English LCCC Newsbulletin For 
Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For June 20/2020
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news
The Bulletin's Link on the 
lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/eliasnews21/english.june20.21.htm
News Bulletin Achieves Since 
2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations For today
But this one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind 
and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on towards the goal for the 
prize of the heavenly call of God in Christ Jesus.
Letter to the Philippians 03/07-14:”Yet whatever gains I had, these I have come 
to regard as loss because of Christ. More than that, I regard everything as loss 
because of the surpassing value of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I 
have suffered the loss of all things, and I regard them as rubbish, in order 
that I may gain Christ and be found in him, not having a righteousness of my own 
that comes from the law, but one that comes through faith in Christ, the 
righteousness from God based on faith.I want to know Christ and the power of his 
resurrection and the sharing of his sufferings by becoming like him in his 
death, if somehow I may attain the resurrection from the dead. Not that I have 
already obtained this or have already reached the goal; but I press on to make 
it my own, because Christ Jesus has made me his own. Beloved, I do not consider 
that I have made it my own; but this one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind 
and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on towards the goal for the 
prize of the heavenly call of God in Christ Jesus.
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials 
published on June 19-20/2021
Health Ministry: 104 new Corona cases, 4 deaths
EU threatens Lebanese politicians with sanctions over crisis
EU Links Aid to Government, Says Sanctions on the Table
Lebanese Politicians May Face Sanctiobs Unless Crisis Solved, EU Says
EU's Borrell tours Lebanese officials
President Aoun meets with top Representative of European Union for Foreign, 
Political and Security Affairs
Reforms represent main battle the new government will fight after removing 
internal, external obstacles hindering the formation process
Borrell affirms European Union's sustainable support for Lebanon, stresses need 
to form a new government, launch negotiations with the International Monetary 
Fund
Berri, Borrell discuss prevailing Lebanese situation: Obstacles to government 
formation are purely internal
Diab welcomes Borrell
Hariri reviews prevailing conditions with Borrell
Akar reviews with Borrell prevailing situation, crisis of the displaced
EU's Borrell tours Lebanese officials
Lighting of 2,000 candles on the beach of Ramlet alBaida to commemorate World 
War II
Karaki to NNA: No amendment to hospital tariffs before financing is secured, 
dossier in Akar's custody, malicious campaigns will not stop NSSF's ongoing 
march
Annual Synod meeting concludes its works in Bkirki
Geagea accuses FPM of "lying" when they claim to work for Christians' rights
Report: Egypt Urges Formation of Govt in Lebanon
Lebanon Seizes Captagon Pills Bound for SA
All Means All’s message to Lebanese leaders: Get lost/Nadim Shehadi/Arab 
News/June 20/2021
Titles For The Latest English LCCC 
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on June 
19-20/2021
Ultraconservative Raisi Elected Iran President as Rivals Concede
Amnesty Calls for Iran's Raisi to Be Investigated over Rights
Russia's Putin congratulates Iran's Raisi on presidential election win
Tehran Summons UK Ambassador Over 'Difficulties' for Iranians Voting in Britain
U.S. Cutting Forces, Missile Batteries in Middle East
US sees ‘wildfire of terrorism’ sweeping from Sahel to Horn of Africa
Amnesty International slams Kurdish clamp-down on dissent
Titles For The Latest The Latest LCCC 
English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on June 
19-20/2021
The Biden Administration’s Iran Policy: All 
Carrots, No Stick/Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/June 19/2021
Is the 'hardliner' talking point about Iran’s Raisi a whitewash?/Seth J. 
Frantzman/ Jerusalem Post/June 19/2021
Biden’s multilateralism is all very nice. But now let’s see action/Baria 
Alamuddin/Arab News/June 20/2021
The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & 
Lebanese Related News & Editorials published 
on June 19-20/2021
Health Ministry: 104 new Corona 
cases, 4 deaths
NNA/June 19/2021 
The Ministry of Public Health announced, in its daily report on Saturday, the 
registration of 104 new infections with Coronavirus, which raised the cumulative 
number of confirmed cases to-date to 543,371. It added that 4 deaths were 
recorded during the past 24 hours.
EU threatens Lebanese politicians with sanctions over 
crisis
Arab News/June 20/2021
BEIRUT: The European Union’s foreign policy chief Saturday berated Lebanese 
politicians for delays in forming a new Cabinet, warning the union could impose 
sanctions on those behind the political stalemate in the crisis-hit country. 
Josep Borrell made his comments at the presidential palace near the capital 
Beirut after meeting with President Michel Aoun. It was the first meeting in a 
two-day visit to Lebanon. Borrell said Lebanese politicians should quickly form 
a new government, implement reforms and reach a deal with the International 
Monetary Fund to start getting the tiny country out of its paralyzing economic 
and financial crisis. Lebanon’s economic crisis — triggered by decades of 
corruption and mismanagement — began in late 2019 and has intensified in recent 
months. The World Bank said earlier this month the crisis is likely to rank as 
one of the worst the world has seen in more than 150 years, adding that the 
economy contracted 20.3 percent in 2020 and is expected to shrink 9.5 percent 
this year. A power struggle between premier-designate Saad Hariri on one side, 
and Aoun and his son-in-law Gebran Bassil on the other, has worsened the crisis 
despite warnings from world leaders and economic experts of the dire economic 
conditions tiny Lebanon is facing. Hariri was named to form a new government in 
October and has not succeeded so far. The government of Prime Minister Hassan 
Diab resigned days after a massive blast in Beirut on Aug. 4, that killed 211 
people and injured more than 6,000.
“We cannot understand that nine months after the resignation of a prime 
minister, there is still no government in Lebanon,” Borrell said. “Only an 
urgent agreement with the International Monetary Fund will rescue the country 
from a financial collapse.”“There is no time to waste. You are at the edge of 
the financial collapse,” he said in English. Borrell said the EU stands ready to 
assist Lebanon and its people but warned that if there is further obstruction to 
solutions “we will have to consider other courses of actions as some member 
states have proposed.” “The council of the European Union has been including 
other options, including targeted sanctions,” Borrell said. He added: “Of course 
we prefer not to go down this road and we hope that we will not have to but it 
is in the hands of the Lebanese leadership.”Borrel rejected claims by some 
Lebanese politicians that refugees are the cause of the crisis, saying it is 
“homemade.” “It is not fair (to say) that the crisis in Lebanon comes from the 
presence of refugees,” he said referring to a nearly 1 million Syrian refugees 
who fled the war in their country to Lebanon.
EU Links Aid to Government, Says Sanctions on the Table
Naharnet/June 19/2021 
The EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep 
Borrell stressed after talks with President Michel Aoun on Saturday that 
introducing reforms and forming a new government are imperative for any 
assistance the crisis-hit country could receive from foreign countries. He also 
said that sanctions on parties obstructing the formation of a government are “on 
the table.”“Reforms in Lebanon and the formation of a government are conditional 
for any EU assistance for Lebanon,” said Borell, noting that it was his first 
official visit as EU representative. “We are extremely concerned about the 
economic crisis in Lebanon. I am here today on behalf of the EU to express 
support for the Lebanese people. We are ready to continue to support Lebanon and 
its people,” he said. He said the EU has provided millions of euros in 
assistance for Lebanon in 2020 that amounted to around one million euros per 
day.
“In coordination with the US we provided direct help for the Lebanes people. We 
have other tools to help the Lebanes as soon as we see tangible progress in the 
government,” he added, stressing no assistance without a cabinet line-up. The 
“EU is willing to provide more help but we have to see tangible reforms. We are 
ready to study and look into the loas and aid assistance programs to relaunch 
the Lebanese economy.”Borrell said the crisis in Lebanon is self-made and 
“local” with grave consequences on the Lebanese people. “Lebanese leaders must 
shoulder their responsibility and place needed measures without any delay.”On 
reported sanctions the EU and France plan to impose on Lebanese officials 
obstructing the formation process, he said: “We prefer not to have to resort to 
sanctions, but this is all in the hands of the Lebanese leadership.”“Sanctions 
are on the table and we are studying them, if they are implemented, it will be 
to motivate the political class to find solutions,” he said. On the refugees 
file, he said the EU “understands the burden they have on Lebanon. Lebanon has 
been a haven for refugees from war-torn neighboring countries.”However, he noted 
that the presence of refugees must not be blamed for Lebanon’s crisis which is 
the result of mismanagement.
Lebanese Politicians May Face Sanctiobs Unless Crisis 
Solved, EU Says
Agence France Presse/June 19/2021
EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell warned Saturday that Lebanese leaders 
could face sanctions unless they pull the country away from financial collapse 
and strike a deal with the IMF. Lebanon is facing what the World Bank has 
described as one of the world's worst economic crises since the 1850s. A 
political crisis has left the country without a functioning government since the 
last once resigned after a massive explosion killed dozens and destroyed swathes 
of Beirut in August 2020. Speaking in Beirut after talks with Lebanese President 
Michel Aoun, Borrell said he had "a message of firmness to all Lebanese 
political leaders on behalf of the EU". "The crisis Lebanon is facing is a 
domestic crisis, is a self-imposed crisis, not a crisis coming from abroad or 
from external factors," he said. "The Lebanese leadership must take its 
responsibility... a government must be formed and key reforms implemented 
immediately." The EU's foreign policy chief said the bloc was willing to help 
Lebanon engage in reforms but only after a deal is struck with the International 
Monetary Fund. "Only an urgent agreement with IMF will rescue the country from a 
financial collapse... and there is no time to waste," he said. "You are on the 
edge of a financial collapse."But Borrell added that should "further 
obstructions to solutions" emerge, the EU "will have to consider other courses 
of action as some member states have proposed". "The council of the EU has been 
including other options, including targeted sanctions... we prefer not to go 
down this road... but it is in hands of the Lebanese leadership," Borrell said. 
In April France imposed sanctions by restricting the entry on its territory of 
Lebanese figures it says are responsible for the political crisis. Foreign 
Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said at the time that talks were underway with 
France's EU partners on how to increase pressure on Lebanese who are 
"obstructing a way out of the crisis".
EU's Borrell tours Lebanese officials
LBC/June 19/2021
President Michel Aoun met on Saturday with High Representative of the European 
Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice President of the European 
Commission Josep Borrell at the Baabda Presidential Palace. Following the 
meeting, Borrell expressed the European Union’s solidarity with the Lebanese 
people, voicing readiness to provide support.  “But we cannot provide 
assistance without reforms," he added. “We have great resources and our 
intention is to help Lebanon to re-launch its economy,” Borrell went on by 
saying.
“But before doing so, we have to see the implementation of reforms and the 
Lebanese leaders must assume their responsibilities and form a government,” he 
stressed. He pointed out that "Lebanon is on the verge of falling into financial 
collapse due to mismanagement,” adding that “it is not fair to say that the 
crisis in Lebanon is caused by the refugees."  He also voiced hopes that 
things will not reach the stage of imposing sanctions on Lebanese leaders, 
adding however the matter requires cooperation from Lebanon. On another note, he 
said that the parliamentary elections should take place on time, adding that the 
EU is ready to monitor if an invitation to do so was received.
Borrell then met with Speaker Nabih Berri in Ain el-Tineh. During the meeting, 
Berri said that the obstacles hindering the formation of a new government is 
internal only. Borrell and the accompanying delegation then headed to the Bayt 
al-Wasat where he met with Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri. 
Discussions focused on the latest political developments in the country and the 
bilateral relations between Lebanon and the EU. The EU's envoy also met with 
Caretaker Prime Minister Hassan Diab at the Grand Serail, heading a delegation 
which included: the Head of Delegation of the European Union to Lebanon 
Ambassador Ralph Tarraf, Mr. Pedro Serrano, Head of Borrell’s Cabinet Mr. Carl 
Hallergard, Deputy Managing Director of North Africa, Middle East, Arab 
Peninsula, Iraq and Iran at the European External Action Service Mr. Rafael 
Daerr, EC Member of Cabinet Ms. Esther Orsini-Rosenberg, EC Communication 
Advisor, and Ms. Hannah Severin, Political Officer at the Delegation of the 
European Union to Lebanon, in the presence of Ministers Raoul Nehme and Ramzi 
Musharrafieh, as well as PM Advisor for Diplomatic Affairs Ambassador Gebran 
Soufan. 
During the meeting, Diab briefed the delegation on the difficulties that Lebanon 
is going through, namely on the financial and economic levels, especially since 
the delay in forming the government, as a result of political bickering, 
exacerbates the crises and increases the suffering of the people, hoping to 
speed up the approval of the draft ration card by the Parliament, which was 
previously sent by the government with securing its funding sources to support 
about 750 000 vulnerable families; PM Diab requested the European Union's 
assistance in this regard. 
Diab also stressed that the key solution to the financial, economic and living 
crisis lies in the formation of a new government that would resume the 
negotiations that the current government had started with the International 
Monetary Fund, and on the basis of the financial recovery plan developed by the 
government and that needs to be updated first. Diab added that the caretaker 
government did not fail to fulfill its duties, in accordance with the 
Constitution, to facilitate citizens' lives and alleviate their suffering.
He also praised the bilateral relations and partnership between Lebanon and the 
European Union.
For his part, Borrell affirmed the European Union's interest in taking stock at 
the prevailing situation in Lebanon, and examining the various governmental, 
economic and social challenges and their repercussions at all levels. He also 
expressed the European Union's readiness to help Lebanon and its people in 
overcoming the difficult crises.
President Aoun meets with top Representative of 
European Union for Foreign, Political and Security Affairs: Reforms represent 
main battle the new government will fight after removing internal, external 
obstacles hindering the formation process
Borrell affirms European Union's sustainable support for Lebanon, stresses need 
to form a new government, launch negotiations with the International Monetary 
Fund
NNA/June 19/2021 
President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, met with the Higher 
Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and the Vice-President 
of the European Union, Josep Borrell, at Baabda palace and informed him of the 
government formation process, stressing the distinctive Lebanese situation. The 
President thanked Mr. Borrell for the European Union's interest in Lebanon and 
the aid presented during the difficult times covering of the Beirut port 
explosion and the crises that burden the Lebanese people, such as the Syrian 
displacement and Corona pandemic.
In addition, President Aoun asked Mr. Borrell to continue providing aid to 
Lebanon, pointing to the importance Europe's assistance in recovering the 
smuggled money to European banks. President Aoun then stressed the importance of 
conducting forensic financial audit despite the obstacles placed to hinder the 
work to combat corruption, which is backed by a system that includes officials, 
politicians, economists, financiers and businessmen. "The forensic financial 
audit is the first step required in the rescue initiatives and aid programs from 
the concerned countries and international bodies, without it reforms and the 
restoration of external confidence in the Lebanese financial reality cannot be 
achieved" the President indicated. Then, President Aoun emphasized that "Lebanon 
welcomes any support provided by the European Union in the formation of the new 
government, which must be credible and capable of carrying out reforms based on 
constitutional principles, traditions and practices that have emerged for years 
which we want to be based on the foundations of national reconciliation". 
Afterwards, President Aoun pointed out that the support Lebanon seeks from the 
international community is not only in the humanitarian field, but also in 
development, reiterating Lebanon's call for the return of displaced Syrians to 
their country, especially after the stable and secure situation in most of the 
Syrian territories, because Lebanon is no longer able to bear the repercussions 
of this displacement in all sectors. For his part, Mr. Borrell assured President 
Aoun during the meeting, which was attended by a delegation that included 
members of the Commission and the European Mission in Lebanon, of the continued 
support of the European Union, focusing on the importance of forming a new 
government and launching talks with the International Monetary Fund, which would 
achieve the flow of European aid to support the Lebanese economy.
Borell's Statement:
"Good morning,
I am very happy to be here in Lebanon again, because a couple of years ago I was 
here as Foreign Affairs Minister of Spain and I had also the honour to be 
received by the President of the Republic [Michel Aoun]. But this is my first 
visit to Lebanon as European Union High Representative. Lebanon is a neighbour, 
and close, long-standing partner of the European Union. We are very concerned by 
the current economic and political crises that Lebanon is facing. I am here 
today to express, on behalf of the European Union, our solidarity and support to 
the Lebanese people, but also our concern to their political authorities.
We, in the European Union, are ready to do our part to provide continued support 
to Lebanon and to its people. In 2020, last year, we provided 333 million euros 
in assistance to Lebanon. This means almost one million euros every day. 
Together with the United Nations, we have established a framework to help the 
Lebanese people directly. We have several other instruments at our disposal to 
help the Lebanese government, and we are willing to mobilise them as soon as we 
see tangible progress on the necessary reforms.
We cannot provide this help without progress on the reform process. Reforms that 
the country needs to undertake to overcome the current crisis. So, let me be 
clear: we have the resources and the willingness to help more. But in order to 
help more, we need the process of reforms to continue, to accelerate and to be 
able to overcome the current situation. Let me put an? example, as soon as an 
International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme will be in place, we will be able to 
look at concessional lending and guarantees, provide trade measures and a 
macro-financial assistance programme. This will mean an important amount of 
money and measures that will help boost the Lebanese economy.
But I also want to pass a message of firmness to all Lebanese political leaders. 
A message on behalf of all the European Union and also of the Member States. The 
crisis Lebanon is facing is a domestic crisis. It is a self-imposed crisis. It 
is not a crisis coming from abroad or from external factors. It is a homemade 
crisis. It is a crisis done by yourselves. And the consequences for the 
population are very much dire: 40% unemployment rate and more than half of the 
population living in poverty. These are dramatic figures.
The Lebanese leadership must take its responsibility and adopt the necessary 
measures without more delay: a government must be formed and key reforms 
implemented immediately. We cannot understand that nine month after the 
designation of a Primer Minster, there is still no Government in Lebanon. Only 
an urgent agreement with the International Monetary Fund will rescue the country 
from a financial collapse. In order to avoid a financial collapse, Lebanon needs 
an agreement with the International Monetary Fund. There is no time to waste. 
You are at the edge of a financial collapse.
I have just had a moment ago a frank exchange with His Excellency President [of 
the Republic of Lebanon, Michel] Aoun on these matters and I will continue my 
discussions with other members of the Lebanese leadership, notably with Prime 
Minister-designate [Saad] Hariri, with Caretaker Prime Minister [Hassan] Diab 
and with Speaker of the House [of Representatives, Nabih] Berri.
Let me insist. We stand ready to assist, if this what you want. But if there is 
further obstruction to solutions to the current multi-dimensional crisis in the 
country, we will have to consider other courses of action, as some Member States 
have proposed. The Council of the European Union has been discussing options, 
including targeted sanctions. Of course we prefer not to go down this route and 
we hope that we will not have to. But it is in the hands of the Lebanese 
leadership.
I also want to say a few words on the refugees in Lebanon ahead of the World 
refugee day, tomorrow. We are going to talk about refugees and we have to praise 
the Lebanese for all this, for the strong support that the Lebanese people have 
provided to the refugees. Ahead of the World refugee day tomorrow we have to 
praise this effort and we are very much aware of the burden the refugee 
population has placed on Lebanon, notably those that came from neighbouring 
Syria. Lebanon has been a place of refuge for people fleeing a savage conflict, 
for the sake of humanity. From the beginning, the European Union has provided 
substantive support, to both the refugees and the hosting communities and we are 
ready to do more. We are ready to support more Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey, the 
countries that are receiving and taking care of the refugees.
Also, on that matter, we trust that the Lebanese authorities will continue to 
respect the principle of non-refoulement. We will continue providing support for 
refugees and for Lebanese communities hosting a large part of the refugee 
population. Let me underline that the economic crisis Lebanon is currently 
facing is the result of mismanagement, and not linked to the presence of 
refugees. It is not fair to say that the crisis in Lebanon comes from the 
presence of refugees.
Another consideration on the Lebanon resources. Despite the brain drain 
triggered by the crisis, Lebanon has precious human capital. Human capital is 
the most important capital. And Lebanon can count on it. I am looking forward to 
my meeting with various activists and civil society organisations -not only with 
the political leadership and institutions, also with activists and civil 
society- to listen to their take on the current situation and discuss ways of 
supporting their efforts.
I think that Lebanon has a vibrant civil society and thanks to this vibrant 
civil society and to all Lebanese who each day fight for the future of their 
country, thanks to that, I am convinced there is a way out of the crisis".
[Presidency Information Office]
Berri, Borrell discuss prevailing Lebanese 
situation: Obstacles to government formation are purely internal
NNA/June 19/2021 
House Speaker Nabih Berri met today at Ain El-Tineh Palace with the High 
Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and 
Vice President of the European Commission, Josep Borrell, and his accompanying 
delegation, in the presence of European Union Ambassador to Lebanon Ralph Tarraf. 
Talks centered on the Lebanese situation with its ramifications and 
repercussions, particularly the government crisis. Speaker Berri provided the 
European delegate with a detailed explanation of his initiative aimed at 
overcoming the governmental crisis, the stages it has crossed and where it 
stands today, stressing that "the obstacles that prevent the government's 
formation are purely internal." The Speaker also outlined the reform laws 
endorsed by the Parliament and what is underway in this context, to keep pace 
with the forthcoming government in its expected reform and rescue mission. Berri 
thanked the European Union for its role and efforts, as well as the French 
initiative in supporting Lebanon out of its crises. On a different note, Speaker 
Berri cabled the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, Imam Sayyed 
Ali Khamenei, in wake of the completed Iranian presidential elections, pointing 
out that "the Islamic Republic of Iran, as it is great in creating its 
steadfastness and prevention in the face of the blockade, and in its 
steadfastness in supporting and aiding vulnerable peoples and nations, it is 
also great at making and preserving its options and constitutional deadlines."
Diab welcomes Borrell
NNA/June 19/2021
Caretaker Prime Minister, Hassan Diab, today welcomed at the Grand Serail, Mr. 
Josep Borrell Fontelles, High Representative of the European Union For Foreign 
Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission (EC), 
heading a delegation which included: the Head of Delegation of the European 
Union to Lebanon, Ambassador Ralph Tarraf, Mr. Pedro Serrano, Head of Borrell’s 
Cabinet, Mr. Carl Hallergard, Deputy Managing Director of North Africa, Middle 
East, Arab Peninsula, Iraq and Iran at the European External Action Service, Mr. 
Rafael Daerr, EC Member of Cabinet, Ms. Esther Orsini-Rosenberg, EC 
Communication Advisor, and Ms. Hannah Severin, Political Officer at the 
Delegation of the European Union to Lebanon, in the presence of Ministers Raoul 
Nehme and Ramzi Musharrafieh, as well as PM Advisor for Diplomatic Affairs, 
Ambassador Gebran Soufan.
Premier Diab briefed the delegation on the difficulties that Lebanon is going 
through, namely on the financial and economic levels, especially since the delay 
in forming the government, as a result of political bickering, exacerbates the 
crises and increases the suffering of the people, hoping to speed up the 
approval of the draft ration card by the Parliament, which was previously sent 
by the government with securing its funding sources to support about 750 000 
vulnerable families; PM Diab requested the European Union's assistance in this 
regard.  Prime Minister Diab also stressed that the key solution to the 
financial, economic and living crisis lies in the formation of a new government 
that would resume the negotiations that the current government had started with 
the International Monetary Fund, and on the basis of the financial recovery plan 
developed by the government and that needs to be updated first. Diab added that 
the caretaker government did not fail to fulfill its duties, in accordance with 
the Constitution, to facilitate citizens' lives and alleviate their suffering. 
The Prime Minister also praised the bilateral relations and partnership between 
Lebanon and the European Union. For his part, Borrell affirmed the European 
Union's interest in taking stock at the prevailing situation in Lebanon, and 
examining the various governmental, economic and social challenges and their 
repercussions at all levels. He also expressed the European Union's readiness to 
help Lebanon and its people in overcoming the difficult crises. Grand Serail 
Information Office
Hariri reviews prevailing conditions with Borrell
NNA/June 19/2021
Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri received this afternoon at "Center House" 
the European Union's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security 
Policy, Josep Borrell, at the head of a delegation accompanied by European Union 
Ambassador to Lebanon Ralph Tarraf, and in the presence of former Minister 
Ghattas Khoury and Hariri's Advisor for Diplomatic Affairs Bassem el-Chab. Talks 
during the meeting dwelt on the latest political developments, the general 
situation in the country, and the relations between Lebanon and the European 
Union.
Akar reviews with Borrell prevailing situation, 
crisis of the displaced
NNA/June 19/2021
Deputy Prime Minister, Caretaker Minister of Defense and Acting Minister of 
Foreign Affairs and Emigrants, Zeina Akar, welcomed today the European Union's 
Higher Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, 
along with his accompanying delegation and the European Union's Ambassador to 
Lebanon Ralph Tarraf, upon their arrival at Rafic Hariri International Airport. 
Akar then held a meeting with Borrell, which included a working lunch in the 
presence of Ambassador Tarraf; his Office Director Pedro Serrano; Deputy 
Director of the Department for Africa, the Middle East and the Arabian Peninsula 
for European External Action Karl Hallegard; Member of the European Commission 
Office Raphael Dyer; Director of Political Affairs at the Lebanese Foreign 
Ministry, Ambassador Ghadi Khoury; Director of International Organizations, 
Ambassador Caroline Ziadeh; Director of Protocols Abeer Ali; and Head of the 
Europe Department Youssef Jabr. According to Akar's office, talks centered on 
the situation in Lebanon in light of the current stifling conditions and the 
crisis of the displaced Syrians, in addition to the results of the conference in 
support of the Lebanese Army, which was held at the invitation of France and 
with the participation of the International Support Group and the United 
Nations. Minister Akar explained to Borrell "the deteriorating economic, social 
and living situation in Lebanon," and commended "the role of the European Union 
and the aid it provides, most notably the aid that arrived after the explosion 
of the Port of Beirut," stressing "the importance of supporting Lebanon in all 
ways and the need to help it with the available means to get out of its crises."
EU's Borrell tours Lebanese officials
LBC/June 19/2021
President Michel Aoun met on Saturday with High Representative of the European 
Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice President of the European 
Commission Josep Borrell at the Baabda Presidential Palace. Following the 
meeting, Borrell expressed the European Union’s solidarity with the Lebanese 
people, voicing readiness to provide support.  “But we cannot provide 
assistance without reforms," he added. “We have great resources and our 
intention is to help Lebanon to re-launch its economy,” Borrell went on by 
saying.
“But before doing so, we have to see the implementation of reforms and the 
Lebanese leaders must assume their responsibilities and form a government,” he 
stressed. He pointed out that "Lebanon is on the verge of falling into financial 
collapse due to mismanagement,” adding that “it is not fair to say that the 
crisis in Lebanon is caused by the refugees."  He also voiced hopes that 
things will not reach the stage of imposing sanctions on Lebanese leaders, 
adding however the matter requires cooperation from Lebanon. On another note, he 
said that the parliamentary elections should take place on time, adding that the 
EU is ready to monitor if an invitation to do so was received.
Borrell then met with Speaker Nabih Berri in Ain el-Tineh. During the meeting, 
Berri said that the obstacles hindering the formation of a new government is 
internal only. Borrell and the accompanying delegation then headed to the Bayt 
al-Wasat where he met with Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri. 
Discussions focused on the latest political developments in the country and the 
bilateral relations between Lebanon and the EU. The EU's envoy also met with 
Caretaker Prime Minister Hassan Diab at the Grand Serail, heading a delegation 
which included: the Head of Delegation of the European Union to Lebanon 
Ambassador Ralph Tarraf, Mr. Pedro Serrano, Head of Borrell’s Cabinet Mr. Carl 
Hallergard, Deputy Managing Director of North Africa, Middle East, Arab 
Peninsula, Iraq and Iran at the European External Action Service Mr. Rafael 
Daerr, EC Member of Cabinet Ms. Esther Orsini-Rosenberg, EC Communication 
Advisor, and Ms. Hannah Severin, Political Officer at the Delegation of the 
European Union to Lebanon, in the presence of Ministers Raoul Nehme and Ramzi 
Musharrafieh, as well as PM Advisor for Diplomatic Affairs Ambassador Gebran 
Soufan. 
During the meeting, Diab briefed the delegation on the difficulties that Lebanon 
is going through, namely on the financial and economic levels, especially since 
the delay in forming the government, as a result of political bickering, 
exacerbates the crises and increases the suffering of the people, hoping to 
speed up the approval of the draft ration card by the Parliament, which was 
previously sent by the government with securing its funding sources to support 
about 750 000 vulnerable families; PM Diab requested the European Union's 
assistance in this regard. 
Diab also stressed that the key solution to the financial, economic and living 
crisis lies in the formation of a new government that would resume the 
negotiations that the current government had started with the International 
Monetary Fund, and on the basis of the financial recovery plan developed by the 
government and that needs to be updated first. Diab added that the caretaker 
government did not fail to fulfill its duties, in accordance with the 
Constitution, to facilitate citizens' lives and alleviate their suffering.
He also praised the bilateral relations and partnership between Lebanon and the 
European Union.
For his part, Borrell affirmed the European Union's interest in taking stock at 
the prevailing situation in Lebanon, and examining the various governmental, 
economic and social challenges and their repercussions at all levels. He also 
expressed the European Union's readiness to help Lebanon and its people in 
overcoming the difficult crises.
Lighting of 2,000 candles on the beach of Ramlet alBaida 
to commemorate World War II
NNA 
The Lebanese team, "Victory Volunteers", is organizing a commemorative event 
dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the start of World War II, at 8 p.m. 
upcoming Monday, with the support of the Embassy of the Russian Federation in 
Lebanon and the Russian Cultural Center in Beirut. Two thousand candles will be 
lit in the form of a plane on an area of 10 x 10 meters, on the beach of 
Beirut's Ramlet al-Baida, along with the word "Normandy".
Karaki to NNA: No amendment to hospital tariffs 
before financing is secured, dossier in Akar's custody, malicious campaigns will 
not stop NSSF's ongoing march
NNA/June 19/2021 
Director-General of the National Social Security Fund, Mohammad Karaki, 
confirmed Saturday, in an interview with the "National News Agency", that "there 
will be no amendment to the hospital tariffs in the event that the necessary 
funding for these increases is not secured," noting that "the file is now in the 
custody of the Deputy Prime Minister, Caretaker Minister of Defense Zeina Akar, 
to follow up with the stakeholders in the Health, Labor and Finance Ministries."
Karaki denied the circulated rumors that the National Social Security Fund has 
begun rationing admissions to hospitals, criticizing what he called "the process 
of lying, slander and fraud."
"All talk about the bankruptcy or withering away of NSSF has no scientific 
foundation, and we say to all the skeptics that the march of NSSF is continuing 
and will not be stopped by all the malicious campaigns," Karaki underlined.
In this connection, he explained that NSSF merely advised physicians to to be 
prudent in controlling unjustified admissions to hospitals and work to write off 
procedures that do not require hospitalization or convert them to external 
coverage in which the Fund contributes 80%. He stated that this step comes in an 
attempt to control needless spending by preventing the insured, whose health 
condition does not require admission to the hospital, from being admitted. "The 
aim is to control health spending to the maximum extent possible, especially 
since the conditions of the country no longer allow for any flaring policies, 
and we are now living on aid from brotherly and friendly countries, and this 
measure approved by the Fund's management was welcomed by the main stakeholders 
in the field of public health in the country, particularly the Minister of 
Public Health and the Chairman of the Parliamentary Health Committee," Karaki 
maintained.
Regarding the end-of-service indemnity, Karaki indicated that "the NSSF recently 
conducted 3 financial studies, all of which proved that the financial 
sustainability in this section is guaranteed, until at least 2065, and that the 
solvency ratio in this Fund exceeds 200%, meaning that the Fund is able today to 
compensate all those insured at once, and therefore there is no problem with the 
type of end-of-service indemnity, neither today nor in the future, and all talk 
contrary to that is misleading."Asked about family compensations, he said: "This 
section has absorbed the accumulated deficit, which was estimated at about 300 
billion LBP, and as of this year, it will achieve annual savings of up to 50 
billion LBP."
Referring to the financial status of the disease and maternity section, Karaki 
said: "We have previously indicated that the accumulated deficit in this branch 
is about 4250 billion pounds by the end of 2020, while the accumulated debts of 
the Lebanese state are around 4800 billion by the end of 2020. Thus, the 
financial condition of this section and its continuity is related to the extent 
to which the state fulfills its duties in terms of paying the accumulated debts 
to NSSF and the funds allocated to it in the public budgets, the most recent of 
which is the budget for the year 2021, estimated at 460 billion, of which only 
50 billion LBP has been paid to-date."
"We affirm that if the state pays all the funds allocated in the 2021 budget, 
there will be no problem with the health insurance offerings throughout this 
year," Karaki reassured.
The NSSF Director-General concluded by reiterating that all talk about the 
bankruptcy or deterioration of the National Social Security Fund is groundless 
and is not based on any scientific or accurate information whatsoever.
Annual Synod meeting concludes its works in Bkirki
NNA/June 19/2021
Maronite Patriarch, Cardinal Beshara Boutros al-Rahi, held a Mass service on 
Saturday in Bkirki marking the end of the annual retreat for the Synod of 
Bishops. In an issued statement following the Synod meeting, the conferees 
thanked Pope Francis for his interest in Lebanon, the preservation of its 
entity, and his keenness for Lebanon to remain a country of mission and a model 
of coexistence and the restoration of its role. Synod members also expressed 
their support for the move of Patriarch Rahi, which aims to save Lebanon after 
the failure of the formation of the government and obstruction of the horizon, 
by calling for Lebanon's neutrality and holding an international conference 
under the auspices of the United Nations.
Geagea accuses FPM of "lying" when they claim to work for Christians' rights
NNA/June 19/2021
Lebanese Forces Chief, Samir Geagea, accused the Free Patiotic Movement (FPM) of 
"lying" when they claim to work for the rights of Christians, saying: "It is a 
new lie when the Free Patriotic Movement claims to work for the rights of 
Christians after the lies of liberation, the sovereignty of the Lebanese state, 
the prevention of illegal weapons, and after the lies of reform and change." 
Geagea criticized the FPM's understanding with its allies during the past four 
years, saying: "You shared quotas with them and exchanged barter with them, 
which led to the ruin of the country and the Christians along with it." "Those 
who say that they are working to achieve the rights of Christians must work 
first to establish sovereignty, restore the strategic decision of the state and 
enable it to play its role, because here are the actual rights of Christians, 
and they have to watch over the management of the state away from theft, 
corruption, neglect, clientelism and self-interest," he added. "Contrary to what 
some have suggested about the nature of the current crisis, the prevailing 
problem is not one of powers between presidencies or a sectarian problem, but 
rather a conflict of narrow interests, influence and power," Geagea concluded.
Report: Egypt Urges Formation of Govt in 
Lebanon
Naharnet/June 19/2021
Egypt believes Lebanon should quickly form a much-needed new government, and 
that any further delay could aggravate the crises in the country, al-Joumhouria 
daily reported on Saturday. “Egyptian diplomats” have come to believe that 
“every delay in the Lebanese agreeing on a government will further exacerbate 
the burdens of the crisis that Lebanon is going through,” according to 
information obtained by the daily. They believe that the “situation in this 
brotherly country requires the Lebanese to meet quickly to assess Lebanon’s 
interest. Egypt encourages the brothers in Lebanon to reach a way out and an 
understanding of a government in accordance with the initiatives put forward.” 
They say a new government reserves Lebanon’s stability and civil peace, avoids 
the dangers and challenges that threaten it, and restores its position and role 
alongside the Arab and international family.
Lebanon Seizes Captagon Pills Bound for SA
Naharnet/June 19/2021 
Lebanese authorities seized Friday millions of Captagon pills in the port of 
Beirut, placed in two containers loaded with stones and prepared for smuggling 
to Saudi Arabia. Caretaker Minister of Interior Mohamed Fahmi on Friday revealed 
that the shipment was bound for Jeddah. Security forces have doubled down to 
prevent smuggling from Lebanon, regularly carrying out drug busts on its soil. 
Fahmi asked all countries to have trust in Lebanon and asked the citizens in 
Lebanon to join their efforts with security forces in order to help restore 
confidence in Lebanon. He congratulated the port’s Customs on seizing millions 
of Captagon pills, pointing to coordination between all security agencies, 
contributing to curbing the scourge of smuggling. He stated that security 
agencies arrested the masterminds involved in drug smuggling, and that efforts 
are ongoing to track more sides involved. In May, Saudi Arabia banned Lebanese 
fruit and vegetable imports after seizing 5.3 million banned Captagon pills 
hidden in a consignment of pomegranates reportedly from Lebanon. Lebanon urged 
Saudi Arabia to rethink the ban on Lebanese fruit and vegetable imports.
All Means All’s message to Lebanese leaders: Get lost
Nadim Shehadi/Arab News/June 20/2021
There is an abstract, intangible dimension to a revolutionary slogan like “All 
Means All” in Lebanon. It is deliberately irrational and expresses a 
denunciation, by a new generation, of everybody and everything. It goes beyond 
the need for an explanation, and purposefully embodies many contradictions, 
almost defying rationality.
“All Means All” — “Killon ya3ni Killon,” or KYK for short — is a nihilistic 
rejection of anything that could have contributed to where we are. Think of the 
Paris revolts of August 1968 and its slogans like “Y’en a Marre” (I am fed up), 
“Elections pieges a cons” (Elections, traps for idiots), “Soyez realistes, 
demandez l’impossible” (be realistic, demand the impossible). KYK epitomizes the 
lot and much more. KYK is a three-letter word that says to the establishment, 
get lost, we’re not playing your games, we don’t accept your rules and we don’t 
recognize your divisions. They are against the sectarian system, against the 
wheeling and dealing of political parties, symbols of corruption and nepotism. 
They are against the split between the March 14 and March 8 political camps. 
There is something millennial and non-binary that deliberately defies any logic 
attached to the system.
This is a post-civil war generation that remembers the 2005 cedar revolution 
being hijacked by corrupt and compromising politicians, and experienced the 
failure of previous revolts. In 2015, the You Stink movement went nowhere and 
was later decimated by political divisions when it got real. It was a revolt 
against politicians who had failed to provide basic of services such as 
electricity and garbage collection.
In 2015, the golden child of civil society was a group called Beirut Madinati 
(Beirut my city), composed of nonpolitical academics and technocrats. They had 
significant support when they fought the municipal elections against the 
candidates of established political parties. But later a seemingly unified civil 
society disintegrated when they were confronted with political questions and 
gained only one single seat in the 2018 parliamentary elections. Politicians 
could not be beaten at their own game, so KYK said we’re not playing that game 
this time, and beating the establishment (all of it) became the only game.
KYK symbolizes unity against an abstract enemy that comes under different names. 
It is sometimes called the political class (all of it), or the establishment 
(Al-Manthoumeh), or the Oligarchy by the more pretentious. Gradually it was 
getting focused on a definition of what constitutes “the authority” (the Sulta) 
and this became code for Hezbollah and its allies. But the H word remains the 
most divisive and many abstain from using it directly and stick to KYK in order 
not to fall into the political trap again and splinter the movement.
The origin of KYK is in the 2015 You Stink protests. There was a poster then 
with a caricature image of all the main politicians: Hariri, Berri, Jaajaa, Aoun, 
Jumblatt, Gemayel, and also including Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah among them. After 
a visit from Hezbollah’s blackshirts, they were “persuaded” to remove 
Nasrallah’s image. It was after that incident that the slogan “All means All” 
started appearing — it was code for Nasrallah himself.
The 2015 You Stink protests were mainly confined to activists in Beirut, and in 
the 2018 elections the only civil society candidate that won was also from 
Beirut. But the Oct. 17, 2019 revolts were nationwide and included cities and 
towns from the far north to the south. Tripoli, Saida, Nabatiyeh all joined in 
and the principal unifying slogan was KYK.
KYK is a unifying slogan, but it is also ambiguous, confused and inconsistent 
when it comes to direct political confrontation. It has an esoteric, almost 
mystical, dimension in its attempt to purify itself from the dirty business of 
politics.
The underlying assumption was that revolts were localized and every local group 
was protesting against its own leaders to avoid any sectarian tensions. Hence 
KYK became the unifying slogan of a national movement for the first time and 
that the description of that movement was upgraded from a revolt to a 
revolution. KYK symbolizes the Lebanese revolution or the thawra.
There are similarities with Iraq, the protests there use the same vocabulary and 
use code when they refer to Iranian sponsored militias or the equivalent to 
Hezbollah in Lebanon. In 2019, protesters in Basra and Najaf sent messages to 
those in Mosul asking them not to criticize the Shiite militias in order to 
avoid giving them the opportunity to turn it into a sectarian confrontation and 
rallying support. The protests are similarly against a sectarian establishment 
riddled with corruption and nepotism and which is unable to provide basic 
services and employment. But increasingly the revolts are focused against “the 
militias” which is also code for Iranian influence.
There are deeply rooted cultural features of Lebanese society also encapsulated 
in KYK. One of them is that politics is historically considered as an exclusive 
club of political families rarely penetrated by outsiders. After the civil war, 
Militia leaders and returned billionaire businessmen joined that club but 
maintained its impenetrability. Another historical feature is the culture of 
compromise and of turning the page. The slogan that ended the civil war in 1860 
was “mada ma mada” or “what is past is past,” and there was a refusal to 
cooperate with an intervention by European countries to introduce accountability 
through a tribunal. A similar spirit was encapsulated in the slogan “no winner 
and no loser” after the mini-civil war of 1958 and in the Amnesty Law of 1991 
that was passed by parliament after the Taif agreement that also turned the page 
over the civil war.
In 2005, protesters in Beirut demanded “the Truth” and the establishment of an 
international investigation and tribunal over the assassination of former prime 
minister Rafik Hariri. When the Special Tribunal for Lebanon issued its judgment 
in August 2020 clearly demonstrating Hezbollah links to the assassination, the 
verdict was ignored, just as it was in 1860. KYK is a unifying slogan, but it is 
also ambiguous, confused and inconsistent when it comes to direct political 
confrontation. It has an esoteric, almost mystical, dimension in its attempt to 
purify itself from the dirty business of politics. The real test it will face 
will be in the elections of 2022, if they are allowed to happen.
• Nadim Shehadi is executive director of the LAU Headquarters and Academic 
Center in New York and an associate fellow of Chatham House in London.
The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous 
Reports And News published on June 
18-19/2021
Ultraconservative Raisi Elected Iran 
President as Rivals Concede
Agence France Presse/June 19/2021
Congratulations poured in for ultraconservative Ebrahim Raisi Saturday on 
winning Iran's presidential election as his rivals conceded even before official 
results were announced. The other three candidates in the race all congratulated 
him for his victory, which had been widely expected after a host of heavyweight 
rivals had been barred from running. "I congratulate the people on their 
choice," said outgoing moderate President Hassan Rouhani without naming Raisi. 
"My official congratulations will come later, but we know who got enough votes 
in this election and who is elected today by the people." The other two 
ultraconservative candidates -- Mohsen Rezai and Amirhossein Qazizadeh Hashemi 
-- explicitly congratulated Raisi, as did the only reformist in the race, former 
central bank governor Abdolnasser Hemmati. Raisi, 60, takes over from Rouhani in 
August as Iran seeks to salvage its tattered nuclear deal with major powers and 
free itself from punishing US sanctions that have driven a sharp economic 
downturn. Raisi, the head of the judiciary whose black turban signifies direct 
descent from Islam's Prophet Mohammed, is seen as close to the 81-year-old 
supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has ultimate political power in 
Iran. Friday's voting was extended by two hours past the original midnight 
deadline amid fears of a low turnout of 50 percent or less. The ballots were 
counted overnight, and authorities were yet to release the official result or 
turnout figures. Many voters chose to stay away after the field of some 600 
hopefuls including 40 women had been winnowed down to seven candidates, all men, 
excluding an ex-president and a former parliament speaker. Three of the vetted 
candidates dropped out of the race two days before Friday's election, and two of 
them quickly threw their support behind Raisi. Populist former president Mahmoud 
Ahmadinejad, one of those who were barred from running by the Guardian Council 
of clerics and jurists, said he would not vote, declaring in a video message 
that "I do not want to have a part in this sin".
'Save the people' 
On election day, pictures of often flag-waving voters dominated state TV 
coverage, but away from the polling stations some voiced anger at what they saw 
as a stage-managed election aiming to cement ultraconservative control. "Whether 
I vote or not, someone has already been elected," scoffed Tehran shopkeeper 
Saeed Zareie. "They organise the elections for the media." Enthusiasm was 
dampened further by spiralling inflation and job losses, and the pandemic that 
proved more deadly in Iran than anywhere else in the region, killing more than 
80,000 people by the official count. Among those who queued to vote at schools, 
mosques and community centres, many said they supported Raisi, who has promised 
to fight corruption, help the poor and build millions of flats for low-income 
families. A nurse named Sahebiyan said she backed him for his anti-graft 
credentials and on hopes he would "move the country forward... and save the 
people from economic, cultural and social deprivation". Raisi, who holds deeply 
conservative views on many social issues including the role of women in public 
life, has been named in Iranian media as a possible successor to Khamenei. To 
opposition and human rights groups, his name is linked to the mass execution of 
political prisoners in 1988. The US government has sanctioned him over the 
purge, in which Raisi has denied playing a part.
'Maximum pressure'
Ultimate power in Iran, since its 1979 revolution toppled the US-backed 
monarchy, rests with the supreme leader, but the president wields major 
influence in areas from industrial policy to foreign affairs. Rouhani, 72, 
leaves office in August after serving the maximum two consecutive 
four-year-terms allowed under the constitution. His landmark achievement was the 
2015 deal with world powers under which Iran agreed to limit its nuclear 
programme in return for sanctions relief. But high hopes for greater prosperity 
were crushed in 2018 when then-US president Donald Trump withdrew from the 
accord and launched a "maximum pressure" campaign against Iran. While Iran has 
always denied seeking a nuclear weapon, Trump charged it was still planning to 
build the bomb and destabilising the Middle East through proxy groups in Iraq, 
Lebanon, Syria and Yemen. As old and new US sanctions hit Iran, trade dried up 
and foreign companies bolted. The economy nosedived and spiralling prices 
fuelled repeated bouts of social unrest which were put down by security forces. 
Iran's ultraconservative camp -- which deeply distrusts the United States, 
labelled the "Great Satan" or the "Global Arrogance" in the Islamic republic -- 
attacked Rouhani over the failing deal. Despite this, there is broad agreement 
among Iran's senior political figures, including Raisi, that the country must 
seek an end to the US sanctions in ongoing talks in Vienna aimed at rescuing the 
nuclear accord.
Amnesty Calls for Iran's Raisi to Be Investigated over Rights
Agence France Presse/June 19/2021
Ultraconservative cleric Ebrahim Raisi, who was declared Iran's next president 
Saturday, should be investigated for alleged crimes against humanity and a "spiralling 
crackdown" on human rights, Amnesty International said. "That Ebrahim Raisi has 
risen to the presidency instead of being investigated for the crimes against 
humanity of murder, enforced disappearance and torture, is a grim reminder that 
impunity reigns supreme in Iran," Amnesty said in a statement. Amnesty said 
Raisi was a member of the "Death Commission" that forcibly disappeared and 
extrajudicially executed in secret thousands of opposition prisoners in 1988 
while serving as Tehran's deputy prosecutor. Asked in 2018 and again last year 
about the executions, Raisi denied playing a role, even as he lauded an order he 
said was handed down by the Islamic republic's founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah 
Khomeini, to proceed with the purge.
Amnesty said the "fate of the victims and the whereabouts of their bodies are, 
to this day, systematically concealed by the Iranian authorities, amounting to 
ongoing crimes against humanity". The London-based pressure group said Raisi had 
"presided over a spiralling crackdown on human rights" while serving as Iran's 
judiciary chief for the past two years. It said the crackdown had seen "hundreds 
of peaceful dissidents, human rights defenders and members of persecuted 
minority groups arbitrarily detained". "Under his watch, the judiciary has also 
granted blanket impunity to government officials and security forces responsible 
for unlawfully killing hundreds of men, women and children." It had also 
subjected "thousands of protesters to mass arrests and at least hundreds to 
enforced disappearance, and torture and other ill-treatment during and in the 
aftermath of the nationwide protests of November 2019.
"We continue to call for Ebrahim Raisi to be investigated for his involvement in 
past and ongoing crimes under international law, including by states that 
exercise universal jurisdiction," it said. Amnesty called on the UN Human Rights 
Council's member states to take "concrete steps to address the crisis of 
systematic impunity in Iran". It said they should establish "an impartial 
mechanism to collect and analyse evidence of the most serious crimes under 
international law committed in Iran to facilitate fair and independent criminal 
proceedings".
Russia's Putin congratulates Iran's Raisi on 
presidential election win
NNA/Reuters/June 19/2021 
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Saturday congratulated hardline Iranian 
judge Ebrahim Raisi on winning Iran's presidential election, RIA news agency 
cited a press officer at the Russian embassy in Tehran as saying. Putin also 
expressed hopes for the "further development of a constructive bilateral 
cooperation", it quoted the source as saying. ---[Reuters]
Tehran Summons UK Ambassador Over 'Difficulties' for 
Iranians Voting in Britain
NNA/June 19/2021 
The Iranian Foreign Ministry announced on Saturday that Britain's envoy to the 
country had been summoned amid certain difficulties created for those Iranians 
who voted in the United Kingdom. According to the Islamic Republic, there was an 
attempt to disrupt the vote in the UK, as several Iranian citizens faced insults 
and physical attacks at polling stations across the country. President Hassan 
Rouhani previously congratulated Raisi as the winner of the vote, while Iranian 
Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei praised the election as a victory over "enemy 
propaganda". Raisi, who was Rouhani's opponent during the previous election in 
2017, received more than 17.8 million votes out of the 28.6 million that have 
been counted by this moment, the Interior Ministry announced. --- Sputnik News
U.S. Cutting Forces, Missile Batteries 
in Middle East
Agence France Presse/June 19/2021
The Pentagon said Friday it was cutting the number of troops and air defense 
units deployed to the Middle East, confirming a Wall Street Journal report that 
eight Patriot batteries were being moved out from the region. The move comes as 
President Joe Biden's administration seeks to ease tensions with Iran after they 
heated up in 2019 and saw a strong escalation in the US military presence across 
the region. The Wall Street Journal said the Patriot anti-missile batteries were 
being removed from Iraq, Kuwait, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, and that a separate 
anti-missile system, called THAAD, was being transferred from Saudi Arabia as 
well. Each battery requires hundreds of troops and civilians to operate and 
support them. Pentagon spokesperson Commander Jessica McNulty said that some of 
the units were being redeployed to other countries and some were returning to 
the United States for maintenance. She would not say where the redeployed units 
were being moved to. "This decision was made in close coordination with host 
nations and with a clear eye on preserving our ability to meet our security 
commitments," she said in an email. "We maintain a robust force posture in the 
region appropriate to the threat and are comfortable that these changes do not 
negatively impact our national security interests," McNulty said. "We also 
retain the flexibility to rapidly flow forces back into the Middle East as 
conditions warrant."The US military is rapidly adjusting its global footprint as 
it pulls out of Afghanistan entirely and sees a greater threat from China in the 
Asia-Pacific region. The Pentagon also slashed its troop presence in Iraq last 
year to 2,500, supporting Iraqi forces in their fight against the Islamic State 
group. Iran is still viewed as a major threat across the Middle East, but the 
Biden administration is in negotiations to restore the agreement on Tehran 
halting its nuclear development program, which would also see some sanctions on 
the country lifted. "The Defense Department maintains tens of thousands of 
forces in the Middle East, representing some of our most advanced air power and 
maritime capabilities, in support of US national interests and our regional 
partnerships," McNulty said.
US sees ‘wildfire of terrorism’ sweeping from Sahel to 
Horn of Africa
The Arab Weekly/June 19/2021
RABAT/ TUNIS— A senior US general warned Friday that the “wildfire of terrorism” 
is sweeping across a band of Africa and needs the world’s attention. He spoke at 
the close of large-scale US-led exercise with American, African and European 
troops.
The African Lion war games, which lasted nearly two weeks, stretched across 
Morocco, with smaller parts held in Tunisia and Senegal. The annual drills were 
skipped last year due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Gen. Stephen J. Townsend, head 
of the US Africa Command, praised the work accomplished in joint operations, and 
painted a dark picture of threats besetting parts of Africa. “I am concerned 
about the security situation across a band of Africa,” from the Sahel region in 
the west to the Horn of Africa, Townsend told reporters. He noted deadly attacks 
by al-Qaida- and Islamic State-linked jihadis and al-Shabab. “All of them are on 
the march,” he said. African neighbours are helping governments deal with the 
threat, but, he added, “all of that does not seem to be sufficient enough to 
stop what I call … (the) wildfire of terrorism that’s sweeping that region.”
African Lion saw more than 7,000 troops from seven countries and NATO carry out 
air, land and sea exercises together. “It has helped our interoperability, our 
joint capabilities, and provided readiness and a good opportunity to build 
cohesion across the forces,” said Maj. Gen. Andrew Rohling, commander of the US 
Army’s Southern European Task Force Africa. He spoke Friday in the desert town 
of Tan-Tan. There was a hitch at the start, with Spain withdrawing from the war 
games citing budgetary reasons. Press reports attributed the move to Spain’s 
poor relations with Morocco, a former key partner.
The two countries have been at loggerheads since Spain took in the leader of the 
Polisario Front for COVID-19 treatment in a Spanish hospital earlier this year. 
During the exercise, Morocco held some airborne operations near the Western 
Sahara and not far from Polisario refugee camps in Tindouf, in neighbouring 
Algeria. “Those activities have been perfectly conducted and agreed upon between 
the two militaries,” Moroccan Brigadier Gen. Mohammed Jamil told The Associated 
Press. The participating countries in African Lion were the US, Morocco, 
Tunisia, Senegal, Italy, The Netherlands and Britain. Observers also attended 
from countries including Egypt, Qatar, Niger and Mali.
Amnesty International slams Kurdish clamp-down on dissent
The Arab Weekly/June 19/2021
LONDON--The authorities in Kurdistan have been clamping down on protests and 
criticism, arresting and detaining illegally journalists and demonstrators, 
claims Amnesty International in a new report. The organisation has called 
subsequent trials a travesty of justice with defendants later being further 
charged for claiming in court that they had been tortured when in custody. 
Individuals had disappeared into custody and friends and relatives were unable 
to establish their whereabouts, sometimes for months.
“Authorities in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KR-I) must put an end to their 
ongoing crackdown of protests by way of arbitrary arrests and harassment and 
they should immediately release those detained, including those already 
sentenced following unfair trials, in relation to their participation in 
protests or related activism or professional practice, said Amnesty 
International.
In mid-August 2020, widespread protests erupted in the KR-I, mainly in 
Sulaimaniyah, Duhok and Erbil, demanding an end to corruption, better public 
services and the payment of overdue salaries of government employees. In the 
aftermath, authorities in the Kurdistan Regional Government launched a mass 
campaign of arrests against activists, protesters and journalists covering the 
protests under the pretext of preserving “national security”. Amnesty reported: 
“According to lawyers and human rights workers interviewed by Amnesty 
International between March 2020 and April 2021, Kurdish security forces 
reportedly arrested over 100 individuals in Duhok governorate alone and 
specifically in the Badinan area, northwest of the governorate. Most individuals 
were released shortly after, but at least 30 remain in detention.”
Amnesty said between February and May 2021 it had interviewed 21 of the 
detained, their family members, lawyers, human rights workers and journalists. 
It had also reviewed official court documents including arrest warrants and 
court verdicts. It documented the cases of 14 individuals from Badinan (three 
journalists and 11 civil society and political activists), all arrested between 
August and October 2020 and found that in all cases, Asayish, the KRG’s primary 
security and intelligence agency and members of Parastin, the intelligence 
agency of the ruling Kurdistan Democratic Party KDP, had arbitrarily arrested, 
detained and in six cases, “disappeared”, individuals, in connection to their 
participation in protests, their criticism of local authorities or to their 
journalistic work.
“All 14 individuals were held incommunicado for periods ranging between a few 
days to five months” said Amnesty, “Six were subjected to enforced 
disappearance, a crime under international law, for periods of time ranging 
between ten days to over three months. Of the 14 individuals, three were 
released but went into hiding for fear of renewed reprisals and one went into 
hiding after receiving threats; five remained in detention without charge or 
known charges and five individuals were sentenced to six years in prison 
following an unfair trial” Amnesty said it had also found four cases where 
family members of the detained were harassed or intimidated and said a defence 
lawyer had been approached by an Asayish operative asking about the case in 
which he was involved. He took this encounter as a clear threat over his 
involvement in the defence of his client.
Amnesty said that on February 16 2021, the second Erbil Criminal Court sentenced 
five activists and journalists Sherwan Sherwani, Guhdar Zebari, Hariwan Issa, 
Ayaz Karam and Shvan Saeed, to six years each, over acts deemed to be 
prejudicial to the security and sovereignty of the KR-I.
“They were accused of ‘spying on account of foreign actors; of having supplied 
the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK) with sensitive information, placed the lives of 
senior Kurdistan regional authorities and foreign officials at risk by gathering 
information about them and collected arms with the intention of supplying them 
to an unidentified armed group”. Amnesty continued: “Their trial was marred by 
serious violations of their right to a fair trial, including concerns around 
sentences based on statements extracted under duress, failure to provide in a 
timely manner the case documents allowing defence lawyers to adequately prepare 
their defence and failure to order investigations into the defendants’ claims of 
torture. Their families were not allowed to attend the sessions”.
According to lawyers and to the United Nations Assistance Mission on Iraq (UNAMI), 
who attended the hearings, all five defendants claimed in court that Asayish had 
extracted their “confessions” under torture. In eight of the cases Amnesty said 
it documented, individuals were reportedly made to sign confessions or confess 
on video-tape under duress. “Do not believe what is said on the video. When you 
see it, know that this was not me. I didn’t do anything. They [Asayish] made us 
do it,” Suleiman Kamal Suleiman told his family in a phone call in reference to 
a video-taped “confession” which he maintains was extracted under duress.
Amnesty continued:“ In the case of the five sentenced individuals, the court 
then relied on these so-called confessions, as well as documents found on the 
electronic properties confiscated, as well as on (the evidence of) two 
informants, one of whom remained anonymous. In one case, the sentenced 
individual faced additional charges of defamation for his claims of torture made 
in court. But the judge dismissed all these claims and ignored a range of 
procedural violations which the defence lawyer raised during the hearing. 
”Amnesty International maintained that in none of the cases were lawyers give 
access to the files ahead of the hearing and so could not prepare adequate 
defences. In addition these lawyers were not allowed to challenge prosecution 
evidence which was made up of the defendants’ confessions and the secret 
informant who was not produced in court, even despite an order from the judge.
Further evidence against the journalist Sherwani was produced from his 
electronic devices. Amnesty said “the main evidence brought against him in court 
was the creation of a messenger group, which he was accused of creating for 
espionage purposes and for sharing sensitive governmental information.”When 
contacted by Amnesty International this March, Office of the Coordinator for 
International Advocacy (OCIA) of the Kurdistan Regional government claimed that 
the convictions of the three journalists were not related to their work. However 
the human rights organisation said that it had examined the chat group messages 
and concluded that they were indeed used for journalism. Sherwani was later 
prosecuted again for claiming in court that he had been tortured in detention. 
Amnesty International has said the Kurdish authorities must immediately release 
all those kept in arbitrary detention and those given unfair trials unless they 
are charged with a crime that is recognisable in international law. The 
organisation is further demanding that “reprisals, intimidation and harassment 
of journalists, human rights defenders, activists and their families must end”. 
It also wants the KR-I to amend ill-defined and vague laws that have been used a 
tool to limit freedom of expression.
The Latest The Latest LCCC English 
analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on June 
18-19/2021
The Biden Administration’s Iran Policy: All Carrots, No Stick
Majid Rafizadeh/Gatestone Institute/June 19/2021
ماجد رفي زاده/معهد جيتستون: سياسة إدارة بايدن تجاه إيران هي عبارة عن شوالات جزر 
ولا حتى عصا واحدة
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/99875/majid-rafizadeh-gatestone-institute-the-biden-administrations-iran-policy-all-carrots-no-stick-%d9%85%d8%a7%d8%ac%d8%af-%d8%b1%d9%81%d9%8a-%d8%b2%d8%a7%d8%af%d9%87-%d9%85%d8%b9%d9%87%d8%af-%d8%ac/
Secretary of State Antony Blinken… stated at his inauguration hearing that he 
had “deep concern about the designation” of the Houthis as a terrorist 
organization, in that “at least on its surface it seems to achieve nothing 
particularly practical in advancing the efforts against the Houthis and to bring 
them back to the negotiating table….” One wonders if the same thinking would 
apply to Al Qaeda or Islamic State.
In yet an additional form of appeasement, the Biden administration has been 
strenuously ignoring the Iranian regime’s aggression and destabilizing 
behavior….. now, [Iran] is sending a destroyer… and a support vessel… to 
Venezuela.
“If the boats [seven Iranian high-speed missile-attack craft] are delivered, 
they may form the core of an asymmetrical warfare force within Venezuela’s armed 
forces. This could be focused on disrupting shipping as a means of countering 
superior naval forces. Shipping routes to and from the Panama Canal are near the 
Venezuelan coast.” — H I Sutton and Sam LaGrone, USNI News, U.S. Naval 
Institute, June 1, 2021.
Tehran has not only been using Venezuela for military cooperation, but also, it 
seems, to advance its nuclear program…. Iran’s ruling mullahs, in fact, appear 
to have been using Venezuela as part of a larger agenda for increasing Iran’s 
influence and the presence of its proxies in Latin and North America.
Instead of confronting Iran’s predatory regime, the Biden administration, has 
been forging ahead with the failed 2015 “nuclear deal” — which permits Iran to 
become a legitimate, full-blown nuclear power in just a few years. The Biden 
administration is also turning a blind eye to the regime’s alarming and 
increasing human rights violations.
Since the Biden administration assumed office, it has been increasingly 
appeasing the Iranian regime, which in return, is further emboldening and 
empowering the mullahs. Pictured US President Joe Biden (right) and US Secretary 
of State Antony Blinken (second from right) in Geneva on June 15, 2021.
Since the Biden administration assumed office, it has been increasingly 
appeasing the Iranian regime, which in return, is further emboldening and 
empowering the mullahs.
The first appeasement came when the administration changed the previous 
administration’s policy of maximum pressure to a policy of appeasement toward 
the Iran’s proxy militia group, the Houthis. Even as evidence — including a 
report by the United Nations — showed that the Iranian regime is delivering 
sophisticated weapons to the Houthi militia group in Yemen, the Biden 
administration suspended some of the sanctions against terrorism that the 
previous administration imposed on the Houthis. The previous US administration 
had designated Iran’s proxies, the Houthis, a terrorist group.
The Houthis have been committing crimes against humanity, including taking over 
Yemen’s capital, Sana’a; arbitrarily detaining and forcibly disappearing people; 
recruiting children, seizing hostages; dispatching “numerous indiscriminate and 
disproportionate airstrikes, killing thousands of civilians and hitting civilian 
structures in violation of the laws of war,” according to Human Rights Watch; as 
well as using banned antipersonnel landmines, and firing “artillery 
indiscriminately into cities such as Taizz, killing and wounding civilians,” and 
“launching indiscriminate ballistic missiles into Saudi Arabia.” The Houthis 
have also been inflicting extreme forms of torture such as beating detainees 
with metal bars and rifles, and hanging them from walls with their arms tied 
behind them.
According to Human Rights Watch’s World Report 2020:
“Since September 2014, all parties to the conflict have used child soldiers 
under 18, including some under the age of 15, according to a 2019 UN Group of 
Eminent International and Regional Experts on Yemen report in 2019. According to 
the secretary general, out of 3,034 children recruited throughout the war in 
Yemen, 1,940—64 percent—were recruited by the Houthis.”
The Houthis are also using landmines that kill civilians in Yemen, according to 
Human Rights Watch. In addition, more than 40 drones and missiles were 
reportedly launched by the Houthis at Saudi Arabia in the month of February 
alone.
Secretary of State Antony Blinken nevertheless stated at his inauguration 
hearing that he had “deep concern about the designation” of the Houthis as a 
terrorist organization, in that “at least on its surface it seems to achieve 
nothing particularly practical in advancing the efforts against the Houthis and 
to bring them back to the negotiating table….” One wonders if the same thinking 
would apply to Al Qaeda or Islamic State.
On February 12, 2021, in yet a further appeasement of Iran, the Biden 
administration revoked the designation of Yemen’s Houthis as a terrorist group 
altogether. The Biden Administration handed Iran’s regime an undeserved 
political victory.
Then, right before heading to Vienna to negotiate rejoining the disastrous 2015 
nuclear deal, which, incidentally, Iran never signed, US State Department 
spokesman Ned Price told reporters that America was prepared to lift sanctions 
against Iran:
“We are prepared to take the steps necessary to return to compliance with the 
JCPOA, including by lifting sanctions that are inconsistent with the JCPOA. I am 
not in a position here to give you chapter and verse on what those might be”.
Iran’s mullahs, nevertheless, did not actually have to wait until the revival of 
the nuclear deal; last week, on June 10, the Biden administration lifted 
sanctions on three former Iranian government officials and two Iranian companies 
involved in the country’s oil industry.
“Biden cravenly lifted sanctions on Iran,” former US President Donald Trump 
commented.
“Now, they’re actually asking for money. Here we go again. Remember? They got 
$150 billion plus $1.8 billion in cash. Now, they’re actually asking for money. 
They never asked me for money. It’s unbelievable. It’s so sad to see.”
Indeed, Iran’s leaders are now emboldened and most likely assume that they can 
extort even more concessions from the Biden administration because they 
successfully did so in the past — when Biden was Vice President during the Obama 
administration. As Iran’s Foreign Minister Javad Zarif told a forum organized by 
New York’s Council on Foreign Relations last fall, he wants a new deal. “A sign 
of good faith is not to try to renegotiate what has already been negotiated,” he 
said, adding that the US must “compensate us for our losses” before any new 
talks.
Iran’s top judicial body had already demanded a year earlier that the US pay 
$130 billion in “damages.”
In yet an additional form of appeasement, the Biden administration has been 
strenuously ignoring the Iranian regime’s aggression and destabilizing behavior. 
Iran’s regime not only threatened to destroy US warships in the Persian Gulf 
last April; now, it is sending a destroyer, the Sahand, and a support vessel — 
the intelligence-gathering Makran — to Venezuela. The Makran set sail on the 
mission “with seven high-speed missile-attack craft strapped to its deck,” 
according to a report published by the U.S. Naval Institute. The report 
continued:
“If the boats are delivered, they may form the core of an asymmetrical warfare 
force within Venezuela’s armed forces. This could be focused on disrupting 
shipping as a means of countering superior naval forces. Shipping routes to and 
from the Panama Canal are near the Venezuelan coast.”
Tehran has not only been using Venezuela for military cooperation, but also, it 
seems, to advance its nuclear program. Venezuela has been accused of covertly 
assisting Iran with the production of raw material for nuclear weapons as well 
as ballistic missiles. The ruling mullahs, in fact, appear have been using 
Venezuela as part of a larger agenda for increasing Iran’s influence and the 
presence of its proxies in Latin and North America.
The Biden administration should be seriously concerned about Iran-backed 
Hezbollah’s increasing presence in Venezuela. As Ambassador Nathan Sales, former 
Coordinator for Counterterrorism at the State Department, said:
“We’re concerned that Maduro has extended safe harbor to a number of terrorist 
groups, the ELN [National Liberation Army] in particular, but also FARC [the 
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia] dissidents who rejected the peace 
accord, as well as supporters and sympathizers of Hezbollah.”
Instead of confronting Iran’s predatory regime, the Biden administration has 
been forging ahead with the failed 2015 “nuclear deal” — which permits Iran to 
become a legitimate, full-blown nuclear power in just a few years. The Biden 
administration is also turning a blind eye to the regime’s alarming and 
increasing human rights violations.
The Biden administration’s policy towards the Iranian regime can fairly be 
characterized, then, as all carrots, no stick.
*Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a business strategist and advisor, Harvard-educated 
scholar, political scientist, board member of Harvard International Review, and 
president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He has 
authored several books on Islam and US foreign policy. He can be reached at 
Dr.Rafizadeh@Post.Harvard.Edu
© 2021 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do 
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No 
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied 
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Is the 'hardliner' talking point about Iran’s Raisi a 
whitewash?
Seth J. Frantzman/ Jerusalem Post/June 19/2021
Is the term accurately a descriptive for Iran’s far-right extremist theocratic 
leaders, or is it used to whitewash and excuse Iran’s politics?
A global narrative among major media outlets uses the term “hardliner” to 
describe Ebrahim Raisi, the winner of Iran’s presidential election announced 
Saturday.
The term “hardliner” was invented by major media to describe the far-right in 
Iran. It is generally not used to describe any other form of politics in the 
world. For instance, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Japan, Spain or the Congo 
don’t have “hardliners” – only Iran.
Does the term accurately describe Iran’s far-right extremist theocratic leaders, 
or is it used to whitewash and excuse Iran’s politics, the way “militants” is 
used to describe extremist groups that mass murder civilians?
Major media that use the term “hardliner” also explain to the readers what it 
means – sometimes. The BBC notes that “Iran’s hardliners will seek to reinforce 
a puritanical system of Islamic government, possibly meaning more controls on 
social activities, fewer freedoms and jobs for women, and tighter control of 
social media and the press. The hardliners are suspicious of the West, but both 
Raisi and Supreme Leader Khamenei favor a return to an international deal on 
Iran’s nuclear activity.”
BBC’s headline on June 19 was that “hardliner Raisi will become president.”
CNN also says that Raisi is the “hardliner” who will be the next president. 
However, CNN’s headline also calls him “ultraconservative.”
The article notes that “From 2018 onwards, [former President Donald] Trump 
unleashed a torrent of sanctions that crippled Iran’s economy and emboldened 
hardliners. The tiny window of opportunity granted by the clerical class to the 
moderate government of President Rouhani to engage with the US and Europe began 
to quickly close. Trump had proven the hardliners’ skepticism about the West 
correct, Iran’s conservatives repeatedly said.”According to France24, Raisi is 
an “ultra-conservative” who is replacing a “reformist” in the current President 
Hassan Rouhani. Under Rouhani, people were persecuted for not covering their 
hair, for protesting, and for other minor offenses. A well-known wrestler was 
murdered under Rouhani’s supposed “reform” leadership. Foreign tourists were 
kidnapped and kept in prison. Journalists and dissidents were hunted down 
abroad. CBS also calls Raisi a hardliner, as does Turkey’s TRT.
With the term “hardliner” cemented as the only normative term that can be used 
to describe Raisi, it is worth wondering what else is going on.
Is there any substantial difference between the regime under the “hardliners” 
than under the “reformers”?
IRAN ALLOWS some diversity of thought. Its media has more interesting stories 
than the totally totalitarian media in Turkey, where only pro-AKP views are 
aired on state media and where criticism of the president can land people in 
prison.
Iran’s regime is more open than the regimes Iran supports in Damascus and the 
thugs it supports among Hezbollah and the Houthis, as well as militias in Iraq.
However, Raisi may be even worse than what Iran has seen in the past. On June 
19, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch said that “Ebrahim Raisi’s 
election as Iran’s new president was a blow for human rights and called for him 
to be investigated over his role in what Washington and rights groups have 
called the extrajudicial executions of thousands of political prisoners in 
1988,” according to Reuters.
It looks like Raisi is not just a “hardliner” or “conservative” but was 
responsible for mass murder. That would put him on par with other murderous 
regime leaders. Accusations of crimes against humanity are not usual for a ruler 
of a country.
Amnesty noted that, “in 2018, our organization documented how Ebrahim Raisi had 
been a member of the ‘death commission’ which forcibly disappeared and 
extrajudicially executed in secret thousands of political dissidents in Evin and 
Gohardasht prisons near Tehran in 1988.” This sounds like a lot more than just 
“hardliner.”
THE REASON the term “hardliner” was invented was largely as a foil for 
narratives in the West. The Western countries needed the far-right extremist 
Iranian regime that hangs innocent people to have a good side, so “reformers” 
were conjured up.
Then “hardliners” were said to oppose them. But the reality was that Iran’s 
regime, run by Ayatollah Khamenei and the IRGC, was already one of the most 
extremist regimes in the world.
But Western governments wanted to make a deal with it in the run-up to the 2015 
JCPOA. To do this, a narrative was created – through focus groups and various 
lobbying groups that were close to governments and media – to push narratives 
about the so-called “Iran Deal” and the need to “empower moderates.”
This created a narrative whereby anyone opposing the Iran deal was “empowering 
hardliners” by not giving Iran’s regime everything it wanted.
It didn’t matter if Iran’s regime was imprisoning people and giving them 
“lashes” for music videos or kidnapping Western tourists and accusing them of 
spying for no reason other than to use them as hostages – the regime had 
“moderates” and “hardliners.”
During the Trump era, the narrative worked to portray him as “empowering 
hardliners.” When the Biden administration came into office, there were attempts 
to argue that the administration should rush back to the Iran deal or the 
“hardliners” might win the June elections. Now we have seen the “elections” in 
which basically only “hardliners” were allowed to run.
It stands to reason that Iran has “hardliners” the way other countries do. Iran 
doesn’t exist on the moon; its politics are linked to those in Iraq, Lebanon and 
the rest of the region. It may be the only Shi’ite theocracy, but its version of 
political Islam is not so different from that of the supporters of the Muslim 
Brotherhood who run Turkey’s AKP.
It is a “revolutionary” power, but largely in a reactionary way. This leaves 
many questions as to why it has “hardliners” while other countries often do not, 
at least consistently the way Iran’s politics is said to be divided.
This brings to mind how Western countries are often said to have a “far right,” 
much as Israel has a “far right” – while in Lebanon, Turkey, Iraq, Pakistan or 
Malaysia there are fewer references to the “far right.”
This is because Western media often lacks a lexicon to discuss non-Western 
political systems. In such cases, arbitrary terms like “hardliner” are used. 
This is in place of local terms.
When it comes to Raisi it’s not clear if the term “hardliner” is enough to 
describe a man now potentially wanted for crimes against humanity.
Biden’s multilateralism is all very nice. But now let’s see action
Baria Alamuddin/Arab News/June 20/2021
For international correspondents, the last couple of weeks represented a gourmet 
meal of global summits, bilateral meetings and multilateral fora. But what does 
all this frenzied diplomatic activity mean for the real world? Among Western 
leaders, there have been smiles and backslapping aplenty, with the G7 and NATO 
meetings functioning therapeutically as a dance upon Trumpism’s grave — and good 
riddance! Leaders can once again see eye-to-eye and hold civilized debates on 
issues that matter.
The question is whether these global powers today collectively possess the 
unassailable diplomatic clout they once enjoyed in an international environment 
where authoritarian leaders are running amok, entire regions are afflicted by 
disintegrating states and human rights are trampled upon on an industrial scale.
One of the most visible tests of Biden’s fledgling presidency was whether or not 
he could stand up to figures like Putin and Erdogan, both of whom exploited the 
anarchy of the Trump years to invade a handful of states and aggressively 
project personal power inside and outside their borders. How did Biden do?
A single meeting was never going to compel Putin to admit the error of his ways, 
and many commenters dismissively condemned the encounter as an opportunity for 
the Russian president to bask in his own self-importance. They simultaneously 
criticized Biden for naivety and stubborn optimism.
However, Biden used the summit to establish ground rules on issues like 
cyber-warfare, his implied message being: We don’t want to have to hurt you! 
Perhaps a textbook example of the diplomatic art of speaking softly while 
wielding a big stick would do? We’ve already seen tin-pot dictators like Erdogan 
moderating their behavior in the knowledge that the current US administration 
will no longer tolerate flagrant warmongering and demagoguery.
With these latest summits taking place in rarefied locations like Geneva, 
Brussels and Cornwall, it’s easy to miss the fact that our planet sits atop a 
live volcano.
Given that much of Putin’s aggressive behavior apparently stems from a sense of 
personal and national inferiority, there is no harm in offering him respect and 
cordiality as part of this reset. The world is sick to death of unearned 
excessive Western superiority and over-confidence. The West can deservedly earn 
superiority if its human rights and governance record remains superior, but 
let’s see an era of greater modesty, honesty and respect for non-Western 
civilizations, coupled with a pragmatic readiness to genuinely set the world to 
rights and address existential challenges like climate change, regional 
instability and extreme poverty.
The Trump regime inflicted lasting damage upon the credibility of American 
democracy, and Europe is asking: What will happen in four years’ time? Will 
anything Biden signs be torn up by a bellicose successor?
These summits were a glorious triumph of style over substance. Leaders took 
pains to proclaim their unity versus China, but regrettably, Secretary of State 
Blinken isn’t being imitated by many other foreign ministers when he defines 
Beijing’s actions against the Uyghurs and other minorities as genocide.
Only fleeting exposure was granted to chronic instability in locations like 
Syria, Yemen, Burma, Sub-Saharan Africa and Central America. Have Western 
leaders surrendered responsibility for far-flung areas of the world engulfed in 
quasi-permanent conflict and turbulence — ungoverned spaces that relentlessly 
export mass migration, terrorism and anarchy? This is the pervading situation 
throughout much of conflict-wracked Africa, while Lebanon and Iraq — sitting 
precariously on either side of Syria — are a mere step away from the abyss. 
Meanwhile, Afghanistan’s impending disintegration risks dragging Central Asia 
into compounded turmoil. Why scarcely a word about these disaster zones?
France is currently withdrawing 5,000 troops from the Sahel region at the worst 
conceivable moment, following a succession of coups in Mali, with neighboring 
states still confronting a jihadist onslaught. Britain is equally disastrously 
slashing funding for the world’s poorest states, abandoning millions to starve. 
None of this is unrelated to the West’s current obsession with China and Russia, 
with both states profiting from such chaos to aggressively expand their global 
footprint. Recent reports spotlighted the embroilment of Russian mercenaries in 
appalling human rights atrocities in the Central African Republic.
Why is the US withdrawing its Patriot anti-missile batteries from the Middle 
East at the exact moment that Khamenei has engineered the coronation of grizzled 
hardliner Ebrahim Raisi for the presidency? Raisi is a dangerous extremist who 
has built his national profile upon the mass executions of political prisoners, 
blatantly heralding a new phase of terrorism and mischief-making on a global 
scale.
Hence, it’s all very nice for Biden and Western leaders to waffle passively and 
complacently about cooperation and multilateralism, but to what end? Where is 
the commitment to promoting good governance, fighting poverty and supporting 
failing states? It is difficult to envisage Western pressure having any 
meaningful influence on Putin and Xi’s style of governance, but what about the 
dozens of states where they could have an impact through vigorous diplomatic 
pressure and well-targeted developmental support?
With these latest summits taking place in rarefied locations like Geneva, 
Brussels and Cornwall, it’s easy to miss the fact that our planet sits atop a 
live volcano.
The world is an infinitely less stable place than just a decade ago. Climate 
change threatens to render vast regions uninhabitable. Conflict-resolution and 
international law institutions like the UN Security Council are broken beyond 
repair.
Mass refugee movements and polarized political discourse will continue 
rocket-fueling the same xenophobic, anti-immigrant backlashes that swept Trump 
and other repugnant far-right tendencies to power.
Hence, if Biden, Trudeau and Macron don’t want to be swept away by a new tsunami 
of anti-democratic populist barbarians, enough of the platitudes and 
backslapping. Roll up your sleeves and start seriously putting this broken world 
to rights!
* Baria Alamuddin is an award-winning journalist and broadcaster in the Middle 
East and the UK. She is editor of the media services syndicate and has 
interviewed numerous heads of state.