LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
February 06/16
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
Bible Quotations For Today
Come, everyone who thirsts, to the waters! Come, he
who has no money, buy, and eat!
Isaiah 55/1-13: “Come, everyone who thirsts, to the waters! Come, he who has
no money, buy, and eat! Yes, come, buy wine and milk without money and without
price. Why do you spend money for that which is not bread? and your labor for
that which doesn’t satisfy? listen diligently to me, and eat you that which is
good, and let your soul delight itself in fatness. Turn your ear, and come to
me; hear, and your soul shall live: and I will make an everlasting covenant with
you, even the sure mercies of David. Behold, I have given him for a witness to
the peoples, a leader and commander to the peoples. Behold, you shall call a
nation that you don’t know; and a nation that didn’t know you shall run to you,
because of Yahweh your God, and for the Holy One of Israel; for he has glorified
you.” Seek Yahweh while he may be found; call you on him while he is near: let
the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts; and let him
return to Yahweh, and he will have mercy on him; and to our God, for he will
abundantly pardon “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways
my ways,” says Yahweh. “For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my
ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts. For as the rain
comes down and the snow from the sky, and doesn’t return there, but waters the
earth, and makes it bring forth and bud, and gives seed to the sower and bread
to the eater; so shall my word be that goes forth out of my mouth: it shall not
return to me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall
prosper in the thing I sent it to do. For you shall go out with joy, and be led
forth with peace: the mountains and the hills shall break forth before you into
singing; and all the trees of the fields shall clap their hands. Instead of the
thorn shall come up the fir tree; and instead of the brier shall come up the
myrtle tree: and it shall be to Yahweh for a name, for an everlasting sign that
shall not be cut off.” God is Sovereign: Life often feels confusing. If we’re
experiencing a tragedy or great turmoil, we might begin to doubt that God is in
control. But these words remind us that the Lord is sovereign … even in our
pain, even in our troubles. Through it all, his love is transforming us,
perfecting us, completing us. James MacDonald in Gripped by the Greatness of
God, explains it this way: “God’s sovereignty is first painful, then slowly
powerful, and over much time seen to be profitable. It is to be studied with
great sensitivity for the experiences of others and deep reverence for the One
who controls the outcomes of every matter in the universe"
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources
published on February 06/16
Iran’s new best friends/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Al
Arabiya/February 05/16
Palestinian refugees in Syria: Aya must not be left behind/Pierre Krähenbühl/Al
Arabiya/February 05/16
Facebook's War on Freedom of Speech/by Douglas Murray/Gatestone
Institute/February 05/16
Rafsanjani Protests Against Iranian Regime's Oppression Of Its Citizens, Warns
Decision-Makers – i.e. Ideological Camp, Led By Supreme Leader Khamenei/MEMRI/February
5, 2016
Writers In Gulf Press: Removal Of Sanctions Will Make It Easier For Iran To Keep
Funding Terror, And Will Facilitate Its Plans To Harm Other Countries/MEMRI/February
5, 2016
Titles For Latest
Lebanese Related News published on February 06/16
Nasrallah, Aoun is your sole president, so elect
him
Security Forces Free Kuwaiti after Weeks of Abduction
Consultative Gathering Refuses Stipulations in Return for International
Assistance on Refugees
EU Ambassador Says Refugees Won’t Return Soon even if there were Peace
Reports: Hizbullah Commander Killed in Aleppo Shiite Town
Official: Spy Was in Lebanon to Help Kidnapped Czech
Salam: No One at London Conference Approached us on Naturalizing Syrian Refugees
Syria Regime, Hizbullah Make Fresh Gains in South
Qahwaji Says he Asked for more Military Aid from U.S.
Berri Says National Pact Untouched at Electoral Session
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
February 06/16
Canada amends its sanctions against Iran
Pope Francis, Russian Orthodox patriarch Kirill, to meet in historic step
Syrians Mass on Turkish Border as Regime Advances
Saudi: Ready to join ground operation in Syria
Iranians ‘failed by reformists’ ahead of vote
Syrian Army, allies make advances in Deraa, Aleppo
Erdogan: Russian claim on Syria ‘laughable’
Iraq’s top Shiite cleric suspends weekly sermons
UK slams ‘ridiculous’ U.N. report on Assange
New U.S. intelligence report says ISIS weaker
Greek police turn to teargas as tempers flare over pensions
U.S. eyes ways to toughen fight against domestic extremists
EU leaders not happy with ‘Brexit’ offer
Links From Jihad Watch Site for
February 06/16
Austria: Muslim migrant brutally rapes 10-year-old boy in Vienna pool
Obama: Islamic State says they’re “holy warriors who speak for Islam. I refuse
to give them legitimacy.”
Obama: “We can’t suggest that Islam itself is at the root of the problem. That
betrays our values.”
Obama to Muslims: “Your entire community so often is targeted or blamed for the
violent acts of the very few”
The Same God Question – Part 3: ‘By their fruits you shall know them…’
Video: John Kerry attacked in Rome; attacker cried “You created ISIS!”
Rush Limbaugh on Obama: “Why did he choose to become a Christian?”
Obama to Christians: “If we’re serious about freedom of religion…an attack on
one faith is an attack on all our faiths”
Pakistan: Muslims waving pistols storm Hindu temple, desecrate idol of Hindu
deity
Germany: Children’s carnival in Herne canceled after Muslims send threatening
letter to “infidels”
But ISIS Kills Muslims Too!” – on The Glazov Gang
UN voices alarm at growing number of child marriages in Iran
Obama: “Islam prohibits terrorism, for the Qur’an says whoever kills an
innocent, it is as if he has killed all mankind”
Paris jihad mass murderer entered France with 90 “refugees” without documents
Nasrallah, Aoun is your sole president, so elect him
Nayla Tueni/Al Arabiya/February 05/16/Last week, Hezbollah leader Hassan
Nasrallah said his party was not obstructing Lebanon’s presidential or municipal
elections, and called on those concerned to attend parliamentary sessions to
elect his presidential candidate, Christian MP Michel Aoun.How democratic and
respectful of parliament and democracy! Nasrallah told MPs to either elect Aoun
or continue to have no president - in other words, an ultimatum to parliament
and the Lebanese people. He said Hezbollah would emerge victorious over its
rivals regarding regional developments, but then contradicted himself by saying:
“Don’t count on outside [powers] and let’s [work together] to find an internal
solution.”
Shirking responsibilities
Hezbollah and the Future Movement, led by Saad Hariri, have been holding
meetings, so if the intent to hold dialogue and meet half way is still there,
why do they not agree on an internal solution regarding the presidency instead
of defying one another via media outlets? Why do Hezbollah MPs not go to
parliament to elect their candidate while respecting democratic foundations?
Whoever gets the majority of votes will win. Even if MPs are affiliated with
political parties, it is their duty to elect a president. Boycotting elections
of a president seriously harms the constitution and the political system.
Obstructing constitutional deadlines is a violation of regulations. Attempts to
impose a certain candidate resemble foreign interference - we in Lebanon have a
bitter history of this. Today, there is foreign tutelage hiding behind a
Lebanese mask, and it is trying to seize control of the state and turn it into
an Iranian proxy.
Security Forces Free Kuwaiti after Weeks of
Abduction
Naharnet/February 05/16/The Internal Security Forces Intelligence Bureau
released on Friday a Kuwaiti national, who was abducted in the eastern Bekaa
region in January, announced the bureau in a statement. It said that the
security forces carried out a security operation in the town of Taanayel in the
Bekaa to free Mohsen Barrak al-Majed, who was abducted from his Qab Elias farm
on January 17. The Intelligence Bureau revealed that the kidnappers had sent a
video to the victim's family in Kuwait, demanding a ransom of 1.1 million
dollars for his release. Following investigations, security forces succeeded on
Friday in determining the identity and location of the assailants in Taanayel.
It carried out an operation in the area, where it freed the captive and arrested
the perpetrators, who have been identified as three Lebanese brothers and a
Palestinian. Another accomplice, a Syrian, was arrested in the South. They
detainees confessed to kidnapping Majed for ransom. They added that they had
held him captive in a room on the roof of the three brothers' Taanayel
residence. ISF chief Ibrahim Basbous and Intelligence Bureau head Imad Othman
later paid a visit to Majed after his release, congratulating him on his safety.
Kuwait News Agency said that he was released without ransom and that he will
return to his country where further investigations in the case will be carried
out.
Consultative Gathering Refuses Stipulations in Return for
International Assistance on Refugees
Naharnet/February 05/16/The Consultative Gathering bloc urged
Lebanon's lawmakers to attend the parliament's session next week aimed at ending
the vacuum at presidential post, and reiterated rejection to conditions set
during the donors conference on Syria that Lebanon opens its labor market for
the refugees in return for assistance. “The Consultative Gathering calls on all
MPs to take part in the February 8 session,which is going to be different from
all its predecessors after the disclosure of the vast majority of MPs about
their electoral inclinations which should facilitate the presidential election
process,” said the statement recited by information Minister Ramzi Jreij. “The
Gathering warns against the consecration of obstruction which jeopardizes the
first state post, destroys the constitution and turns the parliament into a mail
box for counting votes,” it added, referring to the vacuum at the presidential
post that has been lingering for almost 20 months today. The meeting was held at
the residence of the head's Gathering former president Michel Suleiman in the
presence of Defense Minister Samir Moqbel, Telecommunications Minister Butros
Harb, Tourism Minister Michel Pharaon, Minister of Displaced Alice Shabtini,
Sports and Youth Minister Abdel Motleb Hennawi, Economy Minister Alain Hakim,
Kataeb party leader MP Sami Gemayel and former Minister Khalil al-Hrawi. On the
donors conference on Syria held in London a day earlier, the statement read:
“The bloc hails the donors' conference and is interested to confirm that it
rejects conditions being set for providing Lebanon with assistance in return for
opening the labor market for the Syrian refugees. “It would pose a competition
the Lebanese working force at a time when unemployment is rising and the
economic crisis is aggravating in the country,” it stressed.
The conference raised over 10 billion dollars in aid to the Syrian refugees. The
Syrian conflict, which erupted in 2011, has forced 4.6 million Syrians to seek
refuge in nearby countries -- Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey, Iraq and Egypt -- while
hundreds of thousands have journeyed to Europe in the region's biggest migration
crisis since World War II. Lebanon alone supports around 1.5 million refugees.
The Consultative Gathering interlocutors however added that the “Syrian labor
force is welcome, but within Lebanon's labor market needs and under the Lebanese
labor law and applicable regulations.”
They urged the international community to develop a program that allows the
return of the displaced to Syria in parallel with the assistance programs. The
statement of the Gathering came after a statement issued by head of the
Delegation of the European Union to Lebanon, Ambassador Christina Lassen that
highlighted some programs proposed by the Lebanese government to help the Syrian
refugees work in certain sectors, such as agriculture and construction. The
issue has left some people jittery over fears that the displaced Syrians will
remain in Lebanon similar to the Palestinian refugees. “Even if there were peace
(in Syria) tomorrow, they won’t be going immediately,” she said.
EU Ambassador Says Refugees Won’t Return Soon even if there
were Peace
Naharnet/February 05/16/The head of the Delegation of the European Union to
Lebanon, Ambassador Christina Lassen, has said that Syrian refugees will not
return to their country quickly even if there were peace. “What we eventually
want is a solution to the crisis. They have to return home,” Lassen told As
Safir daily published on Friday. “But even if there were peace (in Syria)
tomorrow, they won’t be going immediately,” she said. “The international
community had to make sure that they are living in good conditions and are not
left in bad conditions,” the diplomat added. An international donor conference
in London has received pledges totaling of around $10 billion by 2020 to help
fund schools, shelter and jobs for refugees from Syria's civil war, money that
British Prime Minister David Cameron said "will save lives, will give hope, will
give people the chance of a future."The one-day meeting, held under tight
security at a conference center near Parliament, aspired to bring new urgency to
the effort to help the 4.6 million Syrians who have sought refuge in neighboring
countries including Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey. Another 6 million people or more
are displaced within Syria, and a quarter of a million have been killed. The
Lebanese government has proposed some programs that would help the Syrian
refugees work in certain sectors, such as agriculture and construction. But the
issue has left some people jittery over fears that the displaced Syrians will
remain in Lebanon similar to the Palestinian refugees. “I understand the feeling
of the Lebanese people given their long experience with displacement.
Unfortunately, the situation of the Palestinians is very difficult because it’s
not clear where they can go,” said Lassen. “But the Syrians have their
homeland,” she added.
Reports: Hizbullah Commander Killed in Aleppo Shiite Town
Naharnet/February 05/16/A Hizbullah field commander has been killed in clashes
in a flashpoint Shiite town in the northern Syrian province of Aleppo, media
reports said on Friday. “The commander Haidar Fariz Merhi and the fighter
Hussein Hassan Jawad, who both hail from the western Bekaa town of Mashghara,
were killed fighting in the Nubol and Zahraa area north of Aleppo,” Al-Arabiya
television reported. The pro-Hizbullah South Lebanon news portal confirmed
Merhi's death, also describing him as a Hizbullah commander. According to Al-Arabiya,
a third Hizbullah fighter was killed in Syria in recent days. It identified him
as Ali Moussa Nassour, saying he hailed from the southern Beirut suburb of Bourj
al-Barajneh. Hizbullah, the Syrian army and allied militiamen on Wednesday broke
a long running rebel siege of on the Shiite villages of Nubol and Zahraa. The
two villages, located in the middle of opposition territory, had been blockaded
by rebel groups for around three years. The development marked a major victory
for the regime forces and their allies, which have made significant advances in
the province in the past few days – backed by massive Russian airstrikes. Regime
troops, Hizbullah fighters and allied militiamen arrived in the two towns on
Thursday morning to cheering crowds who threw rice and ululated, according to
footage shown on state television. Hundreds of Hizbullah fighters have been
killed in Syria since the party's decision to intervene militarily in the
conflict.
Official: Spy Was in Lebanon to Help Kidnapped Czech
Associated Press/Naharnet/February 05/16/The Czech defense minister said Friday
that a military spy who was among five Czechs returned from Lebanon was seeking
information about a fellow countryman kidnapped in Libya last year. The
minister, Martin Stropnicky, was quoted in the Hospodarske Noviny daily as
saying the military agent, Martin Psik, went to Lebanon in an effort "to help
our cook in Libya." It was the first official comment on Psik's role in the
group which also included a lawyer, an interpreter and two journalists. They all
returned home Thursday, the same day the Czech government refused to extradite a
Lebanese man, Ali Taan Fayad, to the U.S. to face weapons charges. Stropnicky
had said the refusal to extradite was a condition for releasing the Czechs, but
later said that was simplification of complex case. The U.S. embassy in Prague
on Thursday blasted the decision by the Czech Republic's justice minister not to
extradite Fayad to the U.S. Prague's Municipal Court allowed the extradition of
Fayad, also known as Ali Amin, and two citizens of Ivory Coast last year but
Justice Minister Robert Pelikan has the final say and on Thursday refused to
extradite them. The three were arrested in Prague 2014 while allegedly trying to
sell weapons to undercover U.S. law enforcement agents who pretended to be from
a Colombian terrorist group. "We are dismayed by the Czech government decision
to release Ali Fayad and Khaled El Merebi," the embassy said in a statement.
Court spokeswoman Marketa Puci said Fayad and Ivoirian El Merebi were released
from detention following the minister's decision. The minister still has to
decide on the other Ivoirian. "These men were indicted in the United States
federal court for conspiring to kill officers and employees of the United
States," the embassy said, adding the move harms the relations of the two
allies. "There's no justification for the release of these dangerous
individuals, which deals a blow to the cooperative relationship of our two
countries' law enforcement agencies," the statement said.
Salam: No One at London Conference Approached us on
Naturalizing Syrian Refugees
Naharnet/February 05/16/Prime Minister Tammam Salam expressed on Friday his
“satisfaction” with the results of the donors conference on Syria, revealing
however that he has not yet been informed of Lebanon's share of the donations
for Syrian refugees, reported Voice of Lebanon radio (100.5). He said: “No one
spoke to us of naturalizing the refugees.” “We are satisfied with the manner in
which we were addressed at the conference” that was held in London on Thursday.
“We will not abandon our demand that the refugees be allowed to return to their
homeland,” stressed the premier, reiterating his speech at the conference in
which he rejected the permanent residence of the refugees in Lebanon. Tackling
the Syrian crisis will take years even if a political solution is found
tomorrow, Salam went on to say. The prime minister held talks on the margins of
the London conference with his British counterpart David Cameron, Turkish PM
Ahmet Davutoglu, and German Chancellor Angela Merkel. The conference raised over
10 billion dollars in aid to the Syrian refugees. The Syrian conflict, which
erupted in 2011, has forced 4.6 million Syrians to seek refuge in nearby
countries -- Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey, Iraq and Egypt -- while hundreds of
thousands have journeyed to Europe in the region's biggest migration crisis
since World War II. Lebanon alone supports around 1.5 million refugees.
Syria Regime, Hizbullah Make Fresh Gains in South
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 05/16/Pro-government troops backed by
Hizbullah fighters and Russian warplanes on Friday retook a rebel bastion used
as a launch pad for attacks in southern Syria, a monitor said, in their latest
territorial gain. Syrian soldiers, fighters from Hizbullah, and local and
foreign militiamen seized Ataman, just two kilometers (1.3 miles) from Daraa,
capital of the province of the same name, according to the Syrian Observatory
for Human Rights. "Rebels had used Ataman to launch attacks against Daraa, hence
its importance for the regime," Observatory director Rami Abdel Rahman told
Agence France Presse. He said around 80 Russian air raids over the past two days
had helped regime fighters chase Islamist rebels from the village, killing at
least 10 of them. The government of Syrian President Bashar Assad is attempting
to retake all of Daraa province, which borders Jordan and the Israeli-occupied
Golan Heights, from rebel fighters. Last month pro-regime forces took the
strategic town of Sheikh Miskeen, which lies on a vital crossroads between
Damascus to the north and the government-controlled city of Sweida to the east.
"The army is consolidating its positions north of Daraa city," said Abdel Rahman,
whose British-based monitor relies on a network of sources on the ground. Most
of Daraa province is controlled by opposition forces, though the government
holds parts of the provincial capital and a few villages in the northwest.
Syria's army has been on the offensive since staunch government ally Russia
began an aerial campaign in support of regime forces on September 30. Since
then, the regime has recaptured several key rebel towns in coastal Latakia
province and has advanced in the northern province of Aleppo and in Daraa.
Qahwaji Says he Asked for more Military Aid
from U.S.
Naharnet/February 05/16/Army Commander General Jean Qahwaji has said that U.S.
officials have shown “deep sympathy” with Lebanon’s military needs over the
challenges it is facing on its eastern border. “I felt there is a big
understanding and deep sympathy with our military and logistic needs,” Qahwaji
told An Nahar daily on Friday after he concluded a visit to Washington. U.S.
officials have shown “an understanding to the tremendous challenges to Lebanon’s
national security,” he said. They have also appreciated the Lebanese army’s
efforts to protect the country’s eastern border and preserve calm on the
southern border, Qahwaji stated. He revealed that he asked the officials to
speed up the delivery of equipment that the army had bought from the U.S.,
mainly six A-20 Super Tucano planes and Hellfire air-to-ground missiles. “There
are continuous contacts between the two sides for Lebanon to receive more
helicopters,” he said. The last time Lebanon received military aid from the U.S.
was in October 2015. The shipment provided the army with 50 Hellfire missiles
and 560 artillery rounds, including some precision munitions. This represents
$8.6 million worth of U.S. security assistance to Lebanon and boosts the army's
ability to secure Lebanon’s borders against violent extremists. Since 2004,
America has provided over $1.3 billion dollars in security assistance to the
Lebanese Armed Forces, including both training and equipment.
Berri Says National Pact Untouched at Electoral Session
Naharnet/February 05/16/Speaker Nabih Berri has said that the latest dispute on
the alleged exclusion of Christians from state institutions does not apply to
the parliament. “The issue of the National Pact does not apply to the session on
the election of a president because the more than two-thirds of quorum (86 MPs)
is constitutional,” said Berri in remarks published in al-Joumhouria daily on
Friday. “It will include lawmakers from all confessions and parties,” he added.
A session aimed at electing a new president is scheduled to be held next Monday.
But it will likely have the same fate of its predecessors for lack of quorum.
Two ministers who represent Berri’s Amal movement in the cabinet have been
accused of marginalizing Christians in their ministries. Public Works Minister
Ghazi Zoaiter denied on Thursday claims that his ministry has been carrying out
more development projects in areas with a Muslim population than in Christian
regions. A similar denial was made a day earlier by Finance Minister Ali Hassan
Khalil who defended a decision to allocate a senior post at the ministry's
taxpayers department that was held by a Christian to a Shiite employee.
Lebanon’s National Pact, devised in 1943, is an unwritten agreement that set the
basis for the political system in the country, which is based on sectarian
distribution of power. The ideas of the National Pact provided the basis of the
Taif accord that stipulated, among other matters, that the president of Lebanon
would be a Maronite, the speaker of parliament a Shiite, and the prime minister
a Sunni. Berri also said that Lebanon received aid in education less than Jordan
at the Syria Donor Conference for not having a “sound mind.”Berri told his
visitors that “Lebanon suffers from a lot of problems to the extent that it
can’t think anymore.”“A sound mind is in a sound body but Lebanon does not have
a sound body and suffers from pain all over,” said Berri. “Then how can it think
with a sound mind to resolve its problems?” he asked. World leaders pledged over
$10 billion Thursday to help conflict-hit Syrians at the conference held in
London. The European Union, Germany, Britain and the United States were among
the biggest donors to provide food, education and job opportunities for Syrians
in their homeland and neighboring countries, including Lebanon and Jordan, where
they have fled .
Canada amends its sanctions against Iran
February 5, 2016 - Ottawa, Ontario - Global Affairs Canada
The Honourable Stéphane Dion, Minister of Foreign Affairs, and the Honourable
Chrystia Freeland, Minister of International Trade, announced today changes to
Canada’s economic sanctions against Iran under the Special Economic Measures Act
and the United Nations Act and signalled Canada’s willingness to resume dialogue
with Iran.
Canada welcomed the January 16, 2016, confirmation by the International Atomic
Energy Agency that Iran had fulfilled all necessary commitments under the Joint
Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Canada has therefore amended its
broad-reaching autonomous sanctions against Iran to allow for a controlled
economic re-engagement, including lifting the broad ban on financial services,
imports and exports. Canada has also updated its regulations under the United
Nations Act in order to conform with the changes to the United Nations sanctions
regime mandated by the UN Security Council.
Canadian companies will now be better positioned to compete with other companies
globally.
Canada continues to have serious concerns regarding Iran’s nuclear ambitions and
will continue to maintain tight restrictions on exports to Iran of goods,
services and technologies considered sensitive from a security perspective
(including nuclear goods and technologies, as well as those that could assist in
the development of Iran’s ballistic-missile program). A Notice to Exporters has
been issued indicating that while all applications for export permits will be
considered on a case-by-case basis, permit applications to export the most
sensitive items on the Export Control List will normally be denied. Canada will
also maintain a revised list of individuals and entities of most concern in
relation to the risk of proliferation and to Iran’s ballistic missile activities
and with whom any transactions would continue to be prohibited. Canada has added
six individuals and one entity in response to Iran’s ballistic missile program.
Canada has had no real engagement with Iran since September 2012, when the
embassy of Canada in Tehran was closed and Iranian diplomats were expelled from
Canada. While Iran remains a country of concern, Canada prefers dialogue over
withdrawal.
Canada is willing to have discussions with Iranian officials, including talks on
the possibility of restoring diplomatic contacts. We will maintain our firm
commitment to the human rights of Iranians. Canada will steadfastly continue to
oppose Iran’s support for terrorist organizations, its threats toward Israel,
and its ballistic missile program, while also monitoring Iran’s compliance with
its obligations under the JCPOA.
Quotes
“Canada’s approach to re-engagement with Iran, as with any country of concern,
will be based on efforts to foster dialogue, rather than on withdrawal and
isolation.
“Canada will not lower the standard to which we hold Iran accountable,
particularly on its human rights record and its aggressiveness toward the state
of Israel. We will any renewed engagement with Iran as a tool to support efforts
to advance human rights and regional security.
“Broad sanctions brought Iran to the negotiation table, resulting in an
agreement which has rolled back Iran’s nuclear program—an agreement with which
Iran is complying. We need to recognize this progress and continue to encourage
Iran to fully comply with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.”
- Stéphane Dion, Minister of Foreign Affairs
“With these amendments to Canadian sanctions against Iran, Canadian companies
will now be able to position themselves for new trade opportunities, but we will
also maintain rigorous controls on any exports that raise serious proliferation
concerns.”
- Chrystia Freeland, Minister of International Trade
Quick facts
Canada has maintained an embassy in Tehran since 1961, with the exception of
1980-88 (after the U.S. hostage rescue) and the period since September 7, 2012.
All G-20 countries, apart from the United States, Saudi Arabia and Canada,
currently operate embassies in Tehran. The United Kingdom reopened its embassy
in 2015 after a four-year closure.
Canada’s exports to Iran peaked at $772 million in 1997. With the imposition of
sanctions, this number declined to $67 million in 2014 (comprising mostly food
products exempt from sanctions).
The amendments to Canada’s sanctions under the Special Economic Measures Act
will remove impediments on financial transactions, including transfers of
personal funds.
Canada’s measures under the State Immunity Act and the Justice for Victims of
Terrorism Act, and the listing of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps’
Qods Force as a terrorist entity under the Criminal Code, have not changed.
Since 2003, Canada has led the annual United Nations resolution on the situation
of human rights in Iran. In 2015, the resolution was successfully adopted and
received the support of a cross-regional group of countries, underscoring the
fact that the international community remains deeply concerned by human rights
violations in Iran.
Related products
Backgrounder - Sanctions against Iran
Associated links
Canada welcomes announcement of ‘Implementation Day’ of Iran nuclear deal
Canadian sanctions related to Iran
Special Economic Measures Act
Special Economic Measures (Iran) Regulations
United Nations Act
Regulations Implementing the United Nations Resolutions on Iran
Export Control List and Notice to Exporters
Canada and the international community call on Iran to improve its human rights
record
Pope Francis, Russian Orthodox patriarch Kirill, to meet in
historic step
The Associated Press, Vatican City Friday, 5 February 2016
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/02/05/pope-francis-russian-orthodox-patriarch-kirill-to-meet-in-historic-step/
Pope Francis and the leader of the Russian Orthodox Church will meet in Cuba
next week in a historic step to heal the 1,000-year-old schism that divided
Christianity between East and West, both churches announced Friday. The Feb. 12
meeting between Francis and Patriarch Kirill will be the first ever between the
leaders of the Catholic Church and the Russian Orthodox Churches, which is the
largest in Orthodoxy. Francis is due to travel to Mexico Feb. 12-18. He will
stop in Cuba on the way and meet with Kirill on Feb. 12 at the Havana airport,
where they will speak privately for about two hours and then sign a joint
declaration, the Vatican said. “This event has extraordinary importance in the
path of ecumenical relations and dialogue among Christian confessions,” said the
Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi. The two churches split during the
Great Schism of 1054 and have remained estranged over a host of issues,
including the primacy of the pope and Russian Orthodox accusations that the
Catholic Church is poaching converts in former Soviet lands. Those tensions have
prevented previous popes from ever meeting with the Russian patriarch, even
though the Vatican has long insisted that it was merely ministering to tiny
Catholic communities in largely Orthodox lands. The persecution of Christians -
Catholic and Orthodox - in the Middle East and Africa, however, has had the
effect of bringing the two churches closer together. Both the Vatican and the
Orthodox Church have been outspoken in denouncing attacks on Christians and the
destruction of Christian monuments, particularly in Syria.
In November 2014, Francis had said he had told Kirill: “I’ll go wherever you
want. You call me and I’ll go.” Kirill will be in Cuba on an official visit, his
first to Latin America as patriarch. The meeting, which was announced jointly at
the Vatican and in Moscow, marks a major development in the Vatican’s long
effort to bridge the divisions in Christianity. In the joint statement, the two
churches said the meeting “will mark an important stage in relations between the
two churches. The Holy See and the Moscow Patriarchate hope that it will also be
a sign of hope for all people of good will. They invite all Christians to pray
fervently for God to bless this meeting, that it may bear good
fruits.”Metropolitan Illarion, foreign policy chief of the Russian Orthodox
Church, told reporters on Friday that there are still core disagreements between
the Holy See and the Russian Church, in particular on various Orthodox churches
in western Ukraine.
The conflict centers on the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, the country’s
second-largest church, which follows eastern church rites but answers to the
Holy See. The Russian Orthodox Church has considered western Ukraine its
traditional territory and has resented papal influence there.
“Despite the existing ecclesiastical obstacles, a decision has been taken to
hold a meeting between Patriarch Kirill and Pope Francis,” he said. “The
situation in the Middle East, in northern and central Africa and in other
regions where extremists are perpetrating a genocide of Christians requires
immediate action and an even closer cooperation between Christian churches,”
Illarion said. “In this tragic situation, we need to put aside internal
disagreements and pool efforts to save Christianity in the regions where it is
subject to most severe persecution.”
The Vatican has long nurtured ties with the Istanbul-based Ecumenical Patriarch,
Bartholomew I, who is considered “first among equals” within the Orthodox
Church. Starting with Pope Paul VI, various popes have called upon the
Ecumenical Patriarch in hopes of bridging closer ties with the Orthodox
faithful.
But the Russian Orthodox Church, which is the largest church in Orthodoxy and
the most powerful, has always kept its distance from Rome. Joint theological
commissions have met over the years and the Russian church’s foreign minister
has made periodic visits to Rome, but a pope-patriarch meeting has never been
possible until now. The location of the meeting is significant. It has long been
assumed that a “neutral” third country would be selected for any pope-patriarch
encounter, but it had always been assumed that it would be somewhere in Europe.
Francis, however, played a crucial role in ending the half-century Cold War
estrangement between the United States and Cuba.
That the onetime Soviet outpost in the Caribbean will now play a role in helping
heal the 1,000-year schism between the Catholic and Russian Orthodox churches is
a remarkable feat of geopolitical and ecumenical choreography that may have the
dual effect of thrusting President Raoul Castro into the spotlight, given that
he will greet the pope upon his arrival and preside over the signing of the
joint declaration. The Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, noted that
Cuba is both well-known to the Russian Church as well as the Catholic Church,
given that three different popes have traveled to the island in the span of 20
years.
“It’s a place that positioned itself well for the circumstances,” Lombardi said.
About two-thirds of the world’s Orthodox Christians belong to the Russian
Orthodox Church, or about 200 million, Lombardi said. The Catholic Church claims
about 1.2 billion faithful. About 75 percent of Russia’s 144 million people call
themselves Russian Orthodox, according to the latest polls, although only a
fraction of them say they are observant. Under Francis, the Vatican has
encouraged continuing ecumenical ties with the Orthodox as well as other
Christian denominations. And it has gone out of its way to be solicitous to
Russia, especially in shying away from directly criticizing Moscow over its role
in the Ukraine conflict. Ever since Kirill took the helm of the Russian Orthodox
Church in 2009, the church has enjoyed increasingly close ties with the Kremlin
that critics have dismissed as the de-facto merging of the state and the church.
Syrians Mass on Turkish Border as Regime
Advances
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 05/16/
Up to 20,000 Syrians were stranded on the Turkish border Friday after fleeing a
major Russian-backed regime offensive near Aleppo where a new humanitarian
disaster appeared to be unfolding. Tens of thousands of civilians have joined an
exodus to escape fierce fighting involving government forces who severed the
rebels' main supply route into Syria's second city. On Friday, clashes between
the two sides in and around Ratyan, a town near Aleppo, cost 120 lives, said the
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. The U.N.'s Office for the Coordination of
Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said it estimated "up to 20,000 people have gathered
at the Bab al-Salama border crossing and another 5,000 to 10,000 people have
been displaced to Azaz city" nearby. Western nations have accused the Syrian
government of sabotaging peace talks that collapsed this week with its military
offensive, and Washington has demanded Moscow halt its campaign in support of
President Bashar Assad. The U.N. Security Council was due to meet later Friday
to discuss the faltering peace process, as NATO head Jens Stoltenberg warned
Russian air strikes were "undermining the efforts to find a political solution".
The Syrian Observatory, a British-based monitor that relies on a network of
sources on the ground, estimates that 40,000 people have fled the regime
offensive near Aleppo. "Thousands of people, mainly families with women and
children, are waiting to enter Turkey," Observatory director Rami Abdel Rahman
told AFP. OCHA spokeswoman Linda Tom said that in addition to the thousands at
the border, another 10,000 people were estimated to have been displaced to the
Kurdish town of Afrin, elsewhere in northern Aleppo."The fighting has also
disrupted major aid and supply routes from the Turkish border," she said. Aleppo
province is one of the main strongholds of Syria's opposition, which is facing
possibly its worst moment since the country's brutal conflict began in 2011.
"The trajectory for the rebels is downwards, and the downward slope is
increasingly steep," said Emile Hokayem, a senior fellow at the International
Institute for Strategic Studies.
"The rebels are on the retreat everywhere."Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet
Davutoglu said Thursday up to 70,000 people were heading to his country, which
already hosts about 2.5 million Syrian refugees. Early Friday, the main border
crossing in northern Aleppo was closed and quiet on the Turkish side near the
town of Kilis, with no sign of arriving refugees. But footage released Thursday
by activists showed hundreds of people, including many children, heading towards
the frontier, some carrying their belongings in plastic bags on their backs. "We
were driven from our homes because of Russia, Iran, Bashar and (Lebanese Shiite
militia) Hezbollah," a child said in the video. "We ask (Turkish President Recep
Tayyip) Erdogan to let us into his territory." More than 260,000 people have
died in Syria's conflict and more than half the population has been displaced.
Aleppo city, Syria's former economic powerhouse, has been divided between
opposition control in the east and regime control in the west since mid-2012.
Syria's army has been on the offensive since staunch government ally Russia
began an aerial campaign in support of regime forces on September 30. Since
then, the regime has recaptured several key rebel towns in Latakia province --
Assad's coastal heartland -- and advanced in Aleppo province and in Daraa in the
south.
On Friday, the army seized the town of Ratyan and village of Mayer, north of
Aleppo, with support from dozens of Russian air strikes. But a rebel
counteroffensive saw opposition fighters regain half of Ratyan in heavy fighting
that killed some 60 rebels and the same number of regime forces, according to
the Observatory. Pro-government troops backed by Russian warplanes also retook a
rebel bastion in Daraa used as to launch attacks on the provincial capital, the
monitor said. The losses have angered and demoralized Syria's opposition. "What
frustrates the rebels the most is that the countries that claim to be their
friends are happy with empty words and sitting on the fence," said activist
Maamoun al-Khatib, head of the Shabha press agency in Aleppo. "Meanwhile (regime
allies) Russia and Iran are occupying and violating Syrian territory."
Top diplomats from countries trying to resolve the conflict are set to meet
again on February 11 after U.N.-brokered peace talks in Geneva collapsed this
week. But tensions between them remain, with Moscow on Thursday accusing key
opposition backer Ankara of actively preparing to invade Syria, a claim Erdogan
dismissed Friday as "laughable". Davutoglu had earlier accused Assad's
supporters of "committing the same war crimes" as the regime. The Security
Council was scheduled to meet on Friday for consultations with U.N. envoy
Staffan de Mistura who suspended the floundering Geneva negotiations on
Wednesday until February 25.
Saudi: Ready to join ground operation in Syria
By Staff writer, Al Arabiya English Thursday, 4 February 2016/The spokesman for
Saudi Arabia’s military said on Thursday the kingdom was ready to join any
ground operation in Syria if required by the U.S.-led coalition. "The kingdom is
ready to participate in any ground operations that the coalition (against ISIS)
may agree to carry out in Syria," said military spokesman Brigadier General
Ahmed al-Asiri during an interview with Al Arabiya News Channel. Asiri: Saudi
Arabia ready for ground operations in Syria. "If there was a consensus from the
leadership of the coalition, the kingdom is willing to participate in these
efforts because we believe that aerial operations are not the ideal solution and
there must be a twin mix of aerial and ground operations," Asiri said. Since
late 2014 Saudi Arabia has been part of a U.S.-led coalition which officially
has 65 members and has been bombing the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS)
group which seized large parts of Syria and Iraq. Asiri is spokesman for a
separate Saudi-led Arab coalition which, since March, has conducted air strikes
and ground operations in Yemen. That coalition supports the government there in
its fight against Houthi rebels who seized much of the country and are backed by
Iran. Iran is also one of the main allies of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad,
whose regime has been fighting an insurgency for about five years. Saudi Arabia
supports more moderate rebels against Assad's forces.
U.S. welcomes Saudi news. U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter welcomed on Thursday
a Saudi offer to participate in any ground operations in Syria launched by the
U.S.-led coalition. Carter said increased activity by other countries would make
it easier for the United States to accelerate its fight against ISIS. "That kind
of news is very welcome," he told reporters while on a visit to Nellis Air Force
Base in Nevada. Carter said he looked forward to discussing the offer of ground
troops with the Saudi defense minister in Brussels next week. Click here to
watch Al Arabiya’s full interview with Saudi military spokesman Ahmed al-Asiri.
(with AFP and Reuters)
Iranians ‘failed by reformists’ ahead of vote
Parisa Hafezi, Reuters Friday, 5 February 2016/Many Iranian women and young
people are disillusioned about the upcoming elections, desperate for reform but
losing hope in their pragmatic president and his promise of a freer society. The
Feb. 26 parliamentary poll will see pro-reform candidates, who broadly back
President Hassan Rowhani, attempt to overturn the majority held by conservative
hardliners in the 290-seat assembly. It will be a test of public support for
Rowhani himself ahead of presidential elections next year. While the vote might
not have an influence on foreign policy, which is determined by Iran’s Supreme
Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the election of a reformist parliament could
strengthen Rowhani’s hand to push through economic reforms to open up the
country to foreign trade and investment. Rowhani won the presidency in 2013,
bolstered by the support of many women and young people who were encouraged by
his comments that Iranians deserved to live in free country and have the rights
enjoyed by other people around the world. “I am not going to make the same
mistake twice. I have decided not to vote,” said Setareh, a university graduate
in the northern city of Rasht. “I voted for Rowhani - was he able to improve my
situation? No.”Rowhani’s supporters hoped that his election victory would lead
to social change in country where women have lesser rights than men in areas
including inheritance, divorce and child custody and are subject to travel and
dress restrictions, and strict Islamic law is enforced by a “morality police”.
But rights campaigners say there has been little, if any, moves to bring about
greater political and cultural freedoms as the president has focused on striking
the nuclear accord with world powers to end the international sanctions that
have crippled Iran’s economy. Iran rejects any allegations it is discriminating
against women, saying it follows Sharia law. Now Rowhani and his moderate allies
are struggling to mobilize two of their main support bases - women and young
people. The president’s promises to loosen Internet restrictions have not been
met. Access to social media remains officially blocked, though Rowhani and
Khamenei have their own Twitter accounts. This has been a particular grievance
among those under 30, who represent more than two-thirds of the 78 million
population and were born after the 1979 Islamic revolution that toppled the
U.S.-backed Shah. “I am not going to vote. What is the use of voting? My hopes
are shattered,” said a 27-year-old engineer in Tehran, who refused to give his
name.
Highly educated . The president’s constitutional powers are limited, with
ultimate authority in the hands of Khamenei, who has lambasted the West for
using women as a tool to advertise products and satisfy “disorderly and unlawful
sexual needs”. The Feb. 26 elections will also see the public vote for members
of the Assembly of Experts, a clerical body that could play a pivotal part in
determining Iran’s future path in both domestic and foreign policies - as at
some point it will have the job of selecting a successor to 76-year-old Khamenei.
Iranian women, who make up more than half of the population, are among the most
highly educated in the Middle East; they have a literacy rate of over 80 percent
and account for over 50 percent of university entrees. But under Iranian law,
men can divorce their spouses far more easily than women, while custody of
children over seven automatically goes to the father.
Women have to get permission from their husbands to travel abroad. They are
obliged to cover their hair and the shape of their bodies, their testimony as a
legal witness is worth half that of a man, and daughters inherit half of what
sons do. While they cannot run for president, they are however able to hold most
jobs including other government positions, and can vote and drive. “What will
change if I vote?” said Miriam, 26, who could not win custody of her
eight-year-old son after getting divorced in the central city of Isfahan. “Can
reformist candidates give me equal rights?”A report by the U.N. special
rapporteur on Iran last year said human rights in the country “remained dire”
under Rowhani, while separately a U.N. child rights watchdog said this month
that girls faced discriminatory treatment “in family relations, criminal justice
system, property rights”. Iran denies any infringement of human rights. Retired
government employee Fariba Khamesi, from Tehran, said that even if there had
been little evidence of social change, she would not give up her hopes for a
freer Iran. “Of course I will vote in the elections. There are many problems
like the economic pressure, discriminatory laws against women, but if we don’t
cast our vote, conservatives will gain more power,” the 58-year-old said.
Syrian Army, allies make advances in Deraa, Aleppo
Staff writer, Al Arabiya News Friday, 5 February 2016/The Syrian Army and allied
militias on Friday made advances when they retook a town at the doorstep of
Deraa and completely encircled the northern countryside of Aleppo province.
Deraa is a contested city that lies between Damascus and the Jordan border. The
conquest opens several supply routes to Deraa, which is divided between
government and opposition fighters, the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for
Human Rights said. Deraa was the scene of some of the first protests against
President Bashar Assad in 2011 and holds symbolic value in the narrative of the
uprising that has since collapsed into a vicious civil war. Syria’s official
news agency says the offensive on Atman, north of Deraa, scattered rebel forces
- which it labels terrorists.Troops advanced under the cover of heavy artillery
bombardment and air power, the Observatory reports.
Aleppo
Meanwhile, the commander of a U.S.-supported Syrian rebel group said on Friday
the northern countryside of Aleppo province was completely encircled by Syrian
government forces and its allies, and heavy Russian bombardment continued.
Syrian government troops and their allies broke through rebel defences to reach
two Shiite villages in northern Aleppo province on Wednesday, choking opposition
supply lines from Turkey to Aleppo city. The assault in northern Aleppo
province, backed by hundreds of Russian air strikes there, has also prompted
tens of thousands of people to flee towards the Turkish border and helped derail
peace talks in Geneva. Hassan Haj Ali, the head of a prominent Free Syrian Army
group called Liwa Suqour al-Jabal that has received U.S. military training in
Qatar and Saudi Arabia, said the aerial bombardment continued. “The Russian
cover continues night and day, there were more than 250 air strikes on this area
in one day,” he told Reuters.
“The regime is now trying to expand the area it has taken control of,” he said.
“Now the northern countryside (of Aleppo province) is totally encircled, and the
humanitarian situation is very difficult.”Hezbollah’s Al Manar television said
government forces and allied fighters had taken over the town of Ratyan, which
lies close to areas they captured on Wednesday. The Observatory confirmed the
“symbolic” capture of Ratyan, but Haj Ali said it had not yet fallen. “There are
very heavy battles in Ratyan, and an attempt by the regime to storm it. But
until now they haven't been able to enter,” he said. Haj Ali reiterated calls
for countries backing Syrian rebels to send more military aid, including
anti-aircraft missiles, but said he held out little hope for the latter. “We
demand daily more support, but the issue of anti-aircraft (weapons) has become a
dream ... the dream that will not come true,” he said. U.S.-made TOW missiles,
or guided anti-tank missiles, are the most potent weapon in the rebel arsenal
and have been supplied to vetted rebel groups as part of a program of military
support overseen by the Central Intelligence Agency. But while they have helped
rebels to slow advances on the ground, they are of little use against fighter
bombers.
Tens of thousands flee Aleppo
The Syrian government’s military offensive around the city of Aleppo has
prompted at least 15,000 people to flee and involved a reported 13 airstrikes on
medical facilities in January, the United Nations said on Friday. “The U.N. has
verified that at least 15,000 people (are) fleeing from north of Aleppo city and
tens of thousands have reportedly gathered at the border crossing with Turkey,”
a U.N. spokeswoman said in an emailed comment. “Local sources say that while the
Turkish border remains closed to civilian movement, those requiring urgent
medical care have been receiving treatment from local hospitals in Turkey.”
Turkey’s warning
Meanwhile, Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu on Thursday that the
humanitarian corridor between Turkey and Aleppo has been cut off as Syrian
forces seek to inflict a siege of starvation on the city. “This humanitarian
logistic corridor is now under the invasion of these foreign fighters and regime
forces (with) the support of Russian war planes,” the local Today’s Zaman quoted
him as saying after a Syrian donor conference in London. He said the forces were
seeking to do the same to Aleppo as they did to the besieged town of Madaya,
where dozens have starved to death. The prime minister also warned of a new
influx of Syrian refugees as many as 80,000 after increased airstrikes in
Syria’s northwest. Donor nations also have pledged to give more than $10 billion
by 2020 to meet Syrian needs. The pledges came during a conference in London on
Thursday, described by U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon as the single biggest
humanitarian fundraising event ever. (With AP and Reuters)
Erdogan: Russian claim on Syria ‘laughable’
By AFP and Reuters, Beirut/Ankara Thursday, 4 February 2016/President Recep
Tayyip Erdogan on Friday blasted as “laughable” Russia’s accusation that Turkey
was actively preparing to invade Syria. “I find this Russian statement
laughable... rather it is Russia that is currently engaged in an invasion of
Syria,” Erdogan said, quoted by the state-run Anatolia news agency. Previously,
a senior Turkish government official said on Friday that Turkey is not planning
a military incursion into Syria and Russian talk of such action is propaganda,.
“Turkey does not have any plans or thoughts of staging a military campaign or
ground incursion in Syria,” the official told Reuters, adding Russia was
stepping up its own military campaign in Syria every day instead of working for
a solution. “Turkey is part of a coalition, is working with its allies, and will
continue to do so. As we have repeatedly said, Turkey will not act
unilaterally,” the official said. Russia said on Thursday it suspected Turkey
was preparing a military incursion into Syria, as a Syrian army source said
Aleppo would soon be encircled by government forces with Russian air support.
Turkey in turn accused Moscow of trying to divert attention from its own
“crimes” in Syria, and said Aleppo was threatened with a “siege of starvation”.
It said Turkey had the right to take any measures to protect its security. In
another sign of the spreading international ramifications of the five-year-old
Syrian war, Saudi Arabia said it was ready to participate in ground operations
against ISIS in if the U.S.-led alliance decided to launch them. The United
Nations on Wednesday suspended the first peace talks in two years, halting an
effort that seemed doomed from the start as the war raged unabated. Washington
said on Thursday however it was hopeful they would resume by the end of the
month, and Russia said it expected that no later than Feb. 25. Donors convened
in London to tackle the refugee crisis created by the conflict. British Prime
Minister David Cameron said they raised $11 billion for Syrian humanitarian
needs over the next four years. Turkey said at the conference up to 70,000
refugees from Aleppo were moving toward the border to escape air strikes.
Border march
Footage online showed hundreds of people, mostly women, children and the
elderly, marching towards Turkey’s Onucpinar border gate, carrying carpets,
blankets and food on their backs. Four months of Russian air strikes have tipped
the momentum of the war Assad’s way. With Moscow’s help and allies including
Lebanon’s Hezbollah and Iranian fighters, the Syrian army is regaining areas on
key fronts in the west. Russia’s defense ministry said it had registered “a
growing number of signs of hidden preparation of the Turkish Armed Forces for
active actions on the territory of Syria”. Any Turkish incursion would risk
direct confrontation between Russia and a NATO member.“The Russians are trying
to hide their crimes in Syria,” said a senior official in Turkish Prime Minister
Ahmet Davutoglu’s office. “They are simply diverting attention from their
attacks on civilians as a country already invading Syria. Turkey has all the
rights to take any measures to protect its own security.” In London, Davutoglu
said the “humanitarian logistic corridor” between Turkey and Aleppo was “under
the invasion of these foreign fighters and regime forces (with) the support of
Russian warplanes”. “What they want to do in Aleppo today is exactly what they
did in Madaya before, a siege of starvation,” he added. Davutoglu pledged that
whatever the cost Turkey’s door would remain open to all Syrians. It has already
taken in more than 2.5 million. Relations between Russia and Turkey have
deteriorated badly since Turkey shot down a Russian warplane near the Syrian
border in November. State Department spokesman John Kirby declined to comment on
Turkish military operations on the Syrian border, saying only: “They are working
to secure that stretch of border, but I’m not going to comment on specific
military activities of another nation inside their borders.”
Iraq’s top Shiite cleric suspends weekly sermons
Reuters, Baghdad Friday, 5 February 2016/Iraq’s top Shiite cleric said on Friday
he would no longer deliver regular weekly sermons about political affairs, which
for years have been a source of guidance for Iraqi politicians and his millions
of followers.
Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani did not give a reason for suspending the sermons,
which have lately focused on the government’s battle against ISIS militants and
anti-corruption efforts. “It has been decided not to continue this on a weekly
basis at the present time, but only as demanded by events,” Sistani’s aide Ahmed
al-Safi, who delivered the message, said in a televised speech from the southern
shrine city of Kerbala before reciting a prayer. Sistani, a reclusive
octogenarian, enjoys almost mythical status among millions of Shiite followers
and wields authority that few Iraqi politicians would openly challenge. His
political sermons have ranged over issues such as security, elections and the
economy. He called in June 2014 for Iraqis to take up arms against the Sunni
ultra-hardline insurgents of ISIS after they seized nearly a third of the
country’s north and west. Tens of thousands of Shiites heeded the call. Sistani
then endorsed the sidelining of former Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki. Last
summer, he called for an overhaul of Iraq’s corrupt political system,
emboldening Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi to launch a reform campaign which
Sistani later criticized as slow and ineffective. A spokesman for Sistani’s
office was not immediately available to comment on the decision. A sermon two
weeks ago expressed frustration at inaction in solving Iraq’s myriad security,
political and economic challenges. “All these issues have been repeated
endlessly until our voices became sore,” Sistani said at the time. A Friday
sermon was also broadcast live on state television from the main mosque in
Ramadi, the western capital retaken from ISIS insurgents about a month ago
following a six-month siege. Abdul Lateef al-Himayim, head of Iraq’s government
body overseeing Sunni religious sites, thanked the security services and urged
displaced people to return to their homes. More than 3.3 million Iraqis have
been displaced by the fighting, most of them Sunnis. Government forces are still
dismantling bombs left by ISIS in Ramadi, the capital of the predominately Sunni
province of Anbar, and much of the city’s buildings and infrastructure needs to
be rebuilt. A few soldiers stood guard as security and local officials listened
to the sermon inside the mosque, which was largely untouched by the fighting.
Counter-terrorism forces, which spearheaded the recapture of the city, are still
pursuing insurgents in a few northeastern districts.
UK slams ‘ridiculous’ U.N. report on Assange
The Associated Press, Geneva Friday, 5 February 2016/A U.N. human rights panel
says WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been “arbitrarily detained” by Britain
and Sweden since December 2010, although the UK government slammed the report as
“ridiculous.”The U.N. Working Group on Arbitrary Detention said his detention
should end and he should be entitled to compensation. Swedish prosecutors want
to question Assange over allegations of rape stemming from a working visit he
made to the country in 2010 when WikiLeaks was attracting international
attention for its secret-spilling ways. Assange has consistently denied the
allegations but declined to return to Sweden to meet with prosecutors and
eventually sought refuge in the Ecuadorean embassy in London, where he has lived
since June 2012. However, British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond poured scorn
on the U.N. report, calling it ridiculous, and said the Wikileaks founder was a
fugitive from justice. The panel ruled Assange is being “arbitrarily detained”
in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he fled in 2012 to avoid extradition
to Sweden. “I reject the decision of this working group,” Hammond told ITV news
on Friday. “It is a group made up of lay people and not lawyers. Julian Assange
is a fugitive from justice. He is hiding from justice in the Ecuadorian embassy.
“He can come out any time he chooses... But he will have to face justice in
Sweden if he chooses to do so. This is frankly a ridiculous finding by the
working group and we reject it.” The case has also been complicated by
uncertainty surrounding Assange’s legal status in the United States. The U.S.
government has not revealed whether he has been indicted - grand jury
proceedings are secret there - but has indicated that sensitive investigations
into Assange and WikiLeaks have been made. The working group said Assange could
face “refoulement” to the United States - being handed over to a country where
he could face violence or prison. The U.N. upholds the principle of non-refoulement
prohibiting that practice.
New U.S. intelligence report says ISIS weaker
Jonathan Landay, Reuters Friday, 5 February 2016/The Islamic State of Iraq and
Syria (ISIS) has as many as 25,000 fighters in both country, down from a
previous estimate of up to 31,000, according to a U.S. intelligence report
revealed by the White House on Thursday. U.S. officials cited factors such as
battlefield casualties and desertions to explain the roughly 20 percent decrease
in fighters, and said the report showed a U.S.-led campaign to crush Islamic
State was making progress. The new intelligence estimate “means they continue to
be a substantial threat, but the potential numbers have declined,” said White
House spokesman Josh Earnest. “ISIS has sustained significant casualties,”
Earnst said. Ground fighting efforts by coalition partners of the United States
are having an effect in the conflict against ISIS, he said. U.S.-backed Iraqi
security forces and tribal militias and moderate opposition groups in Syria have
contributed. So too has a U.S.-led air campaign that has launched more than
10,000 strikes against the Islamist extremists, Earnest said. Finally,
international efforts are beginning to stem the flow of foreigners seeking to
join the movement. “ISIL is having more difficulty than they’ve had before in
replenishing their ranks, and we have long been aware of the need of the
international community to cooperate to stop the flow of foreign fighters to the
region,” said Earnest. The new intelligence report of 19,000-25,000 ISIS
compares to 2014 estimates of 20,000-31,000 fighters. “The decrease reflects the
combined effects of battlefield deaths, desertions, internal disciplinary
actions, recruiting shortfalls, and difficulties that foreign fighters face
traveling to Syria,” said Emily Horne, a spokeswoman for the National Security
Council. Some North African extremists who might otherwise have traveled to
Syria to join ISIS may instead have heeded calls by the movement’s leadership to
head to Libya, where the Islamists are fighting to expand their grip on
territory on the Mediterranean coast. The intelligence report did not account
for the Islamic State’s affiliates in South Asia, other parts of the Middle East
and North Africa, where its Libyan branch is expanding. There appear to be
conflicting U.S. estimates of the strength of the movement’s Libyan affiliate.
Defense officials put the number at some 3,000, while other U.S. officials put
it at 5,000-6,000.
Greek police turn to teargas as tempers flare over pensions
Reuters, Athens Friday, 5 February 2016/Scuffles broke out and police used
teargas during a mass rally in Athens on Thursday as Greeks railed against
government pension reforms needed to meet demands of international creditors.
Demanding an end to austerity, about 50,000 Greeks marched peacefully on
parliament in central Athens chanting for the government to ditch the proposals,
which many see as a betrayal of the leftist values of the main governing party,
Syriza. Public health workers carried black balloons, and a large banner
depicting a hunched-over nurse with a walking stick. “This is retirement at 67,”
it said, a reference to the later pension age that will come from the reforms.
Breaking away from the main march, black clad youths hurled stones and petrol
bombs at police, who responded with rounds of teargas and stun grenades. Some of
them smashed bus stops and set a car alight after the march, during a
cat-and-mouse game between police and protesters in the back streets of central
Athens. The angry backlash is piling pressure on leftist Prime Minister Alexis
Tsipras, first elected just over a year ago. With just a three-seat majority in
parliament, he is stuck between either pushing the reforms through to appease
international creditors, or attracting the wrath of thousands of Greeks. “They
should be strung up here, in Syntagma Square,” said pensioner Nikos Ghinis as he
walked along with thousands of others in central Athens. “I’m getting 740 euros
($826.21) a month for 40 years of work ... I’m (demonstrating) here for my
children and grandchildren,” he told Reuters. It was the second nationwide
walkout since Tsipras took power in January 2015 on a pledge to end years of
austerity, only to cave in under the threat of expulsion from the euro zone and
sign up to new belt-tightening reforms under an EU-IMF bailout package worth up
to 86 billion euros. “They are raiding our souls not just our pockets,” said
70-year old George Stathopoulos. “They betrayed us.”
Bailout talks
The 24-hour strike coincides with a major review of Greece’s performance on
terms of its bailout. The heads of the European Union and International Monetary
Fund mission assessing Greece’s progress arrived in Athens earlier this week to
discuss the pension plan, tax reforms and bad loans weighing on Greek banks. In
Washington, IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde told reporters that Greece’s
pension system was not sustainable and needed to be reformed but the Fund wanted
to see Greece succeed. “I really don’t like it when we are portrayed as the
draconian, rigorous, terrible IMF,” she said. “We have said that fiscal
consolidation should not be excessive, so that the economy could work and
eventually expand. But it needs to add up.”Greek ministers were in talks with
the mission chiefs in a hotel near Syntagma square in Athens, when the clashes
erupted. The government wants to conclude the review swiftly to start talks on
debt relief and convince Greeks that their sacrifices are paying off after six
years of austerity and a deep recession that have brought the jobless rate to 25
percent.Greece’s economy will be the only one in the European Union to shrink
this year, the EU Commission said on Thursday, but the fall is much smaller than
previously estimated. Greece has promised to cut pension spending by 1 percent
of GDP, or 1.8 billion euros, this year. To protect retired people whose
pensions have been slashed 11 times already since 2010, the government plans to
increase social security contributions by employees and employers. But unions
say the new plan will increase unemployment as the costs for hard-pressed
businesses will go up, and will force workers, mainly the self-employed, into
tax evasion as it links social security contributions to declared income. Under
the terms of pension reform, social security contributions will increase almost
threefold in coming years.
U.S. eyes ways to toughen fight against domestic extremists
Reuters, Washington Friday, 5 February 2016/The U.S. Justice Department is
considering legal changes to combat what it sees as a rising threat from
domestic anti-government extremists, senior officials told Reuters, even as it
steps up efforts to stop ISIS-inspired attacks at home. Extremist groups
motivated by a range of U.S.-born philosophies present a “clear and present
danger,” John Carlin, the Justice Department's chief of national security, told
Reuters in an interview. “Based on recent reports and the cases we are seeing,
it seems like we’re in a heightened environment.” Over the past year, the
Justice Department has brought charges against domestic extremist suspects
accused of attempting to bomb U.S. military bases, kill police officers and fire
bomb a school and other buildings in a predominantly Muslim town in New York
state.But federal prosecutors tackling domestic extremists still lack an
important legal tool they have used extensively in dozens of prosecutions
against ISIS-inspired suspects: a law that prohibits supporting designated
terrorist groups. Carlin and other Justice Department officials declined to say
if they would ask Congress for a comparable domestic extremist statute, or
comment on what other changes they might pursue to toughen the fight against
anti-government extremists. The U.S. State Department designates international
terrorist organizations to which it is illegal to provide “material support.” No
domestic groups have that designation, helping to create a disparity in charges
faced by international extremist suspects compared to domestic ones.
EU leaders not happy with ‘Brexit’ offer
AFP, Brussels Friday, 5 February 2016/No European leaders are satisfied so far
with proposals for a deal to keep Britain in the EU, which Prime Minister David
Cameron hopes to secure at a summit this month, sources close to the
negotiations told AFP. Initial reactions from European capitals show that
“nobody’s happy” with the draft agreement that European Union president Donald
Tusk unveiled on Monday, one European source said on condition of anonymity. The
lack of satisfaction so far is a sign that Tusk’s proposal is fair and balanced,
but also an indication that it could be hard to reach a deal at the February
18-19 meeting of the 28 EU leaders, the source added. Cameron, who is aiming to
hold a referendum on Britain’s EU membership in June, met Tusk on the margins of
a Syria donor conference in London on Thursday. The British prime minister is
now set to fly to Poland and Denmark on Friday at the start of a whirlwind
fortnight of diplomacy in a bid to win over his skeptical EU counterparts and
secure an accord. European diplomats in Brussels are set to hold their first
full talks on the new proposals on Friday, and will meet again next Thursday in
a bid to iron out their differences and reach an agreement at the summit.
Cameron has meanwhile been in frequent contact with French President Francois
Hollande, who warned on Wednesday that there should be no more changes to the
deal at the summit itself, and has expressed concern over Tusk’s proposals for
protections for non-Eurozone countries.
A British government source said however that “the mood is improving on that.”
Iran’s new best friends
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Al Arabiya/February 05/16
Iranian President Hassan Rowhani has been on a shopping spree in Europe to reap
benefits from business deals worth billions of dollars. The red carpet was
rolled out for him, and he was invited to some of the most esteemed locations on
the continent to meet with business and political leaders. Despite human rights
protests against Rowhani’s visit, more than 30 business deals were signed
covering petrochemicals, construction, transportation, pharmaceuticals,
agriculture and healthcare. He is seeking to diversify Iran’s economy, reducing
its reliance on the oil and gas industries. As Europeans protested Rowhani’s
visit due to Iran’s human rights record, EU politicians’ and business leaders’
eager welcome sends a strong message that they are ready to look the other way.
Car manufacturer Peugeot Citroën signed a deal worth nearly a half billion
dollars with Iran Khodro, and Total signed a contract to buy 150,000 - 200,000
barrels of oil per day from Tehran. Rowhani’s message to the world is that Iran
is ready to do business, and it can sign economic deals with any nation
regardless of their differences. The West has long placed more importance on
money than human rights, and Iran is being welcomed because Europe’s economy is
suffering as the Chinese and Russian stock markets and oil prices are falling.
European countries are desperately in search of new markets to sell their
products. Rowhani is also signaling to the West that his government has a say in
Iran’s socio-political and socio-economic fabrics, he is separating
revolutionary principles from business, and he can modernize Iran’s economy
despite hard-liners’ criticisms. Hard-liners believe Rowhani is opening Iran to
the infiltration of Western culture and endangering their economic monopoly,
while he believes he is reinforcing Iran’s regional and global roles.
Moderation?
One should not fall into the trap of the moderate image that Rowhani is
projecting to the world. To survive, Iran has become moderate only in doing
business with the world, but its domestic and regional policies do not show any
signs of moderation. Iran executed more than 800 people in 2015, a world record
per capita. Journalists, human rights defenders and bloggers are frequently
imprisoned for expressing their opinions. Iran’s foreign policy has shown no
signs of moderation. The Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Quds force
are operating in Syria and Iraq, and assisting Shiite militias across the region
financially, militarily, and in an advisory role. As Europeans protested
Rowhani’s visit due to Iran’s human rights record, EU politicians’ and business
leaders’ eager welcome sends a strong message that they are ready to look the
other way.
Palestinian refugees in Syria: Aya must not be left behind
Pierre Krähenbühl/Al Arabiya/February 05/16
The international conference on Syria on Wednesday in London is an opportune
moment to remember that all wars, in particular this most catastrophic
conflagration, are measured by their human cost. Aya Kassem is a seven year old
Palestine refugee from Damascus. A mortar attack mutilated her leg which had to
be amputated. Courageously, and after a series of operations, Aya has learned to
walk again. Her fortitude and sheer enthusiasm at the prospect of continuing her
education are humbling. With determination beyond her years she told us: “It
made me happy to go to school to meet friends and learn things that I never
knew". Aya illustrates the very real and individual consequences of the Syrian
conflict. Like so many, hers is a destiny that must be nurtured and respected.
Nearly 12 million people have been forced to flee their homes; some 6.5 million
are internally displaced; meanwhile 4.2 million have fled to neighboring
countries. Inside Syria, 13.5 million people are in need of humanitarian
assistance. Less attention is given to 560,000 Palestine refugees in Syria that
have found themselves caught up in the conflict. They are survivors and children
of survivors of the catastrophe or Nakba that befell the Palestinian people,
when the 1948 Arab-Israeli war saw 750,000 Palestinians become refugees; they
fled or were forced to flee their homes into neighboring countries including
Syria. Today the tragedy of their continuing displacement and exile, as part of
a group of over five million Palestine refugees across the region, is as yet
unresolved.
An estimated 450,000 of the 560,000 Palestine refugees registered with UNRWA in
Syria remain inside the country; over 60 percent -- 280,000 people -- are
internally displaced. This includes tens of thousands who are trapped in areas
of active conflict, such as the Yarmouk refugee camp in Damascus. Though Yarmouk
has sometimes made headlines, all 12 Palestine refugee camps in Syria have been
impacted by the fighting. We are dealing with yet another generation of
Palestinians facing dispossession, displacement, destitution and loss of life.
Forced into exile
Of the Palestine refugees from Syria who have been forced again into exile,
around 42,000 have fled to Lebanon and more than 17,000 to Jordan, living a
precarious, marginalized existence -- dependent on UNRWA for basic subsistence
needs. While their number there has been static for some time, others are taking
the more desperate voyage to Europe by boat. UNRWA has a demonstrated capacity
to meet Palestine refugee needs in Syria and beyond, when adequately funded. The
Agency has one of the largest presences of personnel in the country; our 4,000
staff have a deep and longstanding experience of the context. We are uniquely
placed to help Palestine refugees deal with the multiplicity of traumas and
needs they face and we have a demonstrable ability to resume service provisions
in Syria’s rare “post conflict” pockets. Last year, 43,000 students attended our
schools in Syria. We implemented a comprehensive “Education in Emergencies”
scheme, which included self-learning materials complemented by online
interactive learning programs and support classes. 15 UNRWA health centers and
11 health points -- temporary makeshift clinics in conflict affected areas --
conducted several hundred thousand consultations. Against considerable odds, our
work daily demonstrates the value of preserving education and health services to
ensure that no one is left behind; that there should be no lost generation.
UNRWA combines an ability to respond to immediate emergency needs, while at the
same time providing longer term development. We do so under one roof as part of
one seamless, sustained intervention. So in addition to the human development
work described above, in 2016, with the support of our donors and partners, we
are planning a broad range of emergency programs; food and cash for 430,000
people inside Syria and education and health care for the 60,000 Palestinians
who have fled to Lebanon and Jordan.
Life and death
95 per cent of Palestinians in Syria are reliant on URNWA aid. Our support is
often the difference between life and death. The significance of this cannot be
underestimated, particularly among a population which increasingly seeks
protection and services outside the Middle East. With the conflict soon entering
its sixth year, nothing today is more important than progress at the
Geneva-talks. Robust political action is needed to resolve the conflict and
bring about accountability for violations of international law. In the meantime,
we intend to energetically uphold the rights of Palestine refugees, in Syria and
throughout the Middle East. Their plight and the uncertainty they face has gone
on for far too long. Their tragedy is one that the world cannot overlook. In a
region where hope and prospects are elusive at best, I return to Aya. Much
remains to be done beyond saving her life and helping her to recover from the
immediate trauma of losing her leg. Propelled by her ambition to achieve a full
education, UNRWA will seek to sustain her through her youth and to adulthood,
hoping that opportunities and achievement will lie ahead.
Aya is a Palestine refugee, with her aspirations, pride and dignity. She is a
citizen of the world and as such she should not be left behind.
Facebook's War on Freedom of Speech
by Douglas Murray/Gatestone Institute/February 05/16
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7371/facebook-freedom-of-speech
Facebook is now removing speech that presumably almost everybody might decide is
racist -- along with speech that only someone at Facebook decides is "racist."
The sinister reality of a society in which the expression of majority opinion is
being turned into a crime has already been seen across Europe. Just last week
came reports of Dutch citizens being visited by the police and warned about
posting anti-mass-immigration sentiments on social media.
In lieu of violence, speech is one of the best ways for people to vent their
feelings and frustrations. Remove the right to speak about your frustrations and
only violence is left.
The lid is being put on the pressure cooker at precisely the moment that the
heat is being turned up. A true "initiative for civil courage" would explain to
both Merkel and Zuckerberg that their policy can have only one possible result.
It was only a few weeks ago that Facebook was forced to back down when caught
permitting anti-Israel postings, but censoring equivalent anti-Palestinian
postings.
Now one of the most sinister stories of the past year was hardly even reported.
In September, German Chancellor Angela Merkel met Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook at
a UN development summit in New York. As they sat down, Chancellor Merkel's
microphone, still on, recorded Merkel asking Zuckerberg what could be done to
stop anti-immigration postings being written on Facebook. She asked if it was
something he was working on, and he assured her it was.
At the time, perhaps the most revealing aspect of this exchange was that the
German Chancellor -- at the very moment that her country was going through one
of the most significant events in its post-war history -- should have been
spending any time worrying about how to stop public dislike of her policies
being vented on social media. But now it appears that the discussion yielded
consequential results.
Last month, Facebook launched what it called an "Initiative for civil courage
online," the aim of which, it claims, is to remove "hate speech" from Facebook
-- specifically by removing comments that "promote xenophobia." Facebook is
working with a unit of the publisher Bertelsmann, which aims to identify and
then erase "racist" posts from the site. The work is intended particularly to
focus on Facebook users in Germany. At the launch of the new initiative,
Facebook's chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg, explained that, "Hate
speech has no place in our society -- not even on the internet." She went to say
that, "Facebook is not a place for the dissemination of hate speech or
incitement to violence." Of course, Facebook can do what it likes on its own
website. What is troubling is what this organization of effort and muddled
thinking reveals about what is going on in Europe.
The mass movement of millions of people -- from across Africa, the Middle East
and further afield -- into Europe has happened in record time and is a huge
event in its history. As events in Paris, Cologne and Sweden have shown, it is
also by no means a series of events only with positive connotations.
As well as being fearful of the security implications of allowing in millions of
people whose identities, beliefs and intentions are unknown and -- in such large
numbers -- unknowable, many Europeans are deeply concerned that this movement
heralds an irreversible alteration in the fabric of their society. Many
Europeans do not want to become a melting pot for the Middle East and Africa,
but want to retain something of their own identities and traditions. Apparently,
it is not just a minority who feel concern about this. Poll after poll shows a
significant majority of the public in each and every European country opposed to
immigration at anything like the current rate.
The sinister thing about what Facebook is doing is that it is now removing
speech that presumably almost everybody might consider racist -- along with
speech that only someone at Facebook decides is "racist."
And it just so happens to turn out that, lo and behold, this idea of "racist"
speech appears to include anything critical of the EU's current catastrophic
immigration policy.
By deciding that "xenophobic" comment in reaction to the crisis is also
"racist," Facebook has made the view of the majority of the European people
(who, it must be stressed, are opposed to Chancellor Merkel's policies) into
"racist" views, and so is condemning the majority of Europeans as "racist." This
is a policy that will do its part in pushing Europe into a disastrous future.
Because even if some of the speech Facebook is so scared of is in some way
"xenophobic," there are deep questions as to why such speech should be banned.
In lieu of violence, speech is one of the best ways for people to vent their
feelings and frustrations. Remove the right to speak about your frustrations,
and only violence is left. Weimar Germany -- to give just one example -- was
replete with hate-speech laws intended to limit speech the state did not like.
These laws did nothing whatsoever to limit the rise of extremism; it only made
martyrs out of those it pursued, and persuaded an even larger number of people
that the time for talking was over.
The sinister reality of a society in which the expression of majority opinion is
being turned into a crime has already been seen across Europe. Just last week,
reports from the Netherlands told of Dutch citizens being visited by the police
and warned about posting anti-mass-immigration sentiments on Twitter and other
social media.
In this toxic mix, Facebook has now -- knowingly or unknowingly -- played its
part. The lid is being put on the pressure cooker at precisely the moment that
the heat is being turned up. A true "initiative for civil courage" would explain
to both Merkel and Zuckerberg that their policy can have only one possible
result.
**Douglas Murray, a British writer, journalist and commentator, is based in
London, England.
Rafsanjani Protests Against Iranian Regime's
Oppression Of Its Citizens, Warns Decision-Makers – i.e. Ideological Camp, Led
By Supreme Leader Khamenei
MEMRI/February 5, 2016 Special Dispatch No.6293
In light of the Iranian regime's increasing political repression in advance of
the elections for the Majlis and Assembly of Experts that are set for February
26, 2016, and in light of the mass disqualification of thousands of candidates
from the pragmatic and reformist streams,[1] Expediency Council head and
pragmatic camp leader Hashemi Rafsanjani harshly criticized the regime, saying
that it is trying to force its own candidates on the people instead of allowing
truly free, democratic elections.
In an address by Rafsanjani to activists from parties banned by the regime,
filmed sometime in November or December 2015 and posted in late January 2016 on
his website (see MEMRI TV Clip No. 5298, Rafsanjani Protests against the
Regime's Oppression of Its Citizens), included a warning about the regime's
ideological circles' intention to force their candidates on the public. He
protested against the suppression of freedom of expression among university
students and against the outlawing of political parties, and warned the ruling
establishment that its actions were distancing the people from their loyalty to
the Islamic Revolution.
Rafsanjani further warned that all this could generate indifference among the
public, leading to a boycott of the elections, and hinting that such a situation
would lead to civil unrest. He praised the people's democratic vote in the 2013
elections that brought President Hassan Rohani to power, praised also Iran's
nuclear achievements vis-à-vis the U.S., and called for the regime to allow the
people to freely elect its representatives this time as well.
In recent days, due to his criticism of the disqualification of thousands of
candidates from the pragmatic and reformist streams,[2] rage at Rafsanjani in
the ideological camp is growing. On February 1, 2016, Majlis member Hamid Resaei
said that he was "deviating from the path" of the Islamic Revolution, "corrupt,"
and "spreading rumors and lies."[3] The next day, Abdallah Haji Sadeghi, Iranian
Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's deputy representative in Iran's Islamic
Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), said that Rafsanjani's "behavior is like that
of the enemies."[4] On February 4, Assembly of Experts member Hassan Mamdouhi
said that he hoped that Rafsanjani's statements would not create "a new fitna,"
i.e. civil unrest, and warned him that the people would stand fast against any
fitna;[5] Mojtaba Zolnour, advisor to Khamenei's representative in the IRGC,
said that not even the enemies of the founder of the Islamic Revolution
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini ever made statements like Rafsanjani's and noted
that it was time for him to join his son in prison.[6]
The following are highlights of Rafsanjani's statements, from the video released
on his website on January 23, 2016:
"We expect a significant presence of our university [students] in politics, in
the elections, in [state] administration, and in social progress. However, [the
students] are oppressed [by the regime], and this is very bad. Young Muslims are
studying, and most of them acquire an education at their own expense. At the
very least, they should be allowed the freedom to express their opinions. Are
they inferior to those in the religious movements who express their opinion?
These people too are good – I am not condemning them. [The students] also mourn
the death of Hussein, and adhere to Ahl Al-Bayt...[7] But why aren't the
students [entitled to freedom of expression as well]? They are educated young
people, and they actually know more [than the students of religion]. This is an
inexcusable move.
"The security of our Iran emanates from the people. The people are still loyal
to the Revolution, but we must understand – that is, the decision-makers who are
making the wrong decisions must understand – that if the people, especially the
young and the educated, become apathetic and indifferent, the security [of our
society] will not remain as it is today... The indifference of the people is a
grave danger.
"How do people become apathetic? One [reason] is the elections. If they realize
that a choice is being imposed on them in the elections, then they obviously
will not [turn out to vote]. Ever since our first elections, all our referenda
over the years have been free, and the vast majority of the people participated
in them, with a turnout of 99%, [declining] to 60%-70%. We always had [a high
turnout], but [political parties] that were recently formed in the country have
been denied permission to be active in the elections. They can only vote. Over
time this can generate indifference in the country. Who gave us the authority to
interfere with the destiny of the people? We were all born free, and nobody can
tell us what to think. They can only guide us. Did the Prophet [Muhammad] force
anyone [to do anything]? The Koran explicitly states, 'Let there be no
compulsion in religion [2:256]'...
"We have come this far because of our unity – how will we go on if we are
divided?! The ugliest deeds that I see are the fashion [among] 'the concerned'
[referring to the ideological stream] who stand against the tremendous work
carried out humbly and modestly by the [Rohani] government [referring to the
JCPOA], under pressure and denigration. This was no small feat – facing down the
world's great superpowers. Six powerful countries that enjoy extensive
intelligence and diplomatic support sat [at the negotiating table] across from
our foreign minister [Zarif] and his team. [But] we managed to advance our path.
[All the while,] they [the ideological camp] said, constantly and every day,
that it would not succeed. The next day they said [again] that it would not
succeed. You see for yourselves what the newspapers of the 'concerned' are doing
– [they] are still writing that it will not succeed. In any case, this was not a
task that could possibly be carried out by a government under pressure. Indeed,
this government entered the arena intensively, showed patience, and toiled
devotedly. [This government] gave its all, despite [its critics'] mockery and
ridicule – and it finished the job.
"Where did this government come from? From the people's votes and elections. Had
[the people] followed the usual path [of the ideological conservatives] in the
2013 elections, things would not have happened like this. But ultimately, the
people arrived [on the scene, that is, they turned out to vote].
"[In the 2013 presidential elections,] all I did was register [as a presidential
candidate]; I didn't campaign or anything. When I went to register, they asked
me, What is your platform? I responded: I will publish my platform later... If I
am [a candidate] – I will publish it. I have always said: Let this path go
forward, so that I can publish [my platform]. I said nothing, and did not
campaign at all.
"But then came a tsunami [from the public], and everyone realized that the
people wanted something different. This [pragmatic] stream was unacceptable to
[the ideological conservatives]; they thought that they resolved this matter [by
disqualifying me], but things did not work out [for them]. The people stood
fast, and elected Dr. Rohani... All this belongs to the people [that said]: Most
of us are coming [to vote]; we are saying, We are here. It is the people that
decides.
"Look, for example, I am talking about the media. In that [2013] election
[campaign], the leader [Khamenei] said that the votes of the people are a right
that cannot be taken from them. [But] how many [television] programs on this
right of the people did the [state] broadcasting authority [air] – and how many
did you see? What about televised [candidate] debates and interviews?
"On the other hand, when the leader [Khamenei] uttered a single word –
'infiltration' [of U.S. influence into Iran] – they [the ideological media
outlets] filled the entire world with articles and talk, and even threats,
intimidation, and accusations. That does not fool the people – they [i.e. the
ideological stream] fool only themselves... But the people understand.
"The people are educated. They analyze [the situation]... I think that the
Islamic regime should give the people freedom – not force them, threaten them,
or restrict them. I will read to you some of the dictates of the Imam
[Khomeini], so that you can see his explanation about how the people should be
allowed to handle their own affairs. [He said] that there should be no
eavesdropping and no false slander. [He said:] Do not humiliate the people, do
not take their honor lightly, and respect the rights of the people. The Imam
[Khomeini] always said these things, extensively. So I think that the elections
that we are facing are very important."[8]
Endnotes:
[1] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 6282, Iranian Pragmatic Camp Leaders Protest
Against Regime's Mass Disqualification Of Thousands Of Pragmatic Camp Candidates
For February 2016 Majlis Elections, January 28, 2016.
[2] The Kayhan daily, the mouthpiece of the ideological camp, said that
Rafsanjani was responsible for the disqualification of Hassan Khomeini, the
reformist grandson of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who had run for the Assembly
of Experts at Rafsanjani's urging; the accusation was in response to
Rafsanjani's harsh criticism of the Guardian Council which disqualified
Khomeini. Kayhan, Iran, February 2, 2016.
[3] Ilna.ir (Iran), February 1, 2016.
[4] Digarban.com, February 2, 2016.
[5] Tasnim (Iran), February 4, 2016.
[6] Sahamnews.org, February 3, 2016.
[7] A term referring to the descendants of 'Ali and the successors of Shi'a
Islam.
[8] Hashemirafsanjani.ir, January 23, 2016.
Writers In Gulf Press: Removal Of Sanctions Will Make It
Easier For Iran To Keep Funding Terror, And Will Facilitate Its Plans To Harm
Other Countries
MEMRI/February 5, 2016 Special Dispatch No.6292
Following the January 16, 2016 publication of the International Atomic Energy
Agency report verifying that Iran has met its commitments under the JCPOA,
nuclear-related sanctions on Iran have been lifted, and $100 billion in Iranian
assets has been unfrozen. In response, many writers have published articles in
the Gulf press stating that the West is deluding itself by thinking that Iran's
behavior will now change for the better. These writers warned that Iran will
continue to fund terror organizations across the world and to seek to
destabilize its neighbors in order to bring down their regimes, and that the
infusion of billions of dollars will only help it do so. They also said that the
Iranian regime and its affiliates, first and foremost members of Iran's Islamic
Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), are the only ones who will profit and benefit
from these funds, while the Iranian people will continue to live in poverty and
oppression. One writer even called the U.S. "a cheating, lying ally undeserving
of a minimum of trust," and stated that its insistence on bringing Iran back
into the international fold is aimed at igniting the Middle East in order to
justify a permanent U.S. presence there.
Conversely, a Kuwaiti writer expressed hope that the lifting of the sanctions
will lead to strengthening of the moderates in Iran, and called on the Gulf
states to immediately launch an open dialogue with them, for the good of all the
peoples in the region. This, he said, is preferable to squandering huge sums on
weaponry and on a war that no one will win.
The following are translated excerpts from the articles.
Qatari Writer: Those Who Believes Iran Has Changed With The Lifting Of Sanctions
Are Deluding Themselves
Dr. Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari, a Qatari writer and intellectual and former dean of
the Shari'a and Islamic Studies faculty at the University of Qatar, wrote in the
Kuwaiti daily Al-Jarida that the lifting of the sanctions on Iran will not make
Iran a more decent and honest state, but a more violent one: "All those who are
betting that this [Iranian] regime will become more decent and will return to
the fold of the international community as a normal state... are deluding
themselves. The Western countries and the U.S., that are betting on the removal
of the sanctions and the ending of the embargo strengthening the reformist
forces and bringing about the longed-for change, are completely ignoring the
nature of this regime... [This regime] cannot exist without interfering [in
other countries], because if it did not do so, it would lose its religious and
doctrinal legitimacy.
"Evidence that the [Iranian] regime cannot change or become decent or normal is
the fact that its appetite for ballistic weapons only increased after the
sanctions were lifted, and that its interference in the region has become more
violent, after the [show of] smiles by [Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad]
Zarif and the optimism of [Iranian President Hassan] Rohani."[1]
Saudi Writer: Kerry's Illusions That The Region Will Now Be Safer Will Not
Change Reality
Mashari Al-Zaydi, columnist for the Saudi London-based daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat,
wrote that U.S. President Barack Obama, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, and
the entire West are deluded if they thought that the situation in the region
would improve following the lifting of the sanctions: "Will our region become
safer and more stable after Europe and the U.S. lift the sanctions on Iran? This
is the essential question in the story. As far as President Obama's staff is
concerned, first and foremost Secretary of State John Kerry, this will indeed
happen with Iran, after the signing of the decision to lift the sanctions...
"John Kerry, the godfather of the JCPOA, said at a meeting with his Iranian
bridegroom Foreign Minister Zarif that [the agreement] was the result of steps
taken since last July, and that as a result of it 'the U.S. and its friends and
allies in the Middle East and worldwide are now safer.' [Also,] EU foreign
policy chief Federica Mogherini said that [this agreement] will strengthen
stability and peace in the region...
"[But] the agreement, as has already been said again and again, is flawed in
structure, since it restricts the problem of Iran to the nuclear issue, and
[disregards] its destructive political conduct in the region, which is the main
problem. Proof of this is that Iran has remained loyal to this destructive path,
both before and after the announcement of [the JCPOA's Implementation Day].
Moreover, the U.S. Treasury Department has [even] placed new sanctions on Iran
because of its test-launches of ballistic missiles...
"In truth, there is no need for panic, because Obama and all those beside him
have built this agreement on castles in the sand, and the wave of reality that
will come will wash them away. This is because Khomeinist Iran can be only what
it is , and Kerry's and Mogherini's delusions will not succeed in changing the
geographic, demographic, and historic facts in the Middle East."[2]
Bahraini Commentator: With The Billions It Receives, Iran Will Again Fund Terror
Organizations
Sa'ied Al-Hamad, a Bahraini media figure, writer and political commentator,
warned in the Bahraini daily Al-Ayyam that the Iranian regime would use the
unfrozen billions to continue funding terror. The Iranian regime, he said, has
never hidden the fact that it funds terror organizations operating in
neighboring countries, and neither is it hiding it now; furthermore, even
Secretary of State Kerry acknowledged this.
Al-Hamad wrote: "About the funds that Iran will regain following the lifting of
the sanctions, Kerry said, 'I believe that some of these funds will reach the
IRGC or other bodies, some of which are classified as terror organizations'... A
senior Iranian official told the Times ... that the IRGC, especially [its] Al-Qods
[Force], will profit from the new fortune that will come with the lifting of the
sanctions, and that the IRGC and the Qods Force represent the main ammunition of
Iran in the region. He used the military term 'ammunition' explicitly, [the
meaning of which] is not obscure to any reasonable person. Another Iranian
official [said]: 'When you are rich, you can better help your friends.' He did
not clarify who these friends were, and left it for observers and those
concerned to figure out – but [understanding] this demands little effort or
brains.
"The Iranian regime does not hide the massive funding that it has allocated in
the past to militias, groups, and organizations that it planted in neighboring
countries, which have carried out sabotage and terror operations in order to
bring down those regimes and to pave the way for the turban-wearers in [the
Iranian holy city of] Qom, to fulfill their dream, and to reestablish their
Safavid empire. This is the ideological [Iranian] dream, which cannot be denied.
"The Iranian people is perhaps the only one that knows and understands that the
lifting of the sanctions and the return of the billions will not help it,
because these [funds] have been divvied up and allocated to elements that will
benefit from them even before they reach Tehran... [The Iranian people] will
emerge emptyhanded, and its rejoicing at the lifting of the sanctions and at the
return of the billions was disproportionate to the magnitude of the event,
because it knows the path of the 'one and only leader' [Iranian Supreme Leader
Ali] Khamenei and knows to whom these funds will be directed..."[3]
The terror organizations including Hizbullah, Assad, the IRGC, Al-Qaeda and
Shi'ite militias, that will benefit from the unfreezing of Iranian assets
(Source: Al-'Arab, London, January 24, 2016)
Kuwaiti Writer: Billions Will Flow To The IRGC; The Iranian People Will Continue
To Be Oppressed And Impoverished
Similar statements were made by Kuwaiti writer 'Abdallah Al-Hadlaq, who, in an
article in the Kuwaiti daily Al-Watan, accused the Iranian regime, particularly
the IRGC, of plundering Iran's economic resources while the Iranian people "is
bowed under the yoke of oppression and poverty." He argued that this will not
change even after the sanctions are lifted and billions of dollars are unfrozen:
"The fascist Persian Iranian turbaned regime that rules Tehran... interferes in
every single matter, and deposits the country's resources in the hands of those
with whom it is pleased, or those who guarantee its continued existence,
primarily the Persian Revolutionary Guards. When the sanctions on Iran are
lifted, and the billions return to it, the people, who is bowed under the yoke
of oppression and poverty, knows that it will receive a mere pittance from it,
and that the situation will remain the same or even grow worse.
"In terms of economic resources, Iran is considered wealthy, even very
wealthy... But this wealth is not reflected in the lives of its residents; only
the tiniest fraction of it reaches their pockets... The men of the Persian
regime and the IRGC are the unrivalled leaders of the [economic] battle – while
the sanctions have hurt all Iranians, they have greatly benefited the IRGC,
because after foreign firms left Iran, much of what they had been doing was
taken over by the Persian IRGC, allowing it to increase its influence in the
country and to take over the billions belonging to the Iranian people...
"The issue of lifting economic sanctions on Iran once again brings up the main
question: Will things change? The answer of all those who follow [this issue]
indicates that things will indeed change – in greater profit for these same
[already wealthy] elements and for the Persian IRGC, which hold the [most
important] economic junctions, and will partner the foreign investors on most
new projects. The profits of those who already stand to gain will increase, and
as for the poor – they will become even more impoverished and miserable in the
face of an accursed revolution that consumed its own sons, and then their
resources. The unfrozen billions will help strengthen the fascist Iranian
Persian regime's ability to support, fund, and sponsor global terrorism and the
satanic and evil plans of the land of the Persians – Iran."[4]
Kuwaiti Commentator: "The U.S. Is Nothing But A Cheating, Lying Ally Undeserving
Of A Minimum Of Trust"
In a scathing article in the Kuwaiti Al-Rai daily titled "John Kerry, Your
Loyalty Is Less Than Zero," Mubarak Muhammad Al-Hajri accused the U.S. of
insisting on bringing Iran back into the global arena in order to ignite the
Middle East; this, he said, serves American interests: "U.S. Secretary of State
John Kerry has come to the Gulf region many times to warn of the increasing
Iranian power [there], and to clarify [to the Gulf states] that the U.S. will
not be able to protect them, using various baseless pretexts and excuses [to
demonstrate this]. Naturally, the Gulf states are not as naïve as the Americans
think, and have tired of the games played by the American diplomats and of the
psychological warfare that they are constantly waging [against them] – to the
point that even a simpleton far from the air and filth of politics can clearly
see that the U.S. is nothing but a cheating, lying ally undeserving of a minimum
of trust.
"[The U.S.'s] policy and statements that contradict each other leave us no
choice but to expect an Iranian return to the international community, sponsored
by the U.S. – despite its black record of supporting terrorism in Iraq, Syria,
Lebanon, Yemen, Bahrain, Argentina, and other regions that have not escaped the
Iranian regime, and despite its human rights violations and its oppression of
domestic minorities and the opposition, and other shameful things of this kind.
But the U.S. insisted on bringing Iran back into the global arena, as it
disregards international peace and security...
"Once, the Gulf Cooperation Council [GCC] states were considered to be not
independent and the weakest link in the Middle East – but they have managed,
admirably, to reverse this equation... and now they are in charge and enforce
their [own] decisions despite U.S. ire.
"The White House diplomats do not want to hear this harsh truth, in light of
Iran-U.S. harmony. The unfrozen $100 billion will not go to the Iranian people,
but rather to the militias and gangs loyal to the Iranian mullahs, to spark more
sectarian wars and conflicts [in the Middle East] and to spread chaos and
instability [there]. It is this that the U.S. wants, since this is absolutely in
line with its agenda, which has transformed the Middle East into a collection of
tension[-filled] hives so as to justify its permanent presence there."[5]
Arabs squeezed by U.S.-Iran handshake (Source: Al-'Arabi Al-Jadid, London,
January 17, 2016)
Kuwaiti Writer: Needed Immediately: Political-Economic Reconciliation With Iran
Taking a different tack than the others, Kuwaiti writer Hassan Al-'Issa, in the
Kuwaiti daily Al-Jarida, expressed hope that the lifting of sanctions would
strengthen Iran's moderate forces and deescalate tensions in the region. He
called on the Gulf states to immediately launch a dialogue with Iran, with the
aim of gaining political-economic reconciliation that would benefit all the
peoples of the region: "The lifting of the international sanctions on Iran, and
its entry in force into the oil export market, rub salt on the wounds of the
[Gulf] Cooperation Council states, which are drowning in the mighty torrent of
their increased [oil] production and the lack of a demand, at a fair price, for
their orphaned goods. However, as an Omani official said, beyond this pessimism
lies some optimism, in that the lifting of sanctions could bring about a kind of
peaceful atmosphere in our burning region, and because the status of the
moderates in the [Islamic] Republic of Iran... will grow stronger vis-à-vis the
extremist forces... having proven the seriousness of their policy in dealing
with the extremists, and successfully extricating Iran from the sanctions.
"Should there be open talks between our countries and Iran in order to emerge
from the war that is being conducted in Syria and Yemen by means of proxies, we
would stand to gain much, since the excuse for the massive expenditure for
armament would become invalid, and we could be saving that money and spending it
in the right places to serve our peoples instead of channeling it to the pockets
of the arms-dealer cliques. Those who stand the most to gain [from such talks],
even more than us, are the two peoples, Syrian and Yemeni. The tragedy of Syria
has gone on for a long time and could go on even longer, so long as both sides
in the struggle [i.e. Saudi Arabia and Iran] believe that they can achieve a
decisive victory – while reality proves that such civil wars always end with no
winner and no loser, as happened in Lebanon.
"In Yemen, Iran could agree to [adopt the policy of] its moderate wing...
according to which there is no point in inciting the Houthis, and no solution
except in agreement among all the Yemenis, from all sects and tribes. We must
acknowledge that what is happening now is first and foremost a war of attrition
waged against Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states that are subordinate to it...
"Let us look inward to our Gulf, and open the window of dialogue and
reconciliation – because political-economic reconciliation [with Iran] is not a
luxury but rather an urgent necessity that cannot be postponed or delayed."[6]
Endnotes:
[1] Al-Jarida (Kuwait), January 25, 2016.
[2] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), January 18, 2016.
[3] Al-Ayyam (Bahrain), January 25, 2016.
[4] Al-Watan (Kuwait), January 24, 2016.
[5] Al-Rai (Kuwait), January 27, 2016.
[6] Al-Jarida (Kuwait), January 19, 2016.