LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
July 24/15
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins05/english.july24.15.htm
Bible Quotation For Today/No
one has greater love than this, to lay down one’s life for one’s friends
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 15/09-16: "As the Father has
loved me, so I have loved you; abide in my love. If you keep my commandments,
you will abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father’s commandments and
abide in his love. I have said these things to you so that my joy may be in you,
and that your joy may be complete. ‘This is my commandment, that you love one
another as I have loved you. No one has greater love than this, to lay down
one’s life for one’s friends. You are my friends if you do what I command you. I
do not call you servants any longer, because the servant does not know what the
master is doing; but I have called you friends, because I have made known to you
everything that I have heard from my Father. You did not choose me but I chose
you. And I appointed you to go and bear fruit, fruit that will last, so that the
Father will give you whatever you ask him in my name."
Bible Quotation For Today/A
wife is bound as long as her husband lives. But if the husband dies, she is free
to marry anyone she wishes
First Letter to the Corinthians 07/36-40: "If anyone thinks that he is not
behaving properly towards his fiance’e, if his passions are strong, and so it
has to be, let him marry as he wishes; it is no sin. Let them marry. But if
someone stands firm in his resolve, being under no necessity but having his own
desire under control, and has determined in his own mind to keep her as his
fiance’e, he will do well. So then, he who marries his fiance’e does well; and
he who refrains from marriage will do better. A wife is bound as long as her
husband lives. But if the husband dies, she is free to marry anyone she wishes,
only in the Lord. But in my judgement she is more blessed if she remains as she
is. And I think that I too have the Spirit of God."
LCCC
Latest analysis, editorials from miscellaneous sources published on July 23-24/15
ISIS infiltrates Egyptian special forces, joins with Hamas to occupy N. Sinai,
liquidate Sisi/DEBKAfile/July 23/15
Tackling Islamism, Post-Chattanooga/Tarek Fatah/The Toronto Sun/July 23/15
A Syria breakthrough? Don’t hold your breath/Joyce Karam/Al Arabia/July 23/15
Will Iran pull off its nuke deal?/Mohammed Fahad al-Harthi/Al Arabiya/July 23/15
A battle that could define the Yemen war/Manuel Almeida/Al Arabiya/July 23/15
How does one explain the extreme violence of ISIS? Very simply!/Dr. Azeem
Ibrahim/Al Arabiya/July 23/15
LCCC Bulletin titles for the
Lebanese Related News published on July
23-24/15
'Unprecedented
destruction' as battle near Syria-Lebanon border intensifies
Beirut's mounting trash reflects crisis of government
Aoun Calls for Curbing Salam's
'Behavior', Says Army Command behind 'Attack' on Protesters
Salam 'Disgusted' and 'Concerned' over Cabinet Crisis
Report: Drop in Number of Militants in Border Area over Siege
Cabinet Meets but Fails to Reach Decision on Mechanism, Trash Crisis
Report: Woman Arrested in Iqlim al-Kharroub for Terror Recruiting
LF Tells Aoun that Riyadh Backs 'Rapprochement' with FP
Bassil Says No Cabinet Resolutions without Consensus, Lauds PM's 'Responsible
Remarks'
FPM Warns Salam on Cabinet's Decision-Making Mechanism
Asbat al-Ansar Member Injured in Ain el-Hilweh Shooting
LCCC Bulletin Miscellaneous Reports And
News published on
July 23-24/15
Turkey Retaliates after Soldier Killed by Gunfire from IS-held Syria Area
EU's Mogherini to Visit Iran, Saudi Arabia Next Week
Rockets Strike Key Yemen Airport a Day after Reopening
Four Egypt Soldiers Killed in Sinai Bombing
Austria President to Visit Iran
Kerry Stands Up for Iran Nuclear Deal on Capitol Hill
Saudi defense minister orders aid delivery to Yemen
GCC slams Iraq’s Maliki making anti-Saudi remarks
US Congress to begin hearings on Iran nuclear agreement
Obama and Erdogan agree to stop 'foreign fighters' crossing into Syria
After German minister's Iran visit heavily criticized, EU's Mogherini heads to
Tehran
Amnesty: Iran falsifying execution numbers, more than 1,000 expected killed by
year's end
EU rejects report: No plans to boycott Israeli banks
US Republicans, pro-Israel groups step up campaign against Iran deal
Jehad Watch Latest links for Reports And News
Iran to get $700 billion in sanctions relief
Salman Rushdie: world learned “wrong lessons” from his Iran fatwa
Sweden arrests two Muslims accused of jihad terrorism
Islamic State vows to “fill the streets of Paris with dead bodies”
Sweden: Muslims hound Christian asylum seekers out of immigrant housing
Video: Muslim smashes wine bottles in Paris market to enforce Sharia
Florida gun store bans Muslims in wake of Chattanooga jihad attack
87% of network Islamic jihad stories don’t mention Ramadan threats
'Unprecedented destruction' as battle near Syria-Lebanon
border intensifies
Reuters/Ynetnews/Published: 07.23.15/ Israel News
Widespread death reported as Assad regime and Hezbollah bombard city of Zabadani,
including reported use of many barrel bombs; Assad forces claim to destroy
70-meter smuggling tunnel. The United Nations envoy for Syria said government
air strikes had caused widespread death and destruction in the city of Zabadani,
the focus of an offensive by the army and its Hezbollah allies to retake the
area from insurgents. Staffan de Mistura, citing local sources, said the Syrian
military had dropped a large number of barrel bombs on Zabadani "causing
unprecedented levels of destruction and many deaths among the civilian
population". Control of the city, about 45 km (30 miles) northwest of the
capital Damascus and about 10 km from the border with Lebanon, is seen as
crucial to consolidating President Bashar Assad's control over the border zone
between Lebanon and Syria. Fierce clashes continued overnight in the Zabadani
area, with heavy aerial bombardments in and around the city and reports of
casualties on both sides, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring
group said on Wednesday. It gave no detailed figures. Syrian state television
said the army had destroyed a 70 meter-long (77 yards) tunnel used by the
insurgents to transport equipment into Zabadani. The Syrian air force has been
bombarding areas in and around the city and Sunni insurgents have retaliated by
firing rockets and mortar bombs on two villages near Idlib city in the north,
the UN envoy de Mistura said. An alliance of insurgents known as the "Army of
Fatah" (Islamic Conquest) had targeted Al Foua and Kefraya, northern villages
where a large number of civilians are trapped, he said. "In both cases,
civilians are tragically caught in the middle of the fighting," he said. Al Foua
and Kefraya are home to Shi'ite populations. Earlier this week the Syrian army
backed by the Lebanese Hezbollah advanced deeper into Zabadani, two weeks into a
campaign to capture it from insurgents, rebels and the army said. Rebels say
although the army had now encircled the insurgents holed up within a five square
km radius inside the city center and cut arms and food supplies from nearby
towns, they had so far prevented the army and Hezbollah fighters from storming
their defense lines in street fighting. "They have advanced a bit but they have
not entered inside the center of city as they had expected they would in just a
few days," Abu Ado of the Islamist insurgent group Ahrar al Sham said by phone.
Taking Zabadani from the insurgents would be a strategic gain for the Syrian
army which is battling on several other fronts with a range of different
insurgent groups. Hezbollah's military role inside Syria has been growing
steadily since the start of the conflict in 2011. The Syrian government has
described the group as its main ally in the fight against the insurgents
battling to topple Assad.
Beirut's mounting trash reflects
crisis of government
REUTERS/07/23/2015 /The stench of
uncollected refuse in the streets of Beirut is a stark reminder of the crisis of
government afflicting Lebanon, where politicians divided by local and regional
conflicts have been unable to agree on where to dump the capital's rubbish.
Mounting piles of garbage festering in the summer heat are triggering health
warnings and protests by residents furious their government failed to avoid a
crisis ignited by the long-scheduled closure of a major landfill site last week.
For lack of state planning, the tip at Naameh south of Beirut had already been
kept open well beyond its planned closure date. The date set for its final
closure - July 17 - was known, but the authorities had no ready alternative when
the day came. "We got to this point - this crisis - because of the political
struggle in Lebanon," said Mohamad Al Machnouk, the minister of environment. He
blamed procrastination among politicians for the refuse now piling up in the
streets. A plan to dump rubbish from Beirut - where more than half the
population live - at locations around Lebanon is meeting resistance from the
regions. The front page of the French language newspaper L'Orient Le Jour on
Thursday declared Lebanon the "Trash can Republic".
The crisis echoes wider problems facing Lebanon.
The weak state has long been criticized for failing to develop the country and
its infrastructure: Beirut still suffers daily power cuts some 25 years since
the end of the 1975-1990 civil war. But government has been particularly poor
since the eruption of the war in neighboring Syria. That conflict has
exacerbated Lebanon's political divisions, often along sectarian lines that
reflect the Syrian conflict. The presidency has been vacant for more than a
year, and parliament elected in 2009 has extended its own term and postponed
elections until 2017 on the grounds of instability.A government of national
unity has maintained a semblance of central authority and helped to contain
sectarian tensions.
But it is limping along at best.
PASSING TIME
Many observers believe only a deal brokered by regional powers Iran and Saudi
Arabia, which both wield influence over rival Lebanese factions, can set
government back on course. "This government views its role as passing time
rather than governing: representing Lebanese legitimacy to get by with a minimal
degree of stability, until the regional settlement comes," said Nicola Nassif, a
columnist in al-Akhbar newspaper. In the meantime, the costs for Lebanon are
high. The political stalemate has obstructed plans to exploit potential offshore
gas reserves, for example. "They cancelled our elections, they extended
parliament, they stole our votes, and now they want us to live in rubbish," said
Marwan Maalouf, a 31-year-old lawyer, during a protest outside the government
headquarters in Beirut on Tuesday. The contract of the company that until this
week was collecting the refuse expired with the closure of Naameh.
"Unfortunately, the streets are filled up with garbage but we can't find an
alternative now. The plan should come from the state, and we will then act upon
it," said Pascale Nassar, communications manager for the company, Sukleen.
Aoun Calls for Curbing Salam's 'Behavior', Says Army
Command behind 'Attack' on Protesters
Naharnet/24 July/15 /Free Patriotic Movement leader MP Michel Aoun on Thursday
called for “reining in” Prime Minister Tammam Salam while accusing the Army
Command of being behind the scuffles that erupted with the FPM protesters on
July 9. “The premier's behavior must be brought under control,” said Aoun in an
interview on LBCI TV, accusing Salam of infringing on the Christian president's
powers in the absence of a head of state. “A minister is abusing his
jurisdiction, because the decision belongs to the entire cabinet,” Aoun added,
referring to Defense Minister Samir Moqbel. “We will continue the battle over
the (security) appointments in order to put an end to the legal flaws in
governance,” Aoun underlined. The issue of the appointments of senior security
and military officials is a key point of contention that has led to a thorny
debate over the cabinet's decision-making mechanism in the event of a
presidential vacuum. Aoun has been lobbying for the appointment of Commando
Regiment commander Brig. Gen. Chamel Roukoz, his son-in-law, as army chief.“The
army commander cannot demand the extension of his own term,” Aoun told LBCI,
accusing Army chief General Jean Qahwaji of making such a request.
“Christian rights are not limited to the appointments. There is the Christian
representation in parliament, and the Taef Accord and the Constitution stipulate
equal power-sharing in the parliament. The electoral law must preserve the
foundations of coexistence,” Aoun noted.
He stressed that the 24 ministers should take decisions “collectively” in the
cabinet. “The entire cabinet must assume the president's powers, not two thirds
of the members,” he said. “I'm not seeking to eliminate Qahwaji, the others and
Qahwaji are seeking to eliminate me,” said Aoun when asked whether he is
opposing an extension of Qahwaji's term with the aim of blocking the latter's
possible election as president. “Let us do a referendum and ask people about
their favorite candidate for the army chief post or let the cabinet choose after
reviewing the CVs of the top 3 candidates,” Aoun suggested.
He noted that “there is something fishy in the insistence on extending the army
commander's term, as no one would violate the law without awaiting certain
benefits.”Turning to the stalled presidential elections, Aoun noted that the
so-called top four Christian leaders had agreed with Maronite Patriarch Beshara
al-Rahi that the president “should represent Christians.”“We do not want a
president who is not representative,” he added. “I'm not in a battle against
anyone and as long as I'm present, I'm a presidential candidate,” said Aoun.
Separately, Aoun accused army troops of starting the confrontations with the FPM
protesters on July 9 near the Grand Serail, putting the blame squarely on “the
Army Command.” “Our youths were surprised that army troops blocked their way and
I will soon disclose the names of the army personnel who attacked us,” he
explained. “Who are the army troops whom the Command said were wounded?” Aoun
asked, referring to a communique in which the Army Command announced that seven
soldiers were injured in the scuffles.
Addressing the regional situations, Aoun noted that “there are indications that
a solution is being prepared for the region and it would involve ending the
presence of Daesh (Islamic State group) and (Qaida's Syria franchise) al-Nusra
Front.”
“It seems that an international decision has been taken to liquidate them, the
same as there was a decision to create them to perform certain missions,” said
Aoun.
Salam 'Disgusted' and
'Concerned' over Cabinet Crisis
Naharnet/23 July/15/Prime Minister Tammam Salam has expressed “disgust” and
“concern” over the failure to bridge the gap between the bickering sides in the
government. Local dailies quoted officials who have visited Salam as saying that
the premier is “disgusted” from the situation after extensive consultations
between the different parties failed to bring viewpoints closer. He is also
“concerned” because the meetings he has held have not yielded any formula that
would help the government function in a productive way, they said.
The cabinet crisis grew earlier this month when Free Patriotic Movement Minister
Jebran Bassil bickered with Salam during a session after accusing him of
infringing on the Christian president's powers in the absence of a head of
state. The dispute was accompanied by a protest held near the Grand Serail by
FPM supporters. Sources close to Salam did not rule out a resignation by the PM
to object the “paralysis” caused by the FPM. However, they told several dailies
published on Thursday that Salam would pave the way for discussion on the
cabinet's decision-making mechanism which the FPM has conditioned to be at the
top of the agenda.
If discussions continue in vain, then he would hold the parties paralyzing the
cabinet responsible for the deadlock, said the sources.
Salam will not give up his authorities as prime minister and rejects paralysis,
they stressed. “He is ready to accept any mechanism on condition that it does
not obstruct the decisions taken by the government.”“From now on, he won't
accept the paralysis of the cabinet even if it costs him his resignation,” the
sources said.They added that “the situation is getting from bad to worse.”
Report: Drop in Number of Militants in Border Area over
Siege
Naharnet/23 July/15/The number of al-Qaida-linked al-Nusra Front and Islamic
State group militants has dropped after the terrorists were besieged by the
Lebanese army in the eastern Bekaa Valley and by Syrian troops and Hizbullah
fighters on the other side of the border, pan-Arab daily Asharq al-Awsat
reported on Thursday. Al-Nusra gunmen are located in the area of al-Kassarat in
Wadi Hmeid on the outskirts of the northeastern border town of Arsal, which is a
zone blockaded by the Lebanese army from the west and the Syrian military and
Hizbullah in the east. As for IS militants, their presence is concentrated on
the outskirts of al-Qaa in Ras Baalbek and parts of Arsal's outskirts. But the
terrorists have found escape routes to either head to Turkey and Iraq or enter
Lebanon by using fake IDs to escape the siege, the newspaper quoted sources as
saying. The total number of militants now present on the porous Lebanese-Syrian
border is 700 after they were in the thousands, they said. They also said that
al-Nusra Front and the IS are still keep Lebanese servicemen hostage to prevent
a further deterioration in their strength in the border region. Al-Nusra is
holding 16 Lebanese soldiers and policemen while the IS has in its custody six
servicemen. The troops and police were taken hostage when the two terrorist
groups overran Arsal in August last year and engaged in heavy clashes with the
army. They have so far executed four of them. While negotiations with al-Nusra
Front to release the captives have made progress, the talks with the IS have
reached a dead-end over the group's crippling demands. “The leaders of the two
organizations are fully aware” that if they release the hostages, then “this
would mean the end of their presence in the (border) region,” said the sources.
“That's why they are resorting to the procrastination policy in the
negotiations” aimed at setting the hostages free, the sources added.
Cabinet Meets but Fails to Reach Decision on Mechanism,
Trash Crisis
Naharnet/23 July/15/The government failed on Thursday to reach a decision on its
working mechanism and the waste crisis but agreed to continue discussions next
week. The session was held at the Grand Serail amid a “disgust” expressed by
Prime Minister Tammam Salam over the failure to bridge the gap between the
bickering sides in the government. The government did not discuss details on how
to dispose of waste because Salam had clinched a deal with Free Patriotic
Movement ministers not to tackle any issue before resolving the dispute on the
cabinet's decision-making mechanism. He had also hinted that he would resign
over his concern that the cabinet crisis would not be resolved. Justice Minister
Ashraf Rifi said he asked Salam whether he would resign if no agreement was
reached between the ministers. “All options are on the table,” Rifi quoted the
PM as saying. The cabinet will meet on Tuesday to continue its dicussions, said
Information Minister Ramzi Jreij. After the session, Environment Minister
Mohammed al-Mashnouq reiterated that he was seeking to find landfills in several
regions to allow Sukleen to transport the uncollected waste in Beirut and Mount
Lebanon. The garbage crisis erupted after the Naameh landfill south of Beirut
was closed over the weekend under a decision taken by the government months ago.
Al-Mashnouq thanked some municipal chiefs for cooperating with him and allowing
waste to be dumped in locations in their regions. As waste continued to pile up
on the streets, the Beirut Fire Department said it had doused more than 140
fires set on dumpsters across Beirut since Monday.It urged citizens not to burn
waste.
Report: Woman Arrested in Iqlim al-Kharroub for Terror
Recruiting
Naharnet/23 July/15/A woman has been arrested in the Chouf area of Iqlim al-Kharroub
for recruiting young men to terrorist organizations, a media report said on
Thursday.“Army intelligence agents apprehended Maysam N. after raiding her
residence in the Daoud al-Ali area in Iqlim al-Kharroub,” MTV said. She was held
on charges of “recruiting young men to join terrorist organizations,” it
added.The woman is the sister of the detainee M. N. who was arrested in the
morning, MTV said.
LF Tells Aoun that Riyadh Backs 'Rapprochement' with FPM
Naharnet/23 July/15/Lebanese Forces official Melhem Riachi informed Free
Patriotic Movement leader MP Michel Aoun on Thursday that Saudi Arabia
encourages the rapprochement between the two parties. Riachi, who is LF chief
Samir Geagea's envoy, delivered a message to Aoun during a visit he made to
Rabieh that Riyadh “backs and encourages Christian rapprochement,” local media
reported. The LF official met with Aoun in the presence of Change and Reform
bloc MP Ibrahim Kanaan. The meeting was intended to brief the Change and Reform
leader on the results of Geagea's meetings in Saudi Arabia. Geagea was in the
Saudi capital earlier this week where he met with top Saudi officials and al-Mustaqbal
Movement chief ex-PM Saad Hariri. Last month, Aoun and Geagea announced a
declaration of intent, calling for “the election of a strong president who is
embraced by his community and capable of reassuring the other components of the
country.”The presidential candidates agreed to strengthen state institutions,
not to resort to arms or violence and to support the army. They also stressed
commitment to dialogue and underlined “their faith in Lebanon, the coexistence
formula and the Constitution.”
Bassil Says No Cabinet Resolutions without Consensus, Lauds
PM's 'Responsible Remarks'
Naharnet/23 July/15/Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil on Thursday lauded remarks by
Prime Minister Tammam Salam on “turning the page” on the stormy July 9 cabinet
session, as he stressed that no resolutions would be passed in cabinet without
“consensus” among all its components. “We appreciate his stance, especially that
there is an intention to open a new chapter,” said Bassil at a press conference,
describing Salam's statement as “responsible.”“But we underline that the new
chapter is not at the personal level with PM Salam, as the cabinet's functioning
must be based on consensus,” Bassil added. “We apologize to all Lebanese over
the government's performance,” the FM went on to say, echoing earlier remarks by
Salam. The cabinet crisis grew earlier this month when a dispute erupted between
Salam and Bassil, who is a Free Patriotic Movement official, over the cabinet's
decision-making mechanism. The tension between Salam and Bassil was accompanied
by a protest by FPM supporters near the Grand Serail where the session was
underway. The FPM, which is led by MP Michel Aoun, accuses the premier of
infringing on the Christian president's powers in the absence of a head of
state. “We represent the president, although partially. That's why we're
entrusted with the president's powers in their absence,” Bassil added. “If we
couldn't agree on the appointment of a security official, a minister should not
commit legal violations” by extending the terms of the incumbent officials,
Bassil said, referring to Defense Minister Samir Moqbel. “I hope we will
implement the law and the Constitution, especially in the issue of
appointments,” the FM stated. Earlier on Thursday, the government failed to
reach a decision on its working mechanism and the waste crisis but agreed to
continue discussions next week. The session was held at the Grand Serail amid a
“disgust” expressed by Salam over the failure to bridge the gap between the
bickering sides in the government. The government did not discuss details on how
to dispose of waste because Salam had clinched a deal with Free Patriotic
Movement ministers not to tackle any issue before resolving the dispute on the
cabinet's decision-making mechanism.
FPM Warns Salam on Cabinet's Decision-Making Mechanism
Naharnet/23 July/15/The Free Patriotic Movement has snapped back at Prime
Minister Tammam Salam over his criticism that the party is paralyzing the
cabinet, warning him not to hold it accountable. “Our role in today's cabinet
session lies in questioning and holding accountable and not being held
accountable over paralysis,” Education Minister Elias Bou Saab told al-Joumhouria
daily published Thursday. Bou Saab said the FPM ministers will not allow other
cabinet members to “jump over” the government's decision-making mechanism by
stirring other issues. The FPM clinched a deal during the last session for the
cabinet to discuss its working mechanism that was agreed upon after the Baabda
Palace was left vacant. The cabinet crisis grew earlier this month when FPM
Minister Jebran Bassil argued with Salam after accusing him of infringing on the
Christian president's powers in the absence of a head of state. As the dispute
took place, FPM supporters protested near the Grand Serail. Bou Saab's comments
to al-Joumhouria came as officials close to Salam said that the PM has expressed
“disgust” and “concern” over the failure to bridge the gap between the bickering
sides in the government. However, they told several dailies published on
Thursday that the PM would pave the way for discussion on the cabinet's
decision-making mechanism. But Salam will not give up his authorities as prime
minister and rejects paralysis, the sources stressed. Like Bou Saab, an FPM
official, who was not identified, stressed in remarks to As Safir newspaper that
Salam had agreed with the party for the cabinet's mechanism to be at the top of
Thursday's agenda. “Any violation of this agreement will have repercussions,”
including possible street protests, the official said. “The FPM's supporters are
mobilized and ready to move again particularly if they were provoked,” he
warned. He stressed that the FPM would be granted more legitimacy to take to the
streets if Salam backed off from the agreement, which was reached in the
presence of Minister Mohammed Fneish.
Asbat al-Ansar Member Injured in Ain el-Hilweh Shooting
Naharnet/23 July/15/A Palestinian member of the extremist group Asbat al-Ansar
was injured on Thursday in a shooting in the southern refugee camp of Ain el-Hilweh,
the state-run National News Agency reported. NNA said Mohammed Barakat shot
Khaled Alaeddine known as Khaled al-Khomeini in the camp's al-Taware
neighborhood in the back. Alaeddine was taken to a hospital in Ain el-Hilweh.
According to Voice of Lebanon radio (93.3), the man received four shots in the
back. It also said that Barakat is a supporter of wanted Salafist cleric Sheikh
Ahmed al-Asir.
Turkey Retaliates after Soldier Killed by Gunfire from
IS-held Syria Area
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/23 July/15/The Turkish military on Thursday
pounded positions held by Islamic State (IS) militants in Syria after a Turkish
soldier was killed by fire from an area controlled by the jihadists. The clashes
-- the most serious yet between the Turkish army and IS -- came after the
killing of 32 people in a suicide bombing Monday, blamed on IS, sparked an
upsurge in violence. A day after the fatal shooting of two police claimed by
Kurdish militants as "revenge" for the suicide bombing in the town of Suruc on
the Syrian border, a policeman was shot dead in the majority Kurdish city of
Diyarbakir. The soldier was killed from fire from an area controlled by IS in
Syria in the Turkish border region of Kilis, the state Anatolia news agency
said. The Dogan news agency said four soldiers had been wounded. Turkish tanks
from the fifth armored brigade then responded by opening fire on targets
controlled by IS jihadists in Syria, NTV television said, adding that one IS
militant had also been killed. Thirty-two people -- mainly young activists, one
as young as 18, preparing for an aid mission to Syria -- were killed on Monday
in a devastating suicide bombing in Suruc. That attack marked the first time the
government had explicitly blamed IS for a strike in the country. It also
inflamed tensions with Turkey's Kurdish minority, which is unhappy over the lack
of support provided by the government to Kurdish militias fighting IS inside
Syria. Turkey has been accused of colluding in the past with IS extremists in
the hope they might prove useful in its aim of knocking out Syrian President
Bashar Assad. Ankara has always vehemently denied the claims.
Another policeman killed
The military wing of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed the killing of
the two police in the border town of Ceylanpinar, accusing the two slain
officers of collaborating with IS extremists.Aged 24 and 25, they were given a
funeral ceremony with full honors outside police headquarters in the regional
center of Sanliurfa, their coffins draped in the Turkish flag. "The martyrs
never die, the people will never be divided," dozens of police chanted, using a
well known patriotic slogan. The state Anatolia news agency said the three
suspects had been arrested in early morning raids and were being questioned,
without giving further details. In the latest violence one Turkish policeman was
shot dead and another badly wounded in an attack Thursday by armed men during a
routine traffic check in Turkey's majority Kurdish-city of Diyarbakir, hospital
sources said. Meanwhile the Patriotic Revolutionary Youth Movement (YDG-H), seen
as a youth wing of the PKK, claimed it had shot dead an alleged former IS
fighter in Istanbul late Tuesday. Turkish officials have confirmed a 20-year-old
Turkish man linked to IS carried out the suicide bombing in Suruc. Media reports
named the bomber as university student Seyh Abdurrahman Alagoz from Adiyaman in
southeastern Turkey.
'Measures to secure border' The unrest has intensified fears that the battle
raging between Islamic State (IS) jihadists and Kurds inside Syria is now
spilling over onto Turkish territory. Deputy Prime Minister Bulent Arinc said
after a cabinet meeting late Tuesday that the government had discussed an
"integrated system" to secure the frontier with Syria. Turkish media reported
Wednesday that the measures were set to include sending zeppelins into the air
several hundred meters high to monitor the border and building a concrete border
wall. Turkey also plans to put in place two fences separated by a military
patrol road at the border, complete with observation towers at some locations,
the Hurriyet daily said. A moat will also be dug at some points. Turkey has long
been accused by its Western partners of failing to properly control the
911-kilometer (566-mile) frontier and even of colluding with IS, allegations it
fiercely denies. In places, the border has been marked only with a crude
wire-mesh fence ridden with holes that has provided easy passage to militants
and smugglers. Turkey has so far stopped short of playing a full role in the
U.S.-led coalition assisting Kurds fighting IS militants who have taken swathes
of Iraq and Syria. However the Hurriyet daily reported on Thursday that Ankara
had finally given the green light to U.S. forces for use of the Incirlik air
base in the campaign against IS in Syria. It said that the accord was finalized
in telephone talks Wednesday between President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his U.S.
counterpart Barack Obama. The unrest comes at a critical time for Turkey
following elections in which the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) of
Erdogan lost its overall majority in parliament for the first time since coming
to power in 2002.
EU's Mogherini to Visit Iran, Saudi Arabia Next Week
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/23 July/15/EU foreign affairs chief Federica
Mogherini will visit Iran and Saudi Arabia next week following the agreement she
helped broker with Tehran on its contested nuclear program, her office said
Thursday. The talks in Saudi Arabia on Monday will cover "regional issues, in
the aftermath of the agreement reached on 14 July on the Iranian nuclear issue,
as well as international issues of common interest," a statement said. In Iran,
Mogherini's visit Tuesday "will provide an opportunity for exchanges on the
implementation of the agreement, on which the High Representative will continue
to play a coordinating role, and on regional and bilateral issues," the
statement added. The EU played a leading role in talks between Britain, China,
France, Russia, the United States, Germany and Iran, holding the ring during
years of tortured negotiations which finally produced an accord last week on
preventing Tehran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. In return, the powers agreed
to lift damaging economic sanctions as long as Iran sticks to a deal they hope
will eventually normalize ties with Tehran after years of intense distrust over
its nuclear program. Mogherini hailed the accord as a "sign of hope for the
entire world." "It is a decision that can open the way to a new chapter in
international relations and show that diplomacy, coordination, cooperation can
overcome decades of tensions and confrontation," she said after the talks
concluded in Vienna. Sunni Saudi Arabia and Shiite Iran are locked in a
dangerous stand-off from Syria to Iraq to Yemen, driving fears in Brussels of
regional instability and conflict. German Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel visited
Iran earlier this week to push for improved ties but his talks were marked by
sharp differences over Israel, which Iran does not recognize.
Rockets Strike Key Yemen Airport a Day after Reopening
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/23 July/15/Aden's international airport, a vital
aid supply artery for war-torn south Yemen, came under rocket fire Thursday, a
day after it reopened following nearly four months of fierce fighting. Katyusha
rockets were fired at the facility as a Saudi military plane was delivering 20
tonnes of humanitarian aid, officials said. Three rockets hit close to the
landing strip as the cargo plane, the second to land at Aden since Wednesday,
was still on the tarmac, airport security chief Abdullah Qaed told AFP. Qaed
accused Shiite Huthi rebels of attacking the plane, adding that a further volley
of seven rockets struck around the airport once the aircraft had taken off
again. "These Katyusha rockets were fired by the Huthis and fighters of Ali
Abdullah Saleh," Yemen's former leader, he said. Most of the rockets struck
ground around the airport, causing minimal damage, and two crashed on a nearby
road, officials and residents said. Forces loyal to exiled President Abedrabbo
Mansour Hadi, backed by Saudi-led coalition warplanes, pushed the rebels and
pro-Saleh troops out of most of Aden last week. Aden airport was among the first
areas to be recaptured by the loyalists, who are benefiting from the support of
forces trained and equipped by the coalition. A Saudi military plane carrying
aid touched down Wednesday in what officials said was the start of an airlift
aimed at helping the more than 21.1 million Yemenis in need of humanitarian
assistance. Loyalists set up checkpoints on access routes to the airport after
the rocket attacks, witnesses and military sources said, while the Arab
coalition carried out a string of air raids on rebel positions north of Aden.
Taking advantage of the relative calm, a boat chartered by the International
Committee of the Red Cross and loaded with humanitarian aid docked on Thursday.
Pro-Hadi fighters east of Aden, meanwhile, drove back rebels to al-Alam region,
15 kilometers (nine miles) from the city limits, military sources said, killing
at least three insurgents, including a chief, Abu Yahia al-Huthi.
Four Egypt Soldiers Killed in Sinai Bombing
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/23 July/15/ Four Egyptian soldiers where killed by
a roadside bomb on Thursday in the Sinai Peninsula, where the army is battling
an Islamist insurgency, the military said. One officer and three soldiers died
in the attack on their vehicle near the border town of Rafah, a military
spokesman said on his Facebook page. The attack came a few days after seven
soldiers died in a jihadist attack on a checkpoint. Militants loyal to the
Islamic State group have killed hundreds of policemen and soldiers since the
army overthrew Islamist president Mohamed Morsi in 2013. The military says it
has killed more than 1,000 militants in Sinai, which borders Israel and the
Palestinian Gaza Strip.
Austria President to Visit Iran
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/23 July/15/Austrian President Heinz Fischer will
in September make the first visit to Iran by a European head of state since
2004, his office said Thursday. The announcement came nine days after a historic
agreement on Iran's contested nuclear program was struck in Vienna. "After the
success of the Vienna accord on July 14, 2015, concluding several years of
nuclear talks, President Heinz Fischer will make a working visit to Iran from
September 7 to 9," the presidency said in a statement. Though the communique did
not give details of Fischer's program, he will likely hold talks with President
Hassan Rouhani. His will be the first visit to Iran by a head of state of a
European Union (EU) member since Thomas Klestil, a former Austrian president,
traveled there in January 2004. This week, EU foreign affairs chief Federica
Mogherini's office announced she would visit Iran and Saudi Arabia next week
following the deal she helped broker. Fischer will be accompanied by Vice
Chancellor and Economy Minister Reinhold Mitterlehner, as well as Foreign
Minister Sebastian Kurz. The long-awaited nuclear deal has cleared a path to
lift sanctions that have crippled Iran's economy, and should re-open channels
for foreign investment in oil and gas-rich Iran. Neutral Austria, which has long
had good relations with Iran, is hoping for a five-fold increase in exports to
the Islamic Republic, according to the Chamber of Commerce, which welcomed
Iranian Trade Minister Mohammad Reza Nemarzadeh in Vienna on Thursday.
Kerry Stands Up for Iran Nuclear Deal on Capitol Hill
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/23 July/15/ U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry
vigorously defended the Iran nuclear deal on Capitol Hill on Thursday, calling
it a "good deal for the world" that deserves the approval of a skeptical
Congress. Sanctions alone cannot be expected to halt the danger of Iran
developing nuclear weapons, Kerry told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
which he once chaired. "The truth is that the Vienna plan will provide a
stronger, more comprehensive, more lasting means of limiting Iran's nuclear
program than any alternative that has been spoken of," he said. If enacted, the
agreement will put Iran under "intense scrutiny forever" and keep the world
united in ensuring that its nuclear activities "remain wholly peaceful," he
added. "We believe this is a good deal for the world, a good deal for America, a
good deal for our allies and friends in the region -- and we think it does
deserve your support." Kerry was testifying publicly on Capitol Hill for the
first time since the U.N. Security Council on Monday unanimously endorsed the
Iran agreement, which paves the way for a lifting of economic sanctions on
Tehran. The deal was reached last week in Vienna after tough negotiations
between Iran and the Security Council's five permanent members -- Britain,
China, France, Russia and the United States -- plus Germany. But it faces stiff
resistance notably among Republicans in the Senate and the House of
Representatives, which have 60 days to review it. Congress can pass a motion of
disapproval, but President Barack Obama can then veto that. An override of the
veto requires two-thirds approval in both the House and Senate. Kerry was
welcomed to the committee chamber by about a half-dozen anti-nuclear activists
sporting bright pink "Peace with Iran" T-shirts. "Awesome job!" one of them
shouted.But Senator Bob Corker, the Republican chairman of the Foreign Relations
Committee, lashed out at Kerry, saying the deal would give Iran "a perfectly
aligned pathway" towards a nuclear arsenal. "I believe you've been fleeced... I
believe that you have crossed a new threshold in U.S. foreign policy" by
enabling a "state sponsor of terrorism" to become a nuclear power, said Corker,
opening the hearing. Every member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee was
present for Thursday's hearing, including two Republican presidential hopefuls
-- Rand Paul and Marco Rubio.
Saudi defense minister orders aid delivery to Yemen
By Staff writer | Al Arabiya News/Thursday, 23 July 2015/Saudi Deputy Crown
Prince Mohammed bin Salman - who is also the kingdom's defense minister -
ordered the delivery of cargo planes carrying humanitarian goods to Yemen’s
government-held southern city of Aden, Al Arabiya News Channel reported on
Thursday. The deputy crown prince issued the order following directions from
King Salman bin Abdulaziz. Meanwhile, a second Saudi military plane loaded with
20 tonnes of humanitarian aid arrived in the newly-reopened airport of Aden on
Thursday, according to Al Arabiya’s correspondent. On Wednesday, a Saudi
aircraft landed in Aden becoming the first plane to reach the port city in four
months. The delivery planes belong to the Royal Saudi Air Force. They aim at
bringing much-needed relief to Yemeni citizens who have been suffering from the
violations of the Iranian-backed Houthi militias.Some 12.9 million people in
Yemen are either "food insecure" or "severely food insecure," according to World
Food Program (WFP) estimates.
GCC slams Iraq’s Maliki making anti-Saudi remarks
Staff writer, Al Arabiya News/Thursday, 23 July 2015/The head of the Gulf
Cooperation Council (GCC) has condemned Iraqi Vice President Nuri al-Maliki’s
remarks against Saudi Arabia, describing it as “irresponsible, false and heinous
accusations that do not help to strengthen the Gulf-Iraqi relations,” the
official Saudi Press Agency (SPA) reported Thursday.Maliki accused Saudi Arabia
of supporting terrorism during an interview with an Iraqi satellite channel
earlier this month. He also called for Saudi Arabia to be placed under the
international community’s custody. The GCC’s Secretary General Abdullatif bin
Rashid Al-Zayani said Maliki’s “provocative and unrealistic” remarks were not
surprising. Saudi Arabia has long accused Maliki of sectarianism against Iraq’s
Sunni population and criticized his alleged pro-Iranian tendencies. Zayani also
accused the Iraqi vice president of “sabotaging” Baghdad’s relations with other
“Arab brethren” states. He said Maliki was attempting to “separate” Iraq from
“its natural Arab surroundings” to serve “foreign interests.”
Zayani, meanwhile, stressed that Saudi Arabia and other GCC states were at the
“forefront” in their fight against terrorism, highlighting Gulf States’
“effective participation” with the U.S.-led international coalition against the
Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) group.
He said Riyadh’s backing to the coalition was to strengthen Iraq’s defense
capabilities to preserve the country’s unity and security.His statements come
after the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) on Wednesday criticized
Maliki.
OIC also said called Maliki’s statement as “irresponsible.”
US Congress to begin hearings
on Iran nuclear agreement
MICHAEL WILNER/07/23/2015 /The US Congress begins its review of a nuclear
agreement reached between world powers and Iran, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of
Action, on Thursday. Hearings start in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
where three principals of the Obama administration tasked with crafting the deal
– US Secretary of State John Kerry, Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz and Treasury
Secretary Jack Lew – plan to testify. They will also appear before the House
Foreign Affairs Committee next week. Their review begins amid a multi-million
dollar effort, from both opponents and advocates of the agreement, to influence
the outcome of the congressional vote. The lawmakers now have the opportunity to
vote to approve or disapprove of the deal within 56 days.
For a vote of disapproval to have any practical impact on the JCPOA, more than
twothirds of both houses of the US legislature will have to vote against the
agreement. That coalition of Democrats and Republicans would be necessary to
overcome a veto from President Barack Obama, who has vowed to protect his
signature foreign policy achievement. The chairmen of the Senate and House
committees – both Republicans – have voiced strong disapproval of the deal. And
their Democratic ranking members expressed disappointment as the Obama
administration submitted the agreement to the United Nations Security Council
for adoption before Congress had begun the review process. Republican lawmakers
are universally opposed to the deal in its current form; Democrats have remained
largely silent on how they plan to vote. Some have expressed concerns, and fewer
have issued endorsements; the majority say they plan on carefully reviewing the
agreement over the coming weeks. The White House, alongside the governments of
Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany, assert that the JCPOA will
verifiably prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Critics of the deal say
it emboldens a violent Islamic Republic; fails to secure a sound inspections
regime into Iran’s nuclear work; and legitimizes the Iranian government as a
nuclear-threshold state. Israel’s ambassador to the US, Ron Dermer, held
meetings on Capitol Hill on Wednesday with Republican lawmakers. Along with the
entirety of Israel’s political leadership, Dermer has been vocal in his
criticism of the agreement and has publicly declared his intention to kill it
using all tools at his disposal. Obama has been engaging his critics by
questioning their track records on foreign affairs, their smarts and their
motives. Earlier in the week, he said the Iran deal his team brokered was the
“smarter” approach to solving the decades-long conflict, and suggested that its
critics were the same people whose polices led to the second Iraq War. “I f you
had brought [former US vice president] Dick Cheney to the negotiations,
everything would be fine ,” Obama quipped on Tuesday night, appearing on The
Daily Show with John Stewart for the seventh time. Stewart seemed to question
the president’s general approach to Iran in the interview, asking him, “Whose
side are we on?” “This is an adversary,” Obama said. “They are anti-American,
anti-Semitic, they sponsor terrorist organizations like Hezbollah.”“Sounds like
a good partner for peace,” Stewart interjected. The president responded that one
did not need to make peace with friends. Also on Wednesday, the House of
Representatives’ Financial Services Committee’s Task Force on Terrorism
Financing held a hearing related to the nuclear deal. One expert, Mark Dubowitz
of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said the agreement is set to
cancel certain sanctions on Iran that were intended to target its overall
behavior. Sanctions were put on entities such as the Central Bank of Iran for
conduct-based activities not limited to nuclear activities but also including
money laundering and terrorism, Dubowitz said. “The JCPOA requires the lifting
of financial sanctions – including the SWIFT [Society for Worldwide Interbank
Financial Telecommunication] sanctions – prior to a demonstrable change in
Iran’s illicit conduct. “The big winner from the unraveling of European and
American sanctions,” Dubowitz continued, “will be the IRGC [Iranian
Revolutionary Guard Corps].”
Several major American Jewish organizations have called on Congress to reject
the deal in a binding manner. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee and
the Orthodox Union are campaigning against it, while the Anti-Defamation League
and the American Jewish Committee are calling on Congress to demand answers to
several unanswered questions surrounding the watershed agreement.
Obama and Erdogan agree to
stop 'foreign fighters' crossing into Syria
J.Post/23.07.15/WASHINGTON - US President Barack Obama and Turkish President
Tayyip Erdogan agreed in a telephone call on Wednesday to work together to "stem
the flow of foreign fighters and secure Turkey's border with Syria," the White
House said in a statement. It said the two leaders also discussed deepening
their cooperation in the fight against Islamic State, which has grabbed swaths
of Syrian and Iraqi territory and declared a caliphate. Thousands of foreign
fighters have crossed through Turkey, a NATO member, to join Islamic State over
the past few years. The Turkish government has rejected accusations from the
opposition that it has in the past tacitly supported Islamic State militants
operating from Syria and had unwittingly opened the door to a suicide bombing
that killed at least 32 people in a Turkish town near the Syrian border this
week. The White House said Obama had condemned Monday's bombing in the Turkish
town of Suruç."He conveyed condolences on behalf of the American people to the
families of the victims, and the two leaders affirmed that the United States and
Turkey stand united in the fight against terrorism," the statement said. The
phenomenon of Israeli Arabs joining the ranks of ISIS in Syria and Iraq is
growing and, according to estimates, numbers in the dozens. The latest report
came on Monday when it was revealed that three Israeli Arab youths have been
seeking to enter Syria from Turkey in recent days in order to join the Islamic
State (ISIS) terrorist group, according to reports.The three youths hail from
Ramle, Umm al-Fahm and Nazareth. According to reports in Israeli Arab media, the
family members of the three youths have been trying to track their movements and
prevent them from crossing the border into Syria. Yasser Okbi/ Maariv Hashavua
contributed to this report.
After German minister's Iran
visit heavily criticized, EU's Mogherini heads to Tehran
JPOST.COM STAFF,
REUTERS/07/23/2015/he European Union's foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini
will travel to Tehran on Tuesday following the West's historic nuclear deal with
Iran, also going to Saudi Arabia in her first official visit to the two regional
powers.
Mogherini's first stop will be Saudi Arabia on Monday, where she will meet
officials including the country's new foreign minister Adel al-Jubeir, with whom
she is expected to discuss regional issues following the July 14 nuclear accord
with Iran.
Mogherini will then go on to Iran, where she will meet Iranian Foreign Minister
Mohammed Javad Zarif and other senior officials. The European Union formally
approved this week the deal it struck with Iran and other world powers, a step
towards lifting its economic sanctions against Tehran, which the bloc hopes will
send a signal for the US Congress to follow. Mogherini follows on from German
Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel's visit to Iran at the start of this week, the
first senior figure from a large Western government to visit the country since
the deal. Gabriel’s three-day business trip to Iran over the weekend sparked a
wave of intense criticism from members of his social democratic party and NGOs.
Ronald Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress, accused him of putting
business interests before morals and called his approach to Tehran naive. "It is
somewhat irritating that Germany's vice chancellor and economics minister waited
only five days before flying to Tehran with a delegation of German business
leaders."Lauder said Gabriel's offer to function as a bridge builder between
Iran and Israel was naive given what he described as ongoing agitation from
Tehran against Israel and the United States.
"It would have been much better to make new commercial relations with Iran
dependent on a change in the regime's stance toward Israel," Lauder
said.France's Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius and other European foreign
ministers are due to travel there soon.
Iran has completed negotiations with some European companies wanting to invest
in projects in the country following the nuclear agreement, an Iranian deputy
minister said on Thursday. "We are recently witnessing the return of European
investors to the country. Some of these negotiations have concluded, and we have
approved and granted them the foreign investment licenses and protections,"
Mohammad Khazaei told a conference promoting trade between the EU and Iran.
"Even in the past couple of weeks we have approved more than $2 billion of
projects in Iran by European companies," he said, without naming any of the
firms or providing further details on the deals.
Amnesty: Iran falsifying execution
numbers, more than 1,000 expected killed by year's end
JPOST.COM STAFF/07/23/2015/A UN
investigation found that Iran had executed 753 people in 2014, which is expected
to be far exceeded this year if trends continue to hold. Human rights watchdog
Amnesty International Thursday released a report claiming that the Islamic
Republic had executed over 690 people from January 1 to July 15 2015, far
exceeding the 246 executions declared by authorities in Iran. Amnesty said it
had compiled "credible reports" on executions carried out by Tehran and arrived
at the number of 694 as of mid-July, noting that the number approached the total
amount of executions performed in the Shi'ite stronghold in all of 2014. A
report published in March by UN special rapporteur on Iran, Ahmed Shaheed, said
at least 753 people were executed in 2014, the highest toll recorded in over a
decade. But Amnesty International fears that the number will be far surpassed if
trends continue to hold. “If Iran’s authorities maintain this horrifying
execution rate we are likely to see more than 1,000 state-sanctioned deaths by
the year’s end," Deputy Director of Amnesty International's Middle East and
North Africa mission Said Boumedouha said in the report. “The use of the death
penalty is always abhorrent, but it raises additional concerns in a country like
Iran, where trials are blatantly unfair,” he added. Amnesty also noted that even
during the holy month of Ramadan, which usually sees a stoppage in executions
performed in the Islamic Republic, four executions had taken place. Amnesty
International said that Iranian executions do not meet international legal
standards for which the death penalty is appropriate, citing that many of the
executions were mostly for drug-related crimes, along with adultery, sodomy and
“vaguely worded national security offenses.”According to Amnesty International,
Iran executes more people per capita than any other country, which the
organization believes has thousands more on death-row.
EU rejects report: No plans to boycott
Israeli banks
Itamar Eichner/Ynetnews/Published: 7.23.15/ Israel News/Stocks of Israeli
financial institutes drop following report by European think tank recommending
restrictions on Israeli banks. The European Union is not planning to impose
sanctions on Israeli banks, a senior EU official said Wednesday, hours after an
EU think tank released a report recommending such a course of action. "We have
no intention of imposing restrictions on Israeli banks that do business in the
settlements. This entire issue is complete nonsense. This issue has never been
considered," the diplomat said. The European Union agreed this week to push
ahead with labeling Israeli goods made in settlements in the West Bank, a move
that has alarmed the Israeli government. Then, in a paper to be published on
Wednesday, the European Council on Foreign Relations, whose proposals frequently
inform EU policymaking, argued that the EU is in breach of its own laws and must
move much more firmly to distinguish its dealings with Israel from Israel's
activities in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, which it has captured in 1967
Six-Day War. The think tank recommended imposing restrictions on Israeli
banking, loans and mortgages, qualifications earned in settlement institutions
and the tax-exempt status of European charities that deal with Israeli
settlements. The release of the report caused panic in the stock market and led
to a drop in Israeli banks' stocks. The Foreign Ministry and EU officials rushed
to issue calming statements by stressing that the report was merely a
recommendation and the chances it would be adopted are very small. "This is an
independent research institute that has no connections to the European Union and
has no more influence than any other research institute," the European diplomat
said. "Anyone can publish reports. It has no basis in reality. There are no
plans for further legislation on this issue except for the plans to label
settlement products which are moving forward, but have yet to be finalized
US Republicans, pro-Israel groups step
up campaign against Iran deal
Reuters/Ynetnews/Published: 07.23.15/ Israel News
Poll shows increase in both Republican and Democratic opposition to Iran deal as
thousands take to Times Square to protest it; Obama administration to defend
agreement at Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing. Top Republicans vowed
Wednesday to do their utmost to scrap President Barack Obama's nuclear deal with
Iran as the biggest pro-Israel lobby prepared for an all-out campa ign to
pressure wary lawmakers into rejecting the agreement. A bigger push against last
week's historic accord in Vienna was being met with a counteroffensive by senior
Obama administration officials, who have already spent hours on in-person and
telephone briefings with members of Congress.
Secretary of State John Kerry, Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz and Treasury
Secretary Jack Lew briefed the entire House of Representatives and Senate in
separate closed-door sessions on Wednesday and will defend the deal at a public
Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Thursday. As Congress opened a
60-day review of the deal, Republican US House of Representatives Speaker John
Boehner told reporters: "Because a bad deal threatens the security of the
American people, we're going to do everything possible to stop it." Obama
insists that the Iran deal is the only alternative to more war in the Middle
East.
Israel pressed lawmakers on Wednesday to block the deal, with Israeli Ambassador
Ron Dermer meeting privately with a group of about 40 House conservatives. The
most influential pro-Israel group, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee
(AIPAC), will deploy about 300 lobbyists on Capitol Hill next week to try to
convince lawmakers, especially undecided Democrats, to vote against the deal,
according to officials in the pro-Israel camp. AIPAC's plans are being
coordinated with allied groups such as Citizens for a Nuclear Free Iran that are
sponsoring a national television advertising campaign, the pro-Israel sources
said. They are expected to spend upwards of $20 million, one source said.
In Manhattan, thousands of protesters packed into Times Square on Wednesday
evening to demand that Congress vote down the proposed deal. As the crowd loomed
behind police barricades, chants of "Kill the deal!" could be heard for blocks.
The event, billed as the "Stop Iran Rally" consisted mainly of pro-Israel
supporters, though organizers said it represents Americans of all faiths and
political convictions. At the rally, Alan Dershowitz, a prominent Jewish
attorney, said he was "opposing the deal as a liberal Democrat." He said he
believed democracy was "ignored" because the Obama administration negotiated the
deal without congressional input. "That is not the way democracy should
operate," he told the crowd. A Reuters poll taken in the days after the July 14
announcement of the Iran deal, showed 44 percent of respondents who said they
were Republicans opposed the agreement, up sharply from about 30 percent in
April.
Democratic support for the deal held steady at 50 percent, though opposition
among Democrats grew to 16 percent from nearly 10 percent in April, according to
the poll. Republican support for a deal fell during that same period from 31
percent to nearly 27 percent. The number of Republicans who responded was 471,
compared with 1,117 in April when the major powers and Iran signed a framework
agreement. Under a bill reluctantly signed into law by Obama in May, Congress
has until September 17 to decide whether to approve or reject the agreement
between Iran and world powers to rein in Iran's nuclear program in return for
sanctions relief.
Republicans control majorities in both houses of Congress. Many have come out
strongly against the pact, which they say will empower Iran and threaten US ally
Israel.Some said they wanted to know more. Republican Representative Dennis Ross
said he was predisposed against the agreement but, after the briefing, "I am
probably inclined now to dig further and verify for myself."
Partisanship
But if Congress passes a resolution disapproving of the deal, dozens of
Democrats would have to vote with them to override the Democratic president's
threatened veto, which is not likely in the fiercely partisan Congress. "It's a
steep climb but not an impossible climb," the pro-Israel group official said of
the coming campaign.
House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi has come out strongly in favor of it. Among
the senior Democrats whom pro-Israel lobbyists hope to win over is Senator Chuck
Schumer, a strong advocate for Israel's security who has yet to state his
position. Schumer told reporters as he left the hearing that he was still
deciding. "It's a serious issue and I'm studying it carefully, giving it what it
deserves," he said. Several Republicans said the Cabinet secretaries had not
eased their concerns about several issues, particularly the ability to "snap
back" sanctions if Iran violates the deal and the system for inspecting Iranian
nuclear facilities.
Senator Ted Cruz, a 2016 Republican presidential candidate, said the agreement
would provide Iran with billions of dollars that would be used to murder
Americans and their allies. "If this deal goes through, it will transform the
Obama administration into the world's leading financier of radical Islamic
terrorism," he said.
Deal opponents in the pro-Israel camp believe more lawmakers can be swayed by
detailed arguments about what they see as loopholes that Iran could use to skirt
the agreement.
Pressure from AIPAC, whose members' support is widely coveted, could also worry
lawmakers up for re-election. AIPAC boasts 100,000 members. At the same time, J
Street, a smaller liberal pro-Israel group, is urging supporters to lobby
Congress to support the Iran deal. Kerry told reporters before the House meeting
that the deal "will make the region, our friends and allies, safer. It will make
the world safer ... in the absence of any viable alternative."
ISIS infiltrates Egyptian special forces,
joins with Hamas to occupy N. Sinai, liquidate Sisi
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report July 23, 2015
Islamic State affiliates in Sinai and Libya have banded together with the
Palestinian Hamas rulers of the Gaza Strip for the shared goals of capturing
northern Sinai from the Egyptian army and staging an assassination coup against
President Abdel-Fatteh El-Sisi, debkafile’s exclusive military and intelligence
sources report.
They are in the throes of four steps for promoting their objectives:
1. Monday, June 29, a rogue group of Egyptian Special Forces accessed the
heavily-guarded upscale Cairo district of Heliopolis to plant a bomb car, which
they remotely detonated as the convoy of their target, Egypt’s general
prosecutor Hisham Barakat, went by. He was killed on the spot. The assassins
were members of the Egyptian elite force which had defected to the Islamic State
of Iraq and the Levant.
Three weeks later, on July 16, notwithstanding reinforced security in
Heliopolis, ISIS killers reached inside the neighborhood once again and planted
a roadside bomb. It was detonated as an Interior Ministry special forces
security patrol moved past.
Because of the tight official blackout on the event, there are no reliable
accounts on casualties. The authorities in Cairo reported that one Egyptian
soldier was injured, but this is no doubt only part of the picture.
The following day, July 17, a violent clash erupted In the Talibiya neighborhood
of Giza near the pyramids between Egyptian Special Forces and Muslim
Brotherhood’s underground cells. Five MB adherents were reported killed, but
again no word on military losses.
2. On July 1, ISIS forces launched their most ambitious offensive to date
against Egyptian military and police facilities in northern Sinai. Still ongoing
three weeks later, the losses the Egyptian military have sustained to date are
estimated at 120 dead and hundreds injured. Though fighting fiercely, Egyptian
troops have not been able to repel the continuous Islamist assault or contain
its advance through the northeastern section of the peninsula.
Tuesday, July 21, Hamas terrorists arrived at ISIS positions in northern Sinai
for a joint assault on the base of the Multinational Observer Force at El Gorah,
not far from the embattled town of Sheik Zuwaid. It was the first major attack
on the US-led force that was installed in Sinai to monitor the 1979
Egyptian-Israeli peace accord – and is still going on..
Here, too, the MFO command and Cairo have combined to impose a blackout on the
situation in the camp and the extent of casualties..
3. On July 17, the Islamic state of Sinai sank an Egyptian coast guard vessel
with a sophisticated guided Kornet anti-tank missile. The ship was patrolling
the Mediterranean shore of Rafah to prevent the smuggling of arms and fighters
from Egypt proper and Libya into northern Sinai. This was a landmark incident in
that it was the first time ISIS is known to have sunk an adversary’s vessel at
sea.
Cairo reported at first that a fire broke out on the ship and there were no
casualties.
4. On July 22, an audio message began making the rounds in Cairo and other
Egyptian cities claiming to be the voice of Hisham al-Ashmawy, an Egyptian
Special Forces officer who defected to ISIS. He said the country had been
“overpowered by the new pharaoh” and called on all Egyptians “to come together
to confront the enemy.” The message concluded with the words: “Do not fear them,
but fear Allah if you are true believers.”
Western and Middle East counter-terror experts have concluded that it was Hisham
al-Ashmawy who orchestrated the assassination of the general prosecutor last
month. They tag him as the leader of the group of Egyptian officers and men who
defected to ISIS. Egypt’s elite military units would appear therefore to be
heavily penetrated by the Islamic State.
For Egyptian rulers this is a recurring menace. Thirty-years ago in October
1981, President Anwar Sadat was assassinated by a senior Egyptian intelligence
officer who had secretly joined the radical Egyptian Islamic Jihad, one of Al
Qaeda’s two parent groups, and went AWOL a short time earlier.
Tackling Islamism, Post-Chattanooga
Tarek Fatah/The Toronto Sun/July 23 2015
It has been almost a week since the Chattanooga terrorist Mohammad Youssef
Abdulazeez issued the equivalent of an Islamic declaration of war on America in
a text message before killing four U.S. Marines and a Navy petty officer.
Yet there are still some Americans refusing to see the writing on the wall, and
wondering about the 24-year-old jihadi terrorist's "real" motives.
On July 15, the night before the mass murder, Abdulazeez texted a declaration on
behalf of Allah, quoting from Prophet Mohammed's sayings in the Hadith titled
"The loyal friends of Allah." It reads: "Whosoever shows enmity to a friend of
Mine, I [Allah] will indeed declare war against him." This particular Hadith is
from a collection of the 40 most important sayings of Prophet Mohammed.
The text message was not the only clue to Abdulazeez's jihadi frame of mind. In
a "manifesto" posted in early July, the mass murderer quoted the Prophet
Mohammed as saying for Muslims, life on earth should be seen as a life in a
prison, but for non-believers (Christians, Jews, Hindus, pagans and atheists)
earth is the paradise.
Some Americans are still wondering about the 24-year-old jihadi terrorist's
'real' motives.
This is a common call by Islamists when recruiting suicide bombers or jihadi
fighters for the Islamic State, al-Qaida, the Taliban and Boko Haram. In
essence, they claim earth is merely a transit lounge in a journey that will take
Muslims to eternal life in Paradise, surrounded by all things that were
forbidden to them in this world.
Abdulazeez mocked Muslims (like me) who separate Islam from politics, saying
such a separation was contrary to Islamic practice.
He wrote in his manifesto:
So this picture that you have in your mind that the Prophet's companions were
people being like priests living in monasteries is not true. All of them [were]
leaders of an army at the frontlines ... very involved in establishing Islam in
the world ... Every one of them fought Jihad for the sake of Allah. Every one of
them had to make sacrifices in their lives.
All of this evidence stares us in the face, yet we are now being asked to
believe a statement from Abdulazeez's family claiming that their son was a
depressed youth on drugs. The family claims they sent him to Jordan, so he could
get away from the influence of the bad company he kept.
I find that hard to believe given Abdulazeez's own declarations, plus the fact
his father was investigated twice by the FBI for sending money to questionable
charities in the Middle East (he was eventually cleared) and wanted to marry a
second wife in the Palestinian territories, saying this was allowed by Islamic
law.
Former FBI Assistant Director Tom Fuentes claimed not to be sure if "Mohammad
Youssef Abdulazeez" is a Muslim name.
There is something wrong in America when as senior a person as Tom Fuentes,
former assistant director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is
unwilling to conclude the mass murderer was a Muslim. John Berman of CNN asked
Fuentes "Now that we have the name (Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez) the key
questions are what?" Fuentes replied, "I know ... what the name sounds like, but
we don't know that it's a Muslim name. We know it's an Arabic name."
On the opposite side are those like former Democratic presidential candidate
Gen. Wesley Clark, who has proposed the internment of U.S. Islamists identified
as anti-American.
For 15 years now the question of "how to combat Islamism" has been avoided in
the West so as not to offend the powerful urban Islamist lobbyists and vote
banks.
Here are three suggestions:
Interview and debrief every adult male arriving alone from Arab countries,
Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, Nigeria and Somalia, irrespective of religion,
colour and nationality.
Tell every mosque in North America to end any and all derogatory references to "kufaar"
(Christians, Jews, Hindus and atheists) including in ritual prayers, or lose
their charitable status.
End cash donations in mosques and overseas donations from Saudi Arabia and other
Gulf Arab sources.
If we do not take these steps now, there will eventually be a very large
appetite for Clark's harsh prescription to prevent Islamist terror on Western
soil.
A Syria breakthrough? Don’t hold your breath
Joyce Karam/Al Arabia/Thursday, 23 July 2015
In the last four years, the Barack Obama administration has consistently played
up the prospects of a political solution in Syria while the reality on the
ground, in the region and vis-a-vis Russia pointed in the direction of a
stalemate. The Geneva 1 and Geneva 2 processes along with the envoy-ship of
former U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan and the stellar Arab diplomat Lakhdar
Brahimi all yielded no results, and the current mission of U.N. envoy Staffan De
Mistura does not hold more promise.
Today, there is renewed talk from the White House about a political process
following the nuclear agreement with Iran and a more “open” Russian position.
Hope springs eternal in public diplomacy, though in Syria neither the conditions
on the ground nor the positions of the main players are conducive for a
political settlement.
Waiting for Russia
In his interview with Tom Friedman of “The New York Times” and later on in his
press conference on the Iran deal, President Barack Obama spoke of a change in
the Russian position on Syria, and new willingness on Washington’s part to bring
Iran to the table.
Obama’s hopeful diplomatic tone aside, there is little or no indication from
Syria that a political solution is in the horizon
Obama told Friedman : “I was encouraged by the fact that (Russian President) Mr.
Putin called me a couple of weeks ago and initiated the call to talk about
Syria.” He referenced a new recognition from the Kremlin that “the Assad regime
is losing a grip over greater and greater swathes of territory inside of Syria
and that the prospects for a takeover or rout of the Syrian regime is not
imminent but becomes a greater threat by the day.” A day later, the U.S.
President called for “a process to resolve the civil war in Syria”, noting the
importance of including Iran in such "conversation.”
Obama’s hopeful diplomatic tone aside, there is little or no indication from
Syria that a political solution is in the horizon. Western diplomatic sources
tell me that there is “no substantial shift in Russia’s position” except “for
their willingness to have a conversation on Syria prompted by their increased
fear of Chechnian recruits and returnees from Jihadist groups (including ISIS).”
When it comes to discussing a new power structure in Syria, however, the Russian
leadership is not giving up on its deep rooted influence within the Assad
regime. “They want everyone to come to their side and fight terrorism without
agreeing to a bigger set of changes in the regime in Syria” says one diplomat.
Deep regional split
The conversation with Iran, on the other hand, holds even lower prospects in
light of a much deeper divide and higher sense of anxiety between Iran and the
regional neighbors. Following the nuclear deal, higher metrics are being drawn
regionally by the major players and those apply to Syria. At the Camp David
summit last May, key Arab participants told the U.S. President that accepting a
Hezbollah and Iran dominated Syria is a redline for the GCC states.
While there was willingness to work with elements in the Assad regime and Russia
towards a political settlement, countering Iran’s military role in Syria was
communicated at the highest levels by key GCC representatives to Obama. While
there were also differences among the GCC countries on what to do next in Syria,
the participants agreed on countering Iran’s role in war-ravaged Syria. An Arab
diplomat tells me that following the nuclear agreement, “there is even more
commitment on our part to push against Iran and Hezbollah in Syria.” While a
U.S. conversation with Tehran could help in starting a process and creating
diplomatic space, reconciling regional differences is not foreseeable in the
near future in Syria.
Gloomy forecast
As the regional split widens and Iran gains more influence inside the Assad
regime, the next phase in Syria will be a replay of the one before, with each
side trying to change the battle lines. Unless these lines are reshaped
dramatically in the major cities, or both sides are exhausted, a political
solution remains out of sight.
Even if the U.S. throws its weight behind a diplomatic process, the battle lines
inside Syria give Washington little leverage in steering the conflict. It is
regional players, including Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Iran who have the
most influence inside Syria today and the likelihood of them reaching consensus
is lower than it ever was in the last four years. The Assad regime for its part
feels buoyed by the Iran nuclear deal, which could extend a much needed
financial line to his troops and Hezbollah. This will be met by a bigger push
from the Arab countries and Turkey to throw more support behind the rebels.
The U.S. and Western partners are privately not betting on a political
settlement in Syria anytime soon, and are instead choosing alternatives that
would grant them more leverage in the battlefield and focus on fighting ISIS.
Hence, the Train and Equip program is designed to gradually deploy U.S. trained
rebels in the field to fight ISIS. While the initial number of these fighters
deployed is small, it is expected that it would increase quarterly and that
these rebels would “blend in” with bigger groups.
For now, the statements on a diplomatic solution in Syria should be taken for
what they are worth: a saving face tactic to cover up failure in stopping the
bloodshed and the agony of millions in the last four years.
Will Iran pull off its nuke deal?
Mohammed Fahad al-Harthi/Al Arabiya/Thursday, 23 July 2015
With Iran publicly meeting the country it has called “the Great Satan,” and the
West aiming to win contracts for Iranian projects, today is very dissimilar to
yesterday. The region, known for its never-ending wars and conflicts, is taking
a new shape.
The U.S. is pursuing a new and different policy in the region. From being the
one lobbying for an Iranian boycott, the U.S. is now trying to convince the
world of the wisdom of the nuclear deal — both at the U.N. and ultimately in the
U.S. Congress. This is politics.
These developments, however, leave the Arabs facing a new reality. Iran, a
country with influence in some Arab countries, has waged proxy wars in the
region. Though it struggled under the weight of sanctions, it still managed to
carry out its expansionist policies and may now be poised for more of the same.
The region is at a crossroads. The question is not whether the deal will pass
but rather what will result from it. Despite the feelings and desires of
individual states, the deal ushers in a new political reality in the region.
Iran is an important country with an influential role and it is a mistake to
look at our relationship through the prism of a Sunni-Shiite divide or even an
Arab-Persian conflict. Analysts, both good and ill-intentioned, try to promote
these ideas but the difference between Arab countries and Iran is a mere
political dispute.
Changing relations
In different times and under various governments in Iran, Gulf-Iranian relations
changed significantly. When hard-liners were in power — specifically the
previous government headed by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad — relations showed serious
strains and divergences. Iran suffered international political isolation due to
its policies which contradicted international law as well as the accepted norms
of diplomatic relations.
Is Hassan Rowhani the decision-maker or does political power rest with the
so-called supreme leader Ali Khamenei, thus limiting the president’s options?
Once Hassan Rowhani came to power as president, he sent positive signals
suggesting a different political orientation. Yet, these signals were not
translated into political reality in the region. The nuclear deal is one of the
Iranian president’s most important achievements but there remains an overarching
and unanswered question: Is Hassan Rowhani the decision-maker or does political
power rest with the so-called supreme leader Ali Khamenei, thus limiting the
president’s options?
In many situations, Iran opted for what it saw as political realism whenever
necessary. Ayatollah Khomeini’s description of accepting the cease-fire with
Iraq as “drinking poison” eliminated the arguments made by him and his followers
that a cease-fire would never happen. The facts on the ground, however, changed
the realities.
Khamenei has always refused international inspections of nuclear reactors,
saying that Iran was not subject to international restrictions. Now he himself
has congratulated the negotiating team on the agreement and given it his
support. Evidently, this is not an issue of ideology but a matter of coping with
reality and interests even if it means going against all past statements as well
as emotional public discourse.
Iran today has a precious opportunity to set a new policy in the region. Past
experience has shown that wars and interventions only led to tragic realities
producing terror and chaos in the region. This opportunity requires careful
consideration and experimenting with different political possibilities and,
above all, it requires courage and taking the initiative by all in the region.
Competitive country
If the region is able to cooperate for development and building, and use its
resources for the happiness of its people, its ability to compete in the world
will be much different from what it is today. It may seem that this is a modern
type of pragmatic political utopianism, but these are the same incentives that
made “frenemies” share a room for weeks in order to reach an agreement that was
once deemed impossible.
The Gulf has a different political reality and so political work should move to
a new level. With the new facts, international calculations have changed and
things are not the same anymore. It would therefore be wrong to stick to the
same old policies in the face of the new reality.
The Gulf states need to strengthen their political interdependence. The success
of the Gulf states in Operation Decisive Storm can be a good foundation for
unified political positions and homogeneous political, economic and military
actions. Saudi Arabia’s recent choices, linking mutual interests with those of
countries such as Russia, illustrate how interests drive politics.
The Gulf states combined have a huge potential, strong political power and a
dynamic international impact. It is vital to strengthen their internal
structures in order to succeed externally. The new political reality is not
necessarily negative though it is different. In light of the changes, there are
opportunities that necessitate new vision and quick decisions.
A battle that could define the Yemen war
Manuel Almeida/Al Arabiya/Thursday, 23 July 2015
The alliance between the Houthi militias and the military forces loyal to former
President Ali Abdullah Saleh is not the only surprise that emerged out of
Yemen’s ongoing conflict.
The country-wide military offensive by the Houthis and pro-Saleh forces dictated
the rise of another alliance, which looked improbable until the conflict reached
Yemen’s southern shores: the coalition between southern separatist groups and
the military forces fighting for Yemen’s government in exile.
Last week, southern separatist fighters, the militias known as Popular
Resistance Committees and the pro-government military forces all backed
militarily and logistically by the Saudi-led coalition, retook much of the
former southern capital of Aden. This was the biggest strategic blow so far to
the Houthi-Saleh camp.
Recent reports talk about the imminent fall of the last few pockets of Houthi
resistance in the city while key points such as the international airport and
the Mualla port are already under full government control.
Yemeni government officials have been returning to Aden and a team of
technicians from the UAE has worked over the last few days to re-open the
airport. The largest food aid delivery in months reached the city via the port
on Tuesday and more ships carrying urgent aid are expected to follow suit.
Despite the big setback, remaining Houthi snipers continued to indiscriminately
target civilians who ventured out in the open.
The brutality of the Houthis in Aden increased considerably once it became
evident they would not be able to hold their ground for much longer. On Sunday
and Monday in the city’s northern district of Dar Saad alone, over 100 people
(the majority of which were civilians) were killed in shelling by the Houthis.
A potential game-changer
Although not unexpected, the Houthi defeat in Aden and the gradual return of
Yemeni government officials could prove to be a turning point in the conflict.
First of all, it will allow a joint military council to coordinate from within
Yemen the efforts of the various groups fighting the Houthis and pro-Saleh
forces across the country and plan for a possible counter-offensive that could
eventually bring the current crisis to an end.
Although not unexpected, the Houthi defeat in Aden and the gradual return of
Yemeni government officials could prove to be a turning point in the conflict
In a place where the political power of an individual or group is often measured
by the ability to project force, the government’s absence was not sustainable
for much longer. Aden in particular is a key strategic city and the government’s
presence will provide a boost to the capabilities and the morale of the anti-Houthi
forces.
The turning tide could also place the Yemeni government in a stronger position
in the event of any new attempts to reignite the negotiations in the search for
a political solution to the conflict. It will probably also force the Houthis
and those members of the General People’s Congress who still back Saleh to
consider more seriously the negotiations and the conditions set forth by UN
Security Council Resolution 2216. Plus, reports that pro-Saleh Republican Guard
and Special Forces withdrew from the outskirts of Aden in the end of June is now
generating more speculation about the durability of Saleh’s alliance with the
Houthis.
Southern separatism on hold?
Following these developments in Aden, another big question looming over the city
and some of the southern provinces is how southern separatists will balance
their longstanding political ambitions with the new reality they face.
This war and the atrocities committed by the Houthis and pro-Saleh forces in the
south have reinforced the will of many southern separatists to break away from
Sanaa for good. In fact, it was the concentration of power in Saleh’s hands and
his neglect of the south that gave rise to the southern separatist movement.
After the civil war of 1994, there was a pro-unity momentum across the political
spectrum. But Saleh’s rule proved unacceptable for most southerners, even though
some important figures in his government were originally from the south. Years
of unattended political and economic grievances were channeled to the creation
of al-Hirak (Southern Mobility Movement) in 2007, which in a few years turned
into a massive social protest movement.
However, the southern separatist movement has never been an example of unity,
despite the efforts of its leaders since the start of the current war to bring
its various factions together. It remains difficult to tell how the current
conflict and the need to choose the government’s side has impacted the
movement’s internal dynamics, the cleavages within its old guard and between
them and the younger activists, as well as their separatist ambitions.
The present focus of the supporters of a southern state in Aden seems to be, as
it should, on the ongoing fight against the Houthis and pro-Saleh forces, the
reconstruction of the city and the delivery of humanitarian and medical
assistance. It is also impossible at this point to grasp what the will of other
southern governorates is on the question of independence in the face of a new
and constantly changing reality. The timing could not be less appropriate for
Aden’s separatists to push forward their ambitions.
How does one explain the extreme violence of ISIS? Very
simply!
Dr. Azeem Ibrahim/Al Arabiya/Thursday, 23 July 2015
ISIS brutality is a veritable circus of the macabre. But just when we thought
that they might have reached the lowest levels of depravity, we hear that they
allegedly blew up a baby in a video to demonstrate how to handle explosives to
new recruits. As I have heard some British Muslims say before, it is difficult
to conceive how these people are the same species as the rest of us.
But, if one can even countenance the overwhelming obscenity of this kind of
behaviour for one second, we must at the very least ask where it might come
from. How can human beings behave like this? And not just barbarous savages from
distant history, or not so distant history if we think about the Holocaust and
more recent genocides, but people who we might have known and lived with in our
communities not so long ago. People who for most of their lives seemed, and
indeed were, “just like us.”
One theory is that this is intrinsic to the jihadist ideology. And there may be
some credence to that hypothesis; Jihadism is an ideology of violence after all.
And the historical precursors of today’s jihadism certainly had a habit of
committing wholesale massacres and what can only be described as ritualised
brutal murder.
But if that were all there was to it, we would know what to expect by now. Yet
here we are, week after week, month after month, finding out, courtesy of ISIS,
that our imaginations are really rather limited when it comes to the levels of
depravity that human beings can sink to. ISIS, it seems, are not going to let
decency get in the way of their quest for a caliphate!
New lows
This perverse creativity, however, hasn’t just popped onto the scene as a
natural evolution of the jihadism that came before. It is not the sole product
of jihadist ideology. After all, it is difficult to imagine that even Osama bin
Laden himself, evil though he may have been, would have ever stooped to these
levels, or indeed would condone what is now happening in ISIS territories if he
were still alive. By comparison to these creatures, bin Laden seems like a
decent kind of guy!
it is difficult to imagine that even Osama bin Laden himself, evil though he may
have been, would have ever stooped to these levels, or indeed would condone what
is now happening in ISIS territories if he were still alive
Yet things like this have happened, even routinely, in the very recent past, and
specifically in Iraqi territory. It’s just that we didn’t hear about them in the
West. I am talking, of course, about Saddam Hussain’s regime. Quite apart from
the well-known and documented cases of ethnic cleansing and even genocide
against the Marsh Arabs and the Kurds in the 90s, this regime was maintained by
a military and intelligence establishment that were very well acquainted with
and very comfortable with terrorising and killing en masse Iraqi and foreign
civilians.
Gruesome gang
And guess where all these Baathists from Saddam’s intelligence and military
agencies ended up, after the U.S. dismantled Saddam’s state in the wake of the
2003 invasion? Well, initially they all ended up in American prison camps,
alongside jihadists and Islamist demagogues like al-Baghdadi himself. And then,
many of them went and formed ISIS together.
This accounts for the superior organisation of ISIS on the ground compared with
the other fighting groups in Syria and Iraq – these were hardened military men,
well-accustomed to effective hierarchical organisation. It also accounts for the
way in which ISIS has managed to quickly and seemingly quite effectively put in
place the administrative structures typical of a state necessary to manage
ministries, tax systems, courts, utilities like energy, water, rubbish
collection and so on over an area the size of the UK. When I visited Syria in
2013, ISIS was not even on the map. The Nusra Front dominated the news. But
within two years, these people set up the entire ISIS apparatus. And it worked.
After all, they had a lot of experience running just these things under Saddam.
Wanton murder
They also had a lot of experience of how to terrorize a civilian population into
submission, with wanton brutal murder, ritualized aggression against taboo
targets such as children, the works. The Ba’athists under Saddam had no limits
when it came to torturing women, children, elderly, whole families at a time.
There were no red lines. All was fair game – including the liberal use of banned
weapons of mass destruction (like chemical weapons) on whole communities. And
now they have simply transferred these “public administration techniques” to
ISIS. And added glossy videos to help the international propaganda and
recruitment efforts.
A senior military figure I recently met told me that he was convinced that the
Ba’athists selected Baghdadi to be the Caliph rather than Baghdadi selecting
former Ba’athists to administer his dominion. That would not be altogether
surprising if it turns out to be true. Saddam, as it turns out, is causing the
West much more of a headache in death than he had ever done in life.