LCCC 
ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
March 01/2018 
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias 
Bejjani
 
The Bulletin's Link on the 
lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/newselias18/english.march01.18.htm
 
News Bulletin Achieves Since 
2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
 
	Bible 
	Quotations
	
	Go and tell 
	this people:“‘Be ever hearing, but never understanding; be ever seeing, but 
	never perceiving.’ Make the heart of this people calloused; make their ears 
	dull and close their eyes. Otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear 
	with their ears, understand with their hearts, and turn and be healed
	Isaiah06/01-13: "In the year that King 
	Uzziah died, I saw the Lord, high and exalted, seated on a throne; and the 
	train of his robe filled the temple. Above him were seraphim, each with six 
	wings: With two wings they covered their faces, with two they covered their 
	feet, and with two they were flying. 3 And they were calling to one another: 
	“Holy, holy, holy is the Lord Almighty; the whole earth is full of his 
	glory.” At the sound of their voices the doorposts and thresholds shook and 
	the temple was filled with smoke. “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I 
	am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my 
	eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.” Then one of the seraphim flew 
	to me with a live coal in his hand, which he had taken with tongs from the 
	altar. With it he touched my mouth and said, “See, this has touched your 
	lips; your guilt is taken away and your sin atoned for.”Then I heard the 
	voice of the Lord saying, “Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?”And I 
	said, “Here am I. Send me!” He said, “Go and tell this people:“‘Be ever 
	hearing, but never understanding; be ever seeing, but never perceiving.’ 
	Make the heart of this people calloused; make their ears dull and close 
	their eyes.Otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, 
	understand with their hearts, and turn and be healed.” Then I said, “For how 
	long, Lord?”And he answered: “Until the cities lie ruined and without 
	inhabitant, until the houses are left deserted and the fields ruined and 
	ravaged,  until the Lord has sent everyone far away and the land is utterly 
	forsaken. And though a tenth remains in the land,  it will again be laid 
	waste. But as the terebinth and oak leave stumps when they are cut down, so 
	the holy seed will be the stump in the land.”
	 
	Titles 
	For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources 
	published on March 01/18
	Congress Bill Urges Designation of Hezbollah as a 'Foreign Narcotics 
	Trafficker'/Joyce Karam/The National/February 28/18
	An international crime in Ghouta implemented by Russia, Iran/Ali Al-Amin/Asharq 
	Al Awsat/February 28/18
	In The Shadow Of U.S. Demands For Disarming Hizbullah And For Compromise In 
	Lebanon-Israel Border Conflicts, U.S. Secretary Of State Tillerson Is 
	Insulted In Lebanon Visit And Meetings Yield No Results/MEMRI/February 28/18
	U.N. report links North Korea to Syria’s chemical weapons program/Juliane 
	Helmhold/Jerusalem Post/February 28/18 
	Report: Images reveal new Iranian military base outside Damascus/Anna 
	Ahronheim/Jerusalem Post/February 28/18 
	Big Companies Are Getting a Chokehold on the Economy/Noah 
	Smith/Bloomberg/February 28/18 
	How Russia is using Syria as a military 'guinea pig'/Jerusalem Post/February 
	28/18 
	Europe's Telling Silence on Polish Anti-Semitism/Inna Rogatchi//Gatestone 
	Institute/February 28/18 
	Why Turkey Wants to Invade the Greek Islands/Uzay Bulut/Gatestone 
	Institute/February 28/18 
	Iran Is Trying to Avoid a Clash but May Surprise Israel/Ephraim Kam/Haaretz/ 
	February 28/18
	UNRWA and Oxfam: Scandal and politics hit humanitarian organizations/Emad 
	Eryan/Al Arabiya/February 28/18
	Saad Hariri and ‘Sophie’s World’/Mashari Althaydi/Al Arabiya/February 28/18
	
	Titles For Latest LCCC Lebanese Related News published on 
	March 01/18
	Congress Bill Urges Designation of Hezbollah as a 'Foreign Narcotics 
	Trafficker'
	Saudi Crown Prince Says Hariri in 'Better Position' Relative to Hizbullah
	Hariri Meets Saudi King in Riyadh for First Visit Since Strained Ties
	Aoun Says Won't Grant Amnesty to Persons Convicted of Soldiers' Murder
	Acting U.N. Special Coordinator Visits the Bekaa
	Berri Heard 'Very Positive Remarks' from Saudi Envoy
	Hizbullah Launches Syria War Video Game
	Jumblatt tackles situation with Lassen
	Sarraf, European Parliament delegation tackle general situation
	Kardel visits Bekaa, meets Syrian refugees in Qab Elias camp
	Foreign Ministry: Death of student Hisham Mrad ruled not homicide
	Hasbani chairs meeting of adhoc committee on 2018 draft state budget
	Geagea at graduation of LF political cadre: LF electoral candidates are 
	advocates of true change
	Army Chief welcomes official at Geneva Center for Control of Armed Forces
	Guidanian, Swiss Ambassador talk tourism exchange
	LAEC Confirms Canister Found in Ouzai Is Radioactive
	Lebanon PM Hariri meets with Saudi King Salman
	Lebanon's highest judge briefs Aoun on judicial conferences
	Aoun says will start investigating NGOs for special needs
	An international crime in Ghouta implemented by Russia, Iran
	In The Shadow Of U.S. Demands For Disarming Hizbullah And For Compromise In 
	Lebanon-Israel Border Conflicts, U.S. Secretary Of State Tillerson Is 
	Insulted In Lebanon Visit And Meetings Yield No Results
	
	Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And 
	News published on March 01/18
	U.N. report links North Korea to Syria’s chemical weapons program
	Report: Images reveal new Iranian military base outside Damascus
	Abbas’ Advisor Says No Palestinian State Can Be Established Without Gaza, 
	Jerusalem As Capital
	Aid Convoy Blocked in Syria despite U.N. Ceasefire Order
	Death Toll Tops 600 as Civilians Stay Put in Syria's Ghouta
	Afghan President Unveils Plan for Peace Talks with Taliban
	Theresa May: Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s Visit to Bolster Bilateral Ties
	Head of Khamenei’s guards mysteriously disappears, possibly arrested
	US, Britain, France, Germany condemn Iran, warn to stop arming Houthi 
	militia
	Assad media accuses opposition of faking Ghouta child injuries with forged 
	video
	US general: Washington cooperating with Riyadh to secure Bab el-Mandeb 
	navigation
	Arab Affairs High Follow-Up Committee Asks for European Mediation Before US 
	Reveals Peace Plan
	Jubeir Stresses Convergence of Arab, European Views Over Jerusalem, Peace 
	Process
	 
	
	
	Latest Lebanese Related News published 
	on 
	March 01/18
	Congress Bill Urges 
	Designation of Hezbollah as a 'Foreign Narcotics Trafficker'
أميركا: حزب الله أكبر شبكة للجريمة المنظمة بالعالم
	Joyce Karam/The National/February 28/18
	
	
	http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/62884
	The US Congress is considering a bill that will give President Donald Trump 
	the authority to designate Hezbollah “a significant foreign narcotics 
	trafficker" or "a transnational criminal organisation”. It comes less than 
	two months after the US Justice Department created the Hezbollah Financing 
	and Narcoterrorism Team (HFNT) to investigate the Lebanese movement’s 
	illicit activities. The bill, officially named the "Hezbollah Kingpin 
	Designation Act”, is now being considered by the House of Representatives 
	Foreign Affairs Committee, a spokesperson for Congressman Ted Budd who 
	authored the legislation told The National.Budd, a Republican, introduced 
	the bill — which has been co-sponsored by Republican Congressman Lee Zeldin 
	— on February 15. If passed it will require the president “to determine 
	whether Hezbollah should be designated as a significant foreign narcotics 
	trafficker or a transnational criminal organisation, and for other purposes” 
	within 120 days. Either designation by the president would lead to the 
	Lebanese militant group and political party facing further US sanctions.
	Both Congress and the Trump administration have ramped up pressure against 
	Hezbollah in the past year with several bills and Treasury Department 
	sanctions already targeting the movement. The bill references Hezbollah’s 
	alleged links to drug cartels in Latin America — which it says date back to 
	2010 — and cites evidence from the US's Drug Enforcement Administration and 
	its so-called “Project Cassandra” operation to identify the Iran-backed 
	movement “as a major supplier of cocaine into the United States”. According 
	to an investigation by the news site Politico last year, Project Cassandra 
	was launched in 2008 after the DEA amassed evidence that Hezbollah “was 
	collecting $1 billion a year from drug and weapons trafficking, money 
	laundering and other criminal activities”.
	Budd’s bill mentions the US indictment in 2011 of Ayman Saied Joumaa, a 
	Lebanese-Colombian dual national with ties to Hezbollah, and accuses the 
	movement of “using a global network of companies operating out of Latin 
	America, West Africa, and Lebanon to launder as much as $200,000,000 a month 
	in drug proceeds for Mexican and Colombian cartels”. The legislation will 
	also require the Treasury to issue a report to several congressional 
	committees within one year of the legislation being enacted “containing an 
	estimate of the total assets under direct or indirect control by 
	Hezbollah-linked leaders of political parties or movements who are located 
	in the United States”.
	Katherine Bauer, a former Treasury official and a fellow at the Washington 
	Institute for Near East Policy, told The National that if the bill passes 
	both chambers of Congress, “discussions will be ensued around the Kingpin 
	Act requirements, and information as well as evidence needs to be compiled 
	by the administration” to decide whether Hezbollah fits the categories of 
	either "a significant foreign narcotics trafficker" or "a transnational 
	criminal organisation". Since the "Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation 
	Act" was signed into law in 1999, almost 2,000 individuals and organisations 
	have been designated "significant foreign narcotics traffickers", allowing 
	the Treasury to freeze any assets held by the parties in US jurisdictions 
	and to prosecute Americans who help these parties handle their money.
	For Hezbollah to be designated under the so-called "Kingpin Act", however, 
	the Treasury would have to prove that the movement “materially assists in, 
	or provides financial or technological support for or to, or provides goods 
	or services in support of, the international narcotics trafficking 
	activities of a specially designated narcotics trafficker”, or that it 
	“owned, controlled, or directed by, or acts for or on behalf of, a specially 
	designated narcotics trafficker", or “plays a significant role in 
	international narcotics trafficking”. The president can designate Hezbollah 
	a transnational criminal organisation, meanwhile, if he deems it to be 
	either politically or economically destabilising to the US. Under a 
	programme that began in 2011, such designation is followed by the freezing 
	of assets and the prohibition of transactions with the entities or 
	individuals in question, as well as those who "have materially assisted, 
	sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for" 
	them. If the "Hezbollah Kingpin Designation Act” passes the House Foreign 
	Affairs committee, it will then go to a full vote in the House of 
	Representatives, followed by the Senate. Passage in all three would then 
	take the legislation to the desk of Trump who will then have 120 days to 
	consider the legislation. A spokesperson for the House Foreign Affairs 
	Committee contacted by The National said no information on when the body 
	will consider the bill was currently available.
 
	Saudi Crown Prince 
	Says Hariri in 'Better Position' Relative to Hizbullah
	Naharnet/February 
	28/18/Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman said in an interview to the 
	Washington Post on Wednesday that Prime Minister Saad Hariri is in a “better 
	position today” in Lebanon relative to Hizbullah. He said that he was 
	“unjustly” criticized for pressuring Hariri to resign in November. Adding 
	that the PM is “now in a better position in Lebanon."He did not elaborate on 
	the Lebanese situation. Hariri traveled to Saudi Arabia on Tuesday for the 
	first time since his resignation in the kingdom sparked a crisis. The 
	November 4 resignation and his prolonged stay in Saudi Arabia stirred 
	tensions between Riyadh and Beirut, amid suspicions he had been placed under 
	house arrest, until France intervened and he returned to Lebanon where the 
	announcement to quit was reversed. A source close to the prime minister said 
	he would hold talks with Saudi King Salman and the Crown Prince. On Monday, 
	Hariri received and accepted an invitation to visit Saudi Arabia during a 
	meeting with an envoy from the kingdom, Nizar al-Alula. Relations between 
	the two countries have been strained by the competing influences in Lebanon 
	of regional rivals Saudi Arabia and Iran.The Saudi envoy's visit comes ahead 
	of May 6 legislative elections, Lebanon's first since 2009 following three 
	extensions of parliament's mandate.
	
	Hariri Meets Saudi King in Riyadh for First Visit Since 
	Strained Ties
	Naharnet/February 28/18/Prime Minister Saad Hariri arrived in Riyadh at dawn 
	on Wednesday three months after his abrupt now-reversed resignation from the 
	capital. Hariri first met with Saudi King Salman bin Abdulaziz where talks 
	highlighted the bilateral relations between Lebanon and SA and the latest 
	developments in Lebanon, according to Hariri's media office. The Premier is 
	expected to hold talks later with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Hariri's 
	visit is likely to boost relations with his Saudi backers. Counselor at the 
	Royal Court, Nizar al-Alula, Saudi Embassy Charge d’Affaires Walid al-Bukhari 
	and Lebanon's ambassador to Saudi Arabia greeted Hariri at the airport. A 
	statement issued by Hariri's office on Tuesday said the PM left for Riyadh 
	at an invitation from Saudi King Salman that was delivered to him Monday by 
	Saudi royal envoy Nizar al-Aloula. The November 4 resignation and Hariri's 
	prolonged stay in Saudi Arabia stirred tensions between Riyadh and Beirut, 
	amid suspicions he had been placed under house arrest. France eventually 
	intervened and the premier returned to Lebanon where the resignation 
	announcement was reversed.
	
	Aoun Says Won't Grant Amnesty to Persons Convicted of 
	Soldiers' Murder
	Naharnet/February 28/18/President Michel Aoun on Wednesday told a delegation 
	from the families of Army martyrs that he would not sign any “general 
	amnesty law clearing persons convicted or yet to be convicted of soldiers' 
	murder,” the National News Agency reported.
	The government is weighing a general amnesty expected to come ahead of the 
	country's first parliamentary elections in ten years. The elections are 
	scheduled for May. Lebanon had one general amnesty after the end of the 
	civil war in 1990.
	
	Acting U.N. Special Coordinator Visits the Bekaa
	Naharnet/February 28/18/Acting U.N. Special Coordinator for Lebanon Pernille 
	Kardel on Wednesday visited the Bekaa and met with Syrian refugees at a 
	tented settlement in Qab Elias where she heard their accounts of the 
	challenges they faced, particularly those faced by women and youth, her 
	office said. She also interacted with Lebanese municipal authorities, 
	including the municipality of Qab Elias and the Union of Municipalities of 
	al-Bohaira, which includes the municipalities of Qaraoun, Aaitanit, Baaloul, 
	Saghbine, and Mashgharah. “I was impressed by the generosity I witnessed 
	from Lebanese host communities and municipalities eight years into the 
	Syrian conflict and it was moving to hear refugees’ stories, and their 
	expressed desire to return home,” said Kardel. The Acting Special 
	Coordinator added that until they can do so, the international community, 
	including through the upcoming conferences in Paris and Brussels, will 
	continue to offer necessary support and assistance. She said support for 
	refugees as well as stabilization projects to the host communities remained 
	a priority for the U.N. In Zahle, the U.N. official visited the Office of 
	the U.N. High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) and a UNHCR 
	registration/counselling center. She also visited the U.N. Development 
	Program (UNDP) office, and UNDP’s irrigation project in Qab Elias, sewage 
	treatment plant in Aaitanit and solar lighting systems in Qaraoun. 
	
	Berri Heard 'Very Positive Remarks' from Saudi Envoy
	Naharnet/February 28/18/Speaker Nabih Berri told lawmakers on Wednesday that 
	his meeting with Saudi royal envoy Nizar al-Aloula on Tuesday was 
	"characterized by a friendly atmosphere."MPs who attended the weekly Ain el-Tineh 
	meeting with Berri said the Speaker heard from al-Aloula "very positive 
	remarks about Lebanon and its historic and cultural role."Berri also noted 
	that the Saudi envoy will resume his meetings in Lebanon after returning 
	from the kingdom. Al-Aloula has returned home to follow up on Prime Minister 
	Saad Hariri's visit to Saudi Arabia. Al-Aloula on Tuesday had described 
	Berri as a "national leader who is a source of hope and optimism in 
	Lebanon."
	
	Hizbullah Launches Syria War Video Game
	Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 28/18/Sidling down the mean streets 
	of Syria with his rifle, he picks off his enemies relentlessly: Ahmed is the 
	hero of the video game that Hizbullah launched on Wednesday. The Shiite 
	armed group held a ceremony and news conference to unveil the latest 
	production of its electronic media department, which it named "Sacred 
	Defense - Protecting the Homeland And Holy Sites". "It reflects Hizbullah's 
	experience in Syria," Hassan Allam, one of the game's developers, told AFP. 
	With a life of 12 hours, the first-person shooter game is a low-cost spinoff 
	of bestseller "Call of Duty" that glorifies the group's battles in the 
	ongoing Syrian conflict. The scenario's introductory sequence has Ahmed in 
	plain clothes visiting the Sayyeda Zeinab shrine, one of the holiest sites 
	in Shiite Islam. The mausoleum comes under attack and Ahmed reappears 
	wearing a military uniform in a room whose walls bear a poster of Hizbullah 
	leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah. The game allows for a series of different 
	battles, including against the Islamic State jihadist group, in a variety of 
	different locations, including Syria's border with Lebanon. Hizbullah, which 
	is backed by Iran and is often considered to have more firepower than 
	Lebanon's own regular army, deployed fighters in Syria in 2013.
	'Real events' 
	They have since fought alongside the forces of President Bashar al-Assad, an 
	intervention widely seen as a major factor in the regime's survival. Two 
	years into the Syrian conflict, the Assad regime's grip on Damascus was 
	tenuous and its days looked numbered, but it has since regained significant 
	ground. "The idea took shape from real events on the ground, that took place 
	in Syria, at the Syrian-Lebanese border and in Lebanon itself," Allam 
	explained. The game, which will sell for $5 in gaming shops, is expected to 
	be particularly popular in Shiite-dominated areas such as Beirut's southern 
	suburbs, where the armed group's aura is immense. Allam said the aim was to 
	make players understand "what really happened and what the fighters who made 
	sacrifices were doing."Hizbullah has lost many hundreds of fighters, 
	including senior commanders, since it deployed some of its forces to Syria. 
	"To finish one level and move to the next, the player will suffer... He will 
	see how difficult it is for the resistance fighters," Allam said. The 
	battles a player has to win to complete the game include fighting in Qusayr 
	against rebel groups in 2013, Hizbullah's first major military victory in 
	Syria. "Sacred Defense" ends with the Ras Baalbek battle in Syria's 
	mountainous border region with Lebanon during which Hizbullah and Lebanese 
	Army troops fought on two separate fronts, which saw the jihadists defeated 
	in the summer of 2017. In a gamer room in southern Beirut among the first to 
	receive a copy, 25-year-old Hussein Mhanna is testing the new Hizbullah 
	product. "I don't know where the shooting is coming from," said the young 
	man, who is a video game fanatic but was stuck on level 2. "I loved it, I 
	wanted to shoot everybody."
	
	Jumblatt tackles situation with Lassen
	Wed 28 Feb 2018/NNA - President of the Democratic Gathering, MP Walid 
	Jumblatt, met at his residence in Clemenceau, with head of the European 
	Union Mission in Lebanon, Ambassador Christina Lassen, and tackled with her 
	the latest developments, according to a press release issued by the 
	Progressive Socialist Party media office.
	
	Sarraf, European Parliament delegation tackle general 
	situation
	Wed 28 Feb 2018/NNA - National Defense Minister Yaqoub Sarraf on Wednesday 
	welcomed at his ministerial office a delegation of the European Parliament, 
	with talks reportedly touching on the general situation in Lebanon and the 
	broad region. The visiting delegation listened to Minister Sarraf's 
	viewpoint on the overall situation especially concerning the displaced 
	Syrians' crisis and its impact on Lebanon's various sectors, notably the 
	social and economic spheres. The European parliamentary delegation also 
	listened to Minister Sarraf's standpoint regarding the recurrent Israeli 
	enemy's breach of Lebanese sovereignty and its allegations on oil block 
	ownership. The Minister stressed Lebanon's unequivocal rejection of any 
	attempt to tamper with Lebanon's rights and oil resources. Talks also dwelt 
	on the Ministry's present and future planned and future planned projects, 
	including the solar power generation project and a new military hospital. 
	The delegation promised to discuss means of providing assistance for the 
	implementation of a number of projects in Lebanon. The delegation also 
	visited several towns in the south of Lebanon, where they expressed 
	satisfaction regarding the security stability prevailing in the area. The 
	delegation hailed the efforts by the Lebanese army in cooperation with 
	UNIFIL to maintain such stability. The visiting parliamentary delegation 
	also heaped praise on the tasks carried out by the army, which proved its 
	high ability to control internal security and fortify the Lebanese borders 
	after the great victory it has achieved over the terrorist groups during the 
	Fajr Jouroud Battle. 
	
	Kardel visits Bekaa, meets Syrian refugees in Qab Elias camp
	Wed 28 Feb 2018/NNA - Acting UN Special Coordinator for Lebanon Pernille 
	Kardel today visited the Bekaa, in east Lebanon. She met with Syrian 
	refugees at a tented settlement in Qab Elias and heard their accounts of the 
	challenges they faced, particularly those faced by women and youth. She also 
	interacted with Lebanese municipal authorities, including the municipality 
	of Qab Elias and the Union of Municipalities of Al-Bohaira, which includes 
	the municipalities of Qaraoun, Aaitanit, Baaloul, Saghbine, and Mashgharah. 
	"I was impressed by the generosity I witnessed from Lebanese host 
	communities and municipalities eight years into the Syrian conflict and it 
	was moving to hear refugees' stories, and their expressed desire to return 
	home." The Acting Special Coordinator said that until they can do so, the 
	international community, including through the upcoming conferences in Paris 
	and Brussels, will continue to offer necessary support and assistance. She 
	said support for refugees as well as stabilization projects to the host 
	communities remained a priority for the UN. In Zahleh, she visited the 
	Office of the UN High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) and a UNHCR 
	registration/counselling center. She also visited the UN Development 
	Programme (UNDP) office, and UNDP's irrigation project in Qab Elias, sewage 
	treatment plant in Aaitanit and solar lighting systems in Qaraoun. 
	
	Foreign Ministry: Death of student Hisham Mrad ruled not homicide
	Wed 28 Feb 2018/NNA - The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates 
	announced in a statement issued this Wednesday that "Lebanon's consul 
	general in Marseille, Sonia Abu Azar, has reported that the police of the 
	city of Grenoble published their report on the death of Lebanese student 
	Hisham Salim Mrad, who reportedly fell off the balcony of his house," 
	assuring that the young man’s death was “not deemed a homicide."The ministry 
	called upon the media "to be careful and to make the necessary checks before 
	publishing any news, out of respect for the feelings of the family of the 
	deceased."
	
	Hasbani chairs meeting of adhoc committee on 2018 draft 
	state budget
	Wed 28 Feb 2018/NNA - Deputy Prime Minister, Ghassan Hasbani, on Wednesday 
	chaired at the Grand Serail the meeting of the Adhoc Committee to study 2018 
	draft state budget. The meeting was attended by Ministers Ali Hassan Khalil, 
	Mohammed Fneish, Oadis Guidanian, Raed Khoury and Youssef Fenianos, as well 
	as the Secretary General of the Council of Ministers, Fouad Fleifel. On 
	emerging, Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil described the meeting as 
	"fruitful" saying they finalized the budgets of several ministries, to hold 
	another meeting tomorrow to finalize the remaining ministries' budgets.
	Minister Khalil added that the meeting cut budget in certain aspects by more 
	than 20%.
	
	Geagea at graduation of LF political cadre: LF electoral candidates are 
	advocates of true change
	Wed 28 Feb 2018/NNA - Lebanese Forces (LF) leader Samir Geagea on Wednesday 
	stressed that the LF candidates running for the upcoming parliamentary 
	elections are true advocates of actual change and profound reforms. Geagea 
	was speaking at the fourth graduation ceremony of LF affiliated political 
	cadre held in Meerab, attended by the Party's central council members, 
	coordinators and heads of branches.On the 24th commemoration of the 1994 
	bombing of Saydet al-Najat Church, Geagea vehemently denied the LF's 
	connection to this bombing, saying that the authority at that time blamed 
	the LF for the bombing in order to cover up for the real perpetrators. 
	Geagea categorically refuted these accusations. Turning to the forthcoming 
	legislative elections, Geagea noted that the LF reputed candidates are true 
	promoters and advocates of true change and profound reforms, indicating that 
	the upcoming elections shall determine the course of the country in the next 
	four years. "Upcoming elections are very important since they are the key to 
	change," Geagea corroborated, urging citizens to vote for the competent 
	candidates who would best represent them at the Parliament. The LF leader 
	also highlighted Lebanon as an utter democratic country.
	
	Army Chief welcomes official at Geneva Center for Control of Armed Forces
	Wed 28 Feb 2018/NNA - Army Commander, General Joseph Aoun, received at his 
	office in Yarzeh the Head of the Middle East and North Africa office at the 
	Geneva Center for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, Arnold Leuthold, 
	accompanied by his deputy Ayman Ayoub, with talks touching on the general 
	situation and military issues of joint interest. The army commander also 
	received the head of the General Labor Confederation, Bechara al-Asmar, and 
	deliberated with him on various matter.
	
	Guidanian, Swiss Ambassador talk tourism exchange
	Wed 28 Feb 2018/NNA - Tourism Minister, Oadis Guidanian, on Wednesday 
	welcomed at his ministerial office Swiss Ambassador to Lebanon, Monika 
	Schmutz Kirg?z, with whom he discussed the bilateral ties between the two 
	countries notably at the tourism level. Ambassador Schmutz informed the 
	Minister of the number of Swiss tourists which exceeded 17,000 in 2017, with 
	a 15% growth. The Swiss Ambassador also anticipated the number to increase 
	this year. The pair agreed on steps to enhance means of bolstering touristic 
	exchange between the two countries. 
	
	LAEC Confirms Canister Found in Ouzai Is Radioactive
	Kataeb.org/Wednesday 28th February 2018/Head of the Lebanese Atomic Energy 
	Commission (LAEC), Dr. Bilal Nsouli, announced on Wednesday that the 
	canister found one day earlier on the Ouzai shore contains a radioactive 
	material that is usually used in the petroleum industry, assuring that no 
	radiation leakage had taken place. Speaking via Voice of Lebanon radio 
	station, Nsouli said that the commission has transferred the canister to its 
	laboratories to be safely preserved, while failing to determine where it 
	came from in the first place. A red canister with a "radioactive material" 
	label printed on it caused panic among local residents of the Beirut suburb 
	on Tuesday. Shortly after it had been found, security forces cordoned off 
	the area as the Army dispatched a team of experts to examine the canister. 
	The Daily Star newspaper quoted an Army source as suggesting that it must 
	have been washed up ashore after being thrown in the sea by some ship. 
	Environment Minister Tarek Al-Khatib, who headed to the beach where the 
	canister was found, requested that a probe would be launched into this 
	matter. Meanwhile, political and civil activist Imad Bazzi shared his 
	opinion on this issue, noting that his humble judgment stems from his 
	previous experience as a Greenpeace Media Officer and his work with the 
	United Nations mission in Libya. “This is not a gas canister, but a small 
	container for radioactive and waste materials, Type A,” Bazzi wrote on 
	Facebook, adding that what was found is the inner container of a radioactive 
	canister which is usually covered with lead, cement and materials that 
	absorb radiation and shocks. Bazzi warned of the threat that someone must 
	have smuggled these materials into Lebanon, decomposed it and dumped the 
	internal containment canister, noting that these containers are never 
	exported empty. “Anyone who may have touched the canister or got close to it 
	has to undergo immediate tests,” Bazzi alerted, pointing out that it is 
	impossible to clean these canisters from radioactive residues which cause 
	deadly cancers.
 
	Lebanon PM Hariri 
	meets with Saudi King Salman
	Staff writer, Al 
	Arabiya English/ Wednesday, 28 February 2018/Lebanese Prime Minister Saad 
	Hariri arrived in Riyadh on Wednesday and met with King Salman for the first 
	official visit to Saudi Arabia. According to a statement from his office, 
	Hariri was received at the airport by Saudi royal court advisor Nizar al-Aloula, 
	Advisor Waleed Abdullah Bukhari, Minister Plenipotentiary at the Foreign 
	Ministry, and Lebanese Ambassador to the Saudi Kingdom Fawzi Kabara. Hariri 
	is scheduled to meet during his visit, duration unannounced, with King 
	Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
	 
	Lebanon's highest 
	judge briefs Aoun on judicial conferences
	The Daily Star/February 28, 2018/BEIRUT: President Michel 
	Aoun Tuesday discussed the work of the judiciary with Higher Judicial 
	Council head Jean Fahed at the presidential palace in Baabda, a statement 
	from his office reported. Fahed briefed Aoun on his planned participation in 
	a conference in Senegal’s capital Dakar on March 1 and 2 that will deal with 
	the role of supreme judicial bodies in combating terrorism. He also spoke to 
	Aoun about his participation in the launch of the Global Judicial Integrity 
	Network, held in Vienna in April 9 and 10. Fahed was quoted as saying that 
	the Higher Judicial Council has fulfilled all of the steps aimed at 
	enhancing the integrity of judges, in line with the United Nations 
	Convention against Corruption. He also said the council would be holding 
	celebrations for the centennial of Lebanon’s Court of Cassation this year, 
	adding that the heads of Arab supreme courts and the heads of the highest 
	courts in francophone countries would be invited. Separately, Aoun later met 
	with Sidon MP Bahia Hariri, discussing the general situation in Lebanon, 
	Sidon and the south, the statement reported. The president also met with 
	Abdel-Halim Caracalla, who led a delegation from the Caracalla Dance Theatre 
	group to Baabda Palace. Aoun congratulated Caracalla on the group's success 
	as they were set to depart on a world tour including stops in China, France, 
	Britain and the United States, the statement said. “Lebanon is rich in its 
	artists, intellectuals and scientists. They are an image of a nation with 
	roots across the world,” Aoun was quoted as saying.
	
	Aoun says will start investigating NGOs for special needs
	The Daily Star/February 28, 2018/BEIRUT: President Michel 
	Aoun Wednesday said he has called for investigations over ‘fictional NGOs 
	and institutions” for the handicapped, which he said are benefiting from the 
	state funding at the expense of active institutions working in the field. 
	Aoun said there are currently a total of 340 organizations, among which 103 
	are concerned with the care and assistance of handicapped people. Although 
	263 organizations received financial support from the Ministry of Social 
	Affairs in 2017, Aoun said some of them were “made up and others are not 
	completing the required tasks.”The proposed investigations will look into 
	the status of all organizations and institutions attending to the 
	handicapped. It will also monitor the capacity of their work, in order to 
	designate the necessary support for them to receive. This, he said, will set 
	them apart from the fake institutions, as well as those that do not do any 
	work. “The situation won’t go on like it used to. I have asked to 
	investigate into the status of associations and institutions contracted with 
	the state Social Affairs Ministry.” Registered NGOs and organizations can 
	access annual state funding to assist with their work. The president assured 
	the community that attending to special needs and handicapped people and 
	paying attention to institutions that deal with them is one of his top 
	priorities. Aoun’s statements came during a meeting at Baabda Palace in the 
	afternoon with a delegation from the National Union of Disabled Associations 
	in Lebanon, which included representatives of institutions working with the 
	disabled in Lebanon and the Civil Service Council. “We hope that 
	strengthening the weak, integrating them into society and preserving their 
	dignity and social security are within the priorities [of the government]," 
	director of the Learning Center for the Deaf, Hussein Ismail, told Aoun 
	during the meeting. While Ismail expressed his gratitude to Aoun and his 
	government for interest in the community, he also criticized the pace of 
	actions taken by official bodies to assist vulnerable communities. Although 
	the Social affairs Ministry was cooperating with concerned ministries to 
	designate an annual budget for the rehabilitation and education of people 
	with disabilities and difficult social situations, there was a delay which 
	postponed its implementation, Ismail said. Speaking on behalf of the 
	handicapped community, Elie Touq said action is necessary “in order to keep 
	these institutions able to work and provide services to handicapped 
	people.”President Aoun also received the head of the World Federation of the 
	Deaf (WFD), Colin Allen, at the palace Wednesday.
	 
	An international crime 
	in Ghouta implemented by Russia, Iran
	علي الأمين/سوريا 
	وإيران يرتكبان جريمة دولية في الغوطة
	Ali Al-Amin/Asharq Al 
	Awsat/February 28/18
	
	
	http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/62882
	United Nations Resolution 2401, which calls 
	for an immediate ceasefire in Eastern Ghouta and which does not apply to 
	terrorists as it gives permission to shoot, besiege and starve them, is 
	nothing but a mere deceptive decision. In fact, it does not include any 
	details regarding the cessation of military operations or, to be more 
	accurate, about the annihilation of half-a-million Syrian citizen residing 
	in this eastern suburb of Damascus.The resolution calls for an ambiguous 
	30-day ceasefire. However, the Syrian regime’s military forces and its 
	allies saw no harm in targeting civilians by using chlorine gas the very 
	next day the UN resolution was supposedly adopted (24 February 2018). This 
	reflects the extent to which the regime and its allies, Iran and Russia, are 
	willing to go in order to commit genocide while being aware that killing 
	Syrian civilians will not cause a stir in Arab or Western governments.
	Over the past seven years, hundreds of thousands have fallen victim to this 
	alliance. Ever since the regime used chemical weapons in Eastern Ghouta in 
	2013 and was not subjected to any international sanctions, it – along with 
	its allies – realized that there are no international ‘red lines’ they 
	cannot breach to carry out massacres and displace populations.
	The annihilation and displacement of populations is the task which the 
	sectarian regime in Syria wants to accomplish. The secularism claimed by the 
	Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party is merely a facade used for the Alawite minority 
	rule and to commit these grave massacre Arabs have ever witnessed against 
	their own people. Today, Syria might be paying the price for some countries’ 
	stubbornness to get the Syrian tragedy which the Palestinians suffered from 
	due to occupation, displacement and the revocation of identity. Indeed, the 
	international silence over the on-going Syrian bloodshed, which started 
	seven years ago, reflects a policy that unleashes the regime’s monstrosity 
	in order to carry out a maximum number of organized crimes. This stripped 
	the Syrian people, who seek a reasonable amount of freedom and a right to 
	participate in determining the state policies, of international protection. 
	It has even pushed them to give up their human identity, either by 
	succumbing to the regime’s barbarity or being dragged into the madness which 
	the regime uses to conceal – even if partially – some of its past and 
	present crimes against its own people. Given this vicious equation, the 
	regional and international vanguard has become a tool for the partition of 
	influence at the expense of Syrian blood. Axis of the Resistance has simply 
	opened the way for Israel toward Syria which was once called the beating 
	heart of Arabism
	Conspiracy of the Axis of Resistance
	The savagery of the regime, to purge Syria of its people either via murder 
	or displacement, is the reason behind its survival and the source of its 
	regional and international protection. For seven years now, the regime did 
	not feel this brutal task against its own people threatens its existence. 
	This task is rather the very basis for its existence and continuity. What 
	Syria has witnessed over the last few years is a regional and international 
	operation to destroy the Syrian society. This task has been carried out by 
	the so-called ‘Axis of Resistance’ which has resorted to all its sectarian 
	ideologies to engage in this mission. One can further note Iranian and even 
	Russian influence in Syria – via establishing military bases and dominance 
	over large Syrian areas – was conditional upon displacing inhabitants by 
	making living conditions insufferable due to the killings and massacres. In 
	fact, regions under Iranian influence in Syria are the ones whose occupants 
	were subjected to killing and displacement particularly in the areas 
	extending over Damascus and its suburbs, Homs and its countryside and areas 
	between Damascus and the eastern and northern Lebanese borders, as well as 
	the Syrian south and Dera’a.
	Ghouta is the last stronghold of the region that has escaped the influence 
	of Iran, Russia and the regime in Damascus and its adjoining areas. Thus, 
	the decision to target Ghouta by Iranian militias and regime forces aided by 
	Russian air cover is irreversible. The destructive tendency adopted by the 
	regime and its allies aims to destroy living conditions in these areas and 
	displace the maximum number of inhabitants who embraced the revolution 
	against the regime like the case was in Darayya and Yarmouk. The policy of 
	displacement and demographic change is still ongoing and it has met no form 
	of international objection. This shows that the machine of murder and 
	sectarian cleansing is somehow not objected to or there is rather silence 
	over a crime Assad, Iran and Russia volunteered to commit considering it’s a 
	filthy task which influential countries are not willing to directly stain 
	their hands with. Furthermore, the depravity of the Axis of the Resistance 
	has extended to the attempt of covering crimes perpetrated in Ghouta under 
	anti-Israeli slogans. As if Israel will be harmed if the Syrian people are 
	displaced and murdered! The Syrian people are thus well-aware that the Axis 
	of the Resistance’s increased murderous and destructive acts in Syria serve 
	a strategic task to turn the page of hostility towards Israel.
	Unspeakable tragedy
	The Syrian population, who has suffered an unspeakable tragedy under the 
	banner of a so-called American and Israeli resentment and whom Russian 
	planes shell its children and Iranians shell its cities in the name of 
	liberating Jerusalem, is a witness to how the Assad ravaged the country 
	under the false pretense of hostility against Israel. All this will 
	certainly have strategic results on the future of enmity towards Israel. The 
	Axis of the Resistance has simply opened the way for Israel toward Syria 
	which was once called the beating heart of Arabism. Ghouta is just a detail. 
	The recent international resolution shows that the policy of killing, 
	destruction and displacement will continue in favor of the regime of tyranny 
	and resistance. The decision to destroy al-Ghouta will not stop, as long as 
	the political and strategic results are in Iran’s favor and within Russia’s 
	control and as long as they guarantee Israel’s stability on the long run and 
	as long as Washington is reassured that all these parties, including Turkey, 
	will not guarantee their shares without American legitimacy. The only real 
	victim, which is paradoxically absent from this melee is the Syrian people. 
	They are absent from all the policies that shape Syria’s future but is 
	present front and center as the victim that daily suffers the slaughter of 
	Syria and its future.
 
	In The Shadow Of U.S. 
	Demands For Disarming Hizbullah And For Compromise In Lebanon-Israel Border 
	Conflicts, U.S. Secretary Of State Tillerson Is Insulted In Lebanon Visit 
	And Meetings Yield No Results
	MEMRI/February 28, 2018
	
	
	http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/62872
	On February 15, 2018, U.S. Secretary of 
	State Rex Tillerson arrived in Lebanon for an hours-long stopover, as part 
	of his Middle East tour that included Turkey, Jordan, Lebanon, Kuwait, and 
	Egypt. During his visit, he met with Lebanese President Michel 'Aoun, Prime 
	Minister Sa'd Al-Hariri, Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil, and parliamentary 
	speaker Nabih Berri. Tillerson's treatment in Lebanon was insulting; he was 
	met at the airport by the Foreign Ministry's director of ceremonies, not by 
	Foreign Minister Bassil, and, after arriving at the presidential palace for 
	his meeting with President 'Aoun and Minister Bassil, he was kept waiting 
	for several minutes until they arrived – and in the meeting hall the 
	American flag was not displayed alongside the Lebanese flag.
	The nature of Tillerson's reception may have been connected to the American 
	demands that he brought with him in the matter of disarming Hizbullah and in 
	the matter of the Lebanon-Israel dispute over gas drilling rights in the 
	Mediterranean. These demands had been raised with the Lebanese several days 
	previously by U.S. Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Near Eastern 
	Affairs David Satterfield.
	Throughout his Middle East tour, Tillerson expressed conflicting positions 
	vis-à-vis Hizbullah. The day before his Lebanon visit, he said, at a press 
	conference in Amman, Jordan, that the reality of Hizbullah as part of the 
	political process in Lebanon should be acknowledged. However, the next day, 
	at the conclusion of his Lebanon visit, he clarified that the U.S. sees 
	Hizbullah as a terrorist organization and does not differentiate between its 
	political and military wings.
	This report will review Tillerson's Lebanon visit, statements he made, 
	demands he presented, and how he was received by the Lebanese leadership.
	Tillerson In Amman, Before Arriving In Lebanon: We Must Recognize The Fact 
	That Hizbullah Is A Political Power In Lebanon
	At a February 14, 2018 press conference in Amman, Jordan with his Jordanian 
	counterpart Ayman Al-Safadi, Tillerson discussed Hizbullah and its 
	participation in Lebanese political life. In answer to a question about the 
	anxiety over Hizbullah's increasing influence in Lebanon, he said: "We 
	support a free, democratic Lebanon free of influence of others, and we know 
	that Lebanese Hizbullah is influenced by Iran. This is influence that we 
	think is unhelpful in Lebanon’s long-term future. We also have to 
	acknowledge the reality that they also are part of the political process in 
	Lebanon. I think Lebanon is taking positive steps with their law on 
	disassociation[1] that was passed last year to send a signal as to their 
	view that they do not want to see any of Lebanese Hizbullah involved in 
	foreign conflicts and have asked that they bring all of their people back 
	from the conflict in Yemen.
	So I think it’s a long process... We support strengthening the LAF, the 
	Lebanese Armed Forces, so that there is a legitimate security force under 
	full control of the Government of Lebanon..."[2]
	Tillerson's statement that the reality of Hizbullah as part of the political 
	process in Lebanon must be acknowledged provoked the anger of several Arab 
	and Lebanese writers, who saw it as a softening of the American position 
	toward Hizbullah, which the U.S. designated a terror organization in 1990.
	For example, Lebanese Shi'ite journalist Nadim Koteich, known for his 
	opposition to Hizbullah, wrote in the London-based Al-Sharq Al-Awsat daily: 
	"Before he arrived in Beirut, U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson 
	announced that 'Hizbullah is part of the political process' in Lebanon. This 
	declaration is formally correct. The Hizbullah militia is a parliamentary 
	faction and its ministers are in the government and it has officials in the 
	government, mayors, and more. However, what Tillerson and others are missing 
	is the fact that this militia is not a political force of the political 
	arena so much as a security and military force in the political arena. At 
	least since 2005, since the assassination of [former] prime minister Rafiq 
	Al-Hariri, Hizbullah has been leveraging its security and military 
	capabilities to attain political achievements... with the goal of taking 
	control of the country, its institutions, its discourse, and its politics, 
	and in order to exploit this control for Iran's grand plan. The truth is 
	that it is more accurate [to say that] the Hizbullah militia is affiliated 
	with the Iranian plan than that it is affiliated with Lebanese political 
	activity, as Tillerson said..."[3] 
	Lebanese Hizbullah-Affiliated Daily Al-Akhbar: Tillerson Was Kept Waiting 
	For Five Minutes For The President, And The Lebanese Prime Minister 
	Deliberately Turned His Back On Him
	Even though Tillerson appeared to have softened his tone vis-à-vis Hizbullah, 
	he was humiliated by top Lebanese officials during his February 15 visit. 
	First, as noted, he was not received at the airport by Foreign Minister 
	Bassil, but by the Foreign Ministry's director of ceremonies; the latter 
	also saw him off at the airport at the conclusion of his visit. The low 
	point was when he came to the presidential palace to meet with President 
	Aoun and Foreign Minister Bassil, and was forced to wait several minutes 
	until they arrived. During the meeting with them, the American flag was 
	missing. Later, the presidential spokesman explained that the president had 
	not arrived late, but that Tillerson had arrived early.[4]
	Tillerson waits for President Aoun, with no American flag (Source: Al-Akhbar, 
	Lebanon, February 16, 2018. 
	The Hizbullah-affiliated Al-Akhbar daily published an article touting the 
	insulting treatment of Tillerson during his brief visit to Lebanon, and 
	stating that this set a precedent in U.S.-Lebanon relations, as Lebanon was 
	unwilling to submit to U.S. dictates. It stated:
	"[Upon his arrival at the Beirut airport], the American secretary of state 
	found no head of state, minister, or ministry director-general to receive 
	him. He arrived yesterday morning around 9:50 AM, and found on the ground at 
	the Beirut airport, next to the steps of the private American plane, the 
	Foreign Ministry's director of ceremonies, Assaf Dhomat, and U.S. Ambassador 
	Elizabeth Richard, who accompanied her guest in the motorcade of the U.S. 
	Embassy, which made its way directly to the presidential palace at Baabda. 
	Next to the outside door of the palace, Tillerson and his delegation found 
	the presidential palace's director of ceremonies, Dr. Nabil Shadid, who 
	greeted him. The American guest entered the palace, under the lenses of the 
	media – some of which broadcast this 'reception' live.
	"Tillerson entered the ambassadorial hall, and shook hands with the people 
	who there to receive him, that is, the members of the Lebanese delegation 
	who participated in the official talks [with him]: presidential office 
	general director Dr. Antoine Shaqir, general security secretary-general 
	Abbas Ibrahim, [presidential] advisors Mireille 'Aoun Al-Hashem, Paul Matar, 
	and Charbel Wahba, director of the foreign minister's office Hadi Hashem, 
	and presidential spokesman Rafiq Shalala.
	"[But] where are the president of the country, Michel 'Aoun and Foreign 
	Minister Gebran Bassil? That is the question that Tillerson's companions 
	silently asked themselves again and again, as [Tillerson] stood before the 
	chair set out for him, looking to the right and the left as he waited for 
	either 'Aoun or Bassil. Both sides were embarrassed. Suddenly, Tillerson 
	decided to sit down. He took a bundle of papers out of his jacket pocket, 
	read them, put them back, smiled all around and for the cameras and those 
	present, and waited. The waiting grew heavy. After five minutes, his 
	Lebanese counterpart Gebran Bassil entered at a fast clip from the main 
	door, his jacket unbuttoned, and shook his hand. A few seconds later, Aoun 
	came in through the side door separating his office from the ambassadorial 
	hall, and shook Tillerson's hand – but it was noticeable that he did not 
	shake the hands of the members of the American delegation... The doors of 
	the hall closed, and the talks began. Half an hour later, the American guest 
	left, after writing a few words in the guest book. After meeting with his 
	counterpart [Tillerson], Gebran Bassil deliberately turned his back on him 
	and went to joke around with the journalists. And again, the director of 
	ceremonies, Nabil Shadid, was in charge of [bringing] the American guest to 
	the outer door of the palace and bidding him farewell.
	"After the American delegation left Beirut, there was a media uproar. Some 
	rebuked the U.S. Ambassador for poorly coordinating [the visit] with the 
	Lebanese [director of] ceremonies. The embassy replied that what had 
	happened [with Tillerson] at the presidential palace was only a small 
	example of what happens at the [Lebanese] foreign ministry on a daily basis 
	with most of the [foreign] guests and ambassadors, and that things are so 
	[bad] that Ambassador Elizabeth Richard recently decided not to visit the 
	foreign ministry unless officially summoned or dispatched there by her 
	country.
	"[So] what was the reason for the president's behavior? One of his advisors 
	says that, during his visit to New York last year to attend the United 
	Nations General Assembly, 'Aoun expressed displeasure about the 
	'difficulties' that had accompanied the reception held by the American 
	President for the [foreign] presidents attending the General Assembly. 'Aoun 
	did not attend the reception, [citing] 'a meeting with members of the 
	Lebanese community in New York.' Others claimed that his behavior was meant 
	to protest the fact that the Americans have not extended him an official 
	invitation to visit the U.S. As for the official sources, they treated the 
	affair as routine, explaining that 'Tillerson was [simply] early to arrive 
	at the palace. Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil was caught up in traffic and 
	the President entered the hall precisely on time.'
	"Despite this, the incident constitutes a precedent in Lebanon-U.S. 
	relations. [Tillerson's] was the first visit by an American secretary of 
	state to Lebanon in four years. The last [secretary of state] to visit was 
	John Kerry, who came during the period Lebanon had no president. During the 
	term of [former president] Michel Suleiman, relations were normal. And 
	during the term of [former president] Emile Lahoud, the Americans were 
	appalled when he hung up the phone on [then U.S.] secretary of state 
	Madeleine Albright. In his [biography], Lahoud wrote that, in May 2000, on 
	the eve of the liberation [i.e., Israel's withdrawal from South Lebanon], 
	his daily phone call with the American secretary of state lasted five hours; 
	it was their last phone conversation. She called him that night, and when 
	the argument between them became heated, she said to him: 'Do you realize 
	who you are speaking to? You are speaking to the U.S. secretary of state. Do 
	you know what that means, Mr. Lahoud?' Lahoud writes that he replied at 
	once, 'It means that it is five in the morning. I am sleepy and want to go 
	to bed,' and hung up on her."[5] 
	Lebanese Officials Refuse Tillerson's Demands
	According to the Lebanese press, in his meetings with top Lebanese 
	officials, Tillerson discussed several issues and presented a number of 
	demands, which had already been presented to these officials by his 
	assistant David Satterfield, who had prepared the visit. Chief among the 
	issues discussed were a proposal for settling the disputes with Israel over 
	the two countries' shared land and maritime borders; Hizbullah's disarmament 
	and withdrawal from Syria, and the drying up of this organization's sources 
	of funding; the preservation of calm on the Israeli border, and the 
	continued U.S. aid for the Lebanese military.[6]
	The Lebanese press reported that the officials refused all of Tillerson's 
	demands. In the matter of the maritime border with Israel, Tillerson 
	reportedly reiterated the proposal already presented to the Lebanese by U.S. 
	diplomat Fredric Hof: to divide Block 9 (the offshore area in dispute) 
	between the two countries so that Lebanon receives 60% of the territory and 
	Israel 40%, but the Lebanese once again rejected the proposal. According to 
	the Al-Akhbar daily, Foreign Minister Bassil told Tillerson that this 
	proposal was "unacceptable to Lebanon."[7] 
	The reports claimed further that the Lebanese officials also rejected 
	Tillerson's demands to disarm Hizbullah and end its military involvement in 
	Syria. 'Aoun told him that "the role of the resistance's weapons will end 
	when a just and comprehensive peace [with Israel] prevails and all the 
	refugees return to their homes." As for Hizbullah's involvement in Syria, he 
	said that it was part of the war on terror, which transcends the narrow 
	interests of Lebanon, and added: "The more the peace efforts on the Syrian 
	front and in the region advance, the more the situation in Lebanon and the 
	area will improve, and [eventually] there will be no more need for weapons 
	and they will be replaced by the language of dialogue."[8]
	According to Al-Akhbar, Parliamentary Speaker Nabih Berri said that 
	Tillerson had spoken to him at length about Hizbullah, and he had replied 
	that Israel was an enemy occupying Lebanese land and this justified popular 
	resistance against it. Berri also told Tillerson: "We cannot not remain 
	silent in light of Israel's attacks on us. That is why the resistance took 
	up arms to defend our land."[9] 
	Hizbullah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah likewise rejected the 
	suggestions presented by Tillerson and his assistant Satterfield, on the 
	grounds that the Americans were trying to safeguard Israel's interests at 
	the expense of Lebanon's. He said: "We must realize that the main dispute 
	[with Israel] today is not about the land borders. That issue is easy to 
	resolve. [The main dispute is over] the maritime border and the economic 
	waters. The Americans and others want to give us [the land] to which we are 
	entitled... in the disputed areas along the land border, and in return 
	deprive us of our rights... in the sea, [rights pertaining to] oil, and we 
	must be alert to this." It is very important, he added, "that the state, and 
	with it the Lebanese people, address this issue from a position of strength, 
	not weakness. If the Lebanese think of themselves as weak, they will begin 
	to grow weak, and we will lose the battle...We must negotiate [from a 
	position of] strength... The only strength you Lebanese possess in this 
	battle for the gas and oil [in the sea] is the resistance [i.e., Hizbullah 
	and its weapons], because the Lebanese military is not allowed to have 
	surface-to-surface, surface-to-air or surface-to-sea missiles... for the 
	Americans forbid this... [But, thanks to Hizbullah,] today Lebanon and every 
	Lebanese can say [to Israel]: no way! Hold back! If you want to deprive us 
	[of our oil and gas], we will prevent you [from having them]. If you bomb 
	us, we will bomb you. If you attack us, we will attack you... We expect the 
	state and its powerful [leaders] to take the decision, and we [Hizbullah] 
	will carry it out... I promise you that, [if] Lebanon's Supreme Defense 
	Council officially decides that the gas and oil rigs in the Palestinian sea, 
	which is occupied by Israel, must stop functioning, a few hours later they 
	will stop functioning..."
	Nasrallah stated further: "The U.S. is not a fair mediator, and you 
	[Lebanese officials] must treat the American mediators like Israel's 
	attorneys. There are not three [parties] here. Lebanon is negotiating with 
	Israel, which is represented by Tillerson or Satterfield... That is the 
	truth, so this mediation cannot be trusted. The Americans are not interested 
	in Lebanon's good, They are interested in the good of the Zionists... They 
	came to give orders, to impose [terms] on us and to threaten us that if 
	Lebanon does not agree to this or that, they will [punish it] – and I will 
	not go into details."[10] 
	Tillerson At Conclusion Of Lebanon Visit: Hizbullah Is A Terrorist 
	Organization, With No Distinction Between Its Political And Military Wings
	Following his meeting with President 'Aoun, Parliamentary Speaker Berri, and 
	Foreign Minister Bassil, Tillerson met with Prime Minister Hariri. In a 
	joint press conference with Hariri after the meeting, he harshly denounced 
	Hizbullah and stated unequivocally that the U.S. regards it as a terrorist 
	organization. Possibly, this was an attempt to correct the impression made 
	by his statements on the eve of the visit, in which he recognized Hizbullah 
	as part of the Lebanese political process.
	He said: "It’s impossible to talk about stability, sovereignty, and security 
	in Lebanon without addressing Hizbullah. The United States has considered 
	Hizbullah a terrorist organization for more than two decades now. We neither 
	see nor do we accept any distinction between its political and its military 
	arms. It is unacceptable for a militia like Hizbullah to operate outside the 
	authority of the Lebanese Government. The only legitimate defender of the 
	Lebanese state is the Lebanese Armed Forces. Hizbullah is not just a concern 
	for the United States. The people of Lebanon should also be concerned about 
	how Hizbullah's actions and its growing arsenal bring unwanted and unhelpful 
	scrutiny on Lebanon. Hizbullah's entanglement in regional conflicts 
	threatens the security of Lebanon and has destabilizing effects in the 
	region. Their presence in Syria has perpetuated the bloodshed, increased the 
	displacement of innocent people, and propped up the barbaric Assad regime. 
	Their presence in Iraq and Yemen has also fueled violence, and the 
	consequences of their involvement in these far-off conflicts – which have 
	nothing to do with Lebanon – are felt back here at home.
	That’s why we’re urging all Lebanese leaders during my visit to uphold the 
	Government of Lebanon’s commitment to disassociating itself from foreign 
	conflicts. The international community expects all parties in Lebanon to 
	fulfill this commitment, including Hizbullah, which should cease its 
	activities abroad in order to help reduce tensions in the region."[11]
	[1] This was actually a government decision, passed in December 5, 2017.
	[2] State.gov, February 14, 2018.
	[3] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), February 16, 2018.
	[4] Al-Jumhouriyya (Lebanon), February 15, 2018; Al-Akhbar, Al-Liwa 
	(Lebanon), February 16, 2018.
	[5] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), February 16, 2018.
	[6] Al-Akhbar, Al-Liwa (Lebanon), February 16, 2018; Al-Mudun (Lebanon), 
	February 17, 2018.
	[7] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), February 16, 17, 2018.
	[8] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), February 16, 17, 2018.
	[9] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), February 16, 17, 2018.
	[10] Alahednews.com.lb, February 16, 2018.
	[11] State.gov, February 15, 2018.
 
	
	
	Latest LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published 
	
	
	on March 01/18
	U.N. report links 
	North Korea to Syria’s chemical weapons program
	Juliane Helmhold/Jerusalem Post/February 28/18 
	North Korea has been shipping materials to the Syrian government that could 
	be used for the production of chemical weapons, according to a secret UN 
	report, the New York Times reported on Tuesday. The report, which was 
	written by a panel of experts, stated that the supplies, which included 
	acid-resistant tiles, valves and thermometers, were part of at least 40 
	previously unreported shipments to Syria between 2012 and 2017.
	Additionally, North Korean missile experts were spotted inside Syria, 
	working at known chemical weapons and missile facilities. The UN report, 
	which is more than 200 pages long, also emphasized the danger of such a 
	cooperation between the two countries which would allow Syria to maintain 
	its chemical weapons while providing North Korea with funding for its 
	nuclear missile programs. As reported by the New York Times, it is unclear 
	when the report will be released; and the authors and members of the United 
	Nations Security Counsel refused to comment. However, a former member of the 
	UN panel of experts on North Korea, William Newcomb, called it "an important 
	breakthrough."
	“We knew stuff was going on,” Mr. Newcomb said to the New York Times. “We 
	really wanted to up the game on chemical weapons programs, and we just 
	weren’t able to get what we needed to do so.”
	On Wednesday, a senior US disarmament official blamed Russia for violating 
	its commitments as guarantor of the destruction of Syria's chemical weapons 
	stockpile and preventing the Assad government from using them.
	Robert Wood, US disarmament ambassador to the Conference on Disarmament, 
	told reporters in Geneva shortly before Russian Foreign Minister Sergei 
	Lavrov addressed the forum: "Russia is is on the wrong side of history with 
	regard to chemical weapons use in Syria."Wood, when asked about a reported 
	nexus of cooperation between North Korea and Syria, replied: "Clearly there 
	has been a history of a relationship between North Korea and Syria with 
	regard to missile activity, chemical weapons components."
	Russian Foreign Minister Sergi Lavrov, addressing the UN-sponsored 
	Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, responded that Syria has eliminated its 
	chemical weapons stockpiles and placed them under international control, 
	despite "absurd claims" against the Assad government.
	The United States and its allies are "simply exploiting baseless allegations 
	of toxic weapons use by Damascus as a tool of anti-Syrian political 
	engineering."
	Reuters contributed to this report.
	
	http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/UN-report-links-North-Korea-to-Syrias-chemical-weapons-program-543849?utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=28-2-2018&utm_content=un-report-links-north-korea-to-syrias-chemical-weapons-program-543849
	
	Report: Images reveal new Iranian military base outside 
	Damascus
	Anna Ahronheim/Jerusalem Post/February 28/18 
	New satellite images purport to show base built to house missiles "capable 
	of striking Israel."
	New satellite images of an area near the Syrian capital of Damascus show a 
	new permanent military base which may house missiles capable of striking 
	Israel, Fox News reported Wednesday. According to Fox, the new base is 
	operated by Iran’s Quds Force, a branch of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps 
	(IRGC) responsible for operations in foreign countries, deployed to Syria to 
	help embattled Syrian President Bashar Assad and is being used to store 
	short and medium-range missiles.In November, the BBC news agency reported 
	that Iran established another military base at a Syrian army site south of 
	Damascus. It was destroyed in December by an alleged Israeli air-to-surface 
	missile strike, according to foreign media reports.
	According to the report, which was based on a western intelligence source, 
	the Iranian base was some 50 kilometers north of Israel’s Golan Heights and 
	had several buildings which likely would have housed soldiers and military 
	vehicles.
	Israeli officials have repeatedly voiced concerns over the growing Iranian 
	presence on its borders and the smuggling of sophisticated weaponry to 
	Hezbollah from Tehran to Lebanon via Syria, stressing that both are 
	red-lines for the Jewish State.
	Last week, a New York Times investigative report revealed the scope and 
	depth of Iranian entrenchment in Syria, with a high concentration of 
	outposts along the border with Israel, including administrative bases, 
	logistical bases, control centers for UAVs (drones), training centers and 
	more.
	Former Israeli defense minister Amir Peretz said on Twitter Wednesday that 
	the report of a new base demands determined diplomatic action by the Prime 
	Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
	"The message must be made clear that Iranian military entrenchment 
	constitutes a red line that must not be crossed. If need be, all options 
	will be examined to prevent the entrenchment on the northern border," he 
	wrote.
	In early February, an Israeli F-16i fighter jet was downed by Syrian 
	anti-aircraft missiles after it carried out retaliatory airstrikes following 
	the infiltration of an advanced drone into Israel. Prime Minister Benjamin 
	Netanyahu then warned at the Munich Security Conference that Israel could 
	strike the Islamic Republic directly and cautioned Tehran not to “test 
	Israel’s resolve.”“Israel will not allow Iran’s regime to put a noose of 
	terror around our neck. We will act without hesitation to defend ourselves. 
	And we will act if necessary not just against Iran’s proxies that are 
	attacking us, but against Iran itself.”
	On Tuesday, Gen. Joseph L. Votel, head of US Central Command, said that Iran 
	was “increasing the number and quality” of its ballistic missiles deployed 
	to the war-torn country as well as “enhancing” its funding to its proxy 
	troops in the Middle East.
	But despite that increased threat posed by Iran, Votel stated that 
	“countering Iran is not one of the coalition’s missions in Syria.”
	
	http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Report-Images-reveal-new-Iranian-military-base-outside-Damascus-543824?utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=28-2-2018&utm_content=report-images-reveal-new-iranian-military-base-outside-damascus-543824
	
	Abbas’ Advisor Says No Palestinian State Can Be 
	Established Without Gaza, Jerusalem As Capital
	Ramallah- Kifah Zboun/Asharq Al Awsat/February 28/18/Palestinian President 
	Mahmoud Abbas’ Advisor for International Affairs Nabil Shaath said that the 
	Palestinian Authority has fully engaged in a confrontation with the United 
	States, in the wake of its decision to consider Jerusalem as the capital of 
	Israel.
	Speaking during a gathering at the Palestinian Embassy in Cairo, Shaath 
	said: “President Mahmoud Abbas is in a position of full confrontation with 
	the United States and Israel in the wake of the Israeli government’s 
	intransigence and the recent US Administration’s decision to recognize 
	Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and transfer its embassy to it.”“We will 
	not establish our state but on our national soil. No state in Gaza, no state 
	without Gaza, no state without Jerusalem as the capital, not a capital in 
	Jerusalem, but Jerusalem is the capital,” Shaath stressed. He criticized the 
	absence of a unified Arab position to protect the Palestinian project, but 
	said the world would change. The Palestinian president’s advisor went on to 
	say that within three years, “the world ruled by the United States will end 
	and a multilateral leadership will be established.”“We will be part of this 
	new world,” he said. Shaath’s remarks came in response to the United States, 
	which announced earlier this month that it was about to offer the “deal of 
	the century”, disregarding a plan by Abbas to hold an international peace 
	conference to set up a multilateral mechanism for the peace process. The 
	Palestinians refuse to deal with the United States as the sole sponsor of 
	the negotiations, saying they are ready to accept the US as part of a 
	multilateral mechanism within an international quartet that would also 
	include European and Arab states.The relationship between the PA and 
	Washington severely deteriorated after US President Donald Trump recognized 
	Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and decided to move the US embassy to it.
	
	Aid Convoy Blocked in Syria despite U.N. Ceasefire Order
	Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 28/18/About 40 trucks are loaded and 
	ready to ferry relief supplies to Syria's bomb-and-siege shattered Eastern 
	Ghouta, but there has been no let up in fighting despite a U.N. ceasefire 
	resolution, a top U.N. official said Wednesday. Mark Lowcock, the U.N. under 
	secretary-general for humanitarian affairs, said there has been no change in 
	the situation around the rebel-held enclave in the Damascus suburbs despite 
	a ceasefire resolution Saturday. "When will your resolution be implemented?" 
	he asked, staring fixedly at members of the U.N. Security Council, who 
	listened in complete silence. Lowcock said trucks loaded with supplies have 
	been poised to go to 10 besieged areas including Douma, the main town in the 
	enclave, since Saturday. But he said there has been no access for 
	humanitarian convoys, nor authorization by the regime to go into the 
	besieged areas, nor medical evacuations since the Security Council 
	resolution was passed. On the contrary, the bombings have continued, and 
	deaths and wounded have mounted, he said, speaking at a monthly Security 
	Council meeting devoted to the Syrian conflict. The U.S. representative 
	Kelley Currie accused the Syrian regime of violating the ceasefire, while 
	Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia accused the rebels.Carl Skau, the deputy 
	Swedish ambassador to the United Nations, demanded "immediate access" for 
	the humanitarian aid. "There is no time to lose," he said. Before the 
	meeting began, French ambassador Francois Delattre recalled that the rebels 
	in Ghouta had said Tuesday they were ready to observe a ceasefire, but the 
	Syrian regime has given no sign it is ready to do the same. "It is the 
	collective credibility of the Security Council and the responsibility of 
	each of its members that today is heavily at stake in the Syrian drama," he 
	said. Jeffrey Feltman, U.N. under secretary-general for political affairs, 
	expressed frustration over the council's inaction. "What we need is 
	implementation of (resolution) 2401 and that is not happening," he said. 
	After a night of intense fightng on the periphery of Eastern Ghouta, Syrian 
	aviation early Wednesday bombed several localities in the rebel enclave, 
	where an estimated 600 civilians have died since February 18, about a 
	quarter of them children, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human 
	Rights.
	
	Death Toll Tops 600 as Civilians Stay Put in Syria's Ghouta
	Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 28/18/Civilians in Syria's Eastern 
	Ghouta enclave shunned Russia's offer of safe passage for a second day 
	Wednesday, as rebels and Moscow blamed each other for the humanitarian 
	deadlock. The bombardment that killed 600 civilians in 10 days largely 
	stopped but not one of the battered region's 400,000 residents left to board 
	the buses provided by the regime. AFP reporters saw no movement at the 
	Wafideen checkpoint through which would-be evacuees were told to exit 
	Eastern Ghouta, which the government lost in 2012 and has besieged almost 
	ever since. "The humanitarian corridor is open to all those who wish to 
	return to the fold of the homeland, but so far nobody came and this is the 
	second day," said a military officer at the checkpoint. Russia on Monday 
	announced a "humanitarian pause" in the bombardment of the enclave that 
	would provide five hours every day for civilians to flee safely. The move 
	was welcomed inside and outside the enclave as respite from one of the 
	bloodiest assaults in Syria's seven-year-old war. But the hundreds of 
	civilians in need of medical evacuation were not coming out nor were any aid 
	convoys going in. The Syrian regime has accused the Islamist and jihadist 
	groups inside Ghouta of sabotaging the initiative by shelling the designated 
	humanitarian corridors to hold civilians as human shields. "The terrorists 
	are impeding those who want to cross, either by putting pressure on them or 
	by firing on the humanitarian corridors," the military officer said, 
	speaking on condition of anonymity.
	Three days only?
	The first five-hour "pause" on Tuesday passed with only two killed in regime 
	bombardment, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a 
	Britain-based war monitor. No casualties at all were reported when 
	Wednesday's humanitarian window closed at 2:00 pm (1200 GMT) but warplanes 
	were back in the sky moments later. "During the truce, the ceasefire is 
	almost enforced," said Observatory head Rami Abdel Rahman, adding that eight 
	civilians were killed in strikes before and after on Wednesday. The officer 
	at Wafideen checkpoint warned that if Thursday was equally fruitless, the 
	measure may be dropped, raising fears that the kind of bombardment that 
	killed dozens of civilians every day this month would resume. "The truce was 
	meant to last three days. It could be extended but why go on if there are no 
	results," he said. Inside Eastern Ghouta, the residents AFP spoke to were 
	distrustful of a measure put in place by Russia, whose warplanes rained 
	munitions on them alongside Syrian aircraft. The three main armed groups 
	inside the territory, which lies within mortar range of Damascus, said they 
	wanted more international guarantees.In a letter sent to the United Nations 
	on Tuesday, they said they were willing to expel the jihadist factions that 
	also have a footprint in Eastern Ghouta. But they demanded that any 
	evacuations be conducted under the supervision of a U.N. mechanism. Russian 
	President Vladimir Putin, whose portrait was featured alongside Syrian 
	counterpart Bashar al-Assad's at the Wafideen checkpoint, blamed the crisis 
	on the rebels' "constant shelling." "Shells even crash into the grounds of 
	the Russian embassy and the economic mission. Should we continue to tolerate 
	this? Of course not," he said. While it has stemmed the bloodshed, the 
	"pause" declared by Russia, which is Assad's main supporter, falls short of 
	the 30-day ceasefire voted on Saturday by the U.N. Security Council.
	Ground fighting 
	U.N. agencies and the International Committee of the Red Cross said it did 
	not meet the requirements for delivering an efficient aid response to the 
	crisis inside Eastern Ghouta. "Humanitarian corridors need to be well 
	planned and must be implemented with the consent of parties on all sides," 
	said Robert Mardini, the ICRC's Middle East director. "That's the only way 
	people leave safely, if they choose to do so," he said, in a statement 
	issued on Tuesday. Civilians spent days hiding in their basements in the 
	scattering of towns that make up the enclave, which is far from any other 
	rebel-controlled area in Syria. Another military officer at the deserted 
	checkpoint said ground fighting on the edges of Eastern Ghouta, where most 
	anti-regime fighters are deployed, may change the dynamic. The Observatory 
	said regime forces had made limited advances in Eastern Ghouta's Shaifuniyeh 
	and Hosh al-Zawahira districts. The head of the monitoring group said 38 
	regime and allied fighters were killed in three days of fighting in the al-Marj 
	area on the southern edge of the enclave. At least 18 fighters from Jaish 
	al-Islam, Eastern Ghouta's dominant anti-regime faction, were also killed, 
	the Observatory's Abdel Rahman said.
	
	Afghan President Unveils Plan for Peace Talks with 
	Taliban
	Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 28/18/Afghan President Ashraf Ghani 
	on Wednesday unveiled a plan to open peace talks with the Taliban, including 
	eventually recognising them as a political party, days after the militants 
	called for direct negotiations with the US. Civilian casualties have soared 
	in recent months as the Taliban increasingly targets towns and cities in 
	response to a new and more aggressive US military policy ordered by 
	President Donald Trump. Ghani disclosed the framework at a regional 
	conference in Kabul on bringing peace to his country. He called for a truce, 
	after which the Taliban could become a political party and contest 
	elections. "A ceasefire should be held, the Taliban should be recognised as 
	a political party and trust-building process should be initiated," said 
	Ghani, in remarks similar to past offers. "Now the decision is in your 
	hands, accept peace... and let's bring stability to this country," he added. 
	In return, Ghani said the militants should officially recognise the Afghan 
	government and the constitution, a perennial sticking point in past attempts 
	to open talks.  On Monday the Taliban said it was prepared to enter 
	direct talks with the US to find a "peaceful solution" to more than 16 years 
	of war. 
	Its statement however made no mention of negotiating with the Afghan 
	government -- a condition which the US has long stated was vital to any 
	peace process. Pakistani journalist and Taliban expert Rahimullah Yusufzai 
	said the insurgents' leadership remained committed to the US-only position, 
	but others in the movement were less dogmatic about talking with Kabul. 
	"There are some people among the Taliban who believe that they will have to 
	negotiate with the Afghan government," said Yusufzai.He added that the 
	militants have suffered heavy casualties under the new US strategy of 
	increased airstrikes and commando raids. Despite the losses, Yusufzai said 
	the group would continue the insurgency. "They derive their power from their 
	ability to keep fighting," he said. Kabul is hosting the second round of the 
	peace conference at which representatives from 25 countries will discuss 
	counter-terrorism and conflict resolution strategies. US officials have 
	described the current situation in the war as a stalemate.
	
	Theresa May: Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s Visit to 
	Bolster Bilateral Ties
	Asharq Al Awsat/February 28/18/Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman will 
	start on March 7 a visit to London, which British Prime Minister Theresa May 
	described as an opportunity to strengthen bilateral relations. The visit by 
	the Saudi crown prince is a platform for strengthening bilateral ties and 
	will include talks on economic and security partnership, May’s office said 
	in a statement. During the visit, Prince Mohammed is expected to hold talks 
	with the premier and meet with British government ministers. “The 
	partnership between the UK and Saudi Arabia already helps make both of our 
	countries safer through intelligence-sharing which has saved British lives, 
	and more prosperous, with thousands of jobs created in the UK and 
	substantial opportunities for British companies in Saudi Arabia,” the 
	statement added. The British premier also stressed that the visit of the 
	crown prince would establish “the platform for that relationship to become 
	even stronger.”“Saudi Arabia is changing. We have seen recent decisions to 
	allow women to drive from June this year, a target for women to make up 
	one-third of the Saudi workforce by 2030, and a move to develop sectors such 
	as health, education, infrastructure, recreation and tourism," May stated. 
	"These are all sectors where the UK leads the world and where there are new 
	opportunities to work together,” she added. The British premier went on to 
	say that Britain was a country open to the outside, by strengthening its 
	relationships around the world and defending its values.
	“The visit of the Crown Prince is an opportunity to do so precisely for the 
	benefit of our people and the Saudi people,” she said. British Foreign 
	Secretary Boris Johnson said in a tweet that he was eager to welcome Saudi 
	Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. He described the visit as an opportunity 
	to hold constructive dialogue on foreign policy and support the reform 
	program. The visit will be the crown prince’s first to the UK since his 
	appointment in June 2017.
	
	Head of Khamenei’s guards mysteriously disappears, 
	possibly arrested
	Staff writer, Al Arabiya English/Wednesday, 28 February 2018/Iranian sources 
	have reported the disappearance of General Vahid Haghanian, the commander of 
	Iran's Supreme Leader guards nearly about a month ago, amid speculations 
	that he might have been detained or placed under house arrest. The 
	disappearance of Haghanian, who also serves as a political assistant in the 
	private inspection office of Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, has since 
	Jan. 31 raised questions and speculations that there are confusions in the 
	house of the Supreme leader. The news was reported on Tuesday on "Saham 
	News" of the "National Trust party (Etemad Melli)," led by Mehdi Karroubi, 
	the leader of the Green Movement who is under house arrest. Haghanian is 
	described as “the supreme leader’s right hand," and there is a possibility 
	that he was arrested, but no confirmation so far. General Haghanian last 
	appeared in a video spread on social media sites and Iranian websites, in 
	which he insulted Iranian Vice President Eshaq Jahangiri during his visit to 
	the earthquake-affected areas in Sarpol-e Zahab and the Qasr-e Shirin in the 
	Kermanshah Province. Jahangiri said that the former President Ahmadinejad 
	was responsible for the houses that were destroyed as they were constructed 
	during his reign.
	The Supreme Leader’s shadow figure
	On various occasions, Haghanian, a leader in the Revolutionary Guard, 
	appears behind the Supreme Leader and accompanies him in the most important 
	meetings. He was also called the Supreme Leader’s shadow figure.Haghanian 
	served for long time as an assistant to Khamenei's chief of staff and as a 
	personal secretary who had strong influence and impact on Iran, especially 
	after the Green uprising in 2009.Some Iranian activists suspected that 
	Haghanian was arrested for being involved in corruption cases, while others 
	believed that he was arrested because of his differences with Ali Asghar 
	Hejazi, the director of the private security office of the Supreme Leader 
	Khamenei’ office
	
	US, Britain, France, Germany condemn Iran, warn to stop 
	arming Houthi militia
	Staff writer, Al Arabiya English/Wednesday, 28 February 2018/The United 
	States, Britain, France and Germany have condemned Iran on Tuesday in a 
	joint statement for breaking UN law prohibiting supply of arms to Yemen. 
	Their statement comes a day after Russia vetoed a resolution put forward by 
	Britain condemning Tehran. The resolution would also condemn Iran for arming 
	Houthi militias. Following the Russian veto, the Security Council 
	unanimously adopted a technical resolution which renews the current arms 
	embargo without any reference to Iran. For months now, the United States has 
	been pressurizing to condemn Iran and to enforce sanctions upon the country 
	after Houthi militia fired ballistic missiles towards Saudi Arabia in 2017.
	
	Assad media accuses opposition of faking Ghouta child 
	injuries with forged video
	Staff writer, Al Arabiya English/Wednesday, 28 February 2018/Pro-Assad media 
	outlets shared a video of children being painted with red blood claiming 
	that they were Syrian opposition factions in eastern Ghouta trying to fake 
	child injuries.
	However, the video turned out to be from an art workshop which creates this 
	health exercise annually in Gaza.The goal of the workshop is to recreate 
	child injuries sustained in warzones so that doctors can get familiar with 
	them and learn how to care for injured children, the owner of the workshop, 
	Abd al-Baset al-Loulou, said. He added that clips from his workshop’s video 
	were edited together and shared by pro-Assad media outlets as coming from 
	eastern Ghouta. Al-Loulou said that he was then forced to release a 
	statement clarifying that the video was from his annual workshop centered 
	around using special effects makeup to recreate child injuries. “It’s sad 
	that the Syrian regime used art for political reasons,” al-Loulou said, 
	adding that doctors and health care professionals worldwide use special 
	effects makeup artists to train their staff. Russian media has also 
	attempted to show forged victories by Russian soldiers in Syria by using 
	fictional images and scenes. According to the Washington Post, Russian media 
	used scenes from a videogame called Arma purportedly showing Syrian war 
	footage, and a 
	
	US general: Washington cooperating with Riyadh to 
	secure Bab el-Mandeb navigation
	Staff writer, Al Arabiya English /Wednesday, 28 February 2018/The US is 
	worried about Yemen’s Houthi militia threatening international navigation in 
	Bab el-Mandeb, Joseph Votel, the commander of the United States Central 
	Command, said speaking to a House of Representatives Armed Services 
	Committee hearing. The US general said that Washington is cooperating with 
	Riyadh in order to secure navigation in the area, adding that sly Iranian 
	activity poses a real threat on its long term stability. Votel also 
	clarified that the US’s intervention in Syria is solely to fight ISIS after 
	the Syrian regime showed a lack of seriousness in fighting the extremist 
	organization. He accused Russia of playing a destabilizing role in Syria as 
	“both arsonist and firefighter”, saying Moscow had failed to rein in its 
	Syrian ally. “Diplomatically and militarily, Moscow plays both arsonist and 
	firefighter, fueling tensions among all parties in Syria... then serving as 
	an arbitrator, to resolve disputes, attempting to undermine and weaken each 
	party's bargaining positions,” Votel said. "I think either Russia has to 
	admit that it is not capable, or it doesn't want to play a role in ending 
	the Syrian conflict. I think their role is incredibly destabilizing at this 
	point," he added.
	
	Arab Affairs High Follow-Up Committee Asks for European 
	Mediation Before US Reveals Peace Plan
	Paris- Michel Abu Najm/Asharq Al Awsat/February 28/18/Arab League Chief 
	Ahmed Aboul Gheit and High Follow-Up Committee for Arab Affairs officials 
	met with their European counterparts to discuss the Palestinian-Israeli 
	issue, seeking European Union assistance amid rising fears of bias 
	highlighting the upcoming United States peace roadmap.The meetings came in 
	an effort to face Washington’s recent decision to recognize Jerusalem as the 
	official capital of Israel—based on which it will be relocating its embassy 
	next May. EU foreign ministers' meeting with the Arab ministerial committee 
	to follow up the Jerusalem issue in Brussels on Monday stressed the need to 
	save the two-state solution.This comes a month after a meeting between the 
	Palestinian Authority and European ministers and Palestinian Authority 
	President Mahmoud Abbas calling for an international conference mid-year and 
	a multilateral mechanism to be found to break away from the American 
	monopoly over Palestinian-Israeli mediation efforts. However, the importance 
	of the recent Brussels meeting is that it conveyed a strong message to the 
	European side to action before the US administration announces its plan for 
	peace in the Middle East—citing that leaked information clearly is rooted in 
	what cannot be accepted by the Palestinian side. Therefore, the Arab 
	delegation stressed the need for “immediate action” with the American side 
	on the grounds that if Washington commits to its plan, it will be difficult 
	for them to later reverse or modify some of its items.
	Nevertheless, the Arab League ministers hastened to say that "they do not 
	want to exclude the American role, which remains essential, but balance it 
	at a party level overseeing the peace process, namely the Arab peace 
	initiative. Abbas spoke to the Arab ministers last month asking them to 
	recognize the Palestinian state quickly. However, US-Western pressure weighs 
	in heavily against the recognition with Europeans arguing it’s not time yet. 
	Their shy support comes at a time when the European Union exploits every 
	opportunity to show its distancing and rejection of US positions—such as the 
	recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and the embassy transfer. 
	But one of the Arab-Palestinian goals is for Europe to remain “a united bloc 
	that refuses to follow Washington's initiatives” which is deemed wrong. The 
	other European argument inhibiting the recognition of a Palestinian state is 
	that Washington must unveil its plan clearly before taking any further 
	actions. Moreover, Europeans still hold on to the US role in the peace 
	process. According to a European diplomatic source, the EU “does not see 
	that they are capable of replacing Washington, given its close connection to 
	Tel Aviv, and therefore their role is reduced”. 
	The EU believes that Washington is really able to pressure the Israeli 
	leadership to soften their positions and accept needed determinants for a 
	solution. On that note, US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said 
	that Washington’s plan was “almost ready” and that it included compromises 
	for both sides.However, diplomatic sources in Paris have revealed that the 
	most “troubled party” in the upcoming Washington plan will certainly be the 
	Palestinian side.
	
	Jubeir Stresses Convergence of Arab, European Views 
	Over Jerusalem, Peace Process
	Brussels- Abdullah Mustafa/Asharq Al Awsat/February 28/18/A joint meeting 
	between Arab and European ministers reaffirmed consensus over the need to 
	maintain efforts to achieve peace according to the internationally agreed 
	framework, Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry told Asharq Al-Awsat.
	Ministers have also highlighted the necessity to preserve communication with 
	the United States - as an indispensable partner - to restore the peace 
	process in accordance with the relevant international resolutions, the 
	minister added. Statements made by other ministers from Arab and European 
	countries on the sidelines of the joint meeting hosted by Brussels to 
	discuss the future of the peace process underlined a similarity in the 
	positions and views between the two sides. This was confirmed by Saudi 
	Foreign Minister Adel Al-Jubeir, who addressed reporters on Tuesday, saying 
	that the meeting was an opportunity to explain the Arab position to the EU 
	foreign ministers, emphasizing that the gathering was fruitful and 
	constructive. The Saudi minister noted that views were identical on several 
	matters, including Jerusalem, the revival of the peace process and the need 
	to assist UNRWA’s work.
	Jordan’s Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi, for his part, told Asharq Al-Awsat: 
	“The Arab stance on Jerusalem is well-known; East Jerusalem is the capital 
	of Palestine and an occupied territory, the status of which must be resolved 
	through direct negotiations and on the basis of the resolutions of 
	international legitimacy.”EU foreign ministers expressed their commitment to 
	achieving a two-state solution through negotiations to end the conflict in 
	the Middle East. They also noted that EU countries would not transfer their 
	embassies to Jerusalem, emphasizing that the city must be the capital of the 
	two states. In a statement to Asharq Al-Awsat, Austrian Foreign Minister 
	Karin Kneissl said: “We do not accept the transfer of the embassy, and there 
	is a European stance that emphasizes the two-state solution and respect for 
	Jerusalem as the capital of both Israel and Palestine.”
	
	
	Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources 
	published 
	on March 01/18
	
	Big Companies Are Getting a Chokehold on the Economy
	Noah Smith/Bloomberg/February 28/18 
	A recent report by Goldman Sachs’ global research team highlights a new 
	study showing that large, dominant superstar companies are paying lower 
	wages and earning higher profits. I’ve flagged that research myself, but 
	when Goldman says it’s worried, you know things have really gotten serious. 
	American industry is increasingly dominated by a shrinking handful of giant 
	companies: Why is Goldman complaining about the trend? After all, the big 
	bank presumably has many ways to make money off of corporate behemoths. 
	Oligopoly raises profits, which sends stocks higher, contributing to fatter 
	fees for financial companies like Goldman that do things like asset 
	management, brokering and market-making. Goldman also handles mergers and 
	acquisitions, which are a key way that markets become more concentrated.
	Of course if market concentration gets out of hand, it could start to cut 
	into the bottom lines of even big financial firms. One reason is that 
	concentration reduces idiosyncratic volatility in markets, meaning 
	individual stocks don’t go up and down as much. That means traders have less 
	reason to trade, since there are fewer bargains to be had under those 
	conditions. Less trading means less profit for brokers, dealers and 
	market-makers. In a recent paper, economists Söhnke Bartram, Gregory Brown 
	and René M. Stulz show that the increasing domination of public markets by 
	large old companies -- the superstars that economists are warning about -- 
	is responsible for the increasing correlations between stocks.
	Stulz also has another new paper, along with Craig Doidge, Kathleen Kahle 
	and G. Andrew Karolyi, illustrating just how much the US public markets are 
	devoid of small, fast-growing companies. The days when a new company such as 
	Amazon.com Inc. -- which went public in 1997 at a market value of just $438 
	million -- would rush to list itself on the exchanges are long gone. Uber 
	Technologies Inc., for example, is still private, but is valued at about $50 
	billion. It’s not just tech startups, though -- smaller companies in general 
	are moving off of the exchanges. This is one big reason why the public 
	markets are shrinking. So far, that hasn’t been bad for the public markets. 
	Even after the recent selloff, the rising stock market has steadily set new 
	records during the past few years. Profit margins -- which companies with 
	market power can extract by holding down wages and hiking prices -- are 
	probably driving the higher valuations. So pension funds and 401(k) savings 
	plans are doing well (though much of the gain will be siphoned off to 
	management fees).
	The biggest threat from the increasing dominance of big companies isn’t to 
	Goldman Sachs, or even to retirement plans; it’s to workers and consumers. 
	When companies squelch wages and raise prices, it reduces economic activity. 
	It pushes workers out of the labor force entirely, sending them home to play 
	video games on the couch as their job skills and work ethic rot. And it can 
	result in lower output too -- fewer plane rides, fewer people buying 
	broadband internet, few people buying new cars.
	In past eras, the government acted to stop companies from getting too big. 
	It could do the same now by strengthening antitrust enforcement, preventing 
	big mergers and reviewing them after the fact. Some politicians, such as 
	Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, have declared their desire to open 
	up a new era of trust-busting. And to his credit, President Donald Trump did 
	block AT&T’s attempted takeover of Time Warner, though his decision may have 
	been driven by personal bias. But the fact that the stock market 
	increasingly depends on dominant companies may stop the government from ever 
	really cracking down. If monopoly profits are the main thing keeping 
	upper-middle-class Americans’ retirement accounts afloat, most politicians 
	will be very reluctant to do anything that fosters greater competition. The 
	risk is that economy becomes trapped in a toxic cycle. As industries grow 
	more concentrated, dominant companies become a bigger piece of the stock 
	market, and their profit margins push stock valuations higher. Politicians 
	naturally will be less willing to take steps to make markets more 
	competitive, allowing superstar companies to become even more powerful. All 
	the while, retirement accounts do OK, but workers’ wages and the economy 
	suffer from decreasing competition. It’s important to reverse this vicious 
	cycle before the problem becomes too severe. A bit of antitrust now would go 
	a long way toward preventing oligopoly from turning into oligarchy.
	
	How Russia is using Syria as a military 'guinea pig'
	كيفية استعمال روسيا لسوريا كحقل تجارب حربية
	Jerusalem Post/February 28/18 
	
	http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/62875
	High-ranking Russian officials claim countries are lining up to purchase 
	battle-tested hardware.
	Russia’s deputy defense minister claimed Thursday that Moscow has tested 
	over 600 new weapons and other military equipment in Syria since intervening 
	in the conflict in 2015. "The chance to test in real combat can’t be 
	overestimated," Yuri Borisov asserted, adding that "customers have started 
	queuing up for the arms that have proven themselves in [battle].”
	The comments came on the same day that the head of the powerful defense 
	committee in Russia’s Duma, the lower house of parliament, contended that 
	200 of the items were next-generation systems.
	"It’s not an accident that today they are coming to us from many directions 
	to purchase our weapons, including countries that are not our allies,” 
	Vladimir Shamanov declared. "Today, our military industry made our army look 
	in a way we can be proud of."
	According to Mathieu Boulegue, a Research Fellow in the Russia and Eurasia 
	Program at the London-based Chatham House think-tank, "many analysts in 
	Moscow view the Syria campaign as a 'Revolution in Military Affairs,' which 
	is an American term that derives from the US experience mostly during the 
	First Gulf War. Russia sees Syria as a theater for learning how to use 
	[cutting-edge] technology and command and control techniques in modern 
	warfare.
	"They are also getting similar experience in Ukraine," he elaborated to The 
	Media Line, "and it is impossible to separate between the two campaigns as 
	the lessons gained in both arenas are fed into the same beast."
	The Russian hardware being tested reportedly includes advanced aircraft, 
	cruise missiles and precision-guided munitions in addition to armory, 
	battlefield drones and electronic warfare systems, among many others.
	One prominent example is the introduction into Syria of the Sukhoi Su-34 and 
	Su-35 fighter jets, twelve of the former reportedly having soon thereafter 
	been sold to Algeria. Other countries such as Indonesia, India and Nigeria 
	have likewise expressed interest in the plane since it became battle-tested, 
	allowing for tangible evaluation of its performance.
	Similarly, purchase agreements for the Russian S-400 surface-to-air missile 
	defense system have been forged with Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.
	Overall, Middle East and North African countries from Egypt to Qatar to 
	Bahrain, Morocco and Tunisia are lining up to purchase Russian-made 
	equipment; this, as Moscow has renewed its regional influence through the 
	projection of its military after years of US domination.
	In March of last year Russia's top defense official, Sergei Shoigu, told 
	parliament that ninety percent of the weapons tested up to that point had 
	met the Kremlin's expectations. Months later, Dmitry Shugayev, head of 
	Russia's Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation, revealed that 
	foreign orders for Russian weapons amount to almost $50 billion. Notably, he 
	claimed that Moscow is poised to acquire about thirty percent of the global 
	military aircraft market, surpassing the US' share.
	"Russia has come up with the 'Combat-proven Label,' which is used by 
	officials and businesses to enhance military sales," Boulegue explained to 
	The Media Line. "It is very hard to quantify how much this will speed up the 
	commercial prospects but it does go hand-in-hand with a very aggressive 
	policy from the state-owned Rosoboronexport. [Other private companies are 
	also] really reaching out to foreign buyers and so far they have had some 
	good returns.
	"This also applies to Latin America and Africa," he concluded, "because a 
	lot of the contracts that have been signed recently could have originated up 
	to five years ago. There is a focus on countries that could buy some of the 
	older models of Russian systems in bulk—those that can be [incorporated] 
	into the militaries of less wealthy nations."
	Nevertheless, the timing and nature of the statements by high-ranking 
	Russian officials suggests that they may also be intended for domestic 
	consumption, amid a growing realization that Moscow may not easily be able 
	to extricate itself from the Syrian quagmire.
	"This sounds like propaganda as six hundred weapons is very high," Zvi Magen, 
	a former Israeli ambassador to Russia and an expert on its Middle East 
	foreign policy, explained to The Media Line.
	In this respect, it is noteworthy that Moscow last week deployed to Syria 
	two fifth-generation Su-57 stealth fighters, Russia's answer to the US’ F-22 
	Raptor and F-35. That the jets are non-operational, however, supports the 
	notion that their transfer abroad is at least partially a "show" mimicking 
	strength.
	"They are stuck over there and that is why they need excuses," Magen 
	expounded. "The Russians need to finish this war and they have not been able 
	to arrive at an agreement to end it. Instead," he continued, "Moscow 
	declared victory [prematurely] and Putin visited Syria. But since then there 
	have been battles and the Russians have suffered casualties. This leads to 
	domestic pressure."
	Indeed Moscow's beating of the military drums come on the heels of a major 
	clash between Russian "contractors" and US forces on February 7, in which up 
	to 300 mercenaries—employed by the shadowy Wagner PMC (Private Military 
	Company) whose owner is a Putin associate—were killed or injured by American 
	airstrikes and artillery fire during a failed attack on a Kurdish-controlled 
	base in the Deir ez-Zor region.
	While Russia publicly denied any involvement in the incident, it is 
	well-known that Moscow has agreed to the deployment to Syria of as many as 
	2,500 for-hire fighters in order to avoid casualties among its official 
	troops. As such, the Kremlin at the very least has a public relations 
	problem back home, especially given its less-than-satisfactory explanation 
	of the event which was described by US Defense Secretary James Mattis as 
	"perplexing."
	Redirecting the focus to supposed successes in Syria—by hyping its military 
	achievements, real or imagined—might therefore constitute a concerted effort 
	to downplay the loss of its citizens while appealing to a largely 
	nationalistic Russian populace. This, in turn, ties into the second possible 
	explanation for the seemingly coordinated comments; namely, that they come 
	just weeks ahead of the Russian presidential election and it may be that 
	Putin is fending off legitimate criticism of Russia's entanglement in Syria 
	by rallying the support of his patriotic, if not militaristic, voter base.
	The revelations that Russia is effectively using Syria as a testing ground 
	for military hardware also raises moral questions, especially as they come 
	on the background of the humanitarian catastrophe unfolding in Eastern 
	Ghouta.
	More than 500 locals have been killed and some 2,500 others wounded over the 
	past week, as Syrian forces allied with Moscow pounded the rebel-held area 
	from the air and ground in the one of the fiercest offensives in the 
	seven-years-long war. An estimated 400,000 civilians remain trapped in area, 
	with rights groups warning of a major humanitarian catastrophe unless aid is 
	allowed to reach the enclave.
	Moscow's support for Syrian President Bashar Assad has once again brought 
	into stark focus its paramount role in prolonging the war, to the detriment 
	of an already devastated civilian population. That Russian leaders are 
	concurrently trumpeting Moscow's advancement of its military-industrial 
	complex by using Syria as a "guinea pig" sheds light on their underlying 
	intentions and priorities.
	
	http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/How-Russia-is-using-Syria-as-a-military-guinea-pig-543839?utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=28-2-2018&utm_content=how-russia-is-using-syria-as-a-military-guinea-pig-543839
	
	Europe's Telling Silence on Polish Anti-Semitism
	Inna Rogatchi//Gatestone Institute/February 28/18 
	
	https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11955/poland-holocaust-law-antisemitism
	Given Western Europe's open aversion to the rise of right-wing parties in 
	Eastern Europe, the EU's silence in the face of Poland's behavior 
	politically makes no sense.
	Ever since Poland's far-right Law and Justice Party (PiS) took control of 
	both the presidency and the parliament in November 2015, and quickly changed 
	the rules for public media, the secret service, education, and the military, 
	the European Parliament has been claiming that Warsaw is putting the "rule 
	of law and democracy" at risk.
	When it comes to the issue of Polish anti-Semitism, Europe is suddenly at a 
	loss for words. This suggests that it is not merely ineptitude at work.
	Implementation of the controversial Holocaust bill, passed by the Polish 
	Senate on February 1, was "frozen" temporarily, due to the toxic rift it 
	caused in Warsaw-Jerusalem relations. The bill, proposed by the ruling Law 
	and Justice Party (PiS), makes illegal any suggestion that Poland was 
	complicit in the Holocaust, particularly the Nazi death camps, which were 
	German, but located on Polish soil.
	Criticism of the bill in Israel and among diaspora Jews has been loud and 
	forceful across the political spectrum. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin 
	Netanyahu called the bill an attempt to "rewrite history," and a Polish 
	diplomatic delegation is arriving in Israel on February 28 to discuss the 
	diplomatic crisis.
	Although Jewish outrage over such a law -- which would fine and even jail 
	anyone who dared to implicate Poland in the Nazi genocide -- is probably no 
	surprise, the crashing silence from the rest of Europe is shocking.
	To his credit, European Council President Donald Tusk, a former prime 
	minister of Poland, made two public statements against the bill -- one on 
	Twitter and the other during a press conference in Brussels. His sentiments 
	were echoed by members of the world media and intelligentsia, who have 
	protested Poland's move.
	In the face of Poland's implementation of the controversial Holocaust bill, 
	the crashing silence from the rest of Europe is shocking. To his credit, 
	European Council President Donald Tusk, a former prime minister of Poland, 
	made two public statements against the bill. 
	With the exception of France, whose foreign minister called the bill "ill 
	advised," the European Union countries, the European Commission, the 
	European Parliament, the Council of Europe and the Organization for Security 
	and Co-operation in Europe have been avoiding the controversy. German 
	Chancellor Angela Merkel, saying she did not want to "wade into Poland's 
	internal affairs," declined to comment.
	Meanwhile, German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel released a statement 
	assuring Poland that "every form of historical falsification such as the 
	term 'Polish concentration camps' runs into clear rejection on our part and 
	will be sharply condemned." Unfortunately, this is the same Gabriel who told 
	a group of Muslim community leaders in December that what he saw when he 
	visited Israel many years ago "reminded him of apartheid."
	Poland's move is nothing short of a moral fiasco, particularly as it comes 
	amid an anti-Semitism in Europe so rampant that, in 2015, the European 
	Commission appointed a "coordinator on combating anti-Semitism." Katharina 
	von Schnurbein, who holds the position, appears to have done little on the 
	job. About the Polish bill, she has not uttered a word. She also failed to 
	call out a Polish TV host for snidely remarking that the Nazi concentration 
	camps should be called "Jewish camps;" and she did not react when Polish 
	Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki said that the Holocaust had involved 
	"Jewish perpetrators," as well as Polish ones. She also said nothing about 
	Morawiecki's laying a wreath on the memorial of a Polish underground 
	movement that collaborated with the Nazis; and she ignored the demand by a 
	Polish education official that only Poles should be guides to Auschwitz. She 
	has, however, been heard condemning the daily anti-Semitic incidents in 
	Poland, the largest recipient of EU subsidies, and she did make a point of 
	saying, during a 2016 trip to Israel, "We don't see anti-Semitic violence 
	from the refugees at the moment, thank God."
	Given Western Europe's open aversion to the rise of right-wing parties in 
	Eastern Europe, the EU's silence in the face of Poland's behavior makes no 
	sense politically. Ever since Poland's far-right Law and Justice Party took 
	control of both the presidency and the parliament in November 2015, and 
	quickly changed the rules for public media, the secret service, education 
	and the military, the European Parliament has been claiming that Warsaw is 
	putting the "rule of law and democracy" at risk.
	When it comes to the issue of Polish anti-Semitism, however, Europe is 
	suddenly at a loss for words. This suggests that it is not merely ineptitude 
	at work, but a far more worrisome trend. It is high time for the EU and its 
	sister bodies to take a moral stand against anti-Semitism and the rewriting 
	of history, lest Europe's distasteful history repeat itself.
	*Inna Rogatchi, co-founder and president of the Rogatchi Foundation, is an 
	author, scholar, political analyst and filmmaker. Her soon-to-be-published 
	book, A View From the Cattle Wagon, is a collection of essays on the 
	post-Holocaust period.
	© 2018 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here 
	do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone 
	Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be 
	reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of 
	Gatestone Institute.
	
	Why Turkey Wants to Invade the Greek Islands
	Uzay Bulut/Gatestone Institute/February 28/18 
	
	https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11954/turkey-threats-greek-islands
	Turkish propagandists also have been twisting facts to try to portray Greece 
	as the aggressor.
	Although Turkey knows that the islands are legally and historically Greek, 
	Turkish authorities want to occupy and Turkify them, presumably to further 
	the campaign of annihilating the Greeks, as they did in Anatolia from 1914 
	to 1923 and after.
	Any attack against Greece should be treated as an attack against the West.
	There is one issue on which Turkey's ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) 
	and its main opposition, the Republican People's Party (CHP), are in 
	complete agreement: The conviction that the Greek islands are occupied 
	Turkish territory and must be reconquered. So strong is this determination 
	that the leaders of both parties have openly threatened to invade the 
	Aegean.
	The only conflict on this issue between the two parties is in competing to 
	prove which is more powerful and patriotic, and which possesses the courage 
	to carry out the threat against Greece. While the CHP is accusing President 
	Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's AKP party of enabling Greece to occupy Turkish lands, 
	the AKP is attacking the CHP, Turkey's founding party, for allowing Greece 
	to take the islands through the 1924 Treaty of Lausanne, the 1932 
	Turkish-Italian Agreements, and the 1947 Paris Treaty, which recognized the 
	islands of the Aegean as Greek territory.
	In 2016, Erdoğan said that Turkey "gave away" the islands that "used to be 
	ours" and are "within shouting distance." "There are still our mosques, our 
	shrines there," he said, referring to the Ottoman occupation of the islands.
	Two months earlier, at the "Conference on Turkey's New Security Concept," 
	Erdoğan declared: "Lausanne... has never been a sacred text. Of course, we 
	will discuss it and struggle to have a better one." Subsequently, 
	pro-government media outlets published maps and photos of the islands in the 
	Aegean, calling them the territory that "Erdoğan says we gave away at 
	Lausanne."
	To realize his ultimate goal of leaving behind a legacy that surpasses that 
	of all other Turkish leaders, Erdoğan has set certain objectives for the 
	year 2023, the 100th anniversary of the establishment of the Turkish 
	Republic, and 2071, the 1,000th anniversary of the 1071 Battle of Manzikert, 
	during which Muslim Turkic jihadists from Central Asia defeated Christian 
	Greek Byzantine forces in the Armenian highland of the Byzantine Empire.
	The idea behind these goals is to create nationalistic cohesion towards 
	annexing more land to Turkey. To alter the borders of Turkey, however, 
	Erdoğan must change or annul the Lausanne Treaty. Ironically, ahead of his 
	two-day official visit to Greece in December -- touted as a sign of a new 
	era in Turkish-Greek relations -- Erdogan told Greek journalists that the 
	Lausanne Treaty is in need of an update. During his trip, the first official 
	visit to Greece by a Turkish head of state in 65 years, Erdoğan repeated his 
	mantra that the Lausanne Treaty must be revised.
	Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has said that Turkey "gave away" 
	Greek islands that "used to be ours" and are "within shouting distance". 
	"There are still our mosques, our shrines there," he said, referring to the 
	Ottoman occupation of the islands. 
	The following month, Erdoğan targeted CHP leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, again 
	accusing the party that signed the Lausanne Treaty of giving away the 
	islands during negotiations. "We will tell our nation about [this]," Erdoğan 
	said. What this statement means is that Erdogan accepts that the islands 
	legally belong to Greece. Yet, at the same time, he calls the Greek 
	possession of the territory "an invasion" -- apparently because the islands 
	were once within the borders of the Ottoman Empire -- and he now wants them 
	back.
	Meanwhile, the CHP has been equally aggressive in its rhetoric, with 
	Kılıçdaroğlu telling the Turkish parliament that Greece has "occupied" 18 
	islands. When Greek Defense Minister Panos Kammenos was described as 
	"uncomfortable" with this statement, CHP's deputy leader for foreign 
	affairs, Öztürk Yılmaz, responded, "Greece should not test our patience." 
	Yılmaz also reportedly stated that "Turkey is much more than its 
	government," and that any Greek minister who provokes Turkey, will be "hit 
	with a sledgehammer on the head...If [Kammenos] looks at history, he will 
	see many examples of that."
	History is, in fact, filled with examples of Turks carrying out murderous 
	assaults against Anatolian Greeks. In one instance, the genocidal assault 
	against Greek and Armenian Christians in Izmir in 1922 was highlighted in a 
	speech before the parliament by Devlet Bahceli, the head of the Nationalist 
	Movement Party (MHP):
	"If they [the Greeks] want to fall into the sea again -- if they feel like 
	being chased after again -- they are welcome. The Turkish nation is ready 
	and has the faith to do it again. Someone must explain to the Greek 
	government what happened in 1921 and 1922. If there is no one to explain it 
	to them, we know how to stick like a bullet on the Aegean, rain from the sky 
	like a blessed victory, and teach history to the couriers of ahl al-salib 
	[the people of the cross] all over again."
	Turkish propagandists also have been twisting facts to try to portray Greece 
	as the aggressor. Ümit Yalım, former secretary-general of the Ministry of 
	National Defense, for example, said that "Greece has turned the 
	Greek-occupied islands into arsenals and military outposts that Greece will 
	use in its future military intervention against Turkey."
	Turkish politicians all seem to have their own motivations for their 
	obsession with the islands: Traditional Turkish expansionism, Turkification 
	of Hellenic lands, neo-Ottomanism and Islam's flagship of conquest -- jihad. 
	There are also strategic reasons for their wanting to invade the islands, 
	which can be understood in a statement made by Deputy Prime Minister Tuğrul 
	Türkeş about Turkey's control of Cyprus since 1974:
	"There is this misinformation that Turkey is interested in Cyprus because 
	there is a Turkish society there... Even if no Turks lived in Cyprus, Turkey 
	would still have a Cyprus issue and it is impossible for Turkey to give up 
	on that."
	The same attitude and mentality apply to the Aegean islands. Although Turkey 
	knows that the islands are legally and historically Greek, Turkish 
	authorities want to occupy and Turkify them, presumably to further the 
	campaign of annihilating the Greeks, as they did in Anatolia from 1914 to 
	1923 and after. The destruction of any remnant of Greek culture that existed 
	in Asia Minor, a Greek land prior to the 11th century Turkish invasion, is 
	almost complete. There are fewer than 2,000 Greeks left in Turkey today.
	Given that Turkey brutally invaded Cyprus in 1974, its current threats 
	against Greece -- from both ends of Turkey's political spectrum -- should 
	not be taken lightly by the West. Greece is the birthplace of Western 
	civilization. It borders the European Union. Any attack against Greece 
	should be treated as an attack against the West. It is time for the West, 
	which has remained silent in the face of Turkish atrocities, to stand up to 
	Ankara.
	*Uzay Bulut is a Turkish journalist born and raised in Turkey. She is 
	presently based in Washington D.C.
	© 2018 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here 
	do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone 
	Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be 
	reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of 
	Gatestone Institute.
	
	Iran Is Trying to Avoid a Clash but May Surprise Israel
	إيران تحاول تجنب الحرب من إسرائيل ولنها قد تفاجئ الدولة العبرية
	Ephraim Kam/Haaretz/ February 28/18
	
	http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/62877
	The latest confrontation between Israel and Iran on the northern front was 
	predictable. We can assume that neither side wanted the clash, but with 
	Tehran having sent substantial Iranian and Shi’ite combat forces to Syria 
	while arming Hezbollah with advanced weapons, and with Israel determined to 
	check the danger, a clash was almost inevitable.
	On top of that is the consensus among Israel’s leaders that Iran presents 
	the most serious threat to Israel. This perception is based on a number of 
	elements: Hezbollah and its huge missile system, Iran’s large and improved 
	missile system, and Tehran's policy of encircling Israel with radical 
	Shi’ites, marked by the anti-Israel front in Syria and Lebanon.
	Clearly if Iran goes nuclear some day this threat will increase to an 
	unprecedented level. But the balance of powers is more complex. The main 
	tool used by the Israel Defense Forces in Syria is the air force, and Iran 
	has no answer to it; its own air force is based on planes 30 to 40 years old 
	and clearly can’t cope with its Israeli rival.
	In addition, Iran has to operate forces hundreds of kilometers from its 
	borders without any real defense when they’re subject to Israeli attacks and 
	provocations by Sunni groups in Syria. Weapons convoys to Hezbollah and arms 
	plants in Syria are exposed to attacks.
	The United States also poses a threat to Iran. The Trump administration has 
	defined Iran as a threat of the highest order to the United States and its 
	allies due to its use of terror, intervention in other countries, 
	construction of a large missile system, and above all its attempt to produce 
	nuclear weapons.
	The U.S. administration hasn’t yet taken any practical steps to stop the 
	threat, and it’s not clear whether it will, but Iran isn’t certain it won’t, 
	and the last thing Tehran wants is a confrontation with the United States. 
	Meanwhile, the declaration by Washington that it will leave a military force 
	in northern Syria for an indefinite period to check Iranian influence should 
	worry Tehran.
	Although Russia – currently the most influential player in Syria – stands 
	alongside Iran and recognizes Iran’s right to maintain forces in Syria, 
	there are differences of opinion, conflicts of interest and suspicions 
	between Tehran and Moscow. As a result, Iran fears that if an overall 
	agreement in Syria is achieved, Russia won’t insist on leaving Bashar 
	Assad’s regime in place if it receives a promise that it can continue to use 
	its air base and naval base there.
	If the Assad regime is ousted in the context of an agreement, Iran’s 
	influence in Syria will suffer a serious blow. Iran thus hasn’t yet 
	responded with fire to attacks against weapons convoys and factories in 
	Syria.
	Even when Iran challenged Israel in the most recent clash, it did so with a 
	drone, not by opening fire. Since early 2015, Hezbollah has also refrained 
	from responding to what could be perceived as Israeli provocations. This 
	reluctance to respond apparently stems from a recognition of Israel’s 
	significant military advantage in the north.
	The Iranians are also likely to fear that a confrontation with Israel would 
	give Israel a chance to attack the nuclear weapons sites in Iran. Moreover, 
	Iran apparently doesn’t seek a confrontation because its top priority is to 
	stabilize the Assad regime and exploit its standing in Syria to strengthen 
	its influence in Iraq and Lebanon. An entanglement with Israel could block 
	these goals.
	Iran’s supreme regional goal is to entrench itself in Syria and its 
	neighbors for the long term. It has already paid a high price for this in 
	blood and money, and there’s no reason to assume that it will give this up. 
	Israel, meanwhile, must prevent Iran from leaving its forces and the Shi’ite 
	militias in Syria – including Hezbollah – for the long term. This basic 
	conflict could lead to a confrontation again – and there’s no evidence yet 
	of a responsible adult among the great powers to ease the conflict of 
	interests.
	The bottom line is that Iran is trying to avoid a confrontation with Israel, 
	but will find it hard to remain silent for long if Israel strikes Iranian 
	targets. Thus we must take into account that at some stage Iran will take a 
	military action to deter Israel. Iran will want to surprise Israel – with 
	the timing, weapons or method. For that purpose it will prefer to activate 
	Hezbollah and other Shi’ite militias so as not to get involved itself.
	Iran may instruct Hezbollah to use its missile system, despite the risks 
	involved both to it and its emissaries. Iran would probably try to exploit 
	an opportunity when Israel is preoccupied with another crisis – the main 
	candidate is a conflict with Hamas in Gaza. And of course there’s also the 
	possibility of a mistake in judgment that would get Iran embroiled in a 
	conflict with Israel.
	**Ephraim Kam is a senior researcher at the Institute for National Security 
	Studies.
	
	https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/iran/iran-wants-to-avoid-a-clash-but-may-surprise-israel-1.5850054?utm_campaign=newsletter-most-read&utm_medium=email&utm_source=smartfocus&utm_content=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.haaretz.com%2Fmiddle-east-news%2Firan%2Firan-wants-to-avoid-a-clash-but-may-surprise-israel-1.5850054
UNRWA and Oxfam: Scandal and politics hit humanitarian 
organizations
Emad Eryan/Al Arabiya/February 28/18
Is it possible to accuse all international humanitarian organizations of 
indulging in immoral acts on a large scale in the wake of recent scandal that 
has struck UK-based Oxfam group?
Is it possible to point figures at all these institutions or organizations 
because of just a few incidents, abuses and attacks committed by some of these 
organizations? Can we not consider these as isolated incidents and not the norm?
Reviving old doubts
Although these are isolated instances, they remain quite serious offences and 
are quite disconcerting. They raise doubts about the work of NGOs and 
international charities, regardless of the humanitarian efforts they provide to 
the world’s poor and helpless. Moreover, such scandals also revive some of the 
past charges leveled against these organizations. International nongovernment 
organizations have often been accused of being a front for intelligence services 
and for carrying out hidden and illegal tasks for invisible forces. Western 
authorities in general, particularly America, seem defensive about the work and 
penetration of these organizations in societies of developing countries, and are 
accused of carrying out motivated, hideous agendas. Many developing countries 
even face sanctions because they oppose the violations committed by these 
organizations. They demand that the work and funding of these organizations 
should come under local supervision. In the past, these organizations have faced 
many accusations of having breached their mandate and of being involved in 
shameful practices, incompatible with their stated objectives. Even 
international peacekeepers have been found involved in such practices over the 
decades, such as in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
NGOs have often been accused of being a front for intelligence services and for 
carrying out hidden and illegal tasks for invisible forces
Today, Oxfam’s ‘immoral’ scandal — which has also tainted the organization 
Doctors without Borders — show how employees of these organizations take 
advantage of their authority, particularly on people who are in desperate need 
of humanitarian aid in crisis-afflicted areas. According to some of the parties 
that oppose such NGOs, the concept of helping people in need in crisis-hit areas 
remains vague because those who provide assistance have power, and some of the 
people who provide help take advantage of their power. International reports 
have confirmed that the staff of Oxfam did not hold the ‘lewd parties’ after the 
devastating earthquake that hit Haiti in 2010, but such parties may have been 
held during relief operations in Chad in 2006.
UNRWA targeted
Certainly, this is not the first “immoral” expose to have shaken the 
international aid community. It has been found that the staff of some relief 
organizations has been indulging in such crimes against the local citizenry for 
a long time. Thus, Doctors without Borders disclosed 24 cases of sex abuse or 
blackmail in 2017, while the ICRC acknowledged three cases of abuse during 
relief operations in Congo. Aid providers are reported to have misbehaved during 
the Yugoslav war in the 1990s. In order to assist abused women, German women’s 
rights organization, Medica Mondiale supported traumatized women in Bosnia 
during the conflict in Balkans. The NGOs in Cologne continue to help girls and 
women in war zones and crises till date. If one of the managers of these 
organizations finds it difficult to enforce checks on all their employees or 
their behavior, then it would be an even more serious issue. Again, many of 
these organizations receive aid or support from their governments, which allows 
security institutions to have a role in managing such organizations, even from 
behind the scenes, which are greater crimes.
In this regard, we can talk about the brutal campaign against the United Nations 
Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) led by the US, Israel and 
other Western countries. What is interesting here is that UNRWA is exposed to 
this unjust campaign, while it is in dire need of all possible international and 
regional support, for the great humanitarian work it is providing to Palestinian 
children, particularly in health and education fields.
There is no doubt that the American-Israeli attitude towards UNRWA is in itself 
a major international scandal that requires condemnation, even as embarrassing 
scandals and abuses committed by famous Western relief organizations continue 
without any word of condemnation.
Saad Hariri and ‘Sophie’s World’
Mashari Althaydi/Al Arabiya/February 28/18
Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri participated in the first episode of a 
television show in which children ask whatever questions pop up in their minds. 
Hariri answered questions, which reminded us of the simple origins of matters 
much more than the questions of “presumptuous” journalists do.
The program, which airs on the Lebanese MTV channel, is called The Bell Has 
Rung. It’s the Lebanese version of a foreign show in which students aged between 
10 and 12 meet with public figures and ask them questions. The conversation with 
the students, both male and female, was longer than an hour. They asked all 
sorts of questions including personal questions about the premier’s Iraqi 
mother, step-mother, his late brother Hussam, whom he was closest to, and about 
his late father Rafiq whose death continues to influence the Lebanese scene 
although it’s been more than 10 years since he was assassinated by those who 
accused him of treason.
Are there politicians in Lebanon brave enough to confront children’s unplanned 
questions, other than Saad Hariri who did not fully give up the politician’s 
trait of answering questions without revealing too much?
They also asked him about his relation with Saudi Arabia (Hariri has Saudi 
nationality) and with Lebanon where he’s originally from and how he entered the 
world of politics after his father was killed.One of the most interesting 
questions was by a student named Leya Qassab who is around 10 years old. “Do you 
have a minute to explain to us the difference between Sunnis and Shiites?” she 
asked the prime minister. Hariri tried to answer this “basic” question and said: 
“There is no difference between Sunnis and Shiites.” He wrote on the board in an 
attempt to explain this to them and concluded: “To me.. it’s a political 
dispute.”
The most difficult question
Truth be told, the most difficult questions are those of children because the 
latter have not been “tamed” yet within the social framework. Therefore, they 
can ask and inquire all they want. Family magazines always include tips on how 
mothers should deal with children’s embarrassing questions. From a philosophical 
perspective, children’s questions constitute a special field of research. A real 
philosopher is he who maintains the child’s continuous astonishment. The 
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy says: “The philosophy of childhood has 
recently come to be recognized as an area of inquiry analogous to the philosophy 
of science, the philosophy of history, the philosophy of religion, and the many 
other ‘philosophy of’ subjects that are already considered legitimate areas of 
philosophical study.” The book Sophie’s World by Norwegian author Jostein 
Gaarder, which was translated into several languages, is about a child 
protagonist exploring philosophy thanks to her continuous amazement with the 
universe and man. Amazement is the first childhood trait.
Are there politicians in Lebanon who are brave enough to confront children’s 
unplanned questions, other than Saad Hariri who did not fully give up the 
politician’s trait of answering questions without revealing too much?