Detailed 
Lebanese & Lebanese Related LCCC English New Bulletin For October 11/2018 
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias 
Bejjani
The Bulletin's Link on the 
lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/newselias18/english.october11.18.htm
 
News Bulletin Achieves Since 
2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
 
	Bible 
	Quotations
	You 
	hypocrites! Does not each of you on the sabbath untie his ox or his donkey 
	from the manger, and lead it away to give it water?
	Luke 13/10-17: "Jesus was teaching in one of the synagogues on the sabbath. 
	And just then there appeared a woman with a spirit that had crippled her for 
	eighteen years. She was bent over and was quite unable to stand up straight. 
	When Jesus saw her, he called her over and said, ‘Woman, you are set free 
	from your ailment.’ When he laid his hands on her, immediately she stood up 
	straight and began praising God. But the leader of the synagogue, indignant 
	because Jesus had cured on the sabbath, kept saying to the crowd, ‘There are 
	six days on which work ought to be done; come on those days and be cured, 
	and not on the sabbath day.’ But the Lord answered him and said, ‘You 
	hypocrites! Does not each of you on the sabbath untie his ox or his donkey 
	from the manger, and lead it away to give it water? And ought not this 
	woman, a daughter of Abraham whom Satan bound for eighteen long years, be 
	set free from this bondage on the sabbath day?’When he said this, all his 
	opponents were put to shame; and the entire crowd was rejoicing at all the 
	wonderful things that he was doing."
	
	نشرات اخبار عربية وانكليزية مطولة ومفصلة يومية على موقعنا الألكتروني على 
	الرابط التالي
	http://eliasbejjaninews.com/
	
	Daily Lebanese/Arabic - English news bulletins on our LCCC web site.Click on 
	the link below
	
	
	
	http://eliasbejjaninews.com/
	
	
	
	
	
	Titles For The Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials 
	from miscellaneous sources published on October 10-11/18
	
	Hariri upbeat govt will be formed after Aoun returns/Ghinwa ObeidHussein 
	Dakroub/The Daily Star/October 10/18
	Who will replace Nikki Haley/New York Morning/October 10/18
	China’s Got Its Own Swamp/Michael Schuman/Bloomberg/October,10/18
	Italy Isn’t Like Greece. It’s Better and Worse/Mohamed El-Erian/Bloomberg/October,10/18
	Death or Life for Christian “Blasphemer”? Pakistan Ruling on Asia Bibi 
	Expected/Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute/October 10/18 
	Why is the Qatari-Brotherhood media really interested in the Khashoggi case/Mamdouh 
	AlMuhaini/Al Arabiya/October 10/18
	Tunisia’s Ennahda and the secret apparatus/Mashari Althaydi/Al Arabiya/October 
	10/18
	Israel's exilic existential anxiety/Ynetnews/Aviad Kleinberg/October 10/18
	‘Forever war’ in Afghanistan fading from Americans’ memory/Michael Kugelman/Arab 
	News/October 10/18
	Cooperation key to resolving issues between religions/Peter Welby/Arab 
	News/October 10/18
	
	
	
	Titles For The
	Latest LCCC Lebanese Related News published on 
	October 10-11/18
	Czech Intelligence Service Helps 
	Uncover Hezbollah Hacking Network
	Kataeb Party Hosts Meeting in Defense of Freedoms
	Lebanon’s Hariri Says Won’t Return if he Steps Down
	Palestinian president thanks Aoun for UN positions
	Lebanon’s Hariri says concessions made, hopes for govt formation soon
	Aoun Travels to Armenia to Attend Francophonie Summit
	Report: Hizbullah Pressuring Officials to Invite Syria to AESD Summit
	Berri Voices Cautious Optimism on Govt. Formation Process
	Jumblat: An Offer for Settlement Doesn’t Mean Relinquishing Principles
	Army Nabs Top Ain el-Hilweh Passport and Currency Forger
	Police Arrest Suspect in Akkar over IS Links, Bombing Plans
	Gunfire Erupts at SSNP Offices in Aley
	Hankache Stresses Kataeb's Openness, Commitment to Dialogue
	Hariri upbeat govt will be formed after Aoun returns
	Who will replace Nikki Haley?
	
	
	
	
	Titles For The Latest LCCC 
	Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published 
	
	
	
	
	on October 10-11/18
	Statement by The 
	Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs on World Day Against the Death Penalty
	Quds Force Official Demands Scrapping Draft Law to Block Terror Financing in 
	Iran
	Iran is a Trade Transit Point for Somali Terrorist Movement
	Iranian Diplomat in Belgian Court over 'Bomb Plot'
	Public Strike in Iran Protests Worsening Living Conditions
	US VP Pence: Ready to assist in finding Khashoggi in Turkey if Riyadh 
	requests
	Dhahi Khalfan: Khashoggi case can be resolved in 72 hours, ready to help
	Turkey Checks CCTV for Clues in Missing Saudi Journalist Case
	Qatar accused of ‘undermining Palestinian Authority’ through fuel move
	Trump: Planned Kim Summit Narrowed Down to 'Three or Four' Locations
	Hurricane Michael Strengthens, Florida Panhandle Braces for Worst in Decades
	Turkey Says Heavy Arms Pullout Completed in Syria's Idlib
	 
	
	
	
	The Latest LCCC Lebanese Related News published on 
	October 10-11/18
	Czech Intelligence 
	Service Helps Uncover Hezbollah Hacking Network
	Radio Prague/ Wednesday 10th October 2018/The Czech Security 
	Intelligence Service (BIS) on Monday issued a press release saying that it 
	had cooperated with foreign partners in identifying, analysing and disabling 
	servers in the Czech Republic and the wider world, which Hezbollah was using 
	for cybernetic espionage. According to the press release, a network of 
	Hezbollah hackers has been using tricks on social media to hack into mobile 
	devices across the world. Posing as attractive girls on Facebook, they would 
	contact users and start chatting. After steering the conversation to 
	increasingly sensual topics, the profiles would then ask the user to install 
	a ‘more private and secure application‘. According to the 
	counterintelligence service’s press release, some impassioned users would 
	comply and install the app. Unaware that it gave hackers access to their 
	sensitive information, including contacts, photographs, calls, text 
	messages, GPS data and the option to secretely record the owner via the 
	mobile device. The hacking attacks through servers placed in the Czech 
	Republic, the wider EU and the U.S., originated from the middle east. They 
	were aimed at various regions across the world including Central and Eastern 
	Europe and the Middle East itself. The head of the BIS, Michal Koudelka, 
	stated that intelligence gathered by the agency played a direct role in the 
	eventual takedown of the Hezbollah hacking network.
	
	Kataeb Party Hosts Meeting in Defense of Freedoms
	Kataeb.org/Wednesday 10th October 2018/The Kataeb party on Wednesday hosted 
	a broad meeting of Saydet Al-Jabal Gathering at its headquarters in Saifi to 
	voice absolute oppositon to the growing political oppression in the country 
	and to renew unwavering commitment to all forms of freedom. Last week, a 
	meeting of Saydet Al-Jabal Gathering, that was set to be held at the Bristol 
	Hotel in Beirut, was forcibly cancelled. Hezbollah's senior official Wafik 
	Safa admitted that he had personally asked the hotel to not host the event. 
	Following the meeting, former MP Fares Souaid thanked the Kataeb for hosting 
	the meeting, saying that this act reflects the party's history throughout 
	which it has defended political pluralism, cultural diversity and 
	intellectual exchange. "The blatant attack on the Lebanese people's 
	political rights is part of the growing oppression targeting activists, 
	journalists and politicians," he said. "We hold the ruling authority 
	responsible for what Lebanon has been witnessing lately, as we warn against 
	replicating a new model of suppression." Souaid called for a united stand to 
	defend the principles and constants on which Lebanon was built, urging full 
	loyalty to the martyrs of the Cedars Revolution. "The persistent attempts to 
	muzzle and beleaguer free minds, as well as Hezbollah's confiscation of the 
	state's decision-making power amid the shameful submissivness of most of the 
	political forces, require the other parties to unite in defense of the 
	people's constitutional rights." Souaid revealed that Saydet Al-Jabal 
	Gathering will hold a meeting on Sunday at Gefinor Rotana Hotel in Beirut, 
	hoping that no one would opt for the same "blunder" that took place last 
	week. The meeting, chaired by the Kataeb leader Samy Gemayel, was also 
	attended by former MP Ashraf Rifi, Kamil Chamoun representing the National 
	Liberal Party Chief Dory Chamoun, LBCI chairman Pierre Daher, Al-Liwaa 
	editor-in-chief Salah Salam representing former President Michel Sleiman, 
	former MP Boutros Harb and former MP Ahmad Fatfat representing ex-PM Fouad 
	Siniora.
	
	Lebanon’s Hariri Says 
	Won’t Return if he Steps Down
	Beirut - Asharq Al-Awsat/Wednesday, 10 October, 
	2018/Lebanon’s Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri announced on Tuesday 
	that if he stepped aside during the government formation process, he would 
	not accept to be re-designated. "If I step down from forming a government, I 
	won’t accept being asked to form another one,” he told reporters before 
	chairing the meeting of his parliamentary bloc. The PM said the government 
	would be formed within the next ten days because the country is in dire need 
	of it, and the economic situation necessitates it and compels everyone to 
	make concessions for the country. Mohammad Chamseddine, a researcher with 
	the Beirut-based research and statistics company Information International, 
	told Asharq Al-Awsat that Lebanon’s fiscal deficit for this year would 
	amount to $4 billion, while ministries, public institutions and 
	municipalities suffer from excessive staff after hiring more than 10,000 
	employees in the past two years. Facing the dire economic situation, Hariri 
	said his optimism on the cabinet formation stems from his last meeting with 
	President Michel Aoun. He said all parties have made concessions including 
	the Lebanese Forces and the Free Patriotic Movement. However, Hariri pointed 
	out that there are some changes in the distribution of portfolios, refusing 
	to disclose the number of ministers that each party will get. “The only 
	criterion I adopted in the formation is that it is a national accord 
	government. When we set standards, we bind ourselves when forming any 
	government in the future and this has no origin neither in the constitution 
	nor in the customs,” he said. Hariri denied any knowledge of a French 
	initiative to help him form a government, stressing that the results of the 
	CEDRE conference are in danger. The international community had pledged $11 
	billion in loans and grants during the CEDRE conference in Paris last April 
	to support Lebanon’s fragile economy. “These funds were put to help the 
	Lebanese economy but if the Lebanese don’t want to help themselves, is the 
	world going to wait for them?”He added: “There is a loan that was approved 
	by the World Bank for Lebanon and we will lose it if the government and the 
	parliament don’t approve it.”
	
	Palestinian president thanks Aoun for UN positions
	The Daily Star/October 10/18/BEIRUT: President Michel Aoun Tuesday received 
	a thank you letter from Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas for his 
	positions on Palestine during his speech at the United Nations General 
	Assembly last month. Palestinian Ambassador to Lebanon Ashraf Dabbour handed 
	Aoun the letter during a meeting at Baabda Palace, a statement from the 
	presidency said. “The letter included a confirmation from the Palestinian 
	president of the solid and stable historic relations between the Lebanese 
	and Palestinian people,” the statement said, quoting the letter.
	The letter also underscored the importance of mutual Arab cooperation to 
	face the challenges that threaten the Palestinian cause. During his speech 
	on Sept. 26 in New York, Aoun said the international political approach 
	toward the Middle East continues to lack justice and employs double 
	standards. He added that the Palestinian cause reflected these problems. 
	Aoun also said the absence of justice in addressing the issue had “triggered 
	many wars ... and created a resistance that will only end by eliminating 
	oppression and establishing justice.”
	
	Lebanon’s Hariri says concessions made, hopes for govt 
	formation soon
	Reuters, Beirut/Tuesday, 9 October 2018/Lebanese Prime 
	Minister-designate Saad al-Hariri said on Tuesday all political sides had 
	made concessions and he hoped a new government would be formed after 
	President Michel Aoun returns from a trip abroad. In the more than five 
	months since a parliamentary election in May, politicians have been unable 
	to agree a unity government that can get to work on badly needed economic 
	reforms. Lebanon, which has the world’s third largest public debt as a 
	proportion of national output, faces an economic crisis if the political 
	stalemate drags on, politicians have said. “There are concessions from all 
	sides, including the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM),” Hariri told reporters 
	after a meeting of his Future Movement party. “We hope for the formation of 
	a government after the return of the president from Yerevan because the 
	economic and social situation calls for a speedy government formation,” he 
	said. Aoun is expected to return from Armenia on Friday. Rivalry between the 
	two leading Christian parties - Aoun’s FPM, allied to Hezbollah, and the 
	anti-Hezbollah Lebanese Forces (LF) - is widely seen as the main obstacle to 
	a deal. Hariri said his optimism that a government could be formed soon 
	stemmed from a meeting he had with Aoun last Wednesday. Hariri said on 
	Thursday he believed the government would be formed within a week to 10 days 
	because the economy could not tolerate further delay. The formation of a new 
	government would allow Lebanon to begin the substantial fiscal adjustment 
	that the International Monetary Fund says it needs to improve its debt 
	sustainability. It would also likely unlock more than $11 billion worth of 
	infrastructure investment pledged at a donors’ meeting in Paris in April. 
	“We are wrong if we think the world will wait for us to save ourselves. 
	There are loans that won’t wait,” Hariri said.
	
	Aoun Travels to Armenia to Attend Francophonie Summit
	Naharnet/October 10/18/President Michel Aoun departed on Wednesday leading 
	an official delegation to Armenia to partake in the 17th Summit of the 
	International Organisation of la Francophonie (IOF) in Yerevan on October 
	11-12, the National News Agency reported on Wednesday. The delegation 
	included caretaker Minister of Culture Ghattas Khoury, caretaker Tourism 
	Minister Avedis Kedanian and several other officials, NNA said. Caretaker 
	Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil is expected to join the delegation later on 
	along with several ambassadors and diplomats, it added. The President is 
	planned to deliver a speech at the Summit tomorrow. He will meet with 
	attending state leaders on the sidelines of the summit.
	
	Report: Hizbullah Pressuring Officials to Invite Syria 
	to AESD Summit
	Naharnet/October 10/18/As Lebanon continues to invite Arab 
	leaders to the Arab Economic and Social Development Summit it hosts in 
	January, Hizbullah party has reportedly been “pressuring President Michel 
	Aoun into inviting Syria” to the summit, the Kuwaiti Asseyasah daily 
	reported on Wednesday.
	The daily said some Lebanese “political forces allied to Damascus and led by 
	Hizbullah began a pressure campaign to urge Aoun to invite the Syrian regime 
	to attend the summit,” said the daily. Prime 
	Minister-designate Saad Hariri and a number of political forces have 
	rejected the matter it added, arguing that Lebanon must abide by the 
	decisions of the Arab League which suspended Syria’s membership back in 2011 
	over its failure to end government crackdown on protests.
	The Arab Economic and Social Development Summit will be held in 
	Beirut on January 19-20.
	The Arab Economic and Social Development summits are summits of the Arab 
	League, held at the head of state level to address issues of economic and 
	social development among member-states.
	
	Berri Voices Cautious Optimism on Govt. Formation Process
	Naharnet/October 10/18/Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri on Wednesday voiced 
	cautious optimism over the reported progress in the cabinet formation 
	process. “It's about time everyone shouldered their responsibilities to 
	finalize the government issue,” Berri told lawmakers during the weekly Ain 
	el-Tineh meeting. Urging all parties to “show modesty in dealing with the 
	formation process,” the Speaker said “there is a vigorous momentum nowadays 
	and some are speaking of promising and positive developments.”"The economic 
	situation is very critical and this requires us all to cooperate to address 
	this challenge which has an impact on the general situation in the country,” 
	Berri added. He also emphasized that “the parliament will shoulder its 
	responsibilities and perform its role,” noting that “there will be a 
	legislative session before the end of this month.”
	
	Jumblat: An Offer for Settlement Doesn’t Mean Relinquishing Principles
	Naharnet/October 10/18/Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblat 
	emphasized on Wednesday that his offer to make a settlement to ease the 
	government formation process must not be taken as a relinquishment of the 
	party’s principles. “Appealing to all political parties to make concessions 
	is required, but beware of misinterpreting it as a relinquishment of 
	principles,” said Jumblat in a tweet on Wednesday. After announcing 
	willingness to ease the PSP demands in order to help the formation process, 
	Jumblat said that Wednesday’s “clarifications is necessary in order to 
	silence the sounds of discontent and the hoot of owls.” he said. On Monday, 
	Jumblat hinted that he could agree to offer “concessions” regarding his 
	party's share in the new government. “A settlement is necessary and it is 
	not wrong to offer concessions for the sake of the country,” he had said, 
	referring to the stalled formation process. Jumblat had been insisting on 
	getting all three Druze seats for his PSP but has recently shown some 
	flexibility. Lebanese Democratic Party chief MP Talal Arslan, backed by 
	President Michel Aoun and the Free Patriotic Movement, has stressed that he 
	has the right to get one of the Druze seats. In remarks he made to al-Joumhouria 
	daily on Wednesday, Arslan refused Jumblat's latest “offer” saying he would 
	“either accept three centrist Druze ministers or that Jumblat names two 
	ministers” while he names the third.
	
	Army Nabs Top Ain el-Hilweh Passport and Currency Forger
	Naharnet/October 10/18/The most notorious passport and currency forger in 
	the Ain el-Hilweh Palestinian refugee camp was arrested Wednesday in a 
	special army operation. “Following surveillance and follow-up, the 
	Intelligence Directorate managed today to arrest Palestinian fugitive Hassan 
	Nawfal, aka Hassan al-Hakim, and an accomplice,” the army said in a 
	statement. It described the detainee as “one of the most notorious forgers 
	of passports, identity cards and foreign and local currencies.”An 
	investigation has since been launched under the supervision of the 
	judiciary.
	
	Police Arrest Suspect in Akkar over IS Links, Bombing Plans
	Naharnet/October 10/18/The Internal Security Forces Information Branch 
	arrested a suspect in the northern region of Akkar over links to the Islamic 
	State terror organization, ISF said in a statement on Wednesday. The 
	detainee admitted during investigations that he had joined the IS ranks 
	eight months ago through groups that encouraged him to carry out terror 
	attacks in Lebanon instead of Syria, said the statement. He was taught how 
	to make explosive bombs and decided to plant one on a highway in a bid to 
	bomb a Lebanese army patrol whenever one passes through the area where he 
	resided, it said. The suspect was referred to the related judicial 
	authorities.
	
	Gunfire Erupts at SSNP Offices in Aley
	Naharnet/October 10/18/Gunfire erupted Tuesday evening inside the offices of 
	the Syrian Social Nationalist Party in the Mount Lebanon city of Aley, the 
	National News Agency said. The shooting broke out during a dispute between 
	party members inside the building, NNA reported, adding that the offices 
	were later cordoned off by security forces. Senior SSNP official Hussam al-Israwi 
	meanwhile told MTV that the gunfire erupted after “undisciplined party 
	members tried to storm the offices,” denying reports that he was injured 
	during the incident.
	 
	Hankache Stresses 
	Kataeb's Openness, Commitment to Dialogue
	Kataeb.org/Wednesday 10th October 2018/MP Elias Hankache on Wednesday 
	reiterated the Kataeb's openness to all political factions, stressing that 
	contacts are ongoing with everyone in accordance with the party's position 
	as an independent opposition force. “The Kataeb party has repeatedly 
	announced that it is open to everyone [...] as it is keen to serve the 
	country’s interest and believes in the importance of safeguarding dialogue 
	amid the critical conditions facing the country,” Hankache said following 
	talks with Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri as part of his weekly meeting with 
	lawmakers in Ain Al-Tineh.
	
	Hariri upbeat govt will be formed after Aoun returns
	Ghinwa ObeidHussein Dakroub/The Daily Star/October 10/18
	BEIRUT: Sticking to his optimism, Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri 
	Tuesday expressed hope that a new government would be formed after the 
	president returns from a trip to Armenia later this week.
	President Michel Aoun is set to leave on a two-day visit to Armenia 
	Wednesday to attend the Francophone conference. He will be back in Beirut 
	Friday. A source at Baabda Palace told The Daily Star that a meeting between 
	Aoun and Hariri to discuss an amended Cabinet formula could take place after 
	the president’s return from Armenia.
	Hariri disclosed that all the political parties had made concessions to 
	facilitate the formation of a new government, saying that all obstacles, 
	mainly the problems of Druze and Christian representation the two main 
	stumbling blocks to the formation were on their way to being resolved.
	“The economic situation obliged everyone to make concessions for the sake of 
	the country and all the problems are on the way to being resolved,” Hariri 
	told journalists before chairing the weekly meeting of the Future Movement’s 
	parliamentary bloc at his Downtown Beirut residence. He said all parties, 
	including the Lebanese Forces and the Free Patriotic Movement, have made 
	concessions to speed up the government formation.
	Hariri said he was still optimistic that the government would be formed 
	within the 10-day period that he set for himself last week, adding that the 
	deadline could be extended if the need arose.
	He said his optimism about breaking the government formation deadlock, now 
	in its fifth month, stemmed from his meeting with Aoun last week, but 
	lamented FPM leader Gebran Bassil’s recent hard-line Cabinet recommendations 
	were “not positive.” Hariri said no date was set to meet with Bassil to 
	discuss the problem of Christian representation in the next government.
	This was Hariri’s first public reaction to Bassil’s tough stance on the LF’s 
	Cabinet share. Bassil said last week that the LF should not be allocated 
	more than three ministers, despite having boosted its MPs from eight to 15 
	in the May elections.
	Bassil, the caretaker foreign minister, proposed a criterion for the 
	representation of major blocs in the new Cabinet that calls for one minister 
	for five MPs. Bassil’s proposal seemingly appeared to target the LF which 
	has been pushing for a significant Cabinet share of five ministers.
	Hariri, who presented Aoun with his first draft Cabinet formula on Sept. 3 
	and which drew a number of reservations from the president over the 
	allocation of ministerial posts to the LF and the Progressive Socialist 
	Party, said there has been a change in the proposed line-up, but did not 
	give additional details on these changes. But in what appeared to be a 
	response to Bassil’s controversial criterion, Hariri said: “The only 
	criterion I adopted in the formation is that it is a national entente 
	government.
	“When we set standards, we bind ourselves when forming any government in the 
	future and this has no origin whether in the Constitution or in norms.”
	Hariri said if he stepped aside during the formation process, he would not 
	accept to be redesignated to form a government.
	“If I step down from forming a government, I won’t accept being asked to 
	form another one,” he said. “The circumstances that prevailed in my first 
	government are different from the current situation.” In 2009 Hariri stepped 
	down during the formation process before being redesignated as premier.
	Hariri denied the existence of a French initiative to help him in the 
	government formation, but warned that the results of the CEDRE conference 
	were in danger.
	“If we think that the world will wait for us, we are wrong. The world is 
	moving and the days are passing, and these funds [from CEDRE] were put to 
	help the Lebanese economy. But if the Lebanese don’t want to help 
	themselves, is the world going to wait for them?” Hariri said.
	He added that Lebanon also risked losing a World Bank loan if the government 
	and Parliament did not approve it. Donor countries at the CEDRE conference 
	held in Paris on April 6 pledged more than $11 billion in grants and soft 
	loans to finance investment and infrastructure projects in Lebanon.
	After chairing the bloc’s meeting, Hariri met at his residence separately 
	with caretaker Information Minister MP Melhem Riachi as a special envoy from 
	LF chief Samir Geagea, and MP Wael Abu Faour as an envoy from PSP leader 
	Walid Joumblatt, discussing with them ways to overcome the problems of 
	Christian and Druze representation respectively.
	Speaker Nabih Berri also discussed the Cabinet formation impasse in separate 
	meetings with Riachi and a delegation from the PSP’s parliamentary 
	Democratic Gathering bloc.
	Hariri said recent statements made by PSP leader Joumblatt and his rival, 
	Lebanese Democratic Party leader MP Talal Arslan, showed that there might be 
	a solution to their struggle over Druze shares in the next Cabinet.
	Earlier in the day, Arslan took to Twitter to say he would allow Aoun and 
	Speaker Nabih Berri to name a Druze minister in the future Cabinet.
	Following its meeting chaired by Hariri, the Future bloc reiterated the 
	prime minister-designate’s commitment to the formation of a national entente 
	government. The bloc considered that Hariri’s stances during his televised 
	interview last week constituted an integrated road map to get out of the 
	“tunnel of disruptions” and start preparing the mechanisms required for the 
	birth of the government, a statement issued after the meeting said.
	It said Hariri has reaffirmed his “adherence to the formation of a national 
	entente government that includes all the main political forces represented 
	in Parliament, without responding to any calls that violate this.”
	Hariri “insisted on a governmental team that works and achieves, and doesn’t 
	engage in political maneuvering, or in turning the Cabinet into an arena of 
	partisan and sectarian infighting,” the statement said.
	Hariri also emphasized the “good relationship” with Aoun and his commitment 
	to the requirements of the political settlement that ended the presidential 
	vacuum with Aoun’s election on Oct. 31, 2016 and launched work in 
	constitutional institutions.
	The bloc said Hariri’s interview bolstered the hopes of the Lebanese for the 
	formation of the government, but the reactions that followed the interview 
	and the criteria put forward were enough to dispel the atmosphere of 
	optimism. “The Future bloc lays emphasis on its commitment to any decision 
	that Prime Minister Hariri might take toward the deliberate obstruction of 
	the government formation and the insistence on keeping the country hostage 
	to the race for shares and positions,” the statement said.
	“The bloc also refuses to recognize any new norms that some are trying to 
	impose on the formation of governments.”
	The FPM’s parliamentary Strong Lebanon bloc expressed hope Hariri would 
	overcome the remaining hurdles to the government formation.
	“We are still waiting, as do all the Lebanese, [for Hariri] to settle this 
	issue. Certainly, we are building on the optimism expressed by Prime 
	Minister-designate Saad Hariri and on whose basis we hope that negotiations 
	will end and the government will be formed,” a statement issued after the 
	bloc’s weekly meeting, chaired by Bassil, said.
	
	Who will replace Nikki Haley?
	New York Morning/October 10/18
	The American Mideast Coalition for Democracy fully endorses Dr. Walid Phares 
	to become the new US Ambassador to the UN.
	Professor Walid Phares served as a Foreign Policy Advisor to Presidential 
	candidate Donald Trump in 2016. He also served as a National Security 
	Advisor to Presidential Advisor Mitt Romney in 2011-2012
	Professor Phares has been an advisor to the US House of Representatives 
	Caucus on Counter Terrorism since 2007 and is the Co-Secretary General of 
	the Trans-Atlantic Legislative Group on Counter Terrorism since 2008.
	He is Fox News Terrorism and Middle East Expert since 2007 and has been 
	MSNBC-NBC Terrorism Analyst from 2003 to the end of 2006.
	He has taught Global Strategies at the National Defense University in 
	Washington DC since 2006, lectured at the National Intelligence University 
	since 2008 and was a Professor of Middle East Studies, Ethnic and Religious 
	Conflict at the Department of Political Science at Florida Atlantic 
	University (FAU) from 1993 to 2006.
	Professor Walid Phares was a Senior Fellow and the director for Future 
	Terrorism Project at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies in 
	Washington (2001-2010). He was also a Visiting Fellow with the European 
	Foundation for Democracies in Brussels (2006-2010).
	As an international expert on conflicts and terrorism, Professor Phares 
	lectures on campuses, nationwide and internationally. He testifies to and 
	conducts briefings at the US Congress, the European Parliament and 
	Commission, and the UN Security Council, as well as to US State Department 
	and other foreign ministries worldwide and to officials on Counter Terrorism 
	in Europe and the United States. Dr Phares was an advisory board member of 
	the Task Force on Future Terrorism of the US Department of Homeland Security 
	(2005-2007) and a member of the NSC advisory task force on Nuclear Terrorism 
	(2006-2007).
	Dr Phares has also lectured to and advised the US Departments of Justice, 
	Defense, and Homeland Security, as well as regional commands such as CENTCOM, 
	SOUTHCOM, AFRICOM, on academic research on Terrorism. He has served as an 
	expert on Terrorism with the US and European Governments and briefed law 
	enforcement agencies, including INTERPOL since 2003. Dr Phares serves as an 
	academic advisor to several Human Rights and Middle East and Africa 
	communities groups.
	He has published 13 books including, Future Jihad: Terrorist Strategies 
	against the West, The Coming Revolution: Struggle for Freedom in the Middle 
	East, which predicted the Arab Spring and projected the ongoing revolts in 
	the Greater Middle East. His most recent book is, The Lost Spring: U.S. 
	Policy in the Middle East and Catastrophes to Avoid.
 
	
	
	The Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News 
	published 
	
	on 
	
	October 10-11/18
	Statement by The 
	Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs on World Day Against the Death Penalty
	October 10, 2018 - Ottawa, Ontario - Global Affairs Canada
	The Honourable Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Foreign Affairs, today issued 
	the following statement:
	“The death penalty is an inhumane and barbaric form of punishment that goes 
	against all Canadian values and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
	“In Canada, we ended the death penalty more than 40 years ago. We will 
	always oppose its use abroad, as well as seek clemency in every case of 
	Canadians facing execution, without exceptions.
	“This year, Canada is pleased to join the Group of Friends of the Protocol, 
	initiated by the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty. We will continue 
	to advocate against the death penalty where it is still being used and will 
	keep working toward the universal abolition of this form of punishment.
	“Those who break the law must face the consequences of their actions and be 
	held accountable, but the death penalty is never the solution.”
	
	Quds Force Official Demands Scrapping Draft Law to Block Terror Financing in 
	Iran
	London – Asharq Al-Awsat/Wednesday, 10 October, 2018/The 
	Iranian Revolutionary Guard expressed its reservations towards a draft law 
	passed by the Iranian parliament for the country to join the international 
	Terrorist Financing Convention treaty. Iran’s Quds Force, the Revolutionary 
	Guard’s foreign arm, stands to be harmed the most from the bill given that 
	it funds and aids proxy militias in the region. Meanwhile, the country’s 
	Second Deputy Parliamentary Speaker Ali Motahari called for lawsuits and 
	investigations to face parties that have gone as far as making death threats 
	against lawmakers who voted yes on the draft resolution. Quds Force 
	official, senior cleric and Supreme Leader Representative Ali Shirazi urged 
	the Guardian Council to reject the draft law approved by the parliament to 
	allow the Iranian government to join the anti-terror Financial Action Task 
	Force (FATF). The Guardian Council, which oversees the country’s legislative 
	procedures, is supposed to announce its decision on three out of four laws 
	that would help President Hassan Rouhani achieve his aspirations to join 
	FATF. Joining the international body will persuade foreign banks to continue 
	financial cooperation and investment with Iran. Shirazi denied Supreme 
	Leader Ali Khamenei ever agreeing to the draft resolution, and raised 
	questions as to whether the law is related to halting Iranian support from 
	flowing into Syria and Lebanon. The Guardian Council must address this 
	implicit project, Shirazi was quoted as saying by the Fars news agency. It 
	was not clear whether the Guardian Council would approve the bill. "It is 
	too early to announce the opinion of the council," Guardian Council 
	Spokesman Abbas Kadkhodaei said. Parliament passed the draft law, but it was 
	not yet to the Council which has the power to overturn the law. Kadkhodaei 
	also pointed out that the Council has not arrived to a decision yet on two 
	laws passed by parliament for the country to join international bodies 
	similar to FATF that combat money laundering and terror funding. 
	International parties accuse Iran of buying time when it comes to applying 
	for the FATF. Joining the taskforce would mean that Iran needs to amend its 
	laws on money laundering. Hardline critics of the law say it poses “a threat 
	to funding Iran’s Revolutionary Guard regional activities.”
	
	Iran is a Trade Transit Point for Somali Terrorist 
	Movement
	New York – Asharq Al-Awsat/Wednesday, 10 October, 2018/UN sanctions monitors 
	said that criminal networks were using Iran as a transit point for the 
	export of illicit Somali charcoal, according to a report seen by Reuters. 
	This illegal trade provides extremist militants Al-Shabaab with millions of 
	dollars annually in tax, according to the unpublished annual report 
	submitted to the UN Security Council. The report says, according to Reuters, 
	that since March the main destination for shipments - using fake country of 
	origin certificates from Comoros, Ivory Coast and Ghana - has been ports in 
	Iran, where the charcoal is packaged into white bags labeled “Product of 
	Iran”.“The bags were then reloaded onto smaller, Iran-flagged dhows (boats), 
	and exported to Port Al Hamriya, Dubai, UAE, using certificates of origin 
	falsely indicating the ‘country of manufacture’ of the charcoal as Iran,” 
	the monitors wrote, as published by Reuters. UN monitors, who are tracking 
	compliance with UN sanctions on Somalia and Eritrea, said Iran and the UAE 
	had not “substantively engaged” when observers raised concerns about the 
	transshipment of Somali coal. The report estimated the total value of 
	Somalia’s illegal coal trade at about $150 million a year in the UAE, where 
	it is widely used in cooking and nargile smoking. It was also estimated that 
	about three million bags of charcoal were exported from Somalia in the past 
	year. “The charcoal trade continues to be a significant source of revenue 
	for al Shabaab, generating at least $7.5 million from checkpoint taxation,” 
	the report said, according to Reuters. UAE Ambassador to the UN Lana 
	Nusseibeh said she could not comment because the report had not yet been 
	published. “That being said, the UAE is fully aware of all Security Council 
	resolutions and is in full compliance with the sanctions imposed,” she told 
	Reuters. “We also reaffirm our continued cooperation with the Monitoring 
	Group throughout its mandate.”
	Reuters also said that the Iranian mission to the UN did not immediately 
	respond to a request for comment.
	
	Iranian Diplomat in Belgian Court over 'Bomb Plot'
	London - Asharq Al-Awsat/Wednesday, 10 October, 2018/An Iranian diplomat 
	linked to a bomb plot against an Iranian opposition rally in France will 
	appear before a Belgian judge on Wednesday after he was extradited from 
	Germany. The Vienna-based Iranian, who has previously been identified as 
	Assadollah Assadi, was handed over and will appear in court on Wednesday, 
	the Belgian Federal Prosecutor's Office told AFP. The plan to target a 
	gathering of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) in a Paris 
	suburb came to light a few days after the June 30 event. Six people were 
	arrested afterwards in coordinated raids by European police forces, 
	including Assadi. Iran last week staunchly denied French accusations that 
	one of its diplomats was involved in the plot that took place just ahead of 
	a visit to Europe by President Hassan Rouhani. "We deny the accusations and 
	forcefully condemn the Iranian diplomat's arrest and call for his immediate 
	release," the Iranian foreign affairs ministry said on October 2 in a 
	statement. But French security services believe the Iranian intelligence 
	ministry was behind the foiled plot. In retaliation, France announced last 
	week it had frozen Assadi's assets for six months. 
	
	Public Strike in Iran Protests Worsening Living 
	Conditions
	London -Asharq Al-Awsat/Wednesday, 10 October, 2018/Many shop owners in 
	Iranian cities joined truck drivers in their strike, which is on its 16th 
	day, protesting against worsening economic conditions and rising prices. 
	Video footage shared by Iranian activists on social media showed massive 
	strikes in markets across several Iranian cities. The strike received no 
	coverage by official and Revolutionary Guard news agencies that only 
	reported “normal” activity in Tehran markets on Monday. Alternatively, 
	reports said security forces deployed to a number of Iranian cities. 
	According to the activists, Tabriz, Isfahan, Mashhad and Sinandaj were among 
	the biggest cities that have seen recurrent market strikes. Eyewitnesses 
	also reported protests taking place in several Tehran markets, as well as a 
	number of smaller towns. Truck drivers, encouraged by trade unions, have 
	been staging a sit-in for weeks. This is a second such strike they hold this 
	year. Police have arrested over 100 drivers in recent days, according to 
	human rights centers in Iran. These strikes included all the provinces of 
	Iran, according to social media posts. Trade union sources pointed out 
	during the past few days that the strikes were taking place in Urmia, 
	Ardabil, Ahwaz, Isfahan, Qazvin and Bandar Abbas. Despite threats by Iranian 
	authorities and police, strikes have lasted over a week so far.Although 
	economic conditions have worsened enough to provoke strikes, official 
	agencies say that the Iranian rial was improving. Nevertheless, reliable and 
	independent information on dollar to Iranian exchange rates have disappeared 
	after the government shut down multiple economic monitoring websites. 
	Sources said the government launched a misinformation campaign in hopes to 
	tame the demand for the dollar. The Iranian government is using its official 
	media outlets to build confidence in and demand for other foreign currency. 
	Observers say the market has seen the demand for the dollar fall. Meanwhile, 
	official media reported a rise in gold rates. Dollar exchange rates 
	continued to fluctuate, varying between 140,000 and 135,000 rials, according 
	to official agencies.
	
	US VP Pence: Ready to assist in finding Khashoggi in Turkey if Riyadh 
	requests
	Staff writer, Al Arabiya English/Wednesday, 10 October 
	2018/US Vice President Mike Pence said on Wednesday the United States is 
	ready to help in any way in the investigation of the disappearance of 
	prominent Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, according to Reuters. Pence was 
	asked on the Hugh Hewitt syndicated radio program if Washington would send 
	FBI investigators to Turkey if Saudi Arabia requested it. “I think the 
	United States of America stands ready to assist in any way,” Pence said. On 
	Tuesday, US President Donald Trump said he does not know anything about 
	Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi’s disappearance. The Turkish ministry of 
	foreign affairs had stated that Saudi Arabia has provided all assistance and 
	cooperation in the case of the missing journalist who has disappeared in 
	Istanbul last week. Prince Mohammad bin Salman Al Saud, Crown Prince of 
	Saudi Arabia, said in an interview with Bloomberg which was published on 
	Friday, that Khashoggi is not in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, expressing 
	his readiness to allow the Turkish authorities to search the consulate 
	though the premises “are sovereign territory… We have nothing to hide,” 
	according to the crown prince statement to Bloomberg.
	With Reuters
	
	Dhahi Khalfan: Khashoggi case can be resolved in 72 hours, ready to help
	Huda al-Saleh, Al Arabiya English/Wednesday, 10 October 2018/Former Dubai 
	Police chief Lieutenant General Dhahi Khalfan on Wednesday denounced the 
	confusion shown by Turkish security in uncovering the details of the 
	disappearance of Saudi writer and journalist Jamal Khashoggi, one week since 
	his disappearance in Istanbul. The outspoken former police chief told Al 
	Arabiya English: “So-called unknown operation is not relevant in today’s 
	crime science. Today, police forces have advanced capabilities to locate and 
	determine those behind the crime.”“The security authorities can determine 
	the last location of Jamal Khashoggi, even without any surveillance cameras, 
	and the logic of research and investigation, is that it can be reached and 
	does not require all this ambiguity,” he said. The Lieutenant General Dhahi 
	Khalfan, confirmed that the case related to disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi 
	does not require more than 72 hours in getting resolved. He said that before 
	the body of the missing person can be found, it is impossible to talk about 
	his death, and the case remains that of disappearance.
	He even expressed his readiness to assist in uncovering who is behind 
	abduction of Khashoggi in Istanbul. Khalfan pointed out the success of Dubai 
	Police in uncovering the details of the assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh 
	in 2010, in a hotel in Dubai within 72 hours, and accused agents of the 
	Israeli intelligence “Mossad” of being behind the assassination.
	Khalfan said during the interview: “Is there more complicated than 
	Mossad operations? We revealed all those who were behind that crime in 72 
	hours. I can confirm that the most complex issues do not need more than 72 
	hours.” Earlier, the outspoken former police chief said in a tweet: “We can 
	help with revealing who kidnapped Khashoggi in Turkey… Our experience in 
	revealing the Mossad enables us to show the truth within 48 hours.”
	
	Turkey Checks CCTV for Clues in Missing Saudi 
	Journalist Case
	Associated Press/Naharnet/October 10/18/Turkish investigators are examining 
	CCTV footage showing the moment missing Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi 
	entered the kingdom's consulate in Istanbul and the movements of a team 
	suspected of involvement in his disappearance.
	Khashoggi, a Washington Post contributor, vanished on October 2 after 
	entering the consulate to obtain official documents ahead of his marriage to 
	his Turkish fiancee. His fiancee, Hatice Cengiz, made an appeal to U.S. 
	President Donald Trump in an opinion piece for the Washington Post on 
	Tuesday, calling on him to "help shed light on Jamal's 
	disappearance."Government sources said at the weekend that police believed 
	Khashoggi was killed by a team specially sent to Istanbul and thought to 
	consist of 15 Saudis. CCTV released on Wednesday by Turkish TV showed a man 
	believed to be Khashoggi enter the consulate as well as a vehicle of 
	interest entering and leaving the building after Khashoggi went inside. But 
	Riyadh insisted the 59-year-old journalist had left the building and the 
	murder claims were "baseless." Khashoggi, a former Saudi government adviser, 
	had been living in the United States since last year fearing arrest. He has 
	been critical of some policies of the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman 
	and Riyadh's intervention in the war in Yemen. Turkish police were looking 
	into two private aircraft that landed at Istanbul's Ataturk airport on 
	October 2 at different times carrying the individuals of interest in the 
	case.
	A source told the Washington Post that U.S. intelligence "intercepted 
	communications of Saudi officials discussing a plan to capture him." The 
	same source said the Saudis hoped to "lure" Khashoggi to Saudi Arabia "and 
	lay hands on him there."
	Possible kidnapping 
	One of the first images from the CCTV footage shared by 24 TV broadcaster 
	showed Khashoggi enter the consulate at 1.14pm (1014 GMT). Footage also 
	showed some of the Saudis arriving in Istanbul after the first plane landed 
	before 0030 GMT on October 2 and the men later checking into a hotel near 
	the consulate. Aksam daily said some of the men went into the Saudi 
	consulate before Khashoggi. According to the images, a vehicle that went 
	inside the consulate was then driven to the consul-general's residence 
	nearby after 1200 GMT, two hours after Khashoggi had entered the mission. 
	Aksam newspaper's editor-in-chief Murat Kelkitlioglu speculated on 24 TV 
	that it was "almost certain" that Khashoggi had been taken in the vehicle.
	Local media on Tuesday reported on the possibility that Khashoggi was 
	kidnapped and taken aboard one of the private planes. Both planes later 
	returned to Riyadh with one stopping in Dubai and the other in Egypt, 
	pro-government Sabah daily said. According to Hurriyet daily, nine Saudis 
	who arrived in Istanbul on the same day that the journalist vanished, had 
	bought luggage at the Grand Bazaar. However, a police search revealed that 
	they did not take the luggage on their return. Sabah daily on Wednesday 
	published the names and images of what it called the "assassination team" 
	including a man called Salah Muhammed Al-Tubaigy whose name it said matched 
	that of a lieutenant-colonel in the Saudi forensic department. Sabah added 
	that no "body parts" appeared on scans of the belongings of seven passengers 
	of relevance to the case at Istanbul airport. Turkey has said Saudi 
	authorities gave officials the greenlight to search the consulate but it has 
	not yet taken place.
	'I shouldn't go' 
	As pressure increases on Washington to intervene on the issue, U.S. Defense 
	Secretary Jim Mattis said the U.S. was following the situation "very 
	closely."President Trump expressed concern about the case while U.S. 
	Secretary of State Mike Pompeo previously called for a thorough 
	investigation. In his last interview three days before his disappearance, 
	Khashoggi said that he did not think he would return to Saudi Arabia. "When 
	I hear of the arrest of a friend who did nothing that (deserved being) 
	arrested, it makes me feel I shouldn't go," he told the BBC.
	Reporters Without Borders (RSF), which ranks the kingdom 169th out of 180 on 
	its World Press Freedom Index, said in a statement between 25 and 30 
	professional and non-professional journalists are currently detained in 
	Saudi Arabia. RSF said at least 15 Saudi journalists and bloggers have been 
	arrested since September 2017.
	
	Qatar accused of ‘undermining Palestinian Authority’ 
	through fuel move
	Staff writer, Al Arabiya English/Wednesday, 10 October 2018/The Palestinian 
	Authority said that Qatar’s move of bringing in fuel to the Gaza Strip 
	without coordinating with Palestinian official authorities has “crossed all 
	red lines.”Trucks loaded with Qatari fuel began entering Gaza to supply a 
	power station amid completely ignoring the sovereignty of the Palestinian 
	national reconciliation government. The Palestinian Authority has often 
	warned of transforming the Palestinian cause into a mere humanitarian cause 
	in which the call for national rights is replaced with humanitarian aid. 
	These warnings, however, were ignored as Qatar decided to overlook the 
	Palestinian official stance and coordinated with Israel, UN departments and 
	Hamas in order to bring trucks loaded with fuel to Gaza. The Palestinian 
	Authority says the Qatari intervention undermines its efforts. "When Qatar 
	pays for the fuel, Hamas in Gaza will collect the bills and put it in its 
	pocket, and this is an indirect financial aid to Hamas," said a PA official, 
	speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to 
	reporters. Mahmoud al-Habbash, the Palestinian president’s consultant, said 
	those who want to serve the Palestinian cause must first help end divisions. 
	“We believe that those who want to help the Palestinian cause must first 
	help end the divisions and achieve a reconciliation. Any party that these 
	days seeks to provide financial support to Hamas is certainly working 
	against national interest,” Habbash said.
	
	
	Trump: Planned Kim Summit Narrowed Down to 'Three or Four' Locations
	Agence France Presse/Naharnet/October 10/18/US President 
	Donald Trump on Tuesday said that planning for his next summit with North 
	Korean leader Kim Jong Un is advanced and that "three or four locations" 
	have been short-listed. Trump said at the White House that the meeting would 
	"probably" not be in Singapore, where their historic first talks took place 
	in June. The pair discussed ending the reclusive state's nuclear weapons 
	program and hostilities between Washington and Pyongyang.
	Trump said that in terms of timing, the summit "won't be too far 
	away," later telling reporters it would take place after the November 6 
	midterm elections. He also said that there could "eventually" be a meeting 
	on US soil. "On their soil also," Trump added. US Secretary of State Mike 
	Pompeo met with Kim on Monday in Pyongyang to discuss the next summit. "I 
	returned late last night from North Korea from a trip where we made real 
	progress. While there is still a long way to go and much work to do, we can 
	now see a path to where we'll achieve the ultimate goal which is the full 
	and final verified denuclearization of North Korea," Pompeo told reporters 
	at the White House. "We will, in short order, be able to talk about when the 
	president will get to meet with him at what will be the second summit." 
	Trump talked of "incredible progress," hailing the absence of missile or 
	nuclear tests this year and the recent return of remains of US service 
	members killed during the Korean War. "You have no nuclear tests, you have 
	no rockets, and we have a very good relationship with Chairman Kim, which is 
	very important," Trump said.
	"I like him, he likes me, the relationship is good."
	
	Hurricane Michael Strengthens, Florida Panhandle Braces 
	for Worst in Decades
	Agence France Presse/Naharnet/October 10/18/Hurricane Michael 
	swelled to an 'extremely dangerous' category four storm as it rumbled toward 
	the Gulf Coast of Florida early Wednesday in what forecasters warned was an 
	unprecedented weather event for the area. The National Hurricane Center said 
	the storm is now packing maximum wind gusts of 130 mph (210 kilometers), 
	could grow even more and is expected to slam ashore later in the day along 
	the Florida Panhandle or Big Bend area as a "life-threatening event".As 
	outer rainbands from the storm began to lash the coast, the center said a 
	monster storm surge of up to 13 feet (four meters) is expected in some 
	areas. Separately, the National Weather Service office in the state capital 
	Tallahassee issued a dramatic appeal for people to comply with evacuation 
	orders. "Hurricane Michael is an unprecedented event and cannot be compared 
	to any of our previous events. Do not risk your life, leave NOW if you were 
	told to do so," it said. The hurricane was forecast to make landfall 
	somewhere along the Florida Panhandle -- a finger-shaped strip of land on 
	the Gulf of Mexico -- or the Big Bend, which connects the former to the 
	peninsula jutting south. The storm was expected to bring hurricane force 
	winds and heavy rainfall, the Miami-based NHC said. It will then move across 
	the southeastern US for another day or so as it heads toward the Atlantic. 
	The NWS office in Tallahassee said it had searched its historical database 
	for category four hurricanes -- the second highest level on the Saffir-Simpson 
	hurricane wind scale -- that made landfall in the panhandle and Big Bend and 
	found none. It posted a map of the coast on its tweeter feed. "This map says 
	it all -- it's BLANK -- this situation has NEVER happened before," the 
	office said. Governor Rick Scott has activated 2,500 members of the National 
	Guard and warned Michael could be the most destructive storm to hit the 
	Florida Panhandle in decades. President Donald 
	Trump issued an emergency declaration for the state, freeing up federal 
	funds for relief operations and providing the assistance of the Federal 
	Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). "It is imperative that you heed the 
	directions of your State and Local Officials. Please be prepared, be careful 
	and be SAFE!" Trump tweeted. State officials issued disaster declarations in 
	Alabama and Georgia, both of which are also expected to feel the impact from 
	the storm.As of 0600 GMT, Michael was about 180 miles (290 kilometers) south 
	of Panama City and moving north at 12 miles per hour (19 kph).
	Flash flood, tornado warnings 
	The NHC said some areas of the Florida coast could expect storm surges of 
	nine to 13 feet and as much as a foot of rain. The heavy rains could cause 
	flash floods, the NHC said, and spawn tornados in northwestern Florida. 
	About 120,000 residents were under mandatory evacuation orders in Bay County 
	in the panhandle, a low-lying area of beachfront resorts and retirement 
	communities. In other areas, residents of mobile homes were urged to leave.
	Michael was forecast to have the power to uproot trees, block roads 
	and knock out power for days when it hits Florida. It is expected to weaken 
	as it moves up into the southeastern United States. Drivers waited in long 
	lines at gas stations and residents hurried to fill sandbags, while tolls 
	were suspended on some roads to aid movement ahead of the storm's landfall.
	"Since 6:00 am it's been backed up. We're just now running out of 
	regular (gasoline)," Danny Hess, an employee at a gas station in Panama 
	City, told local WJHG television. The Carolinas 
	are still recovering from Hurricane Florence, which left dozens dead and is 
	estimated to have caused billions of dollars in damage last month. It made 
	landfall on the coast as a Category 1 hurricane on September 14 and drenched 
	some parts of the state with 40 inches of rain. Last year saw a string of 
	catastrophic storms batter the western Atlantic -- including Irma, Maria and 
	Harvey, which caused a record-equaling $125 billion in damage when it 
	flooded the Houston metropolitan area. Scientists have long warned that 
	global warming will make storms more destructive, and some say the evidence 
	for this may already be visible. At their most fearsome, these low-pressure 
	weather fronts pack more power than the energy released by the atomic bomb 
	that levelled Hiroshima.
 
	Turkey Says Heavy Arms 
	Pullout Completed in Syria's Idlib
	Agence France Presse/Naharnet/October 10/18/Turkey on 
	Wednesday said a planned buffer zone in the northwestern Syrian province of 
	Idlib has been cleared of heavy weapons as part of a deal reached between 
	Moscow and Ankara. "The pullout of heavy weapons from the de-militarized 
	zone was completed on October 10," the Turkish defense ministry said in a 
	statement. Turkish state media reported earlier this week that Syrian rebels 
	concluded their withdrawal of heavy armaments from the zone.
 
	
	
	The Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous 
	sources published 
	
	
	
	on
	
	
	
	October 10-11/18
	China’s 
	Got Its Own Swamp
	Michael Schuman/Bloomberg/October,10/18
	Beyond retaliating with more tariffs and ads in Iowa newspapers, Chinese 
	leaders have yet to devise a coherent strategy for contending with US 
	President Donald Trump’s escalating trade war. Perhaps they can’t figure out 
	what his divided and erratic administration actually wants. Or maybe they’re 
	so dead set on pursuing their own economic agenda that they just don’t care. 
	There may be another factor, too: President Xi Jinping and his closest 
	allies appear to be more isolated than their predecessors, and that may have 
	left them out-of-touch with what’s really happening in other countries, 
	including the US. That may be leading them to misread warning signs and 
	stumble into policy missteps, serious enough to threaten China’s larger 
	diplomatic agenda. Americans know all too well how such mistakes can happen. 
	They’ve coined the term “inside the Beltway” to describe how a self-absorbed 
	Washington can become dangerously disconnected from the outside world. Just 
	look at the disastrous consequences of US support of Iran’s Shah, or its 
	miscalculated invasion of Iraq -- both the result of horrible 
	misunderstandings of reality on the ground.
	In China, the political elite are similarly trapped inside the “ring roads,” 
	the thoroughfares that enclose the sprawling capital. They appear to have 
	been caught off guard by the severity of Trump’s trade war: The scant offers 
	Beijing made earlier this year to stave off tariffs showed how little 
	appreciation Chinese policymakers have of the growing ire among its trading 
	partners.
	Nor do they seem to have any plan to reverse the escalating resistance to 
	Xi’s most high-profile international initiative, the infrastructure-building 
	Belt and Road program. Xi characterizes the scheme as a selfless quest for 
	peace and development. By contrast, Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir 
	Mohamad, wary of the intentions of the Chinese program, warned recently of 
	“a new colonialism.”
	It’s not hard to figure out how Xi got himself into this mess. When 
	paramount leader Deng Xiaoping toured the US in 1979, he hung out at a Texas 
	rodeo, chomped on barbecue and endured assorted mispronunciations of his 
	name. It’s impossible to imagine Xi similarly cavorting with foreigners. On 
	the rare occasions Wang Qishan, China’s vice president and a top Xi adviser, 
	has emerged from hiding to meet foreign business and government leaders, 
	he’s often done more lecturing than listening and, according to the 
	Financial Times, struck his guests as somewhat oblivious to the darkening 
	attitude in America towards the Middle Kingdom. China’s Communists have 
	never been the most accessible bunch. But when capitalist reform began in 
	the 1980s, they actively sought out foreign ideas and advice as they strove 
	to remake their moribund economy. Now Chinese leaders, made (rightfully) 
	confident by their own success over the past four decades, are more and more 
	charting their own course. As Scott Kennedy, director of the Project on 
	Chinese Business and Political Economy at the Center for Strategic and 
	International Studies in Washington, D.C., notes: “China’s current leaders 
	now seem to think China has all the answers and that foreign experiences 
	offer less of a guide than in the past.”
	Adding to the problem is an ever-more stifling political environment. While 
	the authoritarian Chinese state never fostered free thinking, Deng did at 
	least encourage Party members to “emancipate the mind” and devise new ideas 
	to help the nation. Xi has instead imposed a climate that demands greater 
	ideological conformity and personal loyalty. His dismissal of term limits 
	means that subordinates have every incentive to tell him what he wants to 
	hear. As Bloomberg News recently reported, officials at one ministry spent 
	countless hours compiling documentation to prove they’ve been faithfully 
	following Party guidance. Such an atmosphere certainly doesn’t incentivize 
	mid-level officials to challenge policy orthodoxy, suggest alternatives or 
	bear bad news.
	The point isn’t that Chinese leaders should do what foreigners say. It’s 
	that an insulated leadership will struggle to achieve its superpower 
	ambitions. That’s most definitely one lesson Beijing can learn from 
	Washington, where an often-arrogant foreign policy, immune to outside 
	criticism, has gotten the US into all sorts of avoidable quagmires. If Xi 
	and his comrades don’t venture outside the ring roads more, they’ll never 
	escape their troubles.
	
	Italy Isn’t Like Greece. It’s Better and Worse.
	Mohamed El-Erian/Bloomberg/October,10/18
	After four successive days of increasing risk spreads, and after a prominent 
	politician, Claudio Borghi, said there was an advantage to having your “own 
	currency,” Italy is back squarely on both public and private radar screens 
	as a potential source of systemic economic and financial disruptions. This 
	has led to suggestions that the country could become “a new Greece.”While 
	there are similarities between the Italian and Greek cases, the differences 
	are big enough to suggest that investors in Italy should focus on a 
	different set of factors.
	In less than two weeks, the risk spread on 10-year Italian bonds has climbed 
	about 60 basis points to around 3 percent, a level not seen since 2014. This 
	has spilled over onto the equity market in Italy, and to a lesser extent, 
	elsewhere in Europe. It has also put pressure on the euro.
	The immediate trigger for the widening risk spreads was the government’s 
	announcement of a budget deficit target that exceeds the European Union’s 
	guideline. The gradual reduction in purchases of Italian bonds by the 
	European Central Bank is also an issue for some investors. But the deeper 
	contributors to the turmoil are the medium-term mix of high public debt, 
	some unsteady banks and persistently sluggish growth. Market worries have 
	been exacerbated by some unhelpful public remarks, and not just from 
	euroskeptic Italian politicians such as Borghi. European Commission 
	President Jean-Claude Juncker told a television interviewer that “We have to 
	do everything to avoid a new Greece — this time an Italy — crisis.”The 
	parallel with Greece of a few years ago is understandable. The two cases 
	share at least three important similarities.
	Mohamed A. El-Erian is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He is the chief 
	economic adviser at Allianz SE, the parent company of Pimco, where he served 
	as CEO and co-CIO. His books include “The Only Game in Town” and “When 
	Markets Collide.”
	After four successive days of increasing risk spreads, and after a prominent 
	politician, Claudio Borghi, said there was an advantage to having your “own 
	currency,” Italy is back squarely on both public and private radar screens 
	as a potential source of systemic economic and financial disruptions. This 
	has led to suggestions that the country could become “a new Greece.”
	While there are similarities between the Italian and Greek cases, the 
	differences are big enough to suggest that investors in Italy should focus 
	on a different set of factors. In less than two weeks, the risk spread on 
	10-year Italian bonds has climbed about 60 basis points to around 3 percent, 
	a level not seen since 2014. This has spilled over onto the equity market in 
	Italy, and to a lesser extent, elsewhere in Europe. It has also put pressure 
	on the euro. The immediate trigger for the widening risk spreads was the 
	government’s announcement of a budget deficit target that exceeds the 
	European Union’s guideline. The gradual reduction in purchases of Italian 
	bonds by the European Central Bank is also an issue for some investors. But 
	the deeper contributors to the turmoil are the medium-term mix of high 
	public debt, some unsteady banks and persistently sluggish growth. Market 
	worries have been exacerbated by some unhelpful public remarks, and not just 
	from euroskeptic Italian politicians such as Borghi. European Commission 
	President Jean-Claude Juncker told a television interviewer that “We have to 
	do everything to avoid a new Greece — this time an Italy — crisis.”
	The parallel with Greece of a few years ago is understandable. The two cases 
	share at least three important similarities.
	1- On debt: a fragile mix of sizable public liabilities relative to GDP, 
	lots of the related government bond issuance residing in the domestic 
	banking system and medium-term debt sustainability concerns. 2- On the real 
	economy: a growth model that has repeatedly failed to produce high and 
	inclusive prosperity.
	3- In politics: the emergence of anti-establishment movements that do not 
	shy away from politicizing the issue of the euro zone. Yet there are also 
	important differences suggesting different dynamics governing the extent of 
	the systemic threat in the two countries.
	Unlike Greece, Italy is one of the largest economies in Europe and an 
	original member of the European economic integration project. Because of its 
	size, its gross funding needs in euro terms are sizable relative to the 
	regional safety nets put in place to deal with troubled countries. As such, 
	a big problem with Italy would constitute a much larger and more durable 
	source of systemic risk, economically and financially. It is no exaggeration 
	to say that, if it were to stumble very badly, the southern European country 
	could present an existential threat for the euro zone.
	But also unlike Greece, Italy doesn’t have a current account deficit (it has 
	a surplus), and the average duration of its outstanding debt is longer. With 
	lower risk of financial default in the short term, the main determinant of 
	possible disruptions resides in dislocations originating from domestic and 
	regional politics. That is the most important factor for investors to 
	monitor closely. What ultimately saved Greece’s membership in the euro zone 
	a few years ago was the imminent threat of default. Fearing a shock that 
	would tip the economy into a multiyear depression and fundamentally alter 
	many of Greece’s regional economic and financial relationships, the Syriza 
	government opted for an orthodox approach, even though it had won both the 
	election and the referendum by backing a political agenda that advocated 
	doing the opposite.
	The hope of many investors — as well as EU officials, ECB officials and 
	several policy makers in European capitals — is that the Italian government 
	will perform a similar pivot, even though the immediate default risk is 
	lower. In doing so, Rome would need to design a more comprehensive program 
	aimed at generating high, inclusive and sustainable growth.
	
	Death or Life for Christian “Blasphemer”? Pakistan Ruling on Asia Bibi 
	Expected
	ريموند إبراهيم: من المتوقع صدرور حكم بالموت أو الحياة ضد المسيحية 
	الباكستانية اسيا بيبي المتهمة بالتجديف
	Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute/October 10/18 
	
	
	http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/68017/raymond-ibrahim-gatestone-institute-death-or-life-for-christian-blasphemer-pakistan-ruling-on-asia-bibi-expected-%d8%b1%d9%8a%d9%85%d9%88%d9%86%d8%af-%d8%a5%d8%a8%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%87/
	On October 9, Pakistan’s Supreme Court heard the final appeal 
	of a Christian woman who has been on death row for nearly a decade on the 
	accusation that she insulted Islam’s prophet Muhammad. The woman’s fate is 
	now sealed: “They [judges] have come to a decision, but it has been 
	reserved,” reported Mehwish Bhatti, an officer with the British-Pakistani 
	Christian Association, from the courthouse.
	Aasiya Noreen—better known as “Asia Bibi”—is a 47-year-old married mother of 
	five children who fell afoul of Pakistan’s notorious blasphemy law nearly a 
	decade ago.
	According to her autobiography, Blasphemy: A Memoir: Sentenced to Death Over 
	a Cup of Water, on June 14, 2009, she went to work picking berries in a 
	field. Although she was accustomed to being ostracized by the other female 
	pickers on account of her Christian faith, things came to a head when the 
	dehydrated woman drank water from a common well on that sweltering summer 
	day.
	“Don’t drink that water, it’s haram [forbidden]!” screamed a nearby woman, 
	before turning to the other dozen or so female workers and crying, “Listen, 
	all of you, this Christian has dirtied the water in the well by drinking 
	from our cup and dipping it back several times. Now the water is unclean and 
	we can’t drink it! Because of her!” (Such beliefs are not uncommon in the 
	Muslim world. In one video, an Egyptian cleric expresses his great disgust 
	for Christians, and how he could not drink from a cup that was merely 
	touched by a Christian.)
	The argument spiraled, and the women began calling on Bibi to convert to 
	Islam in order to save herself. “What did your Prophet Mohammed ever do to 
	save mankind?” the embattled woman shot back.
	A report summarizes what happened next: After this, Bibi said the women 
	started screaming, spitting at her and physically assaulting her. She ran 
	home in a fright. Less than a week later, she went fruit-picking in another 
	field when she was confronted by a rioting crowd, led by the woman who had 
	initially shouted at her.
	The crowd surrounded her, beat her and took her to the village, screaming: 
	“Death! Death to the Christian!”
	The village imam said: “I’ve been told you’ve insulted our Prophet. You know 
	what happens to anyone who attacks the holy Prophet Mohammed. You can redeem 
	yourself only by conversion or death.”
	She protested: “I haven’t done anything. Please, I beg you, I’ve done 
	nothing wrong.”
	Bibi was taken to the village police station, covered in blood, where police 
	interrogated her and put a report together. She was then put into a police 
	van and taken straight to prison.
	She has been in that cell ever since.
	Despite inconsistent witness testimonies, a Punjabi court fined and 
	sentenced her to death by hanging before cheering crowds in late 2010. Since 
	then,
	“I’ve been locked up, handcuffed and chained, banished from the world and 
	waiting to die,” says Bibi in her smuggled memoirs. “I don’t know how long 
	I’ve got left to live. Every time my cell door opens my heart beats faster. 
	My life is in God’s hands and I don’t know what’s going to happen to me. 
	It’s a brutal, cruel existence.”
	This is to say nothing of the sufferings of her husband and five children: 
	“I really love her and miss her presence. I cannot sleep at night as I miss 
	her,” her husband Ashiq Masih once explained: “I miss her smile; I miss 
	everything about her. She is my soulmate. I cannot see her in prison. It 
	breaks my heart. Life has been non-existent without her. … My children cry 
	for their mother, they are broken. But I try to give them hope where I can.”
	All of this for asking a rhetorical question—“What did your Prophet Mohammed 
	ever do to save mankind?”—variants of which non-Muslims have been asking for 
	centuries.
	In the late 1390s, for instance, Roman Emperor Manuel II Palaiologos 
	responded to a group of Muslim scholars bent on converting him to Islam by 
	saying, “Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will 
	find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the 
	sword the faith he preached.” Over 600 years later, in 2006, when Pope 
	Benedict passingly quoted this assertion, anti-Christian riots erupted 
	around the Muslim world, churches were burned, and an Italian nun who had 
	devoted her life to serving the sick and needy of Somalia was murdered 
	there.
	In Pakistan, however, such “vigilante justice” is unnecessary to avenge the 
	honor of Muhammad. According to Section 295-C of that nation’s penal code, 
	“Whoever by words, either spoken or written or by visible representation, or 
	by any imputation, innuendo, or insinuation, directly or indirectly, defiles 
	the sacred name of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) shall be 
	punished with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to 
	fine.”
	Because non-Muslims—particularly Christians, who by definition are known to 
	reject Muhammad’s prophecy—are more likely to be suspected of blasphemy, and 
	because the word of a Christian is not valid against the word of a Muslim, 
	blasphemy accusations by Muslims against Christians are common and routinely 
	result in the imprisoning, beating and even killing of Christians (as when 
	1,200 Muslims deliberately burned a young Christian couple to death in 2014 
	for allegedly insulting Islam).
	In other words, Asia Bibi’s story is the notorious tip of a large but hidden 
	iceberg. Seemingly not a month — sometimes not even a week — goes by in 
	Pakistan without some Muslims accusing some Christians of insulting 
	Muhammad, often just to settle a personal score (here, here, here, here, 
	here, here, here and here) or to seize land (here, here, here, and here). 
	These are followed by the usual riots, home- and church-burnings, beatings 
	and expulsion of Christians, and, finally, arrest and imprisonment of the 
	supposed “blasphemer.”
	Although Bibi’s case has sparked outrage around the international community, 
	all calls for her release have for a decade fallen on deaf ears. This is not 
	so much because the nation’s authorities are determined to execute her—one 
	infidel is surely not worth the world’s criticism and contempt—but because 
	excusing her in order to save face with the world would instantly make them 
	lose face with many of their own. That consideration is why, whenever there 
	is any serious talk that Bibi might be spared, protests and riots often 
	ensue. As Bibi’s husband once explained, “The Maulvis [clerics] want her 
	dead. They have announced a [monetary] prize … for anyone who kills Asia. 
	They have even declared that if the court acquits her they will ensure the 
	death sentence stands.”
	Authorities sympathetic to or siding with such “blasphemers” are also 
	targeted. For example, two of her prominent advocates, Governor Salmaan 
	Taseer and Minority Affairs Minister Shabaz Bhatti, were both assassinated 
	in 2011. Taseer was shot twenty-seven times by Mumtaz Qadri, his own 
	bodyguard. After the murder, more than 500 Muslim clerics voiced support for 
	Qadri, who was further showered with rose petals.
	This is arguably why Pakistani authorities continue to delay issuing a final 
	verdict—to give Bibi time to die “naturally” in jail (as not a few 
	Christians have under “mysterious” circumstances). Instead of placating the 
	world but angering Islamists by releasing her, or placating Islamists but 
	horrifying the world by executing her, the Pakistani judicial system 
	abandoned Bibi to a deathtrap of a jail cell for a decade, where wretched 
	conditions, severe maltreatment, unattended illnesses, psychological abuse 
	and beatings should have killed her, as they did many others before her.
	Much to their vexation, however, “She is psychologically, physically and 
	spiritually strong,” Bibi’s husband explained days ago. “Having a very 
	strong faith, she is ready and willing to die for Christ. She will never 
	convert to Islam.”
	In her memoirs, Bibi “wonder[s] whether being a Christian in Pakistan today 
	is not just a failing, or a mark against you, but actually a crime.” Her 
	question is finally about to be answered by Pakistan’s supreme court.
	“All around Pakistan and even many parts of the world, the sense of 
	anticipation . . . regarding Asia Bibi’s final appeal hearing are now at 
	fever pitch,” said Leighton Medley of the British-Pakistani Christian 
	Association concerning Bibi’s recent and final hearing. “There is a sense 
	here in Pakistan that once again, battle lines are being drawn: the battle 
	between those who support hatred and intolerance and those who fight for 
	peace and justice.”
	Accordingly, in the last few days, Christians around the world prayed and 
	fasted, even as extremist Muslims riled each other and called for riots on 
	social media, should the “blasphemer” escape death. Either way, “There will 
	be protests on both sides and you can bet there will be trouble ahead,” 
	continues Medley. “It truly is D-Day for Asia, this is the final countdown 
	and we will soon know whether the extremists win or lose. And whether there 
	will be peace and justice in Pakistan or just more hatred, prejudice and 
	intolerance which sadly has come to typify Pakistan today.”
	*Picture enclosed: Asia Bibi with two of her five children, prior to her 
	death row imprisonment for “blasphemy” in 2010.
	
	https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13114/pakistan-asia-bibi-appeal
	
	Why is the Qatari-Brotherhood media really interested 
	in the Khashoggi case?
	Mamdouh AlMuhaini/Al Arabiya/October 10/18
	The outpouring of grief from Al-Jazeera channel and Qatari and 
	Brotherhood-affiliated channels and websites over the disappearance of 
	journalist Jamal Khashoggi is not out of concern for journalism or freedom 
	of speech, as they claim, and is not out of concern for his safety. But it’s 
	only because he has a Saudi passport. They will 
	certainly act the same if Khashoggi were an Emirati, a Bahraini or an 
	Egyptian, i.e. from the countries that have boycotted Doha. It’s unlikely to 
	see this intensified coverage and organized campaign if Khashoggi had 
	another Arab nationality or any other foreign nationality.
	It’s possible to overcome this and believe this claim if Al-Jazeera, as well 
	as its affiliates, were well-known for moderation, concern over human 
	dignity and freedom of expression and maintaining people’s safety, but it 
	has done the complete opposite and adopted a cheap credibility that’s 
	stained with blood. It violated all professional values and ethical 
	standards when it transformed into an open platform to all extremists and 
	terrorists who committed and promoted massacres and later appeared with wide 
	smiles via its screens.
	It also sponsored the ideology of violence in an organized and planned 
	manner until it became the “Kaaba” to which extremists and hate preachers go 
	to from all over the world to perform pilgrimage. Takfirists’ speeches were 
	once limited to suspicious forums and pursued gatherings but now we see them 
	on Al-Jazeera channel during prime time. Al-Jazeera promotes their rhetoric 
	to the public in such an unprecedented manner and grants their violent 
	ideology wide intellectual and theoretical legitimacy.
	This Qatari-Brotherhood media turned Bin Laden into a TV star and broadcast 
	all his speeches without editing them or commenting on them to respond to 
	his dangerous propaganda and codes in every message and letter. It supported 
	him via anchors and commentators who sympathized with him and called him 
	Sheikh Osama at a time when al-Qaeda members were executing explosions in 
	Riyadh, Baghdad and other cities.
	It’s via its channel that we heard the most violent and bloodiest fatwas 
	such as the fatwa permitting suicide operations and which was issued by its 
	permanent guest Yusuf al-Qaradawi, and this became the favorite strategy of 
	terror groups which this media adopted from Al-Qaeda to Al-Nusra Front, the 
	terror group which the Qatari government sponsored and whose media colored 
	and rehabilitated.Qatari and Brotherhood-affiliated media are exploiting 
	Jamal Khashoggi’s name and politically abusing him not out of concern for 
	him or for journalism, but to serve the political aims of Doha.
	With the digital era and the wave of social media, we saw this huge 
	amount of news websites and flies on Twitter and users on Facebook who do 
	not only settle with promoting Al-Qaeda’s and the Brotherhood’s ideology of 
	violence but also attack those who fight it, whether individuals or 
	institutions, to break their will and tarnish their reputation.The most 
	important thing that other media institutions are doing is attempting to 
	provide professional journalism as much as possible and combat this bloody 
	rhetoric with a moderate and tolerant one instead of leaving the arena open 
	for these deceptive crocodiles.
	Cheap pawns of the Qatari machine
	We know that these malicious Qatari channels that promote this violent 
	rhetoric implement the wishes of Doha and the Brotherhood which are allied 
	together and which share the mutual interest that aims to destabilize 
	countries, spread chaos in them, topple them, replace them with the 
	extremist organization and expand the influence of the Qatari regime which 
	is paying billions to achieve this mad goal. Al-Jazeera and its channels are 
	mere cheap pawns of this machine. And now, the 
	disappearance case of Saudi journalist Khashoggi emerged. Of course it’s 
	worth media follow-up but what we’ve seen is an organized and planned 
	campaign that depends on unreliable sources, invents fake reports and 
	changes the story within hours from abduction to disappearance to murder 
	without referring to official sources regarding such a sensitive case.
	Of course, Al-Jazeera and other channels and websites are exploiting 
	Khashoggi’s name and politically abusing him not out of concern for him or 
	for journalism, but to serve the political aims of Doha. They are also 
	serving the extremists whose humanitarian and professional conscience only 
	awakens when the missing person is of a certain nationality, while going 
	into a deep sleep when the missing is a Qatari or Iranian, or from a country 
	whose regime is friendly to Doha.
	
	Tunisia’s Ennahda and the secret apparatus
	Mashari Althaydi/Al Arabiya/October 10/18
	On July 26, 2013, unidentified gunmen assassinated leftist Tunisian 
	politician Mohamed Brahmi, who opposes the Tunisian Brotherhood Ennahda 
	Movement. He was fatally shot in front of his house in Tunis. Few months 
	before that, Chokri Belaid, the official in the Popular Front and who also 
	opposed Ennahda and its government, was also killed.
	Who assassinated the two politicians who oppose Ennahda?
	Nothing is clear until now but the team defending the two victims dropped a 
	political bombshell when it revealed that Ennahda has a “secret apparatus” 
	that performs dark practices and that it’s the party which covered the 
	killers and hid documents. This is of course according to the defense team’s 
	statements.
	The team defending Brahmi and Belaid confirmed in a press conference that 
	Ennahda Movement has a special organization that’s linked to political 
	assassinations. The man who supervised the apparatus – the defense team 
	publicly stated his name – possessed documents linked to the assassination 
	of Brahmi and Belaid.The defense team confirmed that in December 2013 it 
	found documents in the place where the apparatus’ supervisor lived, and who, 
	by the way, is currently detained on accusations of manipulating with 
	documents.
	Commenting on these dangerous accusations, Sufian al-Sulaiti, a spokesman 
	for Tunisia's counter-terrorism apparatus, said: “The prosecution is 
	investigating the accusations made at the press conference of the defense 
	team of Brahmi and Belaid and about Ennahda Movement’s theft of files 
	related to their assassination.”We are waiting for the judiciary’s last word 
	in this regard. However, what is important is that this behavior, i.e. 
	acting in two different ways: apparent and vague, public and secret, soft 
	and hard and elusive and frank, is a characteristic of the old Brotherhood 
	traits as there are things that can be said to the “brothers” and things to 
	be said to others.
	It’s an old trait which source is religious preaching about the virtue of 
	“secrecy” and which is a result of the political and partisan atmosphere in 
	which the Brotherhood was born in the first half of the past century, and 
	which was the era of secret movements and militias par excellence in Egypt, 
	where there were the green and black shirts and the iron guard, and outside 
	Egypt in Lebanon and Iraq. All this is imported from the political European 
	culture especially Spain, Italy and of course Germany.
	Hence, it’s not strange if this is the case with the Tunisian Ennahda 
	Movement. As we said, the final word is for the Tunisian judiciary. We’re 
	here just ending this shock which some kind people may feel.
	In brief, there are always words said in public and other words said in 
	private, there is always what’s evident and what’s hidden and what’s public 
	and what’s secret. This is how they’ve been and this is how they will 
	remain. Those shocked must save their shock for what’s worth it!
	
	Israel's exilic existential anxiety
	Ynetnews/Aviad Kleinberg/October 10/18
	Op-ed: Israel's founding fathers hoped that when we have our own country, 
	where we can defend ourselves by ourselves, the existential anxiety that had 
	characterized us over 2,000 years of exile would disappear. But it hasn't. 
	Our hysterical treatment of BDS supporters is not strategic in nature, it's 
	psychological.
	Israeli society is living in internal contradiction. On the one hand, we 
	champion the "we don't care what others think about us" attitude. 
	Supposedly, as Ben-Gurion declared, "it's not important what the gentiles 
	say, it's important what the Jews do."
	The new Jew neglected his outward appearance, dismissed manners in the name 
	of the sacred Hebrew "dugri" (direct speech) attitude, and carried out 
	retaliatory actions that drew criticism in the world. Any attention to what 
	others think—on the way we dress, speak or run our country—is seen as 
	exilic, as an offensive symptom of that hyper-sensitivity to the gentiles. 
	The exilic Jew didn't want to cause antagonism, he wanted to be invited to 
	dinner by the neighbors, he was willing to adapt to the expectations of the 
	non-Jewish crowd. The new Jew doesn't need this. He's home, and at home he's 
	doing whatever he wants, and damn the neighbors.
	On the other hand, the new Jew is hyper-sensitive to what others say about 
	him. He would've liked—after the first moments of shock—the neighbors to 
	love him, appreciate him, follow his example. He wants to be a "Light unto 
	the Nations."
	This theoretical yearning is connected to something deeper than anxiety over 
	one's image. Armed from head to toe, protected by nuclear warheads 
	(according to foreign reports), no longer a servant with no rights, but an 
	over privileged master who has his own "Jews"—the new Jew has yet to 
	complete the mental recovery that Israel's founding fathers wished for. 
	After we returned to our land and established a sovereign state in it, they 
	hoped, after we once again became accustomed to being able to defend 
	ourselves by ourselves, the existential anxiety that characterized us over 
	the course of "2,000 years in exile" would disappear. The new Jew will get 
	rid of the nightmares of the old Jew, of the terror that was always hovering 
	over our very existence. Without this anxiety, which made the Jew constantly 
	vigilant so he could prepare himself in advance for the blow to come, we 
	would finally be "like all other nations."
	What does it mean to be "like all other nations"? That's a good question. It 
	appears it's not about becoming similar to them in customs or faith; the 
	State of Israel was established so we could be different without fear. Being 
	"like all other nations" means not to act out of the existential need to 
	please, but also not out of complete disregard to the world. To stop viewing 
	everything in the terms of "what will they say about us," but also not give 
	ourselves a general indulgence (a pardon) because of our chosenness or past 
	suffering. To listen to criticism without having to accept it right away, 
	but at the same time not automatically define it as anti-Semitic. To examine 
	our actions and the actions of our friends in their own right, based on the 
	principles of universal justice: whether—in the terms of philosopher 
	Immanuel Kant—we'd be willing to make our actions the norm. Meaning, are we 
	willing to be treated in the same way we've treated others? This process 
	hasn't happened. Under the Netanyahu governments, the exilic existential 
	anxiety has become the main characteristic of the Israeli. And if there's no 
	existential threat, there's no choice but to make one up.
	The most typical example of the Israeli anomaly is the hysterics over the 
	BDS Movement. This movement, which calls for boycott—full or partial—of 
	Israel, represents the margins of the margins. Most of the world's 
	governments have friendly relations with Israel. So what is the problem? In 
	some of the universities in the West, there are BDS groups that get little 
	support from their institutions.
	When you inquire about the achievements of the BDS movements, you are 
	presented with a list of entertainers who refused to perform in Israel. The 
	exalters of BDS also mention several academics who refused to come to Israel 
	and even—may the all-merciful protect us—won't write letters of 
	recommendation. How many of them? Let me tell you that in my three years as 
	the head of the History Department at Tel Aviv University, hundreds of 
	guests visited us. How many refusals did we receive, in a field that is 
	supposedly a breeding ground for bleeding heart liberals? You can count them 
	on one hand.
	How did the BDS Movement become an existential threat that justifies 
	unfounded conduct, like in the case of Lara Alqasem? The answer will not be 
	found in the field of strategy, but in psychology.
	
	‘Forever war’ in Afghanistan fading from Americans’ 
	memory
	Michael Kugelman/Arab News/October 10/18
	Sunday marked the 17th anniversary of the start of the war in Afghanistan. 
	The conflict has dragged on for so long that, very soon, America’s youngest 
	soldiers could be fighting in a war that began before they were born.
	Aside from a series of news articles, this 17-year milestone didn’t garner 
	much attention around the world. And that’s no surprise, given that few 
	people talk about the war in Afghanistan anymore. Not only is it a “forever 
	war,” it is also a forgotten war —particularly in America, which has 
	stationed troops in Afghanistan for nearly two decades.
	I recently came across one of the most sobering US public opinion polls I’ve 
	ever seen on Afghanistan. Back in July, a Rasmussen Reports survey found 
	that 20 percent of “likely US voters” did not think that America was still 
	at war in Afghanistan. And another 20 percent were not sure. This profound 
	lack of awareness prevails even as US troops continue to die — including 
	most recently a soldier on Oct. 4 — and billions of dollars continue to be 
	spent.
	It is easy to forget that, in its early weeks, the war made constant 
	headlines. The conflict, launched in October 2001 in order to avenge the 
	9/11 attacks, achieved its initial goals — eliminating sanctuaries for 
	Al-Qaeda and removing the group’s Taliban hosts from power — in relatively 
	short order. For most Americans, the war back then was easy to understand 
	and support. So what happened? How has it morphed from the good and 
	necessary war to the endless and forgotten war?
	Academics Tanisha M. Fazal and Sarah Kreps offered a convincing analysis in 
	an August essay in Foreign Affairs magazine. Americans are largely 
	disinterested, they wrote, because “the public is no longer directly 
	affected by the war legally, personally, and financially.” The conflict, 
	which had no formal declaration of war, is relatively informal and is thus 
	“easily normalized and even obscured from public view.” Additionally, the 
	lack of a draft means that most Americans have no personal link to the war.
	“Today’s public,” Fazal and Kreps wrote, “is more insulated from the human 
	costs of war than previous generations.” Finally, because of the lack of 
	financial costs directly tied to the war — such as the war taxes imposed 
	during the Vietnam War — its financial impact “is easily overlooked.”There’s 
	also a simpler reason why people don’t think or talk about the war: They 
	simply can’t process it anymore
	These are all valid explanations. But there’s also a simpler reason why 
	people, and particularly Americans, don’t think or talk about the war: They 
	simply can’t process it anymore, and feel a need to push it away.
	Consider how the dynamic of the war, and perceptions of it, have shifted 
	over the years. After those early objectives were achieved, US policymakers 
	became diverted by the need to prepare for the eventual intervention in Iraq 
	in 2003. Ever since then, successive American leaders have struggled to 
	articulate and justify exactly why the country’s military continues to stay 
	in Afghanistan. Justifying that endless military presence has grown more 
	difficult in recent years, as the war has taken a major turn for the worse. 
	Afghan casualty rates are soaring, and drug harvests — which fund the 
	insurgency — are breaking new records. The Taliban holds more territory than 
	at any time since US forces entered Afghanistan. And American troops 
	continue to die, albeit at a much slower rate than in previous years.
	Little wonder this is so hard for Americans to process. Their country is 
	fighting in and paying for a war with poorly defined objectives, which has 
	gone from bad to worse, and has no end in sight. Dominic Tierney, writing in 
	The Atlantic back in 2015, said it best: “Raising the topic of Afghanistan 
	these days is like mentioning mortality. There’s a profound desire to change 
	the subject.”The Pew Research Center released a survey last week that found 
	that about 50 percent of American adults believe the US has “mostly failed” 
	in achieving its goals in Afghanistan.
	Efforts are now afoot to try to launch a peace process with the Taliban to 
	bring a merciful end to a war that can’t be won on the battlefield. This 
	will be a hard sell to the insurgents, whose battlefield success gives them 
	little incentive to stop fighting. Perhaps, in due course, Washington and 
	Kabul will agree on a series of generous concessions that the Taliban can’t 
	refuse.
	However, getting the Taliban to say yes will take quite some time. It took 
	more than 50 years to negotiate an end to the insurgency in Colombia, a war 
	comparable in many ways to the one in Afghanistan.
	In all reality, the war will most likely go on to reach its most dramatic 
	milestone yet: Its 20th anniversary. And, sadly, few will likely be paying 
	any attention.
	**Michael Kugelman is deputy director of the Asia Program and senior 
	associate for South Asia at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for 
	Scholars. Twitter: @michaelkugelman
	Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do 
	not necessarily reflect Arab News' point-of-view
	
	Cooperation key to resolving issues between religions
	Peter Welby/Arab News/October 10/18
	The secretary general of the Muslim World League (MWL), Sheikh Mohammed bin 
	Abdul Karim Al-Issa, always has interesting things to say, and last week’s 
	MWL conference drove headlines on some important issues. Last Thursday, 
	before an audience of religious leaders and policy makers in New York, he 
	gave a speech that included a call for Christians, Muslims and Jews to 
	jointly visit Jerusalem, visit each other’s holy sites, and begin a new 
	approach to resolving the long-running Israel-Palestine conflict: A brave 
	religious initiative for a conflict focused on a religious city. 
	The conference was on “Cultural rapprochement between the Muslim world and 
	the US.” Being neither a US citizen, nor a Muslim, I’m not sure what I could 
	add by my presence, but I was nonetheless happy to be there, and to speak 
	myself, on the second day.
	Of course, cultural rapprochement between the Muslim World and the US 
	actually requires rapprochement across the West. Modern politics and 
	cultural movements are so interconnected, US politics cannot be considered 
	to be in a vacuum. The cultural memory that has led to such a distrust of 
	Islam in the US is shared across the Western world, both old and new. 
	As I prepared for my own speech at the conference, I came across an 
	interesting 2011 poll of Muslim attitudes in Muslim-majority countries 
	toward Westerners, and non-Muslim Westerners toward Muslims. It found that a 
	majority of Muslims regarded Westerners as greedy, immoral, violent, and 
	fanatical. No positive terms received over 50 percent. Meanwhile, majorities 
	in the West regarded Muslims as fanatical, violent and — just to mix things 
	up — honest.
	Such attitudes don’t arise from nothing. They are the legacy of 1,400 years 
	of rivalry around the Mediterranean. In North Africa, the bastion and 
	theological proving ground of the early Christian Church, though fatally 
	riven by schism, there remains only one church with a history predating the 
	Muslim conquest: That of the Copts. Jerusalem, a city sacred to the three 
	Abrahamic faiths, was surrendered by Patriarch Sophronius to Caliph Umar in 
	637, and the loss of which struck deeply at the Western Christian psyche, 
	with a direct link to the Crusades. The loss of Spain and the glorification 
	of what is known as the Reconquista; the fall of Constantinople and the 
	Eastern Roman Empire; the creeping conquest of the Ottomans in the Balkans 
	and Eastern Europe; and no list of rivalry between Christendom and Islam 
	would be complete without mentioning the Ottomans at the Gates of Vienna in 
	1683.
	This may seem like ancient history. The majority of people in the West won’t 
	be able to tell you about the defeat of the Ottoman armies in 1683 — but by 
	that time the European colonies in North America were well established. In 
	any case, the cultural impact of historical events last long beyond their 
	popular memory. And, however much the West secularizes and moves toward a 
	post-faith society, its attitudes and values are shaped by the legacy of 
	Christianity.
	Cultural memory can be changed through engagement. It is hard but necessary
	Cultural memory perpetuates hatred long after all reason is forgotten. That 
	cultural memory can be found in the deep suspicion of Islam in the West 
	today. History is a story of winners and losers: Victory or defeat does much 
	more to foster identity than examples of engagement.
	That is not a counsel of despair. A house, which takes months to build, can 
	burn down in an afternoon, but no one would suggest that is an argument 
	against building houses. Julius Caesar killed or enslaved at least 20 
	percent of the population of Gaul, but the history of cooperation between 
	Italy and France long ago expunged that memory. Cultural memory can be 
	changed through engagement. It is hard but necessary.
	Which brings us back to Al-Issa’s keynote speech. His agenda, apparent in 
	all of his work since his appointment as secretary general in 2016, is 
	cooperation in order to resolve some of the most pressing areas of distance 
	between the Islamic, Jewish and Christian worlds, as he put it, 
	“spiritually, politically, economically and culturally.”
	The most striking area in which he views an opportunity for cooperation is 
	in Jerusalem. He called for a “peace caravan” of Christians, Muslims and 
	Jews without political affiliation in the dispute to work together to bring 
	a new perspective on its resolution. These were significant words, and it is 
	right that they were noticed. But there are opportunities here to work with 
	those already seeking to do just that.
	The Patriarch of Jerusalem (the successor to Sophronius) is the acknowledged 
	“primus inter pares” (first among equals) of the Christian leaders in 
	Jerusalem, and treads a difficult line between Israeli and Palestinian 
	politics, as well as threats from extremists on both sides. His only concern 
	is that there should be peace, security, and protection for the Christians 
	of the Holy Land.
	Another such figure is Sheikh Abdullah bin Bayyah — mentioned in this column 
	previously — who, two years ago, set up an “American Caravan of Peace” to 
	bring together Christians, Muslims and Jews in the US to work together for 
	the common good.
	This concept is not one that we have heard previously from the MWL. But 
	then, its secretary general, as he outlined in a detailed interview in this 
	newspaper, is someone who is bringing fresh ideas to the table, suffused 
	with energy and vision. That vision should become a reality, working 
	together with others engaged in the field of building peace through 
	friendship and cooperation. It is much needed, and a requirement for 
	long-lasting reconciliation. 
	Peter Welby is a consultant on religion and global affairs, specializing in 
	the Arab world. Previously he was the managing editor of a think tank on 
	religious extremism, the Center on Religion & Geopolitics, and worked in 
	public affairs in the Arabian Gulf. He is based in London, and has lived in 
	Egypt and Yemen. Twitter: @pdcwelby