LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
August 26/16
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://www.eliasbejjaninews.com/newsbulletin16/english.august26.16.htm
News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2006
Bible Quotations For Today
The day that Lot left Sodom, it rained fire and sulphur from heaven and destroyed all of them it will be like that on the day that the Son of Man is revealed.
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to
Saint Luke 17/26-30/:"Just as it was in the days of Noah, so too it will be in
the days of the Son of Man. They were eating and drinking, and marrying and
being given in marriage, until the day Noah entered the ark, and the flood came
and destroyed all of them. Likewise, just as it was in the days of Lot: they
were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building, but on the
day that Lot left Sodom, it rained fire and sulphur from heaven and destroyed
all of them it will be like that on the day that the Son of Man is revealed."
If you show partiality, you
commit sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors.
Letter of James 02/01-13/:"My brothers and sisters, do you with your acts of
favouritism really believe in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ? For if a person
with gold rings and in fine clothes comes into your assembly, and if a poor
person in dirty clothes also comes in, and if you take notice of the one wearing
the fine clothes and say, ‘Have a seat here, please’, while to the one who is
poor you say, ‘Stand there’, or, ‘Sit at my feet’, have you not made
distinctions among yourselves, and become judges with evil thoughts? Listen, my
beloved brothers and sisters. Has not God chosen the poor in the world to be
rich in faith and to be heirs of the kingdom that he has promised to those who
love him? But you have dishonoured the poor. Is it not the rich who oppress you?
Is it not they who drag you into court? Is it not they who blaspheme the
excellent name that was invoked over you? You do well if you really fulfil the
royal law according to the scripture, ‘You shall love your neighbour as
yourself.’ But if you show partiality, you commit sin and are convicted by the
law as transgressors. For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has
become accountable for all of it. For the one who said, ‘You shall not commit
adultery’, also said, ‘You shall not murder.’ Now if you do not commit adultery
but if you murder, you have become a transgressor of the law. So speak and so
act as those who are to be judged by the law of liberty. For judgement will be
without mercy to anyone who has shown no mercy; mercy triumphs over judgement.
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials
from miscellaneous sources published on August 25-26/16
Uncertain future for Syrians as
EU-Lebanon migration deal looms/Tom Rollins/Al-Monitor/August 25/16
King Of Morocco Mohammed VI: Can Anyone Of Sound Mind Believe That The Reward
For Jihad Could Be Some Virgins In Paradise/MEMRI/August 25/16
Are Nonstop Muslim Atrocities the “New Norm”/Raymond Ibrahim/PJ Media/August
25/16
Palestinians: The "Mountain of Fire" Erupts Against Abbas/Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone
Institute/August 25/16
Are Jews who refuse to renounce Israel being excluded from "progressive"
groups/Alan M. Dershowitz/Gatestone Institute/August 25/16
Luther's Anti-Semitism Back to Life/Petra Heldt/Gatestone Institute/August 25/16
The Free Alawite Movement – First Signs Of Armed Alawite Resistance To The Assad
Regime/MEMRI/August 25/16
Russia-NATO Update/MEMRI/August 25/16/August 25/16
Prove Tuncay Babali Broke the Law or Free Him/News from the Middle East
Forum/August 25/16
Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published on
August 25-26/16
Lebanon arrests man related to top
ISIS commander
Report: Aoun Waging a 'Regime Battle' for Hizbullah to Cut Sectarian Danger
Cabinet Keeps Normal Pace, Tackles Uncontentious Files in Absence of FPM
Ministers
Report: Ibrahim Holds Contacts Away From Spotlight to Heal Cabinet Rift
Hariri in Turkey for Talks with Erdogan, Yildirim
Army Arrests Fugitives in Hermel District
Hariri meets Erdogan, Yildirim in Ankara
Northern Metn locals kick off march towards Burj Hammoud landfill
Unidentified bright object found in Akkar
Loyalty to Resistance warns of marginalizing main constituent in country
Hizbullah MPs Warn against 'Marginalizing FPM', Slam Mustaqbal's 'Obstruction
Faction'
Uncertain future for Syrians as EU-Lebanon migration deal looms
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
August 25-26/16
Egypt agrees to draft law allowing
Christians to build, renovate churches
Canada: Muslim ‘Mounties’ allowed to wear hijabs on duty
Questions Mount as Italy Weeps for Quake Victims
Syria Regime Launched Chemical Attacks, IS Used Mustard Gas
U.N. Syria Envoy Expects 'Impact' from Kerry- Lavrov Meeting
Syrian Troops to Receive Training in China
Turkey Says Has 'Every Right to Intervene' if No Syrian Kurd Withdrawal
Turkey Sends More Tanks to Syria, Warns Kurdish Militia
Iraq Parliament Impeaches Defense Minister
In Saudi, Kerry Announces Yemen Peace Initiative, Slams Iran for Arming Huthis
Links From Jihad Watch Site for
on August 25-26/16
Raymond Ibrahim: Meet Ahmed al-Tayeb, the “Most Influential
Muslim in the World”
Germany: If you ban burqa, you have to ban Santa Claus outfit, too
Canada: Muslim ‘Mounties’ allowed to wear hijabs on duty
Iran vessels “harass,” make “high speed intercept” of US warship near Strait of
Hormuz
Kansas Muslim admits role in ISIS plot to bomb military base, says “nobody’s
perfect”
Australia police: “No radicalization” in Muslim who stabbed woman while
screaming “Allahu akbar”
Robert Spencer in PJ Media: AP Claims ISIS Recruits Have a Poor Grasp of Islam
Colin Flaherty Moment: How Black Mob Violence and Islamic Violence are Identical
Jihad attack on American University in Afghanistan
Mississippi: Muslim gets 8 years for trying to join the Islamic
State
on August 25-26/16
Lebanon arrests man related to top
ISIS commander
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English, Thursday, 25 August 2016/Lebanese security
forces arrested an alleged ISIS militant on Wednesday who is said to be a
relative of the militant group’s leader in Lebanon. The country’s Internal
Security Forces arrested Syrian national Muhieddine al-Jarban in the eastern
town of Labweh and believe him to be the uncle of Abu al-Sous - leader of the
ISIS group in the northeastern Lebanese border town of Arsal, Lebanon’s The
Daily Star news site reported. Little is known about Abu al-Sous other than
serving as an ISIS militant field commander in long-disputed mountain range of
Qalamoun, that occuopies majority of the border between Syria and Lebanon. The
ISIS militant group do not have a clear military or organizational structure in
Lebanon, The Daily Star sources said. However, Sous is believed to hold either
Syrian, Iraqi, or Jordanian citizenship. It is unknown what the militant group’s
operations are in Lebanon, but sources have said the group is trying to form
sleeper cells in Lebanon.
Report: Aoun Waging a 'Regime
Battle' for Hizbullah to Cut Sectarian Danger
Naharnet/August 25/16/Head of the Change and Reform parliamentary bloc Michel
Aoun said on Thursday that he understands the contrasting stance of his ally (Hizbullah)
as for approving the term extension of military officials including extending
the term of Army Commander General Jean Qahwaji, As Safir daily reported. Aoun
denied any concerns claiming that the “strong strategic coalition that links it
to Hizbullah is worrisome.” He even pointed positively to the calls of the
Loyalty to the Resistance head MP Mohammed Raad that called for the postponement
of the cabinet meeting to pave the way for “fruitful contacts that aim to
enforce partnership and evade challenges,” added that daily. “As per my role, It
is my destiny to reduce the risk of sectarian strife. I am saving Hizbullah from
waging a regime battle that it cannot wade for sectarian precautions,” visitors
to Aoun quoted him as saying. The daily also said that talks circulate among the
FPM ranks that “if they continue to marginalize our rights and hit the pillars
of the system, then it is worth to consider again the federal option.” Last
week, Defense Minister Samir Moqbel postponed the retirement of Higher Defense
Council chief Maj. Gen. Mohammed Kheir after no consensus was reached over three
candidates that he had proposed, angering the FPM which says that it opposes
term extensions for all senior officers. The movement fears that the extension
of Kheir's term could pave the way for a new extension of the tenure of Army
Commander General Jean Qahwaji next month. Qahwaji's retirement had been
postponed in September 2013 and his term was instead extended for two years. On
Wednesday, Hizbullah called for postponing a controversial cabinet session
scheduled for Thursday amid a declared boycott by its main Christian ally, the
Free Patriotic Movement, as Christian ministers close to ex-president Michel
Suleiman and the March 14 camp announced that they would attend the meeting.
Cabinet Keeps Normal Pace,
Tackles Uncontentious Files in Absence of FPM Ministers
Naharnet/August 25/16/The cabinet convened on Thursday where it deliberately
tackled only normal issues and stayed away from contentious files in light of
the absence of ministers from the Free Patriotic Movement and the Tashnaq party.
“It has been agreed to postpone discussions on controversial issues. Prime
Minister Tammam Salam has assured that the productivity of the cabinet signals
that the government will continue to shoulder responsibility,” said Information
Minister Ramzi Jreij after the meeting. “We expect the FPM ministers to attend
the next cabinet meeting,” said Jreij, as he assured that the cabinet is not
suffering from conformity to the national pact. The cabinet will meet next on
September 8. On the other hand, Tourism Minister Michel Pharaon left the session
before it ended as reports said that he protested the discussions that touched
on major issues, in light of an agreement among the interlocutors not to tackle
such subjects, which requires the presence of all parties. On the trash file,
Jreij said: “The cabinet gave the Agriculture Minister (Akram Shehayyeb) the
right to negotiate with regard to the trash management file to ensure a proper
functioning of the plan and to make sure that the garbage does not go back to
the streets.”Earlier, al-Joumhouria daily said that the cabinet's Thursday
meeting will not tackle controversial issues because Prime Minister Tammam Salam
wanted to avoid triggering a provocative situation to preserve “national
equilibrium” and the “continuity of the government's work.”Several contacts that
were held overnight have shown that the cabinet will convene today in the
absence of ministers of the Free Patriotic Movement and the Tashnag party, but
will be attended by AMAL and Hizbullah ministers, added the daily. The meeting
will address several issues on the agenda without touching on items not listed
on it. In this sense, today's meeting will not see the thorny issue of military
appointments nor the term extension of the Army command chief because “although
Salam is keen on the role of the council of ministers to address the affairs of
the state and people, he does not intend to create a provocative situation to
preserve national equilibrium and the continuity of the work of the government.”
Contacts with Salam said that Hizbullah's calls for the postponement of the
meeting only meant to record a stance in solidarity with the FPM.
Report: Ibrahim Holds
Contacts Away From Spotlight to Heal Cabinet Rift
Naharnet/August 25/16/Several contacts away from the media spotlight were made
in an attempt to mend the rift that plagued the only operating constitutional
institution, as reports said that General Security chief Major Gen. Abbas
Ibrahim has intervened in that regard to give momentum to a cabinet meeting set
for Thursday and prevent its postponement, al-Joumhouria daily reported. Ibrahim
held a series of extensive meetings on Wednesday with officials, political
leaders in addition to PM Tammam Salam in an attempt to find a solution, bring
the conflicting points of views together to avoid further impasse, added the
daily. Al-Joumhouria added that a primary agreement was reached and that the
cabinet will convene on Thursday as scheduled to salvage the government from
obstruction, save the Premier's face and refrain from taking major decisions in
the absence of the Free Patriotic Movement which threatened to boycott the
meeting. Contacts with the political factions will continue after the government
meets to find a formula satisfactory to all parties, concluded the daily.
Hizbullah called Wednesday for postponing a controversial cabinet session
Thursday amid a declared boycott by its main Christian ally, the Free Patriotic
Movement. Sources close to Salam have said that the PM will not postpone the
session despite the FPM's declared boycott.
Hariri in Turkey for Talks with Erdogan, Yildirim
Naharnet/August 25/16/Al-Mustaqbal Movement leader ex-PM Saad Hariri arrived
Thursday in Ankara for talks with top Turkish leaders, his office said. “He will
meet with the Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan at the Turkish presidential
palace. Later on, Hariri is expected to meet with the Turkish Prime Minister
Binali Yildirim,” the office added. Lebanon has been without a president since
the term of Michel Suleiman ended in May 2014 and Hizbullah, MP Michel Aoun's
Change and Reform bloc and some of their allies have been boycotting the
parliament's electoral sessions, stripping them of the needed quorum. Hariri,
who is close to Saudi Arabia, launched an initiative in late 2015 to nominate
Marada Movement chief MP Suleiman Franjieh for the presidency but his proposal
was met with reservations from the country's main Christian parties as well as
Hizbullah. Hariri's move prompted Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea to endorse
the nomination of Aoun, his long-time Christian rival. The supporters of Aoun's
presidential bid argue that he is more eligible than Franjieh to become
president due to the size of his parliamentary bloc and his bigger influence in
the Christian community.
Army Arrests Fugitives in
Hermel District
Naharnet/August 25/16/The Lebanese army staged raids on Thursday in the border
towns of al-Qasr and Fiysan in the Hermel district and arrested two fugitives
wanted on several arrest warrants, the National News Agency reported. The raids
were carried out at dawn, NNA added. The army arrested W.G. who is wanted on
financial crimes, theft and smuggling, and another man wanted on charges of
opening gunfire and battling the army it added. In the Syrian refugees
encampments in the area, the army arrested 14 undocumented Syrians and
confiscated four vehicles and a number of violating motorcycles.
Hariri meets Erdogan,
Yildirim in Ankara
Thu 25 Aug 2016/NNA - Former Prime Minister, Saad Hariri, met in Ankara on
Thursday with Turkish President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and Prime Minister,
Binali Yildirim. During his meetings, Hariri reiterated "solidarity with Turkey,
its people and democracy, in the face of the botched military coup attempt, as
well as in the face of the terrorist attacks against it." Hariri's press office
indicated in a statement that "talks touched on latest developments in the
region, especially in Syria, and the means to protect Lebanon from serious
repercussions." Conferees also discussed the ongoing efforts to end the
presidential vacuum in Lebanon.
Northern Metn locals kick off
march towards Burj Hammoud landfill
Thu 25 Aug 2016/NNA - Bourj Hammoud and North Metn locals as well as civil
society activists kicked off their march towards Bourj Hammoud landfill, to
voice refusal of opening said landfill and pressing for safe and healthy
environmental solutions to the trash predicament, NNA reporter said on Thursday.
Unidentified bright object
found in Akkar
Thu 25 Aug 2016/NNA - An unidentified object fell tonight on a local road in the
Akkar town of Mashha, thought to be a meteorite considering its brightness,
National News Agency correspondent reported on Thursday. Head of Mashha
municipality, Khaled Abdul Qader Zoabi, immediately contacted the Lebanese army
Intelligence. A military expert is currently inspecting the fishy object.
Loyalty to Resistance warns of marginalizing main constituent in country
Thu 25 Aug 2016/NNA - Loyalty to Resistance Bloc underscored the notice made by
Bloc of Reform and Change regarding the disregard being given to a main
constituent in the country, and called thereby upon all components of the
government to beware the threats resulting from marginalizing the constituent,
as the stability of political life could not find impression without such
constituent. Loyalty to Resistance Bloc on Thursday convened at its headquarters
in Haret Horeik. The bloc dwelled on the political crisis in Lebanon, saying
that it is taking a turn for the worse and leading to hazardous situation in the
country. In this regard, the bloc blamed "the disruption team in the Future
Movement that is blocking the way in front of solutions to keep the country in a
state of paralysis awaiting foreign commands." The bloc insisted on the
necessity to treat the telecom file quickly, especially that all the threads
have been revealed, according to the bloc. It thereupon called upon the judicial
authority to assume its responsibilities so as preserve the state's prestige and
dignity, assuring that it will counter any attempt to discard the file.
Hizbullah MPs Warn against 'Marginalizing FPM', Slam Mustaqbal's 'Obstruction
Faction'
Naharnet/August 25/16/Hizbullah's
Loyalty to Resistance parliamentary bloc on Thursday warned against
“marginalizing” the Free Patriotic Movement and described it as “a main
component of the country,” while claiming that there is an “obstruction faction”
in the al-Mustaqbal Movement. “We warn against marginalizing a main component of
the country, the FPM, seeing as the political process cannot stabilize without
its participation,” said the bloc in a statement issued after its weekly
meeting. “The political crisis has reached a dangerous extent that has started
to threaten the State's stricture, which requires a sense of national
responsibility and an end to the intransigence that al-Mustaqbal Movement is
insisting on,” it added. Loyalty to Resistance also lamented that Mustaqbal “has
failed to grab the chance provided by Hizbullah Secretary-General Sayyed Hassan
Nasrallah's call for finding a solution to the crisis.”
“Nasrallah's remarks carried a national aspect and we hold the 'obstruction
faction' in al-Mustaqbal responsible for thwarting the initiative,” the bloc
added. Nasrallah has recently hinted that Hizbullah is willing to accept to the
re-designation of Mustaqbal leader ex-PM Saad Hariri as prime minister in return
for the election of Free FPM founder MP Michel Aoun as president and the
re-election of Speaker Nabih Berri as head of parliament. The country has been
without a president since the term of Michel Suleiman ended in May 2014 and
Hizbullah, Aoun's Change and Reform bloc and some of their allies have been
boycotting the parliament's electoral sessions, stripping them of the needed
quorum. Hariri, who is close to Saudi Arabia, launched an initiative in late
2015 to nominate Marada Movement chief MP Suleiman Franjieh for the presidency
but his proposal was met with reservations from the country's main Christian
parties as well as Hizbullah. Hariri's move prompted Lebanese Forces leader
Samir Geagea to endorse the nomination of Aoun, his long-time Christian rival.
The supporters of Aoun's presidential bid argue that he is more eligible than
Franjieh to become president due to the size of his parliamentary bloc and his
bigger influence in the Christian community.
Uncertain future for Syrians as
EU-Lebanon migration deal looms
Tom Rollins/Al-Monitor/August 25/16
BEIRUT — Many Syrians caught up in increasingly hostile surroundings in Lebanon
believe the country is becoming a harder place to live, an existence dictated by
expensive residency renewals, curfews and incitement.
“We are being regulated more and more,” Fathy, a Syrian in his 40s originally
from Idlib’s Jisr al-Shughur, told Al-Monitor. “I feel like I’m fighting to stay
safe.”
Fathy, who refused to reveal his full name, was one of several Syrians beaten by
local men in the Mount Lebanon village of Hrajel in late June, immediately after
a multiple suicide bombing attack on al-Qaa, a predominantly Christian village
close to Lebanon's northeast border with Syria. The Syrians say they had no
recourse to the municipality police or hospital, partly because they were not
carrying valid residency papers — although a local official in Hrajel later told
Al-Monitor that the men responsible for the beating had been given a “verbal
warning.”
But increasingly harsh conditions for Syrian refugees in Lebanon may also
present new problems for a prospective deal with the European Union, designed to
bolster Lebanon’s economy while effectively keeping Syrians away from Europe.
Since October 2014, when the Lebanese Council of Ministers introduced new
regulations for Syrian refugees, Lebanon has explicitly pursued a policy of
“deterrence” aimed at reducing the number of Syrians in Lebanon, guaranteeing
security and easing the burden on the country.
One central aim of that policy is to “encourage displaced Syrians to return to
their country or to other countries by any means possible, and strictly enforce
Lebanese laws on them.” Refoulement should be used against “all those who
violate Lebanese laws and the conditions of entry.” Refoulement, prohibited
under the 1951 Refugee Convention, means forcibly returning a refugee or asylum
seeker to an unsafe origin country.
Lebanon’s deterrence policy effectively puts it at odds with its obligations
under the EU's new Partnership Framework, a controversial new policy endorsed by
the European Council June 28 that attempts to realign Europe’s relations with
third countries purely in terms of migration management.
The Partnership Framework’s communication highlights 16 partner countries and
five priority countries — including Lebanon — and effectively recommends that
migration management becomes the top priority in how the EU deals with third
countries, with the help of “incentives” for compliant partners, in part because
the “message that migration issues are now at the top of the EU's external
relations priorities has not yet been fully communicated to and appreciated by
partners.”
In recent months, the EU has been busy negotiating country-specific compacts
with third countries aimed at exploring possible leverage in negotiations and
securing future projects.
The projects under the Partnership Framework are being rolled out in some
neighboring countries, with Jordan already having handed 23,000 Syrians work
permits this year in return for low-interest loans and easier access to European
markets, the Associated Press reported in late July. This is part of a long-term
commitment to get 50,000 Syrians to work legally before the end of 2016.
For Lebanon, the Partnership Framework offers improvements to infrastructure and
basic services (waste management, water, education and health) while improving
economic opportunities for Syrians and the “most vulnerable Lebanese
communities,” with no mention of specific communities.
But there's a caveat. According to the framework communication, “In exchange,
the Lebanese government should make efforts on the social and economic inclusion
of Syrian refugees in order to improve their living conditions and legal
residence status.”
While Europe tries to incentivize Lebanon to maintain its Syrian refugee
population — essentially to limit migration toward the EU — Lebanese politicians
are effectively pursuing a policy that aims to encourage Syrians to feel as
unwelcome as possible, leave or even return home. The EU’s aims are at odds with
the prevailing mood in Lebanon, where Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil has been
repeatedly criticized for allegedly xenophobic and inciteful remarks about
Syrian refugees. Socio-economic pressures, in addition to Lebanon not having had
a president since May 2014, has only made matters worse, forcing officials at
the municipality level to enforce and interpret the law. One example is the
introduction of curfews for Syrians at the municipality level, measures that
Human Rights Watch say go against international and Lebanese law.
“The EU is seeking to improve the quality of life of refugees in terms of
education, health, access to the job market while at the same time providing
support … that will benefit the host communities and the whole Lebanese
population and help to improve the political and economic stability of the
country,” an EU spokesperson told Al-Monitor, before addressing concerns about
the kind of rights abuses seen after al-Qaa. “The EU has been given assurances
by the Lebanese authorities that it would not resort to any large-scale
arbitrary detentions or refoulement,” the spokesperson added on condition of
anonymity.
Meanwhile, Lisa Abou Khaled, a spokesperson for the United Nations refugee
agency, UNHCR, told Al-Monitor there have been no cases of refoulement of Syrian
refugees since the incident in al-Qaa, although hundreds have been detained —
many without charge — since June.
Abou Khaled said that negotiations would be “finalized shortly," while the
Lebanese Ministry for Foreign Affairs refused to comment while negotiations were
ongoing.
However, researchers have observed increasingly fraught relations between Beirut
and Brussels during recent negotiations on traditional sticking-point issues —
such as refoulement, registration of refugees and the ratification of the UNHCR
Refugee Convention — largely as a result of the way Europe itself has handled
migration on its own borders, argues Maja Janmyr, a researcher at the University
of Bergen and the American University in Beirut.
Janmyr suggests there has been a “drastic shift” in EU-Lebanese migration talks
over the past year, giving Lebanon “yet more leverage in negotiations with
European states.”
She told Al-Monitor, “Lebanon is carefully watching European states' appalling
responses to refugees and migrants, and is not afraid of using these
observations in negotiations.”
The end result is that Syrian refugees in Lebanon are left feeling ever more
uncertain about the future.
“This isn’t just about us,” Fathy said, remembering the attack in Hrajel. “This
is about all Syrian refugees in Lebanon. Day after day, things are getting
worse.”
Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on on August 25-26/16
Egypt agrees to draft law allowing
Christians to build, renovate churches
Staff writer, Al Arabiya Thursday, 25 August 2016/ The Egyptian Coptic Orthodox
Church announced on Thursday that it had finally reached an agreement with the
government over a draft law pertaining to the construction and renovation of
churches throughout the country, Egyptian newspaper Ahram Online reported. The
announcement followed a meeting on Wednesday hosted by the Church between 105
Coptic bishops to discuss the ramifications of the government’s “unacceptable
amendments.” Talks were also held with President Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi and Prime
Minister Sherif Ismael, whose cooperation prompted the religious body to release
another statement on Thursday. "The Holy Synod announces, in good faith, [that
it has reached] a compromise formula [of the law] with government
representatives," the church said.
Awaiting ratification
The Church added that it is looking forward to seeing the new law implemented
following the cabinet’s approval and final ratification by parliament. This is
not the first issue the Church has encountered. It says that Egypt’s estimated
15 million Copts face more hurdles in seeking government-sanctioned projects
than their Muslim-majority counterparts. The Church hopes that, once passed, the
revised draft will lessen the bureaucratic pitfalls faced by those hoping to
launch construction and renovation projects.
Canada: Muslim ‘Mounties’
allowed to wear hijabs on duty
Blain Tamarin/Jihad Watch/August 2
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/08/25/canadas-muslim-mounties-allowed-to-wear-hijabs-on-duty/
Justin Trudeau’s Canada sure has some interesting priorities. While women living
in Islamic countries are frequently beaten or killed for not covering up
properly, the West is busy fighting to incorporate Islam into every aspect of
public society. Allowing the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to wear hijabs does
not affect the vast majority of Canadians; however, it is representative of the
Sharia normalization movement, which is trying to force its way into the lives
of ordinary citizens.
In an effort to further push the leftist agenda, the West shows no bounds when
appeasing the Muslim minority. According to one source, no members of the Royal
Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) had asked to wear the hijab, therefore confirming
the obvious: “This is intended to better reflect the diversity in our
communities and encourage more Muslim women to consider the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police as a career option,” says Scott Bardsley, spokesman.
As Austrian-British philosopher Karl Popper once said, “Unlimited tolerance must
lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to
those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society
against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed,
and tolerance with them.”
“Canada’s Muslim Mounties allowed to wear hijabs on duty,”
RT, August 24, 2016:
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police have given official permission to female
officers to wear hijabs along with their famous British-style red uniforms in
hopes that the stunning measure will boost recruitment of Muslim women and
promote diversity.
“The commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) recently approved
this addition to the uniform,” Scott Bardsley, a spokesman for Public Safety
Minister Ralph Goodale, told AFP on Tuesday.
“This is intended to better reflect the diversity in our communities and
encourage more Muslim women to consider the Royal Canadian Mounted Police as a
career option,” he added.
Police in Britain, Sweden, and Norway, as well as some US states, have adopted
similar uniform policies, Bardsley said.
The decision to allow hijabs was first approved in mid-January, but was
officially announced on Tuesday, according to local daily La Presse, which cited
internal correspondence between Goodale and RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson.
Three types of hijabs were tested before one was selected as suitable for police
activities, according to the newspaper.
The RCMP has become the third Canadian police agency to allow hijabs to be worn
on duty. Toronto police first allowed it in 2011 and Edmonton police give it the
green light in 2013, according to Commissioner Paulson’s note cited by La Presse.
The RCMP uniform – a red serge tunic, leather riding boots, and wide-brimmed
Stetson campaign hat – is iconic for Canadians and has only undergone minor
changes since it was first introduced in the 1800s, largely influenced by
British military traditions of the time.
Prior to the uniform change, some 30 officers had asked for the rules to be
relaxed for religious or cultural reasons over the past two years, La Presse
reported. In most cases, the officers wanted to grow beards.
In early 1990, RCMP Sikh officers were allowed to wear turbans, and general
attitudes towards the uniforms have softened since then.
Encouraging diversity appears to be a significant part of Prime Minister Justin
Trudeau domestic policy. Earlier on Tuesday, he dismissed the idea of Canada
imposing a burkini ban – a hot and pressing issue across Europe….
Questions Mount as Italy Weeps for
Quake Victims
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 25/16/The death toll from a powerful
earthquake in central Italy was revised downwards to 241 Thursday but officials
cautioned it could rise again as rescuers continued a grim search for corpses,
as powerful aftershocks rocked the devastated area. Weeping in a campsite
erected to house the homeless from a string of mountain villages, Rita Rosine,
63, said her 75-year-old sister was trapped under the ruins of a collapsed
house, presumed dead. "The situation is worse than in war. It's awful, awful ...
they say it will take two days to dig her out because they have to shore up the
surrounding buildings. "She didn't deserve to die like that, she was so good."As
rescuers sifted through the rubble, questions mounted as to why there had been
so many deaths in a thinly-populated area so soon after a 2009 earthquake in the
nearby city of L'Aquila left 300 people dead. That disaster, just 50 kilometers
(30 miles) south, underscored the region's vulnerability to seismic events --
but preparations for a fresh quake have been exposed as limited at best.
Giuseppe Saieva, the chief public prosecutor for most of the area affected, said
he would be opening an investigation into whether anyone could be held
responsible for the disaster. In Amatrice a 4.3 magnitude aftershock shook the
already badly damaged village on Thursday, fueling fears of fresh collapses
which could hamper the rescue operation. Mayor Sergio Pirozzi said over 200
people had died in the village alone, suggesting the total number of victims
could increase significantly. Amatrice normally has a population of around 2,500
but it was packed with visitors when the quake struck as people slept in the
early hours of Wednesday. The fate of 28 of 32 guests staying in the village's
Hotel Roma was still unclear. The Red Cross began shipping in food and water
supplies for homeless residents. Among those who came to pick up emergency
provisions were Maria Atrimala, 48, and her 15-year-old daughter. "We escaped by
pure luck, the stairs of the house held and we ran, blindly in the dark and
dust," she said with tears rolling down her face. "When we got out we could hear
the cries of people still trapped and we helped those we could. "We were in
L'Aquila when the earthquake struck there, and now this. We have friends,
relatives that didn't make it. What the future holds I don't know."
'Nothing left to lose'
Hundreds of people spent the night sleeping in their cars or in
hastily-assembled tents, the aftershocks adding to their discomfort. Mario, a
father of two small boys, said he was still in shock. "We slept in the car last
night, though with the quakes it was hard to sleep at all," he told AFP between
sips of Coke. "We've booked a tent for tonight. But then tomorrow, the next
day?" The extensive damage to lightly-used properties has raised the specter of
some of the smaller hamlets in the region becoming ghost towns. "If we don't get
help, l'Arquata is finished," said Aleandro Petrucci, the mayor of Arquata del
Tronto, which accounted for 57 of the confirmed deaths to date. Petrucci said it
was impossible to say exactly how many people were in the 13 tiny communities
that make up l'Arquata when the disaster struck. In Pescara del Tronto, which
was virtually razed by the quake, there are only four permanently resident
families but there could have been up to 300 people there on Wednesday.
Rebuild and start again
Measuring 6.0-6.2 magnitude, the quake's epicenter was near Amatrice and its
shallow depth of four kilometers (2.5 miles) exacerbated its impact. It occurred
without warning but in an area with a long history of killer quakes. The Civil
Protection agency which is coordinating the rescue effort said that in addition
to the dead, 264 people had suffered injuries serious enough to be hospitalized.
Several of them are in a critical state. Rescue workers were pessimistic about
the chance of finding any more survivors although the last survivor in L'Aquila
was rescued after 72 hours under rubble. Prime Minister Matteo Renzi vowed
lessons from L'Aquila, which still bears the scars of 2009, would be applied.
"The objective is to rebuild and start again," he said.
Nothing ever done'
After L'Aquila, the Civil Protection agency made almost one billion euros
available for upgrading buildings in seismically-vulnerable areas. But the
take-up of grants has been low -- because of form-filling attached, critics say.
"Here in the middle of a seismic zone, nothing has ever been done," said Dario
Nanni of the Italian Council of Architects. "It does not cost that much more
when renovating a building to make it comply with earthquake standards. But less
than 20 percent of buildings do."Nanni said the quake's impact had been
increased by the widespread use of cement rather than wood beams. "These
indestructible beams hit walls like a hammer and that is what made so many
(houses) collapse."
Syria Regime Launched Chemical
Attacks, IS Used Mustard Gas
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 25/16/A U.N. investigation has established
that President Bashar Assad's forces carried out at least two chemical attacks
in Syria and that Islamic State jihadists used mustard gas as a weapon,
according to a report seen by Agence France Presse on Wednesday.
The panel was able to identify the perpetrators of three chemical attacks
carried out in 2014 and 2015, but was unable to draw conclusions in the other
six cases that it has been investigating over the past year. The report from the
Joint Investigative Mechanism (JIM) found that the Syrian regime dropped
chemical weapons on two villages in northwestern Idlib province: Talmenes on
April 21, 2014 and Sarmin on March 16, 2015. In both instances, Syrian air force
helicopters dropped "a device" on houses that was followed by the "release of a
toxic substance," which in the case of Sarmin matched "the characteristics of
chlorine."The panel found that the Islamic State "was the only entity with the
ability, capability, motive and the means to use sulphur mustard" in an attack
on the town of Marea in northern Aleppo province on August 21, 2015. The Assad
regime has repeatedly denied that it has used chemical weapons in Syria, but the
report said that in all three cases, it had "sufficient information to reach a
conclusion on the actors involved." The JIM was set up by the Security Council a
year ago to investigate the use of chemical weapons and for the first time to
determine who is responsible for the attacks. Most of the nine cases
investigated pointed to the alleged use of chlorine gas in barrel bombs dropped
from helicopters. Britain, France and the United States had long maintained that
only the regime has helicopters, but Russia, Damascus's ally, insisted that
there was no concrete proof that Assad's forces carried out the attacks. - U.S.
calls for swift action -U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power called for "strong and
swift action" by the Security Council to follow up on the findings of the
report. "It is essential that the members of the Security Council come together
to ensure consequences for those who have used chemical weapons in Syria," she
said in a statement. In Washington, National Security Council spokesman Ned
Price said "it is now impossible to deny that the Syrian regime has repeatedly
used industrial chlorine as a weapon against its own people." "The United States
will work with our international partners to seek accountability through
appropriate diplomatic mechanisms, including through the United Nations Security
Council," he added. The report "states clearly that the Syrian regime and Daesh
have perpetrated chemical attacks in Syria," French Deputy Ambassador Alexis
Lamek told reporters. "When it comes to proliferation, the use of chemical
weapons, of such weapons of mass destruction, we cannot afford to be weak. The
council will have to act." The Security Council is due to discuss the report on
Tuesday and could decide to impose sanctions on Syria or ask the International
Criminal Court to take up the matter as a war crime. But many diplomats say
Russia would be unlikely to back such a move, despite the JIM's strong findings
of chemical weapons use in the three cases. The panel recommended further
investigation of three other cases of suspected chemical weapons on the village
of Zafr Zita, in Hama province, on April 28, 2014, and on two towns in Idlib:
Qmenas on March 16, 2015 and Binnish on March 24, 2015. The 24-member team said
there was insufficient information to reach a conclusion in three other cases
and recommended that there be no further investigation of those suspected
attacks. Syria agreed to get rid of its chemical stockpile and to refrain from
making any use of toxic substances in warfare when it joined the Chemical
Weapons Convention in 2013, under pressure from Russia. The findings prompted
immediate calls for the perpetrators to face justice. "The U.N. Security Council
should now ensure that those responsible for these attacks are brought to
justice in a court of law," said Louis Charbonneau, Human Rights Watch's U.N.
director.
U.N. Syria Envoy Expects 'Impact'
from Kerry- Lavrov Meeting
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 25/16/The U.N. special envoy for Syria said
Thursday upcoming U.S.-Russian talks could help his push to resume peace talks
on the war-ravaged country.
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry is scheduled to meet Russian Foreign Minister
Sergei Lavrov in Geneva on Friday to discuss Syria's five-year-old conflict.
U.N. envoy Staffan de Mistura told reporters the meeting would be "important"
and have "an impact, certainly on the... political initiatives of the U.N. in
order to relaunch the political process on Syria." He did not say whether he
would be meeting with the two men while they were in town. Successive rounds of
international negotiations have failed to end the conflict, which has killed
more than 290,000 people and forced millions to flee their homes. Moscow and
Washington support opposite sides in the conflict, but have a common foe in the
Islamic State group. They have been in contact on efforts to establish military
cooperation against the jihadists. The two countries also co-chair a U.N.-backed
humanitarian taskforce for Syria, which has been struggling to ensure access for
desperately-needed aid. Aleppo, Syria's second city and former economic hub, has
emerged as a top concern since regime troops seized control of the last supply
route into rebel-held areas in mid-July. Speaking after a weekly meeting of the
humanitarian taskforce, de Mistura hinted a long-demanded 48-hour pause in
fighting in Aleppo could soon happen, since Moscow last week gave its blessing.
"The Russian Federation replied yes. We will wait for others to do the same," he
said, without specifying which parties had yet to agree. In any case, the U.N.
was on standby with large convoys: "Trucks are ready, and they can leave anytime
we get that message," he said. Jan Egeland, de Mistura's deputy and head of the
humanitarian taskforce, told reporters the aim was to secure a weekly 48-hour
pause and deliver aid to both the rebel-held east and government-held west. He
said the plan was to send two convoys of 20 trucks each, carrying enough food
and supplies for 80,000 people, from Turkey and into eastern Aleppo.
Simultaneously, aid mainly coming from Damascus would go into western Aleppo
"where needs have also increased dramatically of late," he said. Efforts would
also be made to repair the electrical plant in the disputed south of the city,
which has been damaged in the fighting, cutting 1.8 million people across the
city off from not only power, but also water, since electricity is needed to run
the pumping stations.
Syrian Troops to Receive Training in
China
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 25/16/China's military will provide
training for Syrian armed forces, a spokesman for Beijing's defense ministry
said Thursday, adding it would take place on Chinese soil. Beijing is a
longstanding backer of the Syrian government of Bashar Assad, which has engaged
in a bloody war that has left more than 290,000 people dead and displaced
millions since it began in 2011 with the brutal repression of anti-government
demonstrations. Last week senior Chinese military official Guan Youfei met with
Syria's defense minister in Damascus and said he wanted closer military ties
with the Syrian government, state media reported. "The Chinese military will
provide the Syrian side with medical and nursing professional training," defense
ministry spokesman Wu Qian told reporters at a monthly briefing. The training
would take place in China, he added, and was intended "to ease the humanitarian
crisis in Syria."The Chinese military has already provided Syrian authorities
with medical equipment and medicines "to help reduce the humanitarian suffering
of the Syrian people," Wu said. "For a long period of time, China and Syria have
helped each other. And China has been pushing for a political solution of the
Syrian conflict and we have always supported the independence of Syria," he
added. As well as supporting Assad's government, Beijing is close to Moscow,
which has carried out strikes on rebel-held areas of Aleppo, as have Assad's
forces. After Guan's visit to Damascus, China's state broadcaster questioned the
authenticity of a harrowing video showing a stunned-looking four-year-old boy
covered in blood and dust after an air strike in Aleppo, alleging it may have
been faked as part of a Western "propaganda war."The footage brought worldwide
attention to the plight of children in the bloody siege of the city, and sparked
diplomatic disagreement, as Russia denied carrying out the attack, and Chinese
media said the group that shot the video had links to the British military.
Iraq Forces Retake Key Town South of Mosul
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 25/16/Iraqi forces backed by coalition air
strikes on Thursday pushed the Islamic State group from Qayyarah, a northern
town considered strategic for any future offensive against the jihadists' last
stronghold of Mosul. "We control all parts of the town and managed, in very
limited time, to root out Daesh (IS)," Lieutenant General Riyadh Jalal Tawfik,
who commands Iraq's ground forces, told an AFP reporter in Qayyarah. The
commander said engineering units were now clearing the town, which lies about 60
kilometers (35 miles) south of Mosul, of unexploded ordnance and booby traps.
Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi issued a statement hailing what he said was a key
step towards reclaiming Mosul, IS' de facto Iraq capital and the country's
second city. "Our heroic forces achieved a big victory, an important step
towards the liberation of Mosul," Abadi said. "I present my congratulations to
the Iraqi people for the liberation of the strategic town of Qayyarah and
neighboring areas," he said. The operation to retake Qayyarah was launched on
Tuesday and led by Iraq's elite counter-terrorism service. Iraqi forces had
already recaptured a nearby air field and Qayyarah is expected to be become one
of the main launchpads for an assault on Mosul in the coming weeks or months.
Turkey Says Has 'Every Right to
Intervene' if No Syrian Kurd Withdrawal
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 25/16/Turkey on Thursday said it had "every
right" to intervene if Syrian Kurdish militia do not withdraw east of the
Euphrates River in Syria, as promised by the United States. The Syrian Kurdish
forces "must move to the east of the Euphrates and Turkey is following this very
closely," Defence Minister Fikri Isik told NTV television. He was speaking a day
Ankara launched an operation in Syria on Wednesday aimed both at the Islamic
State group (IS) and Syrian Kurdish forces. "If this withdrawal doesn't happen,
Turkey has every right to intervene," Isik added. Turkey has said the operation
in Syria is aimed not just at IS jihadists but also the Syrian Kurdish
Democratic Union Party (PYD) and its People's Protection Units (YPG) militia.
Turkey sees the YPG as a terror group bent on carving out an autonomous region
in Syria. Ankara's hostility to the YPG puts it at loggerheads with its NATO
ally, the United States, which works with the group on the ground in the fight
against IS. US Vice President Joe Biden, visiting Turkey on Wednesday, made
clear that Washington has strictly told the YPG not to move west of the
Euphrates and would no longer receive American support if they did. But the
minister said there was as yet no sign of the withdrawal. "They have not yet
withdrawn but we are watching and monitoring whether they will withdraw. Turkey
will be following, moment by moment," Isik said, adding the withdrawal was
promised within a week. A spokesman for the US-led coalition against IS had
tweeted that the Syrian Kurdish forces "have moved east across the Euphrates to
prepare for the eventual liberation" of the IS stronghold of Raqqa. The
Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said only a small number of
the Kurdish forces had moved east back across the river, and most were still on
the western side. The Kurdish forces were still present around the Syrian town
of Manbij seized from IS earlier this month, which lies well west of the
Euphrates, it added..But the YPG told AFP in Beirut it had no interest in
listening to ultimatums laid down by Turkey. "The YPG are Syrians and they are
present on Syrian land -- Turkey cannot impose restrictions on the movements of
Syrians on their land," said YPG spokesman Redur Xelil.
Turkey Sends More Tanks to Syria,
Warns Kurdish Militia
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 25/16/Turkey on Tuesday sent more tanks
into Syria and sternly warned a Kurdish militia to withdraw from frontline
positions, a day after pro-Ankara Syrian opposition fighters captured a key
border town from jihadists. The tanks joined those which crossed the frontier on
Wednesday in the so-called Operation Euphrates Shield, which Turkey says aims at
ridding the northern Syrian border area of both Islamic State (IS) extremists
and Kurdish militia. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Wednesday
that the offensive had expelled IS from the Syrian town of Jarabulus, and
pro-Ankara rebels reported the jihadists had retreated south to the town of al-Bab.
But Defense Minister Fikri Isik warned the Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG)
militia -- who also had designs on Jarabulus -- to move back east across the
Euphrates or also face intervention from Turkey. The new contingent of tanks
roared across a dirt road west of the Turkish border town of Karkamis, throwing
up a cloud of dust in their wake before crossing the border, an AFP photographer
said. They were then followed by around 10 armored vehicles. The operation, the
most ambitious launched by Turkey during the five-and-a-half-year Syria
conflict, has seen Turkish special forces deployed on the ground and jet
fighters striking IS targets. They are supporting a ground offensive by hundreds
of Syrian rebels who on Wednesday marched into Jarabulus and a neighboring
village after meeting little resistance.
- 'Up to 15,000 troops'
It was not immediately clear if the deployment of the new tanks on Thursday was
aimed at securing Jarabulus or helping the rebels move into new territory. But a
Turkish official said on Wednesday that Ankara would "continue operations until
we are convinced that imminent threats against the country's national security
have been neutralized." The well-connected columnist of the Hurriyet daily,
Abdulkadir Selvi, said the aims of the operation included creating a security
zone free of "terror groups" and limiting the advances of Kurdish militia. He
said 450 members of the Turkish military had been on the ground on the first day
of the offensive but this number could rise to 15,000. The Hurriyet daily,
citing military sources, said 100 IS militants had been killed in the offensive.
It is not possible to independently verify the toll. State-run news agency
Anadolu said one rebel fighter was killed but the Turkish armed forces sustained
no losses.
- 'Every right' -
Jarabulus, a small town on the west bank of the Euphrates a couple of kilometers
(miles) south of the border, had been held by IS jihadists since the summer of
2013. Turkey has emphasized that the offensive was also aimed at the YPG, who
Ankara sees as a terror group bent on carving out an autonomous region in Syria.
Ankara's hostility to the YPG puts it at loggerheads with its NATO ally, the
United States, which works with the group on the ground in the fight against IS.
But U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, visiting Turkey on Wednesday, made clear that
Washington has strictly told the YPG not to move west of the Euphrates after
recent advances or risk losing American support. Turkish Defense Minister Fikri
Isik told NTV television there was so far no evidence of any withdrawal and
Turkey reserved the right to strike the YPG if it failed to move. "If this
withdrawal doesn't happen, Turkey has every right to intervene," Isik added.
"They have not yet withdrawn... Turkey will be following, moment by moment,"
Isik said, adding the withdrawal was promised within a week.A spokesman for the
U.S.-led coalition against IS tweeted that the "main element" of the Syrian
Kurdish forces had already moved east although some remained for clean-up
operations.
Selfies on the way
Ankara has in the past been accused of turning a blind eye to the rise of IS but
hardened its line in the wake of a string of attacks -- the latest a weekend
bombing on a Kurdish wedding in the city of Gaziantep that left 54 people dead,
many of them children. The Jarabulus operation proceeded at lightning speed with
the town captured from IS just 14 hours after it was launched. The speed of the
advance stood in stark contrast to the long, grinding battles it had taken for
Kurdish forces to recapture towns from IS in northern Syria, such as Kobane and
Manbij. Television pictures showed the Syrian fighters walking into an
apparently deserted and abandoned Jarabulus unchallenged and newspapers
published pictures showing that the rebels even had time to take selfies along
the way.The apparent efficiency of the operation also marked a major boost for
the Turkish army whose reputation had been badly tarnished by the failed July 15
coup against Erdogan staged by rogue elements in the armed forces.
Iraq Parliament Impeaches Defense
Minister
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 25/16/Iraqi lawmakers on Thursday voted to
impeach Defense Minister Khaled al-Obeidi over corruption allegations, MPs said.
Obeidi lost a no confidence vote by 142 votes to 102 in a secret ballot, while
18 abstained, two members of parliament told AFP. The no confidence vote removes
one of Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi's key Sunni allies from government and
comes as Iraqi forces ramp up preparations for an offensive against Mosul, the
Islamic State group's last major stronghold in the country. The shock
impeachment is the latest development in a bitter feud that erupted earlier this
month between Obeidi and Parliament Speaker Salim al-Juburi, the highest-ranking
Sunni politician in Iraq. Obeidi was questioned in parliament over corruption
allegations to which he answered with accusations of his own implicating Juburi
and several MPs. Juburi moved quickly and agreed to have his immunity lifted so
that he could be investigated, only for a special integrity court to drop the
case hours later.
In Saudi, Kerry Announces Yemen
Peace Initiative, Slams Iran for Arming Huthis
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/August 25/16/U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on
Thursday announced a fresh international peace initiative for Yemen aimed at
forming a unity government to resolve its 17-month-old conflict. "This war needs
to end and it needs to end as quickly as possible," Kerry said after a meeting
in Saudi Arabia with Gulf counterparts, a British minister and the U.N. peace
envoy to Yemen. He said participants "agreed on a renewed approach to
negotiations" between the Saudi-backed government and Iran-supported rebels,
after three months of talks in Kuwait ended earlier in August without making
headway. Kerry lashed out at Iran, saying its arms shipments to the Shiite Huthi
rebels in Yemen posed a threat to the United States. "The threat potentially
posed by the shipment of missiles and other sophisticated weapons into Yemen
from Iran extends well beyond Yemen and is not a threat just to Saudi Arabia
and... the region," Kerry told reporters in the Red Sea city of Jeddah. "It is a
threat to the United States and it cannot continue." The new peace approach will
have "both a security and political track simultaneously working in order to
provide a comprehensive settlement", said Kerry, adding that Gulf states had
"agreed unanimously with this new initiative." He said details of the initiative
would be finalized by the "parties themselves." But the final agreement, in
broad outline, would initially include a "swift formation of a national unity
government with power shared among the parties."It will also include the
"withdrawal of forces from Sanaa and other key areas," and the "transfer of all
heavy weapons including ballistic missiles and launchers from the Huthis and
forces allied with them to a third party."A Saudi-led Arab coalition in March
last year launched a military campaign against Huthi rebels as they closed in on
U.N.-backed President Abedrabbo Mansour Hadi in his southern refuge in Aden. The
intervention helped loyalists push the rebels out of five southern provinces,
including Aden, but the rebels still hold onto many regions, including the
capital Sanaa. More than 6,600 people, mostly civilians, have been killed since
March 2015 and more than 80 percent of the population has been left in need of
humanitarian aid, according to the U.N.
August 25-26/16
King Of Morocco Mohammed VI: Can Anyone Of Sound Mind Believe That The Reward
For Jihad Could Be Some Virgins In Paradise?
MEMRI/August 25/16
In an address directed toward Moroccans living abroad, Mohammed VI, the King of
Morocco, said that they should "always be among the first to defend peace,
harmony, and coexistence in their countries of residence." Calling the killing
of a priest in his church "unforgivable," Mohammed VI said that the Jihadists
are "led by ignorance" and are "destined to dwell in Hell for all eternity."
"Can anyone of sound mind believe that the reward for Jihad could be some
virgins in Paradise?" he asked in the address, which was broadcast by Morocco's
Channel 1 on August 20.
King Mohammed VI: "My dear countrymen, the whole world is talking about the
problem of immigration, and about the human tragedies suffered by the
immigrants. This situation is exacerbated by the spread of terror and extremism,
and the attempts to link it - rightly or not - to the immigrants, especially in
Europe. In this context, I call upon the Moroccans living abroad to adhere to
the values of their religion and to their age-old customs, in confronting this
phenomenon, which is alien to them. I also encourage them to protect the good
reputation for which they are known, to persevere in these difficult
circumstances, and to unite in their ranks. I call upon them to be always among
the first to defend peace, harmony, and coexistence in their countries of
residence.
"We understand the difficult situation in which they live. They are suffering
from the distortion of the image of Islam, as well as from the terrorist
attacks, which have harvested the lives of so many of them. They suffer from
reprisals, and from accusations leveled against them by some, because of their
faith. Naturally, we strongly condemn the killing of innocent people. We believe
that the killing of a monk is prohibited by the shari'a, and that killing him in
a church is an unforgivable act of stupidity, because he is a human being and a
cleric, even if he is not a Muslim. Islam has instructed us to be good to the
People of the Book. Allah said: 'We make no distinction between any of His
messengers.' Allah said: '...one who believes in Allah, Judgement Day, the
angels, the Quran, and the prophets.'
"The terrorists who operate in the name of Islam are not Muslims. They have
nothing to do with Islam, and jump on the bandwagon in order to justify their
crimes and stupid acts. They are people who have been led astray, and they are
destined to dwell in Hell for all eternity.
"Led by their ignorance, they believe that what they do constitutes Jihad. When
was Jihad ever about the killing of innocent people? Allah said: '...do not
transgress. Allah does not love the transgressors.' Is it conceivable that
Allah, the Forgiver, the Compassionate, would order a person to blow himself up
or to kill innocent people?! It should be noted that Islam prohibits suicide of
any kind, regardless of the reasons. Allah said: '...whoever kills a soul unless
for a soul or for corruption upon the land - it is as if he had killed all of
Mankind.'
"Islam is a religion of peace. Allah said: 'Oh you who believe, enter Islam one
and all.' Jihad in Islam is subject to specific conditions, including the
condition that it must not be waged unless for the purpose of defense, and may
never be waged for the purpose of killing or aggression.
"It is prohibited to kill people under the pretext of waging Jihad. Another
condition of Jihad is that it must be declared by the Emir of the Believers -
not by any individual or group.
"People who call for killing and aggression, who unjustly accuse people of
heresy, and who interpret the Quran and the Sunna in a manner befitting their
goals are attributing lies to Allah and His Messenger. This is the true heresy.
"They are exploiting some Muslim youth, especially in Europe. They are
exploiting their ignorance of the Arabic language and of true Islam, in order to
convey their erroneous messages and misleading promises. Can anyone of sound
mind believe that the reward for Jihad could be some virgins in Paradise? Is it
conceivable that anyone who listens to music will be swallowed by the Earth? And
there are similar lies. The terrorists and extremists are using all possible
means to persuade the youth to join them, and to strike at societies that bask
in the values of liberty, openness, and tolerance.
"We are all being targeted. Anyone who believes in what I have said serves as a
target for terrorism. Terrorism struck in Morocco in the past, and then it hits
in Europe and many regions in the world.
"Given the spread of ignorance in the name of religion, everybody - Muslims,
Christians, and Jews - must stand together in the fight against all types of
extremism, against hatred, and against close-mindedness. The history of humanity
is the best proof that it is impossible to achieve progress in any society
suffering from extremism and hatred, because these are the main causes for the
loss of security and stability. Human history abounds with successful examples,
showing that cooperation and coexistence between religions give rise to open and
modern societies, ruled by love, harmony, comfort, and prosperity. This was
embodied in the Islamic culture, especially in Baghdad and Andalusia, which was
one of the most progressive and open human societies."
Are Nonstop Muslim Atrocities the “New Norm”?
Raymond
Ibrahim/PJ Media/August 25/16
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/2016/08/25/raymond-ibrahimpj-media-are-nonstop-muslim-atrocities-the-new-norm/
As hardly a few days pass without some Islamic terror attack in the
West—recently and as of this writing an “Allahu Akbar” shouting Muslim man
stabbed a Jew in France and an “Allahu Akbar” screaming Muslim woman ran over
two policemen in Canada—the West risks becoming desensitized to and seeing
Islamic violence as “just another part of life.”
The words and deeds of Western leaders are not helping. After the Islamic terror
attack in Nice, France, where 84 were killed, counterterrorism chief Patrick
Calvar said: “Today, France is clearly the most threatened country. The question
about the threat is not to know ‘if’ but ‘when’ and ‘where’.” Prime Minister
Manuel Valls declared that “Terrorism … is a threat that weighs heavily on
France and will continue doing so for a long time.”
As if such resignation wasn’t bad enough, at the memorial event for the 84 Nice
victims, Valls declared, “Times have changed and we should learn to live with
terrorism.”
Actually, the main thing to change with time in France is its demography. The
largest Muslim population of Europe resides there and, in accordance’s with
Islam’s Rule of Numbers, is the real reason why France “should learn to live
with terrorism.”
More apathy was in the air during the Munich massacre, where a Muslim gunman
killed nine.
While somberly addressing the massacre still in progress—with the usual
boilerplate “our hearts go out to [X victim of terror]”—U.S. President Obama
managed to crack a joke, grin, chuckle, and draw laughter from his audience.
After all, what is the big deal? Shouldn’t we be used to Muslims rampaging and
killing by now? And really, what’s nine dead compared to the many hundreds
killed by Islamic terrorists around the world in recent weeks?
As for the leader of the nation where the attack took place, Angela Merkel
waited almost 24 hours before she delivered yet another perfunctory speech
containing all the usual words, condolences, and platitudes.
Then again, what was the hurry? Muslims abusing, raping, and killing Germans in
Germany is old hat. A new poll by ZDF found that a record 75 percent of Germans
“expect”—which is not unlike accept—more terror attacks in their nation. Must a
statement be made after every single one?!
Needless to say, lesser Islamic terror attacks which once would’ve been
extremely newsworthy and received condemnation from the highest echelons of the
political wrung now receive perfunctory or no media coverage and little comment.
On July 18 in Germany, another “Allahu Akbar” shouting, axe-waving Muslim
attacked train passengers and critically injured five. The next day, on July 19
in France, a Muslim man stabbed a woman and her three daughters—the
eight-year-old was left with a punctured lung and in critical condition—for
being “scantily dressed.”
No immediate comments from Merkel and Valls. (See here for numerous other
examples of “minor” and “everyday” Muslim “disturbances” in Europe—such as
vandalizing churches and urinating on St. Mary statues—that get little or no
coverage or comment.)
Western people had better wise up: in the field of behavioral psychology,
“systematic desensitization” is a well-known and effective form of graduated
exposure therapy used “to help effectively overcome phobias and other anxiety
disorders.” Consider the following succinct definition with my relevant examples
in brackets:
Systematic desensitization is when the client [the West] is exposed to the
anxiety-producing stimulus [Islamic violence] at a low level [reports and images
of Islamic violence “over there” in the Mideast], and once no anxiety is present
a stronger version of the anxiety-producing stimulus is given [reports of
violence closer to home, in the West]. This continues until the individual
client [the West] no longer feels any anxiety towards the stimulus [Islamic
violence].
Is this the plan? Are the “global elite” producing situations, such as the
manufactured “migrant crisis,” that cause the West to experience incrementally
worse forms of Islamic violence, until it becomes desensitized, loses its
“phobia”—in this case, “Islamophobia”—and simply “learns to live with
terrorism,” in the words of France’s prime minister?
Indeed, if the attacks were to fall back to, say, just once a month, many might
accept that as a “positive step” they can live with—at least in comparison to
what they’ve been seeing, including four savage Islamic attacks in one recent
week in Germany alone.
“Conspiracy theories” aside, a much better way exists. Acknowledge the
truth—Islam is inherently violent and intolerant—and build policies on this
truth. A ban on or serious vetting of Muslim immigration—which a majority of
Americans support—and close monitoring of already existing mosques and Islamic
centers would virtually eliminate Islamic terror from America.
For the fact remains: unlike natural disasters—earthquakes, tsunamis, tornadoes,
and the like—we actually do not need to “live with” Islam.
Palestinians: The "Mountain of Fire" Erupts Against Abbas
Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone Institute/August 25/16
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8763/palestinians-violence-crime
The Palestinian Authority is now paying the price for harboring, funding and
inciting gang members and militiamen who until recently were hailed by many
Palestinians as "heroes" and "resistance fighters."
Hamas's dream of extending its control to the West Bank now seems more realistic
than ever -- unless Mahmoud Abbas wakes up and realizes that he made a big
mistake by authorizing local and municipal elections.
The blood pouring out in Nablus and other Palestinian towns is proof that Abbas
is on his way to losing control over the West Bank, just as he lost Gaza to
Hamas in 2007. In an emergency meeting held on August 25 in Nablus, several
Palestinian factions and figures reached agreement that it would be impossible
to hold the vote under the current circumstances.
Hours after his security officers lynched a detainee, Palestinian Authority
President Mahmoud Abbas urged Palestinian businessmen living abroad to support
the Palestinian economy by investing in the Palestinian territories. The
Palestinian Authority (PA), he asserted, was "working to provide security and
safety to encourage investment."
According to Abbas, "The Palestinian territories are living in a state of
security stability, which we are working to provide for residents and investors
alike by enforcing the rule of law and enhancing transparency and
accountability."
It must be nice to create your own reality, especially if your true reality is
that of the 81-year-old Abbas.
In his speech before the businessmen, Abbas neglected any reference to the
latest wave of "security chaos" in PA-controlled areas in the West Bank,
specifically Nablus, the largest Palestinian city.
Five Palestinians, including two PA police officers, were killed in the worst
scenes of internecine violence to hit the West Bank in recent years. Abbas was
either playing the businessmen for fools or hoping that they share his deaf and
blind state.
The violence in Nablus did not come as a surprise to those who have been
monitoring the situation in the West Bank in recent months.
In fact, scenes of lawlessness and "security chaos" have become part of the norm
in many Palestinian cities, villages and refugee camps -- a sign that the PA may
be losing control to armed gangs and militias. Palestinians refer to the
situation as falatan amni, or "security chaos." An article published in
Gatestone in June referred to the growing instances of anarchy and lawlessness
in PA-controlled areas in the West Bank, first and foremost Nablus.
Palestinians refer to Nablus as the "Mountain of Fire" -- a reference to the
countless armed attacks carried out against Israelis by residents of the city
since 1967. Current events in Nablus, however, have shown how easily fire burns
the arsonist. The Palestinian Authority is now paying the price for harboring,
funding and inciting gang members and militiamen who until recently were hailed
by many Palestinians as "heroes" and "resistance fighters." Unsurprisingly, most
of these "outlaws" and "criminals" (as the PA describes them) are affiliated in
one way or another with Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah faction.
Nablus, the so-called Mountain of Fire, is now threatening to turn into a
volcano that is set to erupt in the face of Abbas and his PA government.
The situation in Nablus the past few days raises serious questions about the
ability of the PA to perform basic security measures and rein in armed gangs and
militiamen. Moreover, the unprecedented violence has further shattered
Palestinian confidence in the PA and its leaders ahead of the local and
municipal elections, scheduled to take place on October 8.
Hamas's dream of extending its control to the West Bank now seems more realistic
than ever. Under the current circumstances, Abbas would be offering the West
Bank to Hamas on a silver platter -- unless he wakes up and realizes that he
made a big mistake by authorizing the local and municipal elections.
And the businessmen who met with Abbas? One might guess that they are
sophisticated enough to avoid a doomed investment. Nablus will no doubt do the
trick: they are likely to go running from the mayhem of the PA-controlled
territories.
Things lately began to unravel when on August 18, in the Old City of Nablus, two
Palestinian Authority security officers, Shibli bani Shamsiyeh and Mahmoud
Taraira, were killed in an armed clash with gunmen.
Hours later, PA policemen shot dead two Palestinian gunmen who were allegedly
involved in the killing of the officers. The two were identified as Khaled Al-Aghbar
and Ali Halawah. The families of the two men accused the PA of carrying out an
"extrajudicial" killing, and claimed their sons were captured alive and only
afterwards shot dead. The families called for an independent commission of
inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the killing of their sons.
Palestinian human rights organizations have also joined the call for an inquiry
into the killings.
On August 18, two Palestinian Authority policemen were killed in an armed clash
with gunmen in Nablus (left). In April of this year, a fierce gun battle erupted
between Palestinian Authority policemen and members of the Jaradat clan in the
refugee camp of Jenin (right). The clash started during an attempt to arrest a
clan member.
In June, two other PA security officers, Anan Al-Tabouk and Uday Al-Saifi, were
also killed in a shootout with gunmen in Nablus. The PA claimed that "outlaws"
were behind the killings and vowed to punish the culprits.
Tensions in Nablus reached their peak on August 23, when scores of PA policemen
lynched Ahmed Halawah, a former policeman suspected of leading a notorious gang
belonging to Abbas's Fatah faction. Halawah was beaten to death by PA policemen
shortly after he was arrested and taken to the PA-run Jneid Prison in Nablus.
The PA leadership, which has since admitted that Halawah was lynched by its
policemen, says it has ordered an inquiry into the case. Its leaders have
described the lynching as an "unacceptable mistake."
The lynching of the detainee sparked widespread protests throughout the West
Bank, with many Palestinians calling for an immediate inquiry into the
circumstances surrounding the case and demanding that those responsible be
brought to trial.
The Palestinian Bar Association issued a statement strongly condemning the
lynching of Halawah as a "crime and a human rights violation." The Association
called for holding those responsible, adding, "The regrettable and painful
events, including the crime of killing Ahmed Halawah, do not serve the interest
of the citizen or homeland and deepens divisions in our society." It also called
on the PA and its security forces to abide by the law and honor the human rights
of the Palestinians and their public freedoms.
Alarmed by the widespread condemnations of the lynching of Halawah, some
Palestinian Authority officials began issuing direct and veiled threats against
Palestinian critics.
Palestinian lawyer Wael Al-Hazam, who called on Abbas to "withdraw" his security
forces from Nablus, was visited by unidentified gunmen who sprayed his house
with 14 bullets. The attorney and his family members were not hurt in the
shooting attack, which was clearly designed to send a warning message to anyone
who dared to raise his or her voice against human rights abuses by the PA
security forces. And in this instance, the message arrived.
Shortly after the attack on his house, the lawyer issued a statement in which he
said, "14 bullets are enough to silence me. I'm a man of the law and I cannot
face bullets. My pen and voice are the only weapon I have. I do not possess
armed militias to defend myself." The attack on his house came shortly after PA
security officers threatened the lawyer, warning him against appearing on a TV
show to discuss the latest wave of violence in his city.
The turmoil in Nablus has prompted many Palestinians to call on Abbas to make a
decision to postpone the upcoming municipal election in their city. In an
emergency meeting held on August 25 in Nablus, several Palestinian factions and
figures reached agreement that it would be impossible to hold the vote under the
current circumstances.
Sarhan Dweikat, a senior member of Abbas's Fatah, said that an election delay
was needed, to
"protect the social fabric and preserve our national project, which is facing an
existential threat in light of the security chaos and anarchy in Nablus. ...
Conditions in Nablus do not provide a positive climate for holding elections."
It is hard to see how Abbas, delusional as he appears to be, would heed the
calls to postpone the local and municipal elections. His pathetic attempt to
persuade Palestinian businessmen to invest their money in PA-controlled areas at
a time when the flames are engulfing his backyard is yet another sign of the
man's refusal -- or inability -- to see the reality on the ground.
This is the same president who claims that he is seeking to lead his people
toward statehood and a better future. Incredibly, Abbas can probably continue to
fool world leaders into believing that he and the Palestinian Authority are
prepared for statehood. Yet the blood pouring out in Nablus and other
Palestinian cities and villages is proof positive that Abbas is on his way to
losing control over the West Bank, just as he lost the Gaza Strip to Hamas in
2007. If until now it seemed that Hamas posed the biggest threat to Abbas's rule
over the West Bank, it is now obvious that that is not so. The real threat, as
brought home in blood in the West Bank, is coming from Abbas's homegrown
loyalists-turned-rebels.
*Khaled Abu Toameh, an award-winning journalist, is based on Jerusalem.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Are Jews who refuse to
renounce Israel being excluded from "progressive" groups?
Alan M. Dershowitz/Gatestone Institute/August 25/16
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8758/are-jews-who-refuse-to-renounce-israel-being
Hard left activists are trying to exclude Jews who do not renounce Israel from
"progressive" organizations.
Last year, Rabbi Susan Talve, a longtime activist on race issues in the St.
Louis area was told that her advocacy for Israel was incompatible with the
objectives of Black Lives Matter: "Solidarity from Ferguson to Palestine has
become a central tenet of the movement" she was informed, because "Israeli and
U.S. state oppression are deeply interconnected." Similarly, a student who
attended a Black Lives Matter rally at Northwestern University last year was
told "you support Israel, so you cannot also support us."
Recently, that seems to be the response of many of the hard left activists who
dominate so-called "progressive" social justice movements.
Over the past several years, progressive Jews, and progressive supporters of
Israel have had to come to terms with the reality that those who do not reject
Israel and accept Boycott Divestment Sanctions ("BDS") and its unique brand of
bigotry are no longer welcome in some progressive circles. And while both
Democratic and Republican parties have embraced the importance of the U.S.
alliance with Israel, that dynamic is under threat more so than at any point in
my lifetime.
The self-described "progressive wing" of the Democratic Party—represented by
radical and often repressive organizations such as MoveOn, CodePink, Occupy Wall
Street, and Black Lives Matter—has become openly opposed to the nation state of
the Jewish people. Increasingly, these organizations demand that their members
and "allies" renounce support for Israel and for Zionism in order to belong.
Using the pretext of intersectionality—a pseudo-academic theory which insists
that all social justice movements, except those supportive of Jews or Israel,
are inexorably linked—anti-Israel activists have successfully made opposition to
Israel and support for BDS a litmus test, especially for Jews, to belong to
"progressive" movements focused on a wide range of issues.
Earlier this year, supporters of the LGBTQ community in Israel learned this
lesson the hard way, when BDS activists together with a local Black Lives Matter
chapter broke up a gay pride event, because it featured a presentation by an
Israeli group. The protestors claimed that the event organizers had engaged in "pinkwashing"
the Israeli occupation by showing solidarity with the Israeli LGBTQ community.
Members of the National Women's Studies Association ("NWSA") who also support
Israel have been similarly excluded. Last year, that organization voted to
endorse BDS, and as one pro-BDS activist explained: "What is significant about
this particular resolution is the rationale; the fact that the resolution makes
it explicit that BDS is a feminist issues... that one cannot call themselves a
feminist... without taking a stand on what is happening in Palestine."
(Apparently, one can call oneself a feminist without taking a stand on Syria,
Russia, Saudi Arabia, and other nations that grossly violate human rights).
This type of repressive ideological packaging has left progressive Jews, and
liberal supporters of Israel in an increasingly uncomfortable position. On the
one hand, they care deeply about causes such as women's rights, criminal justice
reform, income inequality, environmental protection and LGBT rights. On the
other, they find themselves excluded from the groups that advance those very
causes, because—while they are often critical of specific Israeli policies
regarding settlements and the occupation—they refuse to renounce Israel as a
national liberation movement of the Jewish People.
For hard left activists, this sort of nuanced position is impossible to accept.
Their hostility towards Israel does not stem from any particular Israeli actions
or policies. Even if Israel were to withdraw from the West Bank, destroy the
security barrier, and recognize Hamas as a legitimate political organization, it
would still not be enough. For these radicals, it is not what Israel does; it is
about what Israel is: the nation state of the Jewish people—or to use hard-left
terminology: an imperialistic, apartheid and genocidal, colonialist enterprise.
The recently released Black Lives Matter policy platform offers a perfect
example of such extreme rhetoric: it states that U.S. military and economic
support for Israel makes American citizens complicit in "the genocide taking
place against the Palestinian people."
The fact that the BLM platform reads like it was lifted from a BDS screed is
hardly coincidence: the two groups enjoy a longstanding relationship, and a
prominent BDS activist apparently helped draft elements of the BLM declaration.
But BLM is far from the only hard left organization that has been infected by
BDS vitriol. In fact, BDS has pressured a wide range of progressive
organizations into assuming an anti-Israel posture. The American Green Party,
for example—which has become a haven for disaffected progressive activists this
election cycle—recently came out in support of BDS and called for the US to end
its support for "the Israeli apartheid regime".
This trend has been particularly pronounced on college campuses, where a host of
academic groups—most absurdly the Native American Scholars Association and the
Americans Studies Association—have passed resolutions in favor of BDS. Many of
these organizations have also endorsed the Palestinian Academic and Cultural
Boycott ("PACBI"), which encourages participants to engage in McCarthyite
blacklisting of Israeli academic institutions, as well as groups and individuals
who promote "Brand Israel." This category apparently includes artists like
Matisyahu, and academics like me, as I found out last year when a prominent BDS
advocate refused to debate me at the Oxford Student Union.
The PACBI also explicitly denounces "normalization projects"—programs or events
aimed at Israeli-Palestinian reconciliation that do not sufficiently emphasize
the colonialist nature of the state of Israel. These are exactly the types of
initiatives widely supported and promoted by progressives who are critical of
settlements, but remain supportive of Israel and of a two state solution. It is
no coincidence that BDS has singled them out for special treatment. BDS
campaigners want to force any supporters of Israel—no matter their stances on
other political issues—outside of the progressive tent.
This effort has proved alarmingly successful thus far, but despite the pressure
from the hard left, liberals and progressives who support Israel must continue
to carve out a political space for themselves. In doing so, they can follow the
example of the Jewish Community Relations Council, which dissociated itself
"from the Black Lives Matter platform and those BLM organizations that embrace[d]
it" but committed itself "unequivocally to the pursuit of justice for all
Americans, and to working together with our friends and neighbors in the
African-American community, whose experience of the criminal justice system is,
far too often, determined by race." Such efforts are critical to ensure that it
is not supporters of Israel but rather those repressive bigots who falsely claim
the mantle of progressivism and who subscribe to the identity politics practiced
by BDS that are delegitimated by mainstream progressives and liberals.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Luther's Anti-Semitism Back
to Life
Petra Heldt/Gatestone Institute/August 25/16
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8754/lutheran-antisemitism
At the Lutheran assembly in New Orleans, there was one resolution to end all US
aid to Israel, and one to divest from Israel. Both resolutions, de facto, intend
the destruction of the State of Israel. The anti-Israel character of the
resolutions fits the old-style Lutheran anti-Semitic diatribes.
The ELCA group "Isaiah 58" recommends two sources. One is the book by Bethlehem
Lutheran pastor Mitri Raheb, Faith in the Face of Empire, which recommends
Islamic sharia law as the remedy against Israeli occupation. The other is the
2009 Kairos Palestine Document of the World Council of Churches, which aims for
the elimination of the State of Israel.
So who is interested in the anti-Semitic Lutheran resolution? The conclusion is
that all those are cheerful about this resolution who like to see Israel
disappear, be it with a one- or two-state solution; all those who distribute
millions of dollars to Hamas in Gaza to enable the destruction of Israel while
the intended recipients -- namely the children in Gaza -- remain deprived; all
those who turn a blind eye to the education of Palestinian children in summer
camps and schools where they are taught to murder Jews and to destroy the
allegedly non-existent State of Israel; all those who fail to put the record
straight about the just and right support that many Israelis give to
Palestinians.
Lutheran Churches worldwide are getting ready to honor the 500th anniversary of
their founder Martin Luther. Martin Luther's well-known anti-Semitic diatribes
and biblical commentaries have been worked through and are in disrepute with
many Lutheran Christians. A generation ago, in 1994, the Lutheran leadership in
the US, "in concert with the Lutheran World Federation" (LWF) condemned Luther's
anti-Semitism and expressed its desire to "love and respect" the Jewish people:
"In concert with the Lutheran World Federation, we particularly deplore the
appropriation of Luther's words by modern anti-Semites for the teaching of
hatred toward Judaism or toward the Jewish people in our day. Grieving the
complicity of our own tradition within this history of hatred, moreover, we
express our urgent desire to live out our faith in Jesus Christ with love and
respect for the Jewish people."
At that time the LWF was under the leadership of President Gottfried Brakemeier,
a Brazilian of German origin, and a Professor of theology. The Evangelical
Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) was headed by the Presiding Bishop Herbert W.
Chilstrom. Both clergy are still well-respected men of faith who have set the
Lutheran Church on a recognizable Christian track. Now, that effort seems to be
lost under the influence of two present Lutheran leaders, LWF President Munib
Younan and ELCA Presiding Bishop Elizabeth A. Eaton.
Lutheran anti-Semitic hatred of old against the Jewish people is back to life.
This became clear, again, at the triennial assembly of the ELCA in New Orleans,
August 8-13, under the title "Freed and Renewed in Christ: 500 Years of God's
Grace in Action." Celebrating such an acclaimed kind of freedom and renewal, the
assembly approved of the destruction of Israel in the Memorial on "peace with
justice in the Holy Land." There were two resolutions, one to end all US aid to
Israel and one to divest from Israel. Both resolutions, de facto, intend the
destruction of the State of Israel. The anti-Israel character of the resolutions
fits the old-style Lutheran anti-Semitic diatribes.
The resolutions were spearheaded by a group within the ELCA called "Isaiah 58."
It is a self-described "group of Lutherans working for peace and justice in the
Holy Land." The head of the group is named as Jan Miller, a Rocky Mountain Synod
member. Information about Jan Miller leads to the initiative "Peace and Walls"
where he is listed under the "Rocky Mountain Synod Peace and Walls Working
Group" and as a "trip planner" for June 2016 to the Holy Land.
The website informs:
"Peace and Walls connects ELCA members to our Palestinian Lutheran
companions—promoting dignity, full respect for human rights, healing and
reconciliation. With our companions in the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Jordan
and the Holy Land (ELCJHL) and the Lutheran World Federation (LWF), we also
accompany Palestinians and Israelis, Jews, Christians and Muslims working
together for peace with justice."
There are two sources recommended for a successful trip. One is the book by
Bethlehem Lutheran pastor Mitri Raheb, Faith in the Face of Empire (2014), which
recommends Islamic sharia law as the remedy against Israeli occupation. The
other is the 2009 Kairos Palestine Document of the World Council of Churches (WCC),
which aims for the elimination of the State of Israel. One of its authors is the
Head of the Lutheran World Federation, who is also the presiding Bishop of the
Evangelical Lutheran Church of Jordan and the Holy Land (ELCJHL). It is
precisely that connection between the ELCA Synod and ELCJHL plus LWF that Miller
wished to consolidate with a trip in June 2016. This was the mental boost given
to successfully lobbying those two anti-Semitic ELCA resolutions.
If the connection of the ELCA's Isaiah 58 with Bishop Munib Younan's ELCJHL and
LWF is not enough, the cooperation with the World Council of Churches is at
hand. The Palestine Israel Ecumenical Forum (PIEF), cooperating with the ELCA
has the theme of "peace and walls" as its center, just like Miller's "Peace and
Walls Synod Working Group," and calls for a "World Week of Peace" in September
2016 under the motto "God has broken down the dividing walls." It will be "a
week of advocacy and action in support of an end to the illegal occupation of
Palestine and a just peace for all in Palestine and Israel."
At the ELCA assembly, Isaiah 58 received further support from well-known
anti-Israel allies such as Israel Palestine Mission Network of the Presbyterian
Church (USA), American Friends Service Committee, Friends of Sabeel – North
America, New Orleans Palestinian Solidarity Committee, Jewish Voice for Peace,
and the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation.
The strategy was simple: Isaiah 58 (Miller) and the network of the current head
of the LWF (Younan) teamed up for the preparations of the anti-Israel
resolutions. The organized lobbying work in New Orleans produced the desired
results. To make sure that no mishap occurred, the ELCJHL Pastor Khader Khalila
from Bethlehem addressed the ELCA assembly on the alleged Israeli occupation of
Bethlehem (which of course has been controlled by the Palestinian Authority
since 1993). It worked like clockwork. There was no recognizable group of
Lutheran Christians that was able to defend its own turf against such
anti-Semitic usurpers.
The one resolution, to stop US aid to Israel, passed with a compelling majority
of 751-162 votes. It urged Lutherans to
"call on their U.S. Representatives, Senators and the Administration to take
action requiring that to continue receiving U.S. financial and military aid,
Israel must comply with internationally recognized human rights standards as
specified in existing U.S. law, stop settlement building and the expansion of
existing settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, end its occupation of
Palestinian territory, and enable an independent Palestinian state."
In other words, it calls on the U.S. government to end all aid to Israel if it
does not stop building settlements and "enable an independent Palestinian
state." The resolution is determined to harm the State of Israel.
The other resolution picked up the divestment issue and passed with an even
bigger majority of 821-92. It called for the church to "increase positive
investment in Palestine" and adopted a human rights-based investment screen for
its social responsibility funds to ensure the church is not profiting from human
rights abuses, and mentioned the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by name.
The two resolutions do not face reality. Each one presents a hopeful fantasy
that is immediately contradicted by facts, such as, the on-going successful
negotiations between Jerusalem and Washington for a long-term aid program. These
concessions continue as if that Church clique of some 4 million US citizens does
not exist. Like a small-town lobby group, the ELCA sought a halt to all
investment in companies that profit from Israel's "occupation" and called on the
president of the United States to recognize the State of Palestine. But nothing
happens. Who listens? Who is interested? Who profits from such an old-style
anti-Semitic diatribe that once had been shelved by a former enlightened
leadership?
An answer points in the direction of the present Palestinian leader of the LWF
and his machinations. He and his constituency in Jerusalem are known for being
close cooperators with Palestinian aspirants, including the ELCA. Unlike some of
his predecessors, the present LWF bishop is known for not upholding the
renunciation of anti-Semitism and anti-Israelism in Geneva. He is also known for
cherishing the widely dismissed anti-Semitic Palestinian Liberation Theology,
including the Kairos Palestine Document. The introduction of the Prayer against
the Occupation (i.e. Israel) on each 24th day of the month also appeared under
the leadership of that same bishop. The ELCA is one of the most faithful
followers of that anti-Semitic urge to pray against Israel on every 24th day of
any given month, including in December!
A generation ago, in 1994, the leadership of the Lutheran Church in the US
condemned the anti-Semitism of Church founder Martin Luther (left), and
expressed its desire to "love and respect" the Jewish people. Today's president
of the Lutheran World Federation, Bishop Munib Younan (right), is known for not
upholding the renunciation of anti-Semitism and anti-Israelism.
So who is interested in the anti-Semitic Lutheran resolution? The conclusion is
that all those are cheerful about this resolution who like to see Israel
disappear, be it with a one- or two-state solution; all those who distribute
millions of dollars to Hamas in Gaza to enable the destruction of Israel while
the intended recipients -- namely the children in Gaza -- remain deprived; all
those who turn a blind eye to the education of Palestinian children in summer
camps and schools where they are taught to murder Jews and to destroy the
allegedly non-existent State of Israel; all those who fail to put the record
straight about the just and right support that many Israelis give to
Palestinians. Those are the ones who are listening to the ELCA resolutions.
Even if the democratically elected political structures do not pay much
attention to fringe groups such as the ELCA assembly, such resolutions might
gain momentum. Anti-Israel NGOs might be invigorated and the undecided might get
encouraged to jump on the bandwagon. Once before, Lutherans were influential in
tilting the scale against the Jews, as the ELCA declaration of 1994 said with
remorse:
"Lutherans belonging to the Lutheran World Federation and the Evangelical
Lutheran Church in America feel a special burden in this regard because of
certain elements in the legacy of the reformer Martin Luther and the
catastrophes, including the Holocaust of the twentieth century, suffered by Jews
in places where the Lutheran churches were strongly represented."
While politicians might be able to afford to ignore old-fashioned and outdated
resolutions on Israel and continue with their business as usual, the good
leadership of the Lutheran Churches worldwide should not. There are the examples
of inspiring Lutheran leaders such as Bishop Brakemeier and Bishop Chilstrom. Do
they still have followers in the Lutheran church? Is there outrage from Lutheran
Church leaders in Europe and Lutheran lay people about the anti-Semitism
presented by the Isaiah 58 group and its (many synod) followers? Is there
anybody who will take to task the ELCA leaders who, in order to broaden
anti-Israel manipulation, called on the US government not to prevent the
application of the State of Palestine for full membership in the UN and, in
coordination with the UN Security Council,
"to offer a new, comprehensive and time-bound agreement to the governments of
Israel and Palestine, resulting in a negotiated final status agreement between
Israel and Palestine leading to two viable and secure states with a shared
Jerusalem."
All this is known Arab Muslim parlance on the floors of the UN. But now, it is
not meek and just to demand a return to proper Church language, to the good use
of the church as a place of divine worship and of "action of God's grace" which,
by the way, in Christian thought includes Israel?
Such would be a way to put Luther's old anti-Semitism to sleep again.
Rev. Dr. Petra Heldt is Director of the Ecumenical Theological Research
Fraternity, Jerusalem.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
The Free Alawite Movement – First
Signs Of Armed Alawite Resistance To The Assad Regime
MEMRI/August 25/16/ Special Dispatch No.6587
On June 4, 2016, Alawite officer 'Alaa Makhlouf, a bodyguard of President Bashar
Al-Assad's wife Asma, was assassinated after a bomb was placed in his car. A
group called the Free Alawite Movement claimed responsibility for the act, thus
becoming the first Alawite group to openly undertake military action against
regime forces.
An examination of its social media pages indicates that the Free Alawite
Movement, led by Sheikh Mohsen Al-Haidari, was founded in February 2016 to
combat the Assad regime and defend the Alawite sect from it. The movement
operates on three levels – political, informational, and military; its military
activity is carried out by its armed wing, the Free Alawite Brigade. The
movement openly advertises its activity in and out of Syria and expresses its
desire to cooperate with other Syrian rebel groups and opposition factions.
Statements issued by the movement indicated that its founders' opposition to the
Assad regime is also the result of years-long rivalries between various factions
within the Alawite sect,[1] specifically between the Kalaziya faction – the
majority faction that includes the Al-Assad, Makhlouf, Shalish, and Kheirbek
families – and the Haidariya and Makhousiya factions, and possibly others as
well.[2] The movement stresses that the regime is not as tied to the Alawite
sect as it claims but rather harms the sect, and that many Alawites do not
support it.
It should be mentioned that the anger directed at President Assad and his regime
from within the Alawite sect is not new, and was manifested by widespread
anti-regime protests in August 2015 in the regime strongholds of Latakia and
Tartus, and the founding, on October 22, 2015, of an Alawite political
opposition group operating outside of Syria called the Upcoming Syria
movement.[3] However, this is the first time since the onset of the Syrian
crisis in 2011 that an Alawite movement claims responsibility for military
action against the regime.
It should be mentioned that this report is based on the Free Alawite Movement's
Facebook and Twitter pages, and that no other sources of information about the
movement exist. As a result, the movement's size, the scope of its activity, and
the level of its support remain unclear.
This report will review the platform and activity of the Free Alawite Movement:
The Movement's Platform: Assad Regime Will Be Held Accountable For Its Crimes;
Syria Is The Homeland Of All Its People, Regardless Of Sect
On April 24, 2016, the Free Alawite Movement issued its founding statement. The
statement called to view Syria as a homeland for all its residents, regardless
of ethnicity or sect, and to distinguish Alawites who were not party to the
crimes of the Syrian regime from those whose hands are covered in the blood of
their Syrian brethren, and who should be held accountable for their actions.
According to the statement, the movement's goals are to assist all Alawites who
wish to rebel against the rule of the Kalaziya faction and its loyalist
families, and to establish political and military wings that work against these
families and assist the Free Syrian Army. The movement expressed support for
Alawite organizations and figures who oppose the regime, such as Monzer Makhous,
spokesman for the Syrian High Negotiations Committee, and the Upcoming Syria
movement. To highlight its rivalry with the Assad regime and its patrons, the
movement stated that it saw Iran, Russia, Hizbullah, and the Shi'ite militias in
Syria as enemies, and that the Alawite sect has no true religious ties with
Iran; on the contrary, the movement stressed that there was historic hostility
between them.
The founding statement reads: "The movement was founded on February 20, 2016. It
includes a group of leaders from the Haidariya and Makhousiya [factions of the]
Alawite sect, as well as some officers in the regime army, retired officers, and
some current and former politicians.
"The movement's founding principles:
"- Syria is the homeland of all its sons, regardless of sect... religious
school, or ethnicity.
"- Anyone of us who spilled the blood of his Syrian brethren is a criminal who
will be held accountable by tribunals.
"- The movement will absolutely not serve as a cover for criminals and will work
to extradite any criminal whose crimes are proven.
"- We charge our brethren in the homeland to refrain from holding all of us [Alawites]
responsible for the events in Syria. A large number of us oppose these crimes
and some were thrust [into the war] following sectarian brainwashing by regime
loyalists.
"The movement's goals:
"1. Freeing the Haidaris and Makhousis from the control of the Kalaziya
[faction] and the Al-Wahsh,[4] Makhlouf, Shalish, and Kheirbek families.
"2. Defending our remaining youths from inevitable death in the service of these
families.
"3. Stressing to our youths that they are dying for families and not for the
homeland, while Kalaziya members and the Al-Wahsh [Al-Assad], Makhlouf, and
Shalish families sit in their palaces and offices and gamble.
"4. Establishing a political force of free sect members to defend the sect from
Kalaziya [loyalists].
"5. Ensuring safety for defectors, escapees, and those who refuse to be led to
battle.
"6. Establishing charity foundations to ensure aid to families that the regime
refuses to help due to their opposition to its crimes.
"7. Establishing a military force including officers, enlisted men, and youths
who defected [from the regime army].
"8. Striving to eliminate the Shabiha[5] activists of the Al-Wahsh, Makhlouf,
and Shalish families in all areas.
"9. Supporting Monzer Makhous and the leader of Upcoming Syria, brother Fouad
Hamira.[6]
"10. Contacting the Free Syrian Army... to provide information and support and
to defend it in all [our] areas.
"11. To distribute and put up flyers to expose criminals.
"12. To treat Iran, Russia, Hizbullah, and the militias sent by Iran to Syria as
our common enemy.
"13. [To stress] that nothing ties the Free Alawite Movement to Iran
religiously, and that there is a historic hostility between us [Alawites] and
them...
"14. [To reiterate] that Iran is implementing its ancient plan... to transform
part of the Alawite sect into its servant in the region."[7]
Military Activity: Free Alawite Brigade Targets The Regime
As stated above, unlike other Alawite opposition movements, the Free Alawite
Movement is the first to reportedly carry out armed resistance to the regime,
although apparently on a limited scale, so far. The movement's military wing is
the Free Alawite Brigade, and is likely comprised of Syrian army defectors.
There is no information regarding the brigade's commander, but it is known that
his lieutenant is Colonel Muhammad Barakat, who defected from the regime army on
May 2, 2016, to join the brigade.[8]
The brigade claimed responsibility for a number of operations, the most
prominent of which was the assassination of 'Alaa Makhlouf, the bodyguard of
President Assad's wife Asma, on June 4, 2016 by placing a bomb in his car.[9] On
June 12, the Free Alawite Movement tweeted that the one of its fighters "managed
to blow up the headquarters of a brigade in the [Syrian army's] 4th Division and
escape safely."[10]
Bombing a brigade headquarters in the Syrian army's 4th Division (Image:
Twitter.com/jojohm7, June 12, 2016)
Additionally, on May 19, 2016, the movement claimed responsibility for bombing
an ammo depot belonging to the regime's National Defense militia in the city of
Al-Suqaylabiya.[11]
Informational Activity
It appears that the movement's activity focuses on the informational level,
mainly via its Facebook and Twitter pages, criticizing the Al-Assad, Makhlouf,
and Shalish families and the Assad regime in general. The movement's main
argument is that these families, and the Assad regime, do not represent the
Alawite sect and even exploit it in the service of Iran. Thus, for example, on
April 13, 2016, the movement posted a Facebook status arguing that nothing tied
Alawites to Shi'ites, and that those who spread Shi'a Islam among Alawites was
the family of Suleiman Al-Assad, which was not originally part of the Alawite
sect and came to Syria from parts unknown.[12] Another post argued that the
Al-Assad family lives at the expense of impoverished Alawites, who make up some
50% of the sect, and works with Iran to control Alawite opponents of the regime,
thus enabling Iran to take over Syria.[13]
A post on May 10 stated that the Assad regime uses loyalists of Alawite factions
that are not among regime supporters as cannon fodder, citing as evidence the
number of Alawites belonging to the Kalaziya faction killed during the war,
which is far lower than the death toll among loyalists of the other
factions.[14] It further claimed that the Assad regime was responsible for the
massive terror attacks in Jableh and Tartus on May 23, 2016, which claimed 317
lives, all of them members of the Haidariya and Makhousiya factions.[15] Even
though ISIS claimed responsibility for these attacks, the movement claimed that
the Assad regime had carried them out to prevent the outbreak of an "Alawite
intifada" on the Syrian coast.[16]
On April 30, 2016, following the start of a massive Assad regime campaign in
Aleppo, the movement condemned the regime's crimes, claiming that the movement
itself could not be held accountable for the regime's actions.[17]
Political Activity
The movement claims to be conducting political activity beyond Syria's borders.
For example, on May 19 it posted a Facebook status claiming that "the supreme
authority of the Free Alawite Movement has launched day 3 of its meetings in
France. The movement rejected a request by Rifa'at Al-Assad [President Bashar
Al-Assad's uncle] to join the movement due to his poor record. The movement will
issue a statement after its meetings. These are the final days of Bashar Al-Wahsh,
and the whole world agrees on this."[18]
According to the movement, it has held ties with the Syrian High Negotiations
Committee through its spokesman Monzer Makhous, who is a member of the Alawite
Makhousiya faction. Following the May 2016 terror attacks in Jableh and Tartus,
the movement's leader, Sheikh Mohsen Al-Haidari sent a letter to Makhous asking
him to inform international elements that Kalaziya loyalists were on their way
to massacre displaced Sunnis on the Syrian coast.[19] Beyond that, there is no
information on ties between the movement and other large Syrian opposition
bodies such as the National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition
Forces.
The movement's Facebook page also reported on ties with former Syrian defense
minister and chief of staff 'Ali Habib, who is an Alawite and was ousted as
defense minister by President Assad in August 2011. On May 10, 2016, the
movement posted an "announcement from Paris" stating that "Major General 'Ali
Habib, the former Syrian defense minister, spoke with some opposition factions
and world officials [in Paris] in order to find a solution for the Syria war
that would lead to the expulsion of the Al-Wahsh, Makhlouf, and Shalish families
from Syria, and the punishing of anyone with Syrian blood on their hands." The
post further mentioned an upcoming meeting "attended by Major General 'Ali Habib,
Brigadier General Manaf Tlass [a former general in the Syrian regime army and
Assad associate who defected in 2012], and a number of [other] senior officers
who defected from the Al-Wahsh [Al-Assad] family army, in order to establish a
transitional military council that would lead Syria towards becoming a free
democratic country with no room for the Al-Wahsh, Shalish, and Makhlouf
families, and that will hold all criminals accountable. Our Sheikh [Mohsen Al-Haidari]
will join the meeting as head of the Free Alawite Movement and the Free Alawite
Brigade."[20]
On July 12, 2016, the movement posted a Facebook status stating that Al-Haidari
had arrived in Ankara together with 'Ali Habib, and that they had begun a series
of meetings with military and political leaders, including Khaled Al-Mahamid,
who is in charge of coordinating with defecting officers in Syrian opposition
factions in South Syria. It was said that the meetings would last two days,
after which the two would depart for Moscow.[21]
It should be mentioned in this context that 'Ali Habib's meetings in Ankara were
reported by other outlets, but none of them mentioned the Free Alawite Movement
or Al-Haidari. Thus, the Syrian oppositionist website Orient-news.net reported
on July 12 that 'Ali Habib had arrived in Ankara from Paris two days prior to
meet with the Turkish military high command to discuss the establishment of a
wide military government in Syria that would be headed by and include many
defecting officers from the regime, and also to discuss the establishment of a
core for a new national army. The report stated further that, after the
deliberations in Ankara, Habib would continue his meetings in Moscow. However,
as stated, the website did not mention the Free Alawite Movement.[22]
Additionally, some reports denied that Habib had left Syria at all.[23]
Endnotes:
[1] The Alawite sect is divided into several different factions reflecting
religious schools that differ on solar and lunar rituals.
[2] Aljazeera.net, January 17, 2016.
[3] See MEMRI Inquiry & Analysis Series Report No. 1225, 'Alawi Sect Showing
Signs Of Opposition To Assad Regime, February 4, 2016.
[4] Al-Wahsh was the original last name of Bashar Al-Assad's grandfather. He
changed the name to Al-Assad in 1927 after acquiring status.
[5] The popular name given to the Syrian regime's plainclothes militia.
[6] See MEMRI Inquiry & Analysis Series Report No. 1225, 'Alawi Sect Showing
Signs Of Opposition To Assad Regime, February 4, 2016.
[7] The statement is dated April 24, 2016, but was posted on the movement's
Facebook and Twitter pages on May 25. Twitter.com/jojohm7, Facebook.com/1192248117460289,
May 25, 2016.
[8] Twitter.com/jojohm7, May 2, 2016.
[9] Twitter.com/jojohm7, June 4, 2016.
[10] Twitter.com/jojohm7, June 12, 2016.
[11] Facebook.com/1192248117460289, May 19, 2016.
[12] Facebook.com/1192248117460289, April 13, 2016.
[13] Facebook.com/1192248117460289, April 13, 2016.
[14] Facebook.com/1192248117460289, May 10, 2016.
[15] Twitter.com/jojohm7, May 23, 2016.
[16] Twitter.com/jojohm7, May 23, 2016.
[17] Twitter.com/jojohm7, April 30, 2016.
[18] Facebook.com/1192248117460289, May 19, 2016.
[19] Twitter.com/jojohm7, May 23, 2016.
[20] Facebook.com/1192248117460289, May 10, 2016.
[21] Facebook.com/1192248117460289, July 12, 2016.
[22] Orient-news.net, July 12, 2016.
[23] Orient-news.net, July 13, 2016; Al-Quds Al-Arabi (London), July 14, 2016.
Russia-NATO Update
MEMRI/August 25/16/August 25/16/ Special Dispatch No.6586
Russia-NATO Update is a new monthly review by the MEMRI Russian Media Studies
Project, covering the latest news on Russia-NATO relations from the Russian and
East European media.
Russian President Vladimir Putin holds the world in equilibrium, with Russia
serving as the barycenter.
Quotes Of The Month
At the opening of the Russian-German summer school in the Russian city of
Yekaterinburg, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov spoke on "Ways of
Developing the Energy Sector: Modern Challenges":
"By the way, we were told that only NATO members can obtain legally binding
security guarantees. This confirmed NATO's choice of a quite arrogant and
confrontational line to keep expanding indefinitely without regard for anything
so as to impress non-NATO countries that only by joining the North Atlantic
Alliance will they receive security guarantees. This notion is totally wrong.
For instance, when in 2004 the Baltic states were frantic to join NATO, and our
western partners told us that as soon as they become NATO members, all their
phobias regarding Russia will calm down, since they will feel protected, taking
into account their 'historical hardships', so their accession would benefit all,
these promises have never materialized."
In a state TV interview, Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu said that the
Americans and NATO were "fanning the flames of hysteria" and exploiting the
situation "in order to refill the coffers or so that the military industries
would make additional profits."
Shoigu said: "Let me tell you this: It is the fifth year in a row that we have
been acting according to a previously approved plan of building our armed forces
and of rearmament. That's why if anybody thinks that our actions are a reaction
to this, that, or the other - that's not true. What outrages us? We say: 'Guys,
there is a balance. If you exploit the current situation, fanning the flames of
hysteria in order to refill your coffers, or so that the military industries
will make additional profits, that's your own business.'
"But what I really want to say to them is: "Stop frightening your own
population. Those who are educated and know how to count to 100 have a clear
understanding of the situation."I don't understand why they are exacerbating the
situation. We, of course, would like our [American and NATO] colleagues to stop,
and to understand that we are open to dialogue."
Russia-Turkey Relations
Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim said that Russia had no demands to use
Incirlik air base in the southern province of Adana. However, he added that if
Russia wants to use the base to hit ISIS targets in Syria, it can do so.
On August 9, 2016, Russian President Vladimir Putin met with Turkish President
Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Konstantin Palace, 20 kilometers from St. Petersburg.
The meeting was described by the media as "historic," since the two leaders were
meeting for the first time since the Turkish air force shot down a Russian plane
in November 2015. The meeting focused on the normalization of economic and
political relations.
The Turkish media reported that Turkey and Russia are building "a new mechanism
between the two countries on Syria," after the summit in St. Petersburg. Before
the meeting with Putin, Erdogan announced: "We said we would send [Russia] a
tripartite committee featuring an intelligence [officer], a soldier and a
diplomat, and in response to this tripartite committee, you will name your
counterparts and they will conduct intense work." The Turkish tripartite
committee was scheduled to leave for Russia on August 10 and would hold its
first meetings on August 11.
Commenting on Russia-Turkey cooperation on Syria, Turkish Foreign Minister
Mevlut Çavusoglu said: "[This is] the first concrete step [between Turkey and
Russia]: Previously, there were different mechanisms between us on Syria,
between the militaries, foreign ministries and intelligence services. Now, we
[will] establish a threefold mechanism."
Tensions Between Ukraine And Russia
On August 19, Russian President Vladimir Putin met with the permanent members of
the Security Council in Crimea. In the meeting, Putin said: "Apparently, our
partners in Kiev decided to aggravate the situation, and it is clear why they
are doing this: they do not want to, or cannot for whatever reasons, honor the
Minsk agreements and, secondly, they cannot explain to their own people the
significant mistakes they have made in their socio-economic policies. This
method of aggravating the situation is not new. It has been used since time
immemorial, sometimes successfully, but not always. I hope that this will not be
the ultimate choice of our partners, and that common sense will eventually
prevail. For our part, while discussing the issues of additional security
measures in Crimea, we should also say, and I would like to mention this once
again, that we are not going to cut off relations. Despite the reluctance of the
current government in Kiev to have full-fledged diplomatic relations at the
ambassadorial level, we nevertheless will leave them opportunities to develop
and maintain contacts."
Despite the recent announcement by Russian President Vladimir Putin that the
upcoming Normandy Four meeting in China has been cancelled, and Russian Prime
Minister Dmitri Medvedev's remarks about the possible severing of diplomatic
relations with Ukraine, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that Russia is
currently uninterested in a rupture of diplomatic relations. Lavrov said: "I
don't think this is a situation where anyone is interested in breaking off
diplomatic relations. That would be an extreme measure. I think the main goal
now is to avoid succumbing to emotions or taking extreme courses of action but
to work for stabilization in a restrained and consistent manner. As I said, we
will and are already doing this in Crimea regardless of what conclusions our
Western partners and colleagues in Kiev will draw from the events of ten days
ago. I am in favor of focusing efforts on returning to the sequencing and the
substance of the Minsk agreements in all aspects of the situation – security and
political settlement."
At the opening of the Russian-German summer school "Ways of Developing the
Energy Sector: Modern Challenges", in Yekaterinburg, Russian Foreign Minister
Sergey Lavrov's said:
"The current state of affairs stems from the long-standing problems which came
to the surface during the Ukraine crisis. They reflect the profound system-wide
failures in the European architecture. Unfortunately, our numerous proposals to
harmonize the international legal principles underlying equal and indivisible
security in the Euro-Atlantic area have for many years been rejected by NATO
members.
"Sadly, even today, a NATO-centric philosophy, I would even say an arrogance,
prevails over the spirit of the Helsinki Final Act. NATO's policy of eastward
expansion at any cost deepens, without exaggeration, the dividing lines on the
continent. When this policy, which undermines the balance of interests and
stability in Europe, stumbled badly in Ukraine, attempts were made to put the
blame on Russia. There were no efforts to force the organizers of the armed coup
to comply with the agreement on a peaceful settlement and the creation of a
national unity government, which they signed with Germany, France and Poland
acting as intermediaries. Moreover, to our profound regret, our Western partners
turned a blind eye to the ultra-radical nationalist positions of those who
seized power in Kiev and who called for the elimination of everything that is
Russian in Ukraine..."
The newspaper Moskovskii Komsomolets published a commentary by Igor Korotchenko,
editor in chief of National Defense Magazine and Duma Nominee from Rodina
(Homeland) nationalist party: "When it comes to Ukraine, I think, Moscow should
deliver a missile strike against the bases of international terrorists, located
in Ukraine's territory. Also we need to strike the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense
Intelligence Directorate headquarters if the trial (against alleged infiltrators
to Crimea) proves that its officials were behind the training and dispatch of
those terrorists to Crimea. That's exactly what the US does when fighting
international terrorists".
Lithuanian Foreign Minister Linas Linkevicius published a statement on the
Foreign Ministry's website, following a conversation with Ukrainian Foreign
Minister Pavel Klimkin on the rising tensions between Russia and Ukraine.
Linkevicius wrote: "The provocative methods and accusations by Russia threaten
the Normandy format [which comprises Ukraine, Russia, France, and Germany] and
constitute a challenge for the international effort to end external aggression
and military action in Eastern Ukraine. The international community should
respond very seriously to such fabricated accusations and prevent any further
provocations by Russia, if such are planned."
In his twitter account, the Lithuanian FM wrote the following: "[The] aggressor
accused the victim of an attack. Old KGB methods. Russia's false accusations
towards Ukraine to justify future 'retaliation'?"
Obama says to the Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko: If you take the yellow
pill you'll have hallucinations. If you take the blue pill, you'll speak
nonsense.
Russia-Finland Relations
On August 5, Head of the Defense Ministry's Main Directorate for International
Military Cooperation Sergei Koshelev announced that Russia's Defense Ministry
proposed to its counterparts from the Baltic States to discuss the use of
transponders by combat aircraft and interaction with NATO in Moscow this
September.
During Putin's visit to Finland on July 1, the Finnish President Sauli Niinisto
recommended enhancing confidence building measures in the Baltic region. Putin
said: "The Finnish president came up with the proposals today on the first steps
aimed at enhancing confidence and preventing conflicts [in the Baltic airspace].
I have already said that I agree with this... We welcome the Finnish President's
proposal [to ban flights over the Baltics with transponders off]."
However, Finnish Foreign Minister Timo Soini recently said that Moscow's
invitation to Baltic States to discuss confidence building should take place
within a broader framework encompassing additional countries. Soini said: "Such
kind of [handling of] bilateral issues within an international system is not
possibly the best, rather they should be handled together ...Finland has not yet
received a written invitation, but the idea has become clear to us."
In a press release, the Finnish Ministry of Defense said: "The initiative is
interesting. Without more information about Russia's plans to invite countries
to talks, it is impossible to comment more closely on the issue. On a general
level, it can be concluded that the issue of flight safety in the Baltic Sea
region is both topical and important."
The Russian news agency Tass.ru reported that Lithuanian Foreign Minister Linas
Linkevicius said earlier that the flights by NATO's and Russia's warplanes over
the Baltic Sea with switched-on transponders wouldn't improve security in the
region.
In an interview with the daily newspaper Dagens Nyheter the Swedish Minister for
Foreign Affairs, Margot Wallström, stated that Sweden was unlikely to extend an
invitation to Putin, as Finland did (Putin and the Finnish President Sauli
Niinisto met on July 1). Commenting on the interview, Finnish Foreign Minister
Timo Soini said: "I think it's important that we also engage in bilateral
discussions with Russia, and I think it's excellent that President [Sauli
Niinisto] invited Putin to Finland...If Sweden makes another kind of decision,
I'll respect that."
On August 24, Finnish-US combat aircraft drills started in Finland’s southern
Kanta-Hame and Paijat-Hame regions. Earlier, Finland provided its territory for
the Baltops-2016 military exercises for the amphibious landing of NATO’s forces.
The Finnish defense minister stated that the preparations for a framework
military agreement between Helsinki and Washington were caused, among other
things, by "the growing discontent in the Scandinavian countries with Russia’s
military activity in the region." However, the minister said that the document
will not contain military assistance obligations that would imply membership in
NATO. Leading expert at the MGIMO Center for Military and Political Studies
Mikhail Alexandrov said: "Finland is now taking part in NATO’s policy of
pressure on Russia… Although Finland supports NATO’s policy of pressure on
Russia, it does not want to join the North Atlantic alliance, understanding that
it is one thing to exert virtual reality, information and psychological pressure
and it is quite another thing to join NATO… Russia will undoubtedly respond to
this, the relations will deteriorate and trade ties will be frozen."
Russia's Drills And Defense News
Russian logistics and maintenance units launched missions to provide support for
force groups at ground and sea practice ranges in Crimea.
The Russian news agency Tass.ru reported that about 10,000 troops and 2,000
pieces of armored equipment are involved in the command and staff exercises of
Russia's Eastern Military District that kicked off in the Amur Region and the
Trans-Baikal Territory. District spokesman Colonel Alexander Gordeyev stated:
"The exercises will be conducted in several stages spread over August 17-20. Up
to 10,000 servicemen and 2,000 pieces of armament and military hardware,
including aircraft and helicopters, will be involved in maneuvers at practice
ranges in the Trans-Baikal Territory and the Amur Region". He then added that
the maneuvers' goal is to test new automated troop control systems.
Mobile ground missile complexes RS-24 Yars of the Russian Strategic Missile
Force's Teikovskaya division will be involved for the first time in special
drills of radiological, chemical and biological troop protection. (Tass.ru,
August 17)
The Russian Northern Fleet's large anti-submarine warfare ships Vice-Admiral
Kulakov and Severomorsk have teamed up with aviation in exercises to detect and
sink hypothetical enemy submarines.
Recently, a Collective Security Treaty Organization's (CSTO) drill in Pskov and
Leningrad regions kicked off. According to the operational scenario "unlawful
armed units" invaded the territory of one of the treaty's states and the attack
was expected to be repelled by CSTO rapid response forces. According to the
Russian news agency Ria.ru, during the drill, loudspeakers in the field
communicated the following message in Russian, German and English: "NATO
soldiers! You are being fooled. You are no peacekeepers. Lay down your weapons.
You fight on a foreign territory. You have invaded a peaceful country. You'll be
haunted by the vengeance and the outrage of the people which have never lost in
a war. Lay down your weapons; stop being marionettes in your leaders 'hands."
A ballistic missile Iskander was launched during a drill in the Jewish
Autonomous Area in the Far East. Eastern Military District's spokesman,
Aleksandr Gordeyev, said: "The launch was performed from a training site in the
Jewish Autonomous area [Birobidjan]. The missile hit a target at a proving
ground in the Amur region 300 kilometers away." The Russian news agency Tass.ru
reported that "more than 400 officers and men and 100 pieces of military
equipment from a missile unit of the Eastern Military District" are involved in
the drill.
This year, Russian paratroopers will perform several joint exercises with their
colleagues from the armies of Egypt and Serbia. Counter-terrorism training
exercises with the Russian National Guard have finished on the range near
Volgograd. In September, Russia will participate in the "Slavic Brotherhood
2016" exercises together with the Belarusians and Serbs. The drills will take
place at the Nikinci military training field, in Serbia, just 30 km from the
border with Croatia, and NATO. In October, Russia has scheduled joint exercises
with the special ops army units in Egypt. In September, the "Caucasus-2016"
strategic exercises will take place.
The International Army Games were held between July 30 and August 13. The
Russian-owned media outlet, Rbth.com, reports that the games were simultaneously
taking place at 20 training grounds, 19 of which are located within three of
Russia's military districts: the Western, Southern and Central districts,
meaning from Siberia to Kaliningrad in the west and from St. Petersburg to
Sevastopol in Crimea. The media outlet reports that naval competitions are
taking place in the Baltic, Black and Caspian Sea waters. Russia and Kazakhstan
are hosting a total of 121 teams from 19 countries, including China, Venezuela,
and Iran, who competed in 23 of the games' contests. Reportedly, Russia had
previously invited 47 countries, including the U.S. and NATO members, but Greece
was the only NATO member to accept the invitation. It is worth noting that, last
May, Putin visited Greece and said that the Hellenic Republic is "an important
partner in Europe" for Russia. Moscow is considering investing in Greece's
energy and transport sectors.
Despite economic shortages, the Russian Navy does not plan to curtail its
spending. The Navy is developing a new nuclear-powered stealth destroyer
"Leader". In the future, it could be armed with laser and rail-gun weapons.
Moreover the fleet continues to develop an aircraft carrier and "Mistral" type
helicopter carriers.
Commenting on the news, Gazeta.ru quotes an unidentified military source, who
claims that Russia currently has no technical facilities to build an aircraft
carrier.
Interview Of The Month:
On August 10, the Russian magazine Mezhdunarodnaya Zhizn published an interview
with Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov on Russian foreign policy
and on Russia-NATO relations.
Below are excerpts from Ryabkov's interview:
Ryabkov: "We were concerned by the decisions taken to deploy an increased
rotating military presence and by what amounts to permanently stationed NATO
forces right close to our borders in Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Poland. Let
me note that this does not stop at just four multinational battalions. The plan
is to ensure stocks of equipment for several mechanized US ground forces
brigades in Europe over the coming years. They are also establishing
headquarters and bolstering air force groups with planes that will patrol the
airspace, including in the Baltic states. From our observations, the NATO
countries' naval forces are carrying out training and combat patrol operations
in waters that are much closer to Russia's borders than was previously the case.
The frequency of NATO military exercises has increased and their scale is very
significant.
"They take great pains – adding all sorts of menacing passages to the NATO
Warsaw summit's final communiqué – to persuade everyone that all of this is in
response to Russia's 'aggressive behavior', in particular its 'support for
separatists' in southeast Ukraine and so on. To be honest, this NATO 'through
the looking glass' leaves us quite stupefied. The militia operations in Donbass
(let the NATO countries continue chewing away on their own term of
'separatists') are taking place in a region where Russians and Russian-speaking
people have lived for centuries. This is happening at the heart of Eurasia,
where families have become so interwoven over centuries that it is impossible to
see now who came from where, considers where home is, married whom and so on.
'If A NATO-Centric Attitude Is Allowed To Exist, Why Do You Deny Our Right To A
Russia-Centric View?'
Ryabkov: "When we see an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, equipped with missile
defense systems, cruise missiles and intermediate-range Tomahawk attack
missiles, 30 nautical miles from Kaliningrad, or, like during the recent [joint
US-Ukrainian military] Sea Breeze exercises [that started in Black sea on July
18], when we saw a whole line-up of NATO vessels led by large US naval ships in
the port of Odessa, when we see that NATO is deploying its newest fighter planes
only 7-10 minutes' flight time from St Petersburg, we have to ask the question,
was it 'aggressive Russia' that invited them so close? Have we done anything
similar 30 miles of the Norfolk naval base in the US or stationed planes at five
minutes' flight time from Long Island, New York?
"This is not even a case of double standards. Rather, there is no eradicating
from the consciousness of those 'on the other side' a NATO-centric and
American-centric view. When you realize that they have this inborn sense of
representing Western civilization, which, as they see it, is the center of the
world, you start to understand how it comes to be that they have reached the
point of asserting that Russia has encroached on NATO's borders rather than the
other way round.
"But I would ask the smug NATO strategists, if a NATO-centric attitude is
allowed to exist, why do you deny our right to a Russia-centric view? It is like
projections on the globe. Depending on the angle taken, different regions and
territories can be placed at the center. It is a clear and indisputable fact for
us that the military capability of others is coming closer to our borders and
that [these same] others are encircling us with bases and developing missile
defense systems. It is valid to view the issue from this angle too, and indeed,
this is the only real angle we can take when faced with the task of taking
effective care of our own security. This is the angle we look from and you
cannot change it."
'NATO Is Directly And Unambiguously Violating The Obligations In The Founding
Act'
Ryabkov: "Some of our neighbors even called on NATO to officially abandon the
Founding Act in the run-up to the Warsaw summit and during the event. In other
words, they were asking for NATO to unilaterally declare that this document is
no longer in force. It makes me want to thank them for their honesty at least.
We didn't doubt that these countries' governments consciously pursued the goal
of dismantling the West's and NATO's relations with Russia...We see an increase
in tension, rejection of not only Russian policy, but of Russia simply as a
neighbor, let alone as a partner. This is coming through particularly clearly in
these countries' policy on hard security issues and military security...They
tell us, in particular, that these are not permanently stationed forces. As we
see it, though, rotation is even worse than a permanent presence because
rotation makes it possible for a much higher number of service personnel and
contingents from the different countries to get to know these regions, get a
feel for them in operations terms, learn how best to work there. Ultimately,
NATO is directly and unambiguously violating the obligations in the Founding
Act, even if it is trying to assert the opposite.
'I Am Sure There Will Be No War'
Ryabkov: "I am sure there will be no war. These developments are [part of] the
West's usual game of flexing its muscles and just another attempt to 'put Russia
in its place.' This is simply an attempt to capitalize on the current difficult
period in Russia's relations with the West and play up issues on NATO's eastern
and northeastern flanks, putting them to use for opportunistic motives and
obtaining in this way some bonus in the form a beefed-up physical foreign
military presence, construction of particular facilities and so on. The
politicians in these countries seize on these developments to tie themselves and
their voters more tightly to Western roots and the roots of the Western
community..."
Prove
Tuncay Babali Broke the Law or Free Him
News from the Middle East Forum/August 25/16
http://www.meforum.org/6220/prove-babali-broke-law-or-free-him
PHILADELPHIA – Aug. 25, 2016 – Turkish ambassador Tuncay Babali, a Middle East
Quarterly contributor, has been arrested for alleged participation in the July
15, 2016, failed coup attempt in Turkey.
He is one of Ankara's most accomplished young diplomats, having served, among
other government positions, as director of the department of human resources of
the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, counselor to the Turkish embassies in
Washington, D.C., and London, and ambassador to Canada (2012-14).
Babali, who holds an MA degree from the University of London and a PhD from the
University of Houston, has established himself as an authority in the fields of
energy economics and geopolitics as well as Eurasian security. In 2009-10, he
was a fellow at Harvard University's Weatherhead Center for International
Affairs. His article, "Turkey at the Energy Crossroads," appeared in the Spring
2009 issue of the Middle East Quarterly, pp. 25-33.
Eleven days after the failed coup, Babali was sacked from his position –
alongside fellow ambassador Gürcan Balık, chief advisor to former foreign
minister Ahmet Davutoğlu, and scores of lower-level diplomats – as part of the
government's massive purge of civil servants allegedly linked to the Fethullah
Gülen movement. On August 18-19, Babali and Balık were jailed, together with
former ambassador to Costa Rica Ali Findik, as the government embarked on an
unprecedented purge of hundreds of foreign office diplomats.
The Middle East Forum is deeply concerned by the recent arrests of Babali and
tens of thousands of other Turks and believes that the current purge goes far
beyond a reasonable and legitimate response to the abortive coup while casting
serious doubt on Turkey's commitment to democracy and the rule of law. It,
therefore, urges the Government of Turkey to provide incontrovertible evidence
in public of Amb. Babali's criminal activity or to free him immediately.
For immediate release
Contact: Gregg Roman, Director
Middle East Forum
Roman@MEForum.org
215-546-5406, ext. 104