English LCCC Newsbulletin For
Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For October 23/2020
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news
The Bulletin's Link on the
lccc Site
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2021/english.october23.21.htm
News
Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations For today
The Parable of the king who gave a wedding banquet
for his son, but those he invited did not come...For many are called, but few
are chosen.
Matthew 22/01-14: “Once more Jesus spoke to them
in parables, saying: ‘The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a king who gave a
wedding banquet for his son. He sent his slaves to call those who had been
invited to the wedding banquet, but they would not come. Again he sent other
slaves, saying, “Tell those who have been invited: Look, I have prepared my
dinner, my oxen and my fat calves have been slaughtered, and everything is
ready; come to the wedding banquet.” But they made light of it and went away,
one to his farm, another to his business, while the rest seized his slaves,
maltreated them, and killed them. The king was enraged. He sent his troops,
destroyed those murderers, and burned their city. Then he said to his slaves,
“The wedding is ready, but those invited were not worthy. Go therefore into the
main streets, and invite everyone you find to the wedding banquet.” Those slaves
went out into the streets and gathered all whom they found, both good and bad;
so the wedding hall was filled with guests. ‘But when the king came in to see
the guests, he noticed a man there who was not wearing a wedding robe, and he
said to him, “Friend, how did you get in here without a wedding robe?” And he
was speechless. Then the king said to the attendants, “Bind him hand and foot,
and throw him into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing
of teeth.” For many are called, but few are chosen.
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials
published on
October 22-23/2021
Question: "Could God create a rock so heavy He could not lift it?"/GotQuestions.org?/October
22/2021
Aoun Returns Bill Amending Electoral Law to Parliament
Geagea Says He's Under Law but Urges Military Court to be Fair
Putin Suggests 'Profits' Dispute behind Keeping Nitrates at Beirut Port
Hochstein Urges Fast Lebanon-Israel Talks, Says 'Common Reservoirs' Not an
Option
‘Like slaves’: Lebanon's delivery riders struggle as economic crisis bites
Oueidat Denies Suspending Decision to Summon Geagea
US mediator urges quick talks on Lebanon-Israel maritime borders
Shea Inaugurates Pop Up Space Training Program in Sidon
Nasrallah Says Tayyouneh Probe 'Brave', Warns Israel over Oil and Gas
Lebanon’s Hezbollah warns Israel against drilling in disputed maritime border
area
Israeli Defense Minister signs seizure order against Lebanese company for
helping Hezbollah
Lebanon…war and Hezbollah!/Jameel Altheyabi/Saudi Gazate
US mediator says Lebanon-Israel maritime talks need to be quick
Syrians abandon Lebanon as new migrant route to Europe beckons
Nissan ex-Chair Ghosn Set on Restoring Reputation
Titles For The Latest English LCCC
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
October 22-23/20211
Putin Hosts Israeli PM Bennett
France urges Iran to curb nuclear activity, resume talks
U.S. Iran Envoy to Hold Nuclear Talks with Europe Powers
Iran nuclear talks ‘on life support’ as Tehran drags feet
Syria constitution talks stall at UN
Israel designates six Palestinian civil society groups as terrorists
Turkish counter-espionage against foreign spy networks leads to multiple
In South Sudan, flooding called ‘worst thing in my lifetime’
Rare Libya Conference Seeks Support ahead of Landmark Elections
Titles For The Latest The Latest LCCC
English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on
October 22-23/2021
In His Second Term, Trudeau Must Fix His
Iran Policy/Alireza Nader/FDD-Insight/October 22, 2021
Biden's Afghanistan Withdrawal Unleashes a Lethal Terrorist Cocktail/Richard
Kemp/Gatestone Institute./October 22, 2021
Iraqi election results confirm Iran’s unpopularity/Hussain Abdul-Hussain/Arab
News/October 22/2021
Iraqi elections signal stronger Ankara-Baghdad ties/Sinem Cengiz/Arab
News/October 22/2021
Taliban powerless to stop Afghanistan’s decline/Luke Coffey/Arab News/October
22/2021
The Latest English LCCC Lebanese &
Lebanese Related News & Editorials published
on October 22-23/2021
Question: "Could God create a rock so heavy He
could not lift it?"
GotQuestions.org?/October 22/2021
Answer: This question is frequently asked by skeptics of God, the Bible,
Christianity, etc. If God can create a rock that He cannot lift, then God is not
omnipotent. If God cannot create a rock so heavy that He cannot lift it, then
God is not omnipotent. According to this argument, omnipotence is
self-contradictory. Therefore, God cannot be omnipotent. So, the question, could
God create a rock so heavy He could not lift it? The quick answer is “No.” But
the explanation is far more important to understand than the answer...
This question is based on a popular misunderstanding about the definitions of
words like “almighty” or “omnipotent.” These terms do not mean that God can do
anything. Rather, they describe the amount of God’s power. Power is the ability
to effect change - to make something happen. God (being unlimited) has unlimited
power, and the Bible affirms this (Job 11:7-11, 37:23; 2 Corinthians 6:18;
Revelation 4:8; etc.). Therefore, God can do whatever is possible to be done.
God cannot, however, do that which is actually impossible. This is because true
impossibility is not based on the amount of power one has, it is based on what
is really possible. The truly impossible is not made possible by adding more
power. Therefore, unless context indicates otherwise (e.g. Matthew 19:26 where
man’s ability is being shown in contrast to God’s), impossibility means the same
thing whether or not God is involved.
So, the first part of the question is based on a false idea—that God being
almighty means that He can do anything. In fact, the Bible itself lists things
God cannot do - like lie or deny Himself (Hebrews 6:18; 2 Timothy 2:13; Titus
1:2). The reason He cannot do these things is because of His nature and the
nature of reality itself. God cannot do what is not actually possible to be
done, like creating a two-sided triangle, or a married bachelor. Just because
words can be strung together this way does not make the impossible
possible—these things are contradictions, they are truly impossible in reality.
Now, what about this rock? A rock would have to be infinitely large to defeat an
infinite amount of lifting power. But an infinite rock is a contradiction since
material objects cannot be infinite. Only God is infinite. There cannot be two
infinites. So the question is actually asking if God can make a
contradiction—which He cannot.
Aoun Returns Bill Amending Electoral Law to Parliament
Naharnet/22 October ,2021
President Michel Aoun on Friday returned a bill amending some articles of the
electoral law to parliament for reevaluation, the Presidency said. The President
cited “violations” contained in the bill, such as bringing forward the elections
date from May to March and depriving segments of voters from their electoral
rights. Aoun argued that holding the elections on March 27 might prevent some
voters from casting ballots in mountainous areas due to possible storms and bad
weather. He also said that bringing the date forward would shorten the timeframe
for the registration of expat voters while lamenting that the bill
extraordinarily suspends the implementation of the electronic card system and
axes the six new seats dedicated to expats. Moreover, Aoun noted that the
proposed date would deprive 10,685 citizens who turn 21 between Feb. 1 and March
30 from their right to vote. Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri later in the day
called on the joint parliamentary committees to meet on Tuesday to study Aoun’s
returning of the bill.
Geagea Says He's Under Law but Urges Military Court to be
Fair
Naharnet/22 October ,2021
Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea on Friday commented anew on the the Military
Court’s decision to summon him for testimony regarding the deadly Tayyouneh-Ain
al-Remmaneh incidents. “As the head of a legitimate Lebanese party, I’m under
the law,” Geagea tweeted. “But for justice to be correct, the judiciary must
deal with all parties in the country as them being under the law,” he added.
Geagea also lamented that “it seems that the main party in the Ain al-Remmaneh
incidents considers itself to be above the law” and that “so far, the military
judiciary is agreeing with it in this belief.”
The LF leader had overnight stressed that he will not appear before the Military
Court if Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah is not also summoned. “The days
of the Our Lady of Salvation Church are over and we will never allow a return to
those days,” he emphasized.
Seven people were killed on October 14 -- mostly Hizbullah and Amal Movement
members -- during a protest organized by the two groups to demand Tarek Bitar,
the judge investigating Beirut's devastating port blast, be removed. Hizbullah
and Amal accused the Lebanese Forces, which supports the probe, of being
responsible for sniper fire against the protesters that ignited street clashes.
The LF denies the charges. Fadi Akiki, a representative of the military court,
has "instructed the army intelligence to summon Geagea and take his statement
based on information provided by arrested LF members," a judicial official said.
Twenty-six people were arrested after the violence in the Tayyouneh-Ain al-Remmaneh
area, most of them LF members, the official added on Thursday. The exact
circumstances of the violence remain unclear. Geagea has denied responsibility
for the deaths, saying that residents of Ain al-Remmaneh had "defended"
themselves against "Hizbullah militiamen who tried to enter their homes."
Putin Suggests 'Profits' Dispute behind Keeping Nitrates at
Beirut Port
Naharnet/22 October ,2021
Russian President Vladimir Putin has suggested that disagreements over who
should make financial gains had been the reason behind keeping the huge
stockpile of ammonium nitrate at Beirut port for seven years before it
eventually exploded in August 2020. "Years ago they brought the ammonium
(nitrate) substance to this (Beirut) port, and according to what I understood,
they wanted to sell it for a profitable price," Putin said at a press conference
in response to a reporter's question. He did not specify who he was referring
to. "But the desire to achieve profits faced several contradictions related to
who wanted to benefit from those profits," the Russian leader added. "I think
this is what this tragedy was related to," he went on to say. As for Lebanon's
request for satellite images from several nations, Putin said: "As for the
investigations, I don't understand how we can offer help, or how the satellite
images can help. Yes, we have them, and I will make inquiries. If they are of
any use, of course we will provide these images.""We must first ask our
colleagues if they need these images," he added. Asked about the latest
incidents in Lebanon, Putin said Hizbullah is "considered to be an important
political force" in the country. "We always call for resolving any crisis in
Lebanon through dialogue," he said. "We are in contact with all political forces
in Lebanon and we will continue this communication to prevent any bloodshed
which would be in no one's interest," he added. "We will exert utmost effort to
convince all political forces in Lebanon to remain rational and engage in
dialogue," Putin went on to say.
Hochstein Urges Fast Lebanon-Israel Talks, Says 'Common Reservoirs' Not an
Option
Naharnet/22 October ,2021
U.S. Senior Advisor for Global Energy Security and the newly appointed mediator
in the U.S.-sponsored border talks between Israel and Lebanon, Amos Hochstein,
has called for swift negotiations over the demarcation of the maritime border.
He said that the visit he made this week to Lebanon was aimed at determining “if
we can achieve some breakthrough and to move forward on the demarcation
efforts.”Asked whether his visit means that the talks are “resuming,” the U.S.
official told Al-Hadath TV: “I hope so.”He added: “I came here today, really,
first to listen, and to listen to the three presidents and to other ministers
and the Chief of Staff of the military, and to understand the position that the
Lebanese government has, and its views as to what's the best way to move
forward.”“As far as the question of whether or not this will be in Naqoura or in
shuttle diplomacy, I think the meetings in the framework that was achieved
between Israel and Lebanon with the support of the United States was an
incredibly important milestone of having a framework that could facilitate talks
and having indirect talks that are in person in Naqoura between the two sides,
in the presence of the United States and the United Nations, was really
important,” he went on to say. Asked whether the process “will take lots of
time,” Hochstein said: “No. I hope not. I think that in these kinds of efforts
what we've learned is that if you take a lot of time, it doesn't happen. So we
need to be focused, and we need to move quickly and efficiently to address
really the needs of what this negotiation entails.”
The U.S. official also noted that he did not visit Lebanon “in an effort for
normalization” between Lebanon and Israel. “That's not on the table. It is just
to address this one area. So to do that, you need someone that can talk to both
parties, and to see if we can help the sides to narrow their gaps and ultimately
reach a solution,” he pointed out. “I hope that, and trust, and everything I've
heard today, is that there's a commitment and a desire to reach a resolution,”
he added. Commenting on Lebanon’s electricity crisis and its relation to oil
resources, Hochstein said: ”In 2016, when I was here, had we reached a
resolution in 2016, today, you wouldn't have any blackouts in Lebanon. The
lights would be going on and you would be paying the cheapest gas prices,
because you need, paying consumers, Lebanese people, would be paying producer
prices and you'd likely be exporting.”
“Remarkably, we're sitting down here and we're in an energy crisis around the
world. And natural gas prices are the most expensive they have ever been in
history. So instead of buying gas on, the most expensive gas, in the world,
you'd be selling gas into the most expensive market,” he added. “What I want is
to have Lebanon as a producer, having billion -- multibillion dollar investments
from foreign companies here in Lebanon, creating jobs, creating opportunity,
creating economic stability,” the U.S. official said. Responding to a question
about recent media reports, Hochstein said: “I'm not looking at common
reservoirs as an option. That was never my plan, nor is it now.”As for
Hizbullah’s announcement that it broke a “siege” on Lebanon by bringing diesel
tankers from Iran, the U.S. official said: “Do you know why Hizbullah did not
break the noose, or the blockade, or any of the other scary words? We never had
a blockade. There was never a noose. So they didn't break anything.” “We never
attempted to stop fuel tankers from coming here. In fact, we have repeatedly --
our ambassador here in Beirut, and our senior officials -- we have always said:
we want to see Lebanon succeed. We want to see fuel,” he added. He also stressed
that Washington has “a sanctions regime against Syria… not against Lebanon.”“It
has nothing to do with Lebanon.”
‘Like slaves’: Lebanon's delivery riders struggle as
economic crisis bites
Reuters, Beirut/22 October ,2021
His motorbike's tank almost empty, Ahmad had barely enough fuel to make one more
delivery and get home for the night. When the 24-year-old Syrian's phone pinged
with a food order in a distant suburb of the Lebanese capital Beirut, his heart
sank. Ahmad could ill afford to lose the work he picked up through local
delivery app Toters - a precarious lifeline as Lebanon's economic meltdown
destroys thousands of jobs and plunges three-quarters of the population into
poverty.
"If I don't work, I don't eat," said Ahmad, who like other workers asked to be
identified only by his first name. Freelance delivery work from app-based
platforms has boomed worldwide as COVID-19 lockdowns kept people at home,
prompting demands for better pay and conditions from workers around the world,
from New York and Amsterdam to Johannesburg. In Lebanon, eight riders for
leading delivery apps Toters and India's Zomato Ltd told the Thomson Reuters
Foundation they were struggling to make ends meet with the additional strains of
fuel rationing, petrol queues, power cuts, and price hikes. Although gig work is
promoted as flexible, the riders said they found their jobs stressful and
exploitative as they lack the protections of formal employment.
Lebanon's labour minister did not respond to an interview request and Zomato
declined to comment. Toters co-founder and chief operating officer Nael Halwani
defended the company's model, saying it allowed "shoppers" to decline orders as
they wished.
But Ahmad said his managers at Toters refused to reassign his late-night order
some 10 km (6 miles) outside the capital.
After siphoning gasoline from his friend's motorbike to make the delivery, a
power cut left Ahmad stuck in the apartment building's lift for 30 minutes
before he could finally head home. "Remember what it was like in the past when
everyone had slaves? That's what this job is like," he said. Two Toters drivers
shared a list of working conditions they had received in September that stated:
"A driver cannot refuse an order for any reason." The instructions said drivers
who declined orders too often or did not wear their uniform would have their
accounts temporarily closed.
Halwani said drivers had the "freedom" to decline orders and go offline as they
wished, but acknowledged that mid-level supervisors may have communicated such
instructions to drivers.
Halwani added that Toters had raised drivers' rates above those of competitors
to account for rising prices, as well as the usual factors of driver
availability and order volume.
A driver who worked "more than eight hours per day for either five or six days a
week" could bring home 4 million Lebanese pounds per month, he said. That would
have amounted to a competitive salary of just under $3,000 in mid-2019, but the
pound's dramatic devaluation means it is worth $200 at the current market rate.
Toters drivers also said they spent too much time at gas stations to accrue
enough deliveries - or were forced to stay home because of an empty tank. "I'd
go down to the station at 6 a.m. and finish at 12.30 p.m.," said Muhannad, a
31-year-old Toters driver. "I'd keep thinking that I could have delivered three
orders in that time." As hyperinflation drives up fuel prices and other everyday
costs, drivers said compensation rates were falling further and further behind.
One driver said he had to move back in with his parents as he could no longer
afford rent, while Hammoudi, a 24-year-old Lebanese driver for Zomato, wished he
could emigrate. "My monthly wage adds up to about 3 million Lebanese pounds, but
it depends on whether or not I got good tips," said Hammoudi. "I feel like
there's no place for me here anymore."Under Lebanese labour law, app-based
delivery drivers are considered "independent contractors", meaning they have no
social security or health cover and can be laid off at any time. Lebanon is not
a signatory to Convention 87 of the International Labour Organization, which
enshrines the right of workers to establish or join labour organizations. It
does allow collective bargaining, but Zomato and Toters drivers said that when
they asked for better pay and working conditions, their managers told them they
could be easily replaced.
When some Toters riders formed WhatsApp groups and Instagram pages to share
grievances and float the possibility of strike action, company bosses shut their
app accounts - barring them from working - until they removed the posts, two
drivers said.
Economists and labour experts said the tensions were characteristic of gig
economy jobs worldwide but had been exacerbated by Lebanon's cocktail of crises.
"This is the new way of doing business - outsourcing the means of production to
the workers," said Rabih Fakhri, a doctoral candidate at Canada's University of
Montreal researching the Middle East's gig economy.""Workers in Lebanon have to
cope not only with this, but with social, political and economic stressing
factors in a country that is running towards a financial meltdown."
Oueidat Denies Suspending Decision to Summon Geagea
Naharnet/October 22/2021
State Prosecutor Ghassan Oueidat has not suspended State Commissioner to the
Military Court Judge Fadi Akiki’s decision to summon Lebanese Forces leader
Samir Geagea in the Tayyouneh incidents case, Oueidat’s office said on Friday,
denying media reports in this regard. The office, however, noted that Akiki’s
decision is “being followed up by the relevant authorities to determine whether
the interrogation should happen at the Intelligence Directorate or before the
judge who tasked the Intelligence Directorate with hearing the LF leader’s
testimony.”“No timeframe has been set” for the authorities’ deliberations, the
office added.
US mediator urges quick talks on Lebanon-Israel maritime
borders
The Arab Weekly/October 22/2021
CAIRO--The US mediator for indirect talks on border demarcation between Lebanon
and Israel said on Thursday that the negotiations he was hoping to revive should
be concluded in a short period if they were to succeed. Amos Hochstein, speaking
to Al Hadath TV during a visit to Beirut, said holding the indirect talks last
year between the two sides in the presence of the United States and the United
Nations was an important milestone but that it remained to be seen whether the
right time to resume the talks was now. “Perhaps there should be some shuttle
diplomacy first, in order to assess the positions of the parties to identify
where there is room for negotiation and then ultimately, to go back to Naqoura
and complete the negotiations,” he said. Long time foes Lebanon and Israel
started negotiations through a US mediator in October 2020 at the UN
peacekeeper’s base in Lebanon’s Naqoura. The maritime border dispute has held up
exploration in the potentially gas-rich area but talks have since stalled. In
Thursday’s interview, Hochstein said he hoped the negotiation would not take too
much time. “I think that in these kinds of efforts what we’ve learned is that if
you take a lot of time, it doesn’t happen,” he said. “So we need to be focused
and we need to move quickly.” Israel already pumps gas from huge offshore
fields. Lebanon, which has yet to find commercial gas reserves in its own
waters, is desperate for cash from foreign donors amidst a deepening economic
meltdown. Hochstein said resolving the border issue would help alleviate
Lebanon’s power shortage by allowing it to develop its offshore gas resources.
Asked about a deal to export Egyptian gas through a pipeline going through
Jordan and Syria to Lebanon, Hochstein said the United States had been working
to make that happen and US sanctions against Syria would not have to be waived
to make the deal go through as they likely don’t apply in this case. “We have
determined that it is not, this kind of a transaction could be, likely is not,
under, covered by the sanctions. And therefore we’ve informed the government
here, and we’ve informed the government in Egypt that it can move ahead,”
Hochstein said.
Shea Inaugurates Pop Up Space Training Program in Sidon
Naharnet/October 22, 2021
U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Dorothy Shea on Friday attended the inauguration of
the Pop-Up Spaces program in Sidon. "This one year-long program, which is
implemented by Tatweer Baladna, will empower youth and young professionals in
South Lebanon, North Lebanon, and the Bekaa through civic education and social
entrepreneurship training and hands-on activities," the U.S. Embassy said in a
statement. During the event, Ambassador Shea remarked: “Pop-Up American spaces
demonstrate to our friends, the Lebanese people, that wherever you are in this
time of great economic difficulty, we're not going to let that stop us from
popping up and meeting you where you are.”She continued saying, “Let’s look at
this as one step in the long continuum of our engagement and our partnership
with you.” "To the youth who will be participating in the training programs and
the activities that we will foster through this Pop-Up, I thank you for your
commitment and for your engagement, and I'm excited to see what you guys are
going to do with the skills that you further develop through this program,” she
added.
Nasrallah Says Tayyouneh Probe 'Brave', Warns Israel
over Oil and Gas
Naharnet/October 22/2021
Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah on Friday vowed to follow up on the
investigations into the deadly Tayyouneh incidents, as he described the probe as
“serious, accurate and brave.”“Things are judged by their outcomes and the
political, popular and journalistic condemnation of those who killed, aggressed
and almost dragged the country into strife and civil war must continue,”
Nasrallah said in a televised speech marking the Prophet’s Birthday. “We renew
the praise of the awareness, prudence and wisdom of the families of the
aggrieved martyrs, who will carry on with this stance,” Nasrallah added. Turning
to the issue of Lebanon’s stalled sea border talks with Israel, Nasrallah said
he will not comment on anything related to border demarcation and that he leaves
the issue to the Lebanese state. He, however, warned Israel that it would be
mistaken if it thought that it can act as it pleases in the disputed area. “The
resistance in Lebanon, certainly and at the appropriate moment, will act if it
finds that Lebanon’s oil and gas are in danger, even if they are in the disputed
area. It will act accordingly and it is capable of acting accordingly,”
Nasrallah cautioned. As for Lebanon’s expected negotiations with the
International Monetary Fund, Nasrallah said: “We have no problem in the
principle of negotiations and we hope Lebanon will have a truly unified
delegation.”Lebanon should negotiate “from a position of responsibility and
interest, not from a position of receiving diktats,” the Hizbullah leader added.
Commenting on the dire economic situations in Lebanon in light of the latest
hike in fuel prices, Nasrallah called for launching the ration card plan as soon
as possible and agreeing to “the demands of employees as to raising
transportation compensations and reviving public transport.”
Lebanon’s Hezbollah warns Israel against drilling in
disputed maritime border area
Reuters/October 22/2021
BEIRUT: The leader of Lebanon’s Hezbollah on Friday warned Israel against
drilling for oil and gas in the disputed maritime border area between the two
countries until the issue is resolved, and said the Iran-backed group would take
action if it did so. “If the enemy thinks they can act as they please before
reaching a solution to this issue they are wrong,” Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said
in a televised speech. Lebanon’s cabinet had raised the question to the United
Nations permanent representative and others in the international community after
Israel granted US oilfield services group Halliburton an offshore drilling
contract in the Mediterranean, asking to clarify whether the drilling would take
place in disputed areas. Lebanon and Israel are in dispute over the delineation
of their territorial waters and negotiations between the old foes could lead to
Lebanon being able to unlock valuable gas reserves amid its worst-ever financial
crisis. Israel already pumps gas from huge offshore fields. The two countries
have been holding on-off US mediated talks since October to try to resolve the
issue. “I will not state any positions on this as I don’t want to complicate the
negotiations but for sure the resistance in Lebanon at the right time through
following this issue when it finds that Lebanese oil and gas is in danger in the
disputed area it will act accordingly,” Nasrallah said. The US mediator for the
indirect talks, Amos Hochstein, visited Beirut this week and said a period of
shuttle diplomacy would proceed any return to indirect talks between the two
countries similar those held in October 2020 at the United Nations’ peackepeers
base in Lebanon’s Naqoura.
Israeli Defense Minister signs seizure order against
Lebanese company for helping Hezbollah
Shreif Sanitary Co. was slapped with a seizure order by Gantz after providing
Hezbollah with equipment for its precision guided missile project.
Jerusalem Post/October 22/2021
Israel’s Defense Minister Benny Gantz signed a seizure order against a
Lebanon-based company after it allegedly provided Hezbollah with equipment for
the group’s precision-guided missile project.
The directive against the company, Shreif Sanitary Co. and its owner Haytham
Ahmad Muhammad Shrief, was given “within the framework of a wide range of
activities conducted against Hezbollah’s precision-guided missile project,” the
ministry said in a statement.
The seizure order was signed following joint work of the IDF’s Intelligence
Directorate and the National Bureau for Counter Terror Financing in the Ministry
of Defense.
According to the ministry, the company is registered in Lebanon and regularly
conducts commercial activities with Hezbollah as well as provides the Lebanese
terror group with equipment for use in projects related to the production of
precision munitions.
“The company is a preferred supplier of Hezbollah, is fully aware of the
organization’s work, and supplies Hezbollah with equipment at a reduced price,”
read the statement which quoted intelligence gathered by Israel’s defense
establishment.
The group, which has been working on the expensive and classified project since
2013, has been attempting to build factories to produce precision missiles in
South Lebanon, Beirut, and the Bekaa under the guidance of senior officers from
the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps.
Hezbollah has over 130,000 rockets and missiles of all sorts of ranges and
payloads and while the group has been working on this project since 2013, they
have only several dozens precision missiles.
The terror group first tried to bring in ready-to-use precision missiles from
Iran to Lebanon overland via Syria in 2013. But when the majority of those
attempts were thwarted by alleged Israeli airstrikes, Hezbollah decided in 2016
to take “dumb” missiles from Syria and upgrade them to precision missiles.
But continued airstrikes forced the group to move their project to Lebanon,
where Israel rarely acts because while members of Israel’s security cabinet have
pushed for preemptive strikes against Hezbollah in Lebanon, the IDF is against
such actions.
Nevertheless, despite significant investments of time, resources and money,
Hezbollah has been unable to build operational factories to produce precision
missiles for use against the Jewish State.
Gantz’s seizure order of $17,000 that was transferred from Hezbollah to the
company and owner “will enable the introduction of the company into
international financial ‘black lists’ and will greatly hinder its activity,” the
ministry said.
The order will remain in effect until August 1rst 2023. “This order is an
integral part of the campaign conducted against the Lebanese project. It is a
clear and sharp message to every commercial entity that assistance provided to
and business with terror organizations are unacceptable and will negatively
affect their ability to operate within the international financial system,” the
defense ministry said.
Lebanon…war and Hezbollah!
Jameel Altheyabi/Saudi Gazate/October 22, 2021
Is Lebanon back on the brink of a civil war again? What is the benefit for
Hezbollah from blowing up the situation and burning Lebanon? Why does it seek to
plunge the Lebanese into all kinds of chaos, assassinations and crises? Why does
the international community continue to remain silent about its Satanic crimes
and devilish practices?
It was ascertained to the world, through a historic international verdict in the
assassination case of Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in 2005, that the terrorist
Hezbollah — the statelet that dominates the Lebanese state with weapons — is
behind all the crimes, assassinations and liquidations that has taken place in
Beirut.
There are plenty of most compelling proofs and evidence of the involvement of
this terrorist gang, run by a regional power, in its bid to “Persianize” Lebanon
along with Yemen, Iraq and Syria, are handled by the agent Hassan Nasrallah. The
Beirut port explosion and the attempt to bury its crime by threatening Lebanese
Judge Tarek Bitar, who is probing the blast, with insistence on his removal,
were not the last among the crimes of Hezbollah. The terrorist outfit is
attempting to dwarf the Najib Mikati’s government, which has not yet completed
even 40 days.
Hezbollah pays lip service to resisting Israel and supporting Palestine, and it
has spilled the most blood in the Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon, and has
brought to Lebanon nothing but calamities, disappointments, wars and lost
adventures.
There is an international and regional consensus that attributes the despair of
the Lebanese situation to the militia, the terrorist arm of a regional power
that does not want good for either Lebanon or the region. At the same time, the
flabby and selfish and even corrupt political class — as per the description of
the international community — cannot be acquitted of the crimes committed
against Lebanon and turning it into a failed country without a future.
There is no doubt that the agendas of Hezbollah and its supporters and
financiers will continue to push with practicing their crimes in order to keep
Lebanon “sick in bed” as long as possible, and push it into an abyss and an
unbearable hell, which is what the Lebanese are currently experiencing.
Imagine that “the former Switzerland of the East” has no electricity, no fuel,
no medicine, no money, no safe life as corruption is rampant, and its only trade
is the export of drugs in shipments of fruit.
It is certain that the Lebanese militia and those who stand behind it and those
associated with it only want Lebanon to remain as it is. Therefore, Hezbollah
seeks with all its might to distance Lebanon from its Arab surroundings, its
true friends and supporters, and leave it in a friendless state.
This is what Nasrallah speaks out publicly, as he revealed more than once his
rejection of the Lebanese regime. He has never concealed his desire to change
the foundations on which Lebanon is built and turn it into one of the states of
the Great Republic.
In such a context, more patriotic sacrifices are required from the sons of
Lebanon in confronting the “Satanic Party” as well as to expose its practices
and its allies at home and abroad, if they want to return their country to its
former era that is well known for them!
US mediator says Lebanon-Israel maritime talks need to be
quick
Gulf News/October 22, 2021
Cairo: The US mediator for indirect talks on border demarcation between Lebanon
and Israel said on Thursday that the negotiations he was hoping to revive should
be concluded in a short period if they were to succeed. Amos Hochstein, speaking
to Al Hadath TV during a visit to Beirut, said holding the indirect talks last
year between the two sides in the presence of the United States and the United
Nations was an important milestone but that it remained to be seen whether the
right time to resume the talks was now. “Perhaps there should be some shuttle
diplomacy first, in order to assess the positions of the parties to identify
where there is room for negotation and then ultimately, to go back to Naqoura
and complete the negotaitions,” he said. Long time foes Lebanon and Israel
started negotiations through a US mediator in October 2020 at the UN
peacekeeper’s base in Lebanon’s Naqoura. The maritime border dispute has held up
exploration in the potentially gas-rich area but talks have since stalled. In
Thursday’s interview, Hochstein said he hoped the negotiation would not take too
much time. “I think that in these kinds of efforts what we’ve learned is that if
you take a lot of time, it doesn’t happen,” he said. “So we need to be focused,
and we need to move quickly.” Israel already pumps gas from huge offshore
fields. Lebanon, which has yet to find commercial gas reserves in its own
waters, is desperate for cash from foreign donors amidst a deepening economic
meltdown. Hochstein said resolving the border issue would help alleviate
Lebanon’s power shortage by allowing it to develop its offshore gas resources.
Asked about a deal to export Egyptian gas through a pipeline going through
Jordan and Syria to Lebanon, Hochstein said the United States had been working
to make that happen and US sanctions against Syria would not have to be waived
to make the deal go through as they likely don’t apply in this case. “We have
determined that it is not -- this kind of a transaction could be, likely is not,
under -- covered by the sanctions. And therefore we’ve informed the government
here, and we’ve informed the government in Egypt that it can move ahead,”
Hochstein said.
Syrians abandon Lebanon as new migrant route to Europe
beckons
Najia Houssari/Arab News/October 22, 2021
BEIRUT: Struggling to cope with soaring living costs and low wages, desperate
Syrian refugees and workers are abandoning Lebanon and turning to a new
migration route into Europe, via Belarus, with many risking their lives and
family savings in the process.
An illegal Syrian worker who arrived in Beirut four years ago and lives with his
20-year-old sister in the capital told Arab News that “working in Lebanon no
longer makes sense.”
“I work all day long delivering goods to be paid 50,000 Lebanese pounds
(equivalent to $2.50 on the black market),” Ahmed said. “That is not nearly
enough because of the rising costs.”
In the past two months alone, more than 16,000 undocumented migrants are
believed to have entered the EU from Belarus after Belarusian President
Alexander Lukashenko responded to Brussels-imposed sanctions by saying he will
no longer stop asylum-seekers from crossing into neighboring Poland.
Belarus has been accused of offering migrants tourist visas and helping them
across its border — a move that appears to have made the previous migrant route
through Turkey and on to the Greek islands a thing of the past. Arab and foreign
airlines arranging trips to Belarus through Lebanon have seen demand surge since
September, while Syrians have been queuing outside the General Directorate of
Public Security’s offices in Beirut for hours to have their passports returned
or to pay residency fees. Lebanese citizens can obtain a visa for Belarus once
they arrive at Minsk airport. However, Syrians, Iraqis and Palestinians are
required to get a tourist visa in advance. Ahmed told Arab News that he found a
video on TikTok of Syrians talking about their trip to Belarus, then Poland and
finally to Germany, and claiming that the journey is less risky than traveling
by sea. “I am now getting my documents ready to leave before the end of October,
because things will not get easier after that because of the conditions in
winter,” he said.
Migrants undertaking the journey face hazardous conditions, with freezing
overnight temperatures and the risk of getting lost in dense forests along the
500 km frontier. They must also deal with people smugglers of different
nationalities who demand thousands of dollars in advance payments. Social media
posts offer details about the journey and the sums migrants can expect to pay.
Those who reach their final destination reassure their families that they have
arrived at “the camp” — an expression refugees use to describe salvation, as
they pursue a “better life.”Ali, 35, who has worked as a janitor in Beirut’s
suburbs for more than 10 years, said that friends who completed the migration
route called him via WhatsApp and “seemed very happy.”
However, Ali said that he would not consider making the trip. “Migrants must be
young. There is no place for families on such an arduous journey.”Belarus’
announcement at the end of May that it would not stop migrants from entering
Europe came in response to a series of EU sanctions imposed after Belarusian
authorities forced a passenger plane to land in Minsk and seized opposition
journalist Roman Protasevich who was on board. Following the incident, the EU
banned Belarusian carriers from using its airspace and airports.
A Syrian worker, who declined to be named, said: “Syrians in Syria and Lebanon
have heard stories about migration to Belarus, then on to Europe, since August,
but they remained skeptical about this route until September.” He added: “Those
who work legally in Lebanon have the right to travel from Beirut International
Airport and the right to return to Lebanon as long as their residency permits
are valid, but if a refugee wishes to leave Lebanon and go to Belarus, they are
required to sign a document stating they will never come back.”
The website of the Belarusian Consulate in Lebanon provides instructions on
obtaining an entry visa for Belarus, with a list of required documents and visa
fees. Syrians, Iraqis and Palestinians need a tourist visa to enter the country,
and must provide the name of the airline, a passport valid for at least six
months, and an insurance policy that costs €12 ($14). A single-entry visa costs
€25.
The embassy’s website has been overwhelmed with questions from Syrians seeking a
“tourist visa for one week.”Three airlines, Syrian Air, Emirates and Turkish,
fly to Minsk from Lebanon. According to Syrians, the flights “are fully booked
by tourists.”Ahmed said: “The tourism office asked me to pay $4,000 for the
visa, a one-week hotel reservation and a ticket. When I get to Belarus, I will
have to wait with a group of 10 or 15 people for someone who will get us a
mobile phone with Internet access and a pinned location on the Belarusian-Polish
border that we are supposed to reach by foot, crossing through a forest on the
frontier.”He said that the journey might take hours. “When we reach the
location, a car will be waiting for us on the Polish side of the border to get
us into Germany. There, we will turn ourselves in and ask for asylum. To get
from Belarus to Poland, my family must transfer $3,000 to an account in Turkey,
whose owners will handle the cost of the next phase, from Poland to Germany.”
Crossing from Belarus into Poland is getting increasingly difficult.
Ali was told by his friends that “the Belarusian police turn a blind eye to
those walking in the jungle, but the Polish security authorities have very
strict measures. If they catch people trying to cross the borders illegally,
they send them back to Belarus. However, asylum-seekers do not give up. They
keep trying. Those who fail to reach the location, return to their hotels and
try again the next day.”He said that “those who handle the smuggling operation
are from different nationalities, and might be Belarusian, Iraqi or Syrian.”
Ali also said that his relative “got lucky while crossing the jungle, as he fell
and injured his leg, but there was a Syrian doctor in the group, who is also an
asylum-seeker.”Poland said that its border patrols have detained hundreds of
migrants since August. Groups of migrants include Afghan, Iraqi and Syrian
refugees, as well those from Turkey and Jordan. According to press reports,
several asylum-seekers have died of exhaustion as temperatures in the forests on
the Belarusian-Polish border plummet. The Polish Press Agency reported that the
body of a 19-year-old Syrian man who drowned in the Bug River on the border was
found on Wednesday.
Nissan ex-Chair Ghosn Set on Restoring Reputation
Associated Press/22 October ,2021
Carlos Ghosn, the former auto industry superstar whose career screeched to a
halt with his arrest three years ago, isn't about to settle into quiet
retirement. The former head of the Nissan-Renault alliance fled to Lebanon in
late 2019, while out on bail facing financial misconduct charges in Japan. In a
recent interview with The Associated Press, Ghosn was confident, energized and
determined to fight to restore his reputation. "I'm going to be there. I'm going
to defend my rights as long as I have the energy to do it," Ghosn, 67, said via
Zoom from his home in Beirut. His story is "far from finished," he said.
Ghosn fled from Japan while hiding in a big cargo box on a private jet. The
French, Brazilian-born Ghosn took refuge in Lebanon, his ancestral homeland,
which has no extradition treaty with Japan. Ghosn said he is trying to get
Interpol to drop its red flag, which requests police worldwide to seek out and
arrest persons wanted for prosecution or to serve a sentence. He's eager to be
able to travel outside of Lebanon, but the process is likely to be bureaucratic
and long. Japanese prosecutors say they are still intent on pursuing him on
allegations of under-reporting his compensation and of breach of trust in
misusing Nissan money for personal gain — charges he denies. Japan has
extradition treaties with the U.S. and South Korea and prosecutors said they
would seek help from other countries, including Brazil and France, if Ghosn
travels there.
Apart from the main case in Japan, Ghosn is under investigation in France and is
being sued by Nissan Motor Co. in Japan for alleged financial damages. Tokyo
prosecutors have refused to send his files to Lebanon for the criminal case to
be tried there.
Nissan's French alliance partner Renault sent Ghosn to Japan in 1999 to steer a
turnaround when the Japanese automaker was on the verge of collapse. Under Ghosn,
Nissan became more profitable than Renault. The partnership expanded to include
smaller rival Mitsubishi Motors Corp. and other automakers. Nissan owns 15% of
Renault, which owns a much bigger 43% of Nissan. The government of France owns
15% of Renault. Analysts estimate the damage suffered by the Nissan-Renault
alliance over the Ghosn scandal at billions of dollars in capital value, sales
and brand image. Nissan expects to eke out a profit this fiscal year after
losing money for the last two years.
Aaron Ho, analyst at New York-based CFRA Research, believes Nissan has fallen
behind in an intensely competitive industry because of the Ghosn scandal.
"Before Nissan resolves its internal issues over corporate power and puts its
resources back into making tangible progress — which takes a lot of time, and a
lot of time has been wasted — to create values for its end demand, we are not
optimistic," he said. Ghosn asserts the case against him was concocted in a
power struggle within Nissan's boardroom. He said he wants to show "a
conspiracy" by Nissan officials who, worried about a takeover-like merger by
Renault, got Japanese authorities to pursue a criminal case against him. "The
only way I can qualify them are: Thugs, inside Nissan," he said.
Nissan, which has denounced Ghosn, does not comment on the Ghosn case. Testimony
at the trial of Greg Kelly, a former top executive at Nissan Motor Co. who was
arrested at the same time as Ghosn, has shown that Nissan officials did seek out
prosecutors.
The case against Ghosn and Kelly centers on elaborate calculations to compensate
Ghosn after retirement for a pay cut he took beginning in 2009, when disclosure
of big executive pay became a legal requirement in Japan. Prosecutors allege
Ghosn broke the law by failing to report that compensation, which was never paid
or even formally agreed upon. Kelly says he is innocent, and was trying to find
legal ways to pay Ghosn to retain him. Ironically, Ghosn says the money he
allegedly failed to report was based on him retiring in 2018, the year he was
arrested.
Ghosn looks anything but retired. He's working on movies, teaching classes on
management, consulting for businesses and helping out with university research
on "character assassination."
"Look. Books, books, books," he said, when asked what else he's been working
on.. "Broken Alliances," an English version of the 2020 French book "Le temps de
la verite," was released in September. He is writing a book with his wife
Carole, who also is wanted in Japan, about their ordeal.
Human rights advocates and other critics say Japan's system amounts to "hostage
justice," allowing suspects to be questioned for days without a lawyer present
while they are kept in solitary confinement in a small, spartan cell. The
conviction rate of over 99% has raised questions over forced confessions. "One
of the things I could do for Japan is fighting with all those people who are
opposed in Japan to the hostage justice system," said Ghosn. His ride is still a
Nissan, the Patrol sport-utility vehicle, a model he worked on that's popular in
the Middle East. And he insists there was no way he could have foreseen the
trouble that was headed his way. "If somebody was telling you before it happened
that I was going to be arrested," he said, "you would laugh. You would say,
'Come on. It is a joke.'
The Latest English LCCC
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
October 22-23/2021
Putin Hosts Israeli PM Bennett
Associated Press/October 22, 2021
Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed hope on Friday that new Israeli Prime
Minister Naftali Bennett would continue in the footsteps of his predecessor in
maintaining close and "trusting" relations with his country. After talks at
Putin's lush Black Sea residence in Sochi, Bennett hailed bilateral ties as
"strategic" and emphasized the need to maintain an "intimate" dialogue with
Moscow. Greeting the Israeli prime minister at the start of their first meeting,
Putin described Russian-Israeli ties as "unique," noting that Israel is home to
the largest Russian-speaking community. Putin kept close personal ties with
former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has repeatedly visited
Russia. On Friday, Putin pointed to Russia's "business-like and trusting
relationship" with Netanyahu's government and expressed hope that Bennett's
government would pursue a "policy of continuity" in Russian-Israeli ties.
Bennett extolled the "great contribution" made by his country's 1 million
Russian speakers, and emphasized "the deep connection between the two countries"
while praising Putin for bringing them closer during his 20-year rule. "I can
tell you on behalf of the citizens of Israel that we consider you a true friend
of the Jewish people," Bennett said. Bennett hailed the Soviet role in World War
II and talked about a new museum in Israel that honors Jewish soldiers who
fought in allied armies, primarily the Red Army. "It's impossible not to
appreciate the heroism of the entire Russian nation during those difficult
years," he said in remarks that likely resonated with Putin who cherishes his
country's decisive contribution to the victory over the Nazis. Russia and Israel
have developed close political, economic and cultural ties that have helped them
tackle delicate and divisive issues, such as the situation in Syria where Moscow
has teamed up with Tehran to shore up Syrian President Bashar Assad's rule. "We
will also talk about the situation in Syria, and the efforts to halt the Iranian
military nuclear program," Bennett said at the start of his talks with Putin.
Putin said that Russia has been "making efforts to help restore Syria's
statehood and to strengthen it." He noted that despite some problems regarding
the situation in Syria, "there is also common ground and opportunities for
cooperation, especially in terms of the fight against terrorism."
Bennett said on Facebook that he had an "excellent" meeting with Putin, adding
that they discussed a wide range of issues, including "ways to deal with
Fundamentalist Islam," in talks that stretched over five hours. "Russia is a
very important player in the region," he said, noting that the relations between
the two countries are "both strategic and almost daily, and we must maintain a
direct and intimate line of dialogue." Israel views Iranian entrenchment on its
northern frontier as a red line, and it has repeatedly struck what it says are
Iran-linked facilities and weapons convoys destined for Lebanese Hizbullah. The
Iran-backed militant group has fought alongside Syrian government forces in the
country's civil war. Russia has waged a military campaign in Syria since 2015,
helping Assad's government reclaim control over most of the country. Moscow also
has helped modernize Syria's military, including providing Assad with air
defense systems, and trained its personnel. Russia and Israel established a
military hotline to coordinate air force operations over Syria to avoid clashes.
Israel often attacks Iranian-linked targets in Syria, while Russia has provided
support to the Syrian government. In 2018, Russia-Israeli ties were severely
tested by the downing of a Russian warplane by Syrian forces that responded to
an Israeli air raid and mistook a Russian reconnaissance plane for Israeli jets.
All 15 members of the Russian crew died. Moscow also has played a delicate
diplomatic game of maintaining friendly ties with both Israel and Iran. In 2018,
Moscow struck a deal with Tehran to keep its fighters away from the Golan
Heights to accommodate Israeli concerns about the Iranian presence in Syria.
Russia is one of the international parties that negotiated a 2015 nuclear deal
with Iran. The deal fell apart after then-President Donald Trump withdrew in
2018. But President Joe Biden's administration is now trying to revive the deal
with other international powers - a step that Israel opposes.
France urges Iran to curb nuclear activity, resume talks
AP/October 22, 2021
PARIS: France on Friday urged Iran to curb nuclear activities of “unprecedented
gravity” as US and European envoys met to discuss efforts aimed at reviving the
troubled 2015 Iran nuclear deal. US envoy Robert Malley joined counterparts from
France, Britain and Germany at the meetings in Paris, at what the French Foreign
Ministry called a “critical time” in efforts to salvage the accord. “It is
urgent and crucial for Iran to end the activities of unprecedented gravity that
it is conducting in violation of the (agreement) and to immediately resume
full-fledged cooperation” with the International Atomic Energy Agency, Foreign
Ministry spokesperson Anne-Claire Legendre said in an online briefing. The IAEA
is charged with monitoring the 2015 accord, which was aimed at curbing Iran’s
nuclear activity in exchange for the lifting of crippling sanctions. The US
pulled out of the accord under Donald Trump and re-imposed sanctions. Since then
Iran has stepped up nuclear activity and is now in violation of several aspects
of the deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA. Iran’s
nuclear activity includes enriching uranium which Western nations fear could be
used to build an atomic bomb. Tehran denies any such ambitions. The US and
European partners are ready to return immediately to negotiations with Iran “in
order to swiftly conclude an agreement on Iran’s return to its commitments and
the United States’ return to the JCPOA,” Legendre said. Iran’s new hard-line
government led by President Ebrahim Raisi, which took power in August, has
hinted it will return to the nuclear talks in Vienna but has balked at setting a
date.
U.S. Iran Envoy to Hold Nuclear Talks with Europe Powers
Agence France Presse/October 22, 2021
U.S. envoy for Iran Robert Malley will on Friday meet diplomats from three
European powers over the Iranian nuclear crisis as Vienna-based talks to salvage
a 2015 deal remain suspended. The agreement between Iran and world powers to
find a long-term solution to the now two-decade-old crisis over its
controversial nuclear program has been moribund since former U.S. president
Donald Trump walked out of the deal in May 2018. His successor Joe Biden has
said he is ready to re-enter the agreement so long as Iran meets key
preconditions. But the Vienna-based talks through intermediaries made little
headway, before being interrupted by the election of hardliner Ebrahim Raisi as
Iran's president. Malley's trip to Paris for the meeting with the so-called E3
of Britain, France and Germany comes after he visited the Gulf for talks with
allies Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates who are all deeply
concerned by Iran's nuclear program. "Following consultations with partners in
the region, Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley will meet with his E3
counterparts in Paris on Friday," a U.S. State Department spokesman said,
without giving further details. A French diplomatic source also confirmed the
meeting, adding that a representative of the EU's foreign policy section would
attend. Western powers, Israel and pro-Washington Arabian peninsula states fear
that Iran intends to to develop an atomic bomb. Tehran denies this, insisting it
only seeks to produce energy for its population. The nuclear deal promised Iran
step-by-step sanctions relief in exchange for restrictions on its atomic work
which would be under the strict supervision of the U.N. atomic agency. U.N.
nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi expressed concern Tuesday he was still
waiting for a "high level" discussion with Iranian officials in Tehran, after
negotiating last month a new compromise on monitoring Iran's nuclear program to
help restart the talks in Vienna.
Iran nuclear talks ‘on life support’ as Tehran drags feet
Agencies/October 22, 2021
LONDON: Talks to rein in Iran’s nuclear arms program are on the verge of
collapse, an anonymous source from a government involved in the negotiations has
told The Independent. Talks that had been continuing in Vienna earlier this year
ground to a halt when Iran elected its new president, Ebrahim Raisi, who is a
religious and political hard-liner and a close ally of supreme leader, Ayatollah
Khamenei. Since then, Iran has failed to return in earnest to the talks and has
instead ramped up production of enriched uranium and other measures that bring
it closer to having a nuclear bomb.
The JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), agreed in 2015 between Iran, the
US, China, Russia and other world powers, curbed Iran’s nuclear program in
exchange for sanctions relief, but the deal later broke down.
Now negotiations for a return to the JCPOA are on the verge of collapse, The
Independent has reported. “The deal is not totally dead, but it’s on life
support,” said an official of a government involved in the talks. The official
spoke on condition of anonymity. The US has accused the Iranian side of dragging
its feet in returning to the table for talks. State Department spokesman, Ned
Price, told reporters “this is not an exercise that can go on
indefinitely.”Israel’s finance minister, Avigdor Liberman, warned this week that
“a confrontation with Iran is only a matter of time, and not a lot of
time.”Raisi’s team has claimed they need time to settle into their new
government and that is why there are delays, but the official involved in the
talks said: “If they’re just playing for time while expanding their program,
we’ll have to recalibrate our approach.” Some suspect Iran is enriching more
uranium and ramping up its production capacity to gain more leverage if it
chooses to rejoin the talks. Sanam Vakil, deputy director of the Iran program at
London-based think-tank Chatham House, told The Independent: “They are
struggling to build a strategy and build consensus. Their foot-dragging can be
seen as a leverage-building exercise, but it’s also a reflection of internal
paralysis.”She continued: “Their thinking is they can survive whatever is to
come because they have survived everything thus far. But it’s a dangerous
calculation. They’re always strategically on the razor’s edge. The outcome
domestically could be dangerous in the long run. Yes, they have the monopoly of
violence. Yes, the economy is bandaged, but the poverty level is increasing.
Debt is increasing.” The insider source told The Independent: “If the Iranians
really wanted to take their time, why continue to escalate their non-compliance?
“Why not freeze their non-compliance? If they walk away, the options aren’t
good. It would be a miscalculation to think everyone would just shrug their
shoulders.”
Syria constitution talks stall at UN
AFP/October 22, 2021
GENEVA: Talks on a new constitution for Syria this week ended in disappointment,
the United Nations mediator concluded Friday, and without a proper understanding
on how to move the process forward. The sixth round of discussions between 15
representatives each from President Bashar Assad’s government, the opposition,
and from civil society, were held this week at the UN in Geneva. The government
and the opposition traded barbs afterwards, pointing the finger at each other
for the lack of progress. “It was ups and downs,” UN envoy Geir Pedersen told a
news conference following the Syrian Constitutional Committee (SCC) talks. “We
had three days that went rather well and one day that was more difficult.”This
week, each delegation brought forward draft texts on different areas of the
constitution: on Monday, the government on sovereignty, independence and
territorial integrity; on Tuesday, the opposition on the armed forces and
security; then civil society on the rule of law; and on Friday, the government
on terrorism.
Israel designates six Palestinian civil society groups as
terrorists
AP/October 22, 2021
TEL AVIV: Israel on Friday designated six Palestinian civil society groups as
terrorist organizations and accused them of funnelling donor aid to militants.
The charge was rejected by human rights watchdogs who said the move will stifle
monitoring of potential abuses. The designations authorize Israeli authorities
to close the groups’ offices, seize their assets and arrest their staff in the
occupied West Bank, watchdogs Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International said
in a joint statement condemning the move.Israel’s defense ministry said the six
Palestinian groups had ties to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
(PLFP), a left-wing faction with an armed wing that has carried out deadly
attacks against Israelis.
“(The) declared organizations received large sums of money from European
countries and international organizations, using a variety of forgery and
deceit,” the defense ministry said in a statement, alleging the money had
supported PFLP’s activities.
The groups include leading Palestinian human rights organizations Al-Haq and
Addameer, who document alleged rights violations by both Israel and the
Western-backed Palestinian Authority, which has limited self-rule in the West
Bank. Asked for comment, an official with PFLP, which is on the European Union’s
terrorism blacklist, did not outright reject ties to the six groups but said
they maintain relations with civil society organizations across the West Bank
and Gaza. “It is part of the rough battle Israel is launching against the
Palestinian people and against civil society groups, in order to exhaust them,”
PFLP official Kayed Al-Ghoul said.
Al-Haq did not immediately provide comment. Addameer and another one of the
designated groups, Defense for Children International — Palestine, rejected the
Israeli accusations as an “attempt to eliminate Palestinian civil society.” The
other three groups listed did not immediately provide comment. Human Rights
Watch and Amnesty International said the “decision is an alarming escalation
that threatens to shut down the work of Palestine’s most prominent civil society
organizations.”They added: “The decades-long failure of the international
community to challenge grave Israeli human rights abuses and impose meaningful
consequences for them has emboldened Israeli authorities to act in this brazen
manner.”Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem in the 1967
Middle East war. Palestinians seek the territories for a future state. Pedersen
wanted to wrap up Friday by striking a form of provisional agreement on the
principles that had been discussed, either in part or in full — or if not, then
agreeing on what the parties disagreed on. “The discussion today was a big
disappointment. We did not manage to achieve what we had hoped to achieve: that
we would have a good discussion on how to reach forward for some kind of a
consensus,” the Norwegian diplomat said.“We lacked a proper understanding on how
to move that process forward.”Negotiations have not been held since January,
when the fifth round of talks hit a brick wall. No date was agreed for the next
round of discussions.
The SCC was created in September 2019 and first convened a month later.
The tentative negotiations are aimed at rewriting the war-torn country’s
constitution. It is hoped the talks could pave the way toward a broader
political process. Ahmad Kuzbari, the head of the government SCC delegation,
said some opposition proposals were “far from reality and even reflected malign
thought and aggressive agendas,” he told reporters afterwards. He accused the
opposition of “ceaseless attempts to lay obstacles and to make this round fail
and lead it not to achieve any outcome.”“Despite all that took place, our
delegation reaffirms its will to carry on, to engage positively in the process,”
he concluded.
Syrian opposition negotiations leader Hadi Al-Bahra said Kuzbari’s claims were
“bare of any truth” and said the regime did not have the will to reach a
solution. “There were not even attempts to achieve a consensus,” he said. Bahra
said the opposition and the government’s position on Syrian independence,
sovereignty and territorial integrity were interchangeable, “but still they are
insisting that there is no consensus.”But he said the talks in Geneva were the
only international platform on which the Syrian opposition had a voice, so it
was one “we must preserve.”
Pedersen said the participants “agreed that it could not continue like this,”
but revealed that “a little bit of trust” had been established this week and he
could “see that there are possibilities.”Syria’s civil war erupted in 2011 after
the violent repression of protests demanding regime change. It quickly spiralled
into a complex conflict that pulled in numerous actors, including jihadist
groups and foreign powers. The war has left around half a million people dead.
Throughout the civil war, the UN has been striving to nurture a political
resolution.
Turkish counter-espionage against foreign spy networks
leads to multiple
Agencies/October 22, 2021
ANKARA: Turkey has arrested a number of individuals believed to be involved in
espionage activities on behalf of other nations, it has been revealed. A
wide-ranging operation by Turkey’s National Intelligence Organization recently
detained at least 15 people linked with Israeli intelligence agency Mossad, for
allegedly carrying out activities on Turkish soil against Israeli dissidents and
Palestinian students. As part of an investigation by the Istanbul public
prosecutor’s office, according to pro-government newspaper Sabah, interrogation
of the detainees is underway after they were taken to a prison in Istanbul.
Conviction for espionage in Turkey carries a prison term of 15 to 20 years.
Around 200 people took part in the operation to apprehend the 15 detainees,
surveilling them for over a year in secret, in what appears to have been one of
the largest intelligence operations in Turkish history.
The 15 were discovered after Turkish counterterrorism forces held separate
operations in four provinces; the spy network is thought to have had five
separate cells of three people each spread across Turkey. Members were allegedly
in close contact with Mossad field officers, relaying information and documents
through face-to-face meetings abroad, in Croatia, Romania, Kenya, and
Switzerland. The cells, supposedly paid tens of thousands of dollars and euros
for their work, conducted research into various associations and companies in
Turkey, as well as Palestinian students enrolled in Turkish universities on
courses that could have practical use in relation to defense or terrorist
activities, and sent this information back to Mossad. Turkish intelligence
believes several Palestinians reported missing since last month were part of the
ring. A number of Syrians are also thought to have been involved. Neither the
Israeli or Turkish governments have commented on the reports. Although ties
between the two countries have been fragile over the years, with Turkish links
to Hamas a particular sticking point, both countries’ presidents agreed on the
need to improve bilateral ties after a phone call in July. “Until some details
of that operation were disclosed, Turkey was blamed for the … Palestinian people
who went missing in the country. There were even some reports claiming that
Turkey was handing over some Hamas members to improve ties with Israel. But, if
these latest allegations prove true, it seems that some Palestinian people in
Turkey were secretly working for the Mossad in its own operations,” one expert,
who requested anonymity, told Arab News. The Mossad ring was not the only
espionage-related incident to occupy Turkish headlines in recent weeks. On
Thursday, six suspects, including Russians, Ukrainians and Uzbeks, were jailed
pending trial over an alleged plot against Chechen dissidents in Turkey, held on
charges of espionage and preparing armed actions targeting opposition figures in
the country. After being initially detained in the southern resort province of
Antalya, they were transferred to Maltepe prison in Istanbul, a city home to
several thousand Chechens. Turkey also recently detained eight people, including
two Iranian spies and six locals, over a plot to kidnap a former Iranian
military official in the eastern province of Van, some 100 km from the border
with Iran.
The operation to apprehend the eight came after Turkey briefly detained a member
of the Iranian Consulate in Istanbul in February, in connection with a probe
into the assassination of an Iranian dissident in Turkey two years ago.
In South Sudan, flooding called ‘worst thing in my
lifetime’
AP/October 22, 2021
MALUALKON, South Sudan: He feels like a man who has drowned.
The worst flooding that parts of South Sudan have seen in 60 years now surrounds
his home of mud and grass. His field of sorghum, which fed his family, is under
water. Surrounding mud dykes have collapsed. Other people have fled. Only Yel
Aguer Deng’s family and a few neighbors remain. This is the third straight year
of extreme flooding in South Sudan, further imperiling livelihoods of many of
the 11 million people in the world’s youngest country. A five-year civil war,
hunger and corruption have all challenged the nation. Now climate change, which
the United Nations has blamed on the flooding, is impossible to ignore. As he
empties a fishing net, Daniel Deng, a 50-year-old father of seven, recalls a
life of being forced to flee again and again because of insecurity. “But this
one event (the flood) is too much,” he said. “It is the worst thing that
happened in my lifetime.”
The UN says the flooding has affected almost a half-million people across South
Sudan since May. Here in Northern Bahr el Ghazal state, the Lol river has burst
its banks. This state is usually spared from extreme flooding that plagues the
South Sudan states of Jonglei and Unity that border the White Nile and the Sudd
marshlands. But now, houses and crops have been swamped. A new report this week
coordinated by the World Meteorological Organization warned of increasing such
climate shocks to come across much of Africa, the continent that contributes the
least to global warming but will suffer from it most. In these rural South Sudan
communities, shelters of braided grass put up a fragile resistance in a land of
seemingly endless water. In Langic village, Ajou Bol Yel’s family of seven
hosted nine neighbors who had lost their homes. The elders sleep outside on beds
protected by mosquito nets, while the children share the floor. In Majak Awar,
some 100 families have been displaced twice, in June when homes were flooded and
again in August when their shelters were ruined, too. “I want to leave for
Sudan,” whispered Nyibol Arop, a 27-year-old mother of five, as she boiled her
morning tea just steps away from the stagnant water that threatens her current
shelter. It is hard to see a stable future when constantly on the move, a lesson
learned during the civil war that displaced millions of people before a peace
agreement in 2018. “Floods are not constant. Some people will stay, and some
will go,” said Thomas Mapol, a 45-year-old father of nine, as he showed off the
destroyed houses of his village near Majak Awar. “But me, I cannot move
anywhere. There is no other place that I know.”
Rare Libya Conference Seeks Support ahead of Landmark Elections
Agence France Presse/October 22, 2021
Libya's fragile unity government hosted an international conference Thursday to
build support ahead of the war-battered country's landmark December election.
"Your presence is proof that we are on the road to peace," said the head of the
interim government, Abdulhamid Dbeibah, promising that the vote would be held
"on time" and urging "respect for the results." Libya and the U.N. have been
striving to move past the violence that has wracked the North African nation
since a 2011 NATO-backed uprising toppled and killed dictator Moammar Gadhafi. A
ceasefire between eastern and western factions last year led to the unity
government taking office in March with a mandate to take the country to
elections. "Tripoli has recovered. It is the capital of all Libyans," Dbeibah
said at the Libya Stabilization Conference, the first of its kind to be held in
the country for years, with representatives from about 30 nations attending. The
presidential vote is set to take place on December 24, but legislative polls may
be delayed, amid wrangling between factions in the country's east and west.
Libyan Foreign Minister Najla al-Mangoush, in a final statement, said Tripoli
pledged to respect United Nations resolutions to "create a conducive
environment" for the holding of "transparent and inclusive" elections. Foreign
powers have backed various sides in Libya's complex war, and the presence of
mercenaries and foreign troops in the oil-rich nation is one of the toughest
obstacles to a lasting peace.Foreign fighters were a major focus of the
conference. Mangoush repeated Tripoli's "rejection of foreign interference" and
the "attempts to sow chaos in Libya".
'More precarious'
The UN Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs, Rosemary DiCarlo, insisted
on the importance of the December elections to "complete the transitional
phase".he called on international organizations to send "special envoys to
observe this operation" and to guarantee its transparency. As Libya faces
multiple accusations of mistreatment of illegal migrants, DiCarlo urged
authorities to speed up the repatriation of refugees stranded there and to
release migrants in detention. Foreign powers have been pushing hard for
elections to be held as scheduled, after the date was agreed at UN-led talks
last year.
French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said that the holding of both
presidential and legislative elections on December 24 was "within reach". He
praised "remarkable progress" made in both politics and security. "The
aspirations of Libyans for sovereignty converge with the security interests of
the entire region, from the Sahel to Europe to North Africa," Le Drian said.
"With our support, Libyans can seize the historic opportunity that exists today
to regain peace," he added. Although there are sharp disagreements over the
vote, Libya expert Emadeddin Badi said the conference aims to "capitalize on the
momentum to see Libya stabilized, because several countries do actually want to
see a stable Libya, even if on their own terms".
- Foreign fighters -
Mangoush labelled foreign fighters "a threat not just to Libya but to the entire
region". Last December, the UN estimated that 20,000 combatants from abroad were
present in the country. They include Russians sent by the shadowy Kremlin-linked
Wagner group, African and Syrian mercenaries and Turkish soldiers deployed under
a deal with a previous unity government at the height of the last round of
east-west fighting. The minimal progress since a January deadline for their
departure under a ceasefire deal reflects the complexity of the issue. Earlier
this month, a joint commission of eastern and western military commanders agreed
on a roadmap for their departure -- but it lacked a timeline. Tripoli has said a
"very modest" number of fighters have left. Also on the list of Libya's woes is
the question of integrating and unifying the country's armed forces under a
single command -- forces that as recently as last year were firing at each
other. While in theory the country has a unity government, its east is largely
controlled by military strongman Khalifa Haftar, widely expected to stand as a
presidential candidate but despised by many in Libya's west.
The Latest The Latest LCCC
English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on October 22-23/2021
In His Second Term, Trudeau Must Fix His Iran Policy
Alireza Nader/FDD-Insight/October 22, 2021
Last month’s re-election of Justin Trudeau as Canada’s prime minister provides
an opportunity to reflect on Ottawa’s relationship with the Islamic Republic in
Iran. Iran policy is an issue of great importance to hundreds of thousands of
Canadian-Iranians and their allies. So far, however, Trudeau’s Iran policy has
been weak to nonexistent.
He does pay occasional lip service to supporting Iranian human rights and
achieving justice for the 55 Canadian-Iranians killed when the regime shot down
Ukraine International Airlines Flight PS752 last year. But this is all talk.
When push comes to shove, Trudeau and his government choose either to
accommodate Tehran or simply say nothing. Tellingly, Trudeau failed even to
mention Iran or PS752 during the recent Canadian election. And Trudeau’s foreign
minister, Marc Garneau, ignored PS752 during his recent speech before the UN
General Assembly.
This silence reflects Trudeau’s wish to avoid antagonizing Iran. Canada’s
current Iran policy centers on supporting the Biden administration’s efforts to
revive the 2015 nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of
Action (JCPOA), and on keeping the door open to a more positive diplomatic
relationship with the regime. Ottawa fears that applying pressure against Tehran
could undermine these goals.
However, President Joe Biden’s failed attempts to persuade Tehran to resume
compliance with the JCPOA should demonstrate to Ottawa that achieving an
acceptable nuclear deal with Iran will require leverage through sustained
pressure. Indeed, the JCPOA’s prospects grow dimmer every day as the regime
refuses to fulfill its nuclear obligations or even to return to the negotiating
table. New Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi’s ultra-hardline government and new
nuclear negotiating team will likely continue to pursue nuclear and foreign
policies that put Iran at odds with the international community, including the
United States and Canada.
Likewise, the door to a positive relationship with Tehran closed a long time
ago. The Islamic Republic is unlikely ever to reform or pursue policies in line
with Canada’s democratic principles, especially since Iran now has a mass
murderer as president.
Meanwhile, the regime’s conduct, from shooting down Flight PS752 to supporting
terrorist groups across the Middle East and even on Canadian soil, poses a
direct threat to Canada’s national security. Ottawa needs to start fighting
back.
In his second term, Trudeau should adopt a policy aimed at thwarting the
regime’s malign activities, protecting Canadian national security interests, and
advancing the interests of the Iranian people.
As a first step, Ottawa should join the United States in designating Iran’s
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization pursuant to
the Canadian Parliament’s recommendation in 2018. The IRGC is Iran’s most
powerful military and security actor, responsible for supporting and directing
Tehran’s various terrorist proxies.
In fact, IRGC personnel were responsible for downing Flight PS752 in 2020. The
regime has refused to provide a full accounting of the PS752 shootdown, and
according to former Iranian Foreign Minister Muhammad Javad Zarif, the IRGC is
responsible for hiding the truth. So far, Ottawa has not taken any action
against the IRGC, depriving Canada of leverage necessary to convince the regime
to provide clear answers. Canada should couple sanctions against the IRGC with a
concerted push for international bodies such as the International Civil Aviation
Organization to hold the regime accountable for shooting down Flight PS752.
In addition, Ottawa should crack down on Iran’s malign presence in Canada. This
should include efforts to counter the regime’s foreign influence network,
money-laundering, and other illicit activities in Canada.
Ottawa should also re-examine its policy of tolerating regime officials on
Canadian soil. For example, former Iranian Vice President Razm Hosseini has
admitted to living in Canada in the past, and his family continues to reside in
Canada while he works in Iran. As a former governor of Kerman, a city in
southeastern Iran, Hosseini received political support from the late IRGC Qods
Force leader Qassem Soleimani. Another example is Mahmoud Reza Khavari, the
former director of Iran’s Bank Melli, who fled to Canada after the regime
accused him of stealing billions of dollars.
Finally, Ottawa should demonstrate its solidarity with the Iranian people by
imposing sanctions targeting human rights abusers in Iran. While Trudeau and his
government have verbally condemned Iranian human rights violations, they have
done little to back up their words with action. While Canada has followed and
enforced UN and international sanctions on Iran, it has not imposed Global
Magnitsky sanctions on individual Iranian human right abusers.
Ottawa’s soft line on Iran has clearly proven itself incapable of defending
Canada’s values and interests. It is long past time for Trudeau to get tough on
the clerical regime.
*Alireza Nader is a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD),
where he contributes to FDD’s Iran Program and Center on Economic and Financial
Power (CEFP). For more analysis from Alireza, the Iran Program, and CEFP, please
subscribe HERE. Follow Alireza on Twitter @AlirezaNader. Follow FDD on Twitter @FDD
and @FDD_Iran and @FDD_CEFP. FDD is a Washington, DC-based, nonpartisan research
institute focusing on national security and foreign policy.
Biden's Afghanistan Withdrawal Unleashes a Lethal
Terrorist Cocktail
Richard Kemp/Gatestone Institute./October 22, 2021
Despite their promises to deny terrorists safe haven, the Taliban will do the
opposite. They and Al Qaida are joined at the hip, with both Osama Bin Laden and
his successor Ayman Al Zawahiri having sworn unbreakable allegiance, bay'ah, to
the leaders of the Taliban.
The Islamic State's Khorosan branch, with several thousand fighters in
Afghanistan, will pose a similar threat. Many political leaders in the US and UK
claim the Taliban are sworn enemies of the IS, with some even suggesting that we
might form an alliance against IS with Taliban terrorists. But this abhorrent
proposition is merely an attempt to help limit the political fall-out from their
ill-judged actions that facilitated the Taliban's conquest.
Today, all these actors know there is no prospect of further large-scale US
intervention in the country, no matter how great their atrocities. The US
remains capable of air strikes and even special forces raids against serious
threats emanating from Afghanistan, but these require high-grade intelligence
which, despite the powerful technical capabilities of the agencies, is extremely
difficult to gain now that we have withdrawn all forces.
The prospect of a successful jihadist insurgency in Pakistan, with its nuclear
arsenal, has been a long-standing concern for the US, which invested huge
intelligence and military resources to help prevent it. Most of this capability
was withdrawn with the exit from Afghanistan.
Like Pakistan, China supported the Taliban insurgency for many years. In return,
the Taliban have frequently hunted down and killed many of the Uighur leaders —
fellow Sunni Muslims — who took refuge in Afghanistan. Desperate for Beijing's
funds and political backing, the Taliban can be relied on to do all they can to
prevent any export of jihadism into China.
But we can expect no such efforts from Beijing to prevent terrorist actions
against the West. On the contrary, as the new cold war intensifies, China is
more than capable of using its increasing cooperation with the Taliban to enlist
jihadists from Afghanistan as proxies against the US.
Despite their promises to deny terrorists safe haven, the Taliban will do the
opposite. They and Al Qaida are joined at the hip, with both Osama Bin Laden and
his successor Ayman Al Zawahiri having sworn unbreakable allegiance, bay'ah, to
the leaders of the Taliban. Pictured: Bin Laden (center) and Al Zawahiri (left)
address a press conference May 26, 1998 in Afghanistan.
Twenty five year-old Ali Harbi Ali has been arrested on suspicion of the murder
last week of British Member of Parliament Sir David Amess in a church in Essex.
Ali is a member of a well-to-do Somali family who were given refuge in Britain
from the war-torn East African country in the 1990s. British authorities had
previously been alerted to his radicalisation and he was referred to the UK's
"Prevent" anti-terrorist scheme.
The precise reason for his alleged attack on this particular MP, which he has
reportedly admitted, has not yet been established but it is thought he may have
been influenced by Al Shabaab, an Al Qaida group that operates in Somalia and
Kenya.
Last month, the head of Britain's security service MI5, Ken McCallum, warned
there was no doubt the Taliban victory in Afghanistan this summer has "heartened
and emboldened" jihadists everywhere.
It may be that the murder in Essex was the first successful terrorist attack in
Britain inspired by the consequences of US President Joe Biden's catastrophic
decision to withdraw US forces from Afghanistan. Amess's savage knifing follows
jihadist attacks in Norway that killed five and wounded three last week and
another in New Zealand in September that wounded five.
Jihadists around the world celebrated the vanquishment of the West following the
Taliban seizure of power in Kabul. Not only has this re-energised terrorist
cells but it will also lead to an increase in recruiting and a funding boost
from jihadist supporters. Prior to Biden's withdrawal, Al Qaida had been at a
low point in their fortunes, following decimation by US drone strikes in the
Pakistan tribal areas, catastrophic setbacks in Syria, Iraq and Yemen, the
killing of Osama Bin Laden and the rise of the Islamic State. Their
international prestige among fellow jihadists has now been boosted as they share
in the glory of the Taliban's success — in which they played a part.
Al Qaida, the Islamic State and other jihadist networks will capitalise on the
climacterical success of their global movement, directing and inspiring attacks
around the world, emulating IS at the height of its powers in Syria and Iraq,
radicalising thousands and inspiring knife, vehicle-ramming, explosive and gun
attacks in many countries.
A deeply grim prospect — but this widespread inspiration of terrorism will not
be the most serious terrorist consequence of the withdrawal. We will see
jihadists flowing into Afghanistan to join up with terrorists there, as they did
in the years before 9/11. They will train, organize, establish global
connections, plan attacks and receive direction and funding from the leadership.
Despite their promises to deny terrorists safe haven, the Taliban will do the
opposite. They and Al Qaida are joined at the hip, with both Bin Laden and his
successor Ayman Al Zawahiri having sworn unbreakable allegiance, bay'ah, to the
leaders of the Taliban. The Islamic State's Khorosan branch, with several
thousand fighters in Afghanistan, will pose a similar threat. Many political
leaders in the US and UK claim the Taliban are sworn enemies of the IS, with
some even suggesting that we might form an alliance against IS with Taliban
terrorists. But this abhorrent proposition is merely an attempt to help limit
the political fall-out from their ill-judged actions that facilitated the
Taliban's conquest. The reality is that the Taliban and IS will sometimes kill
each other and sometimes cooperate, a phenomenon beyond the comprehension of
many commentators and politicians in the West, but a familiar pattern in the
region. Ultimately, infidels and apostates are a common enemy whose destruction
can unite adversaries in the face of almost any other ideological or practical
clash.
The Taliban also are now more outward-facing in their jihadist ambitions. Before
2001 they were focused predominantly on Afghanistan. Today, after 20 years
fighting Western forces and with many younger members who have greater
international awareness, their eyes are also on the violent role they can play
in establishing a global Islamic caliphate.
The resultant cocktail is even more lethal than before 9/11.
Today, all these actors know there is no prospect of further large-scale US
intervention in the country, no matter how great their atrocities. The US
remains capable of air strikes and even special forces raids against serious
threats emanating from Afghanistan, but these require high-grade intelligence
which, despite the powerful technical capabilities of the agencies, is extremely
difficult to gain now that we have withdrawn all forces
The threat from Afghanistan is not to the West alone. There is also a grave risk
to Russia and Central Asian countries and to the "apostate" Muslim countries
especially in the Arab world. Pakistan and China, today the dominant external
powers in Afghanistan, also fear terrorism emanating from the country. Pakistan
has good reason to be worried, even though their intelligence services and army
were the most effective backers of the Taliban — without whose support they
could never have seized power in Kabul.
Following a crackdown on the Pakistan Taliban (TTP), which have long conducted a
ruthless campaign against the Pakistan government, they took refuge in
Afghanistan. As with jihadists around the world, the TTP will have been inspired
by their jihadist bedfellows' success. It is also likely that the Taliban and a
resurgent Al Qaida, which shares their ambition to bring down the government in
Islamabad and has close links to them, will aid the campaign to do so. The
prospect of a successful jihadist insurgency in Pakistan, with its nuclear
arsenal, has been a long-standing concern for the US, which invested huge
intelligence and military resources to help prevent it. Most of this capability
was withdrawn with the exit from Afghanistan.
The Communist Chinese need have less concern about insurgency spilling across
the border into neighbouring Xinjiang autonomous region. Like Pakistan, China
supported the Taliban insurgency for many years. In return, the Taliban have
frequently hunted down and killed many of the Uighur leaders — fellow Sunni
Muslims — who took refuge in Afghanistan. Desperate for Beijing's funds and
political backing, the Taliban can be relied on to do all they can to prevent
any export of jihadism into China.
China will also seek to enlist the Taliban's support in curbing any further TTP
attacks, as have previously occurred, against their people and projects in
Pakistan, with whose government they are closely aligned. But we can expect no
such efforts from Beijing to prevent terrorist actions against the West. On the
contrary, as the new cold war intensifies, China is more than capable of using
its increasing cooperation with the Taliban to enlist jihadists from Afghanistan
as proxies against the US.
President Biden's withdrawal has not only brought darkness and mayhem to the
people of Afghanistan and fatally undermined the strategic credibility of the
West, it has also unleashed what may turn out to be the most dangerous terrorist
threat the world has yet faced.
*Colonel Richard Kemp is a former British Army Commander. He was also head of
the international terrorism team in the U.K. Cabinet Office and is now a writer
and speaker on international and military affairs.
© 2021 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Iraqi election results confirm Iran’s unpopularity
Hussain Abdul-Hussain/Arab News/October 22/2021
Iraqi voters this month made it clear they have had enough of Iran’s violent
interference in the country’s politics. Under the direction of Tehran’s Quds
Force — the external operations arm of its Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps —
Iraqi Shiite militias have assassinated dozens of activists, suppressed free
speech and boasted about their allegiance to the Iranian regime. However, in the
Oct. 10 elections, voters punished the militias’ candidates, who saw their bloc
shrink from 48 to just 14 of the 329 seats in the Iraqi parliament. This outcome
made clear that it was no anomaly when, over the past two years, Iraqis set fire
to Iranian consulates and tore down posters of Iranian leaders. Rather, such
events reflected the deepening anger against Tehran.
Other aspects of the election results confirmed that Iran’s popularity among
Iraqis is tanking. The bloc of Shiite cleric Muqtada Al-Sadr won 73 seats,
likely making it the biggest bloc in parliament. Al-Sadr campaigned on the
slogan, “No East and no West,” which was first used by the founder of the
Iranian regime, Ayatollah Khomeini, who imagined Tehran’s foreign policy as
being equidistant from the US-led Western camp and its Russian-led rival. In
effect, Al-Sadr called for an Iraqi foreign policy aligned with neither America
nor Iran.
His intentions are harder to discern. In 2005, Al-Sadr formed a militia that
warred with US troops and enjoyed extensive Iranian support. But in 2008, the
firebrand cleric disbanded his militia, although elements within it became the
nucleus of the current crop of Iranian-backed Shiite forces. Meanwhile, Al-Sadr
himself became an ardent supporter of disbanding all militias.
At least compared to the results of the previous elections in 2018, Al-Sadr’s
victory is good news for America. The bad news is that he is a mercurial
populist who has often expressed antagonism toward the US and its role in Iraq.
However, Al-Sadr understands that, even with his impressive bloc of 73 seats,
his candidates will need allies to attain the 165-seat majority required to form
a government. He could potentially form an anti-Iran bloc by teaming up with the
Sunnis and Kurds that are aligned with Washington and its allies.
The good news in that regard is that anti-Tehran Sunnis and Kurds also won big
at the polls. The only consolation for Iran’s allies was the strong performance
of former Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki, whose coalition picked up 37 seats.
While Al-Maliki supports militias, his opportunism has kept him at arm’s length
from Tehran, which does not consider him to be a reliable ally.
Sunnis are divided into two rival camps: Taqaddom, which is headed by incumbent
Speaker Mohammed Al-Halbousi, and Azm, which is led by Khamis Al-Khanjar.
Taqaddom won 43 seats, while Azm collected 15.
Among the Kurds, the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Masoud Barzani, which is
aligned with the US, won 32 seats, beating its rival, the pro-Iran Patriotic
Union of Kurdistan, whose bloc shrank to 15 seats.
With Taqaddom and the KDP, Al-Sadr could form a bloc of 148 seats, elect a
speaker, then a president, and win the call to form a Cabinet. Pro-Tehran
lawmakers will likely try to lure the KDP away from Al-Sadr, mainly by promising
it the presidency, which is currently held by Iraq’s other Kurdish party. While
the presidency is ceremonial, it carries weight for its representation of one of
Iraq’s three big ethno-sectarian blocs.
Al-Sadr could potentially form an anti-Iran bloc by teaming up with the Sunnis
and Kurds that are aligned with Washington and its allies.
Since the fall of Saddam Hussein, Tehran and its proxies in Iraq have pursued
one goal: The creation of a weak state controlled by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei,
the Quds Force and IRGC-backed militias.
Thanks to both Iranian meddling and the fragmentation of candidates into so many
small blocs, Cabinet formation in Iraq might prove to be a lengthy and arduous
process. This may give incumbent Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kadhimi an advantage.
Unlike his predecessors, Al-Kadhimi did not form a party of his own to contest
the elections. For staying neutral, he might once again emerge as the center of
a consensus that could end the stalemate between the blocs and form a new
Cabinet.
If Al-Kadhimi does stay in power, he might again urge Washington to withdraw its
remaining 2,500 military advisers, presumably to take away the excuse that
pro-Iran militias use to justify their continued armament and de facto
independence from authorized chains of command.
This time, however, Washington can bring to Al-Kadhimi’s attention that only a
small fraction of Iraqis buy into such excuses. Given the clear popular mandate
in favor of disbanding the militias, America should not cut and run, but should
strictly condition any downscaling of its adviser corps on Baghdad becoming able
to stand on its own in the face of both religious extremist terrorists, such as
Daesh, and state-sponsored terrorists like the pro-Iran militias.
*Hussain Abdul-Hussain is a research fellow at the Foundation for Defense of
Democracies, a Washington-based, nonpartisan research institute focusing on
national security and foreign policy. Twitter: @hahussain
Iraqi elections signal stronger Ankara-Baghdad ties
Sinem Cengiz/Arab News/October 22/2021
Iraqis went to the polls on Oct. 10 to elect the 329 members of a new
parliament, in what is considered one of the most crucial elections since the
US-led invasion that ousted Saddam Hussein’s regime in 2003. Iraq historically
has been the focal point of Turkey’s regional politics due to its proximity and
a failure to ensure security on Turkey’s doorstep.
The outcome of the elections and the new structure of the parliament is of great
importance to Ankara, which seeks to maintain close relations with different
factions in Iraqi politics in order to preserve its national and strategic
interests. Thus, all eyes are on the new coalition government, which is likely
to influence the future course of bilateral relations between Ankara and
Baghdad. Ahead of the elections, Ankara tried to bring together the two Sunni
Iraqi officials, Mohammed Al-Halbousi, who leads the Taqaddom camp, and Khamis
Al-Khanjar, who leads the Azm coalition. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan
met separately with the two politicians in Ankara in an attempt to unite them
ahead of the elections, a move that failed to bear fruit.
However, the outcome of the elections, in which about 43 percent of eligible
voters cast their ballots, seems to be positive for Ankara, but not for Iran,
another actor that competes for influence in Iraq. The Sunnis emerged as the
second largest force in parliament and Turkmens entered as a united force.
Kurdish parties made considerable gains. The parties of Iraq’s northern
Kurdistan Regional Government region, which are also crucial power brokers,
enjoy close relations with Ankara.
On the other side, the Conquest Alliance, linked to Iran-backed Shiite militia,
suffered a major setback. Considering the visits of Parliamentary Speaker
Mohammed Al-Halbousi and Kurdish officials to Ankara ahead of the elections,
Iraqi observers expect that the new government will enjoy warm relations with
Ankara, which considers cooperation with the new Iraqi government critical to
its security and political concerns.
The fundamental reason for Ankara’s close interest in Iraq is the presence of
the Kurdistan Workers’ Party within the Iraqi territories. The second driving
force is the impact of the Syrian war and Iran’s rising influence. Turkey has
strengthened joint efforts with Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kadhimi, and
previously with the Adil Abdul-Mahdi government, in its fight with the PKK and
other terrorist groups, and hopes that it can maintain a similar cooperation
with the newly formed government.
A few days after the elections, the Turkish presidency — on Oct. 20 — submitted
a motion to parliament to extend the state’s authority to launch cross-border
military operations in northern Iraq for another year. The motion, submitted by
Erdogan’s government, had previously allowed the Turkish military to carry out
cross-border operations from Oct. 30, 2020, until Oct. 30, 2021. Turkey attaches
great importance to the territorial integrity, national unity and stability of
Iraq, the motion said.
In the past, Turkey’s relations with Iraq have suffered due to the former’s
cross-border offensive against the PKK. Baghdad has protested against Turkey’s
military operations on its territory and complained about the presence of
Turkish troops at the military base in Bashiqa, which Ankara established in 2015
to train local forces to fight Daesh.
However, the Al-Kadhimi government played a significant role in defusing the
situation. The existence of the PKK is a fundamental threat for both Turkey and
Iraq. Close cooperation between them, and with the Kurdistan Regional Government
in Iraq, is required to fight against the PKK. Besides the threats emanating
from the PKK, there is also the issue of Iranian influence in Iraq. Turkey’s
strained relations with Iraq were playing into the hands of Iran, which has
influence on Iraqi politics. However, the outcome of the elections and Turkey’s
outreach to Iraq has become important in the sense of not leaving Iraq to Iran.
The fundamental reason for Ankara’s close interest in Iraq is the presence of
the Kurdistan Workers’ Party within the Iraqi territories.
Besides the security domain, economic and political issues are also motivating
factors in Turkey-Iraq relations, as growing trade and energy links in the
region are powerful variables informing the two countries’ relations. Iraq
represents the third-largest market for Turkish exports, while Turkey’s
activities in Iraq include development support, with Ankara announcing in 2019
that it will provide $5 billion in loans for the reconstruction of Iraq — a sign
of its commitment to consolidating its influence in the country. Iraq and Turkey
also have a joint committee to resolve issues and enhance economic relations.
Turkey also backed Iraq’s recent peacemaking efforts in the region.
Thus, geography is the first principle that cannot be changed in international
relations, and it is obvious that Iraq and Turkey are central to each other’s
strategic calculations. At the end of the day, Turkey and Iraq are
interdependent neighbors that need to cooperate on issues such as energy and
security regardless of the divisions within the governments of both countries.
*Sinem Cengiz is a Turkish political analyst who specializes in Turkey’s
relations with the Middle East. Twitter: @SinemCngz
Taliban powerless to stop Afghanistan’s decline
Luke Coffey/Arab News/October 22/2021
While the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan seemed to go smoother and faster
than they expected, the militants now face a very different situation, with
conditions in the country rapidly deteriorating. Weeks after seizing power, the
militants are beginning to realize that governing is much harder than leading an
insurgency. There are massive food shortages across the country. Last month Jens
Laerke, spokesperson for the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian
Affairs, warned that “basic services in Afghanistan are collapsing, and food and
other lifesaving aid is about to run out.”
The economic outlook is bleak, too. According to the International Monetary
Fund, the Afghan economy is expected to contract by 30 percent this year as
international aid dries up and foreign investment declines.
In addition to food insecurity and a looming economic collapse, the Taliban are
facing a crisis in three other areas.
The first is the lack of international recognition. At the time of writing, no
country in the world has formally recognized the Taliban as the official
government of Afghanistan, although Russia, China, Pakistan and Iran have
signaled varying degrees of openness to doing so.
Although they might not admit it, the Taliban want international recognition to
access aid and assistance. The Taliban are also desperate to occupy
Afghanistan’s seat at the UN. The current Afghan representative is a hold-over
from the previous Ghani government, and the question of Taliban participation
was raised during the September 2021 UN General Assembly in New York. The
Taliban have formally requested to send a representative to the UN, but so far
this has not happened.
Recognition by the UN would mean the Taliban inheriting Afghanistan’s existing
membership in other UN bodies, including the UN Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization and the UN Commission on the Status of Women. Considering
the Taliban’s record of destroying UNESCO cultural sites such as the two Buddhas
of Bamiyan, as well as their well-established history of mistreating women and
girls, it would be preposterous to allow the militant outfit in either
organization.
The second problem involves internal disputes and fracturing within the group.
The Taliban did a reasonably good job at hiding their dirty laundry when they
operated in the shadows. Now that they are in government, stories and details of
infighting are shedding light on the group’s dysfunctional internal relations.
For example, last month there was an apparent dispute between Mullah Baradar,
co-founder of the Taliban and deputy prime minister, and Khalil Haqqani, the
minister for refugees, over the division of power. Baradar is part of the
Taliban’s Kandahari faction with close links to the group’s late leader, Mullah
Omar, while Haqqani is the uncle of Sirajuddin Haqqani, the Taliban’s interior
minister, and part of the Haqqani faction with strong influence in the east of
the country.
Some reports said that the argument ended in a brawl, while others suggested
Haqqani pulled a gun on Baradar and there was a shootout between their
respective bodyguards. It is not clear which version is true. Either way, the
Taliban have a major internal issue that must be resolved before it can start
governing effectively. Adding to the Taliban’s internal problems is the status
of supreme leader Haibatullah Akhundzada. Now Afghanistan’s leader, Akhundzada
has never been seen in public and only one photo of him is known to exist. He
has not even released an audio statement since the Taliban takeover, leading to
speculation that he is dead. It is highly likely that the Taliban, and by
default Afghanistan, are being led by someone who is no longer alive.
The third problem the Taliban face is one of internal security and the growing
threat from Daesh. The self-described “Islamic State of Khorasan” was formed in
2015 when Daesh in Syria and Iraq was dominating the headlines. Since then, the
Afghan branch has become one of the deadliest of all extremist groups in the
country. The group recruits from Afghanistan and Pakistan, especially from
disgruntled or former Taliban fighters. They have controlled, at their height,
several small districts in Afghanistan and have been targeted by the US, the
former Afghan government and even the Taliban in the past.
The growing presence of Daesh will continue to be a headache for the Taliban as
they try to enforce security across the country.
Now they operate in the shadows, while coordinating complex and deadly suicide
attacks targeting everyone from Taliban fighters to Shiites. Dozens of Taliban
fighters have been killed by Daesh since the August takeover. The growing
presence of Daesh will continue to be a headache for the Taliban as they try to
enforce security across the country. It is clear that the Taliban are wholly
unequipped for the task they face inside Afghanistan. The group is quickly
learning that taking control of a province is not the same as governing it.
As winter approaches, Afghanistan is in a perilous state. Sadly, for the
innocent Afghan people, there seems to be little the Taliban can do about it.
*Luke Coffey is the director of the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign
Policy at the Heritage Foundation. Twitter: @LukeDCoffey