English LCCC Newsbulletin For Lebanese,
Lebanese Related, Global News & Editorials
For September 08/2020
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/eliasnews19/english.september08.20.htm
News Bulletin Achieves Since
2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations For today
No one after lighting a lamp hides it under
a jar, or puts it under a bed, but puts it on a lampstand, so that those who
enter may see the light. For nothing is hidden that will not be disclosed, nor
is anything secret that will not become known and come to light.
Luke 08/16-21:”‘No one after lighting a lamp hides
it under a jar, or puts it under a bed, but puts it on a lampstand, so that
those who enter may see the light. For nothing is hidden that will not be
disclosed, nor is anything secret that will not become known and come to light.
Then pay attention to how you listen; for to those who have, more will be given;
and from those who do not have, even what they seem to have will be taken away.’
Then his mother and his brothers came to him, but they could not reach him
because of the crowd. And he was told, ‘Your mother and your brothers are
standing outside, wanting to see you. ’But he said to them, ‘My mother and my
brothers are those who hear the word of God and do it.’
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials
published on September 07-08/2020
Your Lebanon Is Holy, Defend Its Sovereignty &
Independence/Elias Bejjani/ٍSeptember 06/2020
Lebanon’s COVID-19 patients exceed 20,000/Najia Houssari/Arab News/September 07,
2020
Armed clash erupts at Beirut’s Tariq Al-Jadida district
One dead, two injured after armed clashes in Beirut's Tariq al-Jadideh
Cyprus sends team to Beirut to stop migrants fleeing crisis-ridden Lebanon
Aoun Asks Jordan King to Allow Passage of Lebanese Produce
Aoun Discusses Forensic Audit Contract with Wazni
Sawwan Questions Witnesses, Dismisses Motions to Release Detainees
Complaint against Ministry of Economy for 'Wasting' Public Funds
Israel Carries Out ‘Maintenance’ Works off Marjayoun
Italian PM to Visit Beirut Tuesday
FPM Blasts Geagea Speech, Accuses Him of 'Obstructing' Aoun
Haniyeh Meets Jumblat, Says Keen on Lebanon SecurityCyprus Worried as 4 Migrant
Boats from Lebanon Reach Island in 48 Hours
Put Lebanon ahead of Iran and stop Arab interference, Geagea tells Hezbollah
Letter to Khamenei and the Iranian Ambassador/Elie Aoun/September 08/2020
Persistence key to Lebanese desire for change/Khaled Abou Zahr/Arab
News/September 07/2020
Hamas seeks radical common ground with pro-Iran Hezbollah/Jemai Guesmi/The Arab
Weekly/September 07/2020
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on September 07-08/2020
EU warns Serbia, Kosovo over Israel embassy move to
Jerusalem
Saudi King tells Trump he is eager for fair solution to Palestinian issue
Jamal Khashoggi killing: eight sentenced and case closed
Saudi Arabia’s King Salman, France’s Macron discuss G20 and coronavirus
Iran plays dangerous game with uranium enrichment
Qatar: Payouts for Hamas no longer guaranteed – report
Iraq to reopen borders for trade, bring back sports and dining
ISIS claims terrorist attack in Tunisia’s Sousse
Morocco talks pave the way for new transitional phase in Libya
Houthi drones target Saudi Arabia amid allegations of Qatari backing
Russian FM Sergei Lavrov visits Syria for first time since 2012
Assad seeks Russian help in face of US sanctions
Sudan floods: Nearly 100 deaths, hundreds homeless amid unprecedented rainfall
Navalny Out of Artificial Coma after 'Novichok Poisoning'
Titles For The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on September 07-08/2020
Turkey expresses 'concern' at Kosovo, Serbia embassy
move to Jerusalem/Alex Winston/Jerusalem Post/September 07/2020
The UN and EU's Silence on Iran's "Shocking Human Rights Violations"/Majid
Rafizadeh/ Gatestone Institute/September 07/2020
Confiscating Books in Sweden/Judith Bergman/ Gatestone Institute/September
07/2020
Terrorism strikes again in Tunisia, amid political crisis/Sghaier El-HidriThe
Arab Weekly/September 07/2020
Eastern Mediterranean conflict further marginalizing NATO/Ramzy Baroud/Arab
News/September 07/2020
The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News & Editorials published on September 06-07/2020
Your Lebanon Is Holy, Defend Its Sovereignty &
Independence
Elias Bejjani/ٍSeptember 06/2020
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/77734/elias-bejjani/
History teaches us that almost none of the world’s greatest nations have
ever been defeated by their rivals. All of them were first weakened and
destroyed from within, before their enemies were able to bring them to their
knees. Even medicine teaches us that when the body loses immunity it becomes
vulnerable to disease. Perhaps the best examples of this can be seen in the fall
of the Ottoman and Roman empires.
These historical and medical realities are a good example of what personifies
the pathetic derailed stances of some of our people in both occupied Lebanon and
in Diaspora. These people are destroying the Lebanese communities from within,
through their shameless collaboration and subservience to the Iranian
occupation.
“Everyone who sins is a slave of sin” (John 8-34), and every Lebanese who
betrays his people to advocate for the Iranian occupation in any way and by any
means is also a sinner too.
These mercenaries and Pharisees, are void of any kind of dignity or national
honor. Unfortunately they come from all walks of life and from all religious
backgrounds and regions.
They have sold themselves to the devil in a bid to increase their riches and
solidify their power. They steal, cheat, embezzle, betray, and change their skin
for personal interests, all at the expense of the Lebanese people and Lebanon.
They ignore Lebanon’s deeply rooted history, distinguishable identity, and they
have no respect for the sacrifices of the many thousands of Lebanese patriots
who offered themselves on the nation’s altar to enable us to be proud,
prosperous and independent.
These antagonists are thirsty for power and blood; They sold their souls and
honor for thirty pieces of silver. They have no respect for Lebanon’s 7000 years
of civilization, culture and its glorious history. They are masters in
defeatism, ignorance, cowardice and faithlessness.
Their wicked camouflage, sweet words and lies are well known to all those who
are witnesses to the truth. They have missed the fact that Lebanon’s people have
never, ever knelt and hung their heads before any tyrant, invader, occupier or
conqueror.
All foreign invaders with their armies were forced to leave Lebanon in defeat,
humiliation and a fractured dignity.
The only memory of these invaders are the primitive carvings on the “Nahr Al-Kaleb”
rocks, near the city of Beirut. These carvings should foretell to the Iranian
occupiers their fate in Lebanon and that they definitely are not going to be any
better than those who like them deluded themselves and falsely believed that
they can destroy Lebanon and subdue its people.
They have all left while Lebanon and its people still stand as proud and
patriotic as they were 7000 years ago!
We remind the Pharisees and Trojans, who apparently suffer of an advanced
selective amnesia that the people of Sidon in the year 350 BC, chose to burn
themselves and their city after their prolonged heroic resistance failed to
safeguard their city against the Persian invader Artechtahta. They preferred to
die with dignity rather than live with humiliation.
The people of Tyre followed this same pattern in 332 BC. They resisted Alexander
the Great’s mighty army for seven months refusing to surrender or kneel.
Alexander, after capturing the city crucified many of the brave Tyrians, while
enslaving others in a bid to revenge his huge loss and demeaning humiliation.
In the same context,The Maronite Patriarch Gabriel Hgola choose to be burned
(1367 AD) in Tripoli northen Lebanese City in front of the Omari mosque in a bid
to save his people from the Mamlouk’s humiliation and torture.
The same sacrifice was taken by the Maronite Patriarch Daniel Al-Amshiti in the
same place in year 1282 for almost the same reasons and for the same cause.
In principle, a man is considered defeated when winning the whole universe, if
he lacks the courage needed to witness the truth and defend God’s word. By the
same token, the brave man who honors human values and dignity, remains
victorious even when imprisoned and chained in shackles.
We remind those who are afraid to takes clear stances in life, change their skin
to suit their opportunistic interests, and lack the courage to witness the
truth, that by doing so, they are committing the worst mortal crime. Imam Ali
says in this regard: “He who accepts acts of others is considered their partner.
He who is involved in evil acts commits two sins, that of performing the act and
that of its acceptance.”
We call on our derailed leaders and politicians in occupied Lebanon to
strengthen your faith, repent for their cowardice behavior and be witness for
the truth.
We call on them not to fall into the trap of individual interests, and not to be
deceived by the golden garments and illustrious schemes of those who have been
assigned to divide our nation and communities, and spread hatred and conflicts
among its members.
These derailed and weak shepherds, “God has blinded their eyes and closed their
minds, so that their eyes would not see, and their minds would not understand,
and they would not turn to me, says God, for me to help them”. (John 12-39).
It is a proven fact that the coward is a blind man in both sight and discretion,
whose conscience has turned numb.
Shame on every Lebanese who keeps a blind eye towards his people who imprisoned
arbitrarily in the Syrian jails and shame on every Lebanese who does not support
human rights and does not advocate for Lebanon’s liberation.
Shame on all these Lebanese who are scared to oppose the occupation of their
country, so as not to be expelled from the heaven of opportunistic interests and
privileges provided by the occupier, or in fear of his reprisal. They have
chosen the track of sin rather than that of righteousness.
These Pharisees are destroying the country which is our holy temple. They should
be dealt with in the same way Jesus did over 2000 years ago:
“It was almost time for the Passover festival, so Jesus went to Jerusalem. There
in the temple he found men selling cattle, sheep and pigeons, and also the money
changers sitting at their tables. So He made a whip from the cords and drove all
the animals out of the temple, both the sheep and the cattle; he overturned the
tables of the money changers and scattered their coins; and he ordered the men
who sold the pigeons: Take them out of here, stop making my Fathers House a
marketplace”. John 03-13
We call on all those who have accepted slavery, are afraid to be witnesses for
the truth, feel defeated inside themselves, have deviated from the righteous
track, camouflaging, cheating and betraying Lebanon; We call on all of them to
wake up and start thoroughly reviewing their dangerous acts! Forgiveness is
always there and Lebanon’s open loving arms will embrace them once they repent.
“If you obey my teaching, you are really my disciples, you know the truth, and
the truth will set you free”. (John 8-13)
Lebanon’s COVID-19 patients exceed 20,000
Najia Houssari/Arab News/September 07, 2020
Lebanon’s total number of COVID-19 patients has exceeded 20,000, with the
country’s health minister on Monday describing the situation as “delicate and in
need of full awareness by all citizens.”
About 12,753 COVID-19 patients were registered during August, while 3,118 cases
were registered during the first week of September. The number of COVID-19
patients whose source of infection was unknown has exceeded 4,000.
Health Minister Hamad Hassan said: “It is the duty of the state to protect
society with its health security, and society must respond to the instructions
of the Ministry of Health and adhere to wearing masks, hygiene, and instructions
issued by the government.”
Many official departments were closed at the weekend in Lebanon for sanitization
operations after coronavirus was detected among employees. Foreign Ministry
staff underwent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests after a COVID-19 case was
found among them. A retirement home in Beirut’s Ain El-Remmaneh area has
recorded infections among the elderly and the staff caring for them. “It is not
easy,” added Hassan. “There are a lot of cases in Lebanon and, unfortunately,
there are some deaths. Hence, I ask that precautionary and preventive measures
be taken seriously, as all the mobilization and emergency laws are not important
if we do not take the measures absolutely seriously.We must be responsible and
not transmit the infection to our nearest members of the family.”The ministry is
equipping government hospitals in areas far from the capital with the
requirements for receiving coronavirus patients, while private hospitals are
working to raise their preparedness in terms of providing intensive care beds
and regular beds for COVID-19 patients. Hassan rejected speculation about the
results of PCR tests issued by laboratories accredited by the ministry, and
urged people not to “question or underestimate” the pandemic.
Municipalities are monitoring infected people and tracking their condition. They
have also resorted to isolating villages until infected people recover to
prevent the transmission of the virus to others. The country’s dire economic
situation has, however, prevailed over the preventive measures taken to combat
the virus. Restaurants, cafes and bars have resumed activity and security
measures are lax in pursuing those breaking COVID-19 procedures by not wearing
face masks. Abdul-Rahman Al-Bizri, an infectious diseases specialist and member
of the Health Ministry’s crisis committee, said that Lebanon’s rate of
infections was relatively high and would continue to rise.
Armed clash erupts at Beirut’s Tariq Al-Jadida district
Arab News/September 07, 2020
Several injuries have been reported after an armed clash erupted in Beirut’s
Tariq Al-Jadida neighborhood on Monday evening. The Lebanese army deployed to
the area and cordoned off Karam Darwish street where the clash took place, the
state National News Agency said.
Machine guns were used in the clash, a correspondent for the agency said. The
injured were rushed to hospital as army attempted to restore security.
One dead, two injured after armed clashes in Beirut's Tariq al-Jadideh
Al Arabiya English/Monday 07 September 2020
The Lebanese army deployed to the streets of Beirut Monday night after a deadly
armed clash broke out in the Tariq al-Jadideh neighborhood. RPGs and machine
guns were used between two groups of men, which led to one death and two
injuries, a statement from the army said.
The army deployed four armored vehicles and several soldiers to the area, in a
video shared on social media. A security source told Lebanese TV channel LBCI
that the gunfight resulted from a dispute between two local families that
initially flared up on Saturday. Earlier in the day, local media reported that
the clashes were between supporters of former Prime Minister Saad Hariri and his
older brother, Bahaa. Al Arabiya English could not independently verify the
reports. However, a statement from Bahaa Hariri's office condemned the incident
and called for an investigation.
Cyprus sends team to Beirut to stop migrants fleeing
crisis-ridden Lebanon
AFP/Monday 07 September 2020
Cyprus said Monday it will send a team to Lebanon to help authorities stop boats
with migrants including from war-torn Syria heading for the Mediterranean island
after several recent attempts. Officials from various services will visit
Lebanon “to deal in the best and most effective way with this phenomenon,”
Interior Minister Nicos Nouris said. Cyprus, just 160 km (100 miles) from
Lebanon’s coast, is so close that the deadly explosion that devastated Beirut on
August 4 was heard on the island. Syria is even nearer. Cyprus is on alert after
at least five boats carrying over 150 migrants were spotted off the coast of the
tourist island by authorities in recent days, and the interior ministry held an
emergency meeting on the situation on Monday. Many of those on board were
Syrians, as well as Lebanese. Some were permitted to disembark, but others were
sent back.
Cypriot authorities chartered a boat to take a group back to Lebanon with an
escort. Lebanon, which hosts a million Syrian refugees, was already reeling from
its worst economic crisis in decades before the cataclysmic explosion in the
port of Beirut. Nearby Nicosia fears becoming a magnet for those fleeing a
political and economic crisis. European Union member Cyprus and Lebanon have a
“send back” agreement to discourage migrants. Cyprus has long complained it is
on the frontline of the Mediterranean migration route, with the EU’s highest
number of first-time asylum seekers per capita of population. “We are no longer
able to receive additional numbers of economic migrants simply because”
reception facilities are full, Nouris said. Nouris last week praised
parliament’s approval to cut the time that migrants can appeal rejected asylum
applications from 75 to 15 days.
Since the migrant “Balkans route” from Turkey to central Europe was blocked in
2015, asylum applications in Cyprus have soared - from 2,253 that year, to
13,648 in 2019 - the interior ministry says. A spokesperson for the UN refugee
agency in Cyprus told AFP: “Any person on a boat who seeks asylum should be
admitted at least on a temporary basis to examine the claim.”
Aoun Asks Jordan King to Allow Passage of Lebanese Produce
Naharnet/September 07/2020
President Michel Aoun on Monday held phone talks with Jordanian King Abdullah II
to inquire about the reasons behind the closure of Jordan’s Nassib border
crossing in the face of Lebanese agricultural goods, the National News Agency
said. “He asked him to intervene to open the crossing to 60 trucks carrying
dozens of tons of fresh Lebanese vegetables and fruits,” NNA added. “King
Abdullah responded positively to President Aoun’s request and gave his
instructions to facilitate the passage of the convoy of trucks,” the agency
said.
Aoun for his part thanked the monarch for his cooperation, stressing “the
firmness of the brotherly Lebanese-Jordanian ties.”The president also extended
gratitude to King Abdullah for the air lift that the kingdom organized in the
wake of the devastating Beirut blast to offer medical and humanitarian
assistance to Lebanon.
Aoun Discusses Forensic Audit Contract with Wazni
Naharnet/September 07/2020
President Michel Aoun on Monday held talks with caretaker Finance Minister Ghazi
Wazni over a contract with a foreign firm aimed at carrying out a forensic audit
of the accounts of the central bank. “The meeting was dedicated to discussing
the issue of the contract with the Alvarez & Marsal firm that will carry out a
forensic audit of the accounts of Banque du Liban, in order to clarify some
ambiguities that occurred after the signing of the contract,” the National News
Agency said. Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Wazni said: “I would like
to assert that forensic audit is one of the main reform topics and will later
entail all of the state’s ministries, administrations, institutions and funds.”
“The contract with Alvarez & Marsal has been signed and has entered into effect,
and if there are any amendments, they will be discussed with the company later,”
Wazni added, noting that he will form a follow-up committee.
Sawwan Questions Witnesses, Dismisses Motions to Release
Detainees
Naharnet/September 07/2020
Lead judicial investigator into the Beirut port blast Judge Fadi Sawwan on
Monday heard the testimonies of four witnesses and will question more witnesses
on Tuesday, the National News Agency said. Sawwan also dismissed motions for the
release of three detainees in the case, remanding them in custody. According to
media reports, 31 suspects have been detained in the probe, most of them customs
and port officials. Sawwan has recently heard the testimony of caretaker PM
Hassan Diab and is reportedly poised to question ministers and former ministers.
The cataclysmic explosion at the port killed at least 191 people and wounded
around 6,500 others, making it Lebanon's deadliest peacetime disaster. Seven
people are still listed as missing while swathes of the capital were devastated
and around 300,000 have lost their homes. The tragedy has been blamed on tons of
explosive ammonium nitrate that were left languishing in an unsecured hangar at
the port for around six years.
SourceNaharnet
Complaint against Ministry of Economy for 'Wasting' Public
Funds
Naharnet/September 07/2020
Director of Media Focal Center, Salem Zahran, filed a complaint on Monday with
the Public Prosecution Office to investigate the “waste of public funds" in the
Ministry of Economy and Trade specifically in subsidized food commodities.
“Millions of dollars were paid from the people's confiscated deposits at Banque
du Liban to merchants under the title “subsidizing food commodities.” Instead of
prices dropping, they rose, as the Minister of Economy admitted. Accordingly, we
registered a complaint with the prosecution to identify and arrest the merchants
who plundered our money and recover it immediately,” said Zahran. Outgoing
Economy Minister Raoul Nehme had in July introduced subsidies to some 300 basic
commodities in light of a severe devaluation of the Lebanese pound to the dollar
that increased the prices of goods uncontrollably.
“It aims to secure the majority of essential goods for citizens at a low price,
and thus increase their purchasing power,” he had said. But his move only pushed
a further increase in prices, although he vowed “we will monitor the prices and
pursue traders or distributors in the event of tampering.”
In a video recording filming Zahran from the Justice Palace, he said all
merchants responsible for the spike in prices of commodities must be jailed
under Article 685 of the Penal Code. Lebanon is reeling under an unprecedented
economic crisis, coupled with the coronavirus outbreak and latest, a colossal
Beirut port explosion that flattened large parts of the capital killing and
wounding many. The currency has crashed in value to the dollar, and banks locked
down dollar accounts to prevent capital flight. Prices have skyrocketed, and
imports are limited in a country that imports nearly everything. Unable to
access their money, even the most able are struggling to secure materials for
repairs.
Israel Carries Out ‘Maintenance’ Works off Marjayoun
Naharnet/September 07/2020
Israeli troops carried out maintenance work using a bobcat bulldozer in the
occupied territories off Lebanon’s Marjayoun plains, the National News Agency
reported on Monday. Israeli military also carried out excavation works behind
the observation station off al-Maysat locality in the outskirts of the town of
el-Wazzani, added the agency. NNA also said an Israeli spy plane hovered over
the southern town of Marjayoun from Sunday through Monday. Israel and Lebanon
are still technically at war, and the UNIFIL peacekeeping force in south Lebanon
is tasked with monitoring the ceasefire.
Italian PM to Visit Beirut Tuesday
Naharnet/September 07/2020
Italian PM Giuseppe Conte is expected to kick off a two-day visit to Beirut on
Tuesday for talks with senior Lebanese officials, and to inspect the UNIFIL’s
Italian battalion and the blast site in Beirut’s port, media reports said on
Monday.
Conte is expected to kick start his meetings with President Michel Aoun, and a
number of officials. He will inspect the blast site in Beirut where an Italian
ship docked earlier transporting advanced aid to Beirut’s firefighters, and
medical and food supplies. After the devastating August 4 explosion, the Italian
government, in addition to several other states, provided relief support and
humanitarian aid for Lebanon. Conte’s visit to Lebanon comes less than two weeks
after the visit of the Italian Minister of Defense, Lorenzo Guerrini, who met
with senior officials and supervised the urgent Italian support programs for the
Lebanese people, after the Beirut port bombing.
FPM Blasts Geagea Speech, Accuses Him of 'Obstructing' Aoun
Naharnet/September 07/2020
The Free Patriotic Movement on Monday responded fiercely to criticism voiced a
day earlier by Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea. “Anytime a positive course
begins to address one of Lebanon’s crises, LF leader Samir Geagea surprises the
Lebanese with a negative rhetoric that poisons the atmosphere of hope,” the FPM
said in a statement. “It is regrettable that he always exploits the martyrs
anniversary. He has forgotten the martyrs and some of the (Lebanese)
resistance’s martyrs fell at his hands and the names are known. His insolence
has reached the level of mentioning martyrs who were the victims of his
treachery,” the FPM added. “This man has never been constructive and yesterday,
like every time, he did not voice a single positive idea nor did he present a
single solution -- not in economy, nor in finance nor as to the monetary
situation. He took extortion money from our pockets to build a castle and buy
properties, he killed the people and assassinated their leaders and his militias
planted toxic waste in our mountains years ago,” the Free Patriotic Movement
charged. Accusing Geagea of “refusing any reconciliation between the Lebanese,”
the Movement said the LF leader is dismayed by the understanding between
Hizbullah and the FPM because “it brought the Lebanese closer to each other.”“He
regrets the reconciliation between Christians because it did not fulfill his
desire to seize power,” the FPM added, referring to the Maarab Agreement between
the FPM and the LF. Referring to the post-explosion relief efforts in Lebanon,
the Movement said “at a time the world has rushed to help Lebanon, Samir Geagea
is insisting on reopening old wounds, stirring sentiments and continuing his
hateful approach.”“He is also continuing his efforts to obstruct President
Michel Aoun and prevent him from making achievements as a president,” the FPM
charged. It also accused Geagea of having “a lust for becoming president.”On
Sunday, Geagea said “the Mar Mikhail understanding was a deal between two
parties to secure their narrow partisan interests at the expense of Lebanon as a
country and at the expense of the state, sovereignty and the Lebanese people.”He
added that “instead of bringing Hizbullah under the wing of the state,” the Mar
Mikhail agreement “brought the state under the wing of Hizbullah, which
destroyed every chance for the rise of a real state in Lebanon.”
Haniyeh Meets Jumblat, Says Keen on Lebanon Security
Naharnet/September 07/2020
Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh held talks Monday in Clemenceau with Progressive
Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblat. “We offered our condolences over the port
martyrs and wished recovery for the wounded and Lebanon is capable of returning
to stability and unity,” said Haniyeh after the meeting.
“We wish success for the talks aimed at forming a government and we hope Lebanon
will become more stable,” he added. “We are keen on Lebanon’s security, our
people in it are part of the Palestinian people and our relation with Lebanon is
clear and strong with all its components,” Haniyeh went on to say.
He added that Hamas does not interfere in Lebanon’s internal affairs and will
not do anything that would “embarrass” the country. “We reject normalization
with the Israeli occupation,” Haniyeh said. Jumblat for his part warned that
Lebanon could “drown in further economic deterioration” and that “its political
and economic fate” will be at stake if it does not form a new government as soon
as possible. “My advice to the brother Ismail Haniyeh is that the unity of the
Palestinian stance is the most important thing no matter what the pressures
might be, and I’m ready, with the capabilities I possess, to help and facilitate
the essential right for Palestinian refugees to live in dignity, seeing as
racial discrimination is unfair against them,” the PSP leader added.
Cyprus Worried as 4 Migrant Boats from Lebanon Reach Island
in 48 Hours
Associated Press/Naharnet/September 07/2020
Cypriot authorities are alarmed over the arrival of four boats carrying Syrian
and Lebanese migrants in waters off the east Mediterranean island nation's
coastline within a 48-hour span. Cyprus police said Sunday that four vessels
appeared off Cyprus' eastern and southern coast over the last two days carrying
a total 123 migrants and about half of them have been permitted to disembark.
Some 21 migrants remain aboard a boat that is adrift off Cyprus' southeastern
tip as a result of a faulty engine. Police said three women and nine children
had earlier been taken off the boat and transferred to a Cypriot hospital as a
precaution. Some 33 migrants aboard a boat that police intercepted 14 miles
(22.5 kilometers) off the southern coast Saturday afternoon have boarded another
vessel that Cypriot authorities have chartered to be taken back to Lebanon.
European Union member Cyprus and Lebanon have an agreement to curb the arrival
of boats loaded with migrants from reaching the island. On Friday, police
encountered a small craft sailing off the coastal town of Larnaca with five
migrants aboard. The boat continued to sail on in an undetermined direction.
Meanwhile, 51 migrants were to a reception center after their boat from Lebanon
reached a rocky beach Saturday along the island's eastern coastline that's
inside a U.N. controlled buffer zone separating ethnically split island's
breakaway Turkish Cypriot north from the internationally recognized Greek
Cypriot south. U.N. peacekeepers transferred the 35 men, five women and 11
children to Cypriot custody. A court on Sunday ordered that four men remain in
custody over suspicion they were the boat's crew. Police said another 20 Syrian
migrants — 19 men, a woman and a child — were taken to a reception center after
being picked up Sunday morning near the buffer zone 10 miles (16 kilometers)
west of the capital Nicosia. Cyprus' Interior Minister Nicos Nouris told private
news channel Alpha that an urgent meeting would be convened Monday to assess the
unfolding situation. He said Cyprus' migrant reception center is reaching its
limits amid concerns over sticking to health protocols to prevent the spread of
COVID-19. On Friday, Nouris hailed lawmakers' approval of a constitutional
amendment shortening the amount of time migrants have to appeal rejected asylum
applications from 75 to 15 days. He said the measure is a key first step in
helping to clear the huge backlog of asylum cases.
Put Lebanon ahead of Iran and stop Arab interference,
Geagea tells Hezbollah
Joseph Haboush and Omar Elkatouri, Al Arabiya English/Monday 07
September 2020
Iran-backed Hezbollah must hand over the decision over war and peace to the
state, a senior Lebanese politician said Sunday, adding that it must stop
unjustified interventions in Arab countries. “It is time to take the initiative
in making a difficult but correct decision to put yourself at the service of
Lebanon and its people ... instead of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Lebanese
Forces (LF) leader Samir Geagea said. Speaking during a memorial ceremony
commemorating fighters of the Christian militia-turned-political party, Geagea
said Hezbollah needed to follow the suit of all other Lebanese political parties
who gave up their weapons and pledged allegiance to the state. Hezbollah is the
only side in Lebanon, other than Palestinian factions, to keep their weapons
following the 1975-90 Civil War. Initially supported to fend off Israeli
aggressions and invasions, Hezbollah’s weapons have been turned against Lebanese
citizens on more than one occasion. The group, designated as a terrorist
organization by the United States and several European and Arab states,
continues to fight alongside Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s forces in the
neighboring war. It is also providing fighters and intelligence support in Iraq
and Yemen against Arab states and interests, including Saudi Arabia. “It is time
to return to Lebanon … Hezbollah must stop its unjustified foreign intervention
in more than one Arab country and stop playing the leading role of the Iranian
project in the Arab region,” Geagea said.
Hassan Nasrallah, the secretary-general, previously pledged allegiance to
Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and admitted to receiving funding and
weapons from Tehran. This has dealt a significant blow to Lebanon’s ties with
the Gulf and its traditional allies in the international community.
“Are you waiting for complete starvation?” Geagea asked, referring to
Hezbollah’s continued intervention in other countries’ affairs. “Hezbollah must
hand off the decision of war and peace to the country,” he said.
Letter to Khamenei and the Iranian Ambassador
Elie Aoun/September 08/2020
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/90210/elie-aoun-letter-to-khamenei-and-the-iranian-ambassador-%d8%a7%d9%8a%d9%84%d9%8a-%d8%b9%d9%88%d9%86-%d8%b1%d8%b3%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a9-%d8%a5%d9%84%d9%89-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ae%d8%a7%d9%85%d9%86%d8%a6%d9%8a/
A meeting took place at the Iranian Embassy in Beirut between Hizballah’s Hassan
Nasrallah and Palestinian Hamas leader Ismael Haniyeh. It is obvious that both
parties – acting with Iran’s support – are renewing their intent to jointly use
Lebanon as a launching ground for attacks against Israel.
Firstly, the role of an embassy is to be a point of contact between two
countries. It has no authority to hold meetings of parties (foreign and
domestic) which intend to use the country as a base for military activities –
and under the guidance of the embassy’s government. The meeting between
Nassrallah and Haniyeh, and their objectives, constitute a trespass on Lebanese
sovereignty and a violation of an embassy’s legitimate responsibility and
duties.
As free Lebanese, we say to your Iranian regime: you have to respect our
sovereignty. If you cannot do so, we do not only ask, but we demand from you to
close your embassy in Beirut and take your ambassador back to Tehran. You are
not welcomed in our country.
If Iran has a war with Israel, go wage it on your own – and not through proxies
at Lebanon’s expense. And if your missiles are sufficient to destroy Israel, as
you claim, why would you need missiles on Lebanese soil? Use your own from your
own land.
Secondly, your declared animosity with Israel is dishonest. As you know, it was
the CIA that helped Khomeini attain power in Iran. It was Israel that played a
role in sending weapons to the Iranian regime in its war against Iraq, in what
was called the Iran-Contra Affair. In other words, your regime received weapons
from Israel to kill other Muslims. If Israel is an enemy, as you claim, what
makes your regime deal with an enemy of Islam to kill Muslims, and to
destabilize Lebanon who has done nothing wrong against Iran or Palestine?
If you consider yourselves to have ethical standards, then let us know what
these standards are. As individuals, we do not see a logic in a so-called
“Islamic Republic” killing Muslims and undermining nations where Muslims live –
if that is honestly what you care about. Based on the results of your actions,
you are con-artists.
Thirdly, the 1949 Lebanese-Israeli General Armistice Agreement prohibits the use
of military force “in the settlement of the Palestine question.” Although that
agreement has been violated on various occasions, it is still a commitment that
was made by the Lebanese and Israeli governments. Those who live on Lebanese
soil (as well as the Israeli side) must abide by it. That includes all
Iranian-controlled proxies in the country.
Those who live on Lebanese territory, and cannot respect its laws, are free to
relocate to another country. Lebanon has done no harm to Palestine, and the
Palestinians must cease all causes of harm to Lebanon. Our hospitality is not an
authorization for you to undermine the security of our country.
Fourthly, there are many signed agreements between Israel and the Palestinian
authorities. If they have no intention to observe these agreements, then let
them void these agreements prior to threatening one another with military
actions. It is not the trait of real men to enter into an agreement to do one
thing and then act in an opposite manner.
Finally, if you, Khamenei, consider yourself to be a man of dignity, then be so
and respect the country that has done nothing wrong to you. Stop using Lebanese
traitors to advance your agenda. Advance whatever agenda you want, at your own
expense, and leave Lebanon alone.
Persistence key to Lebanese desire for change
Khaled Abou Zahr/Arab News/September 07/2020
French President Emmanuel Macron’s follow-up visit to Lebanon last week created
a backlash from those who, like me, oppose Hezbollah and the Iranian influence
in the region. The declarations made by French diplomatic teams giving
legitimacy to this group were a mistake and, for some, a betrayal. The reason is
simple: We see this group in its current form as a danger to the future of
Lebanon; something that contributes to the erosion of the sovereignty of the
country. Likewise, Iran plays a nefarious and expansionist role throughout the
Middle East.Like me, many French people of Lebanese origin hope and dream of a
free Lebanon that is close to France and prospers despite the situation in the
Middle East. We hope that President Macron understands this. Macron’s visit to
Lebanon was followed by a visit to Iraq, and we owed it to him to listen to his
message there. Indeed, during his visit to Iraq, Macron clearly opposed any
interference in the country’s affairs, insisting on France’s support for the
sovereignty of the Iraqi state. Iraq, with its new Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kadhimi,
may have the capacity to rebalance its relations with its Iranian neighbor, even
though the task will be difficult. French and American efforts seem to be aimed
in this direction. The same principle applies in Lebanon, but perhaps no
Lebanese person or political group is able to bring about this change today.
On the other hand, we must also listen to Macron’s message about the
Mediterranean because it is a message of prosperity and stability. Speaking of
the principle of “Pax Mediterranea,” he clearly opposes Turkish imperialist
action and its methods of intimidation, which all Mediterranean countries
refuse. This is again a more complete vision to which Lebanon subscribes and
which can be positive for this country. Some Sunni Lebanese groups seem to be
calling on Turkey to intervene to oppose Hezbollah, but this would be a mistake
that could plunge the country into even more conflict.
Macron’s mission is much more difficult in Lebanon because the country is
complicated and symbolic of an overall vision for the wider region of Europe,
the Mediterranean and the Middle East. For Lebanon, the chaos is already there
and the risks are well known. Macron can only help Lebanon if the Lebanese help
him do it — and help themselves first.
It should also be noted that no one has come to try and help Lebanon except
Macron. He had a clear message to the ruling political class about the
sovereignty of the country. There are, in fact, two realities in the country and
all the signs currently seem to be in favor of the regime that is in place,
which is that of Hezbollah. For these reasons and despite the opposition to the
transformation of Lebanon into either an Iranian or an Ottoman state, it is
important to give the French president time before judging his actions. The
Lebanese have little to lose. It is also important for the Lebanese political
forces attached to sovereignty to remain active and to show that they have real
weight on the local political scene. Any change or rebalancing can only be done
with persistence and consistency, and without alienating international support.
Macron can only help Lebanon if the Lebanese help him do it — and help
themselves first.
Macron’s efforts might perhaps be successful in securing an Iranian deal with a
transition for Hezbollah’s political role. The odds are slim, but inactivity on
the local scene while opposing the actions of the French president is helping to
push the country in the wrong direction. What are the political actions that can
accompany Macron’s efforts and allow for change in Lebanon to begin is the
question that needs to be asked. One thing is certain: We cannot wait for the
initiatives to succeed without having action on the ground to support them.
It is also important to note that, for now, the US appears to support France’s
actions in Lebanon and this will hold true after the presidential election in
November. However, disagreements still seem to exist on the policies vis-a-vis
Iran and Turkey. It is, therefore, also necessary to align Lebanese action in
the direction of these files by giving the necessary advice. It is important to
make people understand that, in a region like the Middle East, a policy of
appeasement is not always best and that some threats are not perceived as such
or are considered weak.
A greater understanding between the US and France could have an incredibly
positive role in the region and help achieve the goals Macron has set for
himself. As far as Lebanon is concerned, neither the state nor any political
force can disarm Hezbollah or reduce its control over key points of the state.
The only way to get there is either a deal with Iran or a war. However, if
nothing is feasible on armaments at this time, the accompaniment of Macron’s
efforts may make it possible to reduce Hezbollah’s control over the state,
mainly with regard to key security-related positions that undermine the state’s
legitimacy.
The Lebanese should, therefore, not remain as spectators to the international
efforts of the French president because it is up to them to create the change.
We must work on acceptable solutions and not underestimate the strength of the
people who want change. Every crisis is also an opportunity. It is not about
shouting a slogan but about building a new Lebanon. As the saying goes, the drop
of water breaks the stone not by force, but by falling often. Persistence will
make the difference.
It is also important to succeed in changing Iran’s actions so that this country
deals with the Lebanese state and not a single group, even though it has a
religion in common with this group. The Lebanese can perhaps learn from the Cold
War history of Finland, which managed to chart an independent foreign policy
course by being close to the US and European countries and benefiting from their
support, while also remaining neutral and communicating with the Soviet Union.
*Khaled Abou Zahr is the CEO of Eurabia, a media and tech company. He is also
the editor of Al-Watan Al-Arabi.
Hamas seeks radical common ground with pro-Iran Hezbollah
Jemai Guesmi/The Arab Weekly/September 07/2020
BEIRUT- During a visit to Lebanon’s port city of Sidon, Hamas leader Ismail
Haniyeh sought radical common ground with the pro-Iran Hezbollah movement at a
time of major challenges for both movements.
Haniyeh’s stop came as part of a week-long visit to Lebanon for rare talks
between Palestinian factions about how to overcome their feuds and weather
transformations in the region in view of recent Arab normalisation moves with
Israel.
Haniyeh’s trip to Lebanon came after a visit to Turkey during which he met with
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, triggering Israeli denunciation of the
relationship.
Meeting with Islamist allies in Turkey and Lebanon, Hamas’s leader seemed in
search of Turkish and Iranian guardianship in the face of international
hostility.
His recourse to anti-Israeli threats in Lebanon betrayed Haniyeh’s temptation to
use rhetorical escalation to gain the support of newly-sought patrons in Iran
and Turkey. After meeting earlier in the week with Lebanese Parliament Speaker
Nabih Berri and representatives of other Palestinian groups, Haniyeh arrived in
the Ain al-Helweh refugee camp near Sidon on Sunday to crowds of cheering
supporters. There he met with Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah to discuss
regional developments and “dangers to the Palestinian cause,” including “Arab
plans for normalisation” with Israel, Hezbollah-run Al Manar TV reported.
Addressing reports of Arab normalisation moves with Israel, Haniyeh said the
trend “does not represent the people, neither their conscience, nor their
history nor their heritage,” according to a Hamas statement.
Earlier in the week he urged for Palestinian factions to come together to
“restore our national unity, put an end to division and establish a unified
Palestinian position… to confront projects directed against our people.”
For years, divergences in ideology and strategy have pit the Islamist Hamas
movement, which controls the Gaza Strip, against the centrist Fatah party, which
leads the West-Bank based Palestinian Authority. The rift between the two
Palestinian factions has complicated their governance of the occupied
territories and undermined efforts to form a strong national response to Israel.
Haniyeh spoke virtually from Beirut with Palestinain Authority President Mahmoud
Abbas in their first face-to-face meeting in years, triggering speculation that
the two rival parties could finally put their differences behind them and forge
a moderate, unified position.
However, Haniyeh reverted back to his familiar violent rhetoric when meeting
with Hezbollah on Sunday, threatening to strike at Tel Aviv, Israel’s cultural
and commercial hub located some 70 km away.
“Our missiles had a range of several kilometers (miles) from the border with
Gaza,” Haniyeh said. “Today the resistance in Gaza has missiles that can hit Tel
Aviv and beyond Tel Aviv.” Hamas, designated by the US and other Western
countries as a terror group, has hit Tel Aviv with rare rocket fire in previous
rounds of fighting, attacks that are considered a serious escalation by Israel
and often met with a harsh response. Hamas-linked groups also recently set
Israeli farmland ablaze with incendiary balloons, which was also viewed as a
severe escalation. While pressing for Arab countries to more forcefully back
Palestinian “resistance” efforts, Haniyeh has frequently antagonised his Arab
neighbours by conveying enthusiastic support for Iran.
In May this year, Haniyeh specifically praised the Islamic Republic for
“supporting and funding the resistance financially, militarily, and
technically.” He has also expressed support for Iran’s regional agenda, saying
that Palestinian militant groups will follow Tehran’s path in confronting
Zionism and “American influence.”
In January, Haniyeh infuriated Egyptian and Saudi leaders by attending the
funeral of slain Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani, who was killed in
a US airstrike as he landed in Bagdhad that month. The Hamas leader lavished
praise on Soleimani during the ceremony, crediting him with bringing the
Palestinian resistance effort “power and steadfastness” and even referring to
him as the “martyr of Jerusalem.” Arab countries’ deep antipathy to Iran, which
stands accused of destabilising the region through a network of proxy militias
and terror groups, have led them to pursue warmer ties with Israel in recent
years. While only the UAE has so far opted to formalise ties with the Jewish
state, Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) members Oman and Bahrain have expressed a
willingness to develop closer ties, while Saudi Arabia has opened its airspace
to some Israeli flights.
The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on September 07-08/2020
EU warns Serbia, Kosovo over Israel embassy
move to Jerusalem
Agencies/September 07/2020
The European Union warned Serbia and Kosovo on Monday that they
could undermine their EU membership hopes by moving their Israeli embassies to
Jerusalem, as US President Donald Trump’s surprise announcement about the change
left officials in Belgrade and Pristina scrambling to limit the political
fallout. In an unexpected move last week, Trump said that Serbia and Kosovo had
agreed to normalize economic ties as part of US-brokered talks that include
Belgrade moving its embassy to Jerusalem, and mutual recognition between Israel
and Kosovo.
It surprised the Europeans, who are leading complex talks between Serbia and its
former territory of Kosovo on improving their long-strained relations, while
Serbian officials appeared to be watering down their commitment to Trump, and
Kosovo sought to allay concerns among Muslim countries.
The EU voiced “serious concern and regret” over both countries’ commitment to
move their embassies to Jerusalem, saying the bloc is still committed to the
“two state solution” in which Jerusalem will be the capital of both Israel and a
future Palestinian state, and its own diplomatic mission is in Tel Aviv.
The 27-nation EU’s long-held policy is that Jerusalem’s status should be worked
out between Israel and the Palestinians as part of broader peace negotiations,
and that Serbia — as a candidate to join the bloc — should respect that.
“There is no EU member state with an embassy in Jerusalem,” European Commission
spokesman Peter Stano said. “Any diplomatic steps that could call into question
the EU’s common position on Jerusalem are a matter of serious concern and
regret.”
The bloc expects prospective members like Serbia to align with its foreign
policy positions.“In this context any diplomatic steps that could call into
question the EU’s common position on Jerusalem are a matter of serious concern
and regret,” EU foreign affairs spokesman Peter Stano told reporters in
Brussels.
Praising what he said was “a major breakthrough” and “a truly historic
commitment,” Trump — deep into campaigning ahead of November’s presidential
election — announced Friday that “Serbia and Kosovo have each committed to
economic normalization.”
US President Donald Trump hosts a signing ceremony with Serbia’s President
Aleksandar Vucic and Kosovo’s Prime Minister Avdullah Hoti at the White House in
Washington, US, Sept. 4, 2020. (Reuters)
Trump also said that Serbia has committed to open a commercial office in
Jerusalem this month and move its embassy there in July. The Trump
administration recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital in late 2017, breaking
with longstanding diplomatic practice, and moved the US embassy there in May
2018.
Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu thanked Serbia’s president and
confirmed that Israel and Kosovo, a predominantly Muslim country, will establish
diplomatic relations. He said Pristina also will open its embassy in Jerusalem.
Stano, speaking as Serbian President Aleksander Vucic and Kosovo Prime Minster
Avdullah Hoti held a new round of talks in Brussels on normalizing their
relations, said the EU was told in advance only about the economic aspects of
the White House event, not about movements in Jerusalem.
In Belgrade, Serbian officials appeared to be stepping back from the embassy
pledge, with Foreign Minister Ivica Dacic saying the final decision will still
have to be discussed by the government and will depend on “a number of factors”
including future development of ties with Israel.
Asked about the move following the meeting in Brussels, Vucic said that “Serbia
has not opened that chapter yet, but we are doing our best to align with EU
declarations, EU resolutions as much as it is possible. But he underlined that
Serbia ”will take care of our own interests for the benefit and for the sake of
our people.”Kosovo’s President Hashim Thaci, meanwhile, was on the phone with
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, trying to assuage fears about the
decision to recognize Israel expressed by Turkey and the Arab League group of
countries.
“Such a recognition will not violate under any circumstances the strategic,
friendly and fraternal partnership with Turkey,” Thaci said after the
conversation.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed the deal that establishes
diplomatic relations with Kosovo, and would have both Kosovo and Serbia open
embassies in Jerusalem. They would join the US and Guatemala as the only
countries with embassies in the contested city, whose eastern sector is claimed
by the Palestinians as the capital of a future state. “We will continue efforts
so that additional European countries will transfer their embassies to
Jerusalem,” Netanyahu said Friday. He noted that Kosovo becomes the first
Muslim-majority country to open an embassy in Jerusalem.
On Monday, Sharren Haskel, a lawmaker in Netanyahu’s Likud party and chairwoman
of the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs subcommittee, said that the “EU efforts to
educate Serbia and Kosovo are shocking.” She called on “other countries to
strengthen Kosovo and Serbia, to join and move their missions to Jerusalem, the
eternal capital of the Jewish people.”
Kosovo unilaterally declared independence from Serbia in 2008, around a decade
after Belgrade sent troops into its former territory to crush an uprising by
ethnic Albanian separatists. Serbia refuses to recognize Kosovo’s statehood, and
tensions have simmered ever since.
The EU-facilitated negotiations, which the Europeans say is the only way to
address their membership hopes, started in March 2011 and have produced more
than a dozen agreements, but most of them have not been observed.
The talks stalled in November 2018 and only resumed in July after a parallel US
negotiating effort began.
But as they met again on Monday, Vucic and Hoti recommitted to the European
track, saying “that they attach the highest priority to EU integration and to
continuing the work on the EU-facilitated Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue.”
In what was described as a “joint statement” issued by the office of EU foreign
policy chief Josep Borrell, Vucic and Hoti also said they “committed to
redoubling their efforts to ensure further EU alignment in accordance with their
respective obligations.”They appeared to play down Friday’s announcement, by
saying that “the recently agreed documents in Washington, D.C., building on
previous Dialogue-related commitments undertaken by the two parties, could
provide a useful contribution to reaching a comprehensive, legally binding
agreement on normalization of relations.”
In one of Europe’s most intractable disputes, Serbia has refused to recognize
Kosovo’s declaration of independence since the province broke away in a 1998-99
war that was ended only by a NATO bombing campaign against Serb troops.
Both Kosovo and Serbia are facing mounting pressure from the West to resolve the
impasse, seen as crucial to either side joining the EU. More than 13,000 people
died in the war, mostly Kosovo Albanians, who form a majority in the former
province.
One key question is diplomatic recognition for Kosovo — five of the EU’s 27
countries do not acknowledge its independence. The EU’s special representative
for the dialogue, Miroslav Lajcak, hailed “full progress” in Monday’s talks on
economic cooperation and the issue of people left missing or displaced by the
conflict. “Our negotiations today were intense as usual and not always easy, but
what prevailed was the will of both sides to advance the discussions despite the
painful and complex issues at hand,” Lajcak said.
Hoti also said advances had been made in Monday’s talks. “I am pleased to say
that progress has been made in drafting the final agreement between the two
countries for the full normalization of relations,” he told reporters.
Talks will continue next week at expert level, Lajcak said, with the two leaders
due to meet again later in September. The two sides have been in EU-led talks
for a decade but little progress has been made. A raft of agreements in 2013
have yet to be fully implemented and a previous round of negotiations broke down
in 2018 after a series of diplomatic tit-for-tats. Vucic and Hoti resumed
face-to-face talks in Brussels in July but the effort got off to a frosty start,
with the Serbian leader accusing Pristina of trying to blackmail Belgrade.
Monday’s talks also broached the question of the ethnic Serb minority in Kosovo
and their future status in the country — one of the thorniest disputes between
the two sides.
Washington touted the agreements signed by Vucic and Hoti at the White House on
Friday as a major breakthrough, but on Monday the two leaders issued a more
cautious joint statement before they met.
(With AP and AFP)
Saudi King tells Trump he is eager for fair solution
to Palestinian issue
Reuters/Jerusalem Post/September 07/2020
Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Islam and site of its holiest shrines, does not
recognize Israel.
Saudi Arabia's King Salman told US President Donald Trump in a phone call on
Sunday that the kingdom was eager to achieve a fair and permanent solution to
the Palestinian issue, which he said was the main starting point of the
kingdom's proposed Arab Peace Initiative, the state news agency reported.
The leaders spoke by phone following a historic US brokered accord last month
under which the United Arab Emirates agreed to become the third Arab state to
normalize ties with Israel after Egypt and Jordan. King Salman told Trump he
appreciated US efforts to support peace and that Saudi Arabia wanted to see a
fair and permanent solution to the Palestinian issue based on the Arab Peace
Initiative proposed by the kingdom in 2002.
Under the proposal, Arab nations have offered Israel normalized ties in return
for a statehood deal with the Palestinians and full Israeli withdrawal from
territory captured in the 1967 Middle East war.
Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Islam and site of its holiest shrines, does not
recognize Israel.
However, this month the kingdom said it would allow flights between UAE and
Israel, including by Israeli airliners, to use its airspace.
White House adviser and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner has said he hopes another
Arab country normalizes ties with within months.No other Arab state has said so
far it is considering following the UAE.
King Salman's son, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, and Kushner discussed the
need for the Palestinians and the Israelis to resume negotiations and reach a
lasting peace after Kushner visited the UAE last month.
The UAE-Israel deal was met by overwhelming Palestinian opposition.
Jamal Khashoggi killing: eight sentenced and case
closed
The National/September 07/2020
Five people sentenced to 20 years in prison for involvement
Saudi Arabia’s Public Prosecution sentenced eight people for their roles in the
murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul. Five
people were sentenced to 20 years in prison for their involvement in the
killing, the Public Prosecution said. Three received 10-year terms and two of
those will serve another seven years each. The Public Prosecution said the
criminal case had been closed, the Saudi state news agency Spa reported.
Khashoggi was killed while visiting the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in October
2018. His body was reportedly dismembered and removed from the building but his
remains have not been found. The Saudi government said the journalist was killed
in a "rogue operation" and the following year prosecutors put 11 unidentified
people on trial. Khashoggi was living in the US and writing for The Washington
Post newspaper. Salah Khashoggi, his son, in May said that he would not accept
the exploitation of his father’s case by his country’s “opponents and its
enemies". “I repeat what I have said in the past: I have absolute confidence in
the kingdom’s judiciary, in its ability to retrieve justice from the
perpetrators of this heinous crime," Salah said."And I will be as Jamal
Khashoggi was, loyal to God, then to my country and its leadership."
Saudi Arabia’s King Salman, France’s Macron discuss G20 and
coronavirus
Arab News/September 07/2020
Saudi Arabia’s King Salman discussed the G20 Summit and the coronavirus pandemic
with French President Emmanuel Macron on Monday. During the phone call, they
reviewed the efforts of the G20 to support health services and economies in
combatting the spread and impact of COVID-19, Saudi state news agency SPA
reported. King Salman and Macron also reviewed bilateral relations between their
two countries and discussed the latest developments in the region. Macron also
praised the Kingdom’s efforts during its presidency.Saudi Arabia assumed the G20
presidency in December and is set to host the 2020 summit on Nov. 21-22.
Iran plays dangerous game with uranium enrichment
The National/September 07/2020
Limiting the proliferation of uranium is fundamental to minimise the threat of
global nuclear war
On Friday, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), a UN body, reported
that Iran’s stock of enriched uranium has reached 2,105 kilograms. This is a
figure 10 times higher than what it agreed to under a 2015 agreement – the Joint
Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The US and Iran both withdrew from the
agreement, in 2018 and 2020, respectively. The IAEA warned that Iran is also
exceeding the permitted level of enrichment, which determines whether uranium is
suitable for use in civilian nuclear energy or, at if it is high enough, as a
critical component of a nuclear bomb. Limiting the proliferation of uranium and
the capability to enrich it to weapons grade is fundamental to minimising the
threat of global nuclear war. It is also part of the raison d’etre of the IAEA.
In matters of non-proliferation, however, Iran has long been opaque. For months,
authorities in Tehran declined to allow access for the IAEA, which acts as the
world's nuclear watchdog, to two Iranian nuclear centres for inspections. Even
without access to these facilities, the agency had already surmised that Iran
had committed a string of JCPOA violations. Late last month, in an effort to
boost its diplomatic standing, Iran relented. Inspectors attended to the first
of the two facilities last week. Friday’s report was released after that visit.
While American officials have repeatedly invited Iran to renegotiate the terms
of the JCPOA, Tehran has refused to participate in any talks, demanding the US
lifts sanctions it has imposed. In response to these sanctions and other
elements of the US’s maximum-pressure campaign, Iran has systematically reduced
its compliance with the JCPOA. Since it announced its intention to scale up its
enrichment dramatically back in January, Iran has been openly in defiance of its
international obligations.
On October 18, a UN conventional arms embargo on Iran is set to expire, and the
US has pursued, complicated procedural avenues within the Security Council to
activate a “snapback”, in which the embargo would be renewed and the JCPOA
would, in effect, be terminated. The UK and France – normally US allies – have
pushed back at the American efforts in a bid to keep the JCPOA alive. The key
point of contention within the Security Council over the last month has been
whether or not the US – now that it has exited the agreement – still has any
right to trigger a snapback. The US and Iran have each submitted opposing legal
arguments on this and other questions, and the outcome remains uncertain. In
matters of non-proliferation, however, Iran has long been opaque. Regardless of
whether or not the snapback is imposed, however, the accelerated transformation
of Iran’s “reduced compliance” into outright noncompliance ought to be alarming.
For one thing, it provides Iran greater influence in any future negotiation – a
fact that, to some extent, can motivate Tehran's strategy. For another, it
diminishes the force of future agreements by showing Iran’s government that it
can engage in noncompliance without serious consequences. Iran has withstood US
sanctions, which have taken a toll on its economy, for years by largely relying
on its regional proxies. But the headwinds that rock Iran’s establishment are
particularly strong now. The pandemic has worsened existing disillusionment, in
Iran and elsewhere in the region, with Tehran and its militias in other states.
If European countries do not wish to support the US’s maximum-pressure campaign,
whatever solution arrives must emphasise to the Iranians that destabilising
moves and the defiance of international law will get them nowhere.
Qatar: Payouts for Hamas no longer guaranteed – report
DEBKAFile/September 07/2020
“Things have changed and we can’t keep on doing things the old way,” said the
Emir Of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani. Middle East intelligence sources
believe that the emir may be shifting ground ready for Donald Trump to win a
second term as US president, by starting to cool his ties with radical and
anti-US elements. Those ties have put him on the wrong side of Trump’s
diplomatic drive in the region and got him in hot water with the Saudi-led Gulf
Arab governments, especially the United Arab Emirates, which has just concluded
a US-brokered normalization pact with Israel. All three parties to the deal have
come off with gains.. The Palestinian Hamas and its parent, the Muslim
Brotherhood, appear to be the first to feel the rough edge of the Qatari ruler’s
re-evaluation. After a visit by US presidential adviser Jared Kushner to Doha
last week, Sheikh Tamim is reported by those sources to have instructed his
aides to inform the Hamas that the continued flow of Qatari cash to the Gaza
Strip’s impoverished population was no longer guaranteed. The latest transfer of
$30 million was “not a policy,” he warned, but “a one-off.” The next instalments
may come on a one-by-one basis, depending on how Gaza’s Hamas regime behaves.
That delivery silenced weeks of incendiary balloon and rocket attacks launched
from the Gaza strip against southern Israel – though not for long judging by
past precedent. However, this time, the Palestinian terrorist group was given a
stern caution by its Doha paymaster: “The Americans and Israelis are not kidding
around this time around,” he said, adding for good measure: “It does not seem as
if Trump is going to lose the presidential elections.”Cooling his longstanding
ties with Iran and Hizballah would be much riskier than cutting cash payments to
Hamas. They are capable of hitting back in ways that could be gravely damaging
to their target. On the other hand, loosening ties with radical and terrorist
entities would open a pathway for Qatar to bury the hatchet with Saudi Arabia
and the UAE and win points in Washington.
Sheikh Tamim is keeping close track of US presidential poll ratings before
making a final jump. He listened when Democratic friends assured him that Joe
Biden’s win was in the bag and he should hold his ground until President Trump
was out. But now, after observing the narrowing gap between the two contenders,
he is becoming convinced that Trump may actually pull off a second term. The
ruler’s advisers have reportedly instructed senior editors of the Qatari Al
Jazeera television network to temper their championship of Hamas and other
radical organizations vis-a-vis Israel, the US and the United Arab Emirates and
be less provocative.
Iraq to reopen borders for trade, bring back sports and
dining
Arab News/September 07/2020
CAIRO: Iraq is reopening its land border crossings, restaurants, hotels, and
bringing back sporting events without spectators, the prime minister said on
Monday, three days after it recorded its highest daily increase in coronavirus
infections. Land crossings would be open for trade only so as to secure local
market needs, Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kadhimi said in a statement. Restaurants
and five-star hotels must adhere to public health guidelines, he added. Sporting
events would resume as of Sept. 12. Government agencies can now bring back to
work up to 50% of their employees, he said.
Iraq registered its biggest daily increase in coronavirus infections on Friday
with 5,036 cases as Iraqis continue to flout lockdown rules, the health ministry
said. It recorded 4,314 new cases on Monday, the health ministry said, and 77
deaths, bringing the total number of cases to 264,684 and the total deaths to
7,589. Kadhimi said the electoral commission would be allowed to open voter
registration centers and that its employees would be exempt from curfew. The
prime minister took office in May as the third head of government in a chaotic
10-week period that followed months of unrest in a country exhausted by war with
Islamist militants, corruption and economic decay. He was appointed to head a
government tasked with organizing an early election, a main demand of
anti-government protesters who staged months of mass demonstrations last year,
and has called one, to be held in June.
ISIS claims terrorist attack in Tunisia’s Sousse
The Arab Weekly/September 07/2020
TUNIS - ISIS claimed responsibility on Monday for a knife and vehicle-ramming
attack in Tunisia which killed one National Guard officer and wounded another,
as security forces rounded up more suspects. The attack early Sunday morning in
a tourist district of the coastal city of Sousse saw a group of assailants ram a
patrol of the National Guard with a vehicle before stabbing the officers. They
were chased by security forces before three of them were shot dead in an ensuing
gun-battle, the Guard said, labelling the attack a “terrorist” act. ISIS said
Monday its “fighters” had carried out the attack, in a brief statement by its
propaganda arm Amaq on the Telegram messenger service. “Photos show that one of
the attackers was wearing a T-shirt with a specific inscription to Daesh
(ISIS),” said Mokhtar Ben Nasr, former head of the National Counter-Terrorism
Commission, while stressing it was difficult to establish precise links between
the group and its supporters. Tunisia, since its 2011 uprising, has been hit by
a string of jihadist attacks that have killed dozens of security personnel,
civilians and foreign tourists. Sunday’s incident took place close to the site
of the deadliest attack, when 38 people, most of them British tourists, were
killed in a 2015 beachside shooting rampage. Tunisian authorities said Monday
they had arrested seven people over the attack. The wounded officer was “in a
stable condition” on Monday, interior ministry spokesman Khaled Hayouni said.
National Guard officer Sami Mrabet, a 38-year-old father of two, was buried
Monday in his hometown of Moknine south of Sousse, in the presence of more than
1,000 people, including several senior government officials, including Prime
Minister Hichem Mechichi.
– Under the radar –
Since Sunday, “43 people have been questioned and seven of them arrested,”
National Guard spokesman Houcem Eddine Jebabli told a private radio station.
They included “the wife of one of the assailants, who described her husband as a
‘martyr’ during the interrogation,” he said. Two brothers of one of the
attackers and a person suspected of recruiting them were also arrested, Jebabli
added. He said the attackers were twin brothers and a third man from the
north-western region of Siliana. He did not confirm or deny reports of a fourth
assailant. Jebabli said the twins had visited Facebook pages dealing with
“explosive and armed attacks” but had stayed under the radar of authorities.
Tunisian President Kais Saied, on a visit Sunday to the scene of the knife
attack, said police were investigating whether the attack was planned “by
individuals or an organisation.” Mechichi vowed to “eradicate terrorists as soon
as possible.”Mechichi, in a statement from his office, urged Tunisians “not to
be afraid” of assailants, whom he described as “microbes.”Sunday’s attack was
the first since March, when a lone-wolf suicide operation against security
forces protecting the US Embassy in Tunis killed a Tunisian police officer and
left several others wounded. The year 2015 was particularly bloody, with three
major deadly attacks claimed by ISIS. An attack at the capital’s Bardo museum in
March killed 21 foreign tourists and a security guard. Three months later, 38
tourists were killed in the shooting at Sousse. And in November of that year, a
bomb blast on a bus in central Tunis killed 12 presidential guards. While the
situation has significantly improved since then, Tunisia has maintained a state
of emergency.
Morocco talks pave the way for new transitional phase in
Libya
The Arab Weekly/September 07/2020
TUNIS – The US-sponsored talks in the Moroccan town of Bouznika between two
Libyan delegations representing the House of Representatives (based in Tobruk)
and the State Council (based in Tripoli are expected to lay the ground for a new
transitional phase in Libya.
Experts see the talks as recycling the same leading figures in Libya’s political
scene since the start of the Libyan crisis in mid-2014.
Political sources confirmed to The Arab Weekly that the internationally-endorsed
Bouznika talks will address a number of contentious issues within the framework
of the agreements reached during the Berlin conference, with the hope of
eventually drawing up a roadmap that would end the current crisis and stop the
suffering of the Libyan people.
Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita said, during the opening session of the
consultations, that the Libyan dialogue held in Bouznika “may be a prelude to
agreements that end the Libyan crisis.”
The Speaker of the Libyan Parliament Aguila Saleh and the Chairman of the State
Council Khaled al-Mishri visited Rabat at the end of last July by official
invitation from Morocco, but they did not meet. They instead held separate
meetings with a number of senior Moroccan officials.
This first round of Libyan-Libyan talks devoted to consultations on activating
the political process under the auspices of the United Nations came after
intense political and diplomatic moves that followed the announcement a few days
ago of a generalised ceasefire in Libya.
The talks are taking place in the town of Bouznika, on the Atlantic coast south
of the Moroccan capital, Rabat, and not in the Palais des Congrès in Skhirat
where the previous Libyan talks, that ended with the signing of the Skhirat
Agreement in 2015, had been held.
Libyan sources told The Arab Weekly that these talks, which will continue for
two days, are the result of Moroccan efforts under the auspices of King Mohammed
VI of Morocco, to push towards a political solution to the Libyan crisis. The
roadmap that will come out of these talks is expected to set the dates for
presidential and legislative elections according to the provisions set forth in
the Libyan constitution and to develop mechanisms to manage the remainder of the
transitional phase, in addition to drafting a plan for addressing the security
and economic crisis to be discussed in the Libyan-Libyan talks scheduled to be
held in Geneva next week. Despite the positive atmosphere created by these
talks, with the participation of the Acting Special Representative of the
Secretary-General of the United Nations in Libya, Stephanie Williams, there were
still divergent opinions and reactions to the discussions inside Libya. Overall,
the talks were welcomed with caution amid fears that they would be limited to
just issues related to “dividing the spoils and distributing posts.”
The Libyan representative from al-Jafara, Ismail al-Sharif, did not hesitate to
welcome these talks and consultations. “In general, we bless every Libyan-Libyan
meeting that would dispel the concerns of the political parties, and build up
trust,” he said on the phone to The Arab Weekly.
He considered that the general framework for these talks and consultations is
“to bridge the gap between the Libyan parties in order to lay the groundwork for
a phase of appeasement that may enable the sowing of the seeds of trust and thus
contribute to healing the deep wounds caused by the continuing conflict.”
On the other hand, he expressed his hope that during these talks “the focus will
be on ways to overcome the current stage with all the suffering it has produced,
and not on sharing spoils through the distribution of posts.”
It was reported earlier that the participants in these talks will address the
development of mechanisms to change the figures that will take over the
leadership of the sovereign institutions, agreeing to form a new presidential
council consisting of a president and two vice-presidents, and the formation of
a new government on the basis of regional quotas that takes into account the
reality of the three Libyan regions. According to a number of parliamentary
representatives contacted by The Arab Weekly, these mechanisms will keep the
parliament in Tobruk and the State Council as the sole legitimate
representatives in Libya, during a transitional period of no less than five
years, in addition to distributing responsibilities for the management of key
government and state institutions based on regional affiliation.
These positions include the Administrative Control Authority, the Audit Bureau,
the Anti-Corruption Commission, the Governor of the Central Bank of Libya, the
Attorney General, the Supreme Court, the Elections Commission, and other
security and military positions, especially the positions of the General Chief
of Staff of the Army and the General Intelligence Services.
Ibtisam al-Ribai, another member of the Libyan Parliament representing al-Jafara,
considered that the Bouznika talks may constitute a prelude to breaking the
political deadlock, and indicated in a statement to The Arab Weekly that “in
general, any opportunity for dialogue is a good one even if it is not
well-planned, because Libya has gone through a period of war and violence that
has closed off every gate for dialogue while the people ended up paying a high
price for it.”
Al-Ribai stressed that “all negotiations, whether in Morocco or in Geneva, are
pushing towards the formation of a government and dividing posts,” noting at the
same time that “there is no ideal solution in Libya, and the quota system is
already in place, but just moving to the stage of a unified government is the
beginning of the solution.” Along these cautious welcoming stances, other
reactions rejecting the talks in Morocco emerged. MP Ali Al-Takbali, for
example, did not hesitate to voice his refusal to hold a political dialogue
between the Parliament and the Supreme Council of State which represents the
Islamists, and to warn against its results that “will bring a new catastrophe”
to Libya, according to him.
Al-Takbali considered that the members of the parliament delegation
participating in these talks “will not be able to deal with the hypocrisy of the
Muslim Brothers and their leader Khaled al-Mishri, who is going to be
participating in them,” at a time when several political circles do not hide
their fear that, during these talks, “the subversive Turkish role in Libya,”
which has shifted the balances of the conflict and prolonged the crisis, will be
ignored.
Houthi drones target Saudi Arabia amid allegations of
Qatari backing
Seth Frantzman/Jerusalem Post/September 07/2020
Riyadh claimed it shot down the drones, some of the two dozen that have targeted
the Kingdom and allies in Yemen in the last month.
Houthi rebels in Yemen have targeted Saudi Arabia with several drones in what
Iranian media called a “large-scale attack.” The attack was aimed at “Saudi
military positions and sensitive targets.” It comes days after The National in
the United Arab Emirates reported that “Qatar paid for Houthi drones used in
attacks on Saudi Arabia.” Riyadh claimed it shot down the drones, some of the
two dozen that have targeted the Kingdom and allies in Yemen in the last month.
Reports about the recent drone attack began late on September 6 in Al-Mayadeen,
a website generally sympathetic to the Syrian regime, Hezbollah and pro-Iran
groups. The site said that eight drones from Yemen attacked Abha airport in
southern Saudi Arabia. A second report at the same website said the UAVs
achieved a “precise” hit at the airport.A spokesman for the Houthis named Yahya
Sari was quoted in Iran’s Tasnim as saying that the Iranian-backed Houthis used
several UAVs against “critical targets at Abha International Airport.” They
claimed Riyadh had been “defeated” by Ansarullah, the Arabic name of the Houthi
rebel group. However, they acknowledged that Saudi Arabia claimed to have downed
the drones.
Tasnim news, which is close to the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps,
published a second story on the attack showcasing other Saudi airports. The
image appeared to be a message aimed at threatening wider attacks. Iran attacked
Saudi Arabia’s Abqaiq facility in September 2019 with drones and cruise
missiles. Initially blamed on the Houthis, the attack by Iran showcased Tehran’s
abilities.
NOW A MORE complex picture emerges because of a wider regional struggle. Al-Mayadeen
reported on Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh’s visit to Ain al-Hilweh Palestinian
refugee camp in Lebanon, as part of a “fortress of resistance” tour. The same
site highlighted US support for Saudi Arabia's opening of its airspace to
Israeli flights to Abu Dhabi in light of the UAE-Israel peace deal. Al-Mayadeen
called the deal a “betrayal” and links it to the conflict in Yemen.
“The Emirati-Zionist step in normalization has proven the accusation that [they
are involved in] aggression waged against Yemen,” the article notes. This
accuses Israel of having “aspirations to control the Red Sea” and that the
Houthis in Sana’a are confronting “colonial forces loyal to the Zionist entity.”
An August 28 Houthi drone attack targeted Najran, a three-hour drive from Abha,
about 250 km. away. While Najran is near the Yemen border, Abha is several
hundred kilometers away, but both have been targeted by drones. A report in
Austria’s Die Presse on September 3 alleges that Qatar was linked to funding of
drone attacks from Yemen. Why Qatar? It has been at odds with Saudi Arabia for
years, increasing after Riyadh broke relations in 2017.
Turkey sent troops to Qatar, and Doha has hosted Hamas and Iranian senior
officials. Qatar funds the Hamas-run-Gaza strip. Qatari media often slams the
UAE and Saudi Arabia for the conflict in Yemen. In July, after previous
allegations that Qatar backed the Houthis, the Qatari Ministry of Foreign
Affairs denied the allegations, according to Middle East Monitor.
The Austrian account claims that technology the Houthis use for drones comes
from Iran. This has been known for years and documented by intercepted shipment
of drone parts, as well as gyroscopes used in Houthi drones. This links Iranian
technical expertise to the Houthi drone program, which goes back years. Die
Presse alleges that these kamikaze drone “glide bombs” are a danger to the
region, not just to Riyadh. “Oil-rich Bahrain and the international shipping
routes” could be threatened. The Houthis have allegedly also acquired the
Iranian-designed Shahed 129, which Arab news reports in January indicate was
already in their hands.
THERE ARE many questions regarding who funds and plans the drone attacks, if it
is not just the Houthis using Iranian technical expertise. Were the recent
attacks timed to try to disrupt the UAE-Israel deal or send a message to Riyadh
and others in the region? The Saudi-led coalition has said that it intercepts
Houthi drone ,but a statement from the coalition at Al-Ain media on September 7
appeared to warn the Houthis against more of these indiscriminate attacks, as if
escalation could result.
The Houthis claim the attacks are precise and aimed at critical infrastructure.
Al-Arabiya says that 23 drones were shot down in August and that there is a
rising intensity of these attacks. It also links them to components brought from
Iran. The US Navy has interdicted at least three shipments from Yemen over the
last year. A total of 358 Iranian-made missiles were stopped, the US said in
February 2020.
The report at The National has additional information on recent claims about
Qatar financing. It mentions “Jason G,” an intelligence analyst who ‘said he was
determined to raise the alarm over the potential threat such as a failed drone
strike on Abha airport on Sunday [August 30].” According to the report, he said:
“I was actively working the last few weeks to determine the risks/threats of
drone strikes – and the best payoff is when casualties are avoided.”
The meeting of Hamas and Hezbollah leaders in Lebanon this weekend, along with
attacks by the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen – as well as the way in which
Turkey, which backs Qatar, has opposed Israeli normalization with the UAE and
hosted Hamas – point to region-wide links of several conflicts. However, rumors
that Saudi Arabia would also be normalizing relations with Israel received a
cold shoulder on Sunday. King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud noted, in a call with
US President Donald Trump, that such a policy could only come with recognition
or progress on a Palestinian state.
Because of these sensitive discussions as well as Saudi Arabia and Bahrain
opening their airspace to Israeli flights, each Houthi drone attack and
interception of the drones has wider regional ramifications. This is why media
from Turkey to Iran and Lebanon all spread rumors trying to undermine the UAE/Israel
deal.
Russian FM Sergei Lavrov visits Syria for first time since
2012
AFP, DamascusMonday 07 September 2020
Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov landed in Damascus on Monday on his
first visit to war-torn Syria since 2012, the Syrian foreign ministry said. He
is joining a Russian delegation led by Deputy Prime Minister Yury Borisov which
arrived in the Syrian capital the previous night, state news agency SANA said.
Lavrov was expected to meet President Bashar al-Assad before a press conference
with his Syrian counterpart Walid Muallem in the afternoon, both foreign
ministries said. He was then expected to head onwards to nearby Cyprus.President
Vladimir Putin made his first trip to Damascus in Syria's nine-year-old war in
January this year. The Russian leader also visited Syria in December 2017 but
had not been to the capital, only stopping at the Russian base of Hmeimim on the
Mediterranean coast. Russia has been a key ally of the Damascus regime
throughout the Syrian conflict that erupted in 2011 with the repression of
anti-government protests. Moscow's military intervention in 2015 helped turn the
tide of the war, with Russian air power allowing Syrian government forces to win
back large parts of the country. The conflict has ravaged the Syria economy,
killed more than 380,000 people and pushed millions to flee their homes.
Assad seeks Russian help in face of US sanctions
The Arab Weekly/September 07/2020
DAMASCUS - Russia and Syria plan to sign an economic pact before the end of the
year that is partly aimed at circumventing US sanctions, Russia’s deputy prime
minister Yuri Borisov said Monday as he led a high-level delegation on a visit
to Damascus with Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
Borisov said the Russian side is expecting to sign the pact on his next visit in
December, adding that it includes more than forty new projects in the energy
sector, reconstruction of a number of power stations and offshore oil
extraction.
The agreement, he added, would “outline a new framework for trade and economic
ties between the two countries for the coming years” while providing relief from
US sanctions, which he said were “strangling” the Syrian people.
Borisov spoke at a joint press conference with Syrian Foreign Minister Walid
Muallem and Lavrov in Damascus after the delegation met with Syrian President
Bashar Assad.
Syria faces an unprecedented economic crisis after nearly a decade of civil war
and Western sanctions. The economic and financial situation has been worsened by
the financial crisis in neighbouring Lebanon, Syria’s main link with the outside
world and where many Syrians have their money. Syria is also grappling with a
coronavirus outbreak. Russia has been a close ally of Assad in Syria’s
devastating nine-year civil war, lending his government vital military, economic
and political support. Russian troops have been fighting alongside Syrian
government forces since 2015, and Russian President Vladimir Putin has visited
the war-torn country twice, including in January this year. With the help of
Russia, as well as regional ally Iran and its proxy Lebanese militia Hezbollah,
Assad has largely succeeded in crushing the armed rebellion against him. The
rebels are confined to the northern Idlib province, where a truce has been in
place for months.
— Economic hardship —
But Syria has been ruined, the economy has spiralled out of control, and the
country remains divided. Turkey-backed forces control a sliver of territory
along the border, and US backed Kurdish forces control an oil-rich area in the
northeast.
“We have to admit that most of the areas rich in oil and gas are outside the
control of the Syrian government,” Borisov said Monday. “This fact prevents the
Syrian government from trading in oil, given that it is an important source of
revenue.”
“The same applies to agricultural lands,” he added. “After Syria used to export
grain, it now imports it. … This harms food security.”
Borisov blamed the United States for the economic deterioration in Syria, which
risks reversing the government’s recent military gains, calling US policies
“unconstructive.”
“The most important reason for the tragic situation in Syria is the devastating
situation of the United States of America, in addition to the Kurds’
unwillingness to communicate with Damascus and hand over control to the
legitimate government over agricultural areas and oil fields,” Borisov said.
Lavrov also criticised US and Western sanctions on Syria, saying they are
“trying to strangle the Syrian people.”
The Syrian president is said to have told his Russian interlocutors he was keen
to expand economic and business relations with Moscow, his closest ally, to help
Syria weather crippling economic sanctions.
According to state media, Assad said he wanted to see Russian investments in key
areas of the economy that had been agreed in the past succeed.
“The government was determined to continue to work with Russian allies to
implement signed agreements and to ensure the success of Russian investments in
Syria,” Assad said, according to state media.
Pro-government newspaper Al Watan quoted Syria’s ambassador to the Russian
Federation, Riad Haddad, as saying that the Russian delegation’s visit “is of
special importance, given the political and economic files that will be
discussed,” which he said included progress in the work of a committee to
discuss possible amendments to the Syrian constitution and Western sanctions on
Syria, as well as efforts to fight terrorism.
Talks between government, opposition and civil society delegations resumed in
Geneva late last month, with the sides discussing a possible new constitution
for the country. The UN’s envoy for Syria, Geir Pedersen has called the talks a
prospective “door-opener” to a final resolution of Syria’s long-running
conflict. The pandemic forced the postponement of an earlier meeting in March.
Borisov and Lavrov arrived after Moscow said it would support Damascus in the
face of tougher US sanctions, which penalise foreign firms dealing with Syrian
government entities.
“Russia turned the tide for Assad and with the regime now facing its gravest
challenges, Moscow is in a better position than any other time to further
squeeze Assad,” said one Western diplomat who follows Syria.
Although Assad has now regained most of the territory he lost, the economy is in
tatters, leaving many Syrians in poverty as the currency has lost 80% of its
value.
Russia has criticised the new US sanctions that took effect in June under the
so-called Caesar Act. Washington says the sanctions aim to cut off revenue for
Assad’s government and push him back into UN-led talks to end the conflict.
Syria is pinning its hopes on Russia, its biggest foreign ally, to help it shore
up its economy. Syria’s main regional ally, Iran, is itself also struggling to
cope under a separate round of US sanctions.
Hussam Taleb, a Syrian pro-government analyst, told Syrian state television the
Russian visit would anger Washington, which he said was “fighting us in our
livelihood by passing the Caesar Act to deprive us of our wealth.”
Western diplomats say Putin’s military involvement in Syria, its biggest Middle
East intervention in decades, secured Moscow major regional influence and a
bigger foothold in a naval base in Syria’s Tartus port.
— Fearing transition —
Arab sources revealed to The Arab Weekly that Syrian regime circles have been
apprehensive about the visit of the high-level Russian delegation for other
reasons. They explained that the Syrian regime is concerned that the high-level
Russian visit could mean that the Russians are preparing to tell Assad’s regime
to take certain actions soon. These actions would include accepting the
implementation of Security Council Resolution 2254, which means preparing for a
transitional phase in Syria in light of the drafting of a new constitution.
Lavrov’s visit to Damascus was announced within the context of meetings held
last week in Geneva of the committee in charge of drafting a new Syrian
constitution. UN envoy Pedersen participated in those meetings and noted that
the Syrian regime showed no urgency in discussing the drafting of a new Syrian
constitution under which Syrian presidential elections would be held in June
2021. Lavrov said that his country, as a guarantor country of the Astana
process, will continue to help the Syrians in the task of changing the
constitution within the framework of Security Council Resolution 2254. Prior to
his recent meeting in Moscow with Pederson, Lavrov said that “not all problems
have been resolved and there has been no agreement on all matters related to
future work, but in general the (Geneva meetings were) very useful and
fruitful.”
Sudan floods: Nearly 100 deaths, hundreds homeless amid
unprecedented rainfall
Ismaeel Naar, Al Arabiya English/Monday 07 September 2020
Nearly 100 people have died and hundreds have been left homeless due to the
unprecedented floods in Sudan caused by heavy rainfall in recent weeks, forcing
the government to declare a state of emergency across all governorates. Various
regions in Sudan are experiencing difficult humanitarian conditions due to the
floods that struck the country. At least 46 people have been injured due to the
recent floods, while large areas of fertile agricultural land that used to
supply the country with its needs of vegetables and fruits have been damaged.
The Director of Civil Defense Police in North Kordofan, Sudan, announced on
Monday the death of 11 people as a result of the floods, noting that 375 houses
had collapsed in the governorate while 16 government facilities were damaged.
The states most affected included North Kordofan, Khartoum, al-Qadarif, and
Sennar states. Sudanese authorities said that the Nile River began to witness
stability in some stations that recorded an unprecedented rise at levels not
seen in a hundred years. Despite the relative stability of the levels of the
Nile, authorities said they do not rule out that it will continue to rise in
some places, especially the capital Khartoum and some cities in the Nile River
state, at a time when different areas in Sudan are experiencing difficult
humanitarian situations that have forced the authorities to declare a state of
emergency in all governorates.
Navalny Out of Artificial Coma after 'Novichok Poisoning'
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/September 07/2020
Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny, who Germany says was poisoned by a
weapons-grade Novichok nerve agent, is now out of a medically induced coma and
being weaned off mechanical ventilation, the Berlin hospital treating him said
Monday.The 44-year-old anti-corruption campaigner and one of President Vladimir
Putin's fiercest critics, fell ill on a domestic flight last month and was
treated in a Siberian hospital before being evacuated to Berlin. "He is
responding to verbal stimuli," Charite hospital said in a statement, reporting
that the 44-year-old's condition "has improved". However, the hospital said it
was too early to determine the long-term impact of the poisoning. Germany said
last week that toxicology tests conducted by its armed forces found "unequivocal
evidence" that Navalny had been poisoned with Novichok, the substance used in
the 2018 attack on a former Russian double agent and his daughter in the English
city of Salisbury. Navalny's associates say the use of Novichok, a
military-grade nerve agent, shows that only the Russian state could be
responsible, but the Kremlin fiercely denies any involvement. "Attempts to
somehow associate Russia with what happened are unacceptable to us, they are
absurd," Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov told journalists on Monday.Russian
officials have accused Germany of being slow to share the findings of its
investigation, despite a request from prosecutors. "We expect information (from
Germany) to be provided in the coming days," Peskov said. "We are looking
forward to it."But Germany warned that the failure by Moscow to thoroughly
investigate the incident could have serious consequences.
Pipeline in crosshairs
German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas said Sunday that Berlin, which holds the
rotating EU presidency, will discuss possible sanctions against Russia if the
Kremlin does not soon provide an explanation for what happened to Navalny.
Otherwise, Germany will be compelled to "discuss a response with our allies"
including "targeted" sanctions, Maas said. He did not rule out action relating
to Nord Stream 2, a multi-billion-euro Russian-German gas pipeline nearing
completion. German Chancellor Angela Merkel's spokesman said Monday that she was
in agreement with Maas, who is a member of junior coalition partner Social
Democrats. She too would not rule out consequences for Nord Stream 2 -- a 10
billion euro ($11 billion) pipeline beneath the Baltic Sea that is set to double
Russian natural gas shipments to Germany, Europe's largest economy.
It has long been in the crosshairs of the United States, which has criticized
European countries for their reliance on energy from Russia.Western leaders have
expressed horror at what Navalny's allies say is the first known use of chemical
weapons against a high-profile opposition leader on Russian soil. British
Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said Sunday that Russia had "a very serious set
of questions to answer" and it was "clear" the Kremlin critic was poisoned with
Novichok. The Navalny poisoning is the latest in a long series of assassination
attempts against Kremlin critics. Already suffering from wide-ranging Western
sanctions imposed over its 2014 annexation of Crimea, as well as the effects of
the coronavirus pandemic and the drop in oil prices, Moscow is anxious to avoid
any further pressure on its economy. Navalny's aides have said they suspect he
drank a cup of spiked tea at the airport. The charismatic Yale-educated lawyer
was initially treated at a Russian hospital, where doctors said they were unable
to find any toxic substances in his blood, before he was flown to Berlin for
specialized treatment on August 22.
The Latest LCCC English analysis &
editorials from miscellaneous sources published on September 07-08/2020
Turkey expresses 'concern' at Kosovo, Serbia embassy move
to Jerusalem
Alex Winston/Jerusalem Post/September 07/2020
"The relocation by any country of its embassy in Israel to Jerusalem would
constitute a clear violation of international law," Ankara said.
Turkey has expressed disappointment and "concern" at Friday's announcement that
Kosovo intends to establish diplomatic ties with Israel and that Kosovo and
Serbia plan to open embassies in Jerusalem.
The announcement was made by US President Donald Trump on Friday, during a
meeting to establish normalized economic ties between Serbia and Kosovo. In
2018, America was the first country to move its embassy from Tel Aviv to
Jerusalem.
The Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs released a statement on Kosovo's planned
embassy in Jerusalem saying, "It is disappointing that such a step, which would
constitute a clear violation of international law, is even considered by the
Kosovo authorities."
The statement also elaborated on Turkey's support for its fellow Muslim nation,
saying that, "Turkey, one of the first countries to recognize Kosovo, has also
provided great support for the efforts toward the international recognition of
this country from the very outset. However, we do not find it right to build
this process against international law and especially upon the suffering of the
Palestinian people whose territories are under occupation.
"We call upon the leadership of Kosovo to comply with these resolutions and
refrain from acts that would harm the historical and legal status of Jerusalem,
and that would prevent Kosovo from being recognized by other states in the
future," the statement said.
Israel has not recognized Kosovo since the tiny Balkan nation declared
independence from neighbor Serbia in 2008.
“Kosovo will be the first Muslim-majority country to open an embassy in
Jerusalem," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Friday. "As I said during
recent days, the circle of peace and recognition of Israel is expanding, with
more countries expected to join.”
"My government is dedicated to open the embassy in Jerusalem, establish
diplomatic relations and deepen bilateral relations," Kosovan Prime Minister
Avdullah Hoti wrote on Twitter in response to Netanyahu.
Ankara also condemned the move by Serbia to relocate its embassy, with the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs saying in a separate statement, "We are deeply
concerned by the decision of the Republic of Serbia to relocate its embassy in
Israel to Jerusalem."
"The relocation by any country of its embassy in Israel to Jerusalem would
constitute a clear violation of international law."
"We call upon all countries to comply with the UN resolutions on this matter, to
respect the historical and legal status of Jerusalem and to refrain from acts
that would further hamper the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,"
the ministry said.
Turkey and Serbia have had mixed relations over the years, punctuated in 2013 by
a speech by then Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in which he
claimed: "Do not forget that Kosovo is Turkey and Turkey is Kosovo." However,
Serbia has stated that it sees a stable Turkey as vital for the Balkan region.
The two currently enjoy full diplomatic relations.
The UN and EU's Silence on Iran's "Shocking Human Rights
Violations"
Majid Rafizadeh/ Gatestone Institute/September 07/2020
Last week, the Iranian regime's Supreme Court issued two death sentences to
wrestling champion Navid Afkari, along with six-and-a-half years in prison and
74 lashes, according to Persian-language news broadcaster Iran International.
His two brothers were also arrested; Vahid Afkari was given a prison sentence of
54 years and 74 lashes, and Habib Afkari received 27 years and 74 lashes.
"For around 50 days I had to endure the most horrendous physical and
psychological tortures... They would place a plastic bag on my head and torture
me until I suffocated to the very brink of death. They also poured alcohol into
my nose." — Navid Afkari, Iranian wrestling champion, in a letter.
You would think that the EU or the UN would at least condemn the ruling mullahs
of Iran for this brutality. Instead, they reward the regime. On August 14, the
UN Security Council voted to allow the 13-year arms embargo on the Iranian
regime to expire in October 2020. The ruling means that the ruling mullahs of
Iran will be permitted to buy, sell and export as many conventional weapons they
wish.
The ruling mullahs now have enough enriched uranium to refine and build a
nuclear bomb if they wish to do so. Approximately 1000 kg of uranium enriched at
just 5% can be further refined to create one nuclear bomb.
The UN and the EU need to hold the Iranian leaders accountable, or be discarded
for irrelevance, where they appear to belong.
According to Amnesty International, victims of the Iranian regime's systematic
torture include children as young as 10 years old. "[V]ictims were frequently
hooded... punched, kicked and flogged; beaten with sticks, rubber hosepipes,
knives,... suspended or forced into holding painful stress positions for
prolonged periods; deprived of sufficient food and potable water..." (Image
source: iStock. Image is illustrative and does not represent any person in the
article.)
The Iranian regime has significantly ratcheted up its human rights violations.
The United Nations and the European Union, which preach about human rights,
completely turn a blind eye to the regime's abuses.
According to a recent report by Amnesty International released on September 2,
various branches of Iran's government, including the judiciary system, law
enforcement and the Ministry of Intelligence, are involved in these abuses and
crimes.
The report stated:
"Iran's police, intelligence and security forces, and prison officials have
committed, with the complicity of judges and prosecutors, a catalogue of
shocking human rights violations, including arbitrary detention, enforced
disappearance, torture and other ill-treatment, against those detained."
Victims, according to the report, include children as young as 10 years old. The
regime has also systematically been targeting those who take part in
demonstrations. Last week, for instance, the Iranian regime's Supreme Court
issued two death sentences to wrestling champion Navid Afkari, along with
six-and-a-half years in prison and 74 lashes, according to Persian-language news
broadcaster Iran International. His two brothers were also arrested; Vahid
Afkari was given a prison sentence of 54 years and 74 lashes, and Habib Afkari
received 27 years and 74 lashes.
While the EU and the UN are silent, the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC)
President Dana White and U.S. President Donald Trump have been pleading with the
Iranian leaders not to execute champion wrestler Navid Afkari. President Trump
tweeted:
"Hearing that Iran is looking to execute a great and popular wrestling star,
27-year-old Navid Afkarai, whose sole act was an anti-government demonstration
on the streets. They were protesting the "country's worsening economic situation
and inflation'...
"...To the leaders of Iran, I would greatly appreciate if you would spare this
young man's life, and not execute him. Thank you!"
UFC President Dana White wrote:
"I would just like to say that I, too, respectfully and humbly ask the
government officials in Iran to please not execute this man and spare his life."
It is at the discretion of the judiciary or the Islamic Revolutionary Court that
many people are arrested on ambiguous charges, such as "spreading corruption on
earth" ("moharebeh"), "waging war against God," or "endangering the country's
national security". Lack of due process, forced confessions and physical or
psychological torture are prominent in the process through which the judiciary
sentences defendants to the death penalty.
According to more reports, Afkari and his brothers were tortured to force them
to testify against each other and to extract "confessions," which were then
aired on television.
"For around 50 days I had to endure the most horrendous physical and
psychological tortures," Afkari wrote in a letter.
"They would beat me with sticks and batons, hitting my arms, legs, abdomen, and
back. They would place a plastic bag on my head and torture me until I
suffocated to the very brink of death. They also poured alcohol into my nose."
In addition, most likely to impose fear among possible dissenters in the
society, the regime, for decades, has resorted to punishments of torture and
death, for example for the possession of cannabis. Torture is administered both
physically and psychologically. According to Amnesty International:
"The organization's research found that victims were frequently hooded or
blindfolded; punched, kicked and flogged; beaten with sticks, rubber hosepipes,
knives, batons and cables; suspended or forced into holding painful stress
positions for prolonged periods; deprived of sufficient food and potable water;
placed in prolonged solitary confinement, sometimes for weeks or even months;
and denied medical care for injuries sustained during the protests or as a
result of torture."
You would think that the EU or the UN would at least condemn the ruling mullahs
of Iran for this brutality. Instead, the regime is rewarded. On August 14, the
UN Security Council voted to allow the 13-year arms embargo on the Iranian
regime to expire in October 2020. The ruling means that the ruling mullahs of
Iran will be permitted to buy, sell and export as many conventional weapons they
wish.
The EU and the UN are also advocating to keep the nuclear deal (JCPOA), which
Iran never signed, and to keep all sanctions lifted, despite repeated Iranian
violations. On September 4, 2020, for example, the International Atomic Energy
Agency reported that Iran's enriched uranium stockpile had reached 2,105 kg
(4,640 lbs) -- almost 10 times the amount of enriched uranium the regime is
allowed to have. The ruling mullahs now have enough enriched uranium to refine
and build a nuclear bomb if they wish to do so. Approximately 1000 kg of uranium
enriched at just 5% can be further refined to create one nuclear bomb.
The president of the UN Security Council during August, Indonesia's UN
Ambassador Dian Triansyah Djani, meanwhile, rejected a US bid to trigger a
"snapback" return of all UN sanctions on Iran. Perhaps the time has come for the
US to defund the UN, or at the very least, "paying only for what the country
wants — and expecting to get what it pays for."
Despite decades of UN "reform" efforts, little or nothing in its culture or
effectiveness has changed. Instead, despite providing the body with a
disproportionate share of its funding, the US is subjected to autos-da-fé on a
regular basis. The only consolation, at least to date, is that this global
virtue-signaling has not yet included burning the US ambassador at the stake.
According to an opinion piece published in The Wall Street Journal in 2017:
"Why does the U.S. tolerate this?... dodging embarrassing votes means
acquiescing to increasingly high expenditures.
"The U.S. should reject this international taxation regime and move instead to
voluntary contributions.... This is a performance incentive the current
assessment-taxation system simply does not provide....
"The U.N.'s five regional economic and social councils, which have no concrete
accomplishments, don't deserve American funding either. If nations believe these
regional organizations are worthwhile—a distinctly dubious proposition—they are
entirely free to fund them. Why America is assessed to support them is
incomprehensible.
"Next come vast swaths of U.N. bureaucracy. Most of these budgets could be
slashed with little or no real-world impact. Start with the Office for
Disarmament Affairs. The U.N. Development Program is another example.
Significant savings could be realized by reducing other U.N. offices that are
little more than self-licking ice cream cones, including many dealing with
'Palestinian' questions. The U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees
could be consolidated into the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees."
The UN and the EU need to hold the Iranian leaders accountable, or be discarded
for irrelevance -- where they probably belong.
*Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a business strategist and advisor, Harvard-educated
scholar, political scientist, board member of Harvard International Review, and
president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He has
authored several books on Islam and US foreign policy. He can be reached at
Dr.Rafizadeh@Post.Harvard.Edu
© 2020 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Confiscating Books in Sweden
Judith Bergman/ Gatestone Institute/September 07/2020
The confiscation of books and the upcoming case against author and comedian Aron
Flam has ignited a debate in Sweden about the value of freedom of speech. As
Flam has pointed out, a Swedish writer who happens to be Jewish having his
books, critical of Swedish-Nazi collaboration during the war, seized by the
Swedish state is a bit ironic.
Uppsala, once a picturesque and peaceful university town, is now the town in
Sweden with the most shootings per capita. "The gangs have been allowed to grow"
Manne Gerell, a criminologist at Malmö University told SVT Nyheter in December
2019, adding that the police had "woken up" a little too late.
Perhaps it is time for Sweden's government to spend fewer resources on
prosecuting the speech crimes of pensioners and comedians, and more on fighting
violent crime.
Perhaps it is time for Sweden's government to spend fewer resources on
prosecuting the speech crimes of pensioners and comedians, and more on fighting
violent crime. (Image source: iStock)
In June, four armed Swedish police officers seized and confiscated the entire
stock of the book Det här är en svensk tiger ("This is a Swedish Tiger"),
written by Swedish author and standup comedian, Aron Flam. The book tells the
story of how Sweden's claim of neutrality during World War II covered up a
reality of Swedish collaboration with the Nazi war effort and the profits that
the Social Democratic government made from the war.
The title of the book is a play on the words of a 1941 wartime poster of a tiger
drawn in the blue and yellow colors of the Swedish flag with the title "En
svensk tiger" ("A Swedish Tiger") and made by Swedish illustrator Bertil
Almqvist. The word "tiger" in Swedish means tiger, but it also means to keep
silent. The original poster was part of a Swedish government campaign to warn
Swedes to keep silent, presumably not to rattle Sweden's wartime relationship
with Nazi Germany.
Flam satirized Almqvist's illustration on the cover of his own book by drawing
an armband with a swastika on the tiger, and having one of its front legs lifted
in the Nazi salute, while winking at the reader. The owner of the copyright of
Almqvist's tiger, however, Sweden's Military Readiness Museum, alleged that Flam
had violated its copyright and reported him to the police -- who confiscated the
books. According to Flam, now the prosecutor even wants to seize books from
readers who already bought them, to make sure the books are destroyed.
The confiscation of books and the upcoming case against Flam has ignited a
debate in Sweden about the value of freedom of speech. As Flam has pointed out,
a Swedish writer who happens to be Jewish having his books, critical of
Swedish-Nazi collaboration during the war, seized by the Swedish state is a bit
ironic. "Just the idea that there is a prosecutor who is seriously pushing to
track down and destroy books is Kafkaesque. If they had contented themselves
with tearing off the front-page, but no", Flam said.
As always, how the police and prosecution choose to operate is a matter of
priorities; those (curious) priorities were on display in another recent court
case about free speech, as well. In it, an elderly Swedish woman was sentenced
to a fine for "incitement", after she expressed her anger on Facebook over the
violent assault by a 27-year old man on an 86-year old pensioner.
"Yes, he [the perpetrator] will probably be out [of prison...] right away. It
would be better to send him out of the country, what kind of monkey people come
into the country, deportation is all that applies now, there are no mitigating
circumstances... The monkeys should not come here and commit such crimes..."
The woman did not mention any specific group of people in her Facebook post, yet
the court found that she had incited hate against immigrants:
"The district court...finds that the communication cannot be understood in any
other way than that it is aimed at such a group of people who are protected by
the provision -- immigrants – i.e. the ethnic groups in Sweden who have in
common that they have a different national origin than the majority population.
By calling this group 'monkeys' and 'monkey people', NN [the woman] has
expressed herself in a way that must be considered derogatory."
The case was not unusual for Sweden. The prosecution of pensioners, and others,
for speech crimes is commonplace.
The problem is that Sweden is a country deeply mired in a growing violent crime
wave that its authorities have not been able to defeat. While Swedish police and
prosecutors give a high priority to the confiscation of books with covers of
satirized Swedish tigers and pensioners guilty of "Wrongthink", they evidently
do not have the resources to confront violent crimes.
In Uppsala, for instance, a report from 2019 showed that 80% of girls in high
school do not feel safe. In 2013, that number was 45%.
Recently, SVT Nyheter ran a story about a 13-year-old girl who had been raped in
a public toilet in a mall in Uppsala in November last year. Even though the
police knew who the suspect was, it took them seven months to arrest him. "Since
the police did not have the resources, he was not detained until now", Moa
Blomqvist, the prosecutor in the case, told Swedish Television. "I am very upset
that such serious crimes are piled up waiting with the police..." The police
deny Blomqvist's claim.
In July, a mother of three and her sister, who were walking home with their
husbands, suffered head injuries when a man, who identified himself to the women
as coming from Gottsunda, a "no-go zone" in Uppsala, decided to start kicking
them in the head, apparently for no reason. The man was soon joined by a gang,
who proceeded to whip the husbands with belts. The police so far have no
suspects in the case. Two weeks later, in the center of Uppsala, a man was
stabbed multiple times.
Uppsala, once a picturesque and peaceful university town, is now the town in
Sweden with the most shootings per capita. "The gangs have been allowed to grow"
Manne Gerell, a criminologist at Malmö University told SVT Nyheter in December
2019, adding that the police had "woken up" a little too late.
Uppsala has also been hit by several bombings -- attacks, typically
gang-related, using explosive devices. In 2019, Sweden had 257 cases. The latest
Uppsala bombing took place in June: a "minor explosive device" detonated in an
apartment building.
Yet, in Sweden, in 2019, not even one in ten bombings led to criminal charges,
according to SVT Nyheter. Perhaps it is time for Sweden's government to spend
fewer resources on prosecuting the speech crimes of pensioners and comedians,
and more on fighting violent crime.
*Judith Bergman, a columnist, lawyer and political analyst, is a Distinguished
Senior Fellow at Gatestone Institute.
© 2020 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Terrorism strikes again in Tunisia, amid political crisis
Sghaier El-HidriThe Arab Weekly/September 07/2020
TUNIS - A Tunisian National Guard officer was killed and another wounded in a
terrorist attack at the Akouda crossing near the Kantaoui district in the
coastal town of Sousse, the country’s interior ministry said Sunday. The three
assailants were killed after they rammed their vehicle into security officers
before attacking them with knives, he said.
The terrorist operation early Sunday morning raised questions about its goals at
a time when the country faces a political controversy over its newly-formed
government, and amid an open struggle between President Kais Saied and the
Islamist Ennahda Movement.
The attack also raised questions about the symbolism of its target, Sousse, the
hometown of the new interior minister and the site of a deadly terrorist attack
in 2015.
sousse
Sunday’s attack occurred days after parliament approved the new government
headed by Prime Minister Hichem Mechichi, who appointed as interior minister
Tawfik Charfeddine, a Sousse lawyer who is considered to be close to Saied.
Tunisian National Guard spokesman Houcem Eddine Jebabli said: “A security patrol
including two National Guard members was attacked by terrorists with knives in
the city centre of Sousse” and that “one of the guardsmen is dead and the second
is in hospital.” Iman Ben Hamida, a spokeswoman for the Sousse 2 court of the
first instance, said that four people who were driving a four-by-four vehicle
were involved in the attack. Reactions to the incident varied, with a number of
politicians denouncing it and others calling for terrorists to be tried more
quickly for their crimes.
Mechichi described terrorists as “microbes” and said the attack was their
attempt to “send messages saying that they exist, but this time they sent their
messages to the wrong address as proven by the elimination of the assailants in
a few minutes.”“The microbes should be afraid of the Tunisians, who should not
be wary of them as there are lions protecting the homeland,” said Mechichi from
the site of the attack. Saied, for his part, described the attackers as “madmen
who do not understand anything.”
“Those who asked them to carry out this attack must be held accountable, and
they will bear that responsibility before God, the people and history,” he added
during his visit to the site of the attack. Analysts have linked the terrorist
attack to Turkey’s continued dispatching of Syrian and other Arab mercenaries to
Libya.
“It is clear that the attack has political goals as it aims to further confuse
the political scene in Tunisia,” Walid Loukini, a judge and former interior
minister spokesman, told The Arab Weekly. “We must take into account as well
that it targeted the home-town of the minister of interior, so it seems the
terrorists were sending messages saying that they are attempting to disrupt the
work of security agencies and anti-terrorism efforts,” he added.
He also linked the attack to “regional developments which are to the benefit of
the terrorist groups.”He said that “there are at least 800 Tunisian terrorists
in Libya. Today, North Africa has become a base of operations for terrorists…
and Tunisia is a target for terrorism sponsors who want to disrupt the country’s
political track,” referring to mercenaries dispatched by Turkey to Libya,
including Tunisian terror suspects.
While there has so far been no claim of responsibility for the attack, experts
have speculated that the Al-Furqan cell, which previously pledged allegiance to
the ISIS, may be behind the attack. The cell has previously targeted Sousse,
which is an important tourism destination in the country.
“We say that terrorism has had its wings clipped, but every time we wake up to a
new terrorist strike. Today, the terrorists carry out their attacks with
unconcealed faces … all forces must adopt a unified and clear position towards
these operations,” Loukini told The Arab Weekly.
“Terrorism has become bare-faced … The next stage will be difficult … the living
forces and civil society must mobilise in the face of terrorism,” he added.
The attack, which coincided with a severe political crisis in which Tunisia
faces a thinly-veiled conflict between Saied and Ennahda, has brought to the
fore demands for the speedy trial of terrorists. “Condemnation, threats and
intimidation are of no use today. Where are the trials and the implementation of
sentences handed down against the perpetrators of terrorism and their
accomplices?” said Mustapha Ben Ahmed, an MP for the Tahya Tounes party.
Loukini said: “Today there are two lines in Tunisia, a national line represented
by the president of the republic, which defends the territorial integrity of
Tunisia and the higher interests of the country and the civic state of the
state. There are other lines that have other pragmatic interests.. but
everyone’s efforts must be devoted to confronting terrorism.”Tunisia is living
in the throes of a stifling political crisis after the conflict between Saied
and Ennahda leader Rached Ghannouchi, who also heads parliament, came to light
recently.
Saied’s recent statements reflected the imminence of the crisis. The president
has repeatedly stressed that “there are those who conspire against the security
of the country and that of Tunisians” and complained of being targeted by
unidentified parties.
On Sunday, Saied said: “Terrorist and criminal operations will not unsettle
Tunisian men and women, and the state will not fall … Whoever attempted to set
the stage for new political situations through such operations is delusional,
because nothing is hidden from the people anymore.”
Analysts believe that the president hinted through his statements at the
possibility of political parties being behind the terrorist operation, either to
further confuse the political scene or to exert pressure with the aim of
reaching understandings that end the tension, including understandings between
him and Ennahda and its allies.
Eastern Mediterranean conflict further marginalizing NATO
Ramzy Baroud/Arab News/September 07/2020
NATO is an alliance in name alone. The brewing conflict over territorial waters
in the Eastern Mediterranean indicates that the military union of mostly Western
countries is faltering.
The current Turkish-Greek tensions are only one facet of a much larger conflict
also involving Israel, Egypt, Cyprus, France, Libya and other Mediterranean and
European nations. Notably absent from the list are the US and Russia, despite
the latter, in particular, standing to gain or lose much economic leverage
depending on the outcome of the conflict.
Conflicts of this nature tend to have historic roots, and Turkey and Greece
fought a brief but consequential war in 1974. Of relevance to the current
conflagration is an agreement signed in January by Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu, Greece’s Kyriakos Mitsotakis and Cyprus’ Nicos Anastasiades.
The agreement envisages the establishment of the EastMed pipeline that, once
finalized, is projected to flood Europe with Israeli natural gas, pumped mostly
from the Leviathan Basin. Several European countries are keen on being part of,
and profiting from, the project. However, Europe’s gain is not just economic,
but also geostrategic. Cheap Israeli gas will lessen Europe’s reliance on
Russian supplies, which pass through two pipelines, Nord Stream and TurkStream,
the latter going through Turkey.
Russia’s state-owned gas company Gazprom supplies Europe with an estimated 40
percent of its natural gas needs, thus giving Moscow significant economic and
political leverage. Some European countries, especially France, have labored to
liberate themselves from what they see as a Russian economic chokehold on their
economies. Indeed, the French and Italian rivalry currently underway in Libya is
tantamount to a colonial expedition aimed at balancing out their over-reliance
on Russian supplies of gas and other energy. Fully aware of France and Italy’s
intentions in Libya, the Russians and Turks are wholly involved in the military
showdown between the Government of National Accord (GNA) and the forces in the
east that are loyal to Field Marshall Khalifa Haftar.
While the conflict in Libya has been ongoing for years, the EastMed pipeline
plan has added fuel to the fire. It has infuriated Turkey, which is excluded
from the agreement, worried Russia, and empowered Israel, which may now cement
its economic integration with the European continent.
Anticipating the Israel-led alliance, Turkey and Libya last year signed a
maritime boundary treaty that gave Ankara access to Libya’s territorial waters.
The bold maneuver allows Turkey to claim territorial rights for gas exploration
in a massive region that extends from the Turkish southern coast to Libya’s
northeast coast. This claimed exclusive economic zone is unacceptable in Europe
because it clashes with the ambitious EastMed project and fundamentally alters
the geopolitics — largely dictated by Europe and guaranteed by NATO — of this
region.
While the conflict in Libya has been ongoing for years, the Eastern
Mediterranean pipeline plan has added fuel to the fire.
However, NATO is no longer the formidable and unified power it once was. Since
its inception in 1949, NATO has been on the rise almost constantly. Its members
have fought major wars in the name of defending one another and also to protect
“the West” from the “Soviet menace.” NATO remained strong and relatively
unified, even after the Soviet Union was dismantled and the Warsaw Pact
collapsed in 1991. NATO managed to sustain a degree of unity despite its raison
d’etre — defeating the Soviets — no longer being a factor because Washington
wished to maintain its military hegemony, especially in the Middle East. While
the Gulf War of 1991 was the first powerful expression of NATO’s new mission,
the Iraq War of 2003 was its undoing. The US adopted an “exit strategy” from
Iraq that foresaw a gradual American retreat from the Middle East and a
simultaneous “pivot to Asia” in the desperate hope of slowing down China’s
military encroachment in the Pacific. The best expression of the American
decision to divest militarily from the Middle East was NATO’s intervention in
Libya in 2011. Military strategists had to devise a bewildering term, “leading
from behind,” to describe the role of the US in Libya. For the first time since
the establishment of NATO, Washington was part of a conflict that was largely
controlled by comparatively smaller and weaker members, including Italy, France
and the UK. While former US President Barack Obama insisted on the centrality of
NATO in US military strategies, it was evident that the once-powerful alliance
had outweighed its usefulness for Washington. France, meanwhile, continues to
fight for NATO with the same ferocity it uses to keep the EU intact. It is this
French faith in European and Western ideals that has compelled Paris to fill the
gap left by the gradual American withdrawal. It is currently playing the role of
the military hegemon and political leader in many of the Middle East’s ongoing
crises, including the flaring Eastern Mediterranean conflict.
Last December, Emmanuel Macron stood up to US President Donald Trump at the NATO
summit in London. Previously, Trump had chastised NATO over its reliance on
America and threatened to pull out of the alliance altogether if fellow members
did not start contributing their fair share.
It is a strange and unprecedented spectacle when countries like Israel, Greece,
Egypt, Libya and Turkey lay claims over the Mediterranean, while NATO scrambles
to stave off an outright war among its own members. It is even stranger to see
France and Germany apparently taking over the leadership of NATO as the US
remains almost completely absent.
It is hard to imagine the reinvention of NATO, at least as an organization that
caters to Washington’s interests and diktats. Judging by France’s recent
behavior, the future may hold irreversible paradigm shifts. In 2018, Macron made
what at the time seemed a baffling suggestion: A “true, European army.” However,
considering the rapid regional developments and the incremental collapse of
NATO, Macron may one day get his army after all.
*Ramzy Baroud is a journalist and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is
the author of five books. His latest is “These Chains Will Be Broken:
Palestinian Stories of Struggle and Defiance in Israeli Prisons” (Clarity Press,
Atlanta). Twitter: @RamzyBaroud