English LCCC Newsbulletin For
Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For June 15/2023
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news
The Bulletin's Link on
the lccc Site
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2023/english.June15.23.htm
News Bulletin Achieves
Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since
2006
Click On The Below Link To Join Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group so you get
the LCCC Daily A/E Bulletins every day
https://chat.whatsapp.com/FPF0N7lE5S484LNaSm0MjW
ÇÖÛØ
Úáì ÇáÑÇÈØ Ýí
ÃÚáì ááÅäÖãÇã
áßÑæÈ
Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group
æÐáß
áÅÓÊáÇã äÔÑÇÊí
ÇáÚÑÈíÉ æÇáÅäßáíÒíÉ ÇáíæãíÉ
ÈÇäÊÙÇã
Elias Bejjani/Click
on the below link to subscribe to my youtube channel
ÇáíÇÓ
ÈÌÇäí/ÇÖÛØ
Úáì ÇáÑÇÈØ Ýí
ÃÓÝá ááÅÔÊÑÇß
Ýí ãæÞÚí Ú
ÇáíæÊíæÈ
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAOOSioLh1GE3C1hp63Camw
15 ÂÐÇÑ/2023
Bible Quotations For
today
Very truly, I tell you, you will weep and mourn, but
the world will rejoice; you will have pain, but your pain will turn into joy
Saint John 16/20-24/:”Very truly, I tell you, you will weep and mourn, but
the world will rejoice; you will have pain, but your pain will turn into
joy. When a woman is in labour, she has pain, because her hour has come. But
when her child is born, she no longer remembers the anguish because of the
joy of having brought a human being into the world. So you have pain now;
but I will see you again, and your hearts will rejoice, and no one will take
your joy from you. On that day you will ask nothing of me. Very truly, I
tell you, if you ask anything of the Father in my name, he will give it to
you. Until now you have not asked for anything in my name. Ask and you will
receive, so that your joy may be complete.”
Titles For The Latest English LCCC
Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on June 14-15/2023
Ibrahim Murad, President of the
Lebanese Syriac Union Party: The Implementation of the UN Resolution, 1959
is the only solution
Lebanon's Hezbollah torpedoes presidential vote
Lebanese lawmakers fail latest attempt to elect president
US State Department expresses concern over MPs leaving chamber, hindering
presidential election vote
UN Special Coordinator urges Lebanon's parliamentarians to ensure
Presidential election
59 MPs vote for Azour, 51 for Franjieh amid row over 'missing' vote
Azour's supporters accuse Hezbollah of blocking democratic vote
MPs from both camps claim 'victory' after botched presidential vote
Berri calls for dialogue, says only consensus can end vacuum
Franjieh calls for 'constructive dialogue with everyone'
Azour urges moving electoral process forward for 'good of Lebanese people'
Bassil: Today's session proves no one can bypass Christian component in
presidency
Geagea slams obstruction of 'entire' presidential election process
Samy Gemayel praises 'uprising' in Parliament for rejecting imposition and
threat
6 'Oct. 17' MPs refuse to vote for 'sectarian parties' candidates
LBCI interviews shed light on parliamentary blocs' reactions following
election session
Report: Macron, MBS to discuss Lebanon in Paris meeting
MP Tony Frangieh: No alternative to openness, unity in face of hate
Minister Sharafeddine broaches displaced Syrians’ dossier with Syrian Chargé
d'Affaires
Grand Mufti broaches general affairs with UNIFIL Commander
USAID Provides More Than $17.4 Million in Additional Humanitarian Assistance
for Vulnerable Lebanese People
Syrians conditions worsen, WFP faces 'unprecedented funding crisis'
A Text of a Letter sent to the USA to Department of State by three Member Of
The Congress addressing the Lebanese Crisis
Amer Foundation Applauds Republican Study Committee's Call for
Accountability in Lebanon
Why Hezbollah’s popularity in Lebanon is rapidly declining/Jerry Maher/Arab
News/June 14, 2023
Hizbullah's Military Exercise Sparks Criticism In South Lebanon: It Is An
Act Of Hijacking The State, Intimidating Hizbullah's Opponents In The
Country/MEMRI/June 14, 2023
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News
published on June 14-15/2023
Arab states make up 24% of
Israel’s 2022 arms exports including drones
Israeli parliament vote deals setback to Netanyahu and judicial overhaul
plan
Germany releases funds for Israel's Arrow-3 missiles in planned 4 billion
euro deal
Washington says it's asking Israel about the death of detained
Palestinian-American
Israel's Rafael says it is developing hypersonic missile interceptor
Israeli army blames mix-up for fatal shooting of Palestinian toddler
China’s Xi hosts Abbas, vows support for Palestinian state on 1967 borders
France's Macron to discuss Ukraine with Saudi Crown Prince this week
Turkey says military 'neutralised' 53 Kurdish militants in northern Syria
Putin admits Russia doesn't have enough drones, warplanes, and ammunition
for the war in Ukraine, even though it's been rushing military production
all year
Russia has lost so much money due to the Ukraine war that it's now trying to
raise $4 billion by slapping a windfall tax on its oligarchs
Russian nuclear weapons 'more powerful than Hiroshima bomb' arrive in
Belarus
Ukraine reports small advances in 'extremely fierce' fighting
No respite for Sudan civilians two months into brutal war
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News &
Editorials published on June 14-15/2023
Taqiyya: Iran Actually Boasts About Deceiving the West in Nuclear
Talks/Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute/June 14/2023
The 'Right' to Rape and Enslave Non-Muslim Women/Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone
Institute./June 14, 2023
Biden’s tough choices on agreeing a new deal with Iran/Osama Al-Shari/Arab
News/June 14, 2023
Blinken’s visit an important step toward restoring US standing in the
region/Dr. Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg/Arab News/June 14, 2023
Egypt leading the way on ensuring net-zero transition is just/Rania Al-Mashat
and Erik Berglöf/Arab News/June 14, 2023
How the Muslim Brotherhood could use Sudan’s protracted crisis to plot a
comeback/Robert Bociaga/Arab News/June 14, 2023
Latest English LCCC Lebanese &
Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on June 14-15/2023
Ibrahim Murad, President of the
Lebanese Syriac Union Party: The Implementation of the UN Resolution, 1959
is the only solution
LCCC/June 14/2023
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/119105/119105/
Ibrahim Murad, President of the Lebanese Syriac Union Party, and
Secretary-General of the “Christian Front,”, issued a press release today in
which he said that “the continuation of the anomalous situation that we, the
Lebanese people are living on daily basis, is caused by the presence of an
armed military Militia that controls the central state, as well as all its
institutions, while bullying, intimidating, challenging and boldly
threatening the state and the Lebanese people. He added, “This Militia, and
because of its weaponry surplus
capabilities keeps on threatening those Lebanese who struggle for the
freedom of their homeland, and oppose its occupation, and at the same time
falsely accusing them of treason and betrayal.
He stressed that, “the ongoing series of rigging the parliamentary quorum
for electing a president of the republic, will continue until this militia
and its axis can impose a president, who is a mere puppet, and willing to
achieve its prime goal in controlling Lebanon. Meanwhile this militia is
working day and night in a bid to confiscate the Christians’ presence in the
state, and hinder their ability to survive”.
“Under this status quo of occupation, definitely, any elected president will
not be able to rule, or achieve any positive results, while the armed
militia remains in full control of all aspects of the state.
Murad urged the political parties, as well as the sovereign Lebanese
leaders, activists and citizens “not to waste any more time, and work more
seriously on calling the international community to implement Resolution
1559, because it is the only solution to liberate Lebanon from the sway of
the Iranian military occupation, and only then the Lebanese can build a
state on the basis of a fair political and national partnership, represented
by the implementation of a federal system, that consolidates peace between
the Lebanese components, and allows civilized and constitutional
competition.
*Translated Freely by: Elias Bejjani
Lebanon's Hezbollah torpedoes presidential vote
Reuters/Wed, June 14, 2023
STORY: Lebanon slid deeper into crisis on Wednesday (June 14) when Hezbollah
and its allies torpedoed their rivals' choice of president. The tussle over
the presidency makes it harder for Lebanon to tackle the devastating
financial meltdown that has festered for four years. It has also sharpened
sectarian tensions, with one of Hezbollah's main Christian allies joining
other Christian factions in support of the candidate - Jihad Azour, who is a
senior IMF official. Azour, who is also a former finance minister, narrowly
won the support of lawmakers. but Shi'ite Hezbollah and its ally the Amal
Movement then withdrew, denying the two-thirds quorum. It was lawmakers'
12th attempt to elect a president since Hezbollah-allied Michel Aoun's term
ended in October. The presidency is reserved for a Maronite Christian, and
Hezbollah is backing its close ally Souleiman Frangieh. He strongly supports
the group's right to possess weapons and is a friend of Syrian President
Bashar al-Assad. Hezbollah has unleashed fierce rhetoric against Azour,
describing him as a candidate of confrontation. Lebanon's Shi'ite Mufti has
accused Azour, without naming him, of being backed by Israel and, quote, "a
president with an American stamp." The power vacuum - with neither a head of
state nor a fully empowered cabinet - is unprecedented even for Lebanon, a
country that has known little stability since independence.
Lebanese lawmakers fail latest attempt to elect
president
Najia Houssari/Arab News/June 14, 2023
BEIRUT: Lebanese lawmakers on Wednesday failed in the latest attempt to
elect a president and break a seven-month power vacuum that has roiled the
Mediterranean country. The results of the vote count in the 12th session of
parliament showed that the opposition candidate, former minister Jihad Azour,
received 59 votes. In contrast, the candidate of Hezbollah and the Amal
Movement, former Premier Suleiman Frangieh, received 51.
A political observer said that the Wednesday session “served to determine
the balance of power, end the chances of candidates, and open other doors
for consensus on new names in another election session.”
The opposition had anticipated that Azour would receive more than 60 votes
compared to Frangieh’s expected 44. Winning in the first round of elections
requires 86 votes, while in the second round, the requirement falls to 65.
For the first time in 12 sessions, all 128 MPs attended the voting session.
The votes of the undecided, independents and those unconvinced by the two
candidates were scattered, totaling 18 votes, including one vote for army
commander Gen. Joseph Aoun, six votes for former minister Ziad Baroud, eight
votes for New Lebanon, and one vote for Jihad Arab, a Lebanese contractor,
which was invalidated. One blank vote was cast, and another was lost but
later counted in favor of Baroud.
The election session ended with Shiite MPs leaving the assembly hall, which
deprived the session of the necessary quorum, and thus no second round was
held. Speaker Nabih Berri did not set a date for a new session.
Neither Azour, 57, nor Frangieh, 58, attended the session. However, the
candidates tweeted immediately after the session ended. Azour thanked all
the MPs who put their trust in him. “I hope the new scene will be an
incentive for convergence on an option to pull Lebanon out of the crisis, by
respecting the expression of the majority of MPs,” he said. Frangieh
expressed his gratitude to the MPs “who elected me and placed their trust in
me. We also respect the opinion of the MPs who did not elect me, and this is
an incentive for constructive dialogue with everyone.”
Hezbollah and Amal Movement MPs left the election session with smiles,
despite Frangieh receiving fewer votes than the opposition candidate.
MP Ali Hassan Khalil from the Amal Movement said: “We have witnessed the
victory of our project, while others struggle with their choices. We are
convinced of our candidate choice.”
Hezbollah MP Hussein Al-Hajj Hassan said: “We still support our candidate,
despite others attempting to rally behind a single candidate despite their
political differences. This is the result. We call for dialogue and unity.”
Lebanese Forces MP Shawki Dakash said the most significant aspect of the
session was that “77 MPs said no to Hezbollah. However, some colleagues
missed the opportunity to elect a president and restore authority to
initiate the country’s revival.”
MP Ashraf Rifi said after the session that there is “significant progress
toward choosing a state rather than a fiefdom.” Following the session,
Kataeb head MP Sami Gemayel highlighted “threats and pressures exerted on
some MPs on Tuesday night and Wednesday morning, forcing them to refrain
from voting for Azour.”The political observer said that five MPs from the
Free Patriotic Movement appeared to have deviated from their leadership by
avoiding voting for Azour. It was also revealed that Armenian MPs voted for
Frangieh. The election session took place amid external pressure on Lebanon
to elect a president as soon as possible. Spokesperson for the French
Foreign Ministry, Anne-Claire Legendre, urged Lebanese MPs to “take the
session seriously and not miss another opportunity.”
The political observer said: “Such an outcome pushes Lebanon into a new
phase of political stagnation at a time when it is most in need of a rapid
rescue operation for its collapsed economy, institutional paralysis, the
continuation of vacancies in important institutions such as the Central Bank
governorship, army leadership, and diplomatic missions abroad, in addition
to the paralysis at the government level, which has been a caretaker
government for over a year.”
Independent MP Michel Daher highlighted the need to choose a consensus
president capable of forming a rescue government and reaching out to Arab
nations for assistance, warning that “otherwise, the collapse continues.”
Joanna Wronecka, UN special coordinator for Lebanon, said: “Lebanon’s
leaders and MPs need to take urgent steps to ensure the election of a
president, for the sake of their country and people. A prolonged vacuum
undermines democratic practices in Lebanon and further delays the reforms
and necessary solutions that have long been awaited to restore the country
to the path of recovery.”
US State Department expresses concern over MPs
leaving chamber, hindering presidential election vote
LBCI/June 14/2023
The US State Department has expressed deep concern over the actions of
Lebanese parliament members who left the chamber, effectively obstructing
the vote on the election of a president. This move has further exacerbated
the political uncertainty and instability in the country.The US State
Department emphasized that Lebanon's leaders and elites must prioritize the
interests of the Lebanese people above their own ambitions and personal
interests. The United States firmly believes that it is crucial for
Lebanon's political figures to prioritize the welfare of the nation and its
citizens. The US State Department highlighted the urgent need for Lebanese
leaders to address and resolve the ongoing political paralysis within the
country.
UN Special Coordinator urges Lebanon's parliamentarians
to ensure Presidential election
LBCI/June 14/2023
UN Special Coordinator for Lebanon, Joanna Wronecka, urged the Lebanese
leaders and parliamentarians to take urgent steps to ensure the election of
a President in the interest of Lebanon and its people. She said on Twitter,
"The prolonged vacuum undermines Lebanon's democratic practices and further
delays the long overdue reforms and solutions needed to steer the country
back to a path of recovery."
59 MPs vote for Azour, 51 for Franjieh amid row over 'missing' vote
Agence France Presse/June 14/2023
Lawmakers in crisis-hit Lebanon on Wednesday failed for the 12th time to
elect a new president, as bitter divisions between Hezbollah and its
opponents marred the vote.
Candidates Jihad Azour and Suleiman Franjieh both failed to get across the
line, with Azour garnering 59 votes and Frangieh 51 in the 128-seat
parliament. Six MPs voted for former minister Ziad Baroud, one MP voted for
Army chief Gen. Joseph Aoun and 8 for "New Lebanon" amid controversy over a
"missing" vote. All lawmakers showed up for the election, but many left the
chamber after placing their ballots in the box and quorum was lost before a
second round of voting -- where the winner only requires 65 ballots -- was
able to go ahead.
Berri adjourned the voting session despite demands by the MPs to repeat the
vote or the counting, as the counted ballots were 127 while 128 MPs voted.
MPs of Amal and Hezbollah and MP Jihad al-Samad had already walked out of
the session. "One missing vote would not make a difference," Berri said, and
ended the session due to lack of quorum. Change MP Melhem Khalaf had asked
Speaker Berri at the beginning of the session not to leave parliament before
a president is elected in open-ended sessions. "I am not listening to you,"
Berri responded. Lebanon has been without a head of state for more than
seven months, and the last bid to elect a president was held on January 19.
As the 11 before it, Wednesday's attempt was "only a way for political
forces to gauge their respective electoral weight" and see how many votes
they can get, analyst Karim Bitar said. Lebanon is facing a double power
vacuum, with the country governed by a caretaker cabinet with limited powers
for more than a year. The international community has urged politicians to
elect a consensus presidential candidate who can help the country enact
reforms required to unlock billions of dollars in loans from abroad.
Franjieh, a former lawmaker and minister who is a friend of Syrian President
Bashar al-Assad, hails from a storied family dynasty, like many of Lebanon's
prominent political figures. On Sunday, he promised to be "the president of
all Lebanese" despite his polarizing alliances. Azour was finance minister
from 2005 to 2008 and has stepped aside from his role as the director of the
Middle East and Central Asia department at the International Monetary Fund
in view of the presidential contest. Azour's supporters had said their
candidate can get more than 65 votes. On Wednesday he garnered 59. "The FPM
and the opposition have nothing in common except the agreement on
eliminating Franjieh," Hezbollah MP Hassan Fadlallah said, as he accused
Azour's supporters of not being convinced of him themselves. Many who voted
for Azour, including Change MPs and the Lebanese Forces, had said he is not
their ideal candidate but would still vote for him to end the vacuum.
- 'Prolonged vacuum' -
The winner needs two-thirds majority, or 86 votes from the 128 members of
parliament -- but Hezbollah and its allies have posted spoilt ballots to
disrupt previous votes. Quorum has been lost before a second round of voting
-- where the winner only requires 65 ballots -- has been able to go ahead.
Hezbollah and its allies adopted a similar tactic in the last presidential
vote, a move that left Lebanon without a president for more than two years,
until Michel Aoun's 2016 win. Pro-Hezbollah daily Al-Akhbar's front page on
Wednesday featured just one word: vacuum.
If Azour got more than 60 votes it would have been a huge "reversal of
fortune for Hezbollah", said Bitar, and would represent massive
cross-sectarian "opposition to Hezbollah hegemony on the Lebanese political
landscape". "However, at this stage, the most likely scenario is a prolonged
vacuum," Bitar added. Azour on Monday said he wanted to "contribute to a
solution" not a crisis, as he announced his bid for the post. He said he was
"not defying anyone", after Hezbollah described him as the "defiance and
confrontation candidate". Mohammad Raad, the head of Hezbollah's
parliamentary bloc, has accused Azour's supporters of not wanting him to be
elected but "using him" to block Franjieh's path to the presidency. Bitar
said the stalemate at Wednesday's ballot could pave the way for protracted
negotiations "that would ultimately reach a third-man solution". The United
States and France on Tuesday renewed calls for Lebanese lawmakers to
cooperate and elect a new president. French foreign ministry spokeswoman
Anne-Claire Legendre urged MPs to "take this date seriously" and "not to
waste another opportunity".
Shiite Duo calls for dialogue -
"Enough passing the buck... for prolonging the vacuum," Berri said in a
statement after the session. "Only consensus and dialogue" will speed up the
election of a president, he added, without immediately scheduling a new
ballot. Sami Gemayel, head of the Christian Kataeb party, called Wednesday's
support for Azour an "uprising" against "diktats and threats", in reference
to accusations Hezbollah is seeking to impose its preferred candidate. The
Shiite movement has described Azour as the "defiance and confrontation
candidate". Before and after the session, Hezbollah MPs called for dialogue
and consensus. "No one can impose a president, the only solution is
consensus," Fadlallah said. He added that "the country cannot be led by
confrontation"."Dialogue is essential for electing a president," he told AFP,
calling for "understanding". Hezbollah lawmaker Hussein Haj Hassan claimed
Azour and those around him had no political program and called for a "real
national dialogue away from the auctioneering and intimidation."
Azour's supporters accuse Hezbollah of blocking
democratic vote
Associated Press/June 14/2023
On Wednesday, supporters of former finance minister Jihad Azour accused
Hezbollah and its allies of blocking the democratic process. Hezbollah and
Amal MPs had withdrawn following the first round of electoral voting on
Wednesday, breaking the quorum, after Azour failed to reach the two-thirds
majority needed to win in the first round. Azour had the backing of the
country's largest Christian political parties, the Free Patriotic Movement,
which has been allied with Hezbollah since 2006, and the Lebanese Forces
party. Azour was also backed by the majority of Druze legislators and some
Sunni Muslims. The new president's most pressing task will be to get this
nation of 6 million people, including more than 1 million Syrian refugees,
out of an unprecedented economic crisis that began in October 2019. The
meltdown is rooted in decades of corruption and mismanagement by the
country's political class that has ruled Lebanon since the 1975-90 civil war
ended. Clinching a bailout deal with the IMF — Azour's current employer — is
seen as key to Lebanon's recovery. Azour took a leave of absence from his
post as regional director for the organization upon announcing his
candidacy. "This group does not believe in democracy," said Fadi Karam,
lawmaker from Lebanese Forces. Independent lawmaker Waddah Sadek said that
"nobody can nominate a candidate and say it's either them or nobody
else."Hezbollah has often criticized opposing candidates as divisive and
"confrontational," though Azour has said that he would work to bring
together rival political groups and end the economic crisis. "Who better
than Jihad Azour to seal the deal with the IMF that can help guarantee us
international investment," Sadek said. Hezbollah lawmaker Hussein Haj Hassan
claimed Azour and those around him had no political program and called for a
"real national dialogue away from the auctioneering and intimidation."
Earlier this week, Franjieh said he was not imposing himself but sought "a
national consensus or majority." Not all lawmakers opposed to Hezbollah
support Azour's candidacy and some see him as representing sectarian
parties. Ibrahim Mneimneh said the one thing that many legislators who like
him ran on anti-establishment platforms agree on was their opposition to
Franjieh. Michel Douaihy, another independent lawmaker, said Azour had not
been the first choice of most independents, but that his candidacy "is the
art of compromise at its best." No date has been set for a thirteenth
attempt to elect a president.
MPs from both camps claim 'victory' after botched presidential vote
Naharnet/June 14/2023
MPs from the rival electoral camps on Wednesday claimed “victory” in a
presidential election session that failed to produce a new president. “The
camp that is trying to impose its candidate garnered 51 votes, which means
that there is a clear majority against the imposition process … Our
rejection of imposition means that we have won,” MP Michel Mouawad of the
pro-Jihad Azour camp said after the session. MP Ali Hassan Khalil of Speaker
Nabih Berri’s Development and Liberation bloc meanwhile said the session
carried “a victory for the democratic battle and for an alliance that
carries a clear political project.”“The victory today was a victory for the
project in the face of an intersection whose elements have said that it is
temporary and would end with the end of the session,” Khalil added. Kataeb
Party chief MP Sami Gemayel for his part noted that the rival camp’s MPs
“blocked quorum and ran away from the session,” noting that “this proves who
won the battle.”“We did not want the battle but rather consensus, and that’s
why we proposed a consensual person. The other camp was supposed to meet us
halfway but it is continuing with its imposition approach and we will
continue confronting them,” Gemayel added. Azour received 59 votes in the
first round of voting in Wednesday’s session as Suleiman Franjieh garnered
51 votes. Speaker Nabih Berri later adjourned the session amid a loss of
quorum and controversy over a “lost” vote. Eighty-six votes are needed by
any candidate to win from the first round while 65 are needed in the second
round. Lebanon has been without a head of state for more than seven months,
and the previous attempt to elect a president was held on January 19.
Berri calls for dialogue, says only consensus can end
vacuum
Agence France Presse/June 14/2023
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri urged Wednesday for dialogue after MPs failed
for the 12th time to elect a president. Berri called on parties to stop
trading blame and to stop "spinning in a vicious circle.""Enough passing the
buck for prolonging the vacuum," Berri said."Denial will not lead anywhere,
only consensus and dialogue will speed up the election of a president," he
added, without immediately scheduling a new ballot. Hezbollah MPs and their
candidate Marada leader Suleiman Franjieh also called on Wednesday for
dialogue. "Dialogue is essential for electing a president," Hezbollah MP
Hassan Fadlallah told AFP. "The country cannot be led by
confrontation".Hezbollah lawmaker Hussein Haj Hassan claimed Azour and those
around him had no political program and called for a "real national dialogue
away from the auctioneering and intimidation."Crisis-hit Lebanon has already
been without a head of state for more than seven months, and the previous
attempt to elect a president was held on January 19.
Franjieh calls for 'constructive dialogue with
everyone'
Naharnet/June 14/2023
Marada Movement chief Suleiman Franjieh on Wednesday thanked the 51 MPs who
voted for him in the 12th presidential election session that was held
earlier in the day without producing a winner. “We also respect the opinion
of the lawmakers who did not vote for me and this should push for
constructive dialogue with everyone,” Franjieh added, in a tweet. Franjieh’s
main electoral rival Jihad Azour received 59 votes in the first round of
voting in Wednesday’s session. Speaker Nabih Berri later adjourned the
session amid a loss of quorum and controversy over a “lost” vote. Eighty-six
votes are needed by any candidate to win from the first round while 65 are
needed in the second round. MPs from both camps claimed “victory” after the
session. Lebanon has been without a head of state for more than seven
months, and the previous attempt to elect a president was held on January
19.
Azour urges moving electoral process forward for 'good
of Lebanese people'
Naharnet/June 14/2023
Ex-minister and incumbent IMF official Jihad Azour on Wednesday thanked the
Lebanese lawmakers who voted for him in the 12th presidential election
session, which did not produce a new president. "I hope that this
development will be an incentive to converge on the need of getting Lebanon
out of the crisis and move the process forward for the good of the Lebanese
people," Azour said in an English-language statement. Azour received 59
votes in the first round of voting in Wednesday’s session as Suleiman
Franjieh garnered 51 votes. Speaker Nabih Berri later adjourned the session
amid a loss of quorum and controversy over a “lost” vote. Eighty-six votes
are needed by any candidate to win from the first round while 65 are needed
in the second round. MPs from both camps claimed “victory” after the
session. Lebanon has been without a head of state for more than seven
months, and the previous attempt to elect a president was held on January
19.
Bassil: Today's session proves no one can bypass
Christian component in presidency
LBCI/June 14/2023
Leader of the Free Patriotic Movement, Gebran Bassil, commented on Today's
session in a tweet, saying: "Today's session, as we said yesterday, has
proven that no one can bypass the Christian component in the presidency of
the republic and that no one can impose a president on another. The movement
is committed and follows its own convictions only...""Every stubbornness
will be met with another stubbornness. There is no solution except through
consensus on the program and on the president, without exclusion or sharing.
No president can succeed without an agreed-upon program," he added. "Drop
the preconditions, as this is not a dialogue, and abandon theories of
imposition and defiance, as this is not Lebanon. Let us focus on the
priorities of the presidency and the names that align with the sovereign,
reformist, and salvation program," Bassil stressed.
Geagea slams obstruction of 'entire' presidential
election process
Naharnet/June 14/2023
Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea on Wednesday described the walkout of
the pro-Suleiman Franjieh lawmakers from the 12 presidential election
session as “a real and actual obstruction of the entire presidential
election process.”“Had the second round (of voting) been held today, we
would have had a president now,” Geagea tweeted. Jihad Azour -- the
candidate of the LF, the Free Patriotic Movement and most opposition forces
-- received 59 votes in the first round of voting in Wednesday’s session as
Suleiman Franjieh garnered 51 votes. Speaker Nabih Berri later adjourned the
session amid a loss of quorum and controversy over a “lost” vote. Eighty-six
votes are needed by any candidate to win from the first round while 65 are
needed in the second round. MPs from both camps claimed “victory” after the
session.
Lebanon has been without a head of state for more than seven months, and the
previous attempt to elect a president was held on January 19.
Samy Gemayel praises 'uprising' in Parliament for rejecting imposition and
threat
LBCI/June 14/2023
The head of the Lebanese Kataeb Party, MP Samy Gemayel, considered that what
happened in the 12th session to elect a president was a real "uprising" by
the Lebanese MPs from all affiliations who gathered to reject the process of
imposition and threat and attempts to suggest that the presidential decision
is in "one place" in Lebanon. Gemayel praised from the Parliament the real
"uprising" that took place, which brought together a large number of
deputies who committed to voting, and praised some of the Change MPs who
decided to show unity against the logic of imposition.
He said that on Tuesday, a group of blocs and deputies were under pressure
and threats, which led to the retreat of some, and despite that, the number
of votes came according to their estimates. He added that they were for
months subject to defamation campaigns, adding, "We are accused of treachery
and that any president other than Sleiman Frangieh lives in Tel Aviv." He
added: "If there are those who consider the victory that occurred in today's
session a failure, what is their stance towards the actions of others who
disrupted the quorum and left the session? Today is the greatest evidence of
who is the winner in the battle, and we say that we never wanted to engage
in a battle […] And the other team was supposed to meet us halfway, but they
continued with the logic of imposition, and we continue to confront them.
6 'Oct. 17' MPs refuse to vote for 'sectarian parties'
candidates
Naharnet/June 14/2023
MPs Elias Jradeh, Halima Qaaqour and Cynthia Zarazir of the Change bloc and
MPs Osama Saad, Abdul Rahman al-Bizri and Charbel Masaad of the
Sidon-Jezzine bloc announced prior to Wednesday’s presidential election
session that they would not vote for the candidates of the “sectarian
parties.”In a statement, the lawmakers said they would only vote for a
candidate who supports the independence of the judiciary and backs holding
corrupts accountable and resuming the probe into the Beirut port blast. They
also called for a president who would work for restructuring banks,
recovering deposits, creating a social safety net and managing “serious
dialogue aimed at devising a defense strategy.”“Because the June 14 session
with the acknowledgement of the various political forces is not aimed at
electing a president, but rather to reinforce the negotiation cards of the
sectarian parties, we the undersigned stress that we will not be dragged by
these sectarian parties … and will only elect the president who shares our
political vision,” the MPs added.
LBCI interviews shed light on parliamentary blocs'
reactions following election session
LBCI/June 14/2023
Amidst the aftermath of the presidential election session, exclusive
interviews with various parliamentary blocs conducted by LBCI revealed
divergent perspectives and reactions. The statements reflected the ongoing
tensions and political complexities surrounding the process of electing
Lebanon's president.
Samir Geagea, leader of the Lebanese Forces, expressed his view that the
12th election session was unconventional, questioning why the elections were
halted after the first round. Geagea emphasized that if the second round had
taken place, Lebanon would have had a president by now, initiating a
potential path towards rescuing the country. Ali Hasan Khalil from the Amal
Movement highlighted the rejection of Jihad Azour by a whole faction,
dismissing attempts to impose their candidate as a form of "imposition." He
stressed the importance of dialogue without preconditions and rejected the
notion of canceling their candidate. Tony Frangieh, Marada Movement MP and
son of candidate Sleiman Frangieh described the session's outcome as
positive, and emphasizing Lebanon's need for a consensus-based approach.
Frangieh acknowledged the pressure exerted on Change MPs and noted that
approximately 20 Christian MPs were outside the intersection that supported
Azour.
Samy Gemayel, leader of the Kataeb Party, called on the opposing faction to
present a consensus candidate before engaging in any dialogue regarding the
presidential file. Gemayel criticized the perception of Azour being
forcefully imposed, highlighting the contradiction with democratic
processes. He emphasized the need for a consensus-based dialogue to break
the cycle. Michel Moawad, member of the Tajadod Bloc, acknowledged the
achievement of supporting Azour and expressed the hope of surpassing the 59
votes. Ibrahim Mneimneh, despite initial hesitation, voted for Azour,
acknowledging that they voted for a candidate they do not endorse. Ahmad al-Kheir
from the National Moderation Bloc affirmed the validity of their decision
and the importance of selecting a candidate in the next session, stating
that the bloc's position remains unified. Wael Abou Faour, representing the
Democratic Gathering Bloc, emphasized the incomplete nature of the current
scene and urged all parties to take responsibility for addressing the
ongoing crisis.
Report: Macron, MBS to discuss Lebanon in Paris meeting
Naharnet/June 14/2023
Saudi Arabia's de facto ruler Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman will discuss
with President Emmanuel Macron on Friday the Lebanese file, local media
reports said Wednesday. The meeting takes place after Lebanese MPs failed
again Wednesday to elect a president amid a chaotic session that ended with
a missing vote and a lack of quorum for the second round. "The French were
awaiting the results of Wednesday's session to resume their talks with the
Lebanese parties," al-Akhbar newspaper reported. It added that Paris has not
changed its stance regarding the presidential consensus and that its efforts
will intensify this week.
MP Tony Frangieh: No alternative to openness, unity
in face of hate
NNA/June 14, 2023
MP Tony Frangieh on Wednesday said via Twitter, “There is no alternative to
openness and unity in the face of hate, exclusion, and division. Today’s
presidential election outcome confirms the victory of this approach. Let's
build on what unites us.”
Minister Sharafeddine broaches displaced Syrians’
dossier with Syrian Chargé d'Affaires
NNA/June 14, 2023
Caretaker Minister of the Displaced, Issam Sharafeddine, on Wednesday
received in his office at the ministry, the Chargé d'Affaires of the Syrian
Embassy in Lebanon, Ali Dagman. Discussions reportedly touched on the
displaced Syrians’ dossier and on Minister Sharafeddine’s upcoming visit to
Damascus at the end of this week.
Grand Mufti broaches general affairs with UNIFIL
Commander
NNA/June 14, 2023
Grand Mufti of the Lebanese Republic, Sheikh Abdel Latif Darian, on
Wednesday welcomed at Dar al-Fatwa UNIFIL Commander, General Aroldo Lazaro,
with whom he discussed general affairs. Lazaro gifted a shield to the Grand
Mufti as a token of love and appreciation.
USAID Provides More Than $17.4 Million in Additional
Humanitarian Assistance for Vulnerable Lebanese People
NNA/June 14, 2023
To help vulnerable Lebanese continue to put food on the table and access
medical care, the United States, through the U.S. Agency for International
Development (USAID), is providing more than $17.4 million in additional
humanitarian assistance to the people of Lebanon via the UN World Food
Programme (WFP) and two non-governmental organizations (NGOs). As staple
food and fuel prices rise and livelihoods erode, Lebanon’s deepening
economic crisis continues to generate humanitarian needs by decreasing
vulnerable populations’ purchasing power, and restricting access to
healthcare. With more than $11.1 million in additional USAID humanitarian
assistance, WFP will provide 300,000 vulnerable Lebanese people with monthly
household food parcels for approximately two months, helping improve food
security for some 75,000 households. The WFP food parcels, which are
purchased locally in Lebanon to support the local economy, provide about 65
percent of daily caloric needs and contain grains such as rice and bulgur;
pulses such as lentils, beans, and chickpeas; pasta; canned fish; oil; and
other staples. WFP’s food parcel program complements national social safety
net programs led by the Government of Lebanon and targets vulnerable
Lebanese people who are not reached by the safety nets. Additionally,
through nearly $6.3 million in USAID humanitarian assistance, Relief
International (RI) and International Medical Corps (IMC) will continue
supporting at least 11 primary healthcare clinics across Lebanon, as well as
home care. With USAID funding, RI- and IMC-supported clinics treated more
than 96,000 patients, approximately 72 percent of whom were Lebanese, in
Fiscal Year (FY) 2022.
Syrians conditions worsen, WFP faces 'unprecedented
funding crisis'
Associated Press/June 14/2023
Six months after she got the call informing her that her U.N. assistance
would be cut, Najwa al-Jassem is struggling to feed her four children and
pay rent for their tent in a Syrian refugee camp in Lebanon's eastern Bekaa
Valley.
She once received food rations and cash that covered most of their modest
monthly expenses. The family now only gets the equivalent of $20 a month,
which just covers the rent for their cramped tent. Her husband gets only
sporadic day labor and "my kids are too young for me to send them to work
the fields," she told The Associated Press in the camp near the town of Bar
Elias. "We're eating one meal a day."
Aid agencies will struggle to draw the world's attention back to the plight
of Syrians like al-Jassem on Wednesday at an annual donor conference hosted
by the European Union in Brussels for humanitarian aid to respond to the
Syrian crisis.
Funding from the two-day conference will also go toward providing aid to
Syrians within the war-torn country and to some 5.7 million Syrian refugees
living in neighboring countries, particularly Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan.
This year, organizers aim to raise some $11.2 billion, though humanitarian
officials acknowledged that pledges will likely fall short.
On Tuesday, a day before the conference, the World Food Program announced
that it was faced with an "unprecedented funding crisis" and would cut aid
to 2.5 million out of the 5.5 million people in Syria who had been receiving
food assistance.
The conference comes as Syria's protracted uprising-turned-civil-conflict
has entered its 13th year, and after a deadly 7.8 magnitude earthquake
rocked large swaths of Syria in February, further compounding its misery.
The World Bank estimated over $5 billion in damage s, as the quake destroyed
homes and hospitals and further crippled Syria's poor power and water
infrastructure. It also comes at a politically precarious time for refugees
living in neighboring countries. Syrian President Bashar Assad recently
received a major political lifeline with the return of Damascus to the Arab
League, and Syria's neighbors have, in return, called for a mass
repatriation of refugees.
Anti-refugee rhetoric has surged in neighboring Lebanon and Turkey, both
dealing with economic and political crises. In Lebanon, where officials have
put the blame for the country's economic crisis onto the country's estimated
1.5 million refugees, authorities have imposed curfews on refugees and
restricted their ability to rent homes. Rights groups have said the Lebanese
military has deported hundreds of Syrian refugees in recent months. In
Turkey, where Syrians were once welcomed with compassion, repatriation of
the roughly 3.7 million refugees became a top theme in last month's
presidential and parliamentary elections, which ended in a new term for
incumbent President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Erdogan's government for years defended its open-door policy, but has in
recent years been building housing developments in areas of northwestern
Syria controlled by Ankara-backed Syrian opposition groups, with the stated
aim of encouraging refugee returns. Ankara and Damascus have also been
holding talks in Moscow to improve strained relations. The government has
also carried out sporadic forcible deportations, while Erdogan's challengers
took a harder line, vowing to deport refugees en masse.
While some Syrian refugees have voluntarily returned from Turkey and
Lebanon, most say the situation is too volatile. At the camp in Lebanon,
Fteim Al-Janoud struggled to hold back her tears as she talked about how she
and her husband can only afford to send one of her six children to school.
But the refugee from Syria's northern Aleppo province said the situation
there is even worse, both in terms of security and material concerns. "If
the conditions were good and if our homes were fixed so we could live
peacefully and comfortably, we wouldn't have a problem going back to Syria,
even with Assad still there," she said. Despite the deteriorating situation
for Syrians, aid has dwindled in recent years, as donors rushed to support
over 5 million Ukrainian refugees and over 7 million internally displaced in
the conflict-hit European country. The war in Ukraine, a global bread
basket, also sparked a food inflation surge on the heels of the COVID-19
pandemic that rocked the global economy for years.
"We see needs are increasing, and we also see that that donor funding is
gradually going down," said Ivo Freijsen, the U.N. refugee agency's
representative to Lebanon, where some 90% of refugees live in extreme
poverty and are dependent on aid.
"From a humanitarian point of view, it means that more people will be
suffering," he said. "We need to be seeking to see funding levels stay at
the same level and actually increase."
At last year's conference in Brussels, donors pledged $6.7 billion, falling
billions short of the U.N.'s $10.5 billion appeal, split almost evenly to
assist Syrians inside the war-torn country and refugees. The funding
shortage forced hospitals in opposition-held northwestern Syria to cut back
services, while the U.N. World Food Program cut the size of its monthly
rations for the more than 1 million people it serves in that area.
"We know that Ukraine has taken a big toll," said U.N. Resident and
Humanitarian Coordinator in Lebanon Imran Riza. "We know that Sudan has now
become also quite a priority. It's a difficult time and it's a time that's
also following COVID and everything else that happened that hit economies so
hard across the globe."Given those difficulties, he said international
donors need to "move towards much more sustainable interventions" rather
than remaining in crisis mode.
At the camp in the Bekaa Valley, Al-Jassem says she's struggling to cope
with mounting debts she and her husband have to cover unpaid rent and
medical expenses.
But she's more worried about the well-being of her children, who have lived
their entire lives in a refugee camp in worsening conditions.
"The kids sometimes go to school without having breakfast," she explained.
"Their teacher would sometimes call me and ask why they didn't bring a
sandwich with them, and I would say it's because I have nothing in the
pantry."
A Text of a Letter sent to the USA to Department of
State by three Member Of The Congress addressing the Lebanese Crisis
Congress Of The United States/House Of Representatives
The Honorable Antony Blinken Secretary of State
Department of State
2201 C Street NW Washington, DC 20520
Dear Secretary Blinken:
June 12, 2023
As Co-Chairs of the U.S.-Lebanon Friendship Caucus, we write to you
regarding Lebanon’s upcoming presidential election. We remain concerned that
Lebanon’s constitutional processes have stalled, resulting in multiple
failed parliamentary electoral sessions and a continued presidential
vacancy.
Lebanon has been without a president since October 2022. Since then, the
Lebanese Parliament has sought to elect a president eleven times. On
Wednesday, June 14, 2023, Parliament will attempt to elect a president once
again. It is time for those who seek to undermine the parliamentary process,
block open election procedures, and continue to prevent multiple rounds of
ballots to either resolve the impasse and allow the country to move forward,
or be held accountable. It is concerning that in the past, the Parliament’s
balloting was not allowed to go to a second round, once again preventing the
selection of a candidate and further prolonging the political, economic, and
humanitarian crises in Lebanon.
The inability to select a president is playing out against the backdrop of
what the World Bank has estimated is one of the worst economic collapses
since the 1850s.1 Since 2019, Lebanon’s economy has disintegrated, leaving
over three-quarters of the population in poverty. On June 8, 2023, the
International Monetary Fund warned that Lebanon must take immediate action
on economic reforms to prevent “irreversible damage” to the economy.2 The
duly elected Lebanese Parliament cannot move forward with legislation to
implement much needed economic reforms until a president is elected.
1 World Bank, Lebanon Sinking (to the Top 3), Lebanon Economic Monitor
Spring 2021, World Bank Washington, DC.
2 Andrea Shalal, IMF says Lebanon needs urgent economic reforms to stop
deepening crisis, Reuters, June 8, 2023
page1image9102912
The United States has a strong interest in a stable, independent Lebanon.
Unfortunately, the presidential vacancy stands in the way of such
cooperation. If Parliamentary leaders and other political elites are unable
to follow through on Lebanon’s own constitution, preserve a quorum, and
allow the multiple rounds of balloting necessary for the selection of a
president, the United States and our partners and allies in the region, must
consider more serious measures.
We believe that the Administration should emphatically restate the
importance of selecting a president who will represent the needs of the
Lebanese people and move forward with necessary economic reforms before it
is too late. We request your urgent attention to this matter.
Sincerely
Darrel Issa/Member Of The Congress
Darrin Lahood/Member Of The Congress
Debbie Dingell/Member Of The Congress
ãÄÓÓÉ ÚÇãÑ ÝÇÎæÑí ÊÑÍÈ ÈÏÚæÉ áÌäÉ ÇáÏÑÇÓÉ Ýí ÇáÍÒÈ ÇáÌãåæÑí ÈÈäÏ ÇáãÓÇÁáÉ
ÈãÇ íÎÕ áÈäÇä
Amer Fakhoury Foundation Applauds Republican Study Committee’s Call for
Accountability in Lebanon
June 14, 2023
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/119130/119130/
The foundation celebrates the recognition of Amer Fakhoury’s case and the
push for accountability in Lebanon’s government and military aid.
Washington, DC.- The Amer Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to
promoting human rights and accountability, commends the Republican Study
Committee (RSC) for its recent release of a budget proposal that addresses
the unlawful detention and torture of a U.S. citizen in Lebanon. The RSC
acknowledged Amer Fakhoury, who faced illegal detention and torture in
Lebanon before his death shortly after being released from prison.
The RSC budget proposal emphasizes the need to counter Iran’s influence in
the region by preventing U.S. aid from supporting regimes that act as
Iranian proxies in the Middle East, such as the current Lebanese government.
The proposal notes that the terrorist group Hezbollah has taken control of
Lebanon’s government, establishing a monopoly on force and enabling the
Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) to participate in the detention and torture of
U.S. citizens.
To address this issue, the RSC budget recommends discontinuing aid to the
LAF and imposing sanctions on current and former Lebanese security officials
involved in the detention and torture of U.S. citizens. This would include
high-ranking officials like Maj. Gen. Abbas Ibrahim, the former head of the
Lebanese General Security Directorate.
Earlier in 2023, the U.S. Administration initiated a program to provide
direct salary payments to the LAF and Internal Security Forces (ISF),
totaling $72 million. These funds ultimately serve as a slush fund in a
country where Hezbollah’s economic presence is widespread.
The Amer Foundation has been advocating for recognition of Amer Fakhoury’s
plight, and the RSC budget proposal represents a significant step toward
holding those responsible for his unlawful detention and torture
accountable. The foundation will continue to push for justice and increased
transparency in the distribution of U.S. aid to Lebanon and other countries
in the region.
“We are encouraged by the Republican Study Committee’s commitment to
accountability and justice in Lebanon. This is the first of many steps
towards ensuring that no other American citizen suffers the same fate as
Amer Fakhoury,” said Macy Fakhoury a representative of the Amer Foundation.
For more information about the Amer Foundation and its ongoing work to
promote human rights and accountability, visit www.amerfoundation.org or
contact team@fakhouryfoundation.org
**About the Amer Foundation**
The Amer Foundation is a non-profit organization established in memory of
Amer Fakhoury, a U.S. citizen who faced illegal detention and torture in
Lebanon. The foundation is committed to promoting human rights,
accountability, and justice for those who suffer similar injustices. Through
advocacy efforts and public awareness campaigns, the Amer Foundation seeks
to create a world where every individual’s rights are protected and
respected.
Link for the RSC full Report/PDF
https://hern.house.gov/uploadedfiles/202306141135_fy24_rsc_budget_print_final_c.pdf
Why Hezbollah’s popularity in Lebanon is rapidly
declining
Jerry Maher/Arab News/June 14, 2023
It is no secret that Hezbollah and its followers are restless about all that
is happening in Lebanon on the economic, financial and social levels as a
result of the suffocating crisis the country is going through. Hezbollah’s
immediate suffering is one of the consequences of the war in Syria and its
involvement there, which has led to the martyrdom of a large number of young
people.
However, amid signs of the end of the war in Syria and Damascus’ return to
the Arab fold via the Arab League, it has become clear to the families of
the fighters that the blood of their sons was spilled in vain, with no gains
resulting from the party’s participation in the conflict in Syria on the
basis of the “strategic aims of the resistance.”
Therefore, resentment among the many Shiites who make up the party’s base
increases on a daily basis, amid the stifling economic crisis and unstable
living conditions the country is facing.
After all, they live with other Lebanese people and they share the same
suffering. It appeared clearly and publicly with the launch of the popular
movement of the Oct. 17 Revolution in 2019, when areas in Southern Lebanon
and the Bekaa Valley witnessed popular movements under the slogan “All means
all.” They accused the political class, including Hezbollah, of bringing the
country to a state of economic deterioration and financial crisis — the
worst since the civil war ended.
Anger and resentment against the party’s policies are now being expressed
publicly, no longer behind walls or in restricted meetings. As a result of
the insane increase in the price of essential consumer goods and fuel, as
well as the decline in purchasing power as a result of the Lebanese pound’s
deteriorating value against the US dollar, people can no longer tolerate
staying silent and have started to publicly express their views. In the end,
a hungry man is an angry man, and all barriers fall before starvation.
The impact of Hezbollah’s policies was evident in last year’s parliamentary
elections, as turnout declined significantly in some of its strongholds. It
is worth noting that the party and its allies directly employed tactics of
intimidation and fear toward voters. Such practices were intense and
widespread.
Moreover, Hezbollah limited its payment of salaries in US dollars to
fighters only due to the shrinking of its revenues from Iran as a result of
sanctions. It also changed the salaries of employees within its institutions
into Lebanese lira, which increased the resentment and anger.
As a result, it is attempting to make up for its financial shortcomings by
providing direct assistance to its most committed supporters, particularly
by granting them Al-Sajjad cards, which can be used to buy products from its
institutions at discounted rates. The same applies to the launch of special
cards to allow Hezbollah followers to buy medicines from a group of
pharmacies it is affiliated with. These medicines are usually Iranian and
are not subject to the conditions or control of the Lebanese Ministry of
Health. The same is true of the foodstuffs imported from Iran.
The children and wives of Hezbollah leaders show off by carrying luxury bags
made by the likes of Gucci and Chanel.
The same also applies to the party’s attempt to expand its financial
institutions, which are now operating in parallel to the legitimate banks in
order to try to replace them in the future. These institutions, specifically
Al-Qard Al-Hassan, which now has 31 branches, are distributed over a number
of different regions after their work was confined to specific branches in
order to absorb people’s resentment. This institution has become part of the
speculative black market in Lebanon by investing “fresh dollars” into its
affiliated ATMs and carrying out normal banking operations as if it were a
commercial bank, in violation of all banking and financial laws in Lebanon.
It is also remarkable that aid in the form of food baskets, mostly given by
international organizations like USAID, benefit only families affiliated
with Hezbollah, even though the party publicly declares its enmity to the US
and other Western countries.
However, it is evident that a number of its officials and their families
lead normal lives and are unaffected by the crisis because they are
fortunate enough to receive direct donations from the party. That increases
the anger of the families that do not benefit from the same and who have to
make do with crumbs.
The children and wives of Hezbollah leaders enjoy a life of luxury, travel
and vacations, showing off by carrying luxury bags made by the likes of
Gucci and Chanel and watches from international brands such as Rolex.
Meanwhile, the people who make up the popular support of Hezbollah are not
given their daily sustenance or anything that helps them face the daily
challenges of living in Lebanon.
Despite the fact that the country is undergoing social and economic
deterioration, we clearly see the family members of Hezbollah officials
living a fancy lifestyle, as explicitly revealed by the weddings of the
children of these officials, which are worth hundreds of thousands of
dollars. This undoubtedly increases the popular resentment against them.
Some experts say Hezbollah is now losing its grip on Lebanon, given the
anger spreading even in its traditional strongholds, with many in the
country dissatisfied with Hezbollah and the other longtime power holders.
The decline of Hezbollah’s popularity and its political alliances cannot be
traced to a single incident. Rather, it is the result of an ongoing
accumulation of missteps and miscalculations the party has made over several
years, not to mention its negative influence, which has hampered Lebanon’s
democratic processes, impeded social cohesion and hindered its path toward
prosperity.
• Jerry Maher, chairman and CEO at Sawt Beirut International and media
adviser to Bahaa Hariri, is a Swedish political writer and analyst
specializing in the Middle East and Iran.
Twitter: @jerrymahers
ÊÞÑíÑ ãä ãæÞÚ ãíãÑí íÊäÇæá ãäÇÑæÉ ÍÒÈ Çááå ÇáÃÎíÑÉ Ýí
ÇáÌäæÈ æãÇ ÇËÇÑÊå ãä ÇäÊÞÇÏÇÊ æÇÓÊäßÇÑÊ ãÝÇÏåÇ Ãä ÇáÍÒÈ íÎÊØÝ ÇáÈáÏ æíÑåÈ
æíÎæä ãÚÇÑÖíå
Hizbullah's Military Exercise Sparks Criticism In South Lebanon: It Is An
Act Of Hijacking The State, Intimidating Hizbullah's Opponents In The
Country
MEMRI/June 14, 2023
Lebanon | Special Dispatch No. 10665
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/119121/119121/
In May 2023, Hizbullah held two military exercises to mark the 23rd
anniversary of Israel's withdrawal from South Lebanon. The first, called "We
Will Cross" (referring to the Israeli border), was held on May 21 near the
town of 'Armata in the Jezzine district, and involved some 200 fighters,
most of them from Hizbullah's elite Radwan Force.[1] Described by Hizbullah
as "the first of its kind," the exercise, conducted with live ammunition,
simulated the seizing of Israeli military vehicles, a breaching of the
border and a raid into Israeli territory, and the takeover of an Israeli
military base and an Israeli settlement. It was an impressive show of force,
in terms of both the number of troops involved and the number of scenarios
simulated, although similar simulations have featured in previous Hizbullah
exercises documented in the organization's videos.[2] Furthermore, the
exercise did not present significant new capabilities or weapons, such as
the accurate missiles Hizbullah frequently boasts that it possesses.
According to media reports, the exercise was observed by 500-600
journalists, at the invitation of Hizbullah's public relations department.
In fact, the organization bussed the journalists to the area and hosted them
there.[3] It was also attended by representatives of Iran-backed militias,
such as the Houthi Ansar Allah movement from Yemen and officials from the
information department of the Iraqi Al-Nujaba movement. This was apparently
meant as a show of "uniting the fronts" of the resistance axis, a goal
Hizbullah has been promoting since 2021.[4]
Several days later, Hizbullah's branch in the Jabel 'Amil area in South
Lebanon invited the public to observe another exercise, called Al-Fath Al-Mubin
("The Clear Conquest"),[5] simulating "the great and final liberation of
Palestine," starting with "the breaching of the [border] fence." But, unlike
in the case of the first exercise, no footage or photos of this event have
been released to date.
These Hizbullah exercises attracted considerable attention in Lebanon and
the world, due to their timing, shortly after the latest round of fighting
between Israel and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) in Gaza, and their
location, close to the border with Israel. The May 21 exercise was
apparently intended to have an impact on public opinion in Israel, Lebanon
and the Arab and global arenas, and to present Hizbullah's military forces
as an alternative to the Lebanese Armed Forces. The fact that Hizbullah
deliberately invited hundreds of journalists from Lebanon and abroad – not
all of them Hizbullah supporters – to observe it reflects the organization's
sense of confidence, or at least its desire to appear confident; moreover,
it shows that Hizbullah is able to hold such an event in Lebanon without any
fear of the authorities' intervention.
It appears that the exercise indeed embarrassed the Lebanese government by
exposing its lack of control on the ground. It is presumably no coincidence
that, shortly after it was held, Lebanon's interim prime minister, Najib
Mikati, held a series of meetings with the UN Special Coordinator for
Lebanon, the UNIFIL commander and the U.S. ambassador in Beirut. The
exercise also rekindled the debate in Lebanon about Hizbullah's weapons, and
sparked dismay and concern among the organization's opponents, who regarded
it as a threatening message directed not only at Israel but at the Lebanese
public, as part of Hizbullah's efforts to promote its presidential
candidate. The organization's opponents stressed that this publicly-held
exercise shows, more than anything else, that Hizbullah behaves like the
real and only authority in Lebanon, and expressed concern about returning to
the days of the Lebanese civil war of the 1970s and 1980s, which almost
destroyed the country. They also noted that Hizbullah was sabotaging
Lebanon's foreign relations, both with the Arab countries, especially Saudi
Arabia, and with the international community.
This report reviews the military exercise held by Hizbullah in South Lebanon
on May 21, 2023, and the reactions to it in the country:
Hizbullah's May 21 Military Exercise
As stated, the military exercise, held near the town of 'Armata in the
Jezzine region, 20 km from the Israeli border, involved 200 fighters who
simulated seizing IDF military vehicles, raiding Israeli territory and
attacking an Israeli army base and an Israeli settlement, using live
ammunition, drones and explosives.[6]
Hizbullah attached considerable importance to this exercise, which was
accompanied by an extensive public relations campaign. Ahead of the event
the organization's media outlets, and social media accounts of its
supporters, circulated advertisements announcing it.[7] Hizbullah's public
relations chief, Muhammad 'Afif, clarified before the exercise that its goal
was to convey a message to the public in Lebanon and Israel: that Hizbullah
is ready to confront any Israeli aggression and to take part in the defense
of Palestine whenever necessary.[8]
After the exercise, Hizbullah and pro-Hizbullah media published extensive
footage of it and statements and reports about it. Hizbullah Deputy
Secretary-General Na'im Qassem described it as "the first exercise of its
kind" held by the organization in Lebanon, and said that it had conveyed
Hizbullah's determination and readiness to achieve victories and deter
Israel.[9] The pro-Hizbullah Lebanese daily Al-Akhbar devoted a special
section to the exercise. Describing it as a "rare" event that took place "a
few kilometers" from the Israeli border,[10] it added that the exercise had
"announced a new resistance strategy, involving advanced technology of the
type used by the most modern armies, and very organized and determined
troops that can realize any concept and translate it into a tactical
operation." The daily also mentioned the extensive media presence at the
event. It noted that, for the first time since 2005, Hizbullah had allowed
"many diverse" media outlets "from Western and Asian countries" to observe
its military activity, and had undertaken an extensive logistical operation
in order to bring the journalists to the area and allow them to document
"almost anything they wished." [11]
The hype ahead of the exercise was apparently more successful than Hizbullah
had anticipated, creating far-reaching expectations among its supporters and
opponents alike – so much so that the organization was forced to temper
expectations several days before the event. Muhammad 'Afif noted that
"several brothers in the media, with good intentions, had created excessive
expectations," and that the drill would involve "military activity limited
in time and place… only a sample of the real capabilities of the
resistance."[12] After the exercise Na'im Qassem stressed, in a similar
vein, that it had "presented just a part and a sample of our capabilities.
The accurate missiles and other weapons were not shown."[13]
The Lebanese Authorities Were Helpless To Prevent The Public Exercise
The Lebanese authorities, including Interim Prime Minister Najib Mikati,
were apparently helpless to prevent this public show of force by Hizbullah.
Asked about this during a meeting with UN Special Coordinator for Lebanon
Joanna Wronecka, held the day after the exercise, Mikati said that his
government "opposes anything that undermines the state's sovereignty" but
that resolving "the specific problem of Hizbullah's weapons… requires a
broad national consensus. At the moment," he added, "the government is
stressing the need to maintain security stability throughout Lebanon and
refrain from any action that undermines it."[14] One day later Mikati met
with UNIFIL Commander Gen. Aroldo Lázaro Sáenz and with U.S. Ambassador to
Lebanon Dorothy Shea. Although these meetings presumably addressed the issue
of the exercise, the only details disclosed were that Mikati had stressed to
Lázaro that cooperation between the Lebanese Armed Forces and UNIFIL was the
main guarantee of stability along the border with Israel.[15]
Lebanese Politicians: Hizbullah Has Once Again Proved That It is Above The
State; It Must Be Disarmed
As mentioned, the widely-covered exercise confirmed the concerns of
Hizbullah's opponents regarding its weapons and rekindled the debate about
this issue. The organization's opponents argued that, in addition to
conveying a clear message to Israel, the drill was also meant to threaten
the Lebanese public, especially in the context of the upcoming presidential
election. They noted that this blatant show of force was disturbingly
reminiscent of the civil war period in Lebanon, when armed Palestinian
organizations did in the country as they pleased. Hizbullah, they added, is
also harming Lebanon's relations with the Arabs, in particular with Saudi
Arabia, and with the entire international community.
Hizbullah's opponents noted that the exercise was held just a few days after
the Arab summit in Saudi Arabia, whose closing statement had condemned the
phenomenon of armed militias. In addition, they said, it was apparently
meant to signal that Hizbullah and Lebanon were not part of the
understandings being formulated between Iran and Saudi Arabia.[16] They
reiterated their demand to disarm Hizbullah, and some even called to take up
arms against this organization, in light of the state's inaction.
Criticism of the exercise was heard even before it took place. MP Nadim
Gemayel, of the Christian Kataeb party, warned that the exercise "is not
directed at Israel, but is an attempt to frighten and intimidate every
Lebanese who believes in Lebanon. It is directed against the Lebanese state
and its sovereignty. Iran, by means of its militias, is determined to turn
Lebanon into an arena of [military] exercises, missiles and false wars."
Gemayel called on the Lebanese army "to take the necessary measures to
prevent such displays."[17]
Following the exercise the condemnations were harsher and more intense. A
notable response that summarized the criticism against the event was issued
by 31 Lebanese MPs from parties opposing Hizbullah. They wrote that this
show of force by Hizbullah was meant "to clarify to the Lebanese, the Arabs,
and the world that its sovereignty exceeds that of the Lebanese state and
that the state [in fact] lacks sovereignty over its territory. [It was meant
to signal] that no decision can be made in Lebanon against Hizbullah's
wishes or the wishes of the regional axis to which it belongs [i.e., the
resistance axis led by Iran], and that the lives of the Lebanese, their
present and their future, are hostage to Hizbullah's plan… The election of a
new president and the re-forming of the executive branch are also hostage to
[Hizbullah's] weapons, which are always there to impose this power equation
on the rest of the Lebanese [and to torpedo] any attempt to create a
political counterweight to Hizbullah and its allies in Lebanon…" The MPs
added that the exercise also "harms Lebanon’s relations with the
international and the Arab community, and informs the Arabs that the sixth
clause of the [closing] statement [of the recent Arab League summit] in
Jeddah, which firmly opposes the presence of armed militias operating beyond
the [purview of] state institutions, does not concern [Hizbullah], because
[this organization] considers itself a state…”
The MPs explained that “the aberrant status of Hizbullah has no place in
Lebanon's political life and is an abomination in the eyes of most
Lebanese." Hinting at Hizbullah, whose name means "the party of God", they
added that, "however high the status of a particular political party may be,
this does not entitle it to drag Lebanon into struggles that serve only its
own regional plan or to impose its political, military, security and
economic agendas on the Lebanese state…”
The MPs concluded with a call to implement the Taif Agreement[18] and the
Lebanese constitution, which is based on it, both of which call for
disbanding all militias and confining weapons to the state and its
legitimate security apparatuses. The parliamentarians also urged to
implement UN Security Council Resolutions 1559 and 1701,[19] to end
Hizbullah's military and security involvement outside the country, as well
as its interference in the internal affairs of other Arab countries, in
order to restore Lebanon's historic relations with the Arab world and the
international community. In addition, they called for dismantling “the
parallel economy that Hizbullah has created by smuggling [contraband]
through the official and unofficial [border] crossings,” and stressed that
Hizbullah and its allies in and out of Lebanon must “understand once and for
all that the Lebanese people will not surrender to the logic of weapons and
force, no matter what the cost…”[20]
Some of the signatories to the MPs' statement condemning the Hizbullah
exercise (image: Al-Nahhar, Lebanon, May 26, 2023)
In an interview with the Lebanese daily Al-Nahhar, Samir Geagea, head of the
Christian Lebanese Forces party, called it inconceivable that "a group
within Lebanon should usurp the decisions of the Lebanese state and the
choice of the rest of the Lebanese, and take them against their will in a
direction they oppose.” He urged the Lebanese people to realize that this
"totally unacceptable" exercise will impact them, their future, their
existence, their lives and the [country] they live in."[21]
A statement from the Saydat Al-Jabal Association[22] noted that this
“unprecedented show of force” by Hizbullah had been held less than a month
after the Iranian foreign minister visited South Lebanon, and that Hizbullah
had used this display to "draw a connection between its weapons and the
issue of the presidency, so that any new president [elected] will be forced
to recognize these weapons and permit Hizbullah to use them, despite [the
absence of] any consensus [about this issue] in Lebanon.”[23]
Kataeb Party: The Absence Of An Official Response To the Exercise Confirms
That Hizbullah Has Taken Over Lebanon; We Will Call On Our Supporters To
Openly Carry Weapons As Well
There were also those who criticized the heads of the Lebanese state for
allowing Hizbullah to do as it pleases in the country. Kataeb Party leader
Samy Gemayel, for example, claimed that the absence of any official response
to Hizbullah's exercises "means that the country is totally under
Hizbullah's control,” and that this, in turn, means that “the presidential
campaign is extremely important.” He called on Hizbullah's opponents to
agree on a presidential candidate, so as to prevent the election of a
president who will license and support more displays of this sort by
Hizbullah.[24]
Kataeb Party MP Nadim Gemayel stated that the authorities' failure to
respond to this event grants de facto permission to any Lebanese citizen to
carry arms, and went so far as to urge the citizens to do so. He said: “[The
exercise] is a provocation to all Lebanese… These sights take us back to
1975 and to the sights of the armed Palestinian organizations [in Lebanon].
We oppose this and will not accept it. The fact that there was no official
response to this essentially gives anyone in Lebanon permission to carry
arms in order to defend himself… Therefore, I urge our supporters to bear
arms openly and not to stop at the checkpoints, because we are all equal and
therefore the state and the army do not interest us, [just as they do not
interest Hizbullah].”[25]
Articles In The Anti-Hizbullah Press: This Organization Has Cancelled The
Lebanese State; Where Is UNIFIL?!
Similar concerns were raised in the Lebanese newspapers known to oppose
Hizbullah. For instance, journalist Nawal Nasser, who was among those who
observed the exercise, shared her impressions in an article on the Nida Al-Watan
website, and complained about the helplessness of the Lebanese state. She
wrote: “…This is the first time in its history that this party [i.e.,
Hizbullah] has held an event of this magnitude… The military exercise
[itself] lasted only one hour, but the events that preceded and followed it
lasted 10 hours… during which we forgot the state of Lebanon, the state's
obligations, and our rights, and became [citizens of] a 'non-state'
belonging to Hizbullah…
“[This event took place after] twenty-five days of preparation, and more
than 500 journalists from Lebanon and the world registered to participate in
the press coverage. On Sunday, [May 21], 11 buses waited for the invitees
and then took off from the central bus station… on Hajj Qassem Soleimani
Street [named after the slain commander of Iran's Qods Force]. All these
details make us feel, against our will, that we have moved from Lebanon to
another place that is nothing like Lebanon…”
The bus ride to the site of the exercise, writes Nasser, was accompanied by
Hizbullah songs and slogans. Along the roads hung pictures of Hizbullah
officials and of Qassem Soleimani, flags of Hizbullah, “and among them also
a few flags of Lebanon, as though Hizbullah wanted to convey that ‘all of
Lebanon is with us’… Military uniforms were everywhere… Dear Allah," she
exclaims, "Hizbullah is allowed to do what the [rest of] the people of this
country are forbidden to do. We look into the eyes of the [local] people…
Their loyalty is to Hizbullah. They receive their instructions from
Hizbullah… Most of them are Lebanese, but they have become involved in great
struggles that are larger than the homeland…”
After the military display, Nasser adds, the guests were taken to the
village of Rihan for lunch with “the jihadi fighters.” The region was full
of Hizbullah military camps, and Hizbullah gunmen were everywhere on the
roads. They were even the ones directing traffic. “Is this allowed?", she
wonders. "Where is UNIFIL? Where is the state and those responsible for
it?..." She concludes by saying that, with this exercise, "Hizbullah has
confirmed that it is no long a statelet but is [simply] the state…”[26]
An article in the Al-Nahhar daily likewise claimed that the exercise was an
outright act of defiance against the Lebanese state: “…The southern region
seems to have been abandoned to be taken over by Hizbullah and by its
arsenals of heavy weapons… The exercise wasn’t limited or symbolic. The
heavy weapons, the missiles, and the drones that were on display were
sufficient for Hizbullah to convey the messages it wanted [to convey] to
Israel, to Lebanon itself, to the Arabs and to the region.” The daily noted
that, although the exercise was ostensibly held on the occasion of
“Liberation Day” [i.e., the anniversary of Israel's withdrawal from South
Lebanon in 2000], marked on May 25, it was actually nothing more than an act
of defiance against the sovereignty of the state, “whose leaders refrained
from [reacting] or were afraid to react to it." Moreover, it was held just
after the Arab League summit in Jeddah, whose closing statement included a
clause opposing the phenomenon of militias within states. The exercise, said
the daily, thus appears to be a direct and swift response to this position
of the summit and a signal that there will be no change in the status quo
following the rapprochement between Saudi Arabia and Iran.[27]
Some compared this show of force by Hizbullah in South Lebanon to its show
of force in Beirut in May 2008,[28] and to the civil war in Lebanon in the
1970s and 1980s. Journalist 'Ali Hamada wrote, “Hizbullah didn’t have to
flex its muscles on Sunday in the south in order to remind Israel of its
missile capabilities, which are no secret. The [military] display, which
went over the head of the slumbering state of Lebanon… was intended to
remind the Lebanese people of [Hizbullah's] raids on Beirut and in the Druze
mountains on May 7 and 11, [2008], and of the Black Shirts[29] who deployed
in the streets of Beirut in a bid to topple the government of Sa'd Al-Hariri…
This act is a reminder for the Lebanese, intended to convey that all the
developments in the region – the agreement between Saudi Arabia and Iran and
the openness toward the Assad regime… – make no difference as far as Lebanon
is concerned. In other words, to convey that Hizbullah will maintain its
role as the de facto authority in Lebanon by means of its illegal weapons
and by instilling terror, regardless of any regional agreement… Hizbullah
[wishes to convey that] it is part of Lebanon's sovereignty, since it is a
Lebanese faction, and that the decision regarding its weapons is an internal
and not an external one.” Hamada added that this exercise "constitutes
another step on the road to [Hizbullah] swallowing up this country, with the
help of [Lebanese] forces that collaborate with it or surrender to it…”[30]
Journalist Diana Moukalled compared Hizbullah to ISIS, tweeting,
“Hizbullah's military display in the south – the use of drones, the display
of weapons, and the way its operatives were dressed – was a performance that
reminded me of the [military] displays held years ago by ISIS. The
similarity is obvious, down to the clothing and the style of the display and
the photography. ISIS was a murderous terrorist organization that turned
killing and death into a spectacular visual display, and Hizbullah is
likewise trying to use this type of spectacle, despite the disgraceful
reality that prevails in Lebanon under its rule.”[31]
Diana Moukalled's tweet
[1] Hizbullah's elite Radwan Force, named after the organization's military
chief 'Imad Mughniyeh, aka Hajj Radwan, who was killed in 2008, comprises
some 10,000 troops and spearheaded the organization's action against the
rebels in in Syria. This force took part in the military parade held by
Hizbullah in the Syrian village of Al-Qusayr in November 2016. About this
parade, see MEMRI Inquiry and Analysis No. 1295, The Significance,
Ramifications, And Messages Of Hizbullah's Show Of Military Force In Al-Qusayr,
Syria, January 3, 2017; MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 6677, Hizbullah Military
Parade In Syrian Town Of Al-Qusayr: Tanks, Cannon, And Machine Guns,
November 14, 2016.
[2] See MEMRI TV Clip No. 10133, Video Footage Of Hizbullah's Elite Unit
Radwan Force Training, Simulating Invasion Of Northern Israel, , February
16, 2023; MEMRI TV Clip No. 10027, In Nighttime Exercise, Hizbullah Fighters
Simulate Breaching the Security Fence Along Israel-Lebanon Border, Ambushing
Israeli Forces, January 1, 2023.
[3] See e.g., Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), May 22, 2023.
[4] In May 2021, several days after the end of a round of fighting between
Israel and the Palestinian factions in Gaza, Hizbullah Secretary-General
Hassan Nasrallah called on the resistance factions on all the fronts to
establish a principle whereby any Israeli aggression against Jerusalem or
Al-Aqsa will spark a regional confrontation with it. Several factions,
especially Shi'ite militias in Iraq and Yemen, proclaimed themselves ready
to heed this call, but it appears that Hizbullah has not yet managed to
implement it in full. See MEMRI JTTM reports: Hizbullah Brigades: Responding
To Nasrallah's Call For A New Equation That A Threat To Jerusalem Equals
Regional War, June 17, 2021; Al-Nujaba Spokesman: Golan Liberation Brigade
Is Ready For Action; Any Violation In Jerusalem Will Lead To Attacks On
Israeli, U.S. Interests In Region, June 16, 2021.
[5] The name is an allusion to Quran 48:1: " Indeed, We have given you, [O
Muhammad], a clear conquest."
[6] See MEMRI TV Clip No. 10303, Hizbullah Military Drill In Southern
Lebanon Simulates Attack On Israeli Military Base, Seizing Israeli Military
Vehicles; Fighters Use ATVs, Motorcycles, Drones, Explosives, May 21, 2023.
[7] See e.g., MEMRI TV Clip No. 10298, Lebanese Hizbullah Video Promotes
Upcoming 'Public Military Drill' Simulating Raid On Israeli Military Base,
Will Be Covered By Local And International Media, May 17, 2023.
[8] Al-Jumhouriya (Lebanon), May 19, 2023.
[9] Almanar.com.lb, May 22, 2023.
[10] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), May 22, 2023.
[11] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), May 22, 2023.
[12] Alahednews.com, May 19, 2023.
[13] Elnashra.com, May 23, 2023.
[14] Al-Nahhar (Lebanon), May 22, 2023.
[15] Al-Nahhar (Lebanon), May 23, 2023.
[16] On these understandings, see MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 10522, In Saudi
Press, Cautious Optimism Follows Saudi-Iranian Renewal Of Relations, March
13, 2023.
[17] Twitter.com/nadimgemayel, May 19, 2023.
[18] The Taif Agreement, signed in 1989 at the conclusion of the Lebanese
civil war, distributed political, civil, and military authority in the
country along sectarian lines.
[19] UN Security Council Resolution 1559, passed on September 2, 2004,
called for the withdrawal of all foreign forces from Lebanon, for disarming
all Lebanese and non-Lebanese militias in the country, and for imposing the
sovereignty of the state throughout Lebanon. UNSC Resolution 1701, passed on
August 12, 2006, called for a ceasefire between Israel and Hizbullah in the
2006 Lebanon war, which broke out following Hizbullah's kidnapping of three
IDF soldiers on the Israeli border. It also called for reenforcing UNIFIL
and expanding its powers, and banned the armed presence of Hizbullah south
of the Litani river.
[20] Al-Nahhar (Lebanon), May 26, 2023.
[21] Al-Nahhar (Lebanon), May 27, 2023.
[22] A Christian cultural organization established in 2006 by the Maronite
Church which promotes Christian-Muslim coexistence.
[23] Saydeteljabal.org, May 22, 2023.
[24] Elnashra.com, May 23, 2023.
[25] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), May 21, 2023.
[26] Nidaalwatan.com, May 23, 2023.
[27] Al-Nahhar (Lebanon), May 22, 2023.
[28] On May 6, 2008, the government of Lebanon, headed by Fouad Siniora,
decided to outlaw Hizbullah's private telecommunications network, on the
grounds that it violated the sovereignty of the state, and to prosecute
those responsible for establishing it. The government also decided to fire
the head of security at Beirut international airport, who was affiliated
with Hizbullah. In response, armed members of Hizbullah took control of
Beirut and other parts of Lebanon, in order to force the government to
revoke its decisions, which it did. See MEMRI Inquiry & Analysis Series No.
437 - The Lebanon Crisis (2): Hizbullah's Victory and its Regional
Implications – March 31, 2009
[29] The Black Shirts is a name for Hizbullah activists who wear black
shirts when attending Hizbullah displays of force. On January 19, 2011, for
example, hundreds of black-clad Hizbullah activists marched in Beirut and in
other Lebanese cities following the release of some of the findings of the
UN investigation into the assassination of Lebanese prime minister Rafik Al-Hariri,
which implicated Hizbullah.
[30] Al-Nahhar (Lebanon), May 23, 2023.
[31] Twitter.com/dianamoukalled, May 21, 2023.
https://www.memri.org/reports/hizbullahs-military-exercise-sparks-criticism-south-lebanon-it-act-hijacking-state
Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News
published
on June 14-15/2023
Arab states make up 24% of Israel’s 2022
arms exports including drones
Rina Bassist/Al Monitor/June 14/2023
Out of the record-high $12.5 billion in Israeli defense exports in 2022, almost
$3 billion were export deals with Arab countries. Nearly three years after the
signing of the Abraham Accords, normalizing Israel’s relations with the United
Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Morocco, Israel’s defense industry exports in 2022
reached $12.5 billion, the highest since the establishment of the state of
Israel 75 years ago, including nearly a quarter with Arab states. A trade report
published by the Defense Ministry on Wednesday revealed that out of the overall
exports, close to $3 billion came from trade with Arab countries. In the
previous record year of 2021, Bahrain and the UAE accounted for $853 million out
of Israel’s $11.4 billion arms export. The data was presented by Defense
Minister Yoav Gallant to leaders of Israel's defense industries at the Defense
Ministry's headquarters in Tel Aviv. The ministry did not publish details on the
different deals reached with Arab states or the extent of defense export to each
of the Abraham Accords nations. According to the report, exports have more
than doubled since 2014, and jumped by 50% in just the last three years. Drones
constituted 25% of the 2022 exports, while missiles, rockets, or air defense
systems represented 19%. The report noted that global and regional conflicts
around the world have contributed to the rise, as did the fighting in Ukraine.
The high quality of Israeli defense products was also cited as a reason.
Reuters reported last September that Israel agreed to sell to the Emirates the
Spyder portable aerial defense systems, manufactured by the Israeli-based Rafael
company. The two countries signed a free trade zone agreement last May.
Israel’s then-Defense Minister Benny Gantz visited Bahrain in 2022, signing an
agreement on security cooperation, but little has been published since then on
defense deals between the two countries. Gantz visited Morocco in 2021, signing
a first-ever security cooperation agreement with an Arab state. Among other
things, the agreement included a commitment to promote weapons deals. A report
by i24, published in July 2022 while IDF Chief of staff Aviv Kochavi visited
Rabat, revealed that Morocco has agreed to purchase Israeli Harop kamikaze
drones, in a $22 million deal. Last Friday, acting Ambassador to Morocco
Shai Cohen revealed that the leading Israeli defense technology company Elbit
Systems will open two production sites in Morocco. This announcement came after
a report that Israel is considering recognizing Morocco’s sovereignty over the
disputed Western Sahara territory. Elbit did not confirm the report.
Israeli parliament vote deals setback to Netanyahu and
judicial overhaul plan
JERUSALEM (AP)/Wed, June 14, 2023
Israel’s parliament on Wednesday appointed an opposition lawmaker to the
powerful committee that picks the country’s judges, defying Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu in a vote that exposed divisions within the ruling coalition
and raised questions about his control over his political allies.
The vote appeared to temporarily avert a crisis that had threatened to unleash
renewed political turmoil over Netanyahu's contentious judicial overhaul plan.
The opposition had threatened to withdraw from negotiations with Netanyahu over
the overhaul if its candidate, Karine Elharrar, was not named to the committee.
Despite Elharrar's appointment on Wednesday, the opposition said it would
nonetheless suspend talks with Netanyahu until the second vacancy on the
committee is filled and it can resume work. “No committee, no talks,” opposition
leader Yair Lapid said.
Netanyahu accused his opponents of trying “to blow up the dialogue.”Netanyahu’s
government unveiled the judicial overhaul days after taking office last
December, saying the plan was needed to rein in an interventionist judiciary.
Netanyahu’s opponents say the plan is a way for the far-right coalition — a
collection of ultranationalist and ultra-Orthodox parties — to gain control over
the judicial system, threatening the country’s system of checks and balances.
The proposal has prompted hundreds of thousands of Israelis to take part in mass
demonstrations each week against the proposed overhaul. The demonstration
prompted Netanyahu to freeze the plan in March and open negotiations, brokered
by the country’s figurehead president, aimed at reaching a compromise with his
opponents. The committee for appointing judges — which, among other things,
approves the makeup of the Supreme Court — has been a central battleground in
the overhaul plan. Both the governing coalition and the opposition traditionally
are represented on the nine-member committee. But proponents of the overhaul had
demanded that the coalition control both positions, drawing accusations that
Netanyahu and his allies were trying to stack the judiciary with cronies. The
votes, cast anonymously, raised doubts about Netanyahu's control over his
coalition. Netanyahu ordered his allies to oppose all candidates, including its
own members, in a maneuver that he hoped would delay all appointments until
another vote a month from now. But in the secret ballot, several coalition
members joined the opposition in supporting Elharrar's appointment in a 58-56
vote. A second candidate, Tally Gotliv of Netanyahu's Likud party, mustered just
15 votes and did not clear the threshold. That means parliament will have to
fill the post in the coming month. Lapid said it was “good news” that an
opposition member would remain on the judicial selection committee. But he said
was problematic that there is still no committee. “Netanyahu today prevented its
establishment, putting an end to the pretense that he was open to negotiations,”
he said. “Netanyahu used to be a liar and powerful. Now he is a liar and weak,”
he said. “The committee was not established, the threat to democracy is not
removed.”In a video statement, Netanyahu said his opponents were to blame,
noting that they froze the talks even after getting what they wanted. “Gantz and
Lapid don’t want real negotiations," he said. "I promise the citizens of Israel,
unlike them, we will act responsibly for our country.”Since the overhaul was
paused in March, the weekly protests have continued to draw tens of thousands of
people. The protesters are set to demonstrate for a 24th week on Saturday.
Anticipating protests over the vote on Wednesday, police set up barriers outside
the parliament building and next to Netanyahu's home in central Jerusalem. But
the protests were called off after the opposition lawmaker's appointment.
Germany releases funds for Israel's Arrow-3 missiles in
planned 4 billion euro deal
BERLIN (Reuters)/Wed, June 14, 2023
German lawmakers released advance payments of up to 560 million euros on
Wednesday ahead of a planned purchase of the Israel-built Arrow-3 missile
defence system for almost 4 billion euros ($4.30 billion) in total, a member of
the budget committee told Reuters. Arrow-3 is designed to intercept ballistic
missiles outside of the earth's atmosphere. It is the top layer of Israel's
missile defence array, which extends from Iron Dome that intercepts short-range
rockets to Arrow-3's long-range missiles that destroy any non-conventional
warheads at a safe altitude. Berlin aims to strike a government-to-government
deal with Israel on the purchase of the Arrow-3 system at the end of the year,
according to procurement documents by the finance ministry that were prepared
for parliament. Germany will lose part or all of its advance payments should the
deal fail, according to the papers, as the money would be used to compensate
Israel for costs incurred by then. The German air force is supposed to take
delivery of Arrow-3, which will cost about one billion euros more than
originally planned, by the fourth quarter of 2025. Russia's war in Ukraine has
laid bare a shortage of ground-based air defence systems such as Raytheon's
Patriot units or the more recently developed IRIS-T in many Western nations.
While Patriot and IRIS-T cover the medium layer of air defence, Arrow-3 -
produced by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) - offers protection for the higher
layer.
Washington says it's asking Israel about the death of
detained Palestinian-American
JERUSALEM (AP)/Wed, June 14, 2023
The United States on Wednesday said it was seeking more information about the
closure of an Israeli military investigation into the death of a 78-year-old
Palestinian-American who was detained, gagged and left unconscious shortly
before being pronounced dead. Israel had announced on Tuesday that it would not
bring criminal charges against the soldiers involved in the detention of the
Palestinian-American, Omar Assad, from an impromptu checkpoint in the occupied
West Bank last year. The military admitted that the actions of the soldiers —
who left Assad lying unresponsive on the ground without offering medical help or
checking to see if he was alive — showed a lapse of moral judgement. But it said
the soldiers would face only internal disciplinary measures because it could not
determine that their misconduct directly caused Assad’s death. Assad's death has
sparked outrage, shining a light on the dangers faced by Palestinians in the
West Bank. Palestinians say they suffer systematic mistreatment living under
military occupation. In the U.S., where Assad spent four decades and where his
family still lives, the State Department said it was discussing “this troubling
incident with the Israeli government.” “We are at this time seeking more
information,” U.S. State Department spokesman Matthew Miller told reporters in
Washington. “We're going to talk to them directly about it.”Miller said the
American government had expected Israel to conduct “a thorough criminal
investigation and full accountability.”Human rights groups long have argued that
Israel rarely holds soldiers accountable for the deaths of Palestinians, with
Israeli military investigations often reflecting a pattern of impunity.
Israel's Rafael says it is developing hypersonic missile interceptor
TEL AVIV, June 14 (Reuters)/Wed, June 14, 2023
The Israeli state-owned defence contractor behind the Iron Dome and David's
Sling air shields announced on Wednesday the development of a new system to
counter hypersonic missiles, a week after Iran said it had produced its first
such weapon. The SkySonic interceptor will "enable us to intercept all kinds of
hypersonic threats - hypersonic ballistic missiles, hypersonic cruise missiles,"
Yuval Steinitz, chairman of Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd, told Reuters at
a media event. The Pentagon was briefed on the development, Rafael said. It
declined to say if or when the Israeli military might deploy SkySonic. Israel's
defence ministry had no immediate comment. Hypersonic missiles can fly at least
five times faster than the speed of sound and on a complex trajectory, making
them hard to shoot down. An animated video rendition of SkySonic issued by
Rafael showed an interceptor missile taking off vertically from a launch
battery. The missile's warhead is then shown detaching and flying with its own
booster toward an incoming threat. Rafael said the system would be unveiled at
the Paris Air Show next week. Israel's arch-enemy Iran on June 6 went public
with what it described as its first domestically made ballistic hypersonic
missile, Fattah. The missile can reach 15,000 kms/hr (9,321 miles/hour) and
evade Israeli defences like the short-range Iron Dome, Iran's state TV said. At
the time, Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant said: "To any such development,
we have an even better response." He did not elaborate.
Israeli army blames mix-up for fatal shooting of
Palestinian toddler
Reuters/June 14, 2023
JERUSALEM: An Israeli soldier who killed a Palestinian toddler in a car two
weeks ago thought he was shooting at gunmen, the army said on Wednesday, blaming
a mix-up caused by another soldier firing in the air in violation of
regulations.Two-year-old Mohammad Al-Tamimi suffered a fatal head wound in the
June 1 shooting near Ramallah in the occupied West Bank. His father was hit in
the shoulder. The Palestinian foreign ministry demanded accountability, deeming
the incident a crime. Publishing the results of its investigation, the Israeli
military repeated previous assertions that Palestinian gunmen had fired at
soldiers guarding a Jewish settlement that night. An army officer searching the
area saw a “suspicious vehicle and fired several times into the air,” prompting
a soldier who heard those shots to open fire on the Tamimis’ car, believing the
gunmen were using it for their getaway. The investigation faulted commanders for
miscommunication and “incorrect decision-making,” the statement said, adding
that the officer who fired in the air would be reprimanded for violating
standing orders. The Palestinian foreign ministry, in a statement, deplored the
findings as “the clearest and ugliest form of disregard for, and legalization
of, the shedding of Palestinian blood.”The West Bank, among territories where
Palestinians seek statehood, has experienced a surge of violence over the last
15 months. A report by Israeli rights group Yesh Din based on military data from
2017 to 2021 found that Israeli soldiers were prosecuted in less than 1 percent
of hundreds of complaints filed against them on alleged offenses against
Palestinians.
China’s Xi hosts Abbas, vows support for Palestinian
state on 1967 borders
Adam Lucente/Al Monitor/June 14/2023
Xi used the word 'Palestine' as he welcomed Mahmoud Abbas on a visit that
follows Beijing's offer to mediate peace talks between Israel and the
Palestinians. Chinese President Xi Jinping reiterated on Wednesday China's
support for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on the 1967
borders in a meeting with his Palestinian counterpart Mahmoud Abbas in Beijing,
further demonstrating Beijing's growing interest in the Middle East. “The
fundamental solution to the Palestinian issue lies in the establishment of an
independent Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as
its capital,” Xi was quoted as saying by Chinese state media. The Chinese leader
used the word "Palestine" in addressing further cooperation with the Palestinian
Authority. "Facing unprecedented changes in the world and the new developments
in the Middle East, China stands ready to strengthen coordination and
cooperation with Palestine, and work for a comprehensive, just and durable
solution of the Palestinian question at an early date," Xi told Abbas, China's
state-run news outlet CGTN reported. Abbas arrived in Beijing on Tuesday for a
three-day visit, and met with Xi on Wednesday. During their meeting, Xi endorsed
the creation of a Palestinian state based on pre-1967 borders and with East
Jerusalem as its capital, according to CGTN. China has long endorsed a two-state
solution to the conflict, like much of the international community. Also during
the meeting, China and the Palestinian Authority (PA) signed a strategic
partnership. Details on the partnership were not immediately available. Xi
described it as "an important milestone in China-Palestine relations that builds
on past achievements and heralds a brighter future," according to CGTN.
Abbas and Xi discussed the PA’s efforts to be admitted as a full member of the
United Nations as well as efforts to engage the International Court of Justice
on the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, the PA’s official WAFA news agency
reported. The Hague-based International Court of Justice said in January that it
received a request for an advisory opinion from the UN General Assembly on the
situation in the West Bank. Abbas also briefed Xi on the conflict with Israel
and the two discussed ways to enhance bilateral relations. Abbas reiterated
support for the One-China policy — which stipulates that Taiwan, which has been
governed independently of China since 1949, is part of China. The president also
pledged to “actively participate” in China’s Belt and Road initiative for global
infrastructure and thanked China for its “political support,” according to WAFA.
Abbas and Xi also signed bilateral cooperation documents on the economy,
technology, and visa exemptions for diplomats, as well as a friendship agreement
between the Chinese city of Wuhan and the Palestinian capitla Ramallah,
according to Reuters. Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang also met his Palestinian
counterpart Riyad Al-Maliki on Tuesday, according to Chinese state media
outlets. This is the fifth time Abbas has visited China, according to CGTN.
Why it matters: Abbas’ visit follows China expressing interest in mediating
between Israel and the Palestinians. In April, Qin told his Israeli and
Palestinian counterparts that the People’s Republic is willing to facilitate
peace talks. The move followed China helping to broker the March agreement
between Saudi Arabia and Iran that resumed relations between the two foes. A May
poll from the Saudi news outlet Arab News and YouGov found that 80% of
Palestinians would welcome Chinese mediation on the conflict. By comparison, 60%
said they did not trust the United States to mediate.
In April, China criticized Israel for raiding Al-Aqsa Mosque. "The attempt of
Israel to change the status quo of Jerusalem as a holy site violates relevant UN
resolutions, and the international community has the responsibility to take
actions to stop the provocative behavior of Israel,” said China’s Middle East
envoy Zhai Jun at the time. Israeli police stormed Al-Aqsa in response to
Palestinian worshippers barricading themselves inside the holy site.
France's Macron to discuss Ukraine with Saudi Crown Prince
this week
PARIS (Reuters)/Wed, June 14, 2023
French President Emmanuel Macron will discuss the war in Ukraine and other
matters when he meets Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on Friday,
the French presidency said. The planned talks between Macron and the Saudi crown
prince come just a month after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy attended
a summit of the Arab League in Saudi Arabia to canvas support, during a meeting
at which bin Salman expressed his readiness to mediate in the war between Moscow
and Kyiv. The Saudi state news agency earlier reported that bin Salman had left
for France.
The crown prince's agenda also includes presiding over the Saudi delegation
during an international Summit for a New Global Financing Pact, to be held on
June 22-23, and taking part in the kingdom's official reception of Riyadh's
candidacy to host Expo 2030 on June 19.
Turkey says military 'neutralised' 53 Kurdish militants in
northern Syria
ANKARA (Reuters)/Wed, June 14, 2023
Turkey's military "neutralised" 53 Kurdish militants in northern Syria, using
ground artillery and drones in retaliatory strikes following an attack on a
police post on the Turkish side of the border at the weekend, the defence
ministry said on Wednesday. The ministry typically uses the term "neutralised"
to describe killed and wounded. The latest strikes targeted the militants'
hideouts in the Manbij and Tal Rifaat regions. Turkey has previously launched
military incursions in Syria against the Kurdish YPG militia, regarding it as a
wing of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), which Turkey, the United
States and the European Union designate as a terrorist group. The United States
has allied with the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), spearheaded by the YPG, in
the fight against Islamic State in Syria, causing a deep rift with Turkey.
The PKK launched an insurgency against the Turkish state in 1984, largely
focused in Turkey's mainly Kurdish southeast. More than 40,000 people have been
killed in the conflict.
Putin admits Russia doesn't have enough drones, warplanes,
and ammunition for the war in Ukraine, even though it's been rushing military
production all year
Business Insider/Tue, June 13, 2023
Vladimir Putin has admitted that Russia sorely lacks the firepower it needs for
the war in Ukraine. He said "many things were missing," such as ammo, aircraft,
and drones, per state media. It's the second time this week that Putin's
commented on Russia's flagging military capabilities. Russian leader Vladimir
Putin publicly admitted on Tuesday that his forces lack the ammo, drones,
aircraft, and communications equipment to fuel the Kremlin's war in Ukraine.
"During the special military operation, it became clear that many things were
missing," he told state media at a press conference. "These are high-precision
ammunition, communications equipment, aircraft, drones, and so on." "We have
them. Unfortunately, we lack them quantitatively," Putin added, per Russian news
agency Interfax. And that's even after Russia ramped up manufacturing of
military equipment, according to figures cited by Putin. "We had a 2.7-fold
increase in production for the main types of weapons over the year, and 10 times
for the most demanded areas," Putin said, per Interfax. It's the second time
this week that Putin has spoken of shortages in Russia's arsenal of ammunition.
On Friday, he said in a statement on the Kremlin's website that its forces "do
not yet have enough modern arms" for the war. On Friday, Putin said Moscow has
been working to fill the gap, and that Russia's military industries are
"intensively building up production of modern weapons."Putin's latest remarks
stand in contrast to his comments last August, when he boasted at a military
forum that Russia's weapons were "cutting edge" and "decades" ahead of their
competition. Since August, he's made concessions that he wants Russia to improve
its military industries. In November, Putin called for the Russian military
industry to up its game with weapons development, while speaking of "arising
issues" in the defense sector. Western experts and officials also say Russia's
supplies of advanced weaponry and equipment have been hit hard by the war in
Ukraine. In April, several reports said that Russia's losses had cut so deep
into its inventory that it's been deploying early Soviet-era tanks, which were
manufactured just after World War II. Russia's Ministry of Defense did not
immediately respond to a request for comment from Insider sent outside regular
business hours.
Russia has lost so much money due to the Ukraine war that
it's now trying to raise $4 billion by slapping a windfall tax on its oligarchs
Business Insider/Tue, June 13, 2023
Russia is preparing to tax companies that made more than 1 billion rubles in
profits since 2021.
The levy is expected to raise about $4 billion, a high-level finance official
told RBC TV.
Russia posted a first-quarter deficit of almost 2.4 trillion rubles amid the war
in Ukraine.
The Kremlin is feeling the pinch from its war in Ukraine, so much that it's
imposing a one-time windfall tax on large Russian companies and their oligarch
owners. Russia approved a draft bill to slap up to a 10% one-off windfall tax on
large Russian companies, according to a Tuesday announcement by the country's
finance ministry. It's targeting companies that annually made more than 1
billion rubles, or $11.9 million, in profits since 2021, per the announcement.
This levy could raise about 300 billion rubles, or $3.6 billion, in taxes
collectively, Andrei Belousov, the first deputy prime minister, said in an
interview with RBC TV, Interfax reported on Tuesday. Belousov told RBC that the
companies themselves proposed the taxes, according to Interfax. "They understand
that they had huge windfall profits for 2021 and 2022, simply massive, bigger
than the budget," Belousov said, per Interfax. "Many of them are true patriots,
no matter what people say about them. They identify very closely with the
country." Russia's finance ministry said in the announcement the taxes would be
used for social spending but did not provide further details. And while the
announcement did not specify which companies would be hit by the taxes, analysts
told the Financial Times that Russia's fertilizer and metals sectors were likely
candidates. Although Russian energy faces sanctions and boycotts by many Western
nations and their allies, the country is still an important commodity exporter,
particularly in agriculture and some industrial raw materials — which, in turn,
help the companies in these sectors. Timur Nigmatullin, an analyst at the
Russian investment company Finam, told the FT that he expected information about
the windfall taxes to be "opaque" to reduce the likelihood that these companies
would be sanctioned. This instance isn't the first time Russia has imposed
windfall taxes to fund the war in Ukraine. Last year, the country levied such a
tax on the energy giant Gazprom after natural-gas prices soared to multiyear
highs following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Gazprom posted record profits in
the first half of 2022, but full-year net profits fell 40% year-on-year because
of the Kremlin's tax hike in the second half of the year.
However, energy prices have now fallen to prewar levels because of recession
fears. Russia's energy revenues have also been majorly hit by sweeping
restrictions against its exports, particularly after the European Union — a
major customer of Russian energy — banned Russian crude oil starting December 5.
In the first quarter of 2023, Russia posted a deficit of almost 2.4 trillion
rubles — sharply reversing a surplus of more than 1 trillion rubles in the first
quarter of 2022. The country posted a 45% drop in quarterly energy revenues to
1.64 trillion rubles, per data released by Russia's finance ministry on April 7.
Russian nuclear weapons 'more powerful than Hiroshima bomb'
arrive in Belarus
The Telegraph/Wed, June 14, 2023
Belarus has begun taking delivery of tactical nuclear weapons from Russia,
including some that are three times more powerful than the atomic bombs dropped
on Japan in 1945. It is believed to be the first time Moscow has moved such
weapons – shorter-ranged and less powerful nuclear weapons that could
potentially be used on the battlefield – outside Russia’s borders since the fall
of the Soviet Union. “We have missiles and bombs that we have received from
Russia,” Alexander Lukashenko, the Belarusian president, said in an interview
with the Rossiya-1 Russian state TV channel. “The bombs are three times more
powerful than those [dropped on] Hiroshima and Nagasaki,” he said, speaking on a
road in a forest clearing with military vehicles parked nearby and what appeared
to be a military storage facility in the background. Vladimir Putin, the Russian
president, on Friday said Moscow, which will retain control of the tactical
nuclear weapons, would start deploying them in Belarus after special storage
facilities to house them were made ready. The Russian leader announced in March
that he had agreed to deploy tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus, pointing to
the US deployment of similar weapons in several European countries over many
decades. The US has criticised Putin’s decision but has said it has no intention
of altering its own stance on strategic nuclear weapons and has not seen any
signs that Russia is preparing to use an atomic weapon. The Russian step is
nonetheless being watched closely by the US and its allies as well as by China,
which has repeatedly cautioned against the use of nuclear weapons in the war in
Ukraine. Mr Lukashenko, a close Putin ally, told Russian state TV that his
country had numerous nuclear storage facilities left over from the Soviet-era
and had restored several of them. He played down the idea that Russian control
of the weapons was an impediment to using them quickly if he felt such a move
was necessary, saying he and Putin could pick up the phone to each other “at any
moment”. Mr Lukashenko, who has allowed his country to be used by Russian forces
attacking Ukraine, says the nuclear deployment will act as a deterrent against
potential aggressors. Speaking on Wednesday, he said his country would enter the
conflict in Ukraine if it was attacked, Russian state-owned news agency TASS
reported.
Ukraine reports small advances in 'extremely fierce'
fighting
KYIV (Reuters)/Wed, June 14, 2023
Ukraine reported incremental advances in its counteroffensive against Russian
forces on Wednesday in what it described as "extremely fierce" fighting. In a
post on the Telegram messaging app, Deputy Defence Minister Hanna Maliar said
the Ukrainian actions had "partial" success. In the past day, Ukrainian troops
had advanced 200-500 metres (220-550 yards) in various areas near the largely
devastated eastern city of Bakhmut, and 300-350 metres in the direction of the
southeastern city of Zaporizhzhia, she said. "Our troops are moving in the face
of extremely fierce fighting and air and artillery superiority of the enemy,"
Maliar said. In later comments, Maliar said Ukraine's losses were
"disproportionately" lower than those of the Russian side. "In general, during
the entire war, we had many times fewer losses," she wrote on Telegram. She told
Ukrainian television that over the past week the number of enemy dead in the
eastern "Khortytsia" section of the front was 8.73 times greater than Ukrainian
losses. The figure for the southern "Tavria" section stood at 5.3. Russian
President Vladimir Putin estimated on Tuesday that Ukraine's human losses were
10 times higher than Russia's since the start of Kyiv's counteroffensive. "As of
now, we are both on the offensive and defensive, just in different
directions...there is a very serious standoff," Maliar said. Russian troops, she
said, had not advanced in a little more than a week. Ukraine said on Monday it
had retaken seven settlements so far and its troops have advanced up to 6.5 km
(4 miles) and seized 90 square km (35 square miles) of ground. Maliar had
reported continuing fighting earlier on Wednesday close to the village of
Makarivka in the area of the southern port city of Berdyansk and said battles
were raging in the areas of Novodanylivka and Novopokrovsk near Mariupol.
Reuters could not verify the battlefield situation. Russia has not acknowledged
any Ukrainian gains.
No respite for Sudan civilians two months into brutal
war
AFP/June 14, 2023
KHARTOUM: Army warplanes bombed the Sudanese city of El Obeid Wednesday, as the
country prepared to mark two months since a power struggle between rival
generals plunged the country into devastating conflict. Since April 15, the
regular army headed by Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan and the paramilitary Rapid Support
Forces commanded by his former deputy Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo have been locked in
urban combat that has left whole neighborhoods of the capital Khartoum
unrecognizable. The fighting quickly spread to the provinces, particularly the
flashpoint western region of Darfur, and has now killed at least 1,800 people,
according to the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project. On Wednesday,
the regular army carried out “air strikes for the first time in El Obeid,” the
capital of North Kordofan state, 350 km south of the capital, which has been
“surrounded by the RSF since the war began,” witnesses told AFP. Nationwide,
some 2.2 million people have fled their homes, more than one million of them
escaping Khartoum, according to the International Organization for Migration. Of
those, more than 528,000 have sought refuge in neighboring countries, according
to the UN agency. Those that remain have run out of “food, water and medicine,”
Khartoum resident Ahmed Taha said. “We have nothing left. The entire country has
been completely devastated. Everywhere you look, you’ll see where bombs have
fallen and bullets have struck. Every inch of Sudan is a disaster area.” US and
Saudi mediation efforts are at a standstill after the collapse of multiple
ceasefires in the face of flagrant violations by both sides. “We think we’ve
given them every shot,” a senior US State Department official said on Tuesday.
Aid agencies have pleaded for the opening of humanitarian corridors to allow
assistance in and fleeing civilians out but to no avail. Entire districts of
Khartoum no longer have running water, mains electricity is only available for a
few hours a week and most hospitals in combat zones are not functioning.
A record 25 million people — more than half the population — are in need of aid,
according to the UN. “We have been suffering and suffering and suffering the
scourge of this war for two months,” said Khartoum resident Soha Abdulrahman.
The conflict’s other main battleground Darfur — home to around a quarter of
Sudan’s population — was already scarred by a two-decade war that left hundreds
of thousands dead and more than two million displaced. Amid what activists have
called a total communications “blackout” in large parts of the region, hundreds
of civilians have been killed in the current fighting. Homes and markets have
been burnt to the ground, hospitals and aid facilities looted and more than
149,000 sent fleeing into neighboring Chad. The head of the UN mission in Sudan,
Volker Perthes, said Tuesday there was “an emerging pattern of large-scale
targeted attacks against civilians based on their ethnic identities, allegedly
committed by Arab militias and some armed men” in RSF uniform. If these reports
are verified they “could amount to crimes against humanity,” he said. Dagalo’s
RSF have their origins in the Janjaweed militias which ousted strongman Omar
Bashir unleashed on ethnic minorities in the region in 2003, drawing charges of
genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. The paramilitaries remain
highly mobile and adept at the sort of urban combat that has gripped Khartoum
and Darfur’s cities but the regular army has so far enjoyed a virtual monopoly
of the skies.
However, an army official said Wednesday that the RSF had begun using “drones,”
which an RSF source said they had obtained “from commandeered army centers.”
The Latest LCCC English analysis &
editorials from miscellaneous sources published on June 14-15/2023
Taqiyya: Iran Actually Boasts About Deceiving the
West in Nuclear Talks
Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute/June 14/2023
The Muslim doctrine of taqiyya, which permits Muslims to deceive non-Muslims, is
back in the news. In a speech delivered on May 20, 2023, Iran’s Supreme Leader,
Ali Khamenei, according to a report,
used the Islamic concept of ‘Taqiyya’ to describe the regime’s decision to
accept the 2015 JCPOA nuclear deal with the West. Taqiyya means the
permissibility to deny or conceal one’s real beliefs to secure a worthy goal.
Taqiyya, in fact, is one of the most important doctrines that Westerners always
overlook in their dealings with Muslims. In short, it permits Muslims to say or
do anything—from cursing and condemning Muhammad to being baptized and partaking
of communion—so long as they remain committed Muslims at heart, and their
deception either benefits themselves or Islam. (For copious documentation, see
here).
For those with a discerning eye, taqiyya is all around us. Whether Muslims
pretending to convert to Christianity (past and present), or whether an Islamic
gunman gaining entrance inside a church by feigning interest in Christian
prayers—examples abound on a regular basis.
As such, that Khamenei relied on the concept of taqiyya to pretend Iran’s
nuclear program is for peaceful purposes is unsurprising.
According to the late Sami Mukaram, the world’s leading authority on taqiyya,
Taqiyya is of fundamental importance in Islam. Practically every Islamic sect
agrees to it and practices it … We can go so far as to say that the practice of
taqiyya is mainstream in Islam, and that those few sects not practicing it
diverge from the mainstream … Taqiyya is very prevalent in Islamic politics,
especially in the modern era.
Moreover, taqiyya is not merely about safeguarding one’s life but can be used to
get an advantage over one’s enemy: “Taqiyya,” writes Mukaram, “in order to dupe
the enemy is permissible.”
One example from the life of Muhammad: A poet, Ka‘b ibn Ashraf, had offended the
prophet of Islam with his verse, prompting Muhammad once to exclaim, “Who will
kill this man who has hurt Allah and his prophet?” A young Muslim named Muhammad
ibn Maslama volunteered on condition that in order to get close enough to Ka‘b
to assassinate him, he be allowed to lie to the poet.
Muhammad agreed.
Ibn Maslama traveled to Ka‘b and began to denigrate Islam and Muhammad. He
carried on in this way till his disaffection became so convincing that Ka‘b took
him into his confidence. Soon thereafter, Ibn Maslama appeared with another
Muslim and, while Ka‘b’s guard was down, killed him.[Ibn Ishaq, The Life of
Muhammad (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 367-8.]
Accordingly, normative Islam teaches that deceit is integral to jihad: Ibn al-Arabi
declares that “in the Hadith [sayings and actions of Muhammad], practicing
deceit in war is well demonstrated. Indeed, its need is more stressed than the
need for courage.” Ibn al-Munir (d. 1333) writes, “War is deceit, i.e., the most
complete and perfect war waged by a holy warrior [mujahid] is a war of
deception, not confrontation, due to the latter’s inherent danger, and the fact
that one can attain victory through treachery without harm [to oneself].” And
Ibn Hajar (d. 1448) counsels Muslims “to take great caution in war, while
[publicly] lamenting and mourning in order to dupe the infidels.” [The Al Qaeda
Reader (New York: Doubleday, 2007), pp. 142-3.]
In short, the earliest historical records of Islam clearly attest to the
prevalence of taqiyya—deception and betrayal, as in the case of the poet Ka‘b
—as a form of Islamic warfare against the non-Muslim infidel. And this is still
a legal strategy for Muslims vis-à-vis non-Muslims—especially if the lying is
rationalized as a form of jihad to empower Islam or Muslims—including through
nuclear armament.
Professor Mukaram continues: “Taqiyya was used as a way to fend off danger from
the Muslims, especially in critical times and when their borders were exposed to
wars with the Byzantines and, afterwards, to the raids of the Franks and
others.” [Mukaram, At-Taqiyya fi ‘l-Islam, pp. 41-42]
Indeed, the widespread use of taqiyya was one of the main reasons that prompted
the Spanish Inquisition: hundreds of thousands of Muslims who had feigned
conversion to Christianity secretly remained Muslim, conspiring with North
African Muslim tribes and Ottomans to reconquer the Iberian Peninsula.
From here one also understands why, according to the report, “the Supreme Leader
often speaks with double meanings, leaving room for himself to shirk
responsibility if a certain policy proves to be a failure.”
Speaking with double meanings—or a double-entendre—is also promoted by Islamic
teaching, through the doctrine of tawriya, or “creative lying.”
Khamenei’s open employment of taqiyya is also unsurprising considering that,
when speaking to one another, Muslims regularly reference taqiyya to justify
their dealings with infidels.
For example, in 1994, after he made a peace treaty with Israel that was
predictably criticized by fellow Arabs as offering too many concessions, PLO
leader Yasser Arafat justified his actions by saying, “I see this agreement as
being no more than the agreement signed between our Prophet Muhammad and the
Quraysh in Mecca”—that is, a truce that Muhammad abolished on a pretext once he
was in a position of power and able to go on the offensive.
In like manner, by referencing taqiyya in the context of Iran’s agreement to a
nuclear deal with the West, Khamenei is signaling that Iran is only going along
for expediency’s sake—until, that is, it finds itself in a position to renege
and realize its nuclear aspirations. As Khamanei said during his speech,
“Expediency means finding ways to circumvent difficult obstacles and pursuing
the same path.”
In short , and as discussed and documented more fully here,
The prophet of Islam, Muhammad … regularly made use of deceit. In order to
assassinate a poet (Ka‘b ibn Ashraf) who offended him, Muhammad permitted a
Muslim to lie to the poet. Muhammad is further on record giving license to
breaking oaths (“if something better” comes along) and openly lying (without
even employing tawriya) to one’s wife and in war. As for the latter, which
assumes a perpetual nature in the guise of the jihad against the non-Muslim in
order to make Islam (and Muslims) supreme (e.g., Qur’an 8:39), deception and
lies are certainly permissible.
That said, is there a single authority representing the West at these
international nuclear talks that knows—let alone cares about—any of this? Or is
the fix already in?
The 'Right' to Rape and Enslave Non-Muslim Women
Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute./June 14, 2023
Last month, in France, a Muslim man told an underage girl with whom he had been
chatting on Facebook, "I will burn you all. I will cut your throats. I will rape
you and your mother because I have the right to do so."
The girl's father, described as "devastated and angry," responded to the terror
threats with which his family and he had been living, saying, "Islam is not what
I have been hearing [it is]... Religion is peace, tolerance, respect... We have
been living in fear for a year!"
The ongoing narrative is that Islam means peace; what is not said is that this
peace comes only after everyone enjoys the "peace" of being Muslim. Until then,
what is often presented to hasten this result is the exact opposite: jihad, or
violence in the service of Islam. Many Muslims, just want, of course, to live in
quiet lives, have good jobs and enjoy the blessings of this life. Others
however, such as Western converts to the "religion of peace" suddenly and
inexplicably become terrorists.
Such men routinely cite the same hadiths and verses from the Koran. Verses 4:3
and 4:24, for instance, permit Muslim men to have sexual relations with as many
women as "their right hand possesses" — meaning as many women — all non-Muslim,
of course — as they are able to take captive during a jihad.
"In the moments before he raped the 12-year-old girl, the Islamic State fighter
took the time to explain that what he was about to do was not a sin. Because the
preteen girl practiced a religion other than Islam, the Quran not only gave him
the right to rape her — it condoned and encouraged it, he insisted." [Emphasis
added] —New York Times report.
In Germany, some Muslim migrants act out their conviction that all "German women
are there for sex." In the 2016 New Year's celebrations in Cologne, migrants
ended up molesting a thousand women.
In Britain, where a large Muslim minority has long existed, thousands of British
girls in various regions have been by abused and gang-raped by "grooming gangs"
made up largely of Muslims, who apparently deemed it their Islamic right. One
rape victim said, "The men who did this to me have no remorse. They would tell
me that what they were doing was OK in their culture."
In a separate case, another Muslim convicted of rape told a British court that
sharing non-Muslim girls for sex "was part of Somali culture" and "a religious
requirement."
[T]he subhuman treatment and sexual degradation of non-Muslim women and children
by Muslim men who deem it their "right" is apparently another "exoticism" the
West is apparently expected to embrace at the altar of multiculturalism.
In Britain, where a large Muslim minority has long existed, thousands of British
girls in various regions have been by abused and gang-raped by "grooming gangs"
made up largely of Muslims, who apparently deemed it their Islamic right.
Pictured: The English town of Rotherham (population ca. 265,000), where at least
1,400 children were sexually abused by a gang of mostly Muslim men of Pakistani
descent. (Image source: Wikimedia Commons)
Last month, in France, a Muslim man told an underage girl with whom he had been
chatting on Facebook, "I will burn you all. I will cut your throats. I will rape
you and your mother because I have the right to do so."
When she refused to marry him, he defaulted to even more severe threats against
her and her family -- at one point texting, "Soon we will cut your throats and
play football with your heads." The communication was accompanied by a video
showing the scene of a beheading.
Based on the name given in the French report, Fabio Califano, who was
subsequently arrested, appears to have been a convert to Islam.
The girl's father, described as "devastated and angry," responded to the terror
threats with which his family and he had been living, saying, "Islam is not what
I have been hearing [it is]... Religion is peace, tolerance, respect... We have
been living in fear for a year!"
The ongoing narrative is that Islam means peace; what is not said is that this
peace comes only after everyone enjoys the "peace" of being Muslim. Until then,
what is often presented to hasten this result is the exact opposite: jihad, or
violence in the service of Islam. Many Muslims, just want, of course, to live in
quiet lives, have good jobs and enjoy the blessings of this life. Others
however, such as Western converts to the "religion of peace" suddenly and
inexplicably become terrorists.
Unfortunately, assertions such as "we will cut your throats and play football
with your heads" echo through the ages. Mu'izzi, an eleventh century Persian
poet for instance, tried to incite an emir to butcher all Christians in the
Middle East:
"For the sake of the Arab religion, it is a duty, O ghazi king, to clear the
country of Syria of patriarchs and bishops, to clear the land of Rum [Anatolia]
from priests and monks. You should kill those accursed dogs and wretched
creatures... You should... cut their throats... You should make polo-balls of
the Franks' heads in the desert, and polo sticks from their hands and feet."
[Hillenbrand, Carole, Turkish Myth and Muslim Symbol: The Battle of Manzikert,
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007, 151–152.]
The line, however, that jumps out in the quote from Califano is: "I will rape
you and your mother because I have the right to do so."
Importantly, it is not the first time that a Muslim man insists that he has the
"right" — given by Islam — to enslave and rape non-Muslim women.
Such men routinely cite the same hadiths and verses from the Koran. Verses 4:3
and 4:24, for instance, permit Muslim men to have sexual relations with as many
women as "their right hand possesses" — meaning as many women — all non-Muslim,
of course — as they are able to take captive during a jihad:
Koran 4:3: "And if you fear that you cannot act equitably towards orphans, then
marry such women as seem good to you, two and three and four; but if you fear
that you will not do justice (between them), then (marry) only one or what your
right hands possess; this is more proper, that you may not deviate from the
right course." [Shakir translation]
Koran 4:24: "And all married women except those whom your right hands possess
(this is) Allah's ordinance to you, and lawful for you are (all women) besides
those, provided that you seek (them) with your property, taking (them) in
marriage not committing fornication. Then as to those whom you profit by, give
them their dowries as appointed; and there is no blame on you about what you
mutually agree after what is appointed; surely Allah is Knowing, Wise." [Shakir
translation]
The Koran uses language, discussed here, that presents such women as things, not
persons. Literally translated, Koran 4:3 permits Muslims to copulate with "what"
—not who—"your right hands possess," as captured by Shakir's translation:
"...but if you fear that you will not do justice (between them), then (marry)
only one or what your right hands possess (Koran 4:3).
To understand how such scriptures and terminology inform the jihadist mind,
consider the following excerpts from a New York Times report, "ISIS Enshrines a
Theology of Rape":
In the moments before he raped the 12-year-old girl, the Islamic State fighter
took the time to explain that what he was about to do was not a sin. Because the
preteen girl practiced a religion other than Islam, the Quran not only gave him
the right to rape her — it condoned and encouraged it, he insisted.
He bound her hands and gagged her. Then he knelt beside the bed and prostrated
himself in prayer before getting on top of her.
When it was over, he knelt to pray again, bookending the rape with acts of
religious devotion.
"I kept telling him it hurts — please stop," said the girl, whose body is so
small an adult could circle her waist with two hands. "He told me that according
to Islam he is allowed to rape an unbeliever. He said that by raping me, he is
drawing closer to God," she said in an interview alongside her family in a
refugee camp here, to which she escaped after 11 months of captivity. [Emphases
added.]
The report continues:
One 34-year-old Yazidi woman, who was bought and repeatedly raped by a Saudi
fighter in the Syrian city of Shadadi, described how she fared better than the
second slave in the household — a 12-year-old girl who was raped for days on end
despite heavy bleeding.
"He destroyed her body. She was badly infected. The fighter kept coming and
asking me, 'Why does she smell so bad?' And I said, she has an infection on the
inside, you need to take care of her," the woman said.
Unmoved, he ignored the girl's agony, continuing the ritual of praying before
and after raping the child.
"I said to him, 'She's just a little girl,' " the older woman recalled. "And he
answered: 'No. She's not a little girl. She's a slave. And she knows exactly how
to have sex.' "
"And having sex with her pleases God," he said.
Even though the mainstream media and pundits maintain that these beliefs have
"nothing whatsoever to do with Islam," in general they permeate Muslim society.
Although there may be the assumption that such beliefs are confined to ISIS and
other fanatical jihadists, evidence emphatically suggests the contrary.
In Pakistan, for example, three Christian girls walking home after a long day's
work were accosted by four "rich and drunk" Muslims — hardly candidates for ISIS
— in a car. They "misbehaved," yelled "suggestive and lewd comments," and
harassed the girls to get in their car for "a ride and some fun." When the girls
declined the "invitation," adding that they were "devout Christians and did not
practice sex outside of marriage," the men became enraged and chased the girls.
"How dare you run away from us," the men yelled. "Christian girls are only meant
for one thing: the pleasure of Muslim men." The men then drove their car into
the three girls, killing one and severely injuring the other two.
In a separate incident, a human rights activist speaking about another Muslim
man's rape of a 9-year-old Christian girl, revealed that
"Such incidents occur frequently. Christian girls are considered goods to be
damaged at leisure. Abusing them is a right. According to the community's
mentality it is not even a crime. Muslims regard them as spoils of war."
[Emphasis added.]
Most recently, a June 3, 2023 report detailed the suffering many Hindus
experience as "infidels" in Pakistan, and quotes some who fled:
"In Pakistan, there is no difference between meat and women.... Had we stayed
back, our women would have been torn to shreds."
Once relegated to third world countries such as Pakistan and ISIS-controlled
areas, the treatment and sexual abuse of "infidel" women is increasingly
becoming a common fixture in the West.
In Germany, some Muslim migrants act out their conviction that all "German women
are there for sex." In the 2016 New Year's celebrations in Cologne, migrants
ended up molesting a thousand women.
In Britain, where a large Muslim minority has long existed, thousands of British
girls in various regions have been by abused and gang-raped by "grooming gangs"
made up largely of Muslims, who apparently deemed it their Islamic right. One
rape victim said:
"The men who did this to me have no remorse. They would tell me that what they
were doing was OK in their culture."
A Muslim imam in Britain confessed that Muslim men are taught that women are
"second-class citizens, little more than chattels or possessions over whom they
have absolute authority" and that the imams preach a doctrine "that denigrates
all women, but treats whites [meaning non-Muslims] with particular contempt."
In a separate case, another Muslim convicted of rape told a British court that
sharing non-Muslim girls for sex "was part of Somali culture" and "a religious
requirement."
Whether seen by "pious" Muslims as a "religious requirement" — as cited by an
ISIS rapist to his 12-year-old victim — or as part of Pakistani (Asian), Somali
(African), or "French convert" Islamic culture, the subhuman treatment and
sexual degradation of non-Muslim women and children by Muslim men who deem it
their "right" is apparently another "exoticism" the West is apparently expected
to embrace at the altar of multiculturalism.
*Raymond Ibrahim, author of Defenders of the West and Sword and Scimitar, is the
Distinguished Senior Shillman Fellow at the Gatestone Institute and the Judith
Rosen Friedman Fellow at the Middle East Forum.
© 2023 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Biden’s tough choices on agreeing a new deal with Iran
Osama Al-Shari/Arab News/June 14, 2023
Despite initial denials by both countries, Iran confirmed this week that it
engaged in indirect talks with the US in Oman last month over Tehran’s nuclear
program. Several Western media reports confirmed that US Middle East coordinator
Brett McGurk and Iran’s top nuclear negotiator Ali Bagheri Kani were in the
Omani capital, Muscat, at the same time in early May and that Omani officials
acted as intermediaries. Both the US and Iran denied that talks centered on
reaching an interim agreement, with Iranian officials insisting on reviving the
2015 nuclear agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. That
agreement, which the Trump administration pulled out of in 2018, was endorsed by
UN Security Council Resolution 2231 in July 2015.
According to American reports, the US passed a message to Iran that it would
face a severe response if it reached the 90 percent uranium enrichment levels
required for use in a nuclear weapon. According to the International Atomic
Energy Agency, Iran has at least 114 kg of uranium enriched up to 60 percent
purity. Israel has also warned that it will never allow Iran to come close to
the 90 percent enrichment level.
Following US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s visit to Saudi Arabia last
week, which must have focused on threats posed by Iran’s nuclear program, and
the leaking of reports regarding possible progress in negotiations, Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Blinken that Israel would not be bound by
any agreement with Iran and that it would take the necessary steps to protect
its national security.
On the other hand, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said earlier this week
that a deal with the West over the nuclear program is possible, but only if
Tehran can keep its nuclear infrastructure intact. Since the US pulled out of
the 2015 agreement and imposed sanctions, Iran has installed advanced
centrifuges and raised its uranium enrichment levels to more than 60 percent. It
has also prevented IAEA monitors from inspecting some facilities and is believed
to have built new ones and expanded others.
Previous attempts by the Biden administration and Western partners to engage
Iran in a bid to reach a new agreement were unsuccessful. Iran insists on
reviving the 2015 agreement, while the West wants to tie the agreement to other
issues, such as Tehran’s controversial ballistic missiles program, curbing the
regional activities of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and allowing the
IAEA to carry out a full investigation of Iran’s nuclear facilities.
For a while, it looked like the Biden administration was no longer interested in
pursuing further talks with Iran. But a number of factors have forced it to
reengage. Russia’s war in Ukraine has brought Moscow and Tehran closer than ever
and Iran is believed to have supplied Russia with advanced drones and is helping
the Russians build a drone factory. In return, Tehran may get its hands on a
first batch of state-of-the-art Su-35 fighter jets from Moscow as early as this
month. And Iran last week unveiled a hypersonic missile it claims can hit Israel
in 400 seconds, while outmaneuvering the Iron Dome defense system. The
technology to develop such a sophisticated system could only come from Russia or
North Korea.
Iran insists on reviving the 2015 agreement, while the West wants to tie the
agreement to other issues.
Also, the recent China-mediated deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran to normalize
ties took the US by surprise. Relations between Riyadh and Washington have gone
through some rough periods since President Joe Biden was elected, while the
Saudis have adopted an independent foreign policy approach that has seen
improved ties with both China and Russia. Feeling its regional influence waning,
Washington has made an about-face; seeking to revive ties with Riyadh and
sending its top diplomats there.
The thaw in Saudi-Iranian ties has been reflected in the Gulf region and beyond.
Earlier this month, the commander of Iran’s naval forces, Shahram Irani,
announced that Tehran was looking to form a joint maritime alliance with the UAE,
Qatar, Bahrain, Iraq, Pakistan and India. Saudi Arabia was also interested in
“heading in this direction,” Irani said. The announcement came a few days after
the UAE decided to quit the Combined Maritime Forces led by the US.
The change in Washington’s attitude toward talks with Iran underlines its
geopolitical concerns, as well as fears that the suspension of the nuclear deal
has only played into Tehran’s hands in many ways. US threats of resorting to
force against Iran are no longer in sync with regional developments. Its key
allies in the region, save for Israel, are now actively talking to Iran, with
some, like Egypt, on the verge of restoring ties with Tehran.
These allies are now in favor of a diplomatic resolution to the Iran nuclear
program issue. This week, the Gulf Cooperation Council issued a statement
calling on Iran to commit to working with the IAEA and asking for the
involvement of the Gulf states in possible negotiations to meet the bloc’s
security concerns.
Interestingly, the US seems to have allowed Iraq to release about $3 billion to
Iran in overdue payments — a sign that some of Tehran’s demands are being met.
Also, a prisoner exchange is expected to take place between Iran and the US in
the coming days, according to Iranian officials.
A deal, whether interim or not, would be good for the region and for the world.
But it might not help Biden and the Democrats in the coming election cycle. Both
will get a lot of flak from Republican candidates, as well from the current
Israeli government. This week, a bipartisan letter from 35 members of Congress
called on the European parties to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal to “snapback”
sanctions on Iran for noncompliance.
In fact, any agreement reached will almost certainly give former President
Donald Trump and other Republican hopefuls the ammunition to tear down the Biden
reelection campaign. This is how hard it will be for the White House to decide
its next move. Not doing anything carries the risk of Israel and Iran finding
themselves in an open war with an unpredictable outcome. Securing a deal would
harm Biden’s election chances, while the return of Trump or a Republican
hard-liner to the White House might make any new agreement a short-lived one
anyway.
• Osama Al-Sharif is a journalist and political commentator based in Amman.
Twitter: @plato010
Blinken’s visit an important step toward restoring US
standing in the region
Dr. Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg/Arab News/June 14, 2023
The visit of US Secretary of State Antony Blinken to Saudi Arabia last week has
dispelled misconceptions about the state of the US-Saudi and US-GCC
partnerships. There had been speculation about a rift between the two sides
following March’s Saudi-Iranian deal, through Chinese mediation, to resume
diplomatic relations.
Readmitting Syria to the Arab League was another source of tension between the
US and its Gulf partners; the US was clearly unhappy with seeing Bashar Assad in
Jeddah last month to attend the Arab League Summit.
These developments came on top of disagreements over OPEC’s policies, especially
its coordination with Russia over production levels, and what was seen as
China’s growing influence in the region.
These issues were enough for pundits outside the region to assume there was
irreparable damage to the GCC-US relationship, especially Washington’s ties with
Saudi Arabia.
Similarly, pundits in the region saw the US as ambivalent about its continued
presence here, despite its protestations otherwise. Memories have faded of
President Joe Biden’s visit last July and his assertions about Washington’s
“enduring commitment” to Gulf security. His speech in Palestine was also
forgotten, during which he reversed his predecessor’s policies on Israeli
settlements and called for an independent and viable state for the Palestinians.
Although the senior leaderships in both camps knew better, those public
perceptions predicted a difficult if not failed visit before it even started.
However, the results of Blinken’s three-day visit — his first solo visit to the
region since becoming secretary of state more than two years ago — have
disappointed the pundits in both camps. It has reassured US partners in the Gulf
about America’s commitment to regional security and brought relief to Washington
that things here are not what they looked like from D.C., more than 10,000 km
away.
Following Blinken’s meeting with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on June 6, the
US said the two affirmed their “shared commitment” to advancing stability,
security and prosperity across the Middle East and beyond, including through
their ongoing partnership in diplomatic negotiations to stop the fighting in
Sudan and working toward a comprehensive political agreement to achieve peace,
prosperity and security. They also discussed deepening economic cooperation,
something in which the US has been lagging compared to China, its chief economic
rival.
On the following day, there was a meeting with GCC foreign ministers in Riyadh,
under the framework of the GCC-US Strategic Partnership announced in 2015. They
agreed that the partnership is there to stay and thrive, even if there are
issues on which they may disagree.
They discussed regional security and important elements of their “strategic,
ambitious and growing partnership,” according to a public statement issued late
on June 7. There was also a serious discussion of issues on which they had
somewhat differing views lately, including Iran, Syria and Ukraine.
Starting with what they agreed on, the US reaffirmed its commitment to the
security of the region, recognizing its vital role in the global economy and
international trade. The two partners would work together for peace, security,
stability, integration and economic prosperity in the Middle East, including
through infrastructure projects to promote regional integration and
interconnectivity, such as connecting the GCC electric grid with those of its
neighbors, starting with Iraq, where the project was finally launched on June 8.
Although the senior leaderships in both camps knew better, public perceptions
predicted a difficult if not failed visit.
On defense and security cooperation, they voiced their shared determination to
contribute to regional security and stability and the upholding of navigational
rights and freedoms, and of collective efforts to address threats to the
security of vessels traveling through the region’s waterways, in a veiled
reference to Iran. For that purpose, they reviewed their defense cooperation
through the frequent joint military exercises and their close partnership
through the Combined Maritime Forces framework.
They further discussed the outcomes of four GCC-US working group meetings from
earlier this year — on integrated air and missile defense, maritime security,
counterterrorism and Iran — and explored the possibility of reconvening them
later this year. They also decided to convene a meeting of their joint
cybersecurity team later this year and explored the possibility of convening
other working groups previously set up to deal with the military and security
aspects of their partnership.
On controversial issues such as Iran, where disagreement preceded Blinken’s
visit, the ministers stressed the need for diplomacy and de-escalation. The US
“welcomed” the decision by Saudi Arabia and Iran to resume diplomatic relations,
but stressed the importance of what was included in the Saudi-Iran-China
statement of March 10 about adherence to international law, including the UN
Charter, which has been the core issue behind GCC-Iran and US-Iran differences
in the past.
While on Iran, they announced their commitment to freedom of navigation and
maritime security and countering aggressive and illegal actions at sea or
elsewhere that might threaten shipping lanes, international trade and oil
installations in the GCC states. On the nuclear issue, they did not dwell on the
Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as it happened in the past, but reaffirmed
their general support for the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
and an enhanced role for the International Atomic Energy Agency.
On Syria, another divisive issue in this partnership, they nevertheless welcomed
Arab efforts to resolve the crisis in a step-by-step manner, consistent with UN
Security Council Resolution 2254, as agreed during the May 1 Amman consultative
meeting of the Arab Ministerial Contact Group on Syria. Reference to the
resolution should reassure all that the GCC and the US remain committed to a
political solution through the UN’s mediation process, which has been lagging
behind in recent months.
On the Palestine question, the two sides underscored their commitment to a just,
lasting and comprehensive peace in accordance with the two-state solution, along
the 1967 borders, with mutually agreed swaps consistent with internationally
recognized parameters, and the Arab Peace Initiative. They also opposed
unilateral moves regarding settlements and Jerusalem, thus again reversing the
Trump administration’s support for Israel’s illegal moves.
On the Ukraine war, on which the two sides did not completely agree on all of
its details, they nevertheless agreed on the importance of respecting the
principles of sovereignty and international law, including the UN Charter, and
the obligation to refrain from threats or the use of force against the
territorial integrity or political independence of any state. They also called
for intensified efforts to find a peaceful solution and deal more effectively
with the humanitarian fallout, including extending the UN Black Sea Grain
Initiative to facilitate the export of grain and other food supplies from
Ukraine.
Sudan has been a bright spot in Saudi-US cooperation in recent weeks and the
ministers supported their diplomatic efforts there and called on the Sudanese
Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces to silence their guns.
In all, Blinken’s visit has reenergized the Saudi-US and GCC-US partnerships and
dealt with disagreements in an effective and constructive manner. After removing
the misunderstandings that were magnified by the media, continued engagement at
the ministerial and technical levels is now needed to move forward and take this
partnership to higher levels, including in the economic sphere, where win-win
opportunities are abundant. Instead of bemoaning China’s growing presence in the
region, the US should increase its own.
• Dr. Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg is the Gulf Cooperation Council assistant
secretary-general for political affairs and negotiation, and a columnist for
Arab News. The views expressed in this piece are personal and do not necessarily
represent GCC views.
Twitter: @abuhamad1
Egypt leading the way on ensuring net-zero transition is
just
Rania Al-Mashat and Erik Berglöf/Arab News/June 14, 2023
The gap between the resources needed to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas
emissions by 2050 and the resources that are available currently amounts to
trillions of dollars — and is still growing. As many developing and emerging
economies lose ground in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, public and private
capital must be mobilized to accelerate mitigation and adaptation efforts. But
this requires governments to produce credible plans for achieving global
sustainability goals, to design and implement these policies themselves and to
ensure that their strategies’ costs and benefits are fairly distributed.
Last November’s UN Climate Change Conference in Egypt, known as COP27 and dubbed
the “implementation COP,” laid the groundwork for a fairer, more robust climate
finance system. The conference’s “guidebook” called on the international
community to advance a transformative agenda that accounts for developing
countries’ national priorities and ensures equitable access to financial and
technical resources. It included, in its definition of climate justice,
“equitable access to quality and quantity climate financing” that considers
“historical responsibility for climate change” and “supports resilient
development pathways, leaving no one behind.”
With this in mind, Egypt launched its Nexus of Water, Food and Energy investment
program during COP27, providing a practical and replicable model for ensuring a
just net-zero transition through a concept of “country platforms.” These
platforms are meant to help countries build state capacities and emphasize the
importance of developing countries’ agency (or “ownership,” in aid parlance).
The Nexus of Water, Food and Energy — whose acronym NWFE, pronounced “nuafiy,”
is Arabic for “fulfilling pledges” — builds on Egypt’s commitments under the
2015 Paris climate agreement and aims to attract financial support for the
country’s development agenda, while accelerating climate action. The
stakeholders include multilateral development banks such as the European Bank
for Reconstruction and Development, the African Development Bank, the European
Investment Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.
Egypt seeks to leverage its partnerships with the multilateral development banks
and other development stakeholders to accelerate its climate agenda
The Nexus of Water, Food and Energy platform integrates several high-priority
water, food and energy projects — all selected by the Egyptian government —
worth a total of $14.7 billion. The projects seek to replace existing
inefficient thermal power plants with renewable energy; enhance small farmers’
adaptation to climate risks; modernize farming practices to increase irrigation
efficiency and boost crop yields; strengthen the resilience of vulnerable
regions; create water desalination capacity; and establish early-warning
systems.
By using innovative financing mechanisms to mobilize public funds, technical
assistance and private investment, Egypt seeks to leverage its partnerships with
the multilateral development banks and other development stakeholders to
accelerate its climate agenda. This would support the country’s green transition
and show that climate action and economic development can go hand in hand. Egypt
can also rely on these partnerships to help it phase out “brown” oil, gas and
mineral assets. For example, partial concessional financial support from the US
will enable the country to retrain (or retire) fossil fuel workers.
Yet, the most innovative instrument may be debt-for-climate swaps, whereby Egypt
receives partial debt relief from, say, Germany, in exchange for commitments to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These types of performance-linked financial
instruments could provide many developing and emerging countries with an
opportunity to lower their debt burden or obtain low-cost funds. By tying
development assistance to progress on a common global target, such swaps could
also prove to be significant in mitigating the worst effects of climate change.
As a 2018 report by the G20 Eminent Persons Group on Global Financial Governance
noted, collective action through country platforms has the power to unlock
public and private investment to achieve climate-resilient and sustainable
development. Such investment platforms can take different forms. For example,
Just Energy Transition Partnerships — first introduced during COP26 in Scotland
in 2021 — aim to direct private capital toward decarbonization targets in the
energy sector. Since launching in South Africa, Just Energy Transition
Partnerships have also been established in Indonesia, India, Vietnam and
Senegal. Egypt’s Nexus of Water, Food and Energy initiative provides a useful
model for how developing and emerging countries can expedite the implementation
of their national climate agendas in line with global priorities. By encouraging
coordination among domestic and external stakeholders, such programs can help
bridge the information gap, establish shared standards and increase the number
of bankable projects.
But the platform’s success hinges on domestic agency, transparency and
accountability in managing these partnerships. Most importantly, the green
transition must be perceived as just in order to be sustainable. Predictability
is particularly important for the poor and fairness is essential to winning
long-term public support for climate measures. To achieve these goals,
governments must lead on climate finance. The net-zero transition depends on it.
*Rania Al-Mashat is Egypt’s Minister of International Cooperation.
Erik Berglöf is Chief Economist of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2023.
How the Muslim Brotherhood could use Sudan’s protracted crisis to plot a
comeback
Robert Bociaga/Arab News/June 14, 2023
Group played a pivotal role in establishing the deposed Islamist government of
Omar Bashir in 1989
Experts say the Brotherhood might exacerbate existing divisions within the
military and compound ongoing feud
JUBA, South Sudan: The role of the Muslim Brotherhood in shaping Sudan’s
continuing conflict is a cause for concern among experts, who warn that the
group could influence the country’s military leaders and even determine the
nation’s political direction.
As a transnational Islamist organization deeply rooted in Sudanese politics, the
Muslim Brotherhood played a pivotal role in establishing the former Islamist
government of Omar Bashir in 1989.
Sudan's strongman Omar al-Bashir (R) and breakaway Islamist Hassan al-Turabi met
on March 14, 2014 for the first time in 14 years, as the government reached out
to opponents after calls for reform. (AFP file photo)
Even after that government’s overthrow in 2019, the Brotherhood proved to be
resilient and influential. Now, against the backdrop of the fighting between the
Sudanese Armed Forces, or SAF, and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, or RSF,
some fear that the group may attempt to make a comeback.
Over several decades, the Brotherhood was able to build support among various
segments of Sudanese society through its advocacy of political Islam and social
justice. During their rule, the Islamists implemented Sharia law — a move
rejected by swathes of the population who adhered to Christianity and other
local faiths, triggering a brutal civil war.
The fall of the Islamist government in 2019 marked an important turning point.
However, concerns surrounding its lingering influence over Sudan’s military
leadership have persisted.
The Brotherhood’s influence has continued through para-police units affiliated
with the former regime — units that have been accused of targeting women in
response to their growing role in public life.
Differing visions of the role of Islam in Sudan’s democratic future have
contributed to splits within the nation’s biggest political parties, providing
the Brotherhood with new potential constituencies to exploit.
Following a 2021 agreement between Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan, head of the armed
forces and the current de-facto ruler of Sudan, and Abdel-Aziz Al-Hilu, chair of
the Sudan People’s Liberation Army, or SPLA-North, to separate religion and
state, a schism emerged within the National Umma Party.
The party leadership suggested postponing the debate until the end of the
transitional period, when a civilian-led government was expected to take over
from Sudan’s military rulers. At the same time, however, the minister for
religious affairs, Nasr Al-Din Mufreh, who was himself a National Umma Party
member, began drafting legislation to ban religious-based political parties.
Following these developments, Umma officials issued conflicting statements on
the matter.
Al-Wathiq Al-Berair, secretary general of the National Umma Party, denied that
his party was founded on a religious basis. However, another party official
later stated it followed the principles of the 1881 Mahdist revolution, which
had both religious and national aspects.
Over the years, many Islamists have shifted their approach, having decided to
focus on supporting “sectarian” parties as a bulwark against the political left.
This new approach reflects an apparent recognition of their weakened position
and failure to achieve their previous goals. The continuing demand among
Islamists for early elections further emphasizes this shift in strategy.
“When the coup happened in October 2021 and afterward, the Muslim Brotherhood
kept quiet,” Peter Schuman, a former deputy joint special representative of the
UN–African Union Mission in Darfur, told Arab News.
“There are, though, individuals who have pursued a certain interest,
particularly Ali Ahmed Karti,” he added, referring to Sudan’s former foreign
minister, who served in the post under Bashir from 2010 to 2015.
Against this backdrop, some Sudanese generals may view the Brotherhood as a
potential ally in their pursuit of power and control. Indeed, the group’s
political base and ability to mobilize support among Islamist groups in the
region make it an attractive partner.
Speaking to Arab News, Cameron Hudson, an analyst and consultant on African
peace and security, said that “the involvement of the Muslim Brotherhood could
exacerbate existing divisions within the military, leading to factionalism and
power struggles.”
The Sudanese Islamist movement was weakened with the removal Omar Bashir. (AFP)
Since the conflict in Sudan erupted on April 15, the RSF has adopted a
vehemently anti-Islamist tone, accusing groups such as the Brotherhood of
infiltrating the SAF as a vehicle to further their political agenda.
“We are fighting Islamists, not SAF. This is the political issue,” Youssef Ezzat,
political adviser to the RSF, told Arab News, rejecting claims that the
paramilitary group was responsible for starting the war.
“Islamists hijacked the SAF, and they want to control the country. This is the
root cause for the war … Islamists promised Al-Burhan to be a full-power
president without RSF.”
While the political reality is probably more complicated than how the RSF seeks
to portray it, the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence does call into question the
durability of Sudan’s secular foundations.
“There are concerns that the group’s support for political Islam could undermine
the country’s secular state institutions and lead to a more conservative and
restrictive society,” Brian Adeba, deputy director of policy at The Sentry, a
Washington-based investigative non-profit organization, told Arab News.
The impact of the Brotherhood’s involvement in Sudan might very well be felt
beyond the country’s borders. Khalid Mustafa Medani, author of “Black Markets
and Militants,” draws attention to the group’s wider regional network.
“Its actions in Sudan could have ramifications for neighboring countries and
regional stability,” he told Arab News. Sudan’s location and porous borders
create an environment that terrorist organizations such as Daesh could exploit
for their own gain.
To safeguard Sudan’s democratic values and foster political pluralism, experts
such as Sargis Sangari, CEO of the Near East Center for Strategic Engagement,
argue that a future transitional government needs to confront the Brotherhood’s
influence and counter its narrative, while underscoring the importance of
alternative channels for political participation.
“The Muslim Brotherhood’s dominant presence has marginalized other ethnic groups
and led to the persecution of religious minorities,” Sangari said.
For his part, Adeba highlights the Brotherhood’s extensive network and
mobilization capabilities within the country, pointing out how it has
successfully infiltrated political parties and civil society organizations,
enabling it to influence Sudan’s political landscape.
Such successes have raised concerns among experts over the group’s ability to
shape Sudanese political discourse and limit pluralism.
The experts say that the conflict has presented the Brotherhood with an
opportunity to capitalize on the power vacuum created by the ousting of Bashir.
International affairs expert, Gordon Kachola, says that the group was able to
take advantage of the transitional period, using its networks to fuel sectarian
tensions and exacerbate the crisis. This has further complicated efforts to
establish stability and consolidate power in Sudan.
Peter Schuman, an expert in regional security, believes the Brotherhood poses a
challenge to Sudan’s long-term democratic aspirations. In his view, the group’s
presence undermines the establishment of democratic institutions, thus hindering
the country’s journey toward stability.
Schuman also believes the Brotherhood’s exclusionary interpretation of Islam
could jeopardize the inclusive governance necessary for sustainable democracy in
Sudan.
Hudson, the analyst and consultant, also has concerns about the Muslim
Brotherhood’s role in Sudan’s transition, arguing that the group’s influence
could impede the development of democratic institutions and stifle dissenting
voices.
He believes that Sudan’s transitional government should address the
Brotherhood’s influence to ensure the preservation of democratic values. As the
international community, regional actors and Sudanese society at large have been
demanding an end to the fighting, Hudson says that “negotiations without the
participation and monitoring of civilians are hard to be understood.”
The Brotherhood’s control over various sectors, particularly agriculture, has
also brought to the fore its impact on Sudan’s economy and society.
Medani says that the group’s control over the black market, in particular, has
allowed it to sustain its power while contributing to the impoverishment of
Sudanese society.
Sudan’s economic crisis, exacerbated by international sanctions and government
policies, has fueled public discontent and protests, which Brotherhood-aligned
politicians have in the past struggled to contain.
When Sudan eventually arrives at its post-conflict destination, the influence of
the Brotherhood will remain a contentious issue. Balancing the desire for
stability with the preservation of democratic values will be a delicate task.