English LCCC Newsbulletin For
Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For August 15/2022
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news
The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2021/english.august15.22.htm
News Bulletin Achieves
Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations For today
Mary’s Song
Luke 1:46-55/ And Mary said: “My soul glorifies the Lord
and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior, for he has been mindful of the humble
state of his servant. From now on all generations will call me blessed, for the
Mighty One has done great things for me— holy is his name. His mercy extends to
those who fear him, from generation to generation. He has performed mighty deeds
with his arm; he has scattered those who are proud in their inmost thoughts. He
has brought down rulers from their thrones but has lifted up the humble. He has
filled the hungry with good things but has sent the rich away empty. He has
helped his servant Israel, remembering to be merciful to Abraham and his
descendants forever,just as he promised our ancestors.”’"
Titels
For English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News
& Editorials published on August 14-15/2022
Egypt's Church Fire Disaster. Prayers and Condolences/Elias
Bejjani/August 14/2022
Charlie Bassil: Running for Mississauga City Councillor representing Ward 9/
Al Rahi talks about "neutrality" in Sunday sermon
Al-Rahi says next president must have a 'vision'
Bishop Aoudi These are the needed Qualities of the new president
Bassil Seeking Lebanese President with Sizeable Parliamentary, Ministerial
Support
People from Rushdie attacker’s hometown in Lebanon condemn attack
Titles For LCCC English
analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on August 14-15/2022
Officials: Fire at Coptic church in Cairo kills 41, hurts 14
News Alert: Dozens killed in Egypt church fire
1 dead, 20 hurt, many under rubble in suspected fireworks blast in Yerevan
More details emerge about Rushdie's Lebanese-origin attacker
Rushdie attack suspect pleads not guilty to attempted murder
Syria reports Israeli missile attack on coastal region
Syria reports Israeli missile attack on coastal region, three soldiers
Palestinian wounds 8 Israelis, 2 critically, in attack on Jerusalem bus
Gunman detained after firing shots in Canberra airport
Iraqi judiciary says it has no powers to dissolve parliament
Titles For The
Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on August 14-15/2022
‘Where Is the Media?’: Persecution of Christians, June 2022/Raymond
Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute/August 14, 2022
A Dangerous Triple Fantasy/Amir Taheri/Asharq al-Awsat/August 14, 2022
What the US Gets Wrong About Iran/Karim Sadjadpour/The New York Times/August,
14/2022
The Delightful Implosion of Boris Johnson/Michelle Goldberg/The New York
Times/August, 14/2022
Heroes, Not Victims/Hazem Saghieh/Asharq Alawsat/August 14/2022
US must wake up to Iran’s terrorist threat/Maria Maalouf/Arab News/August
14/2022
Iran likely to be the winner from new nuclear deal/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Arab
News/August 14/2022
FBI’s Mar-a-Lago raid may give Republicans a midterms boost/Dalia Al-Aqidi/Arab
News/August 14/2022
The Latest English LCCC Lebanese &
Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on August 14-15/2022
Egypt's Church
Fire Disaster. Prayers and Condolences
Elias Bejjani/August 14/2022
“Naked I came from my mother’s womb, and naked I
will depart. The LORD gave and the LORD has taken away; may the name of the LORD
be praised.” (Job 01:21)
We pray with reverence, asking asking, Our Father,
Almighty God for eternal rest in peace for the souls of the
Egyptian Church fire victims, for the quick
healing of the injured, for the Holy Spirit to strengthen the faith and hope of
their families, and to grant them the heavenly gifts
of patience and solace.
Charlie Bassil: Running for Mississauga City Councillor
representing Ward 9/
شربل باسيل مرشح لعضوية مجلس بلدية مدينة ماسيسوكا عن الدائرة التاسعة
نناشد المواطنيين الكنديين الساكنين الدائرة التاسعة دعم وتأييد والتصويت لصديقنا
شريل وهو ناشط مميز في جاليتنا اللبنانية منذ سنين
A Message from Charlie Bassil
Canada/Mississauga/Ward 09
Dear, friends, family and colleagues with great honor I wanted to let you know
that I am running for Mississauga City Councillor representing Ward 9, if you
happen to live in Ward 9 I counting on your vote
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/111249/charlie-bassil-running-for-mississauga-city-councillor-representing-ward-9-%d8%b4%d8%b1%d8%a8%d9%84-%d8%a8%d8%a7%d8%b3%d9%8a%d9%84-%d9%85%d8%b1%d8%b4%d8%ad-%d9%84%d8%b9%d8%b6%d9%88%d9%8a%d8%a9-%d9%85/
Al Rahi talks about
"neutrality" in Sunday sermon
NNA/Sunday, 14 August, 2022
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/111247/%d9%86%d8%b5-%d8%b9%d8%b8%d8%aa%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a8%d8%b7%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%b1%d9%83-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%b9%d9%8a-%d9%88%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%85%d8%b7%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%86-%d8%b9%d9%88%d8%af%d8%a9-11/
Maronite Patriarch Mar Bechara Boutros Al-Rahi indicated in his Sunday sermon
from Diman that it is not possible for Lebanon to live according to his message
if it does not live active neutrality, nor can it be implicated in the struggles
of others. Neutrality is not a circumstantial position, but rather a method of
constructive dialogue. The Patriarch pointed out that
the Patriarchate used to be the voice expressing national positions, so the role
of this edifice throughout history was to defend all the Lebanese without fear.
Rahi stressed that the people need a president who will bring Lebanon out of
conflicts, adding: "It is not permissible at this stage to hear the names of a
candidate from here and there, and we do not see a vision for a candidate."He
stressed the need to expedite taking financial and economic measures to save
Lebanon, noting that the state has several ways to provide depositors' money in
banks,Unfortunately, but unfortunately they remained idle without looking for a
solution.
Al-Rahi says next president must have a 'vision'
Naharnet/Sunday, 14 August, 2022
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/111247/%d9%86%d8%b5-%d8%b9%d8%b8%d8%aa%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a8%d8%b7%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%b1%d9%83-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%b9%d9%8a-%d9%88%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%85%d8%b7%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%86-%d8%b9%d9%88%d8%af%d8%a9-11/
Maronite Patriarch Beshara al-Rahi on Sunday stressed that the country’s next
president must have a “vision” to improve the situations. “The people need a
president who would pull Lebanon out of conflicts instead of keeping it in
them,” al-Rahi said in his Sunday Mass sermon. “In this critical period, it is
unacceptable to hear about candidates from here and there without seeing any
vision for any candidate. Enough with surprises!” the patriarch added. He
accordingly asked about the next president’s vision to reach a “national
reconciliation,” achieve “economic and financial revival,” preserve the
“Lebanese entity,” implement “administrative decentralization,” organize “an
international conference for Lebanon,” restore “Lebanon’s role” in the region
and the world, resolve the Palestinian refugee issue, repatriate the displaced
Syrians and “organize the return” of the Lebanese exiles in Israel.
Bishop Aoudi
These are the needed Qualities of the new president
Agencies/August 14/2022
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/111247/%d9%86%d8%b5-%d8%b9%d8%b8%d8%aa%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a8%d8%b7%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%b1%d9%83-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%b9%d9%8a-%d9%88%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%85%d8%b7%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%86-%d8%b9%d9%88%d8%af%d8%a9-11/
Archbishop Elias Aoudi called on “the
Lebanese Parliament to resolve its issue and convene
in order to elect President for
the Republic within the specified constitutional deadline.”Aoudi
said in his Sunday sermon: “The president we want is a president who is close to
his people, aware of the people’s concerns, adopting their dreams and working to
achieve them. A lover of his country, dedicating himself to his service,
abandoning himself and his selfishness. A person of prestige restores the
state’s prestige, sovereignty and stability, and improves its leadership with
his wisdom, knowledge and experience, not through his followers.” He added: "A
president who restores to Lebanon his position in the hearts of his children
first, then in its surroundings and the world, builds his future on solid
pillars that are not shaken by the slightest storms, has a clear vision and a
strong personality with humility, improves the selection and leadership of his
team, anticipates events and looks forward to the future."
Aoudi also continued: “Courageous where the need arises and meek when
necessary, with no prejudice or affiliation except to Lebanon, respects the
constitution and laws and does not tolerate those who violate them, applies
democratic principles, respects values and does not compromise or give up a
right.” He concluded: "In short, we need a president free from the burdens of
interests and ties, who puts Lebanon's interest in front of its flaws, and works
only for its realization, so that the people gather around him and follow him."
Bassil Seeking Lebanese President with Sizeable
Parliamentary, Ministerial Support
Beirut - Asharq Al-Awsat/Sunday, 14 August, 2022
Head of Lebanon’s Free Patriotic Movement (FPM) MP Gebran Bassil stressed that
he opposes vacuum in the position of president. “The country cannot tolerate
such a vacuum,” he declared after holding talks with Maronite Patriarch Beshara
al-Rahi at his summer residence in Diman. Presidential elections are set for
November with blocs intensifying their efforts to reach agreements on potential
candidates. “The elections will not lead to the
desired change, but they are a constitutional event that must be held on time,”
continued Bassil, who is President Michel Aoun’s son-in-law and whom media
suggest has his own presidential aspirations. “The
president’s power stems from the privileges - limited as they are - that he
enjoys,” continued the MP. “It is important that the president use his powers.”
Selecting the candidate must be based on his character and then, the
extent of his representation, he remarked. “The president must represented by
parliamentary and ministerial bloc that supports him and consolidates the
strength of his privileges and position.”The final say over this issue must lie
in the hands of the “actual representatives,” he suggested. “This is an
opportunity for Bkirki [the Patriarchate] to take the initiative and we will
respond to it.”Moreover, Bassil said the president “must be directly elected by
the people and he must be of the people to avoid the threat of vacuum.”The
constitution stipulates that the president must be elected by parliament.
People from Rushdie attacker’s hometown in Lebanon
condemn attack
Najia Houssari/Arab News/August 14/2022
Hadi Matar’s father, who is separated from his mother, refuses to receive anyone
in wake of New York stabbing
“I have never seen him in this town,” says Yaroun town Mayor Ali Qassem Tuhfa
BEIRUT: The father of Hadi Matar, the man who stabbed novelist Salman Rushdie in
the US on Friday, is refusing to talk to anyone. Since hearing about his
24-year-old son’s crime, he has not received any visitors at his home in the
southern Lebanese town of Yaroun — not even the town’s mayor. Mayor Ali Qassem
Tuhfa told Arab News: “Matar’s parents have been separated for 10 years. The
father returned to Yaroun while his family stayed in the US. He revived the
family’s old business of raising livestock and has been taking care of a small
herd. He has little to no social life and does not talk to anyone.”Yaroun is
close to the town of Maroun Al-Ras in the district of Beit Jbeil. It is about
125 km from Beirut. Previously, the people of the town were famous for farming
and raising livestock. Yaroun is a border town that was abandoned by many
residents during the Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon in the 1970s. Some
also emigrated before then, leaving only about 500 residents. This number
increases with the temporary return of expatriates during the summer and other
holidays, with records showing that 9,000 people originate from the town.
Both Christians and Muslims live in Yaroun, the mayor explained, while noting
that the majority of emigrants have gone to Australia and North and South
America.
Samer Wehbe, a journalist from the area, said: “When the expatriates gradually
returned, they built beautiful houses that resembled the homes in which they
lived abroad, giving the town a wealthy appearance. The majority of townspeople
do not live there permanently; only when they come back to Lebanon on holidays
and special occasions. Political affiliations remain vague, although the town is
located in a pro-Hezbollah area, as it is adjacent to Maroun Al-Ras, in which
Hezbollah scored major victories against the Israeli occupation.”Mayor Tuhfa
said that Matar was born and raised in the US. “I have been the mayor for six
years and have never seen him in town,” he said. Tuhfa explained: “Matar’s
mother is also from Yaroun, but she is not related to her husband. Her name is
Silvana Firdaus. Matar has one sister who also lives with her mother in the
US.”He added: “The news of Matar’s crime raised questions in the town, which
mainly focused on ‘why did he do that?’ His act was even condemned, bearing in
mind that no one knows him (Matar) on a personal level.”
Activists’ reactions on social media platforms were mixed. One considered that
Matar is “only an American of Lebanese descent, who apparently suffers a deep
identity crisis.”Hadi Matar, 24, center, listens to his public defense attorney
Nathaniel Barone, left, addresses the judge while being arraigned in the
Chautauqua County Courthouse in Mayville, NY., Saturday, Aug. 13, 2022. (AP)
Hezbollah refrained from commenting on the attack on Rushdie. According to
Reuters, an official said the group “had no additional information on the
stabbing attack against novelist Salman Rushdie.” The official added: “We don’t
know anything about this subject so we will not comment.”
Nevertheless, in recent days, an old video of Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan
Nasrallah inciting his supporters to kill Rushdie has circulated on social media
platforms.
The Latest English LCCC
Miscellaneous Reports And News published
on August 14-15/2022
Officials: Fire at Coptic church in
Cairo kills 41, hurts 14
SAMY MAGDY/CAIRO (AP)
A fire ripped through a packed church during morning services in Egypt’s capital
on Sunday, killing at least 41 worshippers and injuring 14.
The church quickly filled with thick black smoke, and witnesses said
several trapped congregants jumped from upper floors to escape. “Suffocation,
suffocation, all of them dead,” said a distraught witness, who only gave a
partial name, Abu Bishoy. The cause of the blaze in
the Abu Sefein church in the working-class neighborhood of Imbaba was not
immediately known. An initial investigation pointed to an electrical
short-circuit, according to a police statement.
Footage from the scene circulated online showed burned furniture, including
wooden tables and chairs. Firefighters were seen putting out the blaze while
others carried victims to ambulances. Families waited for word on relatives who
were inside the church. Witnesses said there were many children inside the
building when the fire broke out. “There are children we didn’t know how to get
to them," said Abu Bishoy. "And we don’t know whose son this is, or whose
daughter that is. Is this possible?” The country’s
health minister blamed the smoke and a stampede as people attempted to flee the
fire for causing the fatalities. It was one of the worst fire tragedies in Egypt
in recent years. Witness Emad Hanna said the church includes two places used as
a daycare for children, and that a church worker managed to get many children
out. “We went upstairs and found people dead. And we
started to see from outside that the smoke was getting bigger, and people want
to jump from the upper floor. ... We found the children.”Egypt's Coptic Church
and the country's health ministry reported the casualty toll. The church said
the fire broke out while a service was underway. The church is located in a
narrow street in one of the most densely populated neighborhoods in Cairo.
Fifteen firefighting vehicles were dispatched to the scene to put out the
flames while ambulances ferried casualties to nearby hospitals, officials said.
President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi spoke by phone with the Coptic Christian
Pope Tawadros II to offer his condolences, the president’s office said. Sheikh
Ahmed al-Tayeb, Al-Azhar’s Grand Imam, also offered his condolences to the head
of the Coptic church. “I am closely following the
developments of the tragic accident,” el-Sissi wrote on Facebook. “I directed
all concerned state agencies and institutions to take all necessary measures,
and immediately to deal with this accident and its effects.”
Health Minister Khaled Abdel-Ghafar said in a statement that two of the injured
were discharged from a hospital while 12 others were still being treated.
The Interior Ministry said it received a report on the fire at 9 a.m.
local time, and that they found that the blaze broke out in an air conditioner
in the building's second floor. The ministry, which
oversees police and firefighters, blamed an electrical short-circuit for the
fire, which produced huge amounts of smoke. Meanwhile, the country’s chief
prosecutor, Hamada el-Sawy, ordered an investigation and a team of prosecutors
were dispatched to the church. Later on Sunday,
emergency services said they managed to put out the blaze and the prime minister
and other senior government officials arrived to inspect the site.
Egypt’s Christians account for some 10% of the nation’s more than 103
million people and have long complained of discrimination by the nation’s Muslim
majority. Sunday's blaze was one of the worst fire
tragedies in recent years in Egypt, where safety standards and fire regulations
are poorly enforced. In March last year, a fire at a garment factory near Cairo
killed at least 20 people and injured 24 more.
News Alert: Dozens killed in Egypt church fire
CNN/August 14, 2022
At least 41 people were killed, and at least 14 injured after a fire broke out
at a church in Giza's Imbaba neighborhood in greater Cairo on Sunday, according
to a spokesperson for the Egyptian Coptic Church citing health officials.
At least two officers and three civil protection service members were injured
responding to the fire at Abu Sefein church, Egypt's interior ministry announced
in a Facebook post.The statement added that the fire started around 9 a.m. local
time and was caused by an electrical failure in an air conditioning unit on the
church's second floor.
1 dead, 20 hurt, many under rubble in suspected
fireworks blast in Yerevan
Agence France Presse/Associated Press/August 14, 2022
A strong explosion hit a large market in Armenia's capital on Sunday, setting
off a fire and reportedly trapping people under rubble. The blast killed one
person and injured 20, according to the emergency situations ministry. The
Interfax news agency cited Armenia's emergency service as saying the explosion
occurred in a building at the Surmalu market where fireworks were sold. The
market is about two kilometers south of the center of Yerevan. Russia's state
news agency Tass cited the city's mayor as saying an unspecified number of
people were trapped in rubble. Photos and videos posted on social media showed a
thick column of black smoke over the market and successive detonations could be
heard. The ministry said there were 10 firefighting trucks on the spot and
another 10 were on their way.
More details emerge about Rushdie's Lebanese-origin
attacker
Associated Press/August 14, 2022
U.S. District Attorney Jason Schmidt has told a court judge that Hadi Matar took
steps to purposely put himself in position to harm "The Satanic Verses" author
Salman Rushdie, getting an advance pass to the event where the author was
speaking and arriving a day early bearing a fake ID. "This was a targeted,
unprovoked, preplanned attack on Mr. Rushdie," Schmidt said. Public defender
Nathaniel Barone complained that authorities had taken too long to get Matar in
front of a judge while leaving him "hooked up to a bench at the state police
barracks." "He has that constitutional right of presumed innocence," Barone
added. Rushdie, 75, suffered a damaged liver and
severed nerves in an arm and an eye. He was likely to lose the injured eye.
Investigators were working to determine whether the suspect, born a decade after
"The Satanic Verses" was published, acted alone.
District Attorney Schmidt alluded to Ayatollah Khomeini's fatwa as a potential
motive in arguing against bail. "Even if this court were to set a million
dollars bail, we stand a risk that bail could be met," Schmidt said. "His
resources don't matter to me. We understand that the agenda that was carried out
yesterday is something that was adopted and it's sanctioned by larger groups and
organizations well beyond the jurisdictional borders of Chautauqua County," the
prosecutor said. Barone, the public defender, said
after the hearing that Matar has been communicating openly with him and that he
would spend the coming weeks trying to learn about his client, including whether
he has psychological or addiction issues. Matar is
from Fairview, New Jersey. Rosaria Calabrese, manager of the State of Fitness
Boxing Club, a small, tightly knit gym in nearby North Bergen, said Matar joined
April 11 and participated in about 27 group sessions for beginners looking to
improve their fitness before emailing her several days ago to say he wanted to
cancel his membership because "he wouldn't be coming back for a while."Gym owner
Desmond Boyle said he saw "nothing violent" about Matar, describing him as
polite and quiet, yet someone who always looked "tremendously sad." He said
Matar resisted attempts by him and others to welcome and engage him.
"He had this look every time he came in. It looked like it was the worst
day of his life," Boyle said. Matar was born in the United States to parents who
emigrated from Yaroun in southern Lebanon, the mayor of the village, Ali Tehfe,
told The Associated Press. Flags of the Iran-backed Hezbollah are visible across
the village, along with portraits of leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, Khamenei,
Khomeini and slain Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani. Journalists visiting Yaroun on
Saturday were asked to leave. Hezbollah spokespeople did not respond to requests
for comment. In Lebanon, there were conflicting
reports on whether Matar had visited the country or not. There are also
conflicting reports on whether he carries Lebanese citizenship or not. Iran's
theocratic government and its state-run media assigned no motive for the attack.
In Tehran, some Iranians interviewed by the AP praised the attack on an author
they believe tarnished the Islamic faith, while others worried it would further
isolate their country. On Friday, on AP reporter witnessed the attacker stab or
punch Rushdie about 10 or 15 times.
Rushdie attack suspect pleads not guilty to attempted
murder
Agence France Presse/August 14, 2022
The man accused of stabbing Salman Rushdie at a literary event has pleaded not
guilty to attempted murder charges, as the severely injured author appeared to
show signs of improvement in hospital. Hadi Matar, 24, was arraigned in court in
New York state, with prosecutors outlining how Rushdie had been stabbed
approximately 10 times in what they described as a planned, premeditated
assault. After the on-stage attack on Friday, Rushdie had been helicoptered to
hospital and underwent emergency surgery. His agent
Andrew Wylie had said the writer was on a ventilator and in danger of losing an
eye, but in an update on Saturday he told the New York Times that Rushdie had
started to talk again, suggesting his condition had improved. Author of "The
Satanic Verses" and "Midnight's Children", Rushdie had lived in hiding for years
after Iran's first supreme leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini ordered his
killing. And while Friday's stabbing triggered international outrage, it also
drew applause from Islamist hardliners in Iran and Pakistan. President Joe Biden
on Saturday called it a "vicious" attack and offered prayers for Rushdie's
recovery. "Salman Rushdie -- with his insight into humanity, with his unmatched
sense for story, with his refusal to be intimidated or silenced -- stands for
essential, universal ideals. Truth. Courage. Resilience," Biden said in a
statement. Matar is being held without bail and has been formally charged with
second-degree attempted murder and assault with a weapon. Police provided no
information on his background or what might have motivated him.
- Effective death sentence -
The 75-year-old novelist had been living under an effective death sentence since
1989 when Iran's then-supreme leader Khomeini issued a religious decree, or
fatwa, ordering Muslims to kill the writer. The fatwa
followed the publication of the novel "The Satanic Verses," which enraged some
Muslims who said it was blasphemous for its portrayal of Islam and the Prophet
Mohammed. In a recent interview with Germany's Stern magazine, Rushdie spoke of
how, after so many years living with death threats, his life was "getting back
to normal.""For whatever it was, eight or nine years, it was quite serious," he
told a Stern correspondent in New York. "But ever since I've been living in
America, since the year 2000, really there hasn't been a problem in all that
time."Rushdie moved to New York in the early 2000s and became a U.S. citizen in
2016. Despite the continued threat to his life, he was increasingly seen in
public -– often without noticeable security. Security
was not particularly tight at Friday's event at the Chautauqua Institution,
which hosts arts programs in a tranquil lakeside community near Buffalo.
Witnesses said Rushdie was seated on stage and preparing to speak when
Matar sprang up from the audience and managed to stab him before being wrestled
to the ground by staff and other spectators. Matar's family appears to come from
the village of Yaroun in southern Lebanon, though he was born in the United
States, according to a Lebanese official. An AFP reporter who visited the
village Saturday was told that Matar's parents were divorced and his father –- a
shepherd –- still lived there. Journalists who
approached his father's home were turned away. Matar was "born and raised in the
U.S.," the head of the local municipality, Ali Qassem Tahfa, told AFP.
- Outrage -
"The Satanic Verses" and its author remain deeply inflammatory in Iran. When
asked by AFP on Saturday, nobody in Tehran's main book market dared to openly
condemn the stabbing. "I was very happy to hear the news," said Mehrab Bigdeli,
a man in his 50s studying to become a Muslim cleric.
The message was similar in Iran's conservative media, with one state-owned paper
saying the "neck of the devil" had been "cut by a razor."
In Pakistan, a spokesman for the Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan, a party that
has staged violent protests, said Rushdie "deserved to be killed."Elsewhere
there was shock and outrage. British leader Boris Johnson said he was
"appalled," while Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau called the attack
"reprehensible" and "cowardly."Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid condemned the
attack, branding it as "the result of decades of incitement led by the extremist
regime in Tehran."Messages also flooded in from the literary world, with
Rushdie's close friend Ian McEwan calling him an "inspirational defender of
persecuted writers and journalists across the world."Rushdie was propelled into
the spotlight with his second novel, "Midnight's Children," in 1981, which won
international praise for its portrayal of post-independence India.But "The
Satanic Verses", published in 1988, transformed his life. The resulting fatwa
forced him into nearly a decade in hiding, moving houses repeatedly and being
unable to tell even his children where he lived.
Syria reports Israeli missile attack on coastal region
Associated Press/August 14, 2022
Israel launched a missile attack on western Syria Sunday night and explosions
were heard in the coastal region of the war-torn country, Syrian state media
reported. There was no immediate word on casualties. Syrian state TV reported
that Israel's military targeted several positions in the province of Tartus
without giving further details. The TV said the missiles were fired by warplanes
flying over neighboring Lebanon. The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human
Rights, an opposition war monitor, said the Israeli strike targeted a Syrian
army air defense base in the area of Abu Afsa. It added that Iran-backed
fighters are usually in the base. Israel has carried out hundreds of strikes on
targets inside government-controlled parts of Syria over the past years, but
rarely acknowledges or discusses such operations. Israel has acknowledged,
however, that it targets bases of Iran-allied militant groups, such as Lebanon's
Hezbollah that sent thousands of fighters to fight alongside Syrian President
Bashar Assad's forces. In June, Israeli airstrikes temporarily put Damascus
International Airport out of commission.
Syria reports Israeli missile attack on coastal region,
three soldiers
AP/August 14, 2022
DAMASCUS: Israeli air strikes on Syria killed three soldiers and wounded three
others on Friday, state media said, after the latest such incident in the
war-torn country. “The aggression led to the death of three soldiers, the
wounding of three others,” Syria’s official news agency SANA said, quoting a
military source. Since civil war broke out in Syria in
2011, Israel has carried out hundreds of air strikes inside the country,
targeting government positions as well as allied Iran-backed forces and
Hezbollah fighters. The latest Israeli strikes
targeted sites in the countryside around the capital Damascus and south of
coastal Tartus province, SANA said, adding that Syria’s air defense systems
intercepted some of the missiles. The Syrian
Observatory for Human Rights war monitor also gave the same toll of killed and
wounded from the strikes near an air defense base in Tartus province, where
Iranian-backed groups are active.
The targeted site in Tartus is located eight kilometers (five miles) from a
Russian base, said the monitor, which has a wide network of sources in Syria.
It said ambulances had rushed to the scene of the strikes in Tartus.
In early July Syria’s defense ministry said an Israeli strike conducted from the
Mediterranean Sea near the town of Al-Hamadiyah, south of Tartus town, had
wounded two civilians. On Friday, Israeli shelling
wounded two civilians in southern Syria near the occupied Golan Heights,
according to state media. Last month, an Israeli
strike near Damascus killed three Syrian soldiers, state media said at the time.
The Observatory said that strike targeted a military facility and an “Iranian
weapons depot.”After the latest incident Israeli authorities told AFP that they
“do not comment on reports in the foreign media.”
While Israel rarely comments on individual strikes in Syria, the military has
defended them as necessary to prevent its arch-foe Iran from gaining a foothold
on its doorstep. The conflict in Syria started with
the brutal repression of peaceful protests and escalated to pull in foreign
powers and global jihadists.
The war has killed nearly half a million people and forced around half of the
country’s pre-war population from their homes.
Russia’s military intervention in 2015 helped turn the war in favor of Syria’s
President Bashar Assad, whose forces once only controlled a fifth of the
country.
Last month the Observatory said a Russian air strike killed seven people, four
of them children, in Syria’s rebel-held Idlib region, in the country’s north
Palestinian wounds 8 Israelis, 2 critically, in attack on
Jerusalem bus
Agence France PresseAssociated Press/August 14, 2022
Israeli police said Sunday they had arrested a suspect in a shooting attack on a
bus in Jerusalem's Old City that wounded eight people, including two critically.
"The terrorist is in our hands," police spokesman Kan Eli Levy told
public radio hours after the attack that took place not far from the Western
Wall, the holiest prayer site for Jews. Israeli police said forces were
dispatched to the scene to investigate. Israeli security forces also pushed into
the nearby Palestinian neighborhood of Silwan pursuing the suspected attacker.
Later on Sunday, police said the suspected attacker turned himself in. Police
did not immediately disclose details about the suspected attacker's identity.
But Israeli media reports identified the man as 26-year-old Amir Saidawi, a
resident of occupied East Jerusalem. A spokesperson
for the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem said there were American citizens among the
wounded, but disclosed no other information or details.
A gunman started spraying bullets at the public transport bus and people
outside the vehicle in the pre-dawn attack at the Tomb of David bus stop,
recounted bus driver Daniel Kanievsky. "I was coming from the Western Wall. The
bus was full of passengers," he later told reporters in front of his
bullet-riddled vehicle. "I stopped at the station of
the Tomb of David. At this moment, the shooting started. Two people outside I
see falling, two inside were bleeding. Everybody panicked."
Israel's emergency medical services, the Magen David Adom (MDA), called
the incident a "terror attack in the Old City." "We were on the scene very
quickly," its medics said in a statement. "On Ma'ale Hashalom Street we saw a
passenger bus ... in the middle of the road. Bystanders called us to treat two
males around 30 years old who were on the bus with gunshot wounds." MDA
spokesperson Zaki Heller initially said six men and one woman were wounded, with
all seven "fully conscious," before police raised the wounded toll to eight. One
of the wounded was a pregnant woman, whose baby was delivered after the attack,
a Shaarei Tsedek Hospital spokesman told AFP. "She remains intubated and in
serious condition," he said. "The infant was delivered and is in serious but
stable condition."
'Pay a price' -
Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid said after the attack that police, the army
and other security services "are working to apprehend the terrorist and will not
cease until he is caught." "All those who seek our harm should know that they
will pay a price for any harm to our civilians," Lapid added in the statement.
"The police and the IDF are working to restore calm and a sense of security in
the city," he said, referring to the Israeli army. The Palestinian Islamist
group Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, hailed a "heroic operation" without
claiming responsibility for the attack. "Our people
will continue to resist and fight the occupier by all means," it said in a
statement. The shooting came a week after the end of a three-day conflict
between Israel and Islamic Jihad militants in the densely populated Palestinian
enclave of Gaza. At least 49 Palestinians, including
Islamic Jihad fighters and a number of children, died in the violence which
ended last Sunday after Egypt negotiated a truce. Since March, 19 people --
mostly Israeli civilians inside Israel -- have been killed in attacks, mostly by
Palestinians. Three Israeli Arab attackers were also killed. In the aftermath of
those attacks, Israeli security forces stepped up raids in the occupied West
Bank. More than 50 Palestinians have been killed, including fighters and
civilians, in operations and incidents in the West Bank since then.
Gunman detained after firing shots in Canberra airport
Agence France Presse/August 14, 2022
A gunman fired around five shots inside Canberra's main airport Sunday, sending
passengers fleeing but injuring no one before he was detained by Australian
police. Images posted on social media showed a police
officer restraining a man on the ground inside the terminal as the emergency
alarm sounded in the capital's main airport. Police said the man was taken into
custody and was being held at a station in the city. A firearm was recovered,
they added. The gunman entered the airport's departures area in the early
afternoon and sat close to the terminal's large glass windows, detective acting
superintendent Dave Craft told reporters outside the building. He added that the
gunman waited five minutes before pulling out his firearm and "let off
approximately five rounds" The airport was evacuated and locked down, leading to
the suspension of flights But normal operations resumed after the airport was
re-opened later in the day, though some flights had been cancelled.
Craft said the crime scene indicated that the man had fired shots at the
glass windows in the terminal. No shots were directed at passengers or staff, he
said. Several apparent bullet impacts were visible on
the glass front on the second floor of the airport, television images showed. A
woman identified only as Helen was quoted as telling The Guardian newspaper that
she saw a man "shooting into the air" not far from the check-in counter,
describing him as being middle-aged and "clean cut".After examining the
airport's closed-circuit television images, police said they believed the man
had acted alone.
'We all ran' -
The situation was now "contained", police said, describing the airport as an
"active crime scene". The motive behind the shooting was not immediately clear,
police said. A journalist with Australian public
broadcaster ABC, Lily Thomson, reported that she heard the shots before people
started to scream. She saw a fearful woman looking
after a baby. "So we all ran and I stayed with that grandma and her baby and hid
behind an information desk," Thomson reported on ABC. "We stayed there for a
couple of minutes until security told us to evacuate out to the car park," she
added. "Everyone was hiding behind chairs and people were running." Another
passenger who gave only her first name, Alison, told the Sydney Morning Herald
and Melbourne Age newspapers that she saw the gunman.
"We were in security and heard the first gunshots. I turned around and there was
a man standing with a pistol, like a small one, facing out towards the car
drop-off," she said. "Someone yelled get down, get down and we just ran out of
there." Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he had
been briefed on the shooting incident. "I am advised a
man has been detained and there is no ongoing threat present," the prime
minister said in a statement.
Iraqi judiciary says it has no powers to dissolve
parliament
Associated Press/August 14, 2022
Iraq's top judicial body said Sunday it doesn't have the authority to dissolve
the country's parliament, days after an influential Shiite cleric gave it one
week to dismiss the legislature so that new elections can be held. The decision
by the Supreme Judicial Council is likely to increase tensions between followers
of cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and members of Iran-backed groups as Iraq sinks deeper
into its political impasse, now in its 10th month. The impasse is the longest in
the country since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion reset the political order. The
Supreme Judicial Council said in a statement after a meeting Sunday that
political groups in the country should not get the judiciary involved in their
"rivalries and political competition."Al-Sadr, whose supporters earlier this
month stormed the parliament in Baghdad and have since held a sit-in outside the
building, tweeted on Wednesday that the judiciary has one week to dissolve the
legislature. Al-Sadr has previously demanded that the parliament be dissolved
and that early elections be held but this time he set a deadline.
Al-Sadr's political bloc won the largest number of seats in parliament
but failed to form a majority government that excluded his Iran-aligned rivals.
He called on his followers Saturday night to be ready to hold massive protests
all over Iraq raising concerns of tensions. He did not set a date for the
planned protests. "The Supreme Judicial Council does
not have the authority to dissolve parliament," the statement said, adding that
its main job is to deal with legal matters and it cannot "interfere in the work
of the legislative or executive authorities."Even before Sunday's meeting of the
judiciary, it had stated it does not have the constitutional right to dissolve
parliament and that only lawmakers can vote to dissolve the legislature. Because
the parliament has exceeded the constitutional timeline for forming a new
government following the October elections, what happens next is not clear.
Al-Sadr's political rivals in the Coordination Framework, an alliance of
Iran-backed parties, said earlier that the parliament would have to convene to
dissolve itself. On Friday, supporters of the group demonstrated in Baghdad to
protest the occupation of the legislature by al-Sadr's supporters.
Earlier this month, thousands of al-Sadr's followers stormed the heavily
fortified Green Zone, which houses Iraq's parliament, government buildings and
foreign embassies. They overran and occupied the parliament, after which all
sessions of the assembly were canceled until further notice. The takeover also
effectively halted efforts by the Coordination Framework to try and form the
next government after al-Sadr failed to do so. In their takeover of parliament,
al-Sadr's followers stopped short of overrunning the Supreme Judicial Council
building next door — an act that many would consider a coup as the judiciary is
the highest legal authority in the country.
The Latest LCCC English analysis &
editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on August 14-15/2022
قائمة مفصلة بأحداث اضطهاد المسيحيين خلال شهر حزيران/2022 تحت عنوان أين هي
وسائل الإعلام من هذا الأضطهاد
‘Where Is the Media?’: Persecution of Christians, June 2022
Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute/August 14,
2022
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/111244/raymond-ibrahim-gatestone-institute-where-is-the-media-persecution-of-christians-june-2022-%d9%82%d8%a7%d8%a6%d9%85%d8%a9-%d9%85%d9%81%d8%b5%d9%84%d8%a9-%d8%a8%d8%a3%d8%ad%d8%af%d8%a7%d8%ab/
The Christians of Nigeria are, in fact, being purged in a
genocide, according to several NGOs. Every two hours, one Christian there is
killed.
“Heavily armed bandits, many of whom are said to be ethnic Fulanis, are waging
their own form of Jihad; killing, abducting and terrorizing worship centers and
educational institutions owned by churches as well as impoverished communities
in the North and Middle Belt regions.” — Vanguardngr.com. June 19, 2022,
Nigeria.
The Biden administration’s response to the jihadist onslaught against Christians
in Nigeria…has been to remove Nigeria from the State Department’s list of
Countries of Particular Concern: nations that engage in, or tolerate, violations
of religious freedom.
“The landlocked Sahel state [Burkina Faso], one of the world’s poorest
countries, is in the grip of a nearly seven-year-old jihadist insurgency.
Thousands of people have died and nearly two million have been driven from their
homes.” — Guardian.ng, June 28, 2022, Burkina Faso.
“Amoti came to our home very early in the morning and needed to know more of
Issa [Jesus], whom she had seen in a dream…. she willingly accepted Jesus for
the salvation of her soul….. then together we went to church in Nansana.” When
she arrived home, her father “…ordered his sons to seize and beat her, then took
a sharp knife and pierced her eyes,” one of her brothers who had tried to defend
her later said. “I want to remove these eyes so that you stop seeing churches
forever—even if you die, we are not going to bury you,” her Muslim father said.
— Morning Star News, June 14, 2022, Uganda.
“After Bashir was ousted from 30 years of power in April 2019, the transitional
civilian-military government… outlawed the labeling of any religious group
“infidels” and thus effectively rescinded apostasy laws that made leaving Islam
punishable by death. With the Oct. 25 [2021] coup, Christians in Sudan fear the
return of the most repressive and harsh aspects of Islamic law.” — Morning Star
News, June 20 2022, Sudan.
On June 6, a 15-year-old Christian girl told a court how she was kidnapped and
raped by a Muslim accused of abducting and forcibly converting her to Islam and
marrying her. — Morning Star News, June 7, 2022, Pakistan.
June 14 report tells the story of Rehmat Masih, a Christian man who, despite
there being no evidence, “has been in prison for five months in a new fabricated
blasphemy case. He is accused of profaning and desecrating the pages of the
Koran, but in reality he allegedly simply refused an offer to change religion….
on January 3, “police arrested Rehmat Masih, accusing him of committing
blasphemy and tortured him severely” in an effort to make him admit to
desecrating the Koran, an offence punishable by life imprisonment under Section
295-B of the Pakistan Penal Code. On January 19, 2022, a bail application was
filed for the defendant, but the judge rejected it. Rehmat has been in prison
since, awaiting his trial. — asanews.it, June 14, 2022, Pakistan.
The Christians of Nigeria are being purged in a genocide, according to several
NGOs. Every two hours, one Christian there is killed. On Pentecost Sunday, June
5, terrorists stormed the St. Francis Catholic Church in Ondo State, Nigeria and
massacred about 50 Christians who were peacefully worshipping their God.
Pictured: State officials walk past wounded victims from St. Francis Catholic
Church, on June 5, 2022.
The following are among the abuses Muslims inflicted on Christians throughout
the month of June 2022:
The Muslim Slaughter of Christians
Nigeria: On Pentecost Sunday, June 5, terrorists stormed the St. Francis
Catholic Church in Ondo and massacred about 50 Christians who were peacefully
worshipping their God. Videos, according to one report, “showed church
worshippers lying in pools of blood while people around them wailed.” Western
media presented the attack as a baffling aberration for Nigeria, arguing, as the
AP did, that “It was not immediately clear who was behind the attack on the
church.” Not once did the AP even mention the words “Muslim,” “Islam,” or
“Islamist,” in their determined attempt to ignore the fact that Islamic
terrorists have routinely stormed churches and slaughtered many Christians over
the years in Nigeria — for instance here, here, and here.
On Sunday, June 19, exactly two weeks after the St. Francis Church attack,
motorcycle-riding Muslims raided two other churches in Nigeria: the Maranatha
Baptist Church and the St. Moses Catholic Church. According to one report,
“[T]hree worshippers were killed while several others were abducted when the
attackers in large numbers swooped on the worship places…. [T]he terrorists shot
indiscriminately as they approached the various churches, killing three while
several others sustained injuries.”
The Christians of Nigeria are, in fact, being purged in a genocide, according to
several NGOs (such as here and here). Every two hours, one Christian there is
killed. As a June 19 report notes, “Painfully, the attack on St. Francis Church
was not the only one that jolted Christians in Nigeria. In fact, more than 100
worshippers were killed that week across the country.” Among these hundred other
Christians to be killed, the report cited the murder of 32 Nigerian Christians
inside their church “a few days before” the St. Francis attack.
The report added:
“Heavily armed bandits, many of whom are said to be ethnic Fulanis, are waging
their own form of Jihad; killing, abducting and terrorizing worship centers and
educational institutions owned by churches as well as impoverished communities
in the North and Middle Belt regions.”
Such bandits and terrorists have further abducted or killed 35 pastors over the
last 17 months. According to a June 26 report, as just one example, “bandits”
gunned down and murdered a Catholic priest. The Biden administration’s response
to the jihadist onslaught against Christians in Nigeria — where 13 Christians
are slaughtered every day — has been to remove Nigeria from the State
Department’s list of Countries of Particular Concern: nations that engage in, or
tolerate, violations of religious freedom.
Democratic Republic of Congo: On June 24 and 25, Islamic terrorists targeted two
Christian villages, where they slaughtered a total of thirteen Christians. The
Muslims also torched many Christian homes and shops in both villages, and stole
much of the residents’ property.
Burkina Faso: On June 27, “suspected jihadists” burst into a Christian baptismal
and opened fire, massacring at least eight Christians. According to the report,
“The landlocked Sahel state, one of the world’s poorest countries, is in the
grip of a nearly seven-year-old jihadist insurgency. Thousands of people have
died and nearly two million have been driven from their homes.”
Uganda: A Muslim man stabbed his daughter in the eyes and killed her for
embracing Christ. Earlier that day, Sunday, May 29, Hawa Amoti, aged 28, visited
her Christian neighbor. “Amoti came to our home very early in the morning and
needed to know more of Issa [Jesus], whom she had seen in a dream,” he said.
“After explaining to her about eternal life and forgiveness of sin that comes
from Jesus who came to take away the sins of the whole world, she willingly
accepted Jesus for the salvation of her soul. I then prayed for her, and then
together we went to church in Nansana.”
After church, she joined the neighbor’s family for lunch at their home and
stayed until about 5:45 p.m., when she left for her home. Her father, Haji
Shariifu Agaba, and brothers were already aware of where she had been and what
she had been doing. When she arrived home, her father “Agaba ordered his sons to
seize and beat her, then took a sharp knife and pierced her eyes,” one of her
brothers who had tried to defend her later said. “I want to remove these eyes so
that you stop seeing churches forever—even if you die, we are not going to bury
you,” her Muslim father said. The report concludes:
“Amoti’s wailing and screaming drew neighbors who rushed over to rescue her… As
more members of the community arrived, Agaba and his sons went inside their
house. Neighbors arranged for a vehicle to rush Amoti to a nearby hospital,
where she succumbed to profuse bleeding from her eye injuries…”
In a separate incident, a court sentenced Alias Mohammed Wamala, a Muslim man,
to life in prison for killing Christians. According to a local pastor, “the
accused confessed to having killed Zulaikha Mirembe and several other Christians
to fulfill what was written in the Koran about supporting the cause of Allah by
killing infidels.” The report adds:
“During the trial, Wamala and other Muslims were accused of ritual killings as
part of an occult practice that involved a shrine where the bodies were buried,
[an] area Christian said.”
Pakistan: Two Muslims hacked a Christian farm worker, Younis Masih, aged 50, to
death, before dragging his body through the streets with a hose tied around his
neck. According to the June 23 article,
“The men used farm sickles and scythes to inflict large gaping wounds to the
head and body of the murder victim. They then threw bricks at his head smashing
his skull—probably to make sure he was dead. A hose was then placed around the
neck of the corpse which was dragged through the farm onto the streets nearby
the home of the murder victim. His family were later awoken at 3.30 am by the
terrified employer of the deceased Christian who had found his dead body between
the farm and the victim’s home. A police investigation later uncovered that the
two Muslim men, both of whom owned neighbouring farms, were involved in the
murder. As of now neither murderer has revealed the motive for the killing.”
“I could not recognize the dead body of my father,” said one of his sons: “His
face was severely deformed due to the violence.” From the start, police have
been uncooperative, the slain man’s family says.
“Though a dead body involved in a murder crime was on the streets, Bambanwala
Police Station officers did not arrive at the scene of the crime till 7am. A
delay believed to be induced by the fact that a ritually impure Christian was
killed. It should be noted that the police station itself is only 30-40 minutes
away from the place the body of Mr. Masih was found.”
Gulfam, another of Masih’s sons, said:
“We contact the police every day to learn of any development in their
investigation, but police are not cooperating. Muhammad Abubakar Nawaz [one of
the murderers] threatened me in the presence of the station house officer and
they did nothing to stop him. He boldly told me that though he has confessed to
murdering my father, there is nothing I can do to get justice. Though I am
scared I will do all I can to seek justice.”
Irfan, his brother, added:
“The behaviour of the police is creating more agony. They have not explained why
our father was murdered so brutally. We have no property or anything of value
that could lead to such violence. We are poor people who labour to earn for our
families. We demand to know why this despicable fate has befallen our father.”
Egypt: On Sunday, June 5, 2022, Abdullah Hosni, a Muslim man attacked a
Christian, Kirollos Megali, with a meat cleaver in a village in Sohag. According
to an Arabic report, Kirollos, who was rushed to a hospital “drenched in blood
and with multiple stab wounds,” spent three days in an intensive care unit
before succumbing to his injuries, including hack wounds to his skull. According
to the deceased’s brother, Abdullah was locally known for harassing Christians.
He had relocated to Libya for a time but returned two days before assaulting
Kirollos. The Christian himself had been working abroad (in Kuwait) and was
visiting family, when Abdullah knocked him off his motorbike and started hacking
at him. According to the report,
“A state of anger prevailed among the village’s Copts, because the perpetrator,
Abdullah Hosni, had previously assaulted and always harassed Copts, but no
action was ever taken against him.”
Mourning Christians attending Kirollos’s funeral were heard to chant, “With our
souls, with our blood, we will redeem you, O Cross. The rights of Kirollos must
be returned—and where is the media?”
In a separate incident in Egypt, another Muslim man attempted to slaughter a
Christian woman with a sickle. According to a June 15 Arabic-language report,
Qassim Falah Muhammad attacked Mona Wafdi Marzouk, 35, as she was walking to her
family farm early in the morning to assist her ailing father. Muhammad crept up
behind her and began to strangle her; then, according to the report, “he grabbed
a sickle and tried to slaughter her with it.” Luckily, the blade had dulled over
the years and did not fully slice though the arteries of her neck. Muhammad then
fled the scene, as reported by Mona’s cousin, Makari, who saw the incident from
a distance and ran to the butchered woman’s aid. He and other family members
quickly transferred her to the nearest medical center, where she received seven
stitches to her neck. Although she survived, “Mona lives in a state of terror
and panic after the harsh experience of this extremist person.”
While it is unclear why Muhammad targeted Mona, it is well-established that he
hates Christians and has targeted them before. Just the day earlier, he had
invaded the home of another Copt in the same village and robbed him of his money
and possessions. In response to a police investigation, Muhammad’s family
produced a certificate indicating that he is “mentally ill”—a tactic on regular
display in Egypt whenever a Muslim is caught after attacking a Christian, to get
him the most lenient sentencing. As the report notes,
“If he is mentally ill, why does he exclusively target Copts? Is it sensible to
promote the ‘psychopath’ narrative in every single incident against the Copts—as
if the mentally ill only see and try to kill Copts?”
Muslim Attacks on Christian Churches
Egypt: On the evening of June, 23, 2022, Muslim mobs attacked the homes of
Christian by hurling stones through their windows in al-Hilla, a village in
Luxor governate. This attack occurred soon after Muslims learned that the Church
of Michael the Archangel, built in 2003, had finally received formal recognition
to begin functioning as a church. Soon after this news spread, the angry mobs,
which were augmented by others from neighboring villages, had grown extremely
large and, “amidst hostile chants” began hurling stones through the windows of
Christian homes. According to the report, “the security force charged with
protecting the church tried to rebuff them, but the number of assailants was too
large.” Before peace could be regained, many Christian homes had been damaged;
several vehicles and motorcycles parked in front of Coptic homes were also
“smashed” or set on fire, including the vehicle of the village priest.
The following day, June 24, Luxor police forces reinforced their presence in the
village in anticipation of more Muslim anger following the Friday mosque
prayers—when imams habitually whip the faithful into a frenzy concerning the
alleged sins of the “infidels” who need to be punished. Armed security and
national forces, including several armored vehicles, were deployed all
throughout the village, especially around the Church of Michael the Archangel,
Christian homes, and surrounding mosques. Meanwhile, as the report notes, the
traumatized Christians maintain that their “only sin” was to have “obtained an
official decision to legalize the church.”
Sudan: On June 14, police marched into a church Bible study class and arrested
two Christian leaders, Pastor Kabashi Idris of the African Inland Church and
Evangelist Yacoub Ishakh of the Independent Baptist Church, where the Bible
class was being held. They were arrested for “violating public order,” under
Article 77 of Sudan’s penal code. According to their lawyer,
“[The pastors] were accused by a radical Muslim neighbor who filed a case
against them at the police station in the area, prompting the police to arrest
the two church leaders. The radical Muslim told police his children were singing
the songs of the Christians and feared they might convert to Christianity.”
Although the Christian leaders were released later that day on bail, a guilty
verdict could result in a prison sentence of up to three months, a fine or both,
and the court could issue an order for them to cease worship services. According
to the report,
“Following two years of advances in religious freedom in Sudan after the end of
the Islamist dictatorship under Omar al-Bashir in 2019, the specter of
state-sponsored persecution returned with a military coup on Oct. 25, 2021.
After Bashir was ousted from 30 years of power in April 2019, the transitional
civilian-military government managed to undo some sharia (Islamic law)
provisions. It outlawed the labeling of any religious group “infidels” and thus
effectively rescinded apostasy laws that made leaving Islam punishable by death.
With the Oct. 25 coup, Christians in Sudan fear the return of the most
repressive and harsh aspects of Islamic law.”
Turkey: On Sunday, June 5, ceremonies for the reopening of a historic church
were marred after a large Muslim mob attacked a Christian family that had
planned on attending the re-opening service. According to one report,
“The Yilmaz family—the only Assyrian [Christian] family who live in the
village—were attacked at their home by a group of around 50 Muslims. The family
were at the time entertaining visiting clergy who had come to officiate at the
service. The attackers were led by a Muslim family with whom the Yilmaz family
have had a long-standing dispute over land. The mob attacked the home with
stones, sticks and other weapons. They then set fire to wheat being grown by the
Yilmaz family.”
“They threatened us,” said Cengiz, one of the Christian Yilmaz family, “saying
that they would not let us live in the village … But we are not afraid. We will
continue to stay here.” The Christian family “accused the attackers of
specifically choosing the day of the church ceremony to re-open the land
dispute” and thus spoil the long expected event. Adds the report:
“The tiny remnant Christian community in Turkey is mainly historic Christian
ethnic groups such as Assyrians (like the Yilmaz family) and Armenians; they
still bear the trauma of the Armenian, Assyrian, Syriac and Greek genocides of
the early twentieth century. During these genocides, at least 3.75 million
believers were killed by Ottoman Turks, with many attacks occurring in
south-eastern Turkey…. In August 2021 an Assyrian Christian village in northern
Syria was bombed by the Turkish air force in a campaign against Kurdish
militants.”
General Attacks on and Abuse of Christians
Pakistan: On June 6, a 15-year-old Christian girl told a court how she was
kidnapped and raped by a Muslim accused of abducting and forcibly converting her
to Islam and marrying her. According to a report:
“While most girls facing captors’ threats to harm them or their families are
pressured into making false statements that they voluntarily married and
converted to Islam, Saba Nadeem Masih of Faisalabad showed great bravery in
truthfully sharing her ordeal before a judge, a human rights advocate said.
“‘Saba was in severe mental and physical trauma when the relatives of the
accused produced her before police on May 31,’ Faisalabad-based rights activist
Lala Robin Daniel told Morning Star News. ‘The recovery was made possible due to
the pressure built by church leaders and rights activists by holding a daily
protest from 7 p.m. till midnight.'”
According to the young girl’s testimony against her abductor, 45-year-old
Muhammad Yasir Hussain, who has since gone into hiding,
“We were heading to work when the accused forcibly put me in a rickshaw after
pushing away my sister. He then put something on my mouth due to which I fell
unconscious….. He raped me for two days. I kept crying and pleaded with him to
let me talk to my parents, but he did not listen.”
Discussing this case, local human rights activist Lala said:
“Today’s development is very important because it exposes how these predators
sexually exploit underage minority girls and then prepare forged documents of
Islamic marriage and religious conversion to seek immunity for their crimes.
Saba’s statement proves that the Islamic Nikah [marriage] and conversion
certificates submitted by the accused to the police are fake. He should now be
charged with statutory rape and related offenses and made an example for all
those who target minority girls for their evil designs.”
Discussing this same case, Bishop Azad Marshall, president of the Anglican
Church of Pakistan, said,
“It’s very sad and tragic that a large number of teenage girls from both the
minority Christian and Hindu communities continue to suffer sexual exploitation
at the hands of these predators, but very few are able to pull such courage and
share their trauma in public…. Rape scars the victims for life, and in case of
girls as young as 10, one cannot even imagine the pain and horror these children
of God have suffered in the cover of religion. Enough is enough.”
In a separate incident in Pakistan, a June 14 report tells the story of Rehmat
Masih, a Christian man who, despite there being no evidence:
“Rehmat Masih has been in prison for five months in a new fabricated blasphemy
case. He is accused of profaning and desecrating the pages of the Koran, but in
reality he allegedly simply refused an offer to change religion. The police also
threatened the family, warning them not to prosecute the case. As a result, he
had to move to a safer location.”
For the previous 20 years, Rehmat, a 44-year-old father of two teenagers, had
worked as a cleaner at the Zam Zam publishing house, which prints Korans. There,
the “owners and employees had offered him to convert to Islam, but he had
repeatedly refused to change religion.” Shortly after Christmas, 2021, his
employers asked him about some torn pages of a Koran found in the sewage drain;
he replied that he knew nothing about that. A few days later, on January 3,
“police arrested Rehmat Masih, accusing him of committing blasphemy and tortured
him severely” in an effort to make him admit to desecrating the Koran, an
offence punishable by life imprisonment under Section 295-B of the Pakistan
Penal Code. On January 19, 2022, a bail application was filed for the defendant,
but the judge rejected it. Rehmat has been in prison since, awaiting his trial.
The report closes by quoting several human rights activists on this situation:
“Malook Samuel described it as unthinkable that—with no eyewitnesses to the
alleged event and no evidence—the accused is behind bars, while the complainants
and witnesses involved in making false allegations against the accused enjoy
impunity, and are not instead prosecuted for charges of perjury under Section
182 of the Penal Code, which provides for sentences of five to seven years.
“Pastor Tariq George added that it is regrettable that innocent people are being
targeted to settle personal scores, and that this story was created to punish
religious minorities who do not want to change their faith.”
Egypt: A June 19 report argues that “institutionalized discrimination against
Copts in Egypt” is even evident in that nation’s diplomatic corps, based on an
evaluation of 155 diplomats:
“Copts, the indigenous Christian inhabitants of Egypt, account for, at the very
least, 10 percent of Egypt’s population, and should, therefore, account for, at
the very least, 10 percent of Egypt’s diplomatic corps [though they are nowhere
near that amount]. Nor is such discrimination limited to diplomatic corps; it
permeates every state institution. As one recent example, on March 3, 98 female
judges took the legal oath in preparation for assuming judicial roles in Egypt’s
State Council. This was considered a major and unprecedented development; since
its inception 75 years earlier, not a single woman had sat on the podium of the
State Council court—and now 98 will. And yet, not one of them is a
Christian—again, despite the fact that the Copts account for at least 10 percent
of the nation’s population, suggesting that at least 10 of the 98 should have,
for proper representation, been Copts.”
*Raymond Ibrahim, author of the new book, Defenders of the West: The Christian
Heroes Who Stood Against Islam, is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the
Gatestone Institute, a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, and
a Judith Rosen Friedman Fellow at the Middle East Forum.
About this Series
*While not all, or even most, Muslims are involved, persecution of Christians by
extremists is growing. The report posits that such persecution is not random but
rather systematic, and takes place irrespective of language, ethnicity, or
location. It includes incidents that take place during, or are reported on, any
given month.
© 2022 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/18771/persecution-of-christians-june
A Dangerous Triple Fantasy
Amir Taheri/Asharq al-Awsat/August 14, 2022
Last June Khamenei himself spoke of the "need to open a new front in the West
Bank against the Zionist enemy".
Reliable sources in Baghdad say that the Quds Force has been "transiting"
significant quantities of arms and cash via Iraq to Jordan, to be smuggled to
the West Bank. The Jordanian authorities say they are aware of these "hostile
activities"'. King Abdullah himself has publicly called on Iran to cease
"destabilizing activities".
Supporters of "pre-emptive initiative" speak of a triple alliance in which the
Islamic Republic, the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation work
together to drive the US and its allies out of Eurasia, eastern Europe and the
western Pacific, bringing almost a century of "American hegemony" to an end.
In such a scenario, Taiwan, Ukraine and Israel must not remain as bases for the
American "hegemon" and its European and regional allies. All three, each in its
own way, also pose threats to China, Russia and Iran's authoritarian systems by
offering models for pluralist democracy and liberal capitalism.
It is clear that some dangerous pipe-dreamers in Beijing, Moscow and Tehran have
fallen for the phantasmagoric vision of, "three great powers" banding together
and with help from "the rest", that is to say, the so-called Third World, as
Kayhan says, to destroy an international system created by the "corrupt and
decadent".
[P]rudence demands preparing for even the improbable.
Iran's supporters of "pre-emptive initiative" speak of a triple alliance in
which the Islamic Republic, the People's Republic of China and the Russian
Federation work together to drive the US and its allies out of Eurasia, eastern
Europe and the western Pacific, bringing almost a century of "American hegemony"
to an end. Pictured: Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi
Jinping and Iran's then President Hassan Rouhani in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, on June
14, 2019.
In his meeting in Tehran with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the Islamic
Republic's "Supreme Guide" Ayatollah Ali Khamenei praised what he called "Your
Excellency's pre-emptive initiative" in launching "Special Operations " against
Ukraine.
He claimed that if Putin had not invaded Ukraine, the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO) would have started a war against Russia to regain control of
the Crimean Peninsula.
Although later removed from the official media in Iran, the remarks started a
debate in Tehran's decision-making circles about the Islamic Republic adopting a
similar strategy by going on the offensive against its "enemies".
Supporters of that view have been further encouraged by China's military
demonstrations against Taiwan. Fars News, controlled by the Islamic
Revolutionary Guard Corps, claims the latest showdown on Taiwan had led to
"total humiliation" for the United States.
"China has shown Washington what it should expect if it makes another wrong
move," it asserts. Those who believe that Iran should copycat Putin and "take
the war to the enemy before he attacks" have also called for "special
operations" against Israel.
Last June, Khamenei himself spoke of the "need to open a new front in the West
Bank against the Zionist enemy".
The reason for the attempt to open a new front in the West Bank is the
difficulties that Iran's Quds Force, in charge of "liquidating the Zionist
state," is facing on the two other fronts it has been using for decades, Gaza
and Lebanon.
In Gaza, the Islamic Republic has invested heavily in promoting Hamas and
Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Hamas, however, has always tried to avoid becoming
totally reliant on Tehran and a mere agent of the Quds Force, as is the case
with the Lebanese branch of Hezbollah.
As the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas also emphasizes its
doctrinal differences with the Khomeinist version of Twelver Shiism.
Despite its Islamic label, Islamic Jihad, on the other hand, has always been
keen to imitate Lebanese Hezbollah by making every move wished by the
puppet-masters in Tehran. However, Islamic Jihad is in a minority in Gaza, hence
the attempt by Tehran to help it create a base in the West Bank.
Reliable sources in Baghdad say that the Quds Force has been "transiting"
significant quantities of arms and cash via Iraq to Jordan, to be smuggled to
the West Bank. The Jordanian authorities say they are aware of these "hostile
activities"'. King Abdullah himself has publicly called on Iran to cease
"destabilizing activities".
Turning the West Bank into a base of operations against Israel is unlikely to
leave the Palestinian Authority, i.e. Fatah, indifferent. The Islamic Republic
has regarded Fatah as an "enemy" since 1980, when the late Yasser Arafat
supported Saddam Hussein's invasion of Iran. This is why both Hamas and Islamic
Jihad were given "embassies" in Tehran while the Palestinian Authority remains
persona non grata.
Currently, Tehran is unable to reactivate the Lebanese front for two reasons.
The first is Lebanon's dire economic situation, which has driven it to the edge
of famine. Iran had promised to "feed the people of Lebanon," but itself facing
food shortages as a result of drought and loss of grain imports from Ukraine, it
has failed to deliver. Instead, all eyes are now on Turkey, with a nod from
Moscow, to help bring Ukrainian grain to Lebanon.
The setback suffered by Hezbollah and its allies in Lebanon's recent election is
the second reason for the difficulties Quds Force faces in opening another
anti-Israel front there. Khamenei and his advisers still talk of the "need to
shower rockets and missiles" on Israel from Lebanon, Gaza and West Bank. The
daily Kayhan, believed to reflect Khamenei's views, claims that Israel could be
"wiped out" with 1,500 missile attacks while Hezbollah, Hamas and Islamic Jihad
are supposed to have 100 times as many.
Yet, there are signs that General Ismail Qaani, the new chief of the Quds Force,
has not been able to achieve the same degree of authority with Hezbollah, Hamas
and Islamic Jihad that his predecessor General Qassem Soleimani enjoyed.
In last week's brief clash with Israel, Islamic Jihad tried to upgrade its
position with Tehran compared with Hamas and Hezbollah. However, its claim of
"total victory" has not convinced the advocates of "pre-emptive initiative" in
Tehran.
Supporters of "pre-emptive initiative" speak of a triple alliance in which the
Islamic Republic, the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation work
together to drive the US and its allies out of Eurasia, eastern Europe and the
western Pacific, bringing almost a century of "American hegemony" to an end.
Fars News reports that such an alliance was already seen as "the most dangerous
scenario" for the US by Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter's National
Society Advisor. (Fars wrongly describes him as former US Secretary of State.)
In his book The Grand Chessboard published in 1997, Brzezinski suggests that
China, Russia and Iran might form an alliance not based on ideology but on
hostility to the West in general and the US in particular.
A similar idea was expounded in a series of papers by French military experts
led by Thomas Flichy and published under the title China, Iran and Russia: A New
Mongol Empire? in 2014. In such an empire, China would assume leadership while
Iran and Russia would be allowed to dominate their respective regions in the
Middle East and Eastern Europe.
The "new Mongol empire" will have a total population of 1.7 billion and account
for almost a fifth of global gross domestic product. It would also be the
second-largest military power in the world.
In such a scenario, Taiwan, Ukraine and Israel must not remain as bases for the
American "hegemon" and its European and regional allies. All three, each in its
own way, also pose threats to China, Russia and Iran's authoritarian systems by
offering models for pluralist democracy and liberal capitalism.
Last month, Khamenei praised Putin for his invasion of Ukraine. And this month,
China's Ambassador to Iran, Chang Hua, praised the Islamic Republic for
supporting China in "asserting its sovereignty" over Taiwan.
It is clear that some dangerous pipe-dreamers in Beijing, Moscow and Tehran have
fallen for the phantasmagoric vision of, "three great powers" banding together
and with help from "the rest", that is to say, the so-called Third World, as
Kayhan says, to destroy an international system created by the "corrupt and
decadent". A phantasmagoria produced by three stooges smoking the wrong stuff?
Maybe. However, prudence demands preparing for even the improbable.
What the US Gets Wrong About Iran
Karim Sadjadpour/The New York Times/August, 14/2022
Ibn Khaldun, the 14th-century North African scholar, wrote that empires tended
not to last beyond three generations. The founders of the first-generation are
rough men united by hardship, grit and group solidarity, a concept he called
asabiyyah. The next generation preserves the achievements of their forebears. By
the third or fourth generation, however, the comforts of wealth and status erode
ambition and unity, leaving them vulnerable to a new generation of power seekers
with fire in their bellies.
In the 1979 Iranian revolution, religious fundamentalists with fire in their
bellies transformed the country into an anti-American Islamist theocracy. Today
Iran is still led by one of its first-generation revolutionaries — 83-year-old
Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who has ruled since 1989. Among the reasons for
Khamenei’s longevity is that he rules Iran with the hyper-vigilance and
brutality of a man who believes that much of his own society, and the world’s
greatest superpower, aspire to unseat him.
Under Khamenei’s leadership, anti-Americanism has become central to Iran’s
revolutionary identity, and indeed few nations have spent a greater percentage
of their finite political and financial capital to try and topple the US-led
world order than Iran. On virtually every contemporary American national
security concern — including the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Chinese threats
against Taiwan, nuclear proliferation, and cyberwarfare — Tehran defines its own
interests in opposition to the United States.
As I explained to US lawmakers recently, one need only look at how Vladimir
Putin’s brazen military adventures in Georgia, Crimea, and Syria convinced him
he could invade Ukraine with impunity, to understand how the Iranian Republic
operates. The country’s successful entrenchment of powerful proxies in Iraq,
Syria, Lebanon and Yemen, coupled with America’s humiliating withdrawal from
Afghanistan, have further convinced Iran of its own success as well as America’s
inevitable decline. This dynamic has hampered the Biden administration’s
attempts to revive the 2015 Iran nuclear deal that Donald Trump withdrew from.
Although the nuclear program has easily cost Iran over $200 billion in lost oil
revenue and has not deterred Israel from reportedly carrying out brazen
assassinations and acts of sabotage against Tehran’s nuclear sites, the more
committed the United States has been to diplomacy, the lesser Iran’s sense of
urgency to compromise. Even if the nuclear deal is revived, Tehran’s worldview
will endure.
Multiple US administrations have attempted to coerce or persuade Iran to
reconsider its revolutionary ethos, but have failed. The reason is simple:
US-Iran normalization could prove deeply destabilizing to a theocratic
government whose organizing principle has been premised on fighting American
imperialism.
Herein lies the conundrum. By and large, the United States has sought to engage
a regime that clearly doesn’t want to be engaged, and isolate a ruling regime
that thrives in isolation. Yet over time, the Iranian regime has shown it’s too
influential to ignore, too dogmatic to reform, too brutal to overthrow, and too
large to fully contain. A sound US policy must reconcile the short-term
objectives of countering Iran’s nuclear and regional ambitions without hampering
the long-term goal of a representative Iranian government that is driven by the
national interests of its people, rather than the revolutionary ideology of its
rulers.
In the zero-sum worldview of Iran’s revolutionary elite, opening up the country
could bring in competition that would undermine their private mafias. For many
among Iran’s political and military elite the battle for power is not about
revolutionary ideology or Islam, but about who controls the country’s vast
resources.
“At the beginning of the revolution the rank and file of the regime consisted of
80 percent indoctrinated believers — ignorant of global realities — and 20
percent charlatans, and chameleons” a professor inside the country, whose
students rose to senior official positions, told me. “Today it is the opposite:
20 percent are believers, and 80 percent are charlatans who flock around
officials for wealth and privilege.”
US policy toward Iran has for years faced a paradox that has been poorly
understood: The coercive policies needed to counter the Iranian Republic’s
nuclear and regional ambitions — i.e., sanctions — may inadvertently serve to
strengthen, not weaken, the regime’s grip on power.
When Trump tried to entice Kim Jong-un with a vision of the riches his country
could have — “You could have the best hotels in the world right there” — the
North Korean president wasn’t moved to end his nuclear program. There is often a
fundamental tension between the self-interest of dictatorships and the
well-being of the people they rule.
Although sanctions force adversarial nations to pay a high cost, they do not, on
their own — with the possible exception of South Africa — have a strong track
record of unseating authoritarian regimes from power. Indeed, some even benefit
from their political isolation.
The actor Sean Penn, who had met the late Cuban dictator Fidel Castro, once told
me over a dinner we were both attending that “Fidel likes to joke that if
America were to ever remove the embargo against Cuba, he would do something
provocative the next day to get it reinstated. He understands his power is best
preserved in a bubble,” sequestered from international capitalism and civil
society.
Like Castro, Khamenei too understands that the greater danger to his theocracy
is not global isolation but global integration. When that isolation becomes too
debilitating, Khamenei is willing to consider a tactical deal to serve as a
release valve. For Khamenei, the ideal position is just the right amount of
isolation. Khamenei wants to be neither North Korea nor Dubai. He wants to be
able to sell Iran’s oil on the global market without sanctions, but he doesn’t
want Iran to be fully integrated in the global system.
The former president of Iran, Mohammad Khatami, once told me that Khamenei used
to tell him that the Iranian Republic needed enmity with America. Khamenei has
never hidden his cynicism about the United States. “With regard to America” he
said in 2019, “no problem can be resolved and negotiations with it have nothing
but economic and spiritual loss.”
While Khamenei’s animosity toward the United States is no doubt earnest, it is
also in his self-interest. His commitment to the revolution’s core principles
has been ironclad. Compromising any of these principles could erode the group
solidarity that Ibn Khaldun long ago observed is central to the longevity of any
regime.Eric Hoffer, the American philosopher put it succinctly in his book, “The
True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements”: “Hatred is the most
accessible and comprehensive of all unifying agents,” adding, “Mass movements
can rise and spread without belief in a god, but never without belief in a
devil.”If Iran’s revolutionary elite have thrived in relative isolation, why
doesn’t the United States simply restore relations with Iran? Built into this
question is the assumption that America has the power to unilaterally normalize
relations, and Iran has no agency whether to accept or decline.
In contrast to the Cold War, when the United States had a continuous diplomatic
presence in Moscow and thousands of trained Russia specialists, the US
government has been absent from Iran since the 1979 seizure of the US Embassy in
Tehran, and boasts of little in-country expertise.
This estrangement and lack of understanding has fueled what the former US
National Security adviser H.R. McMaster has called “strategic narcissism,” the
tendency to perceive world events solely through the prism of US behavior.
Liberals often argue that engaging Iran could soften its revolutionary ideology
or empower regime moderates. Conservatives have argued a tougher US approach
could either force Iran to abandon its ideology or risk the implosion of the
regime. Neither approach, on its own, has worked.
Since 1979, every US administration — save for that of George W. Bush — has
attempted to improve relations with Iran. Jimmy Carter’s administration tried to
build confidence with Iran’s new revolutionary regime by sharing intelligence,
which would go unheeded, that Iraq’s Saddam Hussein was planning to invade Iran.
Ronald Reagan sent three unanswered letters to the Iranian government. George
H.W. Bush’s inauguration speech included a message — “goodwill begets goodwill”
— for Iran. Bill Clinton hoped to meet Iran’s reformist president Mohammad
Khatami at the United Nations in 2000.
Barack Obama wrote multiple private letters to Khamenei whose response was to
suggest ways America “could stop being an imperialist bully,” as Obama recalled
in his latest memoir. Even Donald Trump — whose administration assassinated Maj.
Gen. Qassim Suleimani of Iran in 2020 — made at least eight requests to meet
with President Hassan Rouhani, according to an Iranian official.
By contrast, there is not a single known example of Iran’s supreme leader
initiating a public or private dialogue with US officials in the hopes of
normalizing relations. Most recently, he has forbidden his diplomats to meet US
officials working on renegotiating the nuclear deal. Khamenei recognizes that
rapprochement with the United States poses far more of an existential threat to
him than continued Cold War.
To be clear, the United States has also made catastrophic errors. The 2003 Iraq
war spread Iran’s Shia theocracy to Iraq, and facilitated Iran’s regional
ascent. The main outcome of the Trump administration’s unilateral 2018
withdrawal from the nuclear agreement is an Iran with a far more advanced
nuclear program.
If US attempts to engage Iran have gone largely unreciprocated, and US attempts
to coerce Iran have largely backfired, where does that leave us?
There is no silver bullet that can transform the nature of the Iranian regime or
the US-Iran relationship. Few examples exist of Iran agreeing to meaningful
compromise, but nearly all of them have been under similar circumstances: a
combination of sustained global pressure and rigorous US diplomacy, to achieve a
specific resolution. In the case of the nuclear deal, that means restraining,
rather than eliminating it. And that same formula should be applied to limit —
although not eliminate — Iranian influence in the Middle East.
Robert Cooper, a decorated European diplomat who negotiated with Iran, urges
strategic patience. “Revolutionary powers don’t think the way others do,” he
told me. “They don’t want a different place in the world; they want a different
world. It’s no good thinking you can change them, but a moment may come when
they begin to doubt or to get over their revolution … then you can start
something.”
Khamenei has not publicly exhibited any doubts, but he has at times shown an
ability to make tactical compromises when he has feared his regime’s existence
is at stake, and there is a safe path of retreat.
William J. Burns, the director of the C.I.A., and one of the diplomatic
architects of the 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran, wrote that the agreement was
spawned by “tough-minded diplomacy, backed up by the economic leverage of
sanctions, the political leverage of an international consensus, and the
military leverage of the potential use of force.” Today diplomacy has not been
tough-minded, sanctions are not enforced fully, international consensus is more
difficult to obtain and Tehran appears convinced that President Biden has no
interest in another military conflict in the Middle East.
The clerical regime that has ruled Iran over the last four decades is terminally
ill, yet it continues to endure, in part due to a lack of viable alternatives.
It cannot meaningfully reform, out of well-founded fears that doing so would
hasten its death. The four horsemen of Iran’s economy — inflation, corruption,
mismanagement, and brain drain — are endemic. The common denominators between
Iran and its regional spheres of influence — Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, and Iraq —
are insecurity, economic failure, and profound unhappiness.
Crane Brinton, the author of the seminal book “The Anatomy of Revolution,”
argued that most revolutions experience a radical period, the “reign of terror,”
before normalcy eventually sets in. Although revolutionary fervor long ago
subsided in Iran, normalcy has been elusive, partly because of powerful
entrenched interests in the status quo.
The goal of Khamenei and his revolutionary cohorts — the remaining true
believers — is to avoid a normal Iran, and normalization with the United States,
which would deprive the Iranian Republic of the external adversary that has
helped maintain the cohesion of the security forces, the asabiyyah that Ibn
Khaldun wrote about. Although this is a losing strategy in the long run, the
octogenarian Khamenei’s time horizon is limited. Khamenei’s priority has never
been about Iran’s national interest, but it’s to keep his regime united and the
international community divided.
If the four-decade history of the Iranian Republic is any guide, Khamenei may be
unwilling or incapable of marshaling an internal consensus to revive the nuclear
deal with the United States unless he feels regime solidarity is faltering, and
societal exhaustion is beginning to fuel a new generation of power seekers. The
paradox of the Iranian Republic is that it tends to compromise only under severe
pressure, yet that same external pressure and isolation help keep it alive.
It is a game Khamenei has been perfecting for decades.
The Delightful Implosion of Boris Johnson
Michelle Goldberg/The New York Times/August, 14/2022
There isn’t much good news in the world these days, so it’s worth taking time to
appreciate the delightful implosion of soon-to-be former Prime Minister Boris
Johnson.
His 2019 landslide victory against the hapless Jeremy Corbyn of the Labor Party
seemed to be ushering in a long period of right-wing dominance. Johnson, said
The Economist, “is well placed to become one of the most powerful prime
ministers in modern times.” Less than three years later, undone by scandal,
incompetence and the rebellion of his own party, he’s announced plans to step
aside once a new Conservative leader can be found. There may not be a new
general election soon, but if there were, polls suggest that Labor could win a
majority.
On Wednesday, I listened to the hosts of the left-of-center British podcast “Oh
God, What Now?” react, almost in real time, as Johnson’s cabinet ministers
abandoned him en masse. Their elation was contagious. “This isn’t analysis; this
is giggling euphoria!” said the journalist Ian Dunt. At least someone’s having
fun out there! For an American liberal, however, the schadenfreude brought by
Johnson’s collapse is mixed with envy. We are watching a still-functioning
democracy dispatch its bombastic populist leader because his amorality and
narcissistic dishonesty were simply too much. On Wednesday, a day after
resigning as health secretary, Sajid Javid lambasted Johnson during Question
Time in the House of Commons: “We’ve seen in great democracies what happens when
divisions are entrenched and not bridged. We cannot allow that to happen here.”
Johnson, a nationalist demagogue and mendacious blowhard, has often been
compared to Donald Trump, right down to the poufy yellow hair. Their political
careers have certain parallels.
The shocking success of the Brexit referendum, the cause Johnson eventually rode
to power, presaged Trump’s even more shocking presidential victory. Both men
created new electoral coalitions by making inroads with disaffected
working-class voters. Both were given to cruel anti-immigrant stunts, like the
Johnson government’s recent plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda. Both shared
a contempt for truth and the norms of their respective governments.
But, of course, Britain and the United States are very different countries, and
not just because the UK is a parliamentary system, a generally more effective
form of government than our own presidential system. British people are still
evidently capable of being shocked by officials’ sexual harassment and shameless
untruths, even when those officials are on their side. Their country is not
heavily armed, and does not have a powerful faction that regularly threatens
violence. Britain still appears to have some minimal social agreement about
acceptable political behavior. Its government is falling apart precisely because
its society is not. Mired as I am in the demoralizing squalor of American
politics, I’m jealous of the relative quaintness of the scandal that finally
brought Johnson down: lying about someone else’s sexual misconduct! The end of
the Johnson era was precipitated by a member of Parliament named Christopher
Pincher, who recently got drunk and groped two men at a private Tory club.It
turns out that Pincher, whom Johnson appointed as deputy chief whip in February,
had been accused of sexual harassment several times in the past. Johnson and his
allies claimed he hadn’t known about the allegations when he gave Pincher the
job, but he did, even reportedly joking that the M.P. was “Pincher by name,
Pincher by nature.”
Both Pincher and Johnson obviously behaved egregiously. The quaint part is the
near universal condemnation of their behavior, and the widespread acknowledgment
that, after years of bullying and dishonesty, Johnson’s dissembling was the
final straw. Imagine having final straws!
I felt similarly wistful contemplating Partygate, the scandal over Johnson’s
secret pandemic socializing that led conservatives to hold a no-confidence vote
last month, which the prime minister survived. Occasionally I’ve asked British
people if there really was widespread anger at Johnson, or just satisfaction at
catching him out. Under Trump, after all, Americans largely became inured to
hypocrisy, even if they still felt the need to denounce it. Everyone I spoke to,
though, told me that the outrage was real. That was partly because Britain’s
lockdown was much stricter than ours, and applied to the whole country; unlike
Trump’s partying in 2020, Johnson’s violated rules his government was imposing
on others. Still, to be really furious at hypocrisy, you have to have some
expectation that people in power will follow the rules. And to be shamed by the
revelation of hypocrisy, as the Tories seemed to be, you have to accept that the
standards applied to others also apply to you. Another way of saying this is
that intolerance of hypocrisy implies a democratic sensibility, in which
everyone is at least supposed to be bound by the same strictures.
Johnson’s career is ending, at least for now, the way Trump’s should have ended
— with public revulsion leading his own party to oust him. Like Trump, Johnson
initially wanted to cling to power when it was no longer feasible; unlike with
Trump, there was never a prospect of him summoning an armed mob. Watching
Johnson’s fall after living through Trump is like chasing a slasher film with a
cozy mystery. Both may be murder stories, but only one has a reassuring order to
it.
“We deserve a better class of bastards,” Dunt said on the podcast. We all do.
Still, as an American, I have to say: Be thankful for what you’ve got.
Heroes, Not Victims
Hazem Saghieh/Asharq Alawsat/August 14/2022
In 1978, Czech playwright Vaclav Havel smuggled a long text he had written, “The
Power of the Powerless,” in which he discusses life and forms of civil
resistance under the communist regime in former Czechoslovakia. In the text, the
eventual leader of the revolution tells the story of a grocer who put the slogan
“workers of the world unite” on the glass front of his shop.
The dissident intellectual who would go on to become the president of the
Democratic Republic of Czechoslovakia a decade later asked: What did the grocery
store owner hope to achieve by displaying this slogan? Is he genuinely
enthusiastic about the prospect of the workers of the world uniting?
According to Havel, the vast majority of grocery store owners do not think about
the slogans they put on display in their storefronts, nor do they use them to
express their actual opinions. They had been doing so for years because that is
just what they and everyone else do. That is how things were managed in
communist Czechoslovakia and other countries with similar regimes.
As for those who refrain from doing so, they are subjected to harassment that
begins with rapprochement and bashing and ends with accusations of disloyalty,
which could leave them imprisoned.
The slogan is thereby plastered on the storefront because it should be and
because not doing so could mean the owner of the store cannot continue to live
his life in the safety he had grown accustomed to.
In this sense, Havel believes the people are “living a lie.” While that does not
mean that they accept or believe the lie, it does mean they have to accept that
their life is a lie. As for the consequence, it is that rituals and complying
with them become a requisite for having both a personal and social life.
Equivalents of “workers of the world unite” can be found in all countries and
instances of coercion that rely upon a ritual summed up with a slogan: “Unity,
Socialism, Freedom” and “One Arab Nation with an Eternal Message” are those of
the Baath regime in Syria and that which had previously ruled Iraq. “Neither
East nor West- Islamic Republic” and “never to humiliation (Hayhat Minna Zilla)”
or “the victory of blood over the sword” in Iran…
A week ago, we saw another case, though boringly repetitive, of living a lie:
Israel’s assault on Gaza that killed civilians, including children. These
victims should be presented as victims, and the tragedies that took their lives
should be an additional irrefutable argument against Israeli aggression and its
longstanding approach of evading punishment and justice.
However, those pushing the lie do not want to present the victims as victims.
They only want to present them as heroes, and this is not, as it may appear at
first glance, merely naive, inflamed rhetoric. The fact is that the reason for
this lie is another that is bigger and more dangerous, one that has been framed
through many speeches and public statements: we are at a stage in which we are
preparing for a comprehensive war that does away with Israel.
More than that, Iran seems to be facing something of a dilemma regarding who
will do away with the “Zionist entity:” Islamic Jihad, Hamas, or Hezbollah?
It is only natural for demand for heroes to increase under this state of
affairs, with victims who cannot contribute to the operation to do away with the
Jewish state and, perhaps, the United States and the West in its entirety, left
out of the narrative. Victims are a burden to epics, while heroes, in contrast,
were born for epics.
Worse still, this refusal to recognize victims as victims is coupled with a
monopolization of victimhood. We are, as is being repeatedly confirmed, a people
suffering from pains that have never been seen before and will never be seen
again. We come from a long line of resistors confronting a relentless conspiracy
rarely seen in history by any other people.
Living a lie, with all the rituals and slogans that come with it, has become a
system and a way of life across the Arab Levant, though the Palestinian-Israeli
conflict remains the most generous supplier of lies.
That is how words sprout from words, lies sprout from lies, and false narratives
are inflated and entrenched. Arguments, logic, facts, figures, and comparisons
do not resist it, and the actual wills and desires of whoever is directly
concerned do not stand in its way.
What is demanded, at the end of the day, is for the current power hierarchies,
with the profiteering and vested interests that come with them, to remain as
they are: armed groups are to remain in control of the lives of civilians,
making their decisions for them; Iran is to continue to call the shots on
questions of war and peace in the Levant, and “the steadfastness of the Assad
regime in Syria” is to remain a noble goal loftier than any other…
All of that requires living and pushing a lie, as well as presenting those who
do not live this lie and parrot it as leading others astray.
Yes, our innocent victims, the children and civilians in general, are lied to
twice: once when they are deprived of being victims, and another when they are
designated, against their will, as heroes.
This is the course we are taking merely because this is the “natural” course we
should be taking. If we find ourselves in need of an argument, we reach out to
our reservoir of poems telling us that “we have to abide by what is written for
us.”
US must wake up to Iran’s terrorist threat
Maria Maalouf/Arab News/August 14/2022
The US Department of Justice last week announced criminal indictments against a
member of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The unlawful activities he
was charged with stem from an attempt to assassinate John Bolton, who served as
national security adviser under President Donald Trump. Bolton was also a
high-ranking official in the George W. Bush administration.
The accused Iranian was following instructions he had received from the
Iranian government in Tehran. There were also a few others who were his
accomplices. Strangely, the Biden administration has not indicated how it will
respond to this serious act of criminality, which threatened the national
security of the US. The official statement released by
the Justice Department affirmed that the plot to kill Bolton was likely
masterminded as a retaliation for the death of Iran’s chief terrorist, Qassem
Soleimani, who was assassinated in January 2020. So far, the US government has
not expressed any intention to retaliate against Iran for attempting to spread
its terrorism to American soil. National Security
Adviser Jake Sullivan said: “Should Iran attack any of our citizens, to include
those who continue to serve the United States or those who formerly served, Iran
will face severe consequences.” However, he did not elaborate on what
“consequences” Tehran might face for its planned act of terrorism against
America.
In addition, many people both inside and outside America are convinced that the
Justice Department knows more about the attempt to assassinate Bolton but is
withholding information about the plot. Moreover, there could be more than one
Iranian plan to do harm to America. This invites an important question: Does the
US government have more information about Iran’s terror than it has announced
publicly?
In the wake of the Justice Department’s announcement, Bolton said of Iran’s
leaders: “It is not just a window into how they behave with their terrorist
activities and sponsorship of terrorist groups, but how they conduct their
foreign policy altogether.” In addition, Bolton said on CNN: “This is not a
regime that can be trusted to meet its commitments or obligations. It is a
regime that sees the United States as an enemy and acts that way.”So far,
Washington has not expressed any intention to retaliate against Tehran for
attempting to spread its terrorism to American soil.
The political scene that the Biden administration has created in Washington is
one of self-contradictions. While the White House officially condemns the terror
of Iran, it is still negotiating with the regime to reach an agreement over its
nuclear program. President Joe Biden is making serious political
miscalculations. He still indicates that the negotiations with Iran will be
successful and will force it to moderate its criminal activities at home and
drive the ayatollahs toward a more constructive foreign policy. Neither of these
two false wishes will materialize.
A mood of confusion dominates Washington. Gabriel Noronha, who served in the
Trump administration, last week wrote an article for the conservative
publication The Washington Examiner claiming that Secretary of State Antony
Blinken had this month approved sanctions waivers allowing several companies to
engage with Iran’s civilian nuclear industry. Congress apparently knows nothing
about this.
Iran’s attempt to kill Bolton should spur the president to collect more
intelligence information about Iran. Moreover, the Obama-era approach to Iran
must change. President Barack Obama treated Iran’s terrorism not as a strategic
issue but as a law enforcement problem. This is totally wrong because Iran has a
plan to take its terrorism to every part of the world.
In 1993, President Bill Clinton ordered strikes against Iraq after a plot to
assassinate former President George H.W. Bush was revealed. For sure, this will
not happen today.
No analyst knows how long the current administration will go on appeasing Iran.
But as the president hesitates on forcing Iran to quit its terror, Tehran is
wearing away America’s standing in the world. The world cannot tolerate Iran’s
vicious and violent schemes any longer. It is time to punish Iran.
• Maria Maalouf is a Lebanese journalist, broadcaster, publisher and writer. She
has a master’s degree in political sociology from the University of Lyon.
Twitter: @bilarakib
Iran likely to be the winner from new nuclear deal
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Arab News/August 14/2022
When it comes to the nuclear deal, there are several important parameters the
Iranian leaders want in order to ensure that the regime emerges as the sole
winner as a result of the agreement.
First of all, the regime desires a deal that removes all US and European
financial sanctions immediately, rather than a step-by-step lifting of the
sanctions based on periodic verifications that Tehran is complying with the
terms of the deal. This will make it much more difficult for the international
community to reimpose sanctions, even if the Iranian regime were to be found to
be secretly advancing its nuclear program in violation of the nuclear deal.
For example, as part of the 2015 agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive
Plan of Action, the UN lifted all four rounds of crippling sanctions that took
decades to impose on the regime, since they required consensus among the five
permanent members of the UN Security Council (the UK, China, France, Russia and
the US). Even after the theocratic establishment violated all terms and
restrictions of the nuclear deal in June 2020 — and in spite of the fact that it
is now close to obtaining nuclear weapons — the UN Security Council has not
reimposed these sanctions due to a current lack of consensus and the veto power
of China and Russia.The new nuclear pact, which is reportedly close to being
agreed, appears to meet this demand of the Iranian leaders. With the removal of
sanctions upon the signing of the deal, the agreement will lead to the lifting
of economic pressure on Iran, which will likely help Tehran to regain its
financial power, halt its currency devaluation and reignite its economy.
Iran’s staggering economic problems — thanks to reduced oil sales,
spiking inflation, an increase in unemployment, domestic discontent toward the
government, the devaluation of the currency and Tehran’s geopolitical isolation
— are bringing the government to its knees by significantly endangering the hold
on power of the ruling clerics.
However, the proposed deal will allow Tehran to more freely trade in its metal
industry, sell oil, receive several billions dollars of previously frozen
assets, lure back Western oil companies, suppress domestic activists and
exercise its hegemonic ambitions.
The regime will see any new deal as a green light to pursue its political agenda
and ambitions in the region. The Iranian regime also
wants the nuclear deal to have an expiration date. The sunset clauses in the
nuclear pact fulfill that objective. These clauses pave the way for the Iranian
regime to resume enriching uranium to any level it chooses after the period of
time specified in the agreement.
In addition, the Iranian leaders desire a deal that will give it global
legitimacy and make the international community less likely to hold Tehran
accountable for its military adventurism in the region. The regime will see any
new nuclear deal as a green light to pursue its political agenda and ambitions
in the region, as well as to consolidate its power and influence in Yemen,
Syria, Lebanon and Iraq. It will also be a powerful platform, giving Iran the
capability to militarily and economically back its proxies throughout the
region, including the Houthis and Hezbollah.
The regime also wants a deal that will remove a deep concern of Supreme Leader
Ali Khamenei, which emerged after the recent widespread protests and
demonstrations: The possibility of the West attempting to subvert the regime by
supporting opposition parties and human rights and democratic movements in Iran.
Domestically speaking, Iranian human rights activists and dissidents are
genuinely concerned, believing that a nuclear deal will allow the ruling clerics
to suppress domestic opposition with renewed vigor and without reservation.
Furthermore, the Iranian regime is searching for a deal that does not give the
International Atomic Energy Agency full access to its military sites, which
reportedly have connections to Tehran’s nuclear program. It has a history of
building clandestine nuclear sites, which have been revealed and verified. In
other words, the regime will be able to reap the advantages of the nuclear deal
while continuing to enrich uranium to a high level at undeclared underground
nuclear sites.
As a result, the Iranian regime will be in a much stronger position after the
nuclear deal is agreed, feeling less pressure to dismantle its nuclear
facilities and end its uranium enrichment. There is also the issue of its
plutonium reactor, which is believed to have no purpose other than to militarize
Iran’s nuclear program.
Finally, Iran wants a deal that does not address or constrain its ballistic
missile program, which is linked to its nuclear program.
In a nutshell, the proposed nuclear pact appears to meet all the Iranian
regime’s key demands, which will make Tehran the winner after the agreement is
signed.
*Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a Harvard-educated
Iranian-American political scientist. Twitter: @Dr_Rafizadeh
FBI’s Mar-a-Lago raid may give Republicans a midterms
boost
Dalia Al-Aqidi/Arab News/August 14/2022
Anyone who thinks that someone knows what happened at the residence of former
President Donald Trump last week and the reasons behind the FBI’s raid on
Mar-a-Lago is wrong.
On Aug. 8, heavily armed FBI agents with a search warrant raided Trump’s resort
in Palm Beach, Florida, leaving Americans puzzled by what they were looking for
and what spurred the raid. On the same evening, the 45th US president said in a
statement that his residence was under siege, had been raided and was occupied
by a large group of FBI agents. Trump added: “Nothing
like this has ever happened to a president of the United States before. After
working and cooperating with the relevant government agencies, this unannounced
raid on my home was not necessary or appropriate.” He described the events as a
“weaponization” of the justice system aimed at preventing him from running for
president in 2024.
It took a few days for the US Department of Justice to shed light on what
happened. On Thursday, Attorney General Merrick Garland spoke to the public for
the first time, confirming that a federal court authorized the search warrant
upon the required finding of probable cause, revealing that he “personally
approved” the unprecedented decision to seek a search warrant against the former
president.The warrant revealed three severe federal crimes that the Justice
Department is investigating: Obstruction of justice, criminal handling of
government records, and violations of the Espionage Act. Connecting a former US
president with espionage raised many concerns, paving the way for speculation
and the spreading of false or misleading information.
The FBI agents seized boxes of material, including documents marked as “top
secret, secret, and confidential,” binders of photos and handwritten notes. The
Washington Post reported on Thursday that classified documents relating to
nuclear weapons were among the things FBI agents were looking for at
Mar-a-Lago.The slow flow of unclear information raised questions on the nature
and timing of the investigation, with the midterm elections approaching. “We
started by talking about 15 boxes, now it is 35. We started by talking about the
Presidential Records Act, now we’re talking about stolen nuclear secrets and
reams of classified data. We started with GOP rage, now we’re talking Espionage
Act and obstruction. Quite the trendline,” attorney and New York Times
bestselling author Seth Abramson posted on Twitter.
The former president reiterated that, prior to him leaving office, he
declassified all the documents that were found in his residence. However, it is
so far unknown whether the written records to prove his claims are available.
The FBI raid has politically boosted Trump within the Republican Party. Several
key politicians condemned the raid and asked for more information. Popular
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who is expected to make a bid to run for president in
2024, considered the unprecedented move a “political strategy.” He said on his
Twitter account: “The raid of MAL is another escalation in the weaponization of
federal agencies against the regime’s political opponents, while people like
Hunter Biden get treated with kid gloves.”
It seems that the raid has mobilized Republican voters to participate in
upcoming elections, according to a survey conducted by the Trafalgar
Group/Convention of States Action. While 76 percent of Republican voters
believed that Trump’s political enemies were behind the FBI raid, 83 percent of
them said that the events had increased their motivation to cast their vote in
the November midterms. The slow flow of unclear
information raised questions on the nature and timing of the investigation.
The case has not yet begun and the facts will gradually emerge, which might
significantly change the American political equation. Only time will tell.
Those who believed the silly rumor circulating on social media platforms that
the former president had revealed the nuclear codes in a fundraising email and
could launch a nuclear attack from his Florida resort can relax. Simply put,
Trump’s codes expired at noon on Joe Biden’s inauguration day, Jan. 20, 2021,
when the new president’s codes became active, while it also takes more than one
person to launch such an attack.
Dalia Al-Aqidi is a senior fellow at the Center for Security Policy. Twitter:
@DaliaAlAqidi