LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS
BULLETIN
April 18/17
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
The
Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/newselias/english.april18.17.htm
News
Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to go to the LCCC Daily
English/Arabic News Buletins Archieves Since 2016
Bible Quotations For Today
After these things Jesus showed himself again to the
disciples by the Sea of Tiberias
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 21/01-14/:"After these
things Jesus showed himself again to the disciples by the Sea of Tiberias; and
he showed himself in this way.
Gathered there together were Simon Peter, Thomas called the Twin, Nathanael of
Cana in Galilee, the sons of Zebedee, and two others of his disciples. Simon
Peter said to them, ‘I am going fishing.’ They said to him, ‘We will go with
you.’ They went out and got into the boat, but that night they caught nothing.
Just after daybreak, Jesus stood on the beach; but the disciples did not know
that it was Jesus. Jesus said to them, ‘Children, you have no fish, have you?’
They answered him, ‘No.’He said to them, ‘Cast the net to the right side of the
boat, and you will find some.’ So they cast it, and now they were not able to
haul it in because there were so many fish. That disciple whom Jesus loved said
to Peter, ‘It is the Lord!’ When Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he put
on some clothes, for he was naked, and jumped into the lake. But the other
disciples came in the boat, dragging the net full of fish, for they were not far
from the land, only about a hundred yards off. When they had gone ashore, they
saw a charcoal fire there, with fish on it, and bread. Jesus said to them,
‘Bring some of the fish that you have just caught.’So Simon Peter went aboard
and hauled the net ashore, full of large fish, a hundred and fifty-three of
them; and though there were so many, the net was not torn. Jesus said to them,
‘Come and have breakfast.’ Now none of the disciples dared to ask him, ‘Who are
you? ’ because they knew it was the Lord. Jesus came and took the bread and gave
it to them, and did the same with the fish. This was now the third time that
Jesus appeared to the disciples after he was raised from the dead.
We have been buried with him by baptism into death, so that, just as Christ was
raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness
of life
Letter to the Romans 06/03-11/:"Do you not know that all of us who have been
baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? Therefore we have been
buried with him by baptism into death, so that, just as Christ was raised from
the dead by the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life.
For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we will certainly be
united with him in a resurrection like his. We know that our old self was
crucified with him so that the body of sin might be destroyed, and we might no
longer be enslaved to sin.
For whoever has died is freed from sin. But if we have died with Christ, we
believe that we will also live with him. We know that Christ, being raised from
the dead, will never die again; death no longer has dominion over him. The death
he died, he died to sin, once for all; but the life he lives, he lives to God.
So you also must consider yourselves dead to sin and alive to God in Christ
Jesus."
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials from
miscellaneous sources published on April 17-18/17
Syria’s Part in the Potential Russian-American ‘Deal’/Raghida Dergham/April
16/17
Palestinians' Real Enemies: Arabs/Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone Institute/April
17/17
Iran's Elections: Black Turbans vs. White Turbans/Mohammad Amin/Gatestone
Institute/April 17/17
On Backdrop Of Egyptian Efforts To Fight Hamas Tunnels, Egyptian Writer Calls To
Tie Rapprochement With Hamas To Demolition Of Tunnels/MEMRI/April 17/17
Why Easter Brings Out the Worst in Islam/Raymond Ibrahim/FrontPage
Magazine/April 17/17
‘Master Bomb’ and Trump’s message to the world/Ghassan Charbel/Al Arabiya/April
17/17
Evacuation deal is Syria’s new moment of /Mashari Althaydi/Al Arabiya/April
17/17
Why Syria is one thing and Assad is another/Hussein Shobokshi/Al Arabiya/April
17/17
Why Turks can’t get enough of Erdogan/Mahir Zeynalov/Al Arabiya/April 17/17
Titles For Latest Lebanese Related News published
on
April 17-18/17
Rahi Raises Prayers for 'Peace and Prosperity' in France
Houri: Bassil's Law Format Brings Back Logic of Civil War
Fadlallah Urges Approval of Electoral Law on May 15, Says Format Can't be
'Imposed'
Israeli Gunboats Violate Lebanese Waters
Two Families Trade Fire in Akkar
Two Men Shot Dead in Qob Elias, Suspect Handed Over to Authorities
Assailants Toss Stun Grenade in Sidon
Meeting by Lebanese, Palestinian Democratic Youth Unions: Preparations underway
for largest Arab participation in World Youth and Student Festival in Russia
Hariri eulogizing late MP Franjieh: He offered himself to Lebanon, his main
concern was the unity and coexistence of the Lebanese
Shabayta: Palestinian political leadership did not hold official meeting today
Army contains clash in Akkar, restores calm to the region
Joint Security Forces in Ain Helwe call for reinforcing troops
Minister of Information of the Sultanate of Oman welcomes the experience of his
Lebanese counterpart
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin For
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
April 17-18/17
Mass evacuation in Syria postponed after blast kills 80 children
Golan Druze March for Syrian Independence Day
UN: Nearly half a million Iraqis have fled Mosul fighting
Iraqi forces fight door-to-door in Mosul as offensive enters seventh month
ISIS seeking alliance with al Qaeda, Iraqi vice president says
Clashes erupt between tribes and ISIS militants in Sinai
Egypt arrests 13 terrorist suspects 'preparing attacks'
Hundreds of Palestinians in Israeli jails launch mass hunger strike
Turkish PM: People’s message clear, referendum has ended all arguments
Erdogan Slams Criticism of Disputed Turkey Poll
Saudi Arabia Hails Turkey Referendum 'Success'
Pakistan police arrest 22 in "blasphemy" mob killing
Links
From Jihad Watch Site for April 17-18/17
Raymond Ibrahim: Why Easter Brings Out the Worst in Islam
New York Times publishes op-ed by convicted jihad murderer, calls him a
“Palestinian leader”
South Dakota Muslim brandishes weapons, Qur’an outside Christian conference,
says “Be f**king terrified,” isn’t arrested
UK: Westminster car jihadi told family, “You will soon hear of my death, but
don’t worry…I will be in paradise”
Nashville area one of top 20 places in US where girls are at risk for female
genital mutilation
Pakistan: Muslims torture Christian man with hot iron rods for “befriending”
Muslim woman
Australia: Muslim cleric tells girls they’ll go to hell for having non-Muslim
friends
Robert Spencer: What Is It About Converts to Islam?
Robert Spencer: Relax: Muslim Trucker Who Posted Jihad Material to be
“Deradicalized”
Anne Marie Waters Moment: Easy Guide to Debating the Useful Infidel. Part I:
“Not All”
UK: Two large supermarket chains won’t stock Christian Easter egg, but do carry
halal ones
Syria: Sunni Muslims murder 126 people, wound 55 in bomb attack targeting
Shi’ite evacuees
Links From
Christian Today Site on
April 17-18/17
Turkey's President Erdogan declares referendum victory, opponents cry foul
US won't tolerate more North Korea nuclear tests, says VP Pence
Prince Harry sought counselling more than a decade after mother's death
Scottish churchgoing sees dramatic fall, further decline predicted
What is the key religious liberty case on Neil Gorsuch's desk this week?
The not-so-empty tomb: remains of five Archbishops of Canterbury found in hidden
crypt at Lambeth
anger, evil of the world - all the darkness hidden in the corners of our hearts'
Holy Saturday: The space between grieving and rejoicing
Latest Lebanese Related News published
on April 17-18/17
Rahi Raises Prayers for 'Peace and Prosperity' in France
Naharnet/April 17/17/Maronite Patriarch Beshara al-Rahi presided over a
mass service on Monday in appreciation of France in presence of French
Ambassador Emmanuel Bonne and a number of political figures, the National News
Agency reported. Rahi prayed for the prosperity and peace in France, saying: “We
raise our prayers for the peace and prosperity of this dear country. Our prayers
also accompany the beloved people of France, who are preparing these days to
elect a new President of the Republic.” After the mass, Rahi welcomed Army
Commander General Joseph Aoun.
Houri: Bassil's Law Format Brings Back Logic of Civil War
Naharnet/April 17/17/Al-Mustaqbal MP Ammar Houri criticized on Monday an
electoral law proposal suggested by Foreign Minister Jebran Bassil saying “it
brings us back to the logic of civil war.”“The (so-called) qualification part of
Bassil's proposal brings us back to the logic of civil war. It is very far from
the constitution and the path drawn by the Taef agreement,” said Houri in an
interview to VDL (100.5). “Any electoral law must be based on the constitution
and the Taef agreement,” he stressed. The MP assured that negotiations to arrive
at a new electoral law are ongoing. Free Patriotic Movement chief Jebran Bassil
announced recently that the political parties have reached a “preliminary
agreement” over the so-called new “qualification electoral system”.The system
had been initially proposed by Speaker Nabih Berri several months ago before
being eventually endorsed by Bassil. Bassil's proposal suggests that in the
first round, voting takes place in the current 26 districts and voters are not
allowed to vote for candidates from other sects. Two candidates for each
sectarian seat qualify for the second round during which voting would take place
in 10 newly-defined electoral districts and according to a non-sectarian
proportional representation polling system. The law has not garnered consensus
as yet, the Lebanese Forces and Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid
Jumblat have openly rejected it.
Al-Mustaqbal Movement and other parties have also expressed their reservation.
Fadlallah Urges Approval of Electoral Law on May 15, Says
Format Can't be 'Imposed'
Naharnet/April 17/17/MP Hassan Fadlallah of Hizbullah's Loyalty to Resistance
bloc on Monday called on the political forces to seek the approval of a new
electoral law during the May 15 legislative session as he stressed that no party
in Lebanon can “impose” a certain electoral system on the other parties. “We
have a grace period from now until the May 15 parliamentary session that Speaker
Nabih Berri has called for, and we want it to be a session for the approval of a
new electoral law,” Fadlallah added.Media reports are speculating that the
session will witness a controversial third extension of parliament's term due to
the parties' ongoing failure to agree on an electoral law. Lawmakers were set to
extend the legislature's term on April 13 but President Michel Aoun invoked his
constitutional powers to suspend parliament for one month and force the
postponement of a legislative session. “We want this country to live a state of
calm and stability, away from tensions and attempts to drag it into problems
that it can do without,” Fadlallah added. He emphasized that “there is no
possibility for anyone in Lebanon to impose a certain format on the other
parties, seeing as the composition and sectarian nature of our country
necessitate consensus on the essential issues.”The lawmaker warned that “we must
not take the country to sectarian tensions, because there are external parties
that are working night and day on stirring disputes among the sects in
Lebanon.”Fadlallah also stressed that “there will not be any disputes” between
Hizbullah and Aoun or between the party and its ally the Free Patriotic
Movement. “But some divergence and debate might take place sometimes over the
electoral law or other issues and this is something normal,” the MP added. He
also reassured that “the elections will be eventually held and we will have a
new parliament.”
Israeli Gunboats Violate Lebanese Waters
Naharnet/April 17/17/Israeli military vessels violated Lebanon's territorial
waters off Ras al-Naqoura, the Lebanese Army Orientation Directorate said in a
statement on Monday. “On Monday at 4:23 am an Israeli military boat violated
Lebanon's territorial waters opposite al-Naqoura crossing 260 meters into
Lebanon's waters where it stayed for two minutes,” said the statement. Another
violation was recorded at “5:23 am when a military boat violated the same
location sailing to a distance of 275 meters for a period of six minutes,” it
added. The army coordinated with the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL)
in the wake of the incident, the statement said. Israeli troops regularly
violate Lebanon's maritime and land borders crossing the electronic border fence
and sometimes enter Lebanese territory through the U.N.-demarcated Blue Line,
which was drawn up following Israel’s withdrawal from south Lebanon in 2000
after a 22-year occupation.
Two Families Trade Fire in Akkar
Naharnet/April 17/17/A dispute between two families escalated into an armed
clash Monday in the northern Akkar district, state-run National News Agency
reported. “A dispute between members of the al-Akkoumi and Hamad families
erupted into a fistfight and an exchange of gunfire at Bourj al-Arab-Burqayel
intersection in Akkar,” NNA said. It added that the clash is related to old
disputes. Army troops and Internal Security Forces members arrived later on the
scene and contained the situation, the agency reported.
Two Men Shot Dead in Qob Elias, Suspect Handed Over to
Authorities
Naharnet/April 17/17/Two men were killed on Monday when an unknown man driving a
four-wheel vehicle opened fire at them in Qob Elias in the Bekaa region, the
National News Agency reported. An unidentified man driving a four-wheel car
opened fire at Talal Hmeid al-Awad and Khalil Qattan killing them instantly, NNA
said. The victims own a coffee-vending van situated on the international highway
at the junction of the vegetable market in Qob Elias. Awad was transported to
al-Maalqa government hospital in Zahle, while al-Qattan was taken to Chtoura
hospital. No details were reported about the motives of the crime, said NNA.
Later during the day, NNA said the suspect, identified as Mark Yammin, was
caught and handed over to the General Security after efforts exerted by Justice
Minister Salim Jreissati. At the backdrop of the crime, tension flared in Qob
Elias when enraged relatives of the victims gathered outside shops belonging to
the suspect's father and started smashing them, media reports said.
Assailants Toss Stun Grenade in Sidon
Naharnet/April 17/17/Unknown assailants tossed a stun grenade at dawn on Monday
in the southern al-Njasa neighborhood in Sidon, the National News Agency said.
The grenade exploded triggering a fire in a pile of garbage, NNA added. Security
Forces rushed to the scene and opened an investigation into the incident.
Meeting by Lebanese, Palestinian Democratic Youth Unions: Preparations underway
for largest Arab participation in World Youth and Student Festival in Russia
Mon 17 Apr 2017/NNA - Union of
Palestinian Democratic Youth and Lebanese Democratic Youth Union held a joint
leadership meeting, on Monday, at the Union's headquarters in Mar Elias-Beirut,
which included members of the executive offices and district and university
officials in various governorates of Lebanon. The meeting was devoted to
discussing the preparations for the World Youth and Student Festival which will
be held at the end of this year in Russia, with the participation of thousands
of young people from dozens of countries at the invitation of the World Youth
Democratic Union.
Members of both Unions stressed that "preparations are underway for the widest
Arab youth participation in said Festival," considering it "an important global
event, thus entailing an active presence of Arab youth, in a bid to shed light
on the issues and challenges confronting the Arab region."They also agreed to
"organize joint meetings at the level of universities and regions to develop a
process for the implementation of youth programs and activities, and to
coordinate joint moves in tackling issues of mutual concern."
Hariri eulogizing late MP Franjieh: He offered himself to
Lebanon, his main concern was the unity and coexistence of the Lebanese
Mon 17 Apr 2017/NNA - The family of former MP Samir Franjieh received
condolences on his passing away at Saint George Maronite Church in Central
Beirut on Monday, most prominently from Prime Minister Saad Hariri, who
expressed his deepest sorrow at his loss. "The late Samir is a great national
loss to Lebanon, for he offered himself to politics and to Lebanon, and I
personally lost him as a sincere friend who wanted nothing for himself. His main
concern was the unity of the Lebanese and their coexistence. The late Samir was
a friend of Martyr PM Rafic Hariri and we hope they will meet together up in the
sky," Hariri wrote in the condolences register.
Shabayta: Palestinian political leadership did not hold
official meeting today
Mon 17 Apr 2017/NNA - The Secretary of the factions of the PLO and Fatah
Movement in Sidon, Maher Shabayta, denied in a statement on Monday that the
Palestinian political leadership held any official meeting today, stating that
the meeting held was only for deliberations over latest developments. The
statement added that the official meeting has been postponed to Tuesday. "Fatah
Movement does not adopt any official statement issued after the deliberations
[today]."
Army contains clash in Akkar, restores calm to the region
Mon 17 Apr 2017/NNA - The army and security forces were able to restore calm to
the intersection area of Burj al-Arab-Berqayel in Akkar region, following the
individual dispute between members of Hamad family and others from al-Akumi
Family, which evolved into fighting and shooting, NNA correspondent in Akkar
reported Monday evening.
Joint Security Forces in Ain Helwe call for reinforcing
troops
Mon 17 Apr 2017/NNA - The political leadership of the Palestinian forces held an
urgent meeting on Monday in Ain Helweh Camp to closely monitor ongoing
violations in areas of recent clashes, National News Agency correspondent
reported. Conferees called for strengthening the equipment and number of the
Joint Palestinian Forces in Al-Tireh neighborhood and to withdraw armed men from
buildings in order to restore normal life and ensure the return of the
inhabitants to their homes.
Minister of Information of the Sultanate of Oman welcomes
the experience of his Lebanese counterpart
Mon 17 Apr 2017/NNA - The Minister of Information of the Sultanate of Oman,
Abdul Menhem Hussni, on Monday welcomed the move by his Lebanese counterpart
Melhem Riachi to transform the ministry of information into a ministry of
dialogue and communication.In an interview with Radio Lebanon, the Omani
minister stressed that during the current period there is a need for dialogue,
communication and approaching the other. "The challenges facing the world today
require monitoring the electronic media, hence the need to elaborate laws that
govern these media, in particular by pacts based on ethics," he added. Finally,
he warned against the actions of certain electronic information sites that
threaten Arab countries by disseminating information inciting hatred, racism and
discord.
Latest LCCC Bulletin For
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on
April 17-18/17
Mass evacuation in Syria postponed
after blast kills 80 children
The Associated Press, Beirut Monday, 17 April 2017/The evacuation of more than
3,000 Syrians that was scheduled to take place Sunday from four areas as part of
a population transfer has been postponed, opposition activists said, a day after
a deadly blast that killed more than 120 people, many of them government
supporters. The reasons for the delay were not immediately clear. It came as
shells fired by the Islamic State group on government-held parts of the eastern
city of Deir el-Zour wounded two members of a Russian media delegation visiting
the area, according to state-run Syrian news agency SANA. Russia is a main
backer of Syrian President Bashar Assad and Russian journalists enjoy wide
access in government-held parts of the country. Russia's Anna-News military news
service, which employs the journalists, said one was wounded in the arm while
the other suffered leg and stomach wounds. The news service said the two were
evacuated adding that their condition was "satisfactory." The United Nations is
not overseeing the transfer deal, which involves residents of the pro-government
villages of Foua and Kfarya and the opposition-held towns of Madaya and Zabadani.
All four have been under siege for years, their fate linked through a series of
reciprocal agreements that the U.N. says have hindered aid deliveries. Rami
Abdurrahman, who heads the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights,
and Hezbollah's Al-Manar TV, earlier said that 3,000 people will be evacuated
from Foua and Kfarya, while 200, the vast majority of them fighters, will be
evacuated from Zabadani and Madaya. Abdurrahman and opposition activist Hussam
Mahmoud, who is from Madaya, said the evacuation has been delayed. Abdurrahman
said no permission was given for the evacuation to go ahead while Mahmoud said
it has been delayed for "logistical reasons."It was not immediately clear if the
evacuees feared attacks similar to Saturday's bombing. Abdurrahman said
Saturday's blast -which hit an area where thousands of pro-government evacuees
had been waiting for hours - killed 126. He said the dead included 109 people
from Foua and Kfarya, among them 80 children and 13 women. No one has claimed
the attack, but both the Islamic State group and the al-Qaeda-affiliated Fatah
al-Sham Front have targeted civilians in government areas in the past. A wounded
girl, who said she lost her four siblings in the blast, told Al-Manar TV from
her hospital bed that children who had been deprived of food for years in the
two villages were approached by a man in the car who told them to come and eat
potato chips. She said once many had gathered, there was an explosion that tore
some of the children to pieces. Anthony Lake, UNICEF's executive director, said
in a statement Sunday that after six years of war and carnage in Syria "there
comes a new horror that must break the heart of anyone who has one.""We must
draw from this not only anger, but renewed determination to reach all the
innocent children throughout Syria with help and comfort," he said. After the
blast, some 60 buses carrying 2,200 people, including 400 opposition fighters,
entered areas held by rebels in the northern province of Aleppo, Abdurrahman
said. More than 50 buses and 20 ambulances carrying some 5,000 Foua and Kfarya
residents entered the government-held city of Aleppo, Syrian state TV said, with
some of them later reaching a shelter in the village of Jibreen to the south.
U.N. relief coordinator Stephen O'Brien said he was "horrified" by the deadly
bombing, and that while the U.N. was not involved in the transfer it was ready
to "scale up our support to evacuees." He called on all parties to uphold their
obligations under international humanitarian and human rights law, and to
"facilitate safe and unimpeded access for the U.N. and its partners to bring
life-saving help to those in need."Residents of Madaya and Zabadani, formerly
summer resorts, joined the 2011 uprising against President Bashar Assad. Both
came under government siege in the ensuing civil war. Residents of Foua and
Kfraya, besieged by the rebels, have lived under a steady hail of rockets and
mortars for years, but were supplied with food and medicine through military
airdrops. Critics say the string of evacuations, which could see some 30,000
people moved across battle lines over the next 60 days, amounts to forced
displacement along political and sectarian lines. In eastern Syria, an airstrike
by the U.S.-led coalition on the village of Sukkarieh near the border with Iraq
killed eight civilians who had earlier fled violence in the northern province of
Aleppo, according to Deir Ezzor 24, an activist collective, and Sound and
Picture Organization, which documents ISIS violations. Airstrikes by the US-led
coalition had killed dozens of civilians over the past several weeks as the
battle against the extremists intensifies in Syria and Iraq.
Golan Druze March for Syrian Independence Day
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/April 17/17/Hundreds of Druze on the
Israeli-occupied Golan Heights marched Monday for Syrian independence day,
carrying portraits of President Bashar al-Assad and chanting anti-Israel
slogans. "God save Syria!" they shouted as they rallied in the town of Masada.
"Down with the occupation!"Israeli officials say there are about 20,000 Druze on
the strategic plateau seized by Israel from neighboring Syria in the 1967
Six-Day War. Israel subsequently annexed the 1,200 square kilometers (460 square
miles) of territory in an action never recognized by the international
community. But the vast majority of Golan Druze have retained Syrian
nationality. The civil war which has ravaged their homeland for the past six
years is reflected in local divisions, with Masada opponents of the Assad regime
refusing to march behind his picture. But both sides are united in their
opposition to the Israeli occupation, residents told AFP. "We retain our Syrian
identity and follow the path of national resistance," said Nasser Ibrahim, one
of the organizers of Monday's march. "With the crisis in Syria, Israel has
increased its measures on the Golan," said Assad opponent Ayman Abu Jabal,
referring to what he called Israeli-ordered changes to the Golan school
curriculum. Israel and Syria are still officially in a state of war, but Israel
says it has no wish to get involved in the fighting. It does, however, carry out
strikes against its Lebanese foe Hizbullah, which fights for Assad in Syria.
Last month, Israel struck what it said were Hizbullah targets in Syria, drawing
Syrian anti-aircraft missile fire in the worst flare-up between the two
governments since the Syrian civil war began in 2011.
UN: Nearly half a million Iraqis have fled Mosul fighting
The Associated Press, Beirut Monday, 17 April 2017/The United Nations says
nearly half a million civilians have fled Mosul since US-backed Iraqi forces
launched a wide-scale military operation last October to retake the city from
ISIS militants. The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said
Monday that 493,000 people have been displaced from the city. As many as 500,000
others are in ISIS-controlled parts of western Mosul, where fighting is still
underway. The UN says food, water and medicine stocks are running low in the
western half of the city, and that the fighting there is much heavier than it
was in eastern Mosul, which the Iraqi government declared “fully liberated” in
January.
Iraqi forces fight door-to-door in Mosul as offensive
enters seventh month
Reuters, Iraq Monday, 17 April 2017/Iraqi forces gained fresh ground in
door-to-door fighting in the Old City of Mosul, a military spokesman said on
Monday, as the US-backed offensive to capture ISIS's de facto capital in Iraq
entered its seventh month.A Reuters correspondent saw thick smoke billowing over
the Old City, near the Grand al-Nuri Mosque, from where ISIS leader Abu Bakr
al-Baghdadi announced his arrival. Heavy exchanges of gunfire and mortar rounds
could be heard from the neighbourhoods facing the old city across the Tigris
river that bisects Mosul into a western and eastern sides. The war between ISIS
militants and Iraqi forces is taking a heavy toll on several hundred thousand
civilians trapped inside the city, with severely malnourished babies reaching
hospitals in government-held areas. Iraqi Federal Police forces "are engaged in
difficult, house-to-house clashes with ISIS fighters inside the Old City", a
media officer from these units told Reuters. Drones are extensively being used
to locate and direct air strikes on the militants who are dug in the middle of
civilians, he said. Troops have had the famous centuries-old al-Nuri Mosque
leaning minaret in their sights since last month, as capturing it would mark a
symbolic victory over the insurgents. A police spokesman said the troops were
closing in on the mosque without indicating the remaining distance. Their
progress has been slow as about 400,000 civilians, or a quarter of Mosul's
pre-war population, are trapped in neighbourhoods still under control of the
militants.
More 300,000 have fled fighting since the offensive operation started on Oct.
17, with strong air and ground support from a US-led coalition. Mosul, the
largest city in northern Iraq, was captured by the ultra-hardline Sunni Muslim
fighters in mid 2014. Government forces, including army, police and elite
counter terrorism units have taken back most of it, including the half that lies
east of the Tigris river. The militants are now surrounded in the northwestern
quarter including the historic Old City, using booby traps, sniper and mortar
fire against the assailants. Police on Sunday reported a toxic gas attack on its
troops that caused no deaths. It also said the militants were increasingly using
suicide motorbikes attacks. The narrow alleyways restricts the use of suicide
cars by the militants and tanks, armoured personnel carriers and Humvees by the
government forces. The United Nations said last month that 12 people, including
women and children, had been treated for possible exposure to chemical weapons
agents in Mosul. But Iraq's UN ambassador, Mohamed Ali Alhakim, said days later
there was no evidence for that. The fighting has killed several thousands among
civilians and fighters on both sides, according to aid organisations. Residents
who have managed to escape from the Old City have said there is almost nothing
to eat but flour mixed with water and boiled wheat grain.What little food
remains is too expensive for most residents to afford, or kept for ISIS members
and their supporters.
ISIS seeking alliance with al Qaeda, Iraqi vice president says
Reuters, Baghdad Monday, 17 April 2017/ISIS is talking to al Qaeda about a
possible alliance as Iraqi troops close in on ISIS fighters in Mosul, Iraqi Vice
President Ayad Allawi said in an interview on Monday. Allawi said he got the
information on Monday from Iraqi and regional contacts knowledgeable about Iraq.
“The discussion has started now,” Allawi said. “There are discussions and
dialogue between messengers representing Baghdadi and representing Zawahiri,”
referring to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi and Ayman al Zawahiri, the head of
al Qaeda. ISIS split from al Qaeda in 2014 and the two groups have since waged
an acrimonious battle for recruits, funding and the mantle of global extremism.
Zawahiri has publicly criticized ISIS for its brutal methods, which have
included beheadings, drownings and immolation. It is unclear how exactly the two
group may work together, Allawi said. Islamic State blazed across large swathes
of northern Iraq in 2014, leaving the Iraqi central government reeling. Baghdadi
declared a caliphate over the territory the group controlled from the al-Nuri
mosque in Mosul the same year, which also became a point of contention with al
Qaeda. Last October, Iraqi security forces and Shi’ite volunteer fighters,
commonly referred to as the Popular Mobilization Units teamed up with an
international coalition, including the United States, to drive ISIS from of
Mosul and the areas surrounding the city. The group has been pushed out of the
half of Mosul that lies east of the Tigris River, but Iraqi soldiers and their
allies are now bogged down in tough fighting in the narrow streets of in the Old
City of Mosul, west of the river, according to Iraqi security officials. ISIS
has used suicide bombers, snipers and armed drones to defend the territory under
their control. The group has also repeatedly targeted civilians or used them as
human shields during the fighting, according to Iraqi and American security
officials. The militant group has lost ground in Mosul but still controls the
towns of Qaim, Hawija and Tal Afar in Iraq as well as Raqqa, their de facto
capital in Syria. Even if ISIS loses its territory in Iraq, Allawi said, it will
not simply go away. “I can’t see ISIS disappearing into thin air,” Allawi said,
referring to the group by a commonly used acronym. “They will remain covertly in
sleeping cells, spreading their venom all over the world.”
Clashes erupt between tribes and ISIS militants in Sinai
The Associated Press, Egypt Monday, 17 April 2017/Three people were injured in
clashes between militants and local tribes in the Sinai peninsula in a fight
that began when militants shot at a truck smuggling cigarettes, Egyptian
security officials said Monday. The officials told The Associated Press that
ISIS group militants launched RPG attacks on Sunday in their stronghold around
the city of Rafah in response to the kidnapping of three ISIS fighters by local
tribes. The unrest started when militants shot at a truck smuggling cigarettes
into the area, where the ISIS imposes a strict version of Islamic law that
prohibits the sale of tobacco, tribal sources said. The government officials
spoke on condition of anonymity as they were not authorized to brief the media.
The tribal sources requested anonymity for fear of reprisal. The incident marks
an escalation in tension between the two sides over the imposition of Islamic
Law in northern Sinai. Last month, female teachers commuting from the region’s
urban center, El-Arish, to Rafah reported being stopped by militants twice in
one week and were asked not to take the road without a male relative in
compliance with Islamic law. Locals said the militants had previously
intercepted trucks carrying cigarettes and punished passengers with flogging.
Northern Sinai residents have been caught in a violent battle between militant
groups who have expanded their activity in the Peninsula since the removal of
Islamist President Mohammed Morsi in 2013 and security forces waging war against
them. Militants have beheaded locals accused of collaboration with authorities
and recently stepped up their attacks against the peninsula’s Coptic Christian
minority, forcing hundreds to flee following a string of killings in the city of
Arish in February.
Egypt arrests 13 terrorist suspects 'preparing attacks'
AFP, Cairo Monday, 17 April 2017/The Egyptian authorities have arrested 13
suspected "terrorists" allegedly planning to attack Christians and public
institutions, the interior ministry said on Sunday, a week after deadly church
bombings. The announcement came as Egypt's Christians marked Easter under tight
security a week after Palm Sunday bombings claimed by ISIS killed 45 people at
churches in the cities of Tanta and Alexandria. The "13 terrorist elements"
belonged to cells preparing attacks against "government and Christian
institutions" and police in four northern provinces including Alexandria, a
ministry statement said. It was not immediately clear when the arrests took
place. Security forces have also discovered two farms in Alexandria and the
neighbouring province of Beheira that were used to make explosives and store
weapons, the ministry added. Egypt's Coptic Church said on Wednesday that it
would cut back on Easter celebrations to a simple mass after the bombings.
Parliament on Tuesday unanimously approved a three-month state of emergency
declared by President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi in the aftermath of the attacks.
Copts, who make up about one tenth of Egypt's population of more than 92
million, have been targeted several times in recent months. In December, an
ISIS-claimed church bombing in Cairo killed 29 people. The militant group has
threatened more attacks against Egypt's Christian minority. Last week's bombings
came ahead of Catholic Pope Francis's first trip to Egypt, which a Vatican
official has said will go ahead as planned on April 28 and 29 despite the
attacks.
Hundreds of Palestinians in Israeli jails launch mass
hunger strike
By AFP, Ramallah, Palestinian Territories Monday, 17 April 2017/Hundreds of
Palestinians in Israeli jails launched a hunger strike on Monday following a
call from leader and prominent prisoner Marwan Barghouti, a Palestinian
Authority official said. Issa Qaraqe, head of prisoners’ affairs for the
Palestinian Authority, said that “around 1,300 Palestinian prisoners” were
participating in the hunger strike and the number could rise. The Palestinian
Prisoners Club NGO put the number at 1,500. Israeli prison service spokesman
Assaf Librati said that 700 prisoners had announced on Sunday their intention to
begin a hunger strike. “We are checking this morning to see the number of
prisoners actually striking as some of them said they would only observe a
symbolic protest strike and then resume eating afterwards,” he said. “There will
be an update later.”Barghouti is serving a life sentence over his role in the
violent second Palestinian intifada. He is a popular figure, with polls
suggesting he could win the Palestinian presidency. The strike was called in
connection with Palestinian Prisoners Day, which is observed annually. Some
6,500 Palestinians are currently detained by Israel.
Turkish PM: People’s message clear, referendum has ended all arguments
Reuters, Ankara Monday, 17 April 2017/Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim
said on Monday that the people’s message was clear after a referendum which will
hand President Tayyip Erdogan sweeping new powers, and said the vote had ended
all arguments. Election authorities said preliminary results showed 51.4 percent
of voters had backed the biggest overhaul of Turkish politics since the founding
of the modern republic in Sunday’s referendum. European monitors said the vote
did not live up to international standards.
Erdogan Slams Criticism of Disputed Turkey Poll
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/April 17/17/Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan
on Monday angrily rejected criticism by international monitors of a referendum
granting him extra powers that was disputed by the opposition and exposed bitter
divisions in the country. The referendum was seen as crucial not just for
shaping Turkey's political system but also the future strategic direction of a
nation that has been a NATO member since 1952 and a European Union hopeful for
half a century. Returning in triumph to his presidential palace in Ankara,
Erdogan addressed thousands of supporters gathered outside, telling monitors who
criticized the poll: "Know your place." Showing no sign of pulling his punches,
Erdogan said Turkey could hold further referendums on its EU bid and
re-introducing the death penalty. The 'Yes' camp won 51.41 percent in Sunday's
referendum, according to complete results released by election authorities. But
the opposition immediately cried foul, claiming a clean vote would have made a
difference of several percentage points and handed them victory. The main
opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) and the pro-Kurdish Peoples'
Democratic Party (HDP) said they would challenge the results from most ballot
boxes due to alleged violations. "There is only one decision to ease the
situation in the context of the law -- the Supreme Election Board (YSK) should
annul the vote," the Dogan news agency quoted CHP deputy leader Bulent Tezcan as
saying. The referendum has no "democratic legitimacy", HDP spokesman and
lawmaker Osman Baydemir told reporters in Ankara.There were protests in Istanbul
with a few thousand people crowding the anti-Erdogan Besiktas and Kadikoy
districts, blowing whistles and chanting "We are shoulder to shoulder against
fascism".Others brandished viral hashtag slogans from the referendum night like
"The 'No' is not finished" and "'No' has won".
Unlevel playing field'
The opposition had already complained of an unfair campaign that saw the 'Yes'
backers swamp the airwaves and use billboards across the country in a saturation
advertising campaign. International observers agreed the campaign was conducted
on an "unlevel playing field" and that the vote count itself was marred by late
procedural changes that removed key safeguards. "The legal framework... remained
inadequate for the holding of a genuinely democratic referendum," the OSCE
Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) and the
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) monitors said in a joint
statement. The Turkish opposition was particularly incensed by a decision by the
YSK to allow voting papers without official stamps to be counted, which they
said opened the way for fraud. "Late changes in counting procedures removed an
important safeguard," said Cezar Florin Preda, the head of the PACE delegation.
But Erdogan told the mission to "know your place", saying Turkey had no
intention of paying any attention to the report. He added: "This country held
the most democratic polls that have never been seen in any other country in the
West."
'End of the dream'
Erdogan earlier congratulated cheering supporters at Ankara's airport for
"standing tall" in the face of the "crusader mentality" of the West. Getting
back to business as usual, he chaired a meeting of the National Security Council
which swiftly backed extending by another three months the already nine month
state of emergency imposed in the wake of the failed July 15 coup. Turkey's
Western allies have shown little enthusiasm for congratulating Erdogan and the
president has given ominous signs of a looming crisis with the EU. Erdogan
reaffirmed he would now hold talks on reinstating capital punishment, a move
that would automatically end Turkey's EU bid, and would hold a referendum if it
did not get enough votes in parliament to become law. German Foreign Minister
Sigmar Gabriel said that if Ankara were to bring back the death penalty, the
move would be "synonymous with the end of the European dream" and mark the end
of decades of talks to enter the EU. In an interview in the Bild newspaper to be
published Tuesday, he warned Turkey that "joining would not work right now."But
Erdogan said Turkey could hold a referendum on the membership bid. "What George,
Hans or Helga say does not interest us," he said, using typical European names.
'Big cities say No'
Turkey's new political system is due to come into effect after elections in
November 2019, although Erdogan is expected to rapidly rejoin the ruling Justice
Development Party (AKP) he founded but had to leave when he became president. It
would dispense with the prime minister's post and centralize the entire
executive bureaucracy under the president, giving Erdogan the direct power to
appoint ministers. Erdogan's victory was far tighter than expected, emerging
only after several nail-biting hours late Sunday which saw the 'No' result
dramatically catch up.
Turkey's three largest cities -- Istanbul, Ankara and Izmir -- all voted 'No'
although 'Yes' prevailed in Erdogan's Anatolian heartland.
Saudi Arabia Hails Turkey Referendum 'Success'
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/April 17/17/Turkey's ally Saudi Arabia on Monday
praised the "success" of a referendum giving President Recep Tayyip Erdogan
sweeping new powers. The cabinet, at its weekly meeting, voiced "congratulations
to President Erdogan of Turkey and the Turkish people on the success of the
referendum regarding constitutional reforms," the official Saudi Press Agency
reported. The cabinet said it hoped the vote would contribute to "more
development success across the country."The "Yes" camp won more than 51 percent
in Sunday's referendum while the "No" side got almost 49 percent, according to
near-complete results released by Turkey's election authorities. International
observers said the referendum campaign was conducted on an "unlevel playing
field," while Erdogan's opponents fear the result will hand him one-man rule.
Saudi Arabia and Turkey, two Sunni Muslim powers, have become increasingly close
over the past year, sharing in particular a backing for the opposition in
Syria's war. Saudi King Salman hosted Erdogan when he visited Riyadh to further
strengthen ties in February.
Pakistan police arrest 22 in "blasphemy" mob killing
Mon 17 Apr 2017/NNA - Pakistan police announced Monday they had arrested 22
people after the lynching of a university student accused of blasphemy, but
observers said there was little hope authorities would secure convictions. A
large mob attacked journalism student Mashal Khan last Thursday, stripping,
beating and shooting him before throwing from the second floor of his hostel at
the Abdul Wali Khan university in the conservative northwestern town of Mardan.
The brutality of the attack, recorded on a mobile phone camera, shocked the
public and led to widespread condemnation, including from prominent clerics.
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif vowed to prosecute the perpetrators as protests
broke out in several cities. Salahuddin Khan Mehsud, police chief of the
northwestern province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, told a press conference the number
of people arrested in connection with the case had risen to 22, from 12 at the
weekend. They were mainly students but also included some university clerical
workers. He said police had so far found no evidence to support the blasphemy
allegations against Khan, and condemned the university for investigating the
case without police involvement. A second senior police officer, who requested
anonymity, said many members of the police, prosecution service and judiciary
sympathised with the attackers and he did not expect any guilty verdicts.
Blasphemy is a hugely sensitive charge in conservative Muslim Pakistan, and can
carry the death penalty. Even unproven allegations can prompt mob lynchings or
lesser violence. ‘There are hundreds of sympathisers in my force and if I take
too much interest in the case I might be killed too,’ the police officer said.
He added that although arrests had been made on the basis of CCTV footage and
video clips, a court would require witnesses to come forward and past experience
had shown this would not be likely -- partly because Pakistan has no witness
protection programmes. Saroop Ijaz, a lawyer employed by Human Rights Watch in
Pakistan, noted that no Muslims were convicted for torching 100 Christian homes
in a 2013 incident in Lahore sparked by blasphemy claims, nor for the murder of
a young Christian couple a year later. ‘Nobody is going to stick their neck out
because you will be abandoned,’ he said. Vigilantes have murdered 65 people over
blasphemy allegations since 1990, according to research compiled by the Center
for Research and Security Studies think-tank. ---AFP
Titles For Latest LCCC Bulletin analysis & editorials
from miscellaneous sources published on
April 17-18/17
Syria’s Part in the Potential Russian-American ‘Deal’
Raghida Dergham/April 16/17
*Founder and Executive Chairman at Beirut Institute
The bargaining in the context of the potential Russian-American deal on Syria
has started, but not in the context of the putative Grand Bargain that would
include Ukraine and the fate of the Western sanctions on Russia, which remain a
less attainable goal at present. The position of Iran in Syria is part of the
discussions taking place, in the language of corridors and airbases. Hezbollah
will not maintain a presence in the Golan in compliance with Israel’s strategic
demands, but Israel’s position regarding the idea of an Iranian corridor to
Lebanon complete with some form of an airport facility is noteworthy, whether
the consent is covert or overt. The visit by US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson
to Moscow, where he met with his counterpart Sergei Lavrov for nearly four hours
followed by a meeting with Vladimir Putin, is evidence that a serious dialogue
has begun in earnest between the Trump administration and Putin’s government
regarding the bilateral relationship and the components of the potential deal,
for which Syria has been chosen as the starting point. The US-British-French
draft resolution at the UN Security Council condemning the use of chemical
weapons in Idlib and calling for international inspection of Syrian airbases was
met with Russia’s eighth veto, after the Russian envoy called for postponing the
vote in the wake of accords reached between Tillerson and Lavrov. However, the
signs of escalation in New York appeared less important as the bargaining began
in Moscow on the same day. The US ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, launched
the opening salvo of US negotiating positions vis-à-vis Russia from the hall of
the Security Council, which she chairs this month, stressing “partnership” with
Russia in Syria.
Lavrov and Tillerson agreed on several points of partnership and accord,
including the significant reaffirmation of Syria’s territorial integrity and
collaboration in the fight against ISIS. Indeed, calling for a unified Syria
means rejecting its partition, which is proceeding on the ground benefiting the
Iranian “crescent” project that goes through Syria. For this reason, there is
talk currently of a corridor and airbase for Iran, to compensate Tehran which
Moscow does not want to abandon. To be sure, Moscow wants a deal with
Washington, but not at any price. They both recognize that Bashar al-Assad will
have to go sooner or later, and that he is just a temporary ‘knot’ rather than a
fateful one.
Washington’s main message to Moscow is that the opportunity is ripe for securing
an exit strategy from the Syrian predicament after guaranteeing some of its key
interests there. Otherwise, Russia will inherit a broken Syria full of jihadists
like ISIS, a US-empowered armed opposition, and an American intent to enjoy
drowning Russia and Iran in the quagmire. Moscow’s main message to Washington is
that it is ready to bargain, provided that the deal sought after is not linked
to any attempt to undermine Russia’s global power prestige restored through
Syria and Russia’s strategic interests. The space for the two sides to intersect
seem wide today, in the wake of the US military strike in Syria which paved the
way for serious negotiations.
American decision-makers working on Syria and Russia’s role, inside and outside
the US administration, comprise top military brass who are well versed in the
language of geopolitics. The US envoy to the UN, Nikki Haley, has won the
admiration of this influential circle, and is now the mouthpiece of the
military-political policy wing of the Trump administration. The main idea behind
the rapid military response to the use of chemical weapons in Khan Sheikun was
to draw redlines (in the sand) vis-à-vis Russia and Iran too.
The critical objective is to end the bloodletting in Syria, and letting the
Kremlin know that the Trump administration is aware the Russian-Iranian policy
in Syria is based on the ‘military solution’ rather than the ‘political
solution’. For this reason, it has decided that imposing US military conditions
needs to be included in the equation, in a departure from Obama’s neutral policy
in Syria.
There are nearly a thousand US troops and massive reconnaissance assets in
Syria. Military plans are already drawn. For this reason, President Trump was
able to take the decision to strike almost instantaneously, though not
arbitrarily. He has surrounded himself with expert military and political
planners and is ready to exercise his role and powers as president based on
professional, pragmatic advice.
These influential US foreign policy stakeholders want a strategic dialogue with
Russia, but are looking to shape the future of this relationship from the
perspective of the absolute US military edge between the two nations. In other
words, their wager is that Russia would not dare confront the US militarily, and
that all of its next moves in Syria would factor this in. In the US view, this
is a negotiating hand, and they are willing to repeat the military message if
needed, but all in the context of dialogue, accords, and the ‘art of the deal’.
The Trump administration, meanwhile, is benefiting from the impression of
escalation with Russia, because it helps exonerate itself regarding alleged
suspicious ties with the Kremlin. The fear from an escalation with Russia could
also help sell a deal and change the internal attitude vis-à-vis the Russians.
The main axes of negotiations sought by Trump’s White House with the Kremlin,
according to sources well versed with the new talks, include: Curbing Iranian
influence in Syria; defeating ISIS; and safeguarding Israeli interests. The main
American message to Russia, the sources say, is: Buyers beware, if you break it
you buy it. This, in the view of the Trump administration, could work as a
wakeup call for Kremlin to take up the offer of strategic partnership with the
US.
In other words, if accords fail, Syria will become the site of decades of
Somali-style civil wars. The terrorists that had flocked to Syria could return
to their home countries and settle scores, including Chechen and central Asian
fighters from Russia’s neighboring five Muslim republics, while Russia drowns
further in the Syrian quagmire.
Russia’s commitment to Assad is tactical, provisional, and up for negotiations,
according to the US view today, especially since discussions are in full swing
to find alternatives to Assad that would be acceptable to both Russia and the
US. Since Washington is not in a hurry to remove Assad and is willing to accept
the survival of the pillars of the regime in Damascus without the Assad dynasty,
there are prospects for an accord, because Assad’s fate is no longer the main
knot if strategic understandings are reached to secure US and Russian interests
in Syria, which have other conditions.
Indeed, the fate of Hezbollah and the militias backed by Tehran in Syria remains
the biggest obstacle. Moscow is not willing to abandon Tehran, and Washington
understands why it is difficult to expect this. For this reason, there is talk
about pragmatic resolutions to the Iran Knot in Syria. Hezbollah is ready to
pull out from Syria, as soon as Tehran decides it, but Tehran will not decide
this unless it can retain a corridor to Hezbollah into Lebanon. Moscow is
willing to pressure Iran to adapt to accords, once reached with Washington, and
it is coming under US pressure to curb Iranian influence in Syria.
Russia is able to contain Iranian ambitions and projects in Syria and has many
means to accomplish this, including exposing Iran militarily in Syria by pulling
its protective cover on the battleground. Iran is well aware that it cannot
shore up Assad alone or impose its project in Syria without Russia. The Trump
administration is using that equation to demand the Kremlin to make up its mind
on Iran.
What Moscow does not want is to suggest that it would approve regime change in
Damascus not because it is committed to Assad in power but because it fears the
principle of changing regimes from Syria and Ukraine, to Russia itself. Moscow
will not concede its achievements in Syria either, in the absence of US
guarantees that accept its vital interests in Syria, from military bases to
reconstruction deals, in addition to safeguarding its status as a major player
in the Middle East.
Until the Trump administration fully accepts these fundamental Russian
interests, Moscow ill not back down from its commitment to Assad or its alliance
with Iran. Talk about a deal is still in the early stages, and the path to
cutting the deal in Syria is rugged and full of surprising obstacles, both
inside Syria and outside, including in the framework of NATO-Russian relations
and the developments in Ukraine, the other component of the still elusive Grand
Bargain.
The US will not intervene militarily in Syria or Ukraine directly. Instead, it
is relying on its military and economic edge to warn Russia, which remains
weaker regardless of its might on display in Syria. Trump’s Washington will not
be neutral like Obama’s, and is willing to strike if needed, certain that Moscow
will not dare to confront it militarily. The Trump administration is ready for a
deal with Russia, but it does not fear Russia rejecting a deal, because it knows
this would harm Russia more and drag it further down the Syrian quagmire.
If Syria has been the place Putin’s Russia used to restore its prestige and
world power status under Obama, Donald Trump is willing to make true on Making
America Great Again from Syria too.
Palestinians' Real Enemies: Arabs
Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone Institute/April 17/17
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10210/palestinians-enemies
The Arab heads of state and monarchs do not like to be reminded of how badly
they treat Palestinians and subject them to discriminatory and apartheid laws.
It is not comfortable or safe to be a Palestinian in an Arab country. Scenes of
lawlessness and anarchy inside Palestinian refugee camps in the West Bank have
also driven many residents to move to nearby cities and villages. Most refugees
in the West Bank no longer live inside UNRWA-run camps.
Let us end where we began: with the Palestinian (non)leadership. What has it
done to help its people in the Arab countries? Nothing. No Palestinian leader
will urge an emergency session of the UN Security Council to expose the ethnic
cleansing and killing of Palestinians in Arab countries. No Palestinian leader
will demand that the international media and human rights organizations
investigate the atrocities perpetrated by Arabs on their Palestinian brethren.
We are sure to see more such criminal silence when Abbas meets with the
president of the United States.
Palestinians living in refugee camps in the Arab world are facing ethnic
cleansing, displacement, and death -- but their leaders in the West Bank and
Gaza Strip are too busy tearing each other to pieces to notice or even,
apparently, care much.
Between the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Hamas, it looks as if they are
competing for the worst leadership, not the best. Clearly, neither regime gives
a damn about the plight of their people in the Arab world.
PA President Mahmoud Abbas, who is scheduled to visit Washington in the coming
weeks for his first meeting with US President Donald Trump, spends most of his
time abroad. There is hardly a country in the world that he has not visited
since he assumed office in January 2005.
Hamas, for its part, is too occupied with hunting down Palestinians suspected of
"collaboration" with Israel, and arming its members as massively as possible for
war with Israel, to spend much time on the well-being of the two million people
living under its thumb in the Gaza Strip. Hamas does have resources: its money
is otherwise designated, however, to digging attack tunnels into Israel and
smuggling weapons into the Gaza Strip.
The globetrotting Abbas, treated to red-carpet receptions wherever he shows up,
has no time to attend to his miserable people in the Arab countries. Abbas
devotes more than 90 percent of his speeches to denunciations of Israel,
uttering barely a word about the atrocities committed against his people in
Syria, Lebanon, Libya and Iraq. The 82-year-old PA president is, as always,
fully preoccupied with political survival.
Abbas's real enemies are his critics, such as estranged Fatah leader Mohammed
Dahlan, and Hamas. Abbas is currently focused on undermining Dahlan and
preventing Hamas from taking control of the West Bank. In the past few years,
Abbas has also demonstrated an obsession with isolating and delegitimizing
Israel in the international arena. For him, this mission is more sacred than
saving the lives of Palestinians.
Notably, neither Abbas's Palestinian Authority nor Hamas dares to criticize Arab
countries for their mistreatment of Palestinians. In this, they are nothing if
not savvy: critics in Arab states pay an extremely nasty price for
forthrightness.
Consider for a moment the agenda of the recent Arab League summit in Jordan.
This monumental meeting was conspicuously silent on the plight of Palestinians
in Arab lands. The Arab heads of state and monarchs do not like to be reminded
of how badly they treat Palestinians and subject them to discriminatory and
apartheid laws. Beneath the public Arab support for the Palestinians rests a
ruthless policy of oppression that is largely ignored by Palestinian leaders,
the international community and mainstream Western media.
This apathy has turned Palestinians in the Arab countries into easy prey.
The Yarmouk refugee camp near Damascus, which once housed nearly one million
Palestinians, stands almost empty after six years of Syria's civil war. Most of
the camp's houses have been damaged or destroyed in the fighting between the
Syrian army, Palestinian factions, ISIS terrorists and Syrian opposition groups.
More than 3,400 Palestinians have been killed in Syria since the beginning of
the civil war. Thousands of Palestinians are believed to be held in various
Syrian government prisons. Another 80,000 have fled Syria to neighboring
countries.
In nearby Lebanon, the conditions of Palestinians are no better. Palestinian
refugee camps in Lebanon, home to nearly half a million people, were long ago
turned into ghettos surrounded by the Lebanese security forces. In recent years,
the camps have become battlefields for rival Palestinian gangs and other
terrorists, many of whom are affiliated with al-Qaeda and ISIS.
About 10 years ago, the Nahr al-Bared refugee camp in northern Lebanon was
shelled by the Lebanese army; most of its houses were destroyed. Tens of
thousands of Palestinians were forced to flee the camp; hundreds were killed and
wounded after a Palestinian terror leader, Shaker al-Absi, and his men launched
a series of deadly attacks on Lebanese targets, and the Lebanese army assaulted
the camp. Before they were attacked by the Lebanese army, Al-Absi and his men
had barricaded themselves inside the camp, using civilians as human shields.
The scenario of Nahr al-Bared is now repeating itself in another Palestinian
refugee camp in Lebanon: Ain al-Hilweh. As in the previous instance, a terror
leader, Belal Bader, has found shelter inside Ain al-Hilweh, home to more than
50,000 Palestinians. Like al-Absi, Bader is affiliated with radical Islamic
groups such as al-Qaeda and ISIS. Bader's presence in the camp has triggered a
gang war with other Palestinian factions, resulting in heavy fighting between
the warring gangs inside Ain al-Hilweh. In the past week, at least eight
Palestinians have been killed and 40 wounded.
A street celebration in Lebanon's Ain al-Hilweh camp, July 2015. (Image source:
Geneva Call/Flickr)
Residents of the camp now fear that they could meet the same fate as their
fellow Palestinians in Nahr al-Bared.
The Lebanese army, however, has still not intervened to stop the bloodletting.
For Lebanese security forces, Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon remain "no-go
zone." All that is left for the Lebanese authorities to do, in the hope of
preventing the violence from spilling outside the camps, is besiege the camps
and impose restrictions on the movement of Palestinians.
The fears of the residents of Ain al-Hilweh are not unjustified. The Lebanese
government is facing growing pressure to enter Palestinian camps and disarm the
gangs that have been operating there over the course of many years.
By and large, in recent years, the Palestinians who used to live in Syria, Iraq
and Libya have left these countries as a result of the civil wars, and
oppression by the governments and various militias. It is not comfortable or
safe to be a Palestinian in an Arab country. Scenes of lawlessness and anarchy
inside Palestinian refugee camps in the West Bank have also driven many
residents to move to nearby cities and villages. Most refugees in the West Bank
no longer live inside UNRWA-run camps.
Let us end where we began: with the Palestinian (non)leadership. What has it
done to help its people in the Arab countries? Nothing. No Palestinian leader
will urge an emergency session of the UN Security Council to expose the ethnic
cleansing and killing of Palestinians in Arab countries. No Palestinian leader
will demand that the international media and human rights organizations
investigate the atrocities perpetrated by Arabs on their Palestinian brethren.
We are sure to see more such criminal silence when Abbas meets with the
president of the United States.
**Khaled Abu Toameh, an award-winning journalist, is based in Jerusalem.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Iran's Elections: Black Turbans vs. White Turbans
Mohammad Amin/Gatestone Institute/April 17/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=54441
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10209/iran-elections
Any distinction between "extremists" and "moderates" in Iran's political
establishment is false.
Whatever the results of the upcoming Iranian elections, there will be no shift
in Tehran's human rights violations or core aims of regional hegemony and
pursuit of nuclear weapons.
What does matter is the behavior of the West, particularly the United States, in
the near future. If it again resorts to cooperating with Iranian-backed forces
in Iraq and Syria, Khamenei will not only be able to pursue his regional and
global interests unfettered, but will be better equipped to contain crises at
home.
The presidential elections in Iran, scheduled for May 19, have observers
wondering whether the "white turban" incumbent, Hassan Rouhani, will retain his
position, or be defeated by his likely contender, the "black turban" mullah,
Ebrahim Raisi, known for his key role in the 1988 massacre of more than 30,000
political prisoners.
Iran's elections have observers wondering whether the "white turban" incumbent,
Hassan Rouhani (left), will retain his position or be defeated by his likely
contender, Ebrahim Raisi (right), the "black turban" mullah. (Images source:
Wikimedia Commons).
More importantly, the question on Western minds is how and in what way the
Islamic Republic will be affected by either outcome.
The two periods in Iran's recent history that need to be examined in order to
answer this question are that of the tenure of former firebrand President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (2005 to 2013), who also announced he is running again, and
the one that has followed under Rouhani.
At the outset of the Ahmadinejad era, Iran's GDP (using purchasing power parity)
soared beyond $1 trillion, and two of the country's greatest threats -- Iraq
under Saddam Hussein and Afghanistan under the Taliban -- were eliminated. Both
enabled Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to solidify his stronghold.
Midway through this period, however, Iran's economy fell sharply. Iran became
the country with the fifth highest inflation rate in the world. Iran fell into a
serious recession, and millions of Iranians found themselves unemployed. All
this was going on even before the international community imposed sanctions on
the regime in Tehran.
In the years that followed Ahmadinejad's replacement by the so-called "moderate"
Rouhani, sanctions were lifted; oil exports reached pre-sanction levels;
billions of dollars' worth of assets abroad were unfrozen; and hundreds of
agreements were signed to expand business transactions with the West.
Nevertheless, the last year of Rouhani's first term was characterized by yet
another economic crisis, summarized in March by Iranian Road and Construction
Minister Abbas Akhoondi as: banks going bankrupt, crippling national debt and
low economic efficiency.
Iran's economic crises mirrored its political ones. Despite a series of measures
that the West imagined would usher in a new era, the opposite happened.
Indeed, although Iran signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with
world powers in July 2015 -- and then-U.S. President Barack Obama persisted in
attempts at easing tensions -- the regime in Tehran, exceeding its own 30-year
record, outdid itself in fundamentalist activities.
More than 3,000 executions of Iranians, for "crimes" such as "insulting Islam,"
have taken place under Rouhani; Iran got involved in three Middle East wars --
in Syria, Iraq and Yemen; and the regime's semi-official Mehr news agency said
that the Rouhani government has done more to advance strategic weapons
development recently than in the past decade.
All of the above indicates that any distinction between "extremists" and
"moderates" in Iran's political establishment is false. As former U.S. Secretary
of State Henry Kissinger famously put it: "An Iranian moderate is one who has
run out of ammunition."
This is still true, which means that whatever the results of the upcoming
Iranian elections, there will be no shift in Tehran's human rights violations or
core aims of regional hegemony and pursuit of nuclear weapons.
In the event of a Rouhani victory, the country's economy will remain crippled as
factional disputes continue and divisions widen.
If Raisi becomes president, Khamenei and the Islamic Revolutionary Guards
Corps(IRGC) will tighten their grip on the economy, thereby causing an even
greater depression as they allocate the bulk of the country's coffers to fuel
regional wars and fund global terrorism.
As the late leader of the Communist Party of China, Deng Xiaoping, said during a
speech in 1962: "It doesn't matter whether the cat is black or white, as long as
it catches mice."
In today's Iran, it does not matter whether the president's turban is black
(signifying its wearer is a descendant of the Prophet Mohammed through one of
the 12 imams of Twelver Shi'ism) or white (meaning its wearer is not a
descendant of the Prophet and is of non-Arab origin), as long as he remains
loyal to the theocracy.
What does matter is the behavior of the West, particularly the United States, in
the near future. If it again resorts to cooperating with Iranian-backed forces
in Iraq and Syria, Khamenei will not only be able to pursue his regional and
global interests unfettered, but will be better equipped to contain crises at
home.
If, on the other hand, the U.S. adopts a policy of ending Tehran's Middle East
meddling (as its missile strike a Syrian regime airbase on April 6 indicates it
might), the Islamic Republic's domestic powder keg could explode, spelling
disaster for the mullah-led regime, no matter which candidate wins the
presidency.
*Mohammad Amin, born in Tehran, is a prolific author and expert in Iranian
international affairs, and a fellow researcher at the Foundation of Studies for
the Middle East (FEMO) in Paris.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
On Backdrop Of Egyptian Efforts To Fight Hamas Tunnels,
Egyptian Writer Calls To Tie Rapprochement With Hamas To Demolition Of Tunnels
MEMRI/April 17/17
Recently, there have been increasing signs of rapprochement between Egypt and
Hamas, including a visit by Hamas officials o Cairo in early February, 2017,[1]
a more conciliatory tone taken by Hamas officials vis-à-vis Egypt, and a
loosening of restrictions on the passage of Palestinians through the Rafah
border crossing.[2]At the same time, Hamas official 'Izzat Al-Rishq clarified
that a warming of Hamas-Egypt relations would not come at the expense of the
movement's relations with other elements (i.e., other Arab or Muslim countries
like Iran).[3]Egypt, for its part, has made no concessions in its war against
the smuggling tunnels on the Gaza-Egypt border, and continues to flood and
dynamite them, actions which on several occasions have caused the death or
injury of operatives working inside the tunnels. For example, on January 17,
2017 the Egyptian military demolished six tunnels, and on February 25 it
demolished another in an operation that killed three people. Hamas responded
with a statement condemning these actions, which stated that "there is no
justification for Egypt's ongoing use of these dangerous policies vis-à-vis the
besieged people of the [Gaza] Strip" and that Egypt "must open the Rafah
crossing on a permanent basis in order to end the suffering of Gaza and its
people." It added: "It is the right of our people to live in dignity and freedom
like the other peoples of the world; the international community must intervene
in order to end the oppressive siege."[4]
Following the uncovering of numerous tunnels by the Egyptian military, the
independent Egyptian daily Al-Masri Al-Yawm published several articles that
condemned Hamas for using the tunnels to smuggle arms, terrorists and funds and
thereby jeopardizing Egypt's security. Among those who addressed this topic were
the daily's owner, Salah Al-Diab, and Egyptian writer and historian 'Abbas Al-Tarabili.
The following are excerpts from their articles:
'Al-Masri Al-Yawm' Editor: The Tunnels Have Become A Major Source of Discord
Between Hamas And Egyptian Governments
Salah Al-Diab wrote about the threat posed to Egypt by the smuggling tunnels and
about Egypt's efforts to fight them: "Hamas invented the tunnels and used them
to benefit itself, not the Palestinian people of Gaza. The tunnels became a
major source of discord between Hamas and Egyptian governments, discord which
peaked when Egypt discovered that the tunnels were used to smuggle arms,
terrorists and funds... Hamas gains considerable profits from the smuggling, up
to $20,000 a day. Egypt, for its part, has destroyed over 5,000 tunnels and was
forced to construct an iron barrier, 10 km long and 20-30 meters deep, at a cost
of $2 billion. The barrier is 50 cm thick to make it proof against explosives.
It also contains a 10-km pipe that carries sea-water and has openings every
30-40 meters, to create cracks in any tunnel that might be dug."[5]
Egyptian Historian: "Every Day We Awaken To Discover A New Tunnel That Brings
Death To Our People And State"
Egyptian author and historian 'Abbas Al-Tarabili also wrote an article in Al-Masri
Al-Yawm in which he harshly condemned Hamas and its actions. He stated that,
despite its claims that it is increasing its presence on the Egyptian border to
prevent the digging of tunnels, Hamas is not doing enough to end this dangerous
phenomenon that is a threat to Egypt's security, and that the organization in
fact benefits from the tunnels by taxing the goods smuggled through them. He
called on the Egyptian authorities to continue their firm policy against the
tunnels, to demand that Hamas reveal their location, and to make the destruction
of tunnels a condition for Egypt's ongoing efforts to achieve an
intra-Palestinian reconciliation as well as a condition for opening the Rafah
crossing.
Al-Tarabili wrote: "How much longer will Egypt be patient with the Palestinian
brothers who stab [us in the back?]... Every day we awaken to discover a new
tunnel that brings death to our people and state. Is this simply our fate? We
don't wish to boast about having shown grace to someone, but we have helped the
Palestinians more than anyone else throughout their agonies that have lasted for
nearly a century. Forget all the arguments with those who claim to stand with
the Palestinian people, and there are many of them; in all honesty, those who
trade in the Palestinian problem are numerous [as well].
"According to the Egyptian army spokesman, the Egyptian Border Guard [recently]
uncovered a large tunnel in north Sinai that is obviously different from the
many small tunnels. It is sad that this is happening while Egypt is trying to
bring the warring Palestinian factions together, particularly Fatah and Hamas.
Cairo hosts their representatives in order to bring them together and unite all
Palestinian forces vying for power. Stranger yet is the fact that immediately
upon returning to Gaza, Hamas leaders state that they will not allow
interference in [matters of] Egypt's national security, and then the farce
reaches its height when we uncover numerous tunnels. [In the meantime] Hamas
announces the increase of security presence on its side [of the border]... as
though [it] doesn't realize that all these tunnels are dug so that its men can
pass over to Egyptian Rafah in order to smuggle weapons from their side along
with the people who train the Sinai rebels, and in order to take subsidized food
products from Egypt and sell them in Palestinian Rafah for Israeli shekels.
There is also the longstanding issue of the smuggling of narcotics and
cigarettes [into Egypt].
"On this matter, I and all respectable national figures believe that we must
undertake a measure-for-measure policy: If [Egypt] has moved the residents of
Egyptian Rafah away from the border for their own safety, and paid a hefty price
for it,[6] why doesn't Hamas – who has sole control over the Gaza Strip,
including Palestinian Rafah – move its residents away from the border at all
costs to prevent them from digging hundreds of tunnels with which to trade in
the lives and livelihoods of Egyptians? None of [the residents of Gaza] can even
cough without Hamas knowing about it, let along dig tunnels! The reason Hamas
doesn't do this is that Hamas benefits from these tunnels by charging tolls and
taxes for them, and receives some of the profits from the goods that pass
through them. It is not enough for Hamas to announce that it has increased its
patrols on the border; it must send us maps of the tunnels.
"If [Hamas] cannot control the tunnel entrances on its side, why not enable us
to work with it to uncover the tunnels and destroy every tunnel opening on its
side? Moreover, I believe Egypt should tie its ongoing efforts to reconcile the
Palestinian parties to the uncovering of these tunnels – meaning that Hamas must
cooperate with us in fighting these tunnels in return for us continuing to
promote the reconciliation... Hamas should make gestures and cooperate with us
on terrorism, and especially on the tunnels, because most of the weapons
smuggled through these tunnels are meant to be used against us. In fact, Egypt
should officially announce that it is halting all attempts to reconcile [between
the Palestinian factions] until Hamas meets Egypt's legitimate demand. We must
tie the opening of the Rafah crossing, and the crossings for goods located to
the south of it, to the destruction of tunnels on their side. And do not speak
to us about the humanitarian aspects, [the people] on both sides of the crossing
and those who require medical care. The folk saying goes: 'if wind is coming in
through your [open] door, close it and [then you will have some] rest'...
"We require a decisive move, and not on Hamas's part. We need an even more
decisive step. We must stop burying our heads in the sand." [7]
[1] Al-Quds (Jerusalem), February 4, 2017.
[2] Palinfo.com, March 6, 2017.
[3] Amad.ps, February 8, 2017.
[4] Palinfo.com, February 25, 2017.
[5] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), March 17, 2017.
[6] As part of fighting the tunnels, in October 2014 Egypt demolished the homes
of Rafah residents and moved them to new locations farther away from the border.
[7] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), February 22, 2017.
Why Easter Brings Out the Worst in Islam
Raymond Ibrahim/FrontPage Magazine/April 17/17
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/?p=54437
Why are some Christians murdered and many more terrorized in the name of Islam
every Easter holiday?
This year’s most notable attack occurred in Egypt, where two Coptic Christian
churches were bombed during Palm Sunday mass, leaving 50 dead and 120 injured.
While this incident received some coverage in Western media, attacks on churches
in Egypt on or around Easter are not uncommon. For instance, this last April 12,
just two days after the Palm Sunday attacks, authorities thwarted another
Islamic terror attack targeting a Coptic monastery in Upper Egypt. Similarly, on
April 12, 2015, Easter Sunday, two explosions targeting two separate churches
took place in Egypt. Although no casualties were reported—hence no reporting in
Western media—large numbers could easily have resulted, based on precedent (for
example, on January 1, 2011, as Egypt’s Christians ushered in the New
Year—another Christian holiday for Orthodox communities—car bombs went off near
the Two Saints Church in Alexandria, resulting in 23 dead worshippers and dozens
critically injured). Less spectacular but no less telling, after 45 years of
waiting, the Christians of Nag Shenouda, Egypt, finally got a permit to build a
church; local Muslims responded by rioting and even burning down the temporary
tent the Copts had erected to worship under (a different incident from this
similar one). Denied, the Christians of Nag Shenouda celebrated Easter in the
street, to Muslims jeers and sneers (picture here)
While almost anything can provoke Muslims around the world to attack churches,
there is a reason that the animus can reach a fever pitch during Easter: more
than any other Christian holiday, Resurrection Sunday commemorates and
celebrates three central Christian doctrines that Islam manifestly rejects: that
Christ was crucified and died; that he was resurrected; and that by especial
virtue of the latter, he is the Son of God. As Dr. Abdul Rahman al-Bir, Egypt’s
Muslim Brotherhood’s mufti said in 2013, Muslims must not commend Christians
during Easter, for that holiday “contradicts and clashes with Islamic doctrine
unlike Christmas.”From here the carnage makes sense. Thus on Easter Sunday,
2016, another Islamic suicide bombing took place near the children rides of a
public park in Pakistan, where Christians were known to be congregated and
celebrating. Some 70 people—mostly women and children—were killed and nearly 400
injured. Something similar was in store for Pakistan this year, 2017, as
officials foiled a “major terrorist attack” targeting Christians on Easter
Sunday.
Celebrating Easter is an especially dangerous affair in Muslim-majority regions
of Nigeria: a church was burned down on Easter Sunday, 2014, leaving 150 dead;
another church was bombed on Easter Sunday, 2012, leaving some 50 worshippers
dead; Muslim herdsmen launched a series of raids during Easter week, 2013,
killing at least 80 Christians—mostly children and the elderly; additionally,
over 200 Christian homes were destroyed, eight churches burned, and 4,500
Christians displaced.
As Islam’s presence continues to grow in Europe, and in accordance with Islam’s
Rule of Numbers, Easter-related attacks are also growing. According to one
report, “the terror cell that struck in Brussels [in March, 2016, killing 34]
was planning to massacre worshippers at Easter church services across Europe,
including Britain.” In Scotland, 2016, a Muslim man stabbed another Muslim man
to death for wishing Christians a Good Friday and Happy Easter. And if an
al-Qaeda terror plot targeting Easter shoppers in the UK was not thwarted “it
would almost certainly have been Britain’s worst terrorist attack, with the
potential to cause more deaths than the suicide attacks of July 7, 2005, when 52
people were murdered.”
One can go on and on:
The day before Good Friday, 2015, Muslim jihadis raided a Kenyan university and
massacred 147; along with the fact that they tried to distinguish between Muslim
and Christian students in order to kill only the latter, that they taunted those
whom they slaughtered by mockingly saying things like “This will be a good
Easter holiday for us” placed their animus in the context of the Christian
holiday. In Iran, Easter Sunday, 2012, saw 12 Christians stand trial as
“apostates”; authorities raided an Easter service in a house-church in 2014,
arresting and hauling off all those in attendance; and in 2015, various churches
were banned from celebrating Easter Sunday altogether. On Easter Sunday, 2015,
the Islamic State destroyedthe Virgin Mary Church in Tel Nasri, an ancient
Christian region in northeast Syria. After Islamic rebels fired rockets at a
Christian neighborhood right before that same Easter, 2015, killing
approximately 40, a woman lamented how “Our Easter feast has turned to grief.”
In 2015, Muslims attacked a Catholic village in Bangladesh as it celebrated
Easter; they stabbed its priest, destroyed Bibles, crosses, holy pictures,
musical instruments and homes, and slaughtered goats and chickens.
In Turkey, a pastor was beaten by Muslims immediately following Easter
serviceand threatened with death unless he converted to Islam.
According to an AP report from 2013, “Iraq’s Catholic Christians flocked to
churches to celebrate Easter Sunday, praying, singing and rejoicing in the
resurrection of Christ,” but only “behind high blast walls and tight security
cordons.”
Of course, while Resurrection Sunday has the capacity to offend—and thus bring
out the worst in some—Muslims more than any other Christian holy day, one should
be careful not to attribute too much doctrinal nitpicking to the assailants.
After all, Muslims have bombed and burned Christian churches on other holidays—a
Cairo church was bombed leaving 27 dead before last Christmas—and no holidays at
all. (See here for Christmas 2016, here for Christmas 2015, and here for
Christmas 2014 for dozens of anecdotes of Muslim violence against and slaughter
of Christians in the context of Christmas.)
In short, whatever the holiday, growing numbers of Muslims appear to agree with
the view voiced by one Egyptian cleric that “Christian worship is worse than
murder and bloodshed”—meaning, shedding the blood of Christians and murdering
them is preferable to allowing them to flaunt their opposition to Muhammad’s
teachings, as they naturally do every Sunday in church. Only more doctrinally
attuned Muslims, who are in the minority, save their attacks for that one day of
the year that so flagrantly defies Islam: Resurrection Sunday.
http://raymondibrahim.com/2017/04/17/easter-brings-worst-islam/
‘Master Bomb’ and Trump’s message to the world
Ghassan Charbel/Al Arabiya/April 17/17
This is really a scary bomb, Weighing 10 tons, the power of its explosion is
unprecedented if we exclude the nuclear element, which is enormously
destructive. Designed to penetrate the fortifications, tunnels and basements.
There is no hope of survival for those who exist in the targeted place. It is a
tremendous fire wave; a programmed and ruthless earthquake. It is not an
exaggeration to call it “The Master Bomb!” The fighters of ISIS, al-Qaeda and
Taliban have to think carefully. It became an actual suicidal mission to set the
American coat on fire. America has a long hand. As well as the hands of its
laboratories. The Tunnels can no longer be considered as a safe haven, it does
not even deserve to be called so anymore, as it is not enough now to prohibit
the anger of the President in the White House. The morale explosive power of the
bomb passed through Afghanistan. Most probably Russian generals are going to
think about it for a long time. Their army has the ability to turn cities into
ruined fields. But the aura of this bomb challenges them, it leaves deep
concussions in the morale of their partners. Generals know that what’s more
important than the power of a bomb is to take a quick decision to throw it out.
Trump was acting on the basis that America in his time is able to reassure its
allies and provoke its adversaries
Ding Dong to Russia and Iran
Leaving the Russian generals aside under their vast nuclear umbrella. There is
no doubt that the North Korean president is concerned with the “Master bomb”,
whom has been addicted to the nuclear and missile blackmailing. He received the
news while preparing to celebrate his grandfather's birthday in an atmosphere of
suspense and intimidation. His generals have to foresee through what happened in
Afghanistan. The same goes for the Iranian generals who have turned diplomatic
and missile tunnels into a permanent policy. Certainly they would not overlook
that the bomb loaded with explosives and messages came a week after the American
missiles rained down on the Syrian Shayrat Airbase. They know that what’s more
dangerous than these missiles is the decision to throw them. Most probably, the
generals of Russia, North Korea, Iran and Syria feel sorry that Barack Obama's
days has come to an end. In his days, the American Red Line became a popular
joke on social media sites. Some of them were hasty to believe that America has
already turned into a paper tiger.
Trump’s thumbprint
Can the journalist take the risk to state that Donald Trump's actual era began
with bombing the Syrian airport and was confirmed by dropping “The Master Bomb”?
Is it possible to say that what’s more dangerous than the terrible bomb is the
change happened to the image of the President sitting in the Oval Office? Trump
has been observed by his opponents and allies since he started his duties. The
100-day exam was not easy. Much has been written about the confusion of the new
ruling. Lacking both coherent vision and team. The period was full of
contradictory statements and hasty decisions. Many predicted that the reign of
Trump would have an irreparable infections; domestically and abroad. An
infection that would be internationally seen as similar to Obama and his famous
red line.It is clear that Trump listened carefully to his administration and
generals. America wants to be influential, it must be strong. Recovering
America's influence and creating a clear image of the president. A president who
does not hesitate to make difficult decisions when they are necessary to protect
US interests. Thus Trump was acting on the basis that America in his time is
able to reassure its allies and provoke its adversaries.
Rebooting the war on terror
The missiles that targeted Shayrat Airbase have revived the American Red Line.
Trump's administration took advantage of the chemical attack; the president made
a quick decision that pointed a finger at the Syrian regime, damaged the image
of the Russian president and the role of his country. This was accompanied by a
very important political step, which was to hint at the improving relations with
China; if Russia chose to continue to protect the practices of the Syrian regime
and did not oblige it to accept a serious political agreement. The Afghanistan
bomb came to confirm that America is leading the war on terrorism from
Afghanistan, Mawsel, to Al-Raqqa, and that the Russian role in this war is
incomplete or ambiguous. Due to the two strikes, America seemed to regain its
controlling seat, making it able to give guarantees, assurances and warnings.
The return of Trump from Twitter to the established US institutions, in case he
continued, would be a more severe bomb for the international balances than the
missiles targeted the Shayrat Airbase and the Afghanian “Master Bomb”. Most
probably Vladimir Putin made a big mistake when he hesitated to launch a serious
and convincing political agreement in Syria, preferring to wait for a full deal.
If he had done that, Trump would have found no choice other than supporting the
Russian Syria to reduce the chances establishing of the Iranian Syria. When the
American President regains the leadership position and reinforces his country's
diplomacy, world leaders in this or that country must recalculate their own
agendas.
**Ghassan Charbel is the Editor-in-Chief of London-based Al-Hayat newspaper.
Evacuation deal is Syria’s new moment of shame
Mashari Althaydi/Al Arabiya/April 17/17
Saturday’s terrorist attack in Rashidin in Aleppo, which targeted residents who
were being evacuated from the Syrian towns of Foua and Kefraya, shows the deep
rift that exists in Syria today. Residents of Foua and Kefraya are Shiites who
support the Assad regime. The displacement was carried out based on what was
known as the four towns’ deal. As part of this deal, the Sunni residents of
Zabadani and Madaya near Damascus would be displaced to northwestern Syria,
Idlib and other areas, while Shiites in Idlib’s and Aleppo’s countryside would
be displaced to West Syria or to what’s regarded by the Syrian regime as “useful
Syria.” In other words, or rather blatantly, it’s a sectarian demographic
division and manipulation of the Syrian social map on the basis of identity.
It’s a major crime that kills whatever is left of plurality and spontaneity,
which people enjoyed for hundreds of years despite the strife that occurred
around them due to domestic or foreign disputes. The suicide attack against
evacuees from Foua and Kefraya killed 112. Most of them were residents and
fighters. They were waiting in Rashidin while opposition fighters and residents
of Madaya, which is close to Damascus, were waiting at the Ramouseh bus station
few miles away. It’s a major crime that kills whatever is left of plurality and
spontaneity, which people enjoyed for hundreds of years despite the strife that
occurred around them due to domestic or foreign disputes
Evacuation schemes
The plan was to transfer them to Idlib, which is controlled by the armed
opposition. According to the four towns’ deal, there are two phases. The first
one is to evacuate all residents of Foua and Kefraya whose number is estimated
at 16,000 and the second one is to evacuate the residents of Madaya and
Zabadani.The Syrian opposition was right to describe this displacement as a
forced displacement of citizens who oppose Assad from major urban centers in
West Syria. What happened to the residents or even fighters of Foua and Kefraya
is an obvious crime. A similar attack – God forbid – may target residents and
fighters of Madaya and Zabadani as it is expected that the Assad regime and its
militias may retaliate. However, the worst crime here lies in deepening the
sectarian divide and altering the country’s geography and manipulating
demographic facts according to it.
Displacing Syrian identity
This barbaric demographic division is happening before the eyes of the entire
world. It is happening in our era although we thought such displacement and
ethnic cleaning have ended during the Middle Ages and with the Spanish Tribunal
of the Holy Office of the Inquisition.The Syrian regime, the militias affiliated
with it, Iranian thugs and Vladimir Putin’s forces combined with al-Nusra Front,
al-Qaeda and ISIS have sealed the fate of these four towns. They are all
partners in destroying the historical and civilized Syrian identity. The four
towns’ deal is a new Syrian shame.
Why Syria is one thing and Assad is another
Hussein Shobokshi/Al Arabiya/April 17/17
Why did the United States carry out airstrike against Syria?
Firstly, the US did not strike Syria as proclaimed by the national media and the
media that belongs to the terrorist group Hezbollah but it hit a military
airbase fully operated by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards from where the
chemical weapons were launched on Idlib. The US destroyed the military aircraft
and Quds missiles, which were used to hit the Syrian cities. Secondly, let us
try to reestablish the facts to know the situation in Syria and why the regime
of Assad was forced on the Syrian people.Syria, once heart of the Arab world,
allied itself with a revolutionary (non-Arab) sectarian regime Iran. Iran, whose
main objective as outlined in its constitution, is to spread its extremist
ideology in the region. Syria is also allied with the sectarian terrorism group
(Hezbollah), classified as a terrorist organization by the international
community and by most of the Arab countries (it has branches in those countries
and it is accused of many terrorist acts in those states). In addition, Syria is
allied with Russia (the first country to recognize Israel and the Russian lobby
which is the most important lobby inside Israel). This is the story of Syria
under the Assad regime, a fascist, repressive and failed state changed from
Ba’athist to sectarian state par excellence. It is strange that Syria’s allies
(Iran and the terrorist organization Hezbollah) do not see the comparison
between what happened in Iraq, which they strongly supported at that time, while
in Syria they rejected it. Iraq was ruled by Ba’athist dictator (just like
Syria), a minority ruling a majority (again, just like Syria).They exterminated
the unarmed and defenseless civilians in Halabja in Iraq (Assad did the same in
Hama and elsewhere). Saddam occupied Kuwait, Assad occupied Lebanon too but
because of their exclusive sectarian outlook, they never see those issues with
the same objective and fair eye.
It is strange that Syria’s allies do not see the comparison between what
happened in Iraq, which they strongly supported at that time, while in Syria
they rejected it
A reckless system
This reckless system, which is supported by the scum of the “thugs”, killing and
injuring hundreds of thousands of people and displacing millions, is not due any
respect nor is Assad worthy to continue ruling the country. The regime of Syria
gave the Golan Heights to Israel in 1967 without any resistance or without
firing a bullet against Israel and withdrew before the arrival of the Israeli
forces. The Golan remained in complete calm for more than four decades. The
Syrian regime has killed more Lebanese, Palestinians, Syrians, Iraqis and
Jordanians, more than the Israelis did. The removal of Palestinian resistance
from Lebanon also contributed to ignite a civil war in Lebanon in which the
Lebanese devoted sectarian presence, under the banner of terrorist Hezbollah,
and yet continued with all despicable and shameless interference in the
Palestinian cause with threats to assassinate its leaders, just like the
assassinations of great political symbols in Lebanon, Jordan and Iraq. A wicked
and phony political system inherited the rule of the republic from father to
son, forcing the People’s Assembly to change its constitution in minutes to
accept the age of the new president Bashar al-Asaad (by the way he was not the
preferred first choice of his father).The regime has enmity with all the
countries in the region and have forced its people to leave and migrate,
deprived them of their privileges, bitterly humiliated them by imprisonment and
nationalized the major private companies.
The nature of the regime
This is the Assad regime which is now objecting to the military strike against
it. The US did not target any civilians, no civilians were killed and there was
no monetary cost on the people. All the military equipment that was destroyed at
the targeted airbase was within the military deal between the Assad regime and
Russia, in exchange for the establishment of its military base on the coast of
Tartus in the Mediterranean Sea (as it is well-known). Israel knows fully well
that Assad poses no threat to them. There are three historical statements made
at the time of the Syrian revolution when Rami Maalouf, the son of the uncle of
Bashar Al-Assad and one of the most important pillars of the regime, said,
“Security of Syria means security of Israel.” The next statement was by Hassan
Nasrallah, leader of Hezbollah terrorist group. He said, “We will fight until
the end in the defense of Bashar Al-Asaad.”And thirdly, Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu himself said, “the survival of Bashar Al-Asaad is a
zguarantee for Israel’s security”. These statements need no analysis to
understand the role of the Assad’s regime in the region and its importance to
both Iran and Israel. America attacked a military airbase which was used against
the civilians in Syria and it is run entirely by Iran. What is not understood
until today is that Syria is one thing and Bashar Al-Assad is something else.
Bashar Al-Assad is exactly the opposite of everything beautiful that Syria
represented.
Why Turks can’t get enough of Erdogan
Mahir Zeynalov/Al Arabiya/April 17/17
Hardly is there any politician in modern times who is as good as Turkish
president at winning polls. Recep Tayyip Erdogan, again, declared victory on
Sunday in a referendum that significantly expanded his powers. Erdogan’s rise to
power in the early 2000s followed years of devastating economic meltdown and
unceasing political turmoil. Fed up with short-lived, incompetent and corrupt
governments, Turks went to polls to vote for a strongman over and over. People
didn’t want to return to dark old days in the 1990s and Erdogan was their
invincible savior. Throughout his rule in the 2000s, Erdogan was not another
autocrat who crushed the opposition and secured pillars of his government
through brute force. Instead, he fixed the ailing banking sector, lifted
millions of people out of poverty, drove economic growth through massive
infrastructure projects and made sweeping political reforms.
Economic and political stability has so far underpinned his 15-year rule – the
longest in Turkey’s history. Sunday’s referendum paved the way for Erdogan to
stay in power until 2029. Given these circumstances, it is not surprising that
people in Turkey want to see Erdogan stay in power. But bestowing him with more
powers was a gift even many of his supporters thought was unnecessary.For
months, President Erdogan said voting for constitutional changes was the answer
to a series of bomb attacks, sagging economy and post-coup turmoil. The changes
will abolish the post of prime minister, weaken checks and balances, give the
president an authority over judicial appointments, and bury the role of
Parliament as the center of power. The European Union even said the
constitutional changes would end Turkey’s membership bid. The victory was not an
easy one and the narrow margin of victory must have been a disappointment for
the government. The referendum in Turkey, which has a proud history of holding
free and fair elections since the 1950s, is marred by allegations of fraud.
There were reports of videos being posted on social media showing precinct
officials stamping otherwise invalid ballots, or stamped “Yes” on numerous
ballots. Observers have long been scratching their heads to understand what type
of regime Turkey had. Many Western nations called Turkey a Muslim ally that was
democratic and modern. The referendum outcome may have significantly changed
this equation
Recount demand
The opposition said it would challenge the results and demanded a recount. No
Western leader called President Erdogan to congratulate on the Referendum Day
even though there were congratulatory messages received from elsewhere.
State-run news agency Anadolu was on the ground reporting the results while many
questioned the accuracy of the entire process, with no rival news agency
tracking the counting. Will anything change? Hardly. Erdogan has already been
ruling the country in ways that alarmed world rights groups and attracted
criticisms from Western nations. Turks went to polls on Sunday just to give more
powers to Erdogan. It seems, the country has just changed its 9-decade old
regime to accommodate Erdogan’s dreams. Observers have long been scratching
their heads to understand what type of regime Turkey had. Many Western nations
called Turkey a Muslim ally that was democratic and modern. The referendum
outcome may have significantly changed this equation. Now Turkey officially
appears to be moving toward a one-man rule. On foreign policy, it will be
business as usual. It was Erdogan who called the shots in the past anyway. His
policies in Syria, Iraq and continued partnership with Russia will more likely
stay intact. Whichever way one looks at it, Turkey, it seems, cannot have enough
of Erdogan even after so many years of him being in power.