English LCCC Newsbulletin For Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For June 15/2023
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/aaaanewsfor2023/english.June15.23.htm

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006 

Click On The Below Link To Join Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group so you get the LCCC Daily A/E Bulletins every day
https://chat.whatsapp.com/FPF0N7lE5S484LNaSm0MjW

ÇÖÛØ Úáì ÇáÑÇÈØ Ýí ÃÚáì ááÅäÖãÇã áßÑæÈ Eliasbejjaninews whatsapp group æÐáß áÅÓÊáÇã äÔÑÇÊí ÇáÚÑÈíÉ æÇáÅäßáíÒíÉ ÇáíæãíÉ ÈÇäÊÙÇã

Elias Bejjani/Click on the below link to subscribe to my youtube channel
ÇáíÇÓ ÈÌÇäí/ÇÖÛØ Úáì ÇáÑÇÈØ Ýí ÃÓÝá ááÅÔÊÑÇß Ýí ãæÞÚí Ú ÇáíæÊíæÈ
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAOOSioLh1GE3C1hp63Camw
15 ÂÐÇÑ/2023

Bible Quotations For today
Very truly, I tell you, you will weep and mourn, but the world will rejoice; you will have pain, but your pain will turn into joy

Saint John 16/20-24/:”Very truly, I tell you, you will weep and mourn, but the world will rejoice; you will have pain, but your pain will turn into joy. When a woman is in labour, she has pain, because her hour has come. But when her child is born, she no longer remembers the anguish because of the joy of having brought a human being into the world. So you have pain now; but I will see you again, and your hearts will rejoice, and no one will take your joy from you. On that day you will ask nothing of me. Very truly, I tell you, if you ask anything of the Father in my name, he will give it to you. Until now you have not asked for anything in my name. Ask and you will receive, so that your joy may be complete.”

Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on June 14-15/2023
Ibrahim Murad, President of the Lebanese Syriac Union Party: The Implementation of the UN Resolution, 1959 is the only solution
Lebanon's Hezbollah torpedoes presidential vote
Lebanese lawmakers fail latest attempt to elect president
US State Department expresses concern over MPs leaving chamber, hindering presidential election vote
UN Special Coordinator urges Lebanon's parliamentarians to ensure Presidential election
59 MPs vote for Azour, 51 for Franjieh amid row over 'missing' vote
Azour's supporters accuse Hezbollah of blocking democratic vote
MPs from both camps claim 'victory' after botched presidential vote
Berri calls for dialogue, says only consensus can end vacuum
Franjieh calls for 'constructive dialogue with everyone'
Azour urges moving electoral process forward for 'good of Lebanese people'
Bassil: Today's session proves no one can bypass Christian component in presidency
Geagea slams obstruction of 'entire' presidential election process
Samy Gemayel praises 'uprising' in Parliament for rejecting imposition and threat
6 'Oct. 17' MPs refuse to vote for 'sectarian parties' candidates
LBCI interviews shed light on parliamentary blocs' reactions following election session
Report: Macron, MBS to discuss Lebanon in Paris meeting
MP Tony Frangieh: No alternative to openness, unity in face of hate
Minister Sharafeddine broaches displaced Syrians’ dossier with Syrian Chargé d'Affaires
Grand Mufti broaches general affairs with UNIFIL Commander
USAID Provides More Than $17.4 Million in Additional Humanitarian Assistance for Vulnerable Lebanese People
Syrians conditions worsen, WFP faces 'unprecedented funding crisis'
A Text of a Letter sent to the USA to Department of State by three Member Of The Congress addressing the Lebanese Crisis
Amer Foundation Applauds Republican Study Committee's Call for Accountability in Lebanon
Why Hezbollah’s popularity in Lebanon is rapidly declining/Jerry Maher/Arab News/June 14, 2023
Hizbullah's Military Exercise Sparks Criticism In South Lebanon: It Is An Act Of Hijacking The State, Intimidating Hizbullah's Opponents In The Country/MEMRI/June 14, 2023

Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on June 14-15/2023
Arab states make up 24% of Israel’s 2022 arms exports including drones
Israeli parliament vote deals setback to Netanyahu and judicial overhaul plan
Germany releases funds for Israel's Arrow-3 missiles in planned 4 billion euro deal
Washington says it's asking Israel about the death of detained Palestinian-American
Israel's Rafael says it is developing hypersonic missile interceptor
Israeli army blames mix-up for fatal shooting of Palestinian toddler
China’s Xi hosts Abbas, vows support for Palestinian state on 1967 borders
France's Macron to discuss Ukraine with Saudi Crown Prince this week
Turkey says military 'neutralised' 53 Kurdish militants in northern Syria
Putin admits Russia doesn't have enough drones, warplanes, and ammunition for the war in Ukraine, even though it's been rushing military production all year
Russia has lost so much money due to the Ukraine war that it's now trying to raise $4 billion by slapping a windfall tax on its oligarchs
Russian nuclear weapons 'more powerful than Hiroshima bomb' arrive in Belarus
Ukraine reports small advances in 'extremely fierce' fighting
No respite for Sudan civilians two months into brutal war

Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on June 14-15/2023
Taqiyya: Iran Actually Boasts About Deceiving the West in Nuclear Talks/Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute/June 14/2023
The 'Right' to Rape and Enslave Non-Muslim Women/Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute./June 14, 2023
Biden’s tough choices on agreeing a new deal with Iran/Osama Al-Shari/Arab News/June 14, 2023
Blinken’s visit an important step toward restoring US standing in the region/Dr. Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg/Arab News/June 14, 2023
Egypt leading the way on ensuring net-zero transition is just/Rania Al-Mashat and Erik Berglöf/Arab News/June 14, 2023
How the Muslim Brotherhood could use Sudan’s protracted crisis to plot a comeback/Robert Bociaga/Arab News/June 14, 2023
 

Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on June 14-15/2023
Ibrahim Murad, President of the Lebanese Syriac Union Party: The Implementation of the UN Resolution, 1959 is the only solution
LCCC/June 14/2023
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/119105/119105/
Ibrahim Murad, President of the Lebanese Syriac Union Party, and Secretary-General of the “Christian Front,”, issued a press release today in which he said that “the continuation of the anomalous situation that we, the Lebanese people are living on daily basis, is caused by the presence of an armed military Militia that controls the central state, as well as all its institutions, while bullying, intimidating, challenging and boldly threatening the state and the Lebanese people. He added, “This Militia, and because of its weaponry surplus
capabilities keeps on threatening those Lebanese who struggle for the freedom of their homeland, and oppose its occupation, and at the same time falsely accusing them of treason and betrayal.
He stressed that, “the ongoing series of rigging the parliamentary quorum for electing a president of the republic, will continue until this militia and its axis can impose a president, who is a mere puppet, and willing to achieve its prime goal in controlling Lebanon. Meanwhile this militia is working day and night in a bid to confiscate the Christians’ presence in the state, and hinder their ability to survive”.
“Under this status quo of occupation, definitely, any elected president will not be able to rule, or achieve any positive results, while the armed militia remains in full control of all aspects of the state.
Murad urged the political parties, as well as the sovereign Lebanese leaders, activists and citizens “not to waste any more time, and work more seriously on calling the international community to implement Resolution 1559, because it is the only solution to liberate Lebanon from the sway of the Iranian military occupation, and only then the Lebanese can build a state on the basis of a fair political and national partnership, represented by the implementation of a federal system, that consolidates peace between the Lebanese components, and allows civilized and constitutional competition.
*Translated Freely by: Elias Bejjani

Lebanon's Hezbollah torpedoes presidential vote
Reuters/Wed, June 14, 2023
STORY: Lebanon slid deeper into crisis on Wednesday (June 14) when Hezbollah and its allies torpedoed their rivals' choice of president. The tussle over the presidency makes it harder for Lebanon to tackle the devastating financial meltdown that has festered for four years. It has also sharpened sectarian tensions, with one of Hezbollah's main Christian allies joining other Christian factions in support of the candidate - Jihad Azour, who is a senior IMF official. Azour, who is also a former finance minister, narrowly won the support of lawmakers. but Shi'ite Hezbollah and its ally the Amal Movement then withdrew, denying the two-thirds quorum. It was lawmakers' 12th attempt to elect a president since Hezbollah-allied Michel Aoun's term ended in October. The presidency is reserved for a Maronite Christian, and Hezbollah is backing its close ally Souleiman Frangieh. He strongly supports the group's right to possess weapons and is a friend of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Hezbollah has unleashed fierce rhetoric against Azour, describing him as a candidate of confrontation. Lebanon's Shi'ite Mufti has accused Azour, without naming him, of being backed by Israel and, quote, "a president with an American stamp." The power vacuum - with neither a head of state nor a fully empowered cabinet - is unprecedented even for Lebanon, a country that has known little stability since independence.

Lebanese lawmakers fail latest attempt to elect president
Najia Houssari/Arab News/June 14, 2023
BEIRUT: Lebanese lawmakers on Wednesday failed in the latest attempt to elect a president and break a seven-month power vacuum that has roiled the Mediterranean country. The results of the vote count in the 12th session of parliament showed that the opposition candidate, former minister Jihad Azour, received 59 votes. In contrast, the candidate of Hezbollah and the Amal Movement, former Premier Suleiman Frangieh, received 51.
A political observer said that the Wednesday session “served to determine the balance of power, end the chances of candidates, and open other doors for consensus on new names in another election session.”
The opposition had anticipated that Azour would receive more than 60 votes compared to Frangieh’s expected 44. Winning in the first round of elections requires 86 votes, while in the second round, the requirement falls to 65.
For the first time in 12 sessions, all 128 MPs attended the voting session. The votes of the undecided, independents and those unconvinced by the two candidates were scattered, totaling 18 votes, including one vote for army commander Gen. Joseph Aoun, six votes for former minister Ziad Baroud, eight votes for New Lebanon, and one vote for Jihad Arab, a Lebanese contractor, which was invalidated. One blank vote was cast, and another was lost but later counted in favor of Baroud.
The election session ended with Shiite MPs leaving the assembly hall, which deprived the session of the necessary quorum, and thus no second round was held. Speaker Nabih Berri did not set a date for a new session.
Neither Azour, 57, nor Frangieh, 58, attended the session. However, the candidates tweeted immediately after the session ended. Azour thanked all the MPs who put their trust in him. “I hope the new scene will be an incentive for convergence on an option to pull Lebanon out of the crisis, by respecting the expression of the majority of MPs,” he said. Frangieh expressed his gratitude to the MPs “who elected me and placed their trust in me. We also respect the opinion of the MPs who did not elect me, and this is an incentive for constructive dialogue with everyone.”
Hezbollah and Amal Movement MPs left the election session with smiles, despite Frangieh receiving fewer votes than the opposition candidate.
MP Ali Hassan Khalil from the Amal Movement said: “We have witnessed the victory of our project, while others struggle with their choices. We are convinced of our candidate choice.”
Hezbollah MP Hussein Al-Hajj Hassan said: “We still support our candidate, despite others attempting to rally behind a single candidate despite their political differences. This is the result. We call for dialogue and unity.”
Lebanese Forces MP Shawki Dakash said the most significant aspect of the session was that “77 MPs said no to Hezbollah. However, some colleagues missed the opportunity to elect a president and restore authority to initiate the country’s revival.”
MP Ashraf Rifi said after the session that there is “significant progress toward choosing a state rather than a fiefdom.” Following the session, Kataeb head MP Sami Gemayel highlighted “threats and pressures exerted on some MPs on Tuesday night and Wednesday morning, forcing them to refrain from voting for Azour.”The political observer said that five MPs from the Free Patriotic Movement appeared to have deviated from their leadership by avoiding voting for Azour. It was also revealed that Armenian MPs voted for Frangieh. The election session took place amid external pressure on Lebanon to elect a president as soon as possible. Spokesperson for the French Foreign Ministry, Anne-Claire Legendre, urged Lebanese MPs to “take the session seriously and not miss another opportunity.”
The political observer said: “Such an outcome pushes Lebanon into a new phase of political stagnation at a time when it is most in need of a rapid rescue operation for its collapsed economy, institutional paralysis, the continuation of vacancies in important institutions such as the Central Bank governorship, army leadership, and diplomatic missions abroad, in addition to the paralysis at the government level, which has been a caretaker government for over a year.”
Independent MP Michel Daher highlighted the need to choose a consensus president capable of forming a rescue government and reaching out to Arab nations for assistance, warning that “otherwise, the collapse continues.”
Joanna Wronecka, UN special coordinator for Lebanon, said: “Lebanon’s leaders and MPs need to take urgent steps to ensure the election of a president, for the sake of their country and people. A prolonged vacuum undermines democratic practices in Lebanon and further delays the reforms and necessary solutions that have long been awaited to restore the country to the path of recovery.”

US State Department expresses concern over MPs leaving chamber, hindering presidential election vote
LBCI/June 14/2023
The US State Department has expressed deep concern over the actions of Lebanese parliament members who left the chamber, effectively obstructing the vote on the election of a president. This move has further exacerbated the political uncertainty and instability in the country.The US State Department emphasized that Lebanon's leaders and elites must prioritize the interests of the Lebanese people above their own ambitions and personal interests. The United States firmly believes that it is crucial for Lebanon's political figures to prioritize the welfare of the nation and its citizens. The US State Department highlighted the urgent need for Lebanese leaders to address and resolve the ongoing political paralysis within the country.

UN Special Coordinator urges Lebanon's parliamentarians to ensure Presidential election
LBCI/June 14/2023
UN Special Coordinator for Lebanon, Joanna Wronecka, urged the Lebanese leaders and parliamentarians to take urgent steps to ensure the election of a President in the interest of Lebanon and its people. She said on Twitter, "The prolonged vacuum undermines Lebanon's democratic practices and further delays the long overdue reforms and solutions needed to steer the country back to a path of recovery."

59 MPs vote for Azour, 51 for Franjieh amid row over 'missing' vote

Agence France Presse/June 14/2023
Lawmakers in crisis-hit Lebanon on Wednesday failed for the 12th time to elect a new president, as bitter divisions between Hezbollah and its opponents marred the vote.
Candidates Jihad Azour and Suleiman Franjieh both failed to get across the line, with Azour garnering 59 votes and Frangieh 51 in the 128-seat parliament. Six MPs voted for former minister Ziad Baroud, one MP voted for Army chief Gen. Joseph Aoun and 8 for "New Lebanon" amid controversy over a "missing" vote. All lawmakers showed up for the election, but many left the chamber after placing their ballots in the box and quorum was lost before a second round of voting -- where the winner only requires 65 ballots -- was able to go ahead.
Berri adjourned the voting session despite demands by the MPs to repeat the vote or the counting, as the counted ballots were 127 while 128 MPs voted. MPs of Amal and Hezbollah and MP Jihad al-Samad had already walked out of the session. "One missing vote would not make a difference," Berri said, and ended the session due to lack of quorum. Change MP Melhem Khalaf had asked Speaker Berri at the beginning of the session not to leave parliament before a president is elected in open-ended sessions. "I am not listening to you," Berri responded. Lebanon has been without a head of state for more than seven months, and the last bid to elect a president was held on January 19.
As the 11 before it, Wednesday's attempt was "only a way for political forces to gauge their respective electoral weight" and see how many votes they can get, analyst Karim Bitar said. Lebanon is facing a double power vacuum, with the country governed by a caretaker cabinet with limited powers for more than a year. The international community has urged politicians to elect a consensus presidential candidate who can help the country enact reforms required to unlock billions of dollars in loans from abroad. Franjieh, a former lawmaker and minister who is a friend of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, hails from a storied family dynasty, like many of Lebanon's prominent political figures. On Sunday, he promised to be "the president of all Lebanese" despite his polarizing alliances. Azour was finance minister from 2005 to 2008 and has stepped aside from his role as the director of the Middle East and Central Asia department at the International Monetary Fund in view of the presidential contest. Azour's supporters had said their candidate can get more than 65 votes. On Wednesday he garnered 59. "The FPM and the opposition have nothing in common except the agreement on eliminating Franjieh," Hezbollah MP Hassan Fadlallah said, as he accused Azour's supporters of not being convinced of him themselves. Many who voted for Azour, including Change MPs and the Lebanese Forces, had said he is not their ideal candidate but would still vote for him to end the vacuum.
- 'Prolonged vacuum' -
The winner needs two-thirds majority, or 86 votes from the 128 members of parliament -- but Hezbollah and its allies have posted spoilt ballots to disrupt previous votes. Quorum has been lost before a second round of voting -- where the winner only requires 65 ballots -- has been able to go ahead. Hezbollah and its allies adopted a similar tactic in the last presidential vote, a move that left Lebanon without a president for more than two years, until Michel Aoun's 2016 win. Pro-Hezbollah daily Al-Akhbar's front page on Wednesday featured just one word: vacuum.
If Azour got more than 60 votes it would have been a huge "reversal of fortune for Hezbollah", said Bitar, and would represent massive cross-sectarian "opposition to Hezbollah hegemony on the Lebanese political landscape". "However, at this stage, the most likely scenario is a prolonged vacuum," Bitar added. Azour on Monday said he wanted to "contribute to a solution" not a crisis, as he announced his bid for the post. He said he was "not defying anyone", after Hezbollah described him as the "defiance and confrontation candidate". Mohammad Raad, the head of Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc, has accused Azour's supporters of not wanting him to be elected but "using him" to block Franjieh's path to the presidency. Bitar said the stalemate at Wednesday's ballot could pave the way for protracted negotiations "that would ultimately reach a third-man solution". The United States and France on Tuesday renewed calls for Lebanese lawmakers to cooperate and elect a new president. French foreign ministry spokeswoman Anne-Claire Legendre urged MPs to "take this date seriously" and "not to waste another opportunity".
Shiite Duo calls for dialogue -
"Enough passing the buck... for prolonging the vacuum," Berri said in a statement after the session. "Only consensus and dialogue" will speed up the election of a president, he added, without immediately scheduling a new ballot. Sami Gemayel, head of the Christian Kataeb party, called Wednesday's support for Azour an "uprising" against "diktats and threats", in reference to accusations Hezbollah is seeking to impose its preferred candidate. The Shiite movement has described Azour as the "defiance and confrontation candidate". Before and after the session, Hezbollah MPs called for dialogue and consensus. "No one can impose a president, the only solution is consensus," Fadlallah said. He added that "the country cannot be led by confrontation"."Dialogue is essential for electing a president," he told AFP, calling for "understanding". Hezbollah lawmaker Hussein Haj Hassan claimed Azour and those around him had no political program and called for a "real national dialogue away from the auctioneering and intimidation."

Azour's supporters accuse Hezbollah of blocking democratic vote
Associated Press/June 14/2023
On Wednesday, supporters of former finance minister Jihad Azour accused Hezbollah and its allies of blocking the democratic process. Hezbollah and Amal MPs had withdrawn following the first round of electoral voting on Wednesday, breaking the quorum, after Azour failed to reach the two-thirds majority needed to win in the first round. Azour had the backing of the country's largest Christian political parties, the Free Patriotic Movement, which has been allied with Hezbollah since 2006, and the Lebanese Forces party. Azour was also backed by the majority of Druze legislators and some Sunni Muslims. The new president's most pressing task will be to get this nation of 6 million people, including more than 1 million Syrian refugees, out of an unprecedented economic crisis that began in October 2019. The meltdown is rooted in decades of corruption and mismanagement by the country's political class that has ruled Lebanon since the 1975-90 civil war ended. Clinching a bailout deal with the IMF — Azour's current employer — is seen as key to Lebanon's recovery. Azour took a leave of absence from his post as regional director for the organization upon announcing his candidacy. "This group does not believe in democracy," said Fadi Karam, lawmaker from Lebanese Forces. Independent lawmaker Waddah Sadek said that "nobody can nominate a candidate and say it's either them or nobody else."Hezbollah has often criticized opposing candidates as divisive and "confrontational," though Azour has said that he would work to bring together rival political groups and end the economic crisis. "Who better than Jihad Azour to seal the deal with the IMF that can help guarantee us international investment," Sadek said. Hezbollah lawmaker Hussein Haj Hassan claimed Azour and those around him had no political program and called for a "real national dialogue away from the auctioneering and intimidation." Earlier this week, Franjieh said he was not imposing himself but sought "a national consensus or majority." Not all lawmakers opposed to Hezbollah support Azour's candidacy and some see him as representing sectarian parties. Ibrahim Mneimneh said the one thing that many legislators who like him ran on anti-establishment platforms agree on was their opposition to Franjieh. Michel Douaihy, another independent lawmaker, said Azour had not been the first choice of most independents, but that his candidacy "is the art of compromise at its best." No date has been set for a thirteenth attempt to elect a president.

MPs from both camps claim 'victory' after botched presidential vote

Naharnet/June 14/2023
MPs from the rival electoral camps on Wednesday claimed “victory” in a presidential election session that failed to produce a new president. “The camp that is trying to impose its candidate garnered 51 votes, which means that there is a clear majority against the imposition process … Our rejection of imposition means that we have won,” MP Michel Mouawad of the pro-Jihad Azour camp said after the session. MP Ali Hassan Khalil of Speaker Nabih Berri’s Development and Liberation bloc meanwhile said the session carried “a victory for the democratic battle and for an alliance that carries a clear political project.”“The victory today was a victory for the project in the face of an intersection whose elements have said that it is temporary and would end with the end of the session,” Khalil added. Kataeb Party chief MP Sami Gemayel for his part noted that the rival camp’s MPs “blocked quorum and ran away from the session,” noting that “this proves who won the battle.”“We did not want the battle but rather consensus, and that’s why we proposed a consensual person. The other camp was supposed to meet us halfway but it is continuing with its imposition approach and we will continue confronting them,” Gemayel added. Azour received 59 votes in the first round of voting in Wednesday’s session as Suleiman Franjieh garnered 51 votes. Speaker Nabih Berri later adjourned the session amid a loss of quorum and controversy over a “lost” vote. Eighty-six votes are needed by any candidate to win from the first round while 65 are needed in the second round. Lebanon has been without a head of state for more than seven months, and the previous attempt to elect a president was held on January 19.

Berri calls for dialogue, says only consensus can end vacuum
Agence France Presse/June 14/2023
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri urged Wednesday for dialogue after MPs failed for the 12th time to elect a president. Berri called on parties to stop trading blame and to stop "spinning in a vicious circle.""Enough passing the buck for prolonging the vacuum," Berri said."Denial will not lead anywhere, only consensus and dialogue will speed up the election of a president," he added, without immediately scheduling a new ballot. Hezbollah MPs and their candidate Marada leader Suleiman Franjieh also called on Wednesday for dialogue. "Dialogue is essential for electing a president," Hezbollah MP Hassan Fadlallah told AFP. "The country cannot be led by confrontation".Hezbollah lawmaker Hussein Haj Hassan claimed Azour and those around him had no political program and called for a "real national dialogue away from the auctioneering and intimidation."Crisis-hit Lebanon has already been without a head of state for more than seven months, and the previous attempt to elect a president was held on January 19.

Franjieh calls for 'constructive dialogue with everyone'
Naharnet/June 14/2023
Marada Movement chief Suleiman Franjieh on Wednesday thanked the 51 MPs who voted for him in the 12th presidential election session that was held earlier in the day without producing a winner. “We also respect the opinion of the lawmakers who did not vote for me and this should push for constructive dialogue with everyone,” Franjieh added, in a tweet. Franjieh’s main electoral rival Jihad Azour received 59 votes in the first round of voting in Wednesday’s session. Speaker Nabih Berri later adjourned the session amid a loss of quorum and controversy over a “lost” vote. Eighty-six votes are needed by any candidate to win from the first round while 65 are needed in the second round. MPs from both camps claimed “victory” after the session. Lebanon has been without a head of state for more than seven months, and the previous attempt to elect a president was held on January 19.

Azour urges moving electoral process forward for 'good of Lebanese people'
Naharnet/June 14/2023
Ex-minister and incumbent IMF official Jihad Azour on Wednesday thanked the Lebanese lawmakers who voted for him in the 12th presidential election session, which did not produce a new president. "I hope that this development will be an incentive to converge on the need of getting Lebanon out of the crisis and move the process forward for the good of the Lebanese people," Azour said in an English-language statement. Azour received 59 votes in the first round of voting in Wednesday’s session as Suleiman Franjieh garnered 51 votes. Speaker Nabih Berri later adjourned the session amid a loss of quorum and controversy over a “lost” vote. Eighty-six votes are needed by any candidate to win from the first round while 65 are needed in the second round. MPs from both camps claimed “victory” after the session. Lebanon has been without a head of state for more than seven months, and the previous attempt to elect a president was held on January 19.

Bassil: Today's session proves no one can bypass Christian component in presidency
LBCI/June 14/2023
Leader of the Free Patriotic Movement, Gebran Bassil, commented on Today's session in a tweet, saying: "Today's session, as we said yesterday, has proven that no one can bypass the Christian component in the presidency of the republic and that no one can impose a president on another. The movement is committed and follows its own convictions only...""Every stubbornness will be met with another stubbornness. There is no solution except through consensus on the program and on the president, without exclusion or sharing. No president can succeed without an agreed-upon program," he added. "Drop the preconditions, as this is not a dialogue, and abandon theories of imposition and defiance, as this is not Lebanon. Let us focus on the priorities of the presidency and the names that align with the sovereign, reformist, and salvation program," Bassil stressed.

Geagea slams obstruction of 'entire' presidential election process
Naharnet/June 14/2023
Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea on Wednesday described the walkout of the pro-Suleiman Franjieh lawmakers from the 12 presidential election session as “a real and actual obstruction of the entire presidential election process.”“Had the second round (of voting) been held today, we would have had a president now,” Geagea tweeted. Jihad Azour -- the candidate of the LF, the Free Patriotic Movement and most opposition forces -- received 59 votes in the first round of voting in Wednesday’s session as Suleiman Franjieh garnered 51 votes. Speaker Nabih Berri later adjourned the session amid a loss of quorum and controversy over a “lost” vote. Eighty-six votes are needed by any candidate to win from the first round while 65 are needed in the second round. MPs from both camps claimed “victory” after the session.
Lebanon has been without a head of state for more than seven months, and the previous attempt to elect a president was held on January 19.

Samy Gemayel praises 'uprising' in Parliament for rejecting imposition and threat

LBCI/June 14/2023
The head of the Lebanese Kataeb Party, MP Samy Gemayel, considered that what happened in the 12th session to elect a president was a real "uprising" by the Lebanese MPs from all affiliations who gathered to reject the process of imposition and threat and attempts to suggest that the presidential decision is in "one place" in Lebanon. Gemayel praised from the Parliament the real "uprising" that took place, which brought together a large number of deputies who committed to voting, and praised some of the Change MPs who decided to show unity against the logic of imposition.
He said that on Tuesday, a group of blocs and deputies were under pressure and threats, which led to the retreat of some, and despite that, the number of votes came according to their estimates. He added that they were for months subject to defamation campaigns, adding, "We are accused of treachery and that any president other than Sleiman Frangieh lives in Tel Aviv." He added: "If there are those who consider the victory that occurred in today's session a failure, what is their stance towards the actions of others who disrupted the quorum and left the session? Today is the greatest evidence of who is the winner in the battle, and we say that we never wanted to engage in a battle […] And the other team was supposed to meet us halfway, but they continued with the logic of imposition, and we continue to confront them.

6 'Oct. 17' MPs refuse to vote for 'sectarian parties' candidates
Naharnet/June 14/2023
MPs Elias Jradeh, Halima Qaaqour and Cynthia Zarazir of the Change bloc and MPs Osama Saad, Abdul Rahman al-Bizri and Charbel Masaad of the Sidon-Jezzine bloc announced prior to Wednesday’s presidential election session that they would not vote for the candidates of the “sectarian parties.”In a statement, the lawmakers said they would only vote for a candidate who supports the independence of the judiciary and backs holding corrupts accountable and resuming the probe into the Beirut port blast. They also called for a president who would work for restructuring banks, recovering deposits, creating a social safety net and managing “serious dialogue aimed at devising a defense strategy.”“Because the June 14 session with the acknowledgement of the various political forces is not aimed at electing a president, but rather to reinforce the negotiation cards of the sectarian parties, we the undersigned stress that we will not be dragged by these sectarian parties … and will only elect the president who shares our political vision,” the MPs added.

LBCI interviews shed light on parliamentary blocs' reactions following election session
LBCI/June 14/2023
Amidst the aftermath of the presidential election session, exclusive interviews with various parliamentary blocs conducted by LBCI revealed divergent perspectives and reactions. The statements reflected the ongoing tensions and political complexities surrounding the process of electing Lebanon's president.
Samir Geagea, leader of the Lebanese Forces, expressed his view that the 12th election session was unconventional, questioning why the elections were halted after the first round. Geagea emphasized that if the second round had taken place, Lebanon would have had a president by now, initiating a potential path towards rescuing the country. Ali Hasan Khalil from the Amal Movement highlighted the rejection of Jihad Azour by a whole faction, dismissing attempts to impose their candidate as a form of "imposition." He stressed the importance of dialogue without preconditions and rejected the notion of canceling their candidate. Tony Frangieh, Marada Movement MP and son of candidate Sleiman Frangieh described the session's outcome as positive, and emphasizing Lebanon's need for a consensus-based approach.
Frangieh acknowledged the pressure exerted on Change MPs and noted that approximately 20 Christian MPs were outside the intersection that supported Azour.
Samy Gemayel, leader of the Kataeb Party, called on the opposing faction to present a consensus candidate before engaging in any dialogue regarding the presidential file. Gemayel criticized the perception of Azour being forcefully imposed, highlighting the contradiction with democratic processes. He emphasized the need for a consensus-based dialogue to break the cycle. Michel Moawad, member of the Tajadod Bloc, acknowledged the achievement of supporting Azour and expressed the hope of surpassing the 59 votes. Ibrahim Mneimneh, despite initial hesitation, voted for Azour, acknowledging that they voted for a candidate they do not endorse. Ahmad al-Kheir from the National Moderation Bloc affirmed the validity of their decision and the importance of selecting a candidate in the next session, stating that the bloc's position remains unified. Wael Abou Faour, representing the Democratic Gathering Bloc, emphasized the incomplete nature of the current scene and urged all parties to take responsibility for addressing the ongoing crisis.

Report: Macron, MBS to discuss Lebanon in Paris meeting
Naharnet/June 14/2023
Saudi Arabia's de facto ruler Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman will discuss with President Emmanuel Macron on Friday the Lebanese file, local media reports said Wednesday. The meeting takes place after Lebanese MPs failed again Wednesday to elect a president amid a chaotic session that ended with a missing vote and a lack of quorum for the second round. "The French were awaiting the results of Wednesday's session to resume their talks with the Lebanese parties," al-Akhbar newspaper reported. It added that Paris has not changed its stance regarding the presidential consensus and that its efforts will intensify this week.

MP Tony Frangieh: No alternative to openness, unity in face of hate
NNA/June 14, 2023
MP Tony Frangieh on Wednesday said via Twitter, “There is no alternative to openness and unity in the face of hate, exclusion, and division. Today’s presidential election outcome confirms the victory of this approach. Let's build on what unites us.”

Minister Sharafeddine broaches displaced Syrians’ dossier with Syrian Chargé d'Affaires
NNA/June 14, 2023
Caretaker Minister of the Displaced, Issam Sharafeddine, on Wednesday received in his office at the ministry, the Chargé d'Affaires of the Syrian Embassy in Lebanon, Ali Dagman. Discussions reportedly touched on the displaced Syrians’ dossier and on Minister Sharafeddine’s upcoming visit to Damascus at the end of this week.

Grand Mufti broaches general affairs with UNIFIL Commander
NNA/June 14, 2023
Grand Mufti of the Lebanese Republic, Sheikh Abdel Latif Darian, on Wednesday welcomed at Dar al-Fatwa UNIFIL Commander, General Aroldo Lazaro, with whom he discussed general affairs. Lazaro gifted a shield to the Grand Mufti as a token of love and appreciation.

USAID Provides More Than $17.4 Million in Additional Humanitarian Assistance for Vulnerable Lebanese People
NNA/June 14, 2023
To help vulnerable Lebanese continue to put food on the table and access medical care, the United States, through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), is providing more than $17.4 million in additional humanitarian assistance to the people of Lebanon via the UN World Food Programme (WFP) and two non-governmental organizations (NGOs). As staple food and fuel prices rise and livelihoods erode, Lebanon’s deepening economic crisis continues to generate humanitarian needs by decreasing vulnerable populations’ purchasing power, and restricting access to healthcare. With more than $11.1 million in additional USAID humanitarian assistance, WFP will provide 300,000 vulnerable Lebanese people with monthly household food parcels for approximately two months, helping improve food security for some 75,000 households. The WFP food parcels, which are purchased locally in Lebanon to support the local economy, provide about 65 percent of daily caloric needs and contain grains such as rice and bulgur; pulses such as lentils, beans, and chickpeas; pasta; canned fish; oil; and other staples. WFP’s food parcel program complements national social safety net programs led by the Government of Lebanon and targets vulnerable Lebanese people who are not reached by the safety nets. Additionally, through nearly $6.3 million in USAID humanitarian assistance, Relief International (RI) and International Medical Corps (IMC) will continue supporting at least 11 primary healthcare clinics across Lebanon, as well as home care. With USAID funding, RI- and IMC-supported clinics treated more than 96,000 patients, approximately 72 percent of whom were Lebanese, in Fiscal Year (FY) 2022.

Syrians conditions worsen, WFP faces 'unprecedented funding crisis'
Associated Press/June 14/2023
Six months after she got the call informing her that her U.N. assistance would be cut, Najwa al-Jassem is struggling to feed her four children and pay rent for their tent in a Syrian refugee camp in Lebanon's eastern Bekaa Valley.
She once received food rations and cash that covered most of their modest monthly expenses. The family now only gets the equivalent of $20 a month, which just covers the rent for their cramped tent. Her husband gets only sporadic day labor and "my kids are too young for me to send them to work the fields," she told The Associated Press in the camp near the town of Bar Elias. "We're eating one meal a day."
Aid agencies will struggle to draw the world's attention back to the plight of Syrians like al-Jassem on Wednesday at an annual donor conference hosted by the European Union in Brussels for humanitarian aid to respond to the Syrian crisis.
Funding from the two-day conference will also go toward providing aid to Syrians within the war-torn country and to some 5.7 million Syrian refugees living in neighboring countries, particularly Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan.
This year, organizers aim to raise some $11.2 billion, though humanitarian officials acknowledged that pledges will likely fall short.
On Tuesday, a day before the conference, the World Food Program announced that it was faced with an "unprecedented funding crisis" and would cut aid to 2.5 million out of the 5.5 million people in Syria who had been receiving food assistance.
The conference comes as Syria's protracted uprising-turned-civil-conflict has entered its 13th year, and after a deadly 7.8 magnitude earthquake rocked large swaths of Syria in February, further compounding its misery. The World Bank estimated over $5 billion in damage s, as the quake destroyed homes and hospitals and further crippled Syria's poor power and water infrastructure. It also comes at a politically precarious time for refugees living in neighboring countries. Syrian President Bashar Assad recently received a major political lifeline with the return of Damascus to the Arab League, and Syria's neighbors have, in return, called for a mass repatriation of refugees.
Anti-refugee rhetoric has surged in neighboring Lebanon and Turkey, both dealing with economic and political crises. In Lebanon, where officials have put the blame for the country's economic crisis onto the country's estimated 1.5 million refugees, authorities have imposed curfews on refugees and restricted their ability to rent homes. Rights groups have said the Lebanese military has deported hundreds of Syrian refugees in recent months. In Turkey, where Syrians were once welcomed with compassion, repatriation of the roughly 3.7 million refugees became a top theme in last month's presidential and parliamentary elections, which ended in a new term for incumbent President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Erdogan's government for years defended its open-door policy, but has in recent years been building housing developments in areas of northwestern Syria controlled by Ankara-backed Syrian opposition groups, with the stated aim of encouraging refugee returns. Ankara and Damascus have also been holding talks in Moscow to improve strained relations. The government has also carried out sporadic forcible deportations, while Erdogan's challengers took a harder line, vowing to deport refugees en masse.
While some Syrian refugees have voluntarily returned from Turkey and Lebanon, most say the situation is too volatile. At the camp in Lebanon, Fteim Al-Janoud struggled to hold back her tears as she talked about how she and her husband can only afford to send one of her six children to school. But the refugee from Syria's northern Aleppo province said the situation there is even worse, both in terms of security and material concerns. "If the conditions were good and if our homes were fixed so we could live peacefully and comfortably, we wouldn't have a problem going back to Syria, even with Assad still there," she said. Despite the deteriorating situation for Syrians, aid has dwindled in recent years, as donors rushed to support over 5 million Ukrainian refugees and over 7 million internally displaced in the conflict-hit European country. The war in Ukraine, a global bread basket, also sparked a food inflation surge on the heels of the COVID-19 pandemic that rocked the global economy for years.
"We see needs are increasing, and we also see that that donor funding is gradually going down," said Ivo Freijsen, the U.N. refugee agency's representative to Lebanon, where some 90% of refugees live in extreme poverty and are dependent on aid.
"From a humanitarian point of view, it means that more people will be suffering," he said. "We need to be seeking to see funding levels stay at the same level and actually increase."
At last year's conference in Brussels, donors pledged $6.7 billion, falling billions short of the U.N.'s $10.5 billion appeal, split almost evenly to assist Syrians inside the war-torn country and refugees. The funding shortage forced hospitals in opposition-held northwestern Syria to cut back services, while the U.N. World Food Program cut the size of its monthly rations for the more than 1 million people it serves in that area.
"We know that Ukraine has taken a big toll," said U.N. Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator in Lebanon Imran Riza. "We know that Sudan has now become also quite a priority. It's a difficult time and it's a time that's also following COVID and everything else that happened that hit economies so hard across the globe."Given those difficulties, he said international donors need to "move towards much more sustainable interventions" rather than remaining in crisis mode.
At the camp in the Bekaa Valley, Al-Jassem says she's struggling to cope with mounting debts she and her husband have to cover unpaid rent and medical expenses.
But she's more worried about the well-being of her children, who have lived their entire lives in a refugee camp in worsening conditions.
"The kids sometimes go to school without having breakfast," she explained. "Their teacher would sometimes call me and ask why they didn't bring a sandwich with them, and I would say it's because I have nothing in the pantry."

A Text of a Letter sent to the USA to Department of State by three Member Of The Congress addressing the Lebanese Crisis
Congress Of The United States/House Of Representatives
The Honorable Antony Blinken Secretary of State
Department of State
2201 C Street NW Washington, DC 20520
Dear Secretary Blinken:
June 12, 2023
As Co-Chairs of the U.S.-Lebanon Friendship Caucus, we write to you regarding Lebanon’s upcoming presidential election. We remain concerned that Lebanon’s constitutional processes have stalled, resulting in multiple failed parliamentary electoral sessions and a continued presidential vacancy.
Lebanon has been without a president since October 2022. Since then, the Lebanese Parliament has sought to elect a president eleven times. On Wednesday, June 14, 2023, Parliament will attempt to elect a president once again. It is time for those who seek to undermine the parliamentary process, block open election procedures, and continue to prevent multiple rounds of ballots to either resolve the impasse and allow the country to move forward, or be held accountable. It is concerning that in the past, the Parliament’s balloting was not allowed to go to a second round, once again preventing the selection of a candidate and further prolonging the political, economic, and humanitarian crises in Lebanon.
The inability to select a president is playing out against the backdrop of what the World Bank has estimated is one of the worst economic collapses since the 1850s.1 Since 2019, Lebanon’s economy has disintegrated, leaving over three-quarters of the population in poverty. On June 8, 2023, the International Monetary Fund warned that Lebanon must take immediate action on economic reforms to prevent “irreversible damage” to the economy.2 The duly elected Lebanese Parliament cannot move forward with legislation to implement much needed economic reforms until a president is elected.
1 World Bank, Lebanon Sinking (to the Top 3), Lebanon Economic Monitor Spring 2021, World Bank Washington, DC.
2 Andrea Shalal, IMF says Lebanon needs urgent economic reforms to stop deepening crisis, Reuters, June 8, 2023
page1image9102912
The United States has a strong interest in a stable, independent Lebanon. Unfortunately, the presidential vacancy stands in the way of such cooperation. If Parliamentary leaders and other political elites are unable to follow through on Lebanon’s own constitution, preserve a quorum, and allow the multiple rounds of balloting necessary for the selection of a president, the United States and our partners and allies in the region, must consider more serious measures.
We believe that the Administration should emphatically restate the importance of selecting a president who will represent the needs of the Lebanese people and move forward with necessary economic reforms before it is too late. We request your urgent attention to this matter.
Sincerely
Darrel Issa/Member Of The Congress
Darrin Lahood/Member Of The Congress
Debbie Dingell/Member Of The Congress

ãÄÓÓÉ ÚÇãÑ ÝÇÎæÑí ÊÑÍÈ ÈÏÚæÉ áÌäÉ ÇáÏÑÇÓÉ Ýí ÇáÍÒÈ ÇáÌãåæÑí ÈÈäÏ ÇáãÓÇÁáÉ ÈãÇ íÎÕ áÈäÇä
Amer Fakhoury Foundation Applauds Republican Study Committee’s Call for Accountability in Lebanon

June 14, 2023
https://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/119130/119130/
The foundation celebrates the recognition of Amer Fakhoury’s case and the push for accountability in Lebanon’s government and military aid.
Washington, DC.- The Amer Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting human rights and accountability, commends the Republican Study Committee (RSC) for its recent release of a budget proposal that addresses the unlawful detention and torture of a U.S. citizen in Lebanon. The RSC acknowledged Amer Fakhoury, who faced illegal detention and torture in Lebanon before his death shortly after being released from prison.
The RSC budget proposal emphasizes the need to counter Iran’s influence in the region by preventing U.S. aid from supporting regimes that act as Iranian proxies in the Middle East, such as the current Lebanese government. The proposal notes that the terrorist group Hezbollah has taken control of Lebanon’s government, establishing a monopoly on force and enabling the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) to participate in the detention and torture of U.S. citizens.
To address this issue, the RSC budget recommends discontinuing aid to the LAF and imposing sanctions on current and former Lebanese security officials involved in the detention and torture of U.S. citizens. This would include high-ranking officials like Maj. Gen. Abbas Ibrahim, the former head of the Lebanese General Security Directorate.
Earlier in 2023, the U.S. Administration initiated a program to provide direct salary payments to the LAF and Internal Security Forces (ISF), totaling $72 million. These funds ultimately serve as a slush fund in a country where Hezbollah’s economic presence is widespread.
The Amer Foundation has been advocating for recognition of Amer Fakhoury’s plight, and the RSC budget proposal represents a significant step toward holding those responsible for his unlawful detention and torture accountable. The foundation will continue to push for justice and increased transparency in the distribution of U.S. aid to Lebanon and other countries in the region.
“We are encouraged by the Republican Study Committee’s commitment to accountability and justice in Lebanon. This is the first of many steps towards ensuring that no other American citizen suffers the same fate as Amer Fakhoury,” said Macy Fakhoury a representative of the Amer Foundation.
For more information about the Amer Foundation and its ongoing work to promote human rights and accountability, visit www.amerfoundation.org or contact team@fakhouryfoundation.org
**About the Amer Foundation**
The Amer Foundation is a non-profit organization established in memory of Amer Fakhoury, a U.S. citizen who faced illegal detention and torture in Lebanon. The foundation is committed to promoting human rights, accountability, and justice for those who suffer similar injustices. Through advocacy efforts and public awareness campaigns, the Amer Foundation seeks to create a world where every individual’s rights are protected and respected.
Link for the RSC full Report/PDF
https://hern.house.gov/uploadedfiles/202306141135_fy24_rsc_budget_print_final_c.pdf
 

Why Hezbollah’s popularity in Lebanon is rapidly declining
Jerry Maher/Arab News/June 14, 2023
It is no secret that Hezbollah and its followers are restless about all that is happening in Lebanon on the economic, financial and social levels as a result of the suffocating crisis the country is going through. Hezbollah’s immediate suffering is one of the consequences of the war in Syria and its involvement there, which has led to the martyrdom of a large number of young people.
However, amid signs of the end of the war in Syria and Damascus’ return to the Arab fold via the Arab League, it has become clear to the families of the fighters that the blood of their sons was spilled in vain, with no gains resulting from the party’s participation in the conflict in Syria on the basis of the “strategic aims of the resistance.”
Therefore, resentment among the many Shiites who make up the party’s base increases on a daily basis, amid the stifling economic crisis and unstable living conditions the country is facing.
After all, they live with other Lebanese people and they share the same suffering. It appeared clearly and publicly with the launch of the popular movement of the Oct. 17 Revolution in 2019, when areas in Southern Lebanon and the Bekaa Valley witnessed popular movements under the slogan “All means all.” They accused the political class, including Hezbollah, of bringing the country to a state of economic deterioration and financial crisis — the worst since the civil war ended.
Anger and resentment against the party’s policies are now being expressed publicly, no longer behind walls or in restricted meetings. As a result of the insane increase in the price of essential consumer goods and fuel, as well as the decline in purchasing power as a result of the Lebanese pound’s deteriorating value against the US dollar, people can no longer tolerate staying silent and have started to publicly express their views. In the end, a hungry man is an angry man, and all barriers fall before starvation.
The impact of Hezbollah’s policies was evident in last year’s parliamentary elections, as turnout declined significantly in some of its strongholds. It is worth noting that the party and its allies directly employed tactics of intimidation and fear toward voters. Such practices were intense and widespread.
Moreover, Hezbollah limited its payment of salaries in US dollars to fighters only due to the shrinking of its revenues from Iran as a result of sanctions. It also changed the salaries of employees within its institutions into Lebanese lira, which increased the resentment and anger.
As a result, it is attempting to make up for its financial shortcomings by providing direct assistance to its most committed supporters, particularly by granting them Al-Sajjad cards, which can be used to buy products from its institutions at discounted rates. The same applies to the launch of special cards to allow Hezbollah followers to buy medicines from a group of pharmacies it is affiliated with. These medicines are usually Iranian and are not subject to the conditions or control of the Lebanese Ministry of Health. The same is true of the foodstuffs imported from Iran.
The children and wives of Hezbollah leaders show off by carrying luxury bags made by the likes of Gucci and Chanel.
The same also applies to the party’s attempt to expand its financial institutions, which are now operating in parallel to the legitimate banks in order to try to replace them in the future. These institutions, specifically Al-Qard Al-Hassan, which now has 31 branches, are distributed over a number of different regions after their work was confined to specific branches in order to absorb people’s resentment. This institution has become part of the speculative black market in Lebanon by investing “fresh dollars” into its affiliated ATMs and carrying out normal banking operations as if it were a commercial bank, in violation of all banking and financial laws in Lebanon.
It is also remarkable that aid in the form of food baskets, mostly given by international organizations like USAID, benefit only families affiliated with Hezbollah, even though the party publicly declares its enmity to the US and other Western countries.
However, it is evident that a number of its officials and their families lead normal lives and are unaffected by the crisis because they are fortunate enough to receive direct donations from the party. That increases the anger of the families that do not benefit from the same and who have to make do with crumbs.
The children and wives of Hezbollah leaders enjoy a life of luxury, travel and vacations, showing off by carrying luxury bags made by the likes of Gucci and Chanel and watches from international brands such as Rolex. Meanwhile, the people who make up the popular support of Hezbollah are not given their daily sustenance or anything that helps them face the daily challenges of living in Lebanon.
Despite the fact that the country is undergoing social and economic deterioration, we clearly see the family members of Hezbollah officials living a fancy lifestyle, as explicitly revealed by the weddings of the children of these officials, which are worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. This undoubtedly increases the popular resentment against them.
Some experts say Hezbollah is now losing its grip on Lebanon, given the anger spreading even in its traditional strongholds, with many in the country dissatisfied with Hezbollah and the other longtime power holders.
The decline of Hezbollah’s popularity and its political alliances cannot be traced to a single incident. Rather, it is the result of an ongoing accumulation of missteps and miscalculations the party has made over several years, not to mention its negative influence, which has hampered Lebanon’s democratic processes, impeded social cohesion and hindered its path toward prosperity.
• Jerry Maher, chairman and CEO at Sawt Beirut International and media adviser to Bahaa Hariri, is a Swedish political writer and analyst specializing in the Middle East and Iran.
Twitter: @jerrymahers

ÊÞÑíÑ ãä ãæÞÚ ãíãÑí íÊäÇæá ãäÇÑæÉ ÍÒÈ Çááå ÇáÃÎíÑÉ Ýí ÇáÌäæÈ æãÇ ÇËÇÑÊå ãä ÇäÊÞÇÏÇÊ æÇÓÊäßÇÑÊ ãÝÇÏåÇ Ãä ÇáÍÒÈ íÎÊØÝ ÇáÈáÏ æíÑåÈ æíÎæä ãÚÇÑÖíå
Hizbullah's Military Exercise Sparks Criticism In South Lebanon: It Is An Act Of Hijacking The State, Intimidating Hizbullah's Opponents In The Country
MEMRI/June 14, 2023

Lebanon | Special Dispatch No. 10665

https://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/119121/119121/
In May 2023, Hizbullah held two military exercises to mark the 23rd anniversary of Israel's withdrawal from South Lebanon. The first, called "We Will Cross" (referring to the Israeli border), was held on May 21 near the town of 'Armata in the Jezzine district, and involved some 200 fighters, most of them from Hizbullah's elite Radwan Force.[1] Described by Hizbullah as "the first of its kind," the exercise, conducted with live ammunition, simulated the seizing of Israeli military vehicles, a breaching of the border and a raid into Israeli territory, and the takeover of an Israeli military base and an Israeli settlement. It was an impressive show of force, in terms of both the number of troops involved and the number of scenarios simulated, although similar simulations have featured in previous Hizbullah exercises documented in the organization's videos.[2] Furthermore, the exercise did not present significant new capabilities or weapons, such as the accurate missiles Hizbullah frequently boasts that it possesses.
According to media reports, the exercise was observed by 500-600 journalists, at the invitation of Hizbullah's public relations department. In fact, the organization bussed the journalists to the area and hosted them there.[3] It was also attended by representatives of Iran-backed militias, such as the Houthi Ansar Allah movement from Yemen and officials from the information department of the Iraqi Al-Nujaba movement. This was apparently meant as a show of "uniting the fronts" of the resistance axis, a goal Hizbullah has been promoting since 2021.[4]
Several days later, Hizbullah's branch in the Jabel 'Amil area in South Lebanon invited the public to observe another exercise, called Al-Fath Al-Mubin ("The Clear Conquest"),[5] simulating "the great and final liberation of Palestine," starting with "the breaching of the [border] fence." But, unlike in the case of the first exercise, no footage or photos of this event have been released to date.
These Hizbullah exercises attracted considerable attention in Lebanon and the world, due to their timing, shortly after the latest round of fighting between Israel and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) in Gaza, and their location, close to the border with Israel. The May 21 exercise was apparently intended to have an impact on public opinion in Israel, Lebanon and the Arab and global arenas, and to present Hizbullah's military forces as an alternative to the Lebanese Armed Forces. The fact that Hizbullah deliberately invited hundreds of journalists from Lebanon and abroad – not all of them Hizbullah supporters – to observe it reflects the organization's sense of confidence, or at least its desire to appear confident; moreover, it shows that Hizbullah is able to hold such an event in Lebanon without any fear of the authorities' intervention.
It appears that the exercise indeed embarrassed the Lebanese government by exposing its lack of control on the ground. It is presumably no coincidence that, shortly after it was held, Lebanon's interim prime minister, Najib Mikati, held a series of meetings with the UN Special Coordinator for Lebanon, the UNIFIL commander and the U.S. ambassador in Beirut. The exercise also rekindled the debate in Lebanon about Hizbullah's weapons, and sparked dismay and concern among the organization's opponents, who regarded it as a threatening message directed not only at Israel but at the Lebanese public, as part of Hizbullah's efforts to promote its presidential candidate. The organization's opponents stressed that this publicly-held exercise shows, more than anything else, that Hizbullah behaves like the real and only authority in Lebanon, and expressed concern about returning to the days of the Lebanese civil war of the 1970s and 1980s, which almost destroyed the country. They also noted that Hizbullah was sabotaging Lebanon's foreign relations, both with the Arab countries, especially Saudi Arabia, and with the international community.
This report reviews the military exercise held by Hizbullah in South Lebanon on May 21, 2023, and the reactions to it in the country:
Hizbullah's May 21 Military Exercise
As stated, the military exercise, held near the town of 'Armata in the Jezzine region, 20 km from the Israeli border, involved 200 fighters who simulated seizing IDF military vehicles, raiding Israeli territory and attacking an Israeli army base and an Israeli settlement, using live ammunition, drones and explosives.[6]
Hizbullah attached considerable importance to this exercise, which was accompanied by an extensive public relations campaign. Ahead of the event the organization's media outlets, and social media accounts of its supporters, circulated advertisements announcing it.[7] Hizbullah's public relations chief, Muhammad 'Afif, clarified before the exercise that its goal was to convey a message to the public in Lebanon and Israel: that Hizbullah is ready to confront any Israeli aggression and to take part in the defense of Palestine whenever necessary.[8]
After the exercise, Hizbullah and pro-Hizbullah media published extensive footage of it and statements and reports about it. Hizbullah Deputy Secretary-General Na'im Qassem described it as "the first exercise of its kind" held by the organization in Lebanon, and said that it had conveyed Hizbullah's determination and readiness to achieve victories and deter Israel.[9] The pro-Hizbullah Lebanese daily Al-Akhbar devoted a special section to the exercise. Describing it as a "rare" event that took place "a few kilometers" from the Israeli border,[10] it added that the exercise had "announced a new resistance strategy, involving advanced technology of the type used by the most modern armies, and very organized and determined troops that can realize any concept and translate it into a tactical operation." The daily also mentioned the extensive media presence at the event. It noted that, for the first time since 2005, Hizbullah had allowed "many diverse" media outlets "from Western and Asian countries" to observe its military activity, and had undertaken an extensive logistical operation in order to bring the journalists to the area and allow them to document "almost anything they wished." [11]
The hype ahead of the exercise was apparently more successful than Hizbullah had anticipated, creating far-reaching expectations among its supporters and opponents alike – so much so that the organization was forced to temper expectations several days before the event. Muhammad 'Afif noted that "several brothers in the media, with good intentions, had created excessive expectations," and that the drill would involve "military activity limited in time and place… only a sample of the real capabilities of the resistance."[12] After the exercise Na'im Qassem stressed, in a similar vein, that it had "presented just a part and a sample of our capabilities. The accurate missiles and other weapons were not shown."[13]
The Lebanese Authorities Were Helpless To Prevent The Public Exercise
The Lebanese authorities, including Interim Prime Minister Najib Mikati, were apparently helpless to prevent this public show of force by Hizbullah. Asked about this during a meeting with UN Special Coordinator for Lebanon Joanna Wronecka, held the day after the exercise, Mikati said that his government "opposes anything that undermines the state's sovereignty" but that resolving "the specific problem of Hizbullah's weapons… requires a broad national consensus. At the moment," he added, "the government is stressing the need to maintain security stability throughout Lebanon and refrain from any action that undermines it."[14] One day later Mikati met with UNIFIL Commander Gen. Aroldo Lázaro Sáenz and with U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Dorothy Shea. Although these meetings presumably addressed the issue of the exercise, the only details disclosed were that Mikati had stressed to Lázaro that cooperation between the Lebanese Armed Forces and UNIFIL was the main guarantee of stability along the border with Israel.[15]
Lebanese Politicians: Hizbullah Has Once Again Proved That It is Above The State; It Must Be Disarmed
As mentioned, the widely-covered exercise confirmed the concerns of Hizbullah's opponents regarding its weapons and rekindled the debate about this issue. The organization's opponents argued that, in addition to conveying a clear message to Israel, the drill was also meant to threaten the Lebanese public, especially in the context of the upcoming presidential election. They noted that this blatant show of force was disturbingly reminiscent of the civil war period in Lebanon, when armed Palestinian organizations did in the country as they pleased. Hizbullah, they added, is also harming Lebanon's relations with the Arabs, in particular with Saudi Arabia, and with the entire international community.
Hizbullah's opponents noted that the exercise was held just a few days after the Arab summit in Saudi Arabia, whose closing statement had condemned the phenomenon of armed militias. In addition, they said, it was apparently meant to signal that Hizbullah and Lebanon were not part of the understandings being formulated between Iran and Saudi Arabia.[16] They reiterated their demand to disarm Hizbullah, and some even called to take up arms against this organization, in light of the state's inaction.
Criticism of the exercise was heard even before it took place. MP Nadim Gemayel, of the Christian Kataeb party, warned that the exercise "is not directed at Israel, but is an attempt to frighten and intimidate every Lebanese who believes in Lebanon. It is directed against the Lebanese state and its sovereignty. Iran, by means of its militias, is determined to turn Lebanon into an arena of [military] exercises, missiles and false wars." Gemayel called on the Lebanese army "to take the necessary measures to prevent such displays."[17]
Following the exercise the condemnations were harsher and more intense. A notable response that summarized the criticism against the event was issued by 31 Lebanese MPs from parties opposing Hizbullah. They wrote that this show of force by Hizbullah was meant "to clarify to the Lebanese, the Arabs, and the world that its sovereignty exceeds that of the Lebanese state and that the state [in fact] lacks sovereignty over its territory. [It was meant to signal] that no decision can be made in Lebanon against Hizbullah's wishes or the wishes of the regional axis to which it belongs [i.e., the resistance axis led by Iran], and that the lives of the Lebanese, their present and their future, are hostage to Hizbullah's plan… The election of a new president and the re-forming of the executive branch are also hostage to [Hizbullah's] weapons, which are always there to impose this power equation on the rest of the Lebanese [and to torpedo] any attempt to create a political counterweight to Hizbullah and its allies in Lebanon…" The MPs added that the exercise also "harms Lebanon’s relations with the international and the Arab community, and informs the Arabs that the sixth clause of the [closing] statement [of the recent Arab League summit] in Jeddah, which firmly opposes the presence of armed militias operating beyond the [purview of] state institutions, does not concern [Hizbullah], because [this organization] considers itself a state…”
The MPs explained that “the aberrant status of Hizbullah has no place in Lebanon's political life and is an abomination in the eyes of most Lebanese." Hinting at Hizbullah, whose name means "the party of God", they added that, "however high the status of a particular political party may be, this does not entitle it to drag Lebanon into struggles that serve only its own regional plan or to impose its political, military, security and economic agendas on the Lebanese state…”
The MPs concluded with a call to implement the Taif Agreement[18] and the Lebanese constitution, which is based on it, both of which call for disbanding all militias and confining weapons to the state and its legitimate security apparatuses. The parliamentarians also urged to implement UN Security Council Resolutions 1559 and 1701,[19] to end Hizbullah's military and security involvement outside the country, as well as its interference in the internal affairs of other Arab countries, in order to restore Lebanon's historic relations with the Arab world and the international community. In addition, they called for dismantling “the parallel economy that Hizbullah has created by smuggling [contraband] through the official and unofficial [border] crossings,” and stressed that Hizbullah and its allies in and out of Lebanon must “understand once and for all that the Lebanese people will not surrender to the logic of weapons and force, no matter what the cost…”[20]
Some of the signatories to the MPs' statement condemning the Hizbullah exercise (image: Al-Nahhar, Lebanon, May 26, 2023)
In an interview with the Lebanese daily Al-Nahhar, Samir Geagea, head of the Christian Lebanese Forces party, called it inconceivable that "a group within Lebanon should usurp the decisions of the Lebanese state and the choice of the rest of the Lebanese, and take them against their will in a direction they oppose.” He urged the Lebanese people to realize that this "totally unacceptable" exercise will impact them, their future, their existence, their lives and the [country] they live in."[21]
A statement from the Saydat Al-Jabal Association[22] noted that this “unprecedented show of force” by Hizbullah had been held less than a month after the Iranian foreign minister visited South Lebanon, and that Hizbullah had used this display to "draw a connection between its weapons and the issue of the presidency, so that any new president [elected] will be forced to recognize these weapons and permit Hizbullah to use them, despite [the absence of] any consensus [about this issue] in Lebanon.”[23]
Kataeb Party: The Absence Of An Official Response To the Exercise Confirms That Hizbullah Has Taken Over Lebanon; We Will Call On Our Supporters To Openly Carry Weapons As Well
There were also those who criticized the heads of the Lebanese state for allowing Hizbullah to do as it pleases in the country. Kataeb Party leader Samy Gemayel, for example, claimed that the absence of any official response to Hizbullah's exercises "means that the country is totally under Hizbullah's control,” and that this, in turn, means that “the presidential campaign is extremely important.” He called on Hizbullah's opponents to agree on a presidential candidate, so as to prevent the election of a president who will license and support more displays of this sort by Hizbullah.[24]
Kataeb Party MP Nadim Gemayel stated that the authorities' failure to respond to this event grants de facto permission to any Lebanese citizen to carry arms, and went so far as to urge the citizens to do so. He said: “[The exercise] is a provocation to all Lebanese… These sights take us back to 1975 and to the sights of the armed Palestinian organizations [in Lebanon]. We oppose this and will not accept it. The fact that there was no official response to this essentially gives anyone in Lebanon permission to carry arms in order to defend himself… Therefore, I urge our supporters to bear arms openly and not to stop at the checkpoints, because we are all equal and therefore the state and the army do not interest us, [just as they do not interest Hizbullah].”[25]
Articles In The Anti-Hizbullah Press: This Organization Has Cancelled The Lebanese State; Where Is UNIFIL?!
Similar concerns were raised in the Lebanese newspapers known to oppose Hizbullah. For instance, journalist Nawal Nasser, who was among those who observed the exercise, shared her impressions in an article on the Nida Al-Watan website, and complained about the helplessness of the Lebanese state. She wrote: “…This is the first time in its history that this party [i.e., Hizbullah] has held an event of this magnitude… The military exercise [itself] lasted only one hour, but the events that preceded and followed it lasted 10 hours… during which we forgot the state of Lebanon, the state's obligations, and our rights, and became [citizens of] a 'non-state' belonging to Hizbullah…
“[This event took place after] twenty-five days of preparation, and more than 500 journalists from Lebanon and the world registered to participate in the press coverage. On Sunday, [May 21], 11 buses waited for the invitees and then took off from the central bus station… on Hajj Qassem Soleimani Street [named after the slain commander of Iran's Qods Force]. All these details make us feel, against our will, that we have moved from Lebanon to another place that is nothing like Lebanon…”
The bus ride to the site of the exercise, writes Nasser, was accompanied by Hizbullah songs and slogans. Along the roads hung pictures of Hizbullah officials and of Qassem Soleimani, flags of Hizbullah, “and among them also a few flags of Lebanon, as though Hizbullah wanted to convey that ‘all of Lebanon is with us’… Military uniforms were everywhere… Dear Allah," she exclaims, "Hizbullah is allowed to do what the [rest of] the people of this country are forbidden to do. We look into the eyes of the [local] people… Their loyalty is to Hizbullah. They receive their instructions from Hizbullah… Most of them are Lebanese, but they have become involved in great struggles that are larger than the homeland…”
After the military display, Nasser adds, the guests were taken to the village of Rihan for lunch with “the jihadi fighters.” The region was full of Hizbullah military camps, and Hizbullah gunmen were everywhere on the roads. They were even the ones directing traffic. “Is this allowed?", she wonders. "Where is UNIFIL? Where is the state and those responsible for it?..." She concludes by saying that, with this exercise, "Hizbullah has confirmed that it is no long a statelet but is [simply] the state…”[26]
An article in the Al-Nahhar daily likewise claimed that the exercise was an outright act of defiance against the Lebanese state: “…The southern region seems to have been abandoned to be taken over by Hizbullah and by its arsenals of heavy weapons… The exercise wasn’t limited or symbolic. The heavy weapons, the missiles, and the drones that were on display were sufficient for Hizbullah to convey the messages it wanted [to convey] to Israel, to Lebanon itself, to the Arabs and to the region.” The daily noted that, although the exercise was ostensibly held on the occasion of “Liberation Day” [i.e., the anniversary of Israel's withdrawal from South Lebanon in 2000], marked on May 25, it was actually nothing more than an act of defiance against the sovereignty of the state, “whose leaders refrained from [reacting] or were afraid to react to it." Moreover, it was held just after the Arab League summit in Jeddah, whose closing statement included a clause opposing the phenomenon of militias within states. The exercise, said the daily, thus appears to be a direct and swift response to this position of the summit and a signal that there will be no change in the status quo following the rapprochement between Saudi Arabia and Iran.[27]
Some compared this show of force by Hizbullah in South Lebanon to its show of force in Beirut in May 2008,[28] and to the civil war in Lebanon in the 1970s and 1980s. Journalist 'Ali Hamada wrote, “Hizbullah didn’t have to flex its muscles on Sunday in the south in order to remind Israel of its missile capabilities, which are no secret. The [military] display, which went over the head of the slumbering state of Lebanon… was intended to remind the Lebanese people of [Hizbullah's] raids on Beirut and in the Druze mountains on May 7 and 11, [2008], and of the Black Shirts[29] who deployed in the streets of Beirut in a bid to topple the government of Sa'd Al-Hariri… This act is a reminder for the Lebanese, intended to convey that all the developments in the region – the agreement between Saudi Arabia and Iran and the openness toward the Assad regime… – make no difference as far as Lebanon is concerned. In other words, to convey that Hizbullah will maintain its role as the de facto authority in Lebanon by means of its illegal weapons and by instilling terror, regardless of any regional agreement… Hizbullah [wishes to convey that] it is part of Lebanon's sovereignty, since it is a Lebanese faction, and that the decision regarding its weapons is an internal and not an external one.” Hamada added that this exercise "constitutes another step on the road to [Hizbullah] swallowing up this country, with the help of [Lebanese] forces that collaborate with it or surrender to it…”[30]
Journalist Diana Moukalled compared Hizbullah to ISIS, tweeting, “Hizbullah's military display in the south – the use of drones, the display of weapons, and the way its operatives were dressed – was a performance that reminded me of the [military] displays held years ago by ISIS. The similarity is obvious, down to the clothing and the style of the display and the photography. ISIS was a murderous terrorist organization that turned killing and death into a spectacular visual display, and Hizbullah is likewise trying to use this type of spectacle, despite the disgraceful reality that prevails in Lebanon under its rule.”[31]
Diana Moukalled's tweet
[1] Hizbullah's elite Radwan Force, named after the organization's military chief 'Imad Mughniyeh, aka Hajj Radwan, who was killed in 2008, comprises some 10,000 troops and spearheaded the organization's action against the rebels in in Syria. This force took part in the military parade held by Hizbullah in the Syrian village of Al-Qusayr in November 2016. About this parade, see MEMRI Inquiry and Analysis No. 1295, The Significance, Ramifications, And Messages Of Hizbullah's Show Of Military Force In Al-Qusayr, Syria, January 3, 2017; MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 6677, Hizbullah Military Parade In Syrian Town Of Al-Qusayr: Tanks, Cannon, And Machine Guns, November 14, 2016.
[2] See MEMRI TV Clip No. 10133, Video Footage Of Hizbullah's Elite Unit Radwan Force Training, Simulating Invasion Of Northern Israel, , February 16, 2023; MEMRI TV Clip No. 10027, In Nighttime Exercise, Hizbullah Fighters Simulate Breaching the Security Fence Along Israel-Lebanon Border, Ambushing Israeli Forces, January 1, 2023.
[3] See e.g., Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), May 22, 2023.
[4] In May 2021, several days after the end of a round of fighting between Israel and the Palestinian factions in Gaza, Hizbullah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah called on the resistance factions on all the fronts to establish a principle whereby any Israeli aggression against Jerusalem or Al-Aqsa will spark a regional confrontation with it. Several factions, especially Shi'ite militias in Iraq and Yemen, proclaimed themselves ready to heed this call, but it appears that Hizbullah has not yet managed to implement it in full. See MEMRI JTTM reports: Hizbullah Brigades: Responding To Nasrallah's Call For A New Equation That A Threat To Jerusalem Equals Regional War, June 17, 2021; Al-Nujaba Spokesman: Golan Liberation Brigade Is Ready For Action; Any Violation In Jerusalem Will Lead To Attacks On Israeli, U.S. Interests In Region, June 16, 2021.
[5] The name is an allusion to Quran 48:1: " Indeed, We have given you, [O Muhammad], a clear conquest."
[6] See MEMRI TV Clip No. 10303, Hizbullah Military Drill In Southern Lebanon Simulates Attack On Israeli Military Base, Seizing Israeli Military Vehicles; Fighters Use ATVs, Motorcycles, Drones, Explosives, May 21, 2023.
[7] See e.g., MEMRI TV Clip No. 10298, Lebanese Hizbullah Video Promotes Upcoming 'Public Military Drill' Simulating Raid On Israeli Military Base, Will Be Covered By Local And International Media, May 17, 2023.
[8] Al-Jumhouriya (Lebanon), May 19, 2023.
[9] Almanar.com.lb, May 22, 2023.
[10] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), May 22, 2023.
[11] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), May 22, 2023.
[12] Alahednews.com, May 19, 2023.
[13] Elnashra.com, May 23, 2023.
[14] Al-Nahhar (Lebanon), May 22, 2023.
[15] Al-Nahhar (Lebanon), May 23, 2023.
[16] On these understandings, see MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 10522, In Saudi Press, Cautious Optimism Follows Saudi-Iranian Renewal Of Relations, March 13, 2023.
[17] Twitter.com/nadimgemayel, May 19, 2023.
[18] The Taif Agreement, signed in 1989 at the conclusion of the Lebanese civil war, distributed political, civil, and military authority in the country along sectarian lines.
[19] UN Security Council Resolution 1559, passed on September 2, 2004, called for the withdrawal of all foreign forces from Lebanon, for disarming all Lebanese and non-Lebanese militias in the country, and for imposing the sovereignty of the state throughout Lebanon. UNSC Resolution 1701, passed on August 12, 2006, called for a ceasefire between Israel and Hizbullah in the 2006 Lebanon war, which broke out following Hizbullah's kidnapping of three IDF soldiers on the Israeli border. It also called for reenforcing UNIFIL and expanding its powers, and banned the armed presence of Hizbullah south of the Litani river.
[20] Al-Nahhar (Lebanon), May 26, 2023.
[21] Al-Nahhar (Lebanon), May 27, 2023.
[22] A Christian cultural organization established in 2006 by the Maronite Church which promotes Christian-Muslim coexistence.
[23] Saydeteljabal.org, May 22, 2023.
[24] Elnashra.com, May 23, 2023.
[25] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), May 21, 2023.
[26] Nidaalwatan.com, May 23, 2023.
[27] Al-Nahhar (Lebanon), May 22, 2023.
[28] On May 6, 2008, the government of Lebanon, headed by Fouad Siniora, decided to outlaw Hizbullah's private telecommunications network, on the grounds that it violated the sovereignty of the state, and to prosecute those responsible for establishing it. The government also decided to fire the head of security at Beirut international airport, who was affiliated with Hizbullah. In response, armed members of Hizbullah took control of Beirut and other parts of Lebanon, in order to force the government to revoke its decisions, which it did. See MEMRI Inquiry & Analysis Series No. 437 - The Lebanon Crisis (2): Hizbullah's Victory and its Regional Implications – March 31, 2009
[29] The Black Shirts is a name for Hizbullah activists who wear black shirts when attending Hizbullah displays of force. On January 19, 2011, for example, hundreds of black-clad Hizbullah activists marched in Beirut and in other Lebanese cities following the release of some of the findings of the UN investigation into the assassination of Lebanese prime minister Rafik Al-Hariri, which implicated Hizbullah.
[30] Al-Nahhar (Lebanon), May 23, 2023.
[31] Twitter.com/dianamoukalled, May 21, 2023.
https://www.memri.org/reports/hizbullahs-military-exercise-sparks-criticism-south-lebanon-it-act-hijacking-state

Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on June 14-15/2023
Arab states make up 24% of Israel’s 2022 arms exports including drones
Rina Bassist/Al Monitor/June 14/2023
Out of the record-high $12.5 billion in Israeli defense exports in 2022, almost $3 billion were export deals with Arab countries. Nearly three years after the signing of the Abraham Accords, normalizing Israel’s relations with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Morocco, Israel’s defense industry exports in 2022 reached $12.5 billion, the highest since the establishment of the state of Israel 75 years ago, including nearly a quarter with Arab states. A trade report published by the Defense Ministry on Wednesday revealed that out of the overall exports, close to $3 billion came from trade with Arab countries. In the previous record year of 2021, Bahrain and the UAE accounted for $853 million out of Israel’s $11.4 billion arms export. The data was presented by Defense Minister Yoav Gallant to leaders of Israel's defense industries at the Defense Ministry's headquarters in Tel Aviv. The ministry did not publish details on the different deals reached with Arab states or the extent of defense export to each of the Abraham Accords nations.  According to the report, exports have more than doubled since 2014, and jumped by 50% in just the last three years. Drones constituted 25% of the 2022 exports, while missiles, rockets, or air defense systems represented 19%. The report noted that global and regional conflicts around the world have contributed to the rise, as did the fighting in Ukraine. The high quality of Israeli defense products was also cited as a reason.  Reuters reported last September that Israel agreed to sell to the Emirates the Spyder portable aerial defense systems, manufactured by the Israeli-based Rafael company. The two countries signed a free trade zone agreement last May.  Israel’s then-Defense Minister Benny Gantz visited Bahrain in 2022, signing an agreement on security cooperation, but little has been published since then on defense deals between the two countries. Gantz visited Morocco in 2021, signing a first-ever security cooperation agreement with an Arab state. Among other things, the agreement included a commitment to promote weapons deals. A report by i24, published in July 2022 while IDF Chief of staff Aviv Kochavi visited Rabat, revealed that Morocco has agreed to purchase Israeli Harop kamikaze drones, in a $22 million deal.  Last Friday, acting Ambassador to Morocco Shai Cohen revealed that the leading Israeli defense technology company Elbit Systems will open two production sites in Morocco. This announcement came after a report that Israel is considering recognizing Morocco’s sovereignty over the disputed Western Sahara territory. Elbit did not confirm the report.

Israeli parliament vote deals setback to Netanyahu and judicial overhaul plan
JERUSALEM (AP)/Wed, June 14, 2023
Israel’s parliament on Wednesday appointed an opposition lawmaker to the powerful committee that picks the country’s judges, defying Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a vote that exposed divisions within the ruling coalition and raised questions about his control over his political allies.
The vote appeared to temporarily avert a crisis that had threatened to unleash renewed political turmoil over Netanyahu's contentious judicial overhaul plan. The opposition had threatened to withdraw from negotiations with Netanyahu over the overhaul if its candidate, Karine Elharrar, was not named to the committee. Despite Elharrar's appointment on Wednesday, the opposition said it would nonetheless suspend talks with Netanyahu until the second vacancy on the committee is filled and it can resume work. “No committee, no talks,” opposition leader Yair Lapid said.
Netanyahu accused his opponents of trying “to blow up the dialogue.”Netanyahu’s government unveiled the judicial overhaul days after taking office last December, saying the plan was needed to rein in an interventionist judiciary. Netanyahu’s opponents say the plan is a way for the far-right coalition — a collection of ultranationalist and ultra-Orthodox parties — to gain control over the judicial system, threatening the country’s system of checks and balances. The proposal has prompted hundreds of thousands of Israelis to take part in mass demonstrations each week against the proposed overhaul. The demonstration prompted Netanyahu to freeze the plan in March and open negotiations, brokered by the country’s figurehead president, aimed at reaching a compromise with his opponents. The committee for appointing judges — which, among other things, approves the makeup of the Supreme Court — has been a central battleground in the overhaul plan. Both the governing coalition and the opposition traditionally are represented on the nine-member committee. But proponents of the overhaul had demanded that the coalition control both positions, drawing accusations that Netanyahu and his allies were trying to stack the judiciary with cronies. The votes, cast anonymously, raised doubts about Netanyahu's control over his coalition. Netanyahu ordered his allies to oppose all candidates, including its own members, in a maneuver that he hoped would delay all appointments until another vote a month from now. But in the secret ballot, several coalition members joined the opposition in supporting Elharrar's appointment in a 58-56 vote. A second candidate, Tally Gotliv of Netanyahu's Likud party, mustered just 15 votes and did not clear the threshold. That means parliament will have to fill the post in the coming month. Lapid said it was “good news” that an opposition member would remain on the judicial selection committee. But he said was problematic that there is still no committee. “Netanyahu today prevented its establishment, putting an end to the pretense that he was open to negotiations,” he said. “Netanyahu used to be a liar and powerful. Now he is a liar and weak,” he said. “The committee was not established, the threat to democracy is not removed.”In a video statement, Netanyahu said his opponents were to blame, noting that they froze the talks even after getting what they wanted. “Gantz and Lapid don’t want real negotiations," he said. "I promise the citizens of Israel, unlike them, we will act responsibly for our country.”Since the overhaul was paused in March, the weekly protests have continued to draw tens of thousands of people. The protesters are set to demonstrate for a 24th week on Saturday. Anticipating protests over the vote on Wednesday, police set up barriers outside the parliament building and next to Netanyahu's home in central Jerusalem. But the protests were called off after the opposition lawmaker's appointment.

Germany releases funds for Israel's Arrow-3 missiles in planned 4 billion euro deal
BERLIN (Reuters)/Wed, June 14, 2023
German lawmakers released advance payments of up to 560 million euros on Wednesday ahead of a planned purchase of the Israel-built Arrow-3 missile defence system for almost 4 billion euros ($4.30 billion) in total, a member of the budget committee told Reuters. Arrow-3 is designed to intercept ballistic missiles outside of the earth's atmosphere. It is the top layer of Israel's missile defence array, which extends from Iron Dome that intercepts short-range rockets to Arrow-3's long-range missiles that destroy any non-conventional warheads at a safe altitude. Berlin aims to strike a government-to-government deal with Israel on the purchase of the Arrow-3 system at the end of the year, according to procurement documents by the finance ministry that were prepared for parliament. Germany will lose part or all of its advance payments should the deal fail, according to the papers, as the money would be used to compensate Israel for costs incurred by then. The German air force is supposed to take delivery of Arrow-3, which will cost about one billion euros more than originally planned, by the fourth quarter of 2025. Russia's war in Ukraine has laid bare a shortage of ground-based air defence systems such as Raytheon's Patriot units or the more recently developed IRIS-T in many Western nations. While Patriot and IRIS-T cover the medium layer of air defence, Arrow-3 - produced by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) - offers protection for the higher layer.

Washington says it's asking Israel about the death of detained Palestinian-American
JERUSALEM (AP)/Wed, June 14, 2023
The United States on Wednesday said it was seeking more information about the closure of an Israeli military investigation into the death of a 78-year-old Palestinian-American who was detained, gagged and left unconscious shortly before being pronounced dead. Israel had announced on Tuesday that it would not bring criminal charges against the soldiers involved in the detention of the Palestinian-American, Omar Assad, from an impromptu checkpoint in the occupied West Bank last year. The military admitted that the actions of the soldiers — who left Assad lying unresponsive on the ground without offering medical help or checking to see if he was alive — showed a lapse of moral judgement. But it said the soldiers would face only internal disciplinary measures because it could not determine that their misconduct directly caused Assad’s death. Assad's death has sparked outrage, shining a light on the dangers faced by Palestinians in the West Bank. Palestinians say they suffer systematic mistreatment living under military occupation. In the U.S., where Assad spent four decades and where his family still lives, the State Department said it was discussing “this troubling incident with the Israeli government.” “We are at this time seeking more information,” U.S. State Department spokesman Matthew Miller told reporters in Washington. “We're going to talk to them directly about it.”Miller said the American government had expected Israel to conduct “a thorough criminal investigation and full accountability.”Human rights groups long have argued that Israel rarely holds soldiers accountable for the deaths of Palestinians, with Israeli military investigations often reflecting a pattern of impunity.

Israel's Rafael says it is developing hypersonic missile interceptor

TEL AVIV, June 14 (Reuters)/Wed, June 14, 2023
The Israeli state-owned defence contractor behind the Iron Dome and David's Sling air shields announced on Wednesday the development of a new system to counter hypersonic missiles, a week after Iran said it had produced its first such weapon. The SkySonic interceptor will "enable us to intercept all kinds of hypersonic threats - hypersonic ballistic missiles, hypersonic cruise missiles," Yuval Steinitz, chairman of Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd, told Reuters at a media event. The Pentagon was briefed on the development, Rafael said. It declined to say if or when the Israeli military might deploy SkySonic. Israel's defence ministry had no immediate comment. Hypersonic missiles can fly at least five times faster than the speed of sound and on a complex trajectory, making them hard to shoot down. An animated video rendition of SkySonic issued by Rafael showed an interceptor missile taking off vertically from a launch battery. The missile's warhead is then shown detaching and flying with its own booster toward an incoming threat. Rafael said the system would be unveiled at the Paris Air Show next week. Israel's arch-enemy Iran on June 6 went public with what it described as its first domestically made ballistic hypersonic missile, Fattah. The missile can reach 15,000 kms/hr (9,321 miles/hour) and evade Israeli defences like the short-range Iron Dome, Iran's state TV said. At the time, Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant said: "To any such development, we have an even better response." He did not elaborate.

Israeli army blames mix-up for fatal shooting of Palestinian toddler
Reuters/June 14, 2023
JERUSALEM: An Israeli soldier who killed a Palestinian toddler in a car two weeks ago thought he was shooting at gunmen, the army said on Wednesday, blaming a mix-up caused by another soldier firing in the air in violation of regulations.Two-year-old Mohammad Al-Tamimi suffered a fatal head wound in the June 1 shooting near Ramallah in the occupied West Bank. His father was hit in the shoulder. The Palestinian foreign ministry demanded accountability, deeming the incident a crime. Publishing the results of its investigation, the Israeli military repeated previous assertions that Palestinian gunmen had fired at soldiers guarding a Jewish settlement that night. An army officer searching the area saw a “suspicious vehicle and fired several times into the air,” prompting a soldier who heard those shots to open fire on the Tamimis’ car, believing the gunmen were using it for their getaway. The investigation faulted commanders for miscommunication and “incorrect decision-making,” the statement said, adding that the officer who fired in the air would be reprimanded for violating standing orders. The Palestinian foreign ministry, in a statement, deplored the findings as “the clearest and ugliest form of disregard for, and legalization of, the shedding of Palestinian blood.”The West Bank, among territories where Palestinians seek statehood, has experienced a surge of violence over the last 15 months. A report by Israeli rights group Yesh Din based on military data from 2017 to 2021 found that Israeli soldiers were prosecuted in less than 1 percent of hundreds of complaints filed against them on alleged offenses against Palestinians.

China’s Xi hosts Abbas, vows support for Palestinian state on 1967 borders
Adam Lucente/Al Monitor/June 14/2023
Xi used the word 'Palestine' as he welcomed Mahmoud Abbas on a visit that follows Beijing's offer to mediate peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians. Chinese President Xi Jinping reiterated on Wednesday China's support for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on the 1967 borders in a meeting with his Palestinian counterpart Mahmoud Abbas in Beijing, further demonstrating Beijing's growing interest in the Middle East. “The fundamental solution to the Palestinian issue lies in the establishment of an independent Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital,” Xi was quoted as saying by Chinese state media. The Chinese leader used the word "Palestine" in addressing further cooperation with the Palestinian Authority. "Facing unprecedented changes in the world and the new developments in the Middle East, China stands ready to strengthen coordination and cooperation with Palestine, and work for a comprehensive, just and durable solution of the Palestinian question at an early date," Xi told Abbas, China's state-run news outlet CGTN reported. Abbas arrived in Beijing on Tuesday for a three-day visit, and met with Xi on Wednesday. During their meeting, Xi endorsed the creation of a Palestinian state based on pre-1967 borders and with East Jerusalem as its capital, according to CGTN. China has long endorsed a two-state solution to the conflict, like much of the international community. Also during the meeting, China and the Palestinian Authority (PA) signed a strategic partnership. Details on the partnership were not immediately available. Xi described it as "an important milestone in China-Palestine relations that builds on past achievements and heralds a brighter future," according to CGTN.
Abbas and Xi discussed the PA’s efforts to be admitted as a full member of the United Nations as well as efforts to engage the International Court of Justice on the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, the PA’s official WAFA news agency reported. The Hague-based International Court of Justice said in January that it received a request for an advisory opinion from the UN General Assembly on the situation in the West Bank. Abbas also briefed Xi on the conflict with Israel and the two discussed ways to enhance bilateral relations. Abbas reiterated support for the One-China policy — which stipulates that Taiwan, which has been governed independently of China since 1949, is part of China. The president also pledged to “actively participate” in China’s Belt and Road initiative for global infrastructure and thanked China for its “political support,” according to WAFA. Abbas and Xi also signed bilateral cooperation documents on the economy, technology, and visa exemptions for diplomats, as well as a friendship agreement between the Chinese city of Wuhan and the Palestinian capitla Ramallah, according to Reuters. Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang also met his Palestinian counterpart Riyad Al-Maliki on Tuesday, according to Chinese state media outlets. This is the fifth time Abbas has visited China, according to CGTN.
Why it matters: Abbas’ visit follows China expressing interest in mediating between Israel and the Palestinians. In April, Qin told his Israeli and Palestinian counterparts that the People’s Republic is willing to facilitate peace talks. The move followed China helping to broker the March agreement between Saudi Arabia and Iran that resumed relations between the two foes. A May poll from the Saudi news outlet Arab News and YouGov found that 80% of Palestinians would welcome Chinese mediation on the conflict. By comparison, 60% said they did not trust the United States to mediate.
In April, China criticized Israel for raiding Al-Aqsa Mosque. "The attempt of Israel to change the status quo of Jerusalem as a holy site violates relevant UN resolutions, and the international community has the responsibility to take actions to stop the provocative behavior of Israel,” said China’s Middle East envoy Zhai Jun at the time. Israeli police stormed Al-Aqsa in response to Palestinian worshippers barricading themselves inside the holy site.

France's Macron to discuss Ukraine with Saudi Crown Prince this week
PARIS (Reuters)/Wed, June 14, 2023
French President Emmanuel Macron will discuss the war in Ukraine and other matters when he meets Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on Friday, the French presidency said. The planned talks between Macron and the Saudi crown prince come just a month after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy attended a summit of the Arab League in Saudi Arabia to canvas support, during a meeting at which bin Salman expressed his readiness to mediate in the war between Moscow and Kyiv. The Saudi state news agency earlier reported that bin Salman had left for France.
The crown prince's agenda also includes presiding over the Saudi delegation during an international Summit for a New Global Financing Pact, to be held on June 22-23, and taking part in the kingdom's official reception of Riyadh's candidacy to host Expo 2030 on June 19.

Turkey says military 'neutralised' 53 Kurdish militants in northern Syria
ANKARA (Reuters)/Wed, June 14, 2023
Turkey's military "neutralised" 53 Kurdish militants in northern Syria, using ground artillery and drones in retaliatory strikes following an attack on a police post on the Turkish side of the border at the weekend, the defence ministry said on Wednesday. The ministry typically uses the term "neutralised" to describe killed and wounded. The latest strikes targeted the militants' hideouts in the Manbij and Tal Rifaat regions. Turkey has previously launched military incursions in Syria against the Kurdish YPG militia, regarding it as a wing of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), which Turkey, the United States and the European Union designate as a terrorist group. The United States has allied with the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), spearheaded by the YPG, in the fight against Islamic State in Syria, causing a deep rift with Turkey.
The PKK launched an insurgency against the Turkish state in 1984, largely focused in Turkey's mainly Kurdish southeast. More than 40,000 people have been killed in the conflict.

Putin admits Russia doesn't have enough drones, warplanes, and ammunition for the war in Ukraine, even though it's been rushing military production all year
Business Insider/Tue, June 13, 2023
Vladimir Putin has admitted that Russia sorely lacks the firepower it needs for the war in Ukraine. He said "many things were missing," such as ammo, aircraft, and drones, per state media. It's the second time this week that Putin's commented on Russia's flagging military capabilities. Russian leader Vladimir Putin publicly admitted on Tuesday that his forces lack the ammo, drones, aircraft, and communications equipment to fuel the Kremlin's war in Ukraine. "During the special military operation, it became clear that many things were missing," he told state media at a press conference. "These are high-precision ammunition, communications equipment, aircraft, drones, and so on." "We have them. Unfortunately, we lack them quantitatively," Putin added, per Russian news agency Interfax. And that's even after Russia ramped up manufacturing of military equipment, according to figures cited by Putin. "We had a 2.7-fold increase in production for the main types of weapons over the year, and 10 times for the most demanded areas," Putin said, per Interfax. It's the second time this week that Putin has spoken of shortages in Russia's arsenal of ammunition. On Friday, he said in a statement on the Kremlin's website that its forces "do not yet have enough modern arms" for the war. On Friday, Putin said Moscow has been working to fill the gap, and that Russia's military industries are "intensively building up production of modern weapons."Putin's latest remarks stand in contrast to his comments last August, when he boasted at a military forum that Russia's weapons were "cutting edge" and "decades" ahead of their competition. Since August, he's made concessions that he wants Russia to improve its military industries. In November, Putin called for the Russian military industry to up its game with weapons development, while speaking of "arising issues" in the defense sector. Western experts and officials also say Russia's supplies of advanced weaponry and equipment have been hit hard by the war in Ukraine. In April, several reports said that Russia's losses had cut so deep into its inventory that it's been deploying early Soviet-era tanks, which were manufactured just after World War II. Russia's Ministry of Defense did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Insider sent outside regular business hours.

Russia has lost so much money due to the Ukraine war that it's now trying to raise $4 billion by slapping a windfall tax on its oligarchs
Business Insider/Tue, June 13, 2023
Russia is preparing to tax companies that made more than 1 billion rubles in profits since 2021.
The levy is expected to raise about $4 billion, a high-level finance official told RBC TV.
Russia posted a first-quarter deficit of almost 2.4 trillion rubles amid the war in Ukraine.
The Kremlin is feeling the pinch from its war in Ukraine, so much that it's imposing a one-time windfall tax on large Russian companies and their oligarch owners. Russia approved a draft bill to slap up to a 10% one-off windfall tax on large Russian companies, according to a Tuesday announcement by the country's finance ministry. It's targeting companies that annually made more than 1 billion rubles, or $11.9 million, in profits since 2021, per the announcement. This levy could raise about 300 billion rubles, or $3.6 billion, in taxes collectively, Andrei Belousov, the first deputy prime minister, said in an interview with RBC TV, Interfax reported on Tuesday. Belousov told RBC that the companies themselves proposed the taxes, according to Interfax. "They understand that they had huge windfall profits for 2021 and 2022, simply massive, bigger than the budget," Belousov said, per Interfax. "Many of them are true patriots, no matter what people say about them. They identify very closely with the country." Russia's finance ministry said in the announcement the taxes would be used for social spending but did not provide further details. And while the announcement did not specify which companies would be hit by the taxes, analysts told the Financial Times that Russia's fertilizer and metals sectors were likely candidates. Although Russian energy faces sanctions and boycotts by many Western nations and their allies, the country is still an important commodity exporter, particularly in agriculture and some industrial raw materials — which, in turn, help the companies in these sectors. Timur Nigmatullin, an analyst at the Russian investment company Finam, told the FT that he expected information about the windfall taxes to be "opaque" to reduce the likelihood that these companies would be sanctioned. This instance isn't the first time Russia has imposed windfall taxes to fund the war in Ukraine. Last year, the country levied such a tax on the energy giant Gazprom after natural-gas prices soared to multiyear highs following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Gazprom posted record profits in the first half of 2022, but full-year net profits fell 40% year-on-year because of the Kremlin's tax hike in the second half of the year.
However, energy prices have now fallen to prewar levels because of recession fears. Russia's energy revenues have also been majorly hit by sweeping restrictions against its exports, particularly after the European Union — a major customer of Russian energy — banned Russian crude oil starting December 5.
In the first quarter of 2023, Russia posted a deficit of almost 2.4 trillion rubles — sharply reversing a surplus of more than 1 trillion rubles in the first quarter of 2022. The country posted a 45% drop in quarterly energy revenues to 1.64 trillion rubles, per data released by Russia's finance ministry on April 7.

Russian nuclear weapons 'more powerful than Hiroshima bomb' arrive in Belarus
The Telegraph/Wed, June 14, 2023
Belarus has begun taking delivery of tactical nuclear weapons from Russia, including some that are three times more powerful than the atomic bombs dropped on Japan in 1945. It is believed to be the first time Moscow has moved such weapons – shorter-ranged and less powerful nuclear weapons that could potentially be used on the battlefield – outside Russia’s borders since the fall of the Soviet Union. “We have missiles and bombs that we have received from Russia,” Alexander Lukashenko, the Belarusian president, said in an interview with the Rossiya-1 Russian state TV channel. “The bombs are three times more powerful than those [dropped on] Hiroshima and Nagasaki,” he said, speaking on a road in a forest clearing with military vehicles parked nearby and what appeared to be a military storage facility in the background. Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, on Friday said Moscow, which will retain control of the tactical nuclear weapons, would start deploying them in Belarus after special storage facilities to house them were made ready. The Russian leader announced in March that he had agreed to deploy tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus, pointing to the US deployment of similar weapons in several European countries over many decades. The US has criticised Putin’s decision but has said it has no intention of altering its own stance on strategic nuclear weapons and has not seen any signs that Russia is preparing to use an atomic weapon. The Russian step is nonetheless being watched closely by the US and its allies as well as by China, which has repeatedly cautioned against the use of nuclear weapons in the war in Ukraine. Mr Lukashenko, a close Putin ally, told Russian state TV that his country had numerous nuclear storage facilities left over from the Soviet-era and had restored several of them. He played down the idea that Russian control of the weapons was an impediment to using them quickly if he felt such a move was necessary, saying he and Putin could pick up the phone to each other “at any moment”. Mr Lukashenko, who has allowed his country to be used by Russian forces attacking Ukraine, says the nuclear deployment will act as a deterrent against potential aggressors. Speaking on Wednesday, he said his country would enter the conflict in Ukraine if it was attacked, Russian state-owned news agency TASS reported.

Ukraine reports small advances in 'extremely fierce' fighting
KYIV (Reuters)/Wed, June 14, 2023
Ukraine reported incremental advances in its counteroffensive against Russian forces on Wednesday in what it described as "extremely fierce" fighting. In a post on the Telegram messaging app, Deputy Defence Minister Hanna Maliar said the Ukrainian actions had "partial" success. In the past day, Ukrainian troops had advanced 200-500 metres (220-550 yards) in various areas near the largely devastated eastern city of Bakhmut, and 300-350 metres in the direction of the southeastern city of Zaporizhzhia, she said. "Our troops are moving in the face of extremely fierce fighting and air and artillery superiority of the enemy," Maliar said. In later comments, Maliar said Ukraine's losses were "disproportionately" lower than those of the Russian side. "In general, during the entire war, we had many times fewer losses," she wrote on Telegram. She told Ukrainian television that over the past week the number of enemy dead in the eastern "Khortytsia" section of the front was 8.73 times greater than Ukrainian losses. The figure for the southern "Tavria" section stood at 5.3. Russian President Vladimir Putin estimated on Tuesday that Ukraine's human losses were 10 times higher than Russia's since the start of Kyiv's counteroffensive. "As of now, we are both on the offensive and defensive, just in different directions...there is a very serious standoff," Maliar said. Russian troops, she said, had not advanced in a little more than a week. Ukraine said on Monday it had retaken seven settlements so far and its troops have advanced up to 6.5 km (4 miles) and seized 90 square km (35 square miles) of ground. Maliar had reported continuing fighting earlier on Wednesday close to the village of Makarivka in the area of the southern port city of Berdyansk and said battles were raging in the areas of Novodanylivka and Novopokrovsk near Mariupol.
Reuters could not verify the battlefield situation. Russia has not acknowledged any Ukrainian gains.

No respite for Sudan civilians two months into brutal war
AFP/June 14, 2023
KHARTOUM: Army warplanes bombed the Sudanese city of El Obeid Wednesday, as the country prepared to mark two months since a power struggle between rival generals plunged the country into devastating conflict. Since April 15, the regular army headed by Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces commanded by his former deputy Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo have been locked in urban combat that has left whole neighborhoods of the capital Khartoum unrecognizable. The fighting quickly spread to the provinces, particularly the flashpoint western region of Darfur, and has now killed at least 1,800 people, according to the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project. On Wednesday, the regular army carried out “air strikes for the first time in El Obeid,” the capital of North Kordofan state, 350 km south of the capital, which has been “surrounded by the RSF since the war began,” witnesses told AFP. Nationwide, some 2.2 million people have fled their homes, more than one million of them escaping Khartoum, according to the International Organization for Migration. Of those, more than 528,000 have sought refuge in neighboring countries, according to the UN agency. Those that remain have run out of “food, water and medicine,” Khartoum resident Ahmed Taha said. “We have nothing left. The entire country has been completely devastated. Everywhere you look, you’ll see where bombs have fallen and bullets have struck. Every inch of Sudan is a disaster area.” US and Saudi mediation efforts are at a standstill after the collapse of multiple ceasefires in the face of flagrant violations by both sides. “We think we’ve given them every shot,” a senior US State Department official said on Tuesday. Aid agencies have pleaded for the opening of humanitarian corridors to allow assistance in and fleeing civilians out but to no avail. Entire districts of Khartoum no longer have running water, mains electricity is only available for a few hours a week and most hospitals in combat zones are not functioning.
A record 25 million people — more than half the population — are in need of aid, according to the UN. “We have been suffering and suffering and suffering the scourge of this war for two months,” said Khartoum resident Soha Abdulrahman. The conflict’s other main battleground Darfur — home to around a quarter of Sudan’s population — was already scarred by a two-decade war that left hundreds of thousands dead and more than two million displaced. Amid what activists have called a total communications “blackout” in large parts of the region, hundreds of civilians have been killed in the current fighting. Homes and markets have been burnt to the ground, hospitals and aid facilities looted and more than 149,000 sent fleeing into neighboring Chad. The head of the UN mission in Sudan, Volker Perthes, said Tuesday there was “an emerging pattern of large-scale targeted attacks against civilians based on their ethnic identities, allegedly committed by Arab militias and some armed men” in RSF uniform. If these reports are verified they “could amount to crimes against humanity,” he said. Dagalo’s RSF have their origins in the Janjaweed militias which ousted strongman Omar Bashir unleashed on ethnic minorities in the region in 2003, drawing charges of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. The paramilitaries remain highly mobile and adept at the sort of urban combat that has gripped Khartoum and Darfur’s cities but the regular army has so far enjoyed a virtual monopoly of the skies.
However, an army official said Wednesday that the RSF had begun using “drones,” which an RSF source said they had obtained “from commandeered army centers.”

The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on June 14-15/2023
Taqiyya: Iran Actually Boasts About Deceiving the West in Nuclear Talks
Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute/June 14/2023
The Muslim doctrine of taqiyya, which permits Muslims to deceive non-Muslims, is back in the news. In a speech delivered on May 20, 2023, Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, according to a report,
used the Islamic concept of ‘Taqiyya’ to describe the regime’s decision to accept the 2015 JCPOA nuclear deal with the West. Taqiyya means the permissibility to deny or conceal one’s real beliefs to secure a worthy goal.
Taqiyya, in fact, is one of the most important doctrines that Westerners always overlook in their dealings with Muslims. In short, it permits Muslims to say or do anything—from cursing and condemning Muhammad to being baptized and partaking of communion—so long as they remain committed Muslims at heart, and their deception either benefits themselves or Islam. (For copious documentation, see here).
For those with a discerning eye, taqiyya is all around us. Whether Muslims pretending to convert to Christianity (past and present), or whether an Islamic gunman gaining entrance inside a church by feigning interest in Christian prayers—examples abound on a regular basis.
As such, that Khamenei relied on the concept of taqiyya to pretend Iran’s nuclear program is for peaceful purposes is unsurprising.
According to the late Sami Mukaram, the world’s leading authority on taqiyya,
Taqiyya is of fundamental importance in Islam. Practically every Islamic sect agrees to it and practices it … We can go so far as to say that the practice of taqiyya is mainstream in Islam, and that those few sects not practicing it diverge from the mainstream … Taqiyya is very prevalent in Islamic politics, especially in the modern era.
Moreover, taqiyya is not merely about safeguarding one’s life but can be used to get an advantage over one’s enemy: “Taqiyya,” writes Mukaram, “in order to dupe the enemy is permissible.”
One example from the life of Muhammad: A poet, Ka‘b ibn Ashraf, had offended the prophet of Islam with his verse, prompting Muhammad once to exclaim, “Who will kill this man who has hurt Allah and his prophet?” A young Muslim named Muhammad ibn Maslama volunteered on condition that in order to get close enough to Ka‘b to assassinate him, he be allowed to lie to the poet.
Muhammad agreed.
Ibn Maslama traveled to Ka‘b and began to denigrate Islam and Muhammad. He carried on in this way till his disaffection became so convincing that Ka‘b took him into his confidence. Soon thereafter, Ibn Maslama appeared with another Muslim and, while Ka‘b’s guard was down, killed him.[Ibn Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 367-8.]
Accordingly, normative Islam teaches that deceit is integral to jihad: Ibn al-Arabi declares that “in the Hadith [sayings and actions of Muhammad], practicing deceit in war is well demonstrated. Indeed, its need is more stressed than the need for courage.” Ibn al-Munir (d. 1333) writes, “War is deceit, i.e., the most complete and perfect war waged by a holy warrior [mujahid] is a war of deception, not confrontation, due to the latter’s inherent danger, and the fact that one can attain victory through treachery without harm [to oneself].” And Ibn Hajar (d. 1448) counsels Muslims “to take great caution in war, while [publicly] lamenting and mourning in order to dupe the infidels.” [The Al Qaeda Reader (New York: Doubleday, 2007), pp. 142-3.]
In short, the earliest historical records of Islam clearly attest to the prevalence of taqiyya—deception and betrayal, as in the case of the poet Ka‘b —as a form of Islamic warfare against the non-Muslim infidel. And this is still a legal strategy for Muslims vis-à-vis non-Muslims—especially if the lying is rationalized as a form of jihad to empower Islam or Muslims—including through nuclear armament.
Professor Mukaram continues: “Taqiyya was used as a way to fend off danger from the Muslims, especially in critical times and when their borders were exposed to wars with the Byzantines and, afterwards, to the raids of the Franks and others.” [Mukaram, At-Taqiyya fi ‘l-Islam, pp. 41-42]
Indeed, the widespread use of taqiyya was one of the main reasons that prompted the Spanish Inquisition: hundreds of thousands of Muslims who had feigned conversion to Christianity secretly remained Muslim, conspiring with North African Muslim tribes and Ottomans to reconquer the Iberian Peninsula.
From here one also understands why, according to the report, “the Supreme Leader often speaks with double meanings, leaving room for himself to shirk responsibility if a certain policy proves to be a failure.”
Speaking with double meanings—or a double-entendre—is also promoted by Islamic teaching, through the doctrine of tawriya, or “creative lying.”
Khamenei’s open employment of taqiyya is also unsurprising considering that, when speaking to one another, Muslims regularly reference taqiyya to justify their dealings with infidels.
For example, in 1994, after he made a peace treaty with Israel that was predictably criticized by fellow Arabs as offering too many concessions, PLO leader Yasser Arafat justified his actions by saying, “I see this agreement as being no more than the agreement signed between our Prophet Muhammad and the Quraysh in Mecca”—that is, a truce that Muhammad abolished on a pretext once he was in a position of power and able to go on the offensive.
In like manner, by referencing taqiyya in the context of Iran’s agreement to a nuclear deal with the West, Khamenei is signaling that Iran is only going along for expediency’s sake—until, that is, it finds itself in a position to renege and realize its nuclear aspirations. As Khamanei said during his speech, “Expediency means finding ways to circumvent difficult obstacles and pursuing the same path.”
In short , and as discussed and documented more fully here,
The prophet of Islam, Muhammad … regularly made use of deceit. In order to assassinate a poet (Ka‘b ibn Ashraf) who offended him, Muhammad permitted a Muslim to lie to the poet. Muhammad is further on record giving license to breaking oaths (“if something better” comes along) and openly lying (without even employing tawriya) to one’s wife and in war. As for the latter, which assumes a perpetual nature in the guise of the jihad against the non-Muslim in order to make Islam (and Muslims) supreme (e.g., Qur’an 8:39), deception and lies are certainly permissible.
That said, is there a single authority representing the West at these international nuclear talks that knows—let alone cares about—any of this? Or is the fix already in?

The 'Right' to Rape and Enslave Non-Muslim Women
Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute./June 14, 2023
Last month, in France, a Muslim man told an underage girl with whom he had been chatting on Facebook, "I will burn you all. I will cut your throats. I will rape you and your mother because I have the right to do so."
The girl's father, described as "devastated and angry," responded to the terror threats with which his family and he had been living, saying, "Islam is not what I have been hearing [it is]... Religion is peace, tolerance, respect... We have been living in fear for a year!"
The ongoing narrative is that Islam means peace; what is not said is that this peace comes only after everyone enjoys the "peace" of being Muslim. Until then, what is often presented to hasten this result is the exact opposite: jihad, or violence in the service of Islam. Many Muslims, just want, of course, to live in quiet lives, have good jobs and enjoy the blessings of this life. Others however, such as Western converts to the "religion of peace" suddenly and inexplicably become terrorists.
Such men routinely cite the same hadiths and verses from the Koran. Verses 4:3 and 4:24, for instance, permit Muslim men to have sexual relations with as many women as "their right hand possesses" — meaning as many women — all non-Muslim, of course — as they are able to take captive during a jihad.
"In the moments before he raped the 12-year-old girl, the Islamic State fighter took the time to explain that what he was about to do was not a sin. Because the preteen girl practiced a religion other than Islam, the Quran not only gave him the right to rape her — it condoned and encouraged it, he insisted." [Emphasis added] —New York Times report.
In Germany, some Muslim migrants act out their conviction that all "German women are there for sex." In the 2016 New Year's celebrations in Cologne, migrants ended up molesting a thousand women.
In Britain, where a large Muslim minority has long existed, thousands of British girls in various regions have been by abused and gang-raped by "grooming gangs" made up largely of Muslims, who apparently deemed it their Islamic right. One rape victim said, "The men who did this to me have no remorse. They would tell me that what they were doing was OK in their culture."
In a separate case, another Muslim convicted of rape told a British court that sharing non-Muslim girls for sex "was part of Somali culture" and "a religious requirement."
[T]he subhuman treatment and sexual degradation of non-Muslim women and children by Muslim men who deem it their "right" is apparently another "exoticism" the West is apparently expected to embrace at the altar of multiculturalism.
In Britain, where a large Muslim minority has long existed, thousands of British girls in various regions have been by abused and gang-raped by "grooming gangs" made up largely of Muslims, who apparently deemed it their Islamic right. Pictured: The English town of Rotherham (population ca. 265,000), where at least 1,400 children were sexually abused by a gang of mostly Muslim men of Pakistani descent. (Image source: Wikimedia Commons)
Last month, in France, a Muslim man told an underage girl with whom he had been chatting on Facebook, "I will burn you all. I will cut your throats. I will rape you and your mother because I have the right to do so."
When she refused to marry him, he defaulted to even more severe threats against her and her family -- at one point texting, "Soon we will cut your throats and play football with your heads." The communication was accompanied by a video showing the scene of a beheading.
Based on the name given in the French report, Fabio Califano, who was subsequently arrested, appears to have been a convert to Islam.
The girl's father, described as "devastated and angry," responded to the terror threats with which his family and he had been living, saying, "Islam is not what I have been hearing [it is]... Religion is peace, tolerance, respect... We have been living in fear for a year!"
The ongoing narrative is that Islam means peace; what is not said is that this peace comes only after everyone enjoys the "peace" of being Muslim. Until then, what is often presented to hasten this result is the exact opposite: jihad, or violence in the service of Islam. Many Muslims, just want, of course, to live in quiet lives, have good jobs and enjoy the blessings of this life. Others however, such as Western converts to the "religion of peace" suddenly and inexplicably become terrorists.
Unfortunately, assertions such as "we will cut your throats and play football with your heads" echo through the ages. Mu'izzi, an eleventh century Persian poet for instance, tried to incite an emir to butcher all Christians in the Middle East:
"For the sake of the Arab religion, it is a duty, O ghazi king, to clear the country of Syria of patriarchs and bishops, to clear the land of Rum [Anatolia] from priests and monks. You should kill those accursed dogs and wretched creatures... You should... cut their throats... You should make polo-balls of the Franks' heads in the desert, and polo sticks from their hands and feet."
[Hillenbrand, Carole, Turkish Myth and Muslim Symbol: The Battle of Manzikert, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007, 151–152.]
The line, however, that jumps out in the quote from Califano is: "I will rape you and your mother because I have the right to do so."
Importantly, it is not the first time that a Muslim man insists that he has the "right" — given by Islam — to enslave and rape non-Muslim women.
Such men routinely cite the same hadiths and verses from the Koran. Verses 4:3 and 4:24, for instance, permit Muslim men to have sexual relations with as many women as "their right hand possesses" — meaning as many women — all non-Muslim, of course — as they are able to take captive during a jihad:
Koran 4:3: "And if you fear that you cannot act equitably towards orphans, then marry such women as seem good to you, two and three and four; but if you fear that you will not do justice (between them), then (marry) only one or what your right hands possess; this is more proper, that you may not deviate from the right course." [Shakir translation]
Koran 4:24: "And all married women except those whom your right hands possess (this is) Allah's ordinance to you, and lawful for you are (all women) besides those, provided that you seek (them) with your property, taking (them) in marriage not committing fornication. Then as to those whom you profit by, give them their dowries as appointed; and there is no blame on you about what you mutually agree after what is appointed; surely Allah is Knowing, Wise." [Shakir translation]
The Koran uses language, discussed here, that presents such women as things, not persons. Literally translated, Koran 4:3 permits Muslims to copulate with "what" —not who—"your right hands possess," as captured by Shakir's translation:
"...but if you fear that you will not do justice (between them), then (marry) only one or what your right hands possess (Koran 4:3).
To understand how such scriptures and terminology inform the jihadist mind, consider the following excerpts from a New York Times report, "ISIS Enshrines a Theology of Rape":
In the moments before he raped the 12-year-old girl, the Islamic State fighter took the time to explain that what he was about to do was not a sin. Because the preteen girl practiced a religion other than Islam, the Quran not only gave him the right to rape her — it condoned and encouraged it, he insisted.
He bound her hands and gagged her. Then he knelt beside the bed and prostrated himself in prayer before getting on top of her.
When it was over, he knelt to pray again, bookending the rape with acts of religious devotion.
"I kept telling him it hurts — please stop," said the girl, whose body is so small an adult could circle her waist with two hands. "He told me that according to Islam he is allowed to rape an unbeliever. He said that by raping me, he is drawing closer to God," she said in an interview alongside her family in a refugee camp here, to which she escaped after 11 months of captivity. [Emphases added.]
The report continues:
One 34-year-old Yazidi woman, who was bought and repeatedly raped by a Saudi fighter in the Syrian city of Shadadi, described how she fared better than the second slave in the household — a 12-year-old girl who was raped for days on end despite heavy bleeding.
"He destroyed her body. She was badly infected. The fighter kept coming and asking me, 'Why does she smell so bad?' And I said, she has an infection on the inside, you need to take care of her," the woman said.
Unmoved, he ignored the girl's agony, continuing the ritual of praying before and after raping the child.
"I said to him, 'She's just a little girl,' " the older woman recalled. "And he answered: 'No. She's not a little girl. She's a slave. And she knows exactly how to have sex.' "
"And having sex with her pleases God," he said.
Even though the mainstream media and pundits maintain that these beliefs have "nothing whatsoever to do with Islam," in general they permeate Muslim society. Although there may be the assumption that such beliefs are confined to ISIS and other fanatical jihadists, evidence emphatically suggests the contrary.
In Pakistan, for example, three Christian girls walking home after a long day's work were accosted by four "rich and drunk" Muslims — hardly candidates for ISIS — in a car. They "misbehaved," yelled "suggestive and lewd comments," and harassed the girls to get in their car for "a ride and some fun." When the girls declined the "invitation," adding that they were "devout Christians and did not practice sex outside of marriage," the men became enraged and chased the girls. "How dare you run away from us," the men yelled. "Christian girls are only meant for one thing: the pleasure of Muslim men." The men then drove their car into the three girls, killing one and severely injuring the other two.
In a separate incident, a human rights activist speaking about another Muslim man's rape of a 9-year-old Christian girl, revealed that
"Such incidents occur frequently. Christian girls are considered goods to be damaged at leisure. Abusing them is a right. According to the community's mentality it is not even a crime. Muslims regard them as spoils of war." [Emphasis added.]
Most recently, a June 3, 2023 report detailed the suffering many Hindus experience as "infidels" in Pakistan, and quotes some who fled:
"In Pakistan, there is no difference between meat and women.... Had we stayed back, our women would have been torn to shreds."
Once relegated to third world countries such as Pakistan and ISIS-controlled areas, the treatment and sexual abuse of "infidel" women is increasingly becoming a common fixture in the West.
In Germany, some Muslim migrants act out their conviction that all "German women are there for sex." In the 2016 New Year's celebrations in Cologne, migrants ended up molesting a thousand women.
In Britain, where a large Muslim minority has long existed, thousands of British girls in various regions have been by abused and gang-raped by "grooming gangs" made up largely of Muslims, who apparently deemed it their Islamic right. One rape victim said:
"The men who did this to me have no remorse. They would tell me that what they were doing was OK in their culture."
A Muslim imam in Britain confessed that Muslim men are taught that women are "second-class citizens, little more than chattels or possessions over whom they have absolute authority" and that the imams preach a doctrine "that denigrates all women, but treats whites [meaning non-Muslims] with particular contempt."
In a separate case, another Muslim convicted of rape told a British court that sharing non-Muslim girls for sex "was part of Somali culture" and "a religious requirement."
Whether seen by "pious" Muslims as a "religious requirement" — as cited by an ISIS rapist to his 12-year-old victim — or as part of Pakistani (Asian), Somali (African), or "French convert" Islamic culture, the subhuman treatment and sexual degradation of non-Muslim women and children by Muslim men who deem it their "right" is apparently another "exoticism" the West is apparently expected to embrace at the altar of multiculturalism.
*Raymond Ibrahim, author of Defenders of the West and Sword and Scimitar, is the Distinguished Senior Shillman Fellow at the Gatestone Institute and the Judith Rosen Friedman Fellow at the Middle East Forum.
© 2023 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Biden’s tough choices on agreeing a new deal with Iran
Osama Al-Shari/Arab News/June 14, 2023
Despite initial denials by both countries, Iran confirmed this week that it engaged in indirect talks with the US in Oman last month over Tehran’s nuclear program. Several Western media reports confirmed that US Middle East coordinator Brett McGurk and Iran’s top nuclear negotiator Ali Bagheri Kani were in the Omani capital, Muscat, at the same time in early May and that Omani officials acted as intermediaries. Both the US and Iran denied that talks centered on reaching an interim agreement, with Iranian officials insisting on reviving the 2015 nuclear agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. That agreement, which the Trump administration pulled out of in 2018, was endorsed by UN Security Council Resolution 2231 in July 2015.
According to American reports, the US passed a message to Iran that it would face a severe response if it reached the 90 percent uranium enrichment levels required for use in a nuclear weapon. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iran has at least 114 kg of uranium enriched up to 60 percent purity. Israel has also warned that it will never allow Iran to come close to the 90 percent enrichment level.
Following US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s visit to Saudi Arabia last week, which must have focused on threats posed by Iran’s nuclear program, and the leaking of reports regarding possible progress in negotiations, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Blinken that Israel would not be bound by any agreement with Iran and that it would take the necessary steps to protect its national security.
On the other hand, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said earlier this week that a deal with the West over the nuclear program is possible, but only if Tehran can keep its nuclear infrastructure intact. Since the US pulled out of the 2015 agreement and imposed sanctions, Iran has installed advanced centrifuges and raised its uranium enrichment levels to more than 60 percent. It has also prevented IAEA monitors from inspecting some facilities and is believed to have built new ones and expanded others.
Previous attempts by the Biden administration and Western partners to engage Iran in a bid to reach a new agreement were unsuccessful. Iran insists on reviving the 2015 agreement, while the West wants to tie the agreement to other issues, such as Tehran’s controversial ballistic missiles program, curbing the regional activities of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and allowing the IAEA to carry out a full investigation of Iran’s nuclear facilities.
For a while, it looked like the Biden administration was no longer interested in pursuing further talks with Iran. But a number of factors have forced it to reengage. Russia’s war in Ukraine has brought Moscow and Tehran closer than ever and Iran is believed to have supplied Russia with advanced drones and is helping the Russians build a drone factory. In return, Tehran may get its hands on a first batch of state-of-the-art Su-35 fighter jets from Moscow as early as this month. And Iran last week unveiled a hypersonic missile it claims can hit Israel in 400 seconds, while outmaneuvering the Iron Dome defense system. The technology to develop such a sophisticated system could only come from Russia or North Korea.
Iran insists on reviving the 2015 agreement, while the West wants to tie the agreement to other issues.
Also, the recent China-mediated deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran to normalize ties took the US by surprise. Relations between Riyadh and Washington have gone through some rough periods since President Joe Biden was elected, while the Saudis have adopted an independent foreign policy approach that has seen improved ties with both China and Russia. Feeling its regional influence waning, Washington has made an about-face; seeking to revive ties with Riyadh and sending its top diplomats there.
The thaw in Saudi-Iranian ties has been reflected in the Gulf region and beyond. Earlier this month, the commander of Iran’s naval forces, Shahram Irani, announced that Tehran was looking to form a joint maritime alliance with the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, Iraq, Pakistan and India. Saudi Arabia was also interested in “heading in this direction,” Irani said. The announcement came a few days after the UAE decided to quit the Combined Maritime Forces led by the US.
The change in Washington’s attitude toward talks with Iran underlines its geopolitical concerns, as well as fears that the suspension of the nuclear deal has only played into Tehran’s hands in many ways. US threats of resorting to force against Iran are no longer in sync with regional developments. Its key allies in the region, save for Israel, are now actively talking to Iran, with some, like Egypt, on the verge of restoring ties with Tehran.
These allies are now in favor of a diplomatic resolution to the Iran nuclear program issue. This week, the Gulf Cooperation Council issued a statement calling on Iran to commit to working with the IAEA and asking for the involvement of the Gulf states in possible negotiations to meet the bloc’s security concerns.
Interestingly, the US seems to have allowed Iraq to release about $3 billion to Iran in overdue payments — a sign that some of Tehran’s demands are being met. Also, a prisoner exchange is expected to take place between Iran and the US in the coming days, according to Iranian officials.
A deal, whether interim or not, would be good for the region and for the world. But it might not help Biden and the Democrats in the coming election cycle. Both will get a lot of flak from Republican candidates, as well from the current Israeli government. This week, a bipartisan letter from 35 members of Congress called on the European parties to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal to “snapback” sanctions on Iran for noncompliance.
In fact, any agreement reached will almost certainly give former President Donald Trump and other Republican hopefuls the ammunition to tear down the Biden reelection campaign. This is how hard it will be for the White House to decide its next move. Not doing anything carries the risk of Israel and Iran finding themselves in an open war with an unpredictable outcome. Securing a deal would harm Biden’s election chances, while the return of Trump or a Republican hard-liner to the White House might make any new agreement a short-lived one anyway.
• Osama Al-Sharif is a journalist and political commentator based in Amman.
Twitter: @plato010

Blinken’s visit an important step toward restoring US standing in the region
Dr. Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg/Arab News/June 14, 2023
The visit of US Secretary of State Antony Blinken to Saudi Arabia last week has dispelled misconceptions about the state of the US-Saudi and US-GCC partnerships. There had been speculation about a rift between the two sides following March’s Saudi-Iranian deal, through Chinese mediation, to resume diplomatic relations.
Readmitting Syria to the Arab League was another source of tension between the US and its Gulf partners; the US was clearly unhappy with seeing Bashar Assad in Jeddah last month to attend the Arab League Summit.
These developments came on top of disagreements over OPEC’s policies, especially its coordination with Russia over production levels, and what was seen as China’s growing influence in the region.
These issues were enough for pundits outside the region to assume there was irreparable damage to the GCC-US relationship, especially Washington’s ties with Saudi Arabia.
Similarly, pundits in the region saw the US as ambivalent about its continued presence here, despite its protestations otherwise. Memories have faded of President Joe Biden’s visit last July and his assertions about Washington’s “enduring commitment” to Gulf security. His speech in Palestine was also forgotten, during which he reversed his predecessor’s policies on Israeli settlements and called for an independent and viable state for the Palestinians.
Although the senior leaderships in both camps knew better, those public perceptions predicted a difficult if not failed visit before it even started.
However, the results of Blinken’s three-day visit — his first solo visit to the region since becoming secretary of state more than two years ago — have disappointed the pundits in both camps. It has reassured US partners in the Gulf about America’s commitment to regional security and brought relief to Washington that things here are not what they looked like from D.C., more than 10,000 km away.
Following Blinken’s meeting with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on June 6, the US said the two affirmed their “shared commitment” to advancing stability, security and prosperity across the Middle East and beyond, including through their ongoing partnership in diplomatic negotiations to stop the fighting in Sudan and working toward a comprehensive political agreement to achieve peace, prosperity and security. They also discussed deepening economic cooperation, something in which the US has been lagging compared to China, its chief economic rival.
On the following day, there was a meeting with GCC foreign ministers in Riyadh, under the framework of the GCC-US Strategic Partnership announced in 2015. They agreed that the partnership is there to stay and thrive, even if there are issues on which they may disagree.
They discussed regional security and important elements of their “strategic, ambitious and growing partnership,” according to a public statement issued late on June 7. There was also a serious discussion of issues on which they had somewhat differing views lately, including Iran, Syria and Ukraine.
Starting with what they agreed on, the US reaffirmed its commitment to the security of the region, recognizing its vital role in the global economy and international trade. The two partners would work together for peace, security, stability, integration and economic prosperity in the Middle East, including through infrastructure projects to promote regional integration and interconnectivity, such as connecting the GCC electric grid with those of its neighbors, starting with Iraq, where the project was finally launched on June 8.
Although the senior leaderships in both camps knew better, public perceptions predicted a difficult if not failed visit.
On defense and security cooperation, they voiced their shared determination to contribute to regional security and stability and the upholding of navigational rights and freedoms, and of collective efforts to address threats to the security of vessels traveling through the region’s waterways, in a veiled reference to Iran. For that purpose, they reviewed their defense cooperation through the frequent joint military exercises and their close partnership through the Combined Maritime Forces framework.
They further discussed the outcomes of four GCC-US working group meetings from earlier this year — on integrated air and missile defense, maritime security, counterterrorism and Iran — and explored the possibility of reconvening them later this year. They also decided to convene a meeting of their joint cybersecurity team later this year and explored the possibility of convening other working groups previously set up to deal with the military and security aspects of their partnership.
On controversial issues such as Iran, where disagreement preceded Blinken’s visit, the ministers stressed the need for diplomacy and de-escalation. The US “welcomed” the decision by Saudi Arabia and Iran to resume diplomatic relations, but stressed the importance of what was included in the Saudi-Iran-China statement of March 10 about adherence to international law, including the UN Charter, which has been the core issue behind GCC-Iran and US-Iran differences in the past.
While on Iran, they announced their commitment to freedom of navigation and maritime security and countering aggressive and illegal actions at sea or elsewhere that might threaten shipping lanes, international trade and oil installations in the GCC states. On the nuclear issue, they did not dwell on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as it happened in the past, but reaffirmed their general support for the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and an enhanced role for the International Atomic Energy Agency.
On Syria, another divisive issue in this partnership, they nevertheless welcomed Arab efforts to resolve the crisis in a step-by-step manner, consistent with UN Security Council Resolution 2254, as agreed during the May 1 Amman consultative meeting of the Arab Ministerial Contact Group on Syria. Reference to the resolution should reassure all that the GCC and the US remain committed to a political solution through the UN’s mediation process, which has been lagging behind in recent months.
On the Palestine question, the two sides underscored their commitment to a just, lasting and comprehensive peace in accordance with the two-state solution, along the 1967 borders, with mutually agreed swaps consistent with internationally recognized parameters, and the Arab Peace Initiative. They also opposed unilateral moves regarding settlements and Jerusalem, thus again reversing the Trump administration’s support for Israel’s illegal moves.
On the Ukraine war, on which the two sides did not completely agree on all of its details, they nevertheless agreed on the importance of respecting the principles of sovereignty and international law, including the UN Charter, and the obligation to refrain from threats or the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. They also called for intensified efforts to find a peaceful solution and deal more effectively with the humanitarian fallout, including extending the UN Black Sea Grain Initiative to facilitate the export of grain and other food supplies from Ukraine.
Sudan has been a bright spot in Saudi-US cooperation in recent weeks and the ministers supported their diplomatic efforts there and called on the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces to silence their guns.
In all, Blinken’s visit has reenergized the Saudi-US and GCC-US partnerships and dealt with disagreements in an effective and constructive manner. After removing the misunderstandings that were magnified by the media, continued engagement at the ministerial and technical levels is now needed to move forward and take this partnership to higher levels, including in the economic sphere, where win-win opportunities are abundant. Instead of bemoaning China’s growing presence in the region, the US should increase its own.
• Dr. Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg is the Gulf Cooperation Council assistant secretary-general for political affairs and negotiation, and a columnist for Arab News. The views expressed in this piece are personal and do not necessarily represent GCC views.
Twitter: @abuhamad1

Egypt leading the way on ensuring net-zero transition is just
Rania Al-Mashat and Erik Berglöf/Arab News/June 14, 2023
The gap between the resources needed to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 and the resources that are available currently amounts to trillions of dollars — and is still growing. As many developing and emerging economies lose ground in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, public and private capital must be mobilized to accelerate mitigation and adaptation efforts. But this requires governments to produce credible plans for achieving global sustainability goals, to design and implement these policies themselves and to ensure that their strategies’ costs and benefits are fairly distributed.
Last November’s UN Climate Change Conference in Egypt, known as COP27 and dubbed the “implementation COP,” laid the groundwork for a fairer, more robust climate finance system. The conference’s “guidebook” called on the international community to advance a transformative agenda that accounts for developing countries’ national priorities and ensures equitable access to financial and technical resources. It included, in its definition of climate justice, “equitable access to quality and quantity climate financing” that considers “historical responsibility for climate change” and “supports resilient development pathways, leaving no one behind.”
With this in mind, Egypt launched its Nexus of Water, Food and Energy investment program during COP27, providing a practical and replicable model for ensuring a just net-zero transition through a concept of “country platforms.” These platforms are meant to help countries build state capacities and emphasize the importance of developing countries’ agency (or “ownership,” in aid parlance).
The Nexus of Water, Food and Energy — whose acronym NWFE, pronounced “nuafiy,” is Arabic for “fulfilling pledges” — builds on Egypt’s commitments under the 2015 Paris climate agreement and aims to attract financial support for the country’s development agenda, while accelerating climate action. The stakeholders include multilateral development banks such as the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the African Development Bank, the European Investment Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.
Egypt seeks to leverage its partnerships with the multilateral development banks and other development stakeholders to accelerate its climate agenda
The Nexus of Water, Food and Energy platform integrates several high-priority water, food and energy projects — all selected by the Egyptian government — worth a total of $14.7 billion. The projects seek to replace existing inefficient thermal power plants with renewable energy; enhance small farmers’ adaptation to climate risks; modernize farming practices to increase irrigation efficiency and boost crop yields; strengthen the resilience of vulnerable regions; create water desalination capacity; and establish early-warning systems.
By using innovative financing mechanisms to mobilize public funds, technical assistance and private investment, Egypt seeks to leverage its partnerships with the multilateral development banks and other development stakeholders to accelerate its climate agenda. This would support the country’s green transition and show that climate action and economic development can go hand in hand. Egypt can also rely on these partnerships to help it phase out “brown” oil, gas and mineral assets. For example, partial concessional financial support from the US will enable the country to retrain (or retire) fossil fuel workers.
Yet, the most innovative instrument may be debt-for-climate swaps, whereby Egypt receives partial debt relief from, say, Germany, in exchange for commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These types of performance-linked financial instruments could provide many developing and emerging countries with an opportunity to lower their debt burden or obtain low-cost funds. By tying development assistance to progress on a common global target, such swaps could also prove to be significant in mitigating the worst effects of climate change.
As a 2018 report by the G20 Eminent Persons Group on Global Financial Governance noted, collective action through country platforms has the power to unlock public and private investment to achieve climate-resilient and sustainable development. Such investment platforms can take different forms. For example, Just Energy Transition Partnerships — first introduced during COP26 in Scotland in 2021 — aim to direct private capital toward decarbonization targets in the energy sector. Since launching in South Africa, Just Energy Transition Partnerships have also been established in Indonesia, India, Vietnam and Senegal. Egypt’s Nexus of Water, Food and Energy initiative provides a useful model for how developing and emerging countries can expedite the implementation of their national climate agendas in line with global priorities. By encouraging coordination among domestic and external stakeholders, such programs can help bridge the information gap, establish shared standards and increase the number of bankable projects.
But the platform’s success hinges on domestic agency, transparency and accountability in managing these partnerships. Most importantly, the green transition must be perceived as just in order to be sustainable. Predictability is particularly important for the poor and fairness is essential to winning long-term public support for climate measures. To achieve these goals, governments must lead on climate finance. The net-zero transition depends on it.
*Rania Al-Mashat is Egypt’s Minister of International Cooperation.
Erik Berglöf is Chief Economist of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2023.

How the Muslim Brotherhood could use Sudan’s protracted crisis to plot a comeback

Robert Bociaga/Arab News/June 14, 2023
Group played a pivotal role in establishing the deposed Islamist government of Omar Bashir in 1989
Experts say the Brotherhood might exacerbate existing divisions within the military and compound ongoing feud
JUBA, South Sudan: The role of the Muslim Brotherhood in shaping Sudan’s continuing conflict is a cause for concern among experts, who warn that the group could influence the country’s military leaders and even determine the nation’s political direction.
As a transnational Islamist organization deeply rooted in Sudanese politics, the Muslim Brotherhood played a pivotal role in establishing the former Islamist government of Omar Bashir in 1989.
Sudan's strongman Omar al-Bashir (R) and breakaway Islamist Hassan al-Turabi met on March 14, 2014 for the first time in 14 years, as the government reached out to opponents after calls for reform. (AFP file photo)
Even after that government’s overthrow in 2019, the Brotherhood proved to be resilient and influential. Now, against the backdrop of the fighting between the Sudanese Armed Forces, or SAF, and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, or RSF, some fear that the group may attempt to make a comeback.
Over several decades, the Brotherhood was able to build support among various segments of Sudanese society through its advocacy of political Islam and social justice. During their rule, the Islamists implemented Sharia law — a move rejected by swathes of the population who adhered to Christianity and other local faiths, triggering a brutal civil war.
The fall of the Islamist government in 2019 marked an important turning point. However, concerns surrounding its lingering influence over Sudan’s military leadership have persisted.
The Brotherhood’s influence has continued through para-police units affiliated with the former regime — units that have been accused of targeting women in response to their growing role in public life.
Differing visions of the role of Islam in Sudan’s democratic future have contributed to splits within the nation’s biggest political parties, providing the Brotherhood with new potential constituencies to exploit.
Following a 2021 agreement between Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan, head of the armed forces and the current de-facto ruler of Sudan, and Abdel-Aziz Al-Hilu, chair of the Sudan People’s Liberation Army, or SPLA-North, to separate religion and state, a schism emerged within the National Umma Party.
The party leadership suggested postponing the debate until the end of the transitional period, when a civilian-led government was expected to take over from Sudan’s military rulers. At the same time, however, the minister for religious affairs, Nasr Al-Din Mufreh, who was himself a National Umma Party member, began drafting legislation to ban religious-based political parties.
Following these developments, Umma officials issued conflicting statements on the matter.
Al-Wathiq Al-Berair, secretary general of the National Umma Party, denied that his party was founded on a religious basis. However, another party official later stated it followed the principles of the 1881 Mahdist revolution, which had both religious and national aspects.
Over the years, many Islamists have shifted their approach, having decided to focus on supporting “sectarian” parties as a bulwark against the political left.
This new approach reflects an apparent recognition of their weakened position and failure to achieve their previous goals. The continuing demand among Islamists for early elections further emphasizes this shift in strategy.
“When the coup happened in October 2021 and afterward, the Muslim Brotherhood kept quiet,” Peter Schuman, a former deputy joint special representative of the UN–African Union Mission in Darfur, told Arab News.
“There are, though, individuals who have pursued a certain interest, particularly Ali Ahmed Karti,” he added, referring to Sudan’s former foreign minister, who served in the post under Bashir from 2010 to 2015.
Against this backdrop, some Sudanese generals may view the Brotherhood as a potential ally in their pursuit of power and control. Indeed, the group’s political base and ability to mobilize support among Islamist groups in the region make it an attractive partner.
Speaking to Arab News, Cameron Hudson, an analyst and consultant on African peace and security, said that “the involvement of the Muslim Brotherhood could exacerbate existing divisions within the military, leading to factionalism and power struggles.”
The Sudanese Islamist movement was weakened with the removal Omar Bashir. (AFP)
Since the conflict in Sudan erupted on April 15, the RSF has adopted a vehemently anti-Islamist tone, accusing groups such as the Brotherhood of infiltrating the SAF as a vehicle to further their political agenda.
“We are fighting Islamists, not SAF. This is the political issue,” Youssef Ezzat, political adviser to the RSF, told Arab News, rejecting claims that the paramilitary group was responsible for starting the war.
“Islamists hijacked the SAF, and they want to control the country. This is the root cause for the war … Islamists promised Al-Burhan to be a full-power president without RSF.”
While the political reality is probably more complicated than how the RSF seeks to portray it, the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence does call into question the durability of Sudan’s secular foundations.
“There are concerns that the group’s support for political Islam could undermine the country’s secular state institutions and lead to a more conservative and restrictive society,” Brian Adeba, deputy director of policy at The Sentry, a Washington-based investigative non-profit organization, told Arab News.
The impact of the Brotherhood’s involvement in Sudan might very well be felt beyond the country’s borders. Khalid Mustafa Medani, author of “Black Markets and Militants,” draws attention to the group’s wider regional network.
“Its actions in Sudan could have ramifications for neighboring countries and regional stability,” he told Arab News. Sudan’s location and porous borders create an environment that terrorist organizations such as Daesh could exploit for their own gain.
To safeguard Sudan’s democratic values and foster political pluralism, experts such as Sargis Sangari, CEO of the Near East Center for Strategic Engagement, argue that a future transitional government needs to confront the Brotherhood’s influence and counter its narrative, while underscoring the importance of alternative channels for political participation.
“The Muslim Brotherhood’s dominant presence has marginalized other ethnic groups and led to the persecution of religious minorities,” Sangari said.
For his part, Adeba highlights the Brotherhood’s extensive network and mobilization capabilities within the country, pointing out how it has successfully infiltrated political parties and civil society organizations, enabling it to influence Sudan’s political landscape.
Such successes have raised concerns among experts over the group’s ability to shape Sudanese political discourse and limit pluralism.
The experts say that the conflict has presented the Brotherhood with an opportunity to capitalize on the power vacuum created by the ousting of Bashir.
International affairs expert, Gordon Kachola, says that the group was able to take advantage of the transitional period, using its networks to fuel sectarian tensions and exacerbate the crisis. This has further complicated efforts to establish stability and consolidate power in Sudan.
Peter Schuman, an expert in regional security, believes the Brotherhood poses a challenge to Sudan’s long-term democratic aspirations. In his view, the group’s presence undermines the establishment of democratic institutions, thus hindering the country’s journey toward stability.
Schuman also believes the Brotherhood’s exclusionary interpretation of Islam could jeopardize the inclusive governance necessary for sustainable democracy in Sudan.
Hudson, the analyst and consultant, also has concerns about the Muslim Brotherhood’s role in Sudan’s transition, arguing that the group’s influence could impede the development of democratic institutions and stifle dissenting voices.
He believes that Sudan’s transitional government should address the Brotherhood’s influence to ensure the preservation of democratic values. As the international community, regional actors and Sudanese society at large have been demanding an end to the fighting, Hudson says that “negotiations without the participation and monitoring of civilians are hard to be understood.”
The Brotherhood’s control over various sectors, particularly agriculture, has also brought to the fore its impact on Sudan’s economy and society.
Medani says that the group’s control over the black market, in particular, has allowed it to sustain its power while contributing to the impoverishment of Sudanese society.
Sudan’s economic crisis, exacerbated by international sanctions and government policies, has fueled public discontent and protests, which Brotherhood-aligned politicians have in the past struggled to contain.
When Sudan eventually arrives at its post-conflict destination, the influence of the Brotherhood will remain a contentious issue. Balancing the desire for stability with the preservation of democratic values will be a delicate task.