LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
February 01/2018
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/newselias18/english.february01.18.htm 

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006

Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on February 01/18
Welcome to America, Terrorists! Right This Way for Student Visas!
Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/January 31/18
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11816/student-visas-terrorists
"Foreign students have one of the highest rates of overstaying visas of any category -- much higher even than tourist visas. It's one of the favorite visas for terrorists to try to obtain, because it offers a longer duration of stay." — Jessica M. Vaughan, the director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies.
According to the Department of Homeland Security, there were approximately 739,000 immigrants who overstayed their visas last year alone. Roughly 80,000 of those were foreign students.
Worse, jihadists do not even need to obtain a university admission to set foot in the US. They can get a student visa by obtaining an admission from a school to learn English. Many of these Islamists can alter their area of study once they set foot in the US. An agent of the Iranian regime, for instance, may get a visa to study English in the US, but once he arrives, he can switch that major to study nuclear physics, to help his regime obtain nuclear weapons.
Recently, in the middle of a speech at a conference in Europe about the threats of radical jihadist groups, a young imam stood up and vehemently voiced his objection to my remarks. At the end of the conference, the imam and several of his followers came forward. The imam insisted that Americans should be educated about Sharia law.
One of the imam's followers spoke up, his voice filled with excitement as he described how they had just entered Europe and their next destination was the US. When asked what their experience was like traveling to Europe, the man responded with a tone of gloating in his voice.
"It was very easy," he said. "We came here on a student visa, and we will be in the US on another student visa!"
What the man claimed was tragically true. Many Islamists have become adept at manipulating the flaws in the immigration system and have found ways of taking advantage of any legal loopholes.
The breach should concern everyone: any prospective jihadists can easily abuse the immigration system by coming to the US on a student visa. All he needs to do is apply to some US universities, receive a letter of admission, then take it to the closest US embassy as a credible document for obtaining an F-1 student visa.
Those jihadists who desire to hide their origins or find it more difficult to get into the US universities, simply get a student visa from a European country; then, after they are in Europe, it is easier to obtain a student visa to move to the US. Unfortunately, some intelligence and immigration officials believe that since these people have already entered Europe, then they are less of a risk because they have "passed" some security screening.
When students from countries that harbor jihadists and Islamists attempt to get a student visa, they are not fully vetted for whether they sympathize and support jihadist extremist groups. The background screening of these jihadists is at best inadequate, and at worst pathetic. It is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to obtain any genuine information on their background. A few minutes of an interview in the embassy, a quick review of the applications, and an ineffective check of the names against the normally outdated database of people of concern, are totally insufficient tools to detect whoever wants to come to the US to support Islamist groups, commit terrorism, or harm Americans.
The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS; an agency of the U.S. Department of Justice until 2003) admitted that there are so many visas granted each year across the world that it is impossible to check the background of every single applicant.
Recall that some of the September 11 attackers entered the United States using student visas. Not long ago, according the Department of Justice, four university students from Ohio and Illinois were indicted for providing support to Al Qaeda.
Worse, jihadists do not even need to obtain a university admission to set foot in the US. They can get a student visa by obtaining admission from a school to learn English.
Once these jihadists set foot in the country, they move around as they wish: there is no mechanism to check whether they are attending their schools or not. No one is adequately monitoring their actions or whereabouts.
In addition, many of these Islamists can alter their area of study once they set foot in the US. An agent of the Iranian regime, for instance, may get a visa to study English in the US, but once he arrives, he can switch that major to study nuclear physics, to help his regime obtain nuclear weapons.
Considering the risk posed to all Americans, it seems perfectly reasonable to ask, why should the US give visas to people who hate America and support Islamist regimes?
Moreover, both terrorist groups such as ISIS and anti-American regimes such as Iran actively target Muslim students who are already in the US. They may attempt to recruit them, or use them to glean information about the US. Many students are also radicalized through social media and the internet.
Finally, once these Islamists enter the US with student visas, many can overstay their visa in the knowledge that it is extremely unlikely that they will be deported.
Again, the terrorists responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing were living in the US with expired student visas for years before the attack.
According to the US Department of Homeland Security, there were approximately 739,000 immigrants who overstayed their visas last year. Roughly 80,000 of those were foreign students.
According to the director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies, Jessica M. Vaughan:
"Foreign students have one of the highest rates of overstaying visas of any category -- much higher even than tourist visas. It's one of the favorite visas for terrorists to try to obtain, because it offers a longer duration of stay."
Why should those who come from places that breed and encourage terrorism, anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism be able to obtain student visas with such ease? Closing the loopholes and stopping the mismanagement of issuing student visas should be one of the highest priorities of the American national security agencies -- before another terrorist attack takes the lives of innocent citizens and upends the entire nation again.
**Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, is a business strategist and advisor, Harvard-educated scholar, political scientist, board member of Harvard International Review, and president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He has authored books on Islam and US Foreign Policy. He can be reached at Dr.Rafizadeh@Post.Harvard.Edu.
© 2018 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Europe: Making Totalitarianism Great Again
Judith Bergman/Gatestone Institute/January 31/18
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11814/europe-totalitarianism
The European Union has programs in place that seek heavily to influence mainstream news outlets and journalists with its own agendas -- such as that of continued mass-migration into Europe from Africa and the Middle East. For this purpose, the European Commission recently funded the publication of a handbook with guidelines for journalists on how to write about migrants and migration.
It is seemingly in the interest of these media representatives to label competition from alternative or new media, "fake news".
A proposed French law would allow authorities to block websites during election seasons, a draconian measure to combat political opponents, which would place France in the same category as countries such as China and Iran that block websites that do not suit the agendas of the regime.
The European Union is intensifying its efforts to censor and marginalize voices that disagree with its policies, under the convenient euphemism of combating "fake news".
"The Commission needs to look into the challenges the online platforms create for our democracies as regards the spreading of fake information and initiate a reflection on what would be needed at EU level to protect our citizens," wrote Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission, in May 2017. How considerate that Juncker, in totalitarian fashion, wishes to protect EU citizens from news that does not fit the Commission's narratives and agendas.
In October 2017, the European Commission announced its "fake news" policies and how it intends to "design solutions to address the spread of fake news". According to the Commission, "Fake news consists of intentional disinformation spread via online social platforms, broadcast news media or traditional print". Furthermore, according to the Commission, the EU's fake news policy is guided by, among other things, "the freedom of expression, media pluralism, and the right of citizens to diverse and reliable information".
This assurance of freedom of expression and pluralism comes across as rather laughable: the EU already does what it can to eliminate "media pluralism and... diverse and reliable information". The EU, for example, has programs in place -- such as the Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme (REC) - - that seek heavily to influence European mainstream news outlets and their journalists with its own agendas -- such as that of continued mass-migration into Europe from Africa and the Middle East. For this purpose, the European Commission recently funded the publication of a handbook with guidelines for journalists on how to write about migrants and migration. The handbook was launched on October 12 by the International Press Institute (IPI) -- an association of media professionals representing leading digital, print and broadcast news outlets in more than 120 countries. Specifically, with regard to Muslims, the guidelines recommend:
"... Take care not to further stigmatise terms such as 'Muslim' or 'Islam' by associating them with particular acts... Don't allow extremists' claims about acting 'in the name of Islam' to stand unchallenged. Highlight... the diversity of Muslim communities..."
The EU also financially supports a campaign, "Media Against Hate" run by the European Federation of Journalists (EJF), the largest organization of journalists in Europe, which represents over 320,000 journalists across 43 countries. That campaign aims to:
"... improve media coverage related to migration, refugees, religion and marginalised groups... counter hate speech, intolerance, racism and discrimination... improve implementation of legal frameworks regulating hate speech and freedom of speech..."
To further its nascent "fake news" policies, the European Commission recently appointed 39 "experts" to a so-called "High Level Group (HLEG) on Fake News and online disinformation":
"It comprises representatives of the civil society, social media platforms, news media organisations, journalists and academia....
"The High Level group will advise the Commission on scoping the phenomenon of fake news, defining the roles and responsibilities of relevant stakeholders, grasping the international dimension, taking stock of the positions at stake, and formulating recommendations".
The media representatives have been almost exclusively picked from the mainstream media -- giants such as ARD, RTL, Swedish state television, Sky News, AFP and News Media Europe, which renders any sort of balanced outcome that these "experts" might reach a rather illusory option. To the extent that they even view new or alternative media as a threat, it is seemingly in the interest of these media representatives to label competition from alternative or new media, "fake news". The high-level group held its inaugural meeting on January 15, 2018.
The European Commission will poll EU citizens and conduct a Eurobarometer public opinion survey to be launched early 2018 "to measure and analyse the perceptions and concerns of the European citizens around fake news". The Commission will also be organizing a "multi-stakeholder conference on Fake News" which, will "define the boundaries of the problem, assess the effectiveness of the solutions already put in place by social media platforms and... agree on key principles for further action".
The EU is not alone in threatening the shutting down of free speech under the cover of combating "fake news". In France, President Emmanuel Macron has announced that he wants to introduce new legislation aimed at regulating "fake news" during election seasons, including "emergency legal actions" that would allow the French government to remove "fake news" from a website or block sites entirely. Macron said:
"If we want to protect liberal democracies, we must be strong and have clear rules. When fake news is spread, it will be possible to go to a judge ... and if appropriate, have content taken down, user accounts deleted and ultimately websites blocked."
A law like this would mean that the French state -- or whoever is placed in a position to act as thought police on its behalf -- would become the arbiter of what constitutes "truth", much in the same way as the new German censorship law requires social media networks to act as the privatized thought police of the German state.
The proposed French law, however, would go even further than the German censorship, in that it would allow French authorities to block entire websites during election seasons, a draconian measure to combat political opponents, which would place France in the same category as countries such as China and Iran that block websites that do not suit the agendas of the regime.
Such a French law would also be in violation of the right to freedom of expression and information guaranteed in Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, to which France is a party, and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Article 10 states that everyone not only has the right to freedom of expression but "to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers..." Governments are not supposed to interfere in that right -- with a few specific exceptions described in Article 10 -- because such interference constitutes government censorship.
Overall, Europe appears to be aspiring to make totalitarianism great again.
Both European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker (left) and French President Emmanuel Macron (right) are proposing restrictions that would violate the right to freedom of expression and information that is guaranteed in the European Convention on Human Rights. (Image source: European Commission)
**Judith Bergman is a columnist, lawyer and political analyst.
© 2018 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

The Khomeini regime and the Supreme Guide’s cane
Mashari Althaydi/Al Arabiya/January 31/18
In Europe, some have speculated, specifically those in agreement with Iran, that the Khomeini regime has survived the public’s recent protest storm, which sparked anger among the regime and its followers in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen.
The Khomeini regime suffers from an infrastructural problem. It has lost its connection with the Iranians, mainly the youth, which make up the largest demographic bloc in the population. The issue is not a conspiracy from the Saudis or the Americans as Iranian propaganda like to claim, but indeed a flaw in the regime and those in charge of it. These are not my own words, but those of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, in his indirect response to the Supreme Guide Khamenei’s statements made days after the protests – a time when he felt that his Revolutionary Guards will suppress the angry protesters.
It wasn’t Rouhani alone who said this, with pride and modesty that is, but also other symbolic figures who had served the regime or the “Khomeini Revolution” from its beginnings. It also included those who led the Green Revolution in 2009, Mousavi, Karroubi and others.
This revolution that erupted from within the regime, but soon died out after Barack Obama failed it, with his political pessimism and strategic patience. We later understood that the Green Movement’s failure in Iran and for the Syrians was a bribe to those who “serve” Khomeini regime in order to pass Obama’s deal with them.
System flaws
Flaws in the system will not be cured by Obama’s previous gifts, nor with his “White heirs” in Europe, because there’s a deep disease from the core. Mehdi Karoubi, the former president of the Iranian parliament and a leader of the Green Movement, a man who has been under house arrest for seven years, has openly attacked Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in a letter blaming him for the situation in Iran. This is because he has been at the core of Iranian responsibility, since the beginning of the Khomeini Revolution, occupying the posts of minister, president and a guide. The letter was published on Iranian news website “Saham News” affiliated with Etemad Meli or the National Trust Party, headed by Karoubi. Flaws in the system will not be cured by Obama’s previous gifts, nor with his “White heirs” in Europe, because there’s a deep disease from the core. In the letter, Karoubi -- a historical figure in the Khomeini Republic -- also recalled what Khomeini cautioned in the early years of the revolution. “You must be afraid of the day when people understand what you have in mind, then it’s going to be then end all of us,” he said. Karoubi strongly criticized Khamenei, saying that the political, economic, cultural and social situation in Iran is “a direct result of his strategic and operational policies.” He wrote to Khamenei saying: “The regime is now in a downward spiral.” We are not saying that the system will fall similarly to that of the Roman Ceausescu regime. However, the collapse is inevitable, bit by bit, even if it finally leaning on the Supreme Guide’s cane.

The bitter taste of Mosul
Christine Jamet/Al Arabiya/January 31/18
In an article published in the Independent on 17 January, the journalist Robert Fisk questions the delivery of care by medical aid groups embedded with the international coalition during the offensive on Mosul. He quotes one MSF member, Jonathan Whittall, who argued in a blog post in June, that the presence of for-profit organizations and military medical units was a threat to independent and humanitarian action. Echoing Whittall’s concerns, Fisk points out that humanitarian actors would be endangered by being perceived as aligned with other healthcare providers working in conjunction with the Coalition’s goal. We think that this analysis is a smokescreen which is evading the main challenges faced by humanitarian actors in Mosul.
This article is co-written by Isabelle Defourny.
It is a fact that during the offensive to regain Mosul from ISIS forces, MSF did not have a monopoly on medical assistance. The medical pathway for the wounded had been organized by the Iraqi government, international donors and the UN at the same time as they plotted military scenarios. A whole chain of medical referrals was set up, which included the wounded being evacuated from the front lines by Iraqi forces, being stabilized and subsequently being referred to secondary and tertiary medical facilities. Implementing partners were hired by the World Health Organization and included private health providers who were ready to work close to the frontlines and to be embedded with military personnel. MSF was not one of those implementing partners. But we did not make this choice for fear of being perceived as too close to Iraqi forces. In fact, as in every war situation, we had no choice but to negotiate with the armed forces exercising actual control over the territory. With Mosul, because our attempts to engage in dialogue with ISIS had long since faltered, we were only able to work on one side of the conflict. It was with the Iraqi armed forces and their allied militias that we negotiated our access to the territories and the population, and that we negotiated the security of our teams. How could it have been otherwise, since they were the ones manning the checkpoints, and controlling the areas where we ran our activities?
On the battlefield
MSF staff assessed multiple locations along the front lines and concluded that it was simply too dangerous. Mines, drone attacks, explosions, airstrikes, snipers, possible chemical attacks – these were the tangible threats putting the lives of tens of thousands of civilians and humanitarian workers at risk. During a time when there were no functioning hospitals in Mosul, it became clear that it would be most pertinent to provide a wide range of health services (surgical and post-operative care, an inpatient feeding program, maternal healthcare and other lifesaving medical emergencies) to displaced people and local resident populations in safer locations away from the frontlines but still close enough to ensure a timely response.
Certainly, the arrival of new aid groups on the frontlines, such as the ones described by Robert Fisk, did create multiple questions: who they were, how they operated, how they conducted the triage of their patients. But the primary issue at stake in Mosul was not the danger that these groups represented to a pure and principled humanitarianism
A few weeks after the start of the offensive on the west of the city, MSF teams were struggling to help civilians who had managed to escape ISIS snipers, the Iraqi ground offensive and the coalition’s airstrikes. Many of our patients were in need of urgent, lifesaving surgery. Entire families were wounded by the same mortar shell, the same mine explosion, the same airstrike. Just one month after the launch of the offensive on West Mosul, we had already received as many wounded as during the entire battle for East Mosul, which lasted three months. Virtually all of the wounded we received had been referred to us by the network of trauma stabilization points coordinated by the Iraqi government and the UN. Many patients did not survive due to the severity of their wounds. Inpatient capacity was over-stretched and post-operative care insufficient. Many escapees were psychologically traumatized by their experiences, first in ISIS-held territories and then in besieged Mosul, as well as afraid for their future, in a context where many were considered to be ISIS accomplices. In such circumstances, MSF’s ability to provide medical care on the basis of needs alone, and to give priority to the most urgent cases, was often put to the test. In Qayarah hospital for example, 60 km south of Mosul, we started to receive patient-detainees brought by various Iraqi authorities from detention centres, with many showing clear signs of ill-treatment and some in a very severe condition. Our medical teams did not know on what grounds the patients had been arrested, the conditions in which they were being held, or the criteria on which they were sent to us; nor did we know what happened to them once Iraqi authorities had returned them to the detention centers. The only assistance that MSF staff could provide to this group of detainees was medical care. And that is what we did. This situation highlights that our operations during this conflict did not take place without raising a great number of questions, but the questions were generally not related to the presence of private and military medical organizations at the frontlines.
During the final phase of the offensive on the Old City of Mosul, ISIS members were squeezed into a small, confined part of the city which was still inhabited by large numbers of civilians. Despite this, heavy bombing of the Old City was authorized. The patients treated in the aftermath had injuries ranging from shrapnel wounds, gunshots and blast injuries to burns and broken bones caused by collapsing buildings. With the city under siege, those civilians who did manage to flee reported a situation of extreme deprivation, with almost no food and water. This planned sacrifice of thousands of trapped civilians was the result of the encirclement of Old Mosul.
Certainly, the arrival of new aid groups on the frontlines, such as the ones described by Robert Fisk, did create multiple questions: who they were, how they operated, how they conducted the triage of their patients. But the primary issue at stake in Mosul was not the danger that these groups represented to a pure and principled humanitarianism. Although we were not aligned to the coalition’s objectives, although we were not an implementing partner of the UN, we were, however, a de facto component of the offensive’s damage control plan: by assisting those civilians who managed to escape, and by being powerless to do anything for those civilians condemned to die with ISIS militants inside the besieged town. That is the bitter taste of humanitarianism in Mosul’s war.

In the wake of Trump’s Mideast policy, neutrality doesn’t help
Walid Jawad/Al Arabiya/January 31/18
Donald Trump’s diplomatic style looks different than the political minefield, which virtually every American president had tried to navigate over the life of American engagement in the Palestinian–Israeli conflict. Tallying up the scorecard reveals the abysmal progress over decades of prodding the parties toward a viable and lasting peace. Trump’s remarks on Thursday in Davos, Switzerland ahead of his meeting with Israel’s Netanyahu saying that “We’ll see what happens with the peace process but respect has to be shown to the US or we'll just not going any further” is tantamount to inserting the US as a secondary party to the conflict. This statement forces Palestinian negotiators to redirect their attention to managing the hostile dynamic with the US instead of focusing on Israel, the other party to the conflict. But are Trump’s declarations combined with cutting off aid to the Palestinians bad things? I don’t think so. It is better for all parties to drop their masks and negotiate on truthful and realistic grounds. I would have given Trump credit for his courage to reposition the US role in a way that mirrors reality, but unfortunately he didn’t.
Break the cycle
It seems that Trump in his attempt to break the cycle of failed US policies toward the Palestinian-Israeli conflict took Jerusalem off of the negotiations table, as it were. Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, which prejudice final negotiations between the conflicting parties. Further, he cut aid pledged to the UN fund for Palestinian refugees down to $60 million while aid to Israel continues at $3.8 billion (yes, that’s with a “B”) a year. Trump summarizes the intent behind his policies by saying that the Palestinians are “going to have to want to make peace, or we're going to have nothing to do with them any longer.” Two things must be kept in mind here; one, that whatever the US policy is for now is tied to the Trump administration. The new American position will be revealed with a new president in 2020 or 2024. The challenge is for the Palestinians to avoid losing much ground until then. Two, that the court of public opinion has rendered its verdict judging for the Palestinians. This is a rare opportunity for them to present a different Palestinian face, one that is reasonable, calm and principled in achieving a better future for its citizens on the basis of justice and peaceful resistance. The Palestinian cause has been overshadowed by violent resistance over the decades. The morality discussion over this point is irrelevant because violence was and continues to be a failed strategy on any level.
Soft power is more effective in the digital age we live in. Perhaps it is a lesson that can be learned from nefarious actors, be it the Russian model in influencing American public opinion during the presidential elections or Jihadist decentralized digital warriors who created their own online strategy without getting clearances or authorizations from their leaders, some were not even members of any terrorist group. Palestinians have a story to share and it is time to create relatable human suffering and perseverance that people around the world, specially Americans, can sympathize with. Palestinians can look at the Jewish model in the US to see how they did it. There is almost no an American child who does not know Anne Frank; the young Jewish diarist who was murdered by the Nazis in the holocaust, a story that we all have sympathy for.
The US will remain the most influential player beyond the conflicting parties and must be accounted for as such. Therefore, Palestinians must understand and approach the American political system with a strategic eye and should deal with Trump through his own framework and strategy.
No publishers needed. Create stories and visual materials through social media campaigns by empowering the people to tell their own stories. Once the word “Palestinian” confers a human image of quiet pride and reasonable demands, Americans will exert pressure on their elected officials to balance the political and financial support the US provides to Israel.
Although American sympathy for Israel remains around 46% while support for Palestinians at 16% according to the latest Pew Research Center poll published earlier this month, we notice a subtle change. There is an increased number of republicans who are now in support of Israel while more democrats are in favor of Palestinians; a noteworthy change that is not apparent in the overall percentage, which didn’t change much since 1978. The US will remain the most influential player beyond the conflicting parties and must be accounted for as such. Therefore, Palestinians must understand and approach the American political system with a strategic eye and should deal with Trump through his own framework and strategy.
Peace negotiations
Trump’s approach is confusing negotiating for money with negotiating for the dignity of a nation and the affirmation of Palestinians’ history and culture. The position of the Palestinians, as is that of the Israelis, is grounded in tangible demands that mimic positions negotiated by businessmen and women over bottom-line and monetary gains. But it couldn’t be farther from it. The oversimplification of the peace process by forcing a business-like approach upon the parties will inevitably cause the deepening of the conflict.
Engaging in peace negotiations is conditional upon parties’ voluntary willingness to come to the table. Otherwise, any possible agreement forced upon the process by coercing a party into negotiating under duress for the sole purpose of appeasing the facilitator becomes null and void. Palestinian negotiators have to answer to their people when and if an agreement is reached. The two-state solution is increasingly becoming unrealistic. The latest Israeli position suggests institutionally legitimizing apartheid. If Israel wants the authority to control security over the Palestinians for the purpose of protecting itself, then it must balance its authority with an equivalent level of responsibility toward the Palestinians. Israel must accept its role as an occupying force. In light of its refusal to allow Palestinians the right of self-determination it must absorb the people of historic Palestine as Israeli citizens with full rights and responsibilities.

Full Text: Trump’s State of the Union address/النص الكامل لخطاب الرئيس ترامب الإتحادي
Fox News January 31/18
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/62220
The following is President Trump’s State of the Union address, as prepared for delivery:
Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, the First Lady of the United States, and my fellow Americans:
Less than 1 year has passed since I first stood at this podium, in this majestic chamber, to speak on behalf of the American People — and to address their concerns, their hopes, and their dreams. That night, our new Administration had already taken swift action. A new tide of optimism was already sweeping across our land.
Each day since, we have gone forward with a clear vision and a righteous mission — to make America great again for all Americans.
Over the last year, we have made incredible progress and achieved extraordinary success. We have faced challenges we expected, and others we could never have imagined. We have shared in the heights of victory and the pains of hardship. We endured floods and fires and storms. But through it all, we have seen the beauty of America’s soul, and the steel in America’s spine.
Each test has forged new American heroes to remind us who we are, and show us what we can be. We saw the volunteers of the “Cajun Navy,” racing to the rescue with their fishing boats to save people in the aftermath of a devastating hurricane. We saw strangers shielding strangers from a hail of gunfire on the Las Vegas strip.
We heard tales of Americans like Coast Guard Petty Officer Ashlee Leppert, who is here tonight in the gallery with Melania. Ashlee was aboard one of the first helicopters on the scene in Houston during Hurricane Harvey. Through 18 hours of wind and rain, Ashlee braved live power lines and deep water, to help save more than 40 lives. Thank you, Ashlee.
We heard about Americans like firefighter David Dahlberg. He is here with us too. David faced down walls of flame to rescue almost 60 children trapped at a California summer camp threatened by wildfires.
To everyone still recovering in Texas, Florida, Louisiana, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, California, and everywhere else — we are with you, we love you, and we will pull through together.
Some trials over the past year touched this chamber very personally. With us tonight is one of the toughest people ever to serve in this House — a guy who took a bullet, almost died, and was back to work three and a half months later: the legend from Louisiana, Congressman Steve Scalise.
Trump uses his State of the Union address to acknowledge ‘one of the toughest people ever to serve in this House,’ calls on lawmakers to set aside differences, seek out common ground and deliver for the American people.
We are incredibly grateful for the heroic efforts of the Capitol Police Officers, the Alexandria Police, and the doctors, nurses, and paramedics who saved his life, and the lives of many others in this room.
In the aftermath of that terrible shooting, we came together, not as Republicans or Democrats, but as representatives of the people. But it is not enough to come together only in times of tragedy. Tonight, I call upon all of us to set aside our differences, to seek out common ground, and to summon the unity we need to deliver for the people we were elected to serve.
Over the last year, the world has seen what we always knew: that no people on Earth are so fearless, or daring, or determined as Americans. If there is a mountain, we climb it. If there is a frontier, we cross it. If there is a challenge, we tame it. If there is an opportunity, we seize it.
So let us begin tonight by recognizing that the state of our Union is strong because our people are strong. And together, we are building a safe, strong, and proud America. Since the election, we have created 2.4 million new jobs, including 200,000 new jobs in manufacturing alone. After years of wage stagnation, we are finally seeing rising wages.
Unemployment claims have hit a 45-year low. African-American unemployment stands at the lowest rate ever recorded, and Hispanic American unemployment has also reached the lowest levels in history.
Small business confidence is at an all-time high. The stock market has smashed one record after another, gaining $8 trillion in value. That is great news for Americans’ 401k, retirement, pension, and college savings accounts.
And just as I promised the American people from this podium 11 months ago, we enacted the biggest tax cuts and reforms in American history. Our massive tax cuts provide tremendous relief for the middle class and small businesses.
To lower tax rates for hardworking Americans, we nearly doubled the standard deduction for everyone. Now, the first $24,000 earned by a married couple is completely tax-free. We also doubled the child tax credit.
A typical family of four making $75,000 will see their tax bill reduced by $2,000 — slashing their tax bill in half.
This April will be the last time you ever file under the old broken system — and millions of Americans will have more take-home pay starting next month.
We eliminated an especially cruel tax that fell mostly on Americans making less than $50,000 a year — forcing them to pay tremendous penalties simply because they could not afford government-ordered health plans. We repealed the core of disastrous Obamacare — the individual mandate is now gone.
President Trump says Republicans eliminated an ‘especially cruel tax’ that fell mostly on Americans making less than $50,000 a year and repealed the ‘core of disastrous ObamaCare.’
We slashed the business tax rate from 35 percent all the way down to 21 percent, so American companies can compete and win against anyone in the world. These changes alone are estimated to increase average family income by more than $4,000.
Small businesses have also received a massive tax cut, and can now deduct 20 percent of their business income. Here tonight are Steve Staub and Sandy Keplinger of Staub Manufacturing — a small business in Ohio. They have just finished the best year in their 20-year history. Because of tax reform, they are handing out raises, hiring an additional 14 people, and expanding into the building next door.
One of Staub’s employees, Corey Adams, is also with us tonight. Corey is an all-American worker. He supported himself through high school, lost his job during the 2008 recession, and was later hired by Staub, where he trained to become a welder. Like many hardworking Americans, Corey plans to invest his tax cut raise into his new home and his two daughters’ education. Please join me in congratulating Corey.
Since we passed tax cuts, roughly 3 million workers have already gotten tax cut bonuses — many of them thousands of dollars per worker. Apple has just announced it plans to invest a total of $350 billion in America, and hire another 20,000 workers. This is our new American moment. There has never been a better time to start living the American Dream. So to every citizen watching at home tonight — no matter where you have been, or where you come from, this is your time. If you work hard, if you believe in yourself, if you believe in America, then you can dream anything, you can be anything, and together, we can achieve anything.
Tonight, I want to talk about what kind of future we are going to have, and what kind of Nation we are going to be. All of us, together, as one team, one people, and one American family.
We all share the same home, the same heart, the same destiny, and the same great American flag.
Together, we are rediscovering the American way.
In America, we know that faith and family, not government and bureaucracy, are the center of the American life. Our motto is “in God we trust.”And we celebrate our police, our military, and our amazing veterans as heroes who deserve our total and unwavering support.
Here tonight is Preston Sharp, a 12-year-old boy from Redding, California, who noticed that veterans’ graves were not marked with flags on Veterans Day. He decided to change that, and started a movement that has now placed 40,000 flags at the graves of our great heroes. Preston: a job well done.
Young patriots like Preston teach all of us about our civic duty as Americans. Preston’s reverence for those who have served our Nation reminds us why we salute our flag, why we put our hands on our hearts for the pledge of allegiance, and why we proudly stand for the national anthem.
Americans love their country. And they deserve a Government that shows them the same love and loyalty in return.
For the last year we have sought to restore the bonds of trust between our citizens and their Government.
Working with the Senate, we are appointing judges who will interpret the Constitution as written, including a great new Supreme Court Justice, and more circuit court judges than any new administration in the history of our country.
We are defending our Second Amendment, and have taken historic actions to protect religious liberty.
And we are serving our brave veterans, including giving our veterans choice in their healthcare decisions. Last year, the Congress passed, and I signed, the landmark VA Accountability Act. Since its passage, my Administration has already removed more than 1,500 VA employees who failed to give our veterans the care they deserve — and we are hiring talented people who love our vets as much as we do.
I will not stop until our veterans are properly taken care of, which has been my promise to them from the very beginning of this great journey.
All Americans deserve accountability and respect — and that is what we are giving them. So tonight, I call on the Congress to empower every Cabinet Secretary with the authority to reward good workers — and to remove Federal employees who undermine the public trust or fail the American people.
In our drive to make Washington accountable, we have eliminated more regulations in our first year than any administration in history.
We have ended the war on American Energy — and we have ended the war on clean coal. We are now an exporter of energy to the world.
In Detroit, I halted Government mandates that crippled America’s autoworkers — so we can get the Motor City revving its engines once again.
Many car companies are now building and expanding plants in the United States — something we have not seen for decades. Chrysler is moving a major plant from Mexico to Michigan; Toyota and Mazda are opening up a plant in Alabama. Soon, plants will be opening up all over the country. This is all news Americans are unaccustomed to hearing — for many years, companies and jobs were only leaving us. But now they are coming back.
Exciting progress is happening every day.
To speed access to breakthrough cures and affordable generic drugs, last year the FDA approved more new and generic drugs and medical devices than ever before in our history.
We also believe that patients with terminal conditions should have access to experimental treatments that could potentially save their lives.
People who are terminally ill should not have to go from country to country to seek a cure — I want to give them a chance right here at home. It is time for the Congress to give these wonderful Americans the “right to try.”
President Trump says terminally ill patients should have access to experimental treatments that could potentially save their lives and should not have to go from country to country to seek a cure.
One of my greatest priorities is to reduce the price of prescription drugs. In many other countries, these drugs cost far less than what we pay in the United States. That is why I have directed my Administration to make fixing the injustice of high drug prices one of our top priorities. Prices will come down.
America has also finally turned the page on decades of unfair trade deals that sacrificed our prosperity and shipped away our companies, our jobs, and our Nation’s wealth.
The era of economic surrender is over.
From now on, we expect trading relationships to be fair and to be reciprocal.
We will work to fix bad trade deals and negotiate new ones.
And we will protect American workers and American intellectual property, through strong enforcement of our trade rules.
As we rebuild our industries, it is also time to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure.
America is a nation of builders. We built the Empire State Building in just 1 year — is it not a disgrace that it can now take 10 years just to get a permit approved for a simple road?
I am asking both parties to come together to give us the safe, fast, reliable, and modern infrastructure our economy needs and our people deserve.
Tonight, I am calling on the Congress to produce a bill that generates at least $1.5 trillion for the new infrastructure investment we need.
Every Federal dollar should be leveraged by partnering with State and local governments and, where appropriate, tapping into private sector investment — to permanently fix the infrastructure deficit.
Any bill must also streamline the permitting and approval process — getting it down to no more than two years, and perhaps even one.
Together, we can reclaim our building heritage. We will build gleaming new roads, bridges, highways, railways, and waterways across our land. And we will do it with American heart, American hands, and American grit.
We want every American to know the dignity of a hard day’s work. We want every child to be safe in their home at night. And we want every citizen to be proud of this land that we love.
We can lift our citizens from welfare to work, from dependence to independence, and from poverty to prosperity.
As tax cuts create new jobs, let us invest in workforce development and job training. Let us open great vocational schools so our future workers can learn a craft and realize their full potential. And let us support working families by supporting paid family leave.
As America regains its strength, this opportunity must be extended to all citizens. That is why this year we will embark on reforming our prisons to help former inmates who have served their time get a second chance.
Struggling communities, especially immigrant communities, will also be helped by immigration policies that focus on the best interests of American workers and American families.
For decades, open borders have allowed drugs and gangs to pour into our most vulnerable communities. They have allowed millions of low-wage workers to compete for jobs and wages against the poorest Americans. Most tragically, they have caused the loss of many innocent lives.
President Trump says Americans are grieving for Evelyn Rodriguez, Freddy Cuevas, Elizabeth Alvarado and Robert Mickens whose daughters Kayla Cuevas and Nisa Mickens were killed on Long Island.
Here tonight are two fathers and two mothers: Evelyn Rodriguez, Freddy Cuevas, Elizabeth Alvarado, and Robert Mickens. Their two teenage daughters — Kayla Cuevas and Nisa Mickens — were close friends on Long Island. But in September 2016, on the eve of Nisa’s 16th Birthday, neither of them came home. These two precious girls were brutally murdered while walking together in their hometown. Six members of the savage gang MS-13 have been charged with Kayla and Nisa’s murders. Many of these gang members took advantage of glaring loopholes in our laws to enter the country as unaccompanied alien minors – and wound up in Kayla and Nisa’s high school.
Evelyn, Elizabeth, Freddy, and Robert: Tonight, everyone in this chamber is praying for you. Everyone in America is grieving for you. And 320 million hearts are breaking for you. We cannot imagine the depth of your sorrow, but we can make sure that other families never have to endure this pain.
Tonight, I am calling on the Congress to finally close the deadly loopholes that have allowed MS-13, and other criminals, to break into our country. We have proposed new legislation that will fix our immigration laws, and support our ICE and Border Patrol Agents, so that this cannot ever happen again.
The United States is a compassionate nation. We are proud that we do more than any other country to help the needy, the struggling, and the underprivileged all over the world. But as President of the United States, my highest loyalty, my greatest compassion, and my constant concern is for America’s children, America’s struggling workers, and America’s forgotten communities. I want our youth to grow up to achieve great things. I want our poor to have their chance to rise.
So tonight, I am extending an open hand to work with members of both parties — Democrats and Republicans — to protect our citizens of every background, color, religion, and creed. My duty, and the sacred duty of every elected official in this chamber, is to defend Americans — to protect their safety, their families, their communities, and their right to the American Dream. Because Americans are dreamers too.
Here tonight is one leader in the effort to defend our country: Homeland Security Investigations Special Agent Celestino Martinez — he goes by C.J. C.J. served 15 years in the Air Force before becoming an ICE agent and spending the last 15 years fighting gang violence and getting dangerous criminals off our streets. At one point, MS-13 leaders ordered C.J.’s murder. But he did not cave to threats or fear. Last May, he commanded an operation to track down gang members on Long Island. His team has arrested nearly 400, including more than 220 from MS-13.
C.J.: Great work. Now let us get the Congress to send you some reinforcements.
Over the next few weeks, the House and Senate will be voting on an immigration reform package.
In recent months, my Administration has met extensively with both Democrats and Republicans to craft a bipartisan approach to immigration reform. Based on these discussions, we presented the Congress with a detailed proposal that should be supported by both parties as a fair compromise — one where nobody gets everything they want, but where our country gets the critical reforms it needs.
Here are the four pillars of our plan:
The first pillar of our framework generously offers a path to citizenship for 1.8 million illegal immigrants who were brought here by their parents at a young age — that covers almost three times more people than the previous administration. Under our plan, those who meet education and work requirements, and show good moral character, will be able to become full citizens of the United States.
The second pillar fully secures the border. That means building a wall on the Southern border, and it means hiring more heroes like C.J. to keep our communities safe. Crucially, our plan closes the terrible loopholes exploited by criminals and terrorists to enter our country — and it finally ends the dangerous practice of “catch and release.”
The third pillar ends the visa lottery — a program that randomly hands out green cards without any regard for skill, merit, or the safety of our people. It is time to begin moving towards a merit-based immigration system — one that admits people who are skilled, who want to work, who will contribute to our society, and who will love and respect our country.
The fourth and final pillar protects the nuclear family by ending chain migration. Under the current broken system, a single immigrant can bring in virtually unlimited numbers of distant relatives. Under our plan, we focus on the immediate family by limiting sponsorships to spouses and minor children. This vital reform is necessary, not just for our economy, but for our security, and our future.
In recent weeks, two terrorist attacks in New York were made possible by the visa lottery and chain migration. In the age of terrorism, these programs present risks we can no longer afford.
It is time to reform these outdated immigration rules, and finally bring our immigration system into the 21st century.
These four pillars represent a down-the-middle compromise, and one that will create a safe, modern, and lawful immigration system.
For over 30 years, Washington has tried and failed to solve this problem. This Congress can be the one that finally makes it happen.
Most importantly, these four pillars will produce legislation that fulfills my ironclad pledge to only sign a bill that puts America first. So let us come together, set politics aside, and finally get the job done.
These reforms will also support our response to the terrible crisis of opioid and drug addiction.
In 2016, we lost 64,000 Americans to drug overdoses: 174 deaths per day. Seven per hour. We must get much tougher on drug dealers and pushers if we are going to succeed in stopping this scourge.
My Administration is committed to fighting the drug epidemic and helping get treatment for those in need. The struggle will be long and difficult — but, as Americans always do, we will prevail.
As we have seen tonight, the most difficult challenges bring out the best in America.
We see a vivid expression of this truth in the story of the Holets family of New Mexico. Ryan Holets is 27 years old, and an officer with the Albuquerque Police Department. He is here tonight with his wife Rebecca. Last year, Ryan was on duty when he saw a pregnant, homeless woman preparing to inject heroin. When Ryan told her she was going to harm her unborn child, she began to weep. She told him she did not know where to turn, but badly wanted a safe home for her baby.
In that moment, Ryan said he felt God speak to him: “You will do it — because you can.” He took out a picture of his wife and their four kids. Then, he went home to tell his wife Rebecca. In an instant, she agreed to adopt. The Holets named their new daughter Hope.
Ryan and Rebecca: You embody the goodness of our Nation. Thank you, and congratulations.
As we rebuild America’s strength and confidence at home, we are also restoring our strength and standing abroad.
Around the world, we face rogue regimes, terrorist groups, and rivals like China and Russia that challenge our interests, our economy, and our values. In confronting these dangers, we know that weakness is the surest path to conflict, and unmatched power is the surest means of our defense.
For this reason, I am asking the Congress to end the dangerous defense sequester and fully fund our great military.
As part of our defense, we must modernize and rebuild our nuclear arsenal, hopefully never having to use it, but making it so strong and powerful that it will deter any acts of aggression. Perhaps someday in the future there will be a magical moment when the countries of the world will get together to eliminate their nuclear weapons. Unfortunately, we are not there yet.
Last year, I also pledged that we would work with our allies to extinguish ISIS from the face of the Earth. One year later, I am proud to report that the coalition to defeat ISIS has liberated almost 100 percent of the territory once held by these killers in Iraq and Syria. But there is much more work to be done. We will continue our fight until ISIS is defeated.
Army Staff Sergeant Justin Peck is here tonight. Near Raqqa last November, Justin and his comrade, Chief Petty Officer Kenton Stacy, were on a mission to clear buildings that ISIS had rigged with explosives so that civilians could return to the city.
Clearing the second floor of a vital hospital, Kenton Stacy was severely wounded by an explosion. Immediately, Justin bounded into the booby-trapped building and found Kenton in bad shape. He applied pressure to the wound and inserted a tube to reopen an airway. He then performed CPR for 20 straight minutes during the ground transport and maintained artificial respiration through 2 hours of emergency surgery.
Kenton Stacy would have died if not for Justin’s selfless love for a fellow warrior. Tonight, Kenton is recovering in Texas. Raqqa is liberated. And Justin is wearing his new Bronze Star, with a “V” for “Valor.” Staff Sergeant Peck: All of America salutes you.
Terrorists who do things like place bombs in civilian hospitals are evil. When possible, we annihilate them. When necessary, we must be able to detain and question them. But we must be clear: Terrorists are not merely criminals. They are unlawful enemy combatants. And when captured overseas, they should be treated like the terrorists they are.
In the past, we have foolishly released hundreds of dangerous terrorists, only to meet them again on the battlefield — including the ISIS leader, al-Baghdadi.
So today, I am keeping another promise. I just signed an order directing Secretary Mattis to reexamine our military detention policy and to keep open the detention facilities at Guantánamo Bay.
I am also asking the Congress to ensure that, in the fight against ISIS and Al Qaeda, we continue to have all necessary power to detain terrorists — wherever we chase them down.
Our warriors in Afghanistan also have new rules of engagement. Along with their heroic Afghan partners, our military is no longer undermined by artificial timelines, and we no longer tell our enemies our plans.
Last month, I also took an action endorsed unanimously by the Senate just months before: I recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Shortly afterwards, dozens of countries voted in the United Nations General Assembly against America’s sovereign right to make this recognition. American taxpayers generously send those same countries billions of dollars in aid every year.
That is why, tonight, I am asking the Congress to pass legislation to help ensure American foreign-assistance dollars always serve American interests, and only go to America’s friends.
As we strengthen friendships around the world, we are also restoring clarity about our adversaries.
When the people of Iran rose up against the crimes of their corrupt dictatorship, I did not stay silent. America stands with the people of Iran in their courageous struggle for freedom.
I am asking the Congress to address the fundamental flaws in the terrible Iran nuclear deal.
My Administration has also imposed tough sanctions on the communist and socialist dictatorships in Cuba and Venezuela.
But no regime has oppressed its own citizens more totally or brutally than the cruel dictatorship in North Korea.
North Korea’s reckless pursuit of nuclear missiles could very soon threaten our homeland.
We are waging a campaign of maximum pressure to prevent that from happening.
Past experience has taught us that complacency and concessions only invite aggression and provocation. I will not repeat the mistakes of past administrations that got us into this dangerous position.
We need only look at the depraved character of the North Korean regime to understand the nature of the nuclear threat it could pose to America and our allies.
Otto Warmbier was a hardworking student at the University of Virginia. On his way to study abroad in Asia, Otto joined a tour to North Korea. At its conclusion, this wonderful young man was arrested and charged with crimes against the state. After a shameful trial, the dictatorship sentenced Otto to 15 years of hard labor, before returning him to America last June — horribly injured and on the verge of death. He passed away just days after his return.
Otto’s Parents, Fred and Cindy Warmbier, are with us tonight — along with Otto’s brother and sister, Austin and Greta. You are powerful witnesses to a menace that threatens our world, and your strength inspires us all. Tonight, we pledge to honor Otto’s memory with American resolve.
Finally, we are joined by one more witness to the ominous nature of this regime. His name is Mr. Ji Seong-ho.
In 1996, Seong-ho was a starving boy in North Korea. One day, he tried to steal coal from a railroad car to barter for a few scraps of food. In the process, he passed out on the train tracks, exhausted from hunger. He woke up as a train ran over his limbs. He then endured multiple amputations without anything to dull the pain. His brother and sister gave what little food they had to help him recover and ate dirt themselves — permanently stunting their own growth. Later, he was tortured by North Korean authorities after returning from a brief visit to China. His tormentors wanted to know if he had met any Christians. He had — and he resolved to be free.
Seong-ho traveled thousands of miles on crutches across China and Southeast Asia to freedom. Most of his family followed. His father was caught trying to escape, and was tortured to death.
Today he lives in Seoul, where he rescues other defectors, and broadcasts into North Korea what the regime fears the most – the truth.
Today he has a new leg, but Seong-ho, I understand you still keep those crutches as a reminder of how far you have come. Your great sacrifice is an inspiration to us all.
Seong-ho’s story is a testament to the yearning of every human soul to live in freedom.
It was that same yearning for freedom that nearly 250 years ago gave birth to a special place called America. It was a small cluster of colonies caught between a great ocean and a vast wilderness. But it was home to an incredible people with a revolutionary idea: that they could rule themselves. That they could chart their own destiny. And that, together, they could light up the world.
That is what our country has always been about. That is what Americans have always stood for, always strived for, and always done.
Atop the dome of this Capitol stands the Statue of Freedom. She stands tall and dignified among the monuments to our ancestors who fought and lived and died to protect her.
Monuments to Washington and Jefferson — to Lincoln and King.
Memorials to the heroes of Yorktown and Saratoga — to young Americans who shed their blood on the shores of Normandy, and the fields beyond. And others, who went down in the waters of the Pacific and the skies over Asia.
And freedom stands tall over one more monument: this one. This Capitol. This living monument to the American people.
A people whose heroes live not only in the past, but all around us — defending hope, pride, and the American way.
They work in every trade. They sacrifice to raise a family. They care for our children at home. They defend our flag abroad. They are strong moms and brave kids. They are firefighters, police officers, border agents, medics, and Marines.
But above all else, they are Americans. And this Capitol, this city, and this Nation, belong to them.
Our task is to respect them, to listen to them, to serve them, to protect them, and to always be worthy of them.
Americans fill the world with art and music. They push the bounds of science and discovery. And they forever remind us of what we should never forget: The people dreamed this country. The people built this country. And it is the people who are making America great again.
As long as we are proud of who we are, and what we are fighting for, there is nothing we cannot achieve.
As long as we have confidence in our values, faith in our citizens, and trust in our God, we will not fail.
Our families will thrive.
Our people will prosper.
And our Nation will forever be safe and strong and proud and mighty and free.
Thank you, and God bless America.