English LCCC Newsbulletin For
Lebanese, Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For August 29/2020
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
#elias_bejjani_news
The Bulletin's Link on the
lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/eliasnews21/english.august29.21.htm
News
Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations For today
King Herod,
Herodias’s Daughter & The Beheading Of John The Baptist
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Mark 06/14-29/:”King Herod heard
of it, for Jesus’ name had become known. Some were saying, ‘John the baptizer
has been raised from the dead; and for this reason these powers are at work in
him.’But others said, ‘It is Elijah.’ And others said, ‘It is a prophet, like
one of the prophets of old.’But when Herod heard of it, he said, ‘John, whom I
beheaded, has been raised.’For Herod himself had sent men who arrested John,
bound him, and put him in prison on account of Herodias, his brother Philip’s
wife, because Herod had married her. For John had been telling Herod, ‘It is not
lawful for you to have your brother’s wife.’And Herodias had a grudge against
him, and wanted to kill him. But she could not, for Herod feared John, knowing
that he was a righteous and holy man, and he protected him. When he heard him,
he was greatly perplexed; and yet he liked to listen to him. But an opportunity
came when Herod on his birthday gave a banquet for his courtiers and officers
and for the leaders of Galilee. When his daughter Herodias came in and danced,
she pleased Herod and his guests; and the king said to the girl, ‘Ask me for
whatever you wish, and I will give it.’ And he solemnly swore to her, ‘Whatever
you ask me, I will give you, even half of my kingdom.’She went out and said to
her mother, ‘What should I ask for?’ She replied, ‘The head of John the
baptizer.’Immediately she rushed back to the king and requested, ‘I want you to
give me at once the head of John the Baptist on a platter.’The king was deeply
grieved; yet out of regard for his oaths and for the guests, he did not want to
refuse her. Immediately the king sent a soldier of the guard with orders to
bring John’s head. He went and beheaded him in the prison, brought his head on a
platter, and gave it to the girl. Then the girl gave it to her mother. When his
disciples heard about it, they came and took his body, and laid it in a tomb.
Titles For The Latest English LCCC
Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on
August 28-29/2021
MoPH: 1320 new coronavirus infections, five deaths
Lebanon’s Mikati says hurdles obstruct cabinet as warnings mount
Reports: Govt. Formation Process Back to Square One
Berri, Jumblatt meet
Seven prisoners flee Dahr al-Baydar police station
General Security responds to PSP’s statement
Majzoub to Radio Lebanon: We have studied all dimensions of the return to school
plan, and the student cannot stay at home for the third year in a row
FPM holds its periodic meeting
Hawat: There is no change or modification in the prices of recharge cards or
other services
Brax promises gradual improvement of the situation at gas stations
Geagea to Aoun, Diab: They bear responsibility for what is happening at the gas
stations
Arab American group demands protected status for Lebanese nationals in the
US/Ali Younis/Arab News/August 28/2021
A court de tout/Jean-Marie Kassab/August 28/2021
Titles For The Latest English LCCC
Miscellaneous Reports And News published on August 28-29/2021
Biden, Bennett discuss steps to deter Iran’s ‘dangerous regional behaviour’/“If
diplomacy fails, we’re ready to turn to other options,” said the US president.
Israel’s PM presented Biden with ‘death by a thousand cuts’ Iran strategy:
Reports
Khamenei says Biden has same demands as Trump on Iran nuclear issue
U.S. Strikes IS Target in Afghanistan, Pushes Airlift into Final Stage
Biden: Strike in Afghanistan not last, another ISIS attack likely in next 24-36
hours
Pentagon identifies US military casualties in Kabul airport attack
US military begins withdrawal from Kabul airport: Pentagon
Taliban claim to enter resistance stronghold Panjshir, Massoud supporters deny
Slain US Marine who cradled baby at Kabul airport loved her job
Macron at the Baghdad summit: ISIS still poses a threat
Iraq Hosts Regional Meeting Aimed at Easing Mideast Tensions
Amnesty Urges Syria Govt to Lift 'Siege' Off Daraa
Thousands in Berlin protest coronavirus measures
Sisi’s remarks revive debate in Egypt about mention of religion on IDs
Opposition accuses Ankara of allowing Afghan refugees ‘for money’
Titles For The Latest The Latest LCCC
English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on
August 28-29/2021
In new escalation, Algeria to stop supplying Spain with gas through
Morocco/Mohamed Alaoui/The Arab Weekly/August 28/2021
Why apathy on Palestinian injustice will backfire/Daoud Kuttab/Arab News/August
28, 2021
Road to Libya’s elections is fraught with peril/Hafed Al-Ghwell/Arab News/August
28/2021
G7 flexes its political muscles again/Andrew Hammondy/Arab News/August 28, 2021
The Latest English LCCC Lebanese &
Lebanese Related News & Editorials published
on August 28-29/2021
MoPH: 1320 new coronavirus infections, five deaths
NNA/August 28/2021
Lebanon has recorded 1320 new coronavirus cases and five deaths in the last 24
hours, as reported by the Ministry of Public Health on Saturday.
Lebanon’s Mikati says hurdles obstruct cabinet as
warnings mount
The Arab Weekly/August 28/2021
BEIRUT--Lebanon’s Prime Minister-designate Najib Mikati said on Friday he still
had to overcome major hurdles to forming a new government, amid a deep economic
and political crisis that has left the country with a caretaker administration
for a year.
Mikati, the third person picked to try to form a government since last year,
told Saudi-owned television network Al Hadath that the situation in Lebanon
remained grave. Forming a government is a necessary first step to secure
international support to help pull Lebanon out of its deepest crisis since its
1975-1990 civil war. The currency has collapsed, while medicines and fuel are
running out. Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, a heavily armed Shia
militant movement backed by Iran and under US sanctions, has said Iranian fuel
shipments were on their way to help ease shortages. “We have agreed to start
loading a third vessel,” he said in a televised speech. Nasrallah blamed the
country’s economic crisis on what he called an economic siege by the United
States adding that so-called Caesar sanctions imposed by Washington on Syria had
harmed Lebanon. “Go ahead and give Lebanon an exemption for Iranian gasoline and
diesel … go ahead and give Lebanon an exemption from Caesar,” Nasrallah said,
addressing the United States in his speechز Asked about Nasrallah’s comments,
Mikati said he was against anything that would harm Lebanon’s interests. “We
will not let anyone lead us to new sanctions,” he said. “But I tell the critics
and the Arab League give us a candle, we can’t say no to the shipment without
having an alternative.”The prime minister’s position is held by a Sunni
according to Lebanon’s sectarian power-sharing system. Lebanon has been run by
the caretaker government of Prime Minister Hassan Diab, who resigned with his
cabinet after a massive Beirut port blast ripped through the capital a year ago.
Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul Latif Derian, the state’s most senior Sunni Muslim
cleric, warned on Friday Lebanon is heading towards complete collapse. The head
of one of the main security agencies, Major General Abbas Ibrahim, ordered his
officers to stand firm in the face of the crisis, saying it could be protracted
and warning of the chaos that would ensue if the state collapsed. The warnings
are some of the strongest yet from Lebanese officials about the gravity of the
situation. The accelerating pace of the deterioration has added to international
concern about a state that was pieced back together after a 1975-90 civil war
and is still deeply riven by sectarian and factional rivalries. The UN secretary
general on Thursday called for a new government to be formed urgently.
Reports: Govt. Formation Process Back to Square One
Naharnet/August 28/2021
The government formation process returned to square one during the latest
meeting between President Michel Aoun and PM-designate Najib Miqati, al-Joumhouria
daily quoted "credible sources" as saying in remarks published Saturday.
"The main hurdles is neither about portfolios nor about candidates. It rather
lies in the naming of the two Christian ministers who are not part of the shares
of the President, the Free Patriotic Movement and the Syrian Social Nationalist
Party," the sources said.
Berri, Jumblatt meet
NNA/August 28/2021
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri received at his residence in Ain al-Tineh, the
head of the Progressive Socialist Party, Walid Jumblatt, with discussions
reportedly focusing one the general situation and the latest political
developments in the country.
After the meeting, Jumblatt left without making any statement.
Seven prisoners flee Dahr al-Baydar police station
NNA/August 28/2021
Seven prisoners, including Syrians, Lebanese, and Palestinians, have
successfully escaped from Dahr al-Baydar police station, NNA Correspondent said.
General Security responds to PSP’s statement
NNA/August 28/2021
The General Directorate of Public Security issued the following statement
“The Progressive Socialist Party indicated, in a statement issued on 28/8/202,
that five Syrian citizens disappeared during their visit to their country's
embassy in Lebanon last week, without any justification, explanation or
clarification of the legal situation and without clarifying their fate, and that
the Socialist Party places the incident of their disappearance in the name of
Local and international human rights institutions, and the Lebanese General
Security responsible for implementing official decisions not to forcible
deportation, as well as the responsibility of the Lebanese state or what remains
of it, and it is required to prevent such humanitarian violations, whatever the
circumstances.”“The General Directorate of Public Security confirms that the
powers entrusted to it at the border crossings are limited to stamping travel
documents in the possession of transients after verifying them and completing
judicial procedures, and it is not the task of its soldiers to search vehicles
or people, knowing that these tasks fall within the jurisdiction of the
competent authorities at the crossings,” the statement added. “As for the
question posed by the Progressive Socialist Party to those who demand the return
of Syrian refugees to their country about the model represented by this
dangerous phenomenon of supposed “safe” return, the General Directorate of
Public Security made it clear that all return trips organized by the Directorate
during the past years were flawless, no incident was recorded with any Syrian
citizen who returned to his country under the supervision of General Security
and under the supervision of the United Nations agencies operating in Lebanon,”
the statement read.
Majzoub to Radio Lebanon: We have studied all dimensions of
the return to school plan, and the student cannot stay at home for the third
year in a row
NNA/August 28/2021
Caretaker Education Minister Tarek Al-Majzoub indicated, in an interview with
"Radio Lebanon", that his insistence on implementing the return to school plan
"is purely educational, as the student cannot stay at home for the third year in
a row," pointing out that all dimensions of this plan and its educational
aspects have been studied, including the psychological ones for the students and
for the parents as well. “If we lose education, we will lose everything, and
everything is compensated except for education, and I will not leave the matter
to the next minister, the plan is drawn up because the school year, parents,
students and schools must be prepared, and all of this needs time,” Majzoub
said. The minister added: "In addition to the educational plan that has been
developed, financial and economic steps will be taken regarding returning to
school, as we cannot wait for a solution to economic issues without students
going to their schools, and during the next week we will have positive signs."He
revealed that he had made successive visits "to a number of concerned ministers
to cooperate with them on the issue of returning to school to receive the
assistance of those ministries with all their capabilities for the success of
the return plan, because the economic and financial concern has increased
significantly, and the cooperation aims to alleviate financial concerns," hoping
to announce during the next week financial and economic steps regarding
returning to school. He called on the parents to wait in buying books because
most schools have not distributed the book lists so far, and to wait for the
steps that will be issued by the Ministry of Education in terms of a solution
with the ministries and concerned authorities to reduce the prices of books,
declaring that “a meeting will take place with the Central Bank next Monday
about this matter.”He stressed that "most schools support the return of
students, while the Ministry of Education is working on the demands of teachers,
parents and students that this return is safe and easy."
FPM holds its periodic meeting
NNA/August 28/2021
The "Free Patriotic Movement" political body held its periodic meeting today,
chaired by its Chief, MP Gebran Bassil, following which an issued statement
deemed that monopoly of storage and smuggling of fuels, contrary to the law and
morals, constitute an organized crime.
The political body expressed its concern over attempts to obstruct the
investigation into the crime of the Beirut port explosion in order to obscure
the truth about who imported ammonium nitrate, who is responsible for storing
it, and whether its detonation is a deliberate criminal act. The FPM political
body called on the President of the Republic and the Prime Minister-designate,
to cooperate constructively as constitutional partners in forming a government
that would put an end to the collapse and establish financial recovery. Finally,
the political body concluded its statement by saying: "We hope that the
President and the PM- designate will be able to overcome these existing sedition
attempts to sow discord between them, and overcome them through cooperation and
agreement within the constitution that we are working to protect from any harm
or manipulation."
Hawat: There is no change or modification in the prices of
recharge cards or other services
NNA/August 28/2021
Caretaker Minister of Communications, Talal Hawat, confirmed in a statement that
there is no change or modification in the prices of recharge cards for prepaid
lines in all categories or other services, or in the tariff for communication or
the Internet.
He added that "the only motive for his decision not to raise prices stems from
his sensitivity to the suffering of citizens and his standing by their side in
this deadly economic crisis
Brax promises gradual improvement of the situation at gas
stations
NNA/August 28/2021
Member of the Syndicate of Gas Station Owners, George Brax, said in a statement
that a large number of stations that closed last week have opened and deliver
fuel back to customers after being renewed by their suppliers. "This scene will
continue and we will witness a gradual improvement and a decrease in the density
of queues," he added.
Geagea to Aoun, Diab: They bear responsibility for what is
happening at the gas stations
NNA/August 28/2021
Head of the "Lebanese Forces" party, Samir Geagea, addressed the President of
the Republic, General Michel Aoun, and caretaker Prime Minister, Hassan Diab,
saying: You bear the responsibility for everything that happens at the gas
stations these days, just as you bear the responsibility for any accident that
occurs in these stations, as well as any malfunction in any hospital or sector,
and any collapse that occurs in a factory, cafe or store as a result of the
overwhelming chaos prevailing in the fuel market in Lebanon. He added: “You bear
the responsibility for all of this, because the solution is clear and known, and
you are reluctant to make a decision. The actual solution is to liberate the
prices of fuel and medicine and issue the financing card immediately. Everything
else is getting bigger and bigger, and chaos is spreading, and the Lebanese
citizen is left to his destiny.”
Arab American group demands protected status for
Lebanese nationals in the US
Ali Younis/Arab News/August 28/2021
ATLANTA: The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) has requested
that the US government designate Lebanon for Temporary Protected Status (TPS)
due to its political instability and looming economic meltdown. The move was
co-sponsored by more than 70 civic, legal and religious organizations in the US
seeking to protect Lebanese nationals who are presently in the US on
non-immigrant visas but would face dire circumstances should they go back to
Lebanon under the current conditions. The letter was sent to Secretary of
Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas and Secretary of State Antony Blinken
earlier this week, who would take such a decision. It requested the designation
status fearing that further escalations and tensions in Lebanon’s fractious and
dysfunctional political system might escalate into a regional armed conflict.
Lebanon’s political and economic problems became more acute in the aftermath of
Beirut port explosion last year that killed at least 200 people and injured
thousands more and devastated the country’s fragile economy.
TPS is a temporary protection that allows people from a designated country to
remain in the US while conditions in their home country make safe return
impossible. The Secretary of Homeland Security can designate a country for TPS
if the country is experiencing armed conflict, natural disaster or other
extraordinary and temporary conditions. The designation lasts 18 months and can
be renewed several times. If granted, TPS would allow Lebanese nationals to stay
in the United States during the designation period and to legally work. The
letter estimates the number of Lebanese nationals who could benefit from the TPS
designation at around 28,500 people. Among the groups that co-sponsored in this
effort are Amnesty International USA, the Arab American Institute, Jewish Voice
for Peace, Atlanta Chapter and the National Council of Churches.
Commenting on the deteriorating situation in Lebanon, ADC president Samer Khalaf
said: “The conditions in Lebanon are grim. The circumstances and facts on the
ground make it abundantly clear that Lebanon is not in a position to safely
accept the return of its citizens at this time. We call on the Biden
administration to quickly designate TPS protections for Lebanon.”Addressing
concerns over immigration issues that might arise, the letter said that there is
no real risk that such a designation would result in an immigration influx into
the US from Lebanon. “There has also been no indication that TPS designation has
encouraged greater, irregular numbers of migration from the designated areas,
including when Lebanon has been designated in the past,” the letter said. “The
US has already invested billions of dollars over the past 10 years in Lebanon’s
recovery. TPS would strengthen that investment. Lebanon’s stability is also key
to the stability of the region, which is within US foreign policy interests,” it
added. Abed Ayoub, ADC’s legal director, told the Arab News that he feels
optimistic that the US President Joe Biden would show compassion and grant the
request.
“We urge the Biden administration to do the right thing and designate Lebanon
for TPS, Lebanon is on the verge of a complete economic and humanitarian
collapse, granting TPS is the morally correct thing to do, and will help provide
safe haven to nationals of the country currently in the US,” he said.
A court de tout.
Jean-Marie Kassab/August 28/2021
Comme tous les Libanais. A court d'essence , d'éléctricité, de médicaments, de
dignité, de rêve d'avenir, d'éspoir...Et la liste s'allonge.
Pour ma part je suis surtout à court de jurons.
De jurons contre l'occupant et ses agents surtout. Mais aussi à l'adresse de
ceux qui ne firent rien et regardèrent le pays couler sans bouger le doigt et se
contentèrent de faire les guignols tout le long.
A court de juron envers moi-même bien sûr de ne pas les avoir exterminés quand
c'était possible. De ne pas avoir laissé éclater ma colère dans la bonne
direction dernièrement au lieu de me contenter de jurer et épuiser mon stock de
gros mots.
Considérez ce billet comme un
SOS de la dernière heure.
Les jours qui viennent risquent d' être boueux.
Mikati qui probablement s'en ira. Bon, qui s'en fout , de toute façon il
n'aurait rien fait lui et les 40 voleurs. Mais allez expliquez ça au dollars qui
va flamber. On l'avait un peu oublié celui-là , sauf que lui ne nous a pas
oublié et fera à sa guise.
Les carburants seront peut-être un peu disponibles mais inabordables pour nombre
de Libanais. Et puis la rentrée, un cauchemar pour tout le monde..
L' arrivée du navire fantôme Iranien coincidera avec tout ça et ce sera le
bordel total.
Un cocktail de cette sorte est censé réveiller un mort et le sortir de la tombe.
Le peuple Libanais est-il mort ? Se reveillera t- il pour frapper dans la bonne
direction et déloger ces criminels ?
On verra bien.
SOS
The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous
Reports And News published on August 28-29/2021
Biden, Bennett discuss steps to deter Iran’s
‘dangerous regional behaviour’/“If diplomacy fails, we’re ready to turn to other
options,” said the US president.
The Arab Weekly/August 28/2021
WASHINGTON--President Joe Biden told Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett in
White House talks on Friday that he was putting “diplomacy first” to try to rein
in Iran’s nuclear program but that if negotiations fail he would be prepared to
turn to other unspecified options. After a one-day delay due to a deadly suicide
bombing in Kabul during the chaotic US evacuation from Afghanistan, Biden and
Bennett held their first meeting seeking to reset US-Israeli relations and
narrow differences over how to deal with Iran’s nuclear advances. Tensions
complicated relations between Bennett’s predecessor, Benjamin Netanyahu, who was
close to former President Donald Trump, and the last Democratic administration
led by Barack Obama, with Biden as his vice president. But the meeting was
eclipsed by Thursday’s attack outside Kabul airport that killed at least 92
people, including 13 US service members, confronting Biden with the worst crisis
of his young presidency. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, both leaders
touched on Iran, one of the thorniest issues between them, but mostly they
papered over their disagreements. Biden said they discussed “our commitment to
ensure Iran never develops a nuclear weapon.”
“We’re putting diplomacy first and we’ll see where that takes us. But if
diplomacy fails, we’re ready to turn to other options,” Biden added, without
offering specifics. A White House statement issued later said the two also
“reviewed steps to deter and contain Iran’s dangerous regional behaviour.”
Bennett, a far-right politician who ended Netanyahu’s 12-year run as prime
minister in June, was expected to press Biden in private to harden his approach
to Iran and back out of negotiations aimed at reviving an international nuclear
deal with Tehran that Trump abandoned.
US-Iran talks have stalled as Washington awaits the next move by Iran’s new
hard-line president. “I was happy to hear your clear words that Iran will never
be able to acquire a nuclear weapon,” Bennett told Biden. “You emphasised that
you’ll try the diplomatic route but there’s other options if that doesn’t work
out,” he added, also stopping short of identifying the possibilities.
Bennett said he came with his own strategy to thwart Iran’s nuclear ambitions
that he would discuss in private with Biden. “Iran is the world’s number one
exporter of terror, instability, and human rights violations,” Bennett said.
“And as we sit here right now the Iranians are spinning their centrifuges in
Natanz and Fordo. And we got to stop it, and we both agree.”Since the US
withdrawal from the deal in 2018, Tehran over time has abandoned every
limitation the accord imposed on its nuclear enrichment. The country now
enriches a small amount of uranium up to 63%, a short step from weapons-grade
levels, compared with 3.67% under the deal. It also spins far more advanced
centrifuges and more of them than were allowed under the accord, worrying
nuclear nonproliferation experts even though Tehran insists its program is
peaceful.
Different style, same goal
Bennett has sought to move on from Netanyahu’s combative public style but has
been just as adamant as Netanyahu was in pledging to do whatever is necessary to
prevent Iran, which Israel views as an existential threat, from building a
nuclear weapon. Iran consistently denies it is seeking a bomb.
Bennett told reporters that Israel has developed a “comprehensive strategy” to
keep Iran away from nuclear breakout and stop its “regional aggression.”Alluding
to Israel’s threats of military action and the billions of dollars in US
military aid it receives, Bennett said: “It’s our responsibility to take care of
our fate, but we do thank you for the tools you’ve been giving us.”The visit
gave Biden an opportunity to demonstrate business as usual with a key partner
while grappling with the aftermath of the Afghan attack. On the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Biden and Bennett remain far apart. Biden,
according to the White House statement, reiterated support for a two-state
solution, after Trump distanced himself from that longstanding tenet of US
policy. Bennett opposes Palestinian statehood. Biden made only a brief reference
to the issue in his remarks. But the White House said he “underscored the
importance of steps to improve the lives of Palestinians.” Bennett did not
mention the Palestinians in his remarks. The consensus among Biden’s aides is
that now is not the time to push for a resumption of long-dormant peace talks or
major Israeli concessions, which could destabilise Bennett’s ideologically
diverse coalition.
But Biden’s aides say privately they hopes Bennett will make at least make
modest gestures to help avoid a recurrence of the Israel-Hamas fighting in the
Gaza Strip earlier this year. Though the White House made no mention of Biden’s
opposition to further expansion of Jewish settlements on occupied land, it said
he stressed “the importance of refraining from actions that could exacerbate
tensions.”Bennett, 49, the son of American immigrants to Israel, has been a
vocal proponent of settlements. The leaders also discussed “new opportunities”
to expand Israel’s relations with the Arab world, the White House said, after
normalisation agreements reached under Trump with the United Arab Emirates,
Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan.
Israel’s PM presented Biden with ‘death by a thousand
cuts’ Iran strategy: Reports
Tuqa Khalid, Al Arabiya English/28 August ,2021
Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett presented US President Joe Biden with
what Tel Aviv officials described as a “death by a thousand cuts” strategy
against Iran, the Jerusalem Post reported on Saturday citing diplomatic sources.
The report said the diplomats compared the strategy to the Cold War, with
“Israel playing the role of the US and Iran being the Soviet Union.” “Israel has
already started in that vein, so it doesn’t need Biden’s approval, per se, but
it would very much like its cooperation and support,” the report added. Biden
and Bennett met in the White House on Friday, where the US President told the PM
that if diplomatic negotiations failed regarding Iran’s nuclear deal then
Washington was prepared with other options. “We're putting diplomacy first and
we'll see where that takes us. But if diplomacy fails, we're ready to turn to
other options,” Biden said without adding further details.
He stressed to Bennet the US commitment to ensure Iran never developed a nuclear
weapon. On his part, Bennett was pleased with Biden’s remarks, saying: “I was
happy to hear your clear words that Iran will never be able to acquire a nuclear
weapon. You emphasized that you'll try the diplomatic route but there's other
options if that doesn't work out.”Axios further elaborated on the “death by a
thousand cuts” strategy, citing Israeli officials as saying that it involved
countering Iran through a “combination of many small actions across several
fronts — both military and diplomatic — instead of a single dramatic strike.”
Khamenei says Biden has same demands as Trump on Iran
nuclear issue
AFP/August 28/2021
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Saturday accused US President
Joe Biden's administration of making the same demands as his predecessor Donald
Trump in talks to revive a nuclear accord. The multilateral deal that offers
Iran relief from sanctions in return for curbs on its nuclear programme was
torpedoed by Trump's decision to withdraw the United States from it in 2018. A
last round of negotiations between Iran and the deal's remaining parties to
revive the 2015 accord concluded in June with no resumption in sight. "America's
current administration is no different from the previous one, because what it
demands from Iran on the nuclear issue is different in words, but the same thing
that Trump demanded," Khamenei said, quoted by his official website. "The
Americans truly have no shame on the nuclear issue, and even though they
withdrew from the JCPOA... they now talk in a way and make demands as it was
(Iran) that withdrew," he added, referring to the deal by its official name, the
Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. Khamenei made the remarks in a meeting with
President Ebrahim Raisi's newly formed cabinet, during which he acknowledged
public trust in government had been "damaged". The ultraconservative Raisi won a
June 18 election marred by record low turnout and an absence of significant
competitors. He succeeded the moderate Hassan Rouhani, the architect of the
political opening that culminated in the nuclear agreement between Tehran and
six major powers. A year after Trump's decision to withdraw from the deal and
impose sanctions on Iran, the Islamic republic retaliated by gradually waiving
most of the key nuclear commitments that it had accepted under the agreement.
Six rounds of nuclear talks between Iran and world powers -- with the US
indirectly taking part -- were held in Vienna between April and June. The last
round concluded on June 20, with no date set for another. "Behind the scenes of
America's foreign policy, there is a predator wolf that sometimes changes to a
cunning fox," Khamenei said.
U.S. Strikes IS Target in Afghanistan, Pushes Airlift into Final Stage
Agence France Presse/August 28/2021
The United States conducted a drone strike against an Islamic State target in
Afghanistan on Saturday, as the airlift of those desperate to flee moved into
its fraught final stages with fresh terror attack warnings and encroaching
Taliban forces primed to take over Kabul airport. U.S. forces overseeing the
evacuation have been forced into closer security cooperation with the Taliban to
prevent any repeat of the suicide bombing that killed scores of civilians
crowded around one of the airport's main access gates and 13 American troops.
The attack was claimed by a regional Islamic State chapter, and the Pentagon
announced it had carried out a drone attack on a "planner" from the jihadist
group in eastern Afghanistan. "Initial indications are that we killed the
target," said Captain Bill Urban of the Central Command. With the airlift window
narrowing sharply ahead of an August 31 deadline, more than 5,000 people remain
inside Kabul airport awaiting evacuation. But crowds pleading for entry outside
the perimeter gates have thinned to hundreds, according to two people who gained
access on Saturday. The carnage of Thursday's suicide attack injected further
stress and tension into a situation already fraught with panic and despair for
those wanting to leave and high risk for the US forces tasked with securing the
operation. On Saturday, two senior health officials from the former Afghan
administration told AFP the death toll from the blast had topped 100, including
the 13 Americans. Some media have put the toll as high as 170. The bombing
followed a chorus of warnings about an imminent threat and, as people gathered
outside the airport Saturday, the United States issued a fresh alert for its
citizens to leave areas around the main gates "immediately". In recent years,
the Islamic State's Afghanistan-Pakistan chapter has been responsible for some
of the deadliest attacks in those countries -- massacring civilians at mosques,
shrines, public squares and even hospitals.
'Future attempts' -
At the White House, President Joe Biden's press secretary Jen Psaki said U.S.
national security experts consider another attack is "likely" and the next few
days will be "the most dangerous period to date. "Taliban spokesman Bilal Karimi
tweeted that the group's fighters had already moved into parts of the military
side of Kabul airport, but the Pentagon stressed that U.S. forces retained
control over the gates and airlift operations. Racing to meet the Tuesday
withdrawal deadline has required close cooperation with the Taliban on evacuee
movements and the IS threat. The head of U.S. forces at Hamid Karzai
International, Rear Admiral Peter Vasely, is in constant contact with the
Taliban official overseeing security around the airport. And with the Taliban
poised to take over when the last U.S. plane leaves, discussions have begun on
resuming normal flight operations. Turkish officials have held initial talks
with the Taliban in Kabul about helping get the airport back up and running.
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said the Taliban offer was for them to oversee
security at the airport, while Ankara runs logistical operations.
Refugee exodus
Under enormous criticism at home and abroad for his handling of the Afghan
crisis and the U.S. military withdrawal, Biden has pledged to stick to the
airlift deadline and to punish those responsible for the suicide blast. About
109,000 people have been flown out of the country since August 14, the day
before the Taliban swept to power, according to the U.S. government. Some
Western allies, including Britain and Spain, announced an end to their airlifts
on Friday, following other nations such as Canada and Australia earlier in the
week. The United Nations said it was bracing for a "worst-case scenario" of up
to half a million more refugees from Afghanistan by the end of 2021. The Taliban
have promised a softer brand of rule compared with their first stint in power
from 1996 to 2001, which ended when the United States invaded Afghanistan
following the September 11 attacks. But many Afghans fear a repeat of their
brutal interpretation of Islamic law, as well as reprisals against those working
with foreign militaries, Western missions or the previous US-backed government.
Women's role in society has been one of the biggest concerns, after they were
banned from work and education and confined to their homes during the group's
previous rule. Taliban official Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai, the former deputy
chief negotiator of peace talks in Doha, said Friday that women have "an innate
right" to work."They can work, they can study, they can take part in politics
and they can do business," he told a press conference.
Biden: Strike in Afghanistan not last, another ISIS
attack likely in next 24-36 hours
Tuqa Khalid, Al Arabiya English/28 August ,2021
US President Joe Biden said on Saturday the US drone strike targeting ISIS-K in
Afghanistan will not be the last one, and that the threat of another attack by
the extremist group remains high. “I said we would go after the group
responsible for the attack on our troops and innocent civilians in Kabul, and we
have. This strike was not the last. We will continue to hunt down any person
involved in that heinous attack and make them pay,” he said in a statement. The
drone strike was in retaliation for the suicide bombing which targeted Kabul
airport on Thursday and led to the deaths of over a 100 Afghans and wounded
scores more was claimed by ISIS.The Pentagon said the airstrike a “facilitator
and a planner” from ISIS-K, the arm of the group in Afghanistan, with no
civilian casualties. Biden added that the threat of another attack on US troops
remained eminent. “The situation on the ground continues to be extremely
dangerous, and the threat of terrorist attacks on the airport remains high. Our
commanders informed me that an attack is highly likely in the next 24-36 hours,”
he said.“I directed them to take every possible measure to prioritize force
protection, and ensured that they have all the authorities, resources and plans
to protect our men and women on the ground. They assured me that they did, and
that they could take these measures while completing the mission and safely
retrograding our personnel,” Biden added.
Pentagon identifies US military casualties in Kabul airport
attack
Tuqa Khalid, Al Arabiya English/28 August ,2021
The Pentagon released on Saturday the list of names identifying the 13 US
servicemen who died in the deadly attack on Kabul airport.
The suicide bombing which targeted Kabul airport on Thursday and led to the
deaths of over a 100 Afghans and wounded scores more was claimed by ISIS.
The list of deceased US servicemen and their ages are as follows:
Marine Corps Staff Sgt. Darin T. Hoover, 31, of Salt Lake City, Utah.
Marine Corps Sgt. Johanny Rosariopichardo, 25, of Lawrence, Massachusetts.
Marine Corps Sgt. Nicole L. Gee, 23, of Sacramento, California.
Marine Corps Cpl. Hunter Lopez, 22, of Indio, California.
Marine Corps Cpl. Daegan W. Page, 23, of Omaha, Nebraska.
Marine Corps Cpl. Humberto A. Sanchez, 22, of Logansport, Indiana.
Marine Corps Lance Cpl. David L. Espinoza, 20, of Rio Bravo, Texas.
Marine Corps Lance Cpl. Jared M. Schmitz, 20, of St. Charles, Missouri.
Marine Corps Lance Cpl. Rylee J. McCollum, 20, of Jackson, Wyoming.
Marine Corps Lance Cpl. Dylan R. Merola, 20, of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Marine Corps Lance Cpl. Kareem M. Nikoui, 20, of Norco, California.
Navy Hospitalman Maxton W. Soviak, 22, of Berlin Heights, Ohio.
Army Staff Sgt. Ryan C. Knauss, 23, of Corryton, Tennessee.
The US retaliated in less than 48 hours by launching a drone strike in eastern
Afghanistan which the Pentagon said killed a “facilitator and a planner” from
ISIS-K, the arm of the group in Afghanistan, with no civilian casualties.
President Joe Biden vowed to retaliate against the attackers. “We will not
forgive; we will not forget. We will hunt you down and make you pay. I will
defend our interests and our people with every measure at my command,” he said
at the White House on Thursday.
US military begins withdrawal from Kabul airport: Pentagon
Tuqa Khalid, Al Arabiya English/28 August ,2021
US troops have begun their withdrawal from Kabul airport, Major General Hank
Taylor said on Saturday. “Now as the military mission begins to end in Kabul,
thousands of service members are working across the globe and within the United
States to complete this incredibly important mission,” he said. US President Joe
Biden had sent thousands of troops to the airport earlier this month to help
evacuate American citizens and Afghans at risk, after the Taliban seized control
of the country on August 15. Evacuations are underway ahead of the August 31
deadline for the US and its allies to withdraw from Afghanistan. “We continue to
evacuate American citizens and vulnerable Afghans out of Kabul. In fact, there
are approximately 1,400 individuals at the Kabul airport who have been screened
and manifested for flights today,” Taylor said. State Department Spokesman Ned
Price had said on Friday that since August 14, the US evacuated and facilitated
the evacuation of approximately 105,000 people. Since the end of July, the US
has relocated approximately 110,600 people. “There are approximately 500
American citizens we are currently working with who want to leave and with whom
we are communicating directly to facilitate their evacuations,” Price added.
Taliban claim to enter resistance stronghold Panjshir,
Massoud supporters deny
Tuqa Khalid, Al Arabiya English/28 August ,2021
The Taliban said their fighters entered Panjshir province on Saturday without
facing any resistance, Afghan news outlet ToloNews reported. “No fighting
occurred, but the.. [Taliban fighters] advanced from various directions without
facing any resistance. The [Taliban] forces have entered Panjshir from different
directions,” said Anaamullah Samangani, a member of the Taliban’s Cultural
Commission. After the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan on August 15,
Panjshir province in the country’s northwest remained an unconquered area. It
has become a stronghold for resistance, mobilizing under Ahmad Massoud, the
32-year-old son of the slain leader Ahmad Shah Massoud, who vowed to resist the
Taliban. Massoud's supporters rejected the Taliban's claim of entering Panjshir.
“There is no fight in Panjshir and no one has entered the province,” said
Mohammad Almas Zahid, head of the Resistance Front delegation.
The Taliban's Samangani said that the door remained open for negotiations with
Massoud's supporters and on Saturday a delegation of Ahmad Massoud met with a
Taliban delegation in Kabul, ToloNews reported. The Taliban announced last week
that hundreds of their fighters were heading to Panjshir to control the
province.
Slain US Marine who cradled baby at Kabul airport loved her
job
The Associated Press/29 August ,2021
A woman who cradled a baby in her arms at the airport and posted on social media
that she loved her job. A young husband with a child on the way. Another man who
always wanted to be in the military. A man who planned to become a sheriff’s
deputy when his deployment ended. Heart-wrenching details have emerged about
some of the 13 US troops killed in a horrific suicide bombing at Afghanistan’s
Kabul airport, which also claimed the lives of more than 160 Afghans. A week
before she was killed, Sgt. Nicole Gee cradled a baby in her arms at the Kabul
airport. She posted the photo on Instagram and wrote, “I love my job.” Gee, 23,
of Sacramento, California, was a maintenance technician with the 24th Marine
Expeditionary Unit from Camp Lejeune in North Carolina. Sgt. Mallory Harrison,
who lived with Gee for three years and called her a “sister forever” and best
friend, wrote about the magnitude of her loss.
“I can’t quite describe the feeling I get when I force myself to come back to
reality & think about how I’m never going to see her again,” Harrison wrote on
Facebook. “How her last breath was taken doing what she loved — helping people.
… Then there was an explosion. And just like that, she’s gone.”
Gee’s Instagram page shows another photo of her in fatigues, holding a rifle
next to a line of people walking into the belly of a large transport plane. She
wrote: “escorting evacuees onto the bird.”The social media account that includes
many selfies after working out at the gym lists her location as California,
North Carolina and “somewhere overseas.”Photos show her on a camel in Saudi
Arabia, in a bikini on a Greek isle and holding a beer in Spain. One from this
month in Kuwait shows her beaming with her meritorious promotion to sergeant.
Harrison said her generation of Marines hears war stories from veterans of the
Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts, but they seem distant amid boring deployments
until “the peaceful float you were on turns into … your friends never coming
home.”Gee’s car was still parked in a lot at Camp Lejeune and Harrison mused
about all the Marines who walked past it while she was overseas. “Some of them
knew her. Some of them didn’t.” she said. “They all walked past it. The war
stories, the losses, the flag-draped coffins, the KIA bracelets & the
heartbreak. It’s not so distant anymore.”
Macron at the Baghdad summit: ISIS still poses a threat
MEA 24/August 28/2021
Today, Saturday, French President Emmanuel Macron said at a joint press
conference with Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi in Baghdad that “we
should not be complacent” in the face of the militants, stressing that “ISIS is
still a threat.” For his part, Al-Kazemi stressed that “Iraq and France are key
partners in the war against terrorism,” in statements that come during a two-day
visit by the French president to Baghdad, as part of a regional conference in
which a number of neighboring countries, especially Iran and Saudi Arabia, will
participate. The Presidency of the Iraqi government said in a statement, “Prime
Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi received French President Emmanuel Macron, upon his
arrival at Baghdad airport to participate in the Baghdad Conference for
Cooperation and Partnership.” Iraq will host a conference on “cooperation and
partnership”, the most prominent of which is French President Macron, and
includes a number of regional countries such as Iran and Saudi Arabia, and is
expected to be overshadowed by developments in Afghanistan. The correspondent of
Al-Araby Al-Jadeed confirmed the arrival of official delegations from Egypt,
Kuwait and Iran to the Iraqi capital, Baghdad, to participate in the regional
conference. Through the conference, Iraq hopes to obtain support to restore
security and economic stability, and to enhance its regional role. It is likely
that the talks will focus on the rapid developments in Afghanistan, the
Taliban’s control of the country, and the emergence of the “ISIS” organization,
which on Thursday adopted an attack on Kabul Airport, which reinforces fears of
the resurgence of its influence again, after it was defeated in Iraq in 2017 and
in Syria in 2018, with the support of From an international coalition led by the
United States. Since yesterday night, hundreds of members of the
Counter-Terrorism Service have deployed in and around the Green Zone, in which
the conference will be held, while the army and the Federal Police have deployed
in a number of areas of the capital, especially near the Green Zone and near
Baghdad International Airport Street --/
Iraq Hosts Regional Meeting Aimed at Easing Mideast
Tensions
Associated Press/August 28/2021
Iraqi security forces fanned out across the Iraqi capital Saturday ahead of a
regional conference aimed at easing tensions in the Middle East and emphasizing
the Arab country's new role as mediator. Among the invitees are archenemies Iran
and Saudi Arabia, whose rivalry has often played out in Iraq and other
countries, including Yemen and Lebanon. Saudi Arabia has said it would be
represented by its foreign minister, Prince Faisal bin Farhan. It was not clear
what kind of representation Iran would have at the conference. Egyptian
President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi and Jordan's King Abdullah as well as
representatives from Turkey, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates were expected to
participate. French President Emmanuel Macron, whose country is co-organizing
the meeting, arrived in Baghdad early Saturday. Participants were expected to
discuss a regional water crisis, the war in Yemen and a severe economic and
political crisis in Lebanon that has brought the country to the point of
collapse. Iraqi special forces deployed in Baghdad, particularly around the
Green Zone, which houses foreign embassies and is the seat of the Iraqi
government. Sunday's meeting is a chance for Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi
to showcase his recent efforts to portray Iraq as a neutral mediator in the
region's crises and re-engage with the world after decades of conflict. Earlier
this year, the country hosted several rounds of direct talks between regional
rivals Saudi Arabia and Iran, with mid-level officials discussing issues related
to Yemen and Lebanon, according to Iraqi officials. The talks signaled a
possible de-escalation following years of animosity that often spilled into
neighboring countries and at least one still-raging war. The talks, while
significant, fell short of a breakthrough in relations given the deep strains,
historic rivalry and continued sporadic attacks on Saudi oil targets by
Iran-backed Houthis from Yemen. There has been talk, however, of the potential
for Saudi Arabia to reopen its embassy in Tehran, which was ransacked and
shuttered following outrage over the execution of a prominent Saudi Shiite
cleric in early 2016.
Saudi Arabia and other Arab Gulf states like the United Arab Emirates have
called for any nuclear agreement between world powers and Iran to also address
its ballistic missile program and support for militias. Saudi Arabia has sought
talks with Iran as the kingdom tries to end its years-long war in Yemen against
Iran-backed Houthi rebels. Tehran, meanwhile, appears to have calculated that a
gradual detente with Riyadh, a longtime U.S. ally, will work in its favor during
renewed nuclear talks with Washington and world powers. An Iraqi government
official told The Associated Press he anticipated Saudi and Iranian officials
would hold talks on the sidelines of Saturday's meetings. He said the aim was to
bring opponents to the same table and create a political atmosphere for
resolving outstanding problems. Iraq's message at the summit is that it stands
at the same distance from all sides, the official said. He spoke on condition of
anonymity because he was not authorized to give official statements. For Iraq,
hosting the talks is seen as a significant step. After decades of conflict, the
country is seeking to reclaim a leadership role and status in the Arab world
with a centrist policy and a determination among the country's top leaders to
maintain good relations with both Iran and the United States and its regional
allies. The Shiite-majority country lies on the fault line between Shiite Iran
and the mostly Sunni Arab world, led by powerhouse Saudi Arabia, and has long
been a theater in which Saudi-Iran rivalry for regional supremacy played out.
Amnesty Urges Syria Govt to Lift 'Siege' Off Daraa
Agence France Presse/August 28/2021
Rights group Amnesty International has urged the Syrian government to
immediately allow humanitarian aid into a rebel holdout under regime "siege" in
the southern city of Daraa. The United Nations has warned of food shortages in
opposition-held Daraa al-Balad, which is surrounded by Russia-backed regime
fighters seeking to retake control of the area. Clashes have raged between both
sides in recent weeks, before a shaky Moscow-brokered truce deal saw dozens of
rebels quit the area this week. "The Syrian government must immediately lift the
siege to facilitate unfettered access for humanitarian organisations and allow
the medical evacuation of the sick and injured," said Amnesty's Syria researcher
Diana Semaan. She called on all sides to "grant safe passage to civilians
wanting to flee the area". The rights group said the government now rarely
approved medical evacuations, while many of the ill or wounded feared they would
be detained or face reprisals if they stepped into regime-held territory. One
woman told Amnesty last week the shops were almost empty of all food. Her cousin
had died because he was not granted permission to leave for urgent medical
treatment, she told the rights group. The UN humanitarian agency OCHA said
Tuesday that 38,600 people -- more than half of them children -- had fled Daraa
al-Balad and been registered in and around the city. Amnesty said the exodus
happened after the government briefly opened a checkpoint for people to leave
the area. Around 20,000 people remained inside with scarce supplies, it said.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based war monitor with
sources inside Syria, said regime forces fired mortar rounds at Daraa al-Balad
on Friday. There was no sign of any resumption of the evacuation of rebels under
the truce deal, it added. The Observatory had said that 53 people, mostly
"fighters who rejected the reconciliation deal", left on Thursday. Syria's state
news agency said the number had been 45 and included family members. Thursday's
evacuation came two days after an initial smaller group of opposition fighters
boarded buses bound for the rebel-held north of the country, according to the
Observatory. The wider province of Daraa, seen as the birthplace of Syria's
uprising in 2011 and held for years by opposition forces, was returned to
government control in 2018. Some rebels left under a previous Moscow-backed
ceasefire at the time, but others kept their weapons and remained in control of
several areas, including Daraa al-Balad.
Thousands in Berlin protest coronavirus measures
AP/August 28/2021
Thousands turned out in Berlin on Saturday to protest the government’s
coronavirus measures, despite bans against several planned gatherings. Police
banned nine planned demonstrations for Saturday, including one from the
Stuttgart-based Querdenker movement, the most visible anti-lockdown movement in
Germany. A court ruled in favor of allowing one protest, planned for 500 people,
on Saturday and Sunday. More than 2,000 police officers were stationed around
the city to respond to those who showed up despite the bans. Meanwhile, a
counter-protest called the “Love Train,” complete with techno music, drew a
large crowd of its own. Those demonstrators support government restrictions to
slow the spread of the coronavirus. The Saturday protests come amid debates in
Germany about how and whether to impose restrictions for unvaccinated people, a
question taking on more urgency as coronavirus case numbers rise. Similar
protests took place in Berlin in early August, which ended in clashes with
police and hundreds of people detained.
Sisi’s remarks revive debate in Egypt about mention of
religion on IDs
The Arab Weekly/August 28/2021
CAIRO--The mention of religious affiliation on official identification papers
has always been a controversial issue among Muslims and Christian alike in
Egypt. The subject seems to have been revived by recent remarks by President
Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi during a telephone call with a live programme on the Sada
Al-Balad TV channel. Ripple effects from his remarks have been felt throughout
political and cultural elites. Sisi called for the renewal of religious
discourse and stressed the importance of awareness in dealing with the matter,
saying, “We are all born Muslim or non-Muslim according to our ID. We should
reformulate our understanding of belief. We inherit our religion. We were young
and did not know. We have grown up. But did we think or are we too afraid to
think?”Analysts say Sisi’s comments are enough to open the door to serious
discussion this time about deleting the mention of religion from the ID card
that every Egyptian who reaches the age of sixteen must carry. Advocates have
linked the call for suppression of the mention of religious affiliation to
concepts of civil state and citizenship in Egypt. But every time the issue of
religion is raised, it faces objections from some Muslim and Christian
extremists alike, who want to preserve the mention of religious affiliation,
even though it contradicts the principle of the civil state and the narrative
underlying the notion of “new republic” being promoted by the regime, which
considers equality between people to be based on citizenship and not on
religion.
In everyday life, some jobs in Egypt have been tacitly restricted to Muslims,
even though the constitution stresses the equality of all citizens without
discrimination. Muslim and Christian businesses tend at times to reserve
positions to applicants from their respective faith. The abolition of the
mention of religion from the identity cards could help eliminate the suspicion
of discrimination. But its implementation would need the review of a large
number of administrative procedures, such as the registration of births,
marriage, divorce and the issuance of death and inheritance certificates, where
the proof of religious affiliation in these official documents is an important
matter. .
In 2018, an MP submitted a draft law to compel the Egyptian government to remove
the religious affiliation mention from the ID cards, based on Article 53 of the
Constitution, which states that “citizens are equal before the law and there is
no discrimination between them for reasons, including religion or belief”.
Since that time, the issue has not been seriously discussed in public, but
Sisi’s remarks have brought it back. However, the problem in Egypt goes beyond
merely amending the texts of laws or cancelling the mention of religion, because
the names themselves indicate the religious affiliation of its owner.
Egyptian writer and senator Farida El-Shoubashi says the president’s remarks
make it opportune today to raise the issue again. However, she felt that beyond
doing away with the mention of religious affiliation, there is a need to change
the prevailing culture of citizens and specifically the propensity of
conspicuous display of religious symbols. She added that, implementing the
president’s directives requires a “serious approach towards extremist platforms
including campaigns that publicise the importance of the decision in schools,
universities and the media, if not (the authorities) will face crises as a
result of citizens not being convinced”. She added, “We need to reach a deep
understanding of the saying: Religion is for God and the homeland is for all.”
Opposition accuses Ankara of allowing Afghan refugees ‘for
money’
The Arab Weekly/August 28/2021
VAN, Turkey--As Turkey braces for a possible influx of refugees fleeing
Afghanistan following the Taliban takeover, concern over the potential impact is
growing, fuelled by festering resentment over refugees already sheltering in the
country. Turkey already hosts 3.7 million Syrians, the world’s largest refugee
population and the mood has soured in recent weeks as social media videos
allegedly showing Afghans entering by the hundreds unhindered sparked outrage.
Officials say around 300,000 Afghans are also currently in Turkey. Some have
been there for several years. They include an estimated 120,000 unregistered
people, although the opposition say the number is far higher. Gravestones of
those who have died after crossing the border dot a cemetery in the city. While
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his AK Party have defended accepting millions
of Syrians who fled conflict in their country, they have said a new wave would
not be welcome. “Turkey … cannot handle another burden of migration stemming
from Syria or Afghanistan,” Erdogan said on Wednesday. He has also warned EU
leaders that Turkey will not be a “migrant storage unit” for Afghans trying to
reach Europe. More Afghans are already arriving. Officials have not given
details of how many a day, but say they have not yet seen signs of a major surge
since the Taliban’s victory. However, the long distances through Iran mean
migrants could take weeks to arrive. Baran was one of around 20 people in Van
who said that Turkey should stop accepting migrants and send back people already
in the country.In the capital Ankara this month a crowd of Turks attacked shops
and homes belonging to Syrians in the wake of a fight that led to a Turkish
youth being fatally stabbed.
“Border is honour”
Most of those who spoke to Reuters in Van said migrants were damaging the
economy, while locals have to cope with inflation and unemployment in double
figures. Authorities have reinforced the border with Iran to keep Afghan
migrants out, but some still slip through. Police have also detained thousands
of Afghan migrants already in the country in recent weeks. They are taken to
repatriation centres but they are currently not being sent back due to the
turmoil in Afghanistan. “If the government took necessary measures, there
wouldn’t be migration,” said 54-year-old Mehmet Serif Karatas, speaking outside
a textile shop in Van, a transit point for most Afghans crossing into Turkey.
Opposition parties have also criticised Erdogan’s administration for not
securing the frontier. Last week, the main opposition Republican People’s Party
(CHP) put up giant banners on its buildings, reading “Border is honour”.
CHP leader Kemal Kilicdaroglu said that the West may try to make a new deal with
Turkey in return for money, similar to Turkey’s 2016 agreement with the European
Union to stem the flow of migrants to Europe in return for billions of euros for
refugee projects. “How did … thousands of Afghans cross the border and come to
Turkey and who allowed it? We have to blame the ones who allow it,” Kilicdaroglu
said on Wednesday. “They are doing this for money.”Selami Kiye, a 48-year-old
shopkeeper in Van’s Russian Bazaar, said Europe or other countries should take
in the migrants. “Let them go elsewhere. We don’t care about them,” Kiye said.
The Latest LCCC English analysis &
editorials published on
August 28-29/2021
In new escalation, Algeria to stop supplying Spain with gas
through Morocco
Mohamed Alaoui/The Arab Weekly/August 28/2021
RABAT--After unilaterally deciding to sever diplomatic relations with Rabat,
Algiers has announced it will stop supplying Spain with gas through the
Maghreb-Europe gas pipeline, which runs overland through Morocco. According to
analysts, the decision was prompted by Morocco’s calm posture and by the
widespread reactions of mockery and sarcasm on social media after Algeria’s
decision to cut ties with Rabat.
Foreign Minister Ramtane Lamamra had not mentioned the decision regarding the
gas pipeline during the conference during which he announced the suspension of
diplomatic ties, although he spoke at length about the motives for the move and
what it would entail, hence confirming that the decision was subsequently taken
in response to Morocco’s cool posture. Algerian Energy Minister Mohamed Arkab
confirmed on Thursday that all Algerian natural gas supplies to Spain and from
there to Europe will go in the future through the Medgaz pipeline that crosses
the Mediterranean.
Morocco is currently supplied with natural gas through the Maghreb-Europe
pipeline (GME) that links Algeria to Spain and runs across the kingdom. Algeria
has a second pipeline, Medgaz, that does not cross Morocco, and Energy Minister
Mohamed Arkab said it would supply all of Spain’s gas supplies.
Medgaz directly links its facilities in the western town of Beni Saf to Almeria,
in southeastern Spain, with annual capacity of 8 billion cubic metres.Moroccan
international law expert, Sabri El-Ho, said that Algeria believes that with this
step it will cut Moroccan revenues. Annual profits from the pipeline’s passage
through Moroccan territory are estimated at about $50 million. Talking to The
Arab Weekly, El-Ho added, “That is why Algeria recently extended a line and
connected it to the old pipeline to boost its capacity. The goal is to reach,
before the end of October 2021, a capacity that meets Spain’s needs of gas
without the Maghreb pipeline that passes through Morocco.” Sabri El-Ho concluded
that “the intent was there for a while. The move was clearly premeditated”.
International relations experts agree that Morocco’s stretched hand and its
restrained response to the severing of ties seem to have displeased Algerian
decision-makers who opted for escalation. The experts stress that the Algerian
decision is political and will not achieve its purpose of pressuring Morocco.
Moroccan economist Driss Elfina stressed that the Algerian decision is intended
only for domestic consumption so as to show that severing diplomatic relations
will not be without economic consequences for Morocco. He pointed out that
“Morocco receives supplies of gas from several countries, mainly the United
States, Spain and Norway.”Commenting on the decision, the director-general of
the Moroccan Office of Hydrocarbons and Minerals, Amina Benkhadra, told the
Maroc-Le Jour website that Morocco supports the continuation of the use of the
pipeline which transports gas from Algeria to Spain through Moroccan soil.
She added that Morocco expressed this position both in private talks and in
public statements, stressing that the pipeline represents an instrument of
regional cooperation.
The tripartite agreement between Algeria, Rabat and Madrid is set to expire on
October 31, and the pipeline guarantees the supply of gas from Algeria to Spain
and Portugal via Morocco. Algerian media previously indicated that Algeria
intended to impose new contractual conditions on Morocco to market gas
quantities of 1 billion cubic meters annually, to meet Spain and Portugal’s gas
needs through the “Medgaz” pipeline. Accordingly, Rabat would lose the advantage
of transit rights and will be forced to accept the new conditions imposed by
Algeria based on market prices, which have increased by 640 percent. Driss
Elfina stressed that after the decision, it is necessary to return to the
agreement that binds Sonatrach and the Moroccan parties, and if there is a
violation of the terms of this agreement, it is the right of Morocco – or other
concerned parties – to seek compensation for damages.
He considered that the decision is not in the interest of Algeria, as Sonatrach
knows very well that maintaining the pipeline that links Algeria to Morocco is
necessary for Sonatrach, even if it is just to anticipate any contingency
affecting the pipeline that passes from Algeria to Spain. Sabri El-Ho believes
that Algeria is also maneuvering so as to prevent Morocco from reviewing transit
fees, because starting from next March, the infrastructure will be the property
of Morocco, and therefore transit fees will be subject to review so as to
include the cost of the infrastructure.
Why apathy on Palestinian injustice will backfire
Daoud Kuttab/Arab News/August 28, 2021
It is often difficult to analyze the real results of a summit based on the
public statements before and after the meeting, but the latest talks between
Israeli Prime Minister Neftali Bennett and US President Joe Biden are easy to
examine.
The one-day delay caused by the terrorist attack at Kabul airport threw the
observant Jewish leader’s schedule off because of the impracticality of
returning before the sabbath. It was a reminder that despite the usual US broken
record of “shared values” and total support for Israel, there are many other
issues more important to Washington than Israel.
In the limited time that a press briefing provides, the new Israeli prime
minister, who grew up in New Jersey, managed to talk about using Amtrak trains
(a favorite subject for Biden, who used the train for years to commute from
Delaware to DC), but couldn’t muster a single word on the Palestinian-Israeli
conflict. He even found time to mention the third COVID-19 booster shot and, of
course, the Iranian issue, but there was not a single mention of the
decades-long occupation and the colonization of millions of Palestinians.
The mood at the White House and apparently throughout the US capital reflected
the fact that after years of having to deal with the Netanyahus — their lies,
their quirks, and even their dirty laundry — a more stable political leader from
Israel was making the rounds in Washington.
While the Israeli leader said nothing on the Palestinian issue, Biden did — both
in his public remarks and, according to leaks, in the tête-à-tête with Bennett.
President Biden noted before the meeting that he and his Israeli guest “also are
going to discuss ways to advance peace and security and prosperity for Israelis
and Palestinians.” Biden privately pressed Bennett on the threatened eviction of
Palestinian families from their homes in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of
Jerusalem to make way for Jewish settlers, and on the need to reopen the US
consulate in Jerusalem.
While Bennett made no mention of Palestinians in his public statements, both he
and the US president apparently talked about the repeated Israeli calls for a
visa waiver for Israelis wishing to visit the US. Biden said: “We’re also going
to direct our teams to work toward Israel fulfilling the requirements of the
visa waiver program and get that done.” However,Israel’s request has been
regularly rejected because of the country’s discriminatory policies. There is a
huge file of documented cases in which Israel has discriminated against
Americans of Arab origin, especially American Palestinians,at the various border
crossings. It wasn’t clear if Bennett made any gesture on the Israeli security
service’s regular profiling of Americans of Arab origin — although the issue is
currently moot, since no foreigners are allowed to visit Israel because of
COVID-19 restrictions.
If ever there was a time for Palestinian national unity and a reassessment of
the Palestinian national liberation strategy, that time is now.
While Washington is not in agreement with the Bennett administration on
sidelining the Palestinian issue, there does appear to be some convergence on
avoiding any major political or diplomatic effort at present. The Biden
administration has publicly said that it is not a high priority for Washington,
and apart from a short period in May when Gaza-Israel violence escalated, the US
appears to have stayed on course in downgrading the Palestine issue.
Biden is under pressure from progressives in his own Democratic Party to reopen
the Palestinian mission in DC and the US consulate in Jerusalem, and to put an
end to the high-profile house demolitions and evictions, but other than that it
doesn’t appear that the US will do much to get the Palestinian-Israeli talks
back on track. Overall, Israeli and US apathy over the rights of Palestinians
could not have been more clearly illustrated than in that Biden-Bennett summit.
As has happened before, however, such short-sightedness will inevitably
backfire, because the tension in Gaza will blow up again if the illegal Israeli
blockade is not lifted. The Abbas government in Ramallah is also in bad economic
shape; it is running out of money because Israel is withholding a chunk of the
taxes and customs it collects on goods destined forPalestine. The EU, which made
a rare strong statement against the Palestinian security crackdown on peaceful
demonstrators, has been the main financial backer, covering most of the salaries
of Palestinian public servants. Arab countries, which were regular financial
contributors to the Palestinians as part of publicly declared pledges at
consecutive Arab League summits, reduced their support in response to requests
from Donald Trump when he was US president, and have yet to restore it. They are
waiting for Biden to make a public request for it, possibly in the hope that
they can make some political gains in return. The only Arab leader who has met
Biden has been King Abdullah of Jordan.
Palestinians and their friends need to make a somber evaluation of what is
happening. There appears to be no seriouseffort on the horizon for a
breakthrough in the deadlocked Palestinian-Israeli relationship. Israeli and US
efforts to improve the lives of Palestinians will not suffice so long as the
Israeli occupation and its land-grabbing colonial settlement enterprise
continue. US reluctance to use aid as an instrument of pressure means that
Israel will continue to get away with its apartheid regime and its harsh
militaristic crackdown on Palestinian resistance.
If ever there was a time for Palestinian national unity and a reassessment of
the Palestinian national liberation strategy, that time is now.
*Daoud Kuttab is an award-winning Palestinian journalist and former Ferris
Professor of Journalism at Princeton University. Twitter: @daoudkuttab
Road to Libya’s elections is fraught with peril
Hafed Al-Ghwell/Arab News/August 28/2021
Presidential and parliamentary elections in December this year will be the
ultimate test of whether Libya can return to some sort of stability after years
of conflict. Tensions and rivalries among domestic and foreign actors have
intensified amid competition for influence in what most observers believe will
be a relatively stable post-election Libya.
However, rather than heralding a return to the semblance of normality, the
prospect of Libyans heading to the polls to upend a decade-old status quo may
just unleash more chaos. The road to Dec. 24 is fraught with risks that even the
most radical mitigating efforts will never fully counteract.
A sense of weariness, unease and exasperation haunts conversations about the
state of affairs in Libya. Hard-won progress achieved by corralling stakeholders
into agreeing to basic and elementary common goals in the service of mutual
interests is easily and frequently derailed. These setbacks come from troubling
declarations and feigned outrage by local actors, aided in part by the
Machiavellian maneuvering of their external backers.
Granted, most stakeholders acknowledge that elections are inevitable, even if
squabbles about their constitutionality persist. This is a natural consequence
of the fact that all sides agree there is no military solution to Libya’s
debacle, and that the current landscape is unsustainable. The foundation has
been laid for a negotiated political outcome, which should culminate in the
December ballot — if it is ever held.
The failure to agree on the legality of the elections is now a political dispute
between the House of Representatives, led by Aguila Saleh, and the High Council
of State, led by Khalid Meshri. The latter would prefer to stick to the LPDF's
Roadmap agreed on last year in Tunisia, while the former is seeking to operate
unilaterally, particularly on appointments to key sovereign posts.
Each side accuses the other of obstruction, creating an opening for other
actors, whose interests are not fully served by the LPDF, to position themselves
and leverage their preferred candidates.
Notably, Russia is betting on the candidacy of Saif Al-Islam Qaddafi, who has
emerged from years of seclusion. The late Muammar Qaddafi’s heir seems to enjoy
broad support from tribes based in central, western and southern Libya. Some
polling data even places him in close second behind interim Prime Minister Abdul
Hamid Dbeibah. In Moscow’s calculation, beyond legacy ties dating back to the
pre-2011 heydays of the Qaddafi regime, Saif Al-Islam is perhaps a “safe” bet.
For Russia, the uncharacteristically risky geopolitical gamble of propping up
Khalifa Haftar’s eastern hegemony has failed to pay off as well as it did in
Syria, Venezuela and Belarus. Memories of Haftar’s failed 14-month offensive in
western Libya, even with Russian military backing, have sapped confidence in
Moscow that its ambitions for Libya will be realized should the ailing
77-year-old assume the helm. However, signaling its intent to back Saif
Al-Islam’s candidacy this early is equally risky. Critics argue that Saif’s
leadership role in the former regime are disqualifying, a view shared by Saleh.
The HoR, which is essentially a Haftar surrogate now, has proposed an electoral
law that prohibits Libyans wanted by the International Criminal Court from
running for the presidency. It is an obvious shot across the bow for those in
Saif’s camp to rein in their ambitions. Saif’s possible return threatens to
attract the tribal base of both Haftar and Aguila.
All of this is emblematic of the Haftar-Saif dynamic, replete with its
conundrums, mutualities and confusing allegiances, in which their
representatives have coordinated to reject any conditions restricting their
candidacies. Now, however, Russia pressuring Haftar to suspend his political
ambitions in favor of Saif Al-Islam will make this dynamic go awry.
Saif's emergence risks splitting Haftar's self-styled Libyan Arab Army, which
allied itself with remnants of Qaddafi regime security battalions headed by
loyalist officers, and has since integrated them. But divided loyalties and the
skirmishes that may ensue are the least of Haftar’s problems.
In short, a new reality is taking shape in Libya as different sides gauge their
interests and priorities in a constantly shifting landscape leading up to Dec.
24
Russia is confident its plans for Saif Al-Islam will also be backed by Egypt and
(surprisingly) Italy. For now, Cairo has declined to reveal its preferred
candidate, opting instead to facilitate dialogue, cooperation and collaboration
across the spectrum. It is a logical outcome given Egypt’s vested interest in
its western neighbor’s stability, regardless of who Libyans elect to the
presidency. A stable Libya is less of a security threat, and affords Egypt
opportunities to capitalize on at least a quarter of the contracts to emanate
from Libya’s post-conflict reconstruction and the return of millions of Egyptian
laborers to Libya — an outcome put at risk by more conflict.
Even if Haftar’s external backers are able to sideline him or subordinate his
political ambitions in favor of Saif Al-Islam, he will remain a relevant player
in Libya’s post-election landscape. This assumes the elections do proceed on
schedule, and no major security threats endanger Libyans trying to cast their
ballots.
The frequent clashes between east and west are, for now, engineered to coerce
other stakeholders into accepting Haftar’s candidacy. However, should Libyans
resist this power grab through the ballot box, it is likely eastern authorities
will challenge the results of elections mandated by an unelected LPDF, calling
into question the legitimacy of the newly elected government.
Additionally, Haftar has already rejected the Presidency Council’s attempts to
enforce its authority as supreme commander of the Libyan armed forces. The
failure to disarm Libya’s myriad armed actors has given the warlord a coercive
force of battle-hardened fighters. This will complicate any newly elected
government’s plans to consolidate Libya's security apparatus as a necessary
measure to force the expulsion of the thousands of foreign mercenaries within
its borders and mostly allied to Haftar.
Already, beyond Haftar resisting the integration of the LNA into a single,
unified security force, Aguila Saleh has also threatened to form a parallel
government to the GNU, currently headed by Dbeibah. In another twist, former
interior minister and current presidential candidate Fathy Bashagha is a
possible prime minister to replace Dbeibah at the end of the year if elections
fail to take place .
Bashagha and Saleh joined forces and presented themselves as candidates for the
transitional government before Dbeibah and Mohammed Al-Manfi’s appointments as
prime minister and chairman of the Presidency Council. This alliance has
authored a proposal for the constitutional basis for elections, which the LPDF
will vote on later. But this same proposal is based on a plan for the HoR to
withdraw its confidence in the GNU, paving the way for the HoR to designate
Bashagha as the new head of government.
In short, a new reality is taking shape in Libya as different sides gauge their
interests and priorities in a constantly shifting landscape leading up to Dec.
24. Most stakeholders may have agreed to the elections in principle and are
angling to participate in them but, so far, none have committed to respecting
the results. It is worrying that the desperate push for elections is ignoring
the very real possibility that even if they are held successfully and on time,
Libyans will not wake up to a new dawn but a slightly different version of the
status quo.
• Hafed Al-Ghwell is a senior fellow with the Foreign Policy Institute at the
John Hopkins University School of AdvancedInternational Studies. Twitter: @HafedAlGhwell
G7 flexes its political muscles again
Andrew Hammondy/Arab News/August 28, 2021
While the G7 was created in the 1970s to monitor developments in the world
economy, last week’s crisis meeting of Western leaders illustrated the group’s
often under-appreciated importance as an international security linchpin.
The G7 has also shown that other international organizations can still play a
significant role in Afghanistan. To this end, UN Secretary-General Antonio
Guterres has called a meeting on Monday of the permanent members of the Security
Council, and this year’s G20 chair, Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi, is
seeking to convene a September summit.
For now, however, it is the G7 powers that are having the most impact in the
Afghan chaos. In the frenzy following the Daesh terrorist attack on Thursday,
the group is developing a roadmap for future engagement with the Taliban,
including safe passage for people who want to leave Afghanistan beyond Tuesday,
when the international airlift from Kabul ends.
The chair of this year’s G7, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, said on Friday
that the group was using its now limited leverage — economic, diplomatic and
political — with the Taliban to try to ensure this. According to the UN, up to
half a million Afghans may now flee, highlighting the importance of acquiescence
from the Taliban and of neighboring countries keeping their borders open.
Perhaps the key remaining point of leverage the G7 has is whether it recognizes
the Taliban as the legitimate administration in Kabul, which will be key if the
regime wants to have any significant engagement with the West. Such diplomatic
recognition could unlock billions of dollars in frozen funds. Recognition is
also likely to be made conditional on the country not lurching back into
becoming a breeding ground for terrorism, and on human rights factors such as
the education of girls.
It is not the first time geopolitics has dominated G7 meetings this year. At
June’s leadership summit, international security issues framed the agenda, with
the group calling out this year’s significant Russian troop build-up on
Ukraine’s border; agreeing tough, further measures on Myanmar if the military
there refuses to change course; and issuing fresh condemnation of human rights
abuses in Xinjiang.
Perhaps the key remaining point of leverage the G7 has is whether it recognizes
the Taliban as the legitimate administration in Kabul, which will be key if the
regime wants to have any significant engagement with the West.
Issues with China and Russia dominated that session, with the leaders discussing
how the G7 can forge broader alliances of democracies to combat their disruptive
activities. While Moscow is a big concern here, it is Beijing that is perceived
as the stand-out challenge. This emphasis by the G7 on geopolitics is by no
means unusual. The 2017 G7 process, for instance, was dominated by the aftermath
of the terrorist attacks in Manchester, England, and nuclear tensions on the
Korean peninsula.
The G7’s involvement in this multitude of geopolitical dialogues is not without
controversy given its original macroeconomic mandate. For instance, China has
strongly objected to a number of this year’s G7 communiques amid accusations of
“blatantly meddling” in its internal affairs, including Xinjiang.
Given these controversies, it is sometimes asserted, especially by developing
countries, that the G7 lacks the legitimacy of the UN, or even the G20, to
engage in international security issues, and is a historical anomaly because of
the rise of new powers such as China. However, it is not the case that the
international security role of the G7 is new.
An early example of its linchpin function was during the Cold War, when it
coordinated Western strategy toward the Soviet Union. Moreover, following the
September 2001 terrorist attacks, it assumed a key role in the US-led campaign
against terrorism, including in Afghanistan.
One of the reasons that geopolitics has become a more salient part of the G7
agenda is that it has helped to patch over cracks on other issues, from climate
change to international trade, especially during the Trump presidency.
Since Trump left office, the remaining divisions in the West are not as stark or
as broad based. However, the emphasis on international security remains.
*Andrew Hammond is an Associate at LSE IDEAS at the London School of Economics