LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
September 16/2019
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani

The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/eliasnews19/english.september16.19.htm

News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006

Bible Quotations For today
So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are citizens with the saints and also members of the household of God
Letter to the Ephesians 02/17-22/:”Jesus came and proclaimed peace to you who were far off and peace to those who were near; for through him both of us have access in one Spirit to the Father. So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are citizens with the saints and also members of the household of God, built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the cornerstone. In him the whole structure is joined together and grows into a holy temple in the Lord; in whom you also are built together spiritually into a dwelling-place for God.”


Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News published on September 15-16/2019
Hariri Expresses Lebanon Solidarity with KSA after Attack on Aramco
Richard Hails 'Partnership' with Lebanon as USS Ramage Visits Country
Hezbollah's New Missile Capable Of Destrying All Military Battlships,
French Pressure Pushes Lebanon to Combat Tax Evasion
France, Lebanon Condemn Attacks on Saudi Oil Facilities
Hariri, Jumblatt convene in Clemenceau
Berri meets with family of released Lebanese emigrant Hassan Jaber in Ain al-Teeneh
Rahi wraps-up his pastoral visit to Lehfed, Mayfouq and Jaj: Let us remain steadfast in our faith, values and loyalty to the nation in the face of crises
Parliamentary, judicial and medical delegation visits Switzerland at the invitation of DCAF
Sit-in at Khiyam Detention Camp to protest Fakhouri's return to Lebanon
Derian: Let our conference be a struggle to rally around the strong, capable national state
Jumblatt: The dream of independence, sovereignty and prosperity fades, unless a miracle occurs...!
Jarrah commends COLIF initiative in organizing a dinner banquet with proceeds devoted to supporting Lebanon's Civil Defense, says "Lebanon's emigrants remain its real wealth and salvation"
Shooting at a security patrol in Muqneh, no injuries reported
Boustani: Talk of possible sanctions affecting Christians a mere psychological pressure
Okais criticizes summoning of journalists for a political opinion disturbing to authorities
Kataeb MP Nadim Gemayel Called on State and Officials to Assume their Responsibilities Before It's Too Late
Kataeb Leader Affirmed that Bachir Gemayel's Party Is Loyal, Steadfast to His Approach
Kataeb MP Nadim Gemayel Commemorates Father on 37th Assassination Anniversary
Kataeb Officials Pay Tribute to Martyr President Bachir Gemayel
Hankache Asserts that Bachir's Cause Will Not Die
The Fishermen of Ras Beirut: Reviving the fishing culture in Beirut and honoring its fishermen
Hezbollah, Israeli brinkmanship continues in the face of ratcheting tensions
Hariri is telling the world: Hezbollah is your problem, not ours
Bourj Hammoud, the little Armenia in the heart of Beirut/Samar Kadi/The Arab Weekly/September 15/2019
Que veux-tu que je te dise, Bach ?

Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on September 15-16/2019
White House does not rule out Trump-Rouhani meeting after Saudi attacks
Pompeo Condemns Iran following Drone Attacks on Saudi
Iran Refutes U.S. Accusations over Saudi Attacks
Trump tells Saudi Crown Prince US ready to help protect Kingdom’s security
US failed at ‘max pressure’: Iranian foreign minister
Saudi FM condemns Netanyahu pledge to annex West Bank’s Jordan Valley
UAE waiting for results of Saudi Arabia’s drone attack investigation: Official
Drone entered Kuwaiti airspace early Saturday morning: Report
Israel approves new settlement two days before polls
Saudi Bourse Slumps after Oil Facility Attacks
Turkey says delivery of second S-400 battery complete
Tunisia Heads to Polls for Keenly Fought Presidential Contest

Titles For The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on September 15-16/2019
Hezbollah's New Missile Capable Of Destrying All Military Battlships/Jerusalem Post/September 15/2019
The Fishermen of Ras Beirut: Reviving the fishing culture in Beirut and honoring its fishermen/Annahar/Manal Makkieh and Sandra Abdelbaki/September 15/2019
Hezbollah, Israeli brinkmanship continues in the face of ratcheting tensions/Simon Speakman Cordall/The Arab Weekly/September 15/2019
Hariri is telling the world: Hezbollah is your problem, not ours/Mohamad Kawas/The Arab Weekly/September 15/2019
Bourj Hammoud, the little Armenia in the heart of Beirut/Samar Kadi/The Arab Weekly/September 15/2019
Que veux-tu que je te dise, Bach/Ronald Barakat/September 15/2019
To Win Re-Election, Bibi Netanyahu Is Waging ‘Wars’ at Home and Abroad/Neri Zilber/Daily Beast/September 15/2019
Tunisians to Elect a New President/Sarah Feuer/The Washington Institute/September 15/2019
The Americans will see attack on Saudi oil as an attack on them/Mark Stone/SkyNews/September 15/2019
Can Banks Survive Negative Rates/Satyajit Das/Bloomberg/September, 15/2019

The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News published on September 15-16/2019
Hariri Expresses Lebanon Solidarity with KSA after Attack on Aramco
Naharnet/September 15/2019
Prime Minister Saad Hariri on Sunday condemned the drone attacks that targeted Saudi oil giant Aramco, stressing Lebanon’s solidarity with the kingdom. In a statement, Hariri said the development is a “dangerous escalation that threatens to expand the zone of conflicts in the region.”“This aggression puts great responsibilities on the shoulders of the international community in terms of deterring all the tools of aggression and terrorism that are invading the Arab countries and subjecting regional stability to further entanglement in roving conflicts,” the premier added. “We in Lebanon stress our solidarity with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and consider the aggression against it a chapter of a wave that is targeting the Arab Gulf and regional and international security,” Hariri went on to say, urging all Arabs to “show solidarity in order to foil the threats that are surrounding our countries.”The drone strikes Saturday on Aramco's processing plants in Abqaiq and Khurais knocked 5.7 million barrels per day off production, close to six percent of global crude supplies. The disruption represents half the output of the kingdom, which is the world's biggest oil supplier. Yemen's Iran-aligned Huthi rebels have claimed responsibility for the attack but U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo blamed Tehran, saying there was no evidence it was launched from Yemen. "Iran has now launched an unprecedented attack on the world's energy supply," Pompeo said.

Richard Hails 'Partnership' with Lebanon as USS Ramage Visits Country
Naharnet/September 15/2019
The United States Navy’s USS Ramage (DDG-61), an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, entered the port of Lebanon for a one-day goodwill visit on Friday on the sidelines of its participation in “ongoing efforts to ensure freedom of navigation and free-flow commerce in the eastern Mediterranean,” the U.S. embassy said.The USS Ramage is named for Vice Admiral Lawson P. Ramage, a notable submarine commander and Medal of Honor recipient from World War II. During the visit to Lebanon, U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Elizabeth Richard and U.S. Navy Vice Admiral James Malloy hosted an on-board reception for U.S. and Lebanese officials. The Ambassador and the Vice Admiral highlighted “the ongoing commitment of the United States to be a strong and enduring partner for the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), with the goals of enhancing military-to-military cooperation and promoting security and stability in the region,” the embassy said in a statement. Specifically, Ambassador Richard explained that, “this remarkable U.S. ship, docked in this remarkable Lebanese city speaks volumes about the partnership between the U.S. and Lebanese militaries.”“That’s the important word: partnership. In speaking about our relationship with the Lebanese Armed Forces, people often focus on the specific military equipment that we’ve provided to the LAF – aircraft, artillery, Bradley fighting vehicles, Humvees, ammunition, etc. However, our military relationship is much broader than just equipment, and this ship visit is a wonderful opportunity to reflect on how far our partnership has come,” Richard added. “Thousands of LAF officers have trained with us in the United States, and they are also hosting our U.S military trainers on Lebanese bases, working side by side at all ranks. We have conducted joint exercises and shared best practices and innovations. And, yes, the U.S. military is a partner that can bring a ship like this to the port of Beirut, even in the midst of all the maritime challenges and tensions happening in the world right now,” the ambassador went on to say. She added: “Many of our efforts and joint activities have been focused on land, where the LAF has made important gains in securing its borders and defeating terrorist threats. But our partnership also extends to the sea. The LAF has developed plans to improve its naval capabilities, and the U.S. is strongly supporting those efforts.”Richard also stressed that Washington remains “committed to helping the Lebanese people during a period of very difficult economic challenges.” “We are helping strengthen the Lebanese institutions that will defend the country’s sovereignty. And we are helping to anchor Lebanon to the community of democracies, which will safeguard the regional stability and security on which Lebanon’s economic future depends – including -- and perhaps especially -- at sea,” she said. The ambassador noted that as the Eastern Mediterranean’s gas resources are developed by countries in the region, and “hopefully soon by Lebanon itself,” maritime security will only become more important.

Hezbollah's New Missile Capable Of Destrying All Military Battlships,
Jerusalem Post/September 15/2019
"Our new missile is capable of destroying all military battleships, killing all who are on board," wrote a Hezbollah activist on Twitter.
A twitter account affiliated with Hezbollah posted a photo of the terror organization's new missile on Sunday afternoon, which he says is capable of destroying all military battleships. "Our new missile is capable of destroying all military battleships, killing all who are on board," wrote the Hezbollah activist, who often posts photos of South Lebanon Army (SLA) members and their families who have moved to Israel, announcing that they are being called to trial. In August, Hezbollah released footage and pictures of the anti-ship missile that struck the INS Hanit during the 2006 Second Lebanon War, an incident that killed four Israeli soldiers in one of the most significant attacks against the IDF in the war. In a documentary called #Army_To_Be_Drowned aired on Hezbollah’s al-Manar TV channel marking the war the group aired reconnaissance footage of the ship from the Lebanese coastline, preparations for the launch of the missile, the operations room which directed the strike as well as nighttime footage which showed the impact of the Chinese-made C-802 anti-ship cruise missile. According to al-Manar, Hezbollah’s navy commander “Hajj Jalal” said the rocket was launched from the Beirut suburb of Ouzai after “the Zionist enemy esaclated its attacks on various Lebanese areas.”Adding that the group’s leadership delayed the operation for several hours, Jalal said that the group “could have struck Israel‘s warship SAAR-5 in the 2006 war before it entered Lebanon’s international waters,” he said.
*Yasser Okbi contributed to this report.

French Pressure Pushes Lebanon to Combat Tax Evasion
Beirut - Mahasen Morsel/Asharq Al-Awsat/Sunday, 15 September, 2019
During a recent visit, the French envoy in charge of following up the decisions of the CEDRE Conference urged Lebanon to put an end to tax and customs evasion, as a necessary measure to stop state budget squandering. Ambassador Pierre Dukan also called for other reform measures, most notably the implementation of the 2019 budget, the adoption of the 2020 budget within the constitutional deadlines, the reduction of spending and the implementation of the electricity plan. Dukan drew up a roadmap for the Lebanese state, starting with the assertion that extracting gas and oil was not a “magic remedy” that will change the situation for the better, which prompted the government to prove its willingness to apply the reforms pledged during the CEDRE Conference, beginning with the tax and customs evasion file. Customs evasion is a major sign of corruption that eats away at the state's revenues and takes many forms, including legalized smuggling, through the reduced or falsified bill of consumer goods entering Lebanon in large quantities through the port or airport. In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, former minister Fadi Abboud noted that the state loses more than $500 million a year in tax evasion.
As for customs evasion through illegal crossings, it amounts to $5 billion, depriving Lebanon of revenues exceeding one billion dollars, divided between customs duties and VAT. According to the World Bank, more than 40 percent of sales and purchase operations are made without VAT. Lebanon’s GDP is estimated at $60 billion, and the tax rate on profits is at least 10 percent among individuals, institutions and companies.

France, Lebanon Condemn Attacks on Saudi Oil Facilities

Asharq Al-Awsat/Sunday, 15 September, 2019
France condemns attacks on Saudi oil facilities that have disrupted global production, the country’s foreign ministry said on Sunday. “France firmly condemns yesterday’s attacks on the Abqaiq and Khurais oil installations,” the ministry said in a statement that also expressed “complete solidarity” with Saudi Arabia. “These actions can only worsen regional tensions and risk of conflict,” the French statement added. “It is imperative that they stop.”Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri slammed on Sunday the attacks, deeming them a “dangerous escalation that threatens to widen the arena of conflicts in the region.”
He said the attacks demand that the international community assume major responsibilities to put an end to “aggression and terrorism that are sweeping through the Arab world and jeopardizing regional stability.” US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Saturday accused Iran of launching attacks on Saudi oil plants, ruling out the involvement of the Tehran-aligned Houthi militias in Yemen. The Houthis claimed credit for the attacks, but Pompeo firmly placed blame on Iran. “Tehran is behind nearly 100 attacks on Saudi Arabia while Rouhani and Zarif pretend to engage in diplomacy,” Pompeo said, referring to Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif. “Amid all the calls for de-escalation, Iran has now launched an unprecedented attack on the world’s energy supply,” he added.

Hariri, Jumblatt convene in Clemenceau
NNA - Sun 15 Sep 2019
Prime Minister Saad Hariri visited this evening Progressive Socialist Party Chief Walid Jumblatt at his Clemenceau residence. Attending the meeting was also Industry Minister Wael Abu Faour and former Minister Ghattas Khoury.

Berri meets with family of released Lebanese emigrant Hassan Jaber in Ain al-Teeneh
NNA - Sun 15 Sep 2019 at 19
House Speaker Nabih Berri received at Ain al-Teeneh Palace this evening the brothers and family members of Lebanese emigrant, Hassan Jaber, who was detained at Addis Ababa Airport during his return to Lebanon, who came to thank Berri for his support in this case. Attending the meeting was also the Continental Council Head at the Lebanese World Cultural League Abbas Fawaz, and Head of the Lebanese Community in Gabon Imad Jaber. On emerging, Jaber said: "We came to thank His Excellency, House Speaker Berri for his efforts in following-up on the case of my brother, Hassan, with all its details from the very beginning, alongside the Lebanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs."He added: "We must also thank the Gabonese government, which played a role in the return of Haj Hassan Jaber to Gabon, and who will be in Lebanon in the next two days."
Jaber concluded by revealing that "the visit was also an occasion to listen to a briefing by Speaker Berri on the nature of the problems faced by Lebanese emigrants abroad, especially relating to the airlines issue," noting that the Speaker promised to follow-up on this matter and ensure all possible support to Lebanese emigrants in this respect.

Rahi wraps-up his pastoral visit to Lehfed, Mayfouq and Jaj: Let us remain steadfast in our faith, values and loyalty to the nation in the face of crises
NNA - Sun 15 Sep 2019
Maronite Patriarch, Cardinal Bechara Boutros al-Rahi, called Sunday on the Lebanese to remain steadfast in their faith, values and loyalty to the homeland and the need to safeguard and preserve it in the face of crises. Concluding his two-day pastoral visit to the district of Jbeil which included the villages of Lehfed, Mayfouq and Jaj, the Patriarch presided over a Mass service at 'Mar Abda Church" in Jaj this evening. In his religious sermon, Rahi urged politicians to work to lift the burdens off the shoulders of citizens in wake of their growing economic, social and livelihood disress. "We appeal to the political community to implement the plan for the economic advancement of all Lebanese sectors, to undertake the necessary reforms in the country's various structures and departments, and to work hard, courageously and impartially to put an end to corruption and to control smuggling," the Patriarch underlined. "It remains up to all of us to maintain our unity within our religious, cultural and partisan pluralism," he added. "The value of Lebanon lies in its pluralism and national unity, in its civil rather than religious citizenship, and in living together, Christians and Muslims, in cooperation, solidarity and equality," affirmed al-Rahi.

Parliamentary, judicial and medical delegation visits Switzerland at the invitation of DCAF
NNA - Sun 15 Sep 2019
At the invitation of DCAF, a Lebanese delegation comprising senior political, judicial and medical figures arrived in Switzerland where they visited the House of Parliament and had the chance to meet with the Attorney General in Canton. The delegation included Head the Administration and Justice Parliamentary Committee, MP George Adwan; Head of Parliamentary Health Committee, MP Issam Araji; Judges Sobouh Sleiman, John Azzi, Ziad Mekna and Rana Akoum; Head of Judicial Police, Head of Scientific Laboratories, Head of Research and Accidents Laboratory, Roumieh Prison Officer, Physician in charge of forensic medicine, MD in charge of prisoners' health and DCAF's designated official responsible for "Security and Justice Governance" in Lebanon Rabih Qais. The delegation had the opportunity to visit the Palace of Justice and meet with the judges of the criminal courts in Geneva. The encounter was a chance to learn that out of 23 judges, 3 were of Lebanese origins, including Judge Philip Haddad from the town of Deir al-Qamar. The delegation also attended a criminal trial session, visited central scientific laboratories and one of the largest prisons in Geneva. Its members met as well with the President of DCAF.A banquet was held in honor of the visiting delegation by the Permanent Representative of the Lebanese Mission to the United Nations and international organizations, Ambassador Salim Baddoura, and Lebanon's Ambassador to Switzerland, Rola Noureddine. The overall tour was an occasion for the delegation to acquire useful legal and scientific information and expertise to develop laws, forensic work and gathering of evidence, particularly those relating to the verification and combating of torture.

Sit-in at Khiyam Detention Camp to protest Fakhouri's return to Lebanon
NNA - Sun 15 Sep 2019
The National Committee of Prisoners and Released Detainees organized a sit-in in the courtyard of Al-Khiyam detention camp on Sunday to denounce the return of Amer Elias al-Fakhouri to Lebanon, demanding his trial for crimes he committed against detainees during the time of occupation by the Israeli enemy in the South. Participating in the sit-in was a group of freed prisoners and several deputies, political figures and human rights activists. Delivered words centered on rejecting the return of agents to the country, regardless of their affiliation, without punishment.

Derian: Let our conference be a struggle to rally around the strong, capable national state

NNA -Sun 15 Sep 2019
Grand Mufti of the Republic, Sheikh Abdul Latif Derian, affirmed Sunday that "the state is the one that reflects to the world the good management of public affairs, and the state is the guardian of religion, so that it maintains its unanimous and stable customs and doctrines."
"It is also the state that regulates our relations with the world and the international community: nations, organizations and world order," added Derian, speaking at the opening ceremony of the 30th General Conference of the Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs, which kicked off its works in the Egyptian capital, Cairo, today. "Let our conference be a struggle to unite around a strong and capable national state, which safeguards society, achieves stability and prosperity, and in cooperation with scholars and religion, promotes a culture of tolerance, moderation and human brotherhood," stressed Derian.
"Our religious tasks require that we support security, safety and stability, improve people's lives, and ensure equality and justice," he asserted, noting that "security and adequacy resulting from coalition and unison are essential for social survival and political achievement."

Jumblatt: The dream of independence, sovereignty and prosperity fades, unless a miracle occurs...!
NNA - Sun 15 Sep 2019
Progressive Socialist Party Chief, Walid Jumblatt, tweeted on Sunday, saying: "Next year is the Centennial of Greater Lebanon...Yet, the challenges of its existence are growing day by day because the political and economic balances in the surroundings and on the internal scene cause the dream of independence, sovereignty and prosperity to diminish and fade away, only if a miracle were to occur....! But I am not one of those who believe in prediction or the interpretation of dreams, so I look sadly on parting dreams...."

Jarrah commends COLIF initiative in organizing a dinner banquet with proceeds devoted to supporting Lebanon's Civil Defense, says "Lebanon's emigrants remain its real wealth and salvation"

NNA -Sun 15 Sep 2019
Information Minister Jamal al-Jarrah considered that Lebanon's true wealth, rescue and salvation remain embodied in its emigrants, who are its real source of prosperity and fortune and symbolize its hope for a better future. "We are all betting on our emigrants, whether in France or Europe or in all the countries of the world, through whom we can help Lebanon," said Jarrah. "Lebanon's real wealth, rescue and salvation, and the hope of restoring its previous status, remains forever in its emigrants who are capable of reflecting the notion of Lebanon as a homeland of coexistence, love and peace," he confirmed.
The Minister's words came in his address at the dinner banquet organized by the Council of Lebanese in France (COLIF), held in the historical hall of the municipality building within the framework of the "Week of Lebanon" activities taking place in the French capital.Jarrah praised the many valuable contributions that France has provided to Lebanon, affirming that "France is proactive in this matter from Paris I to Paris II to Paris III to the Cedar Conference, which allocates huge sums of money for aiding Lebanon and its infrastructure, and for supporting its economy and annual budget."He recalled herein the quote by His Holiness, Pope John Paul II in saying that "Lebanon is not only a country, but a message," stressing that "we must all carry this message in the best way to the whole world, through which we can, alongside the country's cultural, civilized, and religious diversity, help Lebanon and its people.""Our gathering today is an opportunity to meet the distinguished and creative Lebanese activists who always bear the name of Lebanon in their hearts and minds, and place it in the most important positions and shoulder its responsibility," said Jarrah, hoping that they would one day return to their homeland and partake in its renaissance. The Information Minister concluded by a word of gratitude to the organizers of the event, especially that its revenues are intended for supporting the Civil Defense in Lebanon. "This is a great idea because the emigrants in France always think of Lebanon and of people who sacrifice their lives to save others, for the Civil Defense works to defend and protect all Lebanese and the entire Lebanon," Jarrah corroborated.

Shooting at a security patrol in Muqneh, no injuries reported

NNA - Sun 15 Sep 2019
An Internal Security Forces (ISF) patrol unit was subjected to open fire by unknown gunmen while it was inspecting a plateless black four-wheel "CRV" vehicle parked by the road in the town of Muqneh, reported NNA correspondent in Baalbek this afternoon. There were no casualties as a result of the shooting, while the vehicle in question was found to be stolen and was confiscated by the ISF patrol unit for further investigation.

Boustani: Talk of possible sanctions affecting Christians a mere psychological pressure

NNA - Sun 15 Sep 2019
MP Farid Boustani assured via his Twitter account on Sunday that "the talk about sanctions possibly impacting Christians is nothing but a form of psychological pressure and intimidation." He added: "The Strong Lebanon Bloc is committed to its national cause, based on building a state of law and institutions and social justice, and will never deviate from its path."

Okais criticizes summoning of journalists for a political opinion disturbing to authorities
NNA -Sun 15 Sep 2019
"Strong Republic" Parliamentary Bloc Member, MP George Okais, tweeted Sunday saying: "In 2007, the United Nations decided to mark September 15 as the International Day of Democracy, and to monitor nations' respect for the concepts of democracy...On this occasion, Lebanon was spotted marking this day by summoning journalists for a political opinion that seemed upsetting to the authorities....Happy Democracy Day!"

Kataeb MP Nadim Gemayel Called on State and Officials to Assume their Responsibilities Before It's Too Late
Kataeb.org/ Saturday 14th September 2019,
Kataeb MP Nadim Gemayel on Saturday marked the 37th assassination anniversary of President-Elect Bachir Gemayel, expressing disdain as the national sovereign line is dispersed. During the ceremony held in Ashrafieh, the lawmaker reiterated his call for a unity among factions, sects and citizens to be able to confront illegal arms and the attempt to occupy Lebanon and take over the state. “All of Lebanon and the Lebanese will not succumb to Hezbollah”“In 1975, we united our fronts to liberate Lebanon from the Palestinian invasion and again in 2005 to expel the Syrian occupation; if we do not join forces once more, no one will take us seriously while the cause is delicate and important,” he warned. “The plan needs more courage and vision than in the past because the looming danger nowadays facing all the Lebanese is the mother of all risks and problems,” he notified. Gemayel indicated that the problem with Hezbollah is that it is derailing out of Lebanon's sovereignty, pledging its loyalty to Iran and its goals are not for the sake of Lebanon. “Unfortunately, as in 1975, all the state components and institutions are accomplice to Hezbollah and must be freed from the irresolute state,” he urged. He called on the state and officials to assume their responsibilities, before the dreaded outcome occurs. “Bachir’s message instructed us to stay united and gathered,” he stated, adding “it implored a consolidation of efforts and forces to face the opponent and enemy trying to obtrude on us.”“The Kataeb party will carry on its political battle to follow Bachir’s line so that Lebanon lives,” he stressed.

Kataeb Leader Affirmed that Bachir Gemayel's Party Is Loyal, Steadfast to His Approach
Kataeb.org/ Saturday 14th September 2019,
Kataeb leader Samy Gemayel on Saturday saluted President-Elect Bachir Gemayel on his 37th assassination anniversary and his martyred comrades, pledging his commitment to the cause which he advocated. “If we departed from the cause, no one will carry it on after us, if the cause persisted any official can take it up,” Gemayel said in a speech during the ceremony held in Ashrafieh. “We follow in your footsteps everyday in our lives and not just on September 14. You have taught us to say the truth no matter what,” Gemayel stated in his address to the late President. “Lebanon is in dire need for the truth to be told, and what better than today to utter it?”“Everything Bachir warned about and the mistakes done in the past are being committed today,” he indicated. “The government’s absence and the collective surrender to illegal arms which have destroyed our country and people, are being enacted today as well,” he affirmed. “They are opening the door for illegal arms to spread out on all territories and for others to hijack our decision-making power, fate and future again,” he slammed. The Kataeb leader criticized that the ruling authority has relinquished the country's sovereignty and surrendered to Hezbollah, allowing external powers to seize peace and war decision-making mechanism without taking heed. He lambasted that the ruling authority's silence over such suppressive actions makes it an accomplice, indolent and submissive, ensuring that the Kataeb party remains loyal, steadfast and defiant to Bachir’s approach.
“Politicians bankrupted the country and changed the face of Lebanon with their fabricated deals which we are paying the price for,” he criticized.
"They commit atrocious acts and then hide behind Bachir’s picture at a time of settlements, deals and defeat,” he chastised. “My comrade president, at each crossroad your party’s politburo heals and wonders what you would have done had you and martyr Pierre Amine Gemayel and the founder Pierre Gemayel and all of our martyrs been here?”“Would Bachir have handed over the state’s decision-making power and elected someone who does not believe in Lebanon’s sovereignty and would he have yielded to the partitioning approach and abandoned the cause for the sake of a “pasteboard” seat?”
“I refer to it as a “cardboard” seat because the decision does not lie in their hands given that the de facto ruler is elsewhere taking orders from another place,” he declared. “We hear you from beyond the grave as you articulate that one can never be defiant yet an accomplice, in support of surrender and partitioning at the same time,” he said, adding that “we must keep a lookout to defend our constants.”“Your party did not wane in the face of the authority. It shut the door of the state when met with transgressions on the country’s interest” “Your party is steadfast and defiant, rejecting victory at the country’s expense. It refused to triumph except with the people,” he declared, vowing to follow the path of Bachir’s principles. “My comrade president, the project to build a free, sovereign, independent, civilized, democratic, developed, plural, transparent, competent, humane country is recalled in your speech,” he pointed out. “You believed that Lebanon cannot be constructed without granting rights to the human being regardless of his sectarian and territorial affiliations. You believed in the Lebanese human who revives his country. Today, we continue defending this person”
“Your party is steadfast, a force of change whose goal is to establish the time of change you’ve aspired to” “We are honest with the people and share their pain and sacrifice, thus we walk with our heads held high and we are ready to hold the people’s hands, under the condition that they go back to your approach and cause” “Those in power are bidding on people’s reluctance to hold them accountable but I reassure you that your people have given politicians a chance but were deceived with false slogans,” he affirmed that the people won’t be fooled again. “Your party is strong and deeply-rooted in your mentality. It is only concerned with Lebanon’s interest and we will not compromise the martyrs’ constants,” he asserted.

Kataeb MP Nadim Gemayel Commemorates Father on 37th Assassination Anniversary
Kataeb.org/ Saturday 14th September 2019
On the day of the 37th assassination anniversary of President-Elect Bachir Gemayel, Kataeb MP Nadim Gemayel reflected on his father’s dream which the country seems to be drifting further away from. “The country is out of control; it is tied to regional axes which we have nothing to do with. In addition, illegal arms are confiscating the state’s decision-making,” Gemayel told Voice of Lebanon radio station. “During Bachir’s reign, the country preserved a face-saving compromise and certain formalities which are missing nowadays,” he hailed.
“We did not perceive any official reaction to Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah’s statement linking Lebanon to Iran,” he blasted. “The Lebanese people gave justice to Bachir but the government won’t because it realized that if it wishes to compare itself to him, it will fall flat,” he appraised.

Kataeb Officials Pay Tribute to Martyr President Bachir Gemayel
Kataeb.org/ Saturday 14th September 2019
Kataeb chief Samy Gemayel on Saturday paid tribute to President-Elect Bachir Gemayel on his 37th assassination anniversary, expressing unwavering commitment to fulfill his dream of an independent Lebanon. “Lebanon witnessed 21 days of change during Bachir’s reign. Today, we pledged to restore this time and to achieve a free, sovereign, just, and civilized state where all the Lebanese are equal in rights and duties, in a country that corresponds with our youths’ dreams and ambitions,” Gemayel said in a tweet. In his turn, Kataeb MP Elias Hankache affirmed that “Bachir Gemayel and his comrades martyred to build a strong republic,” promising that it will be attained.

Hankache Asserts that Bachir's Cause Will Not Die

Kataeb.org/ Saturday 14th September 2019
Kataeb MP Elias Hankache on Saturday confirmed continuity of President-elect Bachir Gemayel’s constants and dream on the latter’s 37th assassination anniversary. “Bachir Gemayel proved to us that in 21 days we can realize what we dream of,” Hankache told Voice of Lebanon radio station ahead of the ceremony held in Ashrafieh. He deplored the country’s downfall, stressing that as long as there are youths who believe in Bachir’s cause, the cause will not die. “Bachir epitomized an important cause, otherwise the people wouldn’t have had zeal to hold this ceremony and renew their promise to him,” he mentioned. “We’ve overcome more difficult stages than we are now in,” he assured.

The Fishermen of Ras Beirut: Reviving the fishing culture in Beirut and honoring its fishermen
Annahar/Manal Makkieh and Sandra Abdelbaki/September 15/2019
BEIRUT: For the past 50 years, the fishermen of Beirut have been striving to win the battle against the uncountable challenges hitting the sea of Lebanon. In this light and for the first time, Marwan Naamani, an avid photographer, hosts an exhibition titled: "The Fishermen of Ras Beirut", as part of the Beirut Image Festival this year. Under the Patronage of the President of the Council of Ministers-his Excellency Saad Hariri, in collaboration with the Municipality of Beirut, and with the support of the AUB Neighborhood Initiative and the Image Festival Association, Jamal Itani, the Mayor of Beirut, launched the exhibition on September 7 along the Corniche of Ain el Mreisseh. Running till October 4, the exhibition aims at honoring the fishermen of Beirut and reviving this kind of culture in the city. The exhibition entails pictures of fishermen from Ain el Mreisseh, Jall el Bahr, Manara and Dalieh. In these pictures, Naamani embraces the uniqueness of fishing in Lebanon practiced by Lebanese fishermen for 50 years and highlights the challenges they face. “I like to take pictures of anything that is beautiful and that means to me,” Naamani told Annahar. “That’s why I take pictures of the fishermen in Beirut.”
Naamani believes that the culture of fishing in Beirut and in Lebanon is neglected by the government. “I believe that the fishermen don’t have their rights,” Naamani said. “Yet, this is not the only problem. Fishing is not practiced right in Lebanon. There are laws for fishing, but no one follows them, and the government couldn’t care less.”
Although the chaotic urban sprawl and real estate development have caused damage to the coast of Beirut, the Corniche remains one of the last breathing spaces in Beirut and many fishermen are still fighting to keep their trade alive. “I started fishing since I was only nine years old,” Ali Al Bayati, a Lebanese fisherman at Ain el Mreisseh, told Annahar. “When I go fishing, I feel like I’m taking a break from life for a while.”Today, however, several challenges discourage the Lebanese fishermen from practicing their hobby. Not only did these challenges lead to the decrease in the number of fishermen, but also to the gradual eradication of Beirut’s cultural heritage. These challenges are reported by many fishermen who have considered the shore as refuge for so long. “Lebanese fishermen, for example, don’t receive professional training like in other countries such as Egypt, Turkey, and Cyprus,” Al Bayati said. “They should receive a certificate that allows them to fish safely on the shore. Otherwise, people might be injured by their fishing rods.”
In addition to the government’s carelessness, water pollution is one of the main causes that lead to the deterioration of fishing. “Water pollution is one of the problems that constrain many types of migrant fish to stay out of the Lebanese sea zone,” Chami Al Masri, another fisherman who fishes in Beirut every summer, said. The four ports of Beirut are the only destinations for the Lebanese fishermen to settle in and release their stress. The peaceful sea, the lights, the people, and the streets enrich the fishermen’s sense of patriotism and belonging to Lebanon.“Our mission is to unite the fishermen,” Ramzi Haidar, a representative of the Union of Arab Photographers, said. “Let’s connect culturally with other countries in the MENA region and make our heritage alive again.”

Hezbollah, Israeli brinkmanship continues in the face of ratcheting tensions
Simon Speakman Cordall/The Arab Weekly/September 15/2019
TUNIS - The conflict between Hezbollah and Lebanon’s neighbour Israel has escalated, with the exchange of fire over what might be a situation creeping towards open warfare. However, analysts cautioned against reading too much into recent exchanges between Israeli forces and Hezbollah in a contest that often relies more on perceived threat than tangible action. Almost since the beginning of Hezbollah’s deployment in support of Syrian President Bashar Assad, Syria has served as a conduit for weapons channelled from Iran to Hezbollah. That is not lost on Israel, with numerous unclaimed strikes on Hezbollah-controlled arms factories in Syria, all of which have been attributed to Israel. However, tensions appear to have escalated. Hezbollah fighters claimed to have shot down an Israeli drone on September 9 over Ramyeh in southern Lebanon. A week earlier, Hezbollah and Israeli forces exchanged fire in an apparent response to an Israeli drone entering Lebanese airspace to drop incendiary material on a border forest. There has been an accompanying war of words. Beyond the expected denunciations by Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri of alleged Israeli incursions into Lebanese airspace have been proclamations by Hezbollah General-Secretary Hassan Nasrallah, who threatened strikes against Israeli drones over Lebanese territory.
Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, emboldened by what he is said to regard as the unflinching support of US President Donald Trump, has been accused of capitalising on Israel’s tensions with Hezbollah as he seeks re-election and possible prosecution on corruption charges.
Despite the political vitriol, direct conflict between Hezbollah and the Israelis has been practically nonexistent since the war of 2006, which saw both sides take heavy casualties. Since then, Hezbollah has grown into one of the most potent non-state militias in the world, well-equipped by Iran and with its fighters experienced by their deployment into Syria.
Israel’s wariness is likely justified, Jack Kennedy, senior analyst for MENA at IHS Markit, said. “Hezbollah has between around 120,000 and 150,000 rockets,” he said. “However, it’s not just the number of arms Hezbollah has, it’s their quality. “The Hezbollah arsenal is not highly accurate but it’s the consideration that Iran is trying to introduce that capability that is partly driving Israeli willingness to carry out strikes.”“Of course, Israel has missile defence systems but probably not enough to withstand that level of attack and, politically, it’s not clear if they could absorb the level of casualties an attack by Hezbollah might cause,” he said. That attack was by no means certain, he said. Given Hezbollah’s reliance on Iran, it is unlikely to be goaded into war without Tehran’s sanction. “Hezbollah is very much the tip of Iran’s spear,” Kennedy said. “[It is] unlikely to deploy that casually. Not least when Iran is countering threats on a much wider, global, scale.”It was a view echoed by Chatham House’s Yossi Mekelberg, who said: “However, just because it’s a war that no one wants doesn’t mean there’s no chance of them going to war. Lebanon exists in a near state of chaos, there’s no central state, which means there’s little to restrain Hezbollah. “At some point, at any time, a Hezbollah fighter could shoot the wrong person at the wrong time and then [Israeli Military Intelligence Director Herzi] Halevi’s threat of making Lebanon ‘a country of refugees’ becomes very real.”
For a US administration that has consistently backtracked or contradicted itself on foreign policy issues, Mekelberg said, expecting consistency is hazardous. “You really don’t know what they’re going to do,” he said. “Right now, Trump is making noises about meeting (Iranian President Hassan) Rohani. Say he does that ahead of the 2020 US elections and position himself as the great peacemaker. What’s Netanyahu going to do then, assuming he wins re-election himself?”

Hariri is telling the world: Hezbollah is your problem, not ours
Mohamad Kawas/The Arab Weekly/September 15/2019
It is remarkable that Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri addressed the international community to declare that the problem of Hezbollah’s weapons is a regional and international issue, not a Lebanese one.
His announcement may indirectly coincide with Lebanese President Michel Aoun’s discovery that local and international conditions have changed and no longer call for an internal dialogue to find a defence strategy to protect Lebanon.
It is also noteworthy that Hezbollah did not comment on Hariri’s remarks to US cable news channel CNBC about what was understood to be his government’s disavowing the Hezbollah’s weapons and behaviour.
Hezbollah also remained quiet about Hariri’s submitting the issue to a level of treatment that goes beyond the capabilities of the Lebanese state and places the problem within the scope of the US conflict with Iran. Hezbollah’s weapons have been deemed legitimate in a statement by the Council of Ministers.
Hariri was telling international capitals interested in Lebanon’s affairs, its stability, its role in the region, its economy and energy reserves at the bottom of its continental waters that Hezbollah does not rule the country but controls the decision of war and peace in it.
He was delivering to whom it may concern the message that, as head of the government of an independent, sovereign country, he was confirming that Hezbollah’s address was not in Lebanon, that the party’s decisions come from outside the country and that it cannot be dealt with from within Lebanon.
What can be understood of Hariri’s comments only weeks after his return from a controversial trip to the United States is that he is gradually seeking an internationalisation of the Hezbollah issue, not in the sense that might provoke the anger of the Lebanese domestic scene but in the strategic sense of what is being cooked up for the region. We can only understand from Hariri’s logic that he is calling on the international community to relieve Lebanon, with all of its political currents, sects and institutions, from the task of confronting a phenomenon that has arisen for reasons beyond Lebanon’s control and having to do with the policies adopted by the international community in dealing with Iran and its regime for four decades.
However, what Hariri was saying is fundamentally different from Aoun’s discourse. Some of the opinions expressed by Hariri’s inner political circle and even by his wider circles that are hesitantly reaching out to yesterday’s allies are in play here.
These circles say Hezbollah’s weapons have confiscated the prestige of the state and the unity of its decision on fundamental issues of sovereignty. The weapons glorify the culture of the mini-state, threaten the country’s internal cohesion and shake its internal stability. They contribute to the chaos and total disregard for the country’s institutions, its standing in the world and its foreign relations.
By considering the issue of Hezbollah’s weapons as an external one, Hariri is saying he does not believe in the necessity of them for Lebanon’s defence, contrary to what Aoun has been reiterating.
Aoun says the party’s weapons are Lebanese in their agenda of defending the country and that they are a structural part of its defence system that should not be rejected but protected by the state and the government.
While Hariri speaks of the “problem” that the decision of war and peace is in the hands of Hezbollah, Aoun does not see it that way and does not believe there is a need for internal dialogue to develop a defensive strategy that would end the phenomenon of Hezbollah’s weapons being outside the state system.
“Hezbollah is a regional problem,” said Hariri. Accordingly, he is demanding the controversy over the role of Hezbollah raised by Washington and its allies should not be linked to what this world can do to rid Lebanon of its economic burdens.
While there is much talk about tying up the release of the loans and grants garnered by the CEDRE Conference and the generosity of donor countries to certain conditions requiring the Lebanese state to rein in Hezbollah and seize its weapons, Hariri throws the hot potato into the lap of the world and donor countries using the simple logic that “it is your problem, not ours.”
In the US effort, led by David Schenker, the US assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs, there are indications that the United States’ new working rules will be dealing with Lebanon and Hezbollah as separate cases.
Washington is activating its mediation to end the land and sea borders dispute between Lebanon and Israel. Washington sends its envoy to the region, bearing in mind that the success of his mission requires dispelling the possibility of a new Israeli war against Hezbollah in Lebanon. No serious strategy can be adopted to close the border file, open energy exploration in Lebanese waters and activate the energy project in the Eastern Mediterranean region without seriously addressing the case of Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Israel continues to bring up the file of Hezbollah’s rocket factories and is militarily threatening the famous Tehran-Beirut corridor. The gas exploration operations eagerly anticipated by Washington, France, Italy, Russia and Mediterranean countries are ready to begin and release one of the world’s largest new riches.Arrangements are being made for the Syrian issue as well and the recent Turkish threats of releasing waves of refugee migration towards Europe seem to have reawakened the world’s attention to the region. In fact, files keep piling up in such a way that places Hezbollah and its role within them under closer scrutiny. By what is being leaked of Hariri’s declarations, the matter requires the involvement of the international community. However, Lebanon must decide whether it wants the world to deal with it as an independent state or whether it wants the world to accept the status quo and bless Hezbollah’s tutelage over the country just like it once blessed the tutelage of the Damascus regime.

Bourj Hammoud, the little Armenia in the heart of Beirut
Samar Kadi/The Arab Weekly/September 15/2019
BEIRUT - Walking through the modest alleyways of Bourj Hammoud takes visitors to a small replica of Armenia in the heart of Beirut. The language, the names of streets and the smells of spices and street food that emanate from bakeries and restaurants are all reminiscent of their country of origin, which Armenians were forced to leave fleeing genocide by the Ottomans.
“Armenians arrived in Lebanon in 1917. They walked from Turkey to Syria and Lebanon and settled in refugee camps in the outskirts of Beirut. The area has since developed into a neighbourhood Bourj Hammoud and has become an Armenian hub in the city,” explained Yerevant Shallagian, founder of the “Bourj Hammoud — Walking Tour with Street Food.”
Shallagian was born and raised in Bourj Hammoud. His love for his neighbourhood and his passion for the Armenian culture inspired him to work on this project to promote his culture and background.
“Since I work in Living Lebanon (a platform on travel and tourism in Lebanon), I have a lot of foreign friends coming here who wanted to know about Bourj Hammoud. I was taking them around and offering them Armenian dishes and one German friend told me I should do that as an official tour. So I said why not?” Shallagian said. “I never studied to be a tour guide. I am a local guy who likes to share what he loves about his city. I did as much as I can to share knowledge that I know and care about.”
Roaming the streets of Bourj Hammoud and interacting with residents offer visitors an insight into Armenian culture and traditions that Lebanon’s Armenian community of some 50,000 have maintained and preserved for more than a century. The tour begins at the main Rue d’Armenie (Armenia Street), which is lined with jewellry and gold shops. Armenians are famous for their craftsmanship and have established a reputation as Lebanon’s jewellers.
“When they arrived here, our ancestors learned new skills and made a living by working in gold. They also worked with leather, making shoes and bags and the women did embroidery, anything to bring food to the table,” Shallagian said.
The tour includes churches and workshops famous for producing shoes, bags and ready-to-wear clothes.
“We can make any bag design,” boasted Coco as he put the finishing touches on a silver, beaded clutch at his small workshop along a narrow pedestrian alley. “We also design and produce bags for a local brand ‘la Rose de Sym,’ all handmade.”
St Vartan’s Armenian Cathedral is the biggest of some ten churches in Bourj Hammoud. It was named after an Armenian leader who fought against the Persians in the fifth century. “Thanks to him we remained Christians; otherwise we would have been forced to convert to Islam. The architecture of the church, which was renovated in 2006, is very similar to churches in Armenia,” Shallagian said. Some of the narrow streets where flags of the Armenian revolutionary party, Tashnak, hang next to Armenian and Lebanese flags, have been renovated with donations from wealthy Armenians and foreign governments.
A memorial to the Armenian genocide, a small replica of a memorial stone in Yerevan, Armenia, stands in the heart of Bourj Hammoud. Each April, Armenians commemorate the genocide by marching from Bourj Hammoud to the Armenian patriarchate in Antelias, north of Beirut. “The 2-hour march is meant to mark how our ancestors walked from Turkey to Lebanon fleeing the genocide,” Shallagian explained.
Food tasting is also featured in authentic bakeries and restaurants, such as the Tahinov Hatz, a sweet pastry offered for breakfast; lahmajoon, the Armenian meat pie; and the famous Armenian sausage sujuk.
With a population of 15,000 Armenians, Bourj Hammoud is viewed as a little Armenia in the heart of the Lebanese capital. While first-generation Armenians could hardly speak any Arabic, young Armenians learn Arabic at school in addition to Armenian, French and English.
Gary Walsh, an Australian participant, commented on the tour: “I did not know what to expect but I really came away with lots of appreciation and knowledge of what it means to be Armenian in Lebanon.”
“I do feel it is something I would not have found for myself. It gave me a real taste of Armenian culture,” he said.
“Bourj Hammoud — Walking Tour with Street Food” takes place every Tuesday. It began in June and Shallagian said he hopes it will gain popularity soon.
He said that, in addition to introducing Armenian culture, “the tour aims to change the perspective of Bourj Hammoud, which is regarded as a low-income suburb, while it is actually a place where Armenians have built a civilisation.”

Que veux-tu que je te dise, Bach ?
Ronald Barakat/September 15/2019
Cher Bachir,
Cette année, je n’avais ni le cœur à la fête du 23 août, ni à la « défaite » du 14 septembre. Notre défaite à nous, à long terme. Pas la tienne. Toi, tu avais posé les jalons avant de partir. Tu as mis les bouchées doubles pendant les 22 jours de « règne », comme si tu pressentais quelque chose. Tu as tracé le chemin, rédigé la feuille de route, mis le train national sur les rails (après un long déraillement) et le doigt sur toutes les plaies, prescrit les remèdes politiques, sociaux et économiques, brisé la langue de bois pour lui substituer une langue de foi, de feu et de vérité, ouvert le chantier national, établi le plan des travaux, dressé la longue liste des réformes, abordé les sujets qui font de nous des « objets », à savoir le confessionnalisme, le clientélisme, le suivisme, l’antipatriotisme, et fourni les moyens d’y remédier, dénoncé la « mazraa » et insisté sur l’urgence de l’éradiquer, construit le cadre des 10452 km2… bref tu as presque tout fait avant de faire. On n’avait qu’à appliquer à la lettre tes recommandations et tes discours ! Tu as livré toute la marchandise avant terme ! Bien entendu, il fallait un exécutant et « exécuteur » de ta trempe pour faire du rêve une réalité, mais avec un peu de sagacité et de bonne volonté, un tantinet de clairvoyance, un minimum de sentiment national, un petit effort collectif égal à ton effort individuel, on aurait pu faire avancer les choses. Au moins réduire drastiquement l’espace de cette « mazraa », si ce n’est l’éliminer… mais pas la laisser s’étendre sur toute la longueur, la largeur, la hauteur et la profondeur de la carte et répandre partout sa puanteur ! La puanteur des ordures politiciennes mêlée à celle des déchets amoncelés ici et là sur des décharges d’infortune, en bordure de la mer, mais qui valent une fortune.
Pardonne-moi, mais j’ai honte, à la fin, de célébrer le 23 août et de commémorer le 14 septembre pour la trente-septième fois équivalant à trente-sept fausses promesses ! Je ne peux plus te mentir ! Je ne peux plus te regarder dans les yeux ! Je ne peux plus renouveler mon échec pour la énième fois. Je ne peux plus me contenter de dénonciations et de harangues stériles. Tu me dis que je n’y suis pour rien, que j’ai fait ce que j’ai pu, mais quand même, je me sens responsable. Moi et les miens, et les tiens. On aurait pu mieux faire. On aurait pu rester unis au lieu de nous quereller, et parfois nous entretuer ! Pour le leadership, pour le pouvoir, pour l’argent. Ce qui a permis à nos voisins de palier, puis tous ceux du corridor de prendre possession de notre demeure, avec la complicité des membres de notre maisonnée ! Ceux-ci ont changé de nom de famille nationale. Pas plus tard qu’hier, il y en a un, en turban, qui s’est dit de la famille Khamenei ! Avant lui c’était la famille Assad. Après… je ne sais pas s’il y aura un après. Tout ce que je sais, c’est que j’ai honte de me présenter à toi cette année, de déposer cette gerbe qui va se faner plus vite que les précédentes. Qu’avons-nous fait de ton héritage ? Qu’est devenu ton esprit ? L’esprit d’un peuple ? Qu’est devenu le peuple ? Il s’est déchiré en peuplades communautaires, sectaires, tribales. Il s’est transformé en meutes de races confessionnelles distinctes, dressées pour la chasse à courre sous la sonnerie du cor des « zaïms » respectifs et non respectables.
Qu’est devenu l’État ? Sous la coupe d’un mini-État dont l’armée extranationale mène des opérations selon des règles d’engagement établies par son « mini-gouvernement » qui se dit relever de Dieu, qui suit les directives d’un « dieu » extérieur, qui fait la pluie et le beau temps, et ce au mépris de l’armée nationale, de son état-major et du gouvernement.
Qu’est devenue cette présidence de république ? Soi-disant forte ? Cette présidence ou « résidence » symbolique, pathétique, amorphe, depuis ta présidence exemplaire, prometteuse ?
Qu’est devenue la république ? Celle que tu voulais laïque, démocratique, moderne, aux valeurs humanistes, garante des libertés et des droits de la personne Que sont devenus les pouvoirs publics ? À l’ombre des intérêts privés et face à tant d’impuissance et d’incurie ? Qu’est devenue la justice ? Elle n’a même pas, à ce jour, pu exécuter son propre arrêt contre tes assassins qui longent la frontière en toute impunité en narguant les autorités libanaises. Où est le mandat d’amener ? Où est la notice d’Interpol ? Trente-sept ans plus tard, toi et tes compagnons n’êtes toujours pas vengés !
Que veux-tu que je te dise, Bach? Que je t’énumère tous ceux qui, après toi, sont tombés pour un Liban souverain sans que justice ne leur soit rendue ? Y compris un autre président de la république ? Un mufti ? Un premier ministre ? Des ministres ? Des députés ? Des journalistes ? Des conseillers ? Des juristes ? Des intellectuels ? Des citoyens au mauvais endroit, au mauvais moment ?
Qu’est devenu ton Liban ? Celui des 10452 km2 ? Quadrillé en carrés de sécurité, en zones de non-droit, en territoires autonomes régis par le religieux ? D’un côté une organisation islamiste qui interdit l’alcool et de l’autre un archevêché qui interdit des spectacles.
Qu’est devenu le pays du cèdre, éventré de carrières, déboisé, bétonné, asséché, obscurci, inondé, pollué, enfumé, assourdi, empesté, infesté ?
Que veux-tu que je te dise à ton 37ème anniversaire ? Que je serai meilleur au prochain rendez-vous ? Qu’à ton 38ème anniversaire ton Liban se portera mieux ? Que ton legs aura été récupéré ? Que les Libanais seront devenus plus libanais que chrétiens, musulmans ou druzes ? Plus libanais que FL, Futur, PSP, CPL, Amal et Hezbollah ? Plus libanais que syriens, iraniens et saoudiens ? Que justice aura été faite aux martyrs ? Qu’ils pourront reposer en paix ? Et voir se réaliser les prémices du rêve pour lequel ils se sont sacrifiés ? Pourvu que je puisse te le dire, non au prochain rendez-vous certes, mais à l’un de ces lointains rendez-vous. J’espère pouvoir te le dire de vive voix, lorsque mon tour viendra de te rejoindre. J’espère !
Entretemps, laisse-moi me cacher, me terrer loin de ton pénétrant, lancinant regard. Laisse-moi voir comment faire pour le soutenir la prochaine fois, comment faire pour te rendre fier de moi ! Pour être digne de toi ! De ton message, de ton sacrifice. Laisse-moi voir comment te mériter, comment pouvoir te dire autre chose que des louanges à ta personne. Tu n’as jamais aimé être louangé, ni voir en nous des louangeurs. Laisse-moi voir comment te rendre compte de ce que j’ai fait, et non pas t’annoncer ce que je compte faire, et te faire de fausses promesses. Laisse-moi voir comment me tenir devant toi avec des promesses tenues ! Te faire entendre du nouveau. De bonnes nouvelles. Une bonne, au moins, pour une fois. De quoi me soulager et te réjouir !R.B.

The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on September 15-16/2019
White House does not rule out Trump-Rouhani meeting after Saudi attacks
Reuters, Washington/Sunday, 15 September 2019
The White House on Sunday did not rule out a potential meeting between President Donald Trump and Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, even after Washington accused Iran of being behind drone attacks on Saudi oil facilities. White House adviser Kellyanne Conway said the attacks on Saturday “did not help” prospects for a meeting between the two leaders during the United Nations General Assembly this month but she left open the possibility it could happen. “I’ll allow the president (Trump) to announce a meeting or a non-meeting,” Conway told the “Fox News Sunday” program. The Trump administration’s sanctions and “maximum pressure” campaign on Iran over its nuclear and ballistic missile program will continue whether or not the two leaders meet, she added. However, Conway said, “You’re not helping your case much,” by attacking Saudi Arabia, civilian areas and critical infrastructure that affects global energy markets. Iran has denied allegations made by US Secretary of State Pompeo that it was behind the attacks on plants in the heartland of Saudi Arabia’s oil industry, including the world’s biggest petroleum processing facility. Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthi group claimed responsibility for the attacks, which have disrupted Saudi oil output. Pompeo said Iran was behind nearly 100 attacks on Saudi Arabia while leaders in Tehran “pretend to engage in diplomacy.”
Saudi Arabia and Shiite-led Iran back opposing factions across the Middle East, from Yemen and Syria to Lebanon and Iraq. Saudi Arabia is leading a military coalition to back Yemen’s internationally recognized government against the Houthis. Washington, a staunch ally of Riyadh, has adopted a tough anti-Iran “maximum pressure” policy to force Tehran to negotiate a broader deal that further curbs its nuclear program, restricts Tehran’s ballistic missile work and ends its support for regional proxy forces. Conway said the US Energy Department is prepared to tap into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve after the attacks on Saudi oil facilities if needed to stabilize the global energy supply. “We have energy under our feet and off our shores, and this president is leading the way to responsibly develop it so that when Iran attacks Saudi Arabia over 100 times, we are prepared to take action to protect our own interests,” she said.

Pompeo Condemns Iran following Drone Attacks on Saudi
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/September 15/2019
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has condemned Iran following drone attacks on oil facilities in Saudi Arabia, which had been blamed on Yemeni rebels. The top U.S. diplomat did not specifically name Tehran as the perpetrator of the attacks that led to fires at two key Saudi Aramco facilities, but said, "Iran has now launched an unprecedented attack on the world's energy supply.""There is no evidence the attacks came from Yemen," Pompeo said on Twitter. "We call on all nations to publicly and unequivocally condemn Iran's attacks. The United States will work with our partners and allies to ensure that energy markets remain well supplied and Iran is held accountable for its aggression."

Iran Refutes U.S. Accusations over Saudi Attacks

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/September 15/2019
Iran on Sunday dismissed as "meaningless" U.S. accusations it was behind drone attacks on Saudi oil installations, suggesting Washington was seeking a pretext to retaliate against the Islamic republic. "Such fruitless and blind accusations and remarks are incomprehensible and meaningless," foreign ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi was quoted as saying in a statement. US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo condemned Iran after Saturday's attacks, which knocked out half of the kingdom's oil production. Yemen's Iran-aligned Shiite Huthi rebels claimed responsibility, but Pompeo said "there is no evidence the attacks came from Yemen". Mousavi said the allegations over the pre-dawn strikes on the Abqaiq and Khurais in Eastern Province were meant to justify actions against Iran. "Such remarks... are more like plotting by intelligence and secret organizations to damage the reputation of a country and create a framework for future actions," he said. Arch-foes Tehran and Washington have been at loggerheads since May last year, when President Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out of a 2015 deal that promised Iran relief from sanctions in return for curbs on its nuclear program. Since the withdrawal, the United States has slapped crippling sanctions on Iran as part of a campaign of "maximum pressure". "The Americans have taken the policy of 'maximum pressure' which has apparently turned into 'maximum lying' due to their failures," said Mousavi.

Trump tells Saudi Crown Prince US ready to help protect Kingdom’s security
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English//Sunday, 15 September 2019
Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman received a phone call from US President Donald Trump following the drone attacks on oil production facilities in the Kingdom. During the phone call on Saturday, Trump also affirmed Washington’s readiness to cooperate with the Kingdom to supports its security and stability, according to a statement on the Saudi Press Agency. The US President stressed the negative impact of the terrorist attacks that targeted two Aramco facilities on the American and global economy. “For his part, the Crown Prince stressed that the Kingdom has the will and ability to confront and deal with this terrorist aggression,” the statement on SPA added. Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Interior said on Saturday that drone attacks caused fires at two Saudi Aramco facilities, adding that the blazes are under control. One of the facilities is located in Abqaiq, near Dammam in the Kingdom's Eastern Province. The other facility is located in the Hijrat Khurais oilfield.

US failed at ‘max pressure’: Iranian foreign minister
Reuters, Dubai/Sunday, 15 September 2019
Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said in a tweet on Sunday that the US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo “failed at max pressure” and is turning to “max deceit.”“Having failed at “max pressure”, @SecPompeo’s turning to “max deceit”.. US & its clients are stuck in Yemen because of illusion that weapon superiority will lead to military victory. Blaming Iran won’t end disaster,” Zarif said on Twitter. US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Saturday blamed Iran for the drone attacks which hit two of Saudi Arabia’s Aramco oil installations and were claimed by Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi militia, saying that “Iran has now launched an unprecedented attack on the world’s energy supply.”Iran dismissed as “pointless” US claims that Tehran was behind the drone attacks, the Iranian foreign ministry spokesman said earlier on Sunday.

Saudi FM condemns Netanyahu pledge to annex West Bank’s Jordan Valley
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English/Sunday, 15 September 2019
Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Ibrahim Assaf said on Sunday that the new Israeli measures are invalid and everything resulting from them is rejected by the Kingdom, after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced he is convening his final pre-election Cabinet meeting in a part of the West Bank he's vowed to annex if re-elected. Al-Assaf also condemned the “dangerous escalation” by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, calling for the international community to hold Israel accountable for its violations against the Palestinian people. The comments were part of an emergency Organization of Islamic Cooperation taking place in Jeddah and called for by Saudi Arabia. For his part, Foreign Affairs Minister of the Palestinian National Authority Riyad al-Maliki said that the Palestinian Authority’s leadership appreciates Saudi Arabia’s quick reaction in condemning the Israeli stance. Al-Maliki added that Netanyahu’s pledge to annex the West Bank’s Jordan Valley goes against international agreements and resolutions, stating that it is a continuation of Israel’s attempts to “forge the geography and history of Palestine.”“The Israeli violations against the Palestinian people are happening with an American approval,” al-Maliki said.

UAE waiting for results of Saudi Arabia’s drone attack investigation: Official
Reuters, Abu Dhabi/Sunday, 15 September 2019
The United Arab Emirates is waiting for the conclusions from Saudi Arabia’s investigation into Saturday’s drone attacks, foreign ministry official Hend Mana al-Otaiba said on Sunday. Al-Otaiba said in a media briefing, which previewed the UAE's priorities in the upcoming United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), that the country's focus is on “protecting and building the foundations of prosperity: stability, security, healthy institutions, rule of law, diverse economies and peaceful coexistence.”Al-Otaiba also said the UAE continues to support the United Nations and its special envoy’s diplomatic efforts in Yemen. She added that the UAE will meet its full aid commitment to Yemen for this year. The UAE delegation to the UNGA will include al-Otaiba, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Anwar Gargash and Minister of State for International Cooperation Reem Al Hashimy. Al-Otaiba said one of the UAE delegation’s key objectives during the UNGA would be to strengthen multilateral cooperation and the role of international organizations such as the UN.

Drone entered Kuwaiti airspace early Saturday morning: Report
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English/Sunday, 15 September 2019T
A drone violated Kuwait's airspace early on Saturday, Kuwaiti newspaper al-Rai reported, and hovered at nearly 250 meters above group close to the Dar Salwa presidential palace. “The drone was large at about three meters in length and the size of a small car,” al-Rai quoted a source as saying. The newspaper said and the drone hovered over Dar Salwa presidential palace for a period, ignited its headlights for one minute and then entered Kuwait City airspace.The incident appears to have taken place at the same time drone attacks caused fires at two Saudi Aramco facilities before dawn on Saturday.

Israel approves new settlement two days before polls
AFP, Jerusalem/Sunday, 15 September 2019
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government approved a new settlement in the occupied West Bank on Sunday, his office said, just two days ahead of closely fought general elections. Netanyahu's cabinet agreed to turn the wildcat settlement of Mevoot Yericho in the Jordan Valley into an official settlement, the premier's office said. All settlements are viewed as illegal under international law, but Israel distinguishes between those it has approved and those it has not. Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Ibrahim Assaf said on Sunday that the new Israeli measures are invalid and everything resulting from them is rejected by the Kingdom.

Saudi Bourse Slumps after Oil Facility Attacks
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/September 15/2019
Saudi shares slumped at the start of trading Sunday, the first session after drone attacks on two major oil facilities knocked out more than half the OPEC kingpin's production. The Tadawul All-Shares Index, which tracks the Arab world's largest capital market, sank three percent, shedding some 200 points in the first few minutes before regaining some of the losses. Just under one hour into the session, TASI was down 1.50 percent at 7,715 points. The key energy sector plunged 4.7 percent, while the telecom and banking sectors each slid three percent. The market was also affected by an announcement from the Saudi Basic Industries Co. (SABIC), one of the world's largest petrochemicals producers, that the industry faced a shortage of raw materials. It did not name the reason but said the issue arose on Saturday -- the day of the drone attack. Other bourses in the Gulf also dropped. Dubai Financial Market was down 1.1 percent, Abu Dhabi and Qatar markets declined 0.4 percent each, while Kuwait shares sank 0.8 percent and Bahrain's bourse slid 0.9 percent.
Oman's shares were flat.
Explosives-laden drones struck the processing plants at Abqaiq and Khurais in the Eastern Province early on Saturday morning, knocking out some 5.7 million barrels per day of crude oil production and around two billion cubic feet of natural gas output. The Abqaiq plant handles some seven million bpd of crude oil and billions of cubic feet of natural gas. State-owned energy giant Aramco in March acquired 70 percent of SABIC, the largest capitalized firm on the Saudi market, for $69.1 billion.

Turkey says delivery of second S-400 battery complete
Reuters, Ankara/Sunday, 15 September 2019
Turkey’s defense ministry said on Sunday the delivery of a second battery of Russian S-400 missile defense systems has been completed, adding that the systems would become active in April 2020. Ankara and Washington have been at loggerheads over Turkey’s purchase of the S-400 systems, which the US says are not compatible with NATO defenses and poses a threat to Lockheed Martin’s F-35 ‘stealth’ fighter jets. The initial parts of the system were delivered to Ankara in July despite warnings about possible US sanctions over the purchase. The US has also expelled Turkey from the F-35 program, but Ankara has so far dismissed the warnings. In a statement, the defense ministry said the delivery of the second S-400 battery to Ankara was completed. Efforts to mount the systems and train personnel who will use them were continuing, it said, adding that it planned to activate the S-400s in April 2020. Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusglu told an interview with CNN Turk on Saturday that the S-400s would be activated despite repeated US warnings. “They (US officials) told us ‘don’t activate them and we can sort this out’, but we told them that we didn’t buy these systems as a prop,” Cavusoglu said, adding that Turkey would be open to buying US Raytheon Co Patriot systems as well. In an interview on Friday, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan told Reuters he will discuss buying US Patriot missiles with US President Donald Trump this month, saying his personal bond with the US leader could overcome the crisis caused by the S-400s. On Monday, US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said the Trump administration was considering imposing sanctions related to Turkey’s purchase of the S-400 systems, but no decisions have been made.The dispute over the S-400 systems is one of several issues straining ties between the US and Turkey that include the ongoing conflict in Syria, among others.

Tunisia Heads to Polls for Keenly Fought Presidential Contest

Agence France Presse/Naharnet/September 15/2019
Rarely has the outcome of an election been so uncertain in Tunisia, the cradle and partial success story of the Arab Spring, as some seven million voters head to the polls Sunday to choose from a crowded field. Key players include media mogul Nabil Karoui -- behind bars due to an ongoing money laundering probe -- Abdelfattah Mourou, who heads a first-time bid on behalf of his Islamist inspired Ennahdha party, and Prime Minister Youssef Chahed. The premier's popularity has been tarnished by a sluggish economy and a high cost of living, and he has found himself having to vehemently deny accusations that Karoui's detention since late August is politically inspired. Some 13,000 polling booths opened across Tunisia at 9 A.M. local time (0700 GMT) Sunday, with two dozen candidates vying for a five-year mandate. The election follows an intense campaign beset by personality clashes, albeit one with few clear political differences, brought forward by the death in July of 92-year-old president Beji Caid Essebsi. He had been elected in the wake of the 2011 revolt that overthrew former dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali. Publication of opinion polls has officially been banned since July, but one thing appears certain: many voters remain undecided, due to difficulties in reading a shifting political landscape. "I am undecided between two candidates -- I will decide in the polling booth," smiled one citizen, Sofiene, who added "honest candidates don't have much chance of winning". Some hopefuls have tried to burnish anti-establishment credentials in a bid to distance themselves from a political elite discredited by personal quarrels. One key newcomer is Kais Saied, a 61-year-old law professor and expert on constitutional affairs, who has avoided attaching his bid to a political party. Instead, he has gone door-to-door to drum up support for his conservative platform.
Last minute withdrawals
Another independent candidate is Defense Minister Abdelkarim Zbidi, a technocrat who is running for the first time. However, he has the backing of Essebsi's Nidaa Tounes party. The crowded field has been narrowed slightly by the last-minute withdrawal of two candidates in favor of Zbidi: former political adviser Mohsen Marzouk and businessman Slim Riahi. But Karoui's detention, just 10 days ahead of the start of campaigning, has been the top story of the election. Studies suggest his arrest boosted his popularity. A controversial businessman, Karoui built his appeal by using his Nessma television channel to launch charity campaigns, handing out food aid to some of the country's poorest. But his detractors portray him as a would-be Silvio Berlusconi, the former Italian premier who they allege partly owns his channel.On Friday, an appeal to have the Tunisian mogul released from prison ahead of the election was rejected, his party and lawyers said, two days after he began what his defense team said was a hunger strike. The polarization between the different camps risks a derailment of the electoral process, according to Michael Ayari, an analyst for the International Crisis Group.
'Divisive' candidates
Isabelle Werenfels, a researcher at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, has called the vote a democratic "test" because "it may require accepting the victory of a polarizing candidate," such as Karoui. Distrust of the political elite has been deepened by an unemployment rate of 15 percent and a rise in the cost of living of close to a third since 2016. Jihadist attacks have exacted a heavy toll on the key tourism sector. Overseas voting stations for Tunisia's sizable expatriate population have been open since Friday. Some stations will remain open until 6:00 P.M., while others will close two hours earlier, for security reasons. Some 70,000 security agents will be deployed on Sunday, including 50,000 focused solely on polling stations, according to the interior ministry. Exit polls are expected overnight Sunday into Monday, but preliminary results are not expected from the electoral commission until Tuesday. The date of the second and final round has not been announced, but it must happen by October 23 at the latest and may even take place on the same day as legislative polls -- October 6. Those polls are supposed to be more significant, as Tunisia is an emerging parliamentary democracy. But several candidates have called for presidential powers to be beefed up, despite years of dictatorship under Ben Ali.

The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on September 15-16/2019
To Win Re-Election, Bibi Netanyahu Is Waging ‘Wars’ at Home and Abroad
Neri Zilber/Daily Beast/September 15/2019
Publicizing IDF operations, threatening to annex the West Bank, and making alarmist statements about polling stations and the press may help him eke out a victory, but at what cost to Israel’s security and standing?
Benjamin Netanyahu is firing in all directions these days. Facing a tight re-election bid next Tuesday, the long-serving Israeli prime minister has just in the last two weeks launched air strikes against multiple neighboring Middle Eastern countries, pushed back against a potential U.S.-Iran detente, attacked the local media and his own Arab citizens, and called into question the legitimacy of the entire electoral process. In a bid for every last right-wing vote, on Tuesday Netanyahu again promised to annex wide swaths of the West Bank if he were re-elected—a move that if implemented could spell the end of any two-state solution with the Palestinians and, with it, the end of Israel as both a democratic and Jewish state.
The impression is either of a master strategist in complete control, pulling multiple political, military and diplomatic strings both here and abroad; or, alternatively, a hysterical politician in the twilight of his reign doing everything within his ample powers to maintain a grip on power. There is, of course, the likelihood that it’s both.
The military dimension to Netanyahu’s recent offensive is arguably the most consequential precisely because it’s so out of character. Despite his hardline international reputation, Netanyahu is extremely cautious when it comes to the use of force. Yet, in the span of 24 hours late last month, Israeli aircraft reportedly struck Iranian-affiliated targets in Syria, Lebanon and Iraq.
In recent years Israel has admitted openly to launching hundreds of strikes inside Syria to forestall what officials here call Iran’s “military entrenchment” in its war-torn neighbor: Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps personnel, Shiite militia fighters, and advanced weaponry like precision guided missiles. Such Israeli military action—officially termed the “campaign between wars,” since it’s intended to shear Iranian power ahead of any wider conflict—has now extended into Lebanon and Iraq.
How do we know this? Because Netanyahu confirmed it.
“I’m doing everything to protect the security of our country from all directions—from the north against Lebanon and [the pro-Iranian militia] Hezbollah, in Syria against Iran and Hezbollah, and unfortunately also in Iraq against Iran,” Netanyahu said on August 30 during a Facebook live chat with supporters, days after the reported strikes in those three countries.
A “senior Israeli defense source,” likely Netanyahu himself (who currently also doubles as defense minister), repeated similar claims a few days later to local military reporters. Indeed, the Israeli military has been extremely expansive in recent weeks detailing Iran’s efforts to arm Hezbollah with precision guided missiles on Lebanese soil. A drone attack in Beirut, in the heart of Hezbollah’s Dahiyeh stronghold, reportedly targeted high-value equipment meant to upgrade the Lebanese militia’s arsenal. Here, too, the military briefed reporters on the exact details of what allegedly was hit.
This was all a sharp break from Israel’s usual policy of “purposeful ambiguity,” wherein it declines to take responsibility when something mysteriously blows up across the border—thus sparing its enemies blushes so as to avoid pushing them towards a response. (A limited response ultimately did come on September 1 in the form of a cross-border Hezbollah attack on an Israeli army jeep.)
To be clear: not even Netanyahu’s harshest domestic critics allege that, mere weeks before an election, he’s purposefully pushing the country into war. As The Daily Beast reported in February, there is widespread consensus that Iranian proxies armed with upgraded precision guided missiles are a severe threat to the country’s security, now deemed second only to Iran’s possible pursuit of a nuclear weapon. Most Netanyahu critics even accept the official position that the timing for these strikes was due to Iran’s escalating efforts in this area (primarily recent inroads in Iraq and Lebanon).
What they do take issue with, however, is Netanyahu’s non-stop public rhetoric after the fact—verging on a Middle Eastern “end zone dance” in the face of Iran and Hezbollah—that could lead to deadlier follow-up attacks and a wider conflagration. Israel until recently used to speak softly and carry a big stick, which it deployed to great effect against Iran and its regional proxies. Netanyahu is now publicly trading insults with Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah and IRGC Gen. Qassem Soleimani, who have vowed to respond in kind.
Netanyahu’s chief rival, Benny Gantz, head of the Blue and White party, has strongly supported the government’s regional policy against Iran. Yet even he called into question the increasing “talk and breaking of the [prior] ambiguity,” saying Netanyahu is trying to “score political points” off of the national security debate.
Ron Ben-Yishai, the dean of Israel’s military correspondents going back five decades, told The Daily Beast that even a prime minister-cum-defense minister doesn’t plan operations, the motivating force for which is usually the military and Mossad, Israel’s foreign intelligence agency. Netanyahu, Ben-Yishai said, “wouldn’t launch an operation because of an election, and the army chief of staff isn’t a servant of any prime minister...but the talk [surrounding it] is without doubt political.”
The danger of all this talk, Ben-Yishai added, is that it’s like “poking [Iran in] the eye. Especially in the Middle East, the issue of honor could lead to a response.”
Nevertheless, after years burnishing his reputation as Israel’s “Mr. Security,” an election campaign dominated by military crises could help Netanyahu with his base and the many undecided voters. But part of the audience for all this mounting “blather,” as some have termed it, may in fact be farther afield.
The same weekend that Israel was bombing across the Levant, President Donald Trump was at the G-7 summit in France, where he indicated a willingness to meet with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani to resolve the impasse over Iran’s nuclear program. A short while after Trump made positive comments about Iran, Netanyahu issued a video where he reminded the world (including, presumably, the U.S. president) of where he stood on the issue.
“Iran is working on a broad front to carry out murderous terrorist attacks against the State of Israel,” Netanyahu said. “Israel will continue to defend its security however that may be necessary. I call on the international community to act immediately so that Iran halts these attacks.”
As Axios reported, Netanyahu was unable to reach Trump by telephone during the G-7 summit. In the following days the Israeli prime minister had calls with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Vice President Mike Pence—but tellingly not with Trump.
A snap visit to London last week, primarily to meet with U.S. Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, likely failed to console the Israeli leader. “Iran,” Esper said, “was inching toward that place where we could have talks.” Senior British officials with whom Netanyahu met were also inclined to support a French-led diplomatic process. Israeli defense officials reportedly are convinced that a Trump-Rouhani summit is now a “done deal.”
Trump on Tuesday reiterated his openness to meeting with the Iranian leader, despite Netanyahu just hours earlier revealing what he claimed was a secret Iranian nuclear weapons facility (another cynical use, many Israeli analysts observed, of sensitive intelligence for political gain.) Earlier on Tuesday, Trump fired his ultra-hawkish national security advisor, John Bolton, saying he “disagreed strongly with many of his suggestions.”
A lot is riding on whether Netanyahu can maintain U.S. support for his hard line against Iran and its proxies—not least his own political future. Israelis will again go to the polls on September 17 after Netanyahu failed to form a government in the wake of the original April ballot. According to the polls, Netanyahu is once more in a very tight race for re-election. He has in recent weeks seemingly stopped at nothing to ensure that his now 10-year reign (thirteen overall dating back to the 1990s) continues.
Massive banners of Netanyahu and Trump shaking hands adorn tall office buildings and billboards across the country, underlining the premier’s close relationship with the U.S. president and his overall image as a global statesman (including taking credit for the American withdrawal from the Obama-era nuclear deal). Both points would be severely undercut if there were, in fact, a U.S.-Iran rapprochement.
Just as he’s attacked Iran across the region, Netanyahu with equal vigor has gone after his perceived domestic enemies. He has called for a boycott of the country’s most popular television station—Channel 12—because it has deigned to publish extensive leaks from inside the myriad investigations of Netanyahu’s alleged corruption. “A terror attack against democracy,” the prime minister termed it. The channel’s legal correspondent, Guy Peleg, now travels with bodyguards.
More perniciously, in a Trumpian twist, Netanyahu in the last week has railed constantly against voter fraud among Israel’s Arab minority, alleging that irregularities in this demographic cost him and his right-wing allies victory in April. “The problem of fraud and theft of the elections is real. We will not allow the coming elections to be stolen,” Netanyahu said, priming his supporters to reject the outcome of next week’s poll if it doesn’t go their way.
No matter that the Central Elections Committee, police, attorney general, and other neutral observers say no such fraud actually took place and reject Netanyahu’s demand that cameras be placed in polling stations. Israeli President Reuven Rivlin called the allegations “unsubstantiated and even irresponsible political attacks” intended to “undermine public trust in these [electoral] bodies.”
It seems that Netanyahu is willing to attack the very foundations of Israeli democracy, and again incite against the country’s Arab minority in order to galvanize his nationalist base. It’s a well-worn tactic Netanyahu has deployed in the past—the so-called Gevalt campaign, Yiddish for “alarm.”
“Gevalt is always real and Netanyahu is a panicker to begin with, which is probably what makes him so effective [as a politician],” Tal Shalev, Walla News’ chief political correspondent, told The Daily Beast. “He’s never calm.” Yet Shalev, a keen Netanyahu-watcher who traveled with him to London, said that despite the public hysteria purposefully sown, the prime minister seemed calm, confident and in a good mood in recent days.
There’s a contrast between what he’s broadcasting to those around him and what he’s saying publicly, she added. “But he’s acting a bit more ruthless than usual now, and breaking all the rules, due to the situation he’s in. It’s a battle for the rest of his life.”
Without his right-wing bloc of parties winning an outright majority of 61 seats in the Knesset, Netanyahu could be finished politically—and then there are his looming corruption indictments, with a pre-trial hearing set for early next month. A former ally on the right, Avigdor Lieberman, has turned against him, forcing the repeat election in the first place and now demanding a national unity government with Blue and White—which the latter refuse to countenance so long as the legally compromised Netanyahu still heads the Likud party. The political machinations after September 17 could be even more extreme than the election campaign itself.
Yet there’s another possibility, perhaps even more likely, that against all the odds, and all these enemies—some real, most manufactured—Netanyahu actually wins outright. The polls aren’t looking favorable, but it’s important to recall that in the April ballot, a small right-wing faction was only 1400 votes short (out of 4 million cast) of entering parliament and thereby giving Netanyahu his majority. Last time, too, the right wing essentially threw away six to eight seats via parties that didn’t pass the electoral threshold, a scenario now mitigated by a recent Netanyahu pact with a far-right faction that pulled out of the election.
A source in Blue and White told The Daily Beast that the current polls, both public and internal, were very consistent—a Netanyahu victory isn’t a done deal. “This is going to be close, and will come down to the last few days,” he vowed. With the margins so fine, Netanyahu is pushing Israel to the very edge.
*Neri Zilber, a journalist based in Tel Aviv, is an adjunct fellow with The Washington Institute and a senior fellow at BICOM. This article was originally published on the Daily Beast website.

Tunisians to Elect a New President
Sarah Feuer/The Washington Institute/September 15/2019
With no clear front-runner emerging and public disillusionment mounting, the struggling Arab democracy is transitioning from a period of consensus to uncertainty.
On September 15, Tunisians will vote in the country’s second presidential election since 2011, when a local uprising overthrew longtime autocrat Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali and sparked a wave of revolts across the region. Eight years on, Tunisia is the only “Arab Spring” state to remain on the path of full democracy, a distinction that continues to elicit praise from outside observers. Inside Tunisia, however, the past five years have been marked by disillusionment with unmet economic expectations and widespread frustration with the government’s perceived inability to address them. Both sentiments are coloring the current election cycle, sidelining the contentious Islamist/secularist debates that infused the 2014 elections.
NUTS AND BOLTS
Originally scheduled for November, the current round of voting was moved up following the July 25 death of President Beji Caid Essebsi, so that his successor could take office within the constitutionally mandated ninety-day period. Under normal circumstances, Essebsi would have completed his five-year term, and voters would have chosen a new parliament before proceeding to the presidential election. Now, however, they will be choosing their head of state—who also serves as commander-in-chief and sets defense, foreign, and national security policy—before the parliamentary elections scheduled for October 6. If no candidate receives a majority of votes on September 15, a runoff will be held between the top two candidates.
Among Tunisia’s population of 11.8 million, a remarkable 85 percent of eligible citizens are registered to vote. (By comparison, only 75 percent of eligible Americans are registered.) In the 2014 elections, turnout was around 63 percent for both round one and the ensuing runoff between Essebsi and human rights activist Moncef Marzouki. Yet the 2018 local elections garnered a much lower rate of 35 percent, prompting concerns about declining interest and faith in the electoral process. Still, the registration period for the current cycle saw 1.5 million citizens sign up, and polling by the International Republican Institute earlier this year suggested turnout will exceed 50 percent. Whatever the case, voting will once again be monitored by domestic and international observers, so it should proceed freely and fairly.
NOTEWORTHY CONTENDERS
An eye-popping twenty-six presidential candidates will appear on the ballot, including two women. Remarkably, an openly gay man was in the initial mix despite the fact that homosexuality remains a crime in Tunisia, but his candidacy was ultimately rejected for reasons that remain unclear. Three televised debates have been held, a first for Tunisia and a novelty in the Arab world. No obvious front-runner has emerged, but four candidates appear to be leading:
Youssef Chahed. A forty-three-year-old agronomist who has served as prime minister since 2016, Chahed was forced out of Essebsi’s secularist party Nidaa Tounes (Call of Tunisia) last year. The move was prompted by his intense disagreements with the president over their division of power, and his objections to how Essebsi’s son, Hafedh, was maneuvering to control the party. Chahed recently formed a new party, Tahya Tounes (Long Live Tunisia), whose campaign has emphasized the needs of young people. Yet he may face difficulty convincing the wider populace that he should occupy Carthage Palace. While his anti-corruption policies were widely praised, the austerity measures he oversaw after the IMF loaned Tunisia $2.8 billion in 2016 did not endear him to the masses, who have been contending with entrenched income disparities, an inflation rate twice as high as pre-2011 levels, and unemployment hovering at 15 percent nationally and 35 percent among youths.
Abdelfattah Mourou. A lawyer by training, Mourou cofounded the Ennahda (Renaissance) Party, Tunisia’s main Islamist movement, and now serves as its vice president. He was elected to parliament in 2014 and thereafter became deputy speaker. The seventy-one-year-old’s candidacy marks a significant development for Ennahda, which previously shied away from fielding presidential contenders for fear of provoking the kind of backlash that decimated its original parent group, the Muslim Brotherhood, in Egypt and other countries. By contrast, Ennahda has preferred to govern in coalition with secular parties like Nidaa Tounes and downplay its Islamist orientation, thereby solidifying its dominance in parliament. In 2016, the party even declared it would be curtailing its religious activities and devoting itself entirely to politics, replacing the label “political Islam” with “Muslim democracy.”
When Ennahda announced this summer that it would field a presidential candidate and put leader Rached Ghannouchi in the running for parliament, it seemed confident that the strategy of restraint had sufficiently cemented the party’s place in Tunisia’s political landscape. Although that calculation may still be a gamble, Mourou’s past willingness to criticize the party and his reportedly positive relationships with legislators across the political spectrum make him a relatively safe choice.
Nabil Karoui. The founder of Nessma TV, one of Tunisia’s leading stations, Karoui is currently sitting in jail on charges of money laundering and tax evasion. The fifty-six-year-old has become a well-known figure in recent years thanks to his frequent media appearances and philanthropic work. A former member of Essebsi’s faction, he founded the party Qalb Tounes (Heart of Tunisia) and has campaigned around broadly populist themes, advocating on behalf of the poor and decrying the lack of government services. He was polling above 20 percent when he was arrested in late August, prompting accusations that his rivals were looking to eliminate him from the field (the allegations against him first surfaced in 2017 following an investigation by prominent local anti-corruption NGO “I Watch”). Tunisian law allows individuals accused of criminal activity to run for office as long as they are not convicted, so while Karoui was unable to attend the debates, his name remains on the ballot.
Abdelkarim Zbidi. A doctor by training, the sixty-four-year-old Zbidi is widely viewed as a technocrat seemingly untainted by his longtime affiliation with the Ben Ali regime. He served until recently as defense minister, then resigned to run for president, maintaining his longtime status as an independent while highlighting his experience in the security realm. Tunisia has seen considerable improvements in its counterterrorism capabilities since a string of high-casualty attacks in 2015 and an attempted Islamic State insurgency a year later. Yet this summer’s spate of suicide bombings was a reminder that the country remains fragile, so Zbidi’s association with the extremely popular armed forces may serve him well.
BEYOND THE VOTE
The tenor of Tunisia’s election season suggests that its democracy may be transitioning from a period of relative consensus to something far less certain. Essebsi’s passing evoked eulogies of the grand bargain he reportedly struck with Ghannouchi in 2013, an arrangement rightly credited with saving the country from the social unrest and political turmoil plaguing its regional peers. Yet the limitations of this secular/Islamist consensus were evident long before Essebsi’s death, breeding political paralysis and undermining deeper economic reforms.
Indeed, the election has underscored the price of Tunisia’s post-2013 political stability: namely, growing discontent among an electorate keen to see democracy deliver not only individual freedoms, but basic economic dividends as well. Whoever wins the vote may feel liberated from the years of stagnant elite consensus, but the new president will also face an increasingly restless public, profound fiscal challenges, and a tenuous security situation.
This predicament highlights the necessity of continued American assistance, especially in the economic and counterterrorism realms. The country still needs help with insulating itself from Libya’s civil war to the east, Algeria’s political implosion to the west, and the prospect that thousands of Tunisian foreign fighters who joined the Islamic State may be returning home. The government has managed these local threats admirably while avoiding thorny entanglements further afield, such as Iran’s hegemonic ambitions and the Saudi-Qatar rift. Washington has a keen interest in ensuring that Tunisia remains not only a democratic success story, but also a strategic ally in an unpredictable neighborhood.
*Sarah Feuer is an associate fellow with The Washington Institute.

The Americans will see attack on Saudi oil as an attack on them
Mark Stone/SkyNews/September 15/2019
The Americans have always blamed Iran for sustaining the Yemen conflict and in a delicate region, this attack is very dangerous.
One of the two oil facilities struck in the early hours of Saturday morning was recently described by one industry expert as the the Achilles Heel of the Saudi oil industry. Its size and production capacity makes it a critical part of the global oil supply industry.
It's not yet clear how much damage was caused to the two plants or for how long production will be impacted, but the Saudi oil minister confirmed overnight a temporary loss of 5.7 million barrels per day of production because of the attacks. For context, Saudi Arabia pumped 9.8 million barrels per day in August.
The Abqaiq plant was the target of a failed al Qaeda attack in 2006. Since then it has been heavily fortified but is still vulnerable from the air, especially from drones which can bypass air defence systems.
In terms of the impact on the global market and oil supply: well, short term there may be a problem which will become clear when the markets open on Monday morning. But longer term the gap will probably be bridged by increasing production elsewhere and by releasing reserves into the market.The much bigger concern now is the geopolitical fallout and the consequence for regional security.
The US government is in no doubt that the Saudi drone attacks were the work of Iran.
The operation was claimed by the Yemeni Houthi rebel group but they are known to get weapons and technology from their main backer, Iran, who are suspected by other nations to use relatively low-tech 'attack drones' as weapons.
With cheap new technologies, small attack or 'kamikaze' drones are proving to be disproportionately effective when successful.
Two weeks ago, Israel carried out what they said was a preemptive strike on fighters they said were linked to Iran's elite Quds Force who were preparing to launch a drone from Syria (where Iran now has a strong foothold) to attack Israel.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Tehran had launched an "unprecedented attack on the world's oil supply", adding that there was "no evidence that the drones were launched from Yemen".
It's true that, geographically, the two oil refineries are closer to Iran and Iraq (where Iran has a foothold) than to Yemen.
The Americans have always blamed Iran for stoking the flames of the Yemen conflict. But the drone attack represents, in US government eyes, an attack on global energy supply which they'll interpret as an attack on them.
"We call on all nations to publicly and unequivocally condemn Iran's attacks," Mr Pompeo tweeted. "The United States will work with our partners and allies to ensure that energy markets remain well supplied and Iran is held accountable for its aggression."
In such a chaotic and delicate region, an attack of this type is very dangerous.
Donald Trump has been hoping to meet Iranian President Hassan Rouhani in his latest attempt at rapprochement (after limited success with North Korea's Kim Jong Un and no success with Afghanistan's Taliban).
Last week he fired his national security adviser John Bolton who was calling for a much harder line on Iran.
While Mr Bolton sits out of office no doubt saying "I told you so", President Trump must now be pondering the merits of the proposed meeting with the Iranian president.
His own secretary of state seems clear: "Tehran is behind nearly 100 attacks on Saudi Arabia while Rouhani and Zarif pretend to engage in diplomacy..."

Can Banks Survive Negative Rates?
Satyajit Das/Bloomberg/September, 15/2019
The declining economic outlook and increasing political pressure are pushing central banks into more aggressive unconventional monetary policies. Simultaneously, fears are growing that such steps, especially negative interest rates, actually threaten the stability of the financial system. They risk setting off dangerous feedback loops in credit markets and the real economy, where the second and third-order effects are difficult to anticipate or control.
As the experience of banks in Japan and Europe has illustrated, the process follows a predictable pattern.
Low growth, low inflation, output gaps, unemployment and underemployment -- combined with financial instability, especially volatile asset prices -- first prompt central banks to lower rates below the zero bound. The objective is to stimulate borrowing to finance consumption and investment, thus setting off a self-sustaining growth cycle.
Typically, however, negative rates aren’t fully reflected in actual borrowing and lending rates. Regulations require banks to maintain customer deposit bases. The fear of losing customers dissuades those banks from cutting deposit rates too far. In Europe, to date, only large corporations have faced negative rates, which means they’re charged to maintain deposits.
As interest rate margins contract and profits are squeezed, banks raise fees or turn to other revenue measures to boost earnings. This keeps actual borrowing costs relatively high, undercutting the whole point of a negative rate policy.
As the economy continues to sputter, desperate policymakers slash rates more and more deeply. Government bond yields grow increasingly negative and the yield curve flattens. Banks, which hold substantial amounts of government debt, see their profits decline even further.
Weak earnings, in turn, impact banks’ share prices and raise doubts about future dividends, buybacks or capital returns. Weaker institutions run into funding difficulties. Virtually all face higher borrowing costs.
This perversely reduces the amount of credit available, which again dampens consumption and investment. Given that bank payouts make up a significant source of investor income, fears of shrinking dividends add to the gloom. Instead of stimulating the economy, negative rates increase uncertainty about the future. Households, worried about saving for retirement and other goals, spend less.
Slowing growth increases the number of non-performing loans. This further erodes bank profits and reduces lending. It also increases borrowing costs for banks, which results in higher credit margins for borrowers.
Negative rates distort incentives. Facing declining profits, banks grow reluctant to foreclose on distressed borrowers. They extend lifelines to zombie companies, which can service their debt when interest rates are so low even if they have no prospects of repaying the principal. This is an inefficient use of capital which reduces potential growth and sets the stage for long-term economic under-performance.
Struggling banks also naturally have less demand for government bonds, which restricts the ability of countries to finance their activities. In extreme cases, where banks need help to stay afloat, already heavily indebted governments must borrow to recapitalize them or guarantee deposits. Increased debt levels and rising debt-service commitments lock the state into a low or negative interest rate environment.
The ill effects of these trends will initially vary depending on how profitable a country’s banks are, as well as their interest margins and the quality of their loan portfolios. European and Japanese banks facing low profit margins and a growing pile of non-performing loans are especially vulnerable.
And, ultimately, the problems will spread. US banks have begun to lower earnings guidance, blaming lower rates.
There are two primary transmission channels for negative rates between countries. As witnessed in Europe and Japan, banks faced with negative rates export capital aggressively, driving down returns elsewhere. Also, higher relative rates cause currencies to appreciate, forcing nations to match interest rate cuts in a race to maintain competitiveness.
There are few alternatives. Germany is examining whether to prevent banks from charging most retail clients for deposits. Other alternatives include creating special safe assets or savings accounts that guarantee positive rates. Both measures would undermine negative-rate policies.
Another option is for central banks to lend, either directly or through banks such as the European Central Bank’s existing targeted longer-term refinancing operations, at concessional rates. However, there may be limited demand for loans. The efficacy of these programs is, at best, modest.
The unpalatable reality is that the world still hasn’t learned the true lesson of 2008: An economic model that’s dependent on consumption and investment fueled by excessive borrowing is unsustainable. Lower rates, which are ineffective and weaken the financial system and ultimately the real economy, are merely a mechanism to maintain excessive debt levels for a little longer.
An old farmer reputedly advised a lost traveler, “If you want to go there, I wouldn’t start from here.” Policymakers missed the opportunity to make fundamental changes at the onset of the crisis. No wonder they now find themselves adrift.