English LCCC Newsbulletin For
Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For 19 July/2022
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news
The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2021/english.july19.22.htm
News Bulletin Achieves
Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations For today
‘Whoever listens to you listens to me, and whoever rejects
you rejects me, and whoever rejects me rejects the one who sent me.’”
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint
Luke 10/13-16:”‘Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the deeds of
power done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long
ago, sitting in sackcloth and ashes. But at the judgement it will be more
tolerable for Tyre and Sidon than for you. And you, Capernaum, will you be
exalted to heaven? No, you will be brought down to Hades.‘Whoever listens to you
listens to me, and whoever rejects you rejects me, and whoever rejects me
rejects the one who sent me.’”
Titels
For English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News
& Editorials published on July 18-19/2022
Israel Military Intercepts Drone That Came from Lebanon
Israel says downed small drone likely belonging to Hezbollah
Reports: Hochstein may visit Beirut within two weeks
Aoun says spared no effort for reform, urges formation of new govt.
Aoun urges judiciary to issue rulings in pending cases
Berri tells US delegation no time to waste in border demarcation file
Lebanon’s Maronite Patriarch Calls for Electing Impartial President
Naqoura Tunnel' a New Conflict Issue between Lebanon and Israel
Lebanon's Baalbek festival back, despite economic collapse
Raad: Lebanese are masters of their country and its policies
Jumblat slams Syria, Hezbollah, says Lebanon 'gone with the wind'
FPM welcomes Arab support for Lebanon in Jeddah summit
Civil servants' wages tripled for 2 months, transport allowance hiked from March
Finance committee approves banking secrecy amendments
US delegation urges Lebanon to speed up government formation
Aoun stresses Sunnis’ role in preserving Lebanon unity
Lebanon needs a hero to save it from Hezbollah/Dalia Al-Aqidi/Arab News/July
18/2022
The Evening News and the Forms of Assault against the Pain of the Lebanese/Hazem
Saghieh/Asharq Al Awsat/July 18/2022
LIC Statement on the New Lebanese Parliament
Lebanon LGBTQ community suffers setback amid wider clampdown
Titles For Latest English LCCC
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
July 18-19/2022
Iran, Russia, Turkey presidents to talk Syria war in Tehran
Kohavi: Attack on Iran at Center of Israeli Army Preparations
Macron talks diesel with UAE leader
Russian Shelling Kills Six in East Ukrainian Town
Why Does Russia Want to Remove the Syrian Political Process from Geneva?
Iraq Prosecution to Probe 'Maliki WikiLeaks'
Italy's Embattled PM Draghi Visits Algeria for Gas Talks
Tunisia’s Ghannouchi Investigated on Terrorism Charges
Explosion of Violence in South Sudan Threatens Peace Pact
Titles For LCCC English
analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on July 18-19/2022
Britain's New PM Must Get Real on Iran/Con Coughlin/Gatestone
Institute./July 18/ 2022
Three Figures Made the Date in Jeddah/Ghassan Charbel/Asharq Al Awsat/July
18/2022
Biden and Putin: A tale of two visits/Baria Alamuddin/Arab News/July 18, 2022
The Latest English LCCC Lebanese &
Lebanese Related News & Editorials published
on July 18-19/2022
Israel Military Intercepts Drone That Came
from Lebanon
Asharq Al-Awsat/Monday, 18 July, 2022
Israel's military said on Monday it had intercepted a small drone that crossed
into the country from Lebanon, adding that it had likely been sent by the
Iranian-backed group Hezbollah. The drone had been tracked by Israel throughout
its flight, the military said. "The Israel Defense Forces will continue to
operate in order to prevent any attempt to violate Israeli sovereignty," it
said. Hezbollah has occasionally sent drones into Israeli airspace before,
calling them reconnaissance missions.
Israel says downed small drone likely belonging to
Hezbollah
Naharnet/Monday, 18 July, 2022
The Israeli army on Monday said it brought down a small quadcopter drone likely
belonging to Hezbollah after it crossed from southern Lebanon into Israel.
“Earlier today, the Israeli Defense Forces detected the infiltration of a drone
from Lebanese territory into Israeli territory before bringing it down. The
aerial surveillance units monitored the drone throughout the incident,” Israeli
army Arabic-language spokesman Avichay Adraee tweeted, adding that the
quadcopter drone “seems to be linked to terrorist Hezbollah.”“We will continue
to work to prevent any violation of Israel’s sovereignty,” Adraee added. The
spokesman also published a photo of the apparently unscathed drone, which
indicates that it was likely brought down through technological means. The
incident comes around two weeks after Israel shot down three unarmed Hezbollah
UAVs headed for the Karish offshore gas field. Hezbollah said those drones were
on a “reconnaissance” mission aimed at delivering a “message” to Israel as to
the sea border dispute with Lebanon. Israel later revealed that it had shot down
another Hezbollah drone on June 29 as it was still flying in Lebanon’s airspace.
Reports: Hochstein may visit Beirut within two weeks
Naharnet/Monday, 18 July, 2022
U.S. energy mediator Amos Hochstein may visit Beirut within two weeks, amid
reports of progress in the file of sea border demarcation between Lebanon and
Israel. “A U.S. endeavor will kick off within the next two weeks, through an
expected visit by U.S. mediator Amos Hochstein aimed at reviving the
negotiations,” Lebanon’s al-Binaa newspaper reported on Monday. “A solution will
be eventually reached, seeing as the intersection of interests among major
powers will impose a solution on Lebanon and Israel, especially that the U.S. is
giving this file great importance as part of its war with Russia,” the daily
added. The report comes two days after General Security chief Maj. Gen. Abbas
Ibrahim said that “Lebanon is before a very big chance to regain its wealthiness
through the demarcation of the maritime border.”“I believe we’re only weeks away
from achieving this objective,” Ibrahim added. “I believe that what we will
reach as to border demarcation is less than a right but rather a settlement.
Unfortunately, the international and regional circumstances oblige us to reach a
settlement, seeing as our right is neither Line 29 nor Line 23, but rather
entire Palestine,” Ibrahim said.
Aoun says spared no effort for reform, urges formation of new govt.
Naharnet/Monday, 18 July, 2022
President Michel Aoun said Monday that he has “spared no effort in order to
achieve the aspired reform.”He, however, added that each time he used to “run
into domestic obstacles that left their negative repercussions on the progress
of the situations.”Aoun voiced his remarks in a meeting with a delegation from
the American Task Force for Lebanon comprised of Edward Gabriel, Nijad Fares and
Jay Ghazal. The delegation was accompanied by U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Dorothy
Shea. “The negotiations with the International Monetary Fund have reached
specific results that must be continued and it is necessary to form a new
government to follow up on this essential file that is vital for the future of
economic revival,” Aoun added. Responding to a question from the delegation, the
President stressed that “it is unacceptable to delay the process of demarcating
the southern maritime border” with Israel. He also underscored the need to
“activate the U.S. mediation that is being led by Ambassador Amos Hochstein, in
order to reach quick results and enable Lebanon to invest in its oil and gas
rights in its waters, while preserving the stability of the border.”
Aoun also emphasized that the “time factor” is crucial in this regard.
Aoun urges judiciary to issue rulings in pending
cases
Naharnet/Monday, 18 July, 2022
President Michel Aoun on Monday stressed the need for the judiciary to issue
rulings in the “pending cases, especially those related to financial lawsuits
and the Beirut port blast crime.”“The families of the victims and the detainees
are still awaiting the judiciary’s rulings,” Aoun said in a meeting in Baabda
with caretaker Justice Minister Henri Khoury, Higher Judicial Council chief
Judge Suheil Abboud, State Prosecutor Ghassan Oueidat and the judges Afif
al-Hakim, Habib Mezher, Elias Richa, Dany Chebli and Mereille al-Haddad.
“It is unacceptable to paralyze judicial work under any excuse and the
perpetrators must be punished, in any position they may be,” the President
added. The National News Agency meanwhile said that the meeting tackled “the
current judicial situations and the work of courts and public prosecutors.”
Berri tells US delegation no time to waste in border
demarcation file
Naharnet/Monday, 18 July, 2022
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri on Monday warned a U.S. delegation against any
further delay in the U.S.-mediated talks between Lebanon and Israel to demarcate
their maritime border. “There is no more time for procrastination and delay in
the demarcation of the sea boundary and for allowing the companies that won the
tenders to start their work,” Berri told a delegation from the American Task
Force for Lebanon, which was accompanied by U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Dorothy
Shea. “There is no justification at all for this delay or prohibition,” Berri
added.
Lebanon’s Maronite Patriarch Calls for Electing Impartial President
Beirut - Asharq Al-Awsat/Monday, 18 July, 2022
Lebanon’s Maronite Patriarch Beshara al-Rahi has urged political parties to
secure the formation of a government and the election of a new president. The
patriarch called for a president who abides by the Lebanese cause, national
principles and Lebanon’s sovereignty and independence, and who respects the
principle of impartiality. He rejected a president who is influenced by the
regional axes. Rahi’s comments came during a mass sermon in the Qannoubine
Valley attended by Caretaker Information Minister Ziad Makari. The patriarch
strongly rejected any delay in the election of a new president. “We cannot call
for Lebanon’s neutrality and choose a president who is biased towards the axes
and thus unable to implement neutrality,” he stressed. On maritime demarcation
talks between Lebanon and Israel, Rahi said that Lebanon “cannot wait for a long
time to extract gas and oil while Israel is already doing so.”He called on the
US, which is mediating the negotiations, to resolve the problem.
Naqoura Tunnel' a New Conflict Issue between Lebanon and Israel
Beirut - Nazir Rida/ Asharq Al-Awsat/Monday, 18
July, 2022
A new point of border conflict was added on Monday to the Lebanese-Israeli file
after a pro-Hezbollah caretaker minister included the so-called “railway tunnel”
established by the English army in the forties between Lebanon and Palestine, to
the lingering border dispute between the two countries. Caretaker Minister of
Public Works and Transport Ali Hamieh included the issue under the title “the
Occupied Naqoura tunnel”, to two other conflict border points of Shebaa Farms
and Kfarshuba Hills, and to the disputed maritime areas where border demarcation
is being negotiated under the UN auspices and US mediation. “Our sovereign
rights lie in our decision to restore every inch of the occupied tunnel, besides
to our decision to restore our land and maritime borders too,” said Hamieh
during a visit to Naqoura where the tunnel lies. The tunnel was built by the
English army between 1942 and 1944 to build a railway for rapid movement between
Lebanon and Palestine. It was closed in 1948 with the declaration of the state
of Israel. According to field sources in south Lebanon, “Israel closed the
tunnel with a cement wall and placed concrete barriers inside it within a
geographical spot located inside Lebanese territory." According to the former
head of the negotiating delegation on the border with Israel, retired Major
General Abdul Rahman Shehaitli, the tunnel lies in Lebanese territories and was
closed by Israel, which is occupying the area where the tunnel is located, a
long time ago. The Israeli side "is encroaching on Lebanese territory at this
point,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat in remarks. The tunnel is located directly on
the coast of Naqoura (the farthest south of Lebanon), while the Israeli forces
installed a gate to the east of it that "encroaches on Lebanese territory for a
distance of about 30 meters as well," he added. “There is no dispute over the
point, but Israel is now refusing to acknowledge it or allow the Lebanese to
reach it. The point is still a pile of stones since 1923. The Israeli army
installed the gate in front of it deep inside Lebanese territory in the year
2000 after the liberation of southern Lebanon,” Shehaitli noted. During his
visit to the tunnel, Hamieh said: “We are on Lebanese soil that is under
Lebanese sovereignty...A study was conducted on the railway tunnel, which was
built during the Second World War in 1942." He added that "we are now in the
process of preparing terms of reference for launching international bids for the
establishment of resorts and facilities.” “We will not give up an inch,” of the
land or maritime borders, Hamieh said, “We also want our rights and borders in
the tunnel until the last square meter.” Anti-Hezbollah parliamentary sources
said the issue adds a new dispute to the lingering border conflict between
Lebanon and Israel.
Lebanon's Baalbek festival back, despite economic
collapse
Associated Press/Monday, 18 July, 2022
Lebanon's renowned Baalbek festival is back, held in front of a live audience
for the first time since 2019, despite the country's economic meltdown and the
coronavirus pandemic. French pianist Simon Ghraichy performed in front of a full
house on Sunday night in what organizers described as a night of hope for
Lebanon's revival. The annual festival in the ancient northeastern city of
soaring Roman columns has long attracted celebrities from around the world. It
had taken a major hit as a result of Lebanon's ongoing, nearly 3-year economic
crisis and the pandemic, which had forced organizers to broadcast live from the
site without an audience in 2020 and 2021. Inside the city's mesmerizing
acropolis, French-Iranian oriental dancer Rana Gorgani twirled to Ghraichy's
piano playing. "I'm so proud to be here in this place full of history and
beauty," Ghraichy, who is of Lebanese and Mexican heritage, told The Associated
Press. Since 1956, the Baalbek International Festival has hosted icons from
Lebanon and the rest of the world, including world-renowned artists like French
singer Charles Aznavour in 1999, English musician Sting in 2001, France's Johnny
Hallyday in 2003 and tenor Placido Domingo a year later. It was also home to
concerts by Lebanon's diva Fayrouz and Egypt's Umm Kulthum. The festival
suffered a 23-year hiatus during Lebanon's civil war and resumed in 1997. Both
residents and tourists attended in large numbers every summer. This year, the
festival comes at a challenging time as Lebanon struggles with an unprecedented
economic crisis, described by the World Bank as one of the worst in modern
history. For many among the audience -- which also included Lebanese officials
and foreign dignitaries -- the evening was a welcome escape. "Baalbek is back,
and we want Lebanon to return to the way we used to know it, which is the
Lebanon of art, culture, openness, and moderation," said former lawmaker Henri
Helou.
Raad: Lebanese are masters of their country and its
policies
Naharnet/Monday, 18 July, 2022
Hezbollah MP Mohammed Raad has said that the Lebanese are the masters of their
country. "We are the ones who decide on our policies in a way that serves the
interests of our children and our future generations," Raad said. "We do not
choose our policies based on programs that the black chambers prepare for us,"
he went on to say. Raad stressed that Israel will not succeed in subjugating the
region and that betting on it is "futile." He added that "the Israeli enemy has
no place in our region."Raad's statement comes a day after the United States and
Saudi Arabia called the Lebanese to form a government that ensures that "Lebanon
does not become a launching point for terrorists, drug smuggling, or other
criminal activities that threaten the stability and security of the region."
Jumblat slams Syria, Hezbollah, says Lebanon 'gone with
the wind'
Naharnet/Monday, 18 July, 2022
Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblat has said that the decision of
war and peace is in the hands of Iran and Hezbollah, as long as Lebanon doesn't
have a defense strategy. In a TV interview, Jumblat urged the Arab states to
support the army, the Internal Security Forces, and the institutions, which are
collapsing. "Lebanon is gone with the wind," Jumblat said, as he mentioned
Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah's statement about the Mediterranean gas. He went on to
criticize the Syrian regime, adding that calling for the Syrian refugees
repatriation is nonsense. "This regime does not care about anyone or any sect,
it uses everyone for its own interests in order to maintain power," Jumblat
said. Earlier on Sunday, Jumblat had criticized U.S. President Joe Biden's visit
to Palestine. He said that the latter had failed to pronounce the name of slain
Palestinian American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh correctly. "He has officially
signed the death certificate of the Palestinian state," Jumblat said of Biden.
FPM welcomes Arab support for Lebanon in Jeddah summit
Naharnet/Monday, 18 July, 2022
The Free Patriotic Movement has welcomed, in a statement, the support of the six
Arab Gulf states, Egypt, Jordan and Iraq for Lebanon. In a joint statement
issued after a summit in Jeddah, the leaders of the nine countries had expressed
their support for Lebanon's "sovereignty, security, and stability."The FPM
considered that Lebanon cannot benefit from any support without implementing the
needed reforms. "In order to stop the collapse, we need a political will to
implement a full reform program," the FPM said. The statement added that
Lebanon's "sovereignty, security, and stability" reflects the FPM's position
regarding Lebanon's right to extract its oil and gas resources and the
repatriation of the Syrian refugees. "We are keen on maintaining the best
relations with the Arab countries, based on openness, cooperation and mutual
respect," the FPM said. The statement called for the neutralization of Lebanon
from the regional conflicts. It expressed the FPM's hope for a comprehensive
dialogue in the region, instead of "violence, wars and sanctions, which have
only brought harm and destruction.""We hope that this summit will lead to the
completion of the nuclear agreement and to a real rapprochement between Iran and
the Gulf states, and that it will bring back Syria to the Arab League," the
statement said.
Civil servants' wages tripled for 2 months, transport
allowance hiked from March
Naharnet/July 18/2022
A ministerial committee on Monday agreed to grant civil servants financial
incentives aimed at putting an end to a public sector strike that has paralyzed
state administrations. The committee also decided to revoke a salary hike that
had been recently granted to judges in an exclusive manner.
“It has been agreed to ensure equality among all public sector employees without
any discrimination,” caretaker Labor Minister Mustafa Bayram announced after the
committee’s meeting. “It has been agreed to approve a host of laws that would
secure a large basket of revenues for the public treasury,” Bayram added. He
announced that accordingly civil servants will be granted two extra salaries for
each of July and August, while hiking the daily transport allowance to LBP
95,000 with a retroactive effect as of last March. The committee’s meeting was
chaired by caretaker PM Najib Mikati and attended by a large number of caretaker
ministers. “We will try in today’s meeting to tackle new ideas with the hope to
reach a solution that would be acceptable to everyone, but meeting the demands
all at once is something impossible and would lead to a bigger collapse of the
situations,” Mikati said during the meeting.
Finance committee approves banking secrecy amendments
Naharnet/July 18/2022
The Finance Parliamentary Committee on Monday “approved the amendments of the
banking secrecy law in a manner that serves preventing tax evasion and combating
corruption, terror funding and illicit enrichment,” Committee head MP Ibrahim
Kanaan said.“Our concern is transparency and preventing selectivity,” Kanaan
added.
US delegation urges Lebanon to speed up government
formation
Najia Houssari/Arab News/July 18/2022
BEIRUT: A delegation from the American Task Force for Lebanon has stressed the
importance of “establishing a social economic program before it is too late.”The
call came after the delegation — accompanied by US ambassador to Lebanon Dorothy
Shea — held talks with several Lebanese officials on Monday. Edward Gabriel,
head of the ATFL, said: “Time is moving quickly, and the government must
expedite laws and policies, carry out the required reforms, and take the
necessary steps to meet the needs of citizens to push forward negotiations with
the International Monetary Fund. We need a partner, and that partner is the
government, which has to act quickly to achieve what is required from it.” The
US provided aid worth more than $700 million to Lebanon last year, he added, and
President Joe Biden “did not forget about Lebanon” during his Middle East visit.
FASTFACT
MP Ibrahim Kanaan, chair of the finance and budget committee, announced the
adoption of a law amending banking secrecy to prevent tax evasion, combat
corruption, financing terrorism, and illicit enrichment. Biden mentioned several
issues that affected Lebanon and stressed the integrity of the Lebanese
territories during his meetings. The US call came as judicial assistants decided
to join a strike of public sector employees on Monday, causing courts in Lebanon
to grind to a halt. Public sector employees have been striking for about a month
demanding that salaries be increased and for transportation allowances to be
raised. The judicial assistants said they had stopped working permanently and
would not make any exceptions, be they for urgent cases or public prosecutions,
and would no longer issue notices on behalf of departments and courts. Joseph
Talj, an official from the judicial assistants’ committees, said: “Ever since
the crisis began in 2019, judicial assistants have been seeing how unfortunate
people’s lives have become and are now suffering just like them in making ends
meet. They can no longer provide food for their families, proper education, or
health care.
“How can we work in palaces of justice where equity, equality, justice, and
fairness don’t exist? Either we work to live a decent life with our children, or
we stay home and die of starvation and diseases.”The same demand prompted
retired members of the armed forces to stage a sit-in on Monday morning in front
of the Baalbek branch of Banque du Liban, preventing employees from entering.
They stressed that salary increases needed to include all employees, especially
military personnel, in service and retired.
The Lebanese pound has lost 95 percent of its value since it started
depreciating in 2019. The minimum wage is equivalent to $23 according to the
black market exchange rate of LBP29,500. Before the financial collapse, it
amounted to $444.
With the gradual lifting of subsidies on fuel and medicines, and the inability
of health and social security institutions to cover hospitalization for public
sector employees, the workers went on strike because they were unable to afford
a minimum standard of living. Speaking on behalf of the retired armed forces
personnel, Imad Awada said: “More protests will be organized in different
regions until the decision to amend judges’ salaries based on the LBP8,000/USD
rate is withdrawn, or until all public employees are included in the decision,
especially military personnel in service and retirement, in addition to
improving benefits.” The ongoing strike paralyzes most of the state’s official
departments, especially the Ministry of Finance and the real estate departments.
Those striking urged the ministerial committee tasked with managing public
facilities to hold a meeting headed by the caretaker PM and PM-designate Najib
Mikati to follow up on this issue.
Parliamentary committees have been convening to approve bills that fall within
the framework of reforms demanded by the IMF in light of the ongoing government
impasse since mid-May to present them in a legislative session to be determined
later. MP Ibrahim Kanaan, chair of the finance and budget committee, announced
the adoption of a law amending banking secrecy to prevent tax evasion, combat
corruption, financing terrorism, and illicit enrichment. The committee has not
yet finished studying the 2022 budget which, according to Kanaan, required “the
government to present its study on the unification of the exchange rate,
especially since taxes, fees, and salaries in the state are still calculated
based on the rate of 1,507 LBP/USD, with the exception of judges’ salaries.”
There is also discontent over calls to divide the municipality of Beirut into
one council for the Christian part of the capital and one for the rest. MPs from
the Free Patriotic Movement have proposed a bill on this subject. MPs from the
Lebanese Forces Party and the Kataeb Party argued that the proposal served to
“treat all Beirut neighborhoods equally.”
But there were strong reactions to the idea.
Lebanon’s Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdel Latif Derian said: “This cannot happen. This
would bring us back to the East/West Beirut division. This is unacceptable and
threatens the Islamic-Christian coexistence that we have preserved and will
preserve at all costs. A government needs to be formed as soon as possible,
especially since the collapse and paralysis pervade state institutions.” Derian
stressed that officials needed to assume their responsibilities and form a
rescue government as nothing else would pave the way for the election of a new
president, implementing reforms, and fighting corruption. Beirut MP Ibrahim
Mneimneh also commented on the division proposal. “Beirut's size and role
require an elected local authority with the ability to rule and make decisions,
not sectarian divided municipalities that seek to give priority to narrow
interests over the city's. Populist proposals do not address the crisis, but may
create a larger one.”
Aoun stresses Sunnis’ role in preserving Lebanon unity
Najia Houssari/Arab News/January 29, 2022
BEIRUT: Lebanese President Michel Aoun made a surprise visit to Dar Al-Fatwa on
Saturday, where he met with Lebanon’s Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdel Latif Derian, the
highest authority in Sunni Islam in the country, amid fears of a Sunni boycott
of Lebanon’s political process. Aoun stressed the role “that the Sunni community
plays in preserving Lebanon’s unity and political diversity, and the importance
of participating alongside all other components in national and political life,
as well as all elections that define the future of Lebanon and its people.
“Arrangements are underway so that the parliamentary elections are held as
scheduled, and there is no reason to postpone them,” he added, stressing that
“the Sunni community is an essential component, and we do not support its
boycott of the elections.” Aoun’s visit to Dar Al-Fatwa was described by
political observers as “an attempt to remedy what can no longer be remedied; too
little, too late.”
A source close to the former prime minister of Lebanon, Fouad Siniora, told Arab
News: “The damage was done to the Sunni community when Aoun obstructed all
attempts made by PM-designate Saad Hariri to form his government. Aoun went
further by insulting Hariri, calling him a liar.
“Lebanon’s relationship with the Gulf states was also damaged as a result of the
positions of Aoun and Hezbollah regarding the abuse committed against Saudi
Arabia. It’s pointless to resort to Dar Al-Fatwa now.”
Prime Minister Najib Mikati announced on Friday that “there will be no Sunni
boycott of the parliamentary elections in May. Our main concern is for the state
and its institutions to remain active and effective, and for elections to be
held on time.” It comes days after Hariri, who leads the Future Movement that
represents the majority of the Sunni community in Parliament, announced “the
suspension of political work and the suspension of any direct role or
responsibility in the ruling authority, Parliament and politics in its
traditional sense.” Mikati said: “It is true that Hariri announced his
reluctance to run in the elections, but we will definitely not call for a Sunni
boycott, and whoever wants to run should run. The sect holds great potential to
participate in the elections.” Hariri's Future Movement has a major influence in
10 of the 15 electoral districts in Lebanon. He had attributed the suspension of
political action to his conviction that “there is no room for any positive
opportunity for Lebanon in light of Iranian influence, international uncertainty
and national division.”A source in Dar Al-Fatwa said: “Derian, along with
prominent Sunni figures, decided to move toward unifying the ranks to absorb the
turmoil before it was too late and to confront the Iranian control that
Hezbollah relies upon on the national scene.” The source close to Siniora noted:
“The Sunni sect’s boycott of political action leads nowhere because Hezbollah
can then take the decisions it wants without anyone objecting to it. It can also
nominate whoever it wants for Sunni seats in the elections and ensure their
victory to serve its interests.”
On Friday evening, three days after Hariri’s speech, his older brother Bahaa
Hariri announced that he would “continue his father’s journey, the late Prime
Minister Rafik Hariri.”
Bahaa, 55, who had kept away from politics after the assassination of his father
in 2005, making room for his brother Saad, said: “First of all, it must be
emphasized that neither our religion, nor our morals, nor our upbringing … allow
us, the sons of martyr Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, to abandon our
responsibility, and we put (forward) all our capabilities for the sake of
Lebanon’s renaissance.”
He added: “The family of the martyr Rafik Hariri ... will not disintegrate. In
partnership and solidarity, we will fight the battle to restore the homeland and
restore the sovereignty of the homeland from its occupiers.”
Bahaa stressed that any misinformation alluding to a power vacuum among
Lebanon’s Sunni community serves only the enemies of the country, adding: “Who
dares warn of a vacuum within the largest sect in Lebanon to which I have the
honor to belong?”
داليا العقيدي/لبنان بحاجة إلى بطل لينقذه من حزب الله..لن يسود السلام والأمن
والأمل قبل أن يتخلص لبنان من نصر الله ومن حزبه الإرهابي.
Lebanon needs a hero to save it from Hezbollah/Peace, security and hope will not
prevail until the country has rid itself of Nasrallah and his terrorist party.
Dalia Al-Aqidi/Arab News/July 18/2022
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/110399/dalia-al-aqidi-arab-news-lebanon-needs-a-hero-to-save-it-from-hezbollah-%d8%af%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%8a%d8%a7-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b9%d9%82%d9%8a%d8%af%d9%8a%d9%84%d8%a8%d9%86%d8%a7%d9%86-%d8%a8%d8%ad%d8%a7/
The leader of the Lebanese terrorist group
Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah, last week issued new warnings to the US and its
most prominent ally in the Middle East, threatening Israel with an upcoming war
that might bring woe to the state of Lebanon and its people.
In a televised speech, he said that the July 2 attempted drone attack on the
disputed Karish gas field off Israel’s Mediterranean coast was just the
beginning. “Write this equation down; we will reach Karish and everything beyond
Karish and everything beyond that… If you want to prevent Lebanon from
exercising its right to save itself by extracting oil and gas, no one will be
able to extract oil and gas,” Nasrallah said. He stressed that military action
would be the only Lebanese option to obtain its right to oil and gas resources.
“The capacities of the resistance today are unprecedented; the fighting spirit
is higher than ever. We have various capacities on land, sea and air, and all
these options are open,” he said. The militia leader’s threats increased the
divisions in Lebanon and will most likely soon fuel conflict on the country’s
streets, given the fact that his words do not meet with the people’s consensus.
While Nasrallah sends his drones and threats, the negotiations between Lebanon
and Israel to determine their maritime borders continue with American mediation.
As usual, Nasrallah did not miss a chance to point an accusing finger at the US,
which he always describes as the “Great Satan,” to increase the brainwashing of
his militia members and to please his benefactors in Tehran. Nasrallah
criticized US President Joe Biden’s visit to the Middle East and his actions on
Yemen and Ukraine.
He also accused the US of committing aggression against Yemen and using regional
countries as a tool, stressing that Biden could easily end the war and lift the
siege. However, just one day after his fiery speech, the US State Department
issued a statement in which it reiterated America’s commitment to facilitating
the Lebanese-Israeli negotiations, emphasizing that the only way to achieve
progress toward a resolution is through diplomacy. “The administration welcomes
the consultative and open spirit of the parties to reach a final decision, which
has the potential to yield greater stability, security and prosperity for both
Lebanon and Israel, as well as for the region, and believes a resolution is
possible,” the statement read.
Peace, security and hope will not prevail until the country has rid itself of
Nasrallah and his terrorist party.
Nasrallah waging war against Israel takes us back to 2006, when Hezbollah, with
Iran’s support, kidnapped two Israeli soldiers, forcing Tel Aviv to respond with
military action, the price of which was paid by the Lebanese people. His
selfishness, idiocy and loyalty to a foreign power led to the deaths of more
than 1,200 people, the destruction of Lebanese infrastructure, including
buildings, bridges and roads, and the disruption of power stations. However, the
pro-Iran militia leader should be reminded that 2022 is completely different to
2006. The Israeli military is well equipped with fighter jets, guided missiles,
drones, submarines and military cruisers that have the ability to wipe out a
small country like Lebanon. How long will this country — rich in history,
science, culture and art — remain hostage to someone whose hands have been
stained with the blood of his own people? How long will the Lebanese government
keep silent about the scourge of Nasrallah?
The blood of the victims of the Beirut port explosion has not yet dried and the
pain of the wounds has not yet dissipated. Is there not a single brave Lebanese
figure willing to hold Hezbollah and its leader accountable for their murders,
terrorism and hostility toward foreign countries?
And, above all, for how long do the international community and human rights
organizations intend to turn their eyes away from what is happening in this
beautiful country? Peace, security and hope will not prevail until Lebanon has
rid itself of Nasrallah and his terrorist party. Only at that time will
Lebanon’s life-loving people chant in one voice, filled with optimism and
ambition, the famous song of the late, great musician Wadih El-Safi, “Lebanon,
Piece of Heaven.”
• Dalia Al-Aqidi is a senior fellow at the Center for Security Policy.
Twitter: @DaliaAlAqidi
The Evening News and the Forms of Assault against the
Pain of the Lebanese
Hazem Saghieh/Asharq Al Awsat/July 18/2022
The evening news on the Lebanese broadcaster LBCI is a spectacular scoop that
recurs daily. It tells us that, in contrast to what we know to be true, Lebanon
is leaping from one success to another, consistently taking excellence to new
highs. Vacationers and tourists are flocking to it. The parties and soirees
never stop. The country's towns and villages are putting all their history,
charm, and delicious food on display. The literary and artistic genius of the
Lebanese has captivated the world. Our sports teams are attaining one victory
after another...
Those who present the news in this way probably have good intentions, and they
perhaps looked into the matter deeply and concluded: this total disaster is all
the more reason to demand some hope. Think positive, and positive things will
happen.
Unfortunately, since we are talking about a news bulletin, the fact that the
scoop is fake becomes apparent after only one or two minutes, as does the fact
that optimism about the future is misguided. The attempt to ward off reality
with an arsenal of desires fails before it begins. The reason for this is that
the actual news soon follows and pulls us down from the skies of fantasy to the
reality on the ground: tragedy surrounds us from all sides, while escaping them
is no easy matter.
This approach is dangerous, not only because the famous phoenix will never rise
from the ashes and the Lebanese don't have the capacity to "rebuild what had
been destroyed" as the famous song "Rajaa Yitaamar Libnan" (Lebanon will be
Rebuilt) tells it will. It is a dangerous approach because it could multiply the
sense of hopelessness that the Lebanese feel every time they come into contact
with reality, especially since no citizen can avoid this contact all through
their long days and nights. Reality strikes every time they go to get a loaf of
bread, medicine, or fuel and whenever they face the agonizing reality of being
abandoned and left to fend for themselves...
Taking the opposite course to cultivating illusions allows us to add awareness
of the tragedy to the tragedy itself. Such an approach might be wiser, more
mature, and more useful. It can be realized through a more comprehensive
description of what has happened and is happening that illustrates the immense
difficulties required to overcome this state of affairs, considers the massive
responsibilities that doing so entails, and lays out the sacrifices that have to
be made along the way...
Neither denying nor belittling the problem helps. Thus, the juxtaposition of two
broadcasts in a single broadcast leaves us with a mind-blowing outcome: the
Lebanese's dazzling excellence on every level is behind the unprecedented
catastrophe that they are undergoing today!
But if resisting reality with folklore and rosy pictures is harmful enough,
resisting it with images of blood is far more harmful.
Here, too, and through Al-Manar (for Hezbollah) and Al-Mayadin (for Hezbollah
admirers), uncovering the facts of the matter takes no more than a minute or
two: after tons of victories and talk of what lies "beyond Haifa" and "beyond
Karish," and "humiliating the Zionist enemy," whose teeth are chattering with
fear, the same announcer or guest adds that that enemy has violated our airspace
thousands of times over the past few years, or that, at this very moment, it is
conducting an airstrike on our Syrian neighbor.
Once again, if we bring the two sides of the story together in a single
sentence, we would end up with a phrase something like: because of the many
victories we have achieved and because of the degree of the fear that was
instilled in the enemy, it has violated our airspace thousands of times over the
past few years and continues to violate it.
The knife that stabs formal logic, here, cuts deep.
No doubt, there are many ways to conceal reality, and they come from multiple
sources. Some are derived from simple Lebanese village traditions, others from a
military Arab tradition that became notorious for spinning defeats into
victories.
However, this assault on the mind does not negate the differences between its
forms. The first assault is well-intentioned. It can be categorized as cultural,
meaning that it simultaneously adopts an ancient, folkloric and mystical view of
the country, a view that has little awareness of changes and imagines, in the
same way that old Rahbani songs did, that a nice coincidence could solve our
difficult problems.
The second assault is ill-intentioned, taking advantage of the nation's weakness
and building on it. It is also cultural, but its culture is of a warlike and
revolutionary nature. It is confident that the country is rushing to its death,
and it is taking decisive and proactive steps to accelerate the process.
If the rosy assault on the mind raises fears of squandering the pain of the
Lebanese by mixing its elements and camouflaging its causes, then the message of
the armed attack aggravates that pain and promotes it to the rank of a venerable
goal we should strive for. The first assault tells us that the cure lies in
smiling with hope and keeping everything as it is. The second assault tells us
that the cure is to gulp down more of what has brought us to where we are now,
and by doing so, ensuring that everything will be obliterated by tomorrow.
LIC Statement on the New Lebanese Parliament
July 15, 2022
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: joanna@theresolute.group
Washington, D.C. - In the May 2022 parliamentary elections, the Lebanese people
sent a clear message rejecting the rule of Hezbollah and their allies. The
Hezbollah-led majority was defeated and Hezbollah’s strongest political
adversary, the Lebanese Forces Party, won the largest number of seats. Next,
Parliament is set to elect the President by September and those members opposed
to Hezbollah’s rule have the opportunity to unite and choose a candidate to lead
the country out of this crisis.
The LIC once again congratulates the people of Lebanon on fairly holding these
critical elections despite administrative and logistical obstacles, threats of
violence, and rampant misinformation.
The LIC has long held that elections should occur to replace the current
majority responsible for the grave economic and political crisis ravaging the
country. In that respect, the LIC has been mobilizing the diaspora, engaging
Lebanese opposition leaders, and communicating with electoral monitoring
organizations. LIC President Dr. Joseph Gebeily made two trips to Lebanon before
and during the elections to meet with opposition groups, political activists,
candidates newly elected MPs, and election observers.
The country now enters a new phase of constitutional milestones. Parliament has
selected its Speaker, Deputy Speaker, and other officers of the committees, as
well as reappointed Najib Makati as Prime Minister. What remains now is for
Parliament to convene and elect the President.
The Lebanese people made it clear through the ballot box that they want to see a
different class of rulers; one that is capable and willing to address the
socioeconomic crisis and defend the sovereignty of the State against the
dominance of the militia. These objectives can only be accomplished if the
anti-Hezbollah members of Parliament are united in their efforts to act on
behalf of the majority of the Lebanese people and coalesce behind a single
presidential candidate. The LIC stresses the need for elected MPs from the
opposition, both former representatives and the newly elected, to set aside any
disagreements and form a cohesive front to improve the living conditions of the
Lebanese and protect them against weapons outside the State’s authority. This
parliamentary coalition must:
Ensure the democratic process started with the parliamentary elections continues
with the formation of a capable cabinet and the election of a president.
Elect and support a president with honesty, integrity, and commitment to the
Lebanese state who will uphold the constitution, restore confidence in the
government, and strengthen state institutions.
Pass desperately needed legislation and reforms to address the State’s finances,
the electricity crisis, the independence of the judiciary, and the fight against
corruption.
Take necessary steps to alleviate the suffering of the Lebanese people who lost
their savings and livelihoods and are facing unemployment, hyperinflation, and
shortages of food, fuel, and medicine.
Hold the President and the Cabinet accountable by exercising Parliament’s
fundamental role of oversight of the Executive Branch.
Assert the sovereignty of the State over its territory, controlling its borders
and ports of entry and confronting the illegal activities of the militia.
The LIC calls on the United States and the international community to support
Lebanon at this critical juncture. Lebanon’s allies and friends, including the
U.S., should actively engage the new Parliament, particularly those forces
opposed to the mafia-militia clique, and offer diplomatic support and
legitimacy, as well as humanitarian aid and security assistance. These
initiatives should be conducted in concert with Saudi Arabia and the other Gulf
states to enhance their effectiveness and balance the existing Iranian
influence.
Lebanon will only recover from this crisis that has wrought so much suffering if
structural reforms are implemented, systemic corruption is eradicated, relations
with Lebanon’s neighbors in the Arab world are restored, and State sovereignty
is protected. This demands new leadership with integrity and vision for
Lebanon’s future. The Lebanese people have taken the first step and elected new
representatives with a clear mandate to move forward from this political
impasse. LIC calls upon Parliament to follow the lead of the people and unite
behind a Presidential candidate to guide the nation out of this crisis.
###
The Lebanese Information Center in the U.S. is the largest grassroots
organization of Americans of Lebanese descent, committed to building a free,
sovereign, and democratic Lebanon for the good of the Lebanese people and in the
interest of the United States of America.
Lebanon LGBTQ community suffers setback amid wider
clampdown
Associated Press/Monday, 18 July, 2022
Nour never felt entirely safe as a queer person in Lebanon. But in the past few
years, the 25-year-old pharmacist had begun letting his guard down, meeting with
friends in LGBTQ-friendly spaces in Beirut and even performing in drag shows. He
now opts to stay at home, fearing for his safety more than ever after a wave of
anti-LGBTQ hate speech that followed last month's decision by the Lebanese
Interior Ministry to shut down any events aimed at promoting "sexual
perversion." The setback is part of a broader clampdown on marginalized groups
and freedoms that activists say aims to distract the public from Lebanon's
spiraling economic and financial crisis, which has pulled over three-quarters of
the population into poverty. Millions in the once middle-income country continue
to struggle with soaring inflation, rampant power cuts, and medicine shortages,
while tens of thousands have left the country in search of opportunities abroad.
"It really felt like they wanted to just distract the masses from everything
going on and focus on this hot topic," Nour, who asked to use a pseudonym
because he has not come out to family, told The Associated Press. Security
forces have since cracked down on several events catered to the LGBTQ community,
forcing their organizers to eventually shut them down. They also visited the
offices of Helem, the country's first registered LGBTQ advocacy group, asking
for their registration papers and other documents.
The move followed loud complaints from religious officials who publicly
described them as ungodly and said they were not in line with Lebanese customs.
In a statement on June 24, the Interior Ministry said that LGBTQ-friendly events
"violate our society's customs and traditions, and contradict with the
principles of the Abrahamic religions."Helem's Executive Director Tarek Zeidan
blasted the statement, saying it "pits Lebanese people against each other.""It
was very clear that it was a deliberate decision to manufacture moral panic in
order to divert attention from the general political and economic disaster that
is Lebanon today," Zeidan said. Lebanon since late 2019 has been reeling from a
crippling economic crisis that the World Bank says is among the world's worst
since the mid-1800s. The Lebanese pound has lost over 90% of its value against
the dollar, while much of the population has struggled to cope with soaring
diesel fuel, gasoline, medicine and food prices.
Citizens and experts blame decades of financial mismanagement and corruption at
the hands of Lebanon's entrenched ruling elite for the crisis.
Human rights organizations say the recent setback for the LGBTQ community is
part of a broader clampdown on civil rights and freedoms, coupled with the
economic crisis. In May, religious clerics were up in arms after recently
elected lawmakers and advocacy groups promoted civil marriage and state-mandated
personal status laws independent from religious courts.
Last month, comedian and rights activist Shaden Fakih stood before the Military
Court, accused of harming the reputation and insulting the country's Internal
Security Forces in a prank call during the country's COVID-19 lockdown, in which
she asked for permission to leave the house in order to buy sanitary pads.
And earlier this month, the Lebanese government announced that it has been in
talks with Syria over a forced refugee returns plan for over a million Syrians
in the country. Some activists and human rights advocates say Lebanese
authorities are trying to find scapegoats, as they stall probes linked to a host
of financial crimes, the 2020 Beirut port explosion and soaring cases of
domestic violence and sexual assault. "The state seems either completely
unwilling or unable to crack down on violations of grave rights like corruption,
torture, hate speech, but on the flip side acts very quickly under pressure from
religious and other powerful institutions in the country to crack down on the
rights of marginalized groups," Aya Majzoub, a Lebanon researcher at Human
Rights Watch, told the AP. In some cases, residents have responded to religious
leaders by taking matters into their own hands.
In the predominantly Christian Achrafieh district, partisans dubbed the Soldiers
of God — a protest group that advocates for socially conservative values and
laws — tore down a billboard promoting events for Pride month. Elsewhere,
residents in the Sunni Tarik Jdideh neighborhood gathered to condemn the LGBTQ
community's events and their supporters, calling them an "infiltration" into
their community. The Rev. Abdo Abou Kassm, director of the Catholic Center for
Information, a media arm of the Maronite church, sympathized with the angry
protesters, though he opposes any violence and bullying. "You have your freedom
at home, but you cannot promote this in the community as it is in fact against
nature. The law says so and almost all Lebanese abide by this," Abou Kassm said,
adding that the angry protests were a reaction. "Our society is not ready for
this."
Despite a constant battle fighting discrimination and abuse, Lebanon's LGBTQ
community is the most vibrant and open in the Arab world and has made
significant gains in the past few years. Although homosexuality is still
considered a crime, the country boasts at least half a dozen active LGBTQ
advocacy groups, as well as bars and clubs that openly cater to the community.
Now, Nour and his friends avoid meeting in their usual spots, fearing raids and
harassment. "We do have a WhatsApp group so whenever someone is going out, we
just notify the others and when we expect to be back home," he explained. As
Lebanon's dire economy continues to unravel, activists fear authorities will
continue to target marginalized groups to distract from real issues. "We are
witnessing the beginnings of a full-blown attack, because this ruling regime is
beginning to fear it's losing control," Zeidan said. "What we're saying loudly
and clearly is that they're coming for all of us. First they came for the
refugees, and no one cared. Then they came for the queers and no one gave a damn
either."
The Latest English LCCC
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
July 18-19/2022
Iran, Russia, Turkey presidents to
talk Syria war in Tehran
Agence France Presse/Monday, 18 July, 2022
With the war in Ukraine still raging, Russian President Vladimir Putin travels
Tuesday to Tehran for talks with his Iranian and Turkish counterparts on the
Syria conflict. Russia, Turkey and Iran have in recent years met to discuss
Syria as part of the so-called "Astana peace process" to end more than 11 years
of conflict in the Arab country. All three are involved in Syria, with Russia
and Iran supporting the Damascus regime against its opponents, and Turkey
backing rebels. Tuesday's summit comes as Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan
has threatened to launch a new offensive in northern Syria against Kurdish
militants. Iran, whose President Ebrahim Raisi is hosting the meeting, has
already warned that any Turkish military action in Syria could "destabilize the
region." The Tehran summit will also enable Erdogan to hold his first meeting
with Putin since Russia invaded Ukraine in February. The Turkish president has
for months been offering to meet the Russian leader in a bid to help resolve
heightened global tensions since the war began. "The timing of this summit is
not a coincidence," Russian analyst Vladimir Sotnikov told AFP. "Turkey wants to
conduct a 'special operation' in Syria just as Russia is implementing a 'special
operation' in Ukraine," he said.Turkey has launched waves of attacks on Syria
since 2016, targeting Kurdish militias as well as Islamic State group jihadists
and forces loyal to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Green light? -
Erdogan's planned military offensive targets Kurdish fighters which Ankara
regards as "terrorists." They include the U.S.-backed Kurdish People's
Protection Units (YPG), which formed a crucial part of an international
coalition against the Islamic State group in Syria. Ankara fears a strong
Kurdish presence along its border with Syria will embolden the banned Kurdistan
Workers' Party, which for decades has been waging an insurgency against the
Turkish state that has claimed tens of thousands of lives. Syria's government
has repeatedly condemned Turkish threats to mount a new incursion. Sinan Ulgen,
a visiting scholar at Carnegie Europe who specializes in Turkish foreign policy,
said Ankara wants the blessing of Moscow and Iran before launching its
operation. "It's particularly important because the two potential target regions
are under the control of Russia, and Turkey wants to be able to use the
airspace... so as to minimize the risks," he said. Iran "also has an indirect
presence in the region through Shiite militias that it controls," said Ulgen.
Ultimately, Erdogan is hoping to get "the green light" from Putin and Raisi, he
added. Russia has already expressed the hope that Turkey would "refrain" from
launching an attack on Syria. Iran, whose foreign minister Hossein
Amir-Abdollahian visited both Ankara and Damascus in recent weeks, has also
urged caution.
'Destabilizing' -
Late last month, Iran's top diplomat said in Ankara that "we understand that...
maybe a special operation might be needed." "Turkey's security concerns must be
tackled fully and permanently." Days later, Amir-Abdollahian said in Damascus
that Turkish military action in Syria "would be a destabilizing element in the
region".Mazloum Abdi, chief commander of the YPG-linked Syrian Democratic
Forces, has urged Russia and Iran to restrain Turkey. "We hope (the attacks)
will not take place and that the Kurds... will not be forsaken during the talks
between the big powers," he said. The SDF has warned that an invasion by Ankara
would undermine efforts to combat Islamic State group jihadists in Syria's
northeast. Nicholas Heras of the Newlines Institute said Iran and Russia "want
to prevent another Turkish military campaign in Syria." "Iran is building a
presence in and around Aleppo that concerns Turkey, and Russia is for all
intents and purposes ceding ground to Iran throughout Syria," he added. For
Iranian political analyst Ahmad Zeidabadi, "new differences" have emerged
between Russia, Iran and Turkey following the Ukraine war.
This and an "uncertain future", he said, means the three leaders will try to
"coordinate" their views on Syria to avoid further tensions.
Kohavi: Attack on Iran at Center of Israeli Army Preparations
Asharq Al-Awsat/Monday, 18 July, 2022
Israeli army chief Aviv Kohavi has said it was Israel’s “moral obligation” to
prepare a military response against Iran’s nuclear program. In a speech at a
ceremony marking the change of the military’s Home Front Command chief on
Sunday, Kohavi said: “Preparing the home front for war is a task that must be
accelerated in the coming years, especially in light of the possibility that we
will be required to act against the nuclear threat.”The Times of Israel quoted
him as saying that the Israeli army “continues to prepare vigorously for an
attack on Iran and must prepare for every development and every scenario.”Kohavi
said “preparing a military option against the Iranian nuclear program is a moral
obligation and a national security order.”He added that such preparation is “at
the center” of the Israeli army’s preparations, and includes “a variety of
operational plans, the allocation of many resources, the acquisition of
appropriate weapons, intelligence and training.”Last month, dozens of Israeli
warplanes conducted air maneuvers over the Mediterranean Sea, simulating
striking Iranian nuclear facilities.
Macron talks diesel with UAE leader
Agence France Presse/Monday, 18 July, 2022
French President Emmanuel Macron hosted United Arab Emirates President Sheikh
Mohamed bin Zayed Al-Nahyan for lunch in Paris on Monday, with increased diesel
supplies on the menu for their official talks. The UAE has emerged as a key
partner for Western countries as they scramble for energy supplies worldwide to
replace imports from sanction-hit Russia. Sheikh Mohamed, also known as MBZ, was
on his first overseas state visit since taking office in May following the death
of his half-brother. The visit is expected to conclude with "the announcement of
guarantees given by the UAE on quantities of hydrocarbon supplies to France,"
Macron's office announced before the visit.The deal will cover diesel in
particular, which the UAE does not supply at present. France is seeking "to
diversify its sources of supply in the context of the conflict in Ukraine," the
Elysee source added, referring to EU sanctions on Russian oil. Sheikh Mohamed's
decision to make his first official visit to France "is a conscious one that
acknowledges the historic ties between the two nations but also the potential
for even greater cooperation and growth with France," his diplomatic advisor
Anwar Gargash said on Friday.
"The UAE is determined to remain a reliable partner and source of energy," he
added. "We have sold our oil to the far-east for 40 years and now we are
directing it toward Europe in this time of crisis." The UAE president's visit to
France came after Joe Biden's first Middle East tour as president, which
included a visit to Saudi Arabia for energy talks. Macron and Biden were
overheard talking about energy supplies from the Middle East at a G7 summit at
the end of June in Germany. Macron told Biden that he had spoken to Sheikh
Mohammed who had said he was at his "maximum" in terms of oil production, but
that the Saudis had some spare capacity. After his lunch with Macron, Sheikh
Mohamed is set to be guest of honor at a dinner at the former royal palace in
Versailles outside Paris.
Russian Shelling Kills Six in East Ukrainian Town
Asharq Al-Awsat/Monday, 18 July, 2022
A Russian shell smashed into a two-storey building in the eastern Ukrainian town
of Toretsk on Monday, killing six civilians who were sheltering there, the State
Emergency Service said. It said on Facebook that rescuers found five bodies in
the rubble and pulled three people out alive, but one later died in hospital.
"The town of Toretsk was under fire today from early in this morning. A
two-storey building sheltering people was destroyed as a shell slammed into it,"
the State Emergency Service said. It posted photographs on its Facebook page of
rescue workers digging through rubble and what was left of the devastated
building, and said the search for survivors had been abandoned. Reuters could
not immediately check details of the report independently. Russia, which invaded
Ukraine on Feb. 24, denies deliberately targeting civilians but cities have been
flattened and millions have fled the fighting.
Why Does Russia Want to Remove the Syrian Political Process from Geneva?
London - Ibrahim Hamidi/Asharq Al-Awsat/Monday, 18 July, 2022
Damascus has informed United Nations envoy Geir Pedersen that it would not send
its delegation to Geneva to participate in the ninth round of the Constitutional
Committee on July 25, which means freezing the Syrian political process that is
held under the auspices of the UN.
The actual reason is not related to Damascus’ objection to the Committee’s
mechanism or the topic of “discussions” between the two delegations – namely the
government delegation, and the other representing the opposition “negotiating
committee.”In fact, the decision came upon a recommendation from Moscow. It is
also not related to Russia’s objection to the Syrian constitutional reform
efforts and issues, such as sovereignty, foreign agendas, and “occupations”;
rather, it concerns Switzerland’s position on the Ukrainian war and its break
from neutrality. In short, Moscow is not satisfied with Switzerland’s joining
Western sanctions against Russia because of the Ukraine war.
What is the Russian solution?
Moscow is punishing Geneva - a major European capital for the United Nations and
its institutions - and attempting to shake European unity because of Ukraine, at
the lowest price, and not through Russia’s withdrawal from UN organizations or
boycotting international meetings on the Syrian crisis.
The punishment came from Syria. Accordingly, Moscow asked Damascus to refrain
from participating in the Constitutional Committee meetings in Geneva, and
suggest Sochi, Moscow, Damascus, Algeria or Muscat as possible alternative
hosts.
What prompted the issue>
At the conclusion of the meetings of the eighth round of the Constitutional
Committee in May, Pedersen agreed with the heads of the two government and
opposition delegations - Ahmed Al-Kuzbari and Hadi Al-Bahra respectively - to
hold the next round after the Eid Al-Adha holiday, between July 25-29. At that
time, Russian presidential envoy Alexander Lavrentyev was reportedly not
satisfied with the Swiss authorities’ handling of entry visas for the Russian
delegation and the coldness of the reception.
What does Pedersen want?
Based on the agreement between the Syrians and the regional and international
sponsors in the previous round in June, Pedersen sent written invitations to Al-Kuzbari,
Al-Bahra and the civil society, asking them to present some ideas on the means
to accelerate the work of the committee to achieve the goal stipulated in the
reference standards and the basic elements of the internal regulations and to
work quickly and continuously to achieve results and progress without external
interference or time frames imposed from the outside. Pedersen wants to present
practical proposals to expedite constitutional discussions within three options:
discussing more than one topic per day, tackling one chapter of the constitution
in each round, submitting drafts and discussing one chapter of the constitution
in each session, until all chapters are completed. The atmosphere and diplomatic
contacts remained positive, suggesting that the meetings will take place. Syrian
officials said their delegation would participate in the meetings if “logistical
problems for Russian friends” were resolved. Indeed, the Swiss authorities
facilitated the visa procedures for the Russian delegation. But suddenly, the
decision to boycott was relayed to Geneva from Damascus hours after a
“breakthrough” represented in the Western acceptance of Russian conditions on
extending the Security Council resolution to deliver humanitarian aid across the
border for only six months.
What are the problems of the Russian veto?
Boycotting the Constitutional Committee meetings has many complexities. First,
it exposes the realities of the meetings, collides with the public discourse of
Moscow and embarrasses Damascus, which does not seem to mind abandoning the
international umbrella to discuss its constitution and what it sees as a
sovereign matter issue. Most importantly, the boycott contradicts the political
process, as UN Security Council Resolution 2254 stipulated that reforming the
Syrian constitution was a Syrian-led process and not a Russian matter. This was
confirmed in writing by the work standards document completed by the Syrian
parties in 2019. Moreover, the Syrian National Dialogue Congress, which was held
in Sochi in early 2018, stipulated that reform must be discussed in Geneva. This
was coupled with several statements from the “guarantors” of the Astana process,
stressing that the work of the Constitutional Committee should be carried out
“without external interference.”
What are the options?
An envoy of a Western country, who participated in the Geneva meetings, said
after receiving a letter from Pedersen’s office about the cancellation: “When
you attack another country, and targeting civilians becomes a cornerstone of
military strategy, whether it is in Ukraine or Syria, political hypocrisy is a
key feature embedded in your foreign policy.”The decision meanwhile, came as a
surprise to the opposition, which found in the Geneva Process a platform that
gives it political significance and parity with Damascus. A leader in the
opposition said the government delegation has tied its participation to
“fulfilling Russian demands.”He continued: “We are facing a very deep crisis
that will last for more than a few months, while the Constitutional Committee
will not hold any meetings.”“This fabricated crisis was not created by any
Syrian side, but by a foreign party, Russia,” he added. “This is blatant foreign
interference in the work of what is supposed to be a committee maintained and
led by Syrians. Russia is not a party to the Constitutional Committee to decide
whether they should travel or not.”There is no doubt that the decision that
Damascus conveyed to Geneva on behalf of Moscow will be discussed by the Astana
“guarantors” - Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Turkish and Iranian
counterparts, Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Ebrahim Raisi - in Tehran on Tuesday. It
is true that Tehran, along with Ankara, is looking for an achievement in the
Syrian arena. But the fate of the possible Turkish military operation in
northern Syria will likely be the most pressing issue at hand. The officials
will also likely prioritize the areas of “hostile cooperation” between Ankara
and Moscow in Ukraine. Iran also wants to propose issues that concern its role
and US President Joe Biden's recent visit to the Middle East.
It is known that the Constitutional Committee is neither a committee, nor
working on the constitution. It is nothing but a pretext that allows “players”
to act like there was a political process to justify military choices and social
engineering, as well as prevent another real process from taking shape. And
there are those who want a constitutional process without an international
umbrella. Russia is using Syria and its “political process” as an arena for
controlling its partners, punishing its opponents and “testing” its rivals and
the Constitutional Committee is small evidence of this.
Iraq Prosecution to Probe 'Maliki WikiLeaks'
Baghdad - Fadhel al-Nashmi/Asharq Al-Awsat/Monday, 18 July, 2022
Iraq’s judiciary is expected to examine two complaints to probe the voice
recordings attributed to former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki in which he
criticized politicians, notably his rival cleric Moqtada al-Sadr. Known in Iraq
as the “Maliki WikiLeaks”, the former PM threatened to attack Najaf city to
protect the country’s highest Shiite authority should Sadr attack it himself.
Lawyers who filed the complaints have demanded that Maliki be held accountable
for the recordings, which they said “harm national security and incite strife
and sectarian violence.”A rights source told Asharq Al-Awsat that Maliki may be
tried in a special court over terrorism charges. He added, however, that a trial
is unlikely because the judiciary in Iraq is politicized. On Wednesday, activist
and journalist Ali Fadhel released around one minute of the recording. He has
around 48 minutes worth of recordings and will release a minute or two a day so
that they will have a popular and political impact in the country. In the latest
recording on Sunday, Maliki said: “The coming phase is that of fighting. I told
this yesterday to Prime Minister [Mustafa] al-Kadhimi.” “I told him that I am
not relying on you, the army or the police. They will not do anything,” he was
heard saying. “Iraq is approaching a brutal war from which no one will emerge
unscathed unless we manage to stop Sadr, [parliament Speaker Mohammed] al-Halbousi
and Masoud Barzani,” he added. Maliki’s remarks clearly date back to two months
when the Sadr-Halbousi-Barzani alliance was still standing. Around a month ago,
Sadr’s parliamentary bloc of 73 MPs resigned from the legislature. Maliki was
also heard saying that he was arming ten to 15 groups “in preparation for the
critical phase.” He said he would attack Najaf and protect the Shiite authority
and the people should Sadr attack. The former PM also expressed his
disappointment with the Popular Mobilization Forces, ruling out the possibility
of working with them and describing them as a “nation of cowards.”Maliki has
since twice denied that his voice was in the recordings. Iraqis have dismissed
his denial, saying the voice and ideas expressed in the recordings were “exactly
how the former PM would think and act.” Iraqi researcher at Arizona State
University Saleem Suzah said he has no doubt that the recordings are that of
Maliki. In a Facebook post, he added that the tone of voice and manner of
speaking heard in the recordings match Maliki’s. Political researcher Yehya al-Kabisi
said Maliki’s remarks are nothing new as these are statements he has often
spoken to his guests. But this is the first time they are released in the open.
Sadr, meanwhile, has dismissed the recordings and called on his supporters to do
the same because “we have no regard for Maliki.”
Italy's Embattled PM Draghi Visits Algeria for Gas
Talks
Asharq Al-Awsat/Monday, 18 July, 2022
With his government's fate in limbo, Italian Premier Mario Draghi is visiting
Algeria’s capital Monday to finalize deals boosting Algerian gas supplies to
Italy as Europeans brace for a possible cutoff of Russian gas. In a sign of the
importance of the visit, the Italian delegation includes the foreign minister,
interior minister, justice minister and ecological transition ministers, The
Associated Press said. They’ll hold a day of talks, meet with Algerian President
Abdelmadjid Tebboune and sign joint agreements. Algeria is set to displace
Russia as the main supplier of gas to Italy, after a major agreement was reached
during a trip by Draghi to Algeria in April between Algerian energy giant
Sonatrach and Italian company ENI to increase gas exports. EU countries have
scrambled to diversify energy sources after Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Monday's trip comes at a precarious time for Draghi, who had to cut it a day
short because of political troubles at home. A main partner in his pandemic
unity government, the populist 5-Star Movement, boycotted a confidence vote in
the Senate last week on an energy costs relief bill, jeopardizing the survival
of the 17-month-old government. The political turmoil forced Draghi to reduce
his Algeria visit from two days to just one. Amid concerns that payments for
Russian gas and oil are funding President Vladimir Putin’s war, Europe is trying
to cut its reliance on Russian natural gas imports and prepare for a potential
Russian cutoff in reprisal for EU sanctions. Prior to the war, Russia provided
Italy about 29 billion cubic meters of gas per year, compared with about 23
billion from Algeria. Already this year Algeria has delivered 13.9 billion cubic
meters to Italy via the Trans-Mediterranean pipeline, a 113% rise over
forecasts, according to Algerian energy giant Sonatrach. Algeria on Friday
announced a 4 billion cubic-meter increase in planned supplies for the months
ahead. Italy is especially dependent on natural gas to generate electricity,
heat and cool homes, and power its industry. Italy has also been reaching out to
other energy-producing nations to secure alternate sources, including
Azerbaijan, Qatar, Congo, Angola and Mozambique.
Tunisia’s Ghannouchi Investigated on Terrorism
Charges
Asharq Al-Awsat/Monday, 18 July, 2022
The leader of Tunisia’s main opposition party is due to be questioned by the
country’s anti-terrorism unit on Tuesday on suspicion of money laundering and
terrorist financing through an association charity. The accused, Rached
Ghannouchi, was among a dozen top Ennahdha party officials whose bank accounts
the north African country’s central bank froze earlier this month. The moderate
Islamist Ennahdha vehemently disputes the accusations of money laundering and
terrorism financing. President Kais Saied suspended parliament last year and
seized broad powers in a move that he said was necessary to "save the country"
from a political and economic crisis. This prompted criticism from the
opposition, which accuses him of a slide toward totalitarianism. Ennahdha has
said that these accusations are aimed at distracting attention from a July 25
referendum planned by Saied to change the constitution to augment presidential
powers and reduce the role of the parliament and prime minister. The president’s
critics say he is trying to legitimize a "coup." Opposition figure Nejib Chebbi
said he feared Ghannouchi’s arrest after the hearing, denouncing what he called
a "harassment campaign" unleashed by the government against "leading political
figures."Saied and some others blamed Ennahdha in part for Tunisia’s political
crisis last year. Ennahdha, which dominated parliament before it was suspended,
is among the president’s fiercest critics.
Explosion of Violence in South Sudan Threatens
Peace Pact
Asharq Al-Awsat/Monday, 18 July, 2022
An explosion of violence in South Sudan is raising fears that the country's
fragile peace agreement will unravel before elections the international
community hopes can be held next year. The wave of near-daily killings across
this East African country is often blamed on marauding militias whose attacks
threaten the 2018 truce between President Salva Kiir and Vice President Riek
Machar, The Associated Press said. While the two leaders work in the same
government in relative peace in the capital Juba, elsewhere South Sudan appears
at war with itself: Hundreds of people have been killed since the start of the
year in violence ranging from cattle raids to ethnically motivated revenge
killings. The violence appeared to worsen in June after Pope Francis canceled
his visit this month, citing his knee problem. The pope's visit was meant to
encourage faith in a country damaged by years of war, including a long conflict
for independence from Sudan and then a civil war. At least 209 people were
killed and 33 others wounded across the country in June alone, according to a
violence tracker by the Juba-based civic group known by its initials as CEPO.
Both Kiir and Machar are under pressure to release a timetable for presidential
elections in 2023. While Kiir expresses hope that a vote can be held next year,
Machar has said that elections are impossible amid such widespread insecurity.
In recent days the violence has been worst in the president’s home state of
Warrap, where victims include a military intelligence chief and a former
government commissioner. “We have lost many lives in communal violence," Kiir
said in a speech in early July, noting the killings in Warrap's Tonj North
county, where gunmen killed 30 soldiers on June 25. The Tonj North clashes
erupted after authorities there sent security forces to recover cattle stolen by
raiders from another county. In other cases, deadly skirmishes have been
triggered by efforts to disarm youths. “I deeply regretted their death,” Kiir
said of the people killed in Warrap. "We cannot allow this senseless killing of
both security personnel and civilians to continue.”Killings also have been
reported in the Western Equatoria, Eastern Equatoria and Central Equatoria
states, the president said, acknowledging that peace gains since 2018 have been
eroded by what officials describe as inter-communal violence. Following the
killings in Warrap, Kiir's army chief, Gen. Santino Deng Wol, vowed to defeat
ethnic militias in comments to state broadcaster SSBC. “We are responsible for
the security of the country," he said. "We will not allow chaos to happen, and
we would not allow anyone to disturb the security.” But some analysts say
government troops and police — often outnumbered by civilian attackers in areas
awash with small weapons — can't be relied on to protect civilians. They also
charge that the attackers have powerful political backers in Juba. “The armed
youth in Tonj North are more powerful than our army and other security
institutions,” said Edmund Yakani, head of the CEPO group tracking violence. The
violence is “undermining the genuine implementation” of the peace agreement, he
said. It also is hindering humanitarian efforts among communities in urgent need
of food, medicine and other supplies. “The scale of sub-national conflict —
which now spreads from north to south, from east to west — is alarming,”
Nicholas Haysom, the UN representative to South Sudan, told the Security Council
last month. More than 80% of civilian casualties this year are “attributed to
intercommunal violence and community-based militias,” he said. “This violence
divides communities and hampers reconciliation.” There were high hopes when
oil-rich South Sudan gained independence from Sudan in 2011 after a long
conflict. But the country slid into civil war in December 2013 largely based on
ethnic divisions when forces loyal to Kiir battled those supporting Machar. Tens
of thousands of people were killed in the war, which ended with the 2018 peace
agreement. But the terms of that accord have not been fully implemented, and
persistent violence is weakening it even more. A panel of UN experts in May said
the 2018 agreement is faltering. The deal “is now hostage to the political
calculations of the country’s military and security elites, who use a
combination of violence, misappropriated public resources and patronage to
pursue their own narrow interests,” said the report. Others in South Sudan
express similar alarm. “The country is breaking into pieces," said James Akot, a
political science scholar in Juba. “The country is breaking into community
defense forces that can actually overpower our army soon.”
The Latest LCCC English
analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on July 18-19/2022
Britain's New PM Must Get Real on Iran
Con Coughlin/Gatestone Institute./July 18/ 2022
[U]nder [Boris Johnson's] premiership, Britain backed attempts by other Western
signatories to the deal -- the US, France and Germany -- to revive the JCPOA in
the face of mounting evidence that Tehran has absolutely no interest in abiding
by its commitments.
In the latest indication that Iran is in breach of its JCPOA commitments, the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN-sponsored body responsible for
monitoring Tehran's nuclear activities, has reported that Iran has recently
escalated its uranium enrichment activities at its underground Fordow facility.
Experts say this will enable Iran to enrich uranium to weapons-grade levels
without being detected by IAEA inspection teams.
Consequently, with Mr Johnson soon to depart from Downing Street, there is a
golden opportunity for his successor to adopt a new, more robust policy towards
Tehran, one that clearly identifies the ayatollahs as posing a clear and present
danger to the security of Britain and its allies.
The scale of the Iranian threat is reflected in last week's statement by US
National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan that Iran had agreed to supply Russia
with hundreds of drones to support its war effort in Ukraine.
The revelations concerning Iran's deepening involvement in the Ukraine conflict
should certainly concern the British government....
The recent upsurge in Iranian military activity, both in the Arabian Gulf and
Ukraine, provides incontrovertible evidence that, far from trying to reach an
agreement with the West, Iran appears determined to intensify hostilities.
Britain, together with other signatories to the JCPOA, must base its policy on
the assumption that Iran is a hostile regime, not one that has any interest in
reaching a peaceful accommodation with the West.
Britain Prime Minister Boris Johnson's dramatic removal from office gives a
superb opportunity to adopt a new policy towards Iran, one that takes proper
account of the deadly threat the Iranian regime poses. (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty
Images)
Boris Johnson's dramatic removal from office gives Britain a superb opportunity
to adopt a new policy towards Iran, one that takes proper account of the deadly
threat the Iranian regime poses to Britain and its allies.
From his time as foreign secretary to his more recent tenure as prime minister,
Mr Johnson's attitude towards Iran and its illicit nuclear activities can most
charitably be described as equivocal.
During the Trump administration, Mr Johnson liked to give senior American
officials working on the Iran brief the impression that he was deeply sceptical
about the value of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the deal
negotiated by then US President Barack Obama that was supposed to limit Iran's
nuclear activities. Any reservations Mr Johnson may have entertained in private
about the deal did not, however, see him end Britain's involvement in the
agreement. On the contrary, under his premiership, Britain backed attempts by
other Western signatories to the deal -- the US, France and Germany -- to revive
the JCPOA in the face of mounting evidence that Tehran has absolutely no
interest in abiding by its commitments.
In the latest indication that Iran is in breach of its JCPOA commitments, the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN-sponsored body responsible for
monitoring Tehran's nuclear activities, has reported that Iran has recently
escalated its uranium enrichment activities at its underground Fordow facility.
Experts say this will enable Iran to enrich uranium to weapons-grade levels
without being detected by IAEA inspection teams.
Iran's wilful disregard for the deal it signed with the Obama administration in
2015 has been a key factor in the Biden administration's failure to revive the
deal, despite US President Joe Biden investing an enormous amount of political
capital in his doomed mission to improve relations with Tehran.
Consequently, with Mr Johnson soon to depart from Downing Street, there is a
golden opportunity for his successor to adopt a new, more robust policy towards
Tehran, one that clearly identifies the ayatollahs as posing a clear and present
danger to the security of Britain and its allies.
The scale of the Iranian threat is reflected in last week's statement by US
National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan that Iran had agreed to supply Russia
with hundreds of drones to support its war effort in Ukraine.
Russia's offensive in eastern Ukraine has stalled as a result of the heavy
losses it has suffered both in terms of men and equipment, and Moscow is
desperate to secure military reinforcements to sustain its war effort.
The provision of hundreds of Iranian drones could therefore provide the Russians
with a much-needed boost.
"Our information indicates that the Iranian government is preparing to provide
Russia with up to several hundred UAVs, including weapons-capable UAVs on an
expedited timeline," Mr. Sullivan told a briefing of White House reporters this
week.
The revelations concerning Iran's deepening involvement in the Ukraine conflict
should certainly concern the British government which, under Mr Johnson, has
been a staunch supporter of the Ukrainian cause, so much so that there have even
been Ukrainian streets named in honour of Britain's deposed prime minister. In
such circumstances, it will be extremely difficult for Mr Johnson's successor as
prime minister to continue with the same policy of appeasement towards Tehran
while Iran is actively supporting the Kremlin's war effort in Ukraine.
The British military is certainly under no illusions about the scale of Iran's
military threat after a detachment of Royal Marines recently intercepted a cargo
of Iranian surface-to-air missiles that was being shipped to Iranian-backed
Houthi rebels fighting in Yemen in contravention of a UN Security Council
resolution.
According to details provided earlier this month by London's Ministry of
Defence, the Iranians were attempting to smuggle missiles out of the country in
speedboats destined for the Yemeni coast when they were intercepted by Royal
Marine commandos in the Gulf of Oman.
The recent upsurge in Iranian military activity, both in the Arabian Gulf and
Ukraine, provides incontrovertible evidence that, far from trying to reach an
agreement with the West, Iran appears determined to intensify hostilities.
It is a change of approach that Britain's next prime minister must acknowledge
when formulating Britain's policy for dealing with Iran.
In future, Britain, together with other signatories to the JCPOA, must base its
policy on the assumption that Iran is a hostile regime, not one that has any
interest in reaching a peaceful accommodation with the West.
Con Coughlin is the Telegraph's Defence and Foreign Affairs Editor and a
Shillman Journalism Fellow at Gatestone Institute.
© 2022 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Three Figures Made the Date in Jeddah
Ghassan Charbel/Asharq Al Awsat/July 18/2022
One day in Baghdad, I pondered the reasons why the United States decided to
dissolve the Iraqi army. I didn’t find a convincing answer, neither from
America’s opponents, nor from its allies.
Then President Jalal Talabani said: “The US is confusing and confused. But it is
a major power, which when it sets its mind to it, can offer what others
cannot.”The truth is that the US often acts like a great boxer whose successive
bouts have cost them their ability to listen to friends. The loss in the ability
to listen often doubles the urge to dictate to others.
The boxer’s ability to commit mistakes is also coupled with the ability to admit
to and rectify them, either through a change in US president or by the
decision-makers reviewing their decisions. All of this, of course, is viewed
from the lens of American interests.
The American story with the Middle East is long and complicated. Its interests
there are vast, but its ability to understand its complexities is weaker than
its ability to create shocks in it.
The US has often appeared weary of the Middle East, and the feeling is mutual.
In recent years, successive American administrations did not hide the fact that
the Middle East took a backseat in its agenda as it focused its attention in
containing China’s rise.
Many in Washington believed that this part of the world is stuck in the trap of
history, preoccupied with the wars of the past, reprisals, economic failures,
despair and fear of change and only produces waves of conservatives, extremists
and suicide bombers. The US almost quit the region, especially after its need
for its oil dropped.
Arab and international summits over the decades taught us to limit our
expectations, hopes and judgement. But the series of summits that took place on
the sidelines of the Jeddah summit and the ensuing statements implied that the
US has really reviewed its relations in the region and that it was rewriting its
role in it.
The overall impression is reminiscent of Talabani’s statement in that the US
can, when it decides to do so, offer what Europe, Russia and China cannot. It
can offer advances in defense, the economy, technology, health, education and
environment.
US President Joe Biden was clear in stressing that America decided to be a
strategic partner to its allies and friends in the Middle East and that it was
in no way ready to leave behind a vacuum to be filled by China, Russia or Iran.
It seems that the US has concluded that the return to the Middle East and
acknowledging the “error” of withdrawing from it helps it in its policies
against China, Russia and Iran.
Obviously, the US president’s statements from Jeddah would not have been made
were it not for the shock caused by the Russian war in Ukraine. Every reading of
political, military, energy and food security developments in the world must be
traced back to the shocks that were caused by the war.
One must also not forget the upcoming US midterm elections. Washington has
concluded that the return to the Middle East helps it withstand and perhaps even
contain those shocks and their negative impact and may help it wage the
elections.
The American return to the Middle East would not have been possible had the Arab
player themself not assumed their role in the region. The participation of the
leaders of Egypt, Jordan and Iraq alongside the Gulf Cooperation Council leaders
at the summit gave the impression that the Arab forces of moderation were
playing a greater role in securing their interests, and managing region’s
affairs and its ties with the world.
Moderate countries are no longer accused of being stuck in the past and of being
producers of extremists. They are no longer accused of failing in taking
difficult decisions when it comes to progress, reform, modernization and joining
the race towards the future.
The summit could not have been held – an in Jeddah in specific – were it not for
the spark of renaissance lit by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and that
transformed the new Saudi Arabia into a prominent and responsible political,
economic and energy player and a voice to be reckoned with on the international
arena.
Along with the drive towards stability and prosperity, the Crown Prince launched
efforts to clear the Gulf and Arab air, even extending a hand to neighboring
Iran if it were prepared to meet under international law and the principle of
good neighborliness.
The extraordinary reform process in Saudi Arabia was accompanied with similar
experiences in countries that took part in the summit. This helped the Arab
player return to the Middle East alongside the US. The moderate Arab countries
notably also maintained relations with China and Russia, which certainly has not
escaped American decision-makers.
The dialogue in Jeddah differed from others held in the past. The Saudi-American
talks were frank, open and realistic over security, political and energy issues.
It was the diplomacy of mutual interests, serious partnership and numbers. The
American-Arab dialogue was also clear and frank. We can say that the conditions
of the tango were available.
The US returned with a new approach and Arab moderation came to the summit with
specific visions and knowing what it wants. The fruits of the open dialogue were
evident. The Gulf-American statement expressed Washington’s clear return to its
commitment to defend its allies and develop their defense capabilities to deter
old and new dangers. It also announced a partnership to secure marine navigation
in the strategic straits.
The Jeddah summit statement was also clear about the truce and peace in Yemen,
commitment to the two-state solution, position towards Iran and policy of
meddling and destabilization.
Will the Jeddah summits form a new turn in the developments in the region and
Arab-American relations? Only the future will tell, but Washington’s concern
over the Ukraine war and China’s rise leads us to believe that the
implementation of the agreements is close to the maps that have been drawn up to
handle several files. Add to that rising western voices that warn that the
West’s political and economic dominance was waning. Tony Blair was among them.
He said: “The biggest geo-political change of this century will come from China
not Russia.”
The outcomes of the Jeddah summits will be at the center of attention in
capitals near and far. They will be closely examined in Beijing and Moscow. How
will Tehran interpret America’s return to the region, the return of the Arab
player and the new chapter in ties between Washington and moderate Arabs? Three
figures made the date in Jeddah. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, President Joe
Biden, and of course, Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Biden and Putin: A tale of two visits
Baria Alamuddin/Arab News/July 18, 2022
We are in the throes of two potentially game-changing visits — US President Joe
Biden’s recently concluded trip to Saudi Arabia, followed by Russian leader
Vladimir Putin’s pilgrimage this week to Tehran.
In an implicit admission of his administration’s earlier failure to prioritize
the Middle East, Biden declared to Arab leaders: “We will not walk away to leave
a vacuum to be filled by China, Russia or Iran.”
A joint US-Saudi statement pledged efforts to deter Iran’s interference in “the
internal affairs of other countries, its support for terrorism through its armed
proxies and its efforts to destabilize the security and stability of the
region,” while recognizing the need to prevent Tehran “acquiring a nuclear
weapon.” Specific security measures include a joint US-GCC maritime task force
in the Red Sea.
This reinforced an earlier joint statement by Biden and Israeli Prime Minister
Yair Lapid, pledging to use “all elements of national power” to stop Iran arming
itself with nuclear weapons. Biden said America was ready to use military force
against Iran as a “last resort,” declaring: “The only thing worse than the Iran
that exists now is an Iran with nuclear weapons.”
At last week’s summit in Jeddah of leaders from the six Gulf states plus Egypt,
Jordan and Iraq, which Biden attended, there was an affirmation of their joint
commitment to Lebanon’s “sovereignty, security and stability.” The strong
language from that summit about support for Iraqi democracy and the deal for
interconnected Saudi-Iraqi electricity grids are also important parts of the
necessary process of weaning Iraq away from Iranian dependency. However, there
was a notable absence of commitments for confronting Iran-backed paramilitary
forces in these states.
Of course, this visit was about much more than Iran. As the Saudi Ambassador to
the US Princess Reema bint Bandar put it, this relationship must move beyond the
“oil for security” paradigm. Consequently, America’s focus on cooperation on
technology, renewable energy, education and economic diversification was
welcome, with Biden stressing “how closely interwoven America’s interests are
with the success of the Middle East.” And with trillions of dollars of GCC
investments in the US and the West, this is by no means a one-way relationship.
In the context of such serious matters, many observers despaired at the shallow
stupidity of much of the Western media coverage; respectable outlets focused on
fist bumps and photo opportunities, while largely ignoring the fundamental
issues of global security under discussion.
In a characteristically defiant move, while Biden was still in the region Tehran
unveiled a new fleet of ships and submarines capable of carrying armed drones.
“As we are aware of the aggressive attitude in the US system of domination, it
is necessary to increase our defensive capabilities day by day,” army chief
Abdolrahim Mousavi said, pledging a “regrettable response” if “our enemies make
a mistake.”
Why are the ayatollahs so keen to showcase their evolving drone capabilities at
this exact moment? With cheap Turkish drones having proved an unexpectedly
potent weapon for the Ukrainians, Putin is heading to Tehran to invest in
Iranian drones. There have already been secret scoping visits by Russian
officials to check out Iranian military hardware. The Revolutionary Guards’ tame
media outlets trumpet how Iranian weapons can compensate for Russian
“weaknesses” on the battlefield. However, a US military official in the Gulf
told me that sophisticated American anti-drone and missile capabilities can
neutralize such threats, often before they even get off the ground. Iran’s
increased 2022 defense budget of $26 billion makes it one of the world’s top 15
states in military spending, but that is still about 30 times less than US
defense expenditure, and there are immense differences in effectiveness and
capacity — making all Tehran’s anti-American saber rattling look ridiculous.
Nevertheless, a mutually beneficial Tehran-Moscow axis should trigger alarms. As
well as enabling Russia to procure cheap arms, it would be a financial windfall
for Tehran, which has long sought to flog its domestically produced weaponry to
warlords and terrorists throughout Africa, Asia and Latin America. Thousands of
increasingly sophisticated Iranian missiles have been exported to militias in
Yemen, Iraq, Lebanon and Syria. The planet becomes less secure if we allow Iran
to become the armorer of choice for pariah states and insurgents.
When rogue states band together, they risk coalescing into a bloc — an axis of
evil, if you like — and it becomes difficult to exert meaningful pressure
against them as they trade with each other, exploit each other’s parallel
financial systems, arm each other, and help each other to evade international
law.
To prevent sanctions and anti-proliferation measures being rendered ineffective,
Biden’s strategies toward states such as Russia, Iran, North Korea and China
must not be implemented in isolation. Narrow focus on Europe and NATO will not
make the world safe, it will only embolden other pariahs to flex their muscles.
Biden commended Saudi efforts toward a ceasefire in Yemen, but now it has never
been more important for Arab states to reassert their necessary roles in Syria,
Lebanon and Iraq if there is to be a curtailment of Iranian interference, which
has served only to maintain these nations in a permanent state of turmoil. Arab
states must demonstrate that they possess the diplomatic capacity and vision to
play this crucial role.
We should not be too hasty to applaud Biden’s trip and the Arab summit. Yes,
America is back, but this is where the real work starts. It’s no secret that the
president was reluctant to make this journey in the first place, so Arab states
must be assertive in holding the US to its commitments and keeping this
administration closely engaged.
This is a region on a knife edge; years of Iranian expansionism have made major
regionalized conflict all but inevitable. Biden’s visit shows that the Arab
world has succeeded for now in regaining American attention. Leaders must now do
everything in their power to maintain this attention and keep it laser-focused
on addressing these chronic long-term threats to regional stability.
*Baria Alamuddin is an award-winning journalist and broadcaster in the Middle
East and the UK. She is editor of the Media Services Syndicate and has
interviewed numerous heads of state.