English LCCC Newsbulletin For
Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For May 06/2022
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news
The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2021/english.may06.22.htm
News Bulletin Achieves
Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations For today
Whoever eats of this bread will live for
ever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.
John 06/48-59: “I am the bread of life. Your ancestors ate
the manna in the wilderness, and they died. This is the bread that comes down
from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread that
came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live for ever; and the
bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh. ’The Jews then
disputed among themselves, saying, ‘How can this man give us his flesh to eat?’
So Jesus said to them, ‘Very truly, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the
Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Those who eat my flesh
and drink my blood have eternal life, and I will raise them up on the last day;
for my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink. Those who eat my flesh and
drink my blood abide in me, and I in them. Just as the living Father sent me,
and I live because of the Father, so whoever eats me will live because of me.
This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like that which your ancestors
ate, and they died. But the one who eats this bread will live for ever.’ He said
these things while he was teaching in the synagogue at Capernaum.”
Titles For The Latest English LCCC
Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on May 05-06/2022
UN Chief Urges Free, Transparent Elections in Lebanon on May 15
President Aoun chairs meeting attended by Ministers Bou Habib, Hajjar
Hezbollah Accused of Seeking to Eliminate Electoral Opponents
Elections Supervisory Commission reminds media and candidates of electoral
silence provisions
Army chief meets families of Tripoli boat victims: Investigation has taken its
legal course and will be completed with all...
Saudi daily slams 'Iranian-bearded' Hariri, accuses him of 'political
Shiitization'
Lebanon launches operations room for expat voting
Electoral silence begins for expat vote, low Shiite turnout expected in Gulf
Berri lashes out at 'suspicious' sedition stirrers
Miqati slams electoral money, says KSA not interfering in polls
Mikati urges Lebanese expats to have their voices heard in elections
Hariri’s call on Sunnis to boycott elections likely to serve Hezbollah, Iran
Lebanese Elections: Perpetuating Ties with the 'Resistance Axis' or Being
Canceled/Hussam Itani/Asharq Al-Awsat/May 05/2022
Lebanese must seek drastic change to rein in Hezbollah/Khaled Abou Zahr/Arab
News/May 05/2022
The significance of Syria’s exit from Lebanon/Khairallah Khairallah/The Arab
Weekly/May 05/2022
A Lebanese online archive chronicles Arab immigration to Latin America/Eduardo
Campos Lima/Arab News/May 05/2022
Titles For The Latest English LCCC
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on May 05-06/2022
Three people killed in attack in central Israel
Israel says Putin apologised for foreign minister's Hitler remarks
Israeli police enter al-Aqsa as Jewish visits resume
Congressmen Urge Blinken to Pressure Israel to Protect Christian Community in
Jerusalem
62 senators, including 16 Democrats, vote to oppose nuclear-only Iran deal
US Prepares for a World Both With and Without Iran Nuclear Deal
Iran Prepares for Protests Amid Fears of Nuclear Negotiations Failure
Fighting prevents evacuations of civilians trapped under Ukraine steel plant
Ukraine Repels Some Attacks but Combat Rages at Steel Mill
NYT: US Intel Helped Ukraine Target Russian Generals
Mariupol steel mill battle rages as Ukraine repels attacks
French Ecology Minister Confident in Russia Oil Ban
Heavy Rain and Floods in Afghanistan Kill 22, Destroy Hundreds of Homes
Titles For The Latest LCCC English
analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on May 05-06/2022
Kremlin is targeting Ukraine resupply infrastructure, officials
say/Abigail Hauslohner, Dan Lamothe and Hannah Allam/The Washington Post/May
05/2022
The Palestinian State Bill: Palestinians Ask That More Arab Repression Not Be
Allowed/Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone Institute/May 05/2022
Biden: ‘So Many Muslims Are Targeted With Violence’ and ‘Oppressed for Their
Religious Beliefs’/Raymond Ibrahim/May 05/2022
A Message to the Biden Team on Ukraine: Talk Less/Thomas L. Friedman/The New
York Times/May 05/2022
Phares: America’s 5 Strategic Challenges in Asia/Dr. Walid Phares/May 05/2022
Why any new nuclear deal with Iran is destined to collapse/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Arab
News/May 05/2022
The Latest English LCCC Lebanese &
Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on May 05-06/2022
UN Chief Urges Free, Transparent Elections in
Lebanon on May 15
Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
The UN chief called for Lebanon’s parliamentary elections on May 15 to be "free,
fair transparent and inclusive" in a report circulated Wednesday and urged the
quick formation of a government afterward that gives priority to implementing
reforms addressing the country’s multiple crises.
Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in the report to the UN Security Council
that political polarization in the country has deepened and the Lebanese people
"are struggling daily to meet basic essential needs." He pointed to frequent
protests across the country sparked by "public frustration with the political
situation and the economic and financial crisis."The May 15 elections for
parliament are the first since Lebanon’s economic meltdown began in late 2019.
The government’s factions have done virtually nothing to address the collapse,
leaving Lebanese to fend for themselves as they plunge into poverty, without
electricity, medicine, garbage collection or any other semblance of normal life.
The elections are also the first since the August 4, 2020, catastrophic
explosion at Beirut port that killed more than 215 people and wrecked large
parts of the city. The destruction sparked widespread outrage at the traditional
parties’ endemic corruption and mismanagement. Guterres, who visited Lebanon
last December, said no one has yet been held accountable for the explosion and
the Lebanese people are demanding "truth and justice." He reiterated his call
for "a swift, impartial, thorough and transparent investigation" and stressed
that "the independence of the judiciary must be respected."
In the May 15 election, a total of 103 lists with 1,044 candidates are vying for
the 128-seat legislature, which is equally divided between Christians and
Muslims. Self-declared opposition groups remain divided along ideological lines
on virtually every issue, including over how to revive the economy, and as a
result, there are an average of at least three different opposition lists in
each of the 15 electoral districts, a 20% increase from the 2018 elections.
Guterres noted that proposals submitted in the past two years for a women’s
quota were still pending in parliament, and he urged that the new government be
quickly formed "with full participation of women and young people." The
secretary-general's semi-annual report on implementation of a 2004 Security
Council resolution reiterated that its key demands -- that the Lebanese
government establish its sovereignty throughout the country and that all
Lebanese militias disarm and disband -- have not been fulfilled. Guterres said
Hezbollah’s maintenance "of sizeable and sophisticated military capabilities
outside the control of the government of Lebanon remains a matter of grave
concern." He noted Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah’s February announcement
that it now has the ability to transform thousands of its missiles "into
precision missiles" and has been manufacturing drones "for a long time." The
secretary-general urged the Lebanese state to "increase its efforts to achieve a
monopoly over the possession of weapons and the use of force throughout its
territory."
"I continue to urge the government and the armed forces of Lebanon to take all
measures necessary to prohibit Hezbollah and other armed groups from acquiring
weapons and building paramilitary capacity outside the authority of the state,"
the UN chief said, stressing that this violates Security Council resolutions.
Guterres said Hezbollah’s continued involvement in the war in neighboring Syria
also risks entangling Lebanon in regional conflicts and undermining its
stability. He called on countries in the region with close ties to Hezbollah to
encourage its disarmament and transformation into "a solely civilian political
party." Both Syria and Iran have close ties to Hezbollah.
President Aoun chairs meeting attended by Ministers Bou
Habib, Hajjar
NNA/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
Foreign Affairs Minister, Abdullah Bou Habib, asserted that the Lebanese
position in the “Supporting Syria and the Region” conference, which will be held
in Brussels on the ninth and tenth of May, will be based on the directives of
the President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, that Lebanon can no longer
tolerate the Syrian exodus on its lands.
“Lebanon does not want help the displaced on its lands. We will take care of
ourselves if the displaced Syrians return to their country” Minister Bou Habib
said.
The Foreign Minister also stressed that “We will implement the cabinet decision
that was taken in the government of Prime Minister Hassan Diab in this context,
and we want to cooperate with the United Nations, but we must take into account
our interest, not that they dictate our interest”.
Minister Bou Habib’s words came while the President chaired a meeting this
morning at Baabda Palace, attended by Minister Bou Habib, Minister of Social
Affairs Hector El Hajjar and representatives of the government's presidency,
Ambassador Boutros Assaker and Mr. Ziad Mikati.
Minister Salim Jreissati, General Director of the Presidency of the Republic,
Dr. Antoine Choucair, and advisors Raymond Tarabay and Osama Khashab also
attended the meeting.
The meeting was devoted to discuss the Lebanese position that will be
communicated during the Brussels Conference, which will be held with the
participation of representatives of governments, international and regional
organizations and civil society organizations.
Statement:
After the meeting, Minister Bou Habib made the following statement:
“We discussed with the President Lebanon’s participation in the Sixth Brussels
Conference, which will be held next Monday and Tuesday to help the displaced
Syrians in Lebanon, Turkey and Jordan.
The meetings will be on Monday in the form of seminars and the Minister of
Social Affairs will participate in them. On Tuesday, the general meeting will be
held and I will be present in it. The European Union and the United Nations are
calling for this conference, but due to the disagreement between the two parties
because the European Union objected to Russia’s invitation, the United Nations
refused to participate in it. We took the President‘s directives, regarding the
Lebanese position, which is that Lebanon can no longer tolerate the Syrian
displacement on its lands. We take care of ourselves if the displaced Syrians
return to their country. I think that most of the Syrians who go to Syria and
return take hard currencies with them, because the Lebanese pound there is a
hard currency, these people work and move between the two countries and they
should not be here.
We will implement the decision of the Council of Ministers which was taken in
the government of Prime Minister Hassan Diab in this context. We implement it
without cooperating with the United Nations? We no longer want anyone to dictate
anything to us. This is the Lebanese position in Brussels”.
Questions & Answers:
Question: Is there an understanding with the Syrian government, especially since
the international community was not cooperating with Lebanon in the past in this
regard?
Answer: “There is no understanding with the Syrians, but one of their duties is
to take people from their country, and there are many Syrians who go to Syria
and take money with them because in Syria it is not possible to use the dollar
or the Lebanese pound, and the large part of the hard currency goes from Lebanon
to there.
This is legal and we do not say it is illegal. We know that the international
community, and who is the international community is not Africa, but Europe and
the United States, we know that these do not want refugees to migrate to their
countries. We are no longer able to prevent them from migrating at sea. We do
not have this possibility, so what happened a week ago? We cannot take on a
responsibility of this kind again. Will they help us compensate people? We asked
the international community last week to give us mechanisms that can go down in
the sea to a depth of four hundred meters, and so far we have not received an
answer. Does the international community care about Lebanon’s interest? No,
Lebanon’s interest concerns the Lebanese, not the international community, which
cares about its own interest, and the same applies to Europeans who care about
their own interest, as it is more important than Lebanon’s”.
Question: Do you expect any reaction from the international community, and
secondly, what do you think of Turkey’s initiative to return about a million
Syrians to their country, and can Lebanon not follow Turkey’s example?
Answer: “Lebanon cannot do what Turkey is doing, especially since the latter
occupies Syrian lands on which it can build houses. Lebanon cannot do that.
Syria does not accept, just as Lebanon does not occupy Syrian territory, and it
does not have this kind of hostile relations to some extent with Syria”.
Lebanese Ambassador to UAE:
The President met Lebanon’s Ambassador to the United Arab Emirates, Fouad Dandan,
today at Baabda Palace.
Ambassador Dandan briefed President Aoun on the preparations made by the
Lebanese Embassy in the UAE to hold the parliamentary elections next Sunday in
Abu Dhabi, Dubai, especially since the UAE is the Arab country in which the
largest number of voters registered around 25,000 voters.
Moreover, Ambassador Dandan briefed President Aoun on the situation of the
Lebanese community in the UAE, in addition to other issues dealing with
Lebanese-Emirati relations.
Dandan also presented the communications that accompanied the release of Dr.
Richard Kharrat after his arrest in the UAE, where the President praised his
efforts and follow-up of Dr. Kharrat’s case since his arrest until his release.
Dr. Kharrat:
The President met Dr. Richard Kharrat, and a delegation from his family.
Dr. Kharrat thanked President Aoun for his interest in addressing the issue of
his arrest in the United Arab Emirates on March 30, and the efforts he made to
secure his release and return to Lebanon on April 29.
Fitr Feast Congratulations:
President Aoun received additional Eid al-Fitr congratulations.
Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune stated:
“On the occasion of the blessed Eid al-Fitr, I am pleased to extend to you, on
behalf of Algeria, its people and government, and on my own behalf, my warmest
congratulations and most sincere fraternal wishes, asking God Almighty to repeat
this feast with good health and wellness, and to your brotherly people with more
progress and prosperity, and to our Arab and Islamic nation with general good
and security and stability.
I pray to the God Almighty to accept the fasting and prayers of the blessed
month of Ramadan, and to unite our Arab and Islamic nation after uniting our
hearts with faith in God and His Noble Messenger.
I also take this opportunity to renew our keenness on our brotherly relations,
and our constant readiness to strengthen them in the service of our two
brotherly peoples. Please, Mr. President, and my dear brother, accept my sincere
expressions of appreciation and respect”.
Kuwaiti Prince:
Kuwaiti Prince, Nawaf Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah stated:
“I would like to extend to you my sincere congratulations and best wishes on the
occasion of Eid Al-Fitr, asking God Almighty to repeat this feast to the Arab
and Islamic nations with goodness and blessings, and to achieve more progress,
development and growth for the Lebanese Republic and its brotherly people, and
to perpetuate your Excellency with good health and wellness”.
Turkish President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and Kuwaiti Crown Prince Mishaal
Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah also sent Fitr congratulatory cables.—Presidency
Press Office
Hezbollah Accused of Seeking to Eliminate Electoral
Opponents
Beirut - Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
The Progressive Socialist Party (PSP) and Lebanese Forces warned that the
Hezbollah party and its allies were waging a "battle of elimination and
existence" in the parliamentary elections. Addressing an electoral rally in
Mount Lebanon, head of the Democratic Gathering MP Taymur Jumblatt said: "You
want to eliminate us, but we want partnership with everyone. You want to destroy
the nation for others, while we want to build it for the Lebanese people." "You
want to hold Lebanon hostage of negotiations to protect the regime of killing
and a nuclear Iran. We want a sovereign and independent Lebanon," he
declared."Let us come together in partnership instead of elimination. This is a
nation for everyone," he stressed. The elections are set for May 15.
LF MP Antoine Habshi said Hezbollah was waging an existential battle against the
Lebanese Forces in eastern Lebanon.Speaking at a press conference he remarked
that the electoral battle in the Baalbek-al-Hermel district had recently taken a
turn towards violence and intimidation instead of freedom and democracy. He held
the Interior Ministry and security forces responsible for the violations. He
also said Hezbollah would be blamed for "any drop of blood spilled." The MP had
held the conference after three out of six Shiite electoral candidates withdrew
from the same list that is backed by the LF in the Baalbek-al-Hermel district.
The LF said they were forced to quit the race after being pressured by
Hezbollah. Moreover, Habshi charged that Hezbollah was bribing opponents a
million Lebanese pounds and voters two million pounds so they would not take
part in the elections. He added that the party was even confiscating the
identification cards of Shiite opponents to prevent them from voting. The party
dismissed the claims, saying they were part of a smear campaign against it.
Party MP Hassan Ezzedine said: "We are competing so that the turnout would be
very high We are therefore seeking not only the victory of Hezbollah lists, but
also the national ones that were formed through alliances between Hezbollah and
its allies across the country." He stressed that the party had formed national
lists and were competing for victory in the elections that "would shape a new
political scene that wants to address the country's crises and the people's
suffering."
Elections Supervisory Commission reminds media and
candidates of electoral silence provisions
NNA/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
The Supervisory Commission for Elections reminded, in a statement on Thursday,
of the obligation to abide by the provisions of the electoral silence. Under the
electoral silence, al media means, candidates, lists and political sides shall
remain silent as of midnight of the day before the parliamentary elections day
until the ballot boxes are sealed. Army chief meets
families of Tripoli boat victims: Investigation has taken its legal course and
will be completed with all...
Army chief meets families of Tripoli boat victims:
Investigation has taken its legal course and will be completed with all...
NNA/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
Army Commander, General Joseph Aoun, on Thursday received at his Yarzeh office,
a delegation of the families of the victims of the sinking boat off Tripoli’s
coast, in presence of Army Intelligence Chief, North Lebanon Intelligence Branch
Head, and Naval Forces Commander. The delegation presented their affliction due
to the loss of their loved ones, pointing out that the stifling economic
conditions prompted them to flee by sea. As the delegation renewed their trust
in the military institution and its wisdom in addressing this file, they
appealed to continue the search operation to recover the remaining missing
persons.
For his part, General Aoun affirmed that "this tragedy afflicted everyone, and
the boat victims are the sons of the homeland, that is, the sons of the military
institution," stressing that "the investigation has taken its legal course since
the first moment of the tragic incident, and it will be completed with all
transparency and impartiality."The army commander pointed out that "the
relationship between the army and the sons of Tripoli is solid," calling on the
families of the victims "not to allow this case to be exploited." He assured
them that the army is continuing its search operation.
Saudi daily slams 'Iranian-bearded' Hariri, accuses him of
'political Shiitization'
Naharnet/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
Saudi newspaper Okaz slammed Thursday former Prime Minister Saad Hariri,
criticizing his "Iranian-like beard" and accusing him of "political
Shiitization.""By urging the Sunnis to boycott the parliamentary elections, Saad
has done a great favor to the killers of his father. He left the elections arena
to terrorist Hizbullah and to the Free Patriotic Movement at the expense of his
country and his sect," Okaz said. The daily added that "Saad today is not the
same young man whose tears were wiped by Saudi Arabia after the assassination of
his father in February 2005, seeing as Saad has allied with the FPM and
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri."Okaz said that Hariri must bring Lebanon back to
its Arab identity, instead of "subordinating" it to Iran. "This is your historic
chance, and maybe you do not deserve it. Choose your country first and your sect
second," Okaz addressed Hariri.
Lebanon launches operations room for expat voting
Naharnet/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
Prime Minister Najib Miqati and Foreign Minister Abdallah Bou Habib launched
Thursday at the Foreign Ministry an operations room for overseeing the expat
voting that will start on May 6. Miqati urged all
expats to vote in the parliamentary elections that will be held "with all
integrity and transparency" even though "there had been doubts about carrying
out the elections."For his part, Bou Habib said that all efforts have been made
to make sure the elections will succeed "on the widest possible geographical
scope." "We are keen on organizing the voting abroad in a professional manner
while keeping away from political agendas and calculations," Bou Habib affirmed.
Electoral silence begins for expat vote, low Shiite turnout
expected in Gulf
Naharnet/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
Lebanon entered at midnight the first electoral silence period for expat
parliamentary polls, which will be held Friday in the Gulf countries and Iran.
During the silence period, candidates are forbidden from campaigning through
media outlets. The period ends after the closure of ballot boxes on Friday
evening. The second round of expat voting will be held Sunday in Europe, the
Americas, Africa and Australia. According to al-Liwaa
newspaper, those registered for voting in the Gulf and Asia represent 25.29% of
the total number of expats registered across the world. With their total number
standing at 56,939 voters, 36.09% of them are Sunni, 23.54% are Maronite, 13.46%
are Druze, 9.39% are Greek Orthodox and 9.36% are Shiite.
As for electoral districts, 16.63% of them are registered for Beirut’s
second district, 15.73% for Mount Lebanon’s fourth district and 9.85% for the
North’s second district. According to the Interior Ministry, 225,114 expats are
registered to vote in the May 6 and May 8 elections outside Lebanon. Ad-Diyar
newspaper meanwhile quoted “highly-informed senior sources” from Hizbullah and
the Amal Movement as saying that “the Gulf’s (Lebanese) Shiites did not register
at their places of residence in the Gulf countries because they fear
persecution.”They have “real fears,” the sources said, adding that “some of them
might be in Lebanon on May 15 to practice their (voting) duty.”“As for the
Shiites of Africa and Europe, efforts are underway to encourage them to perform
their duty and partisan delegations have traveled to them for this purpose,” the
sources added.
Berri lashes out at 'suspicious' sedition stirrers
Naharnet/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri on Thursday warned against “sedition stirrers,”
during a meeting in Msayleh with a delegation from the al-Kraydin Arab tribes.
“Love of homeland is part of religious faith and sedition stirrers under any
circumstances, be it in elections time or not, are suspicious in their national
and even religious belonging,” Berri said. “Sedition
and its instigators are cursed in all Abrahamic religions, and sedition’s
results only serve the interest of Israel, which has been and will always be the
enemy of Lebanon and Arabs, be them Muslim or Christian,” the Speaker added.
Miqati slams electoral money, says KSA not interfering in
polls
Naharnet/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
Prime Minister Najib Miqati has criticized "unprecedented dollar amounts" that
have been pumped into Lebanon in the past few days, as Lebanon prepares for its
parliamentary elections in May 15. "There are
violations," Miqati said in a televised interview, as he praised Minister of
Interior Bassam al-Mawlawi for "doing a great job" to achieve the elections
successfully. Miqati also praised the Arab countries and the KSA ambassador to
Lebanon. He said that Ambassador Walid al-Boukhari is part of the Lebanese
fabric and that his presence is essential in the Lebanese elections. "Yet, I
haven't sensed any direct interference from Saudi Arabia in the elections,"
Miqati went on to say. "If only the Lebanese loved their country as much as the
Arabs do," Miqati said. On another note, the PM accused those opposing the
capital control law of doing so for the sake of increasing their chances in the
upcoming parliamentary elections. "Have they read the law proposal before
objecting," he went on to ask. The capital control law, according to Miqati will
protect the rights of the small depositors who constitute 86% of the depositors.
Miqati said he doesn't mind replacing the Central Bank governor after completing
the negotiations with the International Monetary Fund, asking the Minister of
Finance to suggest candidates.
Mikati urges Lebanese expats to have their voices heard
in elections
Najia Houssari/Arab News/May 05/2022
Expat voting is ‘a key moment during this round of elections,’ says PM
Opposition political groups are relying heavily on overseas votes to achieve
change
BEIRUT: Prime Minister Najib Mikati has urged expats to vote in the upcoming
parliamentary elections to ensure their voices are heard and they can achieve
the changes they want.
Mikati’s appeal came as he inaugurated the operations room for managing and
monitoring parliamentary elections abroad. “It is a key moment during this round
of elections,” he said. The parliamentary elections, which will be held on May 6
and 8 abroad, and on May 15 at home, are the first since the economic collapse
began in late 2019. The authorities have permitted 225,114 Lebanese expats to
vote after 244,442 overseas registered voters were reviewed. They will vote at
205 polling stations in 59 countries around the world, except in Ukraine.
Overseas voters constitute a significant proportion of the 3,967,507 total
Lebanese voters. The political movements seeking changes in the crisis-hit
country are relying heavily on expat voting to make a difference. The
government, mired by a political impasse, has taken limited steps to address the
national collapse, leaving the Lebanese to struggle with the crisis on their own
while plunging into poverty, without electricity or medicines. The Ministry of
Foreign Affairs described the election arrangements as “the largest logistical
operation in Lebanon's modern history.” A total of 103 lists made up of 1,044
candidates are competing in the elections, some of whom withdrew after the
deadline.
Political groups seeking radical change and some opposition parties believe the
majority of expat voters resent the ruling authority and are victims of its
corruption, and their presence abroad makes them immune to the pressures that
internal voters are subjected to and the pressure to re-elect the same faces.
These groups are hoping for a strong turnout from the Lebanese who left after
the Beirut port explosion in 2020 and the popular protests in 2019. As of
Thursday, all candidates and political parties are no longer allowed to address
voters and media outlets can no longer interview them until polling stations
close on Sunday night.The Supervisory Commission for Elections prohibits
electoral teams from sharing their estimations on the number of votes.
Foreign Minister Abdullah Bou Habib said Lebanon “has made all possible efforts,
within our modest capabilities, to facilitate the voting process, and set up the
largest possible number of polling stations, as allowed by the laws governing
the countries in which the Lebanese abroad reside.”He added: “We insist on
organizing the voting process abroad professionally while steering clear of
political agendas.”
Interior Minister Bassam Mawlawi said that the government is committed to its
ministerial statement and will indeed hold the elections.
He added: “To those who took to the streets to demand that elections are held, I
tell you this is your chance to voice your opinion.”
He stressed: “Failing to vote serves no one, especially not the country.”
Mawlawi added that all logistical and security preparations had been secured.
“Grants to the military forces participating in the elections, and compensation
to employees, professors, and judges who will participate in the elections will
be sufficient and appropriate,” he added.
He said: “The elections will be held successfully, there is no reason for them
not to. We are attentive to all details.”
While the UN has been following up on all the election arrangements, UN Special
Coordinator for Lebanon Joanna Wronecka met with Mikati on Thursday.
“It seems that all measures have been taken from an administrative and security
point of view, and this is an important matter,” Wronecka said.
She added: “I asked the prime minister what can be expected before and even
after the elections, and I sensed the seriousness and interest on his part to
follow up on every detail.”
In a new report to the Security Council, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres
has called for “free, fair, transparent and inclusive parliamentary elections in
Lebanon.”He further urged “the quick formation of a government afterward that
gives priority to implementing reforms addressing the country’s multiple
crises.”Guterres said that the political polarization in the country has
deepened and the Lebanese “are struggling daily to meet basic needs,” pointing
out the frequent protests across the country sparked by “public frustration with
the political situation and the economic and financial crisis.”
He noted that proposals submitted in the past two years for a women’s quota were
still pending in parliament, and he urged that the new government be quickly
formed “with full participation of women and young people.”Guterres said
Hezbollah’s maintenance “of sizeable and sophisticated military capabilities
outside the control of the Lebanese government remains a matter of grave
concern.”
Hariri’s call on Sunnis to boycott elections likely to
serve Hezbollah, Iran
The Arab Weekly/May 05/2022
In some of the streets of Beirut and its suburbs, banners that are supportive of
the "Future Movement" and its leader, Saad Hariri, are calling for the boycott
of the parliamentary vote.
Thursday 05/05/2022
As banners of the "Future Movement", in Beirut and other parts of Lebanon,
continue to call for the boycott of the forthcoming parliamentary elections,
Lebanese political analysts are voicing dismay at the implications of former
Prime Minister Saad Hariri’s call on Sunni voters to stay away from the
country’s legislative elections, scheduled for May 15. The analysts emphasise
that by doing so, Hariri in fact puts himself on the side of Hezbollah and Iran,
whose interests would be served by a low Sunni turnout. The boycott call, they
point out, is for now confusing and dividing the Sunni community. Many Sunni
voices are however challenging it. Lebanese political activists say they find it
strange for Hariri to talk about “Iranian hegemony” as if it is a recent
occurrence, when all the Lebanese know that he himself had contributed to the
consolidation of Hezbollah’s hold on power. This he did by taking part in a weak
government whose main task was to offer political cover for the ruling alliance
between Hezbollah and the President Michel Aoun. In that sense, Hariri has only
himself to blame for Hezbollah’s unchallenged rise to hegemony. Experts are also
intrigued by the lack of any “Plan B” offered by Hariri to Lebanese Sunni voters
as he calls on them to shun the elections. They believe the best chance for
Sunni and Christian forces to alter the lopsided equation in Lebanon is to enter
the election fray and try to defeat Hezbollah or at least clip its wings. The
May 15 elections for parliament are the first since Lebanon’s economic meltdown
began in late 2019. The government’s factions have done virtually nothing to
address the collapse, leaving Lebanese to fend for themselves as they plunge
into poverty, without electricity, medicine, garbage collection or any other
semblance of normal life.
The elections are also the first since August 4, 2020, catastrophic explosion at
Beirut port that killed more than 215 people and wrecked large parts of the
city.
In the May 15 election, a total of 103 lists with 1,044 candidates are vying for
the 128-seat legislature, which is equally divided between Christians and
Muslims. On Tuesday, in some of the streets of Beirut and its suburbs, banners
supporting the "Future Movement" and its leader, Saad Hariri, called for the
boycott of the parliamentary vote. Analysts add that Hariri may be trying to
draw attention to himself, especially since the Saudis have kept silent about
his role. Riyadh also voiced support for an active and effective participation
by Sunnis in order to guarantee the community a substantial margin of influence
in parliament or in government formation consultations.The former prime
minister, they note, has so far eschewed talking about Saudi Arabia’s decision
to ignore him since his failure to face up to the designs of Hezbollah and Iran
and offer a political counterweight to their encroaching role. Keeping the
Sunnis on the margin of Lebanese politics would only penalise them for Hariris’s
personal setbacks; they add. Last January, he announced the suspension of his
political activity and his decision not to participate in the May elections. At
the time, Hariri said that "there are no positive prospects for Lebanon in light
of Iran’s influence, international confusion, national division, sectarianism
and pressures within the state."
According to official figures, the Sunnis represent the largest number of voters
in Lebanon (1,081,520 million), followed by Shia, the Maronites and then other
sects. On Monday, the Grand Mufti of the Republic, Sheikh Abdul-Latif Derian,
warned of the danger of boycotting the vote, saying such a move would squander
"an opportunity available to achieve change."In his Eid al-Fitr sermon, the
Sunni sheikh said that “refusing to participate in the elections is the easiest
way for bad and corrupt people to come to power,” noting that “the parliamentary
elections are an opportunity for us to ensure change. So let it be a change for
the better ... through active participation”. He pointed out that the Lebanese
today are able to "rebuild their country anew and to restore the crumbling
institutions of their state, based on their choice of members of parliament,
that being the gateway to coveted reform."
Derian called on the Sunni community to be "focused on national change and
national rescue, rather than on a rush towards emigration, even if the price is
to be swallowed by the raging waves of the sea." Experts say that the “March 8
forces” (the allies of Iran and the Syrian regime) are showing greater cohesion
than the alliances of “the March 14 forces” (which are close to Riyadh and
Washington). Recently, many questions have been raised about the reasons for the
decline of the political role of the Sunnis amid the state of confusion and
division prevailing within the community, in contrast to the growing role of
Iran through its ally, Hezbollah. These developments coincided with the
breakdown in relations between Beirut and Riyadh from late last October after
disparaging statements about the Saudi role in Yemen war were made by former
information minister George Kordahi, which led him later to resign.
After an absence of more than five months when the crisis erupted, the
ambassadors of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Yemen have returned to Beirut in early
April.
Lebanese Elections: Perpetuating Ties
with the 'Resistance Axis' or Being Canceled
Hussam Itani/Asharq Al-Awsat/May 05/2022
The objective of the upcoming Lebanese parliamentary elections is nothing less
than tightening the country's ties with the "axis of resistance" and its project
for the region. Several impediments stand in the way, which raises the specter
of the electoral process being sabotaged at the last minute.
The vicious campaign launched by Hezbollah and its allies against the Christian
opponents of the Free Patriotic Movement, especially the Lebanese Forces, can
only be properly understood as part of the effort to limit the erosion of
Christian support that the FPM has been giving the party. While it may be the
county's strongest military force, it also needs to ensure a presence within
other sects to avoid being isolated at the national level.
Hezbollah has been following this strategy since 2006, the year it signed the
Mar Mikhael Agreement with the Aounist movement, and it has done everything in
its power to maximize Aounist influence within state institutions and the FPM's
popularity among Christians. The political benefits of the strategy were evident
during all the misadventures that Hezbollah imposed on Lebanon - from the July
2006 war to the broad and bloody interference in the Syrian war, which began in
2012, up to the various ways in which the party became implicated in Yemeni war
(allowing Houthi television stations to operate from Lebanon and helping the
Houthis with their media, financial and logistic tasks are only a few examples).
In addition, the goal of tying Lebanon to the Iranian nuclear project,
explicitly and repeatedly reiterated through threats to strike Israel in the
event that it openly launches a military attack on the project, is very much on
the axis of resistance agenda. This axis seeks to reproduce its domination of
Parliament and achieve results similar to those of the 2018 elections. Given the
rising improbability of the 2015 nuclear agreement between the United States and
Iran being revived, Iran will certainly not give up on the tools to safeguard
its project at its disposal, and Hezbollah is among the most prominent of those
tools.
In the same vein, there is no harm reproducing a Sunni parliamentary bloc
subservient to the party that mirrors the Consultative Gathering Bloc, which
emerged after the last parliamentary elections and enlarged the image of
"national support" Hezbollah is keen to maintain.
On the other hand, this effort is hindered by the extent of the socio-economic
crisis that continues to shape the Lebanese people's lives two and a half years
after it began, during which no initiative to contain it or vision to resolve it
were put forward.
It goes without saying that the ruling coalition in Lebanon, whose primary
guarantor is Hezbollah, has put all of its weight behind totally depoliticizing
the economic crisis and hindering its association with the country's political
system. They worked hard to draw the boundaries between socio-economic issues
and the political significance of what has been happening since 2019.
The ruling clique refuses to accept the link between the policies that led to
the great collapse and the manner in which Lebanon has been governed for years.
Even before Michel Aoun became president, rivals were being assassinated and
terrorized on a regular basis, and hostility to Arab countries was insisted on.
Thus, the candidates advocating reform and an alternative vision pose a direct
threat to this project for the future of Lebanon, a key component of which is
electing a new president that keeps the country in its current political orbit.
At the same time, these candidatures could open the door to rapprochement with
the Arab world if the regional climate allows. In other words: The task of the
next president of the republic would be to monitor the changes in Arab-Arab and
Arab-Iranian relations and benefit from them without leaving the "axis of
resistance."
The realization of this policy requires a compliant parliament, which would be
undermined by a bloc of deputies who are not concerned with this objective and
insist on radical reform. The electoral battles in a number of Lebanese regions
- including the North, Beirut and some districts in Mount Lebanon - could be
shaped by "rogue" elements seeking to alter that electoral landscape that the
Hezbollah coalition and the Aounist movement hope to see.
Against this background, we have seen hints that the electoral process could be
aborted if it becomes apparent that the Free Patriotic Movement has indeed lost
its capacity to provide adequate Christian cover for the party and if opinion
polls reviewed behind closed doors and seen by a limited number of political
leaders indicate unpleasant surprises for the axis. That would exacerbate the
threats to the electoral process, and violent incidents could be provoked to
leave the country with a new vacuum added to the absence of economic and
financial solutions.
The entire narrative that there is no link between the ongoing collapse and the
country's politics, which is intended to convince the Lebanese that the causes
are purely economic and that it is the fault of a handful of corrupt officials,
as well as obscuring the deep link between erroneous choices of Lebanese
policymakers and the abyss into which it has descended, will be put to a tough
test on election day. So far, the "actual ruler" is still reassured that his
narrative of what had happened and his project for what will happen are safe.
Lebanese must seek drastic change to rein in Hezbollah
Khaled Abou Zahr/Arab News/May 05/2022
By all accounts, both internationally and domestically, Hezbollah’s weapons are
today classified as illegal.
First and foremost, full implementation of UN Security Council Resolutions 1559
(2004) and 1680 (2006) require the disarmament of all armed groups in Lebanon.
Moreover, pursuant to the Lebanese Cabinet decision of July 27, 2006, there
should be no weapons or authority in Lebanon other than that of the state. This
illegal status of Hezbollah as a “state within the state” or “above the state”
is the main grievance of all independent Lebanese. With its absolute obedience
and loyalty to the Iranian regime, Hezbollah’s illegal status has been a poison
for the country.
But what if this changed? What if Hezbollah’s military arsenal became legal?
What if Iran gave the green light to Hezbollah to follow in the footsteps of
Iraq’s Shiite militias? In 2016, Iraq’s parliament voted to fully legalize the
state-sanctioned militias, adopting legislation that promoted them to a
government force. Would Hezbollah and its allies do the same if they achieved an
absolute majority in this month’s parliamentary elections?
The action in Iraq found an excuse with the need to “deter” the security and
terror threats facing the country, especially Daesh. Hezbollah can find many
more in Lebanon. Since the decree passed in Iraq, members of the Popular
Mobilization Units, an assortment of Shiite militia groups, have been granted
many of the same rights as members of the military. The law in Iraq brought the
PMU into the state apparatus, with the militias reporting directly to the prime
minister, who is guaranteed to be a Shiite under Iraq’s governing system. Yet,
in reality, the real boss is Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
Such a step, which would be the first in changing Lebanon, has never been
considered until now. Today, however, regional and domestic signals are aligned
for this dangerous step. Hezbollah has weakened the state in a methodical way
and rules over it. It has targeted the judiciary, the executive and all aspects
of state sovereignty and authority in order to reach this point. Iran, even as
the nuclear deal negotiations drag on, could choose this option as a way of
solving the issue while empowering its own proxy. The situation in Ukraine also
favors Iran thanks to Europe and its gas needs.
A new Lebanon needs to be built — a Lebanon that brings back the greatness and
ingenuity of this country and its people.
This action would institutionalize Hezbollah within the state and, as a
recognized force, it would forever change the fate of Lebanon. Any independent
Lebanese voice would be silenced and the country would transform. This is what
is at stake in the May 15 elections. And this is exactly why voting is of the
utmost importance for all Lebanese. It is absolutely vital to stop this action.
However, it should not be the only objective of voting and of future actions.
Lebanon needs to change. A new Lebanon needs to be built — a Lebanon that brings
back the greatness and ingenuity of this country and its people.
Lebanon moved from the Syrian military occupation to the Iranian military
occupation in a blink of an eye. Worse, and to prove how broken this political
system is, some voices are now pushing the idea that the return of Syria into
the political decision-making fold could be a solution. They hope that the new
regional alignment will permit this and that this will bring order and
stability. This is insanity.
There is no doubt that the current political system is a complete failure. It
has kept Lebanon in vicious cycles with deeper problems. This confessional,
transactional system is in constant need of a patron to rule over its clans and
keep everyone in check. It is a system that does not stand against occupation
but invites it and welcomes it. If still needed, this is the proof that this
system needs to be destroyed and a new one built in its place.
This is why not only should the Lebanese people keep opposing Hezbollah’s status
in the coming elections, but they should also seek deeper change. Lebanon needs
a new constitution and new institutions. This change needs to take place before
it is imposed. The elections are important in order to stop Hezbollah from
benefiting from the capitulation and despair of the Lebanese people. Not a
single vote should be wasted in the effort to stop Hezbollah from taking over
the country by legalizing its actions. But we should also be aware that this
will not solve anything. This is why there needs to be a push toward a dialogue
for a new political system, followed by a referendum. The agenda remains the
same as 40 years ago — and it is about implementing neutrality and federalism.
Every single state institution keeps being ruled and taken advantage of by the
nepotism of the ruling clans. In order to keep their people’s loyalty and
obedience, they live and thrive at the expense of the state, masking it all
under a grandiose global ideology. Neutrality and federalism will flip the
situation around and make them all accountable to their own community. It is the
best way to stop Lebanon’s descent into obscurity.
There is no doubt Hezbollah opposes federalism, yet it has built a parallel
system that is equivalent to an autonomous region. Indeed, alongside its own
military, Hezbollah does its own policing and it runs its own schools,
hospitals, communication networks and financial system. Everything that relates
to its community is decided by Hezbollah. And so why shouldn’t the rest of the
Lebanese be allowed the same privilege?
*Khaled Abou Zahr is CEO of Eurabia, a media and tech company. He is also the
editor of Al-Watan Al-Arabi.
The significance of Syria’s exit from Lebanon
Khairallah Khairallah/The Arab Weekly/May 05/2022
Seventeen years after the withdrawal of the Syrian army from Lebanon, it can
definitively be said that Lebanon is finished … And so is Syria.
On April 26, 2005, Syria’s army left Lebanon along with its security services.
The army was subordinate to the security services, as is the case in Syria
itself.
Seventeen years after the withdrawal of those Syrian forces, it was inevitable
that Lebanon would be in a worse situation than it was before. The fate of the
country is now at stake. But Syria itself has been in a state of collapse since
its regime covered up Iran’s decision to car-bomb Rafik Hariri’s motorcade.
Seventeen years after the withdrawal of the Syrian army from Lebanon, it can
definitively be said that Lebanon is finished ... And so is Syria. Lebanon and
Syria both paid the price for the Iranian decision to assassinate Rafik Hariri.
Bashar was party to this decision but was ill aware of its ramifications and
consequences. Rustom Ghazaleh was the last Syrian officer in charge of Lebanese
affairs, as the “high commissioner” of the Syrian occupation authority to
Lebanon.
Ghazaleh, who was Sunni, had succeeded Ghazi Kanaan, who was Alawite. Kanaan
shared with Army Chief of Staff Hikmat Al Shehabi and Vice-President Abdel Halim
Khaddam, the belief that Bashar al-Assad was not worthy of his father's
succession and that he would take Syria to ruin. This is what actually happened.
Ghazi Kanaan committed suicide and it was said that the regime made him commit
suicide, while Hikmat Al Shehabi and Abdel Halim Khaddam died later.
The fate of Rustom Ghazaleh, who was assassinated by the Syrian regime after his
return home, sums up the tragedy of both Lebanon and Syria. The Sunni senior
officer from the Houran region was liquidated, in stages and in horrible
fashion, ten years after the car-bombing of Rafik Hariri's motorcade.
It is difficult to ascertain whether Ghazaleh knew the exact details of the
car-bombing. The particulars of such a fateful decision with huge regional and
international ramifications were bound to have remained within a very narrow
circle in Damascus and Tehran. Hariri was after all the author of the last
attempt to bring Lebanon back to the map of the Middle East. But Ghazaleh
probably had an inkling of what was in the works. Like many others in Lebanon
and Syria, he knew something about Bashar al-Assad’s mindset and about the
Iranian expansionist project.
Since the exit of the Syrian army from Lebanon, Ghazaleh has died a slow death.
It took him ten years to die. It is known that he died on April 24, 2015. That
is, ten years after the last Syrian soldier left Lebanese territory.
In Syria, Ghazaleh returned to being nothing more than a Sunni officer; a
second-class officer who had to report on a daily basis to his Alawite superior.
Despite the wealth and prestige he had amassed in Lebanon, he had no other task
to perform other than to show loyalty. Loyalty meant in the first place
practicing all possible brutality towards Sunni regions, which had been
rebelling against the regime since 2011, like other Syrians.
Many have been liquidated since the assassination of Rafik Hariri, but the fact
remains that what Rustom Ghazaleh went through gives an idea about the impact
that the withdrawal from Lebanon had on the Syrian regime itself. It changed
from a partner of the Iranians in Lebanon to their subservient follower in both
Syria and Lebanon. The Syrian military’s withdrawal from Lebanon was not a
passing event, in the light of two pivotal developments. The first was Iran's
ability, through Hezbollah and its weapons, to fill the security vacuum left by
the exit of the Syrian army. The second consisted in the domestic consequences
of the withdrawal inside Syria itself. Syria paid dearly for the regime's belief
that it could use Iran and the Revolutionary Guards in particular to blackmail
other Arabs states and the world. With the passage of time, it became clear that
the difference between Hafez al-Assad and his heir was that the former was aware
of the co-straints of power balances in the region. Hafez al-Assad did not
undertake any adventure without planning a way out in case his scheme failed.
There is no doubt that the “Islamic Republic” knew how to take advantage of him
and waited for his death in order to attack Lebanon and Syria at the same time.
Its first ally in the onslaught was Bashar al-Assad, who did not understand the
meaning of his participation in the killing of Rafik Hariri, nor in covering it
up at a time when the man had become a symbol of the Lebanese’s rejection of the
notion that their prime minister could just be a tool for the Syrian
intelligence officer who went by the name of Rustom Ghazaleh and who ruled
Lebanon at the time.Whoever did not understand at the time the meaning of the
Syrian army’s exit from Lebanon, less than two months after the car-bombing of
Rafik Hariri’s motorcade, cannot understand at the present time the meaning of
the Syrian and Lebanese collapse and the cost of their falling under the
domination of Iran.
A Lebanese online archive chronicles Arab immigration to
Latin America
Eduardo Campos Lima/Arab News/May 05/2022
Most of the migration occurred in the final decades of the 19th century and the
first half of the 20th
Project of Holy Spirit University of Kaslik in Jounieh highlights individual
journeys of the Arab pioneers
SAO PAULO, Brazil: Although an estimated 18 million Latin Americans can trace
their ancestry to the Arab region, little effort has been made to chronicle and
conserve the writings, photographs and news clippings that document the history
of their migration and settlement — until now.
Most of the Arabs who moved to Latin America did so in the final decades of the
19th century and the first half of the 20th, with the majority of them traveling
from Syria and Lebanon in search of fortune and a fresh start far from the
Ottoman Empire.
To collect and highlight the individual journeys of these Arab pioneers and
their contribution to the New World, an archive dedicated to telling their
stories has been created by the Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, also known as
USEK, a private, not-for-profit Catholic university in Jounieh, Lebanon.
Inaugurated at the end of March this year, the collection currently includes
about 200,000 pages from Arab newspapers and magazines, stacks of photographs,
and other illuminating documents that help shed light on the diaspora’s presence
in Latin America.
Brazilian-born Roberto Khatlab, director of USEK’s Latin American Studies and
Cultures Center, or CECAL for short, conceived the project after spending
several years working in the cultural department of the Brazilian embassy in
Beirut and conducting independent research on Lebanese migration to Brazil.
Some of the documents that have been digitized and now are part of USEK's
archive, including magazines Oriente and A Vinha. (Arab Brazilian Chamber of
Commerce (CCAB) / USEK / Supplied)
“Over the years, I gathered lots of documents concerning that history,” he told
Arab News.
During a trip to Latin America a few years ago, Khatlab realized a wealth of
important historical material was at risk of being lost unless it could be
properly collected and collated.
“Over time, such documents end up in the hands of grandchildren or
great-grandchildren who do not speak Arabic and do not know what to do with
them,” he said.
As a result, many people end up throwing away family collections or donating
them to local libraries, which are not always equipped or qualified to
adequately catalog them.
In addition, newspapers produced by early Arab immigrants were often printed on
cheap, poor-quality paper that does not always stand the test of time, and so
surviving copies can be extremely fragile.
“I have received 100-year-old newspapers which literally disintegrated as we
tried to take them out of the envelope,” said Khatlab.
Syrian-Lebanese immigrants created the first Arabic-language Latin American
newspaper, called Al-Fayha, in 1893 in the Brazilian city of Campinas.
In the local Portuguese language, its name was Mundo Largo, which translates as
Wide World. As the author of several books about Brazil’s historical
relationships with Lebanon and the wider Arab world, Khatlab recognizes the
value of such historical documents for academic study and posterity.
Latin America has close to 18 million people of Arab origin, most of them in
Brazil. (AFP)
“Under the Ottoman Empire, many intellectuals were not able to publish their
ideas in the Arab world at the end of the 19th century,” said Khatlab. “In the
nascent Arab press in countries like Brazil and Argentina, they found the space
they needed.
“Many times, the articles published in the Arab press in Latin America by such
thinkers were sent back to the Arab world and disseminated there in intellectual
and political circles.”
Most of the early Arabic newspapers in Latin America were produced by Syrian or
Lebanese migrants but there were also a number of Egyptian publications. Over
the years, the Arab community launched newspapers that reflected a variety of
viewpoints based around political ideologies, religious creeds, social clubs and
the arts.
“Many poets and writers published works in the Latin American Arab press,” said
Khatlab. “Some of them were renowned in the Arab world, while others
disappeared. But their production and the ideas conveyed in their texts have
great importance to Arabs, even now.”
The archive has attracted the support of institutions across Latin America that
have connections to the Arab community and they have provided small teams who
are helping to collect and digitize materials, using equipment donated by USEK.
INNUMBERS
Estimated Arab population by country
Brazil: 7-12 million
Argentina: 4.5 million
Venezuela: 1.6 million
Mexico: 1.5 million
Colombia: 1.5 million
Chile: 800,000
Source: Atlantic Council
One such institution is the Arab Brazilian Chamber of Commerce, or CCAB for
short, which helped to collate full collections of magazines, including Revista
Oriente (Orient Magazine), one of the most prominent publications produced by
the Arab diaspora in Brazil during the 20th century.
“Different libraries and institutions had partial collections of Oriente,”
Silvia Antibas, the director of CCAB’s cultural department, told Arab News.
“Now, we managed to gather and digitize all of them for the first time.”
The Brazilian team also managed to assemble a collection of the magazine Al-Carmat,
known in Portuguese as A Vinha (The Vineyard). It was edited for many years by a
female Syrian-Brazilian author called Salwa Atlas.
The CCAB has also contributed to the archive an illuminating collection of
photographs that provide a window on the social and domestic lives of the
diaspora through the years.
“The pictures we collected show not only the community’s social events but also
the architecture of houses, the fashion trends of those years, and how
immigrants financially progressed and integrated into Brazilian society over
time,” said Antibas.
The cover of one edition of A Vinha, published for years by Syrian-Brazilian
intellectual Salwa Atlas, who was a pioneer among female intellectuals of the
Syrian-Lebanese community in Brazil. (Clube Homs / USEK / Supplied)
The Jafet family — who ranked among the most illustrious families in Sao Paulo
in the early 20th century — contributed a superb collection of photographs
depicting the palatial homes built around that time by the city’s industrial
bourgeoisie.
“Benjamin Jafet, my great-grandfather, came to Brazil in 1890 and worked as a
‘mascate’ (a word used in Brazil for an Arab door-to-door salesmen) for a few
years in the countryside until he founded his first shop in downtown Sao Paulo,”
Arthur Jafet, a 38-year-old lawyer and businessman, told Arab News.
Over the years, Benjamin and his brothers built one of Brazil’s greatest textile
manufacturers and became wealthy leaders of the Lebanese community in the
country.
As important philanthropists in Sao Paulo, the Jafets helped to fund not only
Arab institutions such as the local Orthodox cathedral, the Syrian-Lebanese
Hospital, and the Mount Lebanon Club, but also publications such as Revista
Oriente.
“Their small palaces pointed to a rather European taste, with visible influences
of the French neoclassical style but also oriental aspects,” said Jafet.
One of the photos in the collection shows Camille Chamoun, Lebanon’s president
between 1952 and 1958, staying at one of the Jafet family’s opulent homes during
a trip to Brazil.
As director of the Institute of Arab Culture in Sao Paulo and an adviser to the
CCAB, Jafet is part of a new generation of Arab Latin Americans taking a renewed
interest in their cultural origins.
Paulo Kehdi is the executive director of Chuf magazine, the in-house publication
of the Mount Lebanon Club. He is among a number of Lebanese community leaders
who launched Lebanity, a movement dedicated to encouraging Lebanese-Brazilians
to rediscover their cultural roots.
“There has been a deliberate effort to reconnect Lebanese-Brazilians to their
motherland, incentivizing them to obtain Lebanese citizenship, to visit the
country and to help it during donation campaigns,” he told Arab News.
Lebanon's President Camille Chamoun with members of the Jafet family in São
Paulo. He visited Brazil in 1954 and stayed at one of the family's palaces.
(Arthur Jafet / Supplied)
The situation is similar in Argentina, which is home to an estimated 3 million
people with Syrian or Lebanese roots.
For several years, Ninawa Daher, a journalist of Lebanese descent, hosted a TV
show in the country devoted to reviving the interest among younger generations
in their Lebanese origins. After her death in a car accident at the age of only
31 in 2011, her mother, Alicia, created the Ninawa Daher Foundation to continue
her legacy, and it has partnered with USEK for the archive project.
“With Ninawa’s contacts, within a very short time we had already been able to
obtain access to several wonderful collections of the community in Argentina,”
Alicia Daher told Arab News.
The team has gathered stacks of newspapers, photographs and other rare
materials, including two books written and autographed by renowned
Lebanese-American writer, poet and visual artist Khalil Gibran.
“The Syrian and Lebanese people had a tremendous cultural impact in Argentina,”
said Daher. “Now, more and more people and institutions are approaching us in
order to offer materials about the immigration.”
In Beirut, meanwhile, Khatlab is hopeful the archive will continue to grow as
the work on it expands to other Latin American countries and to include other
types of documents, such as letters, film footage and even passenger manifests
of the vessels that brought Arabs to the region.
Access to the archive is free and it is open to the general public.
https://www.arabnews.com/node/2076336/middle-east
The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous
Reports And News published on May 05-06/2022
Three people killed in attack in
central Israel
Reuters, Jerusalem/05 May ,2022
At least three people were killed in an attack in the central Israeli city of
Elad on Thursday, health officials said. Police said the incident, which
occurred as Israelis celebrated independence day, appeared to be a terrorist
attack and they had set up roadblocks to try to catch the assailants who
apparently fled the scene. Elad’s mayor, speaking on television, called on
residents to stay indoors while security forces were still operating. The Magen
David Adom ambulance service said three people were killed and two others
seriously wounded. There have been a spate of Arab street attacks in Israel in
recent weeks. Prior to Elad, Palestinians and members of Israel’s Arab minority
have killed 15 people, including three police officers and a security guard, in
attacks in Israel and the West Bank that have mostly targeted civilians. Israel
has responded with arrest raids in Palestinian towns and villages which have
often sparked clashes and brought the number of Palestinians killed by Israeli
forces since the beginning of the year to at least 40. The casualties include
armed members of militant groups, lone assailants and bystanders.
Israel says Putin apologised for foreign minister's
Hitler remarks
Reuters/May 05/2022
Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said on Thursday that Russian President
Vladimir Putin had apologised for his foreign minister's comments claiming Adolf
Hitler had Jewish origins. Putin also told Bennett in
a phonecall that Russia would allow civilian passage from the besieged Azovstal
steel works in the Ukrainian port of Mariupol via a humanitarian corridor
handled by the United Nations and Red Cross. Bennett's office said Israel's
prime minister had requested civilian passage from the steel works after an
earlier conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy.
Israel lambasted Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov this week for
saying Adolf Hitler had Jewish roots, describing the remarks as an
"unforgivable" falsehood that debased the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust.
Lavrov made the comment on Sunday when asked why Russia said it needed to
"denazify" Ukraine if Zelenskiy was himself Jewish.
"When they say 'What sort of nazification is this if we are Jews', well I think
that Hitler also had Jewish origins, so it means nothing," Lavrov told Italy's
Rete 4 channel, speaking through an Italian interpreter.
After the call with Putin, Bennett said he had accepted the apology and
thanked the Russian leader for "clarifying his regard for the Jewish people and
the memory of the Holocaust." Israel, which has sought to keep good ties with
Kyiv and Moscow, has acted as an intermediary, although an Israeli official said
Bennett had suspended those efforts in late March to deal with a spate of Arab
street attacks in Israel.
The latest phone calls with Putin and Zelenskiy suggested Israel may be resuming
mediation efforts. (Reporting by Ari Rabinovitch;
Editing by Andrew Heavens and Edmund Blair)
Israeli police enter al-Aqsa as Jewish visits resume
Associated Press/May 05/2022
Israeli police entered a flashpoint holy site in Jerusalem to clear away
Palestinian protesters on Thursday, after Jewish visits that had been paused for
the Muslim holidays resumed. Recent weeks have seen several rounds of clashes at
the al-Aqsa Mosque compound, the third holiest site for Muslims, which is built
on a hilltop that is the holiest site for Jews, who refer to it as the Temple
Mount. It lies at the emotional heart of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. As
the visits resumed, dozens of Palestinians gathered, chanting "God is greatest."
Scuffles broke out when the police went to arrest one of them. Police fired
rubber-coated bullets on the sprawling esplanade as some Palestinians sheltered
inside the mosque itself. The police could later be seen just inside an entrance
to the mosque. The police said they responded to dozens of people who were
shouting incitement and throwing stones, and that one police officer was lightly
injured. But unlike in previous confrontations, Palestinian witnesses said there
was no sign of rock-throwing initially. Some of those who sheltered inside the
mosque began throwing stones when police started to enter the building. The
witnesses spoke on condition of anonymity because of security concerns.
Under informal arrangements known as the status quo, Jews are allowed to visit
the site but not pray there. In recent years, they have visited in
ever-increasing numbers with police escorts and many have discreetly prayed,
angering the Palestinians as well as neighboring Jordan, which is the custodian
of the site. The Palestinians have long feared that Israel plans to eventually
take over the site or partition it. Israel says it is
committed to maintaining the status quo, and accuses the Islamic militant group
Hamas of inciting the recent violence.
The visits, by mostly nationalist and religious Jews, resumed Thursday after
being paused for the last 10 days of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan and the
Eid al-Fitr holiday. Thursday is also Israel's Independence Day, and in recent
days fringe groups had called on Jewish worshippers to celebrate by waving
Israeli flags at the holy site. The calls were widely circulated by Palestinians
on social media, along with calls to confront any such display. Hussein
al-Sheikh, a senior Palestinian official who serves as the main liaison between
the Palestinian Authority and Israel, tweeted about the controversy, saying that
raising the flag would show "outrageous disregard" for Palestinian feelings and
mark the "continuation of extremist racist campaigns. "Hamas warned Wednesday
that Israel was "playing with fire and dragging the region into an escalation
for which the occupation bears full responsibility." Clashes in and around Al-Aqsa
last year helped ignite an 11-day war between Israel and Hamas.
Congressmen Urge Blinken to Pressure Israel
to Protect Christian Community in Jerusalem
Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
Eight Republican and Democrat Congressmen sent a letter to US Secretary of State
Antony Blinken urging him to pressure Israel to ensure freedom of worship in
Jerusalem for Christians, Muslims, and Jews. Congressman Joaquin Castro and Gus
Bilirakis led the bipartisan letter, expressing deep concern about a
"disturbing" rise in recent Israeli extremist attacks against Jerusalem’s
Christian community. In the letter, the lawmakers stressed that the protection
of religious freedom abroad must be a critical element of the United States'
foreign policy. “Freedom of religion is a cherished American value and universal
human right, our own experience compels us to advocate for the rights of
vulnerable and underrepresented people around the world,” it read. Signatories
of the letter said the US should maintain its unwavering support to promote and
protect freedom of religion or belief for all.
It listed several incidents, including the attempt by an Israeli man to set fire
to the Church of All Nations located on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem in
December 2020. “In the span of one month in 2021, the Monastery of the Romanian
Church in Jerusalem was the target of four acts of vandalism. Christian clergy
are also targets of attacks,” it added. In May 2021, an Armenian priest was
attacked by three Israeli youths as he made his way to the Church of the Holy
Sepulcher in Jerusalem, the letter added, noting that these are just a few
examples of the attacks sustained against clergy and church properties.
Despite general protections afforded to minority religious communities by the
Israeli government, the lawmakers said actions of radical groups pose a grave
threat to the long-term viability of the Christian presence in Jerusalem.
“Throughout the Holy Land, Christians have become the target of frequent and
sustained attacks by fringe radical groups.”
Since 2012, there have been countless incidents of physical and verbal assaults
against priests and other clergy, attacks on Christian churches, with holy sites
regularly vandalized and desecrated, and ongoing intimidation of local
Christians who simply seek to worship freely and go about their daily lives.
These tactics are being used by such radical groups in a systematic attempt to
drive the Christian community out of Jerusalem and other parts of the Holy Land,
they warned. Lawmakers said the decline of the Christian presence in Jerusalem
is not only a blow to religious freedom but also has humanitarian consequences.
Ministry programs organized under the auspices of the Christian churches in
Jerusalem meet the medical, educational, and humanitarian needs of many
disadvantaged people regardless of religious affiliation.It further warned that
if the radical groups succeed in driving out the Christian community, many of
these programs will no longer be able to operate. Additionally, the actions of
radical groups who are able to act with impunity directly threaten the religious
freedom of the Christian community in Jerusalem and undermines the rich history
of interfaith cooperation within the city. The congressmen asked the State
Department to work with the Israeli government to uphold its stated commitment
to the freedom of religion and worship for all religions and to hold accountable
the radical groups who are engaging in sustained attacks against Christian
clergy and destruction of church properties. During his confirmation testimony
before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Ambassador at Large for
International Religious Freedom, Rashad Hussain pledged, if confirmed, to “carry
out the United States’ abiding commitment to championing international religious
freedom for everyone everywhere.”
62 senators, including 16 Democrats, vote to oppose
nuclear-only Iran deal
Marc Rod/Jewish Insider/May 05/2022
The measure calls for addressing a wider range of Iranian activity and opposes
removing the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ terror designation
A majority of senators, including 16 Democrats, voted on Wednesday night in
favor of a non-binding Senate measure that opposes entering into an Iran deal
addressing only the regime’s nuclear program as well as the removal of the
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ terrorism designation. The final vote on the
measure was 62 to 33.
Wednesday’s vote came on a motion introduced by Sen. James Lankford (R-OK), as
part of the Senate’s consideration of the United States Innovation and
Competition Act (USICA) aimed at countering China.
The motion instructs the senators negotiating the final bill with the House to
“insist” that the legislation include language requiring any nuclear weapons
agreement with Iran to include provisions “addressing the full range of Iran’s
destabilizing activities,” including missiles, terrorism and sanctions evasion;
does not lift any sanctions on the IRGC; and does not revoke the IRGC’s terror
designation.
The Biden administration has sought to rejoin the 2015 nuclear agreement, from
which the Trump administration withdrew in 2018. The original deal did not
address issues beyond Iran’s nuclear program.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Sens. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT),
Cory Booker (D-NJ), Ben Cardin (D-MD), Chris Coons (D-DE), Catherine Cortez
Masto (D-NV) Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Maggie Hassan (D-NH), Mark Kelly (D-AZ),
Angus King (I-ME), Joe Manchin (D-WV), Gary Peters (D-MI), Jacky Rosen (D-NV),
Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ), Jon Tester (D-MT) and Ron Wyden (D-OR) voted for the
measure.
The measure had reportedly become a matter of contention in the Senate, with
some Democrats trying to block the vote. Lankford allegedly threatened to block
Senate proceedings on the bill unless guaranteed a vote on the measure.
Iran has demanded that the U.S. withdraw the IRGC’s Foreign Terrorist
Organization designation. Secretary of State Tony Blinken told Congress last
week that the group would have to cease its support for terrorism in order for
the designation to be withdrawn, but also argued that the designation is largely
ineffectual because other IRGC sanctions would remain in place.
Shortly after the vote, Coons — a close administration ally who has been
referred to as President Joe Biden’s “shadow secretary of state” — said in a
statement that his vote “does not undermine my continuing support for the
administration’s efforts to negotiate an agreement” and that he “maintains an
open mind towards any potential outcomes.”
He explained that he voted for the motion “in order to encourage the Biden
administration’s negotiations to push for the strongest possible deal that
addresses Iran’s nuclear weapons program and many other malign activities.”
Lankford suggested that the measure was pertinent to USICA because Iran exports
much of its oil products to China.
“This bill does not address China’s practice of purchasing and stockpiling
sanctioned Iranian oil to the black market,” Lankford said in a speech prior to
the vote. “The procurement spike by China directly correlated with the spike in
terrorist activities by Iran and its proxies in the Middle East… This particular
Motion to Instruct goes straight at this illicit activity from Iran that’s
facilitating the terror activities.”
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) argued in response that “this motion asks the Senate to
endorse” the Trump administration’s Iran policy, which, he said, “was a complete
and total failure,” in pursuit of a “mythical comprehensive agreement.”
Lankford’s motion was the second measure on Iran to come up for a vote on
Wednesday. Earlier in the day, 86 senators voted in favor of a motion,
introduced by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), stating that terrorism-related sanctions on
the Central Bank of Iran and the IRGC “are necessary to limit… cooperation”
between Iran and China.
The Cruz motion instructs the Senate’s negotiators on the competition bill to
“insist” that the final bill include language requiring the administration to
report to Congress on cooperation between China and Iran.
Twelve senators — Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Tom Carper (D-DE), Mazie Hirono
(D-HI), Ed Markey (D-MA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Chris Murphy (D-CT), Alex Padilla
(D-CA), Rand Paul (R-KY), Jack Reed (D-RI), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Brian Schatz
(D-HI) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) — voted against the motion.
US Prepares for a World Both With and Without Iran
Nuclear Deal
Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
The United States is now preparing equally for both a scenario where there is a
mutual return to compliance with Iran on a nuclear deal, as well as one in which
there is not an agreement, the State Department said on Wednesday. "Because a
mutual return to compliance with the JCPOA is very much an uncertain
proposition, we are now preparing equally for either scenario," Department
spokesperson Ned Price said in a briefing.
Western officials have largely lost hope the nuclear deal can be resurrected,
sources familiar with the matter said last week. While they have not completely
given up on the pact, under which Iran restrained its nuclear program in return
for relief from economic sanctions, there is a growing belief it may be beyond
salvation.
Iran Prepares for Protests Amid Fears of Nuclear
Negotiations Failure
London - Tehran - Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
Iranian authorities issued "secret directives" to the security and the judiciary
units to prepare for public protests after an increase in food prices due to
fears of the collapse of the Vienna talks, Iranian sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.
The sources said that the security services, police, riot control, the
judiciary, and public prosecution offices are on alert to face possible
disturbances within the next three months.A judicial source said that the
instructions refer to "more severe protests than the previous public protests,"
with growing public discontent, especially after increasing prices of essential
food commodities. The military and security services, especially the riot
control, police stations, and checkpoints, increased their daily and night
patrols at the entrances and exits of cities. On Monday, education staff
employees launched protests in dozens of Iranian cities.The Teachers' Trade
Association said that the authorities continued to arrest teachers and
participants in the International Workers' Day rallies, which coincides with
Teacher's Day in Iran.
Negotiations collapse
On March 11, last-minute Russian demands threatened to derail the near-complete
process of reviving the Iran nuclear deal. After the Russian issue was overcome,
the negotiations faced another obstacle when Tehran demanded the US removes the
Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) from the list of terrorist
organizations. A source said that Iranian officials know they will not reach an
agreement in the short term, and the current government prefers to continue
negotiations without signing anything. Iran's Foreign Minister Hossein
Amir-Abdollahian and his Irish counterpart Simon Coveney held a telephone
conversation on Wednesday. Abdollahian said that the US has to adopt a realistic
approach and modify former US President Donald Trump's illegal behavior, and
take steps in the direction of developing political initiatives.
The ministry said that Iran will continue the path of diplomacy until achieving
a final agreement in the Vienna talks. In addition to developing and proposing
political initiatives, Iran has shown that it has the necessary will to reach a
"good," "strong," and "lasting" agreement in the Vienna talks, the top diplomat
was quoted as saying. Coveney described Iran's initiatives in the Vienna talks
as commendable, highlighting the necessity of reaching a "good" agreement
through the diplomatic process that would be capable of safeguarding the
interests of Tehran's interests and the other parties.
Inflation
Meanwhile, despite objections among the middle and poor classes, inflation hit
the Iranian markets, which was reflected in the chants during the state rallies
on the occasion of al-Quds Day. Conservative members of the parliament
criticized the cabinet last month following the new wave of inflation. Iranian
President Ebrahim Raisi ordered the regulatory authorities to set new measures
that regulate markets and control prices.
State-owned media reported that the monetary decisions of the government led to
a decline in annual inflation from about 60 percent to 46 percent in March. Last
month, the government announced it was revoking its subsidized exchange rate
system for imports. However, observers are concerned after essential
commodities, especially bread, continue their upward trajectory. The Jamejam
website, affiliated with state television, quoted the Director General of the
Basic Commodity Price Control at the Ministry of Agriculture as saying the news
of the bread price increase was a "rumor." Reports stated that the price of one
piece of "baguette" rose from 3,000 rials to 10,000 rials. The cost of a 40kg
bag of flour reached 600,000 rials, up from 260,000 rials.
The IRGC-affiliated Fars news agency said the government increased the prices of
flour and pasta following a rise in global inflation due mainly to the
Russia-Ukraine conflict. It is estimated that every Iranian citizen consumes
half a kilogram of pasta a month. The US dollar was selling for 28,250 rials,
according to the foreign exchange site Bonbast.com.
Water Crisis
An official source, who spoke on anonymity, said the authorities fear the water
crisis will coincide with deteriorating living conditions and basic goods. A
judicial source also confirmed instructions from the higher bodies regarding the
possibility of protests erupting due to water scarcity in the country. The
Ministry of Energy announced that water levels in dams had decreased 60 percent
before the summer season. The Executive Director of the Water and Electricity in
Ahwaz Governorate, Abbas Sadrian, said that the province's dams have 4.7 billion
cubic meters, equivalent to 36 percent of the total volume of dams explaining
that 64 percent of the dams' capacity is empty. Experts warn of the dire
consequences of the drought for the second year in a row in the provinces
affected by the government's water policies. Based on these estimates, officials
expect the water protests to erupt in the Arab-majority province of Ahwaz in the
south. An activist said the authorities launched an intense campaign through
Friday prayer sermons in the affected areas, fearing that public discontent
would lead to protests.
Fighting prevents evacuations of civilians trapped under
Ukraine steel plant
Alessandra Prentice and Natalia Zinets/Reuters/May 05/2022
Scores of civilians, many of them women and children, remained trapped on
Thursday in underground bunkers at a steel works, the last Ukrainian holdout in
the devastated city of Mariupol, but Russia promised a new lull in fighting to
allow them to leave.Ukraine's dogged resistance at the vast Azovstal plant has
underscored Russia's failure to capture major cities during a 10-week war that
has united Western powers in arming Kyiv and punishing Moscow with sanctions.
In what would be a major historic shift sure to infuriate Moscow, Sweden and
Finland may shortly decide to join NATO.
Russia's military promised to pause its activity in Azovstal during Thursday
daytime and the following two days to allow civilians to leave, after what
Ukrainian fighters described as "bloody battles" prevented evacuations on
Wednesday. The Kremlin said humanitarian corridors from the plant were in place.
However, nobody from Azovstal was among more than 300 civilians evacuated on
Wednesday from Mariupol and other areas in southern Ukraine, the U.N.
humanitarian office said.
Pictures released by Russian-backed fighters appeared to show smoke and flames
enveloping the Soviet-era Azovstal complex. Ukrainian officials believe around
200 civilians remain trapped along with fighters in a sprawling network of
underground bunkers there.
In an early morning address, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said
Ukraine stood ready to ensure a ceasefire.
"It will take time simply to lift people out of those basements, out of those
underground shelters. In the present conditions, we cannot use heavy equipment
to clear the rubble away. It all has to be done by hand," Zelenskiy said.
Ukrainian fighters inside Azovstal are fighting "difficult, bloody battles,"
Denis Prokopenko, a commander with Ukraine's Azov regiment, said late on
Wednesday.
Ukraine's military general staff said the assault on the plant included air
support.
Its chief commander said Ukraine's armed forces needed multiple launch rocket
systems to defend against resumed Russian cruise missile strikes around the
country. Russia has in recent days targeted railways, weapons dumps and fuel
depots.
The U.S. Congress is debating an aid package for Ukraine worth $33 billion,
largely for weapons. If it gets more supplies, Ukraine could launch a
counter-offensive in mid-June, an adviser to Zelenskiy said.
Mariupol, a port city in southeast Ukraine on the Sea of Azov, is now under
Russian control apart from the steel works, after a weeks-long siege. It has
been an important target in efforts to cut Ukraine off from its coastal grain
and metals export routes, as well as to link Russian-controlled territory in the
east of the country to Crimea, seized by Moscow in 2014.
The United Nations and Red Cross evacuated hundreds of people from the city and
other areas earlier this week, including dozens from Azovstal during a
short-lived U.N. brokered ceasefire.
"God forbid more shells hit near the bunkers where the civilians are," said
Tetyana Trotsak, an Azovstal evacuee among dozens who reached a
Ukraine-controlled town this week, describing her two-and-a-half hour walk to
get across a short stretch of ground at the plant strewn with rubble.
Nordic neighbours Sweden and Finland - which also shares a 1,300-km (819 mile)
border with Russia - stayed out of NATO during the Cold War, but Moscow's
invasion of Ukraine has prompted them to rethink their security needs.
Sweden received U.S. assurances that it would receive support during the period
that a potential application to join NATO is processed by the 30 nations in the
alliance, Foreign Minister Ann Linde said on Wednesday.
Russian President Vladimir embarked on the war partly to counter the expansion
of the NATO alliance, which Ukraine also wants to join.
Sweeping sanctions from the United States and its European allies have hobbled
Russia's $1.8 trillion economy while billions of dollars worth of military aid
has helped Ukraine frustrate the invasion. The United States has provided
details on the location of Russia's mobile military headquarters, allowing
Ukrainian forces to strike those targets and kill Russian generals, the New York
Times reported on Wednesday, citing senior U.S. officials.
In response, Russia said such intelligence sharing would not thwart its goals.
Ukrainian officials said they have killed about 12 Russian generals on the
battlefield, the newspaper said. The Pentagon and the White House did not
respond to Reuters requests for comment on the report. EU envoys are working to
reach a deal this week on phasing out imports of Russian crude oil within six
months and refined products by the end of this year. It requires agreement by
all 27 EU governments.
The plan also targets Russia's top bank, its broadcasters, and hundreds of
individuals. It would follow U.S. and British oil bans and be a watershed for
the EU, the world's largest trading bloc, which remains dependent on Russian
energy.
The Kremlin said Russia was weighing responses to the plan.
Ukraine and Russia said fighting had been heavy across the south and east over
the past day. Ukrainian authorities reported shelling of towns near a frontline
that divides territory it holds in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions from land
held by Russian-backed separatists. The Ukrainian air force said it had downed
three Russian cruise missiles and four aircraft, including two Sukhoi fighter
jets, while Russia said it had killed 600 Ukrainian soldiers overnight. Reuters
could not independently either report.
Pavlo Kyrylenko, governor of the eastern Donetsk region in which Mariupol is
located, said at least 25 civilians were wounded as Russian forces shelled
Kramatorsk, a town that in April suffered a missile strike on a train station
that killed dozens of evacuating civilians. Russia calls its actions a "special
military operation" to disarm Ukraine and protect it from fascists. Ukraine and
the West say the fascist allegation is baseless and that the war is an
unprovoked act of aggression.
More than five million Ukrainians have fled abroad since the start of the
invasion.
Ukraine Repels Some Attacks but Combat Rages at Steel
Mill
Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
Ukrainian forces said Thursday they repelled Russian attacks in the east and
recaptured some territory, even as Moscow moved to obstruct the flow of Western
weapons to Ukraine by bombarding rail stations and other supply-line targets
across the country. Heavy fighting also raged at the Azovstal steel mill in
Mariupol that represented the last stronghold of Ukrainian resistance in the
ruined southern port city, the Ukrainian military reported. A Russian official
earlier denied that troops were storming the plant, but the commander of the
main Ukrainian unit inside said Russian soldiers had pushed into the mill's
territory. "With the support of aircraft, the enemy resumed the offensive in
order to take control of the plant," the General Staff in Kyiv said, adding that
the Russians were "trying to destroy Ukrainian units."To the west of Mariupol,
Ukrainian forces made some gains on the border of the southern regions of
Kherson and Mykolaiv, where Russian troops were reportedly trying to launch a
counteroffensive, and repelled 11 Russian attacks in the Donetsk and Luhansk
regions, the military said.
Five people were killed and at least 25 more wounded in shelling of several
eastern cities over the past 24 hours, Ukrainian officials said.
The Russian military said it used sea- and air-launched missiles to destroy
electric power facilities at five railway stations across Ukraine on Wednesday.
Artillery and aircraft also struck troop strongholds and fuel and ammunition
depots. Videos on social media suggested a bridge there was attacked. Ukrainian
Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba accused Russia of "resorting to the missile
terrorism tactics in order to spread fear across Ukraine." Responding to the
strikes in his nightly video address, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy
said: "All of these crimes will be answered, legally and quite practically - on
the battlefield."The flurry of attacks comes as Russia prepares to celebrate
Victory Day on May 9, marking the Soviet Union’s defeat of Nazi Germany. The
world is watching for whether Russian President Vladimir Putin will use the
occasion to declare a victory in Ukraine or expand what he calls the "special
military operation." A declaration of all-out war would allow Putin to introduce
martial law and mobilize reservists to make up for significant troop losses.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov dismissed the speculation as "nonsense."
Meanwhile, Belarus, which Russia used as a staging ground for its invasion,
announced the start of military exercises Wednesday. A top Ukrainian official
said the country will be ready to act if Belarus joins the fighting. The British
Defense Ministry said it does not anticipate that the drills currently posed a
threat to Ukraine, but that Moscow will likely use them "to fix Ukrainian forces
in the north, preventing them from being committed to the battle for the Donbas,"
the eastern industrial heartland that is Russia's stated war objective.
The attacks on rail infrastructure were meant to disrupt the delivery of Western
weapons, Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Maj. Gen. Igor Konashenkov said.
Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu complained that the West is "stuffing Ukraine
with weapons."
A senior US defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the
Pentagon's assessment, said that while the Russians have tried to hit critical
infrastructure around the western city of Lviv, specifically targeting
railroads, there has been "no appreciable impact" on Ukraine’s effort to
resupply its forces. Lviv, close to the Polish border, has been a major gateway
for NATO-supplied weapons. Weaponry pouring into Ukraine helped its forces
thwart Russia’s initial drive to seize Kyiv and seems certain to play a central
role in the growing battle for the Donbas. Ukraine has urged the West to ramp up
the supply of weapons ahead of that potentially decisive clash. In addition to
supplying weapons to Ukraine, Europe and the US have sought to punish Moscow
with sanctions. The EU's top official called on the 27-nation bloc on Wednesday
to ban Russian oil imports, a crucial source of revenue.
"We will make sure that we phase out Russian oil in an orderly fashion, in a way
that allows us and our partners to secure alternative supply routes and
minimizes the impact on global markets," European Commission President Ursula
von der Leyen told the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France. The proposal
needs unanimous approval from EU countries and is likely to be debated fiercely.
Hungary and Slovakia have already said they won't take part in any oil
sanctions. They could be granted an exemption.
The EU is also talking about a possible embargo on Russian natural gas. The bloc
has already approved a cutoff of coal imports. Russia’s economy is heavily
dependent on oil and natural gas exports.
In Mariupol, Mayor Vadym Boychenko said that Russian forces were targeting the
already shattered Azovstal plant with heavy artillery, tanks, aircraft, warships
and "heavy bombs that pierce concrete 3 to 5 meters thick." "Our brave guys are
defending this fortress, but it is very difficult," he said. Ukrainian fighters
said Tuesday that Russian forces had begun storming the plant. But the Kremlin
denied it. "There is no assault," Peskov said. Denys Prokopenko, commander of
the Ukrainian Azov regiment that's defending the plant, said in a video that the
incursions continued "and there are heavy, bloody battles."
"The situation is extremely difficult, but in spite of everything, we continue
to carry out the order to hold the defense," he added.
His wife, Kateryna Prokopenko, told The Associated Press: "We don’t want them to
die. They won’t surrender. They are waiting for the bravest countries to
evacuate them." Meanwhile, the United Nations announced that more than 300
civilians were evacuated Wednesday from Mariupol and other nearby communities.
The evacuees arrived in Zaporizhzhia, about 140 miles (230 kilometers) to the
northwest, where they were receiving humanitarian assistance. Over the weekend,
more than 100 people - including women, the elderly and 17 children - were
evacuated from the plant during a ceasefire in an operation overseen by the UN
and the Red Cross. But the attacks on the plant soon resumed. The Russian
government said on the Telegram messaging app that it would open another
evacuation corridor from the plant during certain hours on Thursday through
Saturday. But there was no immediate confirmation of those arrangements from
other parties, and many previous such assurances from the Kremlin have fallen
through, with the Ukrainians blaming continued fighting by the Russians. It was
unclear how many Ukrainian fighters were still inside, but the Russians put the
number at about 2,000 in recent weeks, and 500 were reported to be wounded. A
few hundred civilians also remained there, the Ukrainian side said. Mariupol,
and the plant in particular, have come to symbolize the misery inflicted by the
war. The Russians have pulverized most of the city in a two-month siege that has
trapped civilians with little food, water, medicine or heat. The city's fall
would deprive Ukraine of a vital port, allow Russia to establish a land corridor
to the Crimean Peninsula, which it seized from Ukraine in 2014, and free up
troops to fight elsewhere in the Donbas.
NYT: US Intel Helped Ukraine Target Russian Generals
Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
Intelligence provided by the United States has helped the Ukrainian military
target several Russian generals since Moscow's invasion, the New York Times
reported Wednesday. Citing multiple senior US officials, the newspaper said that
of the approximately dozen Russian generals killed by Ukrainian forces, "many"
had been targeted with the help of US intelligence. The US National Security
Council slammed the assertion that the United States was helping Ukraine kill
Russian generals as "irresponsible." "The United States provides battlefield
intelligence to help the Ukrainians defend their country," NSC spokesperson
Adrienne Watson told AFP in an email. "We do not provide intelligence with the
intent to kill Russian generals." The heavy loss of high-ranking Russian
military officers has stunned Western security officials, who last confirmed an
official tally of seven generals in late March, though Ukraine has since
announced more. In March, Western officials had cited low morale as a reason
Russian generals would be so close to the front. They also pointed to potential
communications and logistics issues on the Russian side, which could lead senior
officers to use unencrypted channels and expose themselves to Ukrainian forces.
But the report by the New York Times points to direct assistance from the United
States and other Western intelligence services as a major factor in the
Ukrainian success. The daily said the United States had provided details on the
Russian military's mobile headquarters, which frequently change location, and
that Ukrainian forces used that information in tandem with their own to conduct
attacks on senior Russian officers. President Joe Biden's administration has
kept the military intelligence it is providing to Ukraine under wraps out of
concern it could compromise its sources as well as be taken as a sign by Russia
of direct hostility. Earlier in the conflict, the Pentagon was similarly
cautious about noting that only "defensive" weapons and equipment were being
provided to Ukraine. But it has since announced shipments of offensive weapons
like heavy artillery, helicopters and attack drones.
It has also talked of training Ukrainian troops, including in Germany, to use
the weapons they are receiving. And instead of saying, as it did in February,
that it wants only to help Ukraine survive, Washington now says its goal in the
war is to debilitate Russia for the long term. "We want to see Russia weakened
to the degree that it can't do the kinds of things that it has done in invading
Ukraine," US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said after a visit to Kyiv in
late April. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to request for comment on
the Times report.
Mariupol steel mill battle rages as Ukraine repels
attacks
Associated Press/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
Heavy fighting raged Thursday at the besieged steel plant in Mariupol, as
Russian forces attempted to finish off the city's last-ditch defenders and
complete the capture of the strategically vital port. The bloody battle came
amid growing suspicions that President Vladimir Putin wants to present the
Russian people with a major battlefield success — or perhaps announce an
escalation of the war — in time for Victory Day on Monday. That is the biggest
patriotic holiday on the Russian calendar, marking the Soviet Union's triumph
over Nazi Germany.
Ten weeks into a devastating war, Ukraine's military claimed Thursday it
recaptured some areas in the south and repelled other attacks in the east,
further frustrating Putin's ambitions. Ukrainian and
Russian forces are fighting village by village, as Moscow struggles to gain
momentum in the eastern industrial heartland of the Donbas. Russia switched its
focus to that region — where Moscow-backed separatists have fought Ukrainian
forces for years — after a stiffer than expected resistance bogged its troops
down and thwarted its initial goal of overrunning the capital.
In an interview with The Associated Press on Thursday, Belarus President
Alexander Lukashenko said he hadn't expected the Russian offensive to "drag on
this way." Some Russian troops used ally Belarus as a launch pad for the
invasion on Feb. 24, and Lukashenko publicly supported the operation. "But I am
not immersed in this problem enough to say whether it goes according to plan,
like the Russians say, or like I feel it," the authoritarian leader said.
In the most searing example of how Ukrainian forces have slowed Russia's
progress, Ukrainian fighters are holed up in the tunnels and bunkers under the
sprawling Azovstal steel mill in Mariupol — the last pocket of resistance in a
city that is otherwise controlled by Moscow's forces. Civilians, believed to
number around a few hundred, are also trapped inside the plant. Ukraine said its
fighters drove back a Russian assault into the giant mill, which was also being
bombed from above."The Russian troops entered the territory of Azovstal, but
were kicked out by our defenders," Oleksiy Arestovych, a presidential adviser,
said in remarks on Ukrainian television. "We can say that the fighting is
ongoing."The Kremlin denied that there was any ground assault.
Mariupol's fall would be a major battlefield success for Moscow, depriving
Ukraine of a vital port and allowing Russia to establish a land corridor to the
Crimean Peninsula, which it seized from Ukraine in 2014, and free up troops to
fight elsewhere in the Donbas.
With his troops making slow progress elsewhere, Putin may be looking to declare
a win at the plant in time for Victory Day. Some have also suggested he could
use the celebrations to expand what he calls the "special military operation."A
declaration of all-out war would allow the Russian leader to introduce martial
law and mobilize reservists to make up for significant troop losses. The Kremlin
has dismissed the speculation.The city, and the plant in particular, have come
to symbolize the misery inflicted by the war. The Russians have pulverized most
of Mariupol in a two-month siege that has trapped civilians with little food,
water, medicine or heat. Civilians sheltering inside the plant have perhaps
suffered even more. About 100 of them were evacuated over the weekend — the
first time some saw daylight in months. The Russian
government said it would open another evacuation corridor from the plant during
certain hours on Thursday through Saturday. But there was no immediate
confirmation of those arrangements from other parties, and many previous
assurances from the Kremlin have fallen through, with the Ukrainians blaming
continued fighting by the Russians.
It is unclear how many Ukrainian fighters are still inside the plant, but the
Russians put the number at about 2,000 in recent weeks, and 500 were reported to
be wounded.
As the battle raged in Mariupol, Russian forces shelled elsewhere in the Donbas
and also kept up their bombardment of railroad stations and other supply-line
targets across the country — part of an effort to disrupt the supply of Western
arms, which have been critical to Ukraine's defense. Ukrainian forces said
Thursday they made some gains on the border of the southern regions of Kherson
and Mykolaiv and repelled 11 Russian attacks in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions
that make up the Donbas. Five people were killed and at least 25 more wounded in
shelling of cities in the Donbas over the past 24 hours, Ukrainian officials
said. The attacks damaged houses and a school as well.
A day after Russian attacks were reported near Kyiv, the capital; in Cherkasy
and Dnipro in central Ukraine; and in Zaporizhzhia in the southeast, air raid
sirens sounded anew Thursday in the western city of Lviv, which has been a
gateway for western arms and served as a relative safe haven for people fleeing
fighting farther east.
An assessment by the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War said
Russian forces were struggling to gain traction.
"Ukrainian defenses have largely stalled Russian advances in eastern Ukraine,"
it said late Wednesday. "Russian forces intensified
airstrikes against transportation infrastructure in western Ukraine (on
Wednesday) but remain unable to interdict Western aid shipments to Ukraine," it
added. The war has flattened swaths of cities and
destroyed roads and bridges, and driven millions from their homes, including
many who have crossed into other countries. With the challenge of rebuilding and
demining after the war in mind, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on
Thursday announced the launch of a global fundraising digital platform called
United24. At the same time, Poland hosted an international donor conference that
raise $6.5 billion in humanitarian aid.
Meanwhile, Belarus announced the start of military exercises Wednesday. A top
Ukrainian official said the country will be ready to act if Belarus joins the
fighting. The British Defense Ministry said it does not anticipate that the
drills currently posed a threat to Ukraine, but that Moscow will likely use them
"to fix Ukrainian forces in the north, preventing them from being committed to
the battle for the Donbas."
French Ecology Minister Confident in Russia Oil Ban
Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
France’s ecology minister said Thursday she is confident that the European
Union’s 27 nations will quickly agree to a proposed ban on oil imports from
Russia. Speaking to FranceInfo radio, Barbara Pompili, said the embargo could be
agreed upon within days. “I am confident,” she said. “It is normal that there
are discussions because some counties are more dependent than others on Russian
oil, so we have to try to find solutions so they can get on board with these
sanctions.” She added: “I think we’ll get there perhaps by the end of the week
or at least as soon as possible.” The European Union’s top official, European
Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, proposed Wednesday that EU member
nations phase out imports of Russian crude oil within six months and refined
products by the end of the year. The proposals must be unanimously approved to
take effect. Von der Leyen said that getting all 27 member countries — some of
them landlocked and highly dependent on Russia for energy supplies — to agree on
oil sanctions “will not be easy.” Pompili said the embargo would be “for
everyone” in the bloc and that “is to show Russia that Europe, from the end of
this year, will completely do without its oil.”
Heavy Rain and Floods in Afghanistan Kill 22, Destroy
Hundreds of Homes
Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 5 May, 2022
Heavy rain and flooding has killed 22 people, destroyed hundreds of homes and
damaged crops in Afghanistan, which is already facing a humanitarian crisis, a
disaster management official said on Thursday. The Taliban government,
struggling to cope with the disaster that has affected more than a third of its
provinces, will approach international relief organizations for help, officials
said. "Due to flooding and storms in 12 provinces, 22 people have died and 40
injured," said Hassibullah Shekhani, head of communications and information at
Afghanistan's National Disaster Management Authority. The rain and flooding was
particularly severe in the western provinces of Badghis and Faryab and the
northern province of Baghlan. Afghanistan has been suffering from drought in
recent years, made worse by climate change, with low crop yields raising fears
of serious food shortages. The weather has exacerbated problems of poverty
caused by decades of war and then a drop in foreign aid and the freezing of
assets abroad after the Taliban took over, and US-led forces withdrew, in
August. Shekhani said 500 houses were destroyed, 2,000 damaged, 300 head of
livestock killed and some 3,000 acres of crops damaged. He said the
International Committee of the Red Cross was helping and officials would
approach other international organizations for help. The international community
is grappling with how to help the country of some 40 million people without
benefiting the Taliban.
The Latest LCCC English analysis &
editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on May 05-06/2022
Kremlin is targeting Ukraine resupply infrastructure,
officials say
Abigail Hauslohner, Dan Lamothe and Hannah Allam/The Washington Post/May 05/2022
Lviv governor says Russian forces target Ukraine's supply lines
The Kremlin is carrying out strikes on infrastructure that is critical to
Ukraine’s efforts to resupply its forces in their defense against Russia’s
invasion, Ukrainian officials and the Pentagon said Wednesday.
Are you on Telegram? Subscribe to our channel for the latest updates on Russia's
war in Ukraine.
A senior U.S. defense official, speaking to reporters on the condition of
anonymity under ground rules set by the Pentagon, said Ukraine is still able to
move weapons through the country.
Russia’s targets on Tuesday and Wednesday included electrical substations, a
railroad facility and a bridge in two major cities in western and central
Ukraine. Strikes on Tuesday night caused severe damage at three electrical
substations in Lviv, a critical hub for assistance entering the country from
Eastern Europe, delaying trains and wiping out power for about a quarter of a
million people.
“It was a deliberate blow to supply chains,” Lviv’s regional governor, Maksym
Kozytskyy, said in a statement.
In Ukrainian villages, whispers of collaboration with the Russians
The head of Ukrainian railways reported Wednesday night that fresh attacks had
targeted a railroad facility and a bridge in the populous central city of Dnipro.
Video verified by The Washington Post showed explosions on a bridge in the
city’s center that appears to be used by both cars and trains. Dnipro Mayor
Borys Filatov reported shelling in the area and warned residents to seek
shelter.
“Today, the Russian invaders launched another missile strike at our cities,”
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in his nightly video address. “At
Dnipro, Mykolaiv, Odessa, Zaporizhzhia. At the cities of Donbas and other
regions of our country. All these crimes will get proper answers. Both legal and
quite practical — on the battlefield.”
Ukrainian economists said this week that the country has suffered up to $600
billion in economic losses from Russia’s invasion — including $92 billion in
damage to hundreds of factories, medical facilities, schools, bridges, religious
facilities, cars and warehouses and other infrastructure.
People stand May 4 in front of a building damaged by a missile strike in the
western Ukrainian city of Lviv. (Yuriy Dyachyshyn/AFP/Getty Images)
As the war reached the 10-week mark, Oleksandr Pavliuk, head of the Kyiv
Regional Military Administration, said on Telegram that investigators have
discovered more bodies with signs of torture in the village of Kalynivka, about
20 miles southwest of the capital.
Kyiv regional police chief Andriy Nebytov said that as of Wednesday, his police
had “identified and examined” 1,235 bodies of civilians killed by Russian forces
in the region.
A different grim scene was emerging Wednesday in the shattered southern port
city of Mariupol, where Ukrainian officials said heavy fighting had engulfed the
Azovstal steel plant a day after a United Nations-led humanitarian convoy
evacuated more than 150 civilians from underground shelters there.
Mariupol Mayor Vadym Boychenko said Wednesday that Russian troops were using
tanks and heavy bombs to strike at the remaining Ukrainian forces inside the
complex, who could no longer communicate with him.
“Unfortunately today the connection with the boys broke off. There is no
connection to understand what is happening, whether or not they are safe,”
Boychenko said.
E.U. proposes ban on Russian oil imports by year's end
Ukrainian officials also said Russian forces were forcing residents who remained
in Mariupol — who Boychenko said number more than 100,000 — to help clear debris
elsewhere in the city, in preparation for a parade next week. The parade on May
9 would be in celebration of Russia’s Victory Day holiday, which commemorates
the Soviet Union’s role in defeating the Nazis at the end of World War II.
“To this end, the city is urgently cleaning the central streets of debris, the
bodies of killed and unexploded ordnance,” Ukraine’s defense intelligence agency
said Wednesday.
Petro Andryushchenko, an adviser to Mariupol’s mayor, said residents were being
forced to clear the rubble “in exchange for food.” His claims could not be
independently verified.
What Victory Day means for Russian identity
To Russians at home, Putin has cast his unprovoked invasion of Ukraine as a
response to a revived Nazi threat, a claim not supported by facts. Analysts have
speculated that Putin might use the Victory Day holiday to officially declare
war on Ukraine, a suggestion that Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov dismissed
Wednesday as “nonsense.”
Peskov, who spoke at a news conference, also told reporters that peace
negotiations with Ukraine are at an impasse, and blamed Kyiv. “They change their
position every day,” he said. “This does not inspire confidence that this
negotiation process can somehow end successfully.”
Ukraine, too, has said the talks are in danger of collapsing, and that the
countries have held no face-to-face discussions since March.
In Luhansk on Wednesday, Serhiy Haidai, the regional governor, said the cities
of Popasna, Rubizhne and Severodonetsk have seen intensified Russian shelling in
recent days that left at least two people dead. Hadai wrote on Telegram that
about 50,000 people were in need of evacuation, with water and electricity badly
disrupted.
But evacuations are not possible amid the fighting, he said.
Russian media, meanwhile, reported that Ukrainian shelling had set fire to four
large tanks at an oil depot in the neighboring Donetsk region, in an area under
the control of Russian-backed separatists. One person was reported killed in the
incident.
Cracks emerge in Russian elite as tycoons start to bemoan invasion
Belarus, the Kremlin’s major ally on Ukraine’s northern border, announced it had
launched large-scale drills to test the readiness of its armed forces to respond
quickly to “possible crises” from the air and ground.
The Belarusian Defense Ministry said in a statement that the training exercise
would not “pose any threat to the European community as a whole or to
neighboring countries in particular.”
U.S. defense officials said they saw no sign that Belarus was planning to enter
the war, but Ukrainian officials were more wary. Andriy Demchenko, a spokesman
for Ukraine’s state border guard service, said the border with Belarus was
“constantly being strengthened.”
“We do not rule out that the territory of Belarus could be used at some point …
against Ukraine,” he said. “So we are ready.”
Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, a close ally of Putin, allowed
Russian troops to assemble and conduct military drills in the Eastern European
country in the run-up to Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24. And a large
contingent of Russia’s invasion force crossed into Ukraine from Belarus.
Also Wednesday, Pope Francis issued a stinging criticism of the leader of the
Russian Orthodox Church, telling an Italian newspaper that he had warned
Patriarch Kirill earlier this spring not to be “Putin’s altar boy.”
The populations of both Russia and Ukraine are majority Orthodox.
In a Tuesday interview with the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera, Francis
said that during a meeting over Zoom on March 16, Kirill read from a sheet of
paper to list the justifications for Russia’s invasion.
“Brother, we are not state clerics,” Francis recalled telling Kirill. “We cannot
use the language of politics but that of Jesus. We are pastors of the same holy
people of God. Because of this, we must seek avenues of peace, to put an end to
the firing of weapons.”
Allam reported from Lviv, Ukraine. David Stern in Muchakevo, Ukraine; Dalton
Bennett, Karoun Demirjian, Reis Thebault and Herman Wong in Washington; Amar
Nadhir in Bucharest; Bryan Pietsch in Seoul; and Ellen Francis and Adela Suliman
in London contributed to this report.
War in Ukraine: What you need to know
The latest: Russia has stepped up missile attacks across Ukraine, striking
railways and power stations in the latest sign that the Kremlin may be trying to
restrict the flow of weapons in the east. The first evacuees from the Azovstal
steel plant in Mariupol have also reached Zaporizhzhia.
The fight: Russian forces continue to mount sporadic attacks on civilian targets
in a number of Ukrainian cities. Ukrainian prosecutors have been taking detailed
testimony from victims to investigate Russian war crimes.
The Palestinian State Bill: Palestinians Ask That More Arab
Repression Not Be Allowed
Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone Institute/May 05/2022
According to the new bill, foreign journalists who do not endorse the
Palestinian narrative or who do not "respect the Palestinian identity and
history" may soon be banned from operating in PA-controlled areas.
The same restriction applies to Palestinian media organizations and journalists
seeking permits to operate in these territories.
The PA leadership apparently fears that stories about corruption, anti-Israel
incitement and terrorism will prompt Western donors to halt their funding to the
Palestinians.
Unlike other Arab regimes, however, the PA is almost entirely dependent on
foreign aid from the US, the European Union and other international donors, who
do not seem the least bit bothered by the Palestinian leadership's measures to
curb freedom of expression and deprive its people of an independent media.
In response, several Palestinian human rights and media organizations, including
the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate, expressed deep concern and disapproval of
the PA leadership's intention to hijack the media.
The Palestinian Journalists Syndicate also warned that the draft bill, if
approved, would have a negative impact on the international community's support
for the Palestinians and undermine Palestinians' "dream of a modern Palestinian
state that respects basic rights and freedoms."
Sadly, the Palestinians harbor no hope that their current leaders will work
towards establishing a state where public freedoms and human rights are valued
and respected.
The Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Hamas in the Gaza Strip are
corrupt dictatorships that care only about their own interests.
What remains difficult for Palestinians to understand is the continuing silence
of the international community and foreign media towards the human rights
violations and restrictions on the institutions of democracy and freedom of
speech perpetrated by the Palestinian leaders in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
The leadership of the Palestinian Authority (PA) apparently fears that stories
about corruption, anti-Israel incitement and terrorism will prompt Western
donors to halt their funding to the Palestinians. According to a new draft law
proposed by the PA leadership, foreign journalists who do not endorse the
Palestinian narrative or who do not "respect the Palestinian identity and
history" may soon be banned from operating in PA-controlled areas.
While the US administration and many countries seem enthusiastic about the
establishment of a Palestinian state, the Palestinians themselves are worried
that such a state would end up like most of the corrupt and authoritarian
regimes in the Arab world.
The Palestinians' concern was recently reinforced when they learned that the
Palestinian Authority (PA) is planning to impose even harsher restrictions on
the Palestinian and foreign media.
The restrictions are included in a draft law concerning the conditions for the
licensing of media organizations operating in PA-controlled territories in the
West Bank. The bill, currently being studied by the PA government, may soon be
approved, turning it into official law.
According to the new bill, foreign journalists who do not endorse the
Palestinian narrative or who do not "respect the Palestinian identity and
history" may soon be banned from operating in PA-controlled areas.
The same restriction applies to Palestinian media organizations and journalists
seeking permits to operate in these territories.
The bill comes in the context of the PA leadership's ongoing effort to silence
its critics and tighten its grip on the foreign and local journalists covering
Palestinian affairs.
It also comes in the context of the PA leadership's effort to ensure that
journalists refrain from reporting stories that could reflect negatively on the
Palestinians, especially regarding financial corruption and vicious incitement
and terrorism against Israel.
The PA, which does not tolerate any form of criticism, wants to ensure that the
local and foreign media's attention remains focused on anti-Israel coverage.
This is not a new policy for the PA.
In fact, this has been the PA leadership's policy since its establishment in
1994, after the signing of the Oslo Accords with Israel.
This policy aims to intimidate journalists and their media organizations and
prevent them from reporting stories that could harm the PA leadership's image
and reputation.
The PA leadership apparently fears that stories about corruption, anti-Israel
incitement and terrorism will prompt Western donors to halt their funding to the
Palestinians.
The timing of the proposed bill is not coincidental.
It comes on the eve of the meeting in a few weeks of the Ad Hoc Liaison
Committee, a committee consisting of donor countries that serves as the main
policy-level coordination mechanism for development assistance to the
Palestinian people.
The PA leadership is hoping that the committee will approve additional and
unconditional funding for the Palestinians.
That is why it is critical for PA leader Mahmoud Abbas and his senior officials
in Ramallah, the de facto capital of the Palestinians, to ensure that the media
remains muzzled about rampant corruption and other issues related to bad
governance, and human rights violations by the Palestinian security forces.
Palestinians on the street are saying that instead of working towards
guaranteeing a free media and freedom of expression, the PA is seeking to
tighten its grip on Palestinian media outlets as part of an effort to prevent
the publication of stories that reflect negatively on the PA leadership.
In this regard, the PA leadership is no different from other Arab totalitarian
regimes that have absolute control of the media and crack down on all forms of
criticism and opposition media outlets.
Unlike other Arab regimes, however, the PA is almost entirely dependent on
foreign aid from the US, the European Union and other international donors, who
do not seem the least bit bothered by the Palestinian leadership's measures to
curb freedom of expression and deprive its people of an independent media.
The proposed law grants the PA government's Ministry of Information, Ministry of
Interior (which is in charge of the Palestinian security forces) and the
Ministry of Telecom and Information Technology wide powers to approve or reject
the licensing of newspapers and TV and radio stations.
According to the bill, the media organizations are required, as a precondition
for obtaining a license, to commit to "maintaining public order, public security
and the requirements of the public interest, refrain from broadcasting any
immoral content or anything that is incompatible with the values and
principles of Palestinian society, respect the Palestinian identity and history,
and not to broadcast any media material that would prejudice the Palestinian
identity or prejudice the Palestinian narrative."
In addition, the media organizations are required to obtain security clearance
and the approval of the Ministry of Information to replace a director or
editor-in-chief. They are also required to provide the ministry with all written
contracts of the workers and journalists as a condition for receiving a license.
The bill grants the PA Minister of Information the right to stop the work of any
Palestinian or foreign media organization in the West Bank "that does not
respect the Palestinian identity and history."
In response, several Palestinian human rights and media organizations, including
the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate, expressed deep concern and disapproval of
the PA leadership's intention to hijack the media.
Palestinian organizations are saying that the proposed law was aimed at serving
and promoting the interests of the PA leadership alone. If approved, they are
cautioning, the law would contribute to restricting the work of media
institutions and limit freedom of expression, negatively affecting civil peace
and raising the state of internal tension.
"The organizations believe that this [new measure] comes in the context of a
wave of legislation recently issued by the Palestinian Authority with the aim of
granting more control to the executive authority and the attack on institutions
that protect democratic values and ensure the application of the principles of
good governance," reads a statement by the Palestinian Coalition for
Accountability and Integrity (AMAN), which describes itself as a civil society
organization that seeks to combat corruption and promote integrity, transparency
and accountability in the Palestinian society.
The organizations warned that such legislation would "harm the reputation of the
future Palestinian state with regard to respect for human rights and the values
of freedom and democracy."
The Palestinian Journalists Syndicate also warned that the draft bill, if
approved, would have a negative impact on the international community's support
for the Palestinians and undermine Palestinians' "dream of a modern Palestinian
state that respects basic rights and freedoms."
The Palestinian organizations stressed that ensuring the freedom, plurality and
independence of the media comes within the respect and protection of the right
to good governance and the rule of law, as well as enhancing the principle of
transparency and accountability.
They urged the PA leadership not to endorse the proposed law and instead to
launch discussions with human rights and media groups to reach agreement on
legislation that takes into account democratic values.
Sadly, the Palestinians harbor no hope that their current leaders will work
towards establishing a state where public freedoms and human rights are valued
and respected.
The Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Hamas in the Gaza Strip are
corrupt dictatorships that care only about their own interests.
What remains difficult for Palestinians to understand is the continuing silence
of the international community and foreign media towards the human rights
violations and restrictions on the institutions of democracy and freedom of
speech perpetrated by the Palestinian leaders in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
*Khaled Abu Toameh is an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem.
© 2022 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Biden: ‘So Many Muslims Are Targeted With Violence’ and
‘Oppressed for Their Religious Beliefs’
Raymond Ibrahim/May 05/2022
Day by day, it seems that the ruling class and their media mouthpiece are
dedicated to one principle: find problems where none exist and ignore real
problems that are in desperate need of attention.
Consider the words of U.S. President Joe Biden, spoken during Eid al-Fitr with
Muslims at the White House on May 2. He said:
[T]oday, around the world, we’re seeing so many Muslims being targeted with
violence. No one, no one should discriminate against oppressed or be oppressed
for their religious beliefs…. Muslims make our nation stronger every single day,
even as they still face real challenges and threats in our society, including
targeted violence and Islamophobia that exists.
Now, let’s briefly parse these surreal claims:
[T]oday, around the world, we’re seeing so many Muslims being targeted with
violence. Where are the statistics for this claim? Rather, what we’re used to
seeing is Muslims targeting non-Muslims with violence. According to one tally,
for example, during just this last Ramadan, or basically the month of April
2022, Muslims launched 177 terror attacks “in the name of Islam” that murdered
1,086 people. Again, that’s just during one month—Islam’s “holiest” month. The
same tally finds that there were zero attacks and zero deaths by non-Muslims
operating under the name of their religions.
No one, no one should discriminate against oppressed or be oppressed for their
religious beliefs. Of course, everyone agrees with this—except, apparently, the
one group that Biden was speaking to and presenting as “oppressed,” namely,
Muslims: systematic discrimination and oppression are endemic to the Muslim
world, and that’s because systematic discrimination and oppression are integral
parts of the religion of Islam and codified in sharia. If you’re a non-Muslim,
you are openly treated as inferior and with fewer rights. That’s if you’re
lucky; otherwise, you’re outright persecuted and possibly killed for your faith.
As a recent report found, 360 million Christians around the world are persecuted
for their religious identity—and the overwhelming majority of that persecution
occurs in Muslim nations. In fact, the persecution Christians experience in 39
of the worst 50 nations is due to Islam. Yet never a word about this from Biden.
Instead: Muslims make our nation stronger every single day, even as they still
face real challenges and threats in our society, including targeted violence and
Islamophobia that exists.
While one can point to several ways Muslims potentially make the U.S. weaker
every day—from terror attacks and violent crimes to engaging in propaganda and
subverting the nation from within—it would be helpful to list one reason as to
how “Muslims make our nation stronger every single day.” Sure, it sounds nice,
but some concrete examples, please.
As for Biden’s complaint about “targeted violence and Islamophobia that exists,”
as seen, whatever that may be, it is a tithe of the targeted violence that
Muslims launch on others.
As for the “Islamophobia that exists”—and which has existed since Islam was
born, for obvious reasons—it is simply a manifestation of the fact that more and
more people are learning the truths of Muhammad’s creed, despite the talking
points of Biden and the rest.
A Message to the Biden Team on Ukraine: Talk Less
Thomas L. Friedman/The New York Times/May 05/2022
Growing up in Minnesota, I was a huge fan of the local NHL team at the time, the
North Stars, and they had a sportscaster, Al Shaver, who gave me my first lesson
in politics and military strategy. He ended his shows with this sign-off: “When
you lose, say little. When you win, say less. Goodnight and good
sports.”President Biden and his team would do well to embrace Shaver’s wisdom.
Last week, in Poland, standing near the border with Ukraine, US Defense
Secretary Lloyd Austin got my attention — and certainly Vladimir Putin’s — when
he declared that America’s war aim in Ukraine is no longer just helping Ukraine
restore its sovereignty, but is also to produce a “weakened” Russia.
“We want to see Russia weakened to the degree that it can’t do the kinds of
things that it has done in invading Ukraine,” he said. “So, it has already lost
a lot of military capability. And a lot of its troops, quite frankly. And we
want to see them not have the capability to very quickly reproduce that
capability.”
Please tell me that this statement was a result of a National Security Council
meeting led by the president. And that they decided, after carefully weighing
all the second- and third-order consequences, that it is in our interest and
within our power to so badly degrade Russia’s military that it will not be able
to project power again — soon? ever? not clear — and that we can do that without
risking a nuclear response from a humiliated Putin. Have no doubts: I hope that
this war ends with Russia’s military sharply degraded and Putin out of power.
I’d just never say so publicly if I were in leadership, because it buys you
nothing and can potentially cost you a lot.
Loose lips sink ships — and they also lay the groundwork for overreach in
warfare, mission creep, a disconnect between ends and means and huge unintended
consequences.
There has been way too much of this from the Biden team, and the messes have
required too much mopping up. For instance, a short time after Austin’s
statement, a National Security Council spokesperson said, according to CNN, that
the secretary’s comments reflected US goals, namely “to make this invasion a
strategic failure for Russia.”Nice try — but that was a contrived cleanup
effort. Forcing Russia to withdraw from Ukraine is not the same as declaring
that we want to see it weakened so badly that it can never do this again
anywhere — that’s an ill-defined war aim. How do you know when that is achieved?
And is it an ongoing process — do we keep degrading Russia?
In March in a speech in Poland, Biden said that Putin, “a dictator, bent on
rebuilding an empire, will never erase a people’s love for liberty,” and then
the president added, “For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power.” In the
wake of that statement, the White House contended that Biden “was not discussing
Putin’s power in Russia, or regime change,” but rather was making the point that
Putin “cannot be allowed to exercise power over his neighbors or the region.”
Another cleanup word salad that just convinces me that the National Security
Council didn’t have a meeting that set limits on where US involvement to assist
Ukraine stops and starts. Instead, people are freelancing. That’s not good.
Our goal began simple and should stay simple: Help Ukrainians fight as long as
they have the will and help them negotiate when they feel the time is right — so
they can restore their sovereignty and we can reaffirm the principle that no
country can just devour the country next door. Freelance beyond that and we
invite trouble. How so? For starters, I don’t want America responsible for what
happens in Russia if Putin is toppled. Because one of three things will most
likely result:
(1) Putin is replaced by someone worse.
(2) Chaos breaks out in Russia, a country with some 6,000 nuclear warheads.
(3) Putin is replaced by someone better. A better leader in Russia would make
the whole world better. I pray for that. But for that person to have legitimacy
in a post-Putin Russia, it’s vital that it does not appear that we installed him
or her. That needs to be a Russian process.
If we get Door No. 1 or Door No. 2, you wouldn’t want the Russian people or the
world holding America responsible for unleashing prolonged instability in
Russia. Remember our fear of “loose nukes” in Russia after the fall of communism
in the 1990s?
We also don’t want Putin to separate us from our allies — not all of whom would
sign on for a war whose goal is not just liberating Ukraine but also ousting
Putin. Without naming names, the Turkish foreign minister, Mevlut Cavusoglu,
recently complained that some NATO allies actually “want the war to continue.
They want Russia to become weaker.”
Remember: A lot of countries in the world are neutral in this war because, as
much as they might sympathize with Ukrainians, they really don’t like to see
America or NATO act like a bully — even toward Putin. If this is going to be a
long war, and Ukraine is able to recover all or most of its territory, it is
vital that this be perceived as Putin vs. the world, not Putin vs. America.
And let’s be careful not to raise Ukrainian expectations too high. Small
countries that suddenly get the backing of big powers can get intoxicated. Many
things have changed about Ukraine since the end of the Cold War — except one:
its geography. It is still, and it will always be, a relatively small nation on
Russia’s border. It is going to have to make some hard compromises before this
conflict is over. Let’s not make it even harder for it by adding unrealistic
goals.
At the same time, be careful about falling in love with a country you could not
find on a map with 10 tries a year ago. Ukraine has a history of political
corruption and thuggish oligarchs, but it was making progress toward democratic
reforms before the Russian invasion. It has not become Denmark in the last three
months, although, God bless them, a lot of young people there are really trying,
and I want to support them.
The Biden team has done so well so far with its limited goals. It should stay
there.
“The war in Ukraine gave the administration an opportunity to demonstrate the
US’s unique assets in the world today: Its ability to forge and hold a global
alliance of countries to confront an act of authoritarian aggression; and
second, the capacity to wield an economic super weapon in response that only the
dominance of the dollar in the global economy makes possible,” explained Nader
Mousavizadeh, founder and CEO of Macro Advisory Partners, a geostrategic
consulting firm.
If the US can continue to effectively deploy those two assets, he added, “it
will vastly improve our long-term power and standing in the world and send a
very powerful deterrent message to both Russia and China.”
In foreign affairs, success breeds authority and credibility, and credibility
and authority breed more success. Just restoring Ukraine’s sovereignty, and
frustrating Putin’s military there, would be a huge achievement with lasting
dividends. Al Shaver knew what he was talking about: When you lose, say little.
When you win, say less. Everyone can see the score.
Phares: America’s 5 Strategic Challenges in Asia
Dr. Walid Phares/May 05/2022
By the beginning of Obama’s second term, Washington planned to gradually
reposition U.S. military power from the Greater Middle East into the Pacific
region as a projected (but remote) counterweight to China’s growing power. The
move, however, aimed at setting up the U.S. presence in and around Australia,
away from any hot spot theaters.
This shift came as rationale for the first withdrawal from Iraq towards the end
of 2011, to prepare for an Afghanistan pull-out, and eventually for an Iran
Deal, which was already under discussions. The Obama doctrine, introduced in
June 2009 through his speech in Cairo and the letter to Khamenei, was to
disengage from the Arab Muslim world and focus on the Pacific.
But the rapid withdrawal from Iraq and its penetration by Iran-backed
militias, along with the subsequent ISIS invasion of parts of Syria and Iraq,
forced the U.S. to again fight the new Jihadi threat in the region and postpone
the Afghan pullout. Priority was, however, still given to the Iran deal, signed
in 2015.The Trump administration changed priorities, escalated against ISIS,
withdrew from the Iran Deal, increased support to Israel and the Arab Coalition
against Iran’s militias, launched the historic Abraham Accords, sent a task
force to deter North Korea before meeting with its leader, and kept pressure on
China and Russia for four years. The Biden
administration reverted to the Obama platform, changed U.S. posture again,
rushed to re-sign the JCPOA, and pressured Israel and the Arabs to limit their
responses to the Iranian backed forces in the region as Russia, China and North
Korea began to rebel against U.S. leadership of the international community.This
shift backward in Washington came with dramatic developments worldwide. Russia
invaded Ukraine, China thrust into the Pacific, Pyongyang re-escalated, and Iran
gained ground.
On the global stage, we can clearly see that the Eurasian continent (Asia plus
Russia) is drifting away from American influence, and the U.S. is now facing
five major strategic challenges in that part of the world.
Russia: By its blitz into Ukrainian areas, Moscow transformed the world order.
The U.N. Security Council is paralyzed by two veto powers, Russia and China.
U.S. sanctions are strong and unparalleled against the Russian economy and
leadership, but they haven’t stopped Russian forces from advancing in the east
and the south of Ukraine.
The administration’s strategies to overcome this challenge face an historic
dilemma. As a leader of West, the U.S. is expected to lead the campaign to
defend and liberate Ukraine, even if only by arming the latter.
But geopolitically, that could mean a protracted conflict against a
nuclear-armed and massive country, stretching from Kaliningrad to just across
the waters from Alaska. And that means a span covering the entirety of Asia to
the north.
China: Beijing didn’t endorse the operation in Ukraine, but it is providing
rhetorical and logistical support to Russia to resist Western pressure.
The third nuclear power and the prime holder of U.S. debts is taking advantage
of the War in Europe. It is declaring its ownership of Taiwan, consolidating its
presence in the South China Sea, rapidly producing advanced missiles, and
recently acquiring a military launching pad in the mid Pacific via the Solomon
Islands. The current administration now faces a
dilemma in Asia: Escalate containment with China across the Pacific, mobilize on
two fronts along with Russia, or focus on the latter and allow Chinese expansion
to go unchecked? East Asia is escaping.
North Korea: Chairman Kim, watching Moscow and Beijing “resisting” NATO and the
United States, is at it again, launching more ballistic missiles, stressing
South Korea and Japan. The third challenge facing the administration: Should the
U.S. again send task forces to the Peninsula in the midst of global tensions
with Russia and China — or not?
Iran: The regime is artfully playing the West via a well-executed ballet at the
Vienna talks, using world concerns about Ukraine and the Pacific to demand
conditions that would maximize their own position. The fourth challenge: Should
the U.S. abandon the deal, pressuring Iran who is remobilizing in the region —
or should they sign the deal and empower Tehran?
Afghanistan: The challenge in Afghanistan is much heavier than it appears to be
at first glance. The rapid chaotic U.S. withdrawal of summer 2021 was read by
Moscow, Beijing, Pyongyang, and Tehran as weakness and unwillingness to face off
with militias, emboldening each of them to take action. We are losing Asia
because of how we fled Afghanistan. These five
challenges may generate more crises on other continents. We need to reevaluate
our foreign policy, but that needs a national consensus, which is unfortunately
absent. Maybe after November?
*Dr. Walid Phares, is a Newsmax foreign policy analyst
– beginning in April of 2022. Since 2009, he has served as co-secretary of the
Transatlantic Parliamentary Group. He has also served as a foreign policy
adviser to Donald Trump in 2016 and was a national security adviser (in 2011) to
now-Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Ariz. Dr. Phares is a noted author, professor and
Mideast expert, as well as a former Fox News and MSNBC contributor.
د.ماجد رافيزادا: لهذه الأسباب فإن أي اتفاق نووي مع إيران سيكون مصيره الفشل
Why any new nuclear deal with Iran is destined to collapse
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Arab News/May 05/2022
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/108510/dr-majid-rafizadeh-why-any-new-nuclear-deal-with-iran-is-destined-to-collapse-%d8%af-%d9%85%d8%a7%d8%ac%d8%af-%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%81%d9%8a%d8%b2%d8%a7%d8%af%d8%a7-%d9%84%d9%87%d8%b0%d9%87-%d8%a7%d9%84/
It is important for the world powers to understand that any renegotiated nuclear
deal with the clerical regime of Iran will most likely fall apart.
First of all, there is significant opposition in the US to a new nuclear deal
with the Iranian regime. This means that, regardless of what is signed, Congress
can still inflict new economic sanctions on the Islamic Republic, escalating
tensions between Tehran and Washington. Due to the widespread opposition, there
is also a distinct possibility that, whenever the US gets another Republican
president, his or her administration will likely pull the US out of the nuclear
deal just like Donald Trump did.
The opposition to a new nuclear deal does not only come from politicians, but
also from the military. For example, 45 retired US generals and admirals last
month sent an entreaty, titled “Open Letter from US Military Leaders Opposing
Iran Nuclear Deal,” to the Biden administration, warning it against reviving the
deal. They wrote: “The new Iran deal currently being negotiated, which Russia
has played a central role in crafting, will enable the world’s leading state
sponsor of terrorism to cast its own nuclear shadow over the Middle East. As
retired American military leaders who devoted their lives to the defense of our
nation, we oppose this emerging deal that is poised to instantly fuel explosive
Iranian aggression and pave Iran’s path to become a nuclear power, threatening
the American homeland and the very existence of America’s regional allies.”
Although any nuclear deal will involve Iran and the P5+1 powers (the UK, Russia,
China, France and the US, plus Germany), the two key players are Washington and
Tehran. As the international community previously witnessed, when the Trump
administration pulled the US out of the nuclear deal, the Iran regime also
stopped complying with its commitments. This is due to the fact the US plays a
crucial role in the global financial system. If American sanctions against Iran
remain in place, many other countries and corporations will hesitate to do
business with Tehran.
The regime has shown in the past four decades that it cannot be trusted to
respect international agreements, laws and norms.
The EU also cannot singlehandedly help Iran skirt US sanctions. For example,
after the US left the original nuclear deal in 2018, the EU attempted to salvage
it. The three European signatories to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action —
Germany, France and the UK — set up a new trading mechanism called INSTEX. But
it did not help Tehran because it only dealt with pharmaceutical goods, medical
devices and food products, while Iran’s main revenues come from the energy
sector, notably the export of oil and gas. And European companies did not want
to risk their business with the US or access to US financial systems by dealing
with Iran.
The second reason that any nuclear deal with the ruling clerics is doomed to
fail once again relates to the issue of trust. Unfortunately, the Iranian regime
has shown in the past four decades that it cannot be trusted to respect
international agreements, laws and norms.
The regime is desperate for a nuclear deal with the world powers, not because it
wants to address other nations’ concerns about its nuclear activities but
because it is facing major financial difficulties. The Islamic Republic needs a
nuclear deal so that the US sanctions will be lifted, meaning it will again be
capable of funding its military adventurism throughout the region, its ballistic
missile program and its wide network of militia and terror groups.
This means that, while enjoying the financial fruit of the nuclear deal, the
Iranian regime will most likely continue its nuclear activities clandestinely.
There is evidence that the theocratic establishment was violating the 2015
nuclear deal before the US withdrew. In 2018, two non-partisan organizations
based in Washington — the Institute for Science and International Security and
the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies — released detailed reports about
Iran’s undeclared clandestine nuclear facilities. In addition, the detection of
radioactive particles in Turquzabad in 2019, Iran’s reluctance to answer simple
questions about this secret facility and nonpartisan evidence about Iran’s
nuclear activities at the location all point to the fact that Tehran was most
likely violating the nuclear deal.
In summary, any new nuclear deal with the Iranian regime will most likely fail
due to overwhelming opposition in the US and Tehran’s legacy of failure in
adhering to international agreements and treaties.
*Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a Harvard-educated Iranian-American political scientist.
Twitter: @Dr_Rafizadeh