LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
August 24/15
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins05/english.august24.15.htm
Bible Quotation For Today/There will be more joy in
heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous people who
need no repentance
Luke/01/01-07: "All the tax-collectors and sinners were coming
near to listen to him.And the Pharisees and the scribes were grumbling and
saying, ‘This fellow welcomes sinners and eats with them.’So he told them this
parable: ‘Which one of you, having a hundred sheep and losing one of them, does
not leave the ninety-nine in the wilderness and go after the one that is lost
until he finds it? When he has found it, he lays it on his shoulders and
rejoices. And when he comes home, he calls together his friends and neighbours,
saying to them, "Rejoice with me, for I have found my sheep that was lost." Just
so, I tell you, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents
than over ninety-nine righteous people who need no repentance."
Bible Quotation For Today/All
who obey his commandments abide in him, and he abides in them.
First Letter of John 03/23-24/04,01-06: "This is his commandment, that we should
believe in the name of his Son Jesus Christ and love one another, just as he has
commanded us. All who obey his commandments abide in him, and he abides in them.
And by this we know that he abides in us, by the Spirit that he has given
us.Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether
they are from God; for many false prophets have gone out into the world. By this
you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has
come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is
not from God. And this is the spirit of the antichrist, of which you have heard
that it is coming; and now it is already in the world. Little children, you are
from God, and have conquered them; for the one who is in you is greater than the
one who is in the world. They are from the world; therefore what they say is
from the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God. Whoever knows
God listens to us, and whoever is not from God does not listen to us. From this
we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error."
LCCC
Latest analysis, editorials from miscellaneous sources published on
August 23-24/15
Lebanon’s Michel Aoun: a legacy of change, a failure of
reform/Daily Star/August 23/15
Lebanon… what a load of rubbish/Faisal J. Abbas/Al
Arabiya/August 23/15
Lebanon’s ‘You Stink’ protests: Uprooting the political garbage/Joyce Karam/Al
Arabiya/August 23/15
The smiling faces of the Iranian government/Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/August
23/15
Why Assad’s old and new war crimes do not faze him/Brooklyn Middleton/Al Arabiya/August
23/15
America’s summer of discontent/Hisham Melhem/Al Arabiya/August 23/15
The Iran Deal: How Christians Choose Sides/Susan Warner/Gatestone Institutute/August
23/15
The IKEA Murders: Sweden in Crisis/Ingrid Carlqvist/Gatestone Institute/August
23/15
LCCC Bulletin titles for the
Lebanese Related News published on
August 23-24/15
Lebanon’s Michel Aoun: a legacy of change, a failure of
reform
Lebanon… what a load of rubbish!
Lebanon’s ‘You Stink’ protests: Uprooting the political garbage
At least 20 hurt in Beirut protest against govt, trash crisis
Lebanon PM threatens to resign as protesters rally in Beirut
Clashes as Thousands of Protesters Rally in Riad al-Solh for Second Day
Geagea Urges Salam Not to Resign, Says Protesters Must Seek President Election
Minister Mohammed al-Mashnouq: Date for Declaring Winning Waste Management Bids
Advanced to Monday
Jumblat Voices Support for Salam, Warns against Political Exploitation of
Protests
Report: Salam Refuses to Take Part in the Collapse of the State
Salam Extends Hand to Trash Protesters Who Call for Massive Demo in Response
Aoun Hails ‘You Stink’ Campaign Demonstrations
Hariri Throws Support behind PM, Says Govt. Fall would 'Plunge Lebanon into
Unknown'
Sniper Fire Renews in Sidon, Night Clashes Kill 3 and Injure 20
LCCC
Bulletin Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
August 23-24/15
Britain and Iran Reopen Embassies
Saudi Border Guard Killed by Rocket Fire from Yemen
UAE Forces Rescue British Hostage in Yemen
Syrian Observatory: Toll from Syria Regime Strikes near Damascus
Turkey Opposition Accuses Erdogan of 'Civilian Coup' over Poll
Links From Jihad Watch Web site For Today
Iran’s Supremo: U.S., Israel conspiring against the Qur’an
Islamic State has Damascus in its crosshairs
France train jihadi was “very devout” Muslim, father shocked by attack
France train jihadi who trained in Islamic State “dumbfounded” by terror
accusations
Islamic State ambushes, kills up to 50 Iraq troops
Hamas-linked CAIR: Denial of service over hijab sign of “fossilized policies”
Lebanon’s Michel Aoun: a legacy of change, a failure of
reform
August 23rd, 2015/Daily Star
Love him or loathe him, retired Gen. Michel Aoun has been an integral part of
the political scene for more than a quarter of a century.
At various stages of his political career, first as interim premier, then exiled
opposition leader and finally an integral part of the ruling class, he has
enjoyed popular support in Lebanon, mainly among Christians.
From the early days, the general hit a cord among many when he stood up first to
the Syrian military presence and then to the dominant militia in the Christian
areas during the Civil War. From his exile he later worked actively to garner
international pressure to get Syrian forces out of the country.Despite little success, and at times catastrophic results, many supporters stood
with Aoun, seeing him as a force of change in the political class and a serious
alternative to warlords-turned-politicians.
When he returned to Lebanon his supporters rejoiced and his rivals fretted –
both assuming he would seek change. Forming a large parliamentary bloc, he
called it Change and Reform. Friends and foes braced for the onslaught. Then,
not much changed.
Aoun can point to many factors that didn’t facilitate a reform agenda. He can
blame adversaries for his long trail of disappointments, from the presidency to
the government and Army command. But what happened Tuesday can’t be defended by
the most dedicated of followers.Imposing his son-in-law as leader of his party, without even the façade of an
election or a vote despite widespread internal opposition, epitomized Aoun’s
turbulent career: A lot of rosy promises, but little change. In the end he
became a typical member of Lebanon’s political elite, the elite he spent his
long career claiming he wants to reform.
Lebanon… what a load of rubbish!
Faisal J. Abbas/Al Arabiya/Sunday, 23 August 2015/Lebanon is sinking in a big
load of rubbish; and not just in the physical sense. After all, the one thing
that has emerged from the uncollected piles of garbage bags – apart from the
nasty smell – is that the country’s ongoing institutional failure has now put
everyone in a catch-22 situation, whereby there is no clear winner but a
definite loser: the average Lebanese citizen. Just imagine being this average
citizen for a moment: a victim of decades of corruption and self-serving
politicians, a disgustingly sectarian climate, a devastating civil war, the
spread of extremist ideology and the de facto rule of a militia like Hezbollah
which has been holding the whole country hostage to its pro-Iranian agenda. The
garbage problem won’t be resolved unless the political elite decides that this
issue is a matter of basic rights for their people, not a mere lucrative
contract which is up for grabs. Now if that wasn’t bad enough, the average
citizen also has to deal with the consequences of such a decaying reality. For
instance, the entire infrastructure – rebuilt mainly by the slain Prime Minister
Rafiq Hariri – is now deteriorating and many issues which were somewhat resolved
during his era are now worse than ever.
Catch-22
Indeed, one wouldn’t want to be in the shoes of average Lebanese citizens;
particularly if they can’t afford to buy their own electricity generator. And if
you ever wondered what a ‘catch-22’ feels like, you only have to imagine trying
to escape the heat while living in the coastal, highly-congested, capital city
of Beirut in this exceptionally hot summer. Imagine not only being unable to
turn on your air-conditioning due to the lack of electricity, but also unable to
open your windows due to the nasty smells emerging from the rubbish piling up on
the streets opposite your home.A Lebanese man passes a pile of garbage blocking
a street in east Beirut, Lebanon, Monday, Aug. 17, 2015. (AP) Understandably
frustrated, many Lebanese took to the streets and protested against the current
government’s inability to resolve the situation, demanding its resignation (what
was ironic is that many of these people were motivated by a number of corrupt
politicians who caused the problem but then blamed the government for it.)
However, to be fair, PM Tammam Salam (who is among the few good and honest
politicians in Lebanon) is in a catch-22 situation himself, as the position he
still occupies resembles the last-remaining shred of authority that Lebanon, as
a state, pretends to have. Indeed, the country has been without an elected
president for over a year now, its parliament continues to be a failure and as
mentioned earlier, most key state functions (such as intelligence, defense and
foreign policy) are either fully-controlled or heavily-influenced by Hezbollah
and its allies. The issue here is that even if PM Salam resigns, this will not
necessarily solve the garbage problem, for that won’t be resolved unless the
political elite decides that this issue is a matter of basic rights for their
people, not a mere lucrative contract which is up for grabs. The only good thing
to emerge of out this recent crisis is that - or at least one hopes that - the
Lebanese have finally realized that it is time to take out the garbage; and by
garbage, I mean the stinking sectarian politics which has destroyed the nation
and the self-serving politicians who not only oversaw, but profited from, the
collapse.
Lebanon’s ‘You Stink’ protests: Uprooting the political
garbage
Joyce Karam/Al Arabiya/Sunday, 23 August 2015
The absurdity of the scene in downtown Beirut yesterday is in portraying the
protests to be just about the trash collection crisis, while in reality they are
about everything else that led to the largest waste mismanagement scandal in
Lebanon’s history.Thousands are protesting and vowing to “topple the regime” not
just because the garbage collection has run amok, but due to Lebanon’s political
stagnation crippling the country in the last four years. Beirut is constantly in
a crisis-mode, and right now Lebanon has had no President for over a year, its
parliament has casually renewed its own term twice, and its government of
“rivals” is excelling in shortsightedness, and promoting narrow interests at the
expense of the public good. The country also has over a million Syrian refugee,
and Hezbollah is fighting with more than 5000 members in Syria.
Conspiracy over strategy
Self-infatuation and hubris are allover Lebanese politics. Parliamentarians and
policymakers are frequently busy analyzing and commenting on larger global
events while turning a blind eye to the day to day problems . Everyone is a
nuclear expert when it comes to the Iran deal negotiations, or a
counterterrorism one if it’s the rise of ISIS or the fate of the Syrian war,
while rubbish consumes the capital, and traffic chaos is allover the country.
Even Donald Trump is more likely to come up in a conversation than discussing a
plan or a vision to explore Lebanon’s potential gas resources, traffic
congestion or tackle the question of armed militias. Hezbollah’s weaponry is now
forgotten while the presence of ISIS and Nusra in border towns is being accepted
as a fait accompli.
The “You Stink” campaign will likely transform into a political movement,
transcending the traditional sectarian lines. The political elite’s motto is
every regional event revolves somehow around Lebanon, and nothing can happen in
Lebanon without regional events. A perfect narrative to guarantee that nothing
gets done, while propagating conspiracy theories on the U.S. starting ISIS, or
how will Russian-Saudi talks help the army. Some Lebanese Christian parties are
preoccupied in discussing federalism, but they’re not able to agree on their
highest portfolio position and name a President. Strategy and longterm vision
have had no place in Lebanese politics since the killing of former Prime
Minister Rafic Harriri in 2005, irrespective of opposing views to his plan.
Today, most local parties and leaders operate on a short term calculus, and
pursue narrow partisan interests that occasionally clash with the country’s
wellbeing as in the case of the waste management crisis. The government’s
repeated failure to agree on a new landfill has exacerbated the problem to this
point, while the absence of longterm planning in waste management will
ultimately promise a recurrence. For Hezbollah, its intervention in Syria was
driven by the party’s narrow interest in saving the Assad regime and maintaining
supply routes from Iran, regardless of the security repercussions it has had on
Lebanon.
Protests outcome?
While the protests bear lot of the hallmarks of the Arab spring and Lebanon’s
own cedar revolution in 2005, the “You Stink” campaign will likely transform
into a political movement, transcending the traditional sectarian lines, without
starting a revolution.The political toxicity in Lebanon is deeply entrenched
within the elite as well as the main institutions who will unite in resisting a
major overhaul. This elite consensus to save the system, prevented the Cedar
revolution in 2005 from reinstating new leaders, and from going beyond the goals
of toppling the government and ending the Syrian military presence. Today’s
political and religious elite in Lebanon is fully invested in the sectarian
architecture of the current system, and will block any serious attempt at a
revamp. What the protests can achieve, however, is hold the military and police
who used excessive force accountable, and if they continue with the same pace
possibly overthrow the government. In such scenario, and if Lebanon becomes with
no President, no government and an ineffective parliament, pressure could build
up for a larger dialogue to reach a more comprehensive framework. For now, the
trans-sectarian, forward leaning and passionate Lebanese youth that took to
downtown Beirut to tell the elite “you stink”, gives hope that the spark of
change has not died in Lebanon, and the narrative is not completely hijacked by
ISIS and the authoritarians.
At least 20 hurt in Beirut protest against govt, trash
crisis
Staff writer, Al Arabiya News/Sunday, 23 August 2015/At least 20 people were
injured Sunday in Beirut during a second day of clashes between police and
protesters angry about the Lebanese government’s failure to remove rubbish from
streets, medics said. Around 200 youths, some wearing scarves or masks to cover
their faces, threw stones and bottles filled with sand at police and tried to
pull down security barricades, an AFP correspondent said.A day earlier, 35
people were injured, according to reports. The demonstrators were calling on the
government to step down for mishandling a dispute over uncollected garbage in
the streets for weeks, extending an online campaign named “You Stink” by
activists. Protesters chanted “Down with the regime” and “Freedom,” slogans
borrowed from the Arab Spring uprisings that toppled several governments in the
region. Meanwhile on Saturday, in a response to the protests, Lebanon’s prime
minister threatened to resign, warning rival parties in his unity cabinet that
the state faced collapse because of paralysis that has come to a head with its
failure to resolve a crisis over rubbish disposal. I warn that we are going are
going towards collapse if matters continue/ “I warn that we are going are going
towards collapse if matters continue,” Prime Minister Tammam Salam said in a
televised address. “Frankly, I have not and will not be a partner in this
collapse. Let all officials and political forces bear their responsibilities.”
Salam’s government has suffered almost complete paralysis since it took office
last year as wider crises in the Middle East, including the war in neighboring
Syria, have exacerbated Lebanon’s own political and sectarian divisions.(With
Reuters and AFP)
Lebanon PM threatens to resign as protesters rally in
Beirut
By Laila Bassam | Beirut Reuters/Sunday, 23 August 2015/Lebanon’s prime minister
threatened to resign on Sunday, warning rival parties in his unity cabinet that
the state faced collapse because of paralysis that has come to a head with its
failure to resolve a crisis over rubbish disposal. Protesters called for a
second day of demonstrations against Prime Minister Tammam Salam’s cabinet on
Sunday after at least 35 people were injured on Saturday night when security
forces used water cannons and tear gas to disperse several thousand
demonstrators in central Beirut. Salam’s government has suffered almost complete
paralysis since it took office last year as wider crises in the Middle East,
including the war in neighboring Syria, have exacerbated Lebanon’s own political
and sectarian divisions.“I warn that we are going are going towards collapse if
matters continue,” Salam said in a televised address. “Frankly, I have not and
will not be a partner in this collapse. Let all officials and political forces
bear their responsibilities.”
He described as excessive the force used against protesters on Saturday and said
those responsible would be held to account. On Sunday, several hundred
protesters gathered near the government headquarters on Sunday chanting
anti-government slogans. Activists called for a bigger protest later in the day.
Their campaign “You Stink” is a response to trash being left uncollected in and
around Beirut last month when a refuse tip closed, with no agreement on an
alternative. While collection has resumed, no solution has been found.
‘Political garbage’
The Salam government brings together rival Lebanese parties, including the
Sunni-led Future Movement of Saad al-Hariri, Shiite Hezbollah, and competing
Christian groups. Should it collapse, Salam’s government would stay on in the
caretaker capacity. However, his resignation would trigger a constitutional
crisis. In Lebanon, it is the president who appoints the prime minister, but the
presidency has been vacant since last year. Salam said that if a cabinet meeting
scheduled for Thursday was not productive on issues including a tender to decide
on a new refuse collection company, “there would be no necessity for the
government after it”.“The trash is the straw that broke the camel’s back, but
the story is much bigger than this straw. It is the story of the political
garbage in the country and the political trash in the country,” Salam said. He
also warned the heavily indebted government would be unable to pay salaries next
month. Unable to issue new debt, it risked being classified “among the failing
states.” Lebanon’s public debt currently stands at about 143 percent of gross
domestic product, a government source said. Lebanon, still rebuilding from its
1975-1990 civil war, has been repeatedly jolted by spillover from the Syria war,
including political violence and a major refugee crisis. Hezbollah, a powerful
Iranian-backed party, is fighting alongside President Bashar al-Assad in the
Syrian conflict.
Clashes as Thousands of Protesters Rally in Riad al-Solh
for Second Day
Naharnet/23 August/15/NewsAgencies/Thousands of protesters poured into Beirut's
Riad al-Solh Square on Sunday demanding that the country's top politicians
resign, hours after Prime Minister Tammam Salam hinted he might step down
following violent protests triggered by a monthlong trash crisis. The
demonstrations, the largest in years, railed against the corruption and
dysfunction that has brought about Lebanon's current political crisis. The
country does not have a functioning cabinet or parliament, and hasn't had a
president for more than a year. By Sunday afternoon, thousands of protesters
chanting "revolution" massed near the Grand Serail, demanding that Salam resign
immediately. "The people want to topple the regime!" protesters cried out, a
slogan used during the Arab Spring protests that swept through the region.
Waving Lebanese flags and chanting, they stood in front of a ring of barbed wire
that separated them from government headquarters and riot police. In the
evening, violence erupted as some protesters -- described as "infiltrators" by
organizers and state-run National News Agency -- tried to remove the barricades
outside the Grand Serail. The You Stink campaign, the main group that has called
for the current protests, has noted that the "infiltrators" were sent by
political parties represented in the government.
Security forces fired water cannons and tear gas to disperse the protesters, who
responded by hurling rocks and empty bottles. Several people were injured and
some fainted during the confrontations. Meanwhile, NNA said some "infiltrators"
hurled Molotov cocktails and a burning tire at security forces. The violence
prompted the You Stink campaign to ask its supporters to leave Riad al-Solh and
head to the nearby Martyrs Square. The movement later called on protesters to
leave all streets. The Lebanese Red Cross said at least 43 wounded protesters
were rushed to hospitals as 200 injuries were treated on the spot. The Internal
Security Forces for its part said 36 of its members were injured, one
critically.The clashes come one day after more than 50 protesters were wounded
after security forces used excessive force and fired rubber bullets, tear gas
and water cannons on demonstrators. Saturday's demonstrations were by far the
largest since garbage began piling up on the streets after the capital's main
landfill was closed a month ago. Bickering politicians have been unable to agree
on an alternative system for waste management. Residents and municipalities have
resorted to burning trash on the streets and dumping garbage into valleys,
rivers and near the sea, leading to warnings of a health catastrophe. An online
group calling itself "You Stink" and other civil society groups organized the
rallies, urging others to join them in a revolt against a corrupt system.You
Stink issued a statement Sunday afternoon calling on Salam to resign
immediately, saying, "Our patience has run out."
The campaign is also demanding that those responsible for using excessive force
against protesters be held accountable.
Geagea Urges Salam Not to Resign, Says Protesters Must Seek President Election
Naharnet/August 23/15/Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea on Sunday urged Prime
Minister Tammam Salam not to resign before the election of a new president,
while warning anti-government protesters that “anger” alone cannot resolve the
country's growing crises.
“The grievances of the protesters are our grievances ... The garbage crisis has
reached an unaccepted level,” said Geagea at a press conference in Maarab.“There
is rampant corruption and incompetency. The demands that are being voiced at the
Martyrs Square are legitimate and I voice solidarity with the protesters,” he
added. However, the LF leader cautioned that the current “anger outburst” cannot
solve the country's problems. “It is true that this government must leave and it
is true that new parliamentary elections must be held, but what will we do if
the government and the parliament resign? What is the alternative amid the
current presidential vacuum?” Geagea wondered. He noted that protesters in
downtown Beirut “must remain there until MPs head to parliament and elect a new
president.” “Once a new president is elected, the government would be
automatically rendered resigned. The difference is that you can form another
government in the presence of a president,” Geagea explained. Accordingly, the
LF leader urged PM Salam not to resign, noting that “he is responsible for
maintaining legitimacy in the country until the election of a new president.”
Geagea also called on Salam to “call an immediate cabinet session” to address
the extraordinary situation in the country. He said that the government must
seek to “collect the garbage from the streets immediately” and to discuss the
excessive force that was used against protesters in Saturday's demo. Addressing
protesters, Geagea said “it is prohibited to undermine public order and it is
unacceptable to attack security forces.”“I urge the protesters to preserve the
public order or else they would be harming their legitimate demands,” he added.
Earlier on Sunday, Salam said he was ready to meet with protesters, admitting
that "excessive force" had been used against the demonstrators. Protesters
headed back to central Beirut on Sunday morning, joining those who had spent the
night there in tents after evening protests spiralled into clashes with security
forces that left more than 50 demonstrators injured. Protests in recent weeks
have called for a comprehensive solution to Lebanon's trash crisis, which has
seen piles of waste growing in Beirut and elsewhere since the country's largest
landfill shut down on July 17. But demands posted online on Sunday by the "You
Stink" campaign, which has organized recent protests, called for the
government's resignation and parliamentary elections. The group also called for
the prosecution of security forces who had fired on protestors and of Interior
Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq.
Minister Mohammed al-Mashnouq: Date for Declaring Winning
Waste Management Bids Advanced to Monday
Naharnet/August 23/15/The date for announcing the winning waste management bids
has been advanced from Tuesday to Monday afternoon, Environment Minister
Mohammed al-Mashnouq declared on Sunday. “At the request of Prime Minister
Tammam Salam to double the efforts and speed up the announcement of the winning
waste management bids … I have contacted the technical teams assessing the bids
and asked them to intensify their efforts to finish their task as soon as
possible,” said Mashnouq. “Accordingly, I announce advancing the date for
declaring the names of the winning firms from Tuesday evening to Monday
afternoon,” the minister added. The decision comes in the wake of violent street
protests on Saturday in downtown Beirut. In recent weeks, civil society
activists have called for a comprehensive solution to Lebanon's trash crisis,
which has seen piles of waste growing in Beirut and elsewhere since the
country's largest landfill shut down on July 17. But demands posted online on
Sunday by the "You Stink" campaign, which has organized recent protests, called
for the government's resignation and parliamentary elections after excessive
force was used against demonstrators in Saturday's demo. The winning bids were
supposed to be announced on Wednesday but the declaration was postponed for
“further assessment.”Early in August, three private firms offered bids to manage
Beirut’s waste without stating a clear disposing ground. In July and following
the closure of the Naameh landfill, which receives the waste of Beirut and Mount
Lebanon, an unprecedented waste management crisis erupted and continues until
today. Several regions have refused to take and bury any of the capital’s waste
as a substitute for Naameh. The developments have prompted municipalities to
dump garbage randomly in forests, valleys and on river banks.
Jumblat Voices Support for Salam, Warns against Political
Exploitation of Protests
Naharnet/August 23/15/Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat on
Sunday threw his support behind Prime Minister Tammam Salam, after civil society
demonstrators called for the premier's resignation in protest at the excessive
force that was used against them on Saturday. “We reiterate our full support for
PM Tammam Salam, who showed once again in his press conference his level of
wisdom, vision, patience and responsibility – characteristics that we are in
dire need for amid these critical circumstances in Lebanon and the region,” said
Jumblat in his weekly editorial in the PSP's al-Anbaa newspaper. Calling for a
“productive” cabinet session as soon as possible, the PSP leader said citizens'
“legitimate demands” cannot be addressed through “usurping the popular protests
and diverting them from their real objectives.”Moreover, Jumblat warned that
some political forces are trying to take advantage of the civil society
demonstrations, cautioning that there are attempts to “expand the paralysis and
obstruction and undermine the pillars of the system and stability.”The PSP
leader also reiterated his call for prosecuting the security officials and
personnel who opened fire during Saturday's demonstration in downtown Beirut.
Earlier on Sunday, Salam said he was ready to meet with protesters, admitting
that "excessive force" had been used against demonstrators. Protesters headed
back to central Beirut on Sunday morning, joining those who had spent the night
there in tents after evening protests spiralled into clashes with security
forces that left more than 50 demonstrators injured. He also pledged to hold
accountable those "responsible" for using "excessive force against civil society
and against the people." Protests in recent weeks have called for a
comprehensive solution to Lebanon's trash crisis, which has seen piles of waste
growing in Beirut and elsewhere since the country's largest landfill shut down
on July 17. But demands posted online on Sunday by the "You Stink" campaign,
which has organized recent protests, called for the government's resignation and
parliamentary elections. The group also called for the prosecution of security
forces who had fired on protestors and of Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq.
Report: Salam Refuses to Take Part in the Collapse of the
State
Naharnet/August 23/15/Prime Minister Tammam Salam said on Sunday that he refuses
to be part of the “paralysis” governing the country and driving it to a total
“collapse,” the Pan Arab al-Hayat daily said.
“The PM’s call for a cabinet convention on Thursday came out of his duty that he
should not participate in the complete paralysis controlling the country and
leading it to a breakdown,” visitors to Salam quoted him as saying. They added
that despite the fact that the PM has tried to arrange favorable atmospheres
that allow the ministers of the Free Patriotic Movement, Jebran Bassil and Elias
Bou Saad, to address the matter positively and engage in the session but that
however did not yield until yesterday. “Some might consider resigning as a
collapse, but I believe that the inability to save the country is the most
dangerous,” said the Prime Minister. In the absence of a head of state, the
cabinet had agreed on a decision-making mechanism by consensus among the
ministers. But ministers representing different parties including the FPM began
to put sticks in the wheels of the government, leading it to paralysis.
Salam Extends Hand to Trash Protesters Who Call for Massive
Demo in Response
Naharnet/August 23/15/Agence France Presse/Prime Minister Tammam Salam said
Sunday he was ready to meet with members of a growing movement protesting the
country's trash crisis, and admitted that "excessive force" had been used
against demonstrators. Salam’s comments came in a press conference he held
against the backdrop of Saturday’s clashes between security forces and activists
of the anti-garbage demonstrators in Downtown Beirut. He said that he stood
"with the people and with the citizens."Addressing the protesters, he said he
extended his "hand to civil society. I'm ready to listen to you and sit with
you."“Lebanon and the people are passing through very difficult times which
compels the necessity for each to shoulder responsibility,” said the PM. He
emphasized that the clashes that left scores injured “are a huge
responsibility,” pledging to hold accountable those "responsible" for using
"excessive force against civil society and against the people." “What happened
yesterday was the result of accumulating matters that have been building up and
increasing the people’s suffering as the result of the vacuum we are living,” he
stated. He assured that the incidents will not pass without accountability,
adding “I have no cover for anyone.” Salam also warned that if the cabinet
failed to convene productively on Thursday, then there is no need for it in the
first place. He blamed all political parties for the cabinet obstruction and the
presidential vacuum saying: “I have always warned that this incapability will
accumulate negativity in the country. I have been tolerating all this for the
people’s sake.” In a reference to his earlier threats to submit his resignation
in light of the ongoing obstruction of the cabinet’s work, Salam said: “On
several occasions I have warned that I would submit my resignation, and I have
warned that the situation is becoming unbearable. I have warned that I would
resign but the people’s will prevented me.”“My patience is limited and it is
linked to yours,” he said as if referring to a possible resignation on his part
if the street protests went completely out of hand. “Our country is going
backwards while other countries are progressing. The Lebanese citizens have been
patient for long, watching all countries achieve progress while Lebanon is
deteriorating,” he stated. “I have always been frank and open. I am a citizen
too. I have never sought for positions but always tried to support them. “I have
called for a cabinet session on Thursday that will address pressing issues and
the living matters as we approach the school season and a number of
entitlements. If that convention failed to achieve the desired results, then
there is no need for the cabinet in the first place,” he indicated. “I continue
to bear the responsibility for your (the people) sake. But my patience has
limits. “I call on you people to stand in the face of those who mean harm. I
call on the civil society to form a delegation and put our hands together to
discuss any issue there is. I have nothing to hide,” concluded Salam. However,
You Stink issued a statement following Salam’s speech calling on the PM to
submit his resignation. “We demand that Salam submits his resignation and that
the aggressors are held accountable.”They also called for a massive
demonstration today at 6:00 pm. Police clashed on Saturday with anti-garbage
demonstrators and used tear gas and water cannon to disperse them in downtown
Beirut's Riad al-Solh square and to stop them from moving towards the nearby
Nijmeh Square, leaving scores of protesters injured. However, the demonstrators
stayed in the area and urged all the Lebanese people to join them but anti-riot
police opened fire in the air and used baton charges. The demonstrators erected
tents near Martyrs' Square, vowing to stay there until police release several
activists they arrested during the protest.
Aoun Hails ‘You Stink’ Campaign Demonstrations
Naharnet/August 23/15/Change and Reform bloc MP Michel Aoun congratulated the
Lebanese youth of the You Stink campaign who demonstrated “peacefully” on
Saturday in Downtown Beirut. “I congratulate the Lebanese youth who demonstrated
peacefully and civilized yesterday, and have proven mature in demanding their
rights and pressing livelihood matters,” said Aoun in a statement on Sunday.
However, Aoun denounced the violence of security forces against the protesters
saying “I denounce the violence against the demonstrators and the use of live
ammunition,” calling for immediate accountability. Aoun has warned the political
majority and its apparatuses from taking advantage of the “noble demonstrations”
to achieve political gains. On Saturday, the You Stink campaign organized a
protest and urged police to protect them and to not beat them similar to what
happened on Wednesday during a demonstration. But the Police used tear gas and
water cannon to disperse thousands of them in Riad al-Solh square and to stop
them from moving towards the nearby Nijmeh Square, leaving scores of protesters
injured.
Hariri Throws Support behind PM, Says Govt. Fall would 'Plunge
Lebanon into Unknown'
Naharnet/August 23/15/Al-Mustaqbal movement leader ex-PM Saad
Hariri on Sunday stressed his support for the stances expressed by Prime
Minister Tammam Salam in the wake of Saturday's violent protests, while warning
of attempts to “topple the government.” Condemning “any form of extreme security
measures in facing peaceful protests,” Hariri cautioned in a statement against
“attempts to drag the country into chaos and the unknown.”The ex-PM noted that
the mission of the government is to “reinforce security and stability and manage
the affairs of the state until the problem of the presidential vacancy, which
has been going on for over a year, is resolved.”“This vacancy reflected
negatively on the path of the state as a whole and on the work of the government
and its tasks of managing public affairs and meeting the needs of people,” said
Hariri. He added: “We admit that there is a deficiency in resolving a national
crisis that is affecting every village and city in Lebanon, but protesting
against the garbage crisis and demanding a fast solution to it is one thing, and
demanding to topple the government and the system is another thing.”The former
premier warned that “toppling the government means toppling the last legitimate
stronghold and taking Lebanon into the unknown.”“We will not allow the collapse
of Lebanon and its legitimacy, and we stress at the same time that the garbage
crisis will not remain captive of political disputes; it will find realistic
solutions in the coming days,” Hariri pledged. Earlier on Sunday, Salam said he
was ready to meet with protesters, admitting that "excessive force" had been
used against the demonstrators. Protesters headed back to central Beirut on
Sunday morning, joining those who had spent the night there in tents after
evening protests spiralled into clashes with security forces that left more than
50 demonstrators injured. Protests in recent weeks have called for a
comprehensive solution to Lebanon's trash crisis, which has seen piles of waste
growing in Beirut and elsewhere since the country's largest landfill shut down
on July 17. But demands posted online on Sunday by the "You Stink" campaign,
which has organized recent protests, called for the government's resignation and
parliamentary elections. The group also called for the prosecution of security
forces who had fired on protestors and of Interior Minister Nouhad al-Mashnouq.
Sniper Fire Renews in Sidon, Night Clashes Kill 3 and
Injure 20
Naharnet/August 23/15/Several neighborhoods in the southern city of Sidon,
including al-Baassiri and al-Njasa neighborhoods, went under prolific sniper
early on Sunday despite a cease-fire agreement overnight between the clashing
parties. The overnight clashes, which left 3 dead and 20 wounded, led to the
outbreak of fires in homes and damage to properties and cars and had forced many
Palestinians to flee to the city of Sidon. Despite the agreement that was
reached overnight in the Palestinian refugee camp of Ain el-Hilweh between the
Islamist Jund al-Sham group and the secular Fatah Movement, intermitted gunfire
continued until midnight and it included hand grenades and sniper fire that
forced the closure of a number of roads leading to the camp. The Lebanese army
positions on the entrance of the camps were hit by the clashes and had therefore
replied to the source of fire and fortified its presence and enhanced security
measures. Although contacts between the Lebanese and Palestinian factions led to
a cease-fire agreement, but they failed to keep it going. The camp had witnessed
several similar incidents in recent months. Ain el-Hilweh, the largest
Palestinian camp in the country, is home to about 50,000 refugees who live in
dire conditions and is known to harbor extremists and fugitives. By
long-standing convention, the Lebanese army does not enter the country's 12
refugee camps, leaving security inside to the Palestinians themselves.
Britain and Iran Reopen Embassies
Naharnet/August 23/15/Agence France Presse/Britain's foreign secretary reopened
his country's embassy in Tehran on Sunday in a long-awaited step signaling
better relations four years after a mob stormed the compound, forcing its
closure. Philip Hammond's two-day trip comes five weeks after Britain and five
other world powers struck a deal with Iran to end a 13-year dispute over the
Islamic republic's nuclear program. He led a ceremony shortly after noon in the
embassy garden with Ajay Sharma, the new charge d'affaires who will be Britain's
top diplomat in Tehran. Iran's embassy in London also reopened on Sunday. The
two nations are expected to appoint ambassadors within months. Hammond, the
first British foreign secretary to visit Iran since Jack Straw in 2003,
described the violence that shuttered the Tehran mission as "a low point" but
said a new journey was beginning. "Over the coming months, we will work to
ensure that the nuclear agreement is a success, including by making sure that it
is fully implemented by all sides," Hammond said at the reopening. "Through this
embassy's efforts we will support British trade and investment, once sanctions
are lifted. That will bring benefits for Britain and the Iranian people."
Lifting of sanctions
Hammond was to later hold a press conference with Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iran's
foreign minister and lead negotiator in the nearly two years of talks that have
ended Tehran's isolation from the West. European officials have been quick to
visit Iran since July 14, when the nuclear agreement with Britain, China,
France, Germany, Russia and the United States was announced in Vienna. The deal
will see the lifting of economic sanctions -- imposed as punishment over Iran's
nuclear program -- in exchange for curbs on its atomic activities and a new
inspections regime.Iran's leaders have always denied international allegations
that they sought to develop a nuclear weapon, insisting the program is for
peaceful energy and medical purposes.The nuclear deal has sparked a flurry of
interest from countries seeking to reconnect with the oil-rich Islamic republic,
whose 78 million people are seen as an untapped market for many industries. The
thaw between Britain and Iran started with the June 2013 presidential election
victory of Hassan Rouhani, a moderate who reached out to the West. Hammond is to
meet him on Monday. "We have seen our relationship steadily improve, step by
step," Hammond said, mentioning Prime Minister David Cameron's meeting with
Rouhani in New York last autumn, the first at that level between the countries
since the 1979 Islamic revolution.
Shared challenges ahead
"Last month's historic nuclear agreement was another milestone, and showed the
power of diplomacy, conducted in an atmosphere of mutual respect, to solve
shared challenges," Hammond added. Following the 2011 embassy attack, Britain
said it could not have happened without the tacit consent of the Iranian regime
at the time. It took place after lawmakers voted to expel the British ambassador
and reduce trade relations in retaliation for nuclear-related sanctions against
Iran's banking sector. Students rampaged for hours through the embassy compound,
tearing down the British flag, ripping up pictures of Queen Elizabeth II and
trashing offices. Staff were seized by protesters. Diplomatic relations were
reduced to their lowest possible level, with Britain expelling Iran's officials.
But Hammond said London and Tehran should now be ready to discuss shared
problems, including the spread of the Islamic State jihadist group in Syria and
Iraq. Plans to reopen the embassy were announced in June last year. Sharma was
appointed in a non-resident position in November 2013 and has since visited Iran
12 times. Hammond and treasury minister Damian Hinds are visiting Tehran with a
small trade delegation to discuss business opportunities. Hammond follows his
Italian, French and German counterparts who all visited Iran after the nuclear
deal. Europe is keen on renewing trade ties with Iran, and most countries have
diplomatic representation in Tehran. However the United States, which led the
nuclear talks, has not had diplomatic relations with Iran since 1979 following
the 444-day hostage crisis that followed the storming of its Tehran embassy. The
nuclear deal is undergoing a bruising review in the U.S. Congress, but President
Barack Obama has vowed to veto any vote against the historic agreement.
Saudi Border Guard Killed by Rocket Fire from Yemen
Naharnet/August 23/15/Agence France Presse/A Saudi border guard has been killed
by rocket fire from anti-government rebels in northern Yemen, Riyadh's official
SPA news agency said on Sunday. A border post in the kingdom's Jazan region came
under attack on Saturday, prompting guards to respond to the fire, the SPA said,
quoting an interior ministry spokesman. It said one Saudi guard was killed in
the exchange. More than 50 people have been killed along the Saudi-Yemen border
since a Riyadh-led military coalition began air strikes on Iran-backed rebels
across the impoverished country in March.
Israel Restricts Movement for 10 in Jewish Extremist
Crackdown
Naharnet/August 23/15/Agence France Presse/Israeli authorities have restricted
the movements of 10 people amid a crackdown on Jewish extremists following the
deadly firebombing of a Palestinian family's home, authorities said Sunday. The
orders range from a ban on entering the Israeli-occupied West Bank, where a
number of wildcat Jewish settlement outposts are reputed to house extremist
youths, to lesser restrictions. Israel's Shin Bet domestic security agency said
attacks had "emanated" from the Habaladim outpost near Duma, the Palestinian
village where the firebombing that killed in July an 18-month-old and his father
occurred. "In light of a number of terror incidents recently, including the
taking of human life... restraining orders have been signed in the past days
against 10 activists," the Shin Bet said in a statement. "These orders include
various restrictions, among them on place of residence, movements during the
night hours and preventing their entry to (the West Bank), among other things,
to keep them away from illegal outposts, for example Habaladim, from which the
attacks emanated."A Shin Bet spokeswoman declined to elaborate, including on
whether those responsible for the firebombing had left from Habaladim or if they
were from there. In the wake of the firebombing, three alleged Jewish extremists
were placed in administrative detention, a controversial form of internment
without trial usually used on Palestinians. The firebombing led to criticism of
Israel's security services over what critics said was a failure to tackle Jewish
extremism earlier. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu labeled the firebombing
"terrorism" and vowed to pursue the assailants through all legal means.
UAE Forces Rescue British Hostage in Yemen
Naharnet/August 23/15/Agence France Presse/Forces from the United Arab Emirates
have rescued a British hostage held for more than 18 months by al-Qaida in
Yemen, authorities in Abu Dhabi and London said on Sunday. Douglas Robert Semple,
a 64-year-old oil worker, had been kidnapped by al-Qaida in February 2014 while
working in Yemen's Hadramawt province, a stronghold of the jihadist group, a
statement carried by the UAE's official WAM news agency said. It said that UAE
forces freed Semple in a military operation on Saturday and took him to Yemen's
main southern city of Aden, from where he was flown to Abu Dhabi overnight.
Emirati forces are among troops taking part in a Saudi-led campaign supporting
Yemen's government against Iran-backed rebels. The statement provided no details
about the operation or where Semple had been held. The Foreign Office in London
confirmed that a British hostage in Yemen had been freed by UAE forces but did
not identify him and also provided no further details. "I'm pleased to confirm
that a British hostage held in Yemen has been extracted by UAE forces in a
military intelligence operation," Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond said in a
statement released while he was in Tehran to reopen the British embassy. Hammond
said the freed hostage was "safe and well" and that Britain was "very grateful
for the assistance of the UAE." The statement carried by WAM said Semple had
been met at the airport in Abu Dhabi by UAE officials and the British
ambassador. He was taken to hospital for health checks and spoke to his wife by
telephone, it said. He was to leave for Britain following the medical checks.
WAM said Abu Dhabi's Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan had
telephoned British Prime Minister David Cameron on Saturday night to inform him
of the operation.Cameron later Tweeted: "I'm so pleased for the family of the
British hostage in Yemen -- who has been released safe and well. Thanks to the
UAE for their help."
UAE confirms forces in Aden
The UAE, a longtime Western ally, is a key partner in the Saudi-led coalition
that in March launched air strikes against the Huthi rebels as they advanced on
Aden, forcing President Abedrabbo Mansour Hadi's government to flee to Riyadh.
The Huthis had seized the capital Sanaa last September. The coalition has also
provided military equipment to loyalist forces and reportedly sent troops, with
Saudi media reporting that some 1,500 soldiers, most from the UAE, had entered
Aden. The statement carried on WAM was the first official confirmation that UAE
troops were on the ground in Yemen. "This action by the UAE forces in Aden is
renewed evidence of the UAE's unchanging policy towards terrorism in all of its
forms," the statement said. Backed by the coalition, pro-government forces
retook Aden in mid-July and in recent weeks have been pressing a major offensive
against the rebels. As well as Aden, they have recaptured four other southern
provinces and in recent days have fought fierce battles for control of Yemen's
third-largest city, Taez. The conflict has killed more 4,500 people since March,
according to the United Nations. Kidnapping has long been rife in Yemen, with
hostages often used as bargaining chips between rival groups. Earlier this month
French hostage Isabelle Prime arrived in Oman following her release in Yemen
after nearly six months of captivity.
Last year British teacher Mike Harvey was released after being held for five
months in Yemen following negotiations. In December, U.S. journalist Luke Somers
and South African teacher Pierre Korkie died during a failed attempt by U.S.
commandos to rescue them from an al-Qaida hideout in southeastern Yemen.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), the local branch of the jihadist
network, is considered among its most dangerous affiliates and has taken
advantage of the chaos in Yemen to seize territory including Hadramawt
provincial capital Mukalla. AQAP was behind several plots against Western
targets, including this year's deadly attack on French magazine Charlie Hebdo.
The United States has for years carried out a drone war against al-Qaida
militants in Yemen. On Sunday a local official in Hadramawt told AFP that four
suspected al-Qaida militants were killed overnight in an apparent U.S. drone
strike in Mukalla.
Syrian Observatory: Toll from Syria Regime Strikes near
Damascus
Naharnet/August 23/15/Agence France Presse/The toll from heavy government
bombardment of a rebel stronghold outside the Syrian capital rose on Sunday to
34 civilians including 12 children, a monitoring group said. A separate rocket
attack on Sunday in a regime-held neighborhood northeast of Damascus killed 11
people, state television said. "There are now 34 civilians that were killed in
Saturday's attacks on Douma, among them 12 children and eight women," said Rami
Abdel Rahman, director of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. Forces loyal
to President Bashar Assad targeted the rebel-held town of Douma with shelling
and air raids on Saturday. By late evening, the Observatory said 20 civilians
had been killed, but also that rescuers were still searching for more victims.
"Overnight, they found more victims underneath the rubble, and others who were
wounded died," Abdel Rahman said on Sunday. He said some strikes killed entire
families inside their homes. Local volunteers and civil defense teams worked on
Sunday morning to locate seven people who were still unaccounted for, the
Britain-based Observatory said. The Douma Coordination Committee, a local
activist group, published the names and photos of documented casualties on
Facebook. One picture showed a toddler the group said had been rescued from
beneath the rubble but who succumbed to his wounds shortly afterwards. At least
11 air strikes targeted the Eastern Ghouta area, of which Douma is a part, on
Sunday. The Observatory said several people had been wounded, but had no further
details.
On August 16, a series of regime strikes killed more than 117 people -- mostly
civilians -- in Douma, sparking international condemnation of the Assad
regime.Eastern Ghouta has been under a government siege for nearly two years and
comes under regular air attack. Meanwhile, northeast of Damascus at least 11
people were killed and 56 wounded by rocket fire outside Adra prison on Sunday,
state television said. It said the rockets were fired by "terrorist groups" and
that women and children were among the wounded. The Observatory's Abdel Rahman
said nine people were killed, including civilians. Syria's war, which began in
March 2011 with anti-regime protests, has spiraled into a multi-front conflict
that has killed more than 240,000 people.
Turkey Opposition Accuses Erdogan of 'Civilian Coup' over
Poll
Naharnet/August 23/15/Agence France Presse/The leader of Turkey's main
opposition party on Sunday accused President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of seeking to
stage a "civilian coup" over plans for snap elections after coalition talks
failed. Erdogan's Justice and Development Party (AKP) lost its overall majority
in June 7 legislative polls but was unable to form a coalition by the deadline
that runs out Sunday. The opposition Republican People's Party (CHP), which held
weeks of coalition talks with the AKP, says Erdogan deliberately stymied the
negotiations in the hope of triggering new polls and a better result for his
party. "There is no law in Turkey at the moment," said CHP leader Kemal
Kilicdaroglu. "Democracy is currently suspended and the constitution is is not
working," he told a televised meeting of CHP MPs in Ankara."We are faced with a
civilian coup," he said, in nod to history which has seen Turkey living through
three military coups -- in 1960, 1971 and 1980. He said the CHP, which came
second in the polls, was willing to be the minority partner in a coalition led
by Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, that would have been "respected inside and
outside" of Turkey. But his party wanted to see change on three major issues --
foreign policy, which needed a "180 degree transformation," the "big problem" of
the economy and an education system "that leaves no parent satisfied."On Friday
Erdogan said he would meet the speaker of the Turkish parliament on Monday to
exercise his right to call snap elections, slated for November 1.The CHP is
incensed that Erdogan did not offer the party a chance to form a coalition
government after the failure of talks with the AKP, accusing him of violating
the constitution. But Erdogan snapped back, saying he could not meet
Kilicdaroglu because the CHP leader refused to set foot in his presidential
palace. Speaking to reporters in Ankara on Sunday, Davutoglu insisted that the
AKP had acted in line with the Turkish constitution. "Right until now, since
June 7 - and the nation is our witness - we have not deviated one inch from the
constitution and the law," he said. The key question in the November 1 polls
will be whether the AKP can increase its vote count and regain its overall
majority, an outcome commentators believe is far from inevitable.
The smiling faces of the Iranian government
Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/Sunday, 23 August 2015
The Iranian regime’s bad reputation is not merely propaganda fabricated against
it, amid a political war which has been ongoing since the revolution against the
Shah. It is actually the true face of a regime that has - for more than 36 years
- exported conflicts, revolutions, violence and extremist and hostile ideologies
against any state or movement that locally, regionally or internationally
disagrees with it. This bad reputation has been a direct result of several
malicious acts - abductions, assassinations and explosions - as well as making
threats and funding groups to mobilize against several countries. This is in
addition to the violent form of governance inside Iran itself as the regime
pursued and excluded millions of Iranians who fled and currently live in exile.
These damaging moves, which have accumulated over time, have made Tehran’s
governance resemble the likes of Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq, the Assad
family in Syria, Muammar Qaddafi in Libya and Kim Jong-un in North Korea. This
bad image is therefore not one “fabricated” by the regime’s enemies outside of
Iran. The Iranian regime’s bad reputation is not merely propaganda fabricated
against it The Iranian government has currently resorted to a new language and
is sending clear hints about its desire to establish positive relations with its
rivals in the Middle East. These hints made by Iranian foreign minister Mohammad
Javad Zarif were quickly received by Iran’s rivals. Their reactions came as
expected; in principle, welcoming the new sentiments, still however being
doubtful on how serious these friendly intentions are. There’s a general belief
that Tehran’s government is running a campaign to clear the air with its rivals,
in order to end regional opposition of its nuclear deal with Western powers –
particularly opposition from Gulf countries, Jordan and Israel as they think the
agreement is good in principle, but masks Tehran’s true intentions. Of course
those who oppose this nuclear deal do not all oppose it for the same reasons.
Arab states think that Iran wants to calm the West and end sanctions imposed on
it so it may resume plans to dominate in the region. Meanwhile, Israel thinks
that Iran plans to resume its nuclear military program and fears that the
agreement does not provide enough guarantees and will therefore not only pose a
threat against its security but also against its existence. Some American
politicians, including Democrats, are also doubtful of the agreement and oppose
it. In the past, Iran was clear in regards to its extremism as it ignored all
what was said about its intentions and stances and carried on with its policies;
however, today it fears that the interests of the Arabs, Israelis and Americans
who oppose the nuclear agreement have become and interruption. We must note
however that despite the fierce opposition against this deal, President Barack
Obama’s chances of the deal passing Congress remain very high. All he needs is
to gain the approval of just one third of either the Senate or the House of
Representatives.
Two smiling faces
To activate the nuclear deal, Iran is embellishing its policies and rhetoric
towards other countries in order to reassure opponents that it wants to
cooperate and turn the page and that it has become a new Iran: a country that’s
politically moderate, cooperative on regional and international levels and
religiously tolerant. To serve this purpose, the regime has pushed two smiling
faces to the forefront, President Hassan Rowhani and foreign minister Mohammad
Javad Zarif. Both of them do not at all resemble the officials of the former
government of Mahmoud Ahmedinejad and his grouchy ministers. However, we are
aware that it is actions and not facial expressions which expose a politician’s
true intentions. Bashar al-Assad for example is seemingly a jovial, elegant and
polite man, yet his hands are stained with the blood of more than 250,000
Syrians. In Iran, the president and the government do not actually rule as
there’s a strict religious institution that makes decisions on important
details. Knowing this institution, we have not witnessed any change in its
hostile policy towards countries in the region and towards the Iranian citizens
who oppose it. The image Iran is trying to present and the soft rhetoric it is
addressing us with may just be for the aim of soothing tensions against the
regime and against the deal. Its final goal may be to seal the deal, have it
approved, then have all sanctions lifted.
Why Assad’s old and new war crimes do not faze him
Brooklyn Middleton/Al Arabiya/The video footage of the latest Syrian regime
bombardment of a civilian site showed mangled bodies lining the ground among
scattered fresh vegetables. On the first day of the week, as families likely
attempted to prepare for the week’s meals to come, a round of intense airstrikes
devastated a market in Duma, killing at least 100 people and injuring at least
500 others. The brutal attack on 12 August once again underscored the utter
barbarity of Bashar al-Assad’s disgraced regime. And the assault also proved
Assad continues to feel emboldened by the international community’s refusal to
address his past war crimes.
Human Rights Watch (HRW) noted that the criminal regime carried out at least
four airstrikes on the crowded area and after a five-minute pause – presumably a
window of time in which people rushed toward the carnage to help – at least
several rockets struck the same site. United Nations Political Chief Jeffrey
Feltman's stated the attack "would be yet one more war crime for which those
responsible must be held accountable.” But held accountable by who - no one
knows. Surely not by any single actor in the international community: Not the
U.S., which plans on pulling the Patriot missile defense system from Turkey amid
what Pentagon officials told the Associated Press was due to “a declining Syrian
military threat.” Obviously none of Syria’s allies including Russia, which
reportedly, just sent at least six MiG-31M fighter jets to Assad fighters.
Domestically, U.N. special envoy to Syria Staffan de Mistura released a
statement calling the attack "unacceptable under any circumstances.” Syrian
government officials had a predictably absurd response, stating Mistura bought
into "propaganda circulated within circles known for their hostility to Syria."
It is highly unlikely the Syrian regime will be held accountable for their
latest, well-documented attack against innocent civilians and yet again, any
condemnation is likely to be ephemeral and limited to words.
Targeting civilians
It is worth noting too, that it was not the first time the Assad regime
intentionally targeted civilians trying to gather food for themselves and their
families; in one example of many such attacks, in late December 2012, at least
68 people were killed as they waited in line at a bakery in Halfaya. Reports
noted no less than eight bombs were dropped at the site. In a study conducted by
McClathyDC, credible evidence corroborated locals’ claims that hundreds have
been killed while waiting for bread at dozens of different bakeries across the
country since 2011. In an interview with the site, a U.N. official stated that,
"The number of reported attacks on bakeries and bread lines is extraordinarily
high…If such attacks are indeed proved to be systematic or widespread targeting
of civilian populations, then they may amount to both crimes against humanity
and war crimes. All parties must halt all such attacks.” The article referenced
was written in January of 2013. Over two and a half years later, intentional
regime attacks targeting markets continue while the Assad remains in power.
While every senseless attack intentionally targeting civilians is reprehensible,
the Assad regime’s continued targeting of Syrians attempting to feed themselves
and their families is especially haunting. Assad continues to feel emboldened by
the international community’s refusal to address his past war crimes Meanwhile,
as the blood on the streets of Duma continues fading, Syria marks the somber
anniversary of the Sarin attack that left, according to the White House, at
least 1,429 people, including at least 426 children, dead on August 21, 2013.
Perhaps there is no grimmer evidence of the ramifications of allowing Assad to
continue killing than by a massacre taking place at a market days before the
anniversary of what U.N. chief Ban Ki-Moon called, “the worst use of chemical
weapons on civilians in the 21st century.” As the war-torn country commemorates
the attack, world leaders should hang their heads in collective shame for
allowing the Assad regime to continue killing with impunity.
America’s summer of discontent
Hisham Melhem/Al Arabiya/Saturday, 22 August 2015
The op-ed page of the Washington Post on Friday was fully occupied by columns
about Donald Trump, the Republican candidate for the Presidency who has
dominated the race since he made his entry two months ago with characteristic
bang, labeling members of the political class in Washington as ‘stupid’ and
accusing Mexico of sending its refuse of mostly rapists, criminals and drug
users to America. This was the most dangerous appeal to nativism by a
presidential candidate in recent memory. The day before, Trump a narcissist’s
narcissist, graced the cover of Time Magazine, with a screaming headline: Deal
with it. To make the event worthy of the supposedly richest man to ever
contemplate occupying the White House, Time flew a 27-year-old bald eagle
-America’s emblem- named Uncle Sam from Texas to New York to be photographed
with the man who wants to ‘make America great again’. It was political kitsch
par excellence.
Trump Nation
In recent election cycles we briefly encountered the quick rise and the quicker
fall of the candidate-de-jour phenomenon, particularly on the Republican side,
represented by an assortment of eccentric, colorful, narcissistic, scoundrel,
usually charismatic, attractive and articulate men and women who control the
early stages of the race by sheer aplomb and character. Think of Herman Cain,
Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry, Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich in 2012.These
self-appointed saviors of Western Civilization always cast themselves as the
outsiders holding the keys to quick fixes, or having the divine vision to
deliver us from the political wilderness and put us on the righteous path. Never
mind that most of them are the creation of the same political culture and the
very economic system that they supposedly abjure. In America of late, every
politician denounces ‘Washington’, while barely hiding his/her yearning to
embrace it.
Trump is now one of them. His detractors say that he is this summer’s fling for
angry and alienated Republican voters who will repent in the cold days leading
to the first Republican Caucus in Iowa on February 1, 2016. It is very unlikely
that Trump will be the next Republican nominee, but surely he has more staying
power, than the previous shooting-star candidates because of his wealth,
celebrity and his so far, masterful exploitation of the visceral fears that are
weighing heavily on many Americans; a seemingly insoluble immigration problem
resulting in more than eleven million undocumented immigrants, almost 15 years
of unending wars abroad, rising racial tension and small scale riots in American
cities that could turn into major ones , and what many see as America’s
retrenchment in the world in the face of a rising China and the bloodiest
terrorist entity in the modern world, the so-called ‘Islamic State’, a new
threat driven by apocalyptic visions of End Time. Trump also is benefitting from
the disillusionment of many voters over widening income inequality, stagnant
salaries, and the disappearance of many jobs in the new economy, not to mention
the squabbling professional politicians and a dysfunctional government in
Washington and an election cycle that seemed only few weeks ago destined to be
dominated by two candidates representing two political dynasties.
The art of the scheme
Enter Donald John Trump, once again. Americans have known Trump for decades. You
could not ignore him even if you wanted to. He is loud, crass, bombastic, a
mendacious swashbuckling tycoon and a misogynistic man who mastered the art of
the scheme. This is the man who bragged that he used the laws of the land to
amass huge sums of monies in tax breaks to finance his real estate holdings ( a
whopping $163.775 million on Trump Tower, in New York according to a recent
report in the National Review) The man, who wants to fix a broken wasteful
government in Washington, has reneged on paying his debts because of the way he
engineered four corporate bankruptcies, and he lived to brag about it. He
tweeted recently ‘Stop saying I went bankrupt. I never went bankrupt but like
many great business people have used the laws to corporate advantage—smart!’
Trump's detractors say that he is this summer’s fling for angry and alienated
Republican voters who will repent in the cold days
Of all the ‘outsiders’ and the career politicians who set their eyes on the
prize of the White House in recent years, Trump, maybe because of his brusque
and brash style, his celebrity status and wealth has the most formidable
built-in immune system against blunders, gaffs and doublespeak. Any other
candidate committing a fraction of the slips, half-truths and the outrageous
answers born out of ignorance and arrogance, committed by Trump in the last few
weeks, would have been history by now. Consider this: when the man who would be
the Commander-in-Chief of the American Armed Forces was asked by veteran
reporter and anchor of the Meet the Press program on NBC television network
,’Who do you talk to for military advice right now?’ Trump had no coherent
answer, but he quickly recouped and blurted out,’ well, I watch the shows. I
mean, I really see a lot of great—you know, when you watch your show and all of
the other shows and you have the generals and you have certain people that you
like.’ However, when Todd pressed him gently ‘but is there a go-to for you?’,
Trump began to fall apart and obfuscate claiming that there are two to three
such advisors, including John Bolton, a well-known civilian neoconservative, who
talks like a tough General, but he is certainly not one.
Then, maybe to please Todd, Trump mentioned retired Army Colonel Jack Jacobs, a
highly decorated officer and one of NBC’s best military analysts. Trump, with a
straight face continued ‘Colonel Jack Jacobs is a good guy, and I see him on
occasion.’ The problem with this tale is that it is tall. Colonel Jacobs told
David Corn of Mother Jones magazine that the claim is not true. ‘He may have
said the first person who came to mind, I know him. But I'm not a consultant.
I'm not certain if he has a national security group of people. I don't know if
he does or if he doesn't. If he does, I'm not one of them.’
Grunts, one-liners and elusive victories
Candidate Trump, in his own mind and in the collective imagination of his
supporters is the American equivalent of the awaited Mahdi, the restorer of
American greatness and righteousness. The problem is that Trump is not the
politically pure outsider destined to lead the nation out of the desert; he is
in fact the quintessential insider, the very privileged product of the
political-economic structure that he pretends to be railing against. Trump’s
crass and intimidating persona has fortified him against serious and tough
questioning not only from most of his rivals, but also from most journalists who
are in a stampede to interview the pretender-performer-cum-candidate as if he is
the sage of these bad times. Trump has yet to propose anything serious to
increase American economic growth and narrow the income gap, or how to fight the
Islamic State better than Obama’s limited war, or how to deal with China’s
belligerence in the South China sea, or how to break down barriers preventing
better trade deals with China and Japan or how to deal with an irredentist
Russia.
Trump so far has given us one liners such as: If I am elected, I will beat China
and Japan on trade, I will build a huge 2000 mile wall on the border with Mexico
to be as huge and imposing as the great wall of China, chiming at once that ‘it
will be known as the Trump Wall’, while he is forcibly deporting millions of
‘illegal immigrants’ but without telling us how. Trump, as President, will
literally steal oil from Iraq as he told Chuck Todd ‘and I said you take away
their wealth, that you go and knock the hell out of the oil, take back the oil.
We take over the oil, which we should have done in the first place.’ And as
president, he says he will demand protection money from Saudi Arabia vowing that
‘they should pay us.’ Trump thinks, that such foreign policy demands and grunts
will achieve the elusive victories of a bygone era that he and his supporters
yearn for, ‘we have no victories. I mean, we just don't have victories anymore.
As a country, we don't have victories anymore’. I am hoping that during the next
debate, one of Trumps competitors could muster enough courage and be able to
memorize a simple question to be directed to the American people ‘do you trust a
man like Donald Trump to be the next Commander-in-chief of the United States
Armed Forces?’
A deeper malaise
The Obama years have been lean years of hyper-partisanship domestically and
internationally. The fight over the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) has bloodied
both sides. The Republicans were opposed to it in principle, and their
‘proposals’ were ephemeral and pro-forma and an aloof President Obama did not
seriously engage or challenge them to deliver. In Foreign policy, there were no
victories as Trump said, but that was true of both the George W. Bush and the
Obama administrations in Afghanistan and in Iraq. The Bush administration signed
the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the Maliki government in Iraq, and
both American Presidents tolerated the outrageous sectarian machinations of
Maliki for 8 long years, that almost destroyed Iraq. One could argue that the
United States would not be in the current predicament in Iraq, had the Obama
administration been more robust in pushing for a residual force in Iraq after
the withdrawal of American forces in 2011.The reality today, is that there is no
bipartisan policy on Iraq or Syria or on how to really degrade and ultimately
destroy the ‘Islamic State’. But it should be said that the Obama
administration’s abandonment of the Syrian people to the chemical weapons and
the barrel bombs of the Assad regime, by far the most effective, systematic
killing machine in that tortured and pulverized land, has been the single most
disastrous failure of the Obama administration. But with the exception of few
important Republican voices in congress such as Senators John McCain and Lindsey
Graham calling for effectively arming and equipping the Syrian armed opposition
from the beginning of the conflict (as opposed to the tentative moves by the
Obama administration) there is no massive Republican support for a greater U.S.
involvement in the Syrian conflict. A year into the air campaign against the
Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, and the Republican controlled congress has yet
to authorize the war.
It is expected that the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (the P-5 plus one
nuclear deal with Iran) will survive any veto override by the Republican
congress. Regardless of the merits of the agreement, and there are many
legitimate criticisms leveled against it by non-partisan analysts, now is the
time for the critics of the agreement to demand greater scrutiny and stringent
inspections by the IAEA. The Republican senators did not help their case or show
their seriousness in seeking a rigorous debate with the Obama administration, on
the nuclear deal when they engaged in petty stunts such as writing an open
letter to the Iranian leadership lecturing them about the intricacies of the
American constitution and system of government. Also the ill-advised invitation
to the Prime Minister of Israel Benyamin Netanyahu to address the congress,
about the pitfalls of the agreement and how to stand up to Islamist threats
without even consulting the President of the United States, showed petulance,
and unprecedented lack of good judgment.
Now is the time to remind the Iranian regime that the military sword can still
be unsheathed in case of serious breaches, regardless of what the rest of the
signatories say or do. Now is the time to correct, the stunning failure of the
Obama administration in linking the nuclear negotiations to Iran’s deplorable
human rights record and its regional depredations.
During the long cold war with the Soviet Union, both Democratic and Republican
administrations while pursuing and signing nuclear deals with the Communists in
Moscow, never lessened their support for human rights in Russia and always
maintained support for the dissident movement, as well as actively checking and
in fact at times rolling back Soviet aggression in Africa and Afghanistan. The
abject silence of the Obama administration during the ‘Green Movement’ in Iran
in 2009, when the Islamic regime violently crushed the peaceful protests
following the rigging of elections, was very telling about the Obama
administration’s willingness, even eagerness to work with the Islamic Republic.
Not your father’s Republican Party
It is not an exaggeration to say that the current large field of Republican
candidates is shockingly weak particularly on foreign policy. Their first debate
exposed their limitations and lack of experience. There were those like Senator
Ted Cruz and governor Bobby Jindal who criticized President Obama because he
talks about violent extremism but not ’radical Islamic terrorism.’ Jeb Bush
continued to struggle with the war in Iraq, still unable to extricate himself
from his brother’s war. He is still his brother’s keeper. Ben Carson, a
neurosurgeon, supposedly a healer, defended waterboarding. There were the usual
ritualistic and obligatory lines about U.S. support to Israel, and Trump, was
well, Trump. There were no serious proposals about any outstanding foreign
policy challenge, from Iran, to Russia, to the Islamic State. No wonder the
Republican candidates are in such disarray on national security issues.
This is not your father’s Republican Party. In the wake of the Tea Party and the
rise of such luminaries like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul, this is no longer the home
of George Herbert Walker Bush, Brent Scowcroft, James Baker or Colin Powell. It
is doubtful that Ronald Reagan would be welcomed by the current custodians of
conservatism. Dwight Eisenhower need not apply. The old healthy skepticism of
Republicans and others of centralized Federal powers, has given way to very
corrosive antipathy and even hostility to ‘government’ in general.
Early on after I hit the Eastern shores of the United States as a perplexed
student in the early 1970’s who was fascinated, amused and baffled by America’s
political and social paradoxes , I was introduced to the concept of the
political tent. There was a big Democratic tent that was the home for labor
unions, minorities (Jews and Blacks) and yes a liberal like Senator Ted Kennedy
and a fiery segregationist like Governor George Wallace. There was a smaller
Republican tent, that included hard core conservative groups like the John Birch
Society, Southern and Western conservative Republicans and moderate Republicans
in the Northeast, and yes a moderate like Nelson Rockefeller and an arch
conservative like Barry Goldwater. Talk about the need for a guide to the poor
perplexed Lebanese. Both tents have changed in subsequent decades, but the
Republican tent has all but disappeared, and the handful moderate Republicans if
they are still around are currently politically homeless.
The Democrats, and their front runner, Hillary Clinton, have their own set of
problems and angst. Hillary Clinton, who lacks her husband’s finesse, and
incredible talent to connect with people, is currently in an obfuscating mode
and a deep hole of her own making. Her e-mail server saga gets weirder and more
dangerous by the day. She seems unable to answer simple questions about how,
when and who did erase the server before it was handed to the FBI. Barring a
major violation of the law, Clinton will likely get the nomination of her party.
She has yet to traverse a long journey, to get the nomination and already she is
wobbly. By the time she gets to the convention, she maybe wounded. But that
demands another article.
The Iran Deal: How Christians Choose Sides
Susan Warner/Gatestone Institutute/August 23, 2015
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6372/iran-deal-christians
*It is astounding to think that the term "peace and justice" could embrace
Iranian nuclear ambitions, but these post-modern Christian groups seem to be
able to make the mental adjustments in order to advance their anti-Israel
agenda.
* Christian organizations such as Sabeel, Christ at The Checkpoint Conference
and hundreds of other Christian groups that deny Israel's legitimate claims to
the land seem totally oblivious to the existential threat Iran poses not only to
Israel but to all of Western civilization.
*On the opposite end of the spectrum, Pastor John Hagee's Christians United for
Israel (CUFI) is leading an all-out campaign against the Iran deal, in
solidarity with Israel. And Hispanic Evangelicals are also raising their
collective voices against the Iran deal.
*"This deal is not only bad; it is very dangerous. It falls woefully short of
what both Democrats and Republicans in Congress have said is acceptable. ...
This is not a partisan issue; it is a moral imperative. — Hispanic Christian
leaders, in a statement published on July 24.
Nowhere are the deep divisions within Christianity more apparent than in the
current responses to the Obama-Kerry Iran nuclear deal (officially known as the
Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA).
Even before U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry's appearance on all five Sunday
news talk shows on July 19, in which he elaborated on the administration's
position, Christian groups had already lined up for a war of sorts that would
focus Christian attention on the political debate to come.
The ink was barely dry on the 150-page final agreement when the Vatican, which
represents roughly 70 million American Catholics, released a statement in favor
of the Iran deal, pronouncing it an "important step" and calling for a
"commitment to make it bear fruit," basically affirming the Pope's wish for
peace in our time.
American Christians, when it comes to a nuclear Iran, generally appear to
reflect the nation as a whole — on the one hand, concerned that Iran's daily
chant "Death to America" actually means what it says. On the other hand,
advocates for the "deal" say the time has come to turn the other cheek, give
diplomacy a chance and embrace your enemies — even those who vow to kill you.
According to a statement released by the Vatican on July 14, just as the deal
was made public, Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi said in response to reporters'
questions that
"The agreement on the Iranian nuclear program is viewed in a positive light by
the Holy See. It constitutes an important outcome of the negotiations carried
out so far, although continued efforts and commitment on the part of all
involved will be necessary in order for it to bear fruit. It is hoped that those
fruits will not be limited to the field of nuclear programme, but may indeed
extend further."
Pope Francis communicated his support of initial framework of the Iran deal in
his Easter message, one month after Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
spoke out strongly against it in an attempt to convince both Houses of Congress
that the deal was not only not going to provide peace but was instead a pathway
to war.
Bishop Oscar Cantu, chairman of the U.S. Bishops' Committee on International
Justice and Peace, followed suit in a letter to members of the U.S. Congress, in
which he urged Congress to support the effort.
It is not really news that the Pope and Israel are divided on many issues:
certainly, on the value of President Obama's Iran deal, and recently on the
Pope's premature recognition of a Palestinian state.
Even the group Catholics for Israel has not taken a firm stand opposing the
Pope's position on the Iran deal.
While the Roman Catholic Church appears unified under the Pope's proclamation in
favor of the Iran "deal," Protestant groups embrace each extreme — convinced
that either this deal presents an opportunity to "bring Iran into the community
of nations" or conversely that this deal represents nothing more than a pathway
to satisfying Iran's nuclear ambitions and a catalyst for an inevitable regional
nuclear arms race.
Pacifist groups including both Catholics and Protestants have hopped on a
bandwagon of "hope" absent a clear, realistic comprehension of Iran as a
determined and intractable foe of all people outside their brand of Islam.
Protestant Christianity is not unified — it is both diverse and divided. The
divisions line up along as the many hundreds of Protestant denominations might
suggest — each denomination and often each individual church has its own unique
way of interpreting God, Jesus, scripture, war and politics. "Denominationalism"
itself has become almost a curse within Christianity. John, the Apostle and
Jesus' best friend, said, "By this all men will know that you are My disciples,
if you have love for one another."
Not surprisingly, the Catholic Church, along with and some Protestant groups,
have landed on the same side of the Iran debate. Their common narrative is a
liberal, social justice platform couched in a "pacifist narrative" that Mark
Tooley, President of the Institute on Religion and Democracy, called "neither
reassuring nor relevant." Further, Tooley says:
"Serious Christians can't just cry peace, peace, peace. We've a sacred duty to
think through unintended consequences and advocate policies that seek
approximate justice and security, which requires diplomacy and capacity for
effective force."
Well-known champions of the "post-modern emerging church" movement, such as Tony
Campolo, Shane Caliborne and Ronald Sider, embrace an extreme version of the
"peace and social justice" scenario that they apply to the Iran deal. However,
their version of "peace and justice" has nothing at all to do with actual peace
and justice, but rather hijacks the term and inverts it in order to demonize
Israel as an "Imperialist occupier" and advance the Palestinian and Islamic
agendas.
It is astounding to think that the term "peace and justice" could embrace
Iranian nuclear ambitions, but these post-modern Christian groups seem to be
able to make the mental adjustments in order to advance their anti-Israel
agenda.
Similarly, Christian organizations such as Sabeel, Christ at the Checkpoint
Conference and hundreds of other Christian groups that deny Israel's legitimate
claims to the land seem totally oblivious to the existential threat Iran poses
not only to Israel but to all of Western civilization.
Included in this "club" is Jim Wallis, founder and President of the Sojourners,
an organization focused on "social justice" with roots in "liberation theology,"
made famous in 2008 by former Obama pastor Jeremiah Wright. Wallis is a longtime
friend and adviser to the President. He is leading his Christian devotees in a
"Hope But Verify" movement to support Obama's Iran deal. CAMERA has cited
Wallis' Sojourners magazine for its frequent attacks against Israel.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, Pastor John Hagee, founder of Christians
United for Israel (CUFI) and leader of an enormous media ministry, has expounded
the Christian pro-Israel message for the past 25 years. With longtime friend
Gary Bauer at the head of a new lobbying initiative and well over two million
followers, CUFI is leading an all-out campaign against the Iran deal, in
solidarity with Israel.
Pastor John Hagee has spoken out strongly against President Obama's Iran deal,
portraying it as a danger to the U.S. and Israel. (Image source: Hagee Hotline
video screenshot)
In that same camp, the influential International Christian Embassy of Jerusalem
(ICEJ) has taken a major leadership role in opposition to the Iran deal. Their
campaign, called Not One Bomb for Iran, has been collecting signatures on
petitions to help defeat the deal.
Joining ICEJ is a list of Christian groups including such heavies as Dr. Michael
Little, President of Christian Business Network (CBN); Jerry Johnson, President
of the National Religious Broadcasters; Steve Strang, Founder and CEO of
Charisma Media; Dr. James C. Dobson; Jane Hansen Hoyt, President of Aglow
International; Penny Nance, CEO of Concerned Women for America; Dr. Paul Nyquist,
President of Moody Bible Institute; Tony Perkins, President of the Family
Research Council; and many others.
Hispanic Evangelicals are also raising their collective voices against the Iran
deal. They are represented by:
Reverend Samuel Rodriguez, President of the National Hispanic Christian
Leadership Conference (NHCLC/CONEL), the world's largest Hispanic Christian
organization, claiming to represent Hispanic Evangelicals in more than 40,000 US
churches; and
Rev. Mario Bramnick, President of the Hispanic Israel Leadership Coalition, an
organization that stands against anti-Semitism and the campaign to delegitimize
Israel.
In a statement published on July 24, Hispanic Christian leaders said:
"This deal is not only bad; it is very dangerous. It falls woefully short of
what both Democrats and Republicans in Congress have said is acceptable.
"The implementation of this deal will lead to devastation results in the near
term and in the future. In the short run, the agreement ensures the end of
sanctions and empowers Iran to continue to fund terrorists who target Christians
and Jews, and even Muslims with whom they disagree.
"We represent millions of evangelical Hispanic Christians across the United
States who, like us, have a moral duty to fight anti-Semitism, defend America
and support Israel. ... This is not a partisan issue; it is a moral imperative.
"
Evangelical leader Franklin Graham criticized the nuclear deal, writing, "Iran
has a history of funding terrorism around the world, and they are Israel's worst
enemy. We are alienating our decades-long allies and cozying up to their enemies
and ours."
As the September deadline approaches for Congress to act on the Iran deal, many
Christian groups will continue their lobbying campaigns. What hangs in the
balance is the fate not only of Israel but Western civilization.
Susan Warner is a Distinguished Senior Fellow of Gatestone Institute and
co-founder of the Christian group Olive Tree Ministries in Wilmington, Delaware.
She has been writing and teaching about Israel and the Middle East for over 15
years. She can be reached at israelolivetree@yahoo.com.
The IKEA Murders: Sweden in Crisis
Ingrid Carlqvist/Gatestone Institute.August 23, 2015/
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6379/ikea-murders-sweden
*The mosque fire received huge attention, while the rape epidemic is basically
ignored. When a Swedish woman and her son are brutally knifed to death in the
most Swedish of all places – an IKEA store – the Prime Minister has nothing to
say.
*The normal democratic order, where citizens can contact politicians or the
media to make their voices heard, has all but evaporated in Sweden. Newspaper
websites have removed the reader comment fields, and the politicians hide behind
a wall of officials who brand callers expressing concern "racist," and hang up.
Sweden is governed by a power that has shut down the democratic process.
*Questions flooded the social media: Who are these people that are let into
Sweden? How many of them are not innocent victims of war, but in fact war
criminals and other criminals, hiding among the refugees?
*The most relevant question is: Why has one government after another chosen to
spend Swedish taxpayers' money to support and shelter citizens of other
countries, while some of them try to kill us?
None of the mainstream media has confronted the government about the *violent
crimes committed by asylum seekers against Swedes. On the contrary – the media
have done the utmost to convince Swedes that everything is safe and sound in
Sweden. Better than ever, in fact.
*"Where do I apply for asylum... when the day comes that I can no longer live
here?" – "Ewa," on Facebook.
Violent crime is up 300% and rape is up 1,472% since 1975, the year the Swedish
Parliament decided to turn homogenous Sweden into a multicultural country.
A surge of rage has washed over otherwise docile Sweden. After a double homicide
at an IKEA store in Västerås, where an illegal alien stabbed two random Swedes
to death, more and more people are questioning why the government is exposing
Swedish citizens to murderers from across the globe.
On August 10, news of the IKEA murders shocked Sweden. Two asylum seekers from
Eritrea (the second largest source of asylum applicants in Sweden), were
suspected of having grabbed knives from the kitchenware department and attacked
two random Swedes. The victims were 55-year-old Carola Herlin and her
28-year-old son, Emil.
Carola Herlin, Director of the Moro Backe Health Center, was murdered on August
10, along with her son, in the IKEA store in Västerås, Sweden.
The elder of the two asylum seekers, a 36-year-old man, had twice been denied
residency status in Sweden -- because he had already been granted residency it
in Italy -- but he had not yet been deported. (Eritreans without residence
permits in other EU-countries automatically get to stay in Sweden.)
The killer also inflicted life-threatening injuries on himself, and underwent
several surgeries before the police could finally question him. On August 14, he
confessed. His 23-year-old compatriot was released from custody, because the
police no longer believe he had anything to do with the murders or had even
known what his friend was planning to do.
Fear has now struck the Swedes. Even those who had routinely brand critics of
immigration and multiculturalism racist, were shaken to the core. Questions
flooded the social media: Who are these people that are let into Sweden? How
many of them are not innocent victims of war, but in fact war criminals and
other criminals, hiding among the refugees? And should we pay billions in taxes
to support and shelter citizens of other countries, while some of them try to
kill us?
The fact that the police refuse to deny the persistent rumor that one of the
IKEA victims was beheaded, only adds fuel to the fear.
So many questions and no answers. No one from the government has even bothered
to make a statement about the horrific double murder. None of the mainstream
media has confronted the government about the violent crimes committed by asylum
seekers against Swedes. On the contrary – the media have done the utmost to
convince Swedes that everything is safe and sound in Sweden. Better than ever,
in fact. The day after the double murder, Sweden's largest morning paper, Dagens
Nyheter, published an article titled, "After all, deadly violence on the
decline." The article begins:
"In recent weeks, several brutal murders have been committed, and many people
ask themselves where society is headed. The answer is that Sweden has, after
all, become a safer place. Deadly violence has been on the decline for some
time."
Nowhere does the article explain that the reason deadly violence has been on the
decline is that emergency medicine is now able to save the lives of a lot more
victims of knife- and gunshot-injuries. The so-called Laser Man, for example,
shot a number of immigrants in Sweden in the 1990s. Forensic pathologist Jovan
Rajs commented, "The Laser Man shot eleven people, and one of them died. In the
1930s eight or nine would have died, in the 1970s about five, and today probably
none."
Ergo, deadly violence remains on an even level thanks to better health care in
Sweden, but all other kinds of violent crime (including attempted homicide) has
gone off the charts. Violent crime is up 300% and rape is up 1,472% since 1975,
the year the Swedish Parliament decided to turn homogenous Sweden into a
multicultural country.
Ninety percent of asylum seekers to Sweden lack proper identification papers, so
in reality no one knows how many murderers, rapists and thugs hide among the
100,000 or so people granted asylum in Sweden every year.
Frustrated Swedes are now howling with powerlessness on social media. The normal
democratic order, where citizens can contact politicians or the media to make
their voices heard, has all but evaporated. Newspaper websites have removed the
reader comment fields, and the politicians hide behind a wall of officials, who
brand callers expressing concern "racist," and hang up. Thousands bear witness
to this on Facebook. One person who actually got to talk about her uneasiness is
Ewa, who writes on Facebook about calling Immigration Services:
"Well, I've unleashed the devil now. I called Immigration Services and demanded
to talk to a Unit Manager. ... I gave him an earful about every injustice I
could think of, like how badly we treat our elderly and how we take away their
homes and give them to asylum seekers. I also told him how unsafe Swedish women
feel due to all these gang rapes perpetrated by asylum seekers and other
foreigners. Also asked him if we all have to be beheaded before they stop taking
in these kinds of people. ... Now I'm sitting here, feeling completely empty
after crying, screaming, discussing, raging and getting all this frustration out
of me. Told him there are many of us who feel depressed because of what
Immigration is doing. He was really sorry I feel this way. Yes, I told him, a
lot of people feel this way but they are afraid to open their mouths because
then they are labeled racist. You don't even have to be a Sweden Democrat to see
that our country is falling apart more and more with each passing day. Something
you and all the rest at Immigration Services are responsible for. Where do I
apply for asylum, I asked, when the day comes and I can no longer live here? Our
country is ruined economically, socially and so forth and you are responsible.
He answered that it was the politicians who decided about this, but that they
would do everything in their power to make things better."
Another woman, Amanda, wrote on Facebook that she e-mailed Prime Minister Stefan
Löfven. She noted that "nothing may change, but at least I've made my voice
heard." Her e-mail read:
"Hi, why did the Prime Minister feel it was essential and urgent to go and talk
about the fire at the mosque in Eskilstuna, no one even knew what started it
when he held his speech? But now, he's as silent as the grave. Why? It's
his/your unconditional and lax immigration policies that have enabled this
culprit to move freely in society, despite having received a deportation order
not just once, but twice. Can you tell me if this is something the citizens of
this country should get used to, that immigrants, upon receiving deportation
orders, kill people in order to get a lifelong contract with the Swedish state?
It is your personal responsibility every time this happens, I hope you know
that. Because this is nothing if not a political issue regarding immigration,
and... its massive consequences to an entire nation."
The mosque fire in Eskilstuna that Amanda referred to happened December 25,
2014, and is one of many incidents affecting Muslims and other immigrants that
have received huge attention, while the rape epidemic in Sweden is basically
ignored. After the fire, the Prime Minister was quick to make a statement:
"It is despicable, a despicable act. We will never tolerate this type of crime.
People who want to practice their religion should have the right to do so. Today
I feel great sympathy and empathy for those affected."
Three months later, it turned out no crime was behind the mosque fire, and
police dropped the investigation. Most likely, it was caused by an accident or
children playing with fire.
But when a Swedish woman and her son are brutally knifed to death in the most
Swedish of all places – an IKEA store – the Prime Minister has nothing to say.
The Swedes are not prone to rebellion. To find a citizen that took up arms and
marched on the citadels of power, one has to go back to the days of Gustav Vasa
– the king who during his reign, 1523-1560, founded the nation-state of Sweden.
Although Sweden today is not occupied territory, it is governed by a power that
has shut down the democratic process by the "December Agreement" of 2014. In the
general election that year, the only party critical of mass immigration, the
Sweden Democrats (SD), became the third-largest party in Parliament. The
left-wing and center-right blocs then agreed to lock SD out of political power,
but SD refused to be silenced. When the left-wing minority government budget was
presented one month after the election, SD voted for the opposition's budget – a
shocking and unique occurrence in the Swedish Parliament. Here, it is considered
"good manners and decorum" to vote for your own budget proposition first, then
lay down your vote and let the government win. But after the Sweden Democrats'
"coup," Prime Minister Stefan Löfven (of the Social Democratic Party) was forced
to govern with a center-right budget during his first year in office.
One would think that this came as a pleasant surprise to the center-right
opposition, but that was not what happened. No one wants support from the
"racist" Sweden Democrats. Rather than call a snap election, the two blocs
entered into an agreement in which the center-right opposition promises to
abstain from voting when it comes to important issues such as a proposed budget.
Thus, the December Agreement is in reality a kind of "relay-race" dictatorship:
The left-wing government gets to do what it wants for the next four years, and
after that, for next the four years (if there is a change of power), it will be
the center-right government's turn. This means both parties are free to ignore
the 58% of Swedes who now feel that immigration is too high, and may choose to
vote for the Sweden Democrats in the next election.
When the Swedes got the news about the December Agreement, they did what they
usually do – clenched their fists in their pockets, formed Facebook groups and
wrote angry comments on Twitter and Facebook. But the politicians congratulated
each other on once again restoring order; they ignored the people's concern that
democracy had now become even more eroded.
A well-known stand-up comedian, Magnus Betnér, thought it a good idea to mock
frightened Swedes in a YouTube clip:
"Yes, it's really tragic two people were murdered in IKEA. ... but... it's not
dangerous; Sweden has never been safer than it is now. ... Very few of you guys
watching this clip will be murdered. And those of you who are, will be murdered
in your own homes."
When the establishment refuses to take people's concerns seriously, rumors on
social media spread fast. A stubborn rumor claims that Carola Herlin was
beheaded by the Eritrean murderer. According to sources interviewed by Gatestone,
the woman had her throat slit and was also stabbed in the abdomen. Her son tried
to defend himself, but received a deadly stab wound to the stomach.
When Dispatch International called Per Ågren, the police investigator in charge
of the case, and asked him about the rumor, he said: "I'm not going to
confirm... describe anything at all about what happened, except to say that two
people were murdered. You won't find out how from me."
One of the first measures taken by the police after the IKEA murders was to
start guarding all the buildings housing asylum seekers in the county. There was
some apprehension concerning "dark forces," the police claimed, without
specifying who these "dark forces" were. The night of August 15, an asylum house
in Arboga had to be evacuated after someone shouted something about a bomb
outside. Now the mainstream media were really on their toes: Carola and Emil
Herlin, according to their reports, had been "at the wrong place at the wrong
time."
The newspaper Aftonbladet interviewed an anonymous woman who said, "My cousin
has lived here for over a year. He told me the Swedes are the nicest people in
Europe. Then something like this happens. I could never have imagined."
Once again, it is supposedly the Swedes who should bow their heads in shame.
Supposedly, we are not the ones grieving; we do not have the right to be
frightened to death over the immigration policy of our rulers – it is the asylum
seekers who are the victims, even when they kill, rape, rob and abuse.
The burning question is: What will the people do, whom no one will listen to? In
East Germany of 1989, the people took to the streets, scaled the Berlin wall and
made the government to resign. The other communist dictatorships of Eastern
Europe fell in similar ways. The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (the
right to bear arms), exists to ensure that the citizens are able to seize power
from a tyrannical government.
If powerlessness drives people to answer violence with violence, maybe one
should not ask why Swedes are "racists" if they do not want the highest
immigration level in Europe?
The most relevant question is why one government after another has chosen to
spend Swedish taxpayers' money on citizens of other countries. While Swedish
students take a plunge in the PISA tests, 60% of the welfare benefits go to
immigrants who make up about 15% of the population. Healthcare and other social
services are deteriorating, according to many Swedes, while violence is
exponentially increasing. When more and more Swedes feel that they are being
badly treated in their own country, the politicians have created a powder keg
ready to explode at any minute.
The truth is that even the docile Swedish people have a limit. When those in
power expose us to bloodbaths, whether in the Big Square of Stockholm in 1520 or
at IKEA in Västerås in 2015, there will always be those who are ready to
overthrow the mighty. Just as in Gustav Vasa's day, a lot of Swedes have
firearms. They are not as easy to come by as in the United States, but more and
more Swedes are getting hunting licenses, and are thereafter legally able to buy
guns. From now on in Sweden, anything can happen.
Ingrid Carlqvist is editor-in-chief of Dispatch International.