English LCCC Newsbulletin For Lebanese, 
Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For May 14/2020
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news
The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/eliasnews21/english.may14.21.htm
News Bulletin Achieves Since 
2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations For today
If I have told you about earthly things and you do not 
believe, how can you believe if I tell you about heavenly things
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 03/12-15/:”If I have told 
you about earthly things and you do not believe, how can you believe if I tell 
you about heavenly things? No one has ascended into heaven except the one who 
descended from heaven, the Son of Man. And just as Moses lifted up the serpent 
in the wilderness, so must the Son of Man be lifted up, that whoever believes in 
him may have eternal life.”
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese 
Related News & Editorials published on May 13- 14/2021
Health Ministry: 580 new Corona infections, 20 deaths
3 Rockets Fired from South Lebanon toward Israel
Lebanon spends Eid Al-Fitr under strict quarantine
Presidency Press Office clarifies issue of EDL's outstanding dues
President Aoun will not send an envoy to Paris to follow-up on Le Drian's visit 
to Beirut
Reports: Miqati Emerges as Candidate for PM Post
Report: Hariri Won’t Resign, Most Parties Clinging to Him
EU Sanctions on Lebanese Politicians Expected in 'Next 3 to 4 Weeks'
Driven by Despair, Lebanese Pharmacist Looks to Life Abroad
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News 
published on May 13- 14/2021
U.N. Security Council to Hold New Meeting on Israel-Palestinian Clashes 
Friday
Israeli troops enter Gaza Strip
Palestine and Israel live updates: Israeli troops enter the Gaza Strip
Israel-Palestinian Conflict Escalates as Rockets Fly, Street Violence Flares
Gaza death toll tops 100 as Israeli air strikes, Hamas rocket fire continue
Hamas Fires Large Rocket at Israel's Second Airport near Eilat
Hamas brings out high-powered rockets to hit strategic Israeli targets
Biden Talks to Netanyahu, Hopes Conflict Ending 'Sooner than Later'
Blinken Urges 'Need to End Rocket Attacks' in Call with Abbas
France Says 'Everything Must be Done' to Avert New Mideast Conflict
Iran's Former Firebrand President to Run again for Office
Titles For The Latest The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from 
miscellaneous sources published on May 13- 14/2021
Iran cannot be trusted to obey any nuclear agreement/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Arab 
News/May 13/2021
Specter of Russian military looms over Turkish canal project/Zaid M. Belbagi/Arab 
News/May 13/2021
Blinken's Non-Containment Policy Regarding China/Peter Schweizer/Gatestone 
Institute/May 13/2021 
Move the "Genocide Olympics" Out of China/Uzay Bulut/Gatestone Institute/May 
13/2021
The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese 
Related News & Editorials published on May 13- 14/2021
Health Ministry: 580 new Corona infections, 
20 deaths
NNA/May 13/2021
The Ministry of Public Health announced, on Thursday, the registration of 580 
new Corona infections, thus raising the cumulative number of confirmed cases 
to-date to 534,968.
It also indicated that 20 deaths were recorded during the past 24 hours.
3 Rockets Fired from South Lebanon toward Israel
Agence France Presse/Associated Press/May 13/2021
Three rockets were fired Thursday from southern Lebanon toward Israel, Lebanese 
security officials said, amid an escalating fighting between Israel and the 
militant Palestinian Hamas group in Gaza. The rockets were launched from the 
Qlayleh area north of Naqoura, near the border with Israel. Israel's army 
confirmed the attack and said the rockets landed in the sea. It was not 
immediately clear who had fired them, but two sources close to Hizbullah said 
the Lebanese group had no link to the incident. "A short while ago, three 
rockets were fired from Lebanon into the Mediterranean Sea off the coast of the 
Galilee," Israel's army said in a statement. "According to protocol no sirens 
were sounded," it added. Several media reports said Lebanese security forces 
arrested those who fired the rockets. Al-Jadeed TV however said no arrests have 
been made but added that the Lebanese Army has deployed in the area and is 
following the situation closely. Al-Jadeed later reported that the army was 
chasing several suspects in a grove in the area. A Palestinian official 
meanwhile told An-Nahar newspaper that the Palestinian factions were responsible 
for the incident and that “their message is that the resistance is one in 
Lebanon and Palestine.” Al-Manar TV reporter Ali Shoaib meanwhile tweeted that 
the rockets did not cross the border and that the atmosphere was very normal in 
the area after the army’s deployment. And as MTV said that Israeli warplanes 
were overflying south Lebanon after the incident, Al-Arabiya TV quoted Israeli 
sources as saying that there will be no Israeli response. The spokesman of the 
United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, Andrea Tenenti, meanwhile said that the 
Force, known as UNIFIL, was in contact with the Lebanese and Israeli sides and 
was urging them to show utmost restraint after the incident.
Lebanon spends Eid Al-Fitr under strict quarantine
Najia Houssari/Arab News/May 13/2021
BEIRUT: Eid Al-Fitr celebrations in Lebanon were very scarce on Thursday as the 
country was in the middle of a two-day total closure and curfew to combat the 
spread of the coronavirus (COVID-19). As people avoided gatherings in homes and 
public places during what is supposed to be a joyous time, one prominent 
religious leader expressed fear during his Eid sermon. “People will starve as a 
result of the errors and sins of the government, and from an explosion or social 
violence, which will lead to the revolt of the hungry,” said Sheikh Abdel-Latif 
Derian, grand mufti of Lebanon. “When this happens, remorse will not be 
helpful.” He also accused “political officials of regressing to low levels of 
violating the constitution, striking the judiciary, resorting to sectarian 
delusions, and dividing citizens.” The joy of Eid could not be seen on the faces 
of the Lebanese people as living conditions continue to deteriorate in a country 
gripped in financial and political turmoil. Authorities allowed only 30 percent 
capacity at mosques for the Eid prayers as worshippers spread out in the 
open-air squares surrounding the Al-Amin Mosque in central Beirut.
The prayers were led by Sheikh Derian as Lebanon’s caretaker Prime Minister 
Hassan Diab were among the many who participated in the prayer. The Israeli-Gaza 
violence and unrest dominated the Eid sermon, but the political reality and the 
poor living conditions within Lebanon were also addressed in the sermon from 
Sheikh Derian. “The collapse and devastation that we are living through it can 
only be stopped by the birth of a government that addresses the corruption and 
decay that Lebanon has seen for the first time in decades,” Mufti Derian said. 
“We need a government that carries out the required reforms. Anything else 
counts as deception.”He also criticized “those working in public political 
affairs for failing their citizens when they indulged in corruption and 
prevented the formation of a government capable of stopping the collapse, 
beginning reconstruction, and seeking help from the international community.”
It was noticeable that the Arab and Islamic diplomatic presence was absent from 
the central Eid prayer in downtown Beirut. The Saudi ambassador to Lebanon, 
Walid Bukhari, performed Eid prayers in the garden of his residence in the Yarze 
district while a number of ambassadors of Arab and Islamic countries and embassy 
staff joined him. The embassy took the initial precautionary measures related to 
the coronavirus.
Measures to remove subsidies on more subsidized food commodities, fuel and 
medicines added even more concern to a continuing list of hardships experienced 
by the Lebanese people even before Ramadan. Many pharmacies closed their doors 
because owners did not receive the minimum needs of medicine and baby milk from 
agents and warehouses. Despite the complete closure, petrol stations remained 
busy as people fear more fuel shortages. “The ships that produce power will stop 
on Saturday, and the factories will follow suit,” Abdo Saadeh, president of the 
Association of Private Generator Owners, said on Thursday. “This means that the 
rationing of electric current in Lebanon may exceed 20 hours. In parallel, there 
is a shortage of diesel that feeds private generators, which means we are on the 
verge of a big problem.”
The fuel crisis affects vital sectors in Lebanon, as the secretary-general of 
the Lebanese Red Cross, Georges Kettaneh, announced that the Red Cross “has 
prepared a plan to fill its cars with fuel, and there is no crisis yet.”
The head of the Syndicate of Private Hospital Owners, Suleiman Haroun, said: “If 
Lebanon enters darkness as a result of not providing the funds allocated for the 
purchase of fuel, many patients in need of oxygen and dialysis machines will be 
affected.”
Haroun warned that private hospitals have generators, but it is impossible to 
ask hospitals to supply themselves with electricity 24 hours a day because 
“these generators are there to support the network and be a substitute for any 
malfunctions that occur.”
Presidency Press Office clarifies issue of EDL's 
outstanding dues
NNA/May 13/2021
The Presidency Press Office issued the following statement:
“"MTV" station broadcasted in this evening’s news bulletin, a report on official 
departments and institutions which have not paid their owed bills to the EDL. 
MTV broadcasted that among these departments is the General Directorate of the 
Presidency of the Republic. It concerns the Presidency Press Office to assert 
that the General Directorate of the Presidency of the Republic is committed to 
regularly organizing necessary financial transfers to pay the bills received in 
accordance with the funds available and forwards them to the Finance Ministry. 
The last accumulated bills received from the Electricity of Lebanon were at the 
end of the year 2020, totaling 400 million Lebanese pounds, and the General 
Directorate took the initiative to allocate the funds necessary to pay these 
bills accumulated due to the end of the year, and it is currently awaiting the 
implementation of the allocating process in the Ministry of Finance to pay the 
required value . Noting that since the beginning of the current year, no invoice 
has been received from EDL to the General Directorate of the Presidency of the 
Republic”.
President Aoun will not send an envoy to Paris to follow-up 
on Le Drian's visit to Beirut
NNA/May 13/2021
National News Agency correspondent at the Presidential Palace, reported that 
President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, "is not planning to send an 
envoy to Paris to follow up on the recent visit of French Foreign Minister 
Jean-Yves Le Drian in Beirut," adding that "President Aoun's position is clear 
and was reported to Le Drian during his stay in Beirut."
Reports: Miqati Emerges as Candidate for PM Post
Naharnet/May 13/2021
Foreign efforts have been launched to find a “replacement for PM-designate Saad 
Hariri” and it seems that there is French-Saudi consensus on ex-PM Najib Miqati, 
media reports said. Noting that the efforts are “serious,” al-Akhbar newspaper 
said Miqati has been communicating with Washington, Paris and Riyadh. “An 
agreement on Miqati’s nomination is not guaranteed yet, domestically, but there 
is consensus in principle on him abroad, especially in Riyadh,” the daily added, 
quoting unnamed sources. “Hariri is not opposed to this, and perhaps he has 
become convinced of the impossibility of his success in his mission, mainly in 
light of the Saudi veto on him and secondly due to the difficulty to reach an 
agreement with President Michel Aoun and ex-minister Jebran Bassil,” the sources 
added. “Hariri will endorse Miqati’s nomination to satisfy the kingdom and to 
refute obstruction accusations and implicate Bassil with this designation, 
seeing as Miqati will not be less strict in his conditions,” the sources went on 
to say. According to the sources, Miqati is proposing the same initiative that 
he had put forward in the past, which calls for the formation of a 20- or 
24-seat government comprising political and specialist ministers.
Report: Hariri Won’t Resign, Most Parties Clinging to Him
Naharnet/May 13/2021 
Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri “does not intend to step down” and “those 
awaiting his resignation will wait for a long time,” informed sources said. 
Speaker Nabih Berri is “showing decisive insistence on Hariri’s designation and 
does not see a replacement for him to lead the mission-driven salvation 
government,” sources close to Ain el-Tineh told the Nidaa al-Watan daily in 
remarks published Thursday. “Berri has communicated with Hizbullah’s leadership 
and stressed the need not to give up Hariri’s designation seeing as he is the 
best choice to overcome the crisis, and there was an agreement between him and 
Hizbullah on the issue,” the sources said. Political sources meanwhile told the 
newspaper that Hariri has been urged not to step down and that he still enjoys 
the support of Berri, Hizbullah, the Progressive Socialist Party, the Marada 
Movement, the Tashnag Party, the majority of MPs and Maronite Patriarch Beshara 
al-Rahi.
EU Sanctions on Lebanese Politicians Expected in 'Next 3 to 4 Weeks'
Naharnet/May 13/2021  
The sanctions that the European Union is preparing against Lebanese politicians 
seen as blocking the formation of a new government are expected in “the next 
three to four weeks,” media reports said, quoting a senior EU diplomat. The 
reports said no specific names have been discussed and that Hungary has 
criticized the EU efforts against Lebanese politicians. The European Union 
"expressed its dissatisfaction with the political stalemate Lebanon is 
witnessing, and preparations have begun to impose sanctions on political 
officials whom it considers responsible for the obstruction,” EU's Foreign 
Affairs Chief Josep Borrell announced on Monday evening. After a meeting of the 
foreign ministers of the bloc countries in Brussels, Borrell said: “We are 
working on adopting a policy of carrot and stick in Lebanon. All options are on 
the table in order to put pressure on the political class preventing a solution 
for the impasse."Borrel said he discussed the crisis with Lebanon’s caretaker 
Foreign Minister Charbel Wehbe last Sunday, expressing his regret that the 
situation in Lebanon had not improved. A European diplomat told Al-Arabiya over 
the weekend that the European External Action Department distributed an options 
paper to member states, including incentives to activate the partnership with 
Lebanon, if it forms a reform government. He said the paper “does not exclude 
the option of sanctions.We are moving forward step by step towards concrete 
measures.”Last week, France's foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said ahead of 
his arrival in Beirut that French travel restrictions on Lebanese officials 
suspected of corruption or hindering the formation of the Cabinet were “just the 
start.”France has been trying to force change on Lebanon's ruling class, whose 
corruption and mismanagement has driven the tiny country into the ground and 
pushed it to the verge of bankruptcy.
Driven by Despair, Lebanese Pharmacist Looks to Life Abroad
Associated Press/May 13/2021
The shelves are bare at the Panacea pharmacy north of Beirut. Its owner, Rita El 
Khoury, has spent the past few weeks packing up her career, apartment and 
belongings before leaving Lebanon for a new life abroad. For the 35-year-old 
pharmacist and her husband, and countless others feeling trapped in a country 
hammered by multiple crises, Lebanon has become unlivable. Driven by financial 
ruin, collapsing institutions, hyperinflation and rapidly rising poverty, 
thousands have left since Lebanon's economic and financial crisis began in late 
2019 -- an exodus that accelerated after the massive explosion at Beirut's port 
last August, when a stockpile of improperly stored ammonium nitrates detonated, 
killing 211 people and destroying residential areas nearby. Lebanon has been 
without a functioning government since, with political leaders deadlocked or 
complacent as the country hurtles toward total collapse. Fuel supplies are 
running out, leaving the country at risk of plunging into total darkness as 
power stations and generators run dry. Now young to middle-aged professionals 
are leaving -- doctors, engineers, pharmacists and bankers, part of the latest 
wave of emigration in the small country's modern history."It's been 10 years 
since I opened this pharmacy. I gave it all that I could," said El Khoury, 
standing in her empty pharmacy. Though her career was her passion, she is armed 
with determination and hopes for a better future in France, where they are 
headed.
- LEAVING OR STAYING -
It's a question almost every generation of Lebanese has asked throughout the 
country's turbulent 100-year history, rife with instability and crises. The 
country has seen a ruinous 15-year civil war, military occupation by its 
neighbors, bombings, political assassinations and repeated bouts of civil 
unrest.
The result has been one of the world's largest diasporas relative to the size of 
the country -- estimated to be about three times the population of 5 million at 
home. There are no exact figures for how many Lebanese have left since October 
2019. Some estimate up to 20% of Lebanese doctors have emigrated or are planning 
to leave. Out of 3,400 unionized pharmacies, around 400 have shut down and 70% 
of pharmacy graduates end up leaving, said Ghassan al-Amin, head of the 
pharmacist syndicate. Airport scenes of parents sending off their kids to work 
or study abroad are very common. During the civil war, which ended in 1990, tens 
of thousands of people left, joining previous generations of Lebanese emigrants 
to Latin America, Europe, Africa and Australia. The current economic crisis is 
unprecedented in Lebanon's modern history, and many worry the flight of educated 
professionals and soaring poverty this time would forever alter the identity and 
reputation this small country once had as the medical, tourist and banking 
capital of the Middle East.
El Khoury and her husband, Marcel, never wanted to leave, determined to remain 
close to their parents in a country that provides no social welfare for its 
elderly. She is an only child. Her husband has two brothers, both living in 
Dubai. But their resolve to stay began to crack two years ago. The economy was 
tanking, and hard currency was becoming scarce. In October 2019, public 
frustration exploded into nationwide street protests. Banks clamped down. People 
suddenly saw their dollar bank accounts frozen and Lebanese currency withdrawals 
limited, trapping all their money. The Lebanese pound, pegged to the U.S. dollar 
for decades, unraveled. Salaries dropped and savings evaporated. El Khoury's 
husband, a financial software developer, started looking for jobs abroad, but 
then the pandemic hit, slowing everything down. The couple decided to apply for 
immigration to Canada and began the lengthy paperwork process. By mid-year, 
drugs started disappearing from pharmacy shelves, shortages exacerbated by panic 
buying and suppliers holding on to the drugs, hoping to sell for higher. Six out 
of 10 brand-name drugs were suddenly unavailable.
"There were days when I came home crying," El Khoury said. "When I was studying 
pharmacy for five years, they never told me I'd have to decide who gets to have 
medicine and who doesn't." On Aug. 4 -- the day the of the port explosion -- she 
was working remotely from home when the earth shook, followed by a deafening 
blast. From their apartment north of Beirut's port, she saw a gigantic cloud of 
smoke rising above the city. The explosion triggered childhood memories during 
Lebanon's civil war, when her parents had her sleep behind a sofa, hoping it 
would protect her from the shells. The blast solidified the couple's resolve to 
leave. El Khoury now ridicules the word 'resilience,' often ascribed to Lebanese 
people for their ability to pick up the pieces and rebuild after every disaster.
"To me resilience is an excuse that we give ourselves for apathy and not doing 
anything," she said. "Resilience is why we keep falling lower, and we get used 
to every new low."
STARTING FROM ZERO -
In January, El Khoury's husband received a job offer in France. They decided to 
take it. She began selling her pharmacy stocks, and begin the long process of 
packing up a life in preparation for their departure on Saturday. "We are going 
to start from zero," she said. "Everything we have worked for the past 15 years, 
the money we have earned and saved, it's all gone and we're starting from 
scratch."They feel sadness, apprehension and nostalgia mixed with relief at 
finally taking the leap. They worry about leaving their parents behind in a 
country with an uncertain future but at the same time, there is excitement about 
what awaits. El Khoury recalls the hope and enthusiasm she felt when she first 
opened her pharmacy. She had just returned from a year of study in France, and 
the pharmacy, she felt, was her mission. That mission was cut short, she said. 
Hopefully, a more dignified life in France awaits. With family and friends left 
behind, ties with Lebanon would not be cut. She is already planning Sunday 
lunches with an open Skype connection between Paris and Beirut so they can stay 
connected with their parents. But the move, El Khoury feels, is permanent. "It 
would take a miracle for us to come back here," she said, then added: "A miracle 
or retirement."
The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News 
published on May 13- 14/2021
U.N. Security Council to Hold New Meeting on 
Israel-Palestinian Clashes Friday
Agence France Presse/May 13/2021
Tunisia, Norway and China have requested another emergency U.N. Security Council 
meeting be scheduled Friday on the worsening hostilities between Israel and 
Palestinians, despite ongoing U.S. resistance for the body to take a role in the 
conflict. The session would be public and would include participation by Israel 
and the Palestinians, diplomats told AFP Wednesday. The Council has already held 
two closed-door videoconferences since Monday, with the United States -- a close 
Israel ally -- opposing adoption of a joint declaration, which it said would not 
"help de-escalate" the situation. According to a diplomat speaking on condition 
of anonymity, the idea of a third meeting in less than a week was pushed by the 
Palestinians. The goal of a new meeting is "to try to contribute to peace... and 
to have a Security Council able to express itself and to call for ceasefire," 
stressed another diplomat speaking anonymously. Israel has refused to allow the 
Security Council to get involved in the conflict, a demand Washington has so far 
agreed to, diplomats told AFP. According to several sources, 14 of the 15 
members of the Council were in favor of adopting a joint declaration earlier 
Wednesday aimed at reducing tension. However, the United States saw the Security 
Council meeting as a sufficient show of concern, calling a statement 
"counterproductive," diplomats told AFP on condition of anonymity.
'Act with immediacy' 
In Washington, chief diplomat Antony Blinken announced that a U.S. envoy would 
travel to the Middle East to seek to calm tensions between Israel and the 
Palestinians. But in a sign of frustration after the US move to block a Security 
Council statement, four Council members from Europe -- Norway, Estonia, France 
and Ireland -- issued their own joint statement later Wednesday. "We condemn the 
firing of rockets from Gaza against civilian populations in Israel by Hamas and 
other militant groups which is totally unacceptable and must stop immediately," 
the statement said. "The large numbers of civilian casualties, including 
children, from Israeli airstrikes in Gaza, and of Israeli fatalities from 
rockets launched from Gaza, are both worrying and unacceptable. "We call on 
Israel to cease settlement activities, demolitions and evictions, including in 
East Jerusalem," they wrote. And Palestinian Ambassador to the UN Riyad Mansour 
published a letter to the organization's top officials Wednesday in which he 
pleaded with them to "act with immediacy to demand that Israel cease its attacks 
against the Palestinian civilian population, including in the Gaza Strip."
Violence risks spiraling -
He also called for them to demand that Israel "cease all other illegal Israeli 
actions and measures in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East 
Jerusalem, including a halt to plans to forcibly displace and ethnically cleanse 
Palestinians from the City."When asked about the inability of the Council, the 
body in charge of world peace, to speak out on the Israeli-Palestinian clashes, 
U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric expressed hope for a turnaround soon, and added 
that "any international situation will always benefit from a strong and unified 
voice from the Security Council."U.N. Middle East envoy Tor Wennesland had 
warned Wednesday's meeting that the "situation has deteriorated since Monday... 
there is a risk of a spiral of violence," according to a diplomatic source. 
During a first emergency meeting on Monday, the United States also refused to 
back a text proposed by Tunisia, Norway and China calling on all parties to 
refrain from provocation. Renewed rocket fire and rioting in mixed Jewish-Arab 
towns has fueled growing fears that deadly violence between Israel and 
Palestinians could descend into full-scale war. The most intense hostilities in 
seven years have killed at least 65 people in Gaza, including 16 children, and 
seven in Israel, including a soldier and one Indian national, since Monday.
Israeli troops enter Gaza Strip
AFP/May 14/2021
Israeli troops have entered the Gaza Strip as part of the ongoing military 
operation against the Palestinian Islamist movement Hamas, the military said on 
Friday. "Israeli planes and troops on the ground are carrying out an attack in 
the Gaza Strip," the army said in a brief message.
Army spokesman Jonathan Conricus confirmed that Israeli soldiers had entered the 
Palestinian territory.
Palestine and Israel live updates: Israeli troops enter the 
Gaza Strip
The National/May 14/2021
Israeli planes and troops are carrying out attacks on the Palestinian territory
The Israeli army on Thursday told ground forces to prepare for a potential 
invasion of the Gaza Strip, amid calls from the UN to “step back from the 
brink”.
"We have the ground troops that have been told to prepare," Israeli military 
spokesman Jonathan Conricus told The National. "We have three brigades at the 
division headquarters in the Gaza area."
Meanwhile, the UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres urged Israel and the 
Palestinians to avoid a “descent into chaos", as the Security Council met to 
discuss the crisis.
The cross-border escalation came after weeks of unrest in Jerusalem reached 
boiling point with Israeli police storming Al Aqsa Mosque compound.
As of Thursday night Jerusalem time:
Israeli troops have entered the Gaza Strip
Gaza’s Health Ministry said the death toll has risen to 109 Palestinians, 
including 28 children and 11 women
530 have been wounded mostly as a result of air strikes
Seven people in Israel killed, including one soldier, in Lod, Rishon Letzion, 
Ashkelon and Netiv HaAsara
At least 1,750 rockets fired from Gaza
IDF attacks nearly 1,000 targets in Gaza
Israel-Palestinian Conflict Escalates as Rockets Fly, Street Violence Flares
Agence France Presse/May 13/2021
Israel and the Palestinians were engaged in an escalating conflict on two fronts 
Thursday, with Israeli authorities scrambling to quell riots between Arabs and 
Jews inside Israel after days of exchanging deadly fire with Islamist militants 
in Gaza. Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz ordered a "massive reinforcement" 
of security forces to quell mob violence across the country, where police 
stations have been attacked and people savagely beaten on both sides. Despite 
global alarm and diplomatic efforts to halt the spiraling violence, which U.S. 
President Joe Biden said he hoped would end "sooner than later", hundreds of 
rockets again tore through the skies over the Gaza Strip overnight. Israel's air 
force launched multiple strikes with fighter jets, targeting what it described 
as locations linked to Hamas, the Islamist group that controls Gaza. In Gaza, 83 
people were reported killed since Monday -- including 17 children -- and more 
than 480 people wounded as heavy bombardment has rocked the crowded coastal 
enclave and brought down entire tower blocks. The Israeli military said it had 
struck Gaza targets more than 600 times, while Hamas had fired over 1,600 
rockets towards Israel. Israel's civil aviation authority said it had diverted 
all incoming passenger flights headed for Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion airport to Ramon 
airport in the south, as air raid warnings once more went off across Israel. In 
southern Israel, seven people were killed, including one six-year-old, after a 
rocket struck a family home, the United Hatzalah volunteer rescue service said. 
Recent days have seen the most intense hostilities in seven years between Israel 
and Gaza's armed groups, triggered by weekend unrest at Jerusalem's Al-Aqsa 
mosque compound, which is sacred to both Muslims and Jews. The unrest has been 
driven by anger over the looming evictions of Palestinian families from the 
Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of east Jerusalem.
'Preventing pogroms' 
Coinciding with the aerial bombardments is surging violence between Arabs and 
Jews inside Israel. Police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld told AFP that violence was 
at a nadir not seen for decades and that police were "literally preventing 
pogroms from taking place". Hundreds were protesting in the Arab town of Kafr 
Kassem in central Israel, burning tires and torching police vehicles, he said. 
He added that nearly 1,000 border police were called in to quell the violence, 
and that more than 400 people had been arrested. On Wednesday night, Israeli 
far-right groups took to the streets across the country, clashing with security 
forces and Arab Israelis. Police said they had responded to violent incidents in 
multiple towns, including Lod, Acre and Haifa. Israeli television Wednesday 
aired footage of a far-right mob beating a man they considered an Arab until he 
lay unconscious on his back in a street in Bat Yam, near Tel Aviv. "The victim 
of the lynching is seriously injured but stable," Tel Aviv's Ichilov Hospital 
said, without identifying him. A state of emergency has been declared in the 
mixed Jewish-Arab city of Lod, where an Arab resident was shot dead and a 
synagogue has been torched. Israeli President Reuven Rivlin, in unusually strong 
language, denounced what he described as a "pogrom" in which "an incited and 
blood-thirsty Arab mob" had attacked sacred Jewish spaces. Prime Minister 
Benjamin Netanyahu said that "what has been happening these last few days in 
Israeli towns is unacceptable. "Nothing justifies the lynching of Arabs by Jews, 
and nothing justifies the lynching of Jews by Arabs," he said, adding that 
Israel was fighting a battle "on two fronts."
Stalled diplomacy -
The U.N. Security Council has held two closed-door videoconferences since 
Monday, with close Israeli ally Washington opposing adoption of a joint 
declaration, arguing it would not "help de-escalate" the situation. Netanyahu 
spoke later Wednesday with Biden, who said that "Israel has a right to defend 
itself."U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said he had spoken with 
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, urging an end to the rocket attacks by 
Islamist groups, and that a U.S. envoy would travel to the Middle East to seek 
to calm tensions. But the Israeli government has warned that "this is only the 
beginning," and military spokesman Jonathan Conricus said strikes on Gaza would 
continue as Israel prepares for "multiple scenarios.""We have ground units that 
are prepared and are in various stages of preparing ground operations," he told 
reporters Thursday. Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh has also threatened to step up 
attacks, warning that "if Israel wants to escalate, we are ready for it." 
Violence also again rocked the occupied West Bank, where a Palestinian man was 
killed during a confrontation with Israeli soldiers near Nablus, the Palestinian 
health ministry said Thursday. The crisis flared last Friday when weeks of 
tensions boiled over and Israeli riot police clashed with crowds of Palestinians 
at Jerusalem's Al-Aqsa mosque compound. Nightly disturbances have since gripped 
Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem, leaving more than 900 Palestinians injured, 
according to the Palestinian Red Crescent.
Gaza death toll tops 100 as Israeli air strikes, Hamas 
rocket fire continue
Reuters/May 13/2021
GAZA/JERUSALEM: Palestinian militants fired more rockets into Israel’s 
commercial heartland on Thursday as Israel kept up a punishing bombing campaign 
in the Gaza Strip and massed tanks and troops on the enclave’s border. Four days 
of cross-border fighting showed no sign of abating, and Israeli Prime Minister 
Benjamin Netanyahu said the campaign “will take more time.” Israeli officials 
said Gaza’s ruling Hamas group must be dealt a strong deterring blow before any 
cease-fire. Violence has also spread to mixed communities of Jews and Arabs in 
Israel, a new front in the long conflict. Synagogues were attacked and fighting 
broke out on the streets of some towns, prompting Israel’s president to warn of 
civil war. At least 103 people have been killed in Gaza, including 27 children, 
over the past four days, Palestinian medical officials said. On Thursday alone, 
49 Palestinians were killed in the enclave, the highest single-day figure since 
Monday. Seven people have been killed in Israel: a soldier patrolling the Gaza 
border, five Israeli civilians, including two children, and an Indian worker, 
Israeli authorities said. Worried that the region’s worst hostilities in years 
could spiral out of control, the United States was sending in an envoy, Hady Amr. 
Truce efforts by Egypt, Qatar and the United Nations had yet to deliver a sign 
of progress. US President Joe Biden called on Thursday for a de-escalation of 
the violence, saying he wanted to see a significant reduction in rocket attacks. 
Militants fired rocket salvoes at Tel Aviv and surrounding towns with the Iron 
Dome anti-missile system intercepting many of them. Communities near the Gaza 
border and the southern desert city of Beersheba were also targeted. Five 
Israelis were wounded by a rocket that hit a building near Tel Aviv on Thursday.
Hamas Fires Large Rocket at Israel's Second Airport near 
Eilat
Agence France Presse/May 13/2021
Hamas on Thursday said it fired a large rocket at Israel's Ramon airport near 
Eilat, where incoming passenger flights were diverted after waves of rocket 
launches towards the main airport near Tel Aviv. A spokesman for Hamas' armed 
wing announced the launch of the 250 kilogram rocket and demanded that "all 
international airlines immediately halt their flights to any airports" in 
Israel. Hamas has fired over 1,600 rockets towards Israel since Monday, with the 
Israel military saying it struck Gaza targets over 600 times. Earlier Thursday, 
Israel's civil aviation authority said it had diverted all incoming passenger 
flights headed for Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion airport to Ramon airport, as missile 
sirens once more went off across Israel. International carriers were meanwhile 
canceling flights to Israel. Spokespeople for United Airlines and American 
Airlines told AFP their flights from the U.S. to Israel had been canceled 
"through May 15."In Gaza, 83 people were reported killed since Monday, with 
seven killed on the Israeli side.
Hamas brings out high-powered rockets to hit strategic 
Israeli targets
DEBKAfile/May 13/2021
Hamas rockets midday Thursday, May 13, ripped through Israel from the Greater 
Tel Aviv region to Beersheba in the south and including Ashdod, Lachish, Eylot 
in the Arava and the Bedouin settlements. . Iron Dome intercepted 10 over the 
Tel Aviv region. Hamas spokesman said: “We have a new upgraded rocket with a 
range of 220km and can reach any point in Israel.”
Have Hamas and Jihad got hold of more powerful rockets of longer range than 
before?
The answer, DEBKAfile’s military sources report, is in the affirmative. The 
Palestinian rulers of Gaza have begun using Fajr 5 (military codename M-75) (see 
attached photo) and Burkan (A-122), which reach deeper into Israel and pack a 
far more powerful punch.
For the first time, on Wednesday night, they shot a Fajr 5, an Iranian product 
with a long range and 333mm caliber which is mounted on a Mercedes Benz 2631 
forward control chassis. This rocket weighs a ton, Its warhead is packed with 
175kg of fragmentation warhead containing 90kg of high explosives. Hamas’ rocket 
engineers reduced its payload to extend the Fajr’s range to 170km – up to the 
shore of the Sea of Galilee in northeastern Israel –
The Palestinian terrorist organizations have not just escalated their rocket 
offensive, but they are now after big game, as was indicated on Tuesday when a 
rocket aimed at the Eilat-Ashkelon pipeline set a gas container at the Ashkelon 
end on fire. They have been trying to hit the offshore rig of Israel’s Tamar gas 
field. But they have not hit this target because, even after upgrading their 
rockets, they are not up to the high precision capacity installed by Iran in 
Hizballah’s missile arsenal. Iran’s Lebanese proxy now owns a quantity of Fajr 
5C rockets fitted with wit GPS guidance kits.
Hamas leaders are hoping to obtain those ultra-lethal weapon systems soon.
Burkan, a locally developed version of an Iranian weapon, is more like a bomb 
than a rocket. These weapons have been responsible for the gaping holes driven 
in the walls of Israeli buildings, which took direct hits in the last two days 
in the towns of Sderot, Ashkelon, Petah Tikva, Ashdod, Ashkelon and Yahud.
The IDF’s air campaign has caused heavy damage to much of Hamas and Jihad 
weapons infrastructure. And the Iron Dome air defense system has knocked down 
85-90pc of the rockets aimed at populated areas. However, much of that 
infrastructure is still operational and the Hamas/Jihad rocket arsenal remains 
out of reach of aerial bombardment. IDF communiques leave the public ignorant 
about key elements of the Palestinian terrorists’ deadly rocket campaign against 
Israel. People are therefore bewildered over some of the gravest blows in the 
last 24 hours. IDF Spokesman Hdal Zilberman waxed eloquent earlier on Thursday 
about the tremendous damage the IDF is causing Hamas and Islamic Jihad senior 
officers, infrastructure and latterly government institutions and banks, but 
glossed over as misreported the rocket attack as far north as the Jezreel 
Valley, home to a big air base. This target is 164km from the Hamas rocket 
launchers in the Gaza Strip. Furthermore, the direct hits to civilians and 
property are proliferating as are the casualties: Seven deaths in two days and 
nearly a hundred injured. The IDF’s longstanding public relations tactics which 
tells the public as little as it can get away with is bad for morale and 
outdated. The military can’t control communication by mobile phones or prevent 
the social media rumormongering. Better to be more forthcoming for a suffering, 
responsible population hungry for information. 
Biden Talks to Netanyahu, Hopes Conflict Ending 'Sooner 
than Later'
Agence France Presse/May 13/2021
U.S. President Joe Biden said overnight that Israel has a right to defend itself 
but after speaking with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu he hopes 
violent clashes with Palestinians will end quickly. "I had a conversation with 
Bibi Netanyahu not too long ago," Biden told reporters. "My expectation and hope 
is that this will be closing down sooner than later, but Israel has a right to 
defend itself when you have thousands of rockets flying into your 
territory."Biden said U.S. diplomacy was in high gear with national security and 
defense staff "in constant contact with their counterparts in the Middle East -- 
not just with the Israelis, but also with everyone from the Egyptians and the 
Saudis to the Emiratis."Biden spoke as calls grew internationally for a 
de-escalation of violence after intense hostilities between Israel and the 
Palestinians that have left dozens dead and hundreds injured. The Israeli army 
has launched hundreds of air strikes on the Gaza Strip since Monday, while 
Palestinian militants have launched more than 1,200 rockets, according to 
Israel's army, in some of the worst violence in seven years. Coinciding with the 
aerial bombardments is surging violence between Arabs and Jews inside 
Israel.Secretary of State Antony Blinken said he had spoken by telephone with 
Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas, to urge an end to the rocket attacks. The 
rockets are being fired by Hamas, but the United States does not speak with the 
group, considering it a terrorist organization.  The conversation between 
the top US diplomat and Abbas was the first high-level call between the United 
States and the Palestinians since Biden was sworn into office in January. 
Abbas's Palestinian Authority broke off contact with the previous U.S. 
administration of Donald Trump in 2017, when he recognized Jerusalem as Israel's 
capital. "I spoke with President Abbas about the ongoing situation in Jerusalem, 
the West Bank and Gaza," Blinken posted on Twitter. "I expressed condolences for 
the loss of life. I emphasized the need to end rocket attacks and deescalate 
tensions." A readout of the call from the Palestinian presidency said Abbas had 
"stressed the importance of stopping the Israeli attacks on our Palestinian 
people everywhere, and putting an end to settler attacks and the aggressive 
Israeli measures against our people."
'Harrowing' 
Earlier, Blinken announced that Hady Amr, the State Department official in 
charge of Israeli and Palestinian affairs, was leaving Wednesday to the region 
to urge "de-escalation of violence." The diplomat also talked with Netanyahu, 
again pushing for both sides to step back from fighting.
Blinken "reiterated his call on all parties to de-escalate tensions and bring a 
halt to the violence," said a State Department statement. The Pentagon said 
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin had called his Israeli counterpart, Benny Gantz, 
and backed Israel's "legitimate right to defend itself and its people" while 
also urging steps to restore calm. Blinken described scenes of dead Palestinian 
civilians, including children, as "harrowing" but defended Israel's assault on 
Gaza in response to rocket fire by Hamas militants. "I think Israel has an extra 
burden in trying to do everything they possibly can to avoid civilian 
casualties, even as it is rightfully responding in defense of its people," 
Blinken said. But the diplomat said there was a "very clear and absolute 
distinction between a terrorist organization, Hamas, that is indiscriminately 
raining down rockets -- in fact, targeting civilians -- and Israel's response 
defending itself."
Biden's administration earlier appealed to ally Israel to reroute a flashpoint 
parade in Jerusalem and prevent evictions of Palestinians in the holy city, the 
immediate trigger for the new round of violence. Taking more nuance after the 
militantly pro-Israel administration of Trump, Blinken renewed U.S. support for 
the eventual creation of an independent Palestinian state. "This violence takes 
us further away from that goal," Blinken said. "We believe Palestinians and 
Israelis equally deserve to live with safety and security and will continue to 
engage with Israelis, Palestinians and other regional partners to urge 
de-escalation and to bring calm." In a statement, the White House said that 
during his call with Netanyahu, Biden "condemned the rocket attacks by Hamas and 
other terrorist groups, including against Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. He conveyed 
his unwavering support for Israel's security and for Israel's legitimate right 
to defend itself and its people, while protecting civilians."
Blinken Urges 'Need to End Rocket Attacks' in Call with Abbas
Agence France Presse/May 13/2021
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said overnight he spoke with Palestinian 
President Mahmoud Abbas, urging an end to rocket attacks fired from Gaza by 
Hamas militants amid escalating tensions with Israel. "I spoke with President 
Abbas about the ongoing situation in Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza," the 
U.S. top diplomat posted on Twitter. "I expressed condolences for the loss of 
life. I emphasized the need to end rocket attacks and deescalate tensions."A 
statement from State Department spokesman Ned Price added that "the Secretary 
also expressed his belief that Palestinians and Israelis deserve equal measures 
of freedom, dignity, security and prosperity."A readout of the call from the 
Palestinian presidency said Abbas had "stressed the importance of stopping the 
Israeli attacks on our Palestinian people everywhere, and putting an end to 
settler attacks and the aggressive Israeli measures against our people."
Earlier Wednesday, Blinken said that a U.S. envoy would travel to the Middle 
East to seek to calm tensions. The top diplomat also spoke with Israel's Prime 
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and pushed for both sides to de-escalate. Since 
hostilities escalated on Monday evening, Hamas has fired around 1,500 rockets 
from Gaza into Israeli territory, according to the latest estimate by Israel's 
army. But Washington does not speak with Hamas, which it considers a terrorist 
group. 
France Says 'Everything Must be Done' to Avert New Mideast 
Conflict
Agence France Presse/May 13/2021
The international community must do everything possible to avert a new conflict 
between Israel and the Palestinians, France's foreign minister said Wednesday, 
after Palestinian militants fired hundreds of rockets and the Israeli army 
launched air strikes."The cycle of violence in Gaza, in Jerusalem, but also in 
the West Bank and several cities in Israel risks leading to a major escalation," 
Jean-Yves Le Drian told parliament. "Everything must be done to avoid... a 
conflict" that would be the fourth such deadly confrontation in the last 15 
years, he said. "It is absolutely essential that all actors -- without exception 
-- show the greatest restraint and refrain from any provocation and any 
incitement to hatred to put an end to violence whose victims are chiefly 
Palestinian and Israeli civilians," he said. Gaza militants have launched more 
than 1,000 rockets since Monday, according to Israel's army, which has carried 
out hundreds of air strikes on Islamist groups in the Gaza Strip. Le Drian said 
that as well as talking to Palestinian and Israeli counterparts, he would in the 
next hours be speaking to the Egyptian foreign minister, with Cairo seeking to 
calm the situation. France welcomed the efforts of Egypt -- a traditional 
mediator and close ally of Paris -- and would seek to coordinate French efforts 
with those of Cairo to agree a ceasefire, Le Drian said. He said France 
condemned in the "strongest terms" the firing of missiles from Gaza at Israeli 
cities including Tel Aviv. The crisis started last Friday when weeks of tensions 
boiled over and Israeli riot police clashed with crowds of Palestinians at 
Jerusalem's Al-Aqsa mosque. The unrest has been driven by anger over the looming 
evictions of Palestinian families from the Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh 
Jarrah. Le Drian said that France was also "worried" over the situation in 
Jerusalem and said the Sheikh Jarrah evictions were "colonization and feed 
tensions."
Iran's Former Firebrand President to Run again for Office
Associated Press/May 13/2021
Iran's former firebrand president will run again for office in upcoming 
elections in June, raising the possibility of a bolstered hardline leadership at 
a time of tense negotiations with the West. Thronged by shouting supporters, 
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad marched to a registration center at the Interior Ministry 
where he filled out registration forms. He held up his hands in a "V for 
Victory" salute, before addressing reporters. "My presence today for 
registration was based on demand by millions for my participation in the 
election," he said, adding that the move also came after "considering the 
situation of the country, and the necessity for a revolution in the management 
of the country."Ahmadinejad in recent years has tried to polish his hardline 
image into a more centrist candidacy, criticizing the government for 
mismanagement. The Holocaust-denying Ahmadinejad has previously been banned from 
running for the presidency by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in 2017, 
although then, he registered anyway. A constitutional watchdog, the Guardian 
Council ultimately disqualified him. Khamenei says he will not oppose the 
nomination of any candidate, although the electoral council may still block 
Ahmadinejad's candidacy. In either case, the populist's return to the political 
scene may energize discontent among hard-liners who seek a tougher stance 
against the west — particularly Israel and the U.S. Iran opened registration on 
Tuesday, kicking off the race as uncertainty looms over Tehran's tattered 
nuclear deal with world powers and tensions remain high with the West. President 
Hassan Rouhani can not run again due to term limits, yet with the poll just a 
month away no immediate favorite has emerged among the many rumored candidates. 
There also appears to be little interest in the vote by a public crushed by 
sanctions and the coronavirus pandemic. Nevertheless, many view the country's 
hard-liners as ascendant — even as the U.S. under President Joe Biden tries to 
find a way to re-enter the atomic accord. Whoever wins the June 18 vote will 
take over from Rouhani, a relative moderate within the Islamic Republic whose 
two four-year terms began with Iran reaching the nuclear deal. His time in 
office now draws to a close with the accord unraveled after the U.S. 
unilaterally withdrew from it under President Donald Trump in 2018. Ahmadinejad 
pushed his nation into open confrontation with both the West over its nuclear 
program and its own people after his disputed 2009 re-election sparked the 
biggest mass protests since the country's 1979 Islamic Revolution. Abroad, he 
became a caricature of Western perceptions of the Islamic Republic's worst 
attributes, such as denying the Holocaust, insisting Iran had no gay or lesbian 
citizens and hinting Iran could build a nuclear weapon if it chose to do so. At 
home, however, the former Tehran mayor drew support from the countryside for his 
populist cash handouts and home-building programs. As his two-term presidency 
drew to a close and in his life after office, he also crossed the clear red line 
of Iran's Shiite theocracy, directly challenging Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali 
Khamenei, who has final say on all matters of state. Ahmadinejad entered office 
in 2005 and left in 2013, after the election of President Hassan Rouhani, who 
would go onto to make the nuclear deal with world powers. Yet even out of 
office, Ahmadinejad sought to reinvigorate his political fortunes in public and 
on social media.
The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources 
published on May 13- 14/2021
Iran cannot be trusted to obey any nuclear 
agreement
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Arab News/May 13/2021
Recent developments are pointing to the notion that an agreement on the Iran 
nuclear deal between Tehran and the P5+1 world powers (the US, Russia, China, 
the UK and France, plus Germany) is within reach.
With the expected revival of the 2015 nuclear deal, all major sanctions against 
the Iranian regime will likely be lifted. While the Biden administration is 
declining to disclose which sanctions it is intending to remove, Iranian 
President Hassan Rouhani surprisingly revealed on Saturday: “We’ve reached a 
point where the Americans and the Europeans are saying openly they have no 
choice but to lift sanctions and return to the (nuclear deal), and that almost 
all main sanctions have been lifted and talks continue on some details.”
In spite of the fact President Joe Biden previously stated he wants a stronger 
deal with Iran compared to the one reached in 2015, the upcoming renewal will 
likely be the same as the original Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
The Iranian authorities have been clear they would not accept a different deal 
that might include curbs on its ballistic missile program or address its foreign 
policy in the Middle East. In addition, reaching a deal in such a short period 
of time suggests no new issues have been incorporated in the negotiations.
So it follows that the potential deal between Iran and the six world powers will 
include the previous sunset clauses, which set a firm expiration date for the 
restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program, after which the country’s leaders will 
be free to spin centrifuges and enrich uranium to any level they desire. The 
potential deal will most likely once again make Iran’s military sites exempt 
from inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The resurrection of the nuclear deal will also allow the Iranian regime to 
rejoin the global financial system, giving it greater legitimacy — plus billions 
of dollars flowing into its treasury.
If a deal is reached quickly, what will the Iranian regime do with its nuclear 
program? Will it honor the terms of the deal? The regime will most likely 
continue its clandestine nuclear activities in spite of any deal due to the fact 
this is what the recent history of Iran has shown to the international 
community. If we recall, a year after the nuclear deal was originally signed, 
two credible and timely intelligence reports revealed that Iran had no intention 
of honoring its terms.
Firstly, Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, the Federal Office for the 
Protection of the Constitution, revealed in its annual report in 2016 that the 
Iranian government had pursued a “clandestine” path to obtain illicit nuclear 
technology and equipment from German companies “at what is, even by 
international standards, a quantitatively high level.” The report added that “it 
is safe to expect that Iran will continue its intensive procurement activities 
in Germany using clandestine methods to achieve its objectives.” Even German 
Chancellor Angela Merkel criticized Iran at the time and emphasized the 
significance of these findings. Secondly, a detailed report by the Institute for 
Science and International Security appeared to shed more light on Iran’s covert 
nuclear activities. It stated: “The Institute for Science and International 
Security has learned that Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization recently made an 
attempt to purchase tons of controlled carbon fiber from a country. This attempt 
occurred after Implementation Day of the JCPOA… This attempt thus raises 
concerns over whether Iran intends to abide by its JCPOA commitments… The carbon 
fiber procurement attempt is also another example of efforts by the P5+1 to keep 
secret problematic Iranian actions.”
A year after the JCPOA was signed, two intelligence reports revealed that Iran 
had no intention of honoring its terms. In addition, the detection of 
radioactive particles in Turquzabad, where Israel accused Iran of operating a 
secret nuclear facility, and Iran’s continued reluctance to answer simple 
questions about the issue point to the fact that Tehran has most likely been 
violating the JCPOA ever since it came into effect. After all, Iran has a 
history of deceiving the IAEA by conducting clandestine nuclear activities, as 
it did in Arak, Natanz and Ferdow.
Finally, while the nuclear deal was in effect, the Iranian regime exceeded the 
amount of heavy water — which can be utilized for nuclear energy or for 
producing nuclear weapons — it was allowed to possess. Tehran agreed to keep its 
stockpile of heavy water at less than 130 metric tons, but the IAEA reported in 
2016 that Iran had exceeded this threshold on more than one occasion. IAEA 
Director General Yukiya Amano said at the time: “For the second time since 
implementation of the JCPOA began, Iran’s inventory of heavy water exceeded 130 
metric (tons).”
In conclusion, if an agreement is reached, the Iranian regime will most likely 
continue pursuing its clandestine nuclear activities while simultaneously 
reaping the benefits of the deal.
*Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a Harvard-educated Iranian-American political scientist. 
Twitter: @Dr_Rafizadeh
Specter of Russian military looms over Turkish canal 
project
Zaid M. Belbagi/Arab News/May 13/2021
In 2011, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan declared his intention to 
construct what would be known as the Istanbul Canal as an alternative maritime 
route to the Bosphorus. Since then, the plan has been on hold due to the 
successive economic strains that Turkey has been under. However, with an 
election on the horizon, the issue has returned to the fore, most recently last 
month, when 104 retired Turkish navy admirals signed an online petition warning 
the government against amending the Montreux Convention that governs the 
Bosphorus strait. Though access to the Black Sea has historically concerned 
Russia and Turkey principally, a marked military buildup in the region has drawn 
international attention to the Istanbul Canal plan.
A new passageway to the Black Sea in parallel to the Bosphorus would be a huge 
infrastructural undertaking. The proposed 45 km sea-level waterway would connect 
the Black Sea to the Sea of Marmara and thus to the Mediterranean. Officially, 
the stated purpose of the project is to reduce the amount of maritime traffic in 
the Bosphorus and thereby minimize the associated risks and dangers. Each year, 
41,000 vessels of all sizes pass through the strait, including 8,000 tankers 
carrying 145 million tons of crude oil. International pressure to increase the 
maritime traffic tonnage through the Turkish straits is growing, bringing with 
it significant security risks. It has been argued that the sustained increase of 
freight through the strait will eventually require a solution.
Estimated to cost between $12.7 billion and $25 billion, it is viewed by many as 
yet another mega-infrastructure project that the Turkish government has 
supported. Environmentalists, who fear the project will destroy Istanbul’s 
natural habitat and erode fresh water supplies, have failed to make their case 
sufficiently, as the government continues to seek to proceed with the project. 
In recent years, Turkey has built one of the world’s largest airports in 
Istanbul, an ambitious tunnel under the Bosphorus and one of the planet’s 
largest suspension bridges. Though popular with the public, these projects have 
made the domestic economic situation more acute; so much so that key Turkish 
banks have shied away from financing the canal scheme.
Despite the banks’ hesitance, the government remains confident that the project 
is suitably interesting to woo investors. Erdogan’s spokesman and adviser 
Ibrahim Kalin recently stated that the project would “certainly” attract 
investors and creditors when tenders are put out, especially given that the 
government expects the canal to provide an annual income of between $2 and $8 
billion.
The canal could once again allow the entry of non-littoral states’ military 
vessels to the Black Sea.
With the project seeming likely to proceed, it is important to understand the 
military implications. Russia’s Defense Ministry last month announced that it 
had closed off navigation in parts of the Black Sea to foreign military and 
other official vessels until the end of October. This has led many in the 
international community to grow increasingly worried about troop build-ups in 
the region, especially in the context of the Montreux Convention.
Following the Ottoman Empire’s disastrous involvement in the First World War on 
the side of the Central Powers, Turkey’s peace was governed by the 1923 Lausanne 
Treaty, which demilitarized the Bosphorus and Dardanelles completely. To many 
Turks, the Montreux Convention, which was signed in 1936, was an extension of 
Lausanne. Despite allowing the Turkish army to reclaim its positions in this 
strategic area, it limited the number and tonnage of warships from non-Black Sea 
powers that could enter that sea via the Bosphorus.
The continued demilitarization of the straits, according to the agreement, 
allows civilian vessels to freely pass through based on certain regulations. 
This requirement and an obligation for states not bordering the Black Sea to 
notify Turkish authorities before passing through the straits was observed in 
2008, when Turkey barred the passage of US vessels due to their noncompliance 
with the tonnage limitations. This status quo is, however, increasingly in 
question, as a new canal in Istanbul could once again allow the entry of 
non-littoral states’ military vessels to the Black Sea, including aircraft 
carriers and submarines.
Though the rules of the Montreux Convention give Turkey the upper hand it 
deserves due to its geographical position, they also contribute to stability and 
predictability in the Black Sea. A new canal would change this. Experts argue 
that construction of the Istanbul Canal would effectively undermine the 
convention’s rules. It may be the case that, for Turkey — whose president last 
month unequivocally stated, “We currently have neither any efforts nor intention 
to leave the Montreux Convention” — a new canal is simply an infrastructural 
necessity that provides lucrative economic prospects. However, given Russia’s 
military presence in the region, particularly after its annexation of the Crimea 
and the recent massing of two armies and three airborne units for “combat 
training exercises,” plans for the new canal are geopolitically very important.
Historically, Turkey has closed the straits to Russian military shipping. 
However, the days of the Black Sea being an “Ottoman lake” have long since 
passed. It is now the growing specter of the Russian military that should 
concern international observers about future access to the Black Sea.
• Zaid M. Belbagi is a political commentator, and an adviser to private clients 
between London and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Twitter: @Moulay_Zaid
Blinken's Non-Containment Policy Regarding China
Peter Schweizer/Gatestone Institute/May 13/2021 
"Our purpose is not to contain China, to hold it back, to keep it down. It is to 
uphold this rules-based order that China is posing a challenge to. Anyone who 
poses a challenge to that order, we're going to stand up and defend it." — US 
Secretary of State Antony Blinken, 60 Minutes interview, May 2, 2021.
For American diplomacy, this is a significant admission that America no longer 
wants to lead the world, but instead gracefully back away as the world's 
reigning superpower.
The Chinese communists in Beijing, however, are not known for either subtlety or 
nuance in how they handle their affairs in their own backyard. Where China is 
concerned, words and statements matter. Weakness displayed is weakness 
exploited.
To win the Cold War in the 1980s, President Ronald Reagan's genius was to go 
further than simple containment. Reagan believed a simple containment policy 
would always leave you on defense. He compared it to getting possession of the 
football and punting on first down.
So the leaders of the free world should not only be speaking – and acting – in 
opposition to China's human rights abuses and expansionist, aggressive movements 
internationally. They should be attacking the worst, most vicious exponent of 
Leninism – the Chinese Communist Party – as the cause of the human rights 
problems and global instability that we see in the world.
It is by design and for keeps.
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said last week that the goal of the Biden 
administration was not to "contain" China, but to protect a "rules-based order" 
in international relations. For American diplomacy, this is a significant 
admission that America no longer wants to lead the world, but gracefully back 
away as the world's reigning superpower. Pictured: Then US Deputy Secretary of 
State Blinken (right) meets with Liu Yandong, then Vice Premier of China, at the 
seventh US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue in Washington DC, June 24, 
2015. 
In various recent interviews, President Joe Biden and his top diplomat have 
tried to say they want China to follow "the rules" while it pushes past the 
United States as the dominant power in the world. That is the only way to see 
the signals they are sending to the Beijing regime.
Secretary of State Antony Blinken told Norah O'Donnell of CBS News' 60 Minutes 
last week that the goal of the Biden administration was not to "contain" China, 
but to protect a "rules-based order" in international relations:
"Our purpose is not to contain China, to hold it back, to keep it down. It is to 
uphold this rules-based order that China is posing a challenge to. Anyone who 
poses a challenge to that order, we're going to stand up and defend it."
For American diplomacy, this is a significant admission that America no longer 
wants to lead the world, but gracefully back away as the world's reigning 
superpower. Perhaps these clear signals will be seen by some western allies as 
merely noblesse oblige, a gentlemanly way of responding to the shoves of a 
bully.
Interviewed by Anderson Cooper of CNN, President Biden sounded almost apologetic 
for even bringing up China's human rights abuses in his first phone call with 
Chinese president Xi Jinping. Cooper asked, "When you talk to him about human 
rights abuses, is that just — is that as far as it goes in terms of the U.S.? or 
is there any actual repercussions for China?"
Biden's response is telling. He replied:
"Well, there will be repercussions for China, and he knows that. What I'm doing 
is making clear that we, in fact, are going to continue to reassert our role as 
spokespersons for human rights at the UN and other agencies that have an impact 
on their attitude. China is trying very hard to become the world leader, and 
goat that moniker and be able to do that, they have to gain the confidence of 
other countries. As long as they're engaged in activity that is contrary to 
basic human rights, it's going to be hard to do that. "
It is tempting to see a politician's words about diplomacy as simply tactical 
moves, not an honest statement of their true diplomatic intentions. President 
Donald Trump famously used softer words about Vladimir Putin and North Korean 
despot Kim Jong Un than he did about German prime minister Angela Merkel. But 
the Chinese communists in Beijing are not known for either subtlety or nuance in 
how they handle their affairs in their own backyard. Words and statements matter 
where China is concerned. Weakness displayed is weakness exploited. American 
policy towards emergent China has long been strong words matched with a policy 
of containment, which we should explain.
Containment means containing the geopolitical and influence advances around the 
world of the country in question. During the Cold War with the USSR, this not 
only meant that we wanted to stop Soviet tanks from going through the Fulda Gap 
into West Germany, but also that we wanted to limit or contain Soviet influence 
in Latin America, Africa, and the Middle East. Regarding China, containment has 
meant supporting Hong Kong, India, Tibet, Chinese ethnic and religious 
minorities, Japan, and the other Asian Tigers as a bulwark against Chinese 
hegemony. It has meant opposing Chinese aggression and territorial claims both 
at the UN and with the presence of the Seventh Fleet.
To win the Cold War in the 1980s, President Ronald Reagan's genius was to go 
further than simple containment. Reagan believed a simple containment policy 
would always leave you on defense. He compared it to getting possession of the 
football and punting on first down. This is why he not only built up American 
military capabilities but deployed his rhetorical arsenal against the rusting 
iron grip of Soviet totalitarianism. "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" was 
his closing argument and meant more to the collapse of the Soviet Union than 
Pershing II missiles, as it turned out.
The fact that both Biden and Blinken tread so gingerly around Chinese 
expansionism and tyranny, forswearing even to use the word "containment," is 
because they don't want to provoke Beijing, which would take real offense at us 
saying it. But if they are acknowledging that Beijing wants to overtake us, and 
seeks to expand its model of authoritarianism around the world, how can they as 
putative leaders of the free world not call for containment and more? They 
appear to be straddling two positions while lacking the fortitude to come out 
and call for containment.
In the struggle against Marxism-Leninism, that second word is the most dangerous 
today. The Chinese communist regime is deeply Leninist in its nature and 
operation. Like its eponymous originator, the Leninists of China stress the 
dictatorial side of their "revolution," not its theoretical ideas about class 
or, most definitely, capital. This is the true nature of the Beijing regime and 
why its threats and challenges are so strong. The "Marxism" side has been 
somewhat cast off by the Leninist drive to punish and exploit their adversaries. 
Unless the nature of the Chinese system itself changes, we are going to face 
with this Leninist threat for decades to come.
So the leaders of the free world should not only be speaking – and acting – in 
opposition to China's human rights abuses and expansionist, aggressive movements 
internationally. They should be attacking the worst, most vicious exponent of 
Leninism – the Chinese Communist Party – as the cause of the human rights 
problems and global instability that we see in the world. Human rights in China 
are not a "Chinese" problem, per se, they are a "Leninist" problem. It is no 
coincidence that what is happening in China today is similar to the attempts at 
control that we saw in Romania, East Germany, Cambodia and elsewhere during the 
Cold War.
It is by design and for keeps.
*Peter Schweizer, President of the Governmental Accountability Institute, is a 
Gatestone Institute Distinguished Senior Fellow and author of the best-selling 
books Profiles in Corruption, Secret Empires and Clinton Cash, among others.
© 2021 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do 
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No 
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied 
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Move the "Genocide Olympics" Out of China
Uzay Bulut/Gatestone Institute/May 13/2021
The letter's signatories remind the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee and the 
International Olympic Committee of their charter commitments and international 
obligations pertaining to the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and 
Punishment for Genocide.
"At least one million of these victims are incarcerated in scores of 
concentration camps, some replete with crematoria, where they are being 
brainwashed, raped, forcibly aborted and sterilized, tortured, organ-harvested 
and forced to perform slave labor. Is that acceptable to the U.S. Olympic 
Committee? Would your organization want to be associated with, let alone be seen 
as condoning, such barbaric behavior?" — From the letter "Stop the 2022 Genocide 
Games" signed by at least 115 human rights and faith organizations.
"[T]he PRC has given no indication that it will abandon the genocidal oppression 
of Uyghurs and others, let alone dismantle the massive infrastructure used for 
this purpose. Rather, the CCP will no doubt exploit the 'Genocide Games' as 
proof that the world is indifferent to, if not actually implicitly endorsing, 
its crimes against humanity." — From the letter "Stop the 2022 Genocide Games."
"Then there is the matter of the Chinese Communist Party's involuntary 
extraction of vital organs. Eminent international human rights experts have 
found that forced organ harvesting is taking place in the PRC on an industrial 
scale. It is estimated that hundreds of thousands of China's own people, ethnic 
and religious minorities and prisoners of conscience have been murdered to 
profit the CCP. Is the U.S. Olympic Committee willing to associate with the 
perpetrators of these crimes?" — From the letter "Stop the 2022 Genocide Games."
More than three million deaths worldwide have been caused by Communist China for 
failing to disclose, and even outright lying about, the human-to-human 
transmissibility of the Wuhan virus. Virtually every country has been victimized 
by what can only be regarded as Communist China's mass murder. So why should 
nearly 200 countries reward China with the economic bonanza and implicit 
legitimacy that hosting the 2022 winter Olympics would confer?
All the countries crushed both by deaths caused by Communist China's conscious 
export of its virus and the economic devastation that followed need to make sure 
that instead of being enriched and celebrated, Communist China should be held to 
account -- at the very least by being invoiced for the damage it caused and 
removed from hosting the Olympic games.
Human rights and faith groups have requested in an open letter to the U.S. 
Olympic & Paralympic Committee that the 2022 Winter Olympics be moved out of 
China because of its genocide against the Uyghur people in Xinjiang and severe 
oppression of its other citizens. Pictured: Flag-bearers at a Para Ice Hockey 
test event for the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics at National Indoor Stadium on 
April 10, 2021 in Beijing, China. (Photo by Lintao Zhang/Getty Images)
Human rights and faith groups -- such as the Committee on the Present Danger: 
China's Captive Nations Coalition, Women's Rights without Frontiers, and Save 
the Persecuted Christians -- have requested in an open letter to the U.S. 
Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) that the 2022 Winter Olympics be moved 
out of China because of its genocide against the Uyghur people in Xinjiang and 
severe oppression of its other citizens. The letter's 108 signatories remind the 
USOPC and the International Olympic Committee (IOC) of their charter commitments 
and international obligations pertaining to the 1948 UN Convention on the 
Prevention and Punishment for Genocide. The letter entitled "Stop the 2022 
Genocide Games" said, in part:
"Today, we are confronting another totalitarian regime actively engaging in, 
among crimes against humanity, another genocide. Yet, as of now, the U.S. 
Olympic Committee (USOC) and its international counterpart are preparing to 
enable the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to receive and exploit a propaganda 
bonanza that will make what the Nazis enjoyed pale by comparison. That must not 
happen.
"As you know, the United States government has determined that the CCP is 
genocidally oppressing millions of Uyghur Muslims and other ethnic minorities in 
the region of western China they call East Turkistan and the Chinese Communists 
have branded Xinjiang. At least one million of these victims are incarcerated in 
scores of concentration camps, some replete with crematoria, where they are 
being brainwashed, raped, forcibly aborted and sterilized, tortured, 
organ-harvested and forced to perform slave labor. Is that acceptable to the 
U.S. Olympic Committee? Would your organization want to be associated with, let 
alone be seen as condoning, such barbaric behavior?
"The U.S. government has prohibited the importation of cotton produced in East 
Turkistan lest American consumers unwittingly support the CCP's slave labor 
practices. Western companies in China that are complying with this requirement – 
including some that are sponsors of the 2022 Beijing Olympics – are being 
punished by the Chinese government for such compliance. Does the U.S. Olympic 
Committee really want to side with China's slave-masters?
"That would especially be the case since the PRC has given no indication that it 
will abandon the genocidal oppression of Uyghurs and others, let alone dismantle 
the massive infrastructure used for this purpose. Rather, the CCP will no doubt 
exploit the 'Genocide Games' as proof that the world is indifferent to, if not 
actually implicitly endorsing, its crimes against humanity.
"If the Chinese Communist Party's systematic oppression of those enslaved in its 
Captive Nations – including not only Uyghurs, but Tibetans, Southern Mongolians 
and the people of Hong Kong – were not bad enough, countless millions of Chinese 
citizens are also victims of the CCP. China employs the world's most 
comprehensive state surveillance and a repressive 'social credit system' to 
ensure their submission. Were a Beijing Olympics to occur next year, athletes, 
international staff and visitors would all be subjected to these invasive and 
coercive totalitarian techniques, as well.
"In addition, Olympians would effectively be legitimating the CCP's assiduous 
persecution of millions of religious believers. Millions of Chinese Christians, 
Tibetan Buddhists, Falun Gong practitioners and Muslims are among those who have 
been subjected to CCP imprisonment, torture and executions in the last several 
decades.
"Then there is the matter of the Chinese Communist Party's involuntary 
extraction of vital organs. Eminent international human rights experts have 
found that forced organ harvesting is taking place in the PRC on an industrial 
scale. It is estimated that hundreds of thousands of China's own people, ethnic 
and religious minorities and prisoners of conscience have been murdered to 
profit the CCP. Is the U.S. Olympic Committee willing to associate with the 
perpetrators of these crimes?"
Several countries, including the US, Canada and the Netherlands, have accused 
China of committing genocide -- defined by international convention as the 
"intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or 
religious group".
As well as interning Uyghurs in camps, there is evidence that China has been 
suppressing the Uyghur population through mass sterilizations and using Uyghurs 
as forced labor. In 2020, there were more than 380 "re-education camps" in 
Xinjiang -- an increase of 40% on previous estimates -- according to the 
Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
A UN report from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights noted, as 
early as 2018, that the Chinese state was holding ethnic Uyghurs and other 
minorities in the so-called "counter-extremism centres" and "re-education camps" 
in Xinjiang:
"Gay Mcdougall, Committee Co-Rapporteur for China, raised concern about the 
numerous and credible reports that in the name of combatting 'religious 
extremism' and maintaining 'social stability', the State party had turned the 
Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region into something that resembled a massive 
internment camp shrouded in secrecy, a "no rights zone", while members of the 
Xinjiang Uyghur minority, along with others who were identified as Muslim, were 
being treated as enemies of the State based on nothing more than their 
ethno-religious identity. The Co-Rapporteur noted reports of mass detention of 
ethnic Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslim minorities, and estimates that upwards of 
a million people were being held in so-called counter-extremism centres and 
another two million had been forced into so-called 're-education camps' for 
political and cultural indoctrination. All the detainees had their due process 
rights violated, while most had never been charged with an offense, tried in a 
court of law, or afforded an opportunity to challenge the legality of their 
detention."
The first independent expert application of the 1948 UN Genocide Convention to 
the ongoing treatment of the Uyghurs in China, undertaken by the Newlines 
Institute for Strategy and Policy, in cooperation with the Raoul Wallenberg 
Centre for Human Rights, was issued on March 8. The report stated:
"Dozens of experts in international law, genocide studies, Chinese ethnic 
policies, and the region were invited to examine pro bono all available evidence 
that could be collected and verified from public Chinese State communications, 
leaked Chinese State communications, eyewitness testimony, and open-source 
research methods such as public satellite-image analysis, analysis of 
information circulating on the Chinese internet, and any other available 
source."
According to the report's executive summary:
"This report concludes that the People's Republic of China (China) bears State 
responsibility for committing genocide against the Uyghurs in breach of the 1948 
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Genocide 
Convention) based on an extensive review of the available evidence and 
application of international law to the evidence of the facts on the ground.
"Intent to Destroy. Under Article II of the Genocide Convention, the commission 
of genocide requires the 'intent to destroy, in whole or in part, [a protected 
group], as such.' The 'intent to destroy' does not require explicit statements. 
Intent can be inferred from a collection of objective facts that are 
attributable to the State, including official statements, a general plan, State 
policy and law, a pattern of conduct, and repeated destructive acts, which have 
a logical sequence and result — destruction of the group as such, in whole or in 
substantial part.
"High-level statements of intent and general plan. In 2014, China's Head of 
State, President Xi Jinping, launched the 'People's War on Terror' in XUAR, 
making the areas where Uyghurs constitute nearly 90 percent of the population 
the front line. High-level officials followed up with orders to 'round up 
everyone who should be rounded up,' 'wipe them out completely ... destroy them 
root and branch,' and 'break their lineage, break their roots, break their 
connections, and break their origins.' Officials described Uyghurs with 
dehumanizing terms and repeatedly likened the mass internment of Uyghurs to 
'eradicating tumors.'"
The report also exposes comprehensive state policy, pattern of conduct and 
repeated destructive acts:
"a. Government-Mandated Homestays. Since 2014, the Government of China 
(Government) has deployed Han cadres to reside in Uyghur homes as monitors, 
resulting in the rupturing of family bonds. County governments further coerce, 
incentivize, and actively promote Han-Uyghur marriages.
"b. Mass Internment. In 2017, the XUAR legislature formally legalized the mass 
internment of Uyghurs under 'De-Extremification' regulations. The top security 
official and entities dispatched a manual and set of documents across the region 
with orders to police Uyghurs, 'speed up the construction' and expansion of the 
mass internment camps, 'increase the discipline and punishment' within the camps 
and maintain 'strict secrecy' over all information, which is not to 'be 
disseminated,' nor 'open to the public.' The manual outlines the complex 
hierarchy of officials, entities, and the centralized digital surveillance 
system overseeing the entire campaign.
"c. Mass Birth-Prevention Strategy. China has simultaneously pursued a dual 
systematic strategy of forcibly sterilizing Uyghur women of childbearing age and 
interning Uyghur men of child-bearing years, preventing the regenerative 
capacity of the group and evincing an intent to biologically destroy the group 
as such.
According to Government statistics and directives, including to 'carry out 
family planning sterilization,' 'lower fertility levels,' and 'leave no blind 
spots,' China is carrying out a well-documented, State-funded birth-prevention 
campaign targeting women of childbearing age in Uyghur-concentrated areas with 
mass forced sterilization, abortions, and IUD placements. China explicitly 
admits the purpose of these campaigns is to ensure that Uyghur women are 'no 
longer baby-making machines.'
"d. Forcible Transfer of Uyghur Children to State-run Facilities. Pursuant to 
new Government policy in 2017, China began building a vast network of massive 
State-run, highly securitized boarding schools and orphanages to confine Uyghur 
children, including infants, full time. XUAR counties receive specific quotas 
from higher authorities to institutionalize such 'orphans,' who often lose both 
parents to internment or forced labor.
e. Eradication of Uyghur identity, community, and domestic life. Pursuant to 
Government campaigns, local authorities have eliminated Uyghur education, 
destroyed Uyghur architecture and household features, and damaged, altered, or 
completely demolished the majority of mosques and sacred sites in the region, 
while closing off other sites or converting them into commercial spaces.
f. Selective Targeting of Intellectuals and Community Leaders. The intent to 
destroy the Uyghurs as a group is further demonstrated by the Government's 
deliberate targeting of the guardians and transmitters of Uyghur identity for 
prolonged detention or death, including household heads, intellectuals, and 
cultural leaders, regardless of Party affiliation or educational status.
The deliberate targeting of Uyghur leaders and sacred sites evinces an intent to 
destroy the essential elements of Uyghur identity and communal bonds, which 
define the group as such."
The report notes:
"China's policies and practices targeting Uyghurs in the region must be viewed 
in their totality, which amounts to an intent to destroy the Uyghurs as a group, 
in whole or in substantial part, as such.
Acts of Genocide. While commission of any one of the Genocide Convention's 
enumerated acts with the requisite intent can sustain a finding of genocide, the 
evidence presented in this report supports a finding of genocide against the 
Uyghurs in breach of each and every act prohibited in Article II (a) through 
(e).
"(a) Killing members of the group." There are reports of mass death and deaths 
of prominent Uyghur leaders selectively sentenced to death by execution or, for 
elders in particular, by long-term imprisonment.
"(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group." Uyghurs are 
suffering serious bodily and mental harm from systematic torture and cruel 
treatment, including rape, sexual abuse, exploitation, and public humiliation, 
at the hands of camp officials and Han cadres assigned to Uyghur homes under 
Government-mandated programs. Internment camps contain designated 'interrogation 
rooms,' where Uyghur detainees are subjected to consistent and brutal torture 
methods, including beatings with metal prods, electric shocks, and whips. The 
mass internment and related Government programs are designed to indoctrinate and 
'wash clean' brains, driving Uyghurs to commit or attempt suicide from the 
threat of internment or the daily extreme forms of physical and psychological 
torture within the camps, including mock executions, public 'self-criticisms,' 
and solitary confinement.
"(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring 
about its physical destruction in whole or in part." The authorities 
systematically target Uyghurs of childbearing years, household heads, and 
community leaders for detention in unliveable conditions, impose 
birth-prevention measures on Uyghur women, separate Uyghur children from their 
parents, and transfer Uyghurs on a mass scale into forced hard labor schemes in 
a manner that parallels the mass internment. In sum, China is deliberately 
inflicting collective conditions calculated to terminate the survival of the 
Uyghurs as a group.
"(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group." The 
systematic birth prevention campaign in Uyghur-concentrated areas is reinforced 
by the mass internment drive. In the camps, Uyghur women are subjected to forced 
IUD insertions, abortions, and injections or medication halting their menstrual 
cycles, while Uyghur men of childbearing age are targeted for internment, 
depriving the Uyghur population of the ability to reproduce. As a result of 
these interconnected policies, growth rates in Uyghur-concentrated areas are 
increasingly approaching zero.
"(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group." Where 
detentions and forced labor schemes are leaving Uyghur children bereft of both 
parents, they are being sent to State-run orphanages and raised in 
Chinese-language environments with standard Han child-rearing methods."
The report also explains China's responsibility for genocide under the Genocide 
Convention:
"China is a highly centralized State in full control of its territory and 
population, including XUAR, and is a State party to the Genocide Convention. The 
persons and entities perpetrating the above-indicated acts of genocide are all 
State agents or organs — acting under the effective control of the State — 
manifesting an intent to destroy the Uyghurs as a group within the meaning of 
Article II of the Genocide Convention. This report therefore concludes that 
China bears State responsibility for an ongoing genocide against the Uyghurs, in 
breach of the Genocide Convention."
Kuzzat Altay, the President of the Uyghur American Association, and his family 
are one of the hundreds of thousands of Uyghurs targeted by the Chinese 
government. Altay, in an interview, told Gatestone about his father, who was 
taken to a camp in 2018:
"I did not know whether he was alive or dead. After two years of advocacy, I saw 
my father alive on Chinese State TV, denouncing me from being his son. He asked 
me to stop all activities against the Chinese government.
"He was released from the camp as a retired, wealthy 70 years old businessman 
who 'graduated' from a 're-education' camp with a tailor certificate. His leg 
was broken in the camp. Chinese guards forced him to stand up with a broken leg 
when his leg was broken. I believe Chinese guards pushed him. That's why he 
broke his leg.
"He is currently under house arrest. He can go outside for groceries. But I 
can't communicate with my father. The authorities do not allow it. My brother in 
the US can call him once a week. I lost contact with more than 100 relatives. It 
is a crime for them to contact me.
"China holds our family members hostage. If we speak up, they take our family 
members to concentration camps, or Chinese authorities constantly harass them, 
forcing them to tell us to stop. Sometimes, the Chinese police facetime Uyghurs 
abroad next to their family members, ask them to obey, and to stop speaking up.
"Chinese authorities call Uyghurs abroad to collect intelligence, force them to 
spy, and threaten them with taking family members to the camps. China launches 
periodic mass attacks using its social media trolls to intimidate and harass 
Uyghur activists.
"Uyghur refugees are very well treated in non-Muslim, Western countries, but in 
Muslim countries, including Turkey, Uyghur refugees are in danger. There is 
credible evidence that they are harassed by local authorities, arbitrarily 
detained and deported back to China. Many Uyghurs have been arrested in Turkey, 
although they have committed no crimes. China does not renew their passports, 
and Turkey does not grant them residence cards; thus, they cannot legally work 
and their status is in limbo. They fear arrest and deportation to China."
"The Chinese government wants to eradicate Uyghurs," Altay concluded. "After 
many Western countries have recognized the Uyghur Genocide, China forced local 
Uyghurs to show a 'happy face' on TikTok for Xinjiang propaganda."
Nevertheless, despite its genocide against Uyghurs and systematic repression 
against its other citizens, Communist China is set to host the Winter Olympics 
in 2022.
The letter to the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC), the International 
Olympic Committee and other institutions noted:
"For all these reasons, we – the undersigned members of the Committee on the 
Present Danger: China and leaders of the international human rights community 
who also stand against the Chinese Communists' ongoing genocide and other crimes 
– call upon the U.S. Olympic Committee to lead an urgent international effort to 
relocate the 2022 Winter Games to another venue in this country or elsewhere, 
providing a 'Freedom Olympics' alternative to the 'Genocide Olympics.' Failing 
that, you are on notice that we will bend every effort to boycott the Games.
"We remind you that the 2020 Olympic Charter states: 'The goal of Olympism is to 
place sport at the service of the harmonious development of humankind, with a 
view to promoting a peaceful society concerned with the preservation of human 
dignity.' Honoring arguably the greatest human rights abuser in the world with 
the privilege of hosting the Olympics runs directly counter to the Olympic 
Charter. Holding the Games in Beijing does a tremendous disservice to athletes, 
who do not want their desire to prove themselves the world's best to be put in 
the service of the world's worst oppressors.
"Moreover, under the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of 
Genocide, to which both China and the United States are parties, the official 
designation of CCP genocide by the U.S. government requires that we 'punish' the 
offending regime. Specifically, Article 1 of that binding international treaty 
states: 'The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in 
time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they 
undertake to prevent and to punish.'
"We are, therefore, obliged at a minimum not to reward the Chinese Communist 
Party with hosting perhaps the most prestigious international event in the 
world. Instead, we should recognize the CCP as the Transnational Criminal 
Organization it is and treat it accordingly."
The letter also refers to the coronavirus pandemic that originated from the 
Chinese province of Wuhan, caused more than three million deaths worldwide and 
crippled much of the world economically:
"Holding the 2022 Olympics in Beijing would amount to a vindication of the 
Chinese Communist Party's efforts to avoid responsibility for the ongoing, 
murderous coronavirus pandemic that emanated from Wuhan and was then 
deliberately spread around the world, thanks to the PRC allowing international 
flights to continue after severely restricting domestic travel. Again, the 
question occurs: Does the USOC wish to be remembered as standing with the 
millions of American and other victims of the CCP virus or with those who 
unleashed it?"
More than three million deaths worldwide have been caused by Communist China for 
failing to disclose, and even outright lying about, the human-to-human 
transmissibility of the Wuhan virus. Virtually every country has been victimized 
by what can only be regarded as Communist China's mass murder. So why should 
nearly 200 countries reward China with the economic bonanza and implicit 
legitimacy that hosting the 2022 winter Olympics would confer?
When one thinks of more than three million dead only because of Communist 
China's deliberate deceit -- in addition to its genocidal attacks on the Uyghurs 
-- it would seem appropriate to move the Olympics almost anywhere else. All the 
countries crushed both by deaths caused by Communist China's conscious export of 
its virus and the economic devastation that followed need to make sure that 
instead of being enriched and celebrated, Communist China should be held to 
account -- at the very least by being invoiced for the economic damage it caused 
and removed from hosting the Olympic games.
*Uzay Bulut, a Turkish journalist, is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the 
Gatestone Institute.
© 2021 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do 
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No 
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied 
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.