LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
August 10/15
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletins05/english.august10.15.htm
Bible Quotation For Today/
You hypocrites! You know how to interpret the appearance of earth and sky, but
why do you not know how to interpret the present time
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke 12,54-59/: "Jesus also said
to the crowds, ‘When you see a cloud rising in the west, you immediately say,
"It is going to rain"; and so it happens. And when you see the south wind
blowing, you say, "There will be scorching heat"; and it happens. You
hypocrites! You know how to interpret the appearance of earth and sky, but why
do you not know how to interpret the present time? ‘And why do you not judge for
yourselves what is right? Thus, when you go with your accuser before a
magistrate, on the way make an effort to settle the case, or you may be dragged
before the judge, and the judge hand you over to the officer, and the officer
throw you in prison.I tell you, you will never get out until you have paid the
very last penny."
Bible Quotation For Today/"Do
not be afraid, Paul; you must stand before the emperor; and indeed, God has
granted safety to all those who are sailing with you.
Acts of the Apostles 27,1-4.8a.14-15.18-21a.22-26./: "When it was decided that
we were to sail for Italy, they transferred Paul and some other prisoners to a
centurion of the Augustan Cohort, named Julius. Embarking on a ship of
Adramyttium that was about to set sail to the ports along the coast of Asia, we
put to sea, accompanied by Aristarchus, a Macedonian from Thessalonica. The next
day we put in at Sidon; and Julius treated Paul kindly, and allowed him to go to
his friends to be cared for. Putting out to sea from there, we sailed under the
lee of Cyprus, because the winds were against us. Sailing past it with
difficulty, we came to a place called Fair Havens, near the city of Lasea. But
soon a violent wind, called the northeaster, rushed down from Crete. Since the
ship was caught and could not be turned with its head to the wind, we gave way
to it and were driven. We were being pounded by the storm so violently that on
the next day they began to throw the cargo overboard, and on the third day with
their own hands they threw the ship’s tackle overboard.
When neither sun nor stars appeared for many days, and no small tempest raged,
all hope of our being saved was at last abandoned. Since they had been without
food for a long time, Paul then stood up among them and said, ‘Men, you should
have listened to me and not have set sail from Crete and thereby avoided this
damage and loss. I urge you now to keep up your courage, for there will be no
loss of life among you, but only of the ship. For last night there stood by me
an angel of the God to whom I belong and whom I worship,
and he said, "Do not be afraid, Paul; you must stand before the emperor; and
indeed, God has granted safety to all those who are sailing with you." So keep
up your courage, men, for I have faith in God that it will be exactly as I have
been told. But we will have to run aground on some island.’"
LCCC
Latest analysis, editorials from miscellaneous sources published on
August 09-10/15
Report: Iran furious at Hamas' warming ties with Saudis, cancels
delegation's visit to Tehran/JPOST.COM STAFF/August
09/15
Column One: Obama’s enemies list/By CAROLINE B. GLICK/J.Post/August
09/15
Russia and US woo Saudis to help save Assad - albeit putting Israel and Jordan
in danger from S. Syria/DEBKAfile/August
09/15
Will top Democrat's opposition tip the balance against Iran deal?/Associated
Press/Ynetnews/August
09/15
The world should prepare for the worst in the fight against ISIS/Salman Aldosary/Asharq
Al Awsat/August
09/15
Whatever is the matter with Egypt?/Hisham Melhem/Al Arabiya/August
09/15
Gulf states and Iran’s diplomacy of ‘openness’/Raghida Dergham/Al Arabiya/August
09/15
By Anugrah Kumar , Christian Post Contributor/GP World/August
09/15
Iranian Gas Sale to Europe behind Russia’s Abandonment of Assad/Camal Richa/
August 09/15
LCCC Bulletin titles for the
Lebanese Related News published on
August 09-10/15
Al-Rahi: We Reject Protection from Anyone Other than State, Army
Jumblat: Metn and Chouf Areas Need to Know where to Dispose of Wastes
Security forces arrest Lebanese-Swedish 'Hezbollah spy' at Ben-Gurion Airport
Israel charges Swede with spying for Hezbollah
Young Man Gone Missing Says Was Tortured and Robbed
Italian Killed, Another Injured in Jbeil Climbing Accident
Speaker of Paraguay in Beirut
LCCC Bulletin Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
August 09-10/15
Iran ex-president’s son begins 10-year jail term
Prominent Egyptian Islamist dies in Cairo prison
Israel arrests suspects in West Bank arson probe
Bomb Kills Two Police in Egypt's Sinai
Lavrov Slams 'Unfounded Claims' of Syria Chemical Weapons
Taliban Bombing Kills at Least 21 in Northern Afghanistan
Iraq PM Calls for Sweeping Reforms in Response to Protests
Egypt rejects Qatari mediation to reconcile with Brotherhood
Nearly 400 PKK rebels killed in two weeks of Turkish strikes
In letter to Obama, top scientists praise Iran deal
One killed after Kurdish rebels fire at Turkish police
U.S. Department of State/Iran: Death Sentence of Mohammad Ali Taheri
Exclusive: Hebrew University chemistry professor accepts academic invitation
from Tehran
Links From Jihad Watch Web site For Today
Canada PM proposes travel ban to “places that are ground zero for terrorist
activity”
Hundreds of Syrian Christian families flee town as Islamic State jihadis near
Islamic State kills 300 civil servants for promoting “ideas that distorted
Islam”
“There are areas where Swedish law no longer applies”
UK allows jihadi preacher to stay in country despite “extremist” views
Hamas-linked CAIR protests federal program to combat “extremism”
UK racing against time to head off Islamic State plot against Queen
When A Man
Bites A Dog
Steve Emerson on “Obama vs. US Victims of Palestinian Terror?” — on The Glazov
Gang
Former DIA director: Obama White House made “willful decision” to support
al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood in Syria
Al-Rahi: We Reject Protection from Anyone Other than State,
Army
Maronite Patriarch Beshara al-Rahi stressed Sunday that only the state and its
institutions can protect the Lebanese. “We reject to receive protection from
anyone and only the state, the presidency, the institutions, the army and the
security forces can protect us,” al-Rahi said during a visit to Rashaya's mufti
Sheikh Ahmed al-Ladan. The visit was part of the patriarch's tour of the Bekaa
region which he started on Friday. Al-Rahi has repeatedly called for the
election of a new president. The presidency, the country's top Christian post,
has been vacant since the term of Michel Suleiman ended on May 25, 2014.
Political disputes and electoral rivalry have prevented lawmakers from electing
a successor. The presidential vacuum has started to cripple the work of the
government and the parliament in recent months.
Jumblat: Metn and Chouf Areas Need to Know where to Dispose
of Wastes
Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat stressed on Sunday that the
Minister of Environment is not to blame for the waste management crisis and that
those who put the letter of conditions are accountable. “The areas of Metn, Aley
and Chouf need to know where they should throw the trash. Those who put the
letter of conditions are to blame. It is not the fault of the Environment
Minister,” said Jumblat in statement addressing people of Shahhar. A
waste-management crisis erupted when the Naameh landfill, which since 1997 had
been receiving the trash of Beirut and Mount Lebanon, was closed on July 17.
Following its closure, waste began to pile up on the streets despite a temporary
solution to collect it. “Any company that meets the conditions of the waste
management bids needs no less than 16 months to start removing the waste from
the streets of Beirut,” added Jumblat. On Friday, three private companies
submitted bids to manage Beirut's waste without declaring a disposing ground as
a substitute for Naameh. Despite the good signals that a solution to the trash
crisis may be looming, but the lack of finding a disposing ground poses a major
risk and heralds a long way ahead for a radical solution, as municipalities dump
wastes in populated areas, valleys and forests.
Security forces arrest Lebanese-Swedish 'Hezbollah spy' at
Ben-Gurion Airport
YAAKOV LAPPIN/J.Post/08/09/2015/Security forces arrested a Swedish-Lebanese
suspect at Ben-Gurion Airport on July 21, on suspicion of landing in Israel to
gather intelligence on sensitive targets on behalf of Hezbollah, the Shin Bet
domestic intelligence agency announced on Sunday. The suspect, Hassan Khalil
Hizran, 55, was taken into custody after the Shin Bet received prior
intelligence about him, suggesting that he has ties to Hezbollah. "During
questioning by the Shin Bet, Hizran confessed," the agency said, adding that the
suspect provided an account of how he was recruited by the Hezbollah and
subsequent cooperation with the Lebanese Shi'ite terrorist organization. In
2009, according to Hizran's testimony, he traveled with his wife and children to
Lebanon, during which time, he received an offer to meet with Hezbollah
operatives, and Hizran agreed, the Shin Bet said. During secret meetings with
Hezbollah members, Hizran was told that the Lebanese terrorist organization is
seeking to recruit Palestinians living in Europe who hold foreign passports, and
send them to Israel to gather intelligence for Hezbollah. In 2011 and 2013, he
traveled to Lebanon again, meeting each time with Hezbollah, according to the
Shin Bet. During these visits, Hizran allegedly began receiving missions, which
included recruiting Israeli citizens, particularly those with ties to Jews or to
Israeli military personnel, or with links to Israeli government officials.
"Additionally, he was asked to gather information on locations in Israel where
there are concentrations of military forces, weapons, tanks, and military
bases," the Shin Bet added. Hizran also received orders to investigate how
Israeli security at Ben-Gurion Airport operates, including the reception of
passengers, security arrangements, and passport control procedures. In 2009,
Hizran allegedly received $2,300 for his meetings with Hezbollah, and an
additional $800 in 2011. Hizran also passed on information to the Shin Bet about
an association in the Swedish city of Malmo, called the Lebanese House, whose
members are Shi'ites that carry out social and cultural work among their
communities. "They hold Hezbollah-related days, watch speeches by Hezbollah head
Hassan Nasrallah, and more," the Shin Bet said. Central District prosecutors
charged Hizran at the Central District Court with passing on information,
contact with a foreign agent, and forbidden actions with terrorist property.
Swedish authorities have been updated by Israel about the investigation. "Hizran's
activities prove the attractiveness for Hezbollah in activating foreign citizens
who have access to Lebanon and Israel, out of an assumption that they can travel
in Israel freely," the Shin Bet stated. Hizran's missions prove that Hezbollah
continues to be interested in Israeli civilians who can travel in Israel without
arousing suspicion, particularly those with access to classified information.
Hezbollah's orders to Hizran, to investigate security arrangements at Ben-Gurion
Airport, underline the Lebanese organization's desire to look for a breach that
will allow it to insert people into Israel without interruption or suspicions.
"The interest Hezbollah shows in military bases and military targets proves
again that Hezbollah is preparing for the next war with Israel and is marking
out these locations in its 'target bank,'" the Shin Bet said
Israel charges
Swede with spying for Hezbollah
Reuters/ Aug. 09, 2015/JERUSALEM: Israel charged a Swede of
Palestinian descent Sunday with spying for Hezbollah, saying the group had
tasked him with gathering information on Israeli military facilities that might
be attacked in a future war. The suspect, Khalil Hizran, was arrested on July 21
after flying into Tel Aviv, and confessed under interrogation to working for
Hezbollah, Israel's Shin Bet security service said after a gag order on the case
was lifted. According to a Shin Bet statement, Hizran planned to gather
information on military sites in Israel, a mission it deemed "proof that
Hezbollah is preparing for the next war with Israel and is marking out a 'target
bank'." Hizran's Israeli lawyer, Leah Tsemel, denied the charges. Speaking to
Reuters, she said Hizran had met with Hezbollah members during visits to
Lebanon, where he was born to Palestinian refugees and from which he had
emigrated to Sweden. "But he refused any request to harm Israel's security,"
Tsemel said. Hizran made a previous visit to Israel in 2009. Hezbollah fought
Israel to a standstill in the 2006 Lebanon war. Neither side appears eager to
come to blows again but tensions remain high. Israel worries that Hezbollah has
improved its rocket arsenal and other capabilities while helping Syrian
President Bashar Assad battle a four-year-old insurgency. Hizran was indicted on
three criminal counts. Officials at the Swedish embassy in Israel, and with
Hezbollah in Lebanon, could not immediately be reached for comment.
Young Man Gone
Missing Says Was Tortured and Robbed
Naharnet/August
09/15/A 25-year-old man who was believed to be missing overnight came back home
Sunday morning after claims that he was tortured and robbed by unknown
assailants, the National News Agency reported. Janah Chafiq Abdul Khaleq, from
Aley's Majdal Baana was believed to be missing when contact was lost with him at
night. Abdul Khaleq was on his way from the area of Hazmieh to Sawfar, NNA said.
His brother claimed that Janah was subject to torture and robbery, it added. The
Voice of Lebanon Radio (93.3) said that Abdul Khaleq has sent his brother a text
message claiming that unknown assailants plan to kidnap him for ransom.
Investigations were opened in the case.
Italian Killed, Another Injured in Jbeil Climbing Accident
Naharnet/August 09/15/An Italian young man was killed and another was injured
Sunday during a mountain climbing trip in the Jbeil area of Shwan-Ain Jrein,
Lebanon's National News Agency reported. It said one of them received a fatal
head injury and that efforts were still underway to evacuate the wounded friend
from the steep area that they fell into. Units from the Civil Defense, the
army's Navy Commando Regiment and the Lebanese Red Cross took part in the search
and rescue operation, NNA said. LBCI television said one of them slipped and the
other fell in a similar fashion when he tried to help his friend. The Italian
ambassador has headed to the area to explore the situation on the ground, LBCI
said.
Speaker of Paraguay in Beirut
Naharnet/August 09/15/Speaker of Paraguay arrived in Beirut at the head of a
parliamentary delegation at the official invitation from Speaker Nabih Berri,
the state-run National News Agency said on Sunday.Six members of parliament and
several members of the Lebanese community in Paraguay accompanied the Speaker.
The week-long visit will look at ways to strengthen relations and sign an
agreement of understanding between the two countries.
Iran ex-president’s son begins 10-year jail term
By AFP/Tehran, Iran/Sunday, 9 August 2015/The son of Iran’s former president
Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani began a 10-year prison term for financial and security
crimes on Sunday, insisting his conviction was politically motivated. Mehdi
Hashemi was in March handed prison sentences totalling 25 years after being
convicted on three charges in separate cases involving national security, fraud
and embezzlement. The 45-year-old was also ordered to pay undisclosed fines and
financial penalties, and was barred from holding public office. He lost an
appeal. The trial was held behind closed doors and details of the evidence and
specific crimes has not been released. He was sentenced to two terms of 10 years
in prison and one of five years, and in line with Iranian law will serve the
longest of the three sentences. Iranian media said he had arrived at Evin Prison
in Tehran where he read a statement to reporters demanding that recordings of
his trial be released. Hashemi said he saw “political purposes as the main
element” of the case against him. He said his conviction was “neither fair nor
legal” but he hoped “to protect and defend the integrity of my honourable and
oppressed father”. “I demand once again that state television broadcast my court
hearings fully,” he said. “I firmly believe that this measure will prevent
abuses by radicals from harming one of the important pillars of the Islamic
republic,” he added, in an apparent reference to the judiciary. Rafsanjani
served as Iran’s president from 1989 to 1997. The 80-year-old remains
influential in Iranian politics despite suffering setbacks in recent years. He
is now considered a moderate close to the reformist camp. Rafsanjani was barred
from standing in the 2013 presidential election but threw his support behind
moderate cleric Hassan Rouhani, who eventually won. Rafsanjani’s son was accused
of involvement in massive protests that followed Iran’s 2009 disputed
presidential election, won by hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. At the time,
Hashemi backed the so-called Green Movement led by reformist presidential
candidates Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi, who alleged massive voting
fraud. Threatened with arrest, Hashemi left for Britain. He returned home in
September 2012 but was later detained for questioning and held in custody for
three months before being released on bail. Hashemi had an earlier brush with
the judiciary in the 2000s when his name emerged in cases involving Norway’s
Statoil and French oil giant Total. The oil companies were suspected of having
paid bribes to secure access to Iranian hydrocarbon reserves, at a time when
Hashemi was a senior official in the oil industry.
Prominent Egyptian Islamist dies in Cairo prison
By AFP/Cairo/Sunday, 9 August 2015/A prominent leader of a hardline Islamist
group that backed ousted Egyptian president Mohamed Mursi has died in jail in
Cairo, the interior ministry said on Sunday. It said Essam Derbala, a senior
leader in Gamaa Islamiya, died on Saturday after returning from a hearing at his
trial. Gamaa Islamiya blamed the prison authorities for his death. Police had
arrested the 58-year-old in May on charges of inciting violence and joining a
pro-Mursi opposition alliance. A medical check-up showed Derbala had a fever,
low blood pressure and diabetes, the ministry statement said, adding that he had
a history of diabetes and also previously suffered strokes. "While being taken
to the hospital he started bleeding from the nose, and suffered low blood
pressure and breathlessness that led to his death," it said. Gamaa Islamiya
issued its own statement accusing the prison authorities of "deliberately
killing Derbala by depriving him of his medicine over the past few months". "We
hold the political and security apparatus responsible for his death," it said.
Derbala was also an opponent of ex-president Hosni Mubarak who was forced out in
2011. He was jailed for 25 years during Mubarak's rule for his alleged
involvement in violence in Upper Egypt when Mubarak's predecessor Anwar Sadat
was assassinated in 1981. Derbala was released from prison in 2006. Gamaa
Islamiya waged an armed insurgency in the 1990s and claimed responsibility for
killing 58 tourists and four Egyptian guards at the famed temple city of Luxor
in 1997. It later renounced violence but became a strong supporter of Mursi
during the Islamist leader's sole year in office. Egypt's first freely elected
president was ousted by then army chief and now President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi
in July 2013 after mass street protests. A number of Islamists have died in
prison in recent months, including professor of medicine Tareq al-Ghandour in
November 2014 and ex-parliamentarian and senior Muslim Brotherhood member Farid
Ismail in May. A crackdown targeting Mursi's supporters has left hundreds of
people dead, thousands jailed and hundreds more sentenced to death after speedy
trials.
Israel arrests suspects in West Bank arson probe
By AFP /Occupied Jerusalem/Sunday, 9 August 2015
Israel arrested several suspects on Sunday in raids linked to the firebombing of
a Palestinian home in the West Bank that killed an 18-month-old child and his
father, police said. The suspects were arrested in wildcat Jewish settlement
outposts in the occupied West Bank as part of "the investigation into the events
that occurred in Duma," the Palestinian village where the July 31 arson attack
took place, police said in a statement. It did not give the number of arrests.
Israel has pledged to crack down on Jewish extremists in the wake of the
firebombing as well as a July 30 stabbing attack at a Jerusalem Gay Pride march
that killed a 16-year-old girl and wounded five other people. The father in the
firebombing died of his wounds on Saturday and relatives at his funeral accused
Israeli authorities of failing to address violence by hardline settlers. The
attack also critically wounded the toddler's mother and four-year-old brother.
Bomb Kills Two
Police in Egypt's Sinai
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 09/15/A roadside bomb killed an Egyptian
police captain and a conscript Sunday in North Sinai, where security forces are
fighting an Islamist insurgency, the interior ministry said. North Sinai is a
bastion of the Egyptian affiliate of the jihadist Islamic State group which is
spearheading an insurgency that has swelled since the army's ouster of president
Mohamed Morsi in July 2013. Sunday's attack occurred in North Sinai's provincial
capital El-Arish, the ministry said in a statement. The two policemen were
killed when the blast struck their passing armoured vehicle. Three others were
wounded in the explosion, which was activated by remote control, police said. In
the previous 24 hours the army had detonated nine explosives found on a road
frequently used by troops in North Sinai, police said. Formerly known as Ansar
Beit al-Maqdis, the key jihadist group in the region changed its name to "Sinai
Province" when it pledged allegiance to IS in November. On July 1, the group
staged a series of attacks on security forces in the North Sinai town of Sheikh
Zuweid that the military said killed 21 soldiers. The jihadists say their
attacks are in response to a crackdown by the authorities after Morsi's ouster
which has seen at least 1,400 people killed and thousands jailed.
Lavrov Slams 'Unfounded Claims' of Syria Chemical Weapons
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 09/15/Russian Foreign Minister Sergei
Lavrov on Sunday warned against what he called unfounded claims that Syria has
chemical weapons, as the United Nations Security Council investigates deadly
chlorine gas attacks. His comments came after Russia on Friday backed the
setting up of a UN Security Council panel to identify who is behind the chlorine
attacks, which the West blames on the Damascus regime. Lavrov said the operation
to remove chemical weapons from Syria was successful, and that all claims to the
contrary should be checked. "This problem was successfully resolved," he said of
Syria's chemical weapons stocks in a statement. Syria in 2013 had agreed to turn
over its chemical arsenal and disable production sites after the United States
threatened military action over a sarin attack outside Damascus. A total of
1,300 metric tonnes of chemical weapons have been removed from Syria, with the
majority being destroyed aboard the U.S. Navy ship MV Cape Ray. "Sometimes
publications come out that there could be undeclared chemical weapons in Syria.
This is all being checked, here we must avoid unfounded accusations," Lavrov
said Sunday. "We have every basis to consider that Syria will continue
cooperating closely." The United States, Britain and France have repeatedly
accused President Bashar al-Assad's forces of carrying out chlorine gas attacks
with barrel bombs dropped from helicopters. Russia maintains there is no solid
proof that Damascus is behind the attacks. Russia's top diplomat reiterated
Russia's backing for embattled Assad, arguing that the U.S.-led coalition should
overcome its "persistent rejection" of cooperation with the Assad regime in the
fight with the Islamic State (IS) group. "We still think this objective is
achievable," he said. Lavrov on Tuesday is set to meet his Saudi counterpart
Adel al-Jubeir in Moscow to discuss the situation in Syria and Yemen and ways to
combat IS. Lavrov stressed that international powers should unite against IS,
calling it a "common enemy."He referred to a map drawn up by IS showing its plan
to control the sites of Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia which are sacred to
Muslims. "Members of this terrorist organisation have promised to blow up Muslim
sacred sites because they consider them to be a reflection of 'incorrect' Islam.
This is a terrible organisation," he said.
Taliban Bombing Kills at Least 21 in Northern Afghanistan
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 09/15/A Taliban attack killed at least 21
people in northern Afghanistan, officials said Sunday, after a wave of lethal
bombings in the capital as the insurgency escalates following a bitter power
transition. The Afghan interior ministry said all those killed Saturday evening
in the Khanabad district of Kunduz province were civilians, although local
officials called them anti-Taliban militiamen. The Taliban claimed
responsibility for the attack, which comes after a barrage of bombings in Kabul
killed at least 51 people on Friday, the deadliest day for the capital in years.
"The incident took place (when) a suicide bomber detonated his suicide vest in
Khanabad district," the interior ministry said, strongly condemning the "heinous
act". "The suicide attack... resulted in martyrdom of 21 civilians and wounding
of 10 others." But Abdul Wadood Wahidi, spokesman for the governor of Kunduz,
said 22 militiamen -- including four of their commanders -- were killed by an
improvised explosive device. Kunduz is a volatile province where the Taliban
recently came close to overrunning Kunduz city, in the most alarming threat to
any provincial capital since the 2001 US-led invasion of Afghanistan. The
insurgency has been rapidly spreading across the north from its traditional
southern and eastern strongholds, with Afghan forces increasingly battling the
militants on their own. US-led NATO forces ended their combat mission in
Afghanistan in December last year, although a 13,000-strong residual force
remains for training and counter-terrorism operations. The bombings on Friday in
Kabul struck near an army complex, a police academy and a US special forces
base, killing at least 51 people, officials said. They were the first major
attacks since Mullah Akhtar Mansour was named as the new Taliban chief last week
in an acrimonious power transition after the insurgents confirmed the death of
longtime leader Mullah Omar. The wave of violence has underscored Afghanistan's
volatile security situation amid a faltering peace process and the potency of
the Taliban insurgency, despite it being riven by growing internal
divisions.Experts say the growing number of attacks demonstrates Mullah
Mansour's attempt to boost his image among Taliban cadres and drive attention
away from internal rifts over his leadership. Sayed Sarwar Hussaini, a police
spokesman in Kunduz, also identified the victims of Saturday's bombing as armed
militiamen. With Afghan forces suffering record casualties as foreign troops
pull back, Kabul is increasingly relying on informal militias as a bulwark
against the insurgents -- a gambit observers say is akin to fighting fire with
fire. The mobilisation of militias represents a complete departure from previous
government efforts to disarm these groups, blamed for devastating Afghanistan
during the civil war in the 1990s and setting the stage for a Taliban takeover.
It also lays bare the shortcomings of the multi-billion dollar US-led effort to
develop self-reliant Afghan forces, suffering large daily casualties and
struggling to rein in an ascendant insurgency on their own as the war expands on
multiple fronts.
Iraq PM Calls for Sweeping Reforms in Response to Protests
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 09/15/Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi
called Sunday for sweeping reforms, including abolishing the current post of his
predecessor Nuri al-Maliki, in response to weeks of demonstrations against
corruption and poor services. The proposed reforms, at least some of which
require the approval of the cabinet and parliament, followed a call for tough
measures by Iraq's top Shiite cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani. But even
with popular pressure and Sistani's backing, the entrenched nature of corruption
in Iraq and the fact that parties across the political spectrum benefit from it
will make any efforts to change the system extremely difficult. One of the most
drastic of the proposals outlined in an online statement was the call for
elimination of the posts of vice president and deputy prime minister
"immediately". Maliki, who preceded Abadi as premier, is currently one of the
vice presidents. Scrapping his job would apparently require the constitution to
be amended, meaning that rapid action is unlikely. Maliki, who belongs to the
same party as Abadi and still wields significant influence, said Saturday
evening -- before Abadi outlined his plan publicly -- that he supported the
reform drive. Abadi also called for a major overhaul of the way senior officials
are selected, saying that all "party and sectarian quotas" should be abolished,
and the candidates chosen by a committee appointed by the premier. He also said
there should be a "comprehensive and immediate reduction" in the number of
guards for all officials. This has long been a problem, with some officials
having massive personal protection units, and others hiring less than the
allotted number and pocketing the remainder of the allowance. Abadi also said
that "special provisions" for senior officials, both current and retired, should
be ended. He did not specify what these were, but large salaries,
government-provided vehicles and extremely generous retirement benefits have all
long been bones of contention between the authorities and average Iraqis. And
old and current graft cases should be reopened under the supervision of a high
commission for fighting corruption, he said. Baghdad and other cities have seen
weeks of protests against the poor quality of services, especially power outages
that leave Iraqis with only a few hours of government-supplied electricity per
day as temperatures top 50 degrees Celsius (120 degrees Fahrenheit).The
demonstrators have blamed the services crisis on corruption and incompetence
across the political class. Sistani, who is revered by millions of Iraqis,
called Friday for Abadi to take "drastic measures" against corruption, saying
that the "minor steps" he had announced previously were not enough.
Egypt rejects Qatari mediation to reconcile with
Brotherhood
By Ashraf Abd al-Hameed | Al Arabiya.net/Sunday, 9 August 2015/Egypt has
rejected Qatari mediation to reconcile with the Muslim Brotherhood and
considered statements of the Qatari foreign minister on the matter as an
“unacceptable interference in Egyptian internal affairs.”In a recent interview,
Qatari Foreign Minister Khalid al-Attiyah said Doha does not regard the Muslim
Brotherhood as a "terrorist organization" as the Egyptian authorities do,
adding: "All of the parties in Egypt need to meet half-way," he said. "All we
hope for is that all of the Egyptians unite.”Attiyah also expressed Doha’s
willingness to mediate between the Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian
government, if the government wishes. Egypt's foreign ministry spokesperson
Ahmed Abu Zeid slammed Attiyah’s statements and voiced Egypt’s rejection of
“foreign interferences in its internal affairs” and said Attiyah’s statements
are unacceptable as they undermine the provisions of the Egyptian judiciary and
the decisions of the Egyptian government. Abu Zeid said the Qatari official’s
statements also undermine the Egyptian people’s endorsement of the Brotherhood
as “a terrorist organization,” adding it’s not possible to negotiate or accept
foreign mediation for dialogue with the Brotherhood. Attiyah also said Cairo is
willing to play the role of the mediator between the Egyptian regime and the
Muslim Brotherhood.
Nearly 400 PKK rebels killed in two weeks of Turkish
strikes
AFP, Ankara/Sunday, 9 August 2015/Nearly 400 members of the outlawed Kurdistan
Workers Party (PKK) have been killed and hundreds injured in two weeks of
Turkish airstrikes on positions in northern Iraq, the official Anatolia news
agency reported on Sunday.
The report, which could not be independently verified, said at least four PKK
leaders and 30 female rebel fighters were among the dead. Anatolia generally
bases its information on security and Turkish intelligence sources. Turkey last
month launched a two-pronged "anti-terror" offensive against ISIS jihadists in
Syria and PKK militants after a wave of attacks inside the country. But so far
the Kurdish rebels have borne the brunt of dozens of airstrikes, while just
three have been officially recognized as targeting ISIS.
"So far 390 terrorists have been rendered incapable of causing harm and another
400 have been injured, with 150 suffering serious injuries," Anatolia said.
The PKK has meanwhile kept up its attacks on the Turkish state, killing at least
20 members of the security forces since the start of the latest cycle of
violence that has shattered a ceasefire declared in 2013. In the latest
incident, a policeman was killed and another injured in an attack believed to
have been carried out by the PKK in Midyat, a town in predominantly Kurdish
southeast Turkey, according to the Dogan agency. The PKK's insurgency for
greater rights and powers for Turkey's Kurdish minority began more than 30 years
ago and has left tens of thousands dead.
In letter to Obama, top scientists praise Iran deal
By AFP /Washington/Sunday, 9 August 2015/More than two dozen top U.S.
scientists, among them nuclear researchers and Nobel prize winners, in a letter
to President Barack Obama on Saturday praised the Iran nuclear deal as major
security achievement, The New York Times reported. The two-page letter, from
some of the world's most knowledgeable nuclear experts, could prove to be a shot
in the arm for Obama, who has launched a major effort to sell the deals to
skeptical members of the U.S. Congress.
The letter tells the U.S. president that the Iran deal "will advance the cause
of peace and security in the Middle East and can serve as a guidepost for future
nonproliferation agreements." The Iran accord, the scientists said, has "more
stringent constraints than any previously negotiated nonproliferation
framework." There were 29 signatories of the letter in all, some of whom are
physicists who have held top level military security clearances. Others have
advised Congress, the White House or federal agencies, on military security.
Among those who signed the letter are Leon Cooper of Brown University; Sheldon
Glashow of Boston University; David Gross of the University of California, Santa
Barbara; Burton Richter of Stanford; and Frank Wilczek of the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology -- all Nobel laureates. The so-called P5+1 -- Britain,
France, Germany, Russia, China and the United States -- signed an agreement last
month with Iran aimed at ensuring Tehran does not acquire a nuclear bomb, in
return for relief from crippling sanctions.
As part of the deal, the International Atomic Energy Agency will have to verify
that Iran does indeed scale down its facilities, clearing a path towards ending
U.N., U.S. and EU sanctions.The White House has mounted an intense lobbying
campaign to convince reluctant members of the Republican-controlled Congress to
back the deal.
One killed after Kurdish rebels fire at Turkish police
AP, Ankara/Sunday, 9 August 2015/Officials say Kurdish rebels have fired at a
police vehicle in southern Turkey, killing a policeman and wounding another, in
the latest attack against Turkish security forces. The governor’s office for
Mardin province said militants of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or PKK, opened
fire late Saturday at the officers who were on patrol duty. Militants also fired
rockets at a military outpost in the southeastern Mus province. There were no
casualties. Violence in Turkey has flared in recent weeks, shattering an already
fragile peace process between the PKK and the government. The rebels launch
almost daily attacks at the Turkish security forces while Turkish jets have
raided suspected PKK bases in northern Iraq. The state-run Anadolu Agency claims
that more than 260 PKK militants have been killed in the airstrikes.
U.S. Department of State/Iran: Death Sentence of Mohammad Ali Taheri
Mark C. Toner
Deputy Department Spokesperson
Washington, DC
August 7, 2015
We are deeply concerned by reports that a Revolutionary Court in Iran
has sentenced to death Mohammad Ali Taheri, the Iranian founder of a
spiritual movement, on the charge of “corruption on earth.” We also are
disturbed that a number of the movement’s followers reportedly have been
sentenced to prison terms for similarly vague so-called crimes. The
ability of citizens to exercise their rights of freedom of religion and
expression are fundamental principles of universally-recognized human
rights enshrined in international law.It is our understanding that
Taheri, who has been held in Evin Prison in solitary confinement since
his October 2011 conviction on charges of “insulting Islamic
sanctities,” received this sentence in response to his peaceful exercise
of his rights to freedom of religion and freedom of expression. To
sentence a citizen to death for exercising these freedoms represents an
extreme violation of his rights. We call on the Iranian Government to
rescind Taheri’s death sentence and accord him full due process and to
uphold freedom of expression and belief for its citizens [This is a
mobile copy of
Iran: Death Sentence of Mohammad Ali Taheri]
Short URL:
http://m.state.gov/md245826.htm
Exclusive: Hebrew University chemistry professor accepts academic invitation
from Tehran
JUDY SIEGEL-ITZKOVICH/J.Post/08/09/2015/Although hostility between Israel and
Iran -- over the US-Iranian nuclear control agreement -- has never been worse,
an Israeli academic has received a warm invitation. Hebrew University of
Jerusalem Chemistry Prof. Renata Reisfeld has been invited to become a member of
the editorial board of the Tehran-based International Journal of Environment,
Energy and Waste.
Reisfeld happily accepted the offer. Reisfeld, the Enrique Berman Professor of
Solar Energy at HU’s Institute of Chemistry, told The Jerusalem Post that Maryam
Pazoki, assistant professor at the Faculty of Environment at the University of
Tehran, sent her the official invitation. “The Iran Solid Waste Association (ISWA)
is eager to promote academic, practical and simultaneous interdisciplinary
research regarding technical, social, and cultural aspects of environment,
energy, and waste.” Therefore, “it has decided to set up a peer-reviewed,
open-access International Journal of Environment, Energy and Waste (www.ijeew.com)
available both in printed and electronic versions. On behalf of Prof. Omid
Bozorg Haddad (the chief editor of the journal), I would like to invite you to
join our elite group of managing editors and editorial board. It is my honor to
have your name and support for participating in selection of editors
occasionally. I am sure that with your support, we can make our ambitious goal a
reality,” the Iranian academic wrote
Report: Iran furious at Hamas' warming ties with Saudis,
cancels delegation's visit to Tehran
JPOST.COM STAFF/08/09/2015/Iran has canceled a scheduled visit by a Hamas
delegation to the Islamic Republic in response to Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal's
visit to Tehran's rival Saudi Arabia last month, the Huffington Post's Arabic
edition quoted informed sources as saying Saturday. According to the sources, a
senior official in the Iranian Revolutionary Guards met with Hamas
representatives in an undisclosed Arab capital to condemn Mashaal's visit to
Riyadh, saying that the trip was made against Iran's wishes. The Iranian
official expressed deep anger at the visit, according to the report, and
wondered why Mashaal had immediately accepted the Saudi invitation while he had
refrained from visiting Tehran for more than four years, despite an open
invitation from the Iranian leadership.
Hamas representatives explained that the visit was not intended to be "against
Iran," but rather it came as part of the group's openness to all nations and
Saudi Arabia's important impact on the Arab and Islamic world, as well as its
international influence. The Iranian official said that the Saudis were
attempting to bring Hamas into their orbit in the aftermath of the Iran nuclear
deal, as part of its efforts to enlist support against Tehran. The official told
the Hamas representatives at the conclusion of the "stormy" meeting that the
Hamas delegation's expected visit to Iran was being canceled because the Iranian
leadership was furious at Mashaal's visit to Saudi Arabia. Following last
month's meeting between Mashaal and Saudi King Salmon, senior Hamas official
Salah Bardawl told Ma'an News Agency that there had been a breakthrough in
previously tense relations between the two sides. Relations between the two
sides were strained for many years, especially due to the failure of Saudi and
Arab efforts to end the Hamas-Fatah conflict. The Saudis are also believed to
have been upset with Hamas’s close ties with Iran.
"We sensed that there is a readiness in Saudi Arabia to support the Palestinian
cause," Bardawl explained, asserting that the Saudi's tremendous amount of
political capitol could offer "large support for the Palestinian cause on a
political, moral, and material level." At the time, some saw the possible
rapprochement between Hamas and Saudi Arabia as a sign that the Islamist
movement has decided to distance itself from Iran. Iran and Hamas have already
experienced strained relations in recent years, stemming from a difference of
loyalties in Syria's civil war, with the former - alongside its Lebanese proxy
Hezbollah - supporting the regime of President Bashar Assad and the latter
siding with rebels fighting to topple the government in Damascus. A Hamas
official said late last month, following Mashaal's visit to Saudi Arabia, that
aid from Iran to the Palestinian Islamic organization has ceased in large. In an
interview with the Arabic news network Al Jazeera, Mousa Abu Marzouk, the deputy
head of Hamas's political bureau said financial backing, including military
funding, has become stagnant. He added that aid from Iran was critical in
helping to organize "resistance operations," indicating actions against Israel.
"Assistance was halted and remains suspended," Abu Marzouk told Al Jazeera
without stating specifically when the cut occurred. "The lack of military aid
and aid for residents in the Gaza Strip is difficult to handle."Abu Marzouk
stated that Hamas was working to strengthen relations with the Islamic Republic,
"for the benefit of the Palestinian issue."
**Khaled Abu Toameh and Yasser Okbi contributed to this report.
Column One: Obama’s enemies list
By CAROLINE B. GLICK/J.Post/08/06/2015
In President Barack Obama’s defense of his nuclear deal with Iran Wednesday, he
said there are only two types of people who will oppose his deal – Republican
partisans and Israel- firsters – that is, traitors.
At American University, Obama castigated Republican lawmakers as the moral
equivalent of Iranian jihadists saying, “Those [Iranian] hard-liners chanting
‘Death to America’ who have been most opposed to the deal... are making common
cause with the Republican Caucus.”
He then turned his attention to Israel.
Obama explained that whether or not you believe the deal endangers Israel boils
down to whom you trust more – him or Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. And, he
explained, he can be trusted to protect Israel better than Netanyahu can because
“[I] have been a stalwart friend of Israel throughout my career.”
The truth is that it shouldn’t much matter to US lawmakers whether Obama or
Netanyahu has it right about Israel. Israel isn’t a party to the deal and isn’t
bound by it. If Israel decides it needs to act on its own, it will.
The US, on the other side, will be bound by the deal if Congress fails to kill
it next month.
So the real question lawmakers need to ask is whether the deal is good for
America. Is Obama right or wrong that only partisan zealots and disloyal
Zionists could oppose his great diplomatic achievement? To determine the answer
to that question, you need to do is ask another one. Does his deal make America
safer or less safe? The best way to answer that question is to consider all the
ways Iran threatens America today, and ask whether the agreement has no impact
on those threats, or whether it mitigates or aggravates them.
Today Iran is harming America directly in multiple ways.
The most graphic way Iran is harming America today is by holding four Americans
hostage. Iran’s decision not to release them over the course of negotiations
indicates that at a minimum, the deal hasn’t helped them.
It doesn’t take much consideration to recognize that the hostages in Iran are
much worse off today than they were before Obama concluded the deal on July 14.
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Column-One-Obamas-enemies-list-411390
The US had much more leverage to force the Iranians to release the hostages
before it signed the deal than it does now. Now, not only do the Iranians have
no reason to release the hostages, they have every reason to take more hostages.
Then there is Iranian-sponsored terrorism against the US.
In 2011, the FBI foiled an Iranian plot to murder the Saudi ambassador in
Washington and bomb the Saudi and Israeli embassies in the US capital.
One of the terrorists set to participate in the attack allegedly penetrated US
territory through the Mexican border.
The terrorist threat to the US emanating from Iran’s terrorist infrastructure in
Latin America will rise steeply as a consequence of the nuclear deal.
As The Wall Street Journal’s Mary Anastasia O’Grady wrote last month, the
sanctions relief the deal provides to Iran will enable it to massively expand
its already formidable operations in the US’s backyard. Over the past two
decades, Iran and Hezbollah have built up major presences in Cuba, Venezuela,
Nicaragua, Ecuador and Bolivia.
Iran’s presence in Latin America also constitutes a strategic threat to US
national security. Today Iran can use its bases of operations in Latin America
to launch an electromagnetic pulse attack on the US from a ballistic missile, a
satellite or even a merchant ship.
The US military is taking active steps to survive such an attack, which would
destroy the US’s power grid. Among other things, it is returning the North
American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) to its former home in Cheyenne
Mountain outside Colorado Springs.
But Obama has ignored the findings of the congressional EMP Commission and has
failed to harden the US electronic grid to protect it from such attacks.
The economic and human devastation that would be caused by the destruction of
the US electric grid is almost inconceivable. And now with the cash infusion
that will come Iran’s way from Obama’s nuclear deal, it will be free to expand
on its EMP capabilities in profound ways.
Through its naval aggression in the Strait of Hormuz Iran threatens the global
economy. While the US was negotiating the nuclear deal with Iran, the
Revolutionary Guards unlawfully interdicted – that is hijacked – the Marshall
Islands-flagged Maersk Tigris and held its crew hostage for weeks.
Iran’s assault on the Tigris came just days after the US-flagged Maersk
Kensington was surrounded and followed by Revolutionary Guards ships until it
fled the strait.
A rational take-home message the Iranians can draw from the nuclear deal is that
piracy pays.
Their naval aggression in the Strait of Hormuz was not met by American military
force, but by American strategic collapse at Vienna.
This is doubly true when America’s listless response to Iran’s plan to use its
Houthi proxy’s takeover of Yemen to control the Bab el-Mandab strait is taken
into consideration. With the Bab el-Mandab, Iran will control all maritime
traffic from the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea. Rather than confront this clear
and present danger to the global economy, America abandoned all its redlines in
the nuclear talks.
Then there is Iran’s partnership 20-year partnership with al-Qaida.
The 9/11 Commission found in its report that four of the 9/11 terrorists
transited Iran before traveling to the US. As former Defense Intelligence Agency
director Lt.-Gen. (ret.) Mike Flynn told Fox News in the spring, Iranian
cooperation with al-Qaida remains deep and strategic.
When the US Navy SEALs killed Osama bin Laden in 2011, they seized hard drives
containing more than a million documents related to al-Qaida operations. All but
a few dozen remain classified.
According to Flynn and other US intelligence officials who spoke to The Weekly
Standard, the documents expose Iran’s vast collaboration with al-Qaida.
The agreement Obama concluded with the mullahs gives a tailwind to Iran. Iran’s
empowerment will undoubtedly be used to expand its use of al-Qaida terrorists as
proxies in their joint war against the US.
Then there is Iran’s ballistic missile program.
The UN Security Council resolution passed two weeks ago cancels the UN-imposed
embargoes on conventional arms and ballistic missile acquisitions by Iran. Since
the nuclear deal facilities Iranian development of advanced nuclear technologies
that will enable the mullahs to build nuclear weapons freely when the deal
expires, the Security Council resolution means that by the time the deal
expires, Iran will have the nuclear warheads and the intercontinental ballistic
missiles required to carry out a nuclear attack on the US.
Obama said Wednesday that if Congress votes down his nuclear deal, “we will
lose... America’s credibility as a leader of diplomacy. America’s credibility,”
he explained, “is the anchor of the international system.”
Unfortunately, Obama got it backwards. It is the deal that destroys America’s
credibility and so upends the international system which has rested on that
credibility for the past 70 years.
The White House’s dangerous suppression of seized al-Qaida-Iran documents, like
its listless response to Iran’s maritime aggression, its indifference to Iran’s
massive presence in Latin America, its lackluster response to Iran’s terrorist
activities in Latin America, and its belittlement of the importance of the
regime’s stated goal to destroy America – not to mention its complete collapse
on all its previous redlines over the course of the negotiations – are all signs
of the disastrous toll the nuclear deal has already taken on America’s
credibility, and indeed on US national security.
To defend a policy that empowers Iran, the administration has no choice but to
serve as Iran’s agent. The deal destroys America’s credibility in fighting
terrorism. By legitimizing and enriching the most prolific state sponsor of
terrorism, the US has made a mockery of its claimed commitment to the fight.
The deal destroys the US’s credibility as an ally.
By serving as apologists for its worst enemy, the US has shown its allies that
they cannot trust American security guarantees. How can Israel or Saudi Arabia
trust America to defend them when it is endangering itself? The deal destroys 70
years of US nonproliferation efforts. By enabling Iran to become a nuclear
power, the US has made a mockery of the very notion of nonproliferation and
caused a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. The damage caused by the deal is
already being felt. For instance, Europe, Russia and China are already beating a
path to the ayatollahs’ doorstep to sign commercial and military deals with the
regime. But if Congress defeats the deal, it can mitigate the damage. By killing
the deal, Congress will demonstrate that the American people are not ready to go
down in defeat. They can show that the US remains committed to its own defense
and the rebuilding of its strategic credibility worldwide.
In his meeting with Jewish leaders Tuesday, Obama acknowledged that his claim –
repeated yet again Wednesday – that the only alternative to the deal is war, is
a lie. Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Greg Rosenbaum, chairman of the
National Democratic Jewish Council, which is allied with the White House, said
that Obama rejected the notion that war will break out if Congress rejects the
deal with veto-overriding majorities in both houses. According to Rosenbaum,
Obama claimed that if Congress rejects his nuclear deal, eventually the US will
have to carry out air strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities in order to
prevent them from enriching uranium to weapons-grade levels.
“But,” he quoted Obama as saying, “the result of such a strike won’t be war with
Iran.”
Rather, Obama said, Iran will respond to a US strike primarily by ratcheting up
its terrorist attacks against Israel. “I can assure,” Obama told the Jewish
leaders, “that Israel will bear the brunt of the asymmetrical responses that
Iran will have to a military strike on its nuclear facilities.”What is notable
here is that despite the fact that it will pay the heaviest price for a
congressional defeat of the Iran deal, Israel is united in its opposition to the
deal. This speaks volume about the gravity with which the Israeli public views
the threats the agreement unleashed. But again, Israel is not the only country
that is imperiled by the nuclear deal. And Israelis are not the only ones who
need to worry. Obama wishes to convince the public that the deal’s opponents are
either partisan extremists or traitors who care about Israel more than they care
about America. But neither claim is true. The main reason Americans should
oppose the deal is that it endangers America. And as a consequence, Americans
who oppose the deal are neither partisans nor turncoats.
They are patriots.
Russia and US woo Saudis to help save Assad - albeit
putting Israel and Jordan in danger from S. Syria
DEBKAfile Special Report August 9, 2015
Building on the nuclear accord signed in Vienna last month, the Obama
administration has been in close communion with Moscow and Tehran on regional
moves to save the Assad regime, as the key to their next regional policies,
including a united front against the Islamic State.. Saudi Arabia and its Gulf
partners are being assiduously wooed to join the new alignment being set up for
this purpose. The live wire in getting them all together is Omani Foreign
Minister Khalid bin Mohamed Al-Attiyah, the secret broker who brought Iran and
the United States to the negotiating table for a nuclear accord. This was first
reported in the last DEBKA Weekly. Wednesday, Aug. 7, Obama threw out his first
hint on this development: “The window has opened a crack for us to get a
political resolution in Syria, partly because both Russia and Iran, I think,
recognize that the trend lines are not good for Assad,” he said. “Neither of
those patrons are particularly sentimental; they don’t seem concerned about the
humanitarian disaster that’s been wrought by Assad and this conflict over the
last several years, but they are concerned about the potential collapse of the
Syrian state. And that means, I think, the prospect of more serious discussions
than we’ve had in the past.”
The US president then affirmed more strongly in a CNN interview Sunday, Aug. 9:
“Is there the possibility that having begun conversations around this narrow
issue [the nuclear accord with Iran] that you start getting some broader
discussions about Syria, for example, and the ability of all the parties
involved to try to arrive at a political transition that keeps the country
intact and does not further fuel the growth of ISIL and other terrorist
organizations? I think that's possible,” Obama said. “But I don't think it
happens immediately."
The administration and its prospective partners are united by the will to
destroy ISIS – in its Syrian stronghold, for starters - but are divided on much
else, DEBKA file reports. And so the process is moving forward in careful steps.
Their initial focus is on Syria, the bloody battleground which in less than five
years has left at least 300,000 dead and more than 10 million people homeless.
The plan the group started out with in the last ten days was a swap as simple as
it was ruthless: Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates would slow their
assistance to Syrian rebel groups, against whom President Bashar Assad’s army
and allies would hold their fire; Iran, for its part, was to start withdrawing
its support from the Yemeni Houthis insurgents.
The informal truce in Syria would be the stage for the Assad regime and rebel
groups to start discussing a new government with room for opposition parties.
The Islamists of the Islamic State and Al Qaeda’s Nusra Front would not be
invited.
In Yemen, Tehran would cut back on the arms and intelligence which have enabled
the Houthi insurgents to stand up to the combined forces of Saudi Arabia, the
UAE and Egypt. The pro-Western Yemeni President Abd Rabo Mansour Hadi would be
restored to his palace in Sanaa and invite the insurgent leader, Abdu Malik Al-Houthi,
to discuss his partnership in a new government.
This deal was tantamount to a joint US-Russian guarantee of Bashar Assad
survival in power in return for a Tehran-Riyadh compact for Hadi’s reinstatement
in Sanaa. These arrangements were debated back and forth in exchanges, some
semi-secret, among the leading actors for most of July. The visit to Riyadh of
the Syrian intelligence chief Maj. Gen. Ali Mamlouk was set up by Moscow as a
major push forward. The plan was for the entire enterprise to be brought out in
the open and sealed in Doha, Qatar, Tuesday, Aug. 3 at a conference attended by
US Secretary of State John Kerry, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Saudi
Foreign Minister Adel Al-Jubeir and other top Gulf diplomats. Iranian Foreign
Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif was not there. But he put a strong oar into the
proceedings by calling in at Muscat, Oman the day before the conference and
subsequently on Friday Aug. 7. Assad also kept his hand in by sending his
foreign minister Walid Moallem to Tehran and Muscat last week.
But then, at Doha, just as the package was ready to unveil, the Saudi foreign
minister pulled away and blew it up with two provisions: a) Riyadh would not
countenance Bashar Assad being allowed to stay in office, and: b) Saudi Arabia
would not do business with any representative of the Assad regime.
This put a large spoke in the main wheel of the initiative and also scuttled
some of the secondary plans depending on it. But by then, a lot was happening in
the Yemeni and Syrian war arenas:
1. Saudi and UAE armored forces had landed in Aden and were closing in on the
Yemeni capital, Sanaa. The Houthi rebels, trained and armed by Iran, were forced
to retreat without negotiations on their future role in government.
2. Syrian rebel leaders, sensing the approaching betrayal, sent a secret
delegation to Tehran to discuss terms for opening negotiations with Assad. They
too were left at sea about the deals in play among Washington, Moscow, Tehran
and Riyadh over their future.
Saturday, Aug.8, the Russians, egged on by the Americans, set about winning
Riyadh into the fold, Foreign Minister Al-Jubeir was invited to pay a visit to
Moscow Tuesday, Aug. 11, for talks about the Syrian conflict and the war on the
Islamic State.
Refusing to accept that the new initiative had been grounded in Doha, Moscow
presented the visit as continuing the ongoing dialogue on the issues raised at
that encounter.
debkafile’s military and intelligence sources note that neither Israel nor
Jordan has been co-opted to this big power initiative, as though they are not
concerned. However, both have a big stake in Saudi Arabia’s next decisions. If
Riyadh is won over by US-Russian blandishments and goes back on its decision to
boycott Assad, the Saudi-Israeli-Jordanian effort to support Syrian rebel
control of southern Syria will fall apart. This will open up both countries to
new perils on their northern borders.
Will top Democrat's opposition tip the balance against Iran
deal?
Associated Press/Ynetnews/Published: 08.09.15
Chuck Schumer, No. 3 Senate Democrat and party leader-in-waiting, said the
agreement is 'too risky,' but it is yet unclear how many fellow Democrats will
follow suit. President Barack Obama suffered a notable setback in his all-out
campaign to secure Democratic support for the Iran nuclear deal when the leading
Jewish Democrat in the Senate announced his opposition. The question is how
significant the blow will turn out to be. Republicans, infuriated by Obama's
recent comparison of GOP foes of the pact to "Death to America" Iranian
hardliners, immediately focused on the stunning break with the president by
Chuck Schumer of New York, and they're urging other Democrats to buck the
administration.
But there was no quick indication that the announcement by Schumer, the No. 3
Senate Democrat and party leader-in-waiting, would trigger a rush of Democratic
opposition to the international accord, which aims to curb Iran's nuclear
program in exchange for billions of dollars in relief from crippling economic
sanctions.
In fact, just hours after Schumer's late Thursday statement, Wisconsin Sen.
Tammy Baldwin and Vermont Independent Bernie Sanders endorsed the deal, bringing
the number of Senate backers to 15.
"The test of a great nation is not how many wars it can engage in, but how it
can resolve international conflicts in a peaceful manner," said Sanders, a
Democratic presidential candidate who said he spoke to Obama on Friday.
Still, a second New Yorker, Rep. Eliot Engel, the top Democrat on the House
Foreign Affairs Committee, and an additional Democratic member of the panel,
Brad Sherman of California, joined Schumer Friday in opposing the deal.
Five weeks before crucial votes in Congress, Schumer's decision was seen as a
blow to the administration, whose intense lobbying on Capitol Hill since last
month's deal had produced a steady stream of support from Democrats who had been
the most vocal in demanding congressional oversight, including Virginia's Tim
Kaine and Florida's Bill Nelson.
But Democrats in the House and Senate said they remained confident that a
sufficient number would ensure Obama's deal survives.
"I think there is every reason to be optimistic that we will be able to sustain
a veto in the House," said Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., one of the party's vote
counters
House and Senate Republicans have enough votes to pass a resolution of
disapproval next month, but Obama is widely expected to veto that resolution and
Republicans will then try to overturn the veto.
Faced with uniform GOP opposition, the administration has targeted Democrats,
and 21 of the 188 House Democrats have announced their support while nine oppose
the deal.
Coupled with the courting of Democrats, Obama has lashed out at Republican
critics of the pact, saying hardliners chanting "Death to America" in Tehran are
"making common cause with the Republican caucus."
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called on Obama to stop
demonizing foes of the deal, but the president doubled down on his assessment.
"The reason that Mitch McConnell, and the rest of the folks in his caucus who
opposed this jumped out and opposed this before they even read it, before it was
even posted, is reflective of an ideological commitment not to get a deal done,"
Obama said in a CNN interview that aired Friday. "In that sense they do have
much more in common with the hardliners who are much more satisfied with the
status quo."
Republicans gleefully pointed to Schumer's opposition and questioned whether the
White House would take back its criticism. Other Republicans, like Pennsylvania
Sen. Pat Toomey, called on Democrats to follow Schumer's "independent path."
Schumer — a congressional ally of Israel, a leading fundraiser and strategist
for his party and a lawmaker from a state that is home to more than a
million-and-a-half Jews — had been under intense pressure. The pro-Israel lobby
American Israel Public Affairs Committee is vehemently opposed to the deal,
which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has denounced as undermining the
security of Israel and the region. After days of review and soul-searching,
Schumer said, he informed the White House of his decision Thursday afternoon.
"The very real risk that Iran will not moderate and will, instead, use the
agreement to pursue its nefarious goals is too great," he said in opposing the
pact. Schumer's split with Obama is remarkable for a senior leader in line to
replace Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada after Reid retires at the
end of next year. The New Yorker's decision also puts him at odds with the
Democrats' likely presidential nominee and former New York senator, Hillary
Rodham Clinton, who has cautiously embraced the deal.
Schumer signaled that he wouldn't lobby hard against the accord, saying that "in
my experience with matters of conscience and great consequence like this, each
member ultimately comes to their own conclusion."House Minority Leader Nancy
Pelosi, D-Calif., has said she expects that chamber to back Obama in sustaining
his veto, which would require one-third plus one of those voting in the
434-member House. In the Senate, 34 Democrats would be needed to sustain a veto.
A subtext of the Iran issue is the tension between Schumer and the No. 2
Democrat in the Senate, Dick Durbin of Illinois, and the implications for next
year's choice of a successor to Reid. Reid and Durbin have backed Schumer's
elevation, but the question of whether Schumer stands behind Durbin for the whip
post led to a messy, public spat this past spring.Durbin supports the Iran deal
and has been working hard to round up support for Obama. Schumer's decision
outraged some liberal groups, who called him a "warmonger," dismissed the notion
of Schumer as the next Senate Democratic leader and vowed to withhold
contributions from Democrats opposed to the deal.
The world should prepare for the worst in the fight against ISIS
Salman Aldosary/Asharq Al Awsat/Saturday, 09 Aug, 2015
When it comes to the war on the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), we
should prepare ourselves for the worst. It takes a long time and effort for ISIS
to be defeated in the same way Al-Qaeda was. Although still active, Al-Qaeda is
not as powerful as it was a decade ago. Those who believe the war on ISIS will
be an easy ride are detached from reality. And those who think that the risks of
ISIS will vanish soon are deluding themselves. This is an international war on a
cancer spreading across the world. ISIS is a trans-border terrorist organization
that uses extremist interpretations of Islam. Moreover, there is much difference
between defeating ISIS and eliminating the extremist group, which will not
happen within one or two years. In fact, eliminating ISIS will take many years.
The latest terrorist bombing that targeted a mosque belonging to a special
emergency force in southwestern Saudi Arabia on Thursday is one link in a long
series of terrorist operations carried out by ISIS. ISIS’s terrorist activity is
not linked to a certain place as much as it depends on the group’s goals of
strengthening the idea of establishing a social incubator to facilitate the
movement of its elements from one country to another and attract as many
recruits as possible whom it would control from its main bases in Iraq and
Syria. ISIS ideologues are well aware of the fact that the group’s terrorist
activity, regardless of its size, cannot on its own secure a foothold on the
ground for its members. That is why ISIS tends to stage its operations in
different geographical locations, from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and UAE to Europe,
as its ultimate goal is to attract “soldiers” for its terrorist “state.”
According to Manuel Valls, the Prime Minister of France, there are 10,000 to
15,000 Islamist extremists in France, with around 475 people—living in France or
holding its nationality— fighting with ISIS and Al-Nusra Front in Iraq and
Syria. Around 5,000 Europeans are currently fighting with Islamist extremists in
Syria and Iraq, with the French spy agency estimating the number will increase
to 10,000 by the end of 2015. The growing numbers of European fighters in the
ranks of terrorist organizations confirm that the war on ISIS is of an
international nature and does not concern a specific region or country. This war
will certainly be long and everyone has to deal with it on this basis and always
expects the worst.
If the security aspect of the war on terror has been extremely successful, as
evidenced by the Saudi counterterrorism strategy, work on the ideological front
remains at a standstill. This is not to mention the social efforts that are yet
to be made in order to counter ISIS.
Take, for example, how social media networks have allowed extremists space to
recruit individuals no matter where they are in the world. On the other hand,
internet giants, such as Twitter and Facebook, have not been doing enough to
limit the ability of terrorist groups to benefit from the space social media
networks offer them to spread their ideology. Of course, blocking those websites
would not be the solution. But has Twitter, for example, taken a single legal
step to stop extremists from illegally using its platforms? Unfortunately, the
answer is “no”. Twitter should at least require users to provide their phone
numbers in order to ensure they take legal responsibility for their behavior.
Some even consider such measures to be an infringement of personal freedoms.
ISIS has grown into something closer to an epidemic; it is not different from,
say, cholera which has killed dozens of millions of people. ISIS cannot be
eliminated in one country while it continues to spread in another. Eliminating
the ISIS epidemic requires time, effort, international cooperation and, most
importantly, a genuine willingness to fight it.
Whatever is the matter with Egypt?
Hisham Melhem/Al Arabiya/Sunday, 9 August 2015
‘Whatever happened to Egypt’? The American official exclaiming in dismay at
Egypt’s stunning diminishing regional role in recent years. He was lamenting
what he termed Egypt’s retrenchment from its previous status as the Arab world’s
political powerhouse that exercised regional leadership, influencing and shaping
events and mediating conflicts. Egypt’s role in those bygone years as a regional
influential was supplemented by what we can call now a huge reservoir of ‘soft
power’. Egypt’s intellectuals, novelists, musicians and artists created
pioneering and experimental works in fiction, and theatre, edgy cinema and
re-invigorated classic Arabic music by creatively incorporating western
instruments and styles. Cairo inspired and Alexandria enchanted generations of
Arabs in modern times.
The lament came in the context of a conversation about the utter failure of Arab
states and societies to extinguish the fires of civil wars and sectarian strife
that threatens the very being of some states like Syria and Iraq, and the
growing, and at times suffocating influences of regional powers like Iran and
Turkey in shaping and maybe determining the future of these majority Arab
states. For generations Egypt was a political and cultural power to be reckoned
with in the Levant, and the Arabian Peninsula, in addition to its immediate
African environment. But today Egypt is not in the same league as Israel, Turkey
and Iran. Egypt can barely shield itself from the chaos of Libya, and unable to
influence Gaza on its border except by shutting the crossings. Under Mubarak,
Egypt was stagnant. Since his political demise, Egypt has been a drift.
Cultural sacrilege
The vibrant cultural and artistic life of Egypt between the two World Wars began
to shrivel during the autocratic reign of Gamal Abdel Nasser beginning in the
1950’s until his death in 1970. The decline continued under Anwar Sadat, and
reached a state of stagnation during the long aimless years of Hosni Mubarak’s
rule. The signs of decline, even decadence were everywhere. The case of Nasr Abu
Zayd is telling. This academic’s modern interpretation of the Qur'an created a
storm of protests among the ultra-conservative Muslims, culminating in an absurd
court ruling against him as an apostate. What followed is the stuff of skewed
surrealism. And since under Sharia law a Muslim woman cannot marry a non-Muslim,
and since Abu Zayd has been stripped of his religion, a court declared in 1995
the marriage of Abu Zayd and Ibtihal Younis null and void.
Under Mubarak, Egypt was stagnant. Since his political demise, Egypt has been a
drift
The decision forced Abu Zayd to seek refuge in the Netherlands. The case against
Abu Zayd was part of an assault on liberal and secular intellectuals, professors
and journalists waged by radical Islamists. It took an act of violence against
the Egyptian icon Naguib Mahfouz winner of the 1988 Nobel Prize for Literature
to show the depth of depravity some radical Islamists are willing to go to.
During the controversy over Salman Rushdie’s novel the Satanic Verses, Islamist
extremists remembered that some of Mahfouz’s novels such as Children of Gebelawi
أولاد حارتنا were considered blasphemous, and dispatched two young men to kill
the 82 year old author. They almost succeeded. That assassination attempt was
rich with symbolism. By knifing Mahfouz, the Islamist extremists were stabbing
the modernity and liberalism that he embodied. That single act of cultural
sacrilege was an indictment of the whole Mubarak era.
Living in denial
Watching Iran and Turkey throwing their weight around, Egypt is reduced to
complaining and chafing. The country is surviving economically only because of
the kindness of outsiders. And although Egypt is no longer the cultural gift to
the Arabs, boasting mediocre universities, unreadable newspapers, and outrageous
television programs, still its political and intellectual leaders continue to
live in denial of their predicament. Egypt’s political leaders, still speak as
if their country is entitled to be treated with the deference reserved for
pivotal, powerful ancient cultures. In this skewed Egyptian view of reality,
Egypt is ‘entitled’ to Arab largess, because the Arab Gulf states need Egypt to
balance Iran and Turkey. Egypt is ‘entitled’ to U.S. economic and military aid
because of the peace treaty with Israel and because Egypt is supposedly
important for America’s strategic interests in the Middle East. The bitter
reality many Egyptians find it impossible to admit, is that a country that is
not in full control of its own territory cannot aspire to play a regional role.
Forty two years ago the Egyptian army crossed the Suez Canal and breached the
supposedly impenetrable Bar Lev line and battled the Israeli Army occupying
Saini. Today the Egyptian Army is engaged in battles in Sanai, but the enemy is
a viscous home grown Islamist Insurgency.
A badly needed celebration…Last week, amid great deal of pump and ceremony and
hyper nationalism Egypt celebrated the opening of what they called a ‘new Suez
Canal’, which was in fact a parallel channel running one third the length of the
Canal. It was an impressive engineering feat achieved and paid for by Egyptians,
even though many economists doubted that it will live up to the official hype
that it will double the annual revenues in few years . President Abdel Fattah
el-Sisi used hyperbole called it ‘an additional artery of prosperity for the
world’. But the Sisi government, after two years in power over a divided
country, battling a growing insurgency with greater brute force, and not meeting
the minimal expectations of millions of disenfranchised Egyptians, needed the
celebration and its political and symbolic importance. That’s what prompted Sisi
to say ‘Egyptians needed to confirm to themselves and to the world that they
still can’.
And a bloody day
But the celebrations came few days after scores of extremist Islamists and
soldiers were killed in fierce fighting in Northern Sinai. It was another ugly
reminder that the Sinai Province, formerly known as Ansar Beit al-Maqdis, a
local terrorist group that pledged allegiance to the Islamic State (ISIS) and
other extremist Islamists will not end any time soon, and that it will likely
increase in ferocity. Rarely a day passes by without casualties. Few months ago
the casualties were in single digits; today they are in double digits. Egypt’s
low intensity civil strife can only get worse in the absence of a major shift in
the counterinsurgency strategy of the Sisi government which is solely based on
the application of brute military force, instead of a multipronged approach that
includes political and economic incentives to a large alienated block of
Egyptians. Brian Katulis and Mokhtar Awad, Two astute observers of Egypt
summarized Egypt’s dilemma thus: ’Radical Islamist groups are taking root in a
toxic environment of incitement by the brotherhood and its radical Salafist
allies. The spectrum of the opposition’s zero-sum politics on one end and regime
repression on the other has hindered possibilities for national reconciliation’.
A strategic dialogue with a difficult friend Last week’s resumption of the
strategic dialogue between Egypt and the United States, which was accompanied by
the arrival of eight American made F-16s, and the visit by Secretary of State
John Kelly and his meeting with President Sisi is a clear indication that the
Obama administration, after dithering for a long time, has decided not to let
its concerns with the poor state of human rights in Egypt stand in the way of
resuming full military cooperation with the Sisi government. The U.S. also
agreed to resume the ‘Bright Star’ military maneuvers with the Egyptian armed
forces, which were suspended in 2013 following Sisi’s overthrow of the Mursi
government. It is ironic that American officials believe that the Egyptians
don’t need F-16s or other conventional expensive weapon systems to combat
terrorism in Sinai, just as they don’t believe that large military maneuvers to
deter a conventional threats are warranted, but nonetheless, they are
reluctantly trying to slowly convince a ‘prestige army’ to overcome its
obsession with competing with the Israeli forces for big military systems.
Secretary Kerry, delivered the obligatory and pro-forma statement about
America’s concerns about violations of human rights of peaceful activists and
journalists, and the overall smothering of what’s left of political life in
Egypt. Kerry’s visit to Cairo came in the context of growing conviction in
Washington that not engaging President Sisi, while simultaneously pushing him on
human rights, runs the risk of allowing Egypt to drift further towards greater
civil strife. Already, some American officials say that Sisi’s counter terror
strategy in Sinai is failing and that it will drive Egypt towards greater
disorder.
One of the reasons, conditions in the Arab East are so troubling is the
marginalization of Egypt in recent decades. It will take Egypt many years to
regain its previous regional leadership role, at least in the political/security
domain, and the first step is to defeat the terror networks by pursuing a
comprehensive strategy against extremists that balances the security
requirements and Human rights imperatives. Conditions in the region have changed
radically in the last few years, and Egypt’s return to its old unique position
in the Middle East may not be possible. Certainly it will not be possible as
long as the Egyptian decision makers and opinion makers continue to live in
denial of their predicament. They have to collectively and critically ask
themselves: What is the matter with Egypt?
Gulf states and Iran’s diplomacy of ‘openness’
Raghida Dergham/Al Arabiya/Sunday, 9 August 2015
There have been interesting developments this week in U.S.-Russian relations
with the Gulf states, Egypt, and Turkey – and also interesting developments in
the political discourse of both Iran and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).
The strategic dialogue between the United States and Egypt resumed earlier this
week, for the first time since 2009, tackling the future of U.S.-Egyptian
relations. The relations had become tense following the Muslim Brotherhood rise
to power in Cairo. The talks also tackled Egypt’s regional role in Libya, Yemen,
and Syria.
The declaration by the GCC as spoken by Qatar’s Foreign Minister Khalid Al-Attiyah
welcoming the deal with Iran is a notable development that helps Obama’s
administration, which needs such stances on the eve of the deliberations over
the deal in Congress.
This is also happening in conjunction with an agreement to resume strategic
dialogue between the United States and the GCC, which started in Camp David two
months earlier. The next session of the dialogue will take place in New York
next month.
There is a flurry of diplomatic and political activities coinciding with a
campaign to market the Iranian nuclear deal
The U.S.-Russian partnership represented by Secretary of State John Kerry and
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov brought a new initiative to the GCC for political
and diplomatic efforts in the Arab region, launched in the wake of the nuclear
deal with Tehran. The details of the American and Russian attitudes on regional
issues did not yet amount to a radical shift, whether vis-à-vis Syria or
vis-à-vis the Iranian role there. In truth, the tripartite meeting bringing
together Kerry, Lavrov, and Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir reflected
Washington and Moscow’s desire to reassure Riyadh that the sprint towards Tehran
does not mean a split with Riyadh or the reduction of the Arab regional weight
in favor of Iran.
The Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif is also trying to reassure the
Gulf through his “broad smile” diplomacy. Zarif wrote an article in Al-Safir,
titled “Neighbors before the house”, in which he called for looking for ways to
help all regional countries to uproot the causes of tension and the absence of
trust. The Qatari foreign minister responded by calling for a serious and
constructive dialogue with “our Iranian neighbors”, including discussing what he
said was Iranian interference in the internal affairs of the Gulf countries and
Tehran’s continued support for President Bashar al-Assad.
There is a flurry of diplomatic and political activities coinciding with a
campaign to market the Iranian nuclear deal. There are also economic and
intelligence activities involving the United States, Russia, and Europe in the
direction of Iran and the GCC, part of which to market arms and part of it to
secure a place in the reconstruction of the countries ravaged by this decade’s
mysterious and odd wars.
Zarif’s statements were seen as “amusing” in the words of a one Gulf figure. “He
is far from decision-making positions in Tehran and very far from the Iranian
revolution and only speaks for himself as a pro-Western liberal.”
According to the Gulf interpretation of Zarif’s editorial, Zarif’s statements
are inconsistent with Iran’s actions and come in an inappropriate timing,
immediately in the aftermath of Iranian meddling in Bahrain. According to the
Gulf source, Kuwait and Qatar told Zarif during his visit to their capitals in
the wake of the nuclear deal that they were waiting for proof from Tehran that
it really wants good neighborliness and that it is no longer seeking to export
the Iranian revolution.
It would be good if the Iranian foreign minister can prove Iran’s newfound
moderate streak is real with a crucial decision from Supreme Leader Ayatollah
Ali Khamenei. However, this decision is probably above the paygrade of Minister
Zarif, and it is also likely the Supreme Leader is not in the process of
dispensing of the Revolutionary Guards and their regional ambitions.
Good-cop-bad-cop
The good-cop-bad-cop game will continue for the time being until strategic
decisions are made regarding the future of the Islamic Republic. This period of
time requires giving moderate forces represented by President Hassan Rouhani and
the foreign minister room to send messages of reassurance, because the opposite
would end up undermining the nuclear deal, especially as it is currently under
close international scrutiny before it comes into force and the sanctions are
lifted.
The verbal escalation increased this week from U.S. Secretary of State Kerry and
his British counterpart Philip Hammond against Tehran. The two men criticized
Iran for its support of terrorism with a view to impose its regional influence.
However, this is just verbal escalation and is not an annex of the nuclear deal,
which today dominates U.S. and British priorities.
The American, British, German, and French diplomacies may be truly convinced
that Iran’s rejoining the international community would force it into moderation
and would curb the hardliners who want to export the Iranian revolution and
impose religion on the state. However, these nations have decided in advance not
to use any of the pressure cards they have to influence Tehran’s policies and
regional roles, out of keenness for the conclusion of what they see as a
historical nuclear deal. Hence, their policies vis-à-vis Iran’s regional
ambitions are based on wishful thinking not as a result of secret understandings
with Tehran as part of the deal.
Part of the implications is acknowledging Iran as a regional player and lending
legitimacy to its regional roles, particularly in the Arab countries where Iran
is involved led by Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and Lebanon. But another implication of
the deal is that Turkey is now pushing to reformulate its policy to guarantee
itself a strong position before this is made impossible by the new Iranian role
as drawn and approved by the major powers.
Jawad Zarif tried to address both issues - the momentum of the deal and the
implications. In his editorial, he said that Iran, despite living in “security
and stability”, cannot stand idly by vis-à-vis the huge devastation in its
periphery. He wrote, “Experience tells us that chaos and unrest know no
boundaries, and it is not possible to guarantee the security of any country in a
tumultuous climate in a globalizing world.”
This is an important position that the Iranian minister must communicate to
other Arab capitals, including Abu Dhabi and Riyadh, to prove Tehran’s
determination to shrink its role, which has fueled chaos and unrest across the
border, because it believes that this is no longer in its interest. The
continuation of the classical Iranian role in Syria will be at the expense of
the new Iran, because it will draw it further into a quagmire that it helped
turn into a wasteland, a humanitarian crisis, and a magnet for terrorism which
now justifies Iranian-Western partnership to crush it.
The mechanisms for uprooting tension and the mistrust between the countries of
the region are available to Tehran as well as Riyadh, Ankara, and Doha. The
litmus test is Syria, where none of these players is innocent, just like Moscow,
Washington, London, and Damascus are not either. The roadmap and its mechanisms
is now plain for all to see, and any delay in taking Syria towards a new phase
away from perdition remains a black stain on the consciences of all those
involved.
Defeating ISIS in Syria will not happen if Tehran and Moscow cling on to Bashar
al-Assad. For this reason, there is talk that Russia and Iran are less
intransigent about Assad’s role in the new political configuration in Syria.
This configuration does not adopt the Geneva 1 and Geneva 2 call for a
transitional political process through a governing body with full powers, but
proceeds from a starting point where the regime in Syria remains in power with
Assad being gradually phased out. It seems that the multilateral talks that took
place this week addressed scenarios for regional understandings on new
foundations, but have yet to negotiate over mechanisms of implementation.
Another important thing that Mohammad Javad Zarif said was that “we must all
accept the truth that the time of futile gambits is over, and that we all are
either winners together or losers together, because sustainable security cannot
be achieved by undermining the security of others.”
Zarif chose Yemen to be a “good model” for serious talks to start. This comes on
the heels of military gains made by the Arab coalition and an American move
towards the Gulf with a message to Riyadh that Washington understands Saudi’s
priorities and intends to tell Tehran: stop your meddling in Yemen.
Nevertheless, it would be extremely worthwhile for Yemen to become a model for
understandings between Saudi Arabia and Iran. Yemen is completely different from
Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon, because Yemen falls in the Saudi backyard. Iran is
fully aware of this and knows what it must do if it wants to reassure its
neighbors.
Tehran can demonstrate its good intentions in Iraq, where both the Iranian and
Arab interests require working together on clear non-sectarian bases to crush
ISIS. They must build trust through a conscious government that represents all
popular segments in Iraq – be they sectarian or ethnic. There can be no way to
defeat ISIS through Shiite militias without active participation from Iraq’s
Sunni Arabs and its tribes.
In Syria and in Lebanon, Tehran knows clearly what the roadmap to good
neighborliness is. What needs to be done is not to restructure old initiatives
and give them new titles, while Iranian actions follow the same usual patterns.
What is needed is serious and honest actions that pull Yemen and Syria back from
the disaster and protect Lebanon from coming ones.
For their part, the Gulf nations know what they must do to bring about the
desired shift in Arab-Iranian relations. It is not enough for them to believe
that the doubts and concerns of the GCC are placing pressure on Tehran and that
Iran’s desperate need for international acceptance will force it to rein in the
Revolutionary Guards or Hezbollah.
How the Gulf can benefit
It is the duty of the Gulf nations to benefit from and influence Iran’s openness
diplomacy. The foreign minister of Qatar has done well to welcome the nuclear
deal and call for serious dialogue with Iran.
The choice of Doha to hold the bilateral and trilateral meetings between Kerry,
Lavrov, and the GCC foreign ministers is noteworthy. Indeed, Qatar has been
accused of playing roles opposed by both Washington and Moscow, especially in
the context of supporting extremist groups. Accordingly, the shift that took
place between Washington and Ankara last week converges with the U.S.-Russian
shift with Qatar this week, and both converge in the direction of the
Turkish-Qatari cooperation in the war on ISIS and closing the book on their
alleged – denied by Turkey and Qatar – support for extremist groups in Syria.
These signs of a breakthrough require more than ever from the Gulf countries to
develop a strategy of openness to meet the Iranian openness and encourage the
U.S.-Russian efforts to reassure the GCC countries. It does not suffice for them
to accept, refuse, express reservation, accuse or voice skepticism. The current
phase requires the GCC countries to plan their next steps in a smart and
pragmatic way. This is indeed possible if there is will.
State Dept Report: Iran Officials Involved in Sex
Trafficking of Women, Girls
By Anugrah Kumar , Christian Post Contributor
August 1, 2015/GP World
Iran's government officials were involved in sex trafficking of women and girls,
and some of them even forced girls into prostitution rings, a report by the
State Department says. U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen says the report shows the
Obama administration's "irresponsibility" in striking a nuclear deal with
Tehran.
"Iran is a source, transit, and destination country for men, women, and children
subjected to sex trafficking and forced labor," Trafficking in Persons Report
2015 says. "Organized groups reportedly subject Iranian women, boys, and girls
to sex trafficking in Iran, as well as in the United Arab Emirates and Europe."
Iran is among the six countries in the Middle East and North Africa that have
been placed on the Tier 3 List, the highest level of concern.
"Organized criminal groups force Iranian and immigrant children to work as
beggars and in street vendor rings in cities, including Tehran," the report
explains. "Physical and sexual abuse and drug addiction are the primary means of
coercion. Some children are also forced to work in domestic workshops.
Traffickers subject Afghan migrants, including boys, to forced labor in
construction and agricultural sectors in Iran. Afghan boys are at high risk of
experiencing sexual abuse by their employers and harassment or blackmailing by
the Iranian security service and other government officials."
It adds: "In previous years, there were reports government officials were
involved in the sex trafficking of women and girls. Reports also indicated some
officials operating shelters for runaway girls forced them into prostitution
rings."
Rep. Ros-Lehtinen, a Republican from Florida and chair of the House of
Representatives Subcommittee on the Middle East and North Africa, issued a
statement saying the report gives "further evidence of the administration's
irresponsibility in pretending Iran's nuclear program exists in a vacuum."
The administration decided to negotiate with Iran exclusively on its nuclear
program while ignoring Iran's other illicit activity and human rights record and
is incorrectly arguing that it is only lifting nuclear related sanctions,"
Ros-Lehtinen said. "Despite the administration's claims, the sanctions being
lifted on Iran were never intended solely for its nuclear program but were also
designed to address its human rights record, including human trafficking, among
other issues. As Iran's Tier 3 placement shows, human trafficking and human
rights are not improving in Iran. We must not lift Iran's human rights sanctions
as part of this weak nuclear deal."
In 2013, the report goes on to state, traffickers forced Iranian women and girls
into prostitution in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region. "From 2009-2015, there was a
reported increase in the transport of girls from and through Iran en route to
the Gulf where organized groups sexually exploited or forced them into
marriages. In Tehran, Tabriz, and Astara, the number of teenage girls in
prostitution continues to increase."
Iran's law fails to address the protection of trafficking victims. "Female
victims of sexual abuse, including sex trafficking victims, are liable to be
prosecuted for adultery, which is defined as sexual relations outside of
marriage and is punishable by death," the report says.
"The Government of Iran does not fully comply with the minimum standards for the
elimination of trafficking and is not making significant efforts to do so. As in
previous reporting periods, the government did not share information on its
anti-trafficking efforts. Publicly available information from NGOs, the media,
international organizations, and other governments indicates the Iranian
government is not taking sufficient steps to address its extensive trafficking
challenges, particularly with regard to the protection of trafficking victims."
http://www.christianpost.com/news/state-dept-report-iran-officials-involved-in-sex-trafficking-of-women-girls-142165/
Iranian Gas Sale to Europe behind
Russia’s Abandonment of Assad
Camal Richa/ August 09/15
There have been rumors that Russia has decided to cease its support for Syrian
President Bashar Assad’s regime due to the weakness and fatigue that hit the
regime’s army, and the impossibility to hold on to Assad in power over what is
left of Syria. But, contrary to these rumors, Western diplomatic sources
indicate that the Russian Diplomacy has been trying to find a solution for the
Syrian crisis that does not include Assad in power or in the opposition. Sources
add that Russians also prefer to take into account KSA interests and influence
at the expense of an Iranian influence in Syria after Assad.
Source add that after the nuclear program agreement between Iran and the P5+1
(the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council— China,
France, Russia, United Kingdom, United States,—plus Germany and the European
Union), Moscow realized that there is a threat on its interests in the sale of
Russian gas to Europe. Sources state that Russia did not call for lifting
international sanctions on the Iranian regime in the UN Security Council, adding
that Iran has revealed that after the sanctions against it are lifted it intends
to draw Iranian Gas to Europe through a pipeline running from the Iranian wells
to Turkey through Iraq and Syria. This would become dangerous to Russia since
the competition would be so high with a possibility of Europe buying gas from
Iran instead of Russia, whose pipeline passes through Ukraine, especially since
the Iranian gas is the second stock in the world and that running the pipelines
through Iraq and Syria to Turkey and on to Europe, reduces the cost of buying
Russian gas. This gives the Iranian gas a differential and competitive value in
Europe at the expense of the Russian gas.
At the same time, the Iranian diplomacy has been active to ensure a solution to
the Syrian crisis from a different angle; after the nuclear agreement, Iran does
not mind the departure of Assad and his regime, and is willing to pay the price
in any region, provided that the post-Assad phase would include Iran’s interests
and influence, which includes ensuring that the gas pipeline passes to Turkey.
Sources add that the Russian-Iranian diplomatic race to settle the Syrian crisis
is active in the direction of KSA, which has rejected the Iranian presence as a
partner in resolving the Syrian crisis, and what was approved by Riyadh was
ensuring Iran’s interests in Syria after the departure of Assad, with no
guarantee for any Iranian Influence on Damascus.
Sources pointed out that Riyadh began to regain initiative in the region and was
able to liberate large parts of Yemen from Houthis and the militia of former
President Ali Abdullah Saleh without compromises, and that the Syrian opposition
is making field victories in many areas. Riyadh will also be able to group the
Syrian oppositions in agreement with the international community in order to
find an arrangement that will ensure the establishment of a moderate regime in
Damascus that neither includes the Assad family, nor ISIS or any terrorist
organization. Sources add that Riyadh is moving in the region in light of the
“Operation Decisive Storm” results, in harmony with the Russian endeavor to
resolve the Syrian crisis, in order to ensure the departure of Assad on one
hand, and to reduce the Iranian influence in Damascus on the other hand.