English LCCC Newsbulletin For Lebanese,
Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For March 28/2020
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news
The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/eliasnews21/english.march28.21.htm
News Bulletin Achieves Since
2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations For today
Jesus’ Triumphal Entry To Jerusalem/Palm Sunday
John 12/12-19/The next day a great multitude that had come to the feast, when
they heard that Jesus was coming to Jerusalem, took branches of palm trees and
went out to meet Him, and cried out: “Hosanna! ‘Blessed is He who comes in the
name of the Lord!’The King of Israel!”Then Jesus, when He had found a young
donkey, sat on it; as it is written: “Fear not, daughter of Zion; Behold, your
King is coming, Sitting on a donkey’s colt.”His disciples did not understand
these things at first; but when Jesus was glorified, then they remembered that
these things were written about Him and that they had done these things to Him.
Therefore the people, who were with Him when He called Lazarus out of his tomb
and raised him from the dead, bore witness. For this reason the people also met
Him, because they heard that He had done this sign. The Pharisees therefore said
among themselves, “You see that you are accomplishing nothing. Look, the world
has gone after Him!”
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on March 27-28/2021
Elias Bejjani/Visit My LCCC Web site/All That you need to
know on Lebanese unfolding news and events in Arabic and English/http://eliasbejjaninews.com/
Jesus’ Victorious Entry into Jerusalem -Palm Sunday/Elias Bejjani/March 28/2021
Firas Abiad: AstraZeneca vaccine will be offered on Monday in several centers,
including our hospital
Press Release: Amer Fakhoury Foundation Speaks To US Officials In Washington
Report: U.S., EU to Hold ‘Zoom’ Meeting on Lebanon on Monday
Khalas': Shea Scolds Lebanese Leaders over Govt. Delay
Lebanon Rolls out Astrazeneca Vaccine on Monday
Ibrahim in Paris at Invitation of His French Counterpart
Kanaan after meeting Rahi: Bkirki takes initiative and does not adopt anyone's
position; same baseline points for salvation with Baabda
FPM: We will not participate in the government nor give it confidence on the
grounds proposed by the PM-designate
Future Movement in response to Bassil: For a government that undertakes to stop
the collapse, renew the confidence of brethrens in Lebanon's role, not the
confidence of Gebran and his council
Bukhari from Mukhtara: We stand before a joint historical responsibility to
confirm that we are with Lebanon's Arabism
Beirut neighborhood gets vision of hope after blast
“Dangerous chemical” threat adds to Lebanon’s woes
US defence contractor pleads guilty to espionage for Hezbollah
Lebanon food prices become MENA’s most expensive: World Bank
Lebanon's largest Christian bloc warns against sidelining president
Nabu Musée, Le prétendu gardien (sauveur) du Mashriq/Nelly P. Abboud
Titles For The
Latest
English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published
on
March 27-28/2021
Loud bang heard in Damascus, Syria: Reuters witness
Canada/Minister of Foreign Affairs responds to Chinese sanctions
Strong winds not main reason for huge ship stranding in Suez Canal: Chairman
New Attempts Planned to Free Huge Vessel Stuck in Suez Canal
Five Dead' as Building Collapses in Egypt
Facing two disasters, Egypt’s President Sisi pledges tough action
Sadr offers his own militias’ help to disarm other militias in Iraq
ICC suspect Mahmoud Warfalli gunned down in Benghazi
Women protest in Istanbul over Erdogan’s decision to exit domestic violence
treaty
Titles For The Latest The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on March 27-28/2021
Iranian Regime, Houthis Celebrate Biden Administration’s
Policy/Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/March 27, 2021
Much at stake as India, Saudi Arabia spar over oil prices/John Kemp/The Arab
Weekly/March 27/2021
Suez Canal blockage is a wake-up call/Dr. Theodore Karasik/Arab News/March
27/2021
On Ramadan and Passover, a reminder of how far we have come/Rabbi Marc Schneier/Arab
News/March 27/2021
The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on March 27-28/2021
Elias Bejjani/Visit My LCCC Web site/All That you need to
know on Lebanese unfolding news and events in Arabic and English/http://eliasbejjaninews.com/
Jesus’ Victorious Entry into Jerusalem -Palm Sunday
Elias Bejjani/March 28/2021
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/38277/elias-bejjani-jesus-victorious-entry-into-jerusalem-palm-sunday/
(Psalm118/26): “Hosanna! Blessed is He who comes in the name of Yahweh! We have
blessed You out of the house of Yahweh”.
On the seventh Lantern Sunday, known as the “Palm Sunday”, our Maronite Catholic
Church celebrates the Triumphal Entry of Jesus into Jerusalem. The joyful and
faithful people of this Holy City and their children welcomed Jesus with
innocent spontaneity and declared Him a King. Through His glorious and modest
entry the essence of His Godly royalty that we share with Him in baptism and
anointing of Chrism was revealed. Jesus’ Triumphant Entry into Jerusalem, the
“Palm Sunday”, marks the Seventh Lantern Sunday, the last one before Easter Day,
(The Resurrection).
During the past six Lantern weeks, we the believers are ought to have renewed
and rekindled our faith and reverence through genuine fasting, contemplation,
penance, prayers, repentance and acts of charity. By now we are expected to have
fully understood the core of love, freedom, and justice that enables us to enter
into a renewed world of worship that encompasses the family, the congregation,
the community and the nation.
Jesus entered Jerusalem for the last time to participate in the Jewish Passover
Holiday. He was fully aware that the day of His suffering and death was
approaching and unlike all times, He did not stop the people from declaring Him
a king and accepted to enter the city while they were happily chanting :
“Hosanna! Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord, the King of
Israel!”.(John 12/13). Some of the Pharisees in the crowd said to Jesus,
“Teacher, rebuke your disciples!” “I tell you,” he replied, “if they keep quiet,
the stones will cry out.” (Luke 19/39-40). Jesus entered Jerusalem to willingly
sacrifice Himself, die on the cross, redeem us and absolve our original sin.
On the Palm Sunday we take our children and grandchildren to celebrate the mass
and the special procession while happily they are carrying candles decorated
with lilies and roses. Men and women hold palm fronds with olive branches, and
actively participate in the Palm Procession with modesty, love and joy crying
out loudly: “Hosanna to the Son of David!” “Blessed is he who comes in the name
of the Lord!” “Hosanna in the highest!” (Matthew 21/09).
On the Palm Sunday through the procession, prayers, and mass we renew our
confidence and trust in Jesus. We beg Him for peace and commit ourselves to
always tame all kinds of evil hostilities, forgive others and act as peace and
love advocates and defend man’s dignity and his basic human rights. “Ephesians
2:14”: “For Christ Himself has brought peace to us. He united Jews and Gentiles
into one people when, in His own body on the cross, He broke down the wall of
hostility that separated us”
The Triumphal Entry of Jesus’ story into Jerusalem appears in all four Gospel
accounts (Matthew 21:1-17; Mark 11:1-11; Luke 19:29-40; John 12:12-19). The four
accounts shows clearly that the Triumphal Entry was a significant event, not
only to the people of Jesus’ day, but to Christians throughout history.
The Triumphal Entry as it appeared in Saint John’s Gospel, (12/12-19), as
follows : “On the next day a great multitude had come to the feast. When they
heard that Jesus was coming to Jerusalem, they took the branches of the palm
trees, and went out to meet him, and cried out, “Hosanna! Blessed is he who
comes in the name of the Lord, the King of Israel!” Jesus, having found a young
donkey, sat on it. As it is written, “Don’t be afraid, daughter of Zion. Behold,
your King comes, sitting on a donkey’s colt. ”His disciples didn’t understand
these things at first, but when Jesus was glorified, then they remembered that
these things were written about Him, and that they had done these things to Him.
The multitude therefore that was with Him when He called Lazarus out of the
tomb, and raised him from the dead, was testifying about it. For this cause also
the multitude went and met Him, because they heard that He had done this sign.
The Pharisees therefore said among themselves, “See how you accomplish nothing.
Behold, the world has gone after him.” Now there were certain Greeks among those
that went up to worship at the feast. These, therefore, came to Philip, who was
from Bethsaida of Galilee, and asked him, saying, “Sir, we want to see Jesus.”
Philip came and told Andrew, and in turn, Andrew came with Philip, and they told
Jesus.”
The multitude welcomed Jesus, His disciples and followers while chanting:
“Hosanna! Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord, the King of
Israel!”.(John 12/13). His entry was so humble, meek simple and spontaneous. He
did not ride in a chariot pulled by horses as earthly kings and conquerors do,
He did not have armed guards, nor officials escorting him. He did not come to
Jerusalem to fight, rule, judge or settle scores with any one, but to offer
Himself a sacrifice for our salvation.
Before entering Jerusalem, He stopped in the city of Bethany, where Lazarus
(whom he raised from the tomb) with his two sisters Mary and Martha lived. In
Hebrew Bethany means “The House of the Poor”. His stop in Bethany before
reaching Jerusalem was a sign of both His acceptance of poverty and His
readiness to offer Himself as a sacrifice. He is the One who accepted poverty
for our own benefit and came to live in poverty with the poor and escort them to
heaven, the Kingdom of His Father.
After His short Stop in Bethany, Jesus entered Jerusalem to fulfill all the
prophecies, purposes and the work of the Lord since the dawn of history. All the
scripture accounts were fulfilled and completed with his suffering, torture,
crucifixion, death and resurrection. On the Cross, He cried with a loud voice:
“It is finished.” He bowed his head, and gave up his spirit.(John19/30)
The multitude welcomed Jesus when He entered Jerusalem so one of the Old
Testament prophecies would be fulfilled. (Zechariah 9:9-10): “Rejoice greatly,
Daughter Zion! Shout, Daughter Jerusalem! See, your King comes to you, righteous
and victorious, lowly and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey. I
will take away the chariots from Ephraim and the warhorses from Jerusalem, and
the battle bow will be broken. He will proclaim peace to the nations. His rule
will extend from sea to sea and from the River to the ends of the earth”.
The crowd welcomed Jesus for different reasons and numerous expectations. There
were those who came to listen to His message and believed in Him, while others
sought a miraculous cure for their ailments and they got what they came for, but
many others envisaged in Him a mortal King that could liberate their country,
Israel, and free them from the yoke of the Roman occupation. Those were
disappointed when Jesus told them: “My Kingdom is not an earthly kingdom” (John
18/36)
Christ came to Jerusalem to die on its soil and fulfill the scriptures. It was
His choice where to die in Jerusalem as He has said previously: “should not be a
prophet perish outside of Jerusalem” (Luke 13/33): “Nevertheless, I must go on
my way today and tomorrow and the day following, for it cannot be that a prophet
should perish away from Jerusalem”.
He has also warned Jerusalem because in it all the prophets were killed: (Luke
13:34-35): “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones
those sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, just as
a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you would not have it! “behold,
your house is left to you desolate; and I say to you, you will not see Me until
the time comes when you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord”.
Explanation of the Palm Sunday Procession Symbols
The crowd chanted, “Hosanna to the Son of David” “Blessed is he who comes in the
name of the Lord!” “Hosanna in the highest!” (Matthew 21/09), because Jesus was
is a descendant of David. Hosanna in the highest is originated in the Psalm
118/25: “Please, LORD, please save us. Please, LORD, please give us success”. It
is a call for help and salvation as also meant by the Psalm 26/11: “But I lead a
blameless life; redeem me and be merciful to me”. Hosanna also means: God
enlightened us and will never abandon us, Jesus’ is a salvation for the world”
Spreading cloth and trees’ branches in front of Jesus to walk on them was an Old
Testament tradition that refers to love, obedience, submission, triumph and
loyalty. (2 Kings 09/13): “They hurried and took their cloaks and spread them
under him on the bare steps. Then they blew the trumpet and shouted, “Jehu is
king!”. In the old days Spreading garments before a dignitary was a symbol of
submission.
Zion is a hill in Jerusalem, and the “Daughter of Zion” is Jerusalem. The term
is synonymous with “paradise” and the sky in its religious dimensions.
Carrying palm and olive branches and waving with them expresses joy, peace,
longing for eternity and triumph. Palm branches are a sign of victory and
praise, while Olive branches are a token of joy, peace and durability. The Lord
was coming to Jerusalem to conquer death by death and secure eternity for the
faithful. It is worth mentioning that the olive tree is a symbol for peace and
its oil a means of holiness immortality with which Kings, Saints, children and
the sick were anointed.
The name “King of Israel,” symbolizes the kingship of the Jews who were waiting
for Jehovah to liberate them from the Roman occupation.
O, Lord Jesus, strengthen our faith to feel closer to You and to Your mercy when
in trouble;
O, Lord Jesus, empower us with the grace of patience and meekness to endure
persecution, humiliation and rejection and always be Your followers.
O, Lord Let Your eternal peace and gracious love prevail all over the world.
A joyous Palm Sunday to all.
Health Ministry: 2,957 new Corona cases, 45 deaths
NNA /March 27/2021
The Ministry of Public Health announced in its daily report, on Saturday, the
registration of 2,957 new Corona infections; thus raising the total number of
confirmed cases to-date to 458,338.
It also indicated that 45 deaths were reported during the past 24 hours.
Firas Abiad: AstraZeneca vaccine will be offered on Monday
in several centers, including our hospital
NNA /March 27/2021
"On Monday, the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health will start giving the
AstraZeneca vaccine to people between the ages of 55 and 65 in several centers,
including Rafic Hariri University Hospital," tweeted RHUH Director, Dr. Firas
Abiad, today.
He added: "In Lebanon, more than 120 patients in this age group have died due to
Corona in the past ten days only. The vaccine can prevent this. Several studies
have shown that the AstraZeneca vaccine is safe and effective. In the United
Kingdom, millions of patients received this vaccine, which led to a sharp
decrease in Corona cases. Europe is considering halting exports of the
AstraZeneca vaccine to speed-up the vaccination campaign in European countries."
"In Lebanon, the number of Coronavirus cases is rising, and the easing of
measures and low compliance with safety guidelines will lead to higher infection
rates. For older patients or those with comorbidities, the partial protection
that vaccines provide can denote the difference between life and death," Abiad
emphasized."However, some people say they will not take the AstraZeneca vaccine
if given the opportunity. Some raise concerns about safety or efficacy, and some
prefer to wait for another vaccine, while others do not want any vaccine at all,
although the alternative may be infection," he went on. Abiad hoped that "the
people who will get an appointment to receive the vaccine on Monday will not
waste their chance, for their sake, and for the sake of their family and
friends."
Press Release: Amer Fakhoury Foundation Speaks To US
Officials In Washington
بيان صادر عن مؤسسة الشهيد عامر فاخوري: لقاءات مهمة لممثلين عن المؤسسة في العاصمة
الأميركية مع مسؤولين ورسميين كبار من بينهم السناتور تد كروز وسفير وزارة الخارجية
الأمريكية روجر كارستينس والمبعوث الرئاسي لشؤون الرهائن، وكارلوس ديجوانا، نائب
مدير شؤون الرهائن في الأردن ولبنان.
Amer Fakhoury Foundation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 27/2021
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/97383/press-release-amer-fakhoury-foundation-speaks-to-us-officials-in-washington/
AMER FAKHOURY FOUNDATION DELEGATION SPEAKS TO US OFFICIALS IN WASHINGTON
Fakhoury’s Daughters Invited to DC to Share Their Story with Senator and State
Department Officials
WASHINGTON, DC – Amer Fakhoury Foundation (AFF) representatives were invited to
the Capitol on Thursday, March 25, 2021 to share the story of US citizen Amer
Fakhoury’s illegal detainment and torture in Lebanon and resulting death. AFF’s
delegation was comprised of Fakhoury’s four daughters, who co-founded the
foundation in his name.
In a meeting with Senator Ted Cruz (TX), the AFF delegation thanked him for his
work with Senator Shaheen (NH) in eventually securing Mr. Fakhoury’s freedom.
Discussion included sharing Fakhoury’s story and how AFF and Cruz can engage to
lessen Hezbollah’s influence in Lebanon. Senator Cruz stated, “We share the same
values and vision, and we want to work with you to share your [Amer’s] story.”
Following, the AFF delegation met with US State Department Ambassador Roger
Carstens, Presidential Envoy of Hostage Affairs, and Carlos A. DeJuana, Deputy
Director for Jordan and Lebanon. After sharing the details of torture and
maltreatment Amer Fakhoury received in Lebanon, the officials were briefed on
the foundation’s work, including emotional and financial support for families of
hostages.
Discussion topics moved to the current situation in Lebanon, Hezbollah’s
influence, and the consequential financial crisis impacting Lebanese citizens.
AFF shared their firsthandperspective on systemic government corruption,
including the frequency of Lebanese government officials diverting aid money to
personal interests. Finally, AFF exposed gaps in existing processes which often
slow the return of hostages.
Ambassador Carstens and Deputy DeJuana shared future policy insights, then
applauded the AFF co-founders’ passion in helping US hostages and advocacy for
the people victimized by the corrupt Lebanese government.
Ambassador Carstens concluded by requesting AFF’s assistance in developing a
guidebook for families of hostage victims and both officials expressed their
desire to work with AFF in order to better the current system.
Email:
guilafakhoury@fakhouryfoundation.org
For more information on the Amer Fakhoury Foundation visit:
https://www.amerfakhouryfoundation.org
Contact: Guila Fakhoury, President and Director
Telephone: +1 978-255-3671
Report: U.S., EU to Hold ‘Zoom’ Meeting on Lebanon on
Monday
Naharnet/March 27/2021
The United States and the European Union are reportedly expected to discuss the
controversial situation in Lebanon during a virtual meeting on Monday, Nidaa al-Watan
newspaper reported on Saturday.
The daily quoted prominent sources who said the meeting will be held through a
‘Zoom’ meeting on Monday, and will address the “Lebanese file in terms of
assessing the situation, in preparation for taking appropriate measures.”The
source added on condition of anonymity, that interlocutors have “impositions of
sanctions” as one of the options on the table, and will discuss “imposing joint
sanctions on parties obstructing the formation of a government in Lebanon.” Last
week, shuttle diplomacy has been active in Lebanon in a bid to assess the
political situation amid failed efforts of Lebanese leaders to form a
much-needed government capable of steering the country out of multiple crises.
Ambassadors of the United States, France and Saudi Arabia met with Lebanon’s top
leaders last week.
The PM-designate Saad Hariri made several trips abroad recently in a bid to ease
the government deadlock. Nidaa el-Watan, said that according to diplomatic
reports, France obtained information that “Hizbullah is seriously working to
destroy the French initiative by aggravating disputes between President Michel
Aoun and Hariri.”
Khalas': Shea Scolds Lebanese Leaders over Govt. Delay
Naharnet/March 27/2021
U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Dorothy Shea has called on Lebanon’s feuding
politicians to stop making crippling demands regarding the new government. "Khalas!"
Shea said in excerpts of an interview with Lebanese news portal Asas Media,
using a Lebanese term that roughly translates into “enough is enough”.She added
that politicians should stop making all sorts of demands, stressing that the
Lebanese people want a new government and want politicians to put their disputes
aside and carry out reforms in order to stop the deterioration.
Lebanon Rolls out Astrazeneca Vaccine on Monday
Naharnet/March 27/2021
The Health Ministry will start rolling out the AstraZeneca vaccine for people in
the 55-65 yrs category, said Director of the Rafik Hariri University Hospital on
Saturday. Abiad said the Rafik Hariri University Hospital, the lead hospital
against the fight against COVID-19, “will be one of the designated centers.”
After reports linking the vaccine to an increased risk of blood clots, Abiad
assured that “numerous studies have shown that the AstraZeneca vaccine is safe
and effective. Millions of patients have received the vaccine in the UK,
resulting in a sharp decline in Covid cases.”
He urged people to go for any brand of COVID-19 vaccine and not to wait of
alternatives in order to stop the spread of the virus and a decline in virus
cases. “People offered the vaccine on Monday should not pass their chance, for
their sake, and for the sake of their family and friends,” he said.
Lebanon’s national vaccination campaign began Feb. 14 and has been criticized as
too slow and riddled by violations.
The World Bank has allocated $34 million to inoculate an initial two million of
Lebanon's six million inhabitants free of charge with the Pfizer-BioNTech
vaccine
Ibrahim in Paris at Invitation of His French Counterpart
Naharnet/March 27/2021
General Security chief Abbas Ibrahim traveled to Paris at the invitation of his
French counterpart, the National News Agency reported on Saturday.
Abbas will reportedly meet with political and security officials in France. The
talks with officials are to focus on security files related to Lebanon, and the
controversial formation of a Lebanese government, according to MTV television
station.
Kanaan after meeting Rahi: Bkirki takes initiative and does
not adopt anyone's position; same baseline points for salvation with Baabda
NNA/March 27/2021
Maronite Patriarch, Cardinal Bechara Boutros al-Rahi, met in Bkirki today with
Finance and Budget Parliamentary Committee Head, MP Ibrahim Kanaan. On emerging,
Kanaan hailed the Patriarch's positions and initiatives in this difficult period
that aim at saving Lebanon and helping it overcome its crises, with the
cooperation of all parties and without adopting any of the political stances
presented. "It was evident to me during this meeting that the baseline between
Baabda and Bkirki is one and the reform goals required of the Patriarch are the
goals of His Excellency the President of the Republic, and there are efforts by
Bkirki to reach common denominators to get out of the situation we are in,"
revealed Kanaan. He added: "The country is in need of good initiatives, and we
want to reach results, reform and a project. It is not possible to go to
classical governments, as was the case in the past, which practically turn into
governments of barricades...Consequently, the most important thing is the common
vision to save Lebanon in all the accounts that are presented." Kanaan concluded
by expressing all hope and faith that resurrection will follow the sufferings
that the Lebanese are currently enduring, "and it will be at the hands of great
men, the most prominent of whom is His Excellency the President, His Beatitude
the Patriarch, and all the good people who want cooperation, because the
resurrection is that of Lebanon and the Lebanese society in all its spectrums."
FPM: We will not participate in the government nor give it
confidence on the grounds proposed by the PM-designate
NNA/March 27/2021
The Free Patriotic Movement's political council held its periodic meeting
electronically on Saturday, chaired by Movement Chief Gebran Bassil, following
which it issued a statement indicating that "after the end of the parade staged
by the Prime Minister-designate at the Presidential Palace in search for
electoral popularity, he ought to return to the constitutional principles that
he knows well and which he had previously adopted in forming every government,
because it is the only way to form any cabinet of any kind."
The statement stressed that "the Free Patriotic Movement will not participate in
the government and will not give it confidence on the foundations proposed by
the PM-designate," expressing refusal "to give the PM-designate and his team 'a
half plus one power' in the government because he will use it to prevent reform,
disrupt the forensic audit and brake all attempts to fight corruption." "There
are internal and external reasons that have prevented the PM-designate until now
from seriously resolving to form the government and camouflaging these reasons
by orchestrating flimsy arguments, considering time in his favor as long as he
does not bear direct responsibility for stopping the collapse, but rather throws
the responsibility on the president of the republic and the caretaker
government," the statement went on.
The FPM political body criticized the PM-designate and his supporting political
team for "fabricating a crisis with the head of state, and creating the problem
of the third veto power, which was never a goal or demand in itself by the
president who announced this repeatedly..."
It added that the PM-designate "also fabricates the issue of the size of cabinet
and clings to the number 18 because it clearly and deliberately excludes the
diversity of two basic components in the country (Catholics and Druze), and he
refuses to move to the numbers of 20, 22 or 24, even though there are solutions
to what he complains about in regards to the third veto and specialization..."
Moreover, the political council criticized the PM-designate for keeping the
cabinet formation in a stand-by mode while the Lebanese suffer from the
deteriorating conditions, without venturing into presenting an integrated
government line-up or at least a clear methodological paper that is agreed upon
between PM-designate Saad Hariri and President Michel Aoun and has the approval
of the majority of parliamentary blocs. The FPM body concluded its statement by
emphasizing that escaping reform cannot last forever, as the government will
eventually be formed and the Movement will play the role of constructive
opposition from the outside, within the parliament and in the street, and will
continue to pursue the cabinet positively until it complies with the necessity
of conducting the forensic audit and recovering the money transferred abroad and
applying the Capital Control, alongside the necessary reforms needed to stop the
public waste expenditure, control revenues and stop all forms of corruption in
the state administrations, and so on...It also pledged that FPM will continue
the struggle to uncover the facts about the stolen depositors 'money, the
policies that led to that, and plans and solutions to return the looted funds.
Future Movement in response to Bassil: For a government
that undertakes to stop the collapse, renew the confidence of brethrens in
Lebanon's role, not the confidence of Gebran and his council
NNA|/March 26/2021
Future Movement political bureau responded in a statement this evening to the
Free Patriotic Movement, criticizing MP Gebran Bassil for trying to eliminate
any glimmer of hope for getting out of the blocked tunnel by FPM's standards.
"Former Minister Bassil insists on taking the governmental crisis to a sectarian
end, and surrounding it with conditions that play on the sectarian chord and the
rights of Christians, similar to the content of the last statement by the
political council of the Mirna Shalouhi Movement," the Future statement said.
"It seems that Bassil has forgotten, or is forgetting, the criteria that were
agreed upon at the Pine Palace, based exclusively on forming a government of
non-partisan specialists," the statement underlined. "Yet, we believe that
former Minister Bassil has not forgotten but is rather deliberately playing on
the edge of sectarian incitement, jumping from standard to standard to guarantee
the third veto power, and creating for the Lebanese public opinion a new excuse
and a political bogeyman called 'half plus one' for the PM-designate," the
Future political bureau said. The statement went on to indicate that "there are
those who consider cheating, lying and fraud as special skills of some
people...However, the use of these skills in political action and in confronting
economic and daily-living risks is classified under the category of 'national
crimes'...Unfortunately, this is the case of the Lebanese with Minister Gebran
Bassil, who says that he refuses to participate in the government and then sets
the criteria for its formation and justifies the President of the Republic's
demand for a third veto power, and renders himself as an exclusive guardian over
the rights of the Christian communities, then insinuates to the Prime
Minister-designate that he will not give confidence to the government."
"We understand the confusion that Gebran Bassil suffers, but we do not
understand that he considers the political decision of the Republic Presidency
as being in his hands, and that he blames the Prime Minister-designate for the
consequences of the reactions caused by his special team working at Baabda
Palace, cornering the Presidency with practices that expose it to criticism,
ridicule, and challenge its constitutionality, as is the example of the
scandalous guidance model that has no precedent in the course of formation since
the establishment of the State of Greater Lebanon," the statement underscored.
Finally, the Future Movement's political bureau stressed that "the Prime
Minister-designate assumes his constitutional and national responsibilities to
the fullest, and will not relinquish the rules that he adopted to form the
government, which are complementary to the commended French initiative."
Moreover, it emphasized that there will be no third veto power to anyone within
the next cabinet, which will be comprised of non-partisans and specialists,
known for their integrity and competence, "a mission government that takes
charge of stopping the collapse and renewing the confidence of brothers and
friends in the role and message of Lebanon.""This is the confidence we are
seeking, not that of Gebran and his political council!" the statement concluded.
Bukhari from Mukhtara: We stand before a joint historical
responsibility to confirm that we are with Lebanon's Arabism
NNA/March 26/2021
Progressive Socialist Party Chief, Walid Jumblatt, met at his Mukhtara Palace
this afternoon with Saudi Ambassador to Lebanon, Walid Al-Bukhari, who visited
him in the presence of "Democratic Gathering" Head, MP Taymour Jumblatt, and
Deputies Nehme Tohme and Wael Abu Faour.
The general political situation prevailing in the country, particularly the
government formation issue, topped their discussion. Jumblatt briefed the Saudi
Ambassador on his viewpoints in respect to the status quo and his proposal
regarding the government settlement to get the country out of its current
crises.
During the encounter, emphasis was made on the historical relationship between
the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Mukhtara. "Al-Mukhtara, with its historical
and Arab heritage, is a guarantee of the Mountain and the unity of Lebanon, and
we stand before a joint historical responsibility to confirm that we are with
the Arab identity of Lebanon," Al-Bukhari said. "We have been, and will remain
Arab Christians and Muslims, as long as the Mukhtara church and mosque remains,"
the Saudi diplomat corroborated. Following the meeting, Ambassador Al-Bukhari
visited Prince Shakib Arslan's Mosque in Mukhtara, where he performed his
prayer, and then moved to the shrine of Martyr Mentor Kamal Jumblatt, where he
recited the "Fatiha" for his soul.
Beirut neighborhood gets vision of hope after blast
Reuters|/March 26/2021
Offre Joie (Joy of Giving) NGO has repaired Lebanese districts hit by war and
violence since 1985 and now it is working to rebuild a low-income area
devastated by deadly explosion in capital's port
The sheer scale of the destruction in Beirut's Karantina district after the
massive explosion at the port last August made rebuilding a daunting feat. That
was where Marc Torbey El Helou, a charity worker, came in.
Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter. The low-income neighborhood was one of
the closest to the blast that killed 200 people. It stands across from the
giant, mutilated grain silo that has become a symbol of the tragedy.
Helou decided a day after the explosion to dedicate himself, and the aid group
he runs, to rebuilding the neighborhood. Just removing the rubble required 300
truckloads. Some buildings needed immediate help to stop them collapsing. Helou
says the same of Karantina's residents. "There were children here who would not
laugh or play for months."The neighborhood is home to Lebanese, Syrian and other
residents, a fire brigade and dozens of stores selling everything from car parts
to clay pots. All were hit hard. Helou's charity, Offre Joie (Joy of Giving),
has repaired Lebanese districts hit by war and violence since 1985.
“Dangerous chemical” threat adds to Lebanon’s woes
The Arab Weekly/March 27/2021
BEIRUT--Lebanon’s outgoing Prime Minister, Hassan Diab, said on Friday that
experts had found “dangerous chemicals” at a warehouse at the Zahrani oil
installations in the south.
Diab said the country’s atomic energy authority had identified the substances as
“nuclear” after reviewing a report by German company Combi Lift, which Lebanon
had tasked with clearing hazardous material at Beirut port.
A Combi Lift spokesman said they did not have any knowledge of the Zahrani
issue. If the substances are indeed “nuclear”, their origin is unclear. They
could be medical waste but ought not to be spent nuclear fuel rods. The only
Arab country with nuclear power is the UAE which is this month just starting up
its two nuclear reactors.
“This needs to be discussed now and needs to be dealt with promptly,” a
statement by Lebanon’s higher defence council cited Diab as saying after a
meeting. His comments came nearly eight months after a stockpile of chemicals
detonated in Beirut, killing nearly 200 people in one of the largest non-nuclear
explosions on record. The ammonium nitrate went up in flames last August after
being stored unsafely at the port for years.
Diab’s cabinet has served in a caretaker capacity since resigning over the
devastation that hit much of the Lebanese capital, compounding the country’s
financial crisis.
After Lebanon hired Combi Lift last year in the wake of the blast, the German
firm said it had found 58 containers at Beirut port that posed a threat to the
city. Some of it had been there for more than a decade.
The German ambassador to Beirut, Andreas Kindl, said this month the materials in
the Beirut containers were packed well but were waiting to be shipped out for
disposal in Germany, as Lebanon had yet to make a $2 million payment stipulated
in the contract.
Combi Lift spokesman Malte Steinhoff said on Friday the containers were still in
Beirut amid talks with Lebanese authorities over financing.
“We…hope to find a solution this month,” he said.
Worst crisis in decades
Lebanon is currently facing the worst crisis since its civil war, with the
country economically, politically and socially.
Just 18 months have passed since mass protests against Lebanon’s political class
brought down one government, and nearly eight more months since a huge explosion
destroyed the port of Beirut and toppled its successor.
Since then the currency has lost 90 percent of its value, inflation has driven
more than half the population below the poverty line, the country has defaulted
on its debts, and banks have all but cut clients off from their dollar deposits.
Scenes of shoppers brawling over scarce goods, protesters burning tyres to block
roads, and hundreds of shuttered businesses are now commonplace.
A vibrant Beirut has turned into a ghost-town in eerie darkness, as the outgoing
energy minister warns that a total black-out is looming as fuel for electricity
runs out. Yet even as Lebanon hurtles towards outright collapse, in the worst
crisis since the 1975-1990 civil war, bickering politicians are either unwilling
or unable to form a government.
Saad al-Hariri, the Sunni Muslim three-time prime minister designated by
parliament to form a cabinet, stormed out of his 18th meeting with President
Michel Aoun this week. He said Aoun’s Christian party, led by the president’s
son-in-law Gebran Bassil, wanted to dictate cabinet seats and have veto power
over decisions.
“As of today you have to satisfy Gebran Bassil’s conditions; he has the pen of
the president,” said one government source.
Hariri, son of Rafik al-Hariri, the post-war premier assassinated in 2005, has
called for a technocrat cabinet that must enact reforms long demanded by the IMF
and donor countries such as the United States and France. He is backed by the
Shi’ite Amal party, led by influential House Speaker Nabih Berri and others.
Overshadowing what might otherwise look like a sectarian squabble over sharing
the diminishing pie of Lebanon’s spoils system is the power of Hezbollah, the
Iran-backed Shi’ite group that dominates Lebanon politics and underpins Aoun’s
presidency.
Like other Arab countries such as Iraq and Syria, Lebanon has long been an arena
of proxy competition between Shi’ite Iran and Sunni Saudi Arabia, with
traditionally influential Christians divided between the two.
With a new administration in Washington reassessing policy towards Iran, the
regional balance of power is shifting. For now, Hezbollah, as Iran’s main
client, appears reluctant to back a new government that might be seen as
offering a concession to Saudi- and Western-backed rivals such as Hariri.
While it agrees on the need for a government, Hezbollah is not ready to pressure
Aoun and risk its alliance with his large Christian party.
Need for solutions
The most optimistic scenario would see a capable government, able to regain
local and international confidence, and implement reforms international lenders
have demanded, such as an overhaul of the wasteful power sector, audit of the
central bank and restructuring of the bloated public sector. “Everyone knows
what fiscal and monetary reforms are needed,” a senior official source said.
The pessimistic scenario would see a further collapse in the pound and
plummeting economic growth, already measured at minus 25% of GDP by the IMF last
year and minus 19% of GDP by the World Bank.
The economy is shrinking so fast it is difficult to measure precisely, but on
present trends this year’s contraction is set to be around 10% of GDP, the
source said. The remaining foreign exchange reserves estimated at $16 billion
are draining away: with roughly $500 million a month on fuel, wheat and medicine
subsidies; $75 million to $100 million a month spent by the state, and at least
$100 million a month when the Central Bank intervenes in the currency market.
Some officials, diplomats and politicians are inclined towards pessimism: “I
don’t think the parties want a solution,” the senior official source said.
“It’s not so important who the prime minister is, what matters is the criteria
and implementation, regaining confidence and credibility,” he said. “The current
government started by persuading the parties to go to the IMF (and) any
successor government will have to do the same. They have no choice.”As long as
the paralysis continues, it is hard to fathom how bad the situation can get. Dan
Azzi, former chief executive of Standard Chartered Bank in Lebanon, said a
scenario could evolve in which the currency tumbles further, all basic functions
of government cease to exist and chaos spreads. “If we continue like this…total
control will be lost on society. This means you are driving down a road and
someone with a weapon can stop you kill you, take your car, money and wife.”
Nabil Boumonsef, deputy editor-in-chief of An-Nahar daily, said: “I don’t see
any solutions, I see an open-ended crisis.”
What’s at stake
While Hariri blames Aoun’s demands for holding up a government, the president
has so far remained intransigent. Sources who meet Aoun quote him as saying he
is not responsible for the financial crisis: as power has been held for most of
the last three decades by Hariri, Hariri’s father and Berri, they should be the
ones making concessions, the president believes. The sources say Aoun’s attitude
has hardened since Washington imposed sanctions on his son-in-law Bassil, the
man he was grooming as a contender for president. “There is total change. He’s
not ready to make any concessions at all,” one visitor said. The scale of
financial losses and a planned audit of state finances turned into a point of
friction in Lebanon last year, bringing IMF talks to a halt, as top bankers and
lawmakers torpedoed the outgoing government’s draft recovery plan. Western
donors have made clear they won’t bail out Lebanon without reforms to tackle
enshrined corruption and the crushing debt, and revive IMF talks. Gulf Arab
states that once funnelled money to Lebanon have shut the taps, wary of the
expanding role of Iran’s client Hezbollah. Despite the meltdown, the parties
that form the ruling elite appear more concerned with securing seats in next
year’s parliamentary elections than enacting reforms, diplomats and sources
close to power say. “For them it’s a political game. It’s about who’s going to
win. The total collapse, the economic and social costs are not a priority for
them. It’s a battle of existence for them, they think they can discuss the costs
later,” a source close to government sources said.
“They think they can last a bit longer, but nobody knows where the breaking
point is,” added another political source.
US defence contractor pleads guilty to espionage for Hezbollah
Eric Tucker/The Arab Weekly/March 27/2021
WASHINGTON--A woman who worked as a contract linguist for the US military in
Iraq pleaded guilty Friday to sharing classified information with a romantic
interest linked to the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah. Mariam Taha Thompson
was arrested last year in an espionage case that investigators said put the
lives of American military members and confidential sources at risk and
represented a significant breach of classified information. Thompson, 63 and
formerly of Rochester, Minnesota, pleaded guilty to a single count of delivering
national defence information to aid a foreign government. She admitted as part
of a deal that she shared the names of US government assets with a Lebanese man
with connections to Hezbollah. Assistant Attorney General John Demers, the
Justice Department’s top national security official, said in a statement that
the actions represented “a disgraceful personal and professional betrayal of the
country and colleagues.” Sentencing was scheduled for June 23. Thompson
began communicating with the man, whom she never met in person, in 2017 after
being connected via social media by a family member, and she ultimately
developed a romantic interest in him, prosecutors said.
After a January 2020 US strike that killed Iran’s top general, Qassem Soleimani,
the Lebanese man — who is not named in court papers — asked Thompson to provide
“them” with information about the human assets that had helped the US target
Soleimani.
Investigators say Thompson accessed dozens of files about human sources,
including their names, photographs, background information and operational
cables that described the information they had gathered. She agreed to provide
the classified information to the man; officials say she had planned to marry
him, and was afraid he would end her relationship if she did not cooperate.
Lebanon food prices become MENA’s most expensive: World
Bank
Tala Michel Issa, Al Arabiya English/27 March ,2021
Lebanon’s food prices have become the highest in the Middle East and North
African region, as inflation rates continued to soar amid one of the country’s
worst economic crises to date, according to the World Bank. In the World Bank’s
periodic assessment of the repercussions brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic
on food price inflation in the MENA region, they found that between Feb. 14,
2020 and March 8, 2021, prices surged across all food categories. The country’s
inflation rate in 2020 rose to almost 85 percent, Lebanese newspaper The Daily
Star reported, adding that it hit its highest point since 1992. By the end of
2020, inflation stood at 145.8 percent. The World Bank assessed food prices of
five main food categories in 19 different countries across the region, including
carbohydrates, fruits, meats, dairy products and vegetables. Fresh and frozen
cattle meat prices jumped by 110 percent during the assessment period,
indicating the highest increase in price for this item in the region. Lebanon,
Syria, and Djibouti were the only three countries to record a rise of over 35
percent in this category. The average price increase in this category across the
rest of the region was 11 percent.
Shoppers walk past an empty shelf at a supermarket in Beirut, Lebanon
The price of eggs increased by an average of 7 percent for the rest of the
region while Lebanon, Djibouti, Iran, Syria and Yemen saw a rise of more than 20
percent in the price of eggs. Potato prices in Lebanon rose by just over 71
percent, accounting for the highest in MENA while the prices of frozen chicken
rose by 68.4 percent. The World Bank also found that the prices of apples and
oranges in the country grew by 58.2 and 58.4 percent respectively. Beirut-based
grocery store manager Ziad Hassan told the New York Times on Monday that instead
of the daily email from the supermarket chain’s management to inform him to
adjust the pricing of grocery items, he began to receive emails as often as
three times a day, ordering price increases. He added that his employees would
often not have enough time to finish marking the products with new prices before
the next one arrived.
Eighteen months have passed since mass protests against the country’s political
class began and since then, the Lebanese lira has lost 90 percent of its value,
driving more than half the population below the poverty line, Reuters reported
on Friday. In August 2020, the United Nations estimated that over 55 percent of
the country’s population were trapped in poverty and had been struggling for
bare necessities, stating that extreme poverty registered a threefold increase
from 2019 to 2020. The country has been grappling with the impact of the Aug. 4
Beirut Port Blast which injured thousands and killed hundreds, extreme
hyperinflation, the coronavirus pandemic, and an incompetent ruling class.
Lebanon's largest Christian bloc warns
against sidelining president
BEIRUT (Reuters)
Lebanon’s largest Christian bloc, the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM), warned
prime minister-designate Saad al-Hariri on Saturday against sidelining President
Michel Aoun and other parliamentary blocs in talks over forming a cabinet.
Hariri and Aoun have been at loggerheads over the cabinet for months, dashing
hopes of a reversal of Lebanon’s deepening financial meltdown. Hariri has said
Aoun’s party is trying to dictate cabinet seats in order to gain veto power. The
FPM, which is headed by Gebran Bassil, who is also Aoun’s son-in-law, accused
Hariri of trying to orchestrate a majority for his own supporters. “The
political committee warns of the dangers of sidelining methods that the prime
minister-designate is using when dealing with the president and concerned
parliamentary blocs,” an FPM statement said.
Veteran Sunni politician Hariri was nominated in October to form a cabinet after
Hassan Diab’s government resigned in the wake of the Beirut port blast, which
killed 200 people and damaged large swathes of the city.
Diab’s government has stayed on in a caretaker capacity.
On Monday, the 18th meeting between Hariri and Aoun failed to produce any
concrete results. Lebanon is in the throes of a deep financial crisis that is
posing the biggest threat to its stability since the 1975-1990 civil war. A new
cabinet is needed to carry out reforms that could unlock foreign aid.
Writing by Maha El Dahan; Editing by Alex Richardson and Frances Kerry
Nabu Musée, Le prétendu gardien (sauveur) du Mashriq
Nelly P. Abboud
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/97364/nelly-p-abboud-the-nabu-museum-the-alleged-guardian-saviour-of-the-mashriq/
30 2020/Pàgs. 203–214/DOI 10.21001/rap.2020.30.10
Universitat de Lleida ISSN: 1131–883-X/ISSN electrònic: 2385–4723
www.rap.udl.cat
A private art and archaeological museum was inaugurated in 2018 on the
Mediterranean coast under the name of Nabu after the Mesopotamian God of Wisdom
and Writing. The museum exhibits a collection of more than 2,000 archaeological
artifacts from Lebanon, Syria, Palestine, Iraq, Egypt, and Yemen. Immediately
after its inauguration, the so-called museum was the subject of controversy as
to how and from where it had acquired its archaeological collection. The
co-founder and director of the museum, Jawad Adra, defended the ownership of
this collection and made reference to decree №3065 issued in 2016 that aims at
organizing the General Inventory of Old Movable Archaeological Items. This
article investigates this controversy, its context, causes, and implications.
Keywords: Lebanon, Archaeology, trade, private museums, laws.
En 2018, un musée privé d’archéologie et d’art a été inauguré sur la côte
méditerranéenne, baptisé du nom de dieu mésopotamien de la sagesse et de
l’écriture, Nabu. Le musée présente une collection de plus de 2000 pièces
archéologiques, originaires du Liban, Syrie, Palestine, Irak, Égypte et Yémen.
Juste après son inauguration, le soi-disant musée a provoqué une controverse
liée à la provenance et au mode d’acquisition de sa collection archéologique. Le
cofondateur et directeur du musée, Jawad Adra, a défendu la propriété de cette
collection en se référant à un décret, n ° 3065 publié en 2016, qui vise à
organiser l’inventaire général d’anciens objets archéologiques mobiliers. Cet
article traite de cette controverse, son contexte, causes et enjeux.
Mots-clés : Liban, archéologie, commerce, musées privés, lois.
Fig. 1. The Museum.
The Museum and the Collection
In September 2018, a new privately-owned museum, named after the Mesopotamian
God of Wisdom and Writing, Nabu opened its doors on the coast of El Herri,
Chekka, North Lebanon. The museum was co-founded by Jawad Adra, a businessman
and an art collector along with two renowned Iraqi artists, Dia Azzawi and
Mahmoud Obaidi, who also designed the rust steel cubical museum building.
Situated on the Mediterranean coast, with a stunning view out to the sea, the
museum displays a permanent collection of around 2000 archaeological artifacts
dating to the Bronze and Iron Ages, to Roman, Greek, and Byzantine periods. The
museum’s collection also includes contemporary works of art, paintings, and
sculptures by Lebanese and Arab artists. (22 September 2018. Nabu. Millennia of
Creativity, Museum Catalog, 79 p.)
Curated by Pascal Odille, an expert in Modern and Contemporary Art at the French
National Chamber of experts specialized in arts and collectibles (C.N.E.S.), the
museum’s first exhibition, Millennia of Creativity, compared 60 modern artworks
with around 400 archaeological pieces, coming from the Near Eastern region,
mainly Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Palestine, and Yemen.
Among the most prominent collections housed in the Nabu Museum, is the
Phoenician collection of around 66 funerary stelae, probably from the site of
Tyre Al-Bass, located in south Lebanon (Seeden 1992 a&b).
Another important collection is the Iraqi collection of cuneiform tablets, which
probably comes from the ancient lost city of Irisagrig, whose location was
discovered by looters but remains unknown to archaeologists. It should be noted
that, at present, most of the known cuneiform tablets are dispersed in
collections in the United States of America, Australia, Japan, Canada, the
United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, and France, among other places. Irisagrig
recently made the headlines with the Hobby Lobby case, when 450 cuneiform
tablets smuggled into the U.S., were seized by the American Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) and returned to Iraq.
The online database of Neo-Sumerian Texts, funded by the Spanish Ministry of
Science, which is updated regularly, lists the Nabu Museum, as the owner of 138
tablets from Irisagrig and seven others of unknown provenance.
Another famous collection is the General Moshe Dayan collection of ceramics and
bronze objects, mostly found in Palestine, of unspecified origin.
Moshe Dayan, an Israeli military and political figure held numerous ministerial
roles during the course of his political career: Agriculture, Defense, and
Foreign Affairs.
An amateur archaeologist, he performed illegal digs, looting different sites and
trading in antiquities. All these activities were described in detail by Raz
Kletter (Kletter 2003).
The Moshe Dayan Nabu collection was comprised of the gift allegedly made by
Dayan himself to his friends Helen & Paul Zuckerman, (An American businessman
and a philanthropist) and Irving Bern- stein (Executive vice-president of the
United Jewish Appeal — Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York, from
1971 to 1984). According to one of Bernstein’s sons: “the artifacts have a
well-established provenance, and they have passed through very few hands. As a
favor to Mr. Bernstein, many of the pieces have been identified, autographed,
and dated by Dayan himself.” This collection of gifts was later put up for
auction by the heirs of the Zuckerman and Bernstein families. According to the
catalog of the Moshe Dayan Nabu collection, (The Saadeh Cultural Foundation and
the Social & Cultural Development Association (INMA) Recover Palestine’s Looted
Antiquities, INMA, Beirut, 2015. (See <https://monthlymagazine.
com/article-desc_1810_>), this collection was purchased by two Lebanese NGOs:
The “Saadeh Cultural Foundation”, (Founded in 1999 and named after Antoun Saadeh,
the founder of the Syrian Social Nationalist Party in Lebanon, it aims at
spreading the philosophy of Mr. Saadeh) and the “Social and Cultural Development
Association (INMA)”, (An NGO founded in 1997, by Jawad Adra and his wife Zeina
Akar Adra. INMA scope of activities is based on serving a cluster of villages
and specific neighborhoods throughout Leb- anon. INMA projects cover health,
education, the environment, and income-generating activities.
<http://information-international. com/page/21/inma>) from two auction houses in
the United States of America in 2012.
Another important collection is the Palmyrene Funerary Reliefs, originating from
the ancient city of Palmyra, modern-day Tadmour in Syria (Abousamra 2016 &
2018). This is a UNESCO World Heritage Site that has been subjected to massive
waves of destruction and looting since the ISIL militants took over the city and
destroyed the Temple of Baalshamin on the 23rd August 2015.
Terracotta votive figurines from the site of Tell Halaf, located in North-East
of Syria, near the Turkish border, also feature among the most prominent museum
collections.
Artifacts, mainly alabaster statues and funerary stelae, whose provenance is
labeled as the south of the Arabian Peninsula, without referring directly to the
Republic of Yemen, are also mentioned on the museum’s website.
The controversy
Helen Sader, professor and Chair at the Department of History and Archaeology at
the American University of Beirut, and the author of various articles on looting
and private collectors (Sader 2012–2013) was the first to raise the issue of the
Nabu Museum in her plenary address at the American Schools of Oriental Research
(ASOR) annual meeting, that took place in Denver, last November.
In her address entitled “Between Looters and Collectors, and Warlords: Does
Archaeology Stand a Chance?”, she expressed her dismay at how no one inquired
about the origin of the finds exhibited in this museum. Sader continues and asks
how the museum’s owners were not only able to purchase looted artifacts but also
appear to have the right to display them ‘legally’ in a private museum without
being questioned?
Since then, a few modest voices have been heard discussing the Nabu issue. Yet
despite this controversy surrounding the Nabu Museum and its suspicious
collection, not a single official public statement was issued by the Lebanese
Ministry of Culture, nor by the General Directorate of Antiquities (DGA), which
is the rightful guardian of Lebanon’s heritage and the only entity authorized to
investigate and take the measures needed to stop any illegal action.
In the same way as the Lebanese, no Syrian official body has taken any official
stance, nor have they made any statements whatsoever regarding the acquisition
of Syrian looted artifacts by the Nabu Museum. In contrast, the Iraqi
Ambassador, Ali Al Aamiri, stated in an interview with the Lebanese newspaper Al
Modon, that the Iraqi embassy in Beirut refuses to disclose any details
regarding this matter. Their official comment was restricted to vaguely stating
that the Iraqi government might follow any necessary legal procedures to deal
with the Nabu Museum issue (Merhi 2019).
The Iraqi archaeologist and the translator into Arabic of The catastrophe! The
Looting and Destruction of Iraq’s Past (Mcguire 2008), Abed Es-Salam Sobhi Taha
wrote an article in Arabic, whose translated into English title is: “The memory
of Iraq in the black market” published, in the Iraqi magazine Beyn Nahreyn. In
this article, Taha demands Nabu Museum “to have the wisdom of the Mesopotamian
God Nabu and to return its heritage to its country.” (Taha 2019: 5).
In April 2019, the Nabu Museum and eleven other museums celebrated the Night at
the Museum annual event, which has been organized by the Lebanese Ministry of
Culture since 2016, in partnership with the French Embassy in Beirut and in
conjunction with the yearly celebration of the Francophonie month.
Including a ‘suspicious museum’ in the list of museums taking part generated
controversy among archaeologists and museum professionals working in the public
and the private sector. The author of this article addressed an open letter to
all museum professionals, on March 30th, 2019, a few days before the Night at
the Museum event, which was shared by email and on social media platforms,
urging the custodians of the National Museum, the Higher Commission of Museums,
the National Committee of the International Council of Museums, and the
Directors of University Museums to speak up and fight against the inclusion of
the so-called “Nabu museum” in the Night at the Museum event, bearing in mind
that such an act would legitimize the Museum and its collections.
The letter received different reactions but remained without an official
response from any of the organizers and participants directly concerned in the
event. However, a few archaeologists and DGA employees, voiced objections and
boycotted the event, and refused to participate in the celebration.
Following this open letter, a campaign was launched on social media, with the
aim to spread awareness regarding the origin of the artifacts on display at the
Nabu Museum and to put pressure on officials to take legal measures, in order to
conform to national and international laws. Sadly, however, it received only
modest support from national and local newspapers and television stations.
In response to this campaign, the Nabu Museum hit back with massive media
coverage for the museum and its collection, and they lost no opportunity to
justify the fact that they are collecting and exhibiting artifacts, and they
avoided the issue of how and from where they acquired them.
In a TV interview in a program called The Orient Bells, that was aired on June
7th, 2019 on Al Mayadeen, a Lebanese Pan-Arab satellite television station, Mr.
Adra, defended his right to own these artifacts claiming that the Nabu Museum is
saving the cultural heritage of the ‘nation’. According to Mr. Adra, this
concept of the ‘nation’ goes beyond the Lebanese borders and takes in Syria,
Iraq, Palestine, Jordan, and Egypt.
To understand this ideology better, it should be borne in mind that Mr. Adra,
one of the founders and the director of the museum, is a member of the political
bureau of the Syrian Socialist Nationalist Party (SSNP). The SSNP was founded in
Beirut, by Antoun Saadeh, in 1932, as an anti-colonial and national liberation
organization, modeled on European fascist movements, in order to fight French
colonialism. The SSNP operates in Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and Palestine,
with close political ties to the Ba’ath National Progressive Front, the
governing party in Syria.
The SSNP ideology rejects the borders first drawn up under the Sykes–Picot
agreement in 1916, on the basis that the borders outlining the newly created
states were fictitious, resulting from colonialism, and do not reflect any
historical and social realities. The party maintains that Greater or “natural”
Syria represents the national ideal which encompasses the historical people of
Mesopotamia and the Fertile Crescent, all of whom belong to a common historical,
social and cultural development path (Saadeh, 2004).
Using this doctrine as a starting point, the Nabu Museum is preserving and
promoting the Cultural Heritage of Greater Syria and does not possess artifacts
from other countries, but only from the Greater Syria nation. Nabu considers
itself to be the legitimate guardian and keeper of the heritage of a nation that
formed a single unit in ancient times and still remains so according to the
ideology of those behind the creation of this museum.
Private Museums in Lebanon and Looting
The Nabu Museum is not the first, nor the only private archaeological museum in
Lebanon that has been enriched by purchased artifacts.
In Lebanon, the majority of archeology and history museums are public state
museums. Apart from the National Museum of Beirut, regional site museums have
emerged since the end of the civil war in the nineties. Yet on the private
sector level, two major private universities, the University of Saint-Joseph and
the American University of Beirut have played an important role in protecting
the archaeological heritage of Lebanon. The collections of these university
museums include a considerable number of archaeological remains found throughout
Lebanon and the neighboring countries (Badre 2010).
The Archaeology Museum of the American University of Beirut, created in 1902,
amassed its collection through private donations and acquisitions from the
market during the period of its creation.
Looting and trading antiquities in Lebanon started under the Ottoman empire
(1516–1918), flourished under the French mandate (1923–1946), and began again on
a larger scale during the Lebanese Civil war (1975–1990). Robert Fisk, the
multi-award-winning Middle East correspondent at The Independent investigated
the plundering of Lebanon’s heritage while he was based in Lebanon in 1991, and
he described the country as ‘The biggest supermarket’ in the region” (Fisk
1991a: 243–252).
Two private archaeology museums owned by wealthy businessmen are testament to
the extent of the looting and smuggling that took place in Lebanon during the
last century.
The first is the Audi Mosaic Museum, privately owned by Raymond Audi, chairman
of Audi Bank– Saradar Group, a businessman, politician (Minister of the
Displaced from 11th of July 2008 until 9th of November 2009), and founder of
Audi Foundation for promoting heritage and craftsmanship. The museum is located
in the capital city of Beirut, in Villa Audi, a mansion built in 1910, that
served as the main branch of the Audi Bank from 1970 until 2000. It was later
transformed into a private museum that hosts a unique private mosaic collection,
and a number of sculptures, from different countries, dating back to the second
and sixth centuries A.D. The Audi Museum is currently closed to the public but
occasionally opens its doors during the Night at the Museum event and upon
reservation.
The second is the Robert Mouawad Museum located in Zoqaq El Blat, Beirut.
The current museum was conceived and funded by the jeweler and collector Robert
Mouawad to showcase his collection of art, furniture, carpets, and antiquities.
It is housed in the former home of the late Lebanese politician and art
collector Henri Philippe Pharaoun (Issacs 2014).
The museum’s collection was amassed from antiquities from Lebanon, the Near
East, and different corners of the world, which Mr. Pharaoun had purchased to
decorate his mansion (Farhat 2012).
The New York Times aptly describes the residence as a “palace [which] resembles
a Gothic castle with a hodgepodge of Greek and Roman statues and sarcophaguses
in the walled garden”.
In an interview with National Lebanese television, that was never broadcast, Mr.
Pharaon retells the story of how Greek artifacts, which were later included in
the museum’s collection, were discovered in the garden of the villa in the
mid-forties during renovation work. Mr. Pharaoun’s only son, Naji, sold the
palace to a Saudi Arabian Prince and then in June 1991, ownership of the mansion
was transferred to the Mouawad family. Mr. Pharaon moved to the seaside Carlton
Hotel in 1992 where he was brutally murdered in his hotel room at the age of 92.
For years, the museum was closed for extensive refurbishment and opened only for
special occasions. The museum is now permanently closed and the fate of its
archaeological collections remains unknown.
What distinguishes the aforementioned two museums from the case of the Nabu
Museum, is that these collections were amassed in Lebanon before the
establishment of laws and conventions, and during periods of massive turmoil and
chaos. Many other private Lebanese collections contain huge numbers of looted
antiquities from Lebanon and around the world, but the Nabu collection, with
over 2000 archaeological pieces, appears to be the first collection acquired in
modern-day Lebanon, that clearly and pretentiously defies all the existing and
non-existing national and international laws and agreements.
National and International Laws, Decrees, and Ministerial Decisions
To date, Lebanon continues to rely on a law of antiquities that dates back to
1933, when Lebanon was still under the French mandate. Not a single law
dedicated to museums has been established yet ( 7 November 1933. Lebanese Law of
Antiquities. Bylaw nº 166. Beirut). Despite the fragility of this outdated law,
it still remains operative and has clear dispositions regarding the preservation
of archaeological heritage. The law gives an essential role to the General
Directorate of Antiquities, which is in charge of protecting, restoring, and
managing the cultural heritage (art. 19). It strictly prohibits looting and
clandestine excavations (art. 72–73) and imposes financial penalties for
violators. It outlaws the import of antiquities from Iraq and Palestine (art.
100) without an import license granted by the competent authorities of the
mentioned countries. But on the other hand, the same law allows the import and
export of antiquities, although under strict conditions, and legalizes the work
of antiquities dealers (chap. IV).
Fig. 2. Tyre Funerary Stelae.
To put an end to this and because of the lack of control over the Lebanese
antiquities market, the Minister of Tourism, Walid Joumblatt, issued ministerial
decision №8 in February 1988, after 13 years of civil war, forbidding the import
of antiquities outside Lebanese Territory and urging the General Director of
Antiquities to stop providing dealers with import/ export licenses. (The General
Directorate of Antiquities was then dependent on the Ministry of Tourism and
only fell under the Ministry of Culture in 1993). This decision was followed in
the same year by decree №14 with the aim of organizing the antiquities market
within Lebanon.
Subsequently, in 1990, these two consecutive decisions were combined into a
single Ministerial Decree, which prohibits any type of export of archaeological
objects from Lebanon and bans any kind of trading in antiquities within the
country.
Fig. 3. Iraq Cuneiform Tablets. ©nabumuseum.
Later in the same year, Lebanon ratified the UNESCO 1970 convention on the Means
of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of
Ownership of Cultural Property that gave signatories the ability to seek the
return of illicitly obtained cultural goods and set guidelines for collectors.
Countries parties to the 1970 Convention are committed to establishing
appropriate legislation to combat looting and trafficking antiquities.
Lebanon also recently ratified the UNESCO complementary 1995 UNIDROIT Convention
that aims to balance the complexities of the “good-faith buyer” by demanding a
level of due diligence.
In July 2015, following her insistence that the UNESCO Convention 1970 be
implemented, the then General Director of UNESCO Mrs. Irina Bokova received a
report from the Lebanese Minister of Culture Raymond Arayji. In this report he
listed all the Lebanese laws and ministerial decisions banning the import and
export of antiquities and organizing the sale of antiquities. Mr. Arayji
reassured Mrs. Bokova that Lebanon is abiding by its national laws and
decisions, and by the 1970 UNESCO Convention, mentioning the number of seizures
of artifacts smuggled from Syria and Iraq, that had occurred on Lebanese
territory since 2012.
Less than a year later, and few days before the end of the aforementioned
Minister’s term of office in March 2016, Decree number 3065 was published in the
official gazette, with the aim of organizing the General Inventory of Old
Movable Archaeological Items.
The decree, effective for three years, is comprised of 13 articles, and in its
first article it defines the method for acquiring cultural property, stating
that it is to be done ‘transparently, calmly, in a non-suspicious manner and for
non-commercial means’.
In accordance with this decree, individuals with undeclared collections, had a
grace period of three years to declare them to the Ministry of Culture,
represented by the General Directorate of Antiquities, using an online
declaration form available through the ministry’s website.
Following this declaration, the collector of the artifacts receives a receipt
from the General Directorate of Antiquities, giving him/her legal ownership of
the declared collection.
The decree was recently renewed in June 2019 for a three-year period, with
amendments in respect of the provenance and acquisition mode of the object, the
inspecting archaeologist, and the collector’s responsibility for the accuracy of
the information, and with an emphasis on the right of the General Directorate to
inspect and check the artifacts should it be considered necessary. According to
article number 3, this decree can only be renewed once.
While recognizing that Lebanese law needs to be updated, the problem in Lebanon
is not the dispositions of the law, but how to enforce it. In 1999, The
Directorate-General of Antiquities was given the status of a judicial police
force, empowered to investigate the whereabouts of allegedly stolen
‘antiquities’ and raid suspected hiding places. The Lebanese General Directorate
of Antiquities, whose prerogatives were provided for in the 1933 antiquities
law, moved to take measures against suspected owners of artifacts, especially
those artifacts that dated back to before 1700, which according to the
aforementioned law, are considered to be the property of the state.
The decision to reactivate the law regulating the possession of artifacts that
date back to the 18th century or earlier was taken at a meeting attended by
Magistrate Khaled Hammoud, a public prosecutor for financial fraud, in addition
to DGA’s Acting Director-General at the time, Professor Shaker Ghadban.
Following that decision, many suspicious houses and warehouses were raided,
antiquities confiscated and warehouses sealed with wax. (Daily Star, 18 March
1999).
Fig. 4. Tell Halaf figurines. ©nabumuseum.
Ethical issues
Along with the laws and conventions, the Nabu Museum case highlights the role
played by many archaeologists in studying and authenticating the Nabu
collections.
A number of Lebanese and international archaeologists and art historians
collaborated with the collector and the museum, providing both professional
advice and academic publications.
For example, the Palmyra reliefs belonging to Nabu collection were published in
a study led by Gaby Abousamra (2016), a professor of Epigraphy and Semitics at
the Lebanese University, as well as several articles on other artifacts
belonging to the same collection (Abousamra & Lemaire 2016; Abousamra 2018).
In addition, he co-authored a book on the Phoenician Stelea of Tyre, which is a
part of the private collection of Nabu Museum (Abusamra & Lemaire 2014).
The collection of Sumerian tablets from the site of Irisagrig, Iraq, has also
been studied and published (Owen and Lafont 2000).
That was not the first time that the names of some of these scholars have been
linked to unprovenanced artifacts.
In 2003, the Department of Near Eastern Studies at Cornell University accepted a
donation of a large number of cuneiform tablets. These tablets with no
verifiable evidence of provenance, form the subject matter of an ongoing series
of academic monographs, studied by David Owen and published in 2007 under the
auspices of the Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology (Owen
2007a and 2007b). The collection of 1500 unprovenanced tablets included the
so-called Garšana archives, believed to have been discovered by looters at a
presently unknown location in southern Iraq, but which on the evidence of a
recurring toponym is thought to have been a 3rd-millennium-BC town named Garšana.
Interestingly enough, the Nabu collection also features cuneiform tablets from
Garšana.
Another scholar, André Lemaire, an academic epigraphist, who was the co-author
of the aforementioned book with Abousamra, was previously linked to other
unprovenanced and questionable material: two Iron Age, inscribed biblical
artifacts that appeared on the antiquities market in 1979 and in 2002. The first
one is an ivory pomegranate carrying the inscription “Holy to the priests,
belonging to the T [emple of Yahwe]h” and the second one is the so-called James
Ossuary, a limestone burial box from the 1st century BC bearing the Aramaic
inscription “James, Son of Joseph, Brother of Jesus” (Lemaire 1984 & 2002).
These inscriptions are of a debatable nature, yet were considered to be
authentic by Lemaire.
The market value of both inscriptions increased after they were studied and
published by Lemaire and were sold and bought many times at high prices, without
taking into consideration the authenticity of these inscriptions nor their modes
of acquisition.
Conclusion
Alex Barker (2003: 75–76) argues that exhibiting objects and publishing
collections from a private collection increases their commercial value. He also
argues that such an increase might lead to an increase in looting and
trafficking of cultural goods to meet the market demand. Barker goes on to say
that from a research point of view, there is no way to ensure that these objects
are even authentic if they came from unknown sources.
Owen, on the other hand, in defense of the Garšana research, advocates that
“scholars are obligated to preserve and publish those records of the past that
are available, whether or not they have documented contexts or origins” and that
no evidence whatsoever has been presented to demonstrate that scholarly study
and publication of unprovenanced inscriptions encourages the looting of sites or
inflates the value of cuneiform texts in private collections (Owen 2007a: V &
2009).
Renfrew calls the involvement of scholars in the publication of looted material
an ethical crisis in archaeology and argues that unless a solution is found, our
record of the past will be vastly diminished. He describes the collectors as the
real looters and insists that clandestine digging and looting of archaeological
sites is destroying the context in which archaeological fi can reveal valuable
information about our human past (Renfrew 1993: 16–17).
Tess Davis, an archaeology and heritage law expert at the Scottish Centre for
Crime and Justice Research at the University of Glasgow said in an interview to
ABA Journal in July 2014, that while “cultural heritage has always been a
casualty of war,” the commodification of antiquities has made them even more
vulnerable to armed conflict. “War is an expensive business,” she says. “So as
long as there is a market for these so-called blood antiquities, there will be a
supply. At best, those who purchase such pieces are contributing to the
destruction of the world’s cultural heritage. At worst, they may be prolonging
the conflict by funding, even indirectly, those who wage it.”
Over the course of its modern history, the Lebanese social fabric has been
broken down by the influence of many internal and external factors. The final
blow was the civil war (1975–1990), which destroyed the country’s cultural,
social, and architectural fabric. These events lead to the population’s division
into different ethnic, religious, sectarian, and political groups. These
cultural divides are constantly on the increase, and historical narratives are
used fraudulently by sectarian and political parties in an attempt to prove
origins and develop factions.
These controversial issues extend into both modern and ancient history. History
is thus considered to be full of tragic events and came to be ignored by the
majority of the population.
To date, the Lebanese refuse to reconcile with this painful past and move
towards a better understanding of their history. The multitude of different, and
often contradicting narratives, the disagreement on origins and identity have
resulted in the absence of a homogenous unified history textbook in schools in
Lebanon. The notion of the past as a common legacy, that serves to unite the
population as heirs of a common heritage, was annulled by sectarian and
political parties.
Archaeological artifacts are considered by the majority of the population as a
good source of income, that can be traded for profit.
There is no sense that archaeology belongs to the people and is being
appropriated, which is why there is a lack of activism in archaeological and
cultural causes (Seeden 1994a&b).
The awareness campaigns that aim to promote cultural heritage are rare, or
non-existent, and this is enhanced by the DGA’s current policy of keeping its
work secret, and not engaging with the local community or stepping in to clarify
any controversies being spread by the media about the fate of archaeological
remains, by providing clear and scientific explanations. That leads to a lack of
interest in archaeology, mistrust of the DGA, and does nothing to enhance public
awareness (Sader 2012). As a result of the secretive nature of the work of the
DGA, archaeologists are viewed by the Lebanese as gold diggers, who destroy
sites and steal the artifacts. Hardly anyone understood the controversy
surrounding the opening of the Nabu Museum and even fewer people objected to its
opening.
In 2015, UNESCO, in collaboration with the Ministry of Culture, launched the
national campaign Unite for Heritage to mobilize UNESCO State Members, and to
address the deliberate destruction of cultural heritage by violent extremist
groups.
The hashtag #unite4heritage has been widely shared on all social media platforms
and at the Rafiq Hariri International Airport, and so the #Unite4Heritage
campaign has become a widely expanding global movement that seeks to engage a
global audience, with young people as its core demographic. Ironically, however,
it has not publicly addressed or even discussed the provenance of the Nabu
collection.
In September 2014, following the publication of Lemaire and Abousamra’s book New
Funerary Phoenician Stelae (Abousamra & Lemaire 2014), a Lebanese NGO called The
Green Southerners, based in Tyre, Lebanon, filed a notice with the public
prosecution, stating that the 66 stelae studied in that book were illegally
obtained from clandestine excavations at the archaeological site of Tyre. The
fate of this notice was not made public and remains uncertain.
In 2019, after the inauguration of the museum and the display of a few pieces of
the Phoenician Stelae collection in the museum, the same NGO filed a lawsuit
against the owner of the museum, Mr. Jawad Adra, accusing him of owning looted
artifacts from the Phoenician site of Tyre.
The timing of issuing Decree 3065, in March 2016, should not be ignored.
Amidst the turmoil in Syria and the brutal massacre in August 2015 of Khaled El
Assaad, the director of Antiquities and Museums of Palmyra, and the Palmyra
offensive of the Syrian Arab Army to recapture the city on 27 March 2016, one
must ask if it was an innocent coincidence. And why establish a decree that
organizes private collections at a time of such regional instability, with
massive waves of destruction and looting of archaeological sites?
Some argue that it will help organize this market by reducing the impact of
looting and trade. Others see it as a powerful tool that can be used by
collectors to legalize and “cleanse” their ‘suspicious’ collections, helping
them acquire more objects illegally and later declaring them to the state,
therefore, making them ‘legitimate’.
Fig. 5. Yemen Statue. ©nabumuseum.
The decree does not specify who pays the archaeologist/ inspector, and who owns
the data uploaded onto the declaration website, nor who has the right to access
it.
As a legal response to the issuing and the renewal of this Decree, preparations
are underway by a group of lawyers and heritage activists to lodge an appeal
against Decree 3065, on the basis that it contradicts national and international
laws and decisions, and encourages collectors to keep on purchasing looted
material, in the confidence that the decree will validate their ownership.
In his aforementioned 2015 report, Minister Arayji mentions the number of
antiquities seizures that have occurred since 2012. Yet in fact, there is no
record that the General Directorate of Antiquities returned so many smuggled
artifacts to Syria and Iraq.
The Lebanese Higher Commission of Defense issued a report in 2019, indicating
the presence of more than one hundred illegal crossing points between the
Syrian/Lebanese borders.
Archaeological goods, amongst other items, are being smuggled through these
crossings in the absence of any official authority. The report states that the
smuggling also takes place through the regulated official crossings, making it
even more challenging to be able to control and fight the smuggling. According
to the same report, illegal trading not only happens on land but also in the
territorial waters with the use of speed boats to smuggle all sorts of goods
across Lebanon, Syria, and Turkey.
On June 3rd, 2019 Yemen deposited its instrument of ratification of the
Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export
and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, with the Director-General of
UNESCO. The Convention entered into force on September 3rd, 2019.
Clearly, such laws and conventions are not the magical solutions that will stop
the massive plundering and looting of archaeological sites. But one cannot help
but wonder, in the face of the massive destruction and looting of the Syrian,
Iraqi, Palestinian, and Yemeni heritage, about the purpose and the effectiveness
of all the different conventions, agreements, and UN resolutions.
Do we have any success stories to tell? Have any of these laws and conventions
saved any Middle Eastern country’s heritage from being vandalized, destroyed,
and looted during armed conflicts? One has to pause, reflect and meditate on the
fate of heritage in the Middle East in the last few years, considering all the
laws and agreements written and signed that have never been respected by the
parties in positions of power, and this has only served to heighten the feeling
of helplessness and frustration of the local communities who are facing major
regional conflicts. There is a need for a reassessment of the missions of such
organizations and the politics of preservation in today’s world.
Lynn Meskell (2018) questions the role of UNESCO in the light of recent major
political developments, with different case studies from all over the world that
show where UNESCO fell short, in the face of the plundering and looting of
different archaeological sites.
Over the next five to ten years, the Lebanese Ministry of Culture will
inaugurate new archaeology and history museums. However, the question remains as
to how it will regulate the world of private museums, with the absence of any
laws pertaining to museum licensing, collections, management, and ethics.
In 2016, the Ministry of Culture created an ad- ministrative board for the High
Commission of Museums, composed of seven members; a president, a vice-president,
and an executive committee. The role of this commission is to supervise and
strengthen the establishment and the management of Lebanese public and private
museums, to preserve Lebanese cultural heritage, and to enhance the skills of
the museum professionals. Another organization that can play a role in shaping
the museum sector in Lebanon is the National Committee of the International
Council of Museums (ICOM), an NGO, that has proved itself to be a leading entity
in the museum world. ICOM is the only global organization in the museum sector.
As a forum of experts, it makes recommendations on issues related to cultural
heritage, promotes capacity building and advances knowledge, and sets
professional and ethical standards for museum activities. So far, both
committees in Lebanon remain inoperative for unknown reasons and have not even
taken a stance on the creation of the Nabu Museum.
Collecting antiquities and art is a sign of refinement, luxury, and wealth, and
it seems to be regaining momentum as one of the favorite hobbies of the rich and
sophisticated circles in Lebanese society.
This collecting frenzy evolved, with flamboyant displays of wealth by
collectors, into the opening of private museums to show off their rich
collections. Rich collectors compete over the ownership of the most expensive
works of art or antiquities, indifferent to their scientific historical, or
archaeological value.
The Nabu Museum recently removed all the archaeological artifacts that were on
display keeping only the works of art, the paintings, and the sculptures. Yet
since then, not a single step has been taken by the DGA or any legal entity to
investigate the current location of the artifacts.
In 2013, Cornell University returned more than 10000 Sumerian tablets to Iraq,
and in 2018, over 450 tablets, presumably looted from the city of Irisagrig,
that were seized by the U.S. government, will be repatriated to Iraq. Will the
Republic of Lebanon step in and encourage the Nabu Museum to return any of the
looted artifacts to their various countries of origin?
It is a well-established fact, that due to market demands, collectors can become
dealers, and that publishing and displaying objects contribute to pushing up the
market price of the objects and thus serves as the perfect marketing strategy.
Taking this into account, the question that has to be asked whether publishing
and putting on display a number of the Nabu artifacts was a simple marketing
plan to ensure a more lucrative deal on the resale? And taking this question
further, does the museum serve as a medium to sell the region’s antiquities? Has
the Nabu Museum become the new biggest antiquities supermarket of the Middle
East?
**Nelly P. Abboud Archaeologist and Museum Educator. Founder of MuseoLab The
Cultural Lab, an NGO that promotes Cultural Heritage through experiential
learning.
Data de recepció: 1/10/2019 Data d’acceptació: 30/01/2020
Bibliography
Abousamra, G. (2018). Huit stèles funéraires phéniciennes inédites. Semitica,
60: 105–129.
Abousamra, G. (2016). Palmyrene inscriptions on Seven Reliefs. Semitica, 57:
217–252.
Abousamra, G. and LemAire, A. (2014). New Funerary Phoenician Stelae. Private
Collection. Kutub. Beirut.
Badre, L. (June-September 2010). Private Archaeological Museums in Lebanon. Near
Eastern Archaeology, 73(2/3): 189–194.
Barker, A. (2003). Archaeological ethics: museums and collections. In:
Zimmerman, L. J., Vitelli, K. D., Hollowell, J. J. (eds.). Ethical Issues in
Archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA. AltaMira: 71–84.
Farhat, M. (2012). A Mediterraneanist’s Collection: Henri Pharaon’s Treasure
House of Arab Art. Ars Orientalis, 42: 102–113.
Fisk, R. (1991a). The Biggest Supermarket in Lebanon. A Journalist Investigates
the Plundering of Lebanon’s Heritage. Berytus, XXXIX: 243–252.
Kletter, R. (2003). A Very General Archaeologist- Moshe Dayan and Israeli
Archaeology. The Journal of Hebrew Scriptures, 4: Art. 5.
Lafont, B. and Owen, D. I. (2019). From Mesopotamia to Lebanon, The Jawad Adra
Collection at Nabu Museum, at El Heri Lebanon. Cornell University Studies in
Assyriology and Sumerology, XX. Penn State University Press.
Lemaire, A. (2002). Burial box of James, brother of Jesus. Biblical Archaeology
Review, 28(6): 24–33.
Lemaire, A. (January-February 1984). Probable head of priestly scepter from
Solomon’s Temple surfaces in Jerusalem. Biblical Archaeology Review: 24–29.
McGuire, G. (2008). The Catastrophe: The Looting and Destruction of Iraq’s Past.
The Oriental Institute Museum Publications, University of Chicago. Chicago.
Meskell, L. (2018). A Future in Ruins: UNESCO,World Heritage, and the Dream of
Peace.Oxford University Press.
Owen, D. I. (2009). Censoring knowledge: The case for the publication of
unprovenanced cuneiform tablets. In: Cuno J. (ed.). Whose culture? The promise
of museums and the debate over antiquities, Princeton University Press.
Princeton, NJ: 125–142.
Owen, D. I. (2007a). Series Editor’s preface. In: Owen, D. I. and mAyr, R. H.
(eds.). The Garšana archives. Cornell Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology 3:
v-vi.
Owen, D. I. (2007b). Acknowledgments. In: Owen, D. I. and mAyr, R. H. (eds.).
The Garšana archives. Cornell Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology, 3: vii-ix.
Renfrew, C. and eLiA, R. (May-June 1993). Collectors are the Real Looters.
Archaeology, 46, №3: 16–17.
Saadeh, A. (2004). The Genesis of Nations. Department of Culture of the Syrian
Social Nationalist Party. Dar Al-Fikr. Beirut.
Sader, H. (2012). Between Looters and Private Collectors: The Tragic Fate of
Lebanese Antiquities. In: Archives, Museums and Collecting Practices in the
Modern Arab World, Mejcher-Atassi, S., and Schwartz, J. P. (eds.). Routledge:
57–69.
Seeden, H. (1992a). The Treasure Hunt: Illegal Traffic of Antiquities and the
Preservation of Cultural Property. In: Himāyat Al Athār fi Lubnān: Proceedings of
the workshop organized by the National Lebanese Committee for Education. Science
and Culture (UNESCO): 109–125.
Seeden, H. (1992b). A Tophet in Tyre? Berytus, 39: 39–87.
Seeden, H. (1994a). Search for the Missing Link: Archaeology and the Public in
Lebanon. In: The Politics of the Past. Gathercole and Lowenthal, D. (eds.).
Routledge. London: 141–159.
Seeden, H. (1994b). Archaeology and the Public in Lebanon: Developments since
1986. In: The Presented Past. Heritage, Museums and Education. One World
Archaeology. Stone, P. G. and Molyneaux, B. L. (eds.). 23. Routledge. NY,
London: 95–107.
Journals & Newspapers
Diab, Y. (18 March 1999). 1932 antiquities law revived. Daily Star. <http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Lebanon-
News/1999/Mar-18/13215–1932-antiquities-law-revived. ashx>.
Issacs, D. A. (17 November 2014). Robert Mouawad Private Museum. Lebanon
Traveler Magazine. [Consulted 19 September 2019]. Available on the internet:
<http://www.lebanontraveler.com/en/magazine/lebanon-
traveler-the-museum-of-extravagances/>.
Merhi, M. (27–30 June 2019). An investigation in Archaeology (in Arabic), Al
Modon. 4 parts.
Owen, J. (30 April 2018). Stolen Sumerian Tablets Come from the Lost City of
Irisagrig. Live Science. [Consulted 15 September 2019]. Available on the
internet: <https://www.livescience.com/62437-stolen-
sumerian-tablets-from-lost-city.html>.
Sewell, A. (11 April 2019). A Museum Tangled in Debate over Heritage. Daily
Star: 3. [Consulted 15 September 2019]. Available on the internet: <https://
www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Lebanon-News/2019/Apr-11/480893-museum-tangled-in-debate-over-heritage.
ashx>.
Taha, A. E. S. S. (15 May 2019). The Memory of Iraq in the Black Market (in
Arabic). Beyn Nahreyn Magazine, 120: 4–10.
(7 August 1993). Henry Pharoun Is Slain at Home; Founder of Free Lebanon Was 92,
The New York Times, Section 1: 29. [Consulted 23 September 2019]. Available on
the internet: <https://www.nytimes.com/1993/08/07/ obituaries/henry-pharoun-is-slain-at-home-founder-of-
free-lebanon-was-92.html>.
Yowakim, F. Murdered in his bed at 95 years old: an unpublished interview 22
years old (in Arabic). Al Hayat, 16 August 1993. [Consulted 17 September 2019].
Available on the internet: <http://www.alhayat. com/article/1874259/>.
Laws & Decrees
7 November 1933. Lebanese Law of Antiquities. Bylaw nº 166. Beirut.
12/03/2016. Decree 3065 on the Organization of the General Inventory of movable
antiquities, official gazette, vol. 13, 24/03/2016: 1214–1216. [Consulted 1
September 2019]. Available on the internet: <http:// legallaw.ul.edu.lb/Law.aspx?lawId=258560>.
03/06/2019. The renewal, official gazette, vol. 30, p. 2054, decision nº 54,
13/06/2019.
03/06/2019. The amendments, official gazette, vol. 30, p. 2054, decision nº 55,
13/06/2019.
Conventions
3 June 2019. Ratification by Yemen of the Convention on the Means of Prohibiting
and Preventing Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural
Property, UNESCO Paris. 14 November 1970). [Consulted 5 September 2019].
Available on the internet: <http:// portal.unesco.org/en/ev.phpURL_ID=49506&URL_
DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html>.
14 November 1970. Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the
Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property,
UNESCO. Paris. (Ratified by Lebanon on 25/08/1992). [Consulted 2 September
2019]. Available on the internet:<http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.phpURL_
ID=13039&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html>.
Reports
6 July 2015. Letter addressed to Mrs. Irian Bokova, General Director of UNESCO
by the Minister of Culture Raymond Araygi. [Consulted 4 September 2019].
Available on the internet: <http://www.unesco. org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/Report_
Lebanon_clear.pdf>.
Catalogs
22 September 2018. Nabu. Millennia of Creativity, Museum Catalog, 79 p.
2015. The Saadeh Cultural Foundation and the Social
& Cultural Development Association (INMA) Recover Palestine’s Looted
Antiquities, INMA, Beirut, 32 p.
Websites
AUB Museum website: <https://www.aub.edu.lb/ museum_archeo/Pages/default.aspx>.
Unite4Heritage campaign: <https://www.unite4heritage.
org/en/unite4heritage-celebrating-safeguarding-cultural- heritage>.
Database of Neo-Sumerian Texts: <http://bdtns.filol. csic.es/>.
Videos
8 June 2019. Al Mayadeen Interview with Jawad Adra (in Arabic), The Orient
Bells. Available on the internet: <http://mdn.tv/40yv>.
14 November 2018. Sader, H. Between Looters, Collectors, and Warlords: Does
Archaeology Stand a Chance? The 2018 Plenary Address of the ASOR Annual Meeting.
Published on Dec 17, 2018. Available on the internet: <https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=zCx56KgQsY0>.
The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on March 27-28/2021
Loud bang heard in Damascus, Syria: Reuters witness
Reuters/27 March ,2021
A loud band has been heard in Syria’s capital Damascus, according to a Reuters
witness. The loud bang heard in Syria’s capital was a result of operation to
clear remnants of explosives in the Damascus countryside, according to state
news agency SANA. The overall death toll for Syria’s civil war has reached
388,652 since it began a decade ago this month, a war monitor said. The
Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said the figures includes
almost 117,388 civilians, among them more than 22,000 children. Attacks by the
Syrian regime and allied militia forces accounted for the majority of civilian
deaths, said the Britain-based monitor which relies on sources inside Syria for
its reports.
Canada/Minister of Foreign Affairs responds to Chinese
sanctions
March 27, 2021 - Ottawa, Ontario - Global Affairs Canada
The Honourable Marc Garneau, Minister of Foreign Affairs, today issued the
following statement:
“China’s sanctions against Canadian parliamentarians and democratic institutions
are unacceptable and an attack on transparency and freedom of expression.
“The Government of Canada stands with parliamentarians and all Canadians as we
continue to work with partners in defence of democracy and freedom of speech and
will continue to take action when international human rights obligations are
violated. We need to stand together to remind those who violate human and
democratic rights that the world is watching.”
Strong winds not main reason for huge ship stranding in
Suez Canal: Chairman
Reuters/27 March ,2021
Egypt’s Suez Canal Authority chief said Saturday that strong wind was not the
main reason for the grounding of the MV Ever Given cargo ship in the waterway.
“Strong winds and weather factors were not the main reasons for the ship’s
grounding, there may have been technical or human errors,” Osama Rabie said at a
press conference in Suez. “All of these factors will become apparent in the
investigation,” he added. Asked when the ship could be afloat again, he
suggested it was possible “today or tomorrow, depending on the ship’s
responsiveness to the tides.” The MV Ever Given, which is longer than four
football fields, has been wedged diagonally across the canal since Tuesday,
blocking one of the world’s most vital waterways in both directions. The canal
authority chief said over 300 vessels are now treading water at either end of
the canal, which links the Mediterranean and the Red Sea. Addressing journalists
in Suez, Rabie outlined Egypt’s efforts with tugboats and excavators to free the
bow and propellers of mega-ship in order to reopen the canal. Rabie noted that
on 10.30 pm Friday the propellers had been able to spin, although not at full
speed. However they were jammed again due to the changing tide, he said, adding
that rescuers had had to resort to excavators again overnight to continue the
dredging process. “The type of soil we’re dealing with is very difficult to
manage, as are tides which affect the size of the vessel and its cargo load,” he
added. Rabie also noted that the blockage had caused “no fatalities or
pollution”. The ship’s grounding is holding up some $9.6 billion worth of cargo
each day between Asia and Europe, according to Lloyd’s List data. Rabie
estimated that Egypt is losing some $12-14 million in revenue from the canal for
each day it is closed. The United States also said it was ready to send support,
including a team of US Navy experts. Rabie thanked the US for its support along
with China and the United Arab Emirates.
New Attempts Planned to Free Huge Vessel Stuck in Suez
Canal
Associated Press/March 27, 2021
A giant container ship remained stuck sideways in Egypt's Suez Canal for a fifth
day Saturday, as authorities prepared to make new attempts to free the vessel
and reopen a crucial east-west waterway for global shipping.
The Ever Given, a Panama-flagged ship that carries cargo between Asia and
Europe, ran aground Tuesday in the narrow canal that runs between Africa and the
Sinai Peninsula.
The massive vessel got stuck in a single-lane stretch of the canal, about six
kilometers (3.7 miles) north of the southern entrance, near the city of Suez.
Peter Berdowski, CEO of Boskalis, the salvage firm hired to extract the Ever
Given, said the company hoped to pull the container ship free within days using
a combination of heavy tugboats, dredging and high tides.
He told the Dutch current affairs show Nieuwsuur on Friday night that the front
of the ship is stuck in sandy clay, but the rear "has not been completely pushed
into the clay and that is positive because you can use the rear end to pull it
free."Berdowski said two large tugboats were on their way to the canal and are
expected to arrive over the weekend. He said the company aims to harness the
power of the tugs, dredging and tides, which he said are expected to be up to 50
centimeters (20 inches) higher Saturday.
"The combination of the (tug) boats we will have there, more ground dredged away
and the high tide, we hope that will be enough to get the ship free somewhere
early next week," he said.
If that doesn't work, the company will remove hundreds of containers from the
front of the ship to lighten it, effectively lifting the ship to make it easier
to pull free, Berdowski said. A crane was already on its way that can lift the
containers off the ship, he said. An official at the Suez Canal Authority said
the authority planned to make at least two attempts Saturday to free the vessel
when the high tide goes down. The official spoke on condition of anonymity
because he was not authorized to brief journalists.
Egyptian authorities have prohibited media access to the site. The canal
authority said its head, Lt. Gen. Osama Rabei, would hold a news conference
Saturday in the city of Suez, a few kilometers (miles) from the site of the
vessel. Yukito Higaki, president of Shoei Kisen, the company that owns the giant
container ship, told a news conference in Imabari, Japan on Friday night that 10
tugboats were deployed and workers were dredging the banks and sea floor near
the vessel's bow to try to get it afloat again.
Shoei Kisen said Saturday the company was considering removing containers to
lighten the vessel if refloating efforts fail, but that would be a difficult
operation.
The White House said it has offered to help Egypt reopen the canal. "We have
equipment and capacity that most countries don't have and we're seeing what we
can do and what help we can be," President Joe Biden told reporters Friday.
An initial investigation showed the vessel ran aground due to strong winds and
ruled out mechanical or engine failure, the company and the canal authority
said. GAC, a global shipping and logistics company, had previously said the ship
had experienced a power blackout, but it did not elaborate. A maritime traffic
jam grew to around 280 vessels near Port Said on the Mediterranean Sea, Port
Suez on the Red Sea and in the canal system on Egypt's Great Bitter Lake,
according to canal service provider Leth Agencies. Some vessels began changing
course and dozens of ships were still en route to the waterway, according to the
data firm Refinitiv. A prolonged closure of the crucial waterway would cause
delays in the global shipment chain. Some 19,000 vessels passed through the
canal last year, according to official figures. About 10% of world trade flows
through the canal, which is particularly crucial for transporting oil. The
closure could affect oil and gas shipments to Europe from the Middle East. It
remained unclear how long the blockage would last. Even after reopening the
canal that links factories in Asia to consumers in Europe, the waiting
containers are likely to arrive at busy ports, forcing them to face additional
delays before offloading. Apparently anticipating long delays, the owners of the
stuck vessel diverted a sister ship, the Ever Greet, on a course around Africa
instead, according to satellite data. Others also are being diverted. The liquid
natural gas carrier Pan Americas changed course in the mid-Atlantic, now aiming
south to go around the southern tip of Africa, according to satellite data from
MarineTraffic.com.
Five Dead' as Building Collapses in Egypt
Agence France Presse/March 27, 2021
Five people died and more than 20 were wounded Saturday as a building collapsed
in the Egyptian capital Cairo, local authorities said. "The governorate's crisis
room was informed at 3:00 am (0100 GMT) of the collapse of a building consisting
of a basement, a ground floor and nine (upper) floors," the Cairo governorate
said in a statement. It said that five people were confirmed dead and 24 wounded
in the collapse in the Gesr Suez district near Heliopolis in the east of the
city. "Khaled Abdel Aal, the governor, immediately went to the site of the
incident accompanied by civil protection forces," the statement added.
He ordered the "establishment of an engineering committee" to inspect
surrounding buildings and evaluate the impact. Egypt has suffered several deadly
building collapses in recent years, due to the dilapidation of many premises and
poor adherence to planning regulations.
Facing two disasters, Egypt’s President Sisi pledges tough
action
The Arab Weekly/March 27/2021
CAIRO--Egypt is having to deal with two major crises; the country’s latest
deadly train smash and the huge container vessel entirely blocking the Suez
Canal which has pole-axed the shipping movement of hundreds of billions of
dollars of urgent cargo between Asia and Europe.
Several countries have expressed their willingness to help Egypt deal with
catastrophic grounding on the Japanese container ship Ever Given, while many
offered their condolences to Cairo for the 32 dead and almost 100 injured when
trains collided in the Sohag governorate in the south of the country. These two
disasters have thrown the spotlight sharply on how Egypt deals with crises.
The Suez Canal and the Egyptian railways are two of the oldest and most
important facilities in Egypt. More than a century and a half have passed since
they began operating. The canal generates an income of about $6 billion a year,
while Egyptian National Railways’ 5,600 kilometre network last year recorded 800
million passenger miles.
Since he took office is 2014, President Sisi has paid particular attention to
both the canal and the railway system, appointing senior military officers to
their management.
Ironically, the minister of transportation, Major General Kamel Waziri, was two
years ago given his ministry (which oversees the railway system) after another
train smash killed scores of people. Sisi charged him with upgrading the
long-neglected railway network. Before this, Waziri, then head of the
Engineering Authority of the Egyptian Armed Forces had supervised the project to
expand the Suez Canal project.
Sisi began in office by ordering the excavation of a second channel alongside
the existing northern section of the canal. He also promised that the railway’s
problems would end by 2020. Both these giant projects were apparently aimed at
bolstering support for his new administration.
Now Egyptians have woken up to the two disasters occurring almost at the same
time. This will have raised questions in their minds about the wisdom of the new
canal opened in August 2015, at a cost of about $4 billion and about the
development of the railway system priced at around $9 billion
The new section of canal has certainly improved the movement of vessels. But
unfortunately the Japanese container ship ran firmly aground in the southern
part of the canal which only allows a single shipping lane, meaning vessels move
through in a traffic light system. The rescue operation has been complicated by
the fact that the Ever Given is entirely blocking the canal, from one side to
the other and nothing can pass it.
The development of the railway system has made great progress in terms of the
modernisation of carriages and locomotives. But it has not seemed to include
upgrading poor operational practices.
President Sisi vowed on his Twitter account on Friday, that those responsible
for the train collision would receive “a deterrent punishment” and this will
mean “whoever caused this painful accident out of neglect, corruption, or
anything else, without exception, delay or hesitation.”
A statement by the Railway Authority has already acknowledged negligence,
explaining “During the course of the 157 special train service, between Luxor,
Alexandria, between the Maragha and Tahta stations, the emergency door of some
of the cars was opened by unknown persons. Therefore the train stopped, and the
air-conditioned 2011 train from Aswan passed the Cairo Semaphore 709 and
collided with the rear of the last car of train 157 . This led to the
overturning of two cars from the the 157 train which were stalled on the tracks.
The 2011 train locomotive and the power vehicle overturned, which led to a
number of injuries and deaths.”
The Ministry of Health announced the death of 32 passengers and the injury of 91
others during the collision and reported that 36 ambulances had gone to the
scene to transport the injured to hospitals.
According to a report issued by the Central Agency for Public Mobilisation and
Statistics (governmental), train accidents in Egypt during between 2003 and 2017
totalled 16,174, with 1,657 accidents recorded in 2017 alone.
There was no more recent data available, but it was reported that train
accidents occurred less often than the previous period, as a result of better
maintenance and renovation. While the Suez Canal has not witnessed major crises
that disrupted navigation except in times of wars with Israel, the railway
system has seen many disruptions. Five transportation ministers were fired or
resigned before the current minister’s appointment, with train smashes being the
major reason for their dismissal. Observers say that the collision of the two
trains on Friday is not an ordinary incident. It presents Sisi with a dilemma,
as transport minister Waziri is responsible for fixing the railway system and
what happened was the result of neglect by those in charge.
Sisi has shown himself prepared to act against close colleagues. In 2017, after
a terrorist operation in Western desert in which a number of officers and
soldiers were killed, he fired the Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces,
Lieutenant General Mahmoud Hegazy, despite the ties of friendship, military
fellowship and intermarriage.
Sadr offers his own militias’ help to disarm other militias
in Iraq
The Arab Weekly/March 27/2021
BAGHDAD--Iraqi Shia cleric Moqtada Sadr is increasingly wanting to appear as a
statesman while his political ambitions to hold the reins of the executive
authority in the country are growing.
Earlier in February, the populist Shia cleric said he backed early elections
overseen by the UN, in a rare news conference outside his home in the Iraqi
shrine city of Najaf.
Iraq is meant to hold earlier parliamentary elections this year, a central
demand of an anti-government protest movement which erupted in 2019 and involved
Sadr’s supporters.
The elections will be taking place under a new electoral law that has reduced
the size of constituencies and eliminated list-based voting in favour of votes
for individual candidates.
Sadr’s supporters are expected to make major gains under the new system.
In November, Sadr said he would push for the next prime minister to be a member
of his movement for the first time.
With eyes on the executive authority, the Shia cleric has been calling recently
for control of the weapons’ chaos in the country so as to curb attacks by armed
factions on foreign forces, their supply convoys and the headquarters of the US
embassy in Baghdad.
Sadr’s calls come even though the Shia cleric himself is at the head of the most
powerful militias in Iraq, the Peace Brigades, which are seen as a heir to the
Mahdi Army militia that had previously led an offensive against government
forces under the rule of former Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki.
Sadr had also been involved in a crackdown on a massive uprising that took place
in the cities of central and southern Iraq starting from October 2019. In that
period, he employed a militia called Blue Hats to confront demonstrators in the
streets and sit-in squares, as part of his efforts to crush the protest movement
and protect the regime.
In recent statements, the leader of the Sadrist movement offered to help the
government of Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi end the spread of illegal
weapons in the country.
“The Iraqi government must work diligently and firmly against all armed actions
that target the security of Iraq and its citizens, regardless of the affiliation
of the perpetrators,” Sadr said, adding, “I am aware that they (the militants
who launch attacks) are recruited to destabilise security, threaten stability
and weaken the state with the aim of discrediting the honourable reputation of
the government for the benefit of those who carry foreign agendas.”The majority
of these militias have links with Iran and have been helping pursue Teheran’s
agenda, which is to expand the Islamic Republic’s influence in Iraq and the
region.
Most of the Iraqi Shia militias that were trained to fight ISIS in 2014 are with
the Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF), formally affiliated with the Iraqi armed
forces. Some PMF factions, however, respond only to the orders of leaders who
are close to Iran.
In his recent statements, Sadr stressed that “the security chaos and the spread
of weapons should not last,” calling on the government to “double its efforts”
and offering his services when saying, “We are ready for cooperation.”Sadr is
known for his extreme self-confidence, at times acting as a holder of absolute
power by issuing orders, warnings and setting deadlines for his demands to be
fulfilled. This is fundamentally contrary to the logic of thegovernment’s
control that he has been preaching with his call for ending chaos in the country
and halting the spread of weapons.
Since 2003, Sadr has been part of the political process in Iraq. He didn’t,
however, hold any official positions like his major opponents and rivals from
within the Shia political family.
In recent years, the Shia cleric, who hails from a prominent religious family in
Iraq, has sought to distance himself from the bad governance that led to massive
popular protests against the ruling class.
He portrayed himself as being different from other leaders of Shia parties and
militias, and sought to act as a spokesman for the people, a defender of their
cause, a reformer and an enemy of corruption.
Sadr, in fact, sees the failure of his political rivals as an opportunity to
control the executive , especially in the light of new international and
regional dynamics that may redraw the political map in Iraq.
After 18 years of mostly Shia rule in Iraq, the security situation in the
country is still a serious problem affecting all aspects of life.
The Shia militias, who had obtained weapons and financial resources to help
fight the Islamic State (ISIS) group, constitute today’s the biggest challenge
to peace and security in the country, according to experts.
Washington accuses armed Iraqi factions linked to Iran, including Kata’ib
Hezbollah, of being behind a number of attacks targeting its embassy and
military bases, from which American soldiers are sometimes deployed in the
country. Kata’ib Hezbollah, whose leader Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis was assassinated
in January by the US military while he was with Iranian Major General Qassem
Soleimani near Baghdad airport, is considered one of the factions with the
closest ties toTehran. Iraqi politicians and activists from the protest movement
accuse militias loyal to Iran of kidnapping and torturing protesters, placing
them in secret prisons and shooting demonstrators. Kadhimi promised to hold the
killers of demonstrators accountable and made surprise visits to numerous
prisons to find out whether they included detainees from the protest movement.
Last July, the Iraqi judiciary announced the formation of an investigative body
to look into assassination crimes, hours after an expert on armed groups, Hisham
Hashemi, was assassinated.
ICC suspect Mahmoud Warfalli gunned down in Benghazi
The Arab Weekly/March 27/2021
LONDON--Mahmoud Warfalli died as he had lived, violently and without mercy. The
controversial commander in the Libyan National Army (LNA) was assassinated
Thursday when his car came under a hail of bullets in a busy Benghazi street.
Warfalli, whose brother was injured in the attack, was wanted by the ICC for his
alleged role in executing or ordering the executions of 33 captives in or around
Benghazi in 2016 and 2017. The ICC says the executions were filmed and posted on
social media. These summary killings ought to have been an embarrassment to LNA
commander. Khalifa Haftar. Indeed shortly after the ICC warrant was issued in
August 2017, an LNA spokesman said Warfalli had been arrested and charged with
murder. There was however, never any chance that he would be extradited to face
ICC prosecutors in the Hague. It was also reported that Warfalli had resigned
from the LNA. However, his immediate commander in the LNA’s Saiqa special forces
unit, Wanis Bukhamada had refused to accept his leaving.
Whatever detention Wafalli might have experienced was unlikely to have been
onerous and he appears quickly to have returned to Saiqa’s ranks in the LNA.
Indeed a year later he was pictured sitting and talking with Haftar himself.
Warfalli was an important Saiqa special forces commander. Originally a
ramshackle outfit whose Benghazi base was over run by Islamist terrorists in
2012, Saiqa became the most disciplined and indeed ruthless of the LNA units in
battle and was often lawless away from the front line.
No group immediately claimed responsibility for Warfalli’s murder but there
would have been no shortage of candidates, since he had made powerful enemies,
in particular among the Awagir tribe.
He might well have fallen victim to rival armed gangs. Then again might have
perished in a reprisal for the Benghazi Toyota dealership he and his men shot up
recently, apparently because they objected to the pricing of the ubiquitous
pick-ups, on which guns are mounted to turn them into so-called “technicals”.
The person who may benefit most obviously from the man’s death is Khalifa Haftar,
who was widely condemned for being unwilling or unable to see Warfalli tried and
face justice for multiple murders. The very public mass executions carried out
by the Saiqa officer sullied the reputation of the LNA and of its
commander-in-chief. However one close observer of eastern Libya said he did not
believe that assassinating opponents was the field marshal’s style.
Women protest in Istanbul over Erdogan’s decision to exit
domestic violence treaty
Reuters/27 March ,2021
Several thousand women took to the streets in Istanbul on Saturday to demand
Turkey reverses its decision to withdraw from an international treaty against
domestic abuse which it once championed. President Tayyip Erdogan stunned
European allies with last week’s announcement that Turkey was pulling out of the
Istanbul Convention, named after the Turkish city where it was drafted in 2011.
Turkey was one of the first signatories and women say their safety has been
jeopardized by Erdogan’s move against the European treaty. Amid a heavy police
presence, protesters gathered in an Istanbul seafront square waving purple flags
and chanting slogans including “Murders of women are political”. One placard
read, “Protect women, not the perpetrators of violence.”“Withdrawing from the
Istanbul Convention is a disaster for millions of women and children living in
this country,” Amnesty International Turkey Director Ece Unver told Reuters,
calling for Ankara to reverse its decision. World Health Organization data shows
38 percent of women in Turkey are subject to violence from a partner in their
lifetime, compared with 25 percent in Europe. Estimates of femicide rates in
Turkey, for which there are no official figures, have roughly tripled over the
last 10 years, according to a monitoring group. So far this year 87 women have
been murdered by men or died under suspicious circumstances, it said. “We will
not give up. We will be here until we get our freedom and our convention back.
We will not give up on the convention,” said student Selin Asarlar Celik.
Conservatives in Erdogan’s Islamist-rooted AK Party say the convention, which
stresses gender equality and forbids discrimination on grounds of sexual
orientation, undermines family structures and encourages violence.Officials said
this week domestic law would protect Turkish women, not foreign treaties. The
protesters concerns were echoed by Ankara’s Western allies, who denounced what
they described as a baffling and unwarranted decision which risked undermining
the rights of Turkish women.
The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on March 27-28/2021
Iranian Regime, Houthis Celebrate Biden Administration’s
Policy
د. مجيد رافيزادا/معهد كايتستون: النظام الإيراني والحوثيين يحتفلون بسياسات بايدين
Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/March 27, 2021
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/97370/iranian-regime-houthis-celebrate-biden-administrations-policy-%d8%af-%d9%85%d8%ac%d9%8a%d8%af-%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%81%d9%8a%d8%b2%d8%a7%d8%af%d8%a7%d9%85%d9%86-%d9%85%d8%b9%d9%87%d8%af-%d9%83%d8%a7/
By removing the Houthis from the terrorist list and cutting off US support to
confront the militia group, the Biden Administration has emboldened and
empowered the Houthis and given them a free pass.
That is most likely why the Houthi terror group has ratcheted up its missile
attacks. More than 40 drones and missiles were reportedly launched by the
Houthis at Saudi Arabia in the month of February alone.
In spite of the mounting evidence of crimes committed by the Houthis, the Biden
Administration decided to hand an undeserved political victory to Iran’s regime.
Let us hope that the Biden Administration reconsiders, and stops rewarding Iran
for its malign behavior as well as jeopardizing the strengthening peace and
stability that has finally been taking off throughout the Middle East.
By removing Yemen’s Houthis from the list of foreign terrorist organizations and
cutting off US support to confront the militia group, the Biden Administration
has emboldened and empowered the Houthis and given them a free pass. Pictured:
Houthi gunmen take part in a funeral for fellow militiamen killed in battle with
Saudi-backed government troops in the Marib region, on March 23, 2021 in the
Yemeni capital Sanaa.
The Biden Administration has completely reversed the former administration’s
firm policy on the Houthis in the Yemeni civil war.
Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo designated Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi
rebels, also known as Ansarallah, as a “foreign terrorist organization” in
January 2021. The move was intended to hold the terror group accountable, as
Pompeo clarified:
“These designations will provide additional tools to confront terrorist activity
and terrorism by Ansarallah, a deadly Iran-backed militia group in the Gulf
region. The designations are intended to hold Ansarallah accountable for its
terrorist acts, including cross-border attacks threatening civilian populations,
infrastructure, and commercial shipping.”
But after less than a week in office, the Biden administration began reviewing
the designation and revoked the designation of Yemen’s Houthis as a terrorist
group.
Why would the Biden Administration remove a militia group, which commits crimes
against humanity, recruits, injures and kills children, from the terrorist
designation? According to Human Rights Watch’s World Report 2020:
“Since September 2014, all parties to the conflict have used child soldiers
under 18, including some under the age of 15, according to a 2019 UN Group of
Eminent International and Regional Experts on Yemen report in 2019. According to
the secretary general, out of 3,034 children recruited throughout the war in
Yemen, 1,940—64 percent—were recruited by the Houthis.”
The Houthis are also using landmines that control and kill civilians in Yemen.
According to Human Rights Watch:
“Houthi-planted landmines across Yemen continue to harm civilians and their
livelihoods. Houthi forces have been using antipersonnel mines, improvised
explosive devices (IED), and anti-vehicle mines along the western coast of
Yemen, resulting in hundreds of civilian deaths and injuries. The landmines have
also impeded aid workers’ abilities to reach vulnerable communities. Landmine
use has been documented in six governorates in Yemen since 2015. Since January
2018, at least 140 civilians, including 19 children, have been killed by
landmines in just the Hodeidah and Taizz governorates.”
The Houthi militia group also routinely resorts to various methods of torture.
Human Rights Watch points out:
“Former detainees described Houthi officers beating them with iron rods and
rifles and being hung from walls with their arms shackled behind them. Mothers,
sisters, and daughters of abducted men have demonstrated in front of prisons
across major Yemeni cities, searching for their kidnapped sons, fathers,
brothers, and other male relatives, organized under a group named ‘Mothers of
Abductees Association.’ The Association reported that there are 3,478
disappearance cases, at least 128 of those kidnapped have been killed.”
By removing the Houthis from the terrorist list and cutting off US support to
confront the militia group, the Biden Administration has emboldened and
empowered the Houthis and given them a free pass.
That is most likely why the Houthi terror group has ratcheted up its missile
attacks. More than 40 drones and missiles were reportedly launched by the
Houthis at Saudi Arabia in the month of February alone. Even Western officials
have acknowledged the escalation. A senior U.S. Defense official told NBC News
on a condition of anonymity:
“We’re certainly aware of a troubling increase in Houthi cross-border attacks
from a variety of systems, including cruise missiles, ballistic missiles and
UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles)”.
France, Germany, Italy and Britain also condemned the Houthi offensive and
characterized it as a “major escalation of attacks the Houthis have conducted
and claimed against Saudi Arabia.”
The sophisticated drones and missiles that the Houthi militia group is using
most likely came from the Iranian regime, which has recognized the terror group
as the official government of Yemen. Based on a U.N. report released in January
2021, there is strong evidence showing that the Islamic Republic of Iran is a
provider of weapons to the Houthis. The U.N. panel of experts report said:
“An increasing body of evidence suggests that individuals or entities in the
Islamic Republic of Iran supply significant volumes of weapons and components to
the Houthis”.
Iran mostly relies on the sea route to smuggle weapons to the Houthis, as
several of Iran’s weapons shipments, which were heading to war-torn Yemen, had
been previously seized.
In spite of the mounting evidence of crimes committed by the Houthis, the Biden
Administration decided to hand an undeserved political victory to Iran’s regime.
Let us hope that the Biden Administration reconsiders, and stops rewarding Iran
for its malign behavior as well as jeopardizing the strengthening peace and
stability that has finally been taking off throughout the Middle East.
*Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a business strategist and advisor, Harvard-educated
scholar, political scientist, board member of Harvard International Review, and
president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He has
authored several books on Islam and US foreign policy. He can be reached at
Dr.Rafizadeh@Post.Harvard.Edu
© 2021 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Much at stake as India, Saudi Arabia spar over oil prices
John Kemp/The Arab Weekly/March 27/2021
LONDON--Tensions this month between India and Saudi Arabia over rising oil
prices have underscored the growing importance of their bilateral relationship
and its potential to generate conflict as well as cooperation.
The decision by OPEC+, the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and
its allies, at the beginning of this month to leave output unchanged despite a
near doubling of oil prices since the start of November sparked an angry
exchange of words.
“The decision by OPEC+ has saddened us. It is not good news for India, China,
Japan, Korea and other consuming nations,” India’s minister for petroleum told
Reuters earlier this month. “We have asked companies to aggressively look for
diversification. We cannot be held hostage to the arbitrary decision of Middle
East producers,” an Indian government source said. In response, Saudi Arabia’s
energy minister said India should first use the stocks of crude it bought
cheaply during the price slump in 2020. In practice, there is too much at stake
for both countries to permit the disagreement to poison their overall
relationship. Saudi Aramco has reportedly maintained supplies to India’s
refiners for April, even as it cut loadings for other parts of Asia, a sign the
kingdom is keen to dial down the disagreement. But the dispute underscores how
dependent both countries have become on each other in petroleum supplies and the
increasing potential for disagreements about what constitutes a fair price.
Mutual dependence
In 2019, the last year before the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global trade,
Saudi Arabia was the second-most important supplier of merchandise to India,
while India was the second most important destination for Saudi exports. For
both countries the top trade partner was China, according to data compiled by
the International Monetary Fund . But merchandise trade between the two
countries was very unbalanced, with Saudi Arabia exporting around $27 billion to
India, while importing only around $6 billion in return. As a result, Saudi
Arabia accounted for India’s second-highest trade deficit (after China), while
India accounted for Saudi Arabia’s second-highest trade surplus (again after
China). Given that bilateral trade is dominated by petroleum, sharp increases in
the oil price have the potential to widen the imbalance significantly.
More broadly, the Arab Gulf States, including Iraq, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and the
United Arab Emirates, collectively account for more than 20% of India’s total
import bill, mostly in the form of oil and gas.
India is heavily reliant on imported oil and gas from the Gulf and the rest of
the world, so oil prices are a major source of pressure on the balance of
payments and the domestic economy. The country relies on imports to satisfy
almost 85% of its oil consumption and 55% of its gas, according to BP. The
Saudi-Indian dependency is mutual. India has become the second most important
market for Saudi oil exports — after China but slightly ahead of Japan and South
Korea.
India and China are expected to provide almost all the marginal increase in
global oil consumption over the next few years as more mature markets in North
America, Europe and Northeast Asia stagnate or decline.
India will therefore become increasingly critical for oil exporters. Saudi
Arabia has been keen to forge strategic relationships with India’s refiners and
fuel distributors to secure preferential access to one of the largest and
fastest growing downstream markets in the world.
Major impact
History since the World War Two suggests mutual dependency will not prevent
serious price disagreements between exporters and importers over what
constitutes a reasonable oil price. Between the 1970s and the 2000s, when the
major flow of Middle East oil was to Europe and the United States, the main
disagreements were between Saudi Arabia/OPEC and importers around the North
Atlantic. In the last two decades, reduced oil consumption in relation to GDP,
increased fuel taxes, and the US shale revolution have lessened European and
U.S. vulnerability to price changes originating from the Middle East. Managing
diplomatic and commercial relationships with the United States and Western
Europe was a top priority for Saudi Arabia and OPEC.
But now the major impact of price changes is felt in Asia, especially India and
China, these relations will demand greater commercial, diplomatic and political
attention.
*John Kemp is a Reuters market analyst.
Suez Canal blockage is a wake-up call
Dr. Theodore Karasik/Arab News/March 26/2021
The grounding of the Ever Given mega-container ship in the Suez Canal has
clogged a major global trade artery. The giant vessel has a capacity of 20,000
containers and was en route from Yantian, in China, to the Port of Rotterdam in
the Netherlands when it ran aground and blocked the waterway. The Ever Given is
owned by Japan’s Shoei Kisan Kaisha and chartered to Taiwanese line Evergreen
and the ripple effect of the incident on shipping is only now being realized.
This is not the first time that a ship has become stuck in the Suez Canal which
is a vital passageway between east and west. Previous groundings have involved
smaller vessels, including the Fabiola which blocked southbound transits for two
days in 2016, and the Maersk Shams in 2015 that was refloated on the same day
with little disruption.
But this time it is different. The latest blockage is a wake-up call to
guaranteeing that the Suez Canal chokepoints remain free and clear from such
incidents. If the canal does reopen quickly, vessels waiting now should be able
to make up time without too much disruption to global supply chains already
weighed down by port congestion and inland transportation delays caused by the
coronavirus pandemic.
So, the Suez infarction has occurred while the human race is living through the
pandemic. The body is ill.
It is not yet clear what caused the Ever Given to run aground but initial
reports suggested the ship had experienced engine trouble. However, a spokesman
for the vessel’s technical managers ruled out any suggestion of mechanical or
technical failure.
The Ever Given is now under salvage contract in coordination with the Suez Canal
Authority to move the vessel and to reopen the canal, but estimates vary to the
length of time it will take for a full resumption of traffic.
The key question is what to do? Remedies include waiting for higher tides, or to
dig out a wide turning circle by digging up banks of the canal, but that
solution will take time and require specialist equipment. Another option is to
lighten the vessel, although this would be a more complicated salvage operation.
Given the size of the ship — the length of four football pitches — and the fact
that it is fully loaded, efforts to remove containers using a crane barge will
be challenging.
Shippers will soon have to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope to keep
Asia-northern Europe and Asia-US east coast logistical services running. Such a
move will generate extra insurance and other shipping costs and delay deliveries
by weeks. And the coronavirus pandemic will only add to the snowball effect.
Containerized goods represent around 26 percent of the total Suez Canal traffic,
with westbound shipping estimated to be worth around $5.1 billion a day and
eastbound daily traffic $4.5 billion. In the first day of the blockage, 165
vessels — including 41 bulk carriers, 20 Panamax and Supramax vessels, and two
bulk ore ships — were either waiting at one end of the canal or being prevented
from exiting.
The breakdown becomes more interesting. There were 24 crude tankers, including
three supertankers (VLCCs) and nine Suezmax vessels; 33 container ships, four of
which (including the Ever Given) are of 197,000-plus deadweight tonnage; 16
liquefied petroleum or natural gas carriers; eight vehicle carriers; and 15
product tankers, including long-range ships carrying 90,000-ton cargoes of jet
fuel or diesel to Europe. The backlog, just for energy vessels alone, is around
50 per day.
Safeguarding the back-up of vessels is vital because of maritime security
threats. Such delays send signals that these ships may be ripe for attack or
acts of piracy, inspiring some groups to take advantage of the situation.
Safeguarding the back-up of vessels is vital because of maritime security
threats.
So, the Ever Given incident is creating opportunity for certain actors to
potentially interrupt logistical flows. With ships possibly having to divert
around the southern tip of Africa, piracy also becomes a threat in the Gulf of
Guinea and nations along the Gulf’s coastline need to be on full alert over the
coming weeks.
The blockage of the Suez Canal makes it even more important to ensure that other
waterways remain free and clear. The Ever Given incident is a wake-up call to
the logistical chain and one from which lessons must be learned. The Panama
Canal, which connects the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, has in the past
experienced problems of its own and situations of this kind in narrow waterways
serve to highlight that logistical flow control is key to global economic
security.
**Dr. Theodore Karasik is a senior adviser to Gulf State Analytics in
Washington, D.C. Twitter: @tkarasik
On Ramadan and Passover, a reminder of how far we have come
Rabbi Marc Schneier/Arab News/March 26, 2021
On Saturday, Jews around the world will commemorate the Exodus of the Israelites
from enslavement when they celebrate the holiday of Passover, abstaining from
bread and eating bitter roots to recall the pain of their forebears. Two weeks
later, Muslims will begin their month-long celebration of Ramadan, a time of
fasting but also heightened devotion and reflection.
Both of these sacred events have always had empathy at their core, focusing our
attention on those in need of emotional understanding and our generosity. But in
many ways this year’s parallel festivities are more intertwined than ever
before. In the Middle East, the renewed hope fostered by the recent Abraham
Accords between Israel and four Muslim-led nations is palpable. And, even in the
US, it is hard not to feel an unprecedented spirit of Muslim-Jewish unity taking
hold.
Muslims and Jews alike rejoiced over the end of the “Muslim ban” imposed by
former President Donald Trump, which prevented travelers from several
Muslim-majority countries from entering America. The cynical attempt to brand
the policy as a “travel ban” failed to hide its explicit anti-Muslim nature or
its dangerous institutionalization of Islamophobia and xenophobia in the US.
Other than Muslims themselves, Jews opposed the ban more vociferously than any
faith community in America. A large number of Jewish people joined spontaneous
and organized demonstrations, including the 2017 “Today I am a Muslim too” rally
that I led in Times Square, New York. Rabbis were arrested for protesting
outside of Trump-owned properties and Jewish defense organizations engaged in
court challenges to fight for Muslims overseas to be able to visit this country.
Over four years, the ban separated tens of thousands of spouses, children,
grandparents and other family members from loved ones. Many more could not reach
our safe shores to flee violence or escape persecution in their own communities.
And, for millions of Muslim Americans, the ban was a galling daily reminder that
members of their own faith were not welcomed by the US government, and that
their own fundamental rights as citizens were at risk.
In all its callousness and cruelty, the ban represented the very opposite of the
empathy we as Jews and Muslim are instructed to espouse — especially during
Passover and Ramadan. During Ramadan, Muslims fast every day from sunrise to
sundown, in large part to invoke the pain of people in need, including refugees
requiring our succor.
On Passover, Jews are likewise enjoined to empathize with individuals of all
faiths and ethnicities enduring oppression. In the Torah, God commands the
Jewish people: “But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one
born among you, and thou shall love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the
Land of Egypt.”
As we celebrate this year with friends and families, Jews and Muslims in the US
can each honor the triumph of our common cause. In the 2020 election, more than
two in three in both of our communities voted for President Joe Biden. Polling
and anecdotal evidence indicate many of the same core values driving us toward a
candidate who promised to put empathy at the core of his governing vision. By
overturning the Muslim ban and reversing course on other draconian immigration
restrictions, Biden has delivered on his pledges.
Traveling last month to the Arabian Peninsula and other Muslim countries, I met
foreign leaders and officials confounded by Trump’s poor performance with Jews
after his unparalleled support for Israel. As I explained to them, Trump’s
penchant for xenophobic and fear-driven policies toward Muslims and other
minority groups, including African Americans, Asians and Latinos, greatly
disturbed the American Jewish community. History teaches Jews that they need an
open, pluralistic and democratic environment to thrive.
When American Jews watch television coverage of Syrian refugees, or the plight
of the Rohingya Muslims and Chinese Uighurs, we see the images not only through
the lens of our biblical persecution and exodus. We reflect on the horrors of
the 1930s and 1940s, when the world — including America — shamefully closed its
doors to desperate European Jews seeking to escape the Nazi terror. Wherever
Muslims suffer around the world today, Jews feel a deep solidarity and
determination to use their voices to speak for those being silenced, pressured,
threatened or worse.
As we celebrate with friends and families, Jews and Muslims in the US can each
honor the triumph of our common cause.
Today, America is blessed with a president committed to the basic tenets of
democracy, and to human empathy. As someone touched by tragedy throughout his
own life, Biden has a special ability to feel the pain of others and offer them
solace.
I am confident President Biden will tap into his deep well of empathy to advance
peace between Israelis and Palestinians, building on the success of Trump and
his son-in-law Jared Kushner with the Abraham Accords. Amid so much hope in the
Middle East, and clear signs that Muslims and Jews are writing a new page of
tolerance and understanding, this conflict still poses a regional challenge that
we must address and overcome. Biden understands that Israeli-Palestinian
reconciliation is critical to realizing the full potential of a global
Muslim-Jewish partnership.
We are not there yet, but our two communities have come so far. On this Passover
and Ramadan, I am hopeful Jews and Muslims can together renew our commitment to
recognizing and internalizing the suffering of the other, in all his or her
diversity. And we should continue our duty as peoples of faith to offer comfort
and shelter for those in need, and truly serve as our brothers’ and sisters’
keepers.
*Rabbi Marc Schneier is President of the Foundation for Ethnic Understanding and
co-author with Imam Shamsi Ali of “Sons of Abraham: A Candid Conversation About
the Issues that Divide and Unite Jews and Muslims.”