LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
March 01/16
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
Bible Quotations For Today
Jesus cures the
Blind Man In Bethsaida
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Mark 08/22-26:"They came to
Bethsaida. Some people brought a blind man to him and begged him to touch him.
He took the blind man by the hand and led him out of the village; and when he
had put saliva on his eyes and laid his hands on him, he asked him, ‘Can you see
anything?’And the man looked up and said, ‘I can see people, but they look like
trees, walking.’Then Jesus laid his hands on his eyes again; and he looked
intently and his sight was restored, and he saw everything clearly. Then he sent
him away to his home, saying, ‘Do not even go into the village.’"
Let anyone be accursed who has no love for the Lord. Our
Lord, come!
First Letter to the Corinthians 16/15-24:"Now, brothers and sisters, you know
that members of the household of Stephanas were the first converts in Achaia,
and they have devoted themselves to the service of the saints; I urge you to put
yourselves at the service of such people, and of everyone who works and toils
with them. I rejoice at the coming of Stephanas and Fortunatus and Achaicus,
because they have made up for your absence; for they refreshed my spirit as well
as yours. So give recognition to such people. The churches of Asia send
greetings. Aquila and Prisca, together with the church in their house, greet you
warmly in the Lord. All the brothers and sisters send greetings. Greet one
another with a holy kiss. I, Paul, write this greeting with my own hand. Let
anyone be accursed who has no love for the Lord. Our Lord, come! The grace of
the Lord Jesus be with you.
My love be with all of you in Christ Jesus.".
Titles For Latest LCCC
Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on March
01/16
Iran: A Setback for Hardliners and Little Cheer for Reformists/Amir Taheri/Asharq
Al Awsat/February 29/16
Riyadh’s wrath/Alex Rowell/Now Lebanon/February 29/16
Betrayal by those closest to you/Turki Al-Dakhil/Al Arabiya/February 29/16
Can Arab world economies achieve what politics couldn’t/Raed Omari/Al Arabiya/February
29/16
What a Trump presidency will mean for Iran/Dr. Theodore Karasik/Al Arabiya/February
29/16
Towards a strategic Arab-Russia dialogue/Raghida Dergham/Al Arabiya/February
29/16
Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on March 01/16
Hariri Meets Berri: We Won't Tolerate Isolating Lebanon
from Arab Environment and No One Can Drag Us to Strife
Hizbullah Brings Back Corpses of Fighters Including Ali Fayyad's
Salam’s Sources Say No Party Intends to Resign from Cabinet
Report: Salam Might Suspend Cabinet Sessions over Trash Hurdle
Kuwait Urges Lebanon to be 'Part of Arab Region', Vows to 'Maintain Aid'
Kataeb Slams 'Security Chaos' of Past Two Days, Urges Election of President
Palestinian Islamist Wounded in Ain el-Hilweh Shooting
Report: France Seeks to Revive Saudi Aid to Lebanese Army
Berri Holds onto Hizbullah-Mustaqbal Dialogue despite Tension
Bassil: PM's Remarks on Us Committing Foreign Policy Mistake Do Not Represent
Lebanon, Govt. Policy
Jumblat to Saudi: Halting Aid Weakens State, Economic Siege on Lebanon Not
Useful
Body of Hezbollah commander found in Syria
Saudis increasingly frustrated with Lebanon
Why is Saudi Arabia angry at Lebanon
Punishing Lebanon or Hezbollah?
Israel: Lebanon violated UNSC resolution calls to disarm Hezbollah more than
2,000 times
Titles For Latest LCCC
Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on March 01/16
Canada fulfills promise to take in Syrian
refugees
Netanyahu: Israel ranked the eighth strongest country in the world
Israel 'very concerned' by rising Iranian power in Syria, Ya'alon says
Bahrain Jails 'Terrorists' for Attacking Police
NATO Chief Voices Concern over Syria Truce Violations
U.N. plans aid for 154,000 besieged Syrians in next 5 days
UN chief: Syria ceasefire holding ‘by and large’
Death toll in suicide attack northeast of Baghdad rises to 24: sources
Baghdad blasts’ death toll rises to 70
Russia: Turkish military strikes on Syria would derail ceasefire plan
Gunmen kill pro-govt Sunni cleric in Yemen’s Aden
Suicide bombing kills 4 in Yemen’s Aden: official
Yemeni official: Houthis recruiting African fighters
Yemeni minister criticizes UN over Taiz, hails Gulf contribution
Yemeni army seeking to tighten control of Hajjah and Hodeidah
Top Iran conservatives lose seats on key body
Palestinians reject direct Iran aid to ‘intifada’ families
Links From Jihad Watch Site for
March 01/16
Belgian police find evidence that the Islamic State is looking to build dirty
bomb
Obama wants more Syrian refugees in the U.S.
Muslim Indoctrination and the Department of Education: From Hijab Dress-Up to
Convert
Muslim migrants screaming “Allahu akbar” break down fence on Macedonian border
with home-made battering ram
Boston Marathon jihad murderer passed US citizenship test and denied terror
links 3 months before bombing
Switzerland: Trial begins of four Muslim asylum seekers accused of forming
Islamic State terror cell
Video: Muslima screaming “Allahu akbar” holds child’s severed head; cops say
motive unknown
Pakistan: Protesters clash with cops after killer of blasphemy law foe executed
Trial begins for Muslim Air Force vet accused of supporting the Islamic State
Deborah Weiss on “Freedom of Speech: Under Attack in America” — on The Glazov
Gang
Kuwaiti businessman: “ISIS has always been here”
UK imam’s killer turns out to be Muslim
Canada: Senior imam mocks the Western idea of “marital rape”
Islamic State murders 31 in Shia district of Baghdad
“We’ve got jihad” in Australia: Islamic State supporter arrested for knife
assault
Hugh Fitzgerald: Boston Police Commissioner William Evans: “We’re All Muslims
Deep Down”
Hariri Meets Berri: We Won't Tolerate Isolating Lebanon
from Arab Environment and No One Can Drag Us to Strife
Naharnet/February 29/16/Al-Mustaqbal
Movement leader ex-PM Saad Hariri held talks Monday evening in Ain al-Tineh with
Speaker Nabih Berri. The talks were expected to focus on the faltering dialogue
between Hizbullah and al-Mustaqbal and the latest tensions in the country in the
wake of the row with Saudi Arabia, media reports said. A joint statement issued
after the meeting warned that “there has been a systematic campaign in recent
days to inflame sentiments and incite citizens against each other in order to
stir sectarian strife, implicate us in internal fighting and return us decades
backwards.”Accordingly, Berri and Hariri called on “opinion leaders in Lebanon,
the religious and political leaders and all the media and cultural institutions”
to “confront these suspicious campaigns and any attempt to stir strife, out of
keenness on Lebanon and the Lebanese.”State-run National News Agency ealier said
that the two men discussed "the current situations and developments."Berri threw
a dinner banquet in Hariri's honor after the talks, NNA added. Earlier on
Monday, Hariri had noted that the election of a new president would resolve “50
percent” of the country's problems, while stressing that his camp will not
tolerate “isolating Lebanon from its Arab environment.” “The Lebanese are
suffering nowadays from the obstruction of the presidential vote and from the
deterioration of the social, health and environmental situations and the rest of
the files,” said Hariri during a Center House meeting with a delegation of Akkar
municipal chiefs and mayors. “The absence of a president is the reason behind
this situation and if we elect a president we would be resolving 50 percent of
the problems, seeing as everything can be addressed inside state institutions,”
he added. Lebanon has been without a president since May 2014 when the term of
Michel Suleiman ended and Hariri launched late in 2015 a proposal to nominate
Marada Movement chief MP Suleiman Franjieh for the presidency. Hariri's
initiative was however rejected by the country's main Christian parties as well
as Hizbullah, and Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea, the ex-PM's ally in the
March 14 camp, has recently nominated Change and Reform bloc chief MP Michel
Aoun for the presidency in an apparent response to Hariri's move. Separately,
Hariri noted Monday that “the current political dispute is over Lebanon's role
in its Arab environment.”“We are keen on our Arab identity and we will not
tolerate isolating Lebanon from its Arab environment,” the ex-PM stressed. “The
Kingdom (of Saudi Arabia) has only offered us good things and it has always
stood by us. It supported us during the reconstruction process, it mediated to
stop the civil war and it stood by us during the Israeli attacks,” Hariri said.
“We call on all those concerned in Lebanon to take the higher interests of the
Lebanese into consideration and to stop the campaigns that harm Lebanon and its
Arab role and subject it to unnecessary dangers,” the former premier went on to
say. He was referring to the latest row with Saudi Arabia that the kingdom has
attributed to "hostile Lebanese positions resulting from the stranglehold of
Hizbullah on the State" and alleged Hizbullah "terrorist acts against Arab and
Muslim nations." The kingdom started a series of measures against Lebanon and
Hizbullah on February 19 when its foreign ministry announced that the kingdom
was halting around $4 billion in military aid to the Lebanese army and security
forces. The kingdom later slapped sanctions on individuals and firms accused of
ties to Hizbullah and advised its citizens against travel to Lebanon while
urging those already in the country to leave it. Around 90 Lebanese citizens
have also been fired from their jobs in Saudi Arabia, according to media
reports. Saudi Arabia has also linked its move to Lebanon's refusal to join the
Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation in condemning attacks on
Saudi diplomatic missions in Iran last month. Riyadh cut diplomatic ties with
Tehran after demonstrators burned its embassy and a consulate following the
Saudi execution of a prominent Shiite cleric, Nimr al-Nimr. Later on Monday,
Hariri held a meeting with a delegation of Beirut mayors. “We reject the
attempts to sow strife in Beirut that we witnessed in the past few days. If a
certain party does not approve of a certain issue, there are several ways to
express anger and dismay other than burning tires or blocking roads,” Hariri
said. He was referring to angry protests that Hizbullah supporters staged on
Saturday and Sunday to protest a TV show that poked fun at Hizbullah chief
Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah. The episode was aired by the Saudi-owned MBC channel
and came amid rising tensions between the Iran-backed Hizbullah and Riyadh over
the wars in Yemen and Syria. “Our political rhetoric is clear and our behavior
is well-known and we won't allow anyone to drag us into sectarian strife. We are
keen on Beirut's security and the safety of its residents,” Hariri underlined.
Hizbullah Brings Back Corpses of
Fighters Including Ali Fayyad's
Naharnet/February 29/16/Hizbullah
was able to bring back the bodies of four of its fighters including that of a
senior military commander who was killed in battles in the northern Syrian
province of Aleppo last week, reports said on Monday. Hizbullah recovered the
bodies of four of its fighters including that of Ali Fayyad in a special
operation carried out in collaboration with the Syrian army in the town of Tal-Hmam,
LBCI said. Ali Fayyad, aka “Alaa of Bosnia”, was killed last week in the ongoing
clashes with Syrian rebels on the Athrayya-Khanasser road in rural Aleppo,
according to reports. Fayyad was known to have “planned, overseen and led” a key
part of the siege that is imposed on the rebels in Damascus' Eastern Ghouta
region, they added. He also played a key role in the capture of the strategic
Syrian town of Shebaa that lies on the road to the Damascus international
airport. “Fayyad also led a military operation to besiege the Syrian rebel
groups and isolate them in the south of the Syrian capital after having pushed
them away from the area of the Sayyida Zeinab (Shiite) shrine,” the reports
said. His military tactics also played an important role in “halting the Syrian
rebels' advance towards the Syrian coast.”
Hizbullah has deployed at least 6,000 militants to fight alongside Syrian
President Bashar Assad's forces against Islamist-led rebels and jihadists and
around 1,000 Hizbullah members have been killed in Syria since the start of the
conflict. The party argues that its intervention, which is controversial in
Lebanon, was necessary to protect the country from extremist groups and to
prevent the fall of Syria into the hands of hostile forces.
Salam’s Sources Say No Party Intends to Resign from Cabinet
Naharnet/February 29/16/Sources close to Prime Minister Tammam Salam have denied
that any party had the intention to resign from the government or suspend its
participation in it.The sources told As Safir daily published on Monday that
despite the growing tension between the Mustaqbal-led March 14 alliance and the
Hizbullah-dominated March 8 camp, all parties are aware that there is no
alternative to the cabinet. The rising tension came after Saudi Arabia announced
last week that it would cut $4 billion in aid to the Lebanese army and security
forces. Riyadh's decision came in retaliation to Foreign Minister Jebran
Bassil's rejection to support Saudi resolutions against Iran during two recent
meetings of Arab and Muslim foreign ministers. Bassil is an ally of Hizbullah,
which is backed by Iran. Riyadh’s move was followed by travel warnings issued by
Saudi Arabia and several Gulf countries, which also urged their citizens already
in Lebanon to leave. Saudi Arabia also blacklisted several individuals and
companies for their alleged ties to Hizbullah. The sources said that Riyadh
remains angry at Lebanon’s lack of support to the Kingdom against its rival
Iran. Salam has told Saudi Ambassador Ali Awadh Asiri that he wants to visit
Riyadh to explain the official Lebanese stance. But no date has been set yet for
the visit, the sources added.
Report: Salam Might Suspend Cabinet Sessions over Trash
Hurdle
Naharnet/February 29/16/The agenda of the next cabinet session slated for
Thursday has been distributed on Lebanon's ministers and includes 169 items for
discussion, although Prime Minister Tammam Salam threatens to halt it over a
delay in solutions for the garbage file, An Nahar daily reported on Monday.
Ministerial sources said that Salam has deplored the slow progress in the months
long trash management file and that he is ready to “turn tables” if no progress
is made before the session is held. Sources following up closely on the file
told the daily that Salam is willing to suspend the cabinet meetings if the
controversial file is not solved. Lebanon's garbage crisis erupted when the
Naameh landfill was closed in July 2015. In December, the cabinet approved a
waste export plan. But a scandal broke out revealing that Britain’s Chinook
Urban Mining company, which was selected by the government to manage the export
scheme, may have fabricated its permits. Several plans to solve it have failed
including one to establish landfills in several areas, which is being
reconsidered by the cabinet in light of the absence of all other solutions.
Kuwait Urges Lebanon to be 'Part of Arab Region', Vows to
'Maintain Aid'
Naharnet/February 29/16/Kuwait reassured Monday that it will maintain its
support and aid for Lebanon despite the latest diplomatic rift between Lebanon
and Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Gulf states. “The Kuwaiti aid for the
brotherly Lebanese people will continue,” Kuwait's Deputy Premier and Foreign
Minister Sheikh Sabah al-Khaled al-Sabah announced. But he noted that “Lebanon
is required to be part of its Arab region and its concerns and problems.”The top
Kuwaiti official's remarks come despite the fact that his country has joined
Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Gulf countries, except for Oman, in warning
citizens against visiting Lebanon. Saudi Arabia started its measures on February
19 when its foreign ministry announced that the kingdom was halting around $4
billion in military aid to the Lebanese army and security forces in response to
what it called "hostile Lebanese positions resulting from the stranglehold of
Hizbullah on the state" and Hizbullah "terrorist acts against Arab and Muslim
nations."Around 90 Lebanese citizens have also been fired from their jobs in
Saudi Arabia, according to media reports. The kingdom also attributed its move
to Lebanon's refusal to join the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic
Cooperation in condemning attacks on Saudi diplomatic missions in Iran last
month. Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil said Lebanon abstained from voting on the
two resolutions in line with its famous “dissociation” policy and because
Hizbullah was described as “terrorist” in the Arab statement. Riyadh cut
diplomatic ties with Tehran after demonstrators burned its embassy and a
consulate following the Saudi execution of a prominent Shiite dissident, Sheikh
Nimr al-Nimr.
Kataeb Slams 'Security Chaos' of Past Two Days, Urges Election of President
Naharnet/February 29/16/The Kataeb Party on Monday slammed what it called the
“all-out security chaos” that accompanied protests staged by Hizbullah
supporters in the past two days, as it reiterated its call for the speedy
election of a president. The party “rejects the all-out security chaos that
erupted in various Lebanese regions and involved roaming convoys, road-blocking
and tire-burning at the hands of Hizbullah supporters, in a scene that reminded
us of the 'Black Shirts' incident,” Kataeb's political bureau said in a
statement issued after its weekly meeting. The Hizbullah supporters took to the
streets on Saturday and Sunday to protest a TV show that poked fun at Hizbullah
chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah. The episode came amid rising tensions between the
Iran-backed Hizbullah and Saudi Arabia over the wars in Yemen and Syria. “These
practices in Lebanon mirror Hizbullah's behavior abroad, which has dealt a
severe blow to Lebanon's ties with its Arab neighbors and with the international
community,” Kataeb said on Monday, warning that Hizbullah's alleged policies
were “subjecting the Lebanese to all types of security, economic and political
crises.”Saudi Arabia started a series of measures against Lebanon and Hizbullah
on February 19 when its foreign ministry announced that the kingdom was halting
around $4 billion in military aid to the Lebanese army and security forces. The
kingdom later slapped sanctions on individuals and firms accused of ties to
Hizbullah and advised its citizens against travel to Lebanon while urging those
already in the country to leave it. Around 90 Lebanese citizens have also been
fired from their jobs in Saudi Arabia, according to media reports. Saudi Arabia
has linked its move to "hostile Lebanese positions resulting from the
stranglehold of Hizbullah on the State" and alleged Hizbullah "terrorist acts
against Arab and Muslim nations."It also attributed the move to Lebanon's
refusal to join the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation in
condemning attacks on Saudi diplomatic missions in Iran last month. Riyadh cut
diplomatic ties with Tehran after demonstrators burned its embassy and a
consulate following the Saudi execution of a prominent Shiite cleric, Nimr al-Nimr.
Separately, Kataeb renewed its call Monday for the election of a new president
in order to “liberate the country from governmental paralysis and revive the
approach of resorting to the Constitution and state institutions.”“The
governmental decay has reached an unprecedented extent and it is manifesting
itself in the handling of social files, security, the garbage crisis and lastly
the Arab ties crisis,” the party warned.“This all proves that there can be no
quick solution except through the election of a president,” Kataeb added,
reminding the political parties of the upcoming March 2 electoral session.
Palestinian Islamist Wounded in Ain el-Hilweh Shooting
Naharnet/February 29/16/A Palestinian Islamist activist was injured in a
shooting in the southern refugee camp of Ain el-Hilweh overnight, the state-run
National News Agency reported on Monday. Mohammed Shraidi was lightly wounded in
the foot and was taken to hospital when unknown assailants opened fire at him,
it said. The attack, which took place in the camp’s al-Fawqani street, was
followed by intermittent gunfire.But the Palestinian leadership launched
contacts to contain the incident, NNA added. The impoverished Ain el-Hilweh camp
has gained notoriety as a refuge for extremists and fugitives and for the
settling of scores between factions. By long-standing convention, the army does
not enter the Palestinian refugee camps, leaving the factions themselves to
handle security.
Report: France Seeks to Revive Saudi Aid to Lebanese Army
Naharnet/February 29/16/France is insisting on reviving a $3 billion Saudi grant
to the Lebanese army despite Riyadh’s decision to cut the aid, al-Joumhouria
newspaper reported on Monday. The Saudi government confirmed last week that it
has stopped all military aid to Lebanon. There are deals worth $4 billion aimed
at equipping and supporting the Lebanese army and security forces. One of the
Saudi-financed deals is worth $3 billion under which France would provide arms
and equipment to the Lebanese army. Al-Joumhouria said that Paris provided
guarantees to Riyadh that the weapons would be delivered to the army and would
not go to any other side, especially Hizbullah. In April last year, Lebanon
received the first shipment of the $3 billion worth of French arms to boost the
country's defensive capabilities to combat terror threats, along its
northeastern border in particular. The Saudi aid cut was followed by a call by
Riyadh and other Gulf states on their citizens not to travel to Lebanon for
safety reasons and ordered those staying there to leave. The move sparked fears
of deportations of Lebanese residing in the Gulf. Al-Joumhouria said that the
U.S., France and Canada have launched contacts with the Saudi authorities over
the issue because many Lebanese working there hold the citizenship of these
states.
Berri Holds onto Hizbullah-Mustaqbal Dialogue despite Tension
Naharnet/February 29/16/Speaker Nabih Berri held onto the dialogue between
Hizbullah and al-Mustaqbal officials despite the rising tension between them as
a result of a Saudi aid cut. Berri told his visitors on Sunday that the talks
have no other alternative. According to As Safir daily published Monday, the
adviser of Hizbullah chief, Hussein Khalil, Minister Ali Hassan Khalil, who is
from Berri’s Amal movement and, Nader Hariri, the adviser of the Mustaqbal
leader have agreed to meet again. The last dialogue session that they held under
Berri’s sponsorship in Ain el-Tineh was on Wednesday night. But the meeting was
limited to them. Previous talks used to be attended by more representatives from
the two parties. The newspaper said that the next round of talks could be
between 16 and 20 March. As Safir also quoted Mustaqal leaders as saying that a
meeting, which is expected to be held between Berri and al-Mustaqbal chief Saad
Hairri, would give a new impulse to the dialogue. Tension rose last week between
the Mustaqbal-led March 14 alliance and the Hizbullah-dominated March 8 camp
after Saudi Arabia announced that it would cut $4 billion in aid to the Lebanese
army and security forces. Riyadh's decision came in retaliation to Foreign
Minister Jebran Bassil's rejection to support Saudi resolutions against Iran
during two recent meetings of Arab and Muslim foreign ministers. Bassil is an
ally of Hizbullah, which is backed by Iran. Travel warnings issued by Saudi
Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar this week further
exacerbated the situation. The Gulf countries also urged their citizens already
in Lebanon to leave.
Bassil: PM's Remarks on Us Committing Foreign Policy
Mistake Do Not Represent Lebanon, Govt. Policy
Naharnet/February 29/16/Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil hit back Sunday at Prime
Minister Tammam Salam over remarks that the minister had committed a “foreign
policy mistake” through his stances at the Arab League and the Organization of
Islamic Cooperation. “The prime minister's remarks that we committed a foreign
policy mistake do not represent Lebanon or the government's policy,” said Bassil
during an interview on al-Jadeed TV, when asked about Salam's remarks to Sky
News television. He noted that “some ministers escalate their rhetoric outside
the cabinet and in their remarks to the media as they show softer stances during
the cabinet meetings.”Bassil's remarks come after the rival March 14 camp
accused Hizbullah and the minister of sabotaging Lebanon's ties with Saudi
Arabia, following a series of Saudi measures against Lebanon. The measures
started on February 19 when the Saudi foreign ministry announced that the
kingdom was halting around $4 billion in military aid to the Lebanese army and
security forces. The kingdom later advised its citizens against travel to
Lebanon and urged those already in the country to leave it, citing “safety”
concerns. The rest of the Arab Gulf countries except for Oman followed suit,
issuing similar travel warnings. Around 90 Lebanese citizens have also been
fired from their jobs in Saudi Arabia, according to media reports. Saudi Arabia
has linked its move to "hostile Lebanese positions resulting from the
stranglehold of Hizbullah on the state" and alleged Hizbullah "terrorist acts
against Arab and Muslim nations."It also attributed the move to Lebanon's
refusal to join the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation in
condemning attacks on Saudi diplomatic missions in Iran last month. Riyadh cut
diplomatic ties with Tehran after demonstrators burned its embassy and a
consulate following the Saudi execution of a prominent Shiite cleric, Nimr al-Nimr.
Addressing the Saudi leadership on Sunday, Bassil said: “Lebanon is a free
country and it suffers from certain weakness, so help it become strong.” “I'm
willing to do anything to serve my country … but others must understand
Lebanon's stances,” he added. He also said he does not mind “communicating with
the Saudi foreign minister if the other party is ready for such a move,” noting
that the government has “decided to form a ministerial panel headed by the PM in
order to visit Riyadh.”
Jumblat to Saudi: Halting Aid Weakens State, Economic Siege
on Lebanon Not Useful
Naharnet/February 29/16/Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Jumblat on
Sunday warned Saudi Arabia that its halt of military aid to Lebanon would only
“weaken the Lebanese state” and that any “economic siege” on Lebanon would
“impoverish all Lebanese.”“The response against Lebanese institutions will
weaken the institutions and the State. Suspending the military aid will weaken
the State and they (Hizbullah) will benefit from this,” Jumblat cautioned during
an interview with Orient News TV, which supports the Syrian opposition. “An
economic siege on Lebanon would impoverish all Lebanese and will not be useful,
unless there are plans to undermine Lebanese stability and the Lebanese entity,”
Jumblat added. His remarks come amid an unprecedented rift in the ties with
Riyadh that has seen the kingdom halt around $4 billion in aid to Lebanon's army
and security forces and advise its citizens against visiting the country. Saudi
Arabia has linked its move to "hostile Lebanese positions resulting from the
stranglehold of Hizbullah on the state" and alleged Hizbullah "terrorist acts
against Arab and Muslim nations."Asked about the Lebanese government's stance on
the row with Riyadh and the statement it issued after an emergency session,
Jumblat described the statement as “sufficient.” “I believe that Prime Minister
Tammam Salam has done what is necessary and I hope the kingdom, the UAE and
other Gulf states will accept the official Lebanese apology, for the sake of
Lebanon and the historic ties between Lebanon and the Gulf states,” the PSP
leader added. Asked about justice minister Ashraf Rifi's recent resignation from
the government, Jumblat accused the minister of “attention seeking,” noting that
he should have “showed solidarity with (al-Mustaqbal movement leader ex-PM) Saad
Hariri.” “Saad Hariri remains the first guarantee for Lebanese moderation,”
Jumblat stressed. He also described Hizbullah as “a part of an Iranian system”
in Lebanon and the region, when asked whether the party cares about the
interests of its supporters and the interests of the Lebanese in general.
Body of Hezbollah commander found in Syria
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Monday, 29 February 2016/Hezbollah has
recovered the body for one of its senior commanders, Ali Fayyad, after earlier
reports said he was killed in the northern Syrian province of Aleppo, Al Arabiya
News Channel reported Monday. Reports of Fayad's death first surfaced on Feb. 26
when Syrian activists said he was killed in Aleppo. Fayad, originally from the
village of Ansar in southern Lebanon, was considered one of the key military
commanders in Hezbollah. Hezbollah has been quiet on the number of its fighters
killed in Lebanon over the course of the Syrian conflict, but a Washington
Institute for Near East Studies puts the number close to 865 members killed in
the past four years.
Saudis increasingly frustrated with Lebanon
Ibrahim al-Hatlani/Al-Monitor/February 29/16
Saudi Arabia is not happy with Lebanon or its failure to control the Islamist
militant group Hezbollah, and it's making its displeasure clear. What’s not
known is what it will take to appease Riyadh. The Saudi Ministry of Foreign
Affairs on Feb. 23 asked its citizens not to travel to Lebanon, for their own
safety. It has also asked citizens residing in or visiting Lebanon to leave,
unless they absolutely have to stay. This stance pe rsists despite attempts by
the Lebanese government and others to convince Riyadh to reconsider its Feb. 19
decision to cancel $4 billion in military aid to Lebanon. Riyadh said it is
protesting Lebanese Foreign Minister of Affairs Gebran Bassil’s stance during a
Jan. 10 ministerial meeting of the Arab League. Bassil refrained from condemning
the recent attack on the Saudi Arabian embassy and its consulate in Iran.
Lebanon has a long-standing policy of distancing itself from external conflicts.
Saudi Arabia's actions come against a Lebanese government that has been
politically hijacked by Hezbollah, according to Hezbollah’s opponents in Lebanon
and abroad. Also, Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah has been
escalating his media attacks on Saudi Arabia.
Adding to the hostility, Yemeni President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi declared Feb.
16 that Hezbollah members have been directly implicated in supporting Houthis in
their war against the Saudi-backed legitimate Yemeni government. On Feb. 24, the
military adviser to Saudi Defense Minister Ahmad Assiri said, “We have
intelligence information and recordings about the involvement of Hezbollah’s
militia in supporting Houthis.” That same day, Saudi media published a video
that seems to have been taped between June and July. The Yemeni army said it had
found the video in an area where the Houthi militia had been. The video
reportedly showed a Lebanese recruiter from Hezbollah talking to Houthi soldiers
about carrying out suicide attacks in Saudi Arabia. “Hezbollah is a threat to
all Arab states, especially the Gulf,” a source from the Gulf Cooperation
Council told Al-Monitor on condition of anonymity. “We have all suffered from
Hezbollah’s terrorism and Iran’s use of it,” he continued. “The security
services have succeeded in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain and the UAE [United
Arab Emirates] in controlling several security and financial operations of
Hezbollah during the past three years, and we are in solidarity with Saudi
Arabia.
“There must be a radical change in the balance of power in Lebanon, either
through the emergence of a party with equal strength to Hezbollah or through
weakening Hezbollah to become equal to other Lebanese parties.”
Hezbollah anticipated the Gulf’s angry measures and sent a security delegation
to Cairo. The delegation met with Egyptian officials, reportedly admitted
Hezbollah’s role in Yemen and asked Cairo to intercede.
But Saudi Arabia is not expected to accept any mediation in this issue,
especially from Cairo, which hosted the Houthis in July and permitted them to
stage seminars during which they criticized Saudi Arabia.
The Saudi retaliation against Lebanon surprised many observers there and abroad.
It is part of a series of security measures that Riyadh has taken against
figures or parties operating directly or indirectly in Saudi Arabia in favor of
Iran or Hezbollah. These measures include Saudi trials in May that restricted
bank accounts, investments and real estate assets of 44 Lebanese people
affiliated with Hezbollah in Saudi Arabia. Saudi authorities also pursued
several Shiite clerics in the eastern provinces of Qatif and Ihsaa who collect
money from their Shiite citizens and send it to their religious authorities in
Tehran. Some clerics were arrested on the grounds of money laundering, like
Sheikh Khaled Seif, who was tried in October and sentenced to five years in
jail.
The kingdom’s ruling parties are convinced Hezbollah is working with Iran to
penetrate the Gulf and foil or paralyze Saudi Arabia’s plans to lead the region
on both military and security levels. Those plans began when King Salman bin
Abdul-Aziz Al Saud became ruler, and grew as his ambitious son Mohammad Bin
Salman launched Operation Decisive Storm in March. The plans continued with the
kingdom’s success in forming an Arab alliance to face Houthis in Yemen and were
bolstered in December when it formed a 34-country Muslim military alliance to
fight terrorism.
Saudi Ambassador to Beirut Awad Assiri launched an open-arms policy in April
2013, but Riyadh has failed to contain Hezbollah behind diplomatic doors. Now it
seems Riyadh will not stop at diplomatic and economic displays of anger. It’s
not looking for a middle ground with the Lebanese government, which is unable to
control Hezbollah locally and abroad.
Why is Saudi Arabia angry at Lebanon
Hussain Abdul-Hussain/Now Lebanon/February 29/16
Lebanon is inching closer toward becoming a failing state. Services are
mediocre, the infrastructure crumbling, garbage piling up and the economy
contracting. Now Beirut has added yet another failure to its list: Amateurish
diplomacy that is turning whoever is left of Lebanon's friends into enemies.
Lebanon’s deteriorating relationship with Saudi Arabia is a case in point. But
before we understand the reasons behind Beirut’s crumbling relations with
Riyadh, a quick history is in order. During the civil war, the Lebanese state
managed to maintain some neutrality and decency. In the thick of war, Beirut
deployed skilled Foreign Ministers like Fouad Boutros and savvy diplomats like
Ghassan Tueni. But when the war ended in 1991, warlords and their militias took
over the state and infested its bureaucracy. Suddenly, the nation’s foreign
ministry turned from the voice of a weak, yet credible, government into one of
the spoils rewarded to Lebanon’s new and incompetent leaders.
During the 1990s, late Prime Minister Rafik Hariri — a leader with unparalleled
skills — covered up for the failure of Lebanese diplomacy. During all-out wars
with Israel, like in 1996, Hariri shuttled between foreign capitals and invaded
international broadcasts making the case for Lebanon.
At the Arab Summit in Beirut in 2002, when Syrian President Bashar al-Assad
instructed his Lebanese counterpart Emile Lahoud to censor late Palestinian
President Yasser Arafat’s live video address from his siege in Ramallah, it was
Hariri who roamed the corridors at Phoenicia Hotel and brought back the
Palestinian delegation, thus saving face for Beirut and its summit. But after
Hariri, the inadequacy of Lebanon’s Foreign Ministry became evident, especially
after the takeover by Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil, an engineer by training.
Those who think career diplomats can make up for Bassil’s inexperience, keep in
mind that — like in the rest of the Lebanese bureaucracy — sectarian quota and
appointment by political intercession trumps qualification.
Bassil’s shortcomings at Lebanon’s Foreign Ministry — like in his role at the
Ministery of Electricity — have been evident for a long time. Bassil abused
state resources by treating himself to a summer trip to Brazil to watch the 2014
World Cup games, justifying his trip by saying that its goal was to connect with
the Lebanese Diaspora (even though emigrants usually visit Lebanon in the
summer). The Lebanese also watched another one of Bassil’s scandals, on video,
when he looked as if he was offering the sexual services of one of Lebanon’s
senior female diplomats in New York to the Foreign Minister of the UAE.
Bassil’s blunders at the Foreign Ministry and his amateurism eventually caught
up with him at the Arab League’s meeting that was convened, in January, to
condemn Iranian attacks on the Saudi embassy in Tehran and its consulate in
Meshhad. Had Bassil had the slightest of diplomatic wit, he would have noticed
that Iran’s three most ardent Arab allies — Iraq, Oman and Algeria — voted for
the resolution. Algeria, which noted its reservation on commending the Saudi
severing of ties with Iran, still voted for the resolution. Bassil did not.
Even Iranian President Hassan Rouhani denounced the attacks and said that his
government had opened an investigation to punish the perpetrators. So here you
have it: Lebanon’s talentless Foreign Minister Bassil, who won his position
thanks to his familial connections, has taken down the last shred of
respectability that the Lebanese state once enjoyed. Perhaps Bassil thought that
Arab League meeting was one of Lebanon’s irrelevant cabinet meetings. Perhaps he
thought he could erase his mistake by having his and Hezbollah’s media tweaking
the story, just like they did with the UN Tribunal, among other false propaganda
stunts. Unfortunately, the only thing worse than Bassil’s blunder at the Arab
League was the Lebanese failure to understand the mistake and rectify it.
Lebanon’s enemies of Saudi Arabia started questioning its angry position.
Lebanon’s friends of Saudi Arabia launched a campaign against Iran and
Hezbollah. A better response might be to review the bylaws of the Arab League
and see whether Beirut can recast Lebanon’s vote. Symbolic as it may be,
recasting the vote might tell Riyadh that Beirut understands that Lebanese-Saudi
relations cannot be run by amateurs like Bassil, for if Saudi Arabia believes
that the Lebanese government is in the image of Bassil, the kingdom will
certainly continue distancing itself away from Lebanon, for the first time since
the inception of both countries.
Recasting Lebanon’s vote at the Arab League might help rekindle the crumbling
Lebanese-Saudi friendship, which if it ever collapses, will cost the Lebanese
dearly.
**Hussain Abdul-Hussain is the Washington Bureau Chief of Kuwaiti newspaper
Alrai. He tweet @hahussain.
Punishing Lebanon or Hezbollah?
Abdulrahman al-Rashed/Al Arabiya/February 29/16
Following Saudi measures against Hezbollah, some people now think the Lebanese
people are satisfied with the party’s actions. Let us recall that those who
assassinated former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri, as international investigators
have proven, are Hezbollah members. He and other Lebanese symbols who dared
confront the Iran-Hezbollah-Syrian regime axis were killed. They included
ministers Mohammad Chatah and Bassel Fleihan, army official Francois al-Hajj,
Wissam al-Hassan, one of the most prominent security officials who was
monitoring Hezbollah, Major Wissam Eid for the same reason, and intellectual
George Hawi. One of the most prominent young Christian leaders, minister and MP
Pierre Gemayel - son of Kataeb Party leader Amin Gemayel - was killed at the age
of 34. Prominent author Samir Kassir and renowned journalist Gebran Tueni,
former editor-in-chief of An-Nahar newspaper, were also killed. TV journalist
May Chidiac was targeted by a car bomb. She survived but lost a leg and arm.
Despite this, her stances are the same. When Hezbollah invaded Sunni areas in
west Beirut six years ago, causing much death and destruction, Druze leader
Walid Jumblatt stood in solidarity with the Sunnis. Hezbollah then attacked
Druze areas in the mountains, killing 46 and injuring 123. The bravest of men to
defy Hezbollah is Christian leader Samir Geagea, who has continued to confront
the party and the Syrian regime since his release from jail. Many Lebanese
Shiites have dared to protest in front of the Iranian embassy in Beirut against
Hezbollah’s intervention in Syria. However, party members attacked them, and
shot and killed protest leader Hisham Salman in a hideous public execution.
Unreasonable demands
This is why it is unacceptable to say the Lebanese people have not tried to defy
Iranian hegemony. Hezbollah possesses a power that it established under the
pretext of resisting Israel - a lie that in the past naive Arabs believed and
supported. Most Lebanese wish to get rid of the party ideologically and
militarily, for domestic reasons that have nothing to do with Syria or Saudi
Arabia.Hezbollah has restrained their lives and created fear that has led to the
emigration of hundreds of thousands and the loss of investors. Its activities
have harmed downtown Beirut, as the party has invaded it whenever it wants to
protest and terrorize its visitors. One cannot demand that the Lebanese people
confront Iran and Hezbollah when there is no foreign power willing to support
them. The same goes for the Syrian people who are being slaughtered.
I think Riyadh will increase support to all those confronting Tehran and its
allies, including those in Lebanon and even opposition parties in Iran
The Saudi suspension of aid to the Lebanese army is justified. The aim of the
aid was to empower state institutions in the face of extremist organizations
such as Hezbollah and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). However,
Hezbollah is using the army in its war against the Syrian people to protect its
fronts and passages, and army officials are powerless. Riyadh’s decision is wise
because it targets Hezbollah. The kingdom has also halted Saudi flights to
Beirut, urged Saudi citizens to leave Lebanon, and blacklisted some companies
and people for having links to Hezbollah. All these decisions are justified to
confront Iran and its proxy, especially after the latter’s plan to hijack a
Saudi passenger plane in the Philippines was exposed. I do not think Saudi
Arabia will stop supporting parties that confront Hezbollah, and will not stop
dealing with Lebanese who have nothing to do with the party. I think Riyadh will
increase support to all those confronting Tehran and its allies, including those
in Lebanon and even opposition parties in Iran.
Israel: Lebanon violated UNSC resolution calls
to disarm Hezbollah more than 2,000 times
J.Post/February 29/16/NEW YORK – Lebanon violated UN Security Council Resolution
1701, 2,374 times in 2015, according to a report the Israeli Mission released to
the UN on Sunday. Resolution 1701 was passed in 2006 and was intended to resolve
that summer’s war between Israel and Lebanon. It called for a disarmament of all
armed groups in Lebanon, including Hezbollah. It also stated that no armed
forces other than the UN Interim Force in Lebanon and the Lebanese army would be
posted south of the Litani River. According to the report, 2015 saw 1,079
incidents in which armed individuals were cited freely roaming in southern
Lebanon. Additionally, there were 589 violations involving the UN-delineated
Blue Line border between Israel and Lebanon, and 653 Hezbollah patrols along the
border fence. Two incidents in which Israel was attacked, including two rockets
fired at Nahariya, were also recorded, as well as 51 violent demonstrations
against the IDF. “Hezbollah has free reign in south Lebanon and instead of
reacting forcefully to their violations, the UN is ignoring the problem,” said
Danny Danon, ambassador to the UN. “Israel will continue to show zero tolerance
regarding anyone who attacks us,” he told UN Secretary- General Ban Ki-moon.
“The government of Lebanon is not acting and armed Hezbollah operatives are
roaming freely throughout the south Lebanon in violation of the UN.” The report
follows Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah’s threat last week to strike the
ammonia storage facility in Haifa, which he claimed would cause a nuclear-like
explosion.Danon had filed several complaints about violations of the resolution
to Ban since January, including one earlier this month in which he asked the
secretary-general to condemn rocket attacks from Lebanon on northern Israel.
Canada fulfills promise to take in Syrian
refugees
AFP, Montreal Monday, 29 February 2016/Canada has met a self-imposed deadline to
accept 25,000 Syrian refugees fleeing their country’s civil war, officials said,
fulfilling a campaign promise by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. “25000 reasons
why Canadians should be proud today #WelcomeRefugees,” Immigration, Refugees and
Citizenship Minister John McCallum tweeted after a charter flight carrying
refugees touched down in Montreal on Saturday. Trudeau had made a campaign
pledge to take in 25,000 Syrian refugees from Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey before
the end of 2015. But his Liberal government pushed the target back two months
after taking office following elections in October. Canada has chartered around
a hundred flights from Lebanon and Jordan since Trudeau met the first arriving
plane in December. The government’s resettlement program will cover costs for
more than half the refugees during their first year. Private groups or a
combination of both will cover the rest, the country’s immigration authorities
said. Syrian refugees will continue to arrive in Canada, albeit at a slower
pace. The country is set to take in some 12,000 more refugees by the end of the
year under a program run jointly with the United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees (UNHCR), the immigration authorities said. Some 250 Canadian cities and
towns have taken in refugees so far. The UNHCR has contacted nearly 70,000
Syrians living in refugee camps in Lebanon and Jordan about emigrating to
Canada. Fewer than half said they were interested. Europe’s migrant crisis
became a political issue in Canada during last year’s election campaign.
Political parties competed over the number of refugees the country should accept
after a photograph of the drowned Syrian boy Aylan Kurdi on a Turkish beach
captured international attention.
Netanyahu: Israel ranked the eighth strongest
country in the world
J.Post/February 29/16/Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu touted Israel's strength
among world nations on Monday, saying that Jewish state's international
alliances account for its high ranking among global powers. Speaking at the
weekly Likud faction meeting, Netanyahu said that two trends were characterizing
Israel's international standing: an effort to delegitimize Israel on the one
hand, and a strengthening of Israel's ties with the nations of the world on the
other hand. Netanyahu cited a survey published recently by the Wharton School of
the University of Pennsylvania, which ranked Israel the eighth strongest country
in the world. The survey listed the most powerful nations as the United States,
Russia, China, Germany, Britain, France, Japan, and in eighth place, Israel,
according to Netanyahu. "They rank us high in international power because of our
international alliances," Netanyahu said. Netanyahu's comments came after Yesh
Atid leader Yair Lapid and Yisrael Beytenu leader Avigdor Liberman held a press
conference earlier in the day, contending that Netanyahu had damaged Israel's
standing in the world. "Israel is ranked eighth in the world on the basis of
three criteria that the survey mentioned: military power, that's clear.
International influence, and notice what they said - international alliances,"
he said. Netanyahu said that he had met earlier in the day with the new Egyptian
ambassador to Israel and later with representatives from African states who want
Israel to strengthen its ties once again with Africa. He said that he would also
be meeting US Vice President Joe Biden in the coming days. "We are strengthening
ties with the great powers of Asia and with Latin American countries. That is
what we do all the time, on a daily basis," he said. Dismissing the press
conference held by Lapid and Liberman, Netanyahu said: "The coalition chairman
told me that the left-wing parties held a political emergency conference. So
there are those who choose to blabber and to deal with political conferences,
and there are those who defuse the pressures on Israel an strengthen the
international alliances in order to ensure our future here."
Netanyahu said that Israel's military, economic, diplomatic and technological
strength would ensure the country's future and bring Israel's enemies to make
peace with it. Lapid and Liberman had argued that Netanyahu was hurting Israel's
ability to fight the delegitimization of Israel by closing down foreign
representations abroad and splitting the Foreign Ministry up into smaller
departments. Laqid said that "the deterioration is dramatic. The BDS movement is
gaining steam. The international media is running an anti-Israel line with the
help of Israeli organizations like Breaking the Silence. Our international
standing has never been worse, and what makes the situation more drastic is that
the Israeli government won't admit that the situation is terrible."
Israel 'very concerned' by rising Iranian
power in Syria, Ya'alon says
J.Post/February 29/16/Israel is highly concerned by the prospect of a stronger
Iranian presence in Syria, Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon told his Italian
counterpart, Roberta Pinotti, on Monday in Tel Aviv. Ya'alon, who met with
Pinotti at his Tel Aviv bureau, praised defense relations between Israel and
Italy, and pointed out the use by the IAF of Italy's M346 training plane.
Although Israel would very much like the Syrian civil war to come to an end, the
conflict, which has led to half a million casualties and ten million refugees,
"is still continuing at this time. It has not completely stopped," Ya'alon
said.Israel is highly concerned by the prospect of a stronger Iranian presence
in Syria, Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon told his Italian counterpart, Roberta
Pinotti, on Monday in Tel Aviv. Ya'alon, who met with Pinotti at his Tel Aviv
bureau, praised defense relations between Israel and Italy, and pointed out the
use by the IAF of Italy's M346 training plane. Although Israel would very much
like the Syrian civil war to come to an end, the conflict, which has led to half
a million casualties and ten million refugees, "is still continuing at this
time. It has not completely stopped," Ya'alon said.
Bahrain Jails 'Terrorists' for Attacking
Police
SourceAgence France Presse/Naharnet/February 29/16/Bahrain jailed five people
for up to 15 years on Monday for "terrorist" attacks against police in the
Sunni-ruled Gulf kingdom that has been shaken by Shiite-led unrest since 2011. A
high criminal court sentenced three defendants to 15 years each after convicting
them of setting an interior ministry vehicle on fire, the prosecutor in
"terrorist" cases, Ahmed al-Hammadi, said. They were also collectively fined
more than 17,000 dinars ($45,000), said Hammadi in a statement published by the
official BNA news agency. No casualties were reported in the attack that took
place in August last year. In another case, the same court jailed two
defendants, one for three years and the second for 10 years, after convicting
them of rioting and throwing explosives and rocks at police last April. That
"terrorist" attack wounded two policemen, the statement said. Bahrain, just
across the Gulf from Iran and home to the U.S. Fifth Fleet, has seen frequent
clashes between protesters and security forces in Shiite villages since a
Shiite-led uprising was crushed five years ago.
NATO Chief Voices Concern over Syria Truce Violations
SourceAgence France Presse/Naharnet/February 29/16/NATO Secretary General Jens
Stoltenberg expressed concern over reports of violations of a three-day-old
ceasefire in Syria on Monday and urged all parties to respect the truce. "We
have seen encouraging signs that the ceasefire is largely holding, but at the
same time we have seen some reports about violations," Stoltenberg told a press
conference in Kuwait City. "Of course, that is of concern because it is
important that all sides should respect the agreement," which is the best way to
renew efforts for a political solution to the devastating five-year conflict, he
said. The ceasefire deal was brokered by Moscow and Washington and took effect
at midnight on Friday. It entered its third day largely intact on Monday despite
accusations of violations from both sides. Stoltenberg said NATO was also
concerned about Russia's military buildup in Syria, where it has carried out a
five-month bombing campaign in support of President Bashar Assad. "We are
concerned about the Russian military buildup we have seen in Syria," whether it
is military or air force, he said. The NATO chief said Russian air strikes had
"mainly targeted" non-jihadist rebels rather than the Islamic State group, which
has been targeted by a U.S.-led coalition. He said the Western alliance had no
plans to send ground troops to Syria as part of the campaign against the
jihadists.
U.N. plans aid for 154,000 besieged Syrians in next 5 days
Reuters, Geneva Monday, 29 February 2016/The United Nations and partner aid
organizations plan to deliver life-saving aid to 154,000 Syrians in besieged
areas in the next five days, the UN Resident Coordinator in Damascus Yacoub El
Hillo said in a statement on Sunday. Pending approval from parties to the
conflict, the UN is ready to deliver aid to about 1.7 million people in
hard-to-reach areas in the first quarter of 2016, he said. The U.N. estimates
there are almost 500,000 people living under siege and 4.6 million who are hard
to reach with aid.
UN chief: Syria ceasefire holding ‘by and large’
By Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Monday, 29 February 2016/The UN chief said
Monday a fragile Syria ceasefire was holding “by and large” despite “incidents”
of fighting at the weekend and the opposition warning that the truce was facing
a “complete nullification.”“As of now I can tell you that by and large the
cessation of hostilities is holding even though we have experienced some
incidents,” United Nations Secretary Genera Ban Ki-moon told reporters in
Geneva. A UN-backed taskforce was also set to meet to evaluate various
accusations of breaches. The taskforce monitoring the truce is “now trying to
make sure that this does not spread any further and that this cessation of
hostilities can continue.”That taskforce would meet at 3:00 pm (1400 GMT), the
top UN envoy for Syria, Staffan de Mistura, told AFP. The tenuous truce,
negotiated by Washington and Moscow and backed by the UN, entered its third day
despite reports of violations on both sides. The special international task
force co-chaired by the United States and Russia last met on Saturday, just
hours after the cessation of hostilities began.It is one of several mechanisms
in place to oversee and deal with violations of the agreement, which does not
apply to territory held by ISIS and Al-Qaeda affiliate Al-Nusra Front.
Syrian opposition warning
On Monday, a Syrian opposition official told Al Arabiya's sister channel Al
Hadath that the fragile truce is facing a “complete nullification” because of
President Bashar al-Assad government’s attacks. Asaad al-Zoubi, head of the
Saudi-backed High Negotiations Committee’s delegation to peace talks, said the
truce which came into effect early on Saturday had collapsed before it started.
“We have alternatives to protect our people” if the international community
could not, it quoted him as saying without elaborating. Zoubi added there were
“no indicators” that the ground was being prepared for peace talks, which the
United Nations has said it plans to reconvene on March 7. The Syrian opposition
has also sent a letter to the Security Council, saying that Russian war jets on
Sunday have executed 26 raids on Syrian rebel factions who were already
implementing the ceasefire. The letter also accused Moscow of dropping cluster
bombs on residential buildings, which led to the killing of many civilians.
France has also called for an immediate meeting of the Syria taskforce to
discuss breaches of the cessation of hostilities that came into force on Friday
night, French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault said on Monday. Ayrault told
reporters at the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva that he had information
about attacks against zones held by moderate rebels in Syria. “We have received
indications that attacks, including air strikes are continuing in areas
controlled by the moderate opposition,” Ayrault told reporters in Geneva. “This
must all of course be verified. France has therefore asked that the task force
overseeing the implementation of the cessation of hostilities meets without
delay,” he said on the sidelines of the UN Human Rights Council. Meanwhile, the
Syrian government said on Monday Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister was trying to
thwart a fragile cessation of hostilities agreement. “What Adel al-Jubeir says
... about a plan B regarding the current developments in Syria is merely ... an
attempt to thwart the cessation of hostilities,” a Syrian foreign ministry
official was quoted as saying in a statement on state media.
Aid delivery
On Monday, aid workers began carrying out the first delivery of humanitarian
assistance to Syrians since the landmark truce came into effect at the weekend,
the Syrian Arab Red Crescent said. The Red Crescent said that 10 trucks of aid
including blankets and hygiene supplies provided by the United Nations had
entered the besieged Syrian town of Moadamiyet al-Sham southwest of Damascus.
(With AFP, Reuters)
Death toll in suicide attack northeast of Baghdad rises to
24: sources
Reuters, Baghdad Monday, 29 February 2016/The death toll in a suicide bombing in
Iraq’s eastern province of Diyala rose to 24 on Monday, police and hospital
sources said.A further 55 people were wounded in the attack at a funeral for a
Shiite Muslim militia fighter in Muqdadiya, 80 km (50 miles) northeast of
Baghdad.
Baghdad blasts’ death toll rises to 70
AFP and Reuters, Baghdad Sunday, 28 February 2016/The death toll of a twin
suicide bombing in a Shiite district of Baghdad on Sunday rose to 70, with more
than 100 wounded, police, medics and morgue sources said, Reuters reported. The
attack in Sadr City was earlier claimed by ISIS. Two police sources said the
assailants were suicide bombers riding motorcycles through a crowded mobile
phone market. They said police had sealed off the area to prevent further
attacks. Officials said the bombings in Sadr city claimed by ISIS killed at
least 33 people. ISIS also attacked an army position in an area west of Baghdad,
seizing it and killing at least eight security personnel over the course of the
day. The two blasts near a market in the Sadr City area of northern Baghdad, at
least one of which was a suicide bombing, also wounded at least 79 people,
security and medical officials said. ISIS, which overran swathes of territory
north and west of Baghdad in 2014, claimed the attacks in a statement online
that said two suicide bombers had detonated explosive belts in Sadr City. ISIS
considers Shiite Muslims, who make up the majority of Iraq’s population, to be
heretics and frequently targets them with bombings and other attacks. Suicide
bombings are a tactic almost exclusively used in Iraq by ISIS. The militant
group claimed twin suicide bombings targeting Shiite worshippers on Thursday
that killed at least nine people in Shuala, another Shiite-majority area in
northern Baghdad. ISIS also launched an attack on an army position in the Abu
Ghraib area west of the city on Sunday, security officials said. The militant
attacked the position early in the morning and held it until government
reinforcements arrived and took it back later in the day, the officials said.
The Abu Ghraib violence killed at least eight people, including both members of
the security forces and allied paramilitaries, and wounded at least 22, while IS
members were also killed, officials said. While attacks are still common in
Baghdad, violence in the city has decreased significantly since IS launched a
sweeping offensive in June 2014, after which many of its militants became
occupied with fighting elsewhere. In early 2015, the Iraqi government ended a
long-running curfew that kept most Iraqis off the streets between midnight and
5:00 am (1800 to 0200 GMT), a move that expanded freedom of movement and has not
negatively impacted security. The Iraqi government is now building a series of
walls and trenches at various points surrounding the capital with the aim of
restricting the movement of militants and curbing other illegal activity.
Security spokesman Brigadier General Saad Maan has said that after the
completion of the first phase of construction, half of the checkpoints in the
capital will be removed, though such proposals have been made before but not
implemented. The city is littered with checkpoints manned by forces who often
wave cars through or at most perform cursory searches, adding little to security
while causing major traffic jams. Security personnel at many Baghdad
checkpoints, including those leading to the heavily-fortified Green Zone, still
employ "bomb detectors" that have long since been proven to be fake.
Russia: Turkish military strikes on Syria would derail
ceasefire plan
Reuters, Moscow Monday, 29 February 2016/Russia is concerned about Turkey’s
military preparations along its border with Syria and an armed intervention by
Ankara would deal an “irreparable blow” to the Syria ceasefire plan, Russian
Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said on Monday. “Unfortunately, our
Turkish colleagues still have not abandoned the idea of cross-border strikes,”
Ryabkov told a news briefing. He also said Syria could become a federal state if
that model works in the country. In the same day, NATO Secretary General Jens
Stoltenberg said on Monday the alliance was concerned by a Russian military
build-up in Syria. “We are concerned about the significant Russian military
build up we have seen in Syria with the ground troops, with the naval forces in
eastern Mediterranean and with air forces conducting air strikes,” he told a
press conference in the Gulf Arab country of Kuwait.
Gunmen kill pro-govt Sunni cleric in Yemen’s Aden
AFP, Aden Monday, 29 February 2016/Gunmen killed a pro-government Sunni Salafist
cleric on Sunday in Yemen’s main southern city of Aden, home to a growing
militant presence, a security official said. Sheikh Abdulrahman al-Adani was
shot dead as he was heading to a mosque near his home, the official said. Adani
headed a Salafist religious school which attracts both local and foreign
students. He was known for his stance against the Shiite Houthi rebels as well
as against ISIS and Al-Qaeda which are becoming increasingly active in Aden,
sources there said. According to Zaid al-Sallami, an Aden-based expert on
Islamist groups, Adani was known for “rejecting violence and terrorism.” His
murder was an attempt to “push moderate Salafist youths towards violence,”
Sallami said. Al-Qaeda and ISIS have stepped up attacks in Aden despite the
efforts of the government and its backers in a Saudi-led coalition battling the
Houthis and their allies to secure it. In another sign of growing unrest in
Aden, clashes broke out near the entrance to the presidential palace in the port
city’s Crater district between presidential guards and soldiers demanding their
salaries, an official told AFP. The fighting spread to nearby residential
districts and there were casualties, the official and residents said. President
Abedrabbo Mansour Hadi’s internationally recognized government has declared Aden
the country’s provisional capital after the Houthis and their allies drove it
out of Sanaa and much of northern Yemen since September 2014. The rebels
controlled Aden for months before government loyalists pushed them out in July.
Because of the unrest gripping Aden, Hadi himself and many senior officials in
his government spend most of their time in Riyadh, which has led an anti-rebel
coalition since March 26 last year.
Suicide bombing kills 4 in Yemen’s Aden: official
AFP, Aden Monday, 29 February 2016/A suicide car bombing killed four people
Monday when it hit a gathering of loyalist forces in Yemen’s Aden, the southern
city serving as a government base, a security official said. Five others were
wounded in the attack in the residential Sheikh Othman district, the official
said. The suicide bomber rammed his explosives-laden vehicle into an area where
security forces and pro-government militiamen had assembled, the official said.
President Abedrabbo Mansour Hadi has declared Aden as Yemen’s temporary capital
as Sanaa remains in the hands of the Iran-backed Houthi militias and their
allies since they seized it in September 2014. Al-Qaeda and ISIS have stepped up
attacks in Aden despite the efforts of the government and its backers in a
Saudi-led coalition battling the Houthis and their allies to secure it. The
Houthis controlled Aden for months before government loyalists pushed them out
in July.Because of the unrest gripping Aden, Hadi himself and many senior
government officials spend most of their time in Riyadh, which has led an
anti-rebel coalition since March 26 last year.
Yemeni official: Houthis recruiting African fighters
Staff writer, Al Arabiya News Channel Monday, 29 February 2016/A top military
Yemeni official said the Iran-backed Houthi militias and their ally’s forces
have started recruiting “mercenaries,” coming mostly from African countries, Al
Arabiya News Channel reported Monday. Deputy Chief of Staff Gen. Nasir al-Tahiri
said the move by the Houthis and forces allied to to the toppled Ali Abdullah
Saleh was to buttress their weakening fronts at the capital Sanaa and the
northwestern governorate of Saada. Meanwhile, military sources said Saleh has
ordered Republican Guards forces to withdraw from central al-Baydha,
southwestern Ibb and Dhammar (west of al-Baydaha) to be consolidated in Sanaa as
battles heat up. It is not the first time that an abroad force is helping with
the militias in Yemen. Last week, the internationally recognized Yemeni
government said it has evidence that the Lebanese Shiite movement Hezbollah is
backing the Houthi militia group. President Abedrabbo Mansour Hadi’s
internationally recognized government has declared Aden the country’s
provisional capital after the Houthis and their allies drove it out of Sanaa and
much of northern Yemen since September 2014. The rebels controlled Aden for
months before government loyalists pushed them out in July. Because of the
unrest gripping Aden, Hadi himself and many senior officials in his government
spend most of their time in Riyadh, which has led an anti-rebel coalition since
March 26 last year.
Yemeni minister criticizes UN over Taiz, hails Gulf
contribution
By Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Sunday, 28 February 2016/A minister from
Yemen’s internationally recognized government criticized the UN for not doing
enough to help break the siege on the southwestern province of Taiz, hailing the
Gulf states as the main contributors of relief to his war-wracked country.
Abdul Raqeeb Saif Fateh, who is the minister of local administration and also
chairman of the Higher Committee for Relief in Yemen, told the London-based Al
Arab newspaper this week that the UN and its humanitarian agencies had not been
able to lift the ongoing sanctions against Taiz for the past nine months.
He criticized the UN for accusing “all sides” in the conflict of wrongdoing
after sending one of its teams to Taiz, saying the international organization
should know who is responsible. The Iran-backed Houthi militia group is
currently laying siege to Taiz, the country’s third largest city, and
surrounding areas. Some 200,000 civilians in Taiz are caught up in the fighting.
Last week, the Yemeni army and popular resistance forces made considerable
progress on several fronts in Taiz, while Houthi militias have continued a
bombing campaign of civilians in the city, the Arabic website of Al Arabiya News
Channel reported. Fateh, who was speaking on the sideline of a charity
conference held in Qatar, described the Gulf states as taking a “brotherly
stance” towards Yemen, adding the main issue in Yemen is “political” and “not
sectarian.” Without naming sides, Fateh said political factions backed from
powers abroad are the ones “complicating” the situation in Yemen. He also made
the claim that “82 percent of the Yemeni population [are] in an urgent need of
humanitarian relief.” “The Yemeni president Abdrabbu Mansour Hadi and his deputy
Khaled Bahah have explained that the war imposed was for peace, and that
dialogue is the only solution,” he said. “But we do not want the devil’s
dialogue which brings us back before 2011 just as toppled Ali Abdullah Saleh
[the deposed former longtime president] and his allies want.”Since March last
year, the Saudi-led coalition has bombed Iranian-backed Houthi militias and
forces allied to deposed leader Saleh, in a bid to put the government of
internationally recognized President Abdrabbu Mansour Hadi back in power.
Yemeni army seeking to tighten control of Hajjah and
Hodeidah
Staff writer, Al Arabiya Sunday, 28 February 2016/The army of Yemen’s
internationally recognized government and Popular Resistance units are planning
to tighten their grip over the northwestern province of Hajjah and advance south
to the coastal Hodeidah province after making gains, the army said.
Brigadier General Omar Sajjaf said that government forces are preparing to
advance towards new areas after receiving reinforcements, according to Al
Arabiya News Channel. Several areas in Hajjah province are still controlled by
the Iran-backed Houthis and forces loyal to ousted former President Ali Abdullah
Saleh, although government forces are seeking to dislodge the militias with the
backing of the Saudi-led coalition. Coalition fighter jets launched intensive
raids on militia positions in Sanaa and other Yemeni provinces, targeting a camp
south of the capital Sanaa, in addition to a gathering of military members and
vehicles. The strikes reportedly killed and wounded dozens of militias.In the
southwestern province of Taiz, Popular Resistant units said dozens of militia
gunmen were killed and wounded after shelling from the Arab coalition.
Top Iran conservatives lose seats on key body
AFP, Tehran Monday, 29 February 2016/Two leading hardline ayatollahs, Mohammad
Yazdi and Mohammad Taghi Mesbah-Yazdi, have lost their seats on Iran’s top
clerical body, results from last week’s election confirmed on Monday. The
reformist alliance formed in support of moderate President Hassan Rowhani had
campaigned against both Yazdi, the outgoing chairman of the Assembly of Experts,
and Mesbah-Yazdi, an outspoken opponent of the reformists. But a third
conservative, Ahmad Jannati, who had been targeted by the pro-Rowhani coalition,
narrowly kept his seat on the assembly, a powerful committee which oversees the
work of supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, state television reported. Iran
said on Monday that counting of votes cast in Friday's twin elections was over
and the nationwide turnout was 62 percent."Counting of the votes is finished
.... the participation in Tehran was 50 percent and in the whole country was
around 62 percent," said Interior Minister Abdolreza Rahmani Fazli. Jannati, who
chairs the conservative-dominated Guardian Council which must confirm the
results of Friday’s elections for both the assembly and for parliament, came
16th in Tehran, scraping the last of the capital’s 16 assembly seats.
Verification of the result is not expected for several days. The election to the
88-member Assembly of Experts is important because it will pick Khamenei’s
successor if he dies during its eight-year term. Rowhani placed third in polling
for the assembly in Tehran and his key ally, former president Ayatollah Akbar
Hashemi Rafsanjani took first place.
Conservative accusations
The race for the Assembly of Experts saw claims from prominent conservatives of
foreign interference and some accused the Rowhani-Rafsanjani slate of being “a
British list”. On Sunday as it became increasingly clear that Yazdi and
Mesbah-Yazdi were set to lose their seats the head of the country’s judiciary,
Ayatollah Sadegh Larijani echoed those allegations. Reformists worked with
“American and English media outlets” during the poll, Larijani charged. “Is this
type of coordination with foreigners in order to push out these figures from the
Assembly of Experts in the interests of the regime?” he asked. Rowhani’s
government dismissed the accusations when they were first made during the
election campaign. “We don’t have anything such as a British list and if anyone
wants to say that there is such a list, they are in fact insulting the Guardian
Council,” said government spokesman Mohammad Bagher Nobakht, a vice president.
The Guardian Council approved all candidates who ran in the elections for
parliament and for the Assembly of Experts.
(With Reuters)
Palestinians reject direct Iran aid to ‘intifada’ families
AFP, Ramallah, Palestinian Territories Sunday, 28 February 2016/The Palestinian
Authority on Sunday said direct financial assistance by Iran to the families of
Palestinians killed in a five-month wave of violence would be unacceptable.
Tehran announced last week assistance would be offered to families of
Palestinians killed in the wave of violence that erupted in October, but the PA
says such aid must follow official channels. Palestinian presidency spokesman
Nabil Abu Rudeina, cited by local media, said bypassing the authority in handing
out such funds would constitute illegal interference in internal Palestinian
affairs. Iran should “send this money through official channels to the (PA’s)
Martyrs and Prisoners Foundation rather than relying on informal and circuitous
routes,” Abu Rudeina said. Iran’s ambassador to Lebanon, Mohammad Fathali, said
Wednesday that Tehran would offer $7,000 to the families of each Palestinian
killed in what he called the “Jerusalem intifada”. Iran will also give $30,000
to Palestinian families whose homes have been destroyed by Israel because a
member is accused of carrying out an anti-Israeli attack, he told a news
conference in Beirut. The money pledged is in addition to the monthly aid paid
since 1987 by an Iranian institution to families of Palestinians killed, he
said. The wave of violence in Israel and the Palestinian territories since
October has killed 177 Palestinians as well as 28 Israelis, an American, a
Sudanese and an Eritrean, according to an AFP toll. Most of the Palestinians who
died in the violence were killed by Israeli forces while carrying out knife, gun
and car-ramming attacks, according to Israeli authorities. Others were shot dead
by Israeli forces during clashes and demonstrations. Iran has been accused of
providing support to Hamas, which runs the Gaza Strip and is a rival to
Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas’s Fatah party. Fatah dominates the
Palestinian Authority. Palestinian economists have questioned whether Iran would
be capable of distributing the aid to the families directly via banks since it
could be considered “terrorism financing.” The day after Iran’s announcement,
Israel denounced the decision, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying it
showed Tehran was “continuing to aid terrorism.”
Iran: A Setback for Hardliners and Little Cheer for
Reformists
Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/February 29/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/02/29/amir-taheriasharq-al-awsat-iran-a-setback-for-hardliners-and-little-cheer-for-reformists/
An Iranian man holds a copy of the daily ‘Shargh’ newspaper with pictures of
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani
on it. The headline reads ‘Decisive victory for the reformist’ (EPA)
The final results of Iran’s elections on Friday were released yesterday and it
is possible to examine the latest snapshot of opinion within the ruling
Khomeinist establishment. Some analysts dismiss elections in the Islamic
Republic as no more than a charade if only because all candidates are
pre-approved by the Council of Guardians while the Ministry of Interior rather
than an independent election commission is in charge of the whole operation.
However, Iranian elections remain interesting because they offer a glimpse into
the balance of forces within the regime, much like primaries in the US
Republican and Democrat parties. The first item of interest in Iranians
elections is the voter turnout as a measure of public interest in the exercise.
Turnout figures are always hard to establish with accuracy because there is no
way to verify official data.
This time, a month before voting the Interior Ministry reported that 56 million
people were eligible to vote. But a week before voting that figure was brought
down to a fraction under 55 million. A day after voting, the ministry announced
that a further three million could not have voted because they did not have
national identity cards. Thus, theoretically at least, the number of those
eligible is at least 58 million.
Official figures claim that 33 million votes were cast of which 32 million were
authenticated. This means that about a million votes were spoiled or blank.
Interior Minister Rahmani Fazli puts the percentage of those who voted at just
over 60 per cent, as opposed to around 58 per cent according to the alternative
setoff figures. But even if we accept his figure, it is still four per cent
lower than the last general election four years ago. In other words, the hype
created by the nuclear “deal” with the P5+1 Group led by the US did not create
the “avalanche of participation” that President Hassan Rouhani had hoped for.
Of the nine elections held under the Islamic Republic, yesterday’s produced the
second lowest turnout after the first which had only 51 per cent. There was,
however, one major exception: Tehran where, compared to elections four years
ago, voter turnout increased by a whopping 20 per cent to reach, helping the
list backed by former President Hashemi Rafsanjani to win most of the 30 seats
reserved for the capital (Rouhani is in the same faction). The Rafsanjani
faction also scored a major victory by winning a majority of the 16 seats of
Tehran in the Assembly of Experts, the body of mullahs that could choose or
dismiss the “Supreme Guide”.
Of equal symbolic importance was the fact that the Rafsanjani-Rouhani faction
succeeded in unseating two of the most high profile ayatollahs of the hardline
radical faction: Muhammad Yazdi and Muhammad-Taqi Mesbah-Yazdi from the Assembly
of Experts (Ayatollah Muhammad Yazdi was President of the Assembly).
But beyond those spectacular successes, the picture is not as encouraging for
the Rafsanjani-Rouhani faction not to mention President Barack Obama who had
hoped for a change of course in Tehran. The next Assembly of Experts will
continue to have a solid hardline majority of 58 percent compared to the
Rafsanjani faction’s 17 with “weathervanes” holding the balance of its 88 seats.
In the Islamic Majlis, the unicameral parliament, the hardliners loyal to
“Supreme Guide” Ali Khamenei have won 153 of the 290 seats, a slim majority. The
main Rafsanjani faction, known as “Reformers” has won seats 67 seats while a
smaller list, closer to Rouhani himself, secured 13 seats. The “Independents”
won 21 seats. The remaining seats will be decided in a second round of voting in
a month’s time.
The final results must be approved by the Council of the Guardians of the
Constitution before they become legal. At the time of writing this analysis, a
lot of horse-trading was going on to allow a few grandee losers to secure a
seat.
One grandee who was squeezed in was Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, head of the Council
of the Guardians of the Cosntitution. He had stood for a seat in the Assembly of
Experts in Tehran but was declared stuck at the 17th place, thus failing to get
in. Yesterday, however, the results were altered to let him squeeze in at 16th
place.
There was talk of another grandee securing a seat in the Islamic Majlis. This
was Ghulam-Ali Haddad Adel whose daughter is married to Ayaollah Khamenei’s son.
However, he didn’t succeed getting a seat in the end because alteration of
results could have led to a split in the Rafsanjani winning coalition.
Friday’s election produced a major turnover of the political personnel. First,
the number of female members of the Islamic Majlis was more than doubled,
largely thanks to Tehran where eight women were elected.
Of the incumbent members, a whopping 54 were eliminated while another 30 had
been disqualified as candidates or decided not to run.
Another feature was the continuation of the trend towards the ascendancy of the
Islamic Revolutionary Guard (IRGC). Those with an IRGC background accounted for
30 per cent of the members in the outgoing Islamic Majlis. In the next Majlis
that number will rise to 38 per cent. In contrast, the mullahs, accounting for
18 per cent in the outgoing Majlis will lose further ground, sinking to 12 per
cent in the new parliament. The position of the military in the legislature is
further strengthened by the fact that former intelligence and security officers
have gained at least 12 seats in the new Majlis.
However, the biggest share, around 40 per cent, belongs to technocrats and
government functionaries. All in all, the new Majlis, compared to the nine
previous ones, has an even narrower social base. The bazaaris, tribal and clan
figures, and professionals such as physicians and engineers, have a smaller
presence in the new Majlis.
The Rafsanjani-Rouhani factions, presenting three lists in the election,
suffered from the fact that the mass-audience television channels were
controlled by the hardliners. That was in part compensated for by the
Persian-language TV services of the BBC and the Voice of America which helped
the narrative favored by ”moderates”. The hardliners, known as “Fundamentalists”
(Ousul-garayan) also controlled most of the news agencies and a number of
newspapers. The “moderates” were compensated by their control of the government
news agency IRNA and a number of newspapers financed by Rafsanjani or his
business associates.
None of the rival lists offered a political program. Thus voters made their
choice on the basis of perceptions they had about candidates. Those who voted
for the Rafsanjani-Rouhani list wanted to show their rejection of the hard-line
policies promoted by Khamenei. The personality of the candidates also counted,
especially in smaller constituencies and among religious and ethnic
minorities.Though producing no decisive shift in power in Tehran, Friday’s
election strengthens the position of those who promote the “Chinese option”,
that is to say focusing on economic growth combined with good relations with the
outside world and crushing any opposition at home. Those who support the “North
Korean option”, that is to say a closed economic system, repression at home and
adventurism abroad, have suffered a setback, especially in Tehran and other
major cities. The Rafsanjani-Rouhani faction favors better ties with the US and
Great Britain. The faction led by Khamenei has just launched its “Looking East”
strategy and counts on building an axis with Russia. If anything, the power
struggle in Tehran is likely to intensify as concern about Khamenei’s succession
grows.
Riyadh’s wrath
Alex Rowell/Now Lebanon/February 29/16
SAUDI ARABIA, MECCA : A handout picture provided by the Saudi Press Agency (SPA)
shows Saudi King Salman bin Abdulaziz delivering a speech at the Royal Palace in
Mecca on September 24, 2015
Beginning with its surprise suspension of $4 billion in pledged aid to the
Lebanese army and Internal Security Forces on February 19, Saudi Arabia has
undertaken an extraordinary set of punitive measures against Lebanon and
Lebanese nationals, including warning its own citizens against traveling to the
country (a step later emulated by the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait);
designating several Lebanese companies and individuals as “terrorists;” and
firing at least 90 Lebanese expatriates from their jobs in the Kingdom.
Most recently, speculation has mounted that Saudi and other Gulf states could
also withdraw their deposits in Lebanon’s central bank (said to amount to around
$900 million out of Lebanon’s total foreign reserves of over $37 billion), while
Saudi sources told NOW investment from the Kingdom in Lebanon had likely ceased
already.
“I’m sure a Saudi businessman, even without receiving a telephone call from his
government […] is very much reluctant to invest more in Lebanon right now,” said
Jamal Khashoggi, a veteran Saudi journalist and former advisor to
then-ambassador Prince Turki al-Faisal.
Officially, the trigger for this sudden deterioration in Riyadh-Beirut ties was
the refusal by Lebanese Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil to sign a recent Arab
League statement condemning Iran and Hezbollah in the wake of the January attack
on the Saudi embassy in Tehran. The anti-Hezbollah March 14 coalition
subsequently blamed the loss of Saudi’s $4 billion donation on the Party of God,
which it accused of forcing its ally Bassil’s hand. Hezbollah has substantially
escalated its rhetoric in general against the Kingdom in recent weeks, with
leader Hassan Nasrallah calling it a “takfiri and terrorist” state and
mass-murdering agent of Western imperialism and Zionism in a January speech,
drawing repeated chants of “Death to the Saud family!” from the audience.
Responding to calls for an apology to Saudi Friday, Hezbollah’s deputy leader
Naim Qassem said it was Saudi who ought to apologize to Lebanon: “Saudi Arabia
is the one that attacked us, we did not attack it.”
Yet knowledgeable sources told NOW the Saudi measures were just as much about
sending a message to the Kingdom’s ostensible allies in March 14, who have
failed to meet the expectations of the new Saudi leadership that took over
following the death of King Abdullah in January 2015. Specifically, NOW was told
the new King Salman, along with his highly influential son, Deputy Crown Prince
and Defense Minister Muhammad bin Salman, are deeply disappointed with what they
see as a lack of meaningful opposition to Hezbollah from Saudi partners in
Lebanon.
“I think the Kingdom got fed up with Lebanese taking Saudi Arabia for granted,
[fed up] that even our Lebanese friends just assume that Saudi Arabia will not
let go of Lebanon, will continue in supporting Lebanon, despite them not taking
a decisive positon regarding Hezbollah,” said Khashoggi.
“They complain about [Hezbollah] when they come to Saudi Arabia, they all
realize that Hezbollah is threatening the Lebanese constitution, Lebanese
authority, but at the same time they are not doing anything about it.”
In particular, two recent developments left the Saudis’ “blood boiling,”
according to a Lebanese political source, citing information from people close
to Muhammad bin Salman, who requested anonymity to speak freely. These were the
release on bail in January of bomb-plotting former minister Michel Samaha, and
the nomination by March 14’s two leading factions of presidential candidates
notoriously hostile to the Kingdom.
“March 14 has failed to grasp that Salman and Muhammad bin Salman have a new
management style,” the source told NOW. “What did they expect from Saudi, when
one of their allies [Lebanese Forces chief Samir Geagea] backed the presidential
candidacy of [Free Patriotic Movement leader] Michel Aoun, a major opponent of
Saudi, and their other key ally [Future Movement head Saad al-Hariri] one-upped
him by nominating [Marada Movement leader] Sleiman Franjieh, another enemy of
the Kingdom?”
An opening for Tehran?
Both the Lebanese source and Khashoggi told NOW the Saudi move was no short-term
phenomenon, but rather a fundamental reassessment of policy priorities in
Lebanon and, indeed, the region overall.
“Saudi Arabia is throwing everything in the air, and saying, ‘I’m no longer
going to finance hostile Lebanon’,” said Khashoggi. Asked what, if anything,
could persuade Riyadh to reconsider its decision, Khashoggi replied, “If the
miracle happens, and a national united front against Hezbollah is formed in
Lebanon, that would bring Saudi Arabia to the support of that national front.”
With a “downsized Saudi role in Lebanon,” as Washington Institute for Near East
Policy analyst David Schenker termed it, thus potentially the new reality, some
figures, including Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblatt, are
concerned the Lebanese state will only grow weaker and more susceptible to the
influence of Hezbollah and Iran henceforth. Already, one unconfirmed report in
the pro-Hezbollah Al-Akhbar newspaper claims Iran stands ready to more than
double Saudi’s previous bid, offering as much as $10 billion in expenditure on
Lebanon’s army, water and electricity infrastructure, and waste management
programs. Whether such a dramatic riposte truly comes to fruition, the worries
of many in Lebanon were summarized by the TV presenter and critic of Hezbollah,
Nadim Koteich, who recently met King Salman, and later wrote:
“I fear the Kingdom may make the same strategic mistake with Lebanon that it
made with Iraq, leaving it prey to Iran in its entirety.”
Betrayal by those closest to you!
Turki Al-Dakhil/Al Arabiya/February 29/16
The tragic news of the martyrdom of Badr Hamdi al-Rashidi, a member of the Saudi
anti-terror forces in the central Qassim region, brought to mind similar
incidents when Saudis were betrayed and killed by their relatives.
Colonel Nasser al-Othman was killed in April 2007 with the assistance of his own
nephew. In Sept. 2015, Madous Fayez al-Anzi was killed by his cousins in Al-Shamli
in Hail.
Security measures help succeed on one front in this war on terror, but not
another front that is related to ideological rhetoric and educational awareness
Rashidi’s murder by his relatives comes nine years after this phenomenon of
treacherous murder surfaced. So far there has been no progress in fortifying
generations from extremist ideology, so we are left to be shocked by news of the
Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Al-Qaeda and similar groups.
War on terror
It seems this battle will be long and difficult. Security measures help succeed
on one front in this war on terror, but not another front that is related to
ideological rhetoric and educational awareness. If this hideous crime passes
without controlling speeches aimed at the public and addressing education,
future incidents will be more catastrophic.The kingdom’s admirable security
success has amazed many countries, but if we do not work to achieve similar
success in religious and educational institutions, we will be waging a war on
infested fruits without uprooting the cause of the problem.
Can Arab world economies achieve what politics couldn’t?
Raed Omari/Al Arabiya/February 29/16
We Arabs have been in a state of loss and despair since late 2010. If it is not
war, bloodshed and starvation, we encounter instability and insecurity. Even the
luckiest among us are at the least worried about developments. It would be no
exaggeration to say that all Arabs are either traumatized or are in a state of
indifference that has developed over a period of time owing to their inability
to keep pace with events they can’t figure out. A complex set of political and
military realities face our region today. The region has turned into a domain
for settling scores and crises, one after another, both homegrown and borrowed.
International interference in the Arab region, which is either passive as in the
case with the U.S. or destructive as in Russia’s case, has had its impact on the
Arab world’s relations and on its historically preserved alliances. It is
difficult nowadays for an Arab state to build an alliance with another without
taking into account the geopolitical risks involved. Just like Arab citizens,
its politicians seem bewildered as well. They haven’t fully come to terms with
the lack of interest demonstrated by the U.S. in the region and are unable to
deal with the Russians who have been on a different trajectory.
As a result, Arabs look at the world map redrawn based on economic alliances,
whether in Europe, Latin America, the Indian subcontinent, or in China and
Russia. They look outward and close their doors on each other to avoid further
conflict.
However, this approach has proved to be a failure especially with the region’s
woes surpassing the capabilities of a single state to address. Putting aside the
complex politics and sensitive remapping of alliances, the Arab world has one
option to restore hope for its desperate and traumatized citizens – economic
opportunities. Before the so-called Arab Spring surfaced, inter-Arab gatherings
used to conclude with large Arab corporations signing on the dotted lines for
mega project in other brotherly Arab countries. This would boost the economy and
create jobs. This doesn’t seem to be happening anymore. Nowadays, even letters
of intent or memoranda of understanding, for pan-Arab projects, are not signed
for fear of political conflict and unrest. Even during business gatherings
within the Arab region, such as the World Economic Forum in Jordan, politics
continues to be in focus. In the Forum’s 2015 edition, for instance, almost all
the spotlight was on the situation in Syria and Iraq and the peace process.
Private sector
The Arab world’s private sector also seems to have lost its spirit of adventure
and independence. The sensitive remapping of alliances within the region has
also left a deep impact on the Arab companies’ pragmatism in terms of investment
and joint ventures. The overindulgence in politics and an atmosphere of
suspicion has made issues such as sustainable development and joint ventures
either a luxury or taboo. The people of the Arab world seems to have been
forgotten between an extremely cautious private sector and governments concerned
with security. It is obvious that there is a need to enhance economic
opportunities in the Arab world. In the wake of its troubling politics, a
heartening scene would be that of two Arab leaders, or more, signing on dotted
lines for major cooperation agreements between their countries for the benefit
of their youth or may be a group of Arab states announcing an economic alliance
of some kind such as the EU, even at the micro level, to serve their mutual
interests. What we must realize is that it is the economy and not politics that
makes the EU still hold and the U.S. seeking relations with Cuba. These
countries have seized opportunities and put aside their political differences
for the sake of the welfare of their citizens. Let economies of the Arab world
achieve what politics and armies fail to.
What a Trump presidency will mean for Iran
Dr. Theodore Karasik/Al Arabiya/February 29/16
It’s important – immediately – to start thinking seriously about a Donald Trump
presidency to be sworn into office on January 20, 2017. The republican front
runner is pulling away from his rivals, and, with Super Tuesday on March 1, is
likely to be crowned the Republican Party nominee by default.
There are a host of issues in the MENA region that need to be analyzed in what
seems to be a very probable outcome. At this time, not only will the FBI
investigation into Hillary Clinton’s discretions perhaps lead to her dropping
out of the race but also there is an extremely high likelihood of ISIS followers
to throw off the election in the United States by using Paris-style violence in
American cities. Both can give The Donald a victory. A key question is: How will
a Trump presidency look and interact with the Islamic Republic of Iran? The
answer may surprise you. Trump is a prominent opponent of the Obama
administration’s policy towards Iran and plays keenly into the narrative that
the current president retreated. He is appealing to what can be called American
economic patriotism. Trump has previously said he would be much tougher than the
current U.S. president.
Opposed to JCPOA
The potential next President of the United States has been dead set against the
Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) process and its aftermath since last
year. In July 2015, Trump stated: “We were dealing from desperation. We look so
desperate, and it’s a disgrace. I think the deal is absolutely something. I love
the idea of a deal. But it’s not a well negotiated deal. We should have doubled
up the sanctions and made a much better deal.” The republican front runner is
still advocating scrapping the deal. Trump also banged the drum on other Obama
administration deals with Iran especially a hostage exchange deal two months
ago: the release of five American hostages in exchange for U.S. clemency for
seven Iranians held in America plus the release of frozen assets as a result of
sanction lifting. Trump argued that “they’re getting seven people, so
essentially they get $150 billion plus seven, and we get four. I’m happy they’re
coming back, but I will tell you it’s a disgrace they’ve been there so long.”
Simultaneously, the Iranian capture of 10 sailors and their two boats in the
Arabian Gulf also ignited The Donald. He exclaimed “… the Iranians like to taunt
us because they don’t have like respect for our leaders, right?” He elaborated:
“When I see pictures of them with arms up in the air and guns pointed at them, I
wouldn’t exactly say that’s friendly”.At that time, Trump said Iran resolved the
standoff so quickly because Tehran wants to stay on good terms with the United
States with the Implementation Day a few days away. The Donald asserted
“Obviously they’re going to release them. They’re not going to keep them. If it
happened two weeks from now, they would have kept them, and they would’ve kept
them for a long period of time.”
It is quite likely that Donald Trump doesn’t like it that the Europeans and the
Asians are beating him to the Iranian treasure chest based on American economic
patriotism
At this time, Trump’s attitude with Iran may play well to an American audience
sick of the last eight years of Obama. But his biggest negotiation is coming up
yet in 2017. Opening Iran to American business and accelerating the process
based on his vision of U.S. economic prowess. Yes, you read that right, the real
estate mogul cum U.S. president is likely to accelerate Iran’s acceleration into
the global economy. The next American president cannot avoid the biggest
business deals ever, even of his own corporation, has gone through numerous
bankruptcies. It is quite likely that The Donald doesn’t like it that the
Europeans and the Asians are beating him to the Iranian treasure chest based on
American economic patriotism. Perchance for President Trump, Iran is the biggest
piece of “real estate” ever with immense wealth and opportunity for American
companies. The billions of dollars’ worth of business is too good for the next
American president to pass up.
Currently, U.S. sanctions remain in place. U.S. persons and banks are still
prohibited from all dealings with Iranian companies including investing in Iran
or facilitating third-country trade with Iran. That might just change under
President Trump, and, all of us need to be prepared for that outcome, both good
and bad. The “sea-change” required in Washington thinking about core Iran
sanctions may be coming in January 2017. This scenario between Trump and Iran
will not play well with Gulf Arab neighbors especially in the current
environment. According to an Emirati analyst, Trump’s comments about the Gulf
states have been less than reassuring. Don’t be surprised if a Trump presidency
cuddles up to Iranian business. Overall, a President Trump will likely find a
domestic resonance for his outreach to the Islamic Republic if American
companies create new jobs and opportunities to make America great again no
matter what the cost.
Towards a strategic Arab-Russia dialogue
Raghida Dergham/Al Arabiya/February 29/16
No sane person today expects the Arab countries to have consensus on the
conflicts in the region with a unified position like that of Russia or the
deliberately absent United States. The reputation for division and rivalry
behind the scenes emerges – and is even part of the policies foreign ministers
draft – ahead of any meeting among Arab leaders. The biggest problem, however,
is when Arab diplomatic readings conflict with Russia’s positions, for example,
leading to conflicting policies, as this only serves to continue the bleeding.
This applies to the various readings of US policies in the Middle East as well
as Russian policies. The problem essentially lies in the structure of Arab-Arab
relations, and in the Arab region’s lack of firm and necessary action to
reconfigure the Arab region in the global space. The Beirut Institute in
partnership with A.T. Kearny, presented this week a number of bold policy
recommendations following a unique summit that brought together key decision
makers and young leaders in Abu Dhabi last year. These recommendations to
policymakers included a strategic roadmap for the reconfiguration of the Arab
region, containing five main elements designed to: stop the bleeding; align and
reinforce the core; unleash transformative growth; strengthen societal cohesion;
build a regional security architecture.
Stopping the bleeding is extremely crucial in Syria and Yemen, but also Libya
and Iraq. Starting out from Syria and an Arab assessment of Russian and American
policies there is self-evidently important, especially since the Arab engagement
with Russia covers both the issues of the bleeding and the regional security
architecture. To be sure, Russian-American partnership in Syria could evolve
into a broader-based partnership, including in restructuring regional security,
and talks in this direction have already started in various capitals. Regardless
of whether this happens or not, the Arab region must avoid denial and burying
heads in the sand in light of the historical developments taking place. They
must confront geopolitical arbitrariness with a practical vision and strategy.
A short pause at the conflicting Arab readings of Russian policy shows the depth
of the problem. On the one hand, a segment of the people of the Gulf were
worried when they heard the statement that Russia sees its relationship with
Iran as a long-term strategic one, as this column quoted high-level Russian
sources last week. On the other hand, diplomats skeptical about this said the
information in their possession from decision makers in Moscow directly
contradicts this statement. The bottom line of what these diplomats say is that
the Russian-Iranian relationship is not a permanent strategic one, but is one of
rivalry even in Syria. They say the Russian military intervention in Syria
serves the interests of the Gulf countries, because it disallows their rival
Iran from dominating Syria. They believe the GCC countries stand to benefit from
the Russian intervention because it aims to defeat ISIS, which is an existential
threat to these nations. The proponents of this view, however, deliberately
ignore two issues: First, the Russian intervention has targeted primarily the
moderate Syrian rebels, which some in the Gulf claim to support. Second, Russian
policy is to rescue the regime in Damascus and keeping Bashar al-Assad in power
until further notice. In this regard, some like to insist vehemently that
Moscow’s support for the regime is to support the Syrian state and not
necessarily Bashar al-Assad. Others like to claim that Moscow wants a secular
Syria and not a pro-Shiite pro-Persian Syria. In their view, all this proves
that there is a Russian-Iranian dispute over Syria.
Strategic ties?
There is no need to delve into a rebuttal of these interpretations. Perhaps
Russian diplomacy itself is distributing roles in its messages to the Arab
regions in a deliberately contradicting manner. Perhaps Russian diplomacy’s
vision for relations with key Arab countries is that having long-term strategic
ties with Iran does not conflict with having strong ties with Saudi Arabia, for
example. Moscow does not want to acknowledge that the regime in Tehran is a
theocracy one of whose stated goals is to export the Shiite revolution to the
Arab countries. The reason is that Russia is fully invested in fighting the rise
of Sunni Islamists to power, because this would allow them to export their
radical ideas to Russia where the 20 million Muslims are mostly Sunni.
In the view of one senior Emirati official, the Russian interest requires having
strong and strategic relations with Saudi Arabia, home to Islam’s holiest sites
in Mecca and Medina. His opinion is that Russian diplomacy must consider two
issues when upholding its policies on Syria and Iran: One, the fact that its
leadership of the battle against what it terms Sunni Islamic terrorism could
invite revenge in the Russian homeland and the five Muslim republics formerly in
the USSR. And two, the fact that Russia’s alliance with Iran and the Shiite
militias in Syria reinforces the view that it is at war with Sunnis. Therefore,
in order to avoid being implicated in Sunni-Shiite war, Russia must develop
special ties with Saudi Arabia, according to the UAE official, who said that the
kingdom’s stability is crucial for his country and the Arab Gulf nations, and
must therefore be taken into account by Russian diplomacy.
Some Russian diplomats agree building strong relations with Riyadh is as
important as having strong relations with Tehran, and Saudi already welcomes the
bid to develop relations with Russia. Others believe there is no choice but to
make a choice between the two, because it is impossible to reconcile the two.
Therefore, these diplomats believe it would be best for Moscow to mediate
between Saudi Arabia and Iran.
The reconfiguration of the Arab region in the global space requires accelerating
institutionalization of Arab strategic and operational integration by creating a
cohesive plan and vision
The view of the group of elite thinkers from both the government sector and the
private sector meeting at the Beirut Institute summit, as stated in the
recommendations, was that “the bilateral relationship between Saudi Arabia and
Iran arguably represents the single most important driver of the evolution of
the Middle East geopolitically, economically and socially. Therefore, a
disciplined, energetic effort to regularize dialogue between these two powers is
a critical imperative for the region and the world.” I am the founder and
executive president of Beirut Institute – an international think tank focused on
the Arab region. The 21 pages of recommendations, and the names of those who
attended the summit in Abu Dhabi, are available on www.beirutinstitute.org. The
second summit will convene in Riyadh in partnership with the King Faisal Center
for Research and Islamic Studies next fall.
The recommendations for decision-makers refer to the need to build momentum
gradually in the bilateral relationship between Saudi Arabia and Iran, to
include efforts for a “second path” away from the limelight for
confidence-building measures and establishing a strategic dialog. Russia can
play an active role in this context, provided that it turns from a partner of
Iran in the bleeding of Syria to a serious partner in international efforts to
stop that bleeding.
Stopping the bleeding has become a moral and strategic imperative, as the
recommendations state, and establishing the necessary security basis to achieve
comprehensive progress in the region. This also requires funding and a
region-wide plan for stability and reconstruction, led by the Gulf nations with
international assistance. It also requires systematically intensifying of the
military, financial and strategic communication efforts to defeat ISIS. The
reconfiguration of the Arab region in the global space requires accelerating
institutionalization of Arab strategic and operational integration by creating a
cohesive strategic plan and vision for the region. It also requires improving
the pillars of good governance across the Arab region, strengthening governance
and the rule of law based on agreed norms grounded in local legitimacy and
engaging youth in building the regional future. Political realism does not
prevent conflicting readings but by its nature, that does not require a lot of
diligence. There is no need to deny what is clear just because that would fit
with wishful thinking. The task ahead for the Arab region is huge. The least
thing to do would be to admit to the facts even if they are painful, in order to
develop rational policies to deal with them.
**This article was first published in Al-Hayat on Feb. 26, 2016 and translated
by Karim Traboulsi.