Elias Bejjani/February 06, The cursed anniversary of the signing of the “Memorandum of Understanding” between Hezbollah and Michel Aoun: Agentism, Treason, Dhimmitude, and Iscariotism
February 06: The cursed anniversary of the signing of the “Memorandum of Understanding” between Hezbollah and Michel Aoun: Agentism, Treason, Dhimmitude, and Iscariotism Elias Bejjani/February 06/ 2026
“Woe to you, destroyer, you who have not been destroyed! Woe to you, betrayer, you who have not been betrayed! When you stop destroying, you will be destroyed; when you stop betraying, you will be betrayed. Lord, be gracious to us; we long for you. Be our strength every morning, our salvation in time of distress.” Prophet Isaiah (33:01-02):
The Lebanese people were told on the day the Memorandum of understanding (MOU) was signed between Hezbollah and the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM) on February 6, 2006, that the primary goal was to bring Hezbollah back into the fold of the Lebanese state and to “Lebanonize” it. Today, 20 years later, the exact opposite has happened. Hezbollah has nullified the state and all its components, turned it into a compliant tool in its hands, and placed it in confrontation with the majority of the Lebanese people, Arab countries, and most of the world countries—all to serve the Iranian sectarian, terrorist, and expansionist military imperial project.
This “100% Iranian “Mullah” jihadist armed proxy has practically and realistically transformed Lebanon into a war base, a military camp, and an Iranian weapons depot. In a quick review of the “MoU’s” clauses, we see that the most dangerous is the tenth clause, which addresses Hezbollah’s weapons. This clause describes Hezbollah’s arms as a “sacred means.”
What is striking about this heretical description is that it is the first time in Lebanon’s history that a group other than Hezbollah (the FPM) considers weapons to be a sacred means. Consequently, dealing with Hezbollah’s weapons according to this concept is akin to dealing with deities. Here lies the dilemma and the difficulty—even the impossibility—of discussing this “sacred” matter with Hezbollah’s leadership and its patron, Iran.
When the means are sacred, the end becomes divine. What is astonishing about this “sanctity” is the acceptance of this blasphemous heresy by the other signatory, the FPM, which is supposed to be a sovereignist, pro-independence, secular organization resistant to occupation forces. Furthermore, it was and remains deeply deplorable to sign a document with a religious, sectarian, Iranian armed proxy whose project is Iranian, stating that its weapons are sacred, while they are, first and last, sectarian, Iranian, militia-controlled weapons—neither legitimate nor subject to the Lebanese state or its command.
Indeed, this “divine” concept of weapons and the “holy” objectives for their use facilitated the Hezbollah’s “mini-state” and its Iranian reference to seize the state and gain full control over it. This strange, bizarre, anti-sovereign, anti-independence, and unconstitutional reality has manifested strongly on many abnormal occasions, including Hezbollah’s external wars and terrorist operations, its militia incursions inside Lebanon, and the series of assassinations it committed.
“If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea. Woe to the world because of the things that cause people to stumble! Such things must come, but woe to the person through whom they come!” (Mark 09:42-48; Luke 17:01-02)
Twenty years after the signing of this infamous “MoU,” Lebanon and its people have reaped nothing but national disasters in all forms—sovereign, national, constitutional, security, and economic—in addition to the disruption, and even destruction, of Lebanon’s international, Arab, regional, and global relations. In practice, the document was and remains a tool for destroying, marginalizing, and confiscating the state in favor of the “mini-state,” and for dominating all state decisions, (decision making process) large and small, especially the decision of peace and war.
Some Local Harvest of the “MoU” Direct and Indirect:
*Preventing the establishment of the state and obstructing the restoration of sovereignty and independence.
*Hegemony of the “mini-state” over the state.
*Disabling the constitution, marginalizing the legislative and executive branches, and Hezbollah’s dominance over all state institutions.
*Imposing Hezbollah’s will on presidential and parliamentary elections, and the appointment of the cabinet.
*An economic collapse unprecedented in Lebanon’s modern history.
*Unprecedentedly high levels of unemployment and poverty.
*Mass migration affecting all segments and sects.
*Absence of the middle class and the spread of corrupt deals, brokerage, smuggling, and defiance of law and security.
*Dangerous security chaos and the total absence of accountability.
*Opening the borders and Hezbollah’s involvement in regional wars for the benefit of the Iranian project.
*Imposing a hybrid electoral law that serves the Iranian project.
*Imposing the heresy of the so-called “Army, People, and Resistance” trilogy.
*Invasions of Beirut and the Lebanon Mountain region, toppling governments, and a series of assassinations.
*The “prostitution” of the constitution in the shameful “Doha Agreement”.
*Stagnation of agricultural crops and the destruction of the Lebanese industrial sector due to Hezbollah’s participation in the Syrian war and the closure of export routes.
*Disruption of the service sector (electricity, water, waste management, transport, health, etc.) as the state is paralyzed and its decisions are hijacked.
*Severe international, Arab, regional and global restrictions and sanctions on the banking sector following accusations against Hezbollah of money laundering and drug trafficking.
*Hezbollah causing the 2006 war with Israel.
*Hezbollah waging the recent war on Israel in support of Gaza which is still going on.
Some Arab Harvest of the “MoU” Direct and Indirect:
*Damaging Lebanon’s relations with most Arab countries, especially the Gulf states, due to Hezbollah’s attacks on their regimes and targeting their lands with terrorist operations for the benefit of Iran’s rulers, threatening the fate of about half a million Lebanese working there.
*Destroying Arab and all kinds of tourism to Lebanon and several Arab countries banning their citizens from traveling to Lebanon.
Some International Harvest of the MoU (Direct and Indirect):
*Obstructing the implementation of international resolutions related to Lebanon, 1559, 1680, 1701, the Armistice Agreement, the Taif Agreement and the recent “cessation of hostilities” agreement between Lebanon and Israel..
*Branding Lebanon with terrorism as Hezbollah is listed on terror lists in most countries, including many Arab nations.
*Harassing Lebanese citizens regarding travel to many countries due to Hezbollah’s designation as a terrorist organization.
In short, the document contributed significantly to Lebanon remaining a state without its own decision-making power, unable to control its borders, with its institutions nearly paralyzed, hindering the rise of institutions and handing the state over to the “mini-state”… and the list goes on.
Memorandum of understanding by Hezbollah and Free patriotic movement by Général Michel Aoun, Hassan Nasrallah February 06, 2006
INTRODUCTION
The first meeting ever between the head of the Change and Reform Bloc, MP Michel Aoun, and the Secretary General of Hezbollah, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, took place today afternoon at St. Michael Church in Shiah in the presence of Mahmoud Comati and Ghaleb Abu-Zeinab from Hezbollah, and Gebran Bassil, Ziad Abs and Fuad Al-Ashkar from the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM). The meeting was held under high security measures around the periphery of the church.
The meeting lasted 3 hours, at the end of which a joint memorandum of understanding between the FPM and Hezbollah was made public and read by Abu-Zeinab and Bassil. The following is the text the memorandum dated February 6, 2006
1 – DIALOGUE
National dialogue is the only avenue to find solutions for Lebanon’s crises on stable and firm bases that are a reflection of a unifying consensual will. The following conditions must obtain to ensure its success:
A- The participation of the parties that have a political, popular and national standing with a round table as a venue.
B- Transparency, openness, and placing the interests of the nation above any other interest, through the reliance on self-driven will, and a free and committed Lebanese decision-making.
C- Include all issues of a national character and requiring general concordance.
2 – CONSENSUAL DEMOCRACY
Consensual democracy remains the fundamental basis for governance in Lebanon, because it is the effective embodiment of the spirit of the Constitution and of the essence of the pact of shared coexistence. From this standpoint, any approach for resolving national issues according to a majority- minority formula remains dependent on historic and social conditions for practicing effective democracy in which the citizen becomes a self standing value.
3 – THE ELECTORAL LAW
The reform and systematization of political life in Lebanon require the adoption of a modern electoral law (in which proportional representation may be one of its effective variations) that guarantees the accuracy and equity of popular representation and contributes in accomplishing the following items:
A- Actuate and develop the role of the political parties in achieving civil society.
B- Limit the influence of political money and sectarian fanaticisms.
C- Make available equal opportunities for using the various media channels.
D- Secure the required means for enabling the expatriate Lebanese to exercise their voting rights. We demand the Government and Parliament to commit to the shortest possible deadline to enact the required electoral law.
4– BUILDING THE STATE
Building a modern State that enjoys the trust of its citizens and is able to meet their needs and aspirations, and provide them with the sense of security and safety as to their present and future, requires that State to be erected on strong and solid foundations that make it impervious to destabilization and periodic crises whenever it is threatened by difficult circumstances or changes. This requires adhering to the following:
A- Adopt the standards of justice, equality, parity, merit and integrity.
B- An equitable and impartial judiciary is the essential condition for creating a State of rights,laws and institutions, which is based on:
a- The complete independence of the judiciary as an institution and the selection of judges with recognized competence in order to activate the work of all courts
b- Respect for the actions of the constitutional institutions; shelter them from political polarization; ensure the continuity of their work; and prevent their breakdown (the Judicial Council and the Constitutional Council). What happened in the Constitutional Council is an example of such a breakdown, particularly with respect to the issue of parliamentary challenges submitted to it and which have not yet been decided.
c- Address corruption at the root, because temporary and pacifying solutions are no longer sufficient. They have in fact become a simple exercise in deception that the beneficiaries of corruption at all levels carry out to perpetuate the theft of the resources of the State and the citizen. This requires:
I- Activate the financial and administrative control and inspection institutions and boards, with the mandate to separate them from the executive power in order to guarantee that their work is not politicized.
II- Conduct a complete survey of the pockets of corruption, in preparation for opening judicial investigations that ensure the prosecution of those responsible for corruption, and return the embezzled public funds.
III- Legislate the required laws that contribute to combating corruption in all its aspects and demand of the government that Lebanon signs on the United Nations Treaty for Combating Corruption.
IV- Act toward a global administrative reform that ensures that the right person is assigned to the right position, particularly those whose merit, competence and integrity are recognized. This can be accomplished by empowering the Civil Service Council to assume its full prerogatives. Timeframes and deadlines need to be set for actions on these issues because the factor of time has become critical. The matter requires solutions that are simultaneously judicious and rapid and that use the time factor to their advantage instead of the corrupt using it to theirs.
5– THE MISSING DURING THE WAR
To turn the page of the past and have global national reconciliation, all the outstanding files of the war must be closed. The file of the missing in the war requires a stance of responsibility to end this anomalous situation and put the parents’ minds at ease. The parents cannot be expected to forgive without respecting their rights to know the fate of their children. Which is why we ask all the forces and parties that participated in the war for their full cooperation to uncover the fate of the missing and the locations of the mass graves.
6– THE LEBANESE IN ISRAEL
Whereas both sides are convinced that the presence of Lebanese citizens in their homeland is better than their presence in enemy territory, a resolution of the question of the Lebanese residing in Israel requires a speedy action to ensure their return to their country while taking in consideration all the political, security and livelihood circumstances surrounding the matter. On this basis, we issue a call to them to promptly return to their country at the basis of the call by His Eminence Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah following the Israeli withdrawal from south Lebanon and the speech delivered by General Michel Aoun at the first assembly of Parliament.
7– THE SECURITY QUESTION
First- political assassinations: Any form of political assassination is condemned and rejected because of its violation of basic human rights, the most important foundations of the existence of Lebanon represented by difference and diversity, and the essence of democracy and its practice. Therefore, to the extent that we condemn the assassination of His Excellency the martyr President Rafik Hariri and all assassinations and assassination attempts that preceded and followed it leading to the assassination of MP Gibran Tueni, we emphasize the importance of proceeding forward with the investigation according to the officially-approved mechanisms in order to uncover the truth, which is an issue that cannot be subjected to any compromise because it is a required condition to achieve justice and serve it against the criminals, as well as to bring an end to the cycle of murder and bombings. For this reason, it is an obligation to distance these issues from any attempts at politically exploiting them, which would harm their essence and the essence of justice that must remain above any political conflicts or disagreements.
Second- Security Reforms: A reform of the Security Services is an inseparable part of the broader reform process of the basic State institutions, and to rebuild them on sound and solid bases. Given the delicate position that the Security Services occupy in protecting and defending a stable security environment in the country against any breaches or threats, the process of building those Services must be given special attention. As such, the government is hereby urged to assume its full responsibilities as follows:
A- Put in place an integrated security plan based on the centralization of decision in security matters and a clear definition of enemy versus friend, the foci of security threats, including the question of terrorism and security breaches that must be addressed.
B- Neutralize the Security Services against any political considerations and patronages, such that their full loyalty is to the nation alone.
C- Assign the responsibility of the Services to personalities with recognized competence and integrity.
D- Security measures must not be in conflict with the basic freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, with first the freedom of expression and political action that do not threaten security and public stability.
E- Constitute a joint Parliamentary-Security Services committee that would oversee and control the reform and building processes of the Security Services.
8– LEBANESE-SYRIAN RELATIONS
The establishment of mutual and sound Lebanese-Syrian relations requires a review of the past experience and drawing the necessary conclusions and lessons in order to avoid the accumulated mistakes, blemishes and breaches. This is in order to pave the way to re-cast these relations on clear bases on parity and the full and mutual respect for the sovereignty and independence of both States, and on the grounds of a rejection of a return to any form of foreign tutelage.
Therefore, it is required:
A- That the Lebanese government take all legal measures and procedures pertaining to the assertion of the Lebanese identity of the Shebaa Farms and present these to the United Nations, after the Syrian State has declared the Shebaa Farms to be fully Lebanese in identity.
B- Delineate the borders between Lebanon and Syria, while eliminating the tensions that could break down the process, as both Lebanon and Syria have a long-standing need to complete this process as part of an agreement by the two countries.
C- Demand the Syrian State to fully cooperate with the Lebanese State in order to uncover the fate of the Lebanese detainees in Syrian prisons in the absence of provocation, tension and negativity that would hinder a positive resolution to this file.
D- Establish diplomatic relations between the two countries and provide appropriate conditions for them, which would move the relation from one between individuals and groups to one between institutions in order to secure their permanence and constancy.
9– LEBANESE-PALESTINIAN RELATIONS
Addressing the Palestinian file requires a global approach that asserts, on one hand, the respect by the Palestinians of the authority of the Lebanese State and their compliance with its laws, and on the other hand, the reaffirmation of solidarity with their cause and their recovery of their rights, in accordance with the following rules:
A- The social condition of the Palestinians requires a strong attention to improving their living conditions and securing a decent standard for the bases of a dignified human life according to the mandates of bilateral cooperation and the human rights charter, in addition to giving them the required facilitations to move inside and outside of Lebanese territory.
B- The Right of Return of the Palestinians is a fundamental and permanent right, and the rejection of the settling of Palestinian refugees in Lebanon is an issue that has the consensus of the Lebanese people and cannot be conceded under any circumstance.
C- Define the relationship between the Lebanese State and the Palestinians in a single institutional Palestinian framework that would be a legitimate representative of the Palestinian people in Lebanon in a manner conducive to proper coordination and cooperation.
D- Address the issue of bringing the practice of weapons outside the camps to an end, and make arrangements for the security situation inside the camps. This must be done as part of a serious, responsible and close dialogue between the Lebanese government and the Palestinians, leading to the exercise of the State’s authority and laws over all Lebanese territory.
10– THE PROTECTION OF LEBANON AND PRESERVING ITS INDEPENDENCE AND SOVEREIGNTY
The protection of Lebanon and the preservation of its independence and sovereignty are a national public responsibility and duty, guaranteed by international treaties and the Human Rights Charter, particularly in confronting any threats or dangers from any source that could harm them.
Therefore, carrying arms is not an objective in itself. Rather it is an honorable and sacred means that is exercised by any group whose land is occupied, in a manner identical to the methods of political resistance. In this context, Hezbollah’s weapons should be addressed as part of a global approach that falls within two bounds:
The first bound is the reliance on justifications that meet a national consensus for keeping the weapons, which would constitute a source of strength for Lebanon and the Lebanese people, and the other bound is the definition of objective conditions that would lead to a cessation of the reasons and justifications for keeping those weapons. Since Israel occupies the Shebaa Farms, imprisons Lebanese resistance members and threatens Lebanon, the Lebanese people should assume their responsibilities and share the burden of protecting Lebanon, safeguarding its existence and security and protecting its independence and sovereignty by:
A- Liberating the Shebaa Farms from the Israeli occupation.
B- Liberating the Lebanese prisoners from Israeli prisons.
C- Protecting Lebanon from Israeli threats through a national dialogue leading to the formulation of a national defense strategy over which the Lebanese agree to and subscribe to by assuming its burdens and benefiting from its outcomes.
Général Michel Aoun
Hassan Nasrallah
**Translation : Joseph Hitti.
