LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN

November 29/16

Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

 

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site

http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletin16/english.november29.16.htm

 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006

Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006

Bible Quotations For Today
Martha, Martha, you are worried and distracted by many things; there is need of only one thing. Mary has chosen the better part, which will not be taken away from her
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Luke 10/38-42/:"Now as they went on their way, he entered a certain village, where a woman named Martha welcomed him into her home. She had a sister named Mary, who sat at the Lord’s feet and listened to what he was saying. But Martha was distracted by her many tasks; so she came to him and asked, ‘Lord, do you not care that my sister has left me to do all the work by myself? Tell her then to help me.’But the Lord answered her, ‘Martha, Martha, you are worried and distracted by many things; there is need of only one thing. Mary has chosen the better part, which will not be taken away from her.’"

All of us once lived among them in the passions of our flesh, following the desires of flesh and senses, and we were by nature children of wrath, like everyone else
Letter to the Ephesians 02/01-10/:"You were dead through the trespasses and sins in which you once lived, following the course of this world, following the ruler of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work among those who are disobedient. All of us once lived among them in the passions of our flesh, following the desires of flesh and senses, and we were by nature children of wrath, like everyone else. But God, who is rich in mercy, out of the great love with which he loved us even when we were dead through our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ by grace you have been saved and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, so that in the ages to come he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness towards us in Christ Jesus. For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God not the result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are what he has made us, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand to be our way of life."

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on November 28-29/16
On Khaled al-Faisal’s Beirut visit, what do we want from Lebanon/Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/November 28/16
Obama’s foreign policy legacy: Ambitious but largely unsuccessful/Dr. Azeem Ibrahim/Al Arabiya/November 28/16
What are Egypt’s foreign policy intentions/Maria Dubovikova/Al Arabiya/November 28/16
Genetic research claims to trace mysterious origins of Israel’s Druze/By Ilan Ben Zion/The Times Of Israel/ November 25/2016
Muslims Demand Right to Preach in Public Schools: Canada/ John Goddard/The Clarion Project/November 28/16
Israel must seek Saudi Arabia’s friendship/Edy Cohen/Jerusalem Post/November 28/17
Palestinians: The 'Wall of Shame'/Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone Institute/November 28/16
Grégoire Canlorbe: Interview with Howard Bloom – Part I/Gatestone Institute/November 28/16

Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on on November 28-29/16
On Khaled al-Faisal’s Beirut visit, what do we want from Lebanon?
Hariri Meets Aoun, Vows to Maintain Good Ties with Berri
Berri: Delay in Cabinet Formation Jeopardizes Election Law
Report: Delay to Line-Up Cabinet Threatens Upcoming Parliamentary Elections
Kataeb Laments Delay in Cabinet Formation, Urges New Electoral Law
Derbas: Hariri to Make More Concessions to Facilitate Cabinet Line-up
Al-Mustaqbal Movement Elects Political Bureau Members
Report: Turkish Foreign Minister Expected in Beirut
Rahi returns from Europe visit
One shot by Daesh commander in Arsal, critically injured
 

Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on on November 28-29/16
Israeli Airforce Strikes IS-Linked Group in Syria
Aleppo rebels handed over districts to Kurds: report
Aleppo rebels handed over districts to Kurds: report
In Major Blow, Syria Rebels Lose all of Northeast Aleppo
Britain Calls for Immediate Ceasefire in Syria's Aleppo
Syria Calls Chemical Arms Accusations 'Campaign of Lies'
U.S. Says French Strike Likely Killed al-Qaida Ally Belmokhtar
Can Conservative Fillon Keep France's Far-Right at Bay?
Israel Jails Palestinian for Life for Tel Aviv Killings
Iraqi Forces Try to Weed Out IS from Those Fleeing Mosul
Kuwait Cabinet Steps Down after Parliament Polls
Cubans Begin Tearful Farewell to Fidel Castro
Dutch Far-Right MP Tops Polls Again ahead of March Vote
Khamenei's adviser: will be a global Islamic government in this century
Al-Arabiya TV: Maryam Rajavi believes there is no solution other than dismantling current regime in Iran
IRAN: Mullah’s judiciary attempt to arrest a member of parliament
Iranian political prisoners support Paris conference on 1988 massacre
Call on int’l organizations to guarantee security of Ahmad Montazeri, prevent his imprisonment

Links From Jihad Watch Site for on November 28-29/16
OSU jihadi: “America! Stop interfering with other countries … [if] you want us Muslims to stop carrying lone wolf attacks”
OSU jihadi Abdul Artan: “I’m a Muslim, it’s not what the media portrays me to be”
OSU jihadi Abdul Artan lived in Pakistan before coming to US as “refugee,” used car registered to Mohamed Ali
Ohio State University jihad attacker now identified as Somali Muslim “refugee” Abdul Artan
Cops say OSU jihad attacker’s motive is “still unclear”
Even Washington Post notices: Ohio State University attack resembles Islamic State attacks
Ohio State University jihad attacker: Muslim “refugee” Abdul Artan
Ohio State University jihad attacker reportedly “Somali refugee OSU student”
Jihad at Ohio State University: Man who attacked with knife and car “tentatively identified” as Somali Muslim
Hugh Fitzgerald: George Soros, Karl Popper, and Podsnap
Muslim cleric: Happiness over Israeli fires “is in keeping with the Sharia
Hamas-linked CAIR claims California mosques get pro-Trump letter threatening genocide of Muslims
Islamic State video tutorial shows “lone wolves” how to murder “disbelievers” in US, UK and France
Robert Spencer in FrontPage: SPLC Calls on Trump to Denounce ‘Racism and Bigotry’
Islamic State jihadis open fire on Israeli soldiers in the Golan Heights

 

Links From Christian Today Site for on November 28-29/16
Two More Yazidi Mass Graves Found Near Mosul
ISIS Are The 'Grandsons Of Satan': Iraqi Christians Return To Find Church Desecrated By Jihadis
Stop Victimising Christians, Says UK Equalities Chief
Winter Closes In On Refugees Fleeing Iraq's Mosul
Cathedrals Benefit From £5.4m Government Grants
My Christian Faith Helps With Decisions Over Brexit, Says Theresa May
Christian TV Reaches Millions Of Christians Across The Middle East
Islamic Extremism Infiltrating China, Officials Claim
Jerry Falwell Jr Says He Turned Down Job As Donald Trump's Education Secretary
Jo Cox Murder Led To 52,000 Tweets Celebrating Her Death
Trump Will 'Cleanse' America Of Muslims, Three Mosques Warned In Hateful Letters
Churches Join Resistance Against Trump's Deportation Pledge
Stephen Hawking Visits The Vatican To Discuss Origin Of The Universe

Latest Lebanese Related News published on November 28-29/16
On Khaled al-Faisal’s Beirut visit, what do we want from Lebanon?
Turki Aldakhil/Al Arabiya/November 28/16
On March 9, 1973, Lebanese President Sleiman Franjieh visited Saudi Arabia where he met with Saudi officials, including King Faisal bin Abdulaziz al-Saud. By the end of the visit, a joint statement was released which read: “During this visit, his Excellency, our great guest, visited the city of Riyadh and the cities of Dammam and Jeddah and checked out the landmarks of construction and economic boom and the great achievements fulfilled by the Saudi kingdom. Our guest was warmly received by Saudi leaders and people thus expressing their feelings of true friendship toward their brothers, the Lebanese people and their leaders.”On November 21, 2016, Khaled al-Faisal was dispatched by King Salman to Lebanon and he was tasked with delivering two letters. The first one is an invitation to the Lebanese president to visit Saudi Arabia. The second one is from the Saudi people who wish Lebanon well and who want stability and prosperity for the country. Those who know the history of ties between the Lebanese and Saudis are well-aware of the extent of the damage which any unrest in Lebanon may cause as the latter is the “thermometer” of regional tensions. It is also the most significant indicator of the future as stability in Lebanon underlies potential for a calm atmosphere and vice versa. Khaled al-Faisal visited Lebanon, representing the legacy of relations between King Salman and journalists, intellectuals and thinkers in Lebanon. It is not easy for Saudi Arabia to see Lebanon being dragged into non-Arab axes, especially when it’s an ancient country known for its Arabism. Lebanon is an issue of concern for Saudi Arabia and King Salman wants Lebanon to remain as it is, with Arab orientations and identity.
 *This article was first published in Okaz on November 28, 2016.

Hariri Meets Aoun, Vows to Maintain Good Ties with Berri
 Naharnet/November 28/16/Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri held consultations Monday with President Michel Aoun at the Baabda Palace after which he pledged to maintain good ties with Speaker Nabih Berri."There are some obstacles in the cabinet formation process but we will try to resolve them," Hariri said after the talks.He also noted that Aoun is keen on the country's economy. Aoun's election and Hariri's appointment as premier-designate have raised hopes that Lebanon can begin tackling challenges including a stagnant economy, a moribund political class and the influx of more than a million Syrian refugees. In a sign that Hariri's mission as premier might not be easy, Hizbullah's MPs declined to endorse him during binding parliamentary consultations. Hariri and Aoun are still struggling to put together a new cabinet amid conflicting demands from the political forces that are seeking to join the unity government. Horsetrading is still revolving around the so-called services-related ministerial portfolios, mainly public works and telecommunications.
 
Berri: Delay in Cabinet Formation Jeopardizes Election Law
Naharnet/November 28/16/Speaker Nabih Berri stressed on Monday that a prolonged delay in the government formation process imperils stipulating a new electoral law that helps hold the parliamentary elections on time, al-Joumhouria daily reported Monday. Berri had voiced warnings in front of his visitors that he has not been informed of any positive developments as for the efforts exerted to facilitate the difficulties hampering the formation, according to the daily. He stressed the need to line-up a government and warned against the consequences shall the delay extend further. He underlined the importance of drafting a new electoral system to replace the 1960 law as soon as the cabinet is lined-up and before the parliamentary elections slated in May. Berri voiced fears “that some political parties might be pushing towards imposing the 1960 voting law, which would put the political class in a confrontation with the overwhelming majority of the Lebanese who reject the 1960, according to statistics.”“The Development and Liberation bloc, the Loyalty to the Resistance bloc and the Change and Reform bloc all meet on common ground and on the need to draft a new law that achieves just representation. Any law other than the 1960 law would be more worthy of the aspirations of the Lebanese who want a comprehensive and just representation in the parliament,” concluded Berri. Last month, the parliament elected Michel Aoun, a former general, as president ending a two-and-half-year deadlock that left Lebanon without a president. But Premier-designate Hariri is still facing obstacles bringing together a line-up that balances Lebanon's delicate sectarian-based political system. At stake is the distribution of the most powerful portfolios like the defense ministry and other key portfolios including the public works. The political parties are also bickering over amending the current majoritarian or winner-takes-all election law which divides seats among the different religious sects. The current parliament has failed to amend the law, and has extended its mandate twice amid criticism. New elections are scheduled for May 2017.
 
Report: Delay to Line-Up Cabinet Threatens Upcoming Parliamentary Elections
 Naharnet/November 28/16/The delay in lining up a cabinet as the result of wrangling over specific ministerial portfolios, raises fears about the fate of a new electoral law that is supposed to be agreed among political parties in order to hold the parliamentary elections slated for May, al-Joumhouria daily said on Monday. Several political parties are adamant to be given certain portfolios in the new government which is hampering the efforts of PM-designate Saad Hariri to form one. The daily questioned the motives behind the unwavering positions and said that it raises fears as for the fate of the electoral law and the parliamentary elections that are supposed to be held in May. No positive developments were recorded in the past hours at the formation level, but the efforts are expected to resume to tackle several hurdles including key portfolios, mainly the public works ministry which is an issue of wrangling between Speaker Nabih Berri and the Lebanese Forces, added the daily. Furthermore, the Marada Movement is still insisting on one of three key portfolios -- public works, energy or telecommunications. Amending the current election law which divides seats among the different religious sects is a subject of conflict among Lebanon's political parties. The current parliament has failed to amend the law, and has extended its mandate twice amid criticism. New elections are scheduled for May 2017.
 
 Kataeb Laments Delay in Cabinet Formation, Urges New Electoral Law
 Naharnet/November 28/16/The Kataeb Party on Monday called for “releasing the new government from captivity,” lamenting the delay that the formation process has witnessed.
“The government must be formed as soon as possible and without procrastination so that it can address the living conditions of the Lebanese and the economic, social and political issues,” Kataeb's political bureau said in a statement issued after its weekly meeting. It also noted that “devising a new law for parliamentary elections that guarantees correct representation and prevents a return to the 1960 law should be among the new government's priorities.”The party also said the new cabinet must approve a new state budget. The election of Michel Aoun as president and Saad Hariri's appointment as premier-designate have raised hopes that Lebanon can begin tackling challenges including a stagnant economy, a moribund political class and the influx of more than a million Syrian refugees. In a sign that Hariri's mission as premier might not be easy, Hizbullah's MPs declined to endorse him during binding parliamentary consultations. Hariri and Aoun are still struggling to put together a new cabinet amid conflicting demands from the political forces that are seeking to join the unity government. Horsetrading is still revolving around the so-called services-related ministerial portfolios, mainly public works and telecommunications.
 
 Derbas: Hariri to Make More Concessions to Facilitate Cabinet Line-up
 Naharnet/November 28/16/Caretaker Minister of Social Affairs Rashid Derbas commented on the delay in forming a new government and said that the hurdles obstructing it “are draining” the initiative of PM-designate Saad Hariri that first started with a comprehensive settlement to elect President Michel Aoun and end the presidential vacuum. “Hariri made major concessions which fell within a comprehensive settlement that requires the election of General Michel Aoun as president and that expected a new government to be ready within a week after the election,” said Derbas in an interview to Voice of Lebanon Radio (93.3). Derbas considered the wrangling over ministerial portfolios that have hampered the formation process so far as “draining the momentum of the president and Hariri's initiative.”He added the the conflicts over key portfolios “means that the related parties prefer their own interests over the interest of the State.”He concluded as saying that Hariri is ready and will make additional concessions to speed up the formation.
 
 Al-Mustaqbal Movement Elects Political Bureau Members
 Naharnet/November 28/16/Al-Mustaqbal Movement winded-up, on Sunday, its 2nd annual convention held at BIEL in Central Beirut, which resulted in the election of PM-designate Saad Hariri as Head of the Movement, and Ahmad Hariri as its Secretary-General. The convention, in which 2400 voters and 400 observing members participated, elected a 32-member political bureau, including 7 women. PM-designate Hariri also appointed Bassem Sabeh, Raya al-Hassan and Samir Doumit as Vice-Presidents and MP Jamal Jarrah as a representative of the Mustaqbal Parliamentary Bloc. In a statement by the Movement's Media Bureau, it reiterated that "the electoral process took place in a democratic and peaceful setting, following the closed meetings which continued over the weekend, during which participating members discussed the Movement's political and economic reports, in addition to the organizational chart and internal procedures, before concluding the works of the convention by adopting the proposed political, economic and regulatory recommendations."
 
Report: Turkish Foreign Minister Expected in Beirut
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/November 28/16/Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu is expected to visit Beirut next week carrying a message of congratulations from Turkish President Recep Tayyib Erdogan to newly elected President Michel Aoun, and to highlight the latest developments of concern for both countries following his latest visit to Iran, al-Joumhouria daily reported on Monday. After his visit to Iran on Saturday where he met with President Hassan Rouhani, Cavusoglu is expected in Beirut to congratulate Aoun on his election, and to hold meetings with senior Lebanese officials including Speaker Nabih Berri, PM-designate Saad Hariri and Caretaker PM Tammam Salam, said the daily. Talks are said to discuss the latest developments in the region in light of the open connections between the Turkish President and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin which dealt in detail with the developments in Syria and the repercussions of the crisis of displaced Syrians on neighboring countries including Lebanon, it added. The file of the displaced is a joint file between Ankara and Beirut that have cooperated with Jordan in some international and regional conferences devoted to look at the cost of this issue and mitigate the negative implications. The Turkish diplomat's visit follows recent visits by Arab officials including Qarati Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdul Rahman al-Thani, a Saudi delegation led by Mecca Governor Prince Khaled al-Faisal., Egyptian FM Sameh Shoukry and Iran's FM Mohammad Javad Zarif earlier this month.
  
Rahi returns from Europe visit

Mon 28 Nov 2016/NNA - Maronite Patriarch Cardinal Mar Beshara Boutros Rahi returned on Monday to Beirut, following a pastoral visit in Rome and France. From Bkerki, Rahi related the meetings he held in Europe, hoping the new government in Lebanon would be formed soon. He also hoped that Lebanon would rise in the face of major domestic and regional challenges.
 
One shot by Daesh commander in Arsal, critically injured
 Mon 28 Nov 2016/NNA - 20-year-old Ahmad Abdo Atrash received several gunshots as one Daesh security commander opened fire at him, following previous disputes between the two, National News Agency correspondent reported on Monday. Atrash was admitted to a nearby hospital; his condition is reportedly critical.

Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on on November 28-29/16
Israeli Airforce Strikes IS-Linked Group in Syria
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/November 28/16/Israel's air force targeted gunman linked to the Islamic State group in Syria overnight, the army said Monday, after they fired on an Israeli soldier in the occupied Golan Heights. "Overnight the (Israeli air force) targeted an abandoned UN building that has been used by the Islamic State as an operations centre along the border in the southern Syrian Golan Heights," an army statement read. It said the building was the "base for yesterday's attack," which was believed to be the first such direct assault by jihadists on Israeli soldiers in the Golan Heights since Syria's civil war began in 2011. The army said Israeli soldiers were targeted Sunday with machinegun fire and mortars and shot back. The air force then bombed the vehicle carrying the gunmen, identified as members of the Yarmouk Martyrs' Brigade, a Syrian rebel group that pledged allegiance to IS. Four of the militants were killed, with no Israeli soldiers injured. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised the soldiers who "successfully repelled an attempted attack.""Our forces are prepared on our northern border, and we won't let (IS) elements or other hostile elements use the cover of the war in Syria to establish themselves next to our borders," he said in remarks relayed by his office. Israel seized 1,200 square kilometres (460 square miles) of the Golan from Syria in the Six-Day War of 1967 and later annexed it in a move never recognised by the international community. The two countries are still technically at war, though the border had remained largely quiet for decades until 2011. Since then regular stray missiles have landed in Israeli border areas, but rebel groups and Syrian government forces have largely avoided directly targeting Israeli forces. Israel attacks Syrian military targets when fire, even unintentional, spills over the demarcation line.

Aleppo rebels handed over districts to Kurds: report
Now Lebanon/November 28/16/Opposition factions reached an agreement with the YPG to deliver Bustan al-Pasha, Al-Halak and other quarters bordering the Kurdish-controlled Sheikh Maqsoud district, according to a pro-opposition outlet.
BEIRUT - Amid the dramatic collapse of opposition lines in northeastern Aleppo, rebels groups purportedly handed over a number of districts to Kurdish forces in the divided city.
One of the most popular pro-rebel outlets in Aleppo reported early Monday afternoon that opposition factions reached an agreement with the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG) to deliver the Baydin, Bustan al-Pasha, Ayn al-Tal, Al-Halak, Sheikh Fares and Zaytounat quarters, all of which border the Sheikh Maqsoud district, which is under the de facto control of autonomous Kurds. “The agreement to hand over the neighborhoods… came to protect the lives of civilians and to avoid shelling by the regime and Russian forces,” a military source told the Aleppo Media Center. A monitoring NGO tracking developments in war-torn Syria confirmed that YPG troops entered Bustan al-Pasha and Al-Halak, while saying that Baydin and other areas where under the control of regime forces. However, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights did not provide context on the YPG entry into the two areas nor mention whether YPG fighters engaged in clashes with rebel forces. The Kurdish advance on the edges of Sheikh Maqsoud comes as rebel lines in northeastern Aleppo have crumbled in the past 48-hours, with opposition forces losing control over at least 13 districts in their worst military setback yet in Syria’s second city. The pro-opposition Enab Baladi gave credence to the Aleppo Media Center claim on the handover, which has not yet been reported by other local media outlets nor confirmed or denied by any relevant groups. An “informed source” told Enab Baladi that the factions deployed in the areas reportedly handed over the Kurds, including the Sultan Mrad Division and Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, withdrew southward in the city. The YPG, for its part, issued a statement Monday that it entered the Bustan al-Pasha and Al-Halak neighborhoods bordering Sheikh Maqsoud to “open a humanitarian crossing” for civilians seeking to flee fighting. According to the Kurdish fighting force, 6,000 civilians were brought to safety from the formerly rebel-held neighborhoods. The YPG made no mention of how it seized the two districts or whether it engaged in any fighting with the insurgent factions previously based there. Meanwhile, Al-Akhbar reported that the Kurdish forces “entered the battles” on Sunday after informing a Syrian regime operations room that they intended to secure the movement of civilians into Sheikh Maqsoud. The pro-Hezbollah Lebanese newspaper did not go into details on the YPG entry into Bustan al-Pasha or the other neighborhoods in the area. NOW's English news desk editor Albin Szakola (@AlbinSzakola) wrote this report. Amin Nasr translated Arabic-language source material.

Aleppo rebels handed over districts to Kurds: report
Albin Szakola/Now Lebanon/November 28/16/ Liwa al-Quds military commander Mohammad Mahmoud Rafeh was presented a medal by Russian military officers.
BEIRUT - A top leader in the pro-regime Liwa al-Quds (Jerusalem Brigade) has been killed in fighting in east Aleppo, months after receiving a military medal from Russia. The Palestinian fighting force announced that its military commander Mohammad Mahmoud Rafeh died on November 27 while leading troops in the Baydin Roundabout, one of the areas in the divided city seized by pro-regime forces in the past 48 hours amid a collapse of rebel lines. “Today, he was chosen by God to stay next to him as a martyr after achieving the mission of controlling the Baydin Roundabout,” the elegiac death notice issued by Liwa al-Quds said. Rafeh, who was nicknamed the “Godfather,” was feted by Russian officers only three-months ago when they awarded him a medal. In a ceremony in early August, the casually dressed Rafeh was presented Russia’s medal for “Strengthening Military Cooperation,” an award created by the Ministry of Defense in 1995. Rafeh’s Liwa al-Quds, one of the main auxiliary fighting forces for the regime in Aleppo, was formed in 2013. The militia draws mostly on Palestinian fighters from the province, including the Handarat refugee camp located north of Aleppo, which became one of the fiercest battlegrounds around the divided city.
NOW's English news desk editor Albin Szakola (@AlbinSzakola) wrote this report. Amin Nasr translated Arabic-language source material
 
In Major Blow, Syria Rebels Lose all of Northeast Aleppo
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/November 28/16/Syria's rebels lost all of the northern neighborhoods of their stronghold in east Aleppo on Monday, as the army made significant advances in its offensive to recapture the entire city. The regime gains have prompted an exodus of thousands of desperate civilians, some fleeing to districts held by the government or Kurdish forces, others heading south into areas still under opposition control. "The situation is disastrous," said Ibrahim Abu Al-Leith, a spokesman for the White Helmets rescue group in the Ansari neighborhood. "There is mass displacement and morale is in the gutter," he said, his voice cracking with emotion. "People are sleeping in the streets. They don't have anything to eat or drink, but neither do we," he told AFP. The loss of eastern Aleppo would be a potentially devastating blow to Syria's rebels, who seized the area in 2012. The opposition has steadily lost territory since Russia began an intervention to bolster President Bashar Assad in September 2015. On Monday, government forces seized the Sakhur, Haydariya and Sheikh Khodr districts, and Kurdish fighters took the Sheikh Fares neighborhood from rebels, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor said. "This is their (the rebels') worst defeat since they seized half the city in 2012," said Observatory director Rami Abdel Rahman. The advances left all of northeast Aleppo under government control.
Cold, hungry civilians
Syria's White Helmets warned on Monday they had no more fuel reserves for vehicles they use to rescue civilians after bombardment. In a video statement, the rescue group urged on "all humanitarian, aid, and medical organizations to immediately intervene to put an end to the humanitarian disaster" facing civilians in besieged Aleppo. Nearly 10,000 civilians have fled the east, the Observatory said late Sunday, with about 6,000 moving to the Kurdish-held Sheikh Maqsud neighborhood and 4,000 to government-held west Aleppo. Kurdish officials published a video they said showed civilians crossing a field to Sheikh Maqsud, where local forces helped people lift baggage over a makeshift berm as they arrived. Syria's Kurds are officially aligned with neither the government nor the rebels, but the opposition views them as effectively allied with the regime in its bid to recapture Aleppo city. Hundreds of civilians were also fleeing south to the remaining rebel-held districts with little more than the clothes they wore, an AFP correspondent said. People in southern neighborhoods were donating blankets and other items to the new arrivals, who had traveled on foot, exhausted, cold and hungry. The United Nations said it was "deeply concerned" about the plight of civilians in the east, where international aid is exhausted and food stocks are desperately low after more than four months of siege. The U.N. has appealed for access to the east many times, but has failed to secure the necessary guarantees to enable aid deliveries.
'Turning point' in war
The government advances mean the regime now controls at least a third of eastern Aleppo, just under two weeks into its renewed bid to recapture the city. State television said the army had captured the key Suleiman al-Halabi water pumping station, which controls supply to government-held west Aleppo and has periodically been shut by rebels. Three people were killed and another 29 wounded in rebel fire on western Aleppo on Monday, state media said. And regime bombardment of the eastern districts killed six civilians, Abdel Rahman said. The assault has been waged with heavy air strikes, barrel bomb attacks and artillery fire that have killed at least 235 civilians, including 27 children, in east Aleppo, according to the Observatory. Rebel fire into the government-held west has also killed at least 27 civilians, among them 11 children, since November 15, the monitor says. Syria's Al-Watan daily, which is close to the government, said the next stage of the operation would be "to divide the remaining (rebel-held) area into... districts that will be easily controlled and to capture them successively." Fabrice Balanche, a Syria expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said the regime retaking east Aleppo "would be a turning point" as it would then hold "the five largest cities in Syria" including the capital. More than 300,000 people have been killed and millions displaced since Syria's conflict began with anti-government protests in March 2011. Syria's deputy foreign minister on Monday denounced accusations by "western" countries that it has used chemical weapons in the conflict as "a campaign of lies."
Faisal Muqdad was speaking at the annual conference in The Hague of countries belonging to the Chemical Weapons Convention.

Britain Calls for Immediate Ceasefire in Syria's Aleppo
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/November 28/16/Britain called on Monday for an immediate ceasefire in Aleppo, saying a humanitarian catastrophe threatened the Syrian city. Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson also urged Russia and Iran to use their influence on Syrian President Bashar Assad to stop the assault his forces are waging. Syria's rebels lost all of the northern neighborhoods of their stronghold in east Aleppo on Monday, as the regime army made significant advances in its offensive to recapture the entire city. "I call on those with influence on the regime -- especially Russia and Iran -- to use this to end the devastating assault on eastern Aleppo and ensure the U.N.'s humanitarian plan for the city can be implemented," Johnson said in a statement. "The assault is threatening a humanitarian catastrophe. Hundreds of civilians are reported killed in the past fortnight and thousands displaced by attacks over the weekend. "We need an immediate ceasefire in Aleppo and immediate access for impartial humanitarian actors to ensure the protection of vulnerable civilians fleeing the fighting. These are humanitarian imperatives." Johnson said everyone involved in the assault had a responsibility to protect civilians under international humanitarian law. "Elsewhere, the Assad regime is using siege and bombardment tactics to force surrenders -- this too must stop," he added. The loss of eastern Aleppo would be a potentially devastating blow to Syria's rebels, who seized the area in 2012.

Syria Calls Chemical Arms Accusations 'Campaign of Lies'
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/November 28/16/Syria launched a blistering verbal attack Monday on "Western" countries that have accused it of using chemical weapons in its deadly five-year conflict, dismissing the allegations as "a campaign of lies.""The multitude of accusations, made in some Western circles without any tangible evidence, as to the responsibility of the Syrian government in cases of use of toxic chemicals are but a part of a coordinated and repeated campaign of lies," Syria's deputy foreign minister Faisal Muqdad said. He was speaking at the annual conference of countries belonging to the Chemical Weapons Convention, a treaty that compels all member states to help rid the world of toxic arms. Both the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad and the Islamic State group have been accused of unleashing chemical weapons during the conflict. More than 300,000 people have been killed since Syria's conflict began with anti-government protests in March 2011. A panel set up by the U.N., known as the Joint Investigative Mechanism, has already determined during a year-long probe that Syrian government forces carried out three chlorine gas attacks on villages in 2014 and 2015. It was the first time that an international inquiry had pointed the finger of blame at Assad and his forces, after years of denial from Damascus. The panel consisting of U.N. and experts from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) also found that the IS group -- which captured a large swathe of Iraq and Syria in 2014 -- was behind a mustard gas attack in Syria in August 2015. But Muqdad on Monday disputed the JIM's findings, saying its reports were made on "the basis of inaccurate and unconvincing findings" which "undermines the credibility of the OPCW." The world should instead be concerned about stopping terror groups like IS from making and using chemical weapons, Muqdad added. His words were echoed by Syria's main ally Russia, whose deputy trade and industry minister Georgy Kalamanov said the panel's findings remained "unconvincing and sometimes even partial" against Damascus.
Without naming countries, Kalamanov said there were some who "attempt to use the OPCW to overthrow elected governments. That's unacceptable."
'Troubling uncertainties'
Speaking at the start of the five-day conference in The Hague, OPCW chief Ahmet Uzumcu however stressed that "gaps, inconsistencies and discrepancies" remain in Syria's statements about its own chemical weapons program. Jacek Bylica, the EU's special envoy for disarmament and non-proliferation said more than three years after Syria joined the convention "many and deeply troubling uncertainties regarding the dismantling of the Syrian chemical program remain." "Syria has manifestly failed to declare its full chemical weapons program," he told delegates. The EU is "deeply concerned that these chemical weapons might fall into the hands of terrorist groups," Bylica said. Syria caved to international pressure under a Russia-U.S. brokered deal in September 2013 and agreed to hand over its chemical stockpile to the OPCW for destruction. It was the first time Syria publicly acknowledged having a chemical arms stockpile and came after a sarin gas attack in August that year on rebel-held areas near Damascus blamed on Assad's regime. While the OPCW has verified that all of Syria's declared chemical weapons stockpile has been destroyed, it remains concerned by allegations of continuing attacks, many of them said to be from chlorine gas dropped in barrel bombs. Chlorine, widely used for such things as water purification and fertilizers, is exempt from the convention and does not have to be declared to the OPCW. Uzumcu told AFP earlier this month that the OPCW is probing more than 20 reports of the alleged use of toxic arms in Syria since August.

U.S. Says French Strike Likely Killed al-Qaida Ally Belmokhtar

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/November 28/16/Algerian militant Mokhtar Belmokhtar, one of al-Qaida's key allies in North Africa, is thought to have been killed in a French air strike, a U.S. official said Monday. The official, speaking to AFP on condition of anonymity, confirmed a report in the Wall Street Journal that U.S. intelligence had helped France target the jihadist. Belmokhtar, notorious commander of an Al-Qaeda-linked faction of the al-Murabitoun jihadist group, has been reported killed on several previous occasions.
But the official told AFP the latest strike is believed finally to have killed the elusive one-eyed militant, known for kidnapping European citizens for ransom. According to the Wall Street Journal report, citing experts and unnamed officials, the strike reflects closer U.S. and French intelligence cooperation. Belmokhtar became one of the world's most wanted men in January 2013 after a spectacular assault on the In Amenas gas plant in Algeria left at least 38 hostages dead. This year, his group claimed responsibility for an attack on luxury a hotel in Burkina Faso that killed another 20 people, most of them foreigners. And reports he had arrived in Libya have fuelled concern that jihadists will take advantage of the political turmoil there to establish a base of operations. Washington put a $5 million bounty on the 44-year-old's head, dubbing him the leader of the Khaled Abu al-Abbas Brigade, also known as the "Signatories in Blood." In May last year, he insisted al-Murabitoun remained loyal to al-Qaida, despite another of its leaders pledging allegiance the Islamic State group.
Belmokhtar was born on June 1, 1972 in the ancient desert city of Ghardaia, 370 miles (600 kilometers) south of the Algerian capital.
'Mister Marlboro'
In a rare 2007 interview he said he joined the mujahideen rebels fighting the Soviet forces in Afghanistan in 1991 when he was barely 19 years old. In Afghanistan, he claimed, he lost an eye to shrapnel and had his first contact with the group that became al-Qaida, eventually rising to a senior position. He returned to Algeria in 1993, a year after the Algiers government sparked civil war by cancelling an election that an Islamist party was poised to win. He joined the Armed Islamic Group (GIA), and thrived thanks to his intimate knowledge of the remote deserts of southern Algeria, northern Mali and Niger. In 1998 the "Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat" (GSPC) broke from the GIA and Belmokhtar went with them. Nine years later, GSPC formally adopted the global ideology of Saudi-born jihadist kingpin Osama bin Laden and renamed itself Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb. Belmokhtar was best known as a smuggler, known by some as "Mister Marlboro" for trafficking cigarettes. But in 2013 he emerged as the hardline leader of the "Signatories in Blood," blamed for attacks across the Sahara and the Sahel in Algeria, Mali, Chad and Niger.

Can Conservative Fillon Keep France's Far-Right at Bay?
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/November 28/16/Francois Fillon, having clinched the presidential nomination for the right-wing Republicans party, will now join a far bigger battle for the future of France, the European Union and mainstream politics in the West.
After Donald Trump's stunning victory in the United States, France's election next April and May has become a test for how far a rising tide of nationalist and populist politics will rise. If polls are to be believed, Fillon's biggest rival is the far-right National Front (FN) leader Marine Le Pen who sees herself as part of a spreading revolt against globalisation and the political elite. Fillon's backers in the Republicans party believe his hard-right positions on protecting French culture, fighting Islamic extremism and combating crime will help to neuter Le Pen's appeal. "When you enter someone else's house you do not take over," Fillon said in a message to immigrants last week in a sign that he is not scared to adopt the nationalist language of his opponents. His conservative social views and appeal to rural voters as a devout Catholic from provincial France might also shield him from charges of being an out-of-touch metropolitan liberal. "It appears your imminent victory is worrying Marine Le Pen," Bruno Le Maire, a rival-turned-supporter in the Republicans party, boomed at Fillon's final campaign rally in Paris last Friday. Le Maire, a former minister defeated by Fillon in the first round of the Republicans primary, declared Le Pen was right to be scared -- to cheers from the mostly white, middle-class crowd.
-A symbol of the past? - The stakes for France and Europe are high.
As well as pledging a crackdown on immigration, Le Pen has promised to pull her country out of the euro and organise a referendum on France's membership of the European Union. While Britain's planned departure from the EU club was a major blow, the withdrawal of France, a founding member, could deliver the European project a coup de grace. The FN under Le Pen has worked hard to try to shed the party's historic racist image and hopes to capitalise on economic gloom and concern about Europe's biggest migrant crisis since World War II. In the northeastern Parisian suburb of Raincy, a group of FN activists buoyed by Trump's victory and the Brexit vote gathered Sunday morning to hand out leaflets. Local councillor Jordan Bardella rehearsed the attack lines on Fillon which are likely to be at the core of the party's pitch. Firstly, he argued that Fillon's time as prime minister from 2007-2012 and various ministerial roles mean he is the sort of discredited establishment face that angry voters are keen to reject. "He symbolises the past and I think French people want to turn the page," the 21-year-old rising figure in the party told AFP in front of a fruit and vegetable market. Secondly, his programme "is unprecedented in its violence. It's a real attempt to smash the social system," Bardella added. Fillon has vowed to cut 500,000 public sector jobs, scrap the 35-hour working week, and introduce social security and healthcare cuts designed to reduce France's chronic over-spending. The 62-year-old, who grew up in a chateau near the town of Le Mans, has also expressed admiration for ex-British leader Margaret Thatcher, an advocate of globalisation, deregulation and free markets. "Today the world is going totally in the opposite direction," FN vice president Florian Philippot said last Thursday. "For me, Fillon is Thatcher but 30 years too late."- Unpredictable race -Two new polls published on Sunday evening forecast that the Republicans party candidate will face -- and beat -- Le Pen in a second-round run-off vote in May. This would be a re-run of the 2002 election when Le Pen's father Jean-Marie made it into the second round against the rightwing candidate Jacques Chirac. Voters on the centre-right and left united in a so-called "Republican front" to keep Le Pen out. This pattern was repeated in regional elections in France last December when centrist voters came together to prevent the FN winning a single council despite a strong showing in the first round. Fillon's defeated rival Alain Juppe had argued that his programme of more gradual reform and less traditional views on abortion or gay rights would make him more palatable to leftist voters. Jean-Yves Camus, an author and expert on the far-right in Europe, says that the election remains highly uncertain, with the Socialist party yet to nominate its candidate and the role of independents still unclear. He says the attack on Fillon's economic programme will be the FN's most effective line, particularly among the sort of working class voters who helped propel Trump to the White House. "At the end of the day, I still think the 'Republican front' will work," he told AFP. "I don't see French people making Marine Le Pen president of the Republic."

Israel Jails Palestinian for Life for Tel Aviv Killings
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/November 28/16/Israel on Monday jailed a Palestinian for life for the 2015 killing of two Israelis and the wounding of a third in a Tel Aviv knife attack, the justice ministry said. A copy of the judgment of the Tel Aviv district court said Rayed Khalil, born in 1979, was sentenced to two life terms for the murders and an additional 20 years for three attempted murders in the attack at a Tel Aviv office building. A justice ministry spokeswoman told AFP that each life sentence was 25 years, with no possibility of parole. The court ruled that Khalil, from the southern West Bank city of Hebron, should have no prospect of early release as his November 2015 rampage met the legal definition of "aggravated circumstances.""It is decided that the acts of murder which the defendant committed were carried out in circumstances that were exceptional in their gravity," the three judges wrote. The spokeswoman said Khalil would also be ineligible for inclusion in any future prisoner release that might be agreed between Israel and the Palestinians. At a separate court hearing Monday in Lod, near Tel Aviv, judges jailed another Palestinian for 16 years and six months. Tamer Weridat, aged around 30, stabbed and wounded an Israeli at the start of a wave of violence in October 2015. Since then, 241 Palestinians, 36 Israelis, two Americans, a Jordanian, an Eritrean and a Sudanese have been killed, according to an AFP count. Most of the Palestinians killed were carrying out attacks, according to Israeli authorities. Others were shot dead during protests or clashes, while some died in Israeli air strikes on Gaza. Israeli courts have recently been handing out stiff sentences to perpetrators who survived. On November 2, a military tribunal sentenced a Palestinian minor to life for stabbing to death a 38-year-old Israeli nurse and mother of six in her home in a West Bank settlement.

Iraqi Forces Try to Weed Out IS from Those Fleeing Mosul
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/November 28/16/An Iraqi officer shuffled through identity cards as he sat at a battered desk by the side of the dust-blown highway heading east from the city of Mosul. Six men in dirt-spattered tracksuits huddled nearby, waiting on a concrete slab, part of the latest convoy of civilians to flee fighting as government forces try to oust Islamic State jihadists from the city. Clutching a phone to his ear, the officer stood up and read out the men's names one by one, waiting a second to receive a word from the person on the other end. He then handed them back their identity cards and let them go. Eventually, only one man remained. The officer repeated his name several times, his voice rising. Suddenly, he grabbed the man and started hauling him into a makeshift cell at the back of what was once a roadside car workshop. "Everyone in Mosul knows who the terrorists are," said Lieutenant Ali of Iraq's special forces, part of a group of officers involved in the screening. Some 70,000 civilians have fled the violence since Iraqi forces started the offensive to retake Mosul last month. After more that two years of extremist rule over the city of more than a million inhabitants, the authorities are desperate to stop any jihadists escaping among the throngs of displaced civilians. To do this, they say they use a database of intelligence collected from different sources, including Western spy agencies, old records and Mosul residents who lived under IS. "We get information from Mosul because of the difficulties people suffered during the two-and-a-half years under Daesh," Ali said, using an Arabic acronym for IS. Official figures are not made public on how many people have been detained by the various forces fighting IS -- the Iraqi army, special forces, police and Kurdish peshmerga. Intelligence officer Ali, who did not give his second name, estimated that some five percent of the men fleeing the city have been held on suspicion of cooperating with IS. That would mean hundreds -- if not thousands -- are currently detained.
I'm in prison
Iraqi officials say the men they detain are investigated and -- if enough evidence is provided of their ties to IS -- put on trial. Some parts of Mosul's population initially welcomed the jihadists, following abuses committed by the Shiite-dominated security forces against the Sunni-majority city's residents before IS swept in. And when the daily hardships of life in IS' tyrannical "caliphate" became evident, some level of acceptance of the jihadist organization was sometimes necessary to survive. Dhiaa Zuhair clutched his ID card in relief as he walked back to his family after passing through the screening. The dust from walking out of the Mosul battlefield still clung to his clothes, shoes and hair. "I wasn't worried because I had nothing to do with IS," he said. "The forces have very good intelligence." But some said that the dragnet for IS members was falling too wide and subject to abuse. Several rights groups have said the process is opaque and has not undergone enough scrutiny. At her tent in the sprawling Khazir camp for displaced people, Um Yamen showed off the note she had received from her husband that morning. "I'm well and in good health," read the message handwritten on paper from the International Committee of the Red Cross. "I'm in prison."
It was the first news she had received from her husband in the 20 days since Kurdish forces arrested him as he followed her out of their village close to Mosul. They accused him of working with IS, and Kurdish intelligence is holding him in a neighboring district. But his wife insisted he was just a clerk at the local power company doing his job.  The real reason he was detained, she said, was that some people in the village had a grudge against him and claimed he was a member of IS to get him in trouble. "This is an injustice. He didn't do anything wrong. He was just going to his job," she said, asking to use a pseudonym. "I don't really understand why this has happened."

Kuwait Cabinet Steps Down after Parliament Polls
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/November 28/16/The Kuwaiti cabinet on Monday submitted its resignation to the emir of the oil-rich Gulf state following snap parliamentary polls, an official statement said. The move falls in line with the emirate's constitution which requires the cabinet to step down after polls. After accepting the resignation, Emir Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmad Al-Sabah will either reappoint the outgoing premier, Sheikh Jaber Mubarak Al-Sabah, or name another senior member of the ruling family to form a cabinet. The new cabinet must be formed before parliament holds its first session within the next two weeks. The election on Saturday saw the Islamist-dominated opposition win nearly half of the 50-seat parliament after it ended a four-year boycott and took part in the polls. Analysts predict the return of political disputes in parliament unless the ruling family-led government succeeds in cooperating with the opposition. Around half of the opposition candidates who won seats are Islamists from a Muslim Brotherhood-linked group and Salafists. The emir dissolved the previous parliament due to a dispute over hiking petrol prices.But a majority of the elected MPs have openly said they would oppose any austerity measures by the government to boost non-oil income. Voters dealt a heavy blow to candidates from the outgoing parliament, with more than half of them failing to win seats in the new assembly. Only one woman was elected and Kuwait's Shiite Muslim minority was reduced to six seats from nine in the previous house. Unlike other Arab states in the Gulf, Kuwait has an elected parliament with powers to hold ministers to account, even though senior members of the ruling family hold all the top cabinet posts. The election came as Kuwait faces its most acute budget crisis in years. Oil income, which accounts for 95 percent of government revenues, has nosedived by 60 percent in the past two years. The OPEC member which pumps 3.0 million barrels per day of oil posted its first budget deficit of $15 billion last year following 16 years of surpluses.

Cubans Begin Tearful Farewell to Fidel Castro
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/November 28/16/Hundreds of thousands of Cubans swarmed Havana's iconic Revolution Square in a tearful and nostalgic tribute to Fidel Castro on Monday, kicking off a week-long farewell to the divisive Cold War icon. Long lines of mourners entered the towering monument to independence hero Jose Marti, filing past a black-and-white picture of "El Comandante" as a young, black-bearded revolutionary carrying a rifle. Many walked by silently while clutching flowers, some took pictures with their phones and others sobbed uncontrollably as they looked up at the portrait flanked by white roses. But his ashes were not put on display, surprising many who had hoped to see the urn holding the remains of their hero. The memorial began with a salvo of 21 cannon shots from a colonial fort overlooking Havana harbor. Lourdes Rivera, a 66-year-old retired civil servant, sat on a curb and cried as she waited for her turn to enter the monument."He's the father of all Cubans. My dad was my dad, but he couldn't give me what (Castro) gave me. He gave me everything. My freedom. My dignity," she said. For 36-year-old university professor Pedro Alvarez, "we know that our comandante has become immortal." Castro, whose 1959 revolution toppled a dictatorship with the promise of bringing justice and equality to the Caribbean island, was a towering figure of the 20th century.While some saw him as a socialist hero who brought education and free health care, others labeled him a "tyrant" who caused economic hardship and sparked an exodus of Cubans seeking a better life.
Terminator Trump?
In a sign of changing times, U.S. President Barack Obama visited Revolution Square during his historic visit to Havana in March, when he became the first U.S. leader since 1928 to step foot in Cuba, a nation of 11 million people. In 2014, Fidel's brother and successor, Raul Castro, announced a diplomatic detente with Obama, who has lifted some trade barriers. On Monday, the first regular flights from the United States to the Cuban capital in half a century resumed. But U.S. President-elect Donald Trump renewed a threat to end the thaw unless Havana makes concessions on human rights and opening up its economy. "If Cuba is unwilling to make a better deal for the Cuban people, the Cuban/American people and the US as a whole, I will terminate deal," he said on Twitter. Manuel Rodriguez Oliva, a 73-year-old interior ministry retiree who paid tribute to Castro, said Trump is "paranoid and crazy.""He can break relations. We have lived without them and we will keep living."Raul Castro has enacted gradual economic reforms. But he has firmly resisted any changes to the communist island's political system. Government opponents hope Fidel's death will enable bolder reforms. Fidel handed power to Raul in 2006 after undergoing emergency intestinal surgery. His cause of death on Friday at age 90 has not been disclosed. Castro, who came to power as a cigar-chomping 32-year-old in combat fatigues, survived more than 600 assassination attempts, according to aides, as well as the failed 1961 U.S.-backed Bay of Pigs invasion and the 1962 Cuban missile crisis.
'Nothing changes'
Dissidents who were repressed by Castro's regime for years said they were happy that the "dictator" had died, but called off regular demonstrations on Sunday out of deference to those in mourning. "We're going to remain calm, even if (Castro) is the main culprit for the misery and lack of political rights in Cuba," said veteran dissident Jose Daniel Ferrer. Once the nine-day period of national mourning is over, "we will continue fighting the system he created," he said. In Miami, where so many Cubans flocked in the past decades to escape Castro's policies, Cuban-Americans celebrated his death with street parties throughout the weekend. After two days of commemorations in Havana, Castro's ashes will go on a four-day island-wide procession starting Wednesday. They will be buried on Sunday in the southeastern city of Santiago de Cuba, the heartland of Castro's uprising against U.S.-backed dictator Fulgencio Batista. Fidel could do no wrong for the mourners at the Revolution Square, where Castro would often rail against the US "empire" during his legendary, marathon speeches. Many were dressed in state uniforms -- school children, soldiers, veterans, doctors and customs officers.

Dutch Far-Right MP Tops Polls Again ahead of March Vote
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/November 28/16/Far-right Dutch MP Geert Wilders was topping the polls on Monday ahead of March elections, a new survey said, appearing to have been boosted by his ongoing hate-speech trial. According to a poll released on Sunday, if elections were held now the anti-Islam politician would take 33 seats in the 150-seat Dutch parliament. That would make his Freedom Party (PVV) the largest group in parliament, pushing the Liberal Party of Prime Minister Mark Rutte into second place with just 25 seats -- well down on the 41 it currently has. The new weekly poll from respected Dutch pollster Maurice de Hond comes ahead of March elections as support for populist parties in Europe has been on the rise since Donald Trump's victory in the U.S. presidential race. "The trial of Wilders has ensured that the positive electoral flow towards the PVV since the election of Trump has been further strengthened," said De Hond. Wilders' PVV party took the lead in the polls late last year amid a polarizing debate over how to accommodate the wave of migrants arriving in Europe. It had slipped back to run neck-and-neck with the Liberals in recent months. But amid a wave of publicity since the October 31 start of Wilders's trial, support has been steadily climbing and the PVV moved back ahead of the Liberals two weeks ago. The Freedom Party currently holds just 12 seats in parliament. Rutte's Liberals currently govern in a coalition with their junior partner the Labor Party (PvdA) together holding a 75-seat majority. But Sunday's polls showed Labor only keeping 10 seats in the upcoming vote. Wilders is now awaiting a December 9 verdict having been charged with inciting racial hatred and insulting a racial group. If found guilty of insulting Moroccans during an election rally in 2014, he faces a likely 5,000 euros fine. But he remained unapologetic when addressing the court last week as the hearings wrapped up, saying he was "not a racist."The polls come as Austria votes on Sunday in a re-run of disputed presidential elections pitting the leader of the anti-immigration Freedom Party (FPOe) against a contender backed by the Greens. And in France Francois Fillon has clinched the presidential nomination for the rightwing Republicans ahead of elections in April and May, hoping to fend off a strong challenge from the far-right National Front's leader Marine Le Pen. For them, the country's economic problems stem from the decades-old U.S. embargo. "If we didn't develop more, it's the fault of imperialism," said Augustin Fivale Hernandez, 80, with tearful eyes and holding his wife's hand after seeing the memorial.

Khamenei's adviser: will be a global Islamic government in this century
Sam Yono/Face Book/November 28/16 /Assistant and senior adviser to Khamenei, Major General Yahya Rahim Safavi said, that America has begun to decline and the present century will establish a global Islamic government centrality of Iran. He added Safavi, in a speech during the one occasion in the northern Iranian city of Gallus on Monday, that America has begun to back down on the political and military levels.He continued, "The survival of the code and the lives of the Iranian people to walk in the mortgage jihad and martyrdom approach even if the Iranian people did not have the spirit of sacrifice for the sake of the values ​​and principles he would have been forced to bow in front of the enemies and their ambitions." He noted that Iran has lost about one million square kilometers of its territory in the past, not so long ago, during the Golestan and Turkmengy and Paris treaties due to the inability of the rulers at that time for instilling the spirit of love of martyrdom among the people."Young Muslim world as Yemen and Iraq have young model today Iran and offered thousands of martyrs." Rahim safavi was drawn to America's politicians and military commanders are unable to decide on a military attack on Iran since that success, thanks to the wisdom of the leader of the revolution and resilience of the country's mobilization forces. "Martyrs of Iran gave lessons in resistance and steadfastness against the oppressors of over one billion and 600 million Muslims in the world."He stressed that "all the world powers today look and behave respectfully with the Islamic Republic of Iran is the result of their awareness of the extent of the energies and capabilities of Iran and their inability to confront and stop the wheel of progress."

Al-Arabiya TV: Maryam Rajavi believes there is no solution other than dismantling current regime in Iran
Monday, 28 November 2016/On Saturday November 26, Al-Arabiya TV published a report regarding a conference held in Paris on Saturday. The report reads:"the political figures and legal organizations called for the referral of the case to international courts regarding the increasing number of executions in Iran. They also stressed on prosecuting the Iranian authorities who committed killings and mass executions." In the summit held in Paris, The French committee of "a democratic Iran" and the committee of human rights protection in Iran called on the international community to support the global campaign for trying and prosecuting the Iranian regime that has executed thousands of Iranians.The President of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), Maryam Rajavi stated that trampling the current Iranian regime is the only solution. She stressed that the Iranian people should support the resistance of the Syrians in Aleppo.
The political figures and EU parliament members, the Syrian opposition, international and Iranian legal organizations participated in the meeting and they called for the referral of Iran's case to the International Court of Justice. The Former senator and anti-corruption French activist, Ingrid Betancourt said:"the international justice must be done in Iran and some other countries. We should call on the International Court of Justice to prosecute those who cause killing and execution in Iran." Al-Arabiya TV added:"after being released, the two anti-regime Iranians could escape from Iran. They have witnessed the terrible incidents that happened in the prisons of Iran."The student activist, Shabnam Madadzadeh said:"I am here to convey the voice of the Iranians as well as the mothers who witnessed the execution of their children by the Iranian regime."Al-Arabiya added:"the global campaign has started a few months ago to try and prosecute the Iranian regime and it has been developed through the gatherings in order to fulfill the legal and political demands of people."
The member of NCRI Foreign Affair Committee, Musa Afshar stated:"the legal entities participating in the meeting hold a considerable power to prosecute the criminals of war as well as the perpetrators of crimes against the humanity."
As Al-Arabiya reports, the participating political figures focused towards the need to review the US policy that has caused destruction in Iraq, Syria, Yemen and other countries in the region. The political and legal figures called for the referral of the case regarding the increasing number of executions in Iran to international courts. They also demanded an independent investigation to be carried out regarding the condition of human rights in Iran in order to put an end to the impunity of the Iranian clerics who were involved in the mass executions as well as the expansion of wars in the neighboring countries.

IRAN: Mullah’s judiciary attempt to arrest a member of parliament
Monday, 28 November 2016/NCRI - A member of the Iranian regime’s Majlis (Parliament) who called for publication of the report on bank accounts of the head of the regime’s Judiciary, Sadegh Larijani, escaped the agents who were dispatched to his home to arrest him. Mahmoud Sadeghi, published the news via Telegram on November 27. This Member of Iranian regime’s parliament in an interview with state-run ILNA news agency on November 27 pointed to the attempt by the regime’s agents to arrest him and said: “About an hour ago when I was returning home, the agents holding a warrant tried to arrest me… Considering that the issue is contrary to the law regulating the behavior of MPs, I resisted and entered my home. However, the agents are still waiting in front of the home.”
The state-run Entekhab also wrote on Sunday night November 27: “Following the action to arrest Mahmoud Sadeghi, a number of MPs went to the home of this member of parliament.”Ali Motahari, deputy speaker of regime’s parliament, during a speech on the same night attacked the attempt by the regime’s judiciary to arrest Mahmoud Sadeghi and said: “We are witnessing that a representative who criticizes the Judiciary has been indicted immediately. While he only wants an explanation about an issue, this is how he is dealt with.”
In addition, Massoud Pezashkian, another deputy speaker of the regime’s parliament, said in this regard: “The nightly action to arrest Mahmoud Sadeghi without informing the parliament is disrespect for the parliament first of all. We will pursue this behavior…”
Not long ago, Mahmoud Sadeghi called for an explanation regarding the bank accounts of the head of the Iranian regime’s Judiciary. He said in the regime’s parliament: “What law allows public funds to be deposited into personal accounts?” He asked Sadegh Larijani, Head of the regime’s judiciary, to publish a report of 5-years performance of the accounts in question and the expenditure of their bank interests “for transparency and in order to prevent continued abuse by foreigners.”

Iranian political prisoners support Paris conference on 1988 massacre

Monday, 28 November 2016
NCRI - On Saturday November 26, a group of political prisoners in Iran in a letter addressing the organizers, guests and participants in a conference held on Saturday in Paris that called for accountability of the perpetrators of the 1988 massacre in Iran.
The following is the excerpts of the letter:
“Salute and greetings to all organizers, fellow participants and particularly guests form across the world,
This conference which is held to strengthen the movement for seeking justice for the massacre (of political prisoners) in the summer of 1988 in Iran shows the desire of Iranian people for the elimination of tyranny and establishment of freedom and democracy.
The product of overthrow of the religious dictatorship in Iran does not only directed toward people of Iran, but also does good and rightness for the region and human society and the failure of fundamentalism in the region.
We, political prisoners, understand more than anyone else the need for such justice seeking. Today, we still face the wave of executions because that crime and massacre was not accounted for.
Dear friends,
Every day when the prisoners are taken to the gallows and executed, it is as if we are also hanged with them and we have to endure bitterly every moment of these crimes while unable do anything about them…
We wish we could meet closely with you libertarian and humanitarian friends.
Now that there is an opportunity prepared for us, we would like to tell you about our heartfelt wish and thank all of you the libertarians, parliamentarian figures and jurists and all friends of the Justice Seeking Movement. Our wish is the same as what the families of the massacred political prisoners want which is expressed repeatedly by Mrs. Rajavi and that is accountability and trial of the masterminds and perpetrators of this “crime against humanity” most of whom are unfortunately hold government positions including Ministry of Justice (in Rouhani’s cabinet).
Signed by political prisoners: Reza Akbari MonfaredSaeed MasouriSaleh Kohandel – Ali Moezi – Mohammad Ali MansouriMehdi Farahi ShandizShahin Zoghi TabaarAbolqassem Fouladvand – Hassan SadeghiArzhang DavoudiKhaled HardaniEbrahim Firouzi”.

Call on int’l organizations to guarantee security of Ahmad Montazeri, prevent his imprisonment
NCRI Statements/Monday, 28 November 2016/Mullahs' regime in fear of further revelation of 1988 massacre and justice-seeking movement for victims
The so-called “Clerics Court” in the city of Qom in central Iran issued its ruling sentencing Ahmed Montazeri, son of the late Ayatollah Hossein-Ali Montazeri, former successor to Iranian regime founder Ruhollah Khomeini, to 21 years behind bars, and to be stripped of any clerical authority. This ruling is in reaction to the revelation of a sound clip unveiling remarks made by Mr.z Montazeri during a meeting with the perpetrators of the 1988 massacre. Ahmad Montazeri has been sentenced on charges of “measures against national security,” “publishing a classified sound clip” and “propaganda against the state.”“Considering the mean minimum and maximum punishments to be implemented” the ruling is decreased to 6 years behind bars and banned from clerical activities for 3 years, the ruling adds.The Iranian Resistance strongly condemns this cruel ruling and demands urgent and firm action by the international community to ensure the security of Ahmad Montazeri, and prevent his imprisonment. This ruling, issued under orders from Iranian regime leader Ali Khamenei, unveils the mullahs’ utter fear of further revelations regarding the 1988 massacre and the justice-seeking movement for its victims. These ridiculous remarks are an implied confession by official organs in the Iranian regime proving the correct nature of this sound bite.
“This justice seeking effort has targeted the entire religious tyranny, and this is exactly why the mullahs’ regime is completely fragile against it,” said Iranian Resistance President-elect Maryam Rajavi in a Paris international conference held on November 26.
e of Mr. Montazeri refers to a conversation dating back to August 15, 1988 between Mr. Montazeri and members of the "Death Committee", Hossein-Ali Nayyeri (a religious judge), Morteza Eshraghi (deputy public prosecutor), Ibrahim Reisi (deputy prosecutor) and Mostafa Pour Mohammadi (representing the Intelligence Ministry). In this sound bite Mr. Montazeri unveils new scopes of this crime, now known as an obvious case of crime against humanity and genocide. Pour Mohammadi is currently the Justice Minister in the cabinet of Iranian regime president Hassan Rouhani. “We are proud to have carried out God’s orders regarding the monafeqin (term used by the Iranian regime in reference to the Iranian opposition People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK),” he said after the sound bite’s revelation.
Reisi is now deputy chair of the mullahs’ so-called Assembly of Experts and has recently been appointed by Khamenei as head of the Astan Quds Razavi (one of Iran’s largest economic establishments).
Nayyeri currently heads the Supreme Disciplinary Court for Judges.
Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran/November 28, 2016

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on November 28-29/16
Obama’s foreign policy legacy: Ambitious but largely unsuccessful
Dr. Azeem Ibrahim/Al Arabiya/November 28/16
When President Obama took the presidency eight years ago, we looked set for an overhaul of America’s place in the world and the world order enshrined at the end of the Cold War. In the depths of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression following 1929, we had reasons to be hopeful: the world’s foremost superpower was finally ruled by a liberal of conviction, a thoughtful and intelligent man with great ambitions for a better world. And as we stand on the cusp of the Trump presidency, we are indeed in a far different world. Unfortunately, the world now is different mostly for the worst. Obama was successful in steering the world through the aftermath of the global financial crisis and we have avoided a 1930s style depression. No one will be able to take that away from him. But as for the rest of his legacy, things do not look good. Everything he has stood for and everything he would have advertised as his greatest achievements six months ago - from bringing healthcare to millions of uninsured Americans the pivot to Asia, to the Paris Accord on climate change - are things that Trump has vowed to overturn. And what is more, it is precisely those commitments that have won Trump the presidency. But Obama’s failure to bring Americans, and the rest of the world, over to his way of thinking will have its most profound and long-lasting effects in the international arena. In the beginning, Obama addressed the Arab world with great hopes of a long-overdue settlement of the Israel-Palestine conflict. Now that relations between Israel and the US are at their lowest point ever and the US has virtually no leverage to stop continued Israeli settlement in the Occupied Territories.
Promises
When Obama promised a more open world, many of the youth of the Middle East took to the streets in the Arab Spring – and we in the West gave them our blessings. But six years later, most of those revolutions have floundered and those which did not, most notably Libya and Syria, have been left in a state of perpetual civil war. Perhaps this will be the last time that America’s vision for the world will matter. After Trump, America will lack both the power and the moral authority to lead. Relations with Asia remain patchy as China resented his expansionary approach in their backyard, while the Philippines is moving, slowly but surely, out of the US sphere of influence. And the three great openings of Obama’s tenure, Myanmar, Iran and Cuba, all look shaky at best. In Myanmar, Obama was too quick to give Aung San Suu Kyi the benefit of the doubt, and lift sanctions. But many parts of the state and the economy remain firmly under the control of the former military regime, and now those parts are waging open war on the Rohingya Muslim minority while the Nobel Peace Prize laureate is standing idly by. Obama was the main man to push for the improvement of conditions for this oppressed group, but now that he is on the way out, it seems like there is precious little standing between the Rohingya and outright genocide. In Iran, the nuclear deal championed by Obama has given us some reprieve from Iranian nuclear development but at a tremendous cost to American interests in the region. The lifting of sanctions have given the Iranians the confidence and the resources to push their agenda in the region with renewed zeal, and the heavy lifting that Iranian militias and troops are doing in Iraq and Syria for factions that are not aligned with US interests will be just the beginning of our problems. Above all stands the renewed Cold War with Russia. Some analysts warn that this kind of language is alarmist, or even that it may aggravate tensions needlessly, but the facts speak for themselves. The US and its Western allies are imposing sanctions on Russia, while Russia is waging open cyber-warfare on the West, its institutions and most seriously of all, its democratic process as we have seen from the involvement of Russian hackers in the US elections.
Chaos
In all this chaos, this new world disorder, the only major Obama foreign policy foray that still has legs is the reopening of relations with Cuba. But even that is hostage to the caprices of Raul Castro and Donald Trump. And who knows what might happen there next.
And that is the real tragedy at the end of the Obama presidency. Here is a man of vision and principle, of intelligence and intent. If anyone could have been trusted to take the world as they found it in 2008 and made it better by 2016, it would have been Obama. And he cannot be faulted for not trying. But once again, America’s vision for the world has been left in disarray by the vagaries of history. And perhaps this will be the last time that America’s vision for the world will matter. After Trump, America will lack both the power and the moral authority to lead. And the world is not a better place for it.

What are Egypt’s foreign policy intentions?
Maria Dubovikova/Al Arabiya/November 28/16
Egypt is standing at the crossroads. Revolutions denoted that the Egyptian people could not continue the same way any longer. The choice made after revolution, when the Egyptians had to choose between the representative of the old regime and the Muslim Brotherhood, could hardly be considered a choice made in a healthy environment. The coup was inevitable and the majority of Egyptians praised it. Revolutions inspired, liberated public consciousness, opened the door to new chances and opportunities, but did not draw a path to the future. Egypt is charting a path without a clear understanding or where it is heading. Economically, Egypt is balancing between deep economic crisis and an economic boom. The economy cannot carry most of the subsidies, permitted to keep the prices on basic foods at a low level. Meanwhile, the population is growing. In the past six months, the population has 92 million. The burden on economy is becoming immense and sooner or later the government will have to take birth control measures, I believe. The country is suffering from an extremist and terrorist threat. The Muslim Brotherhood too does not contribute to the country’s future. The economy is still in turbulence after two revolutions and due to instability, while before the crisis the economy was performing with seven percent annual growth. The newly imposed austerity measures, due to a deal with the World Monetary Fund, damages social stability and weaken support of the government by the society.
At the same time, there is an economic and investment boom. According to the UNCTAD 2015 World Investment Report, Egypt in the top five African countries in terms of attracting foreign direct investments. The UK is the key investor in Egypt, with 41.5 percent of investments made to Egypt in 2014-2015, followed by the US with just 16.4 percent. Egypt’s newly discovered oil rich field is one of the key points of attraction that will supposedly enrich not only the country itself, but its investors as well. The leading industries in terms of foreign investments after the oil sector are construction, telecommunications, financial services and healthcare sectors. Also, Suez-II, despite all skepticism, apparently has a chance to become a zone that will guarantee Egypt prosperity and a significant role in the world’s trade in a mid-term perspective, with all these modern industrial zones of world countries to be built in Suez-II area. Development of nuclear energy, renewable energy, including solar energy, attracts more and more investors from all over the world, consolidating the prospects of Egypt’s complete economic recovery, however it will not be fast. The inarticulate foreign policy of Egypt leaves too much space for interpretations that could be damaging
The terrorist threat and unclear foreign policy could be the factors that bring Egypt to fur-there decline. Libya, on the one hand, and Sinai on the other. Egypt keeps on fighting with the enemy, which once beheaded grows two new heads. Egypt cannot handle its Libyan threat, that poses a drastic threat to Europe, Africa and the Middle East, without in depth global strategy in Libya. And in Sinai, without adequate systematic cooperation with neighbors and global powers, Egypt cannot make inroads.
The inarticulate foreign policy of Egypt leaves too much space for interpretations that could be damaging. Egypt’s desire for a political solution in Syria leaves more questions than answers.
In recent days, rumors have swirled that Egypt has secretly intervened in Syria, that Egyptian pilots fly Russian helicopters and that Egyptian fighter jets are deployed in Syria. These rumors are unfounded but exemplify concerns that Egypt could become involved. There is no use in explaining why an Egyptian intervention in the Syrian conflict would cause a dramatic shift and deep schism in the region, automatically making Egypt more vulnerable from the inside. Having no clear rhetoric toward any foreign policy issue is good and bad at the same time. The reason is clear - Egypt is attempting to sit on all chairs at the same time without making a clear declaration. Egypt has a chance to attain economic and social recovery. However, more than ever it depends on what Cairo is doing beyond its borders. Cairo needs to learn articulate its intentions, even the superficial ones. If not, Egypt will be damaged by the power of conjecture.

Genetic research claims to trace mysterious origins of Israel’s Druze
By Ilan Ben Zion/The Times Of Israel/ November 25/2016
 http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/28/ilan-ben-zionthe-times-of-israelgenetic-research-claims-to-trace-mysterious-origins-of-israels-druze/
 Controversial genome ‘GPS’ study suggests religious minority migrated to Levant from mountains of Turkey, Iraq; author asserts similarity to Ashkenazi Jews
 Researchers may have unraveled part of the mystery of the enigmatic Druze religion’s history and ancestry.
 A study of Israeli Druze genetics published last week in Scientific Reports of Nature may help shed light on the secretive religious sect’s history and ancestry. Researchers examined a sample of genes from members of the country’s 130,000 Druze in an attempt to better understand the origins of the group.
 Druze constitute a small minority, not quite 10%, of Israel’s Arab population. Around 138,000 of the world’s estimated 2.3 million adherents call Israel home; Syria is home to half a million and Lebanon to another 250,000.
 Israel recognized the Druze as a distinct religious community in 1956. Since then, Druze are required to serve in the IDF.
 The religion splintered off from Shia Islam in the late 10th century CE and spread to the Levant by the following century. Its actual beliefs and practices are kept a close secret by its members, but its theological principles draw from Islam, Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Christianity and a variety of other faith systems. One aspect of Druzism until recently was strict endogamy — marrying within the clan — a practice which began around the 12th century.
 According to Druze authors writing centuries later, persecution of the faithful between 1021 and 1042 sent Druze fleeing for refuge from Levantine cities to the mountains of Lebanon, Syria and northern Israel that they inhabit today.
 “The racial origins of the Druze have been the subject of wild speculation over the years,” University of Haifa historian Kais Firro noted in his 1992 “A History of the Druzes.” The theories have ranged from the “curious and amusing” to the “naive and strange,” including “Arameans, Arabians, Samaritans, Cuthites, Hivites, Armenians, Persians, and Turks, more strangely the French and British, and even the Tibetans,” he wrote.
 Eran Elhaik (Courtesy)
 The new study, supervised by University of Sheffield population geneticist Eran Elhaik, sought to put some of the more dubious theories to rest by using the geographic population structure (GPS) tool, an algorithm that tries to pinpoint a population’s origins based on their genetic code. Elhaik says the technique “works in a similar way to the sat nav in your car,” but for finding ancestry instead.
 The method involves recreating ancient gene pools from around the world, then comparing individuals’ genetic fingerprints to find a corresponding population. By analyzing the DNA of Israeli Druze and testing it against different populations around the Middle East, Elhaik and his colleagues tried to determine the population’s origins.
 Elhaik’s GPS method isn’t without controversy. Earlier this year Elhaik’s study which pointed to Ashkenazi Jews originating in what is today Turkey, supporting an equally controversial theory about the origins of the Yiddish language, was dismissed by some scholars.
 The new study’s findings indicated Druze were most closely related to neighboring Arabs in Syria, Lebanon and Palestinian areas, and to Armenians. But the GPS data showed that “proto-Druze emerged from Armenian-Turkish tribes residing in the Zagros and surrounding mountains, prior to the end of the first millennium A.D.,” who later intermingled with peoples of Syria while migrating to the Levant.
 The authors postulated that these Turkish-Armenian inhabitants of the mountainous terrain along the modern day Turkey-Iraq border swept southwest toward their heartland in what is now Syria, Lebanon and Israel along with the Seljuk Turks after the battle of Manzikert in 1071.
 “Although not actively encouraged by religious authorities, old and modern historical records, along with our genetic findings suggest that it is very likely that some conversions to the Druze faith were allowed after the 11th century A.D.,” the authors said. “Conversion efforts may have continued on a small scale until such regional operations drew the unwanted attention of local governments, forcing Druze leaders to halt further conversion efforts.”
 In an article about his research published last week on Scroll.in, Elhaik claimed that the genetic proximity of Ashkenazi Jews and Druze is supported by his two studies this year indicating Turkish origins of both peoples.
 “Our findings explain a 1,000-year saga of two people living side by side in these lands,” Elhaik wrote. Ashkenazi Jews moved north and west, he claimed, and Druze moved south, “only for both people to reunite hundreds of years later” in modern Israel.
 “And although by that time, neither one recalled their common roots, both retained the evidence in their genes,” Elhaik said. 

Muslims Demand Right to Preach in Public Schools: Canada
 John Goddard/The Clarion Project/November 28/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/28/john-goddardthe-clarion-project-muslims-demand-right-to-preach-in-public-schools-canada/
http://www.clarionproject.org/analysis/muslims-demand-right-preach-public-schools-canada

 Student Islamists are mounting a coordinated campaign to expand Muslim religious services in the high schools of Canada’s sixth largest city.
 So far, authorities are proving sympathetic, suspending a new policy meant to regulate student sermons.
 “The school board should not be policing religion,” campaign leader Shahmir Durrani told one of two November board meetings in Mississauga, Ontario, that heard from imams, parents, high school students and university leaders of the Muslim Students Association(MSA), an organization founded for universities students by members of the Muslim Brotherhood in 1963.
 “Many students are feeling stigmatized because of this.”
 Talk of prayers and sermons might come as a surprise to those unaware of how widespread Muslim religious activity has become in some Canadian school jurisdictions, and how far the fundamentalist MSA has penetrated the public education system.
 The changes started a decade ago, when the Ontario provincial government encouraged accommodation of an individual’s religious practice at workplaces and schools.
 At first, Muslim students were denied Friday congregational prayers and were told they could only pray only as individuals.
 Five years ago, however, the Toronto Sun reported that 800 students at Toronto’s Valley Park Middle School were converting the school’s cafeteria into a temporary mosque every Friday during class hours, with boys praying in front, girls praying behind them separated by a barrier and menstruating girls obliged to sit at the very back to observe the service but not participate.
 Toronto school trustees upheld the practice, and since then, Friday congregational prayers have been spreading though the public school system ever since.
 One of Canada’s highest Muslim concentrations is in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada’s sixth city located at Toronto’s western border. Of the city’s 19 high schools, 17 have a Muslim Students Association (MSA).
 The list of 17 includes Meadowvale Secondary, which temporarily banned its MSA 10 years ago after two alumni were caught co-leading a terrorist cell known as the Toronto 18, with plans to blow up buildings in downtown Toronto. A third cell member had led the school’s Friday prayers.
 The MSAs promote Friday prayers in schools, but how many Mississauga elementary, middle, and high schools are holding services is not publicly known. “We don’t track school-by-school,” Peel District School Board spokesperson Brian Woodland said.
 At some point — Woodland would not give details — staff supervisors reported problems with student sermons.
 On Sept. 20, the school board ruled that students could not deliver their own sermons, but must choose from a bank of approved sermons written by a committee of six local imams. Themes were restricted to the board’s stated values of caring, cooperation, honesty, inclusiveness, respect and responsibility.
 The students pushed back. In a well organized campaign, three levels of activists publicly petitioned school trustees to scrap mandatory use of approved sermons. They also demanded that students be allowed to pray together every day, not just on Fridays.
 “Eliminate the prohibition of allowing students to pray together outside of Jummah [Friday] prayers if it is convenient [to the students],” said campaign leader Durrani, a University of Toronto at Mississauga student and activist for the Canadian Muslim Youth Federation.
 “Policing this one group [Muslims] based on prejudice and control… could have serious psychological impacts,” said Maleeha Baig, a student at the same university and coordinator for the High School Muslim Student Associations, a subsidiary of the youth federation.
 “This policy… sets out to prohibit the discussion of Islamic beliefs in sermons,” said Hamza Aziz, MSA president at John Fraser Secondary School and part of the third organizational rung. Aziz was one of 16 MSA executive members from five Mississauga high schools who addressed the school board at a recent meeting.
 Bilal Sheikh, a self-described “active Bilal Sheikh (extreme front) with other members of the Muslim community who refused to stand up for the Canadian national anthem at a recent school board meetingmember of the Muslim community” — and who with several other men refused to stand for the national anthem — accused the board of “systemizing Islamophobia.”
 In response, school trustees immediately suspended mandatory use of the approved sermons. As an interim measure, they ruled that students can submit their own sermons to a principal for approval on the Monday before the Friday prayer service. A revised permanent policy is to be announced in the coming weeks, board chair Janet McDougald said.
 Although the school trustees have allowed the prayers — which are already problematic due to their segregation rules (and certainly embarrassingly stigmatizing to girls who are menstruating) — the involvement of the Muslim Brotherhood-linked MSA organizations, which are known promote Islamist ideology, is even more than troubling.
 *John Goddard is an independent newspaper and magazine reporter living in Toronto.

Israel must seek Saudi Arabia’s friendship
Edy Cohen/Jerusalem Post/November 28/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/28/edy-cohenjerusalem-post-israel-must-seek-saudi-arabias-friendship/
While we expect a whole different world under president Trump, we must also accept that the rules in the Middle East have changed and that we need a strong and stable Saudi Arabia.
Many including some Jewish writers and activists in the US have cheered the passing of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA ), which enables victims of terrorism to sue Saudi Arabia as an alleged supporter of terrorism, but if we take a closer look at the facts we will discover that anyone who wants stability in the Middle East should have opposed the law.
The first and main issue with the law is that undermining Saudi Arabia empowers Iran, and even those who claim Saudi Arabia is an Islamist state should ask themselves whether Iran is preferable. Saudi Arabia has never been supportive of fundamentalist acts against Israel; yes, Saudi Arabia does support the Palestinian cause, with a passion, but all of its historical support has been in the form of humanitarian aid, building houses, offering Palestinians jobs in the kingdom – where two million Palestinians work without any restrictions – and even unconditional and open residency permits. At the same time, on not a single occasion have we heard of Saudi Arabia financially supporting Hamas or even the PLO . Moreover, Saudi Arabia bans all known Islamic terrorist groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood.
What we may conclude from these facts is that Saudi Arabia actually cares for the Palestinians, and at the same time chooses not to disrupt the region.
Terrorist groups like ISIS, Muslim Brotherhood and others regularly attack Saudi Arabia, and while this in itself does not necessarily make us allies, still, to even consider undermining Saudi Arabia or attacking it either politically or in the media seems unwise.
Also, Saudi Arabia like it or not is the foundation stone of the stability of the Arab peninsula. To demonize it is to support Iran – a mistake we could all pay dearly for. We in Israel, and Jews the world over, must approach Saudi Arabia with our arms open in friendship and understanding, and not only in little meetings with former officials like former general Anwar Ishki, who has visited Israel.
No, we must look to the day we see an Israeli embassy or at least business office in Riyadh, and must mobilize all of our friends and activist to set the record straight on Saudi Arabia and the need to defend it and its image.
To those who don’t like this view, consider the alternative: Iran. At the same time Saudis must understand Israel has rights and sacred values it is not willing to compromise; the Saudis have presented a peace initiate which we are willing to consider but only under the full acceptance that Israel will forever maintain it sovereign as a Jewish state. Also we must expand our cooperation against our mutual enemy, Iran, given the fact that there is concrete intelligence information that Iran and Hezbollah have spread a number of terrorist sleeper cells in the Gulf states intended to foment sectarian unrest.
May this be a call to the Israeli government to seek true and open friendship with Saudi Arabia for the good of the region, Israel and also Palestinians, bearing in mind that the Saudi deputy crown prince, Muhammad bin Salman Al Saud, is a very open-minded and practical man who easily accepts new ideas and is avidly seeking positive change in his country.
**The author is chairman of the Kedem Forum human rights NGO.

Palestinians: The 'Wall of Shame'
Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone Institute/November 28/16
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9442/palestinians-wall
"The equation facing the Palestinian factions is clear: Hand over the terrorists and there will be no wall. The Palestinians have proven that they are unable to take security matters into their own hands in this camp." — Lebanese security official.
These anti-Palestinian practices are regularly ignored by the international community, including mainstream media and human rights organizations, whose obsession with Israel blinds them to Arab injustice. A story without an anti-Israel angle is not a story, as far as they are concerned
Typically, Western journalists and human rights activists do not even bother to report or document cases of Arab mistreatment of Arabs. This abandonment of professional standards is why apartheid laws targeting Palestinians in several Arab countries are still unknown to the international community.
The Lebanese authorities also say that they decided to build the wall after discovering several tunnels in the vicinity of Ain al-Hilweh, used to smuggle weapons and terrorists into and out of the camp.
The new wall will not solve the real problem -- namely the failure to absorb the refugees and grant them citizenship. Palestinians living in Arab countries are denied citizenship (with the exception of Jordan) and a host of basic rights.
Now is the time for the international community to apply pressure to the Arab countries to start helping their Palestinian brothers by improving their living conditions and incorporating them into these countries.
The refugee problem will end the day their leaders stop lying to them and confront them with the truth, basically that there will be no "right of return" and that the time has come for them to move on with their lives.
It is no secret that Arab countries have long mistreated their Palestinian brothers and sisters, governing them with inhumane laws and imposing severe restrictions on their public freedoms and basic rights. Building a wall around a Palestinian community to prevent terrorists from entering or leaving, however, has raised the bar on such infringements.
This is precisely what is happening in Lebanon these days. The construction of a security wall around Ain al-Hilweh, the largest Palestinian refugee camp (with a population of nearly 120,000), has drawn sharp criticism from Palestinians and revived memories of the abuse they regularly receive at the hands of their Arab brethren.
The Lebanese authorities say the Palestinians have left them no choice but to build the controversial concrete wall. The Palestinians, they say, refuse to cooperate against terrorists who have established bases within their camps. Yet that problem raises the question: "What has Lebanon done in the past half-century or so to help the Palestinians who fled to that country?" The answer: "Nothing."
In fact, among all Arab countries, Lebanon has been arguably the worst in its treatment of the Palestinians. Palestinian refugees in Lebanon are denied access to adequate housing and certain categories of employment. According to Amnesty International: "Over half of Palestinian refugees live in decaying and chronically overcrowded camps and discriminatory practices are permitted under personal status laws and nationality laws."
These anti-Palestinian practices are regularly ignored by the international community, including the mainstream media and human rights organizations, whose obsession with Israel blinds them to Arab injustice. While, every now and then, an organization does publish a report on the misery endured by Palestinians in Arab countries, these bodies rarely follow up on their work, thus creating the impression that they are doing so only for the sake of protocol.
As such, the plight of the Palestinians in many Arab countries continues to be a taboo, as far as the international community is concerned. Typically, Western journalists and human rights activists do not even bother to report or document cases of Arab mistreatment of Arabs. This abandonment of professional standards is why apartheid laws targeting Palestinians in several Arab countries are still unknown to the international community. Even when Western journalists and human rights advocates do hear about these violations, they prefer to look the other way. A story without an anti-Israel angle is not a story, as far as they are concerned.
So what is going on in Lebanon, and why are so many Palestinians furious with the Lebanese authorities?
Until a few years ago, the population of Ain al-Hilweh camp was 70,000. But the influx of refugees fleeing the civil war in Syria, since 2011, has increased the camp population to nearly 120,000. It turns out that many of these new "refugees" are actually terrorists fleeing from Syria and Iraq.
Ain al-Hilweh, like most of the camps in Lebanon, has always been a major headache for the Lebanon. It seems, however, that the Lebanese government has had enough.
For years, the Lebanese authorities, for whom the camp is "off-limits," have been trying, unsuccessfully, to clean the camp of its hundreds of terrorists.
Lebanese security forces steer clear of the refugee camps in an attempt to avoid friction with the Palestinians living there. This evasion has allowed the camps to become hotbeds for various jihadi groups and terrorists who pose a threat not only to the national security of Lebanon, but to Palestinians themselves and neighboring Arab countries such as Jordan, Egypt and Syria (not to mention Israel).
Alarmed by this heightened threat, the Lebanese authorities recently began building a concrete wall around Ain al-Hilweh, sparking a wave of denunciations from Palestinians. The Palestinians claim that the new wall, which will be completed in 15 months, will turn the camp into a big open-air prison. They refer to it as the "Wall of Shame." Their main argument is that it is disgraceful that any Arab country would build a wall surrounding a refugee camp at a time when Palestinians are asking the world to condemn Israel for building a security fence to prevent terror attacks against Israelis from the West Bank.
Camp residents claim that the Lebanese authorities have misled them concerning the construction of the wall. According to the residents, the authorities led them to believe that it was to be a small fence on the outskirts of parts of the camp and not a massive concrete wall surrounding the camp. The Lebanese security authorities have chosen to call the new barrier the "Wall of Protection" -- stressing that it is mainly intended to prevent terror attacks against Lebanon and stop the camps from becoming bases for terrorists and criminals. The authorities say that if anyone is to blame for the construction of the wall, it is the Palestinians themselves, who have refused to cooperate with the Lebanese government against the terrorists. "The goal is to prevent terrorists from infiltrating the camp," explained a Lebanese security official. "The equation facing the Palestinian factions is clear: Hand over the terrorists and there will be no wall. The Palestinians have proven that they are unable to take security matters into their own hands in this camp."
The Lebanese authorities also say that they decided to build the wall after discovering several smuggling tunnels in the vicinity of Ain al-Hilweh. These tunnels, they say, are being used to smuggle weapons and terrorists into and out of the camp.
Representatives of Ain al-Hilweh and other Palestinians have been holding marathon meetings with Lebanese government officials in the past few weeks to persuade them to halt the construction of the wall. The Palestinians in Ain al-Hilweh are now threatening that if the Lebanese government does not cancel the project, they will seek the intervention of other Arab, and also Western, countries, as well as the United Nations.
Notably, the Palestinian Authority (PA) leadership in the West Bank has not joined in the efforts to persuade the Lebanese government to drop the idea of building a wall around the camp. This avoidance probably springs from the PA leadership and its president, Mahmoud Abbas, being well aware that Ain al-Hilweh and other refugee camps in Lebanon have fallen into the hands of their enemies, namely Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Islamic State and Al-Qaeda.
The "Wall of Shame" appears particularly to bother Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal. Last week, he telephoned a number of Lebanese officials, including Prime Minister Tammam Salam and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, to warn about the consequences of the construction of the wall. Mashaal, who is based in Qatar and enjoys a luxurious life most Palestinians can barely dream of, urged the Lebanese government to halt construction if the wall and said that the wall jeopardized the lives of Palestinian refugees and would have "negative repercussions."
Hamas's spokesman in Lebanon, Ra'fat Murra, dismissed Lebanon's security concerns for building the wall. He warned that the wall would turn the camp into an isolated enclave and exacerbate tensions between Palestinians and Lebanese. Murra, however, expressed readiness to cooperate with the Lebanese authorities in apprehending and handing over wanted terrorists who had found shelter inside Ain al-Hilweh.
Protests against the wall reached their peak when hundreds of Palestinians (and some Lebanese) took to the streets of the nearby city Sidon, in southern Lebanon, calling on the government to stop construction immediately. The protesters warned that the wall would further increase tensions between Palestinians and Lebanese, and further reduce the quality of life for the camp residents.
Lebanon may be justified in building a security wall around the Palestinian refugee camp. Without a doubt, Ain al-Hilweh and other camps have become hubs for terror groups and criminals, and Lebanon has every right to combat terrorism. Yet, Lebanon needs to come up with ways to assimilate, rather than alienate, the Palestinians. Furthermore, this is a problem that extends beyond Lebanon's borders. The same applies to the camps in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and Syria and Jordan.
The continued mistreatment of Palestinians at the hands of Lebanon and other Arab countries is totally unjustified. The new wall, complete with watchtowers, that is being erected around Ain al-Hilweh may stop some terrorists from infiltrating the camp, but it will not solve the real problem -- namely the failure to absorb the refugees and grant them citizenship. In point of fact, Palestinians living in Arab countries are denied citizenship (with the exception of Jordan) and a host of basic rights.
Now is the time for the international community to apply pressure to the Arab countries to start helping their Palestinian brothers by improving their living conditions and incorporating them into these countries. Holding Palestinians in refugee camps for more than six decades is deadly counterproductive. The camps become sanctuaries for terrorists who pose a threat to the national security and stability in these Arab countries. There is no reason why a Palestinian living in Lebanon or Egypt or Kuwait should be banned from purchasing his or her own home.
Moreover, Arab states' lies concerning the return of refugees to former homes inside of Israel, so long a staple fed to the refugees, have far outlived their usefulness. The refugee problem will end on the day their leaders stop lying to them and confront them with the truth, basically that there will be no "right of return" and that the time has come for them to move on with their lives.
If the lies do not end, the day will come when these countries will be forced to place all the refugees behind walls and fences -- a move not likely to enhance stability in these countries. Ain al-Hilweh should serve as a wake-up call to all those Arabs who continue to subject Palestinians to apartheid laws and practices.
*Khaled Abu Toameh, an award-winning journalist, is based in Jerusalem.
Follow Khaled Abu Toameh on Twitter
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Grégoire Canlorbe: Interview with Howard Bloom – Part I
Gatestone Institute/November 28/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/11/28/gregoire-canlorbe-interview-with-howard-bloom-part-i/
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9408/howard-bloom
“Millions of Muslims envision Islam as a religion of tolerance, pluralism, and peace. But there is a blunt fact staring us in the face…. For Allah and His Messenger demand that Muslims be on top. They demand that Muslims allow others to live only if they take a role as second-class citizens in a purely Muslim state and pay the jizya, a tax designed to shame. And they demand that Islam rule every inch of land on God’s own speck of dust — the planet Earth.” — Howard Bloom.
“Those who want to ‘annihilate’ or to convert their fellow men in the West are not madmen. They are rational and they are something more — they are idealists. They want to save us…. If we are tricked into following false laws, believing in false gods… we will go to an unspeakably painful hell.” — Howard Bloom.
“It is very unlikely that [Iran's former president, Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad was proposing a ‘thought experiment.’ He was proposing a reality that Iran and its fellow Muslim states would be able to achieve with their upcoming weaponry — and with the existing 120 Islamic nuclear bombs of Pakistan — bombs that could easily fall into the hands of ISIS.” — Howard Bloom.
“My introduction to Islamic culture came in 1962. In the back of a library file on the Middle East, I found several English-language pamphlets printed by the Arab League, a coalition of twelve leading Arab governments. The pamphlets tried to reach people like you and me with an extremely urgent “clarification” of historical errors. First, the Holocaust, the mass murder of six million Jews by Germany’s Nazis, was a charade, a hoax. It never happened.” — Howard Bloom.
“As hungry replicators eager to remold the world, ideas often turn their ultimate weapon — the superorganism — into a killing machine. And, contrary to the doctrines of some modern critics, they do not engage in this ‘hegemonic imperialism’ only in the purportedly ‘malevolent West.’” — Howard Bloom.
There are only a handful of authors alive today whose ideas about geopolitics have won respect in both the world of Islam and in the West. One of those authors is Howard Bloom.Bloom’s second book Global Brain was the subject of an Office of the Secretary of Defense symposium in 2010, with participants from the State Department, the Energy Department, DARPA, IBM, and MIT. And the Department of Defense’s SENSIAC Military Sensing Symposium then relied on Bloom to explain how to see the world through the eyes of Osama bin Laden.Bloom’s 182 appearances on North America’s highest rated overnight talk radio show, Coast to Coast AM, a show that airs on 500 of the continent’s leading radio stations, have covered everything from the Gulf War and 9/11 to the Fort Hood shootings. In addition, he has dissected headline issues over 30 times on Saudi Arabia’s KSA2-TV, Ekhbariya TV, Economics TV, and on Iran’s global English language PressTV.Howard Bloom has also debated one-one-one with senior officials from Egypt’s Moslem Brotherhood and Gaza’s Hamas on Iran’s global Arab-language Alalam TV News Network. Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Dubai’s ruler, who doubles as the Prime Minister of the United Arab Emirates, has named a racehorse after one of Bloom’s books.
Grégoire Canlorbe: In a market overwhelmed with books on Islam, what is unique about The Muhammad Code?
Howard Bloom: The Muhammad Code tells a story quite unknown in the West, namely the story of the only founder of a major religion ever to call himself “The Prophet of War” and to command 65 military campaigns. It tells the story of how that man set our ancestors in the West up for over 1,300 years of enslavement and attack, the story of how he laid the groundwork for the destruction of superpowers far more potent than the United States, and the story of how he started the longest-running world war in history. And most important, The Muhammad Code tells the story of how that prophet to many people demands that his never-ending war be turned today against the ideals we hold dear in the West—human rights, gender equality, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of trade, entrepreneurship, pluralism, and democracy.
Millions of Muslims envision Islam as a religion of tolerance, pluralism, and peace. But there’s a blunt fact staring us in the face. What ISIS is doing is merely one attack in the world’s longest running world war—the war of “Mohammed the Conqueror” and the “knights” of Islam, as Bin Laden used to say, against every other civilization on the face of the planet. For Allah and His Messenger demand that Muslims be on top. They demand that Muslims allow others to live only if they take a role as second-class citizens in a purely Muslim state and pay the jizya, a tax designed to shame and humiliate. And they demand that Islam rule every inch of land on God’s own speck of dust—the planet Earth. So Muslims in the West can never be happy. At least not according to the standards of the Hadith and the Qur’an. Not according to the standards of al Qaeda, Boko Haram, the Iranian Islamic Revolution, and the Islamic State. That is, “good” Muslims cannot be happy until Shariah rules every land. And that includes your land and mine.
Since the beginning of history, we have been blinded by evil’s ability to don a selfless disguise. From our urge to pull together comes our tendency to tear each other apart. From our devotion to a higher good comes our propensity to the foulest atrocities. And from our commitment to ideals come our excuses to hate. Righteousness in Islam consists in following Muhammad’s footsteps. And those footsteps are violent, imperialist, colonialist, sadistic, and genocidal. But those who want to “annihilate” or to convert their fellow men in the West are not madmen. They are rational and they are something more—they are idealists. They want to free us. They want to save you and me.
As they see it, you and I were made from a clot of blood by Allah, by God. We were given everything we have by Him. Since we are His creations, we will experience true justice and peace only if we live by His laws and are enlightened by His truths. What are those laws and truths? The ones that God himself gave to Mohammed in the seventh century. Islam believes it is out to save us in an even more profound way. If we are tricked into following false laws, believing in false gods, and sticking to what Osama bin Laden used to call false “opinions, orders [and] theories,” we will go to an unspeakably painful hell. Our earthly life is but a brief interlude, a brief gift, a brief test to see if we can follow God’s path. But hell and heaven are forever.
Islamic militants want to save you so you can spend the time that really matters, the time that lasts the longest, the time from your death to the Day of Judgement, in the luxurious upper rooms of paradise. Only if your eyes are opened to the legacy of Mohammed, only if you are persuaded to drop all other “opinions, orders, theories and religions” can Islam save you. What happens, according to them, if you stubbornly refuse Islam? What happens if you cannot be won over to the light? You must be wiped out. You must be kept from corrupting the minds of others and dragging them down to hell with you.
When former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad held a press conference in September 2006 to report on his visit to Senegal, Cuba, Venezuela and the United Nations, he said, “And God willing, with the force of God behind it, we shall soon experience a world without the United States and Zionism.” He had also made the same word-for-word statement the previous year. It is very unlikely that Ahmadinejad was proposing a “thought experiment.” He was proposing a reality that Iran and its fellow Muslim states would be able to achieve with their upcoming weaponry—and with the existing 120 Islamic nuclear bombs of Pakistan, bombs that could easily fall into the hands of ISIS.
Islam has called for the annihilation of the Jews for close to 1,400 years. But why eradicate those of us who live in America? My suspicion is this. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Abubakar Shekau, and Islamic militants from Iran to Indonesia and from Trinidad to Dearborn, Michigan, feel that Europe is eager to appease the Muslim world, eager to bow to Islam’s will. Europe can be saved. Europe can be brought into the fold of Islam. But America stubbornly insists on promoting its Satanic culture, a culture that will drag millions down to the pit of fire. Hit America with a few nuclear weapons, take out New York, Washington, and a handful of other American coastal cities, and those left in America will embrace Islam. What’s more, the weak-willed Europeans will finally see the truth and will accept second-rate status in something Allah promised Mohammed long ago—Islam’s global empire.
Grégoire Canlorbe: Besides your concern for the survival of the modern Western civilization, how did you come to have an interest in Islam? Does it have anything to do with your personal history?
Howard Bloom: My introduction to Islamic culture came in 1962. My parents and grandparents were Zionists—people who wished ardently for the right of Jews to return to a homeland that appears in a flood of Hebrew prayers, the Promised Land, the Hebrew territory from which Jews were expelled over and over again and which the Jews stubbornly rebelled to retake in 66 AD, 133 AD, 351 AD, 438 AD, and 614 AD. Those Jews, my ancestors, battled the biggest imperialists of the day, the Romans. Rome periodically got fed up with Jewish freedom fighters and removed most of the Hebrews from the land Jews had inhabited since 1,200 BC. Rome scattered this remnant across the face of the Old World. Yet Jews insistently trickled back into what they considered their native land again, and by 636 AD, Arab historians say these Hebrew returnees, and the Jews still on the land of Judea, had built 41 cities in what is today called Palestine and Israel.
Then came an imperialist force that made the Romans look like pipsqueaks; a violent, militaristic, colonialist empire on its way to becoming largest in the history of the planet—one of the few imperial powers still around in today’s world and still, like us, in a mood for conquest: the empire of Islam. Mohammed himself did not take kindly to Jews. Mohammed said, “Whoever of the Jews falls into your hands, kill him.” And, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.” According to the 9th century Muslim historian Abu Al-Abbas Al-Baladhuri, the armies of Islam wiped those 41 Jewish cities off the face of the map. For the next 1,312 years, Jews would end their springtime holiday Passover dinner with the phrase, “Next year in Jerusalem.”
Zionists such as my grandparents and parents were proud of the fact that Jews had trickled back into Israel once again in the 19th and 20th century, had drained the malarial swamps, had run irrigation lines to the deserts, and had made this small slice of miserable Turkish land into a garden, a rich farmland. To my grandparents and parents, Zionism meant establishing a Jewish state and teaching our Arab brethren to turn the vast and barren two billion acres under Arab control into a land with trees, groves, and valleys abundant in harvests.
In 1962, when I was 19 years old, my father offered to send me for a year to Israel, a country a mere fourteen years old. Israel had kibbutzim—one of the most radical forms of social experiment on the planet. These were socialist agricultural communities in which the land and goods were held in common by roughly 350 adults. The children were raised together by child-care experts, the meals were made in a communal kitchen and eaten in a communal dining hall, and the laundry was done by a communal laundry staff. As a result, when they finished their day of farming, parents could romp with their kids for hours, free from the worry of nagging their children to clean up their bedrooms, and free from the need to shop and cook a meal.
My dad’s offer sounded good. I wanted to see if 19th and 20th century thinkers were right: if by changing the structure of society you could change human nature and wipe away greed, gripes, and violence. The kibbutz was a laboratory of social change. So I said yes. To prepare myself, I hitch-hiked from my hometown, Buffalo, New York, down to Pennsylvania’s Swarthmore College, where I had friends, and spent a month in the library studying peoples of the Middle East, such as the Natufians of 11,000 years ago and a little-known culture, the Nabataeans, who invented a system of terraced irrigation that allowed them successfully to farm the deserts of southern Israel and the surrounding lands from 312 BC to 105 AD.
Then one day, I had a shock. In the back of a library of materials on the Middle East, I found several English-language pamphlets printed by the Arab League, a coalition of twelve leading Arab governments. The pamphlets tried to reach people like you and me with an extremely urgent “clarification” of historical errors. First, the Holocaust, the mass murder of six million Jews by Germany’s Nazis, was supposedly a charade, a hoax; it never happened. Second, World War II had not been a confrontation started by the Germans in an effort to take over the world on behalf of a blond and blue-eyed master race. It had been started by Jews out to win the sympathy of the world and to establish the state of Israel. Third, Adolf Hitler had not been a Jew-hater. To the contrary. He had, according to them, been a Jewish puppet, a Jewish creation set in motion, once again, to achieve the establishment of a so-called Jewish homeland.
The villains behind these radical misunderstandings of history were, according to the Arab League, those clever liars, those people out to dominate the world, those “sons of pigs and monkeys,” the Jews—my family and me. One of my aunts had managed to survive the Holocaust’s concentration camps. One of my cousins had lost her parents, her brothers, and her sisters, and had been saved by a Catholic farm family in Poland. The rest of my family in Europe, the Shebshelovitzes of Riga, Latvia, and the Wechelefskys of Belarus, had disappeared entirely. I was under the impression that the Holocaust had been real. Very real. But the Arab League wanted me—and you—to believe otherwise.
This was one of my first introductions to the fact that another culture can have a radically different system of thought, a radically different way of seeing the world. It was also my introduction to Islamic anti-Semitism. Where did this hatred of Jews come from? There are fewer Jews on the planet than the inhabitants of just one Muslim city, Cairo. Did the officials of the Arab League seriously imagine that a tribe so absurdly small could manipulate the mind of the German Volk, the mass mind of the German people, and could plan and promote one of the biggest wars in history?
If I were to understand just how different the world looked through the lens of another culture, I might as well study a culture that made hatred of me a central preoccupation. For the next four decades I studied the instinctual underpinnings of war, creativity, and genocide. For the next four decades I studied mass behavior, from the mass behavior of quarks, nucleons, and galaxies to the mass behavior of reptiles, chimpanzees, rats, birds, fish, bacteria, and human beings. And for the next four decades I used the culture of Islam as a test-case, a supreme living specimen in which to watch the instinctual forces of history at work. That’s how I came to write The Muhammad Code.
Grégoire Canlorbe: Your book invites the reader to pay attention to the achievements and the mentality of Mohammed, especially to understand the mass murders and infringements of personal freedom perpetrated now on behalf of Islamic fundamentalism. Could you tell us more about the life of “the Prophet”?
Howard Bloom: To understand men such as Osama bin Laden, the iconic example of guerrilla warfare; Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the “George Washington” of the Islamic Revolutionary Republic of Iran; Dr. A.Q. Khan, the father of the Pakistani Islamic Bomb of 1998; to understand the heads of groups such as ISIS, Boko Haram, and Hamas; to understand the Islamic militants making headlines today and who will make headlines tomorrow, you have to understand the key to their way of thinking, and, like them, you have to understand the life of Mohammed.
Two hundred years after the fall of Rome, Mohammed was a merchant living in the desert town of Mecca, a bleak and isolated community on a caravan route over which passed camels carrying goods to far‑off, elegant cities such as Damascus. At the age of twelve, when he was an apprentice to his uncle—a trader—Mo­hammed made his first trip to cosmopolitan Syria to learn the export/import business. When he was 25, Mohammed married a well‑to‑do woman of 40 and became a respectable, wealthy burgher, a man whose opinions were listened to. But all that changed when Mohammed reached a mid-life crisis at 39. He began to have visions. He had been sitting in a cave in the mountains one day, he said, praying in solitude, when the angel Gabriel had appeared in a blinding light, grabbed him in a bear hug, and forced him to read a message from God. Since then, claimed Mohammed, he had been functioning as God’s spokesman on earth.
Some modern scholars feel that Mohammed’s visions may have been the result of epileptic fits. The citizens of Mecca would have found the diagnosis believable. When Mohammed planted himself on street-corners and declaimed the new truths that the angel Gabriel had communicated to him, his fellow Meccans were certain that this formerly upstanding, middle‑class man had gone insane. They mocked Mohammed or ignored him. One, while Mohammad was praying, put a slimy camel foetus down his neck. Another tried to stran­gle him. Only a few believed him. Among the believers were a handful of close relatives, one good friend, and a disconcerting number of slaves.
The citizens of Mecca were none too happy with the havoc Mohammed’s new notions wreaked on their households. Slaves who had abandoned the tried and true religions stopped their household chores and ran off to pray and wash themselves at all kinds of strange hours. But Mohammed would not keep his visions to him­self. When a plot was hatched to murder him, Mohammed fled. He sought refuge in a community where his views might be a bit more welcome, more than 200 miles away in Medina, another town isolated in the desert along the caravan route. In Medina, Mohammed found more willing listeners. During the course of a few years, he was able to build a following large enough to dominate his adopt­ed city’s politics.
The fledgling prophet was no man of peace. He consolidated his hold over Medina by ordering opponents assassinated. Then he masterminded a series of assaults on passing Meccan caravans and the armed escorts sent to protect them. When Mec­cans, fearful of Mohammed’s new power, attacked the outskirts of Medina, he led his faithful against the intruders and won. Mohammad’s military success impressed some of the fierce tribes that wandered in the hills outside of town. They signed up with the new, battle‑tested religion. A few years later, the prophet marched his troops 200 miles to the Jewish town of Khaibar and conquered it. He killed all of Khaibar’s 900 men and carried off the women and children as slaves.
At last Mohammed was ready to take revenge for the indignities his former neighbors in Mecca had heaped on him. In 630 AD, eight years after he had fled, the prophet led an army of 10,000 followers back to his old home town. The Meccans were not particularly interested in being treated as the Jews had been the previous year. They gave up with scarcely a fight. Thanks to the heavily armed Islamic squadrons parading through the streets, Mohammed was able to convert Mecca’s inhabitants to the beliefs they had formerly scorned as the ravings of a madman.
Once Mohammed’s birth­place had been conquered, the sword of Islam was not sheathed. The city’s wealthy traders and illit­erate Bedouins joined the army that had begun in Medina, and went out to conquer the world for their new belief. They were astonishingly successful. In short order, the legions of Islam overran the ancient empires of Persia, Mesopotamia and Egypt. During the next hundred years, the Mohammedan hordes spread across northern Africa, taking Algeria, Morocco and Libya. They invaded India—attacking the towns that had defied even the invincible Alexander the Great. They snipped off parts of Spain and nearly conquered France. They even faced the mighty forces of the Chinese army at Talas in Central Asia.
Within a few generations of Mohammed’s death, these men from backwater towns and primitive desert tribes had built an empire of awesome size. But their victories did not stop there. In coming centuries, Mohammedans would repeatedly make the Euro­peans tremble—eventually attacking even Vienna. They would seize African lands as far away as the Sudan and the Niger. They would convert Afghanistan, win over the Mongols, and spread their rule as far as the Pacific islands of Indonesia and the Philippines. The notions of a man who had claimed to meet an angel in a cave would spawn battles whose bloodshed would soak the earth for the next 1,400 years.
Grégoire Canlorbe: You conceive of Mohammed’s ideology—his complete system of values and beliefs—as a “meme” or replicator. Could you clarify this notion, borrowed from Richard Dawkins?
Howard Bloom: In 1976, Oxford zoologist Richard Dawkins’ The Selfish Gene rearranged the way that many of those who deal with animal and human behavior see the world around them. Dawkins came up with the idea of the “replicator.” The replicator is a clever and narcissistic mega molecule that is able to make copies of itself. That avaricious mega molecule is the gene. Dawkins said that we tend to see ourselves and the creatures around us as the masters of our genetic endowment, but that in reality, we are merely servants. We are not using genes to achieve our own ends; our genes are using us. The idea had been anticipated by the English poet and satirist Samuel Butler in the 17th century. Butler had quipped that, “A hen is just an egg’s way of making more eggs.”
If Dawkins is right, humans and their social groups originated as mere puppets, complex tools of tiny mole­cules. You and I were fashioned as if we were cranes, dump trucks and tanks, designed to be driven by a set of replicators. We are gatherers of raw materials operating at the behest of microscopic mini‑factories seated at the center of our cells. For genes are infect­ed with an overweening ambition: their ultimate goal is to repro­duce—and in the process, to overrun this world. Up to this point, Dawkins was summing up and simplifying the evolutionary biology emerging around him. Then Dawkins made a totally original contribution: He posited the existence of a new replicator, one that has no physical substance, and can not be studied under a microscope or kept in a jar. It is the meme—the catchy idea.
Genes, said Dawkins, first made copies of themselves in primordial puddles. But memes also copy themselves in the puddles of human minds. And the ones that are truly successful jump from one mind to another until they girdle the planet. Think of the pop song you loathe but cannot get out of your mind. That is a successful meme. So are Islam, Christianity, and freedom. The memes that count the most are the ones that assemble vast arrays of re­sources in startling new forms. They are the memes that con­struct social systems, from tribes to empires. As genes are to the individual organism, so memes are to the social organism, or super-organism, pulling millions of individu­als together—family, tribe and nation—into a collective creature of awesome size.
The meme, like its predecessor the gene, is capable of assembling vast amounts of matter. Unlike the gene, the meme can manufacture forms of order than mere genetic stuff could never dream of. And finally there is something that Dawkins himself failed to see. Very often, it is the meme, not the gene, whose survival and expansion come first. We are willing to live and die for “something bigger than ourselves.” And that something is the cluster of ideas that sits at our culture’s core. But there is more. As hungry replicators eager to remold the world, ideas often turn their ultimate weapon—the superorganism—into a killing machine. And, contrary to the doctrines of some modern critics, they do not engage in this “hegemonic imperialism” only in the purportedly “malevolent West.”
The ravenous voice of the meme calls out to charismatic men and women. Disguised as revelation or inspi­ration, it has spoken to humans as diverse as Mohammed, Napoleon I, Lenin, St. Paul, Moses, Hitler, Joan of Arc, Mahatma Ghandi, Thomas Jefferson, Karl Marx, and the Ayatollah Khomeini. Its message varies. But under the many disguises is one imperative: gather a group together and awaken them with my words. Wield them into a mighty force which will impose its dominion on a large swatch of the world.
The voice of the meme calls out to those on a lower level as well. To them, it dictates sacrifice. The converts have a sublime perception of truth and feel caught up in a fren­zied oneness with some superior being whose power leaves them in awe. But the holy vision or lofty secular ideals that create this thrill may be merely the voice of the larger social beast calling for some ultimate contribution—demanding that a seventh century Mohammedan hurl himself against the defenses of a city far from his ancestral home; or that his descendant hijack a civil aircraft and crash it into an American office building.
Grégoire Canlorbe: The intellectual elite in the West is often reproached for believing blindly in the neo-Darwinian view of evolution, according to which genes (instead of groups) are the true objects of “natural selection.” It implies, in particular, that humans and other social animals, far from sacrificing their own individual interests—survival and reproduction—for the sake of a mythical Leviathan, society, instead cooperate for their own selfish motives and, unwittingly, in the interest of their genes. What are your thoughts about that?
Howard Bloom: Our membership in a larger organism—and the fact we occasionally find ourselves expendable in that superorganism’s interests—is indeed not a fashionable theory at the moment among academics. As I mentioned, current evolutionary theory says that preservation of your genes is your first priority—preservation for yourself, your children, and for your remaining relatives. And self-sacrifice in the interest of the group, the very definition of altruism, does not quite square with the notion of genes fighting for themselves no matter what. Underlying the notion of genetic selfishness is another, even more basic assumption, the theory of individual selection, according to which the “struggle for life” occurs between individuals—and only between individuals. In fact, the idea that this competition could occur between groups has been resoundingly dismissed since the publication of The Selfish Gene. It has been mocked and scorned.
Yet Dawkins and individual selectionists have had a very bad time dealing with the problem of altruism. August theorists such as W.D. Hamilton and R.L. Trivers explained away the seemingly “altruistic” tendencies in humans and other species by generating a new mathematical system, the notion of kin selection. It stated that individuals would only sacrifice their own interests in favor of others if the others in question were relatives, creatures who contained similar sets of genes. In other words, self-sacrifice was “selfless” only at first sight. In fact, it consisted of increasing the number of our genes in generations yet to come. The selfish-gene theory of evolution is partly right. It is a powerful tool for cracking the mysteries of evolution and human behavior. But from Darwin himself to V.C. Wynne-Edwards, Robert Ardrey, and the late Edward. O. Wilson, its limitations have been attacked by a line of scientists with powerful minds. Those critics demonstrate that our biology often refuses to follow the paths that scientific assumptions about personal survival and kin selection would predict.
We come complete at birth with an arsenal of survival instincts in the interest of our genes. But we are also equipped with self‑destruct mechanisms—depression, anxiety and hopelessness. Not to mention the deactivation of our immune system when we are seriously discouraged. That depressed immune system invites disease to come in and do its worst. And we are crippled by the stress hormones that flood our system—glucocorticoids. These hormones in short, sharp doses are energizers, emergency handlers. But in the long, never-ending doses that hit us when we are down, stress hormones destroy our health. Stress hormones are poisons generated within us—not by psychology alone, but by our biology. According to selfish gene theory and the theory of individual selection, these self-damaging circuits should not exist. So why are self-destruct circuits present in animals of all kinds?
A wide range of evidence—evidence you can find in my books The Lucifer Principle and Global Brain—indicates that these biological suicide circuits turn us into components of a mass IQ, neurons of a collective brain. And our fellow neurons in the collective brain, our fellow humans and thought partners, are not necessarily our kin. How do self-damagers increase the collective intelligence? They turn down the resources and the influence of those of us who do not seem to be able to solve the problem of the moment. And they turn up the popularity, health, vigor, cash, and influence of individuals who do seem to have a handle on things. They are tricks our body uses to turn us into modules in a neural net. A massively parallel-processed social learning machine—to repeat, a group IQ.
If preserving our genes were indeed our ruling force, then self-destruct mechanisms should not exist. Or, at best, their action should be limited to aiding those who carry genes nearly identical to our own. Even more damning, our acts of valor on the battlefield have generally nothing to do with an individualistic gene selfishly protecting a copy of itself. By the standards used by the selfish gene clique, and their colleagues in economics and the social sciences, the rational choice crew, the genes of kamikaze aviators in the closing stages of World War II were radically different. They did not show the degree of genetic relatedness demanded by Hamilton’s and Trivers’ mathematics. To many Americans, the kamikaze’s ultimate devotion to their emperor and the glory of Japan seems baffling, alien, something that could never happen here. But it has hap­pened here. Patrick Henry was declaring his loyalty to the cause of his fellow revolutionaries when he said, “Give me liberty or give me death.” He was confessing that the social organism of which he was a part was more important than his genetic interests—his own survival and that of his genes.
Here is the bottom line. Evolution, either biological or cultural, is not just a competition between individuals. It is also a competition between groups. It is a race between the varieties of cooperation that grow up between solitary creatures—the unseen ties that bind those creatures together into a larger unit. Men and animals do not merely struggle to maintain their individual existence. They are part of social organisms that scramble for survival—and that work for mastery over other organisms of their kind. And very often the interests of the group outweigh those of the individual, including his life and the posterity of his genes. What’s more, our savagery, not only as individuals but as groups, comes as an actual feature of our biological legacy. As E.O. Wilson writes in his 2012 book, The Social Conquest of Earth, “To form groups, drawing visceral comfort and pride from familiar fellowship, and to defend the group enthusiastically against rival groups—these are among the absolute universals of human nature and hence of culture.” “It can now be argued in the context of modern biology,” says Wilson, that “our bloody nature is ingrained because group-versus-group was a principal driving force that made us what we are.”
From military crusades to ethnic deportation, mass slaughter, and migratory invasion, culture alone is not responsible for group violence. In fact, it comes from something both sub- and superhuman, something we share with gorillas, apes, fish and ants—a brutality that speaks to us through the “animals” in our brain. From bacteria colonies to human conglomerations, superorganisms are hungry creatures, attempting to break down the boundaries of their competitors, chew off chunks of their opponents’ substance and digest and redistribute it as part of themselves. In the world of humans, that struggle takes the form of a competition between ideologies, between worldviews, between group souls. When the Japanese aviators guide their planes to the American enemy, when the Crusaders of Christendom march off to challenge the Empire of Islam, or even when Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin gauge each other, the struggle is not a battle of men, but a battle of networks, learning-machines bound together by memes, testing and confronting their respective shapes, claiming supremacy over each other.
In law, politics, and economics, individualism is a personal credo of great importance. I, for one, am a passionate believer in free speech, democracy, and capitalism. But to scientists, the obsession to place emphasis on the individual has been a chimera leading them down a dead‑end path. History, either natural or human, has never been the sole province of the selfish individual, essentially preoccupied with preserving his genes. For history is the playfield of the superorganism—and of its recent step-child, the meme. It is the environment of the mass murders that occur when one animal society tries to dominate another, the large‑scale savageries that arise when one human culture tries to impose its own system of values. On May 12, 2004, Osama Bin Laden explained how powerfully the 21st century’s wireless jihad was driven by Mohammed’s ideology. In a message to the worldwide community of Islam he wrote, “The main confrontation,” is “a religious and doctrinal one, not an economic or military one.” “The clash,” he said, “is in fact a clash of civilizations”—a clash of worldview-driven sociopolitical blocs.
Bin Laden also told us just how powerfully Mohammed’s notions powered him and what those memes mean for the Western civilization in a statement he addressed directly to us Americans, a statement most of us missed. “Why are we fighting and opposing you?” asked bin Laden. “What are we calling you to, and what do we want from you? The first thing that we are calling you to is Islam. The religion of the Unification of God; of freedom from associating partners with Him [Islamic code for Christianity], and rejection of this; of complete love of Him, the Exalted.” Then bin Laden commanded us to “the discarding of all the opinions, orders, theories and religions which contradict the religion He sent down to His Prophet Muhammad.” In other words, bin Laden called for a worldwide end to Christianity, Buddhism, Judaism, yoga, New Age beliefs, secularism, humanism, Darwinism, constitutions, and separation of Church and State. Only time will tell if our memes have the stick-to-it-iveness to survive or if Mohammed’s ideology will take over your life and mine.
TO BE CONTINUED…
Howard Bloom is the author of The Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition Into the Forces of History (“mesmerizing”-The Washington Post), Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind from the Big Bang to the 21st Century (“reassuring and sobering”-The New Yorker), The Genius of the Beast: A Radical Re-Vision of Capitalism (“Impressive, stimulating, and tremendously enjoyable.” James Fallows, National Correspondent, The Atlantic), and The God Problem: How A Godless Cosmos Creates (“Bloom’s argument will rock your world.” Barbara Ehrenreich).
He also has two books about to be published in new versions: How I Accidentally Started the Sixties (“a monumental, epic, glorious literary achievement.” Timothy Leary), and The Muhammad Code: How a Desert Prophet Gave You ISIS, al Qaeda, and Boko Haram—or How Muhammad Invented Jihad (“a terrifying book… the best book I’ve read on Islam,” David Swindle, PJ Media).
Bloom explains that his field is “mass behavior, from the mass behavior of quarks to the mass behavior of human beings.” That specialization gives him a wide scope. In 2005, Bloom lectured an international conference of quantum physicists in Moscow—Quantum Informatics 2006—on why everything they know about Schrodinger’s Equation is wrong, and the concepts Bloom introduced were later used in a book proposing a new approach to quantum physics, Constructive Physics, by Moscow University’s Yuri Ozhigov.
Bloom has his own YouTube series, Howard the Humongous, which gets up to 790,000 views per installment. His website, howardbloom.net, has had between four and five million hits.
Grégoire Canlorbe, a journalist, currently lives in Paris. While presently collaborating with Howard Bloom, he has conducted many interviews for journals such as Man and the Economy, founded by Nobel Prize winning economist Ronald Coase, and think-tanks such as Mises Institute and Gatestone Institute. Contact: gregoire.canlorbe@wanadoo.fr
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute