English LCCC Newsbulletin For
Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For February 17/2022
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news
The Bulletin's Link on the
lccc Site
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2021/english.february17.22.htm
News
Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations For today
when you are offering your gift at the
altar, if you remember that your brother or sister has something against you,
leave your gift there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your
brother or sister, and then come and offer your gift
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew
05/21-26/:”‘You have heard that it was said to those of ancient times, “You
shall not murder”; and “whoever murders shall be liable to judgement.”But I say
to you that if you are angry with a brother or sister, you will be liable to
judgement; and if you insult a brother or sister, you will be liable to the
council; and if you say, “You fool”, you will be liable to the hell of fire. So
when you are offering your gift at the altar, if you remember that your brother
or sister has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar and
go; first be reconciled to your brother or sister, and then come and offer your
gift. Come to terms quickly with your accuser while you are on the way to court
with him, or your accuser may hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the
guard, and you will be thrown into prison.Truly I tell you, you will never get
out until you have paid the last penny.”
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials
published on February 16-17/2022
Justice and Truth are inseparable/Abu Arz-Etienne Saqr/February 16/2022
Hizbullah Posters Spark Clash outside LAU's Beirut Campus
Hizbullah Releases Video Featuring Mountain Commandos Performing Elaborate
Shooting Drills, Praying In The Snow
Judge Aoun Slams 'Political Protection' for Salameh, Asks Othman for
'Explanation'
Questioning Session Set for Othman as Mustaqbal Lashes Anew at Aoun
'Shut Up', Miqati Reportedly Tells Fayyad in Electric Exchange
Nasrallah: Hizbullah Making Precision Missiles, Drones inside Lebanon
Tel Aviv Says Israeli Gas Will Reach Lebanon Through Egypt, Jordan
Jumblat Says Salameh's Arrest Not Best Solution for Halting Collapse
Political Leader Warns of 'Civil War' if Salameh Arrested
Divisions rock Lebanon over questioning of central bank chief
When will Sheikh Darian utter the word of truth?/Ali Sarraf/Arab News/February
16/2022
Lebanese trust army — not Hezbollah — to secure stability, poll shows/Najia
Houssari/Arab News/February 16, 2022
Hollowing Lebanon Out!/Hazem Saghieh/Asharq Al-Awsat/February 16/2022
Titles For The Latest English LCCC
Miscellaneous Reports And News published
on February 16-17/2022
France Says Macron and China’s Xi Agreed to Step up Efforts on Iran
Nuclear Deal
Decision on Iran Nuclear Deal Days Away, Ball in Tehran’s Court, Says France
2015 Nuclear Deal Has Become an ‘Empty Shell’, Iran’s Top Security Official Says
Pelosi Arrives in Israel, Vows Support on Iran
Kremlin Says 'Positive' that Biden Wants to Continue Talks
NATO Says Russia's Military Build-Up Continuing around Ukraine
Key Ruling Fuels Tensions between Baghdad, Kurdish Govts
Pelosi in Jerusalem: U.S. Support for Israel is 'Ironclad'
17 Israelis Arrested over Attack on Palestinian Village
Human rights lawyers in bid to bring Syrian, Iranian war-crime cases to court
Canada/Minister Joly to travel to Germany and France
Titles For The Latest LCCC English
analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on February 16-17/2022
GCC holds first meeting with Afghanistan’s de facto rulers/Dr. Abdel Aziz
Aluwaisheg/Arab News/February 16, 2022
Will Xi Jinping's 'End of Days' Plunge China and the World into War?/Gordon G.
Chang/Gatestone Institute/February 16, 2022
Iran’s Strategy Following a Deal with the US/Camelia Entekhabifard/Asharq Al-Awsat/February
16/2022
Helpless Europe/Tariq Al-Homayed/Asharq Al-Awsat/February 16/2022
on February 16-17/2022
Justice and Truth are inseparable
Abu Arz-Etienne Saqr/February 16/2022
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/106387/%d8%a3%d8%a8%d9%88-%d8%a3%d8%b1%d8%b2-%d9%8a%d8%b9%d9%84%d9%82-%d8%b9%d9%84%d9%89-%d9%85%d9%84%d8%a7%d8%ad%d9%82%d8%a9-%d9%81%d9%82%d8%b7-%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%a7%d8%b6-%d8%b3%d9%84%d8%a7%d9%85%d8%a9/
The judicial decision in occupied Lebanon to charge and prosecute Riad Salameh,
the Central Bank Governor only among the other corruption lords responsible for
the country’s ruin and bankruptcy, is a selective and retaliatory decision.
This judicial track does not fall within the framework of the anti-corruption
campaign sought by the people, but rather within the framework of covering up
the corrupted officials and politician prosecuted internationally and locally.
The aim of this vindictive persecution aims to have a scapegoat who will be held
accountable for all the thefts, suspicious deals, brokerages and organized
looting that the ruling gang has perpetrated over many decades.
We do not defend any of the members of this satanic gang, but we affirm that the
fight against corruption starts vertically from top to bottom, and is
comprehensive or not... because justice and truth inseparable
Long Live Lebanon
Hizbullah Posters Spark Clash outside LAU's Beirut
Campus
Naharnet/February 16/2021
A clash erupted Wednesday outside the campus of the Lebanese American University
(LAU) in Beirut’s Qureitem area. Al-Jadeed TV said the clash pitted LAU students
belonging to Hizbullah and the Amal Movement against supporters of al-Mustaqbal
Movement who came from outside the university. The clash broke out as
Hizbullah’s students were marking their party’s so-called Martyr Leaders Day by
displaying posters of Hizbullah’s slain leaders and blaring partisan anthems
from loud speakers. The rally was organized in the street outside the
university’s campus seeing as LAU’s administration bans political party
activities inside the university. Media reports said the army intervened and
contained the clash, which involved the use of fists and batons. LAU’s
administration meanwhile issued a statement clarifying that the clash occurred
outside and not inside the university and that all political events are banned
at the university’s campuses in Beirut and Jbeil.“The university urges the
various media outlets to seek accuracy in this difficult period that Lebanon is
going through, especially as to preserving the reputation of Lebanon’s
university institutions and students,” the statement added.
Hizbullah Releases Video Featuring Mountain Commandos Performing Elaborate
Shooting Drills, Praying In The Snow
MEMRI/February 16/2021
Source: The Internet - "central-media.org (Hizbullah – Lebanon)"
On February 16, 2022, Hizbullah released a video showcasing the combat
capabilities of its mountain commando unit. The commandos are shown in white
uniforms and balaclavas, and their weapons are also camouflaged in white and
other light colors. They are shown shooting at targets with the Israeli flag
painted on them, as well as shooting from bipods and while skiing or riding
snowmobiles. They used a variety of weapons, including light machine guns,
handguns, and rifles, some of which had optical sights. In addition, the video
shows the commandos training in hand-to-hand combat and praying together in the
snow. Some of the shooting drills performed by the commandos involved shooting
at targets while other soldiers stand next to the targets or march back and
forth between the shooter and the target. The video concluded with a statement
by Hizbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah, which was subtitled in Arabic and Hebrew:
"Hizbullah has a characteristic about it that horror walks before it."
According to a caption on the video, the exercises were performed in southern
Lebanon at an altitude of 1370 meters (4495 ft) and a temperature of -2 Celsius
(28.4 Fahrenheit). The video was published on central-media.org (Hizbullah –
Lebanon).
Click on the below link to view this clip on MEMRI TV
https://www.memri.org/tv/hizbullah-mountain-commando-snow-camouflage-shooting-drills-praying-south-lebanon
Judge Aoun Slams 'Political Protection' for Salameh,
Asks Othman for 'Explanation'
Associated Press/February 16/2021
Mount Lebanon Prosecutor Judge Ghada Aoun has said that she may sue Internal
Security Forces chief Maj. Gen. Imad Othman, accusing him of preventing a State
Security force from bringing in for questioning the central bank governor, who
is accused of corruption.
Judge Aoun told The Associated Press that Central Bank Governor Riad Salameh
failed to show up for questioning for a fourth time on Tuesday. She alleged that
the banker was defying judicial orders because he has political protection.
Salameh, who is accused of corruption and dereliction of duty during Lebanon's
historic economic meltdown, is facing a lawsuit filed by a Lebanese
anti-corruption group. The value of the national currency has plunged, foreign
reserves are running low and the highly indebted government has been unable to
agree on an economic recovery plan.
Many hold Salameh partly responsible for the financial crisis, blaming him for
policies that only drove national debt up and caused the currency to tumble.
Salameh, 71, has been in the post for nearly three decades and enjoys backing
from most politicians, including the country's prime minister.
Salameh is also being investigated in several countries including Switzerland,
Luxembourg and France for potential money laundering and embezzlement. Local
media reported in recent months that Salameh, his brother and an aide have been
involved in illegal businesses, including money transfers abroad despite the
informal capital controls imposed at home. Judge Aoun had issued an order to
appear to Salameh earlier this month. But Salameh dismissed the lawsuit against
him as political, saying it lacked evidence. It was filed by a group of lawyers
known by the name "The People Want to Reform the Regime." Salameh has called for
Judge Aoun to be dismissed from the case and accused her of bias. Salameh's case
revealed divisions within Lebanon's security agencies after a force from State
Security, an intelligence department, went to his home and office to bring him
in for questioning and no one answered when they knocked on the door.Aoun said
she then told the force to break in after he failed to show up for questioning
for a fourth time. At that point, she said, members of the Internal Security
Forces, or police, warned State Security agents that they cannot go in by force
otherwise "there will be a confrontation."
Interior Minister Bassam Mawlawi denied there were divisions within the two
security agencies, saying they are both carrying out their duties, according to
the state-run National News Agency. Aoun said she has sent a formal letter to
ISF chief Maj. Gen. Imad Othman, asking for an explanation regarding the
incident. "I have asked for an explanation, and I am considering filing a
lawsuit against him," Aoun said about Othman. "What he did is considered to be
an offense, which is fighting authorities and preventing the implementation of a
judicial order."The ISF issued a statement later saying the force did not
prevent State Security from bringing in Salameh, adding that the force's mission
is only to protect the central bank governor and does not have the authority to
prevent the implementation of official memorandums. The statement added that the
matter was discussed between Othman and State Security chief Maj. Gen. Tony
Saliba. The division between the two security agencies mirrors the rivalry
between the country's politicians. Othman is considered close to former Prime
Minister Saad Hariri, who quit politics last month, and was a main opponent of
President Michel Aoun, who backs Saliba.
The judge has been also been blamed of being close to the president. They are
both from the same family but not related.
Questioning Session Set for Othman as Mustaqbal Lashes
Anew at Aoun
Naharnet/February 16/2021
Judge Nicolas Mansour on Wednesday scheduled a session for the interrogation of
Internal Security Forces chief Maj. Gen. Imad Othman in the lawsuit filed
against him by Mount Lebanon Prosecutor Judge Ghada Aoun, LBCI TV reported.
The TV network said Othman has been informed of the date through the Interior
Ministry and that Mansour has also asked the Directorate General of State
Security to provide him with information about what happened with its patrol
when it headed to Central Bank chief Riad Salameh’s house on Tuesday. Judge
Aoun’s lawsuit accuses Othman of “preventing a security patrol from enforcing a
subpoena” she had issued against Salameh. Al-Mustaqbal Movement meanwhile issued
a new statement in which it blamed President Michel Aoun for the judge’s
measures against both Salameh and Othman.
Accusing Aoun of “taking part in the Free Patriotic Movement’s battles” and
“undermining legitimate state institutions,” Mustaqbal added that Aoun has
founded for his political movement “a private Justice Palace led by Ghada
Aoun.”“Targeting the ISF’s command after Banque du Liban’s governorship in this
blatant and suspicious manner is something rejected in all standards, especially
that it comes after the announcement of major achievements for the ISF’s command
in busting sabotage and terrorism networks and arresting kidnap, robbery and
smuggling gangs,” the Movement added.
“Judge Aoun is not acting on her own and the Lebanese must search for the
masterminds who are plunging the country into further chaos in the halls of the
palace in which General Aoun resides,” Mustaqbal went on to say, while stressing
that “the attempt to target Maj. Gen. Imad Othman shall not pass, no matter how
much they rally their forces.
'Shut Up', Miqati Reportedly Tells Fayyad in Electric
Exchange
Naharnet/February 16/2021
Tuesday’s Cabinet session witnessed a heated exchange between Prime Minister
Najib Miqati and Energy Minister Walid Fayyad over the electricity plan, media
reports said on Wednesday. “Miqati thanked the Energy Minister for his
presentation (in Cabinet about the electricity plan), stressing the need to
implement Law 462, especially as to the creation of a regulatory commission,”
al-Joumhouria newspaper reported. “He linked tariff rectification to increasing
supply hours, demanding a fast implementation. He then told Fayyad, ‘We can no
longer wait until 2023, we must begin the work, especially the reform steps, and
the World Bank is waiting for answers from us. We want electricity, hurry up and
see what you can do,’” the daily added. That prompted Fayyad to “fiercely defend
his plan and raise his voice, which prompted Miqati to shout him and ask him to
‘shut up,’” al-Joumhouria said. President Michel Aoun then adjourned the session
and the debate over the electricity plan was postponed to a session whose date
was not scheduled, the daily added. Al-Joumhouria reported that Miqati and
Fayyad “reconciled at the hall’s door after the session” and that the Energy
Minister “showed cordiality towards Miqati, who regretted the word he
said.”Ministerial sources meanwhile told the newspaper that Miqati lost his
temper because “he has become embarrassed towards the World Bank and its
(regional) director Saroj Kumar Jha with whom he will meet soon.”“He wanted to
carry something in his hands before heading to Munich on Thursday on a visit
that might involve a German proposal for the Energy Ministry,” the sources
added.
Nasrallah: Hizbullah Making Precision Missiles, Drones
inside Lebanon
Naharnet/February 16/2021
Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah on Wednesday announced that his group
now possesses the ability to transform its ordinary rockets into
precision-guided missiles, adding that Hizbullah has also been manufacturing
drones for several years now.
“I tell the Israelis that what they call a ‘battle between wars’ has turned the
threat into an opportunity for the resistance,” Nasrallah said in a televised
address, referring to Israel’s recurrent strikes on Hizbullah-bound arms
shipments inside Syria. “We now possess the ability to transform our thousands
of rockets into precision-guided missiles,” Nasrallah added, noting that such
missiles are spread throughout Lebanon and are not stored in a single place.
Hizbullah’s leader also boasted that his group has been manufacturing drones for
several years now, adding that it is willing to start selling such aircraft. He
also warned Israel against carrying out any landings or airborne operations
inside Lebanon. “Should the enemy dare to carry out a certain operation in
search of our missiles, it might face an ‘Ansariyeh 2’ operation,” Nasrallah
said, referring to Israel’s 1997 botched landing on Ansariyeh’s shore in which
12 of its troops were killed.Nasrallah also said that Hizbullah has been working
on improving its military capabilities, revealing that last summer, Hizbullah
fighters conducted the largest training exercise since the group was formed in
1982. Stressing that Hizbullah will continue to “protect Lebanon” through the
so-called army-people-resistance equation, Nasrallah added that his party does
not fear any national dialogue over the fate of its weapons. “Our strategy is
clear and let them demonstrate their strategy to us instead of insults and
slurs,” he said. “We insist on strengthening and equipping the army and we also
insist that the assistance should not come from a single side,” he added,
referring to Washington’s support for the Lebanese Army. As for the upcoming
parliamentary elections, Nasrallah emphasized that “all electoral rounds in
Lebanon are important and critical” and underscored that Hizbullah supports
holding the elections on time.
Nasrallah also commented on Interior Minister Bassam al-Mawlawi’s banning of two
events for the Bahraini opposition in Lebanon and his criticism of a rally that
was held at a pro-Hizbullah venue. “Those who met yesterday in the Risalat Hall
are the ones who consolidated Lebanon’s identity and the Bahraini opposition has
the right to celebrate the anniversary of its revolution,” Nasrallah stressed.
“Lebanon has always been the refuge of political oppositions in the Arab world.
Who wants to transform it into an oppressive country? Lebanon is the country of
freedoms and this is its real identity,” he said.
Tel Aviv Says Israeli Gas Will Reach Lebanon Through
Egypt, Jordan
Tel Aviv - Asharq Al-Awsat/Wednesday, 16 February, 2022
The Israeli Minister of Energy, Karine el-Harar, confirmed that "Israeli gas
will reach Lebanon," an announcement denied earlier in Lebanon. Several official
Lebanese sources denied this news in the past weeks, asserting that the gas
supply agreement states that the gas is Egyptian and not Israeli. However, when
asked about the possibility of Israeli gas exported to Egypt and Jordan making
its way to Lebanon, Harrar said, "so be it."
Harar participated in Egypt Petroleum Show 2022 (EGYPS) at the head of a large
Israeli delegation. Harar added, "I don't care about that. We sell gas to
Egypt," and Cairo sells it to others. The Israeli energy economy is a bridge for
consolidating relations with regional countries, she said, adding that she is
pleased to have the opportunity to represent Israel in EGYPS, hoping it will be
another step on the road to achieving peace. Harrar, who uses a wheelchair due
to a disease that left her unable to stand, cried when Egyptian President Abdel
Fattah El-Sisi treated her in a special way.
Sisi was seen walking to the other side of the hall to welcome the Israeli
Minister. Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett praised Sisi for his special
greeting. Bennett retweeted video footage of the moment and wrote that he was
"touched" by the gesture. "President al-Sisi, you've touched us all," tweeted
Bennett. The Ministry of Energy issued a statement announcing that this is the
first time Israeli officials have participated in the conference. The Israeli
delegation included the Ministry's Director-General, Lior Schillat, senior
officials, and representatives of various Israeli companies producing gas and
electric power. Meanwhile, Egypt's petroleum minister Tarek el-Molla told the
same event that the timeline for sending gas to Lebanon is flexible as it
depends on Jordan and Lebanon. He added that the technical aspects of supporting
gas exports to Lebanon would be finished by February.
Jordanian Minister of Energy Saleh al-Kharabsheh announced that exporting
electricity to Lebanon will start next month after finalizing a funding
agreement with the World Bank. The editor of Arab affairs in Yedioth Ahronoth
newspaper reported that Israelis know that Hezbollah chief Hasan Nasrallah did
not object to the gas deal. She claimed that he turned a blind eye to the deal
because there isn't any serious alternative, neither from Iran nor any other
party. The arrival of gas from Jordan is the shortest and fastest way to solve
the energy crisis in Lebanon. The gas reaches Jordan from Israel and Egypt.
Jumblat Says Salameh's Arrest Not Best Solution for
Halting Collapse
Naharnet/Wednesday, 16 February, 2022
Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblat on Wednesday said Central Bank
Governor Riad Salameh’s arrest would not be the best solution for halting the
financial and economic collapse in the country. “What would be better: the
arrest of the central bank governor by the State Security agency and putting the
institution under judicial guardianship or devising a program that would
preserve depositors’ rights in collaboration with the IMF in order to halt the
collapse?” Jumblat asked in a tweet. Separately, the PSP leader wondered about
the reason behind “the sudden objection against the U.S. aid for the Lebanese
Army.”“Has the issue been a secret (throughout the past years?)” he asked,
apparently referring to recent remarks by Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan
Nasrallah.
Political Leader Warns of 'Civil War' if Salameh
Arrested
Naharnet/Wednesday, 16 February, 2022
A political leader has warned that the arrest of Central Bank chief Riad Salameh
“in a confrontational way might lead to a civil war,” cautioning against
“underestimating the consequences that might arise from such a behavior,”
sources close to the leader told al-Joumhouria newspaper in remarks published
Wednesday.Sources informed on Salameh’s case meanwhile told the daily that “this
issue cannot be settled without agreements on a comprehensive deal that would
include other vital topics that are still unresolved.”
“The balances of the domestic situation do not allow for incomplete solutions,”
the sources added. According to media reports, a standoff erupted Tuesday
between the State Security agency and the Internal Security Forces when a State
Security force arrived at Salameh's residence to enforce a subpoena issued by
Judge Ghada Aoun. The standoff between the two security agencies mirrors the
rivalry between the country's politicians. ISF chief Maj. Gen. Imad Othman is
considered close to former Prime Minister Saad Hariri, who quit politics last
month, and was a main opponent of President Michel Aoun, who backs Saliba.Judge
Ghada Aoun has been also been blamed of being close to the president. They are
both from the same family but not related.
Divisions rock Lebanon over questioning of central bank
chief
AFP/Wednesday, 16 February, 2022
An investigative judge said Tuesday she may sue Lebanon’s police chief, accusing
him of preventing a security force from bringing in for questioning the central
bank governor, who is accused of corruption. Judge Ghada Aoun said that Central
Bank Governor Riad Salameh failed to show up for questioning for a fourth time
on Tuesday. She alleged that the banker was defying judicial orders because he
has political protection. Salameh, who is accused of corruption and dereliction
of duty during Lebanon’s historic economic meltdown, is facing a lawsuit filed
by a Lebanese anti-corruption group.
The value of the national currency has plunged, foreign reserves are running low
and the highly-indebted government has been unable to agree on an economic
recovery plan. Many hold Salameh partly responsible for the financial crisis,
blaming him for policies that only drove national debt up and caused the
currency to tumble. Salameh, 71, has been in the post for nearly three decades
and enjoys backing from most politicians, including the country’s prime
minister. He is also being investigated in several countries including
Switzerland, Luxembourg and France for potential money-laundering and
embezzlement.
Local media reported in recent months that Salameh, his brother and an aide have
been involved in illegal businesses, including money transfers abroad despite
the informal capital controls imposed at home. Judge Aoun had issued an order
for Salameh to appear before her earlier this month. But Salameh dismissed the
lawsuit against him as political, saying it lacked evidence. It was filed by a
group of lawyers known by the name “The People Want to Reform the
Regime.”Salameh has called for Judge Aoun to be dismissed from the case and
accused her of bias. Salameh’s case revealed divisions within Lebanon’s security
agencies after a force from State Security, an intelligence department, went to
his home and office to bring him in for questioning and no one answered when
they knocked on the door.
Aoun said she then told the force to break in after he failed to show up for
questioning for a fourth time. At that point, she said, members of the Internal
Security Forces, or police, warned State Security agents that they cannot go in
by force otherwise “there will be a confrontation.”
Interior Minister Bassam Mawlawi denied there were divisions within the two
security agencies, saying they are both carrying out their duties, according to
the state-run National News Agency. Aoun said she has sent a formal letter to
Internal Security Force chief Major General Imad Osman, over the incident.
“I have asked for an explanation and I am considering filing a lawsuit against
him,” Aoun said of Osman. “What he did is considered to be an offence, which is
fighting authorities and preventing the implementation of a judicial order.”ISF
issued a statement later saying the force did not prevent State Security from
bringing in Salameh, adding that the force’s mission is only to protect the
central bank governor and does not have the authority to prevent the
implementation of official memorandums.The statement added that the matter was
discussed between Osman and State Security chief Major General Tony Saliba. The
division between the two security agencies mirrors the rivalry between the
country’s politicians. Osman is considered close to former Lebanese Prime
Minister Saad Hariri, who quit politics last month and was a main opponent of
President Michel Aoun, who backs Saliba.
The judge has been also been accused of being close to the president. They are
both from the same family but not related.
When will Sheikh Darian utter the word of truth?
Ali Sarraf/Arab News/February 16/2022
Muslim clerics do not usually stand with their people. They rarely do. They
usually stand with tyrants, out of fear or greed. They find excuses and
justifications for tyranny. They claim that “an unjust ruler is better than a
lasting sedition." But both the ruler and the sedition usually continue. Such a
theory has no roots in the Holy Qur’an, nor in the Sunnah nor any interpretation
of the faith. The Grand Mufti of the Lebanese Republic, Sheikh Abdellatif Darian
is not one of these clerics. It is still hoped that he will play his role in
standing by the Lebanese, not only in the face of the “unjust ruler” but also in
the face of “the lasting sedition”.Sheikh Darian does not meddle in politics.
This is to his credit. But supporting the Lebanese against a system of
corruption, injustice, oppression, discrimination and foreign allegiance is not
politics. It is the essence of religion. I do not want to compare Sheikh Darian
to Patriarch Bechara Boutros al-Rai, for this noble patriot leads his own battle
within his own house. And he is fighting his battle not simply for the sake of
the Christians who have fallen into the grip of the corrupt, the arrogant, the
tyrannical, the hypocritical and the greedy. He is fighting it for the sake of
all Lebanese.
Nothing is louder than the moaning of the Lebanese. They are not just starving.
They are shedding tears over a country that has ended up in the hands of
criminals who killed the motherland and danced on its corpse. A cleric who does
not hear the sound of moaning has no religion. Whoever hesitates to say the word
of truth in the face of the oppressors has nothing to do with religion. The
crisis in Lebanon is not just economic. Nor is it a political crisis. It is a
crisis of a system that is no longer suitable in any aspect of life or religion.
It must crumble and fall on the heads of those who drove the country into the
precipice. This system needs to be overhauled, from its foundations,
constitutional rules, electoral regulations, government type, institutional
roles and the work of its political parties.
This system will fall if Muslims stop providing support for its survival and
renewal through parliamentary elections. If they call a halt, they will find in
Christians real brothers and partners. This system will fall if one of its main
columns is pulled from underneath its structure.
Chaos will erupt, but it will be the kind of chaos that opens the way for hope,
including the hope that the country's resources would not go to the corrupt. Is
it, in any case, going to be a form of chaos worse than that which the Lebanese
endure today? Is there a more violent crime than that of a country without
services, electricity, medicine or wages that are sufficient to buy bread? I do
not know how Sheikh Darian eats, under which light he reads his books nor how he
sleeps. But I dare surmise he is probably in pain. But he has not yet uttered
the cry of truth that all the Lebanese have been waiting to hear from him.
It is quite noble of him not to meddle in politics, but it would be more noble
of him to meddle in religion. Because the state of Lebanon today is one of utter
blasphemy. It would be sufficient for him to say he has nothing to do with those
who stand for elections in the name of the Sunnis. It would be sufficient for
him to say that nothing in the Sunnah will justify partnering with an oppressive
regime or being an accomplice to corruption. It would be enough for him to tell
the Shia drug dealers: your religion is not mine. And to the corrupt Christian:
your religion is not mine. It would be enough for him to tell them: the system
you endorse is not mine. The issue is not about disrupting elections. The issue
is to utter the word of truth about the regime, its nature and its institutions.
This regime, which has been able to renew itself, with or without elections,
must fall. The members of the Sunni sect's participation in the elections must
be made conditional upon change. Change has been necessary since the civil war
stopped in 1990. The regime itself should have fallen by now so the Lebanese
could build a new constitutional, moral, social and political edifice.
More than thirty years have passed since then. And Lebanon has continued to
revolve around the same vicious cycle of corruption. Eventually, the Lebanese
paid ten times the cost of building electrical generating stations that would
have been enough to light ten countries the size of Lebanon.
Preventing this system from regeneration and ending its cycle of corruption
needs the word of truth to be uttered by Sheikh Darian, even if he is already
thirty years late.
Lebanese trust army — not Hezbollah — to secure
stability, poll shows
Najia Houssari/Arab News/February 16, 2022
BEIRUT: Eighty-nine percent of respondents in a recent poll said they trusted
the Lebanese Armed Forces to ensure the country’s stability, while 80 percent
felt the same way about the religious leadership and 75 percent about the
judiciary. In contrast, just 19 percent of those polled — regardless of their
religious beliefs — thought political parties could be trusted to ensure
stability. On Hezbollah, opinions were divided. The poll, conducted by Zogby
Research Services, found that 48 percent of respondents had confidence in it to
secure Lebanon’s stability, while 52 percent did not.
Almost two-thirds of those polled expressed the belief that the “weapons and
forces of the resistance should be under the control of the LAF and this
includes a majority of respondents in every sectarian community.”
The poll was carried out in September, 10 days after the formation of Najib
Mikati’s government. The respondents were adults from various Lebanese regions
and sects, and all said they were optimistic about the future despite the
current situation being worse than it was five years ago.
A total of 869 people were asked their opinions on the economic crisis in
Lebanon, how it has affected citizens and how far they trust state institutions.
They also gave their views on Lebanon’s relations with other countries, the
political regime and their hopes for the upcoming legislative elections.
Speaking at an event organized by the AUB Issam Fares Institute for Public
Policy and International Affairs, also attended by Arab News, James Zogby, who
owns the polling company, said: “The developments Lebanon has faced of late led
to breaking the existing regime which needs reform, but the ruling political
elite does not want to admit that.”
Zogby, who is also the founder and president of the Arab American Institute,
said the poll showed that respondents had been seriously affected by shortages
of fuel (97 percent), electricity (89 percent) and drinking water (74 percent).
More than a third of people reported having to go without food on some
occasions, with one in five from poor backgrounds saying they or members of
their families had “very often gone without meals because of a lack of money or
available food.”“Almost two-thirds said they don’t have enough income to make
ends meet. And when asked to identify the most pressing economic problems facing
the country, far and away the two issues they pointed to were the collapse of
the lira (Lebanese pound) and corruption. Given this dire situation, almost
two-thirds of all respondents said they would emigrate if given the
opportunity,” Zogby said. He added that about 65 percent of respondents thought
the “Oct. 17 revolution was beneficial for the country’s stability, while 29
percent said parliament does not ensure stability.”
Seventy-six percent of respondents under the age of 30 were more confident in
the revolution ensuring Lebanon’s stability.
When asked whether Lebanon should strengthen or weaken its ties with other
countries, only France scored well, with respondents supporting strengthening
ties with Paris by a ratio of two to one. On the US and Iran, a third of people
said ties should be strengthened, a third said they should be weakened and a
third said they should remain as they were. Zogby said that respondents, “seemed
optimistic of change in the next legislative elections,” with almost 60 percent
expressing some confidence that they would “bring the political change Lebanon
needs.”
That attitude may be due to the fact that two-thirds of respondents said they
would be voting for the “new alternative parties, with this holding true for all
demographic groups. Only one in five said they will vote for the traditional
parties.”This rejection extends to the Taif agreement, with almost 60 percent
saying Lebanon should dispose of the Taif formula and “adopt a new
constitutional model of governance.”
The results of the poll — which Dr. Fadlo Khoury, president of the American
University of Beirut, said was based on reliable sources, and which was praised
by Dr. Joseph Bahout, director of the Issam Fares Center for Public Policy and
International Affairs at AUB — also raised a number of questions.
Dr. Brigitte Khoury, founding director of the clinical psychology training
program at AUH, said: “People need food and health security, in addition to
security itself. Every day brings new challenges to the Lebanese, which prevents
them from planning for the future or from dreaming of a better future.”
She added that after the explosion of the port of Beirut, “people became more
desperate and depressed, while the level of tension rose and people lost their
power and control, and this is the hardest thing that a human being could face,
and it could acquire a violent tendency especially among people who live through
shocking events.”
Khoury said that if the “elections do not take place then I fear that people
will further lose their power and control especially if there is no justice or a
sound judiciary.”Dr. Jamil Mouawad, a political scientist, expressed his fear
that the “institutions which the Lebanese still trust might be a target for the
untrustworthy political powers. We see how the judiciary and the military
institutions are getting besieged by the politicians.”He was skeptical about the
“possibility of the next parliamentary elections producing promising changes if
the parties in power revert to confessional polarization and to using money.”
The Lebanese “should agree on a political plan to get out of the crisis and this
is something that is not clear. And the question that needs an answer is what is
the political regime that the Lebanese want, and what are we protesting
against?”Mouawad said that “the ones who participated in the Oct. 17 revolution
lack experience and should have history lessons to see what has happened.”
Hollowing Lebanon Out!
Hazem Saghieh/Asharq Al-Awsat/February 16/2022
The news from Afghanistan is genuinely heartbreaking; it is an affront to
everything human in contemporary human beings. Loaves of bread are, in the
literal sense, lacking. Hoards of people are flocking to embassies as they
search for a way out of their country. However, only four and a half months ago,
it was said that Afghanistan had attained a resounding victory, humiliating the
Americans who withdrew from the country like mice.
This victory resembles a joke that has become a cliche: the surgery was
successful; unfortunately, however, the patient has died.
Something similar is demanded in Lebanon: Western ambassadors and diplomatic
missions are not wanted in Beirut. The multinational forces in the south are
undesirable as well. NGOs are not wanted anywhere in the country. All of them
are condemned and threatened on a daily basis.
The factions that want them all to disappear, threatening them after condemning
them, are those who offer the Lebanese the Afghan or perhaps North Korean
option: the West, in all its forms, should not come close to us. Why? Because
this is among the prerequisites for attaining victory similar to that attained
by Afghans and the one under whose shadow the North Koreans live.
Of course, they do not speak in these exact terms, but that is literally what
they are saying: closing our country off from most of the Arab world but also
most of the world as a whole, especially Western countries, and putting out
every source of illumination in the country, its economy, culture, educational
institutions, and so on.
The fact is that the West, whose expulsion is demanded, is not just political.
The dollar, which, amid our economic crisis, we need like a desert needs rain,
will also be undesirable. That is because the dollar being in a place where all
of those are banned is unimaginable.
Those who oppose it forget that the West now extends to encompass everything
from particular ways of eating, appearing, and dressing to all forms of
technology to producing images, be it through cinema or any of the many other
mediums. And all of this, with the sensitivities they refined and the
imaginations they sharpened, has no competition, neither in China, Russia, or -
of course - in Iran.
What is demanded is taking us back to where we had been before coming in contact
with the West and learning from it. That is, they want us to go back to the
isolated and crumbling model adopted by regimes of one party, one opinion, and
one group placed above a weak people. In fact, we have already gone a long way
along this path.
The truth is that the majority of the Lebanese, maybe the overwhelming majority,
do want this model even if it were a requisite for the total, uncompromised
liberation of Palestine. This majority may be sectarian, and its leaders may be
corrupt; nonetheless, it has chosen a life of freedom for itself, one that is
open to the world and welcomes its influences. As for dragging it to this
cemetery in the name of fighting America or pushing back against Israel, all
that remains is to hollow Lebanon out and issue a death sentence for the
ambitions of its people.
Let us say that it is the first time that the Lebanese’ disputes are so imbued
with an ideological position that has implications for how to understand
developments worldwide, from here to Ukraine and Taiwan. Today’s dispute
concerns just about everything: the Arabs versus Iran. The West versus Russia
and China, as well as Iran. Freedom versus tyranny, prosperity versus
starvation...
In each side of this dispute is an affiliation that has never been this clear
and unequivocal: the majority of the Lebanese, who may quarrel among themselves
over an array of issues, want Western embassies to stay in their country, they
want to feel safe and secure in it, and they want the multinational forces to
stay in the south. They want these forces to remain an impediment to another
war, which this majority opposes. They want Western educational institutions to
take root and educate greater numbers of students and for NGOs to provide what
is one of the very few sources of income for the Lebanese, in addition to their
role, however modest, in creating small development projects and expanding
freedom of expression.
On the other hand, is the isolationist model, which is concerned only with
politics in the narrowest sense of the world- politics that bring destruction,
isolation and self-imposed bareness regardless of whether those behind this
politics are victorious or vanquished.
As for the call to defend the model that the majority of Lebanese have clung to,
it is fair and just; heeding it is urgently needed if we are to avoid seeing one
of us write what the German priest and poet Martin Niemoller had once written:
‘‘First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.’’
The Latest English LCCC
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
February 16-17/2022
France Says Macron and China’s Xi Agreed to
Step up Efforts on Iran Nuclear Deal
Asharq Al-Awsat/February 16/2022
French President Emmanuel Macron and China's President Xi Jinping both agreed on
Wednesday on the need to step up their joint efforts to reach a nuclear deal
with Iran, said a statement from Macron's office on Wednesday.
The secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council had said earlier on
Twitter on Wednesday that the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers
had become an "empty shell." Iran and major world powers are currently in Vienna
to revive the nuclear deal that former-US President Donald Trump left in 2018 by
imposing crippling sanctions on Iran's economy. France's foreign minister said
on Wednesday that a decision on salvaging the deal was just days away, but that
it was now up to Tehran to make the political choice. Indirect talks between
Iran and the United States on reviving the tattered agreement resumed last week
after a 10-day hiatus and officials from the other parties to the accord -
Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia - have shuttled between the two sides
as they seek to close gaps. Western diplomats previously indicated they hoped to
have a breakthrough by now, but tough issues remain unresolved. Iran has
rejected any deadline imposed by Western powers.
Decision on Iran Nuclear Deal Days Away, Ball in Tehran’s Court, Says France
Asharq Al-Awsat/Wednesday, 16 February, 2022
France's foreign minister said on Wednesday that a decision on salvaging Iran's
2015 nuclear deal with world powers was just days away, but that it was now up
to Tehran to make the political choice. Indirect talks between Iran and the
United States on reviving the tattered agreement resumed last week after a
10-day hiatus and officials from the other parties to the accord - Britain,
China, France, Germany and Russia - have shuttled between the two sides as they
seek to close gaps. Western diplomats previously indicated they hoped to have a
breakthrough by now, but tough issues remain unresolved. Iran has rejected any
deadline imposed by Western powers. "We have reached tipping point now. It's not
a matter of weeks, it's a matter of days," French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le
Drian told parliament, adding that the Western powers, Russia and China were in
accord on the outlines of the accord. "Political decisions are needed from the
Iranians. Either they trigger a serious crisis in the coming days, or they
accept the agreement which respects the interests of all parties." The agreement
began to unravel in 2018 when then-President Donald Trump withdrew the United
States and reimposed far reaching economic sanctions on Iran, which then began
breaching the accord's limits on its uranium enrichment activity. Diplomats and
analysts say the longer Iran remains outside the deal, the more nuclear
expertise it will gain, shortening the time it might need to race to build a
bomb if it chose to, thereby vitiating the accord's original purpose. Tehran
denies it has ever sought to develop nuclear arms.Western diplomats say they are
now in the final phase of the talks and believe that a deal is within reach.
'Moment of truth'
"We are coming to the moment of truth. If we want Iran to respect its (nuclear)
non-proliferation commitments and in exchange for the United States to lift
sanctions, there has to be something left to do it," Le Drian said. Iran's
foreign ministry said on Monday it was "in a hurry" to strike a new deal as long
as its national interests were protected and that restoring the pact required
"political decisions by the West". Ali Shamkhani, hardline secretary of Iran's
Supreme National Security Council, underlined Iranian wariness in saying on
Wednesday that the 2015 accord had become economically worthless for Iran and he
blamed the United States and European powers. "The United States and Europe
failed to meet their obligations under the (deal). The deal has now become an
empty shell for Iran in the economic sphere and the lifting of sanctions. There
will be no negotiations beyond the nuclear deal with a non-compliant America and
a passive Europe," he tweeted. China's envoy to the talks said on Wednesday Iran
was being constructive by putting everything on the table in response to US
approaches. "They have not only adopted this straightforward approach but also
made a political decision based on give and take," Wang Qun told Reuters. Key
bones of contention remain Iran´s demand for a US guarantee of no more sanctions
or other punitive steps in future, and how and when to restore verifiable
restrictions on Tehran's nuclear activity. The agreement curbed Iran's
enrichment of uranium to make it harder for Tehran to develop material for
nuclear weapons, in return for a lifting of international sanctions. Iran has
since rebuilt stockpiles of enriched uranium, refining it to higher fissile
purity, close to weapons-grade, and installed advanced centrifuges to speed up
enrichment.
2015 Nuclear Deal Has Become an ‘Empty Shell’, Iran’s Top Security Official Says
Asharq Al-Awsat/Wednesday, 16 February, 2022
The 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers has become an "empty shell",
the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council said on Twitter on
Wednesday. "The United States and Europe failed to meet their obligations under
the JCPOA. The deal has now become an empty shell for Iran in the economic
sphere and the lifting of sanctions. There will be no negotiations beyond the
nuclear deal with a non-compliant America and a passive Europe," Shamkhani said.
Iran and major powers are currently in Vienna to revive the nuclear deal that
former-US President Donald Trump left in 2018 by imposing crippling sanctions on
Iran's economy. Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian said on Monday
during a call with EU's Borrell that "a lack of serious will on the part of the
West to reach a good and credible agreement in Vienna has led to unnecessary
prolongation of the talks". The talks, with European intermediaries shuttling
between the two, have been held in Vienna since April amid growing Western fears
about Tehran’s accelerating nuclear advances, seen by Western powers as
irreversible unless a deal is struck soon.
Kremlin Says 'Positive' that Biden Wants to Continue Talks
Agence France Presse/Wednesday, 16 February, 2022
The Kremlin said Wednesday it was "positive" that U.S. President Joe Biden
wanted to continue talks on the Ukraine crisis, as Moscow said it was pulling
back some troops from its neighbor's border. "It is positive that the U.S.
president is also noting his readiness to start serious negotiations," Kremlin
spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters. A day earlier Biden had vowed to push
for a diplomatic solution to the crisis. But he also warned that a Russian
invasion remained "very much a possibility" and that retaliatory sanctions were
primed and ready. "We can welcome that the president of the United States, one
of the most powerful countries, thinks about the Russian nation," Peskov said.
"Of course, we would rather not hear the threats about what will happen to us if
we do something or not do something," he added. "We are tired of these threats."
The Kremlin spokesman said negotiations would be "very complex and will require
flexibility on both sides." Russia this week announced the end of some of its
massive military drills on Ukraine's borders. But Biden said that despite
Russian claims, Washington and its allies had yet to verify the withdrawal of
any of the 100,000 troops he says Moscow has now mustered along Ukraine's
border.
NATO Says Russia's Military Build-Up Continuing around
Ukraine
Agence France Presse/Wednesday, 16 February, 2022
NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg on Wednesday said Russia's military build-up seemed
to be continuing around Ukraine despite Moscow announcing the pullback of more
forces. "We have heard the signs from Moscow about readiness to continue
diplomatic efforts, but so far, we have not seen any de-escalation on the
ground," Stoltenberg said ahead of a meeting of NATO defense ministers. "On the
contrary, it appears that Russia continues their military build-up," he said.
Stoltenberg said "it remains to be seen whether there is a Russian withdrawal.
"We are of course monitoring very closely what Russia does in and around
Ukraine. What we see is that they have increased the number of troops and more
troops are on their way." Russia on Wednesday said military drills in
Moscow-annexed Crimea had ended and that soldiers were returning to their
garrisons, a day after it announced a troop pullback from Ukraine's borders.
Germany's Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht said the Russian troop build-up
on the border "continues to be a cause for concern". "There are signals that at
least give us hope. But it is important to observe closely whether these words
are followed by deeds," she said. Stoltenberg said Moscow still maintained the
ability to launch a major attack on Ukraine and said NATO remained "prepared for
the worst." He urged Moscow to carry out a sustained withdrawal of its forces
from the border and cautioned that Moscow "always moves forces back and forth."
"If they really start to withdraw forces, that's something we will welcome. But
that remains to be seen," he said. "Just that we see movement of forces, of
battle tanks doesn't confirm a real withdrawal."
Key Ruling Fuels Tensions between Baghdad, Kurdish Govts
Asharq Al-Awsat/Wednesday, 16 February, 2022
A surprise ruling by Iraq's high court cast doubt on the legal foundations of
the independent oil policy of Iraq's Kurdish-run region and threatened to drive
a political wedge between the two governments, officials warned Wednesday.
Iraq's Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down the legal justifications for the
semi-autonomous region's oil policy, effectively calling into question the
future of the region's oil contracts, exports and revenues. The ruling comes
during a politically sensitive time, as efforts have stalled in Iraq to form a
government. “At a time when Iraq is passing through a turbulent political
period, it is unfortunate that the ruling of the Federal Supreme Court of Iraq
deems the Kurdistan Region’s oil and gas law unconstitutional, causing the
Kurdistan region great concern,” said region President Nechirvan Barzani on
Wednesday. The ruling “will further exacerbate the disputes between the Iraqi
federal government and the Kurdistan Regional Government on the issues of oil
and gas,” he said. Last week, Iraq's Supreme Court barred the presidential
candidate from the Kurdistan Democratic Party — the Kurdish-region's main ruling
party — from running for the post. The court ruled that Hoshyar Zebari was not
eligible to run amid corruption allegations. It was a blow to populist Shiite
cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, the biggest winner in the October election, who vowed to
speedily push through a new government excluding Iran-backed parties. Under
Iraq's governing system adopted in 2005, the prime minister must be a Shiite,
the speaker a Sunni and the presidency held by a Kurd. The process to select
candidates is typically set back by political deadlock. It was not immediately
known why the ruling, which comes after nearly a decade of delays, came this
week. Tuesday's decision cast into doubt the future of the region's main revenue
source. The region averaged $750 million per month in oil exports via Turkey in
2021, according to Iraq Oil Report, a media outlet that covers Iraq and its oil
sector. The region also relies on budget transfers from Baghdad to pay for
salaries and debts to traders. The Kurdish region said the ruling itself was
“unjust, unconstitutional” and “unacceptable” in a statement. The region has
historically relied on the absence of a federal oil and gas law to justify its
independent oil policy. Iraq's constitution says regions and provinces can have
a modicum of independence over oil but that the specifics should be spelled out
in a separate law. Such a law has never been passed. Baghdad filed a lawsuit
challenging the region's claims in 2012. The case was suspended in the last
known hearing in September 2019 after the judge requested that then-Prime
Minister Adil Abdul Mahdi sign off on continuing the legal battle.
Pelosi in Jerusalem: U.S. Support for Israel is
'Ironclad'
Associated Press/Wednesday, 16 February, 2022
American support for Israel remains "ironclad," U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
told members of Israel's parliament Wednesday, despite deep differences between
the nations on Iran, peace with the Palestinians and other issues. Pelosi stuck
to what the U.S. and Israel have in common, particularly on their desires to
rein in Iran's nuclear capabilities and find a path toward peace with the
Palestinians. "The U.S. remains ironclad, I keep using that word, in our support
of Israel's security and its regional stability," Pelosi said with her
counterpart, Knesset Speaker Mickey Levy, standing nearby. The face-to-face
diplomacy came at a tense time in the nations' relationship as talks about a
deal to rein in Iran's nuclear capabilities drag on in Vienna. U.S. President
Joe Biden campaigned on renewing and expanding the Iran nuclear deal after
former President Donald Trump, with strong encouragement from then-Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, withdrew the United States in 2018. Since then, the
U.S. has reimposed sanctions and Iran has stepped up its nuclear activities,
amassing a stockpile of highly enriched uranium that goes well beyond the bounds
of the accord.
Israel has said it will not be bound by any international agreement concerning
Iran's nuclear program, and says it is prepared to take military action if
needed to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear arms. Iran insists its nuclear
program is solely for peaceful purposes.
Standing before a vibrant mural in the Knesset's Chagall Hall, Pelosi said
Israel and the U.S. remain concerned about the same threat from Iran and its
proxies. "We are together in the fight against terrorism posed by Iran, both in
the region and also its nuclear development," she said. "The nuclear threat of
Iran is a global one...Israel's proximity to Iran is of concern to all of
us."Pelosi, 81, also raised the Biden administration's commitment to Palestinian
statehood at a time when Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett opposes the
idea. "Our delegation is also here to reaffirm America's commitment to a just
and enduring two state solution, one that embraces, enhances stability and
security for Israel, Palestinians and their neighbors," Pelosi said. Pelosi has
faced turmoil in her own Democratic caucus over Israel, including a brief and
unsuccessful revolt by progressives against funding for Israel's Iron Dome
missile defense system last fall. The House passed it and Pelosi said she hopes
the funding passes the Senate "soon."The congressional delegation included Rep.
Adam Schiff, D-Calif., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee,
appropriator Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., chairwoman of the subcommittee on
foreign operations and Rep. Ted Deutch, D-Fla., who chairs the Foreign Affairs
subcommittee on the Mideast.
17 Israelis Arrested over Attack on Palestinian Village
Naharnet/Wednesday, 16 February, 2022
Seventeen Israelis have been arrested on suspicion of involvement in a racist
attack on a Palestinian village in the occupied West Bank last month, police
said Wednesday. Police said Jewish Israelis armed with stones, clubs and "other
objects" wounded one Palestinian and vandalized shops, vehicles and property in
the northern West Bank village of Hawara on January 24. The suspects -- who live
in the West Bank, Jerusalem and northern Israel -- are under investigation for
perpetrating "an attack, participation in a prohibited gathering and destroying
property with a racist motive," police said. Human rights groups say that West
Bank Palestinians face frequent attacks by Jewish Israelis and that perpetrators
often go unpunished as Israeli security forces rarely take action. Israel's
B'tselem rights group, which closely monitors West Bank violence, said in
November that it had documented 451 incidents of Jewish settler violence on
Palestinians since early 2020. In 66 percent of cases in which settlers attacked
Palestinians, Israeli security forces did not visit the scene, B'tselem said.
The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs recorded
410 attacks by Israeli settlers against Palestinians in the first 10 months of
2021, compared to 358 in 2020. The Israeli army said it documented 100 attacks
by Palestinians against Jewish settlers in the West Bank last year. Israel has
occupied the West Bank since the Six-Day War of 1967. Since then, some 475,000
Jewish settlers have moved into the territory, living in communities considered
illegal under international law alongside nearly 2.9 million Palestinians.
Human rights lawyers in bid to bring Syrian, Iranian
war-crime cases to court
Arab News/February 16, 2022
LONDON: An attempt has been launched to bring cases of war crimes allegedly
committed by Iranian and Syrian military officials to the International Criminal
Court, it was reported on Wednesday. The US-based Iran Human Rights
Documentation Center, working with British barrister Haydee Dijkstal, is
bringing evidence gathered from Syrians forced to flee into Jordan as a result
of attacks and intimidation by Syrian President Bashar Assad’s government and
Iranian-backed militia groups, the Guardian reported. According to the IHRDC
evidence, the Syrian victims — who include journalists — were targeted between
2011 and 2018 on the grounds of their professional activities, which were deemed
by the Syrian regime as “opposition activities.”The evidence being presented in
The Hague says the Syrian civilians felt forced to flee in the face of
bombardments, extrajudicial killings, arbitrary arrest, and detention, along
with other civil liberty abuses. It adds that Iranian-backed militias, including
Lebanon’s Hezbollah, attacked their towns and cities with the help of armed
factions of the Syrian government. The case would mark the first time Iranian
officials had been made to answer for their actions in Syria, and forms part of
an increased push for them to be held accountable for their alleged crimes in
international courts. Ongoing efforts at the UN have stalled in the face of
stiff opposition from Russia. Gissou Nia, a lawyer on the legal team bringing
the case, said: “Up until now, little public attention has been paid to the
legal responsibility of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the decade-long Syrian
conflict, despite the significant intervention of Iranian officials in Syria and
perpetration of atrocities. “Iran has provided a vast range of military and
non-military support to achieve its objectives, chiefly to prevent the fall of
disgraced Syrian President Bashar Assad at any cost. “Unfortunately, that goal
has been fought at the cost of hundreds of thousands of killed, injured, and
displaced Syrian civilians,” she added. Syria is not a signee of the ICC’s Rome
Statute, but the IHRDC said the court has jurisdiction in the case because the
victims, who are predominantly Sunni Muslims and at odds with the Alawite Assad
regime backed by Shiite Iran, fled into Jordan — a state party to the treaty.In
a previous case in 2018, the ICC was ruled to have jurisdiction over the
Rohingya people after they were forced to flee into Bangladesh, a party to the
ICC, from Myanmar, which is not a party. The ICC will now have to make a
preliminary decision prior to launching any investigation. There is no deadline
by which the court must decide.
Canada/Minister Joly to travel to Germany and France
February 16, 2022 - Ottawa, Ontario - Global Affairs Canada
Canada has played a significant role in the creation and the upholding of the
rules-based international order. When these rules are challenged, Canada must
stand up and work with its allies to prevent their deterioration. Russia’s
aggression and destabilizing activities in and around Ukraine are deeply
concerning and Canada will continue to engage with partners and allies to pursue
a diplomatic resolution to the ongoing crisis. The Honourable Mélanie Joly,
Minister of Foreign Affairs, today announced that she will travel to Germany and
France to reiterate Canada’s support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial
integrity with international partners.In Germany, the Minister will attend the
Munich Security Conference, the world’s largest conference on security. There,
she will reinforce Canada’s key foreign policy priorities, including our
unwavering support to NATO and Ukraine. She will meet with Canada’s partners and
allies to discuss efforts to resolve the current crisis in Ukraine
diplomatically and the swift, severe consequences Russia will face should the
Russian military further invade Ukraine. She will also meet with counterparts to
discuss pressing global issues, including the protection of democracy against
the rise of authoritarianism and transatlantic cooperation on security and
defence issues.
In France, the Minister will meet with French Foreign Minister Le Drian, to
discuss their work to ensure the stability and security of Ukraine. She will
also attend an EU-sponsored forum on cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region. The
forum will provide an opportunity to deepen our engagement with the European
Union and regional stakeholders and to promote effective cooperation in the
Indo-Pacific.
The Minister will depart Canada on Thursday, February 17, and return on Tuesday,
February 22. All COVID-19-related public health rules and guidelines will be
followed before, during and after the Minister’s trip.
Quotes
“International collaboration is a cornerstone of Canada’s foreign policy. By
working with our allies to address the challenges in Eastern Europe, we make
clear our intention to uphold the security and human rights across the globe.”
- Mélanie Joly, Minister of Foreign Affairs
Quick facts
Since Russia’s attempted annexation and illegal occupation of Crimea in 2014,
Canada has imposed sanctions on more than 440 individuals and entities, many in
coordination with our allies.
On January 26, 2022, Canada extended Operation UNIFIER until March 2025. UNIFIER
is the Canadian Armed Forces’ military training and mentorship mission to
Ukraine’s security forces.
Canada also announced $50 million for development and humanitarian assistance.
On February 14, 2022, Canada announced additional contributions to support
Ukraine’s security and economic resiliency:
An offer of a loan of up to $500 million to the Government of Ukraine through
the Bretton Woods and Related Agreements Act (BWRAA). This is in addition to
Canada's offer for a loan up to $120 million, announced on January 21, 2022.
A donation of over $7 million of lethal weapons and assorted support items to
the Armed Forces of Ukraine. This equipment includes machine guns, pistols,
carbines, 1.5 million rounds of ammunition, sniper rifles, and various related
equipment.
The Munich Security Conference is one of the world’s largest gatherings of its
kind and is recognized as an important independent forum for the exchange of
ideas on international security policy.
The Latest LCCC English analysis &
editorials from miscellaneous sources published on
February 16-17/2022
GCC holds first meeting with Afghanistan’s
de facto rulers
Dr. Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg/Arab News/February 16,
2022
A Gulf Cooperation Council delegation on Monday met for the first time with
representatives from the de facto authorities in Afghanistan, aka the Taliban,
in Qatar. Previously, representatives from individual GCC member states had met
with the group in various capacities, mostly to discuss the delivery of
humanitarian assistance, security and logistics. While the mere fact that a
meeting such as the one that took place in Doha was an event in itself, the
participants managed to exchange valuable information and get important messages
across. Paradoxically, since the war in Afghanistan ended, the country has
descended into a humanitarian crisis because of economic isolation, the drying
up of financial resources and the inability to provide basic government
services. At the Doha gathering, GCC representatives stressed the importance of
addressing the urgent humanitarian needs of the people of Afghanistan, as
international reports depict a grim reality. According to the UN World Food
Programme, Afghanistan is becoming the world’s largest humanitarian crisis, with
its needs surpassing those of Ethiopia, South Sudan, Syria and Yemen. Tens of
millions of lives are at stake. The WFP found 22.8 million people could face
acute risk, while 8.7 million face emergency levels of hunger, indicating a
serious risk of widespread famine. The UN estimates that 97 percent of Afghans
could fall into poverty during 2022.
GCC countries have been at the forefront of humanitarian efforts in Afghanistan.
The King Salman Humanitarian Aid and Relief Center has maintained a regular flow
of aid to the country, as have relief agencies in other GCC countries. At the
Doha meeting, GCC representatives expressed their readiness to contribute
further to mobilizing international and regional resources to provide
humanitarian assistance and improve economic conditions in Afghanistan. They
also addressed some of the challenges facing humanitarian work, including
ensuring the security of aid convoys to enable them to deliver aid to their
intended recipients.
While there is consensus on addressing humanitarian needs, the political side of
things is more problematic, as the new rulers of Afghanistan lack diplomatic
recognition by any country, including the GCC states. Despite that fact, it is
important to respect Afghanistan’s sovereignty, political independence, unity
and territorial integrity, which means that Afghans decide their own future — a
message that was delivered very clearly by the GCC representatives at the Doha
gathering. The GCC previously publicly stated its position on Afghanistan in the
communique issued after its December 2021 summit. After more than 40 years of
strife, it is for the benefit of the country to seek national reconciliation and
a consensus political solution that fulfills the aspirations of the people of
Afghanistan, takes into consideration the interests of all components of its
society, and respects basic freedoms and rights, including women’s rights to
work and education. Combating terrorism and drug trafficking in Afghanistan is
of the utmost importance for the GCC and the rest of the world. Afghanistan has,
for too long, been plagued by terrorism and extremism. Al-Qaeda, for example,
set up its base there a long time ago and plotted attacks from the country, with
ruinous results. The GCC representatives condemned all terrorist attacks, which
have targeted civilians and civilian structures in Afghanistan. They stressed
the GCC’s solidarity with Afghanistan as it aims to enhance security and combat
terrorism and organized crime. But they also expressed concerns that terrorist
groups may be able to launch attacks against other countries from Afghan
territory. They emphasized the need for the de facto authority to ensure that
Afghanistan’s territory is not used by terrorist groups for any reason or
exploited by traffickers to export drugs.
The Gulf representatives stressed the importance of addressing the urgent
humanitarian needs of the people of Afghanistan. Another issue that the GCC
representatives communicated was the need for Afghanistan to remain closely
engaged with the international community and to listen to its expectations and
concerns. This applies especially to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, UN
bodies, the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, whose political,
security and economic advice can be instrumental in getting Afghanistan the help
it needs. If there is any delay in living up to the international community’s
expectations and dealing with its concerns or in carrying out the obligations
the de facto authority has made regarding combating terrorism and respecting
human rights, including the rights of women and children, Afghanistan’s troubles
may intensify. The meeting stressed the importance of continued engagement in
contributing to preserving Afghanistan’s security and stability and meeting the
humanitarian needs of the country’s people. However, this engagement did not
imply political recognition of the new order in Afghanistan. It provides for
cooperation on practical issues, especially humanitarian assistance and
combating terrorism, while getting first-hand insights into developments on the
ground and progress made in the different issues discussed in Doha.
*Dr. Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg is the GCC Assistant Secretary-General for Political
Affairs & Negotiation, and a columnist for Arab News. The views expressed in
this piece are personal and do not necessarily represent GCC views. Twitter:
@abuhamad1
Will Xi Jinping's 'End of Days' Plunge China
and the World into War?
Gordon G. Chang/Gatestone Institute/February 16, 2022
Xi Jinping, China's mighty-looking leader, has an "enormous array of domestic
enemies." — Gregory Copley, president of the International Strategic Studies
Association and editor-in-chief of Defense & Foreign Affairs Strategic Policy,
to Gatestone Institute, February 2022.
Xi created that opposition. After becoming China's ruler at the end of 2012, he
grabbed power from everyone else and then jailed tens of thousands of opponents
in purges, which he styled as "anti-corruption" campaigns.
Beijing is panicking, adding nearly a trillion dollars in total new credit last
month, a record increase.... When the so-called "hidden debt" is included, total
debt in the country amounts to somewhere in the vicinity of 350% of gross
domestic product.
Not surprisingly, Chinese companies are now defaulting. The debt crisis is so
serious it can bring down China's economy—and the country's financial and
political systems with it.
In the most recent hint of distress, "Fang Zhou and China"... wrote a
42,000-character essay titled "An Objective Evaluation of Xi Jinping." The
anti-Xi screed, posted on January 19 on the China-sponsored 6park site, appears
to be the work of several members of the Communist Party's Shanghai Gang
faction, headed by former leader Jiang Zemin. Jiang's faction has been
continually sniping at Xi and now is leading the charge against him.
Xi's problems, unfortunately, can become our problems. He has, for various
internal political reasons, a low threshold of risk and many reasons to pick on
some other country to deflect elite criticism and popular discontent.
The Communist Party of China has always believed its struggle with the United
States is existential—in May 2019 the official People's Daily declared a
"people's war" on America—but the hostility has become far more evident in the
past year.
Virulent anti-Americanism suggests Xi Jinping is establishing a justification to
strike America. The Chinese regime often uses its media to first warn and then
signal its actions.
America has now been warned.
Xi Jinping, China's mighty-looking leader, created his opposition. After
becoming ruler at the end of 2012, he grabbed power from everyone else and then
jailed tens of thousands of opponents in purges, which he styled as
"anti-corruption" campaigns. Xi's problems, unfortunately, can become our
problems. Virulent anti-Americanism suggests Xi is establishing a justification
to strike America. Pictured: Xi at the Great Hall of the People on May 28, 2020
in Beijing. (Photo by Kevin Frayer/Getty Images)
When truckers took over Canada's capital, Ottawa, and shut down border entry
points to America, some called it a "nationwide insurrection." Mass
demonstrations have occurred across the democratic world. People have had enough
of two years of mandates and other disease-control measures.
Not so in the world's most populous state, which maintains the world's strictest
COVID-19 controls. There are no known popular protests in the People's Republic
of China against anti-coronavirus efforts.
Yet China is not stable, and Xi Jinping is facing his "End of Days," as a recent
essay by opposition figures (see below) puts it. The revolt is not in society at
large but at the top of the Communist Party. As Gregory Copley, president of the
International Strategic Studies Association, told Gatestone, Xi Jinping, China's
mighty-looking leader, has an "enormous array of domestic enemies."
Xi created that opposition. After becoming China's ruler at the end of 2012, he
grabbed power from everyone else and then jailed tens of thousands of opponents
in purges, which he styled as "anti-corruption" campaigns.
Xi also used the disease to great advantage. As Copley, also the editor-in-chief
of Defense & Foreign Affairs Strategic Policy, points out, "Xi's 'zero COVID'
policy is, indeed, less about stopping the spread of COVID and more about
suppressing his internal enemies, both in the public and in the Party."
The "enormous array" is now starting to strike back. Xi is most vulnerable on
his handling of the country's stagnating economy. For one thing, the draconian
campaign against COVID—massive testing, meticulous contact-tracing, strict
lockdowns—have of course undermined consumption, which Beijing has touted as the
core of the economy.
Beijing is panicking, adding nearly a trillion dollars in total new credit last
month, a record increase. Chinese technocrats have also become sneaky, embarking
on what the widely followed Andrew Collier of Global Source Partners terms
"shadow stimulus"—stimulus provided by local governments and their entities in
order to allow the central government to avoid reporting spending.
China needs a vibrant economy to service enormous debts, largely run up as
Beijing overstimulated the economy, especially beginning in 2008. When the
so-called "hidden debt" is included, total debt in the country amounts to
somewhere in the vicinity of 350% of gross domestic product.
Not surprisingly, Chinese companies are now defaulting. The debt crisis is so
serious it can bring down China's economy—and the country's financial and
political systems with it.
For three decades, a Chinese leader was essentially immune to criticism because
all decisions of consequence were shared by top figures in the Communist Party.
Xi Jinping, however, as he took power also ended up with accountability—in other
words, with no one else to blame. With things not going China's way in recent
years, Xi, often called the "Chairman of Everything," is taking heat.
There are signs of intensifying discord among senior leaders. In the most recent
hint of distress, "Fang Zhou and China"— "Fang Zhou" is a pseudonym meaning
"ark"—wrote a 42,000-character essay titled "An Objective Evaluation of Xi
Jinping." The anti-Xi screed, posted on January 19 on the China-sponsored 6park
site, appears to be the work of several members of the Communist Party's
Shanghai Gang faction, headed by former leader Jiang Zemin. Jiang's faction has
been continually sniping at Xi and now is leading the charge against him.
Fang's piece incorporates previously voiced criticisms but does so in a
comprehensive fashion. Fang blames Xi for, among other things, ruining the
economy.
"Xi will be the architect of his own defeat," writes Fang at the end of the
rant, in a section titled "Xi Jinping's Denouement" or "End of Days." "His style
of governance is simply unsustainable; it will generate even newer and greater
policy missteps."
Fang notes that Xi was able to take advantage of a feeble opposition but has not
been able to accomplish much. "Xi's policies have been retrogressive and
derivative, his successes minor and his blunders numerous," writes the Asia
Society's Geremie Barme, who translated the essay, summarizing Fang's thoughts.
Fang believes Xi "deserves a score of less than zero."
Xi is not one to let a decade of zero scores get in the way of his continued
rule. Communist Party norms require him to step down at the 20th National
Congress, to be held sometime this fall if tradition holds. He obviously wants a
precedent-breaking third term as general secretary so that he can become, as
outsiders say, "Dictator for Life." Most observers expect he will get that new
term.
Maybe. Fang Zhou's essay shows Communist Party leaders are risking stability by
airing disagreements in public. Xi Jinping therefore, now realizes he is in the
fight of his life.
Xi's problems, unfortunately, can become our problems. He has, for various
internal political reasons, a low threshold of risk and many reasons to pick on
some other country to deflect elite criticism and popular discontent.
In 1966, Mao Zedong, Communist China's first ruler, started the decade-long
Cultural Revolution to vanquish political enemies in Beijing. Xi is doing much
the same thing now, especially with his "common prosperity" program, which could
return China to the 1950s.
Unlike Mao, however, Xi has the power to plunge the world into war, and he has
reason to lash out soon.
Xi is targeting the United States. On August 29 of last year, People's Daily,
China's most authoritative publication, accused America of launching "barbaric"
attacks on the Chinese nation. On the 21st of that month, Global Times, a
tabloid controlled by People's Daily, insinuated the U.S. was working with
China's "enemies."
The Communist Party of China has always believed its struggle with the United
States is existential—in May 2019 the official People's Daily declared a
"people's war" on America—but the hostility has become far more evident in the
past year.
Virulent anti-Americanism suggests Xi Jinping is establishing a justification to
strike America. The Chinese regime often uses its media to first warn and then
signal its actions.
America has now been warned.
*Gordon G. Chang is the author of The Coming Collapse of China, a Gatestone
Institute distinguished senior fellow, and a member of its Advisory Board.
© 2022 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Iran’s Strategy Following a Deal with the US
Camelia Entekhabifard/Asharq Al-Awsat/February 16/2022
News coming from the nuclear talks in Vienna shows that the topic of a prisoner
exchange between Iran and the US has taken priority over the talk on monitoring
Iran’s nuclear program. According to the officials of the Iranian regime, these
two topics are now being negotiated at the same time.
The Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson directly pointed this out on Monday.
Speaking at a press conference, Saeed Khatibzadeh said this issue was being
discussed in parallel to nuclear talks, but that the US was still undecided.
What Khatibzadeh is speaking about is the haggling over the cost of releasing
Iranian-American hostages. The list of these hostages is long, but the US has
put some of them in a Class A of hostages and the hostage-takers who know this
are demanding a higher cost for their release.
Amongst the prisoners, four people are mentioned the most: Siamak Namazi, Baqer
Namazi, Morad Tahbaz and Emad Sharqi. It seems like these are the four prisoners
for whom Iran requests in exchange for the release of a major part of its cash
holdings.
A few months ago, Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, Iran’s new foreign minister, spoke
about the US having released “10 billion dollars of Iranians holdings to show
good faith.” According to South Korea, 7 billion dollars of the Iranian holdings
have been frozen in South Korean banks due to sanctions.
The US could easily release this amount with a simple order; this is a
presidential prerogative. But it looks like it’s an additional 3 billion dollars
of Iranian holdings which are being discussed between Iranian and US officials
in Vienna.
"Prisoner exchange" is a misleading concept since no Iranian has been held
hostage in the US. But the Biden administration, which badly wants to reach a
deal with the Iranian regime, uses this term to refer to what is, in reality,
paying a fee for a deal.
Amongst the dual-citizens Iranians who are imprisoned in the US, we can point to
Mansour Arbabsiar, easily the most notable Iranian prisoner in the US. He was
arrested and accused of working with the IRGC and planning to assassinate the
Saudi ambassador in Washington (then, Adel al-Jubeir). In the court, and in
front of a jury, he admitted his guilt.
In 2015, he was not on the list of prisoners Iran asked for, and he is not being
mentioned now either. Those Iranian prisoners in the US which the Iranian regime
mentions are usually lower-level figures charged with money-laundering and
breaking the sanctions regulations of the US Treasury to the benefit of the
Iranian regime. The crimes they’ve committed was not done out of patriotism or
love of Iran but based on greed and hope that they can get bribes and make an
easy buck.
Ironically, some of the prisoners who were released or whose federal offenses
were pardoned following the 2015 Iran deal didn’t even return to Iran. For
instance, Ahmad Sheikhzadeh, a professor at NYU, who, according to the FBI,
worked for a hostile government (i.e. the New York-based permanent
representation of Iran to the UN) without license and received cash for
consultancy and other services rendered to Iran, without reporting them to tax
authorities.
Sheikhzadeh, who had a friendship with Iran’s former foreign minister, Mohammad
Javad Zarif, didn’t leave the US soil following his release.
Among those released in 2015, the ones who returned to Iran were those without
dual citizenship who had to leave the US. But Iranian-Americans jailed in Evin
(Jason Rezaian, Amir Hekmati, Nustarullah Khosravi and Saeed Abdeini) were sent
to Switzerland on a special flight, with planes full of cash going to Iran to
assure their release. Iran got 1.7 billion dollars of cash in their return. The
Obama administration claimed that this was not linked to the prisoner’s release
and this was 400 million dollars that Washington owed to Iran due to military
deals in the 1970s. But the simultaneity of the two events makes this doubtful.
The Iranian regime is now attempting to magnify the plight of imprisoned
Iranians in the US to ride a humanitarian wave and portray this as a basic
attempt to free its own citizens. Meanwhile, it is trying to get a big cash
bonanza in exchange with hostages it is holding in Tehran.
If the Iranian regime is so humanitarian and so worried for its own citizens
around the world, why doesn’t it show its good will by releasing Nazanin
Zaghari-Ratcliffe? This young woman is spending the best years of her life, that
could have been spent with her husband and daughter, in detention and under
psychological and emotional torture. An entire world is heart-broken at the
sight of the sad eyes of Nazanin’s young daughter. Have the officials looked at
the situation of this family who has been destroyed because the Iranian regime
heartlessly turned her into a bargaining chip with the UK?
The coming deal, just like the original 2015 pact, won’t make a difference in
how the regime behaves or the general well-being of the Iranian people. But the
money the regime is so hard after could be injected to the market and bring
about a short-term and relative psychological calm among the people and thus
prevent a national explosion and a hunger revolt.
But we all know that Iran’s disorders won’t be solved so easily and with
receiving of ransom or limiting the nuclear program. While the regime is
negotiating in Vienna, it is also threatening the neighboring countries via its
militias and their missiles.
What matters most to the Biden administration is a return to the 2015 deal and
control of the Iranian regime so that it can’t build an atomic bomb. Recent
threats by Iran are lucrative for the arms industry in the US that are busy
selling equipment and missile defense systems to countries of the region.
Last week, the US issued a license for new arm deals with the UAE, Saudi Arabia
and Jordan. In one deal with Jordan, the US will receive 4 billion dollars to
supply Amman with F-16 and guided missiles. Similar deals on a lower level have
been signed for selling advanced air-defense systems, such as Patriot, Hawk and
THAAD, with the UAE. The Saudis, who recently signed a 650-million-dollar deal
with the US to buy surface-to-air missiles, have also inked a new 24 million
dollar to receive parts for air-defense.
Biden’s strategy is the same as the 2015 strategy of the Obama administration,
but the Iranian regime has changed its approach. It no longer seeks a
relationship with the West and attraction of foreign investment.
Lack of social and political stability and security in Iran means that large
commercial and economic concerns won’t invest in the country. The dominant
strategy of the Iranian regime is the Look East policy aimed at expanding ties
with China and Russia. The deal will help them assuage their economic worries
for a while to keep the Iranian people at bay. Following their deal with the
West over the nuclear program, the Iranian regime will pursue new relations with
countries of the region.
Helpless Europe
Tariq Al-Homayed/Asharq Al-Awsat/February 16/2022
While our region was expecting an active European role in the Iranian nuclear
file in Vienna, in order to “rationalize” the American rush, as well as to
assume a pivotal task in the process of soothing the crisis in some Arab
countries, such as Libya or Lebanon, it became clear to us that the Old
Continent is incapable of resolving its own problems. Europe as a whole is
unable to address the Russian-Ukrainian dispute, amid an escalation that
suggests that we are facing an upcoming war. Instead, we see the United States
issuing statements and warnings, despite the fact that any military
confrontation or gas crisis would not concern Washington.The US administration
is intensely managing two dangerous files. In Vienna, Washington is hastening to
conclude a deal, at any price, with Iran. In Ukraine, it is acting in a way that
suggests that it wants the Russians to get involved there, but without any plan
for the “next day” for both crises.
The “next day” is always the dilemma of the United States, whether after the
invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as during what was known as the Arab
Spring in our region, or now in the Russian-Ukrainian crisis… As Washington
always stumbles on the details.
We watched how the US National Security Adviser, Jake Sullivan, spoke about the
Russian-Ukrainian crisis, as if he were the spokesman for the Russian forces,
where he actually caused panic, without giving any clear US commitment to the
security of Ukraine. Note that the Pentagon spokesman contradicted most of Mr.
Sullivan’s information!
Accordingly, while hopes were pinned on the Europeans to help rationalize
American positions, it has become clear that Europe itself is in a crisis, as it
is incapable of assuming an effective role in easing the tension.
Moreover, Europe is incapable of acting, even if the crisis developed into a
war. Despite the European threat to impose sanctions on Russia, the Old
Continent is in dire need of Russian gas, to which it can’t find an alternative
at the present moment.
As long as Europe cannot prevent a possible war on its territories, how can it
contribute to rationalizing the US position on the Iranian nuclear file in
Vienna, or putting an end to Iranian ballistic missiles or drones targeting our
region?!
It is certain that the French president is unable to do anything in this regard.
We have seen how he was dealt with during his visit to Moscow and his meeting
with President Putin. The British are also powerless: the British prime minister
is fighting his own party, not even his foes, to stay on the political stage.
Therefore, we are facing a European helplessness and an American rush forward,
which means that there is a real international crisis, from which only China
will benefit, as the Russians cannot sustain their own military and political
ambitions, while the Iranians are facing significant internal challenges. The
two countries will try in vain to take advantage of the situation: Iran’s power
is subversive, and Russia’s is tactical, but hard to sustain.
Everything suggests that instability will persist. It is now important to think
carefully about the power vacuum that awaits us amid the absurd American rush to
deal with Iran, or to push Russia into getting involved in Ukraine, as well as
to deal with the obvious European helplessness.