LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS
BULLETIN
June 06/17
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
The
Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/newselias/english.june06.17.htm
News
Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily
English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2016
Bible Quotations For Today
God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in
spirit and truth
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 04/21-24/:"Jesus said to
her, ‘Woman, believe me, the hour is coming when you will worship the Father
neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem. You worship what you do not know; we
worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews. But the hour is coming,
and is now here, when the true worshippers will worship the Father in spirit and
truth, for the Father seeks such as these to worship him. God is spirit, and
those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.’"
Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of
Jesus Christ so that your sins may be forgiven
Acts of the Apostles 02/29-39/:"‘Fellow Israelites, I may say to you confidently
of our ancestor David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us
to this day. Since he was a prophet, he knew that God had sworn with an oath to
him that he would put one of his descendants on his throne. Foreseeing this,
David spoke of the resurrection of the Messiah, saying, "He was not abandoned to
Hades, nor did his flesh experience corruption." This Jesus God raised up, and
of that all of us are witnesses. Being therefore exalted at the right hand of
God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, he has
poured out this that you both see and hear. For David did not ascend into the
heavens, but he himself says, "The Lord said to my Lord, ‘Sit at my right hand,
until I make your enemies your footstool.’ " Therefore let the entire house of
Israel know with certainty that God has made him both Lord and Messiah, this
Jesus whom you crucified.’Now when they heard this, they were cut to the heart
and said to Peter and to the other apostles, ‘Brothers, what should we do?’Peter
said to them, ‘Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus
Christ so that your sins may be forgiven; and you will receive the gift of the
Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you, for your children, and for all who are
far away, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to him.’
Titles For Latest LCCC
Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on June
05-06/17
The Blood of Lamis Nacchouche Shall be the Beginning of an Uprising/Ahmad El-Assaad
June 05/ 2017
What is happening with Qatar can happen any moment with Lebanon/François Bainy/Face
Book/June 05/17
Walid Phares, the Natational. Security Expert: Time for ‘Real Resistance’
Against Jihadis/Kathryn Blackhurst/LifeZette/June 05/17
Five Reasons Why Israel Should Care About The Qatar Crisis/Jerusalem Post /June
05/17
Defeating Extremist Islam - A Western Imperative/Saied Shoaaib/Gatestone
Institute/June 05/17
Turkey: Jail for Hunger Strike/Burak Bekdil/Gatestone Institute/June 05/17
Nasser's populist rhetoric still affects region/Dr. Simon Waldman/The
National/June 05/17
Qatar needs to address its policy contradictions/Majid Rafizadeh/The
National/June 05/17
Fredom Of Speech in the Age of Yellow Journalism/www.tayyar.org/June 05/17
Europe Has No Bubbles to Fear/Ferdinando Giugliano/Bloomberg View/June 05/17
What Does Russia Think/David Ignatius/The Washington Post/June 05/17
The World Bank Has Bigger Problems Than Bad Writing/Noah Smith/Bloomberg/June
05/17
Ambassadors of the Dark/Ghassan Charbel/Asharq Al Awsat/June 05/17
Six Muslim Countries Just Got Sick of Qatar Bankrolling Terror/Elliot Friedland/Clarion
Project/June 06/17
Titles For Latest
Lebanese Related News published on
June 05-06/17
Authorities to impose tight security in Baalbeck:
Aoun
Pro-Hizbullah Lebanese Journalist Rafiq Nasrallah: Hizbullah Can Strike Israel
By Air, And Show It On TV In Real Time - 'We Have Technology Now'
Lassen Visits EU-Funded Projects in Support of Vulnerable Communities in Bekaa
Adwan Says PM to Hold 'Final' Meeting on Electoral Law before Going to Cabinet
Berri Says Vote Law Details Must be Agreed Before Deadline
Hasbani Acts after Woman Dies of Lipo Complications as Jreissati Vows
Accountability
Airport Customs Seize 5 Kg of Cocaine, Detain Smuggler
Hariri: Amnesty Bill Will Soon be Issued to Bring Justice to All
Man Found Dead at Suburban Home Northeast Beirut
Hariri: Cabinet to Convene in Tripoli to Endorse Development Projects
Hariri receives delegations from Interparliamentary Assembly on Orthodoxy, Arab
Parliamentary Union and Lebanese University
Kataeb warns against electoral deal: For discussing election law within
constitutional institutions
Farah Kassab's family voices confidence in Lebanese judiciary
Army Commander, interlocutors tackle bilateral relations
Sarraf meets Finnish Ambassador, MP Hajjar
Hassan Fadlallah: For election law that safeguards diversity and anchors
security
Army refers suspect to judiciary for arms' trafficking
The Blood of Lamis Nacchouche Shall be the Beginning of an Uprising
François Bainy/What is happening with Qatar can happen any moment with Lebanon
Titles For Latest
LCCC Bulletin For Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
June 05-06/17
Five dead in Orlando workplace shooting, attacker
kills self: Police
Arab League chief regrets split between Arab states and Qatar
Turkey Offers to Help Resolve Gulf-Qatar Row
Qatar Airways Suspends All Flights to Saudi Arabia
Civil Aviation Bans Qatari Planes from Landing at Saudi Airports
OIC Urges Qatar to Honor Commitments
Al Jazeera Offices Closed in Saudi Arabia
Hacker of Bahrain Foreign Minister’s Twitter Account Identified
Jubeir, Shoukry Discuss Fighting Terrorism on Financial, Intellectual Levels
Two senior Hamas officials forced to leave Qatar
Qatar Denounces 'Unjustified' Cut of Gulf Ties
Gulf States, Egypt Cut Ties with Qatar
New Raids, 'Several' Arrests over London Attack
Latest Lebanese
Related News published on
June 05-06/17
Authorities to impose tight security in Baalbeck: Aoun
The Daily Star/June 05, 2017/BEIRUT:
Security forces will impose strict security measures in the eastern city of
Baalbeck following the surge in crime rate in the area, President Michel Aoun
said Mondya. "Security forces were given the order to be firm in enforcing the
law," Aoun told a delegation from the city. The president said that the Higher
Defense Council had decided to "put an end to the security chaos, particularly
after local figures lifted the immunity off culprits and demanded their
arrest."A security plan for the Bekaa Valley was revived in March. Security
agencies cracked down on a number of suspects, including major drug lords. The
actions prompted media reports citing the “subtle” revival of the 2015 security
plan targeting Hezbollah-dominated areas. The area has witnessed criminal acts
including kidnapping, killings, car theft, and arms and drug trafficking. A
previous security plan implemented in 2014 was described as a failure, given its
inability to reduce the incidence of such events. However, Interior Minister
Nouhad Machnouk said last week that “the measures put in place since the
institution of the security plan have not been successful in protecting the
lives of the citizens and their children.”The interior minister also said that
“the situation cannot continue” and vowed to pursue the matter alongside the
president in order to implement elements of the security plan that had not yet
been enacted.The delegation, headed by Baalbeck Mayor Hussein Lakkis elaborated
on the surged crime rate in Baalbeck and neighboring towns, stressing it's
negative impacts on the economy. They expressed concern that more innocent
civilians fall victim to these crimes. Aoun stressed the importance to "restore
stability and calm to the city and its neighboring areas" as summer festivals
are nearing. Lamis Hasan Nakkoush – the latest victim of the area’s violence,
who was born in 2008 – was shot in front of her house a few minutes before iftar
on May 30. Aa.W. of the Wehbe family and the victim’s brother reportedly
exchanged words before the former opened fire, hitting Nakkoush in the back of
her head. The suspect instantly fled the scene, while Nakkoush was taken to a
nearby hospital, where she died. The attack was widely condemned in Baalbeck,
with residents calling on officials to put an end to the area’s insecurity.
Earlier in May, Baalbeck residents went on a general strike to protest the
deteriorating security situation in their city.
Pro-Hizbullah Lebanese Journalist Rafiq Nasrallah: Hizbullah Can Strike Israel
By Air, And Show It On TV In Real Time - 'We Have Technology Now'
MEMRI/June 05/17
In a recent TV interview, Lebanese journalist and researcher Rafiq Nasrallah
suggested a scenario in which Hizbullah fighters entered the Upper Galilee and
fought inside Israel. "What if airplanes were to strike in the heart of Israel
and at the settlements?" he asked. "What would the [Israeli] air force be able
to do then?" Nasrallah, Director of the Lebanese International Center for Media
and Research, said that "even those little reconnaissance aircrafts are being
manufactured now by Hizbullah and in Syria" and that they "can strike targets
and broadcast it on TV in real time." The interview aired on the Lebanese Al-Jadid/New
TV channel on May 23.
Interviewer: "Wars today are waged from the sky, and you cannot do anything
unless you possess deterrence capabilities."
Rafiq Nasrallah: "That is what Israel says. But what does the other side say?
What does Hizbullah say? What if the confrontations were to take place in the
Galilee? Let's imagine a scenario in which groups of 50 infiltration fighters
each - you can call them martyrdom-seekers... Let's imagine that these groups
were to enter Metula and other settlements inside Israel, and then TV would
start broadcasting the scenes from inside Israel, for the first time in the
history of the Arab-Israeli conflict...
"Note that I am raising my finger... From inside the Upper Galilee, from the
Jordanian border, and facing the Golan... What would the Israelis do? What would
their air force be able to do then? Secondly, the Israeli air force cannot do
whatever it wants in the sky anymore. If they send a plane, we will send one
too. Even those little reconnaissance aircrafts are being manufactured now by
Hizbullah and in Syria."
Interviewer: "Yes, but you are talking about F-16 and F-29 [sic] airplanes
here..."
Rafiq Nasrallah: "They are good for striking specific targets, such as homes and
bridges. But what if airplanes were to strike in the heart of Israel and at the
settlements? And what if missiles were launched..."
Interviewer: "Does Hizbullah have airplanes?"
Rafiq Nasrallah: "Of course."
Interviewer: "It has reconnaissance aircrafts, but not airplanes..."
Rafiq Nasrallah: "What does everybody rely on these days?"
Interviewer: "On what?"
Rafiq Nasrallah: "They rely on reconnaissance aircrafts. They can strike targets
and broadcast it on TV in real time. The concepts of war have changed. We have
technology now."
Lassen Visits EU-Funded Projects in Support of Vulnerable Communities in Bekaa
Naharnet/June 05/17/Ambassador
Christina Lassen, Head of the Delegation of the European Union to Lebanon,
visited Monday two EU-funded projects in the Beqaa supporting local development
and the response to the consequences of the Syrian crisis. In Labweh, Lassen
visited the Primary Health Care Center, which provides services to both Lebanese
citizens and Syrian refugees. It is one of more than 200 centers and public
hospitals that have received EU funds for new equipment, free medications and
vaccines for children. The EU funding also covers training for doctors, nurses,
pharmacists and health workers, as well as awareness raising sessions. The
Primary Health Care Center in Labweh is part of the Ministry of Public Health
network. The EU assistance is provided through UNHCR, UNICEF and WHO. The visit
was attended by UNHCR Representative Mireille Gerard, UNICEF Representative
Tanya Chapuisat, and WHO Representative Dr. Gabriele Riedner. Since the
beginning of the Syrian crisis, the EU provided €92 million to the Lebanese
authorities to meet basic health needs of vulnerable Lebanese and Syrian
refugees. Additional €62 million have recently been allocated for access to
quality health care. Ambassador Lassen said: "We admire the efforts Lebanon is
undertaking in hosting so many Syrian refugees and we know the pressure that the
refugee influx is putting on public services." "The EU is committed to continue
its support to the Lebanese health sector to improve access to high quality
health services for both Syrian refugees and Lebanese citizens," she added.
Later, Lassen headed to the border town of al-Qaa where she visited the "One
drop for Peace" project which was implemented by the Lebanese NGO ILDES (Institut
libanais pour le développement économique et social) with EU-funding.
The project addressed the increasing water shortage in al-Qaa brought by the
population rise as a result of the refugee influx, climatic conditions and
drought. It also addressed the upgrading of the infrastructure, and tackled the
related environmental and financial constraints. As a result of the project, the
irrigation water reaching al-Qaa increased by twofold, thus improving the
standard of livelihoods of the host and the Syrian refugee communities alike.
Educational kits allowed children from both communities to acquire the basis
information about the best hygiene and water usage and preservation. Workshops
were conducted to allow women to acquire better skills for domestic usage. Young
adults also participated in awareness sessions and activities around water
preservation. The visit took place in the presence of al-Qaa municipal chief
Bashir Matar, the President of ILDES Samir Medawar and the project manager at
ILDES Dr. Boutros Labaki. Ambassador Lassen stated: "The project is just another
example of our engagement in favor of both the Lebanese host communities and
Syrian refugees." "I come here to hear your voices, to know better how this
project has impacted your lives and how we could further support you," she
stressed.
Adwan Says PM to Hold 'Final' Meeting on Electoral Law
before Going to Cabinet
Naharnet/June 05/17/Prime Minister Saad Hariri is expected to call for a “final
evaluation meeting” on the electoral law ahead of discussing the electoral
system in Cabinet, Lebanese Forces deputy head MP George Adwan said on Monday.
“The meeting with the Prime Minister was aimed at informing him of the
atmosphere of the meetings that are taking place. Time is running and we have to
reach a text and submit it to Cabinet then Parliament. I think that Premier
Hariri will request, in the next 24 or 48 hours, a meeting during which we will
make a final assessment and then move on to the Council of Ministers,” Adwan
said after meeting Hariri at the Grand Serail in the presence of Nader Hariri,
the PM's adviser. “The atmosphere is good and we are still working on some
points, which are mostly technical. We are also working on reforms that must be
included in the electoral law, such as the magnetic card that allows every
citizen to vote from wherever they might be,” Adwan added. The political parties
have recently agreed on an electoral law format involving full proportional
representation and 15 electoral districts but discussions are still revolving
over several technical details related to the proposed system.
Berri Says Vote Law Details Must be Agreed Before Deadline
Naharnet/June 05/17/Speaker Nabih Berri stressed the need to speed up
deliberations in order to finalize the new parliamentary electoral law in light
of the looming end of the parliament's term, al-Joumhouria daily reported on
Monday. “We must complete (discussions) because we are short on time,” the daily
quoted the Speaker as telling his visitors on Sunday. Berri pointed out that
deliberations and meetings between political parties have started in order to
finalize the last details, after agreeing the broad lines of the vote system
that will govern the country's parliamentary polls. He said a meeting was held
on Sunday and another one will be held on Monday and will be chaired by Prime
Minster Saad Hariri to that end. Political parties have agreed the broad lines
of an electoral law that will be based on full proportional representation in 15
electoral districts, but they still have to discuss some details before the law
is final. In reply to a question, Berri said it has been decided that voters are
to use magnetic cards to cast their votes because it “ensures transparency and
the integrity of the electoral process, prevents bribes and corruption, and
eases the burden of voters' transfer from one region to another.”
He said voters will be able to cast their votes in their place of residence
without the need to move to their hometowns, “this card also increases the
number of voters,” he said.
The parliament's term ends on June 20.
Hasbani Acts after Woman Dies of Lipo Complications as
Jreissati Vows Accountability
Naharnet/June 05/17/Deputy PM and Health Minister Ghassan Hasbani
announced Monday that he has taken a series of strict measures in connection
with the case of the Iraqi woman who died of liposuction complications, Farah
Qassab, as Justice Minister Salim Jreissati vowed accountability and stressed
that there will be no political interference in the legal course. In a
statement, Hasbani said he has banned surgeries requiring general anesthesia in
“daytime hospitals” and “beauty centers.” He has also banned surgeries requiring
general anesthesia at the Dr. Nader Saab Plastic Surgery Hospital, where the
woman, according to her father, had undergone five liposuction procedures prior
to her death. Moreover, the health minister has sent memos to the public
prosecution and the Lebanese Order of Physicians, asking them to conduct the
necessary investigations into the case. “The Order has two weeks to clarify some
technical medical points and answer the public health minister's questions
regarding the aforementioned death incident,” the statement said. “The measures
complement the minister's instant oral decision that suspended surgeries at the
aforementioned hospital in the wake of the incident and his written decision
that was issued on Friday, June 2,” the statement added. Hasbani's written
resolution had banned “surgeries that could lead to complications requiring
intensive care, such as liposuction surgeries and other treatments, except at
specialized hospitals containing a intensive care sections licensed by the
Health Ministry.”
The resolution had also demanded that plastic surgeons explain the possible
risks of certain plastic surgeries to patients and to ask for their signatures
on the approval papers. The justice minister meanwhile responded to a question
from the National News Agency about reports claiming that there are efforts to
“cover up” the case. Explaining the measures that he has taken until the moment
and the probe that the public prosecution has launched, in addition to the
travel ban that has been issued against Dr. Nader Saab and the decision to
conduct an autopsy, Jreissati stressed that “there can be no cover-up in any
case that the justice minister is following up on.”
He also noted that medical committees could be formed to further investigate the
case if necessary. The Dr. Nader Saab Plastic Surgery Hospital has meanwhile
issued a statement denying that Saab, one of the most prominent plastic surgeons
in Lebanon and the Arab world, had fled the country.
“Dr. Nader Saab, who is present in Lebanon, and his medical team fully trust the
Lebanese judiciary and have placed themselves at its disposal and at the
disposal of the reputable Lebanese Order of Physicians and Health Ministry, in
order to unveil the full truth and nothing but the truth,” the statement said.
In an interview with Lebanon's Future TV, Qassab's sister has accused Saab of
“deceiving” Farah while also alleging the presence of “collusion” between the
Dr. Nader Saab Plastic Surgery Hospital and the Notre Dame Du Liban Hospital, to
where the woman was transferred after the start of medical complications. The
businessman Jawad Qassab, Farah's father, meanwhile told An Nahar newspaper that
“all what Farah wanted was to remove some belly fat, but the doctor who has no
conscience encouraged her to conduct liposuction surgeries on her entire body
and performed on her five simultaneous surgeries with a cost of $50,000.”Media
reports said Farah stayed for four hours at the Dr. Nader Saab Plastic Surgery
Hospital after the surgeries and that her family was later told that the patient
had been transferred to the “relatively far” Notre Dame Du Liban Hospital.
The Notre Dame Du Liban Hospital has announced that the woman was already
deceased upon arrival. “She underwent a liposuction surgery but things
deteriorated after she suffered a rare fat embolism in the wake of the surgery,”
the hospital explained, noting that the Dr. Nader Saab Plastic Surgery Hospital
does not have an intensive care unit for use in such cases.
Airport Customs Seize 5 Kg of Cocaine, Detain Smuggler
Naharnet/June 05/17/Customs officials at the Rafik Hariri International Airport
foiled an attempt to smuggle around five kilograms of cocaine, the National News
Agency reported on Monday. The cocaine was wrapped and hidden inside the bag of
a Paraguayan female who had arrived from Brazil on board an Ethiopian Airlines
flight at midnight, added NNA. The suspect, who was identified as Silva Del
Rosario Almada, was interrogated and will be referred to the related
authorities.
Hariri: Amnesty Bill Will Soon be Issued to Bring Justice
to All
Naharnet/June 05/17/Prime Minister Saad Hariri stressed that an amnesty law will
be issued as soon as possible to do justice to all detainees. “There are people
from Minieh among the detainees and I promise you that we will issue an amnesty
law as soon as possible to do justice to all,” said Hariri in a speech during
the Suhur held in the northern area of Minieh on Sunday.“In each election,
Minieh makes the difference because of its loyalty to the school, path and
project of Martyr Premier Hariri, which is our project; Lebanon’s Arabism,
moderation, coexistence and most importantly the state in Lebanon,” said Hariri.
“About the elections and the new electoral law, I know that some fear the
elections may result in three MPs for Dinniyeh and the loss of the Minieh seat.
But I tell you that this is out of question and the Minieh seat is preserved
regardless of the law.“We are repeating ourselves when we say that this region
was unfairly treated on the development level in the past, and that there is an
ongoing attempt to inflict greater injustice on it by attempting to portray it
as an area of extremism, especially after the incidents of Bhanin although the
people of Minieh has nothing to do with them. On the contrary they supported the
state, the Lebanese Army and the legal security forces, just as the people of
Bhanin and Minieh supported the Lebanese army during the Nahr al-Bared
incidents,” added the PM. “The people of Minieh do not need lessons in
moderation and the real values of our religion,” added Hariri. “They are the
first to stand up against extremism, terrorism and misguidance, and are
committed to coexistence, legality and the state." "There are people from Minieh
among the detainees and I promise you that we will issue an amnesty law as soon
as possible to do justice to all,"Hariri concluded.
Man Found Dead at Suburban Home Northeast Beirut
Naharnet/June 05/17/A man found dead outside the entrance of a building in his
suburban Adonis home in Keserwan was reportedly killed, authorities said on
Monday. The 26-year old man was identified as Elie Kraidi, the National News
Agency reported. He was found near a building adjacent to his home where he
lives with his family, NNA added. Police in the area inspected the digital
surveillance cameras in the street to see whether the crime took place in the
street itself or if the body was transferred there.
Hariri: Cabinet to Convene in
Tripoli to Endorse Development Projects
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 05/17/Beirut –
Lebanon’s Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri promised on Sunday to hold a cabinet
session in Tripoli to endorse the city’s much-needed development projects.
Speaking during a “Ramadan Suhour” held in his honor by former Minister Mohammad
Safadi in Batroun, Hariri said: “Today, a new atmosphere prevails in the country
that is in the interest of Lebanon as a whole, and Tripoli in particular.”
Addressing ministers, deputies and prominent dignitaries representing the North
region, Hariri said: “God willing, we will meet again in Tripoli. We are seeking
to fulfill the interests of Lebanon and Tripoli, which really need a lot of
work.”Thanking Safadi for his kind hospitality, the prime minister highly valued
their “deep and honest friendship”. Safadi, for his part, lauded the Lebanese
premier’s determination to tackle the needs of Tripoli and its surrounding
region. In remarks last month, Hariri underlined the need to develop solutions,
projects, and programs to address problems facing the northern city of Tripoli.
“Tripoli, which was oppressed in recent years due to deliberate rounds of
fighting and tensions, and to the distortion of its open, educated and moderate
image, has a historic opportunity and we will not allow anyone to spoil it,”
Hariri said during the opening of the “Tripoli Development Conference”, which
was organized by the Safadi Foundation at the Grand Serail in May.
Hariri receives delegations from
Interparliamentary Assembly on Orthodoxy, Arab Parliamentary Union and Lebanese
University
Mon 05 Jun 2017 /NNA - The President
of the Council of Ministers Saad Hariri received on Monday at the Grand Serail a
delegation of the Interparliamentary Assembly on Orthodoxy, headed by its
Secretary General, Greek MP Andreas Michailidis, in the presence of MPs Atef
Majdalani, Ghassan Moukheiber and Riad Rahal. After the meeting, Michailidis
said: "We represent the general assembly of the Interparliamentary Assembly on
orthodoxy. We met with a number of political and spiritual leaders of Christian
communities. After these meetings, we came up with the idea of holding an
international conference next year on March 25th. The theme would be the
situation of Christians in the Middle East. We will provide you with more
details after the meeting of our general assembly at the end of the month in
Rome." He added: "Prime Minister Hariri, like all other political leaders in
Lebanon, supported this initiative and we will work for it to succeed and have
practical application for the benefit of Lebanon and its friendly people."Hariri
also received the Secretary General of the Arab Inter-Parliamentary Union Fayez
Shawabkeh, who said after the meeting: I informed PM Hariri on the work of the
Union. Its temporary headquarter has been in Beirut for five years while waiting
for the situation in Syria to improve. We have the support of Speaker Nabih
Berri who was the president of the union last year and is working for
cooperation between Arab parliaments. Prime Minister Hariri expressed his
readiness to cooperate and provide all facilities for the work of the Union in
the procedures related to the government side. Hariri then received the
Executive Committee of the Full-Time Professors Association at the Lebanese
University, headed by Dr. Mohammed Smaili, who said after the meeting that the
meeting was positive. He added that they discussed issues related to the budget
of the Lebanese University, its mutual fund and the nomination of deans of
schools.
Kataeb warns against electoral deal: For discussing
election law within constitutional institutions
Mon 05 Jun 2017/NNA - Kataeb Party categorically warned against an attempt to
pass an electoral deal, calling for extricating the poll law from 'closed
chambers' to be discussed and approved according to principles within
constitutional institutions. Kataeb's fresh words on Monday came in a statement
issued in the wake of its regular meeting, chaired by Party chief MP Sami
Gemayel. The Party dwelt on most recent developments in the country. Kataeb
considered that the election law based on proportionality with fifteen
districts, agreed upon in Bkirki, can be a convergence point for improving
representation and fairness, provided that it is not blown up by adding new
rules tailored according to narrow interests. Kataeb shed light on the necessity
of adopting electoral reforms which have the Party has long advocated, including
women quota, expatriates' voting, and the formation of an independent body to
oversee the elections. Kataeb deprecated the current political class for
deliberately leaving matters till the last moment in an attempt, as he said, to
pass an electoral deal.
Farah Kassab's family voices confidence in Lebanese
judiciary
Mon 05 Jun 2017 /NNA - Farah Jawad Kassab's family on Monday voiced confidence
in the Lebanese judiciary, and said in a statement that it clings to its full
legal rights. "The only authorized side to speak on Farah's subject, in Lebanon,
is the office of Lawyer Fadi al-Barsha... And in Jordan, the office of Attorney
Faisal Batayneh," statement said. Kassab's family urged all media outlets,
including audio-visual, written and social media, to absolutely desist from
dwelling on the issue in any form, reserving all their rights in this regard.
Army Commander, interlocutors tackle bilateral relations
Mon 05 Jun 2017/NNA - Army Commander Joseph Aoun on Monday received at his
Yarzeh office Canadian Army's Joint Operations Commander, General Stephen Bowes,
on top of a delegation, with talks reportedly touching on the bilateral ties
between the armies of both countries.
General Aoun also met with US Defense Attaché Colonel Ulises V. Calvo, who came
on a farewell visit at the end of his mission in Lebanon. Colonel Calvo
introduced to the General his successor Colonel Daniel Mouton.
Sarraf meets Finnish Ambassador, MP Hajjar
Mon 05 Jun 2017/NNA - Minister of National Defense, Yaacoub Sarraf, on Monday
met with Finnish Ambassador to Lebanon, Matti Lassila. The pair reportedly
discussed latest developments and the bilateral relations between Lebanon and
Finland, especially in the military field.Sarraf also met today with Future
bloc's lawmaker Mohammad Hajjar, over the current general situation on the local
scene. He later met with the military committee tasked with following up on the
military hospital's rehabilitation.
Hassan Fadlallah: For election law that safeguards diversity and anchors
security
Mon 05 Jun 2017/NNA - "Loyalty to Resistance" bloc MP Hassan Fadlallah
categorically underlined the dire need to devise an election law that safeguards
diversity and consecrates security and stability in the country. MP Fadlallah's
stance came during a memorial in the southern town of Haddatha in Bint Jbeil
district, where he emphasized the need for an election law that preserves
nationwide coexistence. The Lawmaker beseeched all political parties to benefit
from the prevailing positive climate in the country at the level of the election
law, calling on all concerned sides to work at speed to put the last touches on
the new poll law before June 20.
Army refers suspect to judiciary for arms' trafficking
Mon 05 Jun 2017/NNA - Army intelligence referred the so-called Hassan Mohammed
Al-Ahmad to the concerned judiciary over arms and ammunition trafficking, army
command said in a communiqué.
The communiqué said that the suspect was referred to judiciary for sending
weapons to Syria for the benefit of terrorist organizations, and smuggling
terrorists between Syria and Lebanon. The suspect is also wanted for a number of
arrest warrants issued against him.
The Blood of Lamis Nacchouche Shall be the Beginning of an Uprising
Ahmad El-Assaad June 01, 2017
While the politicians are preoccupied with internal strife, and having sterile
debates about the electoral law, Baalbek was once more sinking in grief and
suffering. While those endeavor to push the government into the abyss, Baalbek
paid the price of that government’s absence, and this time, the price was too
high: a small girl, the same age as the twice-extended parliament, i.e. eight
years old, died with a bullet to her head, fired by some hooligans. Lamis
Naccouche, this innocent child, was assassinated by the illegal weapons, which
would have never even existed, hadn’t it been in the protection of the Forces of
the Status Quo in the region. Those same weapons that have turned Baalbek and
the region into a stronghold for criminals of all sorts, and a constant
battlefield for clans and gangs. The people of the region – same as in all of
Lebanon – have had enough, and it is no longer acceptable to continue this way.
But the solution is not only to have a security campaign here, and some raids
there, nor is it through arresting some criminals alone. The radical solution
would be to eradicate the statelet and its illegal weapons. The solution is not
only through lifting the metaphorical cover, but through not allowing such a
cover to exist in the first place. The government alone should be the protector
of all the citizens, on all Lebanese territories. This protection must be
granted without an invitation, and without permission. Baalbek, just as the
southern Beirut outskirt Dahiyeh, and all regions suffering from illegal
weapons, is a blatant example of what happens when there is an extra
governmental authority in the possession of weapons. Let Lamis Naccouche’s blood
be the start of the uprising of the City of the Sun, against this darkness. Let
her martyrdom spark the revolution of all the Lebanese, united for a true
government, uncontested and sovereign.
François Bainy/What
is happening with Qatar can happen any moment with Lebanon,
ما يحدث في قطر قد يستنسخ في لبنان في أي لحظة
فلنتجنب دفن رؤسنا في الرمال
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=55987
Thank You Qatar, Good Bye Obama, Watch out Lebanon.
By: François Bainy/Face Book/June 05/17
Less than two weeks after the end of the Arab-Islamic Summit in Ryad falls the
Giant Sponsor of the Terrorism. Don't underestimate the event because it is only
the beginning. Let's have a look at the impact of this incident on the Lebanese
scene.
First, Those who considered this summit as a plain exhibition should review
their position.
Second: Those who thought that President Trump was interested by the Saudi Money
have no idea how complex is the American system when it comes to arm sale to our
region.
Third: Those who spread around gossips and whispers that the US policy is the
same no matter who is the President are still living in the Obama era and are so
blind that it is hard for them to see and perceive that President Trump is a man
of deal which means a man of word and principles
Fourth: The main points of the agenda meeting in Ryad were the terrorism, Syria
and the Iranian expansion in the Middle-East
Fifth: Qatar sponsored and financed ISIS and Iran at the same time with the
knowledge and the instruction of the Obama Administration.
What has Lebanon to do with all that???
First let us compare Lebanon with Qatar
Qatar is one of the wealthiest countries on the planet and Lebanon is sorry to
say that) one of the most corrupt countries in the world... Being rich like
Qatar does not allow you the right to threat the world order by financing
terrorism. Being corrupt like Lebanon does not allow our country to support
indefinitely and sponsor the Iranian terrorism at the official level. Even
before the start of the Arab-Islamic Summit Lebanon was under watch and vetoing
the presence of the Lebanese President Michel Aoun is a clear indication, not
only from the Arab league but also from the new US Administration, that Lebanon
is officially sponsoring and sheltering Hezbollah Terrorism, That same
terrorists that killed 249 marines and Kidnapped and killed American Diplomats
and citizens in Beirut. The Minister of Foreign affairs M.Gebrane Bassil
declares that Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization every time that US
Secretary Tellerson delivers a note stating that Hezbollah is an Iranian backed
Terrorist Organisation. Saudi Arabia is monitoring closely Prime Minister Saad
Hariri and might call him to visit Saudi Arabia soon in order to give
explanations about Bassil's declarations if they represent the Lebanese
Government's position, and if not he should have to contain him and put every
one in his right place. If not... What is happening with Qatar can happen any
moment with Lebanon, Let's not hide our head in the sand.
Latest LCCC Bulletin For
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
June 05-06/17
Five dead in Orlando workplace
shooting, attacker kills self: Police
Mon 05 Jun 2017/NNA - A shooting on
Monday at an industrial park in the Florida city of Orlando has resulted in five
fatalities, authorities said, without describing the circumstances of the
incident. The Orange County Sheriff's office said the situation had been
"stabilized.""Multiple fatalities. Situation contained. Sheriff will brief as
soon as info is accurate," the sheriff's office said on Twitter. A year ago, the
city - a hub of Florida's resort industry popular with tourists - was the scene
of a mass shooting in a gay nightclub+ that left 49 people dead and dozens more
wounded. ---AFP
Arab League chief regrets split
between Arab states and Qatar
Mon 05 Jun 2017/NNA - Arab League
Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit expressed regret on Monday that relations
between Qatar and major regional powers had got to the point of suspending
diplomatic relations. The Arab world's strongest powers cut ties with Qatar on
Monday over alleged support for Islamists and Iran. Saudi Arabia, Egypt, United
Arab Emirates and Bahrain cut relations with Qatar in a coordinated move. Yemen,
Libya's eastern-based government, and the Maldives joined in later. "Aboul Gheit
is sorry things reached this point between several Arab states and is concerned
about the ramifications these differences will have on joint Arab work," his
office said in a statement. A former Egyptian foreign minister, Aboul Gheit said
he hoped Arab states would overcome their differences and present a united front
against common threats to their national security. He called on all sides to
return to agreements reached in 2014, the last time matters between Qatar and
its neighbours had reached a tipping point. Qatar has for years presented itself
as a mediator and power broker for the region's many disputes, but Egypt and the
Gulf Arab states resent Qatar's support for Islamists, especially the Muslim
Brotherhood, which they see as a political foe. Qatar denies it interferes in
the affairs of other countries. ---Reuters
Turkey Offers to Help
Resolve Gulf-Qatar Row
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June
05/17/Turkey on Monday called for dialogue and said it was ready to help defuse
the row between Qatar and Arab nations including Saudi Arabia and Egypt that
accuse Doha of supporting extremism. "It's a development that really saddened
all of us," Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu told reporters. "There
could be problems between the countries but dialogue must prevail in all
circumstances," he said, adding that Ankara was ready to do its best to help
resolve the dispute. Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen joined Saudi
Arabia and Egypt in severing relations with gas-rich Qatar, with Riyadh accusing
Doha of supporting groups, including some backed by Iran, "that aim to
destabilize the region."Cavusoglu said problems could only be resolved through
dialogue. "We will give any kind of support for the situation to be normalized,"
he said. Turkey enjoys friendly relations with Qatar including in the energy
sector but also maintains good ties with other Gulf countries.
Qatar Airways Suspends All Flights to Saudi Arabia
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June
05/17/Qatar Airways said on Monday it had suspended all flights to Saudi Arabia
as a major diplomatic crisis escalated in the Gulf region. The move by the
Doha-based carrier came just hours after Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the United Arab
Emirates and Egypt cut diplomatic ties with Doha over accusations it supports
extremism. Several airlines from those countries earlier announced they would no
longer fly to Qatar. "Qatar Airways has suspended all flights to the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia" until 1159 GMT the same day, a statement from the airline said. A
spokeswoman said it was unclear if the suspension would be extended. Qatar
Airways flies to nine cities in Saudi Arabia. UAE carriers Emirates, Etihad, Fly
Dubai and Air Arabia, as well as Saudi Airlines, all announced earlier on Monday
they would suspend flights to Doha starting from Tuesday morning. It was not
immediately clear if Qatar Airways would also suspend flights to other
countries. Regional powerhouse Saudi Arabia on Monday ordered its nationals to
leave Qatar within 14 days and barred Qataris from the kingdom. Saudi Arabia has
also closed its border with Qatar.
Civil Aviation Bans Qatari Planes
from Landing at Saudi Airports
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 05/17/General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) has issued
a decision – effective immediately- banning all Qatari airlines and aircraft
from landing at the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s airports, Saudi Press Agency
reported. It also prevented all private and commercial airlines registered in
the Kingdom from operating to Qatar (both direct and non-direct), SPA said.
Furthermore, GACA decided to prevent all Qatari airlines and aircraft from
crossing the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s airspace as of 6/6/2017 at 00:01
according to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), the agency said. GACA pointed out
that all airlines and non-registered aircraft in the Kingdom or Qatar wishing to
cross the Kingdom’s airspace from the State of Qatar and to it have to contact
the Authority within a week to determine the necessary procedures for continued
operation across Saudi airspace. This circular of GACA includes all airlines
operating from and to Saudi airports based on the statement issued by the
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia regarding the severing of diplomatic and consular
relations with the State of Qatar. Saudi Arabian Airlines (Saudia) also
announced on its official Twitter account Monday that it has suspended all
flights to Qatar.
OIC Urges Qatar to Honor Commitments
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 05/17/The General Secretariat of the Organization of
Islamic Cooperation (OIC) stated that it has been following closely the current
developments in the Gulf region, namely the severance of diplomatic relations
with Qatar by many OIC member states following information and evidence of
Qatar’s involvement with hostile acts. OIC’s General Secretariat called urged
that Qatar honors previous commitments and agreements signed within the Gulf
Cooperation Council (GCC), particularly with regard to ceasing support of
terrorist groups and their activities and ending media incitement, said the
Saudi Press Agency (SPA). The General Secretariat underscored the need for all
member states, including Qatar, to adhere to the principles of the OIC Charter,
which calls for upholding good neighborliness, respect for the sovereignty,
independence and territorial integrity of member states, and non-interference in
their domestic affairs. The OIC is an international organization founded in
1969, comprises of 57 member states, with a collective population of over 1.6
billion as of 2008. The organization is “the collective voice of the Muslim
world” and works to “safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in
the spirit of promoting international peace and harmony.”
Al Jazeera Offices Closed in Saudi Arabia
Asharq Al-Awsat/June 05/17/Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Culture and Information
announced on Monday shutting local offices of Al Jazeera, Qatar’s influential
satellite channel, hours after the kingdom and other Arab powers cut ties over
Doha’s support for ultra-hardliners and Iran.
The move comes after Al-Jazeera has promoted terrorist propaganda and plots,
supported Houthi militias in Yemen, and tried to compromise Saudi security by
inciting public unrest which is aimed at harming the kingdom’s sovereignty,
Saudi Press Agency(SPA) reported Monday.
More so, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, United Arab Emirates and Bahrain cut relations
with Qatar in a coordinated move. Closing all transport ties, Qatari visitors
and residents two weeks to leave. While Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Egypt banned
Qatari planes from landing and forbade them from crossing their airspace. The
UAE and Saudi Arabia also stopped exports of white sugar to Qatar. The
diplomatic broadside threatens the international prestige of Qatar which is set
to host the 2022 World Cup.
Hacker of Bahrain Foreign Minister’s Twitter Account
Identified
Obaid Al-Suhaymi/Asharq Al-Awsat/June 05/17/Manama – Bahrain’s Ministry of
Interior announced on Sunday that the hacker of Foreign Minister Sheikh Khalid
bin Ahmed Al Khalifa’s Twitter account has been identified. The investigation
identified the hacker as a fugitive terrorist living outside of Bahrain and
whose nationality had been revoked in a previous case. The hacker took over the
account for a short time before the Twitter management froze it and returned it
to its original owner. The Director General of Anti-corruption and Economic and
Electronic Security announced on Saturday that as part of the monitoring and
follow up by the Cyber Crime Directorate, the department learned that the
Twitter account of the foreign minister was hacked. Commenting on the incident,
Sheikh Khaled Al Khalifa said that the IT department in the ministry contacted
the concerned officials in the United States and Dubai to recover the account
and delete all the harmful tweets.
Jubeir, Shoukry Discuss Fighting Terrorism on Financial,
Intellectual Levels
Sawsan Abu Hussein and Mohammed Abdu Hassanein/Asharq Al-Awsat/June 05/17/Cairo
– Saudi Minister of Foreign Affairs Adel al-Jubeir and his Egyptian counterpart
Sameh Shoukry underlined the need to promote bilateral cooperation and fight
terrorism on financial and intellectual levels. During a meeting in Cairo on
Sunday, the two officials discussed the activation of bilateral agreements on
various levels, as well as coordination of stances on regional issues, including
the situation in Syria, Libya, and Yemen. Speaking at a joint news conference,
the Saudi foreign minister said: “Saudi Arabia and Egypt are keen on facing
extremism and terrorism in all its forms, and spreading the values of tolerance
and coexistence.” He added that discussions with Shoukry were “broad and have
touched on latest developments in the region”. “We look forward to promoting
cooperation with Egypt, in particular in facing terrorism and extremism and
protecting Arab national security,” Jubeir also said. Describing relations with
Egypt as “excellent”, the Saudi foreign minister highlighted the presence of
“very strong collaboration” between the two countries, adding that the Riyadh
summits have produced an effective partnership to counter terrorist threats in
the region. On the Riyadh summits held on 20–21 May, Jubeir said: “The presence
of US President Donald Trump in the summits was a positive indication of
building true partnerships in this field.”The Egyptian minister, for his part,
underlined the “historic and strong relations between the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia and Egypt.”Welcoming his Saudi counterpart in his “second country Egypt”,
Shoukry stressed the importance of the visit to resume political coordination in
the wake of challenges facing the region. He also said that discussions have
tackled the means to fight terrorism by halting all forms of terrorism financing
and eradicating extremist groups’ safe havens. Shoukry added the meeting
underlined the need to bolster Arab national security to face foreign
interference.
Two senior Hamas officials forced to leave Qatar
Elior Levy/Ynetnews/June 05/17/Hamas has begun cooperating with Qatar after the
Gulf State issued the organization a list of members it wanted out of the
country posthaste; those who left are tied to the West Bank section of the
terror group. Two senior Hamas officials have left Qatar since reports surfaced
that the Gulf State submitted the terrorist organization a list of members who
were required to leave immediately. The senior Hamas officials were identified
as Saleh al-Arouri—believed to be responsible for organizing and directing Hamas
members in the West Bank—and Musa Dodin, who was released in the 2011 Shalit
prisoner exchange. There are still several more Hamas officials who are required
to leave Qatar, but their identities and exact numbers remain unknown. All those
leaving Qatar will be dispersed to different countries such as Malaysia, Lebanon
and Turkey. Qatar's list of persona non grata Hamas members includes those
involved in attempts to establish Hamas terror infrastructure in the West Bank.
Al-Arouri had worked for many years to establish Hamas cells in the West Bank in
order to carry out terror attacks against a variety of Israeli targets. He had
previously been located in Turkey, but was banished as part of the
reconciliation agreement between Israel and Ankara. Musa Dodin was active in
Hamas' West Bank headquarters, directing terror attacks against Israelis. Dodin
is also in charge of the issue of Hamas prisoners in Israel. Dodin's brother has
been in administrative detention for more than a year. Hamas admitted Sunday
that there were changes in the location of various officials whose names have
not been disclosed. However, the organization said it was linked to
administrative changes that were made following the internal elections. At the
same time, Hamas denied that the request was made by Qatar following external
pressure on it.
Qatar Denounces 'Unjustified' Cut of Gulf Ties
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 05/17/Qatar on Monday slammed the decisions
of three Gulf states to sever ties with it, saying they were "unjustified" and
aimed to put Doha under political "guardianship"."The measures are unjustified
and are based on false and baseless claims," the Qatari foreign ministry said in
a statement, referring to the unprecedented steps taken by Saudi Arabia,
Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt. "The aim is clear, and it is to
impose guardianship on the state. This by itself is a violation of its (Qatar's)
sovereignty as a state," it added. The host of the football World Cup 2022 said
it has been subjected to an "incitement campaign based on fabrications, which
reflects an intention to harm Qatar". Doha insisted the sanctions, which include
the Gulf states severing air, land and sea links with Qatar, "will not affect
the daily life of citizens and residents".The Qatari government will take all
measures necessary... to foil attempts to affect or harm Qatar's society and
economy," the statement said. Qatar has land borders with Saudi Arabia and is
separated by Gulf waters from nearby Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates.
Gulf States, Egypt Cut Ties with Qatar
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 05/17/Gulf states on Monday cut diplomatic
ties with neighbouring Qatar and kicked it out of a military coalition, less
than a month after US President Donald Trump visited the region to cement ties
with powerhouse Saudi Arabia.In the region's most serious diplomatic crisis in
years, Qatar's Gulf neighbours Riyadh, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates as
well as Egypt all announced they were severing ties with gas-rich Qatar. Riyadh
cut diplomatic relations and closed borders with its neighbour to "protect its
national security from the dangers of terrorism and extremism," the official
Saudi Press Agency said. A Saudi official cited by SPA said Riyadh decided to
"sever diplomatic and consular ties with Qatar, and to close all land, sea and
aviation ports."The "decisive" measure was due to the "gross violations
committed by authorities in Qatar over the past years," the Saudi statement
said.
Many expatriate and Saudi travellers use Qatar as their gateway into the
kingdom. A Saudi-led coalition which for more than two years has been fighting
Iran-backed rebels in Yemen separately announced Qatar was no longer welcome in
the alliance. In a statement, the coalition accused Qatar of "support to
(terrorist) organisations in Yemen". Qatar had assigned warplanes to the
coalition conducting air strikes against Yemen's Huthi rebels. Egypt's foreign
ministry also accused Doha of supporting "terrorism" and announced the closure
of its ports and airports to Qatari carriers.
- 'Shameful cybercrime' -Doha launched a probe into an alleged "hack" of state
media after it said false and explosive remarks attributed to Emir Sheikh Tamim
bin Hamad Al-Thani were published on the Qatar News Agency website last month.
The stories quoted him questioning US hostility towards Iran, speaking of
"tensions" between Doha and Washington, commenting on Hamas and speculating that
Trump might not remain in power for long. The alleged comments were made after
Trump's visit to the region. However, Doha has denied all the comments and said
it had been the victim of a "shameful cybercrime". Trump's visit to Riyadh --
the first foreign stop of his young presidency -- saw the two sides sign a
"strategic vision" agreement to intensify ties in defence, economics and other
areas. Riyadh has embraced Trump's harder line against its rival Iran, with
which it severed diplomatic relations in January last year. In a Riyadh speech
to Muslim leaders from around the world, Trump urged them to "drive out"
extremists and "terrorists", as Sunni jihadists carry out attacks in many
countries. But he also singled out Shiite Iran for allegedly fuelling "the fires
of sectarian conflict and terror".
Qatar said it had also been the victim of a hostile media campaign, particularly
in the US over the issue of its supposed support for Islamist groups. Qatar has
so far given no indication of where the alleged cyber May 24 cyber attack
originated. But regional powers including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab
Emirates used the comments to demonstrate that Qatar is out of line with Gulf
foreign policy, especially regarding Iran. Media organisations in several
countries in the region reported the emir's comments as fact, despite an
official denial by Qatar. They also blocked Qatari broadcasters and websites
following the alleged comments. In a sign that the rift in Qatar's relations
with its near neighbours was deepening, one Saudi newspaper reported that
members of a prominent Saudi family had demanded that Qatar's state mosque, the
Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab Mosque, be renamed.The demand came amid
questions over the Qatari royal family's link to Abdul Wahhab, co-founder of the
Saudi state. Some experts had feared the current situation could trigger a
repeat of the crisis in 2014, when several Gulf countries recalled their
ambassadors from Doha, ostensibly over its support for the Muslim Brotherhood.
Last week the Qatari emir travelled to Kuwait to meet Emir Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmad
Al-Sabah in what was widely seen as an attempt at mediation by the Kuwaitis.
New Raids, 'Several' Arrests over London Attack
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/June 05/17/British police on Monday made several
arrests in two dawn raids following the London attack claimed by the Islamic
State group which left seven people dead. "At around 4.15 on Monday... officers
from the Met's Counter-Terrorism Command investigating the London Bridge terror
attack entered two further addresses -- one in Newham and another in Barking. A
number of people have been detained and are at present being spoken to," a
statement said. In earlier raids in the ethnically diverse London suburb of
Barking, police arrested seven women and five men aged between 19 and 60 at two
properties in the hours after Saturday night's rampage. A 55-year-old man was
later released. The attackers ran people over with a van on London Bridge, then
lunged with knives seemingly at random at crowds gathered around Borough Market,
which is full of restaurants and bars. A vigil for the victims will take place
at nearby Tower Bridge on Monday evening.
Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on
June 05-06/17
Walid Phares, the Natational. Security Expert: Time for ‘Real Resistance’
Against Jihadis
وليد فارس: حان الوقت لمحاربة الجهاديين بجدية
Kathryn Blackhurst/LifeZette/June 05/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=56001
Walid Phares urges western leaders
to 'step forward' and tell the public 'we are in a war'
National security and foreign policy expert Walid Phares called on ordinary
citizens to form a “real resistance” against the threat posed by radical Islamic
terrorists, during an interview Monday on “The Laura Ingraham Show.” Since
President Donald Trump’s election, outraged liberals have labeled themselves
“The Resistance,” staging protests and engaging in any effort to undermine the
president’s agenda. Phares, a former adviser to Trump during the campaign, said
the real and present danger facing the world are the deadly actions carried out
by Jihadis. “Instead of having the national leadership — I’m talking about
mostly Europe and other countries in the West — advising the citizens as to what
to do, my concern now is that … the government needs to step forward and tell
the nations that we are in a war, unlike in the last eight years of the Obama
administration,” Phares said. “And that is what Trump has been trying to do over
the last few weeks now.” "Tell the public that we need to resist, be the real
resistance against the Jihadis," Phares added. "And then see what else we can
do."
As a prime example, Phares pointed to reports stemming from Saturday's London
Bridge and Borough Market attacks in the British capital that described
bystanders throwing bottles, chairs and other items at the terrorists.
"When one of the terrorists attacked a bar or a restaurant, for the first time
we hear that the citizens who threw the tables and bottles at him … that is the
spirit of resistance," Phares said, adding that if the government tells the
people that "everything is normal and don’t do anything," it only serves to
demoralize them. Phares appeared to be alluding to London Mayor Sadiq Khan's
statement following the attacks in which he said, "My message to Londoners and
visitors to our great city is to be calm and vigilant today. You will see an
increased police presence today, including armed officers and uniformed
officers. There is no reason to be alarmed by this. We are the safest global
city in the world."
U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May also offered remarks that seemed to dismiss the
scale of the threat. "Everybody needs to go about their lives as they normally
would," she said, "Our society should continue to function in accordance with
our values."
President says DOJ submitted 'watered down, politically correct' exec order to
Supreme Court. Phares urged Europe and the U.S. to steadfastly pursue stricter
immigration policies and extreme vetting in order to begin dealing with the
increasing global threat.
"Actually at the beginning of civilization, the Romans, they had this saying,
'First you survive. Then you do all the philosophy that you want.' We are with
terrorism at a similar stage," Phares said. "The government needs to ensure the
survival of the population. Even if these are still dispersed actions, they are
growing in numbers.""What happened to vetting? We've been talking about vetting
for the last 10 years. Nothing has happened. And when there is an attempt by
government … to begin looking at vetting, it is charged as Islamophobia," Phares
said, alluding to Trump's blocked travel ban executive order awaiting a Supreme
Court hearing. "So we need to make sure that whatever the policy is on
immigration, it be preceded, not followed — we don’t vet after migration. You
vet before migration," Phares said. "And that’s why we need to change that
policy. Unfortunately, there is still a lot of opposition to the Trump
administration’s attempt to create a re-vetting system."
Five Reasons Why Israel Should
Care About The Qatar Crisis
Jerusalem Post /June 05/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=55979
Israel's image in the region likely can improve
amid the current developments.
IIt hurts Hamas
Qatar has supported Hamas over the last decade and hosted former Hamas leader
Khaled Meshaal for the last five years in Doha. In 2012 Qatari Emir Sheikh Hamad
bin Khalifa al-Thani visited Gaza and pledged hundreds of millions for the
Strip. Qatar therefore provided Hamas not only a home in Doha but financial
support and diplomatic succor. The new pressure on Qatar has encouraged it to
expel Hamas members and will reduce its support for the group. This may also
isolate Turkey’s relations with Hamas. Qataris are now focused on which airlines
will still fly to the country tomorrow, spending money on the Gaza Strip and
hosting Hamas may seem like a liability they don’t need now. Hamas will find
itself with even fewer allies which could give Israel leverage to encourage the
group to change its ways. More likely, Hamas may lash out against Israel to show
its relevance.
2. It brings Israel closer to Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the Gulf
Israel has shared interests with Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states in opposing
Iran. Because Qatar has supported Hamas, the new crises encourages those states
that oppose Qatar to see Israel as a partner against Hamas and against Iran.
This relationship has already been quietly growing in recent years, but the
crises with Qatar allows writers in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf to speak out more
firmly against Hamas. Saudi's Al Arabiya has showcased interviews with Wonder
Woman's Gal Gadot.
3. It shows US influence is back in the region
The background of the current crises was a feeling that US President Donald
Trump’s speech to “drive out” terror gave a blank check to local states to act.
Under Barack Obama Israel sometimes felt isolated, especially as the US pursued
the Iran deal. Now Israel feels that the Americans are back in the region and
will stand by their allies.
4. It delegitimizes terror
The regimes that have broken relations with Qatar pay lip-service to fighting
terror and instability. Israel prefers a stable region without terror groups
undermining neighboring states. However there is ISIS in Sinai, Hamas in Gaza,
Jihadists near the Golan and Hezbollah on the Golan and in Lebanon. In that
sense Israel knows that any greater instability can be a threat. So long as
Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and other states work in concert, the winds of
stability will blow in Israel’s direction as well. The saying “all ships rise
with the tide” is apt. All stable countries in the region will rise if extremist
groups are reduced.
5. It bolsters Israel’s hand in general and Israel’s current government in
particular
Israel benefits when it is not the center of attention and certainly when it is
not under pressure. This is a boon for the current government because Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has long spoken about working towards quietly
cultivating regional relationships beyond Egypt and Jordan that stretch to the
Gulf. He has spoken about the Iranian threat for two decades. If the Arab states
are more concerned with Iran and Qatar, than with the Palestinians, that takes
pressure off of Israel, at a time when Palestinians are trying to remind the
region that they are facing fifty years of living under Israel’s military rule.
Over the years Israel has gone from being seen as the center of the region’s
problems, to today when the Palestinian issue is dwarfed by larger conflicts in
Syria, Iraq, Yemen Libya and now in the Gulf. That plays into Netanyahu’s
narrative, and takes the wind out of any sails that hoped 50 years since 1967
would have some sort of jarring affect. This will have some blowback because
voices in the region will accuse the Gulf and Saudi of working "for Israel."
Syria and Iran already accuse them of working with Israel. But these voices are
already opposed Israel, which means Israel's image in the region likely can
improve amidst the current crises.
Defeating Extremist Islam - A Western Imperative
Saied Shoaaib/Gatestone Institute/June 05/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=55983
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10378/defeating-extremist-islam
The infiltration of this ideology is reminiscent of the spread of communism and
should be defeated similarly -- not with weapons, but by exposing its true
nature and providing an alternative. The West first must abandon, however, the
notion that radical Islam is an internal Muslim issue, any more than communism
was a "Russian issue" that "the Russians" needed to solve.
In addition, the views of liberal Muslim scholars, who reject the whole premise
of extremist, political Islam, should be supported and widely circulated.
Finally, imams in Western countries must be held to the same standard as members
of other professions. They should be required to receive occupational licenses,
based on criteria determined by the state, in conjunction with modern Muslims
seeking a peaceful life and the ability to integrate into their societies
without fear of repercussions at the hands of fundamentalists.
Many imams in the West -- citizens of the United States, Canada and other
countries -- use their pulpits to promote practices that go against democratic
values and ultimately lead to terrorism.
Some call on their flock to kill Jews, Christians and "infidel" Muslims who do
not adhere either to the strictest interpretation of Islam. Others justify the
marriage of grown men to nine-year-old girls. There are those, too, who defend
the spousal "right" of husbands to rape their wives.
Contrary to some claims, the type of clerics who preach murder and sexual abuse
in North American and European mosques do not suffer from poor socioeconomic
conditions and are not mentally unbalanced. Rather, they are loyal followers of
an interpretation of Islam that envisions the establishment of a worldwide
caliphate governed by sharia law. They deeply believe that the only way to enter
Allah's paradise is to live by the letter of the Quran and the Hadith (the words
and deeds of the Prophet Muhammed).
It is from such imams, most of whom are graduates of renowned Islamic
institutions in the Middle East and Asia, that Muslims in the West have been
receiving guidance. Key among these institutions is Al-Azhar, a Cairo-based
Sunni center for higher learning, attended by students from all over the world.
Its curriculum includes extremist content, such as tenets that killing
"apostates" is a Divine obligation; that it is a Muslim's duty to humiliate
female prisoners through sexual abuse; that adulterers should be stoned to
death, and that Christians and Jews are the "enemy of God."
Many imams in the West are graduates of Cairo's Al-Azhar, a Sunni center for
higher learning. Its curriculum includes extremist content, such as tenets that
killing "apostates" is a Divine obligation; that it is a Muslim's duty to
humiliate female prisoners through sexual abuse; that adulterers should be
stoned to death, and that Christians and Jews are the "enemy of God." (Image
source: Diego Delso/Wikimedia Commons)
Whenever confronted by critics in the West calling them to task for spreading
such violent teachings, many imams respond by cloaking their real objectives,
saying that the texts should be read in the context of the time that they were
written, and by highlighting peaceful and tolerant Quranic verses. Other clerics
-- those who do not know how to tailor their rhetoric to Western ears -- openly
admit their religious ideology's true intentions.
The infiltration of this ideology is reminiscent of the spread of communism and
should be defeated similarly -- not with weapons, but by exposing its true
nature and providing an alternative. The West first must abandon, however, the
notion that radical Islam is an internal Muslim issue, any more than communism
was a "Russian issue" that "the Russians" needed to solve. Islam and Muslims are
part and parcel of Western societies, and Islamist terrorism is a global
problem.
In addition, the views of liberal Muslim scholars, who reject the whole premise
of extremist, political Islam, should be supported and widely circulated. Among
these are prominent intellectuals -- such as the late Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd from
Egypt; Mohammed Arkoun, an Algerian who died in France in 2010; the late
Egyptian Supreme Court justice Muhammad Sa'id al-'Ashmawi; Egyptian talk-show
host Islam Bahiri; and the late Sudanese theologian Mahmoud Muhammad Taha -- all
of whom have provided evidence, based on knowledge of the Quran and Hadith, that
the "caliphate" is merely a project to colonize more land, as all the old
empires did, and that the hostility toward Jews connected to the Muhammed's
battle with the Banu Qurayza in the 7th century should have ended long ago.
Muslim innovators abound in the West, as well, and should be the ones
establishing mosques, educational institutions and media outlets, to provide
followers with an alternative to political Islamism. Finally, imams in Western
countries must be held to the same standard as members of other professions.
They should be required to receive occupational licenses, based on criteria
determined by the state, in conjunction with modern Muslims seeking a peaceful
life and the ability to integrate into their societies without fear of
repercussions at the hands of fundamentalists.
**Saied Shoaaib is a Muslim writer and researcher, specializing in Islamic
movements. He can be reached at: saiedshoaaib@gmail.com
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Turkey: Jail for Hunger Strike
Burak Bekdil/Gatestone Institute/June 05/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10456/turkey-jail-hunger-strike
Instead of trying to silence the global voice against his increasingly
autocratic governance, and oppressing millions who do not respect him, Erdogan
could try to earn respect by having a little mercy on dissidents.
Although there has been no ruling so far that Fethullah Gulen was the mastermind
behind the attempted coup, 150,000 people have been purged, and they, their
families and perhaps a million Turks are decrying Erdogan's unjust behavior.
So, officially, they remain "terrorists", even though they were acquitted of
charges of terrorism.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is in an odd mood: He is trying to
convince the international community that he is not Hitler. Most recently,
Erdogan's government ordered Google to de-list more than 40 URLs that reported
about the Turkish government's recent crackdown on journalists and other critics
that compared Turkey's president to Hitler.
Instead of trying to silence the global voice against his increasingly
autocratic governance, and oppressing millions who do not respect him, he could
try to earn respect by having a little mercy on dissidents. That is probably too
much to expect from someone who once infamously said that "If you pity you will
be pitied".
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is trying to convince the international
community that he is not Hitler. (Photo by Elif Sogut/Getty Images)
In the aftermath of a failed coup against his government in July 2016, Erdogan
has dismissed 150,000 public employees, citing their alleged links with
Fethullah Gulen, a Muslim cleric in self-exile in Pennsylvania, whom Erdogan
claims was the mastermind behind the attempted putsch. The Ankara government
also has arrested more than 50,000 people on the same charges.
Although there has been no ruling so far that Gulen was, in fact, the mastermind
behind the attempted coup, 150,000 people have been purged, and they, their
families and perhaps a million Turks are decrying Erdogan's unjust behavior. The
victims are not only the "Gulenists": The purge has targeted a wide spectrum of
dissidents including anti-Islamist leftists of different views. In just one week
in May, Turkey's Interior Ministry said, 1,284 suspects were detained in
"counter-terrorism raids".
In March, a professor of literature, Nuriye Gulmen, and a primary school
teacher, Semih Ozakca, both victims of the purge, started protesting by going on
a hunger strike: a liquid diet of lemon, saltwater and sugar solutions. They
have lost weight and doctors say their health is deteriorating.
What to do? Let the teachers die a slow and painful death? Listen to their plea
and rethink if, without guns and bombs, they really are "terrorists"? Erdogan's
government chose a third way: On May 22, the 76th day of their hunger strike,
the police broke down their door and detained them. The reason for their arrest?
The police feared "that their protest could turn into death fasts and new
protests".
So, at around the same time that Erdogan's government was trying to convince
world opinion that he is not Hitler, his police detained two protesters on
hunger strike.
"I've been a lawyer for a long time and have never seen such a reason for an
arrest," said Selcuk Kozagacli, a lawyer representing the teachers. When
Kozagacli met them in jail, he said they "looked tired and knocked about a bit".
Amnesty International said that the dismissals of state employees in Turkey had
been carried out arbitrarily and had a catastrophic impact on their lives:
"The failure of the authorities to set out clear criteria for the dismissals or
provide any individualized evidence of wrongdoing blows a hole in their claim
that all the dismissals are necessary to counter terrorism ... Instead, evidence
suggests widespread abusive and discriminatory motives behind the purge".
In a letter to Turkish Justice Minister Bekir Bozdag, 62 members of the European
Parliament condemned the arrests and called for the hunger-strikers' immediate
release. The letter said:
"We, the undersigned members of the European Parliament, wish to express our
deepest concern about the ongoing state of emergency and disproportionate
effects thereof on democracy and human rights in Turkey".
Ankara looks entirely indifferent, even remorseless. Suleyman Soylu, the
interior minister, said that the two teachers had lost their jobs because of
links to the leftist militant group Revolutionary People's Liberation
Party/Front (DHKP/C). "There are organic ties between these two persons and the
DHKP-C terrorist organisation... It is very clear," the minister said. And it
all fell on deaf ears when the teachers' lawyer, said that they had both been
acquitted of the charges mentioned by the minister in 2012. So, they remain
"terrorists", even though they were acquitted of charges of terrorism: Guilty
without verdict. Minister Soylu also claimed that the teachers were "on a hunger
strike from 9 am until the evening but then went home to eat".
Didem Engin, an opposition MP, said that at least 37 people who had been purged
have committed suicide. Messrs Erdogan and Soylu must be sorry about that. They
might be thinking: If only we had detained them first, before they killed
themselves in "terrorist activity"...
**Burak Bekdil, one of Turkey's leading journalists, was just fired from
Turkey's leading newspaper after 29 years, for writing what was taking place in
Turkey for Gatestone. He is a Fellow at the Middle East Forum.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Nasser's populist rhetoric still affects region
Dr. Simon Waldman/The National/June 05/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=55994
Everywhere you look, populism is on the rise. In the UK, there’s Brexit; in the
United States, there’s Donald J Trump; in Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan keeps
winning elections.
The Australian academic Benjamin Moffitt explains that populism is a political
style, a kind of repertoire, a performance if you will. Indeed, one could
certainly add that it's a form of political theatre where social media is the
stage and soundbites within 140 characters are the actors’ lines. The populist
leader likes to simplify policy and groups political life into "us" and "them"
with appeals to "the people" against a particular group, nation or outsider.
Such displays of a political performance are not new. There are plenty of past
examples. But, it was in the Middle East that the populist leader par excellence
emerged. His name was Gamal Abdel Nasser.
Rising through the ranks of the military during turbulent 1930s and 1940s Egypt,
Nasser was aware of the widespread anti-British sentiment across the country.
Confined to the barracks, Nasser established the Free Officer movement. He used
the loss of Palestine to the nascent state of Israel during the 1948 war to
rally more officers to his cause, blaming the British-backed King Farouk for
giving Egyptian troops defective weaponry.
The Free Officers staged a coup in July 1952. First it was General Naguib who
claimed leadership. But with the support of the Liberation Rally, an
organisation formed by Nasser to create the appearance of popular street
support, not unlike fake Twitter and Facebook accounts used by some political
campaigns today, Nasser took over as president in 1954, a position he held until
his death in 1970.
Nasser used the social media of his day, the radio station Voice of the Arabs,
to spread his message across the Arab world. Using colloquial language, he
styled himself a man of the people standing up to imperial powers while
promoting Arab unity and decrying "reactionary" Arab regimes. Meanwhile, in
Egypt, Nasser initiated land reforms and other popular domestic policies.
Although they did little to change inequality, they helped his claim to
represent the ordinary man.
Nasser’s popularity reached unprecedented heights after he nationalised the Suez
Canal in 1956. It was an act of defiance against the colonial powers of Britain
and France and a means to fund the Aswan Dam, a huge project Nasser said was for
the benefit of the common Egyptian. London and Paris conspired to depose Nasser:
Israel would attack Egypt, prompting Britain and France to intervene and remove
him. But Nasser was defiant and held his ground against Britain, France and
Israel, who bungled their operation.
Nasser’s popularity was now so great that it was by the invitation of Syria’s
nationalists that, in 1958, the United Arab Republic was formed, unifying Egypt
and Syria and making Pan-Arabism appear a reality and not just a dream.
But Nasser’s undoing was his disastrous attempt to lead the Arab world to
liberate Palestine in 1967.
Perhaps this was a bid to rekindle his light which was waning after Syria left
the UAR in 1961, complaining of Egyptian colonialisation of all things. Perhaps
Nasser wanted to reverse Egypt’s losses following its intervention in the Yemen
civil war to support the republicans against Saudi-backed royalists. The long
and bloody war became known as Egypt’s Vietnam. Or perhaps Nasser was disturbed
by accusations that he was doing nothing to support Jordan or Syria in military
skirmishes and conflagrations with Israel. "Nasser is hiding behind the skirts
of the UN," quipped King Hussein of Jordan, referring to the UN forces stationed
in the Sinai separating Israeli and Egyptian troops.
Nasser expelled the UN forces from Sinai, closed the straights of Tiran to
Israeli shipping and, to the cheers of the masses, proclaimed his intention to
destroy Israel. On June 5, 1967, Israel launched a pre-emptive strike. After six
days of fighting, Egypt lost Sinai while Israel controlled the West Bank, Golan
Heights and East Jerusalem, which it has held on to ever since. Nasser accused
Britain and the US of colluding with the Israelis. But he had been defeated.
Nasser resigned. In one last populist performance, crowds gathered in a
stage-managed call from the street for he to remain president. he died three
years later. His goals of defeating Israel and seeing through pan-Arab unity lay
in tatters.
As the fate of Nasser shows, without substance populists are merely performers
facing a possible final curtain call of failure.
**Dr Simon A Waldman is visiting research fellow at King’s College London
http://www.thenational.ae/opinion/nassers-populist-rhetoric-still-affects-region
Qatar needs to address its policy contradictions
Majid Rafizadeh/The National/June 05/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=55998
For Iran’s ruling Shia clerics, the increasing division between Doha and other
Arab nations is a significant victory.
First of all, the rift plays right into a core pillar of Iran’s regional and
foreign policy: the divide-and-rule doctrine. When Donald Trump made his first
foreign trip to Saudi Arabia, Tehran was alarmed. After many years of exploiting
diplomacy, concessions and divisions, Iranian leaders became aware that the
region’s realignment was under way. A powerful coalition and united front
between the US and the GCC was formed to counter Iran’s regional ambitions.
Iran is not going to alter its foreign policy and revolutionary ideals. As a
result, Iran’s tactical shift is to break up this coalition through various
means. And for Iran, the key was Qatar. Iran is attempting to abuse the
situation by sending a message to Washington and the international community
that there is no unity in the GCC or among Arab nations.
Secondly, Iran is also rejoicing the fact that the divisions between Qatar and
other GCC allies are diverting attention from the region’s geopolitical and
security priority; which is confronting Iran’s military adventurism and
expanding influence in the Middle East.
While the headlines are directed towards the rift between Qatar and other Arab
allies, Iran is liberally increasing its financial, military, advisory,
intelligence and weaponry assistance to Bashar Al Assad, Shia militias and some
designated-terrorist groups in Syria. Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps and its
elite wing, the Quds Force, are deploying more troops in Syria as well.
In Iraq, Iran is expanding its Shiite militia proxies, arming them and making
political reality of these groups in order to further control the political
destiny of the nation.
In Bahrain, Tehran is escalating its attempts to further infiltrate the system
and generate chaos in order to advance the core pillar of its foreign policy.
In Yemen, Iran continues to deliver sophisticated arms to the Houthis which is
exacerbating and radicalising the conflict.
Tehran is benefiting from the instability. Roughly four decades of the history
of the Islamic Republic has shown that it is through chaos and crisis that Iran
expands its influence.
What Qatar has failed to recognise is that Iran’s ruling Shia clerics will not
serve Doha’s long-term economic, strategic and geopolitical interests. For
Qatar, alliance with Arab nations and the US ought to be more important. For
example, economically speaking, Qatar’s deals and trades with other GCC members
and the United States significantly outweigh Doha’s business deals with Iran.
Qatar should be aware that geopolitically and strategically, Iran’s
revolutionary political establishment is not sustainable.
In addition, if Qatar faces domestic challenges, Arab nations, not Iran, are
more likely to assist Doha. Tehran will instead attempt to exploit the situation
and infiltrate Qatar’s political establishment as it did with Iraq, Syria, Yemen
and Bahrain.
Therefore, to preserve its long-term interests, Qatar needs to adequately
address the deep contradictions in its foreign policy. Qatar cannot appear to
appease Iran and its proxies while simultaneously projecting itself as an ally
of other GCC members.
Qatar's foreign policy is also undermining the US-GCC united front to confront
terrorism and Iran's military adventurism in the region. This is diverting
attention from the underlying issue: Iran’s relentless pursuit of regional
power.
In order to stop Iran’s pursuit of regional superiority, diplomacy is required
to bridge the gap between Qatar and other Arab allies.
The US can play a crucial role as a mediator. Since the largest American base in
the Middle East is located in Qatar, Washington can play a critical role in
persuading Qatar through negotiations, diplomacy and political pressure to
change its calculations. Meetings between Qatar and other GCC members would be
crucial as well.
If these diplomatic initiatives are coherently implemented, they can lead Qatar
to recalculate its political and economic priorities. It is not in the interest
of Qatar to lose its relationships with Washington and other Arab nations for
the Shia Iran, Hizbollah and other non-state actors.
In a nutshell, Iran is the major beneficiary of Qatar’s actions and the rift
between Doha and other GCC allies. Tehran is freely advancing its expansionist
policies, military adventurism and sectarian agenda. When it comes to the
division between Qatar and other Gulf members, Iran will definitely continue to
add more fuel to the fire. Doha should wake up to that fact and change its
calculations.
*Dr Majid Rafizadeh is a leading Iranian-American political scientist, president
of the International American Council and board member of the Harvard
International Review
Fredom Of Speech in the Age of Yellow Journalism!
www.tayyar.org/June 05/17
“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say
it.” While this popular quote is normally attributed to Voltaire, it refers to
what Evelyn Hall thought Voltaire’s attitude would have been in response to the
condemnation of the Claude-Adrien Helvétius’s controversial work by the
Parlement de Paris and by the Collège de Sorbonne. This is an extreme approach
to defending the fundamental right to speech, but that right should not abridge
on the rights of others. Indeed, the law and the Constitution, even in a free
country like the United States, do not protect all types of speech. For example,
defamation or libel cannot be protected.
The flood of defaming articles that has invaded the Lebanese press and social
media is nothing but a manifestation of what is better known as yellow
journalism or ‘presstitution.’ Without any research and reliable facts, people
have bombarded the public with unfounded, unsubstantiated, and damaging claims.
To better understand the fine line between the fundamental right to speech and
defamation, the LACD media team reached out to Joey Chbeir, an attorney in the
United States whose doctoral thesis has focused on constitutional protection to
civil liberties.
LACD Media: Mr. Chbeir, as it is very well known, the First Amendment of the
U.S. Constitution pertains to the freedom of speech. Could you please explain to
us the extent of this right?
J.C.: There is no doubt that the United States of America remains the beacon of
freedom to most democracies and the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
mandates for Congress to “make no law … abridging the freedom of speech, or of
the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
Government for a redress of grievances….” The United States Supreme Court has
creatively interpreted the First Amendment and created an extensive body of law,
but not every speech is protected. The law will protect your opinion, your
thoughts, and your recitation of true facts. However, the law will not protect
someone claiming, without any basis to the story, that a minister stole or was
paid an $800 million in commissions or someone finances terrorist activities.
The First Amendment does not protect speech that leads to illegal activity,
imminent violence, obscenity, defamation, or libel.
LACD Media: Does Freedom of speech protect defamation of character?
J.C.: Freedom of speech will always protect an opinion, but not false and
damaging statements that harm the reputation of an individual, group, or a
business. As such, a defamation lawsuit will be generally lost if the defendant
can prove that the statement he or she made is true or if the statement is a
true expression of an opinion (and not facts). That second category entails a
long analysis to determine whether the opinion is protected under the First
Amendment. At any rate, in some cases and without proving any damages, a
plaintiff can recover from a defendant if he/she simply proves that the
defendant made a statement that involves one of the following four categories:
(1) accusing the plaintiff of a crime, (2) claiming that the plaintiff has a
loathsome disease, (3) accusing the plaintiff of a trait that would adversely
reflect on his or her fitness to conduct business or trade, or (4) imputing
serious sexual misconduct. Again, the truth is always a good defense.
LACD Media: So, journalists can say “I don’t approve of/like this politician”
but cannot falsely state “This politician supports a terrorist organization?”
J.C.: Exactly. Freedom of speech allows people to express their opinion or their
approval of people and/or laws, but it does not give them a carte blanche to
convey false information as facts. This can be grounds for a legitimate lawsuit.
My advice to all journalists, reporters, bloggers, and analysts is to check
their sources and verify their information before publishing it. Several years
ago, an American/Lebanese blogger was sued for accusing another fellow
American/Lebanese of supporting a terrorist organization. Despite the blogger’s
claim to a constitutional right, which would normally preempt any law, the Court
found that the blogger’s statements were defamatory and the jury awarded the
plaintiff $90,000.
LACD Media: Thank you.
LACD Media Coordinator
Marlene Sabeh
Europe Has No Bubbles to Fear
Ferdinando Giugliano/Bloomberg View/June 05/17
Talk to critics of the European Central Bank’s ultra-loose monetary policy and a
common theme emerges: concern about financial stability. Quantitative easing is
seen as creating dangerous asset bubbles. Negative interest rates are said to
hurt bank profitability, making the financial system more vulnerable to shocks.
These concerns are widely misplaced. In fact, the real worry should be the risks
that arise from ending monetary stimulus too soon. A premature tightening could
cause euro zone government bond yields to spike, raising doubts over debt
sustainability in the weakest member states.
There is little evidence so far that the measures the ECB has implemented to
lift inflation and revive growth have had any dangerous side effects for
financial stability. The Bundesbank has warned that the ECB’s unorthodox
monetary policy has pushed up property values in Germany, adding that house
prices in some German cities are now overvalued by up to 30 percent. However,
while property prices may be climbing fast in some parts of the euro area, the
increases are well in line with long-term valuations. When they are not — for
example in the case of prime commercial real estate — the increase does not seem
sufficiently widespread to threaten a financial crisis.
A second fear relates to negative interest rates. Instead of paying banks
interest on their extra reserves, the ECB now charges banks a rate of 0.4
percent for storing their money. Some central bankers, such as François Villeroy
de Galhau, governor of the Bank of France, are now warning against this policy,
which they fear is eating too deeply into the profitability of the banks.
Still, the evidence that negative rates are hurting the banks is flimsy. True,
between June 2014 and September 2016, the ECB’s monetary policy reduced the
margin between deposit and lending rates for the median bank by 1 percentage
point. However, only a quarter of this effect can be attributed to negative
rates, according to the central bank’s own calculations. Meanwhile, the ECB’s
easing package has delivered other benefits, for example improving the quality
of credit by reducing the risk of default. The overall impact on the
profitability of banks appears negligible. A much bigger challenge for banks —
in Germany and elsewhere — is to adapt to the digital revolution, cutting costs
and finding new revenue streams.
For now, the continuation of the ECB’s stimulus does not pose particular risks
to financial stability. Its premature removal, however, would. As the latest
issue of the ECB’s Financial Stability Review has shown, stress in the euro zone
sovereign bond market has increased around the turn of the year. On aggregate,
government debt for the currency area stands at around 90 percent of gross
domestic product, which is high by historical standards. An increase in
sovereign risk could have an impact on debt sustainability for the most
vulnerable countries, such as Italy or Portugal, where debt is around 130
percent of GDP. And since many banks still hold large quantities of domestic
government bonds, these tensions could easily spread to the financial system.
These risks suggest that the ECB should err on the side of caution when it
withdraws its stimulus. Luckily, the central bank can afford to be patient: the
inflation rate in the euro area — once stripped of its more volatile components
— is still well below the central bank’s target of just below 2 percent.
Unemployment remains high; the recovery has further to go before putting
pressure on wages.
But there are risks that are beyond the control of the ECB. The most important
one is the divergence between countries in the euro area. Mario Draghi, ECB
president, has made it clear he will not withdraw the monetary stimulus unless
the pickup in inflation is broadly spread across the currency union. However, it
is possible that the recovery will be faster in some countries than in others.
When the ECB chooses to wind down QE and raise rates, the most vulnerable member
states could face an exceedingly tight monetary policy. This could spook
investors, raising fears over debt sustainability.
With a one-size-fits-all monetary policy, the ECB is poorly equipped to deal
with possible financial turmoil in one or a handful of countries. Governments
must do their bit, keeping debt levels in check and seeking higher rates of
growth. While the ECB can do a lot to preserve financial stability, it cannot
act alone.
What Does Russia Think?
David Ignatius/The Washington Post/June 05/17
When Russian officials and analysts here talk about the US investigation of
their alleged hacking of the 2016 campaign, two themes predominate: They’re
flattered that their country is seen as such a powerful threat, and they’re
amazed that the United States is so preoccupied with the scandal.
This is the official line, to be sure, but it was also expressed by several
critics of the regime I interviewed this week. People can’t quite believe the
sudden reversal of fortunes: Russia is back as a global force, after decades of
humiliation. And the United States, so long the dominant superpower, is now
divided, disoriented and, to Russian eyes, in retreat.
For the Kremlin version, here’s how Sergey Karaganov, the head of Russia’s
Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, describes his reaction to the
investigation: “It’s a mixture of disgust and sympathy. Disgust because 99
percent of that is lies or a concoction, maybe 100 percent. As for sympathy,
it’s a desperate picture when a great democracy is killing itself, committing
collective suicide.”
There’s an undisguised tone of schadenfreude here, even as officials talk about
US overreaction. “I would have been proud and happy if the authorities of my
country would have used some hackers to penetrate [your system], and showed that
you’re living in a crystal palace and should not interfere in the affairs of
others,” said Karaganov, who’s an informal Kremlin adviser in addition to
running the think tank.
Russian President Vladimir Putin wins either way, argues Andrei Kolesnikov, an
independent analyst who’s a senior associate with the Carnegie Moscow Center.
“If we did meddle in your elections, we show our might. If we didn’t, we’re
pure.”
A similar assessment of the win-win dynamic for Putin comes from Andrei Soldatov,
one of Moscow’s best investigative reporters and the author of many exposés
about Russian intelligence. “What did Russia get [from the hacking] in terms of
foreign policy? Almost nothing, except that Russia looks powerful,” he told me.
“That’s why Putin is so popular. He gives people an identity: Once again, we’re
a superpower.”
What surprises Russians is how quickly the US-led order has been coming apart
since the election of Donald Trump. Russian officials loathed Hillary Clinton
and favored Trump. But it’s unlikely that, even in the darkest corridors of the
Kremlin, Putin’s advisers imagined that President Trump would be so disruptive,
or the reaction to him so volatile. Russians have grown up being intimidated by
the United States; they didn’t imagine it was so fragile.
“We think Washington has gone crazy,” said Andranik Migranyan, a former Russian
government official who has taught politics in the United States. “The American
story was always one of self-sufficiency. Now, we see a sense of vulnerability.”
He sees Trump’s election as a “paradigm shift” for an America that was much more
polarized and overstretched than the elites realized. Now, in his view, it’s
payback time.
You might expect that Russians would feel embarrassed by the charge that they
tried to subvert US and European campaigns, but it’s the opposite. Migranyan
explained: “You are assuring us that Putin is all-powerful, that he can do
anything he wants — fix elections, change Europe, do anything.”
The official media here are sardonic about each day’s revelations in the US
media and Congress. When Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said this week that Russia
was more dangerous than ISIS, a Russian news site responded: “Somebody give this
gentleman a sedative.” When a story broke about White House adviser Jared
Kushner’s problems, the same site headlined: “Once again, those Russians!”
Basically, they think it’s funny.
Karaganov described Trump as “unbelievably brave” in challenging US political
orthodoxy, including his calls for better relations with Russia.
Trump’s chief virtue for the Kremlin is that he turned back Clinton, who
embodied the aggressive, pro-democracy, interventionist policies that Russia
viewed as a mortal threat. “We saw them as absolutely 100 percent dangerous,”
Karaganov said. “My advice to the government if she wins was: Put your nuclear
forces on alert, so they would know.”
Putin is hosting a celebration of Russia’s new power this week, at the St.
Petersburg International Economic Forum, a Davos-like gathering. It’s not a
victory parade, but it might as well be. For Putin and his allies, America’s
vaunted “liberal international order” is dissolving.
“That order we did not like, and we are doing away with it,” Karaganov said.
The World Bank Has Bigger Problems Than Bad Writing
Noah Smith/Bloomberg/June 05/17
Economists, to put it mildly, are not known for their communication skills. The
typical economics paper is written in a formal, stilted style, laden with
phrases like “in the following subsection” and “it has been shown that.” Jargon
flies thick and fast, interspersed with highly formalized mathematical
definitions and propositions. For a non-economist to hack through the verbal
jungle of the typical paper is often an impossible task.
Why is econ so abstruse? A simple explanation is that economists are just math
nerds who were never forced to communicate well. A hardened cynic might suggest
that the purpose is to create a secret language that can only be understood by
insiders, in order to thwart outside scrutiny. I suspect that econ is far from
the worst offender when it comes to using jargon as an artificial barrier to
entry, but it’s possible some of this is going on.
In any case, Paul Romer, chief economist of the World Bank, seems to have tried
to change this situation. After assuming leadership of the Bank’s research arm
last year, the Development Economics Group, Romer apparently initiated a crusade
against stilted writing, even going so far as to count how many times
researchers used the word “and.” The researchers were having none of it,
however, and successfully campaigned to force Romer to give up leadership of the
group. Romer’s budget cuts and elimination of positions within the bank probably
didn’t endear him to his subordinates, either.
This is sad, but was probably inevitable. An aggressive, maverick leader rarely
succeeds in shaking up a sleepy, hidebound organization overnight. To truly
change the institutional culture of a place like the World Bank would take a
long time and a lot of painful inside baseball — it’s not the kind of thing that
can be accomplished with a quick frontal assault. Romer isn’t the first reformer
to get bogged down in that particular organization — President Jim Yong Kim, who
attempted a massive restructuring of the Bank in 2014, caused turmoil and even
provoked a work stoppage.
So Romer’s efforts were probably always a low-percentage shot. But it was a good
try. From an outside perspective, it certainly looks as if the World Bank is an
institution in need of great change. And the problem goes far beyond poor
communication.
First of all, the Bank’s original mission — to lend money to developing
countries — is becoming less and less important. As Center for Global
Development researchers Scott Morris and Madeleine Gleave noted in a 2015
report, the rapid growth of the world economy means that most countries just
don’t need the bank anymore:
The Bank will continue to play an essential role in a relatively small number of
fragile states, but the rest of its core lending model could very quickly become
irrelevant to most of its other current borrowers…On its current path, the World
Bank will soon enough be viewed as no longer essential.
Morris and Gleave suggest a number of other roles the Bank could step into,
including disease response, funding scientific research, making municipal loans
or simply acting as a think tank. But this isn’t very encouraging — it paints
the picture of an organization shambling onward out of sheer momentum, an
expensive bureaucracy looking for a purpose. In 2014, the Financial Times
wondered openly if the Bank was “sliding into irrelevance.”
Meanwhile, the World Bank’s sister institution, the International Monetary Fund,
has its own problems. Created to make emergency loans to countries in crisis,
the IMF advocated fiscal austerity that probably often ended up making the
situation worse. In recent years, the Fund’s macroeconomists, led by Chief
Economists Olivier Blanchard and Maurice Obstfeld, have almost completely
reversed the organization’s standard approach to fiscal policy. But that leaves
the uncomfortable question of why the Fund’s institutional culture allowed such
a wrongheaded approach to persist for so long in the first place.
A picture is beginning to emerge of global financial institutions that are too
hidebound and conservative. Faced with changes in both the global economy and
economists’ understanding of recessions, both the World Bank and the IMF have
too often resisted change rather than embrace it. It’s worth wondering if the
root of the problem comes from the culture of economics.
Economists are, in general, an insular and hierarchical bunch. They are used to
having the quality and value of their work judged only by other economists. The
outside world is expected to pay economists’ salaries and listen to their
advice, but not to question the value of what they do. But when this ivory-tower
approach is applied to real-world organizations, the result can be unacceptable
institutional inertia.
Perhaps it was this insular culture, rather than just bad writing, that Romer
had really intended to shake up. If so, the deck was stacked against him from
the start. Making economists open up and engage with the wider world — and make
themselves vulnerable to criticism by intelligent outsiders — may be a task too
great even for a famous and brilliant individual like Romer.
Ambassadors of the Dark
Ghassan Charbel/Asharq Al Awsat/June 05/17
I initially wanted to write about June 05, 1967. I wanted to discuss the half
century of degeneration from the Naksa to the Nakba we are drowninng in today.
This Nakba is more horrific than that we witnessed after Palestine was occupied.
I was planning to talk about what “historic leaders” did and how their escapades
ended with the dissipation of nations and their wealth. They killed every
promising idea and chance and left the people out in the open to face bigots who
dream of taking the nation back to the stone age.
I meant to address the delusion of trans-border leadership and its expensive
termination. I also intended to discuss republics that collapsed because of
fear, the brutality of regimes that gambled with the fate of lands and its
people, millions of displaced civilians living in refugee camps with their
hungry children, hundreds of prisoners rotting in jails.
I wanted to share the experience of three of my friends on how the Naksa
affected their lives. My Libyan friend said that the present is far more
dangerous than the past. The youngsters who witnessed the series of civil wars
initiated by the “Arab Spring” will turn into ticking bombs in the Arab nations,
he added.
He believes that the disappointment of moderate Arabs is deeper than when people
discovered half a century ago that the war is not going as the “Voice of Arab”
radio station stated or what its famous anchor Ahmad Said reported.
My Iraqi friend said he was deeply saddened and at loss, with a feeling like a
delusional disbelief. Yet, he said, he felt a sense of a challenge which
prompted him to participate in the protests despite the fact that he had been in
hiding since his release from prison.
He explained the role of Baath Party in persecuting every different opinion and
slaughtering and arresting the opposition.
Nonetheless, my Syrian friend was very brief. He just said that the Naksa of
1967 caused pains far less than the current one.
I decided on Sunday morning to write about the Naksa turned into Nakba. Things
have changed. London was enjoying a beautiful weather which doubled its magic. I
left my office on Saturday night to the center of the city hoping I could steal
away something of this short and swift Spring night.
People were clearly enjoying the beautiful weather. That’s the normal thing for
cities that have bid farewell to tragedies of civil wars and opted for elections
to express content or discontent. The British are getting ready for Thursday’s
election.
All of sudden, shortly after 10 PM, police and ambulance sirens filled the air,
and a few minutes later, it was confirmed that the city was attacked by a lone
wolf or a group of wolves. Everyone was in shock, especially that Manchester
attack happened only recently.
The news about the stabbing and rampage were on all cellphones and restaurant
goers cut their visit short. I, as an Arab, had a strange feeling of guilt.
Every time a similar incident occurs, we all wish the executor weren’t an Arab
or a Muslim. But our wishes are always crushed by the fact that these incidents
seem to be limited to the world we belong to.
I felt like apologizing.
Courtesy aside, these European countries welcomed millions of Arabs and Muslims
who escaped poverty, injustice, and depression and were, in fact, kinder to them
than our own countries.
Europe aimed to integrate the newcomers into its communities and economy and
granted them the right to be different and respected their beliefs. It gave them
money from taxpayers and enrolled their children in modern education.
I am saying this because I monitored closely how Germany was busy welcoming the
Syrian refugees where one of them expressed his joy for arriving at a country
where he can find his three daily meals.
The tragedy is horrific indeed. Over the past decades, darkness took over: an
ideology that doesn’t acknowledge others and insists on eliminating or killing
them. A creed provoked by lit streets, cultural occasions, freedom and
creativity, scientific research and posing complicated questions.
A doctrine that considers anyone different as the enemy who deserves to be
stabbed, rammed, or slaughtered.
Worse than that tragedy are those looking for justifications for the
perpetrator, citing what this country did or what history wrote as if we haven’t
done any transgressions ourselves. The situation can no longer bare
justifications or silence.
Terrorists have inflicted far more damages to the West than they have done to
our countries. Arabs and Muslims should take a clear stand for the sake of their
countries and their grandchildren.
A comprehensive battle against extremism should be the first article in the
constitution of every Arab and Islamic nation. Without winning this battle, we
will continue our fall towards hell.
We do not have the right to punish the world like this.
Ambassadors of the dark’s obdurate actions will sooner or later backfire at the
Arab and Islamic community and the countries they came from.
Six Muslim Countries Just Got Sick of Qatar Bankrolling
Terror 6 دول لم تعد تتحمل ارهاب المال القطري
Elliot Friedland/Clarion Project/June 06/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=56013
Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Yemen, the Maldives and
the Eastern government of Libya all just severed diplomatic relations with
Qatar. Saudi Arabia sealed all land, sea and air borders with the country. All
countries said they would halt all air and sea traffic to Qatar.
Qatari diplomats have just 48 hours to get out.
The six countries cited Qatar’s ties to terrorism, in particular to the Muslim
Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood is a global Islamist movement originally
founded in Egypt that seeks to implement sharia as state law.
Join our campaign to ban the Muslim Brotherhood. Write to your elected
representative and tell them why they demand the designation of the Muslim
Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization.
UAE state media outlet WAM accused Qatar of “supporting, funding and embracing
terrorism, extremism and sectarian organisations.” Bahrain accused Qatar of
“shaking the security and stability of Bahrain and meddling in its affairs.”
Qatar has pulled its forces from the Saudi-led coalition against the Houthi
rebels in Yemen.
The exact cause of the severing of ties remains unknown. Qatar hit back saying
there was “no justification.”
Ties were severed just days after it was reported that Qatar expelled senior
Hamas leaders tied to terrorism from its territory. Qatar said the expulsions
came as a result of unspecified “outside pressure.” Palestinian officials told
Israeli TV the pressure came from the United States and Saudi Arabia and that
Qatar gave Hamas a list of names of individuals who had to leave Qatar
immediately.
Yet there has long been tension building. Two weeks ago the same four countries
blocked access to Qatari websites after controversial statements criticizing
Saudi Arabia and supporting Iran were reported to have been made by the Saudi
Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani.
The emir reportedly said “There is no reason behind Arabs’ hostility to Iran and
our relationship with Israel is good.”
“Iran represents a regional and Islamic power that cannot be ignored and it is
unwise to face up against it,” he was reported as saying. “It is a big power in
the stabilization of the region.” In a series of tweets which were later
deleted, Qatar’s state owned media outlet Al Jazeera also said Qatar would be
withdrawing its ambassadors from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain and the United
Arab Emirates.
Qatar dismissed the reports as fake news caused by a hacking attack against its
media outlets. Nevertheless, the damage was done.
So why is this happening?
Qatar has funded jihadi groups in Syria that wage war against the Assad regime,
including Ahrar al-Sham which was perfectly happy to fight alongside then
al-Qaeda affiliate Jabhat al Nusra. In Libya, Qatar has funded the Islamist
“Libya Dawn” coalition. Arms shipments to Islamist militias there were tracked
by British intelligence.
In 2014, anger over these funding ties led Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain and the
UAE to pull their ambassadors from Qatar.
Over the past decades, Qatar has pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into
funding Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood’s affiliate based in Gaza.In March, Hamas
leader Khaled Meshal unveiled the new Hamas Charter in the Sheraton Hotel in
Doha. As recently as February they sent $100 million to Gaza, as part of a
$1-billion package they promised after Operation Protective Edge.
Al Jazeera also provided much in the way of media support for the Muslim
Brotherhood in Egypt during the 2011 revolution, during the tenure of Muslim
Brotherhood president of Egypt Mohammed Morsi and in the aftermath of his
departure. Immediately following the coup, 22 journalists working for Al Jazeera
in Egypt resigned after being told by their Qatari bosses to support the Muslim
Brotherhood.
Abdel Latif el-Menawy, former head of the Egypt News Center accused the outlet
of being a “propaganda channel” for the Brotherhood.
Egypt later shut down Al Jazeera offices and arrested several of its journalists
accusing them of supporting the Brotherhood. You can read Clarion Project’s
interview with the former bureau chief of Al Jazeera Egypt, Mohammed Fahmy,
here.
The Muslim Brotherhood is correctly regarded, along with Pakistan’s Jamaat e-Islami
as the grandfather of modern Islamism. The mentor of Osama bin Laden, Abdullah
Azzam, was a Muslim Brotherhood member and Milestones, written by Muslim
Brotherhood ideologue Sayyid Qutb has become a foundational textbook for the
jihadi movement.
Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the UAE see the Brotherhood as a threat to their rule.
All have banned the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. The UAE not only
banned the Muslim Brotherhood, but also 80 of their international affiliates
including the American Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Muslim
American Society (MAS).
For more information about the Muslim Brotherhood, see Clarion Project’s Special
Report: The Muslim Brotherhood.
The White House is reportedly considering banning the Muslim Brotherhood. There
are those in policy circles, such as the Brookings Institute, which oppose a
ban. It is worth noting that in 2013 Brookings took a $14.8 million gift from
none other than Qatar, payable over four years, which among other things “helped
fund a Brookings affiliate in Qatar and a project on United States relations
with the Islamic world,” according to The New York Times.
Join our campaign to ban the Muslim Brotherhood. Write to your elected
representative and tell them why they demand the designation of the Muslim
Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization.
https://clarionproject.org/four-arab-countries-just-got-sick-qatar-bankrolling-terror/