he said. That would 
have amounted to a competitive salary of just under $3,000 in mid-2019, but the 
pound's dramatic devaluation means it is worth $200 at the current market rate.
Toters drivers also said they spent too much time at gas stations to accrue 
enough deliveries - or were forced to stay home because of an empty tank. "I'd 
go down to the station at 6 a.m. and finish at 12.30 p.m.," said Muhannad, a 
31-year-old Toters driver. "I'd keep thinking that I could have delivered three 
orders in that time." As hyperinflation drives up fuel prices and other everyday 
costs, drivers said compensation rates were falling further and further behind. 
One driver said he had to move back in with his parents as he could no longer 
afford rent, while Hammoudi, a 24-year-old Lebanese driver for Zomato, wished he 
could emigrate. "My monthly wage adds up to about 3 million Lebanese pounds, but 
it depends on whether or not I got good tips," said Hammoudi. "I feel like 
there's no place for me here anymore."Under Lebanese labour law, app-based 
delivery drivers are considered "independent contractors", meaning they have no 
social security or health cover and can be laid off at any time. Lebanon is not 
a signatory to Convention 87 of the International Labour Organization, which 
enshrines the right of workers to establish or join labour organizations. It 
does allow collective bargaining, but Zomato and Toters drivers said that when 
they asked for better pay and working conditions, their managers told them they 
could be easily replaced.
When some Toters riders formed WhatsApp groups and Instagram pages to share 
grievances and float the possibility of strike action, company bosses shut their 
app accounts - barring them from working - until they removed the posts, two 
drivers said.
Economists and labour experts said the tensions were characteristic of gig 
economy jobs worldwide but had been exacerbated by Lebanon's cocktail of crises. 
"This is the new way of doing business - outsourcing the means of production to 
the workers," said Rabih Fakhri, a doctoral candidate at Canada's University of 
Montreal researching the Middle East's gig economy.""Workers in Lebanon have to 
cope not only with this, but with social, political and economic stressing 
factors in a country that is running towards a financial meltdown."
Oueidat Denies Suspending Decision to Summon Geagea
Naharnet/October 22/2021
State Prosecutor Ghassan Oueidat has not suspended State Commissioner to the 
Military Court Judge Fadi Akiki’s decision to summon Lebanese Forces leader 
Samir Geagea in the Tayyouneh incidents case, Oueidat’s office said on Friday, 
denying media reports in this regard. The office, however, noted that Akiki’s 
decision is “being followed up by the relevant authorities to determine whether 
the interrogation should happen at the Intelligence Directorate or before the 
judge who tasked the Intelligence Directorate with hearing the LF leader’s 
testimony.”“No timeframe has been set” for the authorities’ deliberations, the 
office added.
US mediator urges quick talks on Lebanon-Israel maritime 
borders
The Arab Weekly/October 22/2021
CAIRO--The US mediator for indirect talks on border demarcation between Lebanon 
and Israel said on Thursday that the negotiations he was hoping to revive should 
be concluded in a short period if they were to succeed. Amos Hochstein, speaking 
to Al Hadath TV during a visit to Beirut, said holding the indirect talks last 
year between the two sides in the presence of the United States and the United 
Nations was an important milestone but that it remained to be seen whether the 
right time to resume the talks was now. “Perhaps there should be some shuttle 
diplomacy first, in order to assess the positions of the parties to identify 
where there is room for negotiation and then ultimately, to go back to Naqoura 
and complete the negotiations,” he said. Long time foes Lebanon and Israel 
started negotiations through a US mediator in October 2020 at the UN 
peacekeeper’s base in Lebanon’s Naqoura. The maritime border dispute has held up 
exploration in the potentially gas-rich area but talks have since stalled. In 
Thursday’s interview, Hochstein said he hoped the negotiation would not take too 
much time. “I think that in these kinds of efforts what we’ve learned is that if 
you take a lot of time, it doesn’t happen,” he said. “So we need to be focused 
and we need to move quickly.” Israel already pumps gas from huge offshore 
fields. Lebanon, which has yet to find commercial gas reserves in its own 
waters, is desperate for cash from foreign donors amidst a deepening economic 
meltdown. Hochstein said resolving the border issue would help alleviate 
Lebanon’s power shortage by allowing it to develop its offshore gas resources. 
Asked about a deal to export Egyptian gas through a pipeline going through 
Jordan and Syria to Lebanon, Hochstein said the United States had been working 
to make that happen and US sanctions against Syria would not have to be waived 
to make the deal go through as they likely don’t apply in this case. “We have 
determined that it is not, this kind of a transaction could be, likely is not, 
under, covered by the sanctions. And therefore we’ve informed the government 
here, and we’ve informed the government in Egypt that it can move ahead,” 
Hochstein said.
Shea Inaugurates Pop Up Space Training Program in Sidon
Naharnet/October 22, 2021 
U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Dorothy Shea on Friday attended the inauguration of 
the Pop-Up Spaces program in Sidon. "This one year-long program, which is 
implemented by Tatweer Baladna, will empower youth and young professionals in 
South Lebanon, North Lebanon, and the Bekaa through civic education and social 
entrepreneurship training and hands-on activities," the U.S. Embassy said in a 
statement. During the event, Ambassador Shea remarked: “Pop-Up American spaces 
demonstrate to our friends, the Lebanese people, that wherever you are in this 
time of great economic difficulty, we're not going to let that stop us from 
popping up and meeting you where you are.”She continued saying, “Let’s look at 
this as one step in the long continuum of our engagement and our partnership 
with you.” "To the youth who will be participating in the training programs and 
the activities that we will foster through this Pop-Up, I thank you for your 
commitment and for your engagement, and I'm excited to see what you guys are 
going to do with the skills that you further develop through this program,” she 
added.
Nasrallah Says Tayyouneh Probe 'Brave', Warns Israel 
over Oil and Gas
Naharnet/October 22/2021 
Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah on Friday vowed to follow up on the 
investigations into the deadly Tayyouneh incidents, as he described the probe as 
“serious, accurate and brave.”“Things are judged by their outcomes and the 
political, popular and journalistic condemnation of those who killed, aggressed 
and almost dragged the country into strife and civil war must continue,” 
Nasrallah said in a televised speech marking the Prophet’s Birthday. “We renew 
the praise of the awareness, prudence and wisdom of the families of the 
aggrieved martyrs, who will carry on with this stance,” Nasrallah added. Turning 
to the issue of Lebanon’s stalled sea border talks with Israel, Nasrallah said 
he will not comment on anything related to border demarcation and that he leaves 
the issue to the Lebanese state. He, however, warned Israel that it would be 
mistaken if it thought that it can act as it pleases in the disputed area. “The 
resistance in Lebanon, certainly and at the appropriate moment, will act if it 
finds that Lebanon’s oil and gas are in danger, even if they are in the disputed 
area. It will act accordingly and it is capable of acting accordingly,” 
Nasrallah cautioned. As for Lebanon’s expected negotiations with the 
International Monetary Fund, Nasrallah said: “We have no problem in the 
principle of negotiations and we hope Lebanon will have a truly unified 
delegation.”Lebanon should negotiate “from a position of responsibility and 
interest, not from a position of receiving diktats,” the Hizbullah leader added. 
Commenting on the dire economic situations in Lebanon in light of the latest 
hike in fuel prices, Nasrallah called for launching the ration card plan as soon 
as possible and agreeing to “the demands of employees as to raising 
transportation compensations and reviving public transport.”
Lebanon’s Hezbollah warns Israel against drilling in 
disputed maritime border area
Reuters/October 22/2021
BEIRUT: The leader of Lebanon’s Hezbollah on Friday warned Israel against 
drilling for oil and gas in the disputed maritime border area between the two 
countries until the issue is resolved, and said the Iran-backed group would take 
action if it did so. “If the enemy thinks they can act as they please before 
reaching a solution to this issue they are wrong,” Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said 
in a televised speech. Lebanon’s cabinet had raised the question to the United 
Nations permanent representative and others in the international community after 
Israel granted US oilfield services group Halliburton an offshore drilling 
contract in the Mediterranean, asking to clarify whether the drilling would take 
place in disputed areas. Lebanon and Israel are in dispute over the delineation 
of their territorial waters and negotiations between the old foes could lead to 
Lebanon being able to unlock valuable gas reserves amid its worst-ever financial 
crisis. Israel already pumps gas from huge offshore fields. The two countries 
have been holding on-off US mediated talks since October to try to resolve the 
issue. “I will not state any positions on this as I don’t want to complicate the 
negotiations but for sure the resistance in Lebanon at the right time through 
following this issue when it finds that Lebanese oil and gas is in danger in the 
disputed area it will act accordingly,” Nasrallah said. The US mediator for the 
indirect talks, Amos Hochstein, visited Beirut this week and said a period of 
shuttle diplomacy would proceed any return to indirect talks between the two 
countries similar those held in October 2020 at the United Nations’ peackepeers 
base in Lebanon’s Naqoura.
Israeli Defense Minister signs seizure order against 
Lebanese company for helping Hezbollah
Shreif Sanitary Co. was slapped with a seizure order by Gantz after providing 
Hezbollah with equipment for its precision guided missile project.
Jerusalem Post/October 22/2021
Israel’s Defense Minister Benny Gantz signed a seizure order against a 
Lebanon-based company after it allegedly provided Hezbollah with equipment for 
the group’s precision-guided missile project.
The directive against the company, Shreif Sanitary Co. and its owner Haytham 
Ahmad Muhammad Shrief, was given “within the framework of a wide range of 
activities conducted against Hezbollah’s precision-guided missile project,” the 
ministry said in a statement.
The seizure order was signed following joint work of the IDF’s Intelligence 
Directorate and the National Bureau for Counter Terror Financing in the Ministry 
of Defense.
According to the ministry, the company is registered in Lebanon and regularly 
conducts commercial activities with Hezbollah as well as provides the Lebanese 
terror group with equipment for use in projects related to the production of 
precision munitions.
“The company is a preferred supplier of Hezbollah, is fully aware of the 
organization’s work, and supplies Hezbollah with equipment at a reduced price,” 
read the statement which quoted intelligence gathered by Israel’s defense 
establishment.
The group, which has been working on the expensive and classified project since 
2013, has been attempting to build factories to produce precision missiles in 
South Lebanon, Beirut, and the Bekaa under the guidance of senior officers from 
the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps.
Hezbollah has over 130,000 rockets and missiles of all sorts of ranges and 
payloads and while the group has been working on this project since 2013, they 
have only several dozens precision missiles.
The terror group first tried to bring in ready-to-use precision missiles from 
Iran to Lebanon overland via Syria in 2013. But when the majority of those 
attempts were thwarted by alleged Israeli airstrikes, Hezbollah decided in 2016 
to take “dumb” missiles from Syria and upgrade them to precision missiles. 
But continued airstrikes forced the group to move their project to Lebanon, 
where Israel rarely acts because while members of Israel’s security cabinet have 
pushed for preemptive strikes against Hezbollah in Lebanon, the IDF is against 
such actions.
Nevertheless, despite significant investments of time, resources and money, 
Hezbollah has been unable to build operational factories to produce precision 
missiles for use against the Jewish State.
Gantz’s seizure order of $17,000 that was transferred from Hezbollah to the 
company and owner “will enable the introduction of the company into 
international financial ‘black lists’ and will greatly hinder its activity,” the 
ministry said.
The order will remain in effect until August 1rst 2023. “This order is an 
integral part of the campaign conducted against the Lebanese project. It is a 
clear and sharp message to every commercial entity that assistance provided to 
and business with terror organizations are unacceptable and will negatively 
affect their ability to operate within the international financial system,” the 
defense ministry said.
Lebanon…war and Hezbollah!
Jameel Altheyabi/Saudi Gazate/October 22, 2021
Is Lebanon back on the brink of a civil war again? What is the benefit for 
Hezbollah from blowing up the situation and burning Lebanon? Why does it seek to 
plunge the Lebanese into all kinds of chaos, assassinations and crises? Why does 
the international community continue to remain silent about its Satanic crimes 
and devilish practices?
It was ascertained to the world, through a historic international verdict in the 
assassination case of Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in 2005, that the terrorist 
Hezbollah — the statelet that dominates the Lebanese state with weapons — is 
behind all the crimes, assassinations and liquidations that has taken place in 
Beirut.
There are plenty of most compelling proofs and evidence of the involvement of 
this terrorist gang, run by a regional power, in its bid to “Persianize” Lebanon 
along with Yemen, Iraq and Syria, are handled by the agent Hassan Nasrallah. The 
Beirut port explosion and the attempt to bury its crime by threatening Lebanese 
Judge Tarek Bitar, who is probing the blast, with insistence on his removal, 
were not the last among the crimes of Hezbollah. The terrorist outfit is 
attempting to dwarf the Najib Mikati’s government, which has not yet completed 
even 40 days.
Hezbollah pays lip service to resisting Israel and supporting Palestine, and it 
has spilled the most blood in the Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon, and has 
brought to Lebanon nothing but calamities, disappointments, wars and lost 
adventures.
There is an international and regional consensus that attributes the despair of 
the Lebanese situation to the militia, the terrorist arm of a regional power 
that does not want good for either Lebanon or the region. At the same time, the 
flabby and selfish and even corrupt political class — as per the description of 
the international community — cannot be acquitted of the crimes committed 
against Lebanon and turning it into a failed country without a future.
There is no doubt that the agendas of Hezbollah and its supporters and 
financiers will continue to push with practicing their crimes in order to keep 
Lebanon “sick in bed” as long as possible, and push it into an abyss and an 
unbearable hell, which is what the Lebanese are currently experiencing.
Imagine that “the former Switzerland of the East” has no electricity, no fuel, 
no medicine, no money, no safe life as corruption is rampant, and its only trade 
is the export of drugs in shipments of fruit.
It is certain that the Lebanese militia and those who stand behind it and those 
associated with it only want Lebanon to remain as it is. Therefore, Hezbollah 
seeks with all its might to distance Lebanon from its Arab surroundings, its 
true friends and supporters, and leave it in a friendless state.
This is what Nasrallah speaks out publicly, as he revealed more than once his 
rejection of the Lebanese regime. He has never concealed his desire to change 
the foundations on which Lebanon is built and turn it into one of the states of 
the Great Republic.
In such a context, more patriotic sacrifices are required from the sons of 
Lebanon in confronting the “Satanic Party” as well as to expose its practices 
and its allies at home and abroad, if they want to return their country to its 
former era that is well known for them!
US mediator says Lebanon-Israel maritime talks need to be 
quick
Gulf News/October 22, 2021
Cairo: The US mediator for indirect talks on border demarcation between Lebanon 
and Israel said on Thursday that the negotiations he was hoping to revive should 
be concluded in a short period if they were to succeed. Amos Hochstein, speaking 
to Al Hadath TV during a visit to Beirut, said holding the indirect talks last 
year between the two sides in the presence of the United States and the United 
Nations was an important milestone but that it remained to be seen whether the 
right time to resume the talks was now. “Perhaps there should be some shuttle 
diplomacy first, in order to assess the positions of the parties to identify 
where there is room for negotation and then ultimately, to go back to Naqoura 
and complete the negotaitions,” he said. Long time foes Lebanon and Israel 
started negotiations through a US mediator in October 2020 at the UN 
peacekeeper’s base in Lebanon’s Naqoura. The maritime border dispute has held up 
exploration in the potentially gas-rich area but talks have since stalled. In 
Thursday’s interview, Hochstein said he hoped the negotiation would not take too 
much time. “I think that in these kinds of efforts what we’ve learned is that if 
you take a lot of time, it doesn’t happen,” he said. “So we need to be focused, 
and we need to move quickly.” Israel already pumps gas from huge offshore 
fields. Lebanon, which has yet to find commercial gas reserves in its own 
waters, is desperate for cash from foreign donors amidst a deepening economic 
meltdown. Hochstein said resolving the border issue would help alleviate 
Lebanon’s power shortage by allowing it to develop its offshore gas resources. 
Asked about a deal to export Egyptian gas through a pipeline going through 
Jordan and Syria to Lebanon, Hochstein said the United States had been working 
to make that happen and US sanctions against Syria would not have to be waived 
to make the deal go through as they likely don’t apply in this case. “We have 
determined that it is not -- this kind of a transaction could be, likely is not, 
under -- covered by the sanctions. And therefore we’ve informed the government 
here, and we’ve informed the government in Egypt that it can move ahead,” 
Hochstein said.
Syrians abandon Lebanon as new migrant route to Europe 
beckons
Najia Houssari/Arab News/October 22, 2021
BEIRUT: Struggling to cope with soaring living costs and low wages, desperate 
Syrian refugees and workers are abandoning Lebanon and turning to a new 
migration route into Europe, via Belarus, with many risking their lives and 
family savings in the process.
An illegal Syrian worker who arrived in Beirut four years ago and lives with his 
20-year-old sister in the capital told Arab News that “working in Lebanon no 
longer makes sense.”
“I work all day long delivering goods to be paid 50,000 Lebanese pounds 
(equivalent to $2.50 on the black market),” Ahmed said. “That is not nearly 
enough because of the rising costs.”
In the past two months alone, more than 16,000 undocumented migrants are 
believed to have entered the EU from Belarus after Belarusian President 
Alexander Lukashenko responded to Brussels-imposed sanctions by saying he will 
no longer stop asylum-seekers from crossing into neighboring Poland.
Belarus has been accused of offering migrants tourist visas and helping them 
across its border — a move that appears to have made the previous migrant route 
through Turkey and on to the Greek islands a thing of the past. Arab and foreign 
airlines arranging trips to Belarus through Lebanon have seen demand surge since 
September, while Syrians have been queuing outside the General Directorate of 
Public Security’s offices in Beirut for hours to have their passports returned 
or to pay residency fees. Lebanese citizens can obtain a visa for Belarus once 
they arrive at Minsk airport. However, Syrians, Iraqis and Palestinians are 
required to get a tourist visa in advance. Ahmed told Arab News that he found a 
video on TikTok of Syrians talking about their trip to Belarus, then Poland and 
finally to Germany, and claiming that the journey is less risky than traveling 
by sea. “I am now getting my documents ready to leave before the end of October, 
because things will not get easier after that because of the conditions in 
winter,” he said.
Migrants undertaking the journey face hazardous conditions, with freezing 
overnight temperatures and the risk of getting lost in dense forests along the 
500 km frontier. They must also deal with people smugglers of different 
nationalities who demand thousands of dollars in advance payments. Social media 
posts offer details about the journey and the sums migrants can expect to pay. 
Those who reach their final destination reassure their families that they have 
arrived at “the camp” — an expression refugees use to describe salvation, as 
they pursue a “better life.”Ali, 35, who has worked as a janitor in Beirut’s 
suburbs for more than 10 years, said that friends who completed the migration 
route called him via WhatsApp and “seemed very happy.”
However, Ali said that he would not consider making the trip. “Migrants must be 
young. There is no place for families on such an arduous journey.”Belarus’ 
announcement at the end of May that it would not stop migrants from entering 
Europe came in response to a series of EU sanctions imposed after Belarusian 
authorities forced a passenger plane to land in Minsk and seized opposition 
journalist Roman Protasevich who was on board. Following the incident, the EU 
banned Belarusian carriers from using its airspace and airports.
A Syrian worker, who declined to be named, said: “Syrians in Syria and Lebanon 
have heard stories about migration to Belarus, then on to Europe, since August, 
but they remained skeptical about this route until September.” He added: “Those 
who work legally in Lebanon have the right to travel from Beirut International 
Airport and the right to return to Lebanon as long as their residency permits 
are valid, but if a refugee wishes to leave Lebanon and go to Belarus, they are 
required to sign a document stating they will never come back.”
The website of the Belarusian Consulate in Lebanon provides instructions on 
obtaining an entry visa for Belarus, with a list of required documents and visa 
fees. Syrians, Iraqis and Palestinians need a tourist visa to enter the country, 
and must provide the name of the airline, a passport valid for at least six 
months, and an insurance policy that costs €12 ($14). A single-entry visa costs 
€25.
The embassy’s website has been overwhelmed with questions from Syrians seeking a 
“tourist visa for one week.”Three airlines, Syrian Air, Emirates and Turkish, 
fly to Minsk from Lebanon. According to Syrians, the flights “are fully booked 
by tourists.”Ahmed said: “The tourism office asked me to pay $4,000 for the 
visa, a one-week hotel reservation and a ticket. When I get to Belarus, I will 
have to wait with a group of 10 or 15 people for someone who will get us a 
mobile phone with Internet access and a pinned location on the Belarusian-Polish 
border that we are supposed to reach by foot, crossing through a forest on the 
frontier.”He said that the journey might take hours. “When we reach the 
location, a car will be waiting for us on the Polish side of the border to get 
us into Germany. There, we will turn ourselves in and ask for asylum. To get 
from Belarus to Poland, my family must transfer $3,000 to an account in Turkey, 
whose owners will handle the cost of the next phase, from Poland to Germany.”
Crossing from Belarus into Poland is getting increasingly difficult.
Ali was told by his friends that “the Belarusian police turn a blind eye to 
those walking in the jungle, but the Polish security authorities have very 
strict measures. If they catch people trying to cross the borders illegally, 
they send them back to Belarus. However, asylum-seekers do not give up. They 
keep trying. Those who fail to reach the location, return to their hotels and 
try again the next day.”He said that “those who handle the smuggling operation 
are from different nationalities, and might be Belarusian, Iraqi or Syrian.”
Ali also said that his relative “got lucky while crossing the jungle, as he fell 
and injured his leg, but there was a Syrian doctor in the group, who is also an 
asylum-seeker.”Poland said that its border patrols have detained hundreds of 
migrants since August. Groups of migrants include Afghan, Iraqi and Syrian 
refugees, as well those from Turkey and Jordan. According to press reports, 
several asylum-seekers have died of exhaustion as temperatures in the forests on 
the Belarusian-Polish border plummet. The Polish Press Agency reported that the 
body of a 19-year-old Syrian man who drowned in the Bug River on the border was 
found on Wednesday.
Nissan ex-Chair Ghosn Set on Restoring Reputation
Associated Press/22 October ,2021
Carlos Ghosn, the former auto industry superstar whose career screeched to a 
halt with his arrest three years ago, isn't about to settle into quiet 
retirement. The former head of the Nissan-Renault alliance fled to Lebanon in 
late 2019, while out on bail facing financial misconduct charges in Japan. In a 
recent interview with The Associated Press, Ghosn was confident, energized and 
determined to fight to restore his reputation. "I'm going to be there. I'm going 
to defend my rights as long as I have the energy to do it," Ghosn, 67, said via 
Zoom from his home in Beirut. His story is "far from finished," he said.
Ghosn fled from Japan while hiding in a big cargo box on a private jet. The 
French, Brazilian-born Ghosn took refuge in Lebanon, his ancestral homeland, 
which has no extradition treaty with Japan. Ghosn said he is trying to get 
Interpol to drop its red flag, which requests police worldwide to seek out and 
arrest persons wanted for prosecution or to serve a sentence. He's eager to be 
able to travel outside of Lebanon, but the process is likely to be bureaucratic 
and long. Japanese prosecutors say they are still intent on pursuing him on 
allegations of under-reporting his compensation and of breach of trust in 
misusing Nissan money for personal gain — charges he denies. Japan has 
extradition treaties with the U.S. and South Korea and prosecutors said they 
would seek help from other countries, including Brazil and France, if Ghosn 
travels there.
Apart from the main case in Japan, Ghosn is under investigation in France and is 
being sued by Nissan Motor Co. in Japan for alleged financial damages. Tokyo 
prosecutors have refused to send his files to Lebanon for the criminal case to 
be tried there.
Nissan's French alliance partner Renault sent Ghosn to Japan in 1999 to steer a 
turnaround when the Japanese automaker was on the verge of collapse. Under Ghosn, 
Nissan became more profitable than Renault. The partnership expanded to include 
smaller rival Mitsubishi Motors Corp. and other automakers. Nissan owns 15% of 
Renault, which owns a much bigger 43% of Nissan. The government of France owns 
15% of Renault. Analysts estimate the damage suffered by the Nissan-Renault 
alliance over the Ghosn scandal at billions of dollars in capital value, sales 
and brand image. Nissan expects to eke out a profit this fiscal year after 
losing money for the last two years.
Aaron Ho, analyst at New York-based CFRA Research, believes Nissan has fallen 
behind in an intensely competitive industry because of the Ghosn scandal. 
"Before Nissan resolves its internal issues over corporate power and puts its 
resources back into making tangible progress — which takes a lot of time, and a 
lot of time has been wasted — to create values for its end demand, we are not 
optimistic," he said. Ghosn asserts the case against him was concocted in a 
power struggle within Nissan's boardroom. He said he wants to show "a 
conspiracy" by Nissan officials who, worried about a takeover-like merger by 
Renault, got Japanese authorities to pursue a criminal case against him. "The 
only way I can qualify them are: Thugs, inside Nissan," he said.
Nissan, which has denounced Ghosn, does not comment on the Ghosn case. Testimony 
at the trial of Greg Kelly, a former top executive at Nissan Motor Co. who was 
arrested at the same time as Ghosn, has shown that Nissan officials did seek out 
prosecutors.
The case against Ghosn and Kelly centers on elaborate calculations to compensate 
Ghosn after retirement for a pay cut he took beginning in 2009, when disclosure 
of big executive pay became a legal requirement in Japan. Prosecutors allege 
Ghosn broke the law by failing to report that compensation, which was never paid 
or even formally agreed upon. Kelly says he is innocent, and was trying to find 
legal ways to pay Ghosn to retain him. Ironically, Ghosn says the money he 
allegedly failed to report was based on him retiring in 2018, the year he was 
arrested.
Ghosn looks anything but retired. He's working on movies, teaching classes on 
management, consulting for businesses and helping out with university research 
on "character assassination."
"Look. Books, books, books," he said, when asked what else he's been working 
on.. "Broken Alliances," an English version of the 2020 French book "Le temps de 
la verite," was released in September. He is writing a book with his wife 
Carole, who also is wanted in Japan, about their ordeal.
Human rights advocates and other critics say Japan's system amounts to "hostage 
justice," allowing suspects to be questioned for days without a lawyer present 
while they are kept in solitary confinement in a small, spartan cell. The 
conviction rate of over 99% has raised questions over forced confessions. "One 
of the things I could do for Japan is fighting with all those people who are 
opposed in Japan to the hostage justice system," said Ghosn. His ride is still a 
Nissan, the Patrol sport-utility vehicle, a model he worked on that's popular in 
the Middle East. And he insists there was no way he could have foreseen the 
trouble that was headed his way. "If somebody was telling you before it happened 
that I was going to be arrested," he said, "you would laugh. You would say, 
'Come on. It is a joke.' 
The Latest English LCCC 
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on 
October 22-23/2021
Putin Hosts Israeli PM Bennett
Associated Press/October 22, 2021
Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed hope on Friday that new Israeli Prime 
Minister Naftali Bennett would continue in the footsteps of his predecessor in 
maintaining close and "trusting" relations with his country. After talks at 
Putin's lush Black Sea residence in Sochi, Bennett hailed bilateral ties as 
"strategic" and emphasized the need to maintain an "intimate" dialogue with 
Moscow. Greeting the Israeli prime minister at the start of their first meeting, 
Putin described Russian-Israeli ties as "unique," noting that Israel is home to 
the largest Russian-speaking community. Putin kept close personal ties with 
former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has repeatedly visited 
Russia. On Friday, Putin pointed to Russia's "business-like and trusting 
relationship" with Netanyahu's government and expressed hope that Bennett's 
government would pursue a "policy of continuity" in Russian-Israeli ties. 
Bennett extolled the "great contribution" made by his country's 1 million 
Russian speakers, and emphasized "the deep connection between the two countries" 
while praising Putin for bringing them closer during his 20-year rule. "I can 
tell you on behalf of the citizens of Israel that we consider you a true friend 
of the Jewish people," Bennett said. Bennett hailed the Soviet role in World War 
II and talked about a new museum in Israel that honors Jewish soldiers who 
fought in allied armies, primarily the Red Army. "It's impossible not to 
appreciate the heroism of the entire Russian nation during those difficult 
years," he said in remarks that likely resonated with Putin who cherishes his 
country's decisive contribution to the victory over the Nazis. Russia and Israel 
have developed close political, economic and cultural ties that have helped them 
tackle delicate and divisive issues, such as the situation in Syria where Moscow 
has teamed up with Tehran to shore up Syrian President Bashar Assad's rule. "We 
will also talk about the situation in Syria, and the efforts to halt the Iranian 
military nuclear program," Bennett said at the start of his talks with Putin. 
Putin said that Russia has been "making efforts to help restore Syria's 
statehood and to strengthen it." He noted that despite some problems regarding 
the situation in Syria, "there is also common ground and opportunities for 
cooperation, especially in terms of the fight against terrorism."
Bennett said on Facebook that he had an "excellent" meeting with Putin, adding 
that they discussed a wide range of issues, including "ways to deal with 
Fundamentalist Islam," in talks that stretched over five hours. "Russia is a 
very important player in the region," he said, noting that the relations between 
the two countries are "both strategic and almost daily, and we must maintain a 
direct and intimate line of dialogue." Israel views Iranian entrenchment on its 
northern frontier as a red line, and it has repeatedly struck what it says are 
Iran-linked facilities and weapons convoys destined for Lebanese Hizbullah. The 
Iran-backed militant group has fought alongside Syrian government forces in the 
country's civil war. Russia has waged a military campaign in Syria since 2015, 
helping Assad's government reclaim control over most of the country. Moscow also 
has helped modernize Syria's military, including providing Assad with air 
defense systems, and trained its personnel. Russia and Israel established a 
military hotline to coordinate air force operations over Syria to avoid clashes. 
Israel often attacks Iranian-linked targets in Syria, while Russia has provided 
support to the Syrian government. In 2018, Russia-Israeli ties were severely 
tested by the downing of a Russian warplane by Syrian forces that responded to 
an Israeli air raid and mistook a Russian reconnaissance plane for Israeli jets. 
All 15 members of the Russian crew died. Moscow also has played a delicate 
diplomatic game of maintaining friendly ties with both Israel and Iran. In 2018, 
Moscow struck a deal with Tehran to keep its fighters away from the Golan 
Heights to accommodate Israeli concerns about the Iranian presence in Syria. 
Russia is one of the international parties that negotiated a 2015 nuclear deal 
with Iran. The deal fell apart after then-President Donald Trump withdrew in 
2018. But President Joe Biden's administration is now trying to revive the deal 
with other international powers - a step that Israel opposes.
France urges Iran to curb nuclear activity, resume talks
AP/October 22, 2021
PARIS: France on Friday urged Iran to curb nuclear activities of “unprecedented 
gravity” as US and European envoys met to discuss efforts aimed at reviving the 
troubled 2015 Iran nuclear deal. US envoy Robert Malley joined counterparts from 
France, Britain and Germany at the meetings in Paris, at what the French Foreign 
Ministry called a “critical time” in efforts to salvage the accord. “It is 
urgent and crucial for Iran to end the activities of unprecedented gravity that 
it is conducting in violation of the (agreement) and to immediately resume 
full-fledged cooperation” with the International Atomic Energy Agency, Foreign 
Ministry spokesperson Anne-Claire Legendre said in an online briefing. The IAEA 
is charged with monitoring the 2015 accord, which was aimed at curbing Iran’s 
nuclear activity in exchange for the lifting of crippling sanctions. The US 
pulled out of the accord under Donald Trump and re-imposed sanctions. Since then 
Iran has stepped up nuclear activity and is now in violation of several aspects 
of the deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA. Iran’s 
nuclear activity includes enriching uranium which Western nations fear could be 
used to build an atomic bomb. Tehran denies any such ambitions. The US and 
European partners are ready to return immediately to negotiations with Iran “in 
order to swiftly conclude an agreement on Iran’s return to its commitments and 
the United States’ return to the JCPOA,” Legendre said. Iran’s new hard-line 
government led by President Ebrahim Raisi, which took power in August, has 
hinted it will return to the nuclear talks in Vienna but has balked at setting a 
date.
U.S. Iran Envoy to Hold Nuclear Talks with Europe Powers
Agence France Presse/October 22, 2021
U.S. envoy for Iran Robert Malley will on Friday meet diplomats from three 
European powers over the Iranian nuclear crisis as Vienna-based talks to salvage 
a 2015 deal remain suspended. The agreement between Iran and world powers to 
find a long-term solution to the now two-decade-old crisis over its 
controversial nuclear program has been moribund since former U.S. president 
Donald Trump walked out of the deal in May 2018. His successor Joe Biden has 
said he is ready to re-enter the agreement so long as Iran meets key 
preconditions. But the Vienna-based talks through intermediaries made little 
headway, before being interrupted by the election of hardliner Ebrahim Raisi as 
Iran's president. Malley's trip to Paris for the meeting with the so-called E3 
of Britain, France and Germany comes after he visited the Gulf for talks with 
allies Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates who are all deeply 
concerned by Iran's nuclear program. "Following consultations with partners in 
the region, Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley will meet with his E3 
counterparts in Paris on Friday," a U.S. State Department spokesman said, 
without giving further details. A French diplomatic source also confirmed the 
meeting, adding that a representative of the EU's foreign policy section would 
attend. Western powers, Israel and pro-Washington Arabian peninsula states fear 
that Iran intends to to develop an atomic bomb. Tehran denies this, insisting it 
only seeks to produce energy for its population. The nuclear deal promised Iran 
step-by-step sanctions relief in exchange for restrictions on its atomic work 
which would be under the strict supervision of the U.N. atomic agency. U.N. 
nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi expressed concern Tuesday he was still 
waiting for a "high level" discussion with Iranian officials in Tehran, after 
negotiating last month a new compromise on monitoring Iran's nuclear program to 
help restart the talks in Vienna.
Iran nuclear talks ‘on life support’ as Tehran drags feet
Agencies/October 22, 2021
LONDON: Talks to rein in Iran’s nuclear arms program are on the verge of 
collapse, an anonymous source from a government involved in the negotiations has 
told The Independent. Talks that had been continuing in Vienna earlier this year 
ground to a halt when Iran elected its new president, Ebrahim Raisi, who is a 
religious and political hard-liner and a close ally of supreme leader, Ayatollah 
Khamenei. Since then, Iran has failed to return in earnest to the talks and has 
instead ramped up production of enriched uranium and other measures that bring 
it closer to having a nuclear bomb. 
The JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), agreed in 2015 between Iran, the 
US, China, Russia and other world powers, curbed Iran’s nuclear program in 
exchange for sanctions relief, but the deal later broke down.
Now negotiations for a return to the JCPOA are on the verge of collapse, The 
Independent has reported. “The deal is not totally dead, but it’s on life 
support,” said an official of a government involved in the talks. The official 
spoke on condition of anonymity. The US has accused the Iranian side of dragging 
its feet in returning to the table for talks. State Department spokesman, Ned 
Price, told reporters “this is not an exercise that can go on 
indefinitely.”Israel’s finance minister, Avigdor Liberman, warned this week that 
“a confrontation with Iran is only a matter of time, and not a lot of 
time.”Raisi’s team has claimed they need time to settle into their new 
government and that is why there are delays, but the official involved in the 
talks said: “If they’re just playing for time while expanding their program, 
we’ll have to recalibrate our approach.” Some suspect Iran is enriching more 
uranium and ramping up its production capacity to gain more leverage if it 
chooses to rejoin the talks. Sanam Vakil, deputy director of the Iran program at 
London-based think-tank Chatham House, told The Independent: “They are 
struggling to build a strategy and build consensus. Their foot-dragging can be 
seen as a leverage-building exercise, but it’s also a reflection of internal 
paralysis.”She continued: “Their thinking is they can survive whatever is to 
come because they have survived everything thus far. But it’s a dangerous 
calculation. They’re always strategically on the razor’s edge. The outcome 
domestically could be dangerous in the long run. Yes, they have the monopoly of 
violence. Yes, the economy is bandaged, but the poverty level is increasing. 
Debt is increasing.” The insider source told The Independent: “If the Iranians 
really wanted to take their time, why continue to escalate their non-compliance? 
“Why not freeze their non-compliance? If they walk away, the options aren’t 
good. It would be a miscalculation to think everyone would just shrug their 
shoulders.”
Syria constitution talks stall at UN
AFP/October 22, 2021
GENEVA: Talks on a new constitution for Syria this week ended in disappointment, 
the United Nations mediator concluded Friday, and without a proper understanding 
on how to move the process forward. The sixth round of discussions between 15 
representatives each from President Bashar Assad’s government, the opposition, 
and from civil society, were held this week at the UN in Geneva. The government 
and the opposition traded barbs afterwards, pointing the finger at each other 
for the lack of progress. “It was ups and downs,” UN envoy Geir Pedersen told a 
news conference following the Syrian Constitutional Committee (SCC) talks. “We 
had three days that went rather well and one day that was more difficult.”This 
week, each delegation brought forward draft texts on different areas of the 
constitution: on Monday, the government on sovereignty, independence and 
territorial integrity; on Tuesday, the opposition on the armed forces and 
security; then civil society on the rule of law; and on Friday, the government 
on terrorism.
Israel designates six Palestinian civil society groups as 
terrorists
AP/October 22, 2021
TEL AVIV: Israel on Friday designated six Palestinian civil society groups as 
terrorist organizations and accused them of funnelling donor aid to militants.
The charge was rejected by human rights watchdogs who said the move will stifle 
monitoring of potential abuses. The designations authorize Israeli authorities 
to close the groups’ offices, seize their assets and arrest their staff in the 
occupied West Bank, watchdogs Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International said 
in a joint statement condemning the move.Israel’s defense ministry said the six 
Palestinian groups had ties to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine 
(PLFP), a left-wing faction with an armed wing that has carried out deadly 
attacks against Israelis.
“(The) declared organizations received large sums of money from European 
countries and international organizations, using a variety of forgery and 
deceit,” the defense ministry said in a statement, alleging the money had 
supported PFLP’s activities.
The groups include leading Palestinian human rights organizations Al-Haq and 
Addameer, who document alleged rights violations by both Israel and the 
Western-backed Palestinian Authority, which has limited self-rule in the West 
Bank. Asked for comment, an official with PFLP, which is on the European Union’s 
terrorism blacklist, did not outright reject ties to the six groups but said 
they maintain relations with civil society organizations across the West Bank 
and Gaza. “It is part of the rough battle Israel is launching against the 
Palestinian people and against civil society groups, in order to exhaust them,” 
PFLP official Kayed Al-Ghoul said.
Al-Haq did not immediately provide comment. Addameer and another one of the 
designated groups, Defense for Children International — Palestine, rejected the 
Israeli accusations as an “attempt to eliminate Palestinian civil society.” The 
other three groups listed did not immediately provide comment. Human Rights 
Watch and Amnesty International said the “decision is an alarming escalation 
that threatens to shut down the work of Palestine’s most prominent civil society 
organizations.”They added: “The decades-long failure of the international 
community to challenge grave Israeli human rights abuses and impose meaningful 
consequences for them has emboldened Israeli authorities to act in this brazen 
manner.”Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem in the 1967 
Middle East war. Palestinians seek the territories for a future state. Pedersen 
wanted to wrap up Friday by striking a form of provisional agreement on the 
principles that had been discussed, either in part or in full — or if not, then 
agreeing on what the parties disagreed on. “The discussion today was a big 
disappointment. We did not manage to achieve what we had hoped to achieve: that 
we would have a good discussion on how to reach forward for some kind of a 
consensus,” the Norwegian diplomat said.“We lacked a proper understanding on how 
to move that process forward.”Negotiations have not been held since January, 
when the fifth round of talks hit a brick wall. No date was agreed for the next 
round of discussions.
The SCC was created in September 2019 and first convened a month later.
The tentative negotiations are aimed at rewriting the war-torn country’s 
constitution. It is hoped the talks could pave the way toward a broader 
political process. Ahmad Kuzbari, the head of the government SCC delegation, 
said some opposition proposals were “far from reality and even reflected malign 
thought and aggressive agendas,” he told reporters afterwards. He accused the 
opposition of “ceaseless attempts to lay obstacles and to make this round fail 
and lead it not to achieve any outcome.”“Despite all that took place, our 
delegation reaffirms its will to carry on, to engage positively in the process,” 
he concluded.
Syrian opposition negotiations leader Hadi Al-Bahra said Kuzbari’s claims were 
“bare of any truth” and said the regime did not have the will to reach a 
solution. “There were not even attempts to achieve a consensus,” he said. Bahra 
said the opposition and the government’s position on Syrian independence, 
sovereignty and territorial integrity were interchangeable, “but still they are 
insisting that there is no consensus.”But he said the talks in Geneva were the 
only international platform on which the Syrian opposition had a voice, so it 
was one “we must preserve.”
Pedersen said the participants “agreed that it could not continue like this,” 
but revealed that “a little bit of trust” had been established this week and he 
could “see that there are possibilities.”Syria’s civil war erupted in 2011 after 
the violent repression of protests demanding regime change. It quickly spiralled 
into a complex conflict that pulled in numerous actors, including jihadist 
groups and foreign powers. The war has left around half a million people dead. 
Throughout the civil war, the UN has been striving to nurture a political 
resolution.
Turkish counter-espionage against foreign spy networks 
leads to multiple 
Agencies/October 22, 2021
ANKARA: Turkey has arrested a number of individuals believed to be involved in 
espionage activities on behalf of other nations, it has been revealed. A 
wide-ranging operation by Turkey’s National Intelligence Organization recently 
detained at least 15 people linked with Israeli intelligence agency Mossad, for 
allegedly carrying out activities on Turkish soil against Israeli dissidents and 
Palestinian students. As part of an investigation by the Istanbul public 
prosecutor’s office, according to pro-government newspaper Sabah, interrogation 
of the detainees is underway after they were taken to a prison in Istanbul. 
Conviction for espionage in Turkey carries a prison term of 15 to 20 years. 
Around 200 people took part in the operation to apprehend the 15 detainees, 
surveilling them for over a year in secret, in what appears to have been one of 
the largest intelligence operations in Turkish history. 
The 15 were discovered after Turkish counterterrorism forces held separate 
operations in four provinces; the spy network is thought to have had five 
separate cells of three people each spread across Turkey. Members were allegedly 
in close contact with Mossad field officers, relaying information and documents 
through face-to-face meetings abroad, in Croatia, Romania, Kenya, and 
Switzerland. The cells, supposedly paid tens of thousands of dollars and euros 
for their work, conducted research into various associations and companies in 
Turkey, as well as Palestinian students enrolled in Turkish universities on 
courses that could have practical use in relation to defense or terrorist 
activities, and sent this information back to Mossad. Turkish intelligence 
believes several Palestinians reported missing since last month were part of the 
ring. A number of Syrians are also thought to have been involved. Neither the 
Israeli or Turkish governments have commented on the reports. Although ties 
between the two countries have been fragile over the years, with Turkish links 
to Hamas a particular sticking point, both countries’ presidents agreed on the 
need to improve bilateral ties after a phone call in July. “Until some details 
of that operation were disclosed, Turkey was blamed for the … Palestinian people 
who went missing in the country. There were even some reports claiming that 
Turkey was handing over some Hamas members to improve ties with Israel. But, if 
these latest allegations prove true, it seems that some Palestinian people in 
Turkey were secretly working for the Mossad in its own operations,” one expert, 
who requested anonymity, told Arab News. The Mossad ring was not the only 
espionage-related incident to occupy Turkish headlines in recent weeks. On 
Thursday, six suspects, including Russians, Ukrainians and Uzbeks, were jailed 
pending trial over an alleged plot against Chechen dissidents in Turkey, held on 
charges of espionage and preparing armed actions targeting opposition figures in 
the country. After being initially detained in the southern resort province of 
Antalya, they were transferred to Maltepe prison in Istanbul, a city home to 
several thousand Chechens. Turkey also recently detained eight people, including 
two Iranian spies and six locals, over a plot to kidnap a former Iranian 
military official in the eastern province of Van, some 100 km from the border 
with Iran. 
The operation to apprehend the eight came after Turkey briefly detained a member 
of the Iranian Consulate in Istanbul in February, in connection with a probe 
into the assassination of an Iranian dissident in Turkey two years ago. 
In South Sudan, flooding called ‘worst thing in my 
lifetime’
AP/October 22, 2021
MALUALKON, South Sudan: He feels like a man who has drowned.
The worst flooding that parts of South Sudan have seen in 60 years now surrounds 
his home of mud and grass. His field of sorghum, which fed his family, is under 
water. Surrounding mud dykes have collapsed. Other people have fled. Only Yel 
Aguer Deng’s family and a few neighbors remain. This is the third straight year 
of extreme flooding in South Sudan, further imperiling livelihoods of many of 
the 11 million people in the world’s youngest country. A five-year civil war, 
hunger and corruption have all challenged the nation. Now climate change, which 
the United Nations has blamed on the flooding, is impossible to ignore. As he 
empties a fishing net, Daniel Deng, a 50-year-old father of seven, recalls a 
life of being forced to flee again and again because of insecurity. “But this 
one event (the flood) is too much,” he said. “It is the worst thing that 
happened in my lifetime.”
The UN says the flooding has affected almost a half-million people across South 
Sudan since May. Here in Northern Bahr el Ghazal state, the Lol river has burst 
its banks. This state is usually spared from extreme flooding that plagues the 
South Sudan states of Jonglei and Unity that border the White Nile and the Sudd 
marshlands. But now, houses and crops have been swamped. A new report this week 
coordinated by the World Meteorological Organization warned of increasing such 
climate shocks to come across much of Africa, the continent that contributes the 
least to global warming but will suffer from it most. In these rural South Sudan 
communities, shelters of braided grass put up a fragile resistance in a land of 
seemingly endless water. In Langic village, Ajou Bol Yel’s family of seven 
hosted nine neighbors who had lost their homes. The elders sleep outside on beds 
protected by mosquito nets, while the children share the floor. In Majak Awar, 
some 100 families have been displaced twice, in June when homes were flooded and 
again in August when their shelters were ruined, too. “I want to leave for 
Sudan,” whispered Nyibol Arop, a 27-year-old mother of five, as she boiled her 
morning tea just steps away from the stagnant water that threatens her current 
shelter. It is hard to see a stable future when constantly on the move, a lesson 
learned during the civil war that displaced millions of people before a peace 
agreement in 2018. “Floods are not constant. Some people will stay, and some 
will go,” said Thomas Mapol, a 45-year-old father of nine, as he showed off the 
destroyed houses of his village near Majak Awar. “But me, I cannot move 
anywhere. There is no other place that I know.”
Rare Libya Conference Seeks Support ahead of Landmark Elections
Agence France Presse/October 22, 2021
Libya's fragile unity government hosted an international conference Thursday to 
build support ahead of the war-battered country's landmark December election. 
"Your presence is proof that we are on the road to peace," said the head of the 
interim government, Abdulhamid Dbeibah, promising that the vote would be held 
"on time" and urging "respect for the results." Libya and the U.N. have been 
striving to move past the violence that has wracked the North African nation 
since a 2011 NATO-backed uprising toppled and killed dictator Moammar Gadhafi. A 
ceasefire between eastern and western factions last year led to the unity 
government taking office in March with a mandate to take the country to 
elections. "Tripoli has recovered. It is the capital of all Libyans," Dbeibah 
said at the Libya Stabilization Conference, the first of its kind to be held in 
the country for years, with representatives from about 30 nations attending. The 
presidential vote is set to take place on December 24, but legislative polls may 
be delayed, amid wrangling between factions in the country's east and west. 
Libyan Foreign Minister Najla al-Mangoush, in a final statement, said Tripoli 
pledged to respect United Nations resolutions to "create a conducive 
environment" for the holding of "transparent and inclusive" elections. Foreign 
powers have backed various sides in Libya's complex war, and the presence of 
mercenaries and foreign troops in the oil-rich nation is one of the toughest 
obstacles to a lasting peace.Foreign fighters were a major focus of the 
conference. Mangoush repeated Tripoli's "rejection of foreign interference" and 
the "attempts to sow chaos in Libya".
'More precarious'
The UN Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs, Rosemary DiCarlo, insisted 
on the importance of the December elections to "complete the transitional 
phase".he called on international organizations to send "special envoys to 
observe this operation" and to guarantee its transparency. As Libya faces 
multiple accusations of mistreatment of illegal migrants, DiCarlo urged 
authorities to speed up the repatriation of refugees stranded there and to 
release migrants in detention. Foreign powers have been pushing hard for 
elections to be held as scheduled, after the date was agreed at UN-led talks 
last year.
French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said that the holding of both 
presidential and legislative elections on December 24 was "within reach". He 
praised "remarkable progress" made in both politics and security. "The 
aspirations of Libyans for sovereignty converge with the security interests of 
the entire region, from the Sahel to Europe to North Africa," Le Drian said. 
"With our support, Libyans can seize the historic opportunity that exists today 
to regain peace," he added. Although there are sharp disagreements over the 
vote, Libya expert Emadeddin Badi said the conference aims to "capitalize on the 
momentum to see Libya stabilized, because several countries do actually want to 
see a stable Libya, even if on their own terms".
- Foreign fighters -
Mangoush labelled foreign fighters "a threat not just to Libya but to the entire 
region". Last December, the UN estimated that 20,000 combatants from abroad were 
present in the country. They include Russians sent by the shadowy Kremlin-linked 
Wagner group, African and Syrian mercenaries and Turkish soldiers deployed under 
a deal with a previous unity government at the height of the last round of 
east-west fighting. The minimal progress since a January deadline for their 
departure under a ceasefire deal reflects the complexity of the issue. Earlier 
this month, a joint commission of eastern and western military commanders agreed 
on a roadmap for their departure -- but it lacked a timeline. Tripoli has said a 
"very modest" number of fighters have left. Also on the list of Libya's woes is 
the question of integrating and unifying the country's armed forces under a 
single command -- forces that as recently as last year were firing at each 
other. While in theory the country has a unity government, its east is largely 
controlled by military strongman Khalifa Haftar, widely expected to stand as a 
presidential candidate but despised by many in Libya's west. 
The Latest The Latest LCCC 
English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published 
on October 22-23/2021
In His Second Term, Trudeau Must Fix His Iran Policy
Alireza Nader/FDD-Insight/October 22, 2021
Last month’s re-election of Justin Trudeau as Canada’s prime minister provides 
an opportunity to reflect on Ottawa’s relationship with the Islamic Republic in 
Iran. Iran policy is an issue of great importance to hundreds of thousands of 
Canadian-Iranians and their allies. So far, however, Trudeau’s Iran policy has 
been weak to nonexistent.
He does pay occasional lip service to supporting Iranian human rights and 
achieving justice for the 55 Canadian-Iranians killed when the regime shot down 
Ukraine International Airlines Flight PS752 last year. But this is all talk.
When push comes to shove, Trudeau and his government choose either to 
accommodate Tehran or simply say nothing. Tellingly, Trudeau failed even to 
mention Iran or PS752 during the recent Canadian election. And Trudeau’s foreign 
minister, Marc Garneau, ignored PS752 during his recent speech before the UN 
General Assembly.
This silence reflects Trudeau’s wish to avoid antagonizing Iran. Canada’s 
current Iran policy centers on supporting the Biden administration’s efforts to 
revive the 2015 nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of 
Action (JCPOA), and on keeping the door open to a more positive diplomatic 
relationship with the regime. Ottawa fears that applying pressure against Tehran 
could undermine these goals.
However, President Joe Biden’s failed attempts to persuade Tehran to resume 
compliance with the JCPOA should demonstrate to Ottawa that achieving an 
acceptable nuclear deal with Iran will require leverage through sustained 
pressure. Indeed, the JCPOA’s prospects grow dimmer every day as the regime 
refuses to fulfill its nuclear obligations or even to return to the negotiating 
table. New Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi’s ultra-hardline government and new 
nuclear negotiating team will likely continue to pursue nuclear and foreign 
policies that put Iran at odds with the international community, including the 
United States and Canada.
Likewise, the door to a positive relationship with Tehran closed a long time 
ago. The Islamic Republic is unlikely ever to reform or pursue policies in line 
with Canada’s democratic principles, especially since Iran now has a mass 
murderer as president.
Meanwhile, the regime’s conduct, from shooting down Flight PS752 to supporting 
terrorist groups across the Middle East and even on Canadian soil, poses a 
direct threat to Canada’s national security. Ottawa needs to start fighting 
back.
In his second term, Trudeau should adopt a policy aimed at thwarting the 
regime’s malign activities, protecting Canadian national security interests, and 
advancing the interests of the Iranian people.
As a first step, Ottawa should join the United States in designating Iran’s 
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization pursuant to 
the Canadian Parliament’s recommendation in 2018. The IRGC is Iran’s most 
powerful military and security actor, responsible for supporting and directing 
Tehran’s various terrorist proxies.
In fact, IRGC personnel were responsible for downing Flight PS752 in 2020. The 
regime has refused to provide a full accounting of the PS752 shootdown, and 
according to former Iranian Foreign Minister Muhammad Javad Zarif, the IRGC is 
responsible for hiding the truth. So far, Ottawa has not taken any action 
against the IRGC, depriving Canada of leverage necessary to convince the regime 
to provide clear answers. Canada should couple sanctions against the IRGC with a 
concerted push for international bodies such as the International Civil Aviation 
Organization to hold the regime accountable for shooting down Flight PS752.
In addition, Ottawa should crack down on Iran’s malign presence in Canada. This 
should include efforts to counter the regime’s foreign influence network, 
money-laundering, and other illicit activities in Canada.
Ottawa should also re-examine its policy of tolerating regime officials on 
Canadian soil. For example, former Iranian Vice President Razm Hosseini has 
admitted to living in Canada in the past, and his family continues to reside in 
Canada while he works in Iran. As a former governor of Kerman, a city in 
southeastern Iran, Hosseini received political support from the late IRGC Qods 
Force leader Qassem Soleimani. Another example is Mahmoud Reza Khavari, the 
former director of Iran’s Bank Melli, who fled to Canada after the regime 
accused him of stealing billions of dollars.
Finally, Ottawa should demonstrate its solidarity with the Iranian people by 
imposing sanctions targeting human rights abusers in Iran. While Trudeau and his 
government have verbally condemned Iranian human rights violations, they have 
done little to back up their words with action. While Canada has followed and 
enforced UN and international sanctions on Iran, it has not imposed Global 
Magnitsky sanctions on individual Iranian human right abusers.
Ottawa’s soft line on Iran has clearly proven itself incapable of defending 
Canada’s values and interests. It is long past time for Trudeau to get tough on 
the clerical regime.
*Alireza Nader is a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), 
where he contributes to FDD’s Iran Program and Center on Economic and Financial 
Power (CEFP). For more analysis from Alireza, the Iran Program, and CEFP, please 
subscribe HERE. Follow Alireza on Twitter @AlirezaNader. Follow FDD on Twitter @FDD 
and @FDD_Iran and @FDD_CEFP. FDD is a Washington, DC-based, nonpartisan research 
institute focusing on national security and foreign policy.
Biden's Afghanistan Withdrawal Unleashes a Lethal 
Terrorist Cocktail
Richard Kemp/Gatestone Institute./October 22, 2021
Despite their promises to deny terrorists safe haven, the Taliban will do the 
opposite. They and Al Qaida are joined at the hip, with both Osama Bin Laden and 
his successor Ayman Al Zawahiri having sworn unbreakable allegiance, bay'ah, to 
the leaders of the Taliban.
The Islamic State's Khorosan branch, with several thousand fighters in 
Afghanistan, will pose a similar threat. Many political leaders in the US and UK 
claim the Taliban are sworn enemies of the IS, with some even suggesting that we 
might form an alliance against IS with Taliban terrorists. But this abhorrent 
proposition is merely an attempt to help limit the political fall-out from their 
ill-judged actions that facilitated the Taliban's conquest.
Today, all these actors know there is no prospect of further large-scale US 
intervention in the country, no matter how great their atrocities. The US 
remains capable of air strikes and even special forces raids against serious 
threats emanating from Afghanistan, but these require high-grade intelligence 
which, despite the powerful technical capabilities of the agencies, is extremely 
difficult to gain now that we have withdrawn all forces.
The prospect of a successful jihadist insurgency in Pakistan, with its nuclear 
arsenal, has been a long-standing concern for the US, which invested huge 
intelligence and military resources to help prevent it. Most of this capability 
was withdrawn with the exit from Afghanistan.
Like Pakistan, China supported the Taliban insurgency for many years. In return, 
the Taliban have frequently hunted down and killed many of the Uighur leaders — 
fellow Sunni Muslims — who took refuge in Afghanistan. Desperate for Beijing's 
funds and political backing, the Taliban can be relied on to do all they can to 
prevent any export of jihadism into China.
But we can expect no such efforts from Beijing to prevent terrorist actions 
against the West. On the contrary, as the new cold war intensifies, China is 
more than capable of using its increasing cooperation with the Taliban to enlist 
jihadists from Afghanistan as proxies against the US.
Despite their promises to deny terrorists safe haven, the Taliban will do the 
opposite. They and Al Qaida are joined at the hip, with both Osama Bin Laden and 
his successor Ayman Al Zawahiri having sworn unbreakable allegiance, bay'ah, to 
the leaders of the Taliban. Pictured: Bin Laden (center) and Al Zawahiri (left) 
address a press conference May 26, 1998 in Afghanistan. 
Twenty five year-old Ali Harbi Ali has been arrested on suspicion of the murder 
last week of British Member of Parliament Sir David Amess in a church in Essex. 
Ali is a member of a well-to-do Somali family who were given refuge in Britain 
from the war-torn East African country in the 1990s. British authorities had 
previously been alerted to his radicalisation and he was referred to the UK's 
"Prevent" anti-terrorist scheme.
The precise reason for his alleged attack on this particular MP, which he has 
reportedly admitted, has not yet been established but it is thought he may have 
been influenced by Al Shabaab, an Al Qaida group that operates in Somalia and 
Kenya.
Last month, the head of Britain's security service MI5, Ken McCallum, warned 
there was no doubt the Taliban victory in Afghanistan this summer has "heartened 
and emboldened" jihadists everywhere.
It may be that the murder in Essex was the first successful terrorist attack in 
Britain inspired by the consequences of US President Joe Biden's catastrophic 
decision to withdraw US forces from Afghanistan. Amess's savage knifing follows 
jihadist attacks in Norway that killed five and wounded three last week and 
another in New Zealand in September that wounded five.
Jihadists around the world celebrated the vanquishment of the West following the 
Taliban seizure of power in Kabul. Not only has this re-energised terrorist 
cells but it will also lead to an increase in recruiting and a funding boost 
from jihadist supporters. Prior to Biden's withdrawal, Al Qaida had been at a 
low point in their fortunes, following decimation by US drone strikes in the 
Pakistan tribal areas, catastrophic setbacks in Syria, Iraq and Yemen, the 
killing of Osama Bin Laden and the rise of the Islamic State. Their 
international prestige among fellow jihadists has now been boosted as they share 
in the glory of the Taliban's success — in which they played a part.
Al Qaida, the Islamic State and other jihadist networks will capitalise on the 
climacterical success of their global movement, directing and inspiring attacks 
around the world, emulating IS at the height of its powers in Syria and Iraq, 
radicalising thousands and inspiring knife, vehicle-ramming, explosive and gun 
attacks in many countries.
A deeply grim prospect — but this widespread inspiration of terrorism will not 
be the most serious terrorist consequence of the withdrawal. We will see 
jihadists flowing into Afghanistan to join up with terrorists there, as they did 
in the years before 9/11. They will train, organize, establish global 
connections, plan attacks and receive direction and funding from the leadership. 
Despite their promises to deny terrorists safe haven, the Taliban will do the 
opposite. They and Al Qaida are joined at the hip, with both Bin Laden and his 
successor Ayman Al Zawahiri having sworn unbreakable allegiance, bay'ah, to the 
leaders of the Taliban. The Islamic State's Khorosan branch, with several 
thousand fighters in Afghanistan, will pose a similar threat. Many political 
leaders in the US and UK claim the Taliban are sworn enemies of the IS, with 
some even suggesting that we might form an alliance against IS with Taliban 
terrorists. But this abhorrent proposition is merely an attempt to help limit 
the political fall-out from their ill-judged actions that facilitated the 
Taliban's conquest. The reality is that the Taliban and IS will sometimes kill 
each other and sometimes cooperate, a phenomenon beyond the comprehension of 
many commentators and politicians in the West, but a familiar pattern in the 
region. Ultimately, infidels and apostates are a common enemy whose destruction 
can unite adversaries in the face of almost any other ideological or practical 
clash.
The Taliban also are now more outward-facing in their jihadist ambitions. Before 
2001 they were focused predominantly on Afghanistan. Today, after 20 years 
fighting Western forces and with many younger members who have greater 
international awareness, their eyes are also on the violent role they can play 
in establishing a global Islamic caliphate.
The resultant cocktail is even more lethal than before 9/11.
Today, all these actors know there is no prospect of further large-scale US 
intervention in the country, no matter how great their atrocities. The US 
remains capable of air strikes and even special forces raids against serious 
threats emanating from Afghanistan, but these require high-grade intelligence 
which, despite the powerful technical capabilities of the agencies, is extremely 
difficult to gain now that we have withdrawn all forces
The threat from Afghanistan is not to the West alone. There is also a grave risk 
to Russia and Central Asian countries and to the "apostate" Muslim countries 
especially in the Arab world. Pakistan and China, today the dominant external 
powers in Afghanistan, also fear terrorism emanating from the country. Pakistan 
has good reason to be worried, even though their intelligence services and army 
were the most effective backers of the Taliban — without whose support they 
could never have seized power in Kabul.
Following a crackdown on the Pakistan Taliban (TTP), which have long conducted a 
ruthless campaign against the Pakistan government, they took refuge in 
Afghanistan. As with jihadists around the world, the TTP will have been inspired 
by their jihadist bedfellows' success. It is also likely that the Taliban and a 
resurgent Al Qaida, which shares their ambition to bring down the government in 
Islamabad and has close links to them, will aid the campaign to do so. The 
prospect of a successful jihadist insurgency in Pakistan, with its nuclear 
arsenal, has been a long-standing concern for the US, which invested huge 
intelligence and military resources to help prevent it. Most of this capability 
was withdrawn with the exit from Afghanistan.
The Communist Chinese need have less concern about insurgency spilling across 
the border into neighbouring Xinjiang autonomous region. Like Pakistan, China 
supported the Taliban insurgency for many years. In return, the Taliban have 
frequently hunted down and killed many of the Uighur leaders — fellow Sunni 
Muslims — who took refuge in Afghanistan. Desperate for Beijing's funds and 
political backing, the Taliban can be relied on to do all they can to prevent 
any export of jihadism into China.
China will also seek to enlist the Taliban's support in curbing any further TTP 
attacks, as have previously occurred, against their people and projects in 
Pakistan, with whose government they are closely aligned. But we can expect no 
such efforts from Beijing to prevent terrorist actions against the West. On the 
contrary, as the new cold war intensifies, China is more than capable of using 
its increasing cooperation with the Taliban to enlist jihadists from Afghanistan 
as proxies against the US.
President Biden's withdrawal has not only brought darkness and mayhem to the 
people of Afghanistan and fatally undermined the strategic credibility of the 
West, it has also unleashed what may turn out to be the most dangerous terrorist 
threat the world has yet faced.
*Colonel Richard Kemp is a former British Army Commander. He was also head of 
the international terrorism team in the U.K. Cabinet Office and is now a writer 
and speaker on international and military affairs.
© 2021 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do 
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No 
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied 
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Iraqi election results confirm Iran’s unpopularity
Hussain Abdul-Hussain/Arab News/October 22/2021
Iraqi voters this month made it clear they have had enough of Iran’s violent 
interference in the country’s politics. Under the direction of Tehran’s Quds 
Force — the external operations arm of its Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps — 
Iraqi Shiite militias have assassinated dozens of activists, suppressed free 
speech and boasted about their allegiance to the Iranian regime. However, in the 
Oct. 10 elections, voters punished the militias’ candidates, who saw their bloc 
shrink from 48 to just 14 of the 329 seats in the Iraqi parliament. This outcome 
made clear that it was no anomaly when, over the past two years, Iraqis set fire 
to Iranian consulates and tore down posters of Iranian leaders. Rather, such 
events reflected the deepening anger against Tehran.
Other aspects of the election results confirmed that Iran’s popularity among 
Iraqis is tanking. The bloc of Shiite cleric Muqtada Al-Sadr won 73 seats, 
likely making it the biggest bloc in parliament. Al-Sadr campaigned on the 
slogan, “No East and no West,” which was first used by the founder of the 
Iranian regime, Ayatollah Khomeini, who imagined Tehran’s foreign policy as 
being equidistant from the US-led Western camp and its Russian-led rival. In 
effect, Al-Sadr called for an Iraqi foreign policy aligned with neither America 
nor Iran.
His intentions are harder to discern. In 2005, Al-Sadr formed a militia that 
warred with US troops and enjoyed extensive Iranian support. But in 2008, the 
firebrand cleric disbanded his militia, although elements within it became the 
nucleus of the current crop of Iranian-backed Shiite forces. Meanwhile, Al-Sadr 
himself became an ardent supporter of disbanding all militias.
At least compared to the results of the previous elections in 2018, Al-Sadr’s 
victory is good news for America. The bad news is that he is a mercurial 
populist who has often expressed antagonism toward the US and its role in Iraq.
However, Al-Sadr understands that, even with his impressive bloc of 73 seats, 
his candidates will need allies to attain the 165-seat majority required to form 
a government. He could potentially form an anti-Iran bloc by teaming up with the 
Sunnis and Kurds that are aligned with Washington and its allies.
The good news in that regard is that anti-Tehran Sunnis and Kurds also won big 
at the polls. The only consolation for Iran’s allies was the strong performance 
of former Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki, whose coalition picked up 37 seats. 
While Al-Maliki supports militias, his opportunism has kept him at arm’s length 
from Tehran, which does not consider him to be a reliable ally.
Sunnis are divided into two rival camps: Taqaddom, which is headed by incumbent 
Speaker Mohammed Al-Halbousi, and Azm, which is led by Khamis Al-Khanjar. 
Taqaddom won 43 seats, while Azm collected 15.
Among the Kurds, the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Masoud Barzani, which is 
aligned with the US, won 32 seats, beating its rival, the pro-Iran Patriotic 
Union of Kurdistan, whose bloc shrank to 15 seats.
With Taqaddom and the KDP, Al-Sadr could form a bloc of 148 seats, elect a 
speaker, then a president, and win the call to form a Cabinet. Pro-Tehran 
lawmakers will likely try to lure the KDP away from Al-Sadr, mainly by promising 
it the presidency, which is currently held by Iraq’s other Kurdish party. While 
the presidency is ceremonial, it carries weight for its representation of one of 
Iraq’s three big ethno-sectarian blocs.
Al-Sadr could potentially form an anti-Iran bloc by teaming up with the Sunnis 
and Kurds that are aligned with Washington and its allies.
Since the fall of Saddam Hussein, Tehran and its proxies in Iraq have pursued 
one goal: The creation of a weak state controlled by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, 
the Quds Force and IRGC-backed militias.
Thanks to both Iranian meddling and the fragmentation of candidates into so many 
small blocs, Cabinet formation in Iraq might prove to be a lengthy and arduous 
process. This may give incumbent Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kadhimi an advantage. 
Unlike his predecessors, Al-Kadhimi did not form a party of his own to contest 
the elections. For staying neutral, he might once again emerge as the center of 
a consensus that could end the stalemate between the blocs and form a new 
Cabinet.
If Al-Kadhimi does stay in power, he might again urge Washington to withdraw its 
remaining 2,500 military advisers, presumably to take away the excuse that 
pro-Iran militias use to justify their continued armament and de facto 
independence from authorized chains of command.
This time, however, Washington can bring to Al-Kadhimi’s attention that only a 
small fraction of Iraqis buy into such excuses. Given the clear popular mandate 
in favor of disbanding the militias, America should not cut and run, but should 
strictly condition any downscaling of its adviser corps on Baghdad becoming able 
to stand on its own in the face of both religious extremist terrorists, such as 
Daesh, and state-sponsored terrorists like the pro-Iran militias.
*Hussain Abdul-Hussain is a research fellow at the Foundation for Defense of 
Democracies, a Washington-based, nonpartisan research institute focusing on 
national security and foreign policy. Twitter: @hahussain
Iraqi elections signal stronger Ankara-Baghdad ties
Sinem Cengiz/Arab News/October 22/2021
Iraqis went to the polls on Oct. 10 to elect the 329 members of a new 
parliament, in what is considered one of the most crucial elections since the 
US-led invasion that ousted Saddam Hussein’s regime in 2003. Iraq historically 
has been the focal point of Turkey’s regional politics due to its proximity and 
a failure to ensure security on Turkey’s doorstep.
The outcome of the elections and the new structure of the parliament is of great 
importance to Ankara, which seeks to maintain close relations with different 
factions in Iraqi politics in order to preserve its national and strategic 
interests. Thus, all eyes are on the new coalition government, which is likely 
to influence the future course of bilateral relations between Ankara and 
Baghdad. Ahead of the elections, Ankara tried to bring together the two Sunni 
Iraqi officials, Mohammed Al-Halbousi, who leads the Taqaddom camp, and Khamis 
Al-Khanjar, who leads the Azm coalition. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan 
met separately with the two politicians in Ankara in an attempt to unite them 
ahead of the elections, a move that failed to bear fruit.
However, the outcome of the elections, in which about 43 percent of eligible 
voters cast their ballots, seems to be positive for Ankara, but not for Iran, 
another actor that competes for influence in Iraq. The Sunnis emerged as the 
second largest force in parliament and Turkmens entered as a united force. 
Kurdish parties made considerable gains. The parties of Iraq’s northern 
Kurdistan Regional Government region, which are also crucial power brokers, 
enjoy close relations with Ankara.
On the other side, the Conquest Alliance, linked to Iran-backed Shiite militia, 
suffered a major setback. Considering the visits of Parliamentary Speaker 
Mohammed Al-Halbousi and Kurdish officials to Ankara ahead of the elections, 
Iraqi observers expect that the new government will enjoy warm relations with 
Ankara, which considers cooperation with the new Iraqi government critical to 
its security and political concerns.
The fundamental reason for Ankara’s close interest in Iraq is the presence of 
the Kurdistan Workers’ Party within the Iraqi territories. The second driving 
force is the impact of the Syrian war and Iran’s rising influence. Turkey has 
strengthened joint efforts with Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kadhimi, and 
previously with the Adil Abdul-Mahdi government, in its fight with the PKK and 
other terrorist groups, and hopes that it can maintain a similar cooperation 
with the newly formed government.
A few days after the elections, the Turkish presidency — on Oct. 20 — submitted 
a motion to parliament to extend the state’s authority to launch cross-border 
military operations in northern Iraq for another year. The motion, submitted by 
Erdogan’s government, had previously allowed the Turkish military to carry out 
cross-border operations from Oct. 30, 2020, until Oct. 30, 2021. Turkey attaches 
great importance to the territorial integrity, national unity and stability of 
Iraq, the motion said.
In the past, Turkey’s relations with Iraq have suffered due to the former’s 
cross-border offensive against the PKK. Baghdad has protested against Turkey’s 
military operations on its territory and complained about the presence of 
Turkish troops at the military base in Bashiqa, which Ankara established in 2015 
to train local forces to fight Daesh.
However, the Al-Kadhimi government played a significant role in defusing the 
situation. The existence of the PKK is a fundamental threat for both Turkey and 
Iraq. Close cooperation between them, and with the Kurdistan Regional Government 
in Iraq, is required to fight against the PKK. Besides the threats emanating 
from the PKK, there is also the issue of Iranian influence in Iraq. Turkey’s 
strained relations with Iraq were playing into the hands of Iran, which has 
influence on Iraqi politics. However, the outcome of the elections and Turkey’s 
outreach to Iraq has become important in the sense of not leaving Iraq to Iran. 
The fundamental reason for Ankara’s close interest in Iraq is the presence of 
the Kurdistan Workers’ Party within the Iraqi territories.
Besides the security domain, economic and political issues are also motivating 
factors in Turkey-Iraq relations, as growing trade and energy links in the 
region are powerful variables informing the two countries’ relations. Iraq 
represents the third-largest market for Turkish exports, while Turkey’s 
activities in Iraq include development support, with Ankara announcing in 2019 
that it will provide $5 billion in loans for the reconstruction of Iraq — a sign 
of its commitment to consolidating its influence in the country. Iraq and Turkey 
also have a joint committee to resolve issues and enhance economic relations. 
Turkey also backed Iraq’s recent peacemaking efforts in the region.
Thus, geography is the first principle that cannot be changed in international 
relations, and it is obvious that Iraq and Turkey are central to each other’s 
strategic calculations. At the end of the day, Turkey and Iraq are 
interdependent neighbors that need to cooperate on issues such as energy and 
security regardless of the divisions within the governments of both countries.
*Sinem Cengiz is a Turkish political analyst who specializes in Turkey’s 
relations with the Middle East. Twitter: @SinemCngz
Taliban powerless to stop Afghanistan’s decline
Luke Coffey/Arab News/October 22/2021
While the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan seemed to go smoother and faster 
than they expected, the militants now face a very different situation, with 
conditions in the country rapidly deteriorating. Weeks after seizing power, the 
militants are beginning to realize that governing is much harder than leading an 
insurgency. There are massive food shortages across the country. Last month Jens 
Laerke, spokesperson for the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian 
Affairs, warned that “basic services in Afghanistan are collapsing, and food and 
other lifesaving aid is about to run out.”
The economic outlook is bleak, too. According to the International Monetary 
Fund, the Afghan economy is expected to contract by 30 percent this year as 
international aid dries up and foreign investment declines.
In addition to food insecurity and a looming economic collapse, the Taliban are 
facing a crisis in three other areas.
The first is the lack of international recognition. At the time of writing, no 
country in the world has formally recognized the Taliban as the official 
government of Afghanistan, although Russia, China, Pakistan and Iran have 
signaled varying degrees of openness to doing so.
Although they might not admit it, the Taliban want international recognition to 
access aid and assistance. The Taliban are also desperate to occupy 
Afghanistan’s seat at the UN. The current Afghan representative is a hold-over 
from the previous Ghani government, and the question of Taliban participation 
was raised during the September 2021 UN General Assembly in New York. The 
Taliban have formally requested to send a representative to the UN, but so far 
this has not happened.
Recognition by the UN would mean the Taliban inheriting Afghanistan’s existing 
membership in other UN bodies, including the UN Educational, Scientific and 
Cultural Organization and the UN Commission on the Status of Women. Considering 
the Taliban’s record of destroying UNESCO cultural sites such as the two Buddhas 
of Bamiyan, as well as their well-established history of mistreating women and 
girls, it would be preposterous to allow the militant outfit in either 
organization.
The second problem involves internal disputes and fracturing within the group. 
The Taliban did a reasonably good job at hiding their dirty laundry when they 
operated in the shadows. Now that they are in government, stories and details of 
infighting are shedding light on the group’s dysfunctional internal relations.
For example, last month there was an apparent dispute between Mullah Baradar, 
co-founder of the Taliban and deputy prime minister, and Khalil Haqqani, the 
minister for refugees, over the division of power. Baradar is part of the 
Taliban’s Kandahari faction with close links to the group’s late leader, Mullah 
Omar, while Haqqani is the uncle of Sirajuddin Haqqani, the Taliban’s interior 
minister, and part of the Haqqani faction with strong influence in the east of 
the country.
Some reports said that the argument ended in a brawl, while others suggested 
Haqqani pulled a gun on Baradar and there was a shootout between their 
respective bodyguards. It is not clear which version is true. Either way, the 
Taliban have a major internal issue that must be resolved before it can start 
governing effectively. Adding to the Taliban’s internal problems is the status 
of supreme leader Haibatullah Akhundzada. Now Afghanistan’s leader, Akhundzada 
has never been seen in public and only one photo of him is known to exist. He 
has not even released an audio statement since the Taliban takeover, leading to 
speculation that he is dead. It is highly likely that the Taliban, and by 
default Afghanistan, are being led by someone who is no longer alive.
The third problem the Taliban face is one of internal security and the growing 
threat from Daesh. The self-described “Islamic State of Khorasan” was formed in 
2015 when Daesh in Syria and Iraq was dominating the headlines. Since then, the 
Afghan branch has become one of the deadliest of all extremist groups in the 
country. The group recruits from Afghanistan and Pakistan, especially from 
disgruntled or former Taliban fighters. They have controlled, at their height, 
several small districts in Afghanistan and have been targeted by the US, the 
former Afghan government and even the Taliban in the past.
The growing presence of Daesh will continue to be a headache for the Taliban as 
they try to enforce security across the country.
Now they operate in the shadows, while coordinating complex and deadly suicide 
attacks targeting everyone from Taliban fighters to Shiites. Dozens of Taliban 
fighters have been killed by Daesh since the August takeover. The growing 
presence of Daesh will continue to be a headache for the Taliban as they try to 
enforce security across the country. It is clear that the Taliban are wholly 
unequipped for the task they face inside Afghanistan. The group is quickly 
learning that taking control of a province is not the same as governing it.
As winter approaches, Afghanistan is in a perilous state. Sadly, for the 
innocent Afghan people, there seems to be little the Taliban can do about it.
*Luke Coffey is the director of the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign 
Policy at the Heritage Foundation. Twitter: @LukeDCoffey