LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
June 14/2019
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
The Bulletin's Link on the lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/eliasnews19/english.june14.19.htm
News Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations For today
You know that the rulers of the Gentiles
lord it over them, and their great ones are tyrants over them
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint Matthew 20/20-28/:"Then the
mother of the sons of Zebedee came to him with her sons, and kneeling before
him, she asked a favour of him. And he said to her, ‘What do you want?’ She said
to him, ‘Declare that these two sons of mine will sit, one at your right hand
and one at your left, in your kingdom.’ But Jesus answered, ‘You do not know
what you are asking. Are you able to drink the cup that I am about to drink?’
They said to him, ‘We are able.’He said to them, ‘You will indeed drink my cup,
but to sit at my right hand and at my left, this is not mine to grant, but it is
for those for whom it has been prepared by my Father.’When the ten heard it,
they were angry with the two brothers. But Jesus called them to him and said,
‘You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great
ones are tyrants over them. It will not be so among you; but whoever wishes to
be great among you must be your servant, and whoever wishes to be first among
you must be your slave; just as the Son of Man came not to be served but to
serve, and to give his life a ransom for many.’"
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese
& Lebanese Related News published on June 13-14/2019
US, Argentina Holds Workshop On Countering Hezbollah Terror
Aoun awards President of French Court of Cassation National Order of the Cedar
in rank of officer
Hariri receives the Countess of Wessex
Berri welcomes Muselier, British delegation
Jumblat Lambasts Possible Tax Imposition on Retirement Pensions
President of Ireland welcomes Basil, praises generosity of Lebanon
Abu Sleiman: Syrian delegation withdrawal says regime does not want to
facilitate return of refugees
Loyalty to Resistance rejects tax increase that will affect poor
Report: Russian Delegation to Visit Beirut for Refugees Initiative Talks
Israeli Releases the Two Shepherds
Sayyed: Govt. Must Target Basic Sources Where Funds are Wasted
Hariri Receives American Task Force for Lebanon
Israel Inspects Technical Fence, Reconnaissance Airplanes Hover Nabatieh
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports
And News published on June 13-14/2019
Tankers attacked with ‘mine and torpedo’ in Gulf of Oman
Pompeo: Iran ‘responsible’ for Gulf tanker attacks
Iran said It Rescued 44 Crew after Tanker 'Accident'
Japan PM Meets Iran Supreme Leader Seeking to Ease US Tensions
UK warns Iran over ‘deeply unwise’ attacks on oil tankers
U.N. chief condemns tanker attacks, says facts must be established
Oil Prices Surge after US Reports Tankers Attacked
White House spokeswoman Sanders leaving job at end of month
Moscow Announces Ceasefire in Northwest Syria
Putin fires police officers involved in journalist’s case
China Snubbed Trudeau Request for Talks about Detained Canadians
Boris Johnson Wins First Round of UK Leadership Vote
Titles For The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous
sources published
on June 13-14/2019
US, Argentina Holds Workshop On Countering Hezbollah Terror/Jerusalem Post/June
13/2019
Analysis/Trump Sold Three More Bahrain Tickets, but Program Still TBD (To Be
Discussed)/Zvi Bar'el/Haaretz/June 13/2019
Washington Times: ‘War College Cancels Speaker on Islam/Raymond
Ibrahim/Washington Times/June 13/2019
With No Progress In Indirect U.S.-Iran Contacts, Tehran Sends Threatening
Messages Via Its Proxies In Gaza/MEMRI/June 14/2019
In Light Of Impasse In Indirect Iran-U.S. Negotiations, Upsurge In Iranian
Terrorism Anticipated On Various Fronts/A. Savyon and Y. Carmon/MEMRI/June
14/2019
The Suppressed Plight of Palestinian Christians/Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone
Institute/June 13/2019
Refugees in Turkey: Mistreated by Ankara, Ignored by the UN/Sirwan Mansouri/Gatestone
Institute/June 13/2019
Iran thinks it can pressure the US. It can’t/Dr. John C. Hulsman/Arab News/June
13/2019
The terrorism of Iran and its militias must be confronted/Dr. Hamdan Al-Shehri/Arab
News/June 13/2019
The Latest English LCCC Lebanese &
Lebanese Related News published on June 13-14/2019
US, Argentina Holds Workshop On Countering
Hezbollah Terror
جيرالزوم بوست: ورشة عمل أميركية_ارجنتينية لمناقشة سبل مواجهة إرهاب حزب الله
Jerusalem Post/June 13/2019
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/75752/%d8%ac%d9%8a%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%b2%d9%88%d9%84%d9%85-%d8%a8%d9%88%d8%b3%d8%aa-%d9%88%d8%b1%d8%b4%d8%a9-%d8%b9%d9%85%d9%84-%d8%a3%d9%85%d9%8a%d8%b1%d9%83%d9%8a%d8%a9-%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%ac%d9%86%d8%aa%d9%8a/
Workshop held month before 25th anniversary of the AMIA bombings.
The United States and Argentina held a workshop this week on countering
Hezbollah’s terror activities in the Western Hemisphere, a month before the 25th
anniversary of the AMIA bombings.
The workshop, held in Buenos Aires on Tuesday and Wednesday, included law
enforcement personnel and financial practitioners from Argentina, Chile,
Colombia, Panama, Paraguay and Peru, as well as representatives from Ameripol.
Officials from the US Departments of State, Justice and the Treasury, as well as
the Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Counterterrorism Center, and Drug
Enforcement Administration, also participated in the meeting.
The summit was held ahead of Western Hemisphere Ministerial that the Government
of Argentina will host commemorating the 25th anniversary of the terrorist
bombing of the AMIA Jewish Center in the Argentine capital on July 18, 1994
which killed 85 people and injured over 300 others.
According to a statement released by the US State Department, the workshop
focused on Hezbollah’s global modus operandi and its terrorist and criminal
infrastructure and activities in the Americas.
“Participants discussed various techniques to constrain and counter the group’s
illicit activities, including the financial and law enforcement tools available
to identify, investigate, and prosecute Hezbollah’s global support and
facilitation networks. Participants also discussed Hezbollah attempts to
continue and expand its fundraising in the Western hemisphere, especially in
light of the current financial pressure on Hezbollah,” the statement said.
The finances of the Lebanese Shi’ite militant group, designated as a Foreign
Terrorist Organization by dozens of countries across the globe, has been hit
hard due in recent years by sanctions placed the United States.
The US has also passed the Hezbollah International Financing Prevention Act
threatening sanctions against anyone who finances the group in any significant
way. But the designation has not affected Hezbollah’s patron, Iran, which
continues to provide the terrorist group with financial and military support.
Hezbollah also receives significant financial aid by supporters who live abroad
as well as through charities and a wide variety of criminal activities including
fraud and trafficking in drugs, arms and blood diamonds.
Not based in Lebanon, Hezbollah’s crime network is global, and based primarily
in Africa. The group also runs an international network of criminal and narcotic
rings in Africa, as well as both North and South America.
Hezbollah operatives also rely on legitimate business enterprises that in truth
are shell companies which raise, launder and transfer vast sums to the group.
Aoun awards President of French Court of Cassation National Order of the Cedar
in rank of officer
Thu 13 Jun 2019/NNA - President of the Republic General Michel Aoun awarded the
President of the Court of Cassation of France, Bertrand Louvel, the National
Order of the Cedar in the rank of officer, in the presence of Ministers of
Justice Albert Sarhan, Minister of State for Presidential Affairs Salim
Jreissati and the President of the Supreme Judicial Council Judge Jean Fahd.
Hariri receives the Countess of Wessex
Thu 13 Jun 2019/NNA - The President of the Council of Ministers Saad Hariri
received today at the Grand Serail the Countess of Wessex Princess Sophie Helen
Rhys-Jones and the UK Minister of State for the Commonwealth and the United
Nations Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon, in the presence of the British Ambassador Chris
Rampling. They discussed the situation in Lebanon and the bilateral relations
between the two countries. Princess Sophie is the wife of Prince Edward, Earl of
Wessex, the youngest son of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of
Edinburgh. Lord Ahmad is also the British Prime Minister’s Special
Representative on Preventing Sexual Violence in Conflict and the Prime
Minister’s Special Envoy on Freedom of Religion or Belief.
Berri welcomes Muselier, British delegation
Thu 13 Jun 2019/NNA - Speaker Nabih Berri received this Thursday the head of the
regional council of the Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur region, Renaud Muselier, and
the French ambassador to Lebanon, Bruno Foucher, with whom he discussed the
situation in Lebanon and the region, as well as bilateral relations. The Speaker
also welcomed Princess Sophie Helen Rhys-Jones, Countess of Wessex, accompanied
by British Minister of State, Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon and British Ambassador
Chris Rampling, with talks touching on bilateral relations and the preset
situation. In the afternoon, he welcomed a delegation of the American Task Force
headed by its president Edward Gabriel. The delegation stressed the importance
of interaction between the Lebanese parliament and the US Congress, and
expressed its readiness to exert more efforts to support Lebanon and its issues.
Berri then met with General Security Chief, Abbas Ibrahim, and briefed him on
the security situation.
Jumblat Lambasts Possible Tax Imposition on Retirement
Pensions
Naharne/June 13/2019/Progressive Socialist Party leader ex-MP Walid Jumblat on
Thursday criticized as “unjust” the possible government imposition of taxes on
retirement pensions. “The tax on retirement pensions is the highest level of
injustice and contempt for hardworking employees and members of the armed
forces,” said Jumblat in a tweet. Jumblat accused what he described as the “new
modern ruling class” of exploiting these employees. The Finance and Budget
Committee on Wednesday said it will work to amend an article in the government's
draft 2019 state budget that imposed a new tax on retirement pensions. On May
27, Lebanon's government approved a long-awaited austerity budget aimed at
rescuing an economy crumbling under massive debt and unlocking billions in
international aid. Some of the austerity measures included in the budget are
expected to include a temporary hiring freeze in the public sector, a reduction
of public sector benefits and pensions, and tax hikes. Lebanese public
employees, however, have warned that their benefits are a red line.
President of Ireland welcomes Basil, praises generosity of
Lebanon
Thu 13 Jun 2019/NNA - President of the Republic of Ireland, Michael de Higgins,
received Minister of Foreign Affairs and Emigrants Gebran Bassil, with whom he
tackled relations between Lebanon and Ireland and the contribution of the latter
to the UNIFIL.The pair tackled the situation in the region, whereby the Irish
President stressed "the importance of the implementation of international law on
the Arab-Israeli conflict," praising "Lebanon's generosity in hosting the
displaced Syrians. History will remember Lebanon's role and its humanitarian
gesture towards a people suffering from war."Bassil underlined the "relationship
between Lebanon and Ireland and the need to develop and strengthen ties
economically and politically in the coming years."
Abu Sleiman: Syrian delegation withdrawal says regime does
not want to facilitate return of refugees
Thu 13 Jun 2019/NNA - Labor Minister Camille Abou Sleiman said on Thursday that
the withdrawal of the Syrian delegation during Lebanon's speech at the
International Labor Organization conference in Geneva confirmed that the Syrian
regime does not want to facilitate the return of refugees to their country. Abu
Sleiman said his speech at the ILO conference reflected Lebanon's official
position on the issue of Syrian displacement.
Loyalty to Resistance rejects tax increase that will affect
poor
Thu 13 Jun 2019/NNA - The parliamentary bloc "Loyalty to the Resistance",
affirmed after its periodic meeting held this Thursday in Haret Hreik under the
presidency of MP Mohammad Raad, its refusal to any increase of tax which will
affect the poor and people with low income, calling for the adoption of
substitutes that would ensure the same revenues to the State. "The Finance and
Budget Parliamentary Committee and the deputies participating in its meetings
are committed to the need to finalize the study of the draft budget for the year
2019," said the statement.
Report: Russian Delegation to Visit Beirut for Refugees Initiative Talks
Naharne/June 13/2019/Lebanon expects a Russian delegation in Beirut next week to
follow up on the Russian initiative to repatriate the Syrian refugees back to
their homeland, al-Joumhouria daily reported on Thursday. The delegation will
reportedly meet with Lebanon’s three senior leaders, said the daily. According
to media circles close to the delegation, the Russian members are familiar with
the Syrian file and are also running negotiations with the Iranian party in that
regard. In 2018, Syria's ally Russia has put forward plans to the United States
to cooperate for the safe return of refugees to Syria.
Moscow has proposed the establishment of working groups in Lebanon and Jordan,
to where many refugees have fled. Seven years into Syria's war, Lebanon hosts
around 1.5 million Syrian refugees, compared with a local population of 4.5
million.Over the past few months, several hundred Syrians have left Lebanon in
operations organised by the governments of Beirut and Damascus. Several thousand
have also independently left in recent years.
Israeli Releases the Two Shepherds
Naharne/June 13/2019/The Israeli enemy forces released the shepherds who were
taken hostage on Wednesday, the National News Agency reported on Thursday. NNA
said that two shepherds were handed over through the Naqoura crossing to the
Lebanese Army which, in turn, will hand them over to the Intelligence
Directorate of the South for interrogation.On Wednesday, an Israeli commando
force kidnapped them in the vicinity of the southern border town of Shebaa. It
identified the shepherds as Lebanese national A.D., who hails from Shebaa, and
Syrian national M.A., saying they were taken into the occupied Shebaa Farms
Sayyed: Govt. Must Target Basic Sources Where Funds are
Wasted
Naharne/June 13/2019/MP Jamil al-Sayyed on Thursday said the government must
collect the funds it needs to slash the budget deficit from the main sources
where public funds are being wasted instead of imposing additional taxes on
people. In a televised press conference he held at the parliament, Sayyed called
on the state “to go to the main sources where money is wasted instead of
collecting it from the pockets of citizens.”Lashing at the two mobile operators
in Lebanon, Sayyed said: “They activate mobile services that customers are
unaware of, who later find out that they are charged for services they did not
request.”
“Subscribers must know the entire details before deciding what service to ask
for,” he added. The MP named three individuals “Najib Abu Hamzah, Hisham Itani
and Ayman Jumaa,” whom he accused of “monopolizing” the mobile services sector
in Lebanon. He went on saying: “The amounts which the government plans to
collect from (state budget) articles related to retired government employees
amounts only to $40 million dollars, compared to the amounts collected for one
service by the mobile service providers,” he said. Sayyed also touched on how
maritime property tax would secure sufficient funds for the treasury. Said tax
imposes fines on private beaches and facilities built on the Lebanese coast and
on government property.
Hariri Receives American Task Force for Lebanon
Naharne/June 13/2019/Prime Minister Saad Hariri received Wednesday evening at
the Grand Serail a delegation from the “American Task Force for Lebanon”, headed
by its president Ambassador Edward Gabriel, Hariri’s press office said.
Gabriel said after the meeting that the organization is seeking to improve the
relation between Lebanon and the United States. “The delegation is visiting
Lebanon this week to achieve this goal and to discuss the issue of military
assistance and other topics that concern the country, especially the issue of
Syrian refugees and the economic situation. In this regard we held a very good
meeting with Prime Minister Hariri from which we came out with a very positive
feeling about Lebanon and its future,” said Gabriel.
Israel Inspects Technical Fence, Reconnaissance Airplanes
Hover Nabatieh
Naharnet/June 13/2019/Members of the Israeli army forces and Hummer vehicles
have on Thursday combed the military road opposite the Adaiseh checkpoint in
Marjayoun, the National News Agency reported. NNA said some 20 Israeli troops
and two Hummer vehicles combed the military road, and inspected the technical
fence opposite the checkpoint of Adaiseh - Marjayoun district. Earlier, NNA said
that Israeli reconnaissance airplanes hovered over the southern town of Nabatieh
and Iqlim al-Tuffah.
The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published
on June 13-14/2019
Tankers attacked with ‘mine and torpedo’ in
Gulf of Oman
Arab News/June 13/2019/ DUBAI: Two oil tankers were attacked in
the Gulf of Oman Thursday, leaving one ablaze and both adrift.
The attacks sent oil prices up by more than 3 percent by
mid-afternoon over worries about Middle East supplies. They come at a time of
heightened tensions over Iran’s activities in the region and after Tehran has
repeatedly threatened to disrupt shipping in and out of the Arabian
Gulf.Thursday’s attacks took place to the east of the Strait of Hormuz, a major
strategic waterway for world oil supplies, that leads into the Arabian Gulf. The
first ship, the Front Altair was on fire in between the coast of Iran and the
UAE after an explosion. The Norwegian owner said its crew were safe.
A second Japanese-owned tanker, the Kokuka Courageous, was abandoned after being
hit by a suspected torpedo, the firm that chartered the ship said. The crew were
also picked up. Bernhard Schulte Ship management said the hull of the Kokuka
Courageous was breached above the water line while transporting methanol from
Jubail in Saudi Arabia to Singapore. It said the ship was afloat and the crew
safe with one minor injury reported. A shipping broker said the blast that
struck the Kokuka Courageous might have been caused by a magnetic mine. Japan’s
Kokuka Sangyo, owner of the Kokuka Courageous, said its ship was hit twice over
a three-hour period. Taiwan’s state oil refiner CPC said the Front Altair, owned
by Norway's Frontline, was “suspected of being hit by a torpedo” around 4 a.m.
GMT, as it carried 75,000 tonnes of the petrochemical feedstock naphtha to
Taiwan. Frontline said its vessel was on fire but afloat, denying a report by
the Iranian news agency IRNA that the vessel had sunk. The Bahrain-based US Navy
Fifth Fleet said it was assisting the two tankers after receiving distress
calls.
TV images showed huge, thick plumes of smoke and fire billowing from one of the
tankers as it lay out to sea. The master of the Front Altair ordered the
23-member crew to abandon ship after a blast, International Tanker Management,
the technical manager of the vessel, said. It said the crew were picked up by
the nearby Hyundai Dubai. The Front Altair loaded its cargo from Ruwais in the
UAE, according to trade sources and shipping data on Refinitiv Eikon. Iran’s
IRNA reported that Iranian search and rescue teams had picked up 44 sailors from
two damaged tankers and had taken them to the Iranian port of Jask. That report
could not immediately be confirmed.
Ship tracking websites showed the two ships halting their course early Thursday
after they had passed through the Strait of Hormuz. The Front Altair performed a
hard turn to starboard just before 3 a.m. GMT and turning full circle. The
Kokuka Courageous changed course after 7 a.m. GMT
Tensions have risen in the Gulf since an Iranian threat prompted the US last
month to deploy an aircraft carrier strike group and B-52 bombers to the region.
Teams putting out a fire on board an oil tanker attacked in the Gulf of Oman. (AFP)
Within days of the announcement, four ships were attacked with limpet mines
while moored off the UAE coast. Saudi Arabia and the US blamed the incident on
Iran. On Wednesday, a missile fired by Yemen-based Houthi militants, which are
supported by Iran, struck Saudi Arabia’s Abha airport, injuring 26. The Houthis
also claimed an armed drone strike last month on Saudi oil pumping stations.
President Donald Trump, who has demanded Tehran curb its military programmes and
influence in the Middle East, pulled the United States out of a deal between
Iran and global powers to curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions. In recent months, the
US has used punishing sanctions to reduce Iran’s oil exports to a trickle. Saudi
Arabia and other oil producers in the region have increased production to fill
the void and keep prices on track. Thursday’s attacks prompted strong
international condemnation and deep concern of the impact on shipping in an area
which carries so much of the world’s oil supply.
“We need to remember that some 30 percent of the world’s (seaborne) crude oil
passes through the Straits. If the waters are becoming unsafe, the supply to the
entire Western world could be at risk,” said Paolo d’Amico, chairman of
INTERTANKO tanker association.
Pompeo: Iran ‘responsible’ for Gulf tanker attacks
Staff writer, Al Arabiya English/hursday, 13 June 2019/US Secretary of State
Mike Pompeo said in a press conference on Thursday that the United States has
assessed, based on intelligence, type of weapons used and sophistication of
assaults, that Iran is responsible for the attacks on tankers in the Gulf of
Oman. The Secretary of State said Iran’s unprovoked attacks are part of a
campaign to escalate tension, adding that Iran is working to disrupt the flow of
oil through Strait of Hormuz. It is the assessment of the U.S. government that
Iran is responsible for today's attacks in the Gulf of Oman. These attacks are a
threat to international peace and security, a blatant assault on the freedom of
navigation, and an unacceptable escalation of tension by Iran. pic.twitter.com/cbLrWNU5S0
— Secretary Pompeo (@SecPompeo) June 13, 2019
“Prime Minister [Shinzo] Abe made a historic trip to Iran to ask the regime to
de-escalate and enter into talks, Iran’s Supreme Leader rejected PM Abe’s
diplomacy today by saying he has no response to President Trump and will not
answer,” Pompeo said during the press conference. “The Supreme Leader’s
government then insulted Japan by attacking a Japanese oil tanker just outside
of Iranian waters, threatening the lives of the entire crew, creating a maritime
emergency,” he added. Pompeo said: “Iran’s Foreign Minister today responded to
these attacks, he said sardonically: ‘suspicious doesn’t begin to describe what
likely transpired this morning.’”“Foreign Minister Zarif may think this is
funny, but no one else in the world does.”Pompeo also said he has instructed US
ambassador to UN to raise Iran issue before Security Council. Two tankers were
hit in suspected attacks in the Gulf of Oman and the crew have been evacuated,
shipping sources said on Thursday, a month after a similar incident in which
four tankers in the region were struck. With agencies.
Iran said It Rescued 44 Crew after Tanker 'Accident'
Agence France Presse/Naharne/June 13/2019/Iran's navy rescued 44 crew members
from two oil tankers which caught fire after an "accident" in the Sea of Oman on
Thursday, official news agency IRNA reported.
"Forty-four sailors from the two foreign oil tankers which had an accident this
morning in the Sea of Oman were saved from the water by the (navy) rescue unit
of Hormozgan province and transferred to the port of Bandar-e-Jask," IRNA quoted
an "informed source" as saying.
The news agency said the first accident occurred at 8:50 (0420 GMT) 25 nautical
miles off Bandar-e-Jask in southern Iran. The Marshall Islands-flagged tanker
was carrying a load of ethanol from Qatar to Taiwan, the source said. "As the
ship caught fire, 23 of the crew jumped into the water and were saved by a
passing ship and handed over to the Iranian rescue unit. "An hour after the
first accident the second ship caught fire at 9:50 am 28 miles off the port."
That Panama-flagged ship was headed to Singapore from one of Saudi Arabia's
ports with a load of methanol, and 21 of its crew jumped and were rescued, said
the source. The US Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain, said that its vessels in the
Middle East had received distress calls from two tankers reportedly under attack
in the Gulf of Oman. "We are aware of the reported attack on tankers in the Gulf
of Oman," it said in a statement. "US naval forces in the region received two
separate distress calls at 6:12 am. local time and a second one at 7:00 am," it
said. "US Navy ships are in the area and are rendering assistance."
Japan PM Meets Iran Supreme Leader Seeking to Ease US
Tensions
Agence France Presse/Naharne/June 13/2019/Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe met
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei Thursday, seeking to ease tensions
between Tehran and Washington during the first visit by a Japanese premier since
the 1979 Islamic revolution. Tokyo is a key ally of Washington and has also
traditionally enjoyed good ties with Tehran. "Meeting with Mr. @AbeShinzo, the
Prime Minister of Japan," said a tweet on Khamenei's official English-language
Twitter account accompanied by a photograph of the two men. Iran has been locked
in a bitter standoff with the United States since US President Donald Trump
withdrew from a landmark 2015 nuclear deal in May last year. Washington has
since reimposed crippling unilateral sanctions -- which have forced Tokyo to
halt its once-substantial purchases of Iranian oil -- and launched a military
buildup in the Gulf. There have also been rising tensions in the Gulf region,
with Saudi Arabia on Thursday warning Iran of "grave consequences" after
Tehran-linked Huthi Yemen rebels wounded 26 people in a missile attack on a
Saudi airport. "It is essential that Iran plays a constructive role in building
solid peace and stability in the Middle East," Abe told a joint news conference
in Tehran on Wednesday with Iran's President Hassan Rouhani. "Today, tension is
rising in the Middle East. Some experts point out that the conflict might be
triggered accidentally," said Abe. An armed clash "must be avoided by all
means", the premier stressed. He added that Japan "wishes to play an utmost role
in its capacity to ease the tension. This is the one single thought that brought
me to Iran." Addressing the same news conference, Rouhani said he expected a
"very positive change" in the Middle East and the world if the United States
stops its economic pressure on Iran through sanctions. "If there are some
tensions, (their) roots stem from America's economic war against Iran. Whenever
it stops we will witness a very positive change in the region and the world,"
Rouhani said. "We will not initiate a conflict in the region, even against the
US, but if a war starts against us we will then give a crushing response," the
Iranian president added.
Lower the temperature
Abe began his visit to Iran on Wednesday with the stated aim of defusing
tensions between Tehran and Washington. Japan stopped importing Iranian crude
oil in May to comply with US sanctions against the Islamic republic. The Asian
powerhouse has an interest in keeping the Middle East stable in order to ensure
the flow of hydrocarbons to fuel its economy. Rouhani said he saw "Japan's
interest in continuing to buy oil from Iran and fixing financial issues" as a
"guarantee" for the ongoing development of bilateral ties. The spokesman for
Japan's foreign ministry, Takeshi Osuga, later said that, on the questions of
Iranian oil sales to Japan, "our understanding is that this was the wish of the
Iranian side."But he added: "Oil purchase (from Iran) is the decision of private
companies. I cannot predict their decision."The Iranian president also
underlined a convergence of views with his visitor on the issue of nuclear
weapons, which he said "both of us are against". Abe discussed "the situation in
Iran" in a telephone call with Trump on Tuesday, a Japanese government spokesman
said. The Japanese premier won Trump's blessing for the mediation mission when
the US president visited Tokyo last month.
"We believe it is extremely important that, at the leadership level, we call on
Iran as a major regional power to ease tension, to adhere to the nuclear
agreement and to play a constructive role for the region's stability," Japanese
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga said.
UK warns Iran over ‘deeply unwise’ attacks on oil tankers
Reuters, London/Friday, 14 June 2019/Britain is working on the basis that Iran
is responsible for attacks on two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman on Thursday,
and warned Iran that these actions were “deeply unwise,” Foreign Secretary
Jeremy Hunt said. “This is deeply worrying and comes at a time of already huge
tension. I have been in contact with (US Secretary of State Mike) Pompeo and,
while we will be making our own assessment soberly and carefully, our starting
point is obviously to believe our US allies,” Hunt said in a statement. “We are
taking this extremely seriously and my message to Iran is that if they have been
involved it is a deeply unwise escalation which poses a real danger to the
prospects of peace and stability in the region,” he added. Pompeo told reporters
earlier on Thursday that the US government believed Iran was to blame, based on
the weapons used, the level of expertise needed to execute the operation, and
other factors.
U.N. chief condemns tanker attacks, says facts must be
established
Thu 13 Jun 2019/NNA - United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres strongly
condemned attacks on two oil tankers on Thursday in the Gulf of Oman that left
one ablaze and both adrift, warning that the world cannot afford “a major
confrontation in the Gulf region.”
“I strongly condemn any attack against civilian vessels. Facts must be
established and responsibilities clarified,” he told a meeting of the U.N.
Security Council on cooperation between the United Nations and the League of
Arab States. The attacks were the second in a month near the Strait of Hormuz, a
major strategic waterway for world oil supplies.The United States and Saudi
Arabia blamed Iran for last month’s attacks using limpet mines on four tankers
off the coast of the United Arab Emirates, a charge Tehran denies. Arab League
Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit called on the U.N. Security Council to act
against those responsible to maintain security in the Gulf region. “Some parties
in the region are trying to instigate fires in the region and we must be aware
of that,” he told the 15-member council, without specifically naming anyone. --
REUTERS
Oil Prices Surge after US Reports Tankers Attacked
Agence France Presse/Naharne/June 13/2019/Oil prices soared Thursday after the
US Navy reported two tankers had been attacked in the Gulf of Oman, fanning
geopolitical concerns in the crude-rich region. Both main contracts jumped about
three percent after the Navy said its vessels had received distress calls
following a "reported attack on tankers", while a merchant shipping information
service run by Britain's Royal Navy reported an "incident". The news follows the
sabotage of four ships in the strategically crucial Gulf last month with the
United States saying Iranian naval mines were "almost certainly" to blame. "We
know that geopolitical tensions in the region are worsening and raise
supply-side concerns in terms of short-term outages," said Neil Wilson, chief
market analyst at Markets.com. However, he warned prices would not likely stay
elevated for long, adding: "With the demand outlook so clouded there is no sense
that the bear market will end any time soon," he added.The spike in crude prices
came as the commodity was wallowing around five-month lows after data on
Wednesday showed a surge in US inventories, which exacerbated uncertainty caused
by the China-US trade war. The jump of more than two million barrels of crude --
compared with an expected drop of one million -- fuelled worries about demand in
the world's top economy and sent both main contracts to levels not seen since
January. Hopes that OPEC and other key producers led by Russia will reach an
agreement to extend output cuts beyond June were also giving support to prices,
although no date has been set for their meeting due later this month. While the
Gulf blasts spurred talks of increased Gulf tensions, Asian equity markets
recovered from a morning sell-off to end mixed.
-- Hong Kong recovers --
Hong Kong stocks pared earlier losses to end only slightly lower, having shed
more than one percent early Thursday, as the demonstrations that shook the city
the day before did not re-materialise. The Hang Seng Index had taken a hammering
Wednesday owing to huge protests against a planned extradition law that critics
fear will entangle people in China's courts and hammer the city's reputation as
an international business hub. And with Beijing backing the law, observers
warned the issue could have a detrimental effect on the mainland. "Beijing’s
push for this extradition bill could prove costly as investors and businesses
value Hong Kong’s autonomy," said OANDA senior market analyst Edward Moya.
"Uncertainty with Hong Kong’s autonomy will dampen business prospects and put a
further strain on Chinese growth. If the US and Europe become involved it could
complicate relations and future trade deals."The amount Hong Kong's banks charge
each other to borrow cash -- known as the Hong Kong Interbank Borrowing Rate (Hibor)
-- hit a fresh 11-year high Thursday as cash is sucked out of the financial
system. The gains saw the local dollar hit a six-month high. While the
withdrawals are expected at this time of year for various seasonal reasons as
well as preparations for IPOs, analysts said the protests were also having some
effect. Among other regional markets Shanghai and Singapore were up 0.1 percent,
Tokyo slipped 0.5 percent and Seoul shed 0.3 percent. Sydney was flat.
Wellington and Manila rose but Taipei and Mumbai fell.
In morning London trade the FTSE index rose 0.2 percent, while Paris added 0.4
percent and Frankfurt was up 0.1 percent.
- Key figures around 0900 GMT -
Tokyo - Nikkei 225: DOWN 0.5 percent at 21,032.00 (close)
Hong Kong - Hang Seng: DOWN 0.1 percent at 27,294.71 (close)
Shanghai - Composite: UP 0.1 percent at 2,910.74 (close)
London - FTSE 100: UP 0.2 percent at 7,380.38
Euro/dollar: UP at $1.1299 from $1.1288 at 2100 GMT
Pound/dollar: DOWN at $1.2682 from $1.2687
Dollar/yen: DOWN at 108.33 yen from 108.51 yen
Oil - West Texas Intermediate: UP $1.44 at $52.58 per barrel
Oil - Brent North Sea: UP $1.77 at $61.74 per barrel
New York - Dow: DOWN 0.2 percent at 26,004.83 (close)
White House spokeswoman Sanders leaving job at end of month
Reuters, Washington/Friday, 14 June 2019/White House spokeswoman
Sarah Sanders, a fierce loyalist of President Donald Trump who evolved into one
of his closest advisers, will leave her job at the end of the month to return to
her home state of Arkansas, Trump said on Thursday. “She’s a warrior,” said
Trump, who announced her departure on Twitter shortly before calling Sanders on
stage at an event at the White House. “We’ve been through a lot together, and
she’s tough, but she’s good.”Trump did not immediately name a replacement. The
Republican Sanders, who is 36 and has three young children, has drawn fire from
the White House Correspondents Association for ending daily briefings, with
Trump preferring to take questions himself from reporters and command the White
House stage. The last briefing was 94 days ago, but Trump answers questions from
reporters on a near-daily basis, including two extended sessions with them on
Wednesday. Sanders called the job “the honor of a lifetime.”“I’ve loved every
minute, even the hard minutes,” she said, her voice trembling with emotion. “I
have three amazing kids and I’m going to spend a little more time with
them.”Sanders evolved into a senior adviser and confidante of the president, one
who is regularly brought into senior-level meetings. Speculation immediately
turned to whether Sanders might run for governor of Arkansas, a position once
held by her father, Mike Huckabee. “If we can get her to run for the governor of
Arkansas, I think she’ll do very well,” Trump said.
Moscow Announces Ceasefire in Northwest Syria
Agence France Presse/Naharne/June 13/2019/Moscow has announced a ceasefire in
Syria's northwestern Idlib province after weeks of intensified rocket fire and
air strikes by regime and Russian forces. "At Russia's initiative, with the
mediation of Turkey and Russia, a ceasefire agreement was concluded in the Idlib
de-escalation zone as of midnight on June 12," the Russian Reconciliation Centre
for Syria said in a statement late Wednesday. "As a result, a significant
reduction has been observed in the number of bombardments by illegal groups,"
said the centre, which is operated by Russia's armed forces. Idlib, the last
major area of Syria outside government control, has faced intense regime
bombardment in recent weeks, despite a months-old buffer zone deal. The Syrian
Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based war monitor, said Monday that 25
civilians including seven children had been killed in recent strikes, with more
than 360 civilians killed since the end of April. Syria's war has killed more
than 370,000 people and displaced millions since it started in 2011 with the
repression of anti-government protests. Russia launched a military intervention
in support of President Bashar al-Assad's regime in 2015, helping his forces to
reclaim large parts of the country from opposition fighters and jihadists.
Putin fires police officers involved in journalist’s case
The Associated Press, Moscow Thursday, 13 June 2019/Russian
President Vladimir Putin on Thursday dismissed two senior police officers
involved in the arrest of an investigative journalist on drug charges that were
later dropped for lack of evidence, in a case that provoked national outrage.
The firings, which came a day after massive arrests at a protest rally in the
Russian capital, reflect a careful balancing act by the Kremlin, which seeks to
assuage public anger while maintaining a tight lid on dissent. Last week’s
arrest of Ivan Golunov on drug-dealing charges he rejected as sham drew an
unprecedented show of solidarity, with three top national newspapers publishing
front pages demanding his release. The interior ministry dropped all charges
against the reporter on Tuesday in a highly unusual move, and asked Putin to
dismiss two senior officers who oversaw the case.
The Kremlin on Thursday announced the ouster of Moscow police’s anti-drugs
chief, Yuri Devyatkin, and head of the police department for western Moscow,
Andrei Puchkov. The firings follow arrests at an unsanctioned but peaceful rally
supporting Golunov in Moscow on Wednesday. Moscow police said about 200 people
were detained, while independent monitoring group OVD-Info said over 500 were
taken into custody and some of them were beaten. The vast majority were released
quickly without charges. Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said Thursday that
the Kremlin is aware of complaints about excessive use of force by police and
expects an official inquiry to look into that. Peskov told reporters that the
president will consider proposals to revise legislation to prevent police from
using drug charges to frame innocent people. “If such initiative is formulated
it will be considered,” he said. He added that it’s premature to conclude that
Golunov’s case highlights an urgent need for sweeping police reforms, saying
that the Kremlin would await the results of an official probe. The decision to
drop charges against Golunov and fire police generals responsible for his arrest
marked an unusual shift for the Kremlin, which has staunchly backed law
enforcement officials in other cases widely seen as trumped up. Observers say
that this time the damage from Golunov’s arrest was too big for the Kremlin to
stick to the familiar pattern. They also say that the officials allegedly
involved in fabricating the case were too insignificant to merit high-level
protection. “Moscow police’s expectations for political support were rooted in
their belief that the Kremlin wouldn’t act against those protecting its own
security, and that was a major mistake,” analyst Tatiana Stanovaya wrote in a
commentary for Moscow’s Carnegie Center. Stanovaya noted that the Kremlin was
angry to see a big image problem resulting from a case apparently driven by
personal interests of minor officials. “Golunov was freed not only because of
public outrage, but because those who arrested him have no political value for
Putin,” she wrote. “In the world of Putin, they are like dust.”
China Snubbed Trudeau Request for Talks about Detained
Canadians
Agence France Presse/Naharne/June 13/2019/China ignored Canadian Prime Minister
Justin Trudeau's personal request for dialogue to end a spiralling diplomatic
row, his office revealed Wednesday. rudeau requested the call in January with
Premier Li Keqiang so he could "personally advocate" for the immediate release
of two Canadians detained a month earlier and for clemency in the case of
another Canadian who would later be sentenced to death for drug trafficking, his
spokeswoman Chantal Gagnon said in a statement. "Our appeal for clemency (in the
drug case) was also made directly to senior Chinese officials," she added. The
disclosure comes amid growing domestic calls for Trudeau to step up pressure on
China to release the two Canadians, whom his government has said were
arbitrarily detained. Former diplomat Michael Kovrig and businessman Michael
Spavor were detained after the December 1 arrest of a top Huawei executive, Meng
Wanzhou, in Vancouver on a US warrant. China has said it suspects Kovrig, who
works for the International Crisis Group think tank, of espionage and alleged
that Spavor provided him with intelligence. But Trudeau retorted that the pair
"had been detained for political reasons." Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland
said last month she also sought a meeting with her Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi,
to no avail. The detentions have thrown relations between Ottawa and Beijing
into crisis. China has also blocked Canadian agricultural shipments worth
billions of dollars. In response, Ottawa has rallied a dozen countries to its
side, including Britain, France, Germany and the United States, as well as the
European Union, NATO and the G7. Meng is living in a Vancouver mansion on bail
awaiting an extradition hearing scheduled to start in early 2020.
Boris Johnson Wins First Round of UK Leadership Vote
Agence France Presse/Naharne/June 13/2019/Boris Johnson overwhelmingly won the
first round of voting Thursday in the race to replace outgoing British Prime
Minister Theresa May, with the field of candidates narrowed to seven from 10.The
Brexit-backing former foreign minister picked up 114 of the 313 votes cast in a
secret ballot of Conservative Party lawmakers in the lower House of Commons.
Mark Harper, Esther McVey, and Andrea Leadsom, who came in second to May in the
last leadership race in 2016, failed to collect the required 17 votes and were
knocked out. "Obviously we're happy with the results but there's still a long
way to go to winning the contest," a spokesman for Johnson told reporters. "You
have to hold the numbers to go through to the next round," the spokesman said.
"That's a challenge." The outcome, if repeated in subsequent rounds which will
further whittle down the field starting next Tuesday, is above the 105 votes
Johnson would need to make the final two. The last pair standing will go up
before 160,000 voting Conservative Party members across the country. The winner
will become new party leader and automatically replace May as premier, most
likely at the end of July. Foreign Minister Jeremy Hunt was a distant second
with 43 votes. Environment Minister Michael Gove was third with 37 votes, former
Brexit minister Dominic Raab picked up 27, Home Secretary Sajid Javid won 23
votes, and Health Secretary Matt Hancock had 20.
International Development Secretary Rory Stewart snuck through in seventh place
with 19 votes after running an original social media campaign that endeared him
to more liberal party members -- and the British public at large. "This is now
neck-and-neck going into the next round," Stewart told reporters after watching
the results announcement. "I feel really inspired and encouraged."Hunt and Gove
are widely seen as going head-to-head for votes from the more moderate wing of
the party which favours a softer line on Brexit negotiations with the European
Union. Raab, like Johnson, has warned that he was ready to take Britain out of
the EU without an agreement when the new Brexit deadline arrives in October, if
the EU does not offer better terms.
The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources
published
on June 13-14/2019
Analysis/Trump Sold Three More Bahrain
Tickets, but Program Still TBD (To Be Discussed)
تحليل للمحلل زفي برئيل من الهآرتس يتناول فيه حيثيات المؤتمر الإقتصادي الذي سيعقد
في البحرين بدعوة من ترامب وصهره في سياق ما يسمى صفقة العصر
Zvi Bar'el/Haaretz/June 13/2019
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/75749/%d8%aa%d8%b9%d9%84%d9%8a%d9%82-%d9%84%d9%84%d9%85%d8%ad%d9%84%d9%84-%d8%b2%d9%81%d9%8a-%d8%a8%d8%b1%d8%a6%d9%8a%d9%84-%d9%85%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%87%d8%a2%d8%b1%d8%aa%d8%b3-%d9%8a%d8%aa%d9%86%d8%a7/
With Egypt, Jordan and Morocco now on board, attendance of upcoming economic
conference isn't really about the Palestinian issue
The announcement by the White House Tuesday that Egypt, Jordan and Morocco will
attend the economic workshop that U.S. President Donald Trump is convening in
Bahrain this month has been measured in terms of losses and wins: a loss for the
Palestinians, who failed to persuade the Arab states to stay away; a win for
Trump, who succeeded in selling an additional three tickets to the show, without
knowing the program and the level of representation.
The expected attendance at the “Peace to Prosperity” workshop of Saudi Arabia,
the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and the most recent invitees to RSVP should be
examined in the context of the relationships among these countries and between
Washington and Israel, rather than as a test of enthusiasm for the opportunity
to take part in solving the Palestinian problem.
Jordan delayed its response for weeks, and then hinted at first that it didn’t
plan to attend. But Jordan is dependent on U.S. aid. Even more important, it
cannot afford to skip any gathering at which decisions might be made with
implications for its role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Jordan fears that
Riyadh might assume control of the holy places and exclude Amman from the
political processes in the region. Of even more concern is that while the
economic plan is expected to give Jordan billions of dollars in aid, their price
could include agreeing to accept tens of thousands, if not hundreds of
thousands, of Palestinians in a bid to neutralize the right of return issue.
Saudi Arabia is on a collision course with Congress, which is currently debating
four bills aimed at blocking weapons sales to the kingdom because of the
unending war in Yemen, which the United Nations has declared a major
humanitarian disaster. The status of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in
Washington isn’t great, particularly after the murder of journalist Jamal
Khashoggi and the demand by the U.S. House of Representatives to continue to
investigate the crown prince’s responsibility for the murder.
Saudi Arabia, however, sees the United States as a crucial anchor in the
struggle against Iranian influence in the Middle East, so responding to any
Trump initiative is a strategic necessity, whether the initiative yields a
diplomatic solution or not. For Saudi Arabia, the Palestinian problem is
secondary, if not marginal, to its own regional interests; the importance of its
participation in the Bahrain conference is similar to a celebrity appearance at
an international festival.
Egypt’s attendance at the conference is also part of the close relationship
between President Abdel-Fattah al-Sissi and Trump. Egypt isn’t a vocal rival of
Iran and its involvement in the war in Yemen against the Houthis is symbolic.
But its economic dependence on Riyadh and Washington doesn’t allow it to ignore
the American initiative. In addition to the billions of dollars Egypt has gotten
from Saudi Arabia since Sissi took power in 2013, and the annual aid it gets
from the United States since signing the Camp David Accords, there are the
support and guarantees that the United States gave the loans Egypt has taken
from the International Monetary Fund totalling $12 billion, and the grandiose
investment plans to be funded mostly by Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the UAE are cooperating militarily with the private army
of Libyan Gen. Khalifa Haftar, while Egypt has an unofficial military alliance
with Israel in the war against terror near Israel’s borders. But Egypt, like
Jordan and even Bahrain, have made it clear that it supports the two-state
solution, a formula unacceptable to Israel and one that Washington is also
apparently shying away from. Morocco has an interest in preserving its status as
a partner to diplomatic developments in the region, and in the past helped
mediate between Israel and the Palestinians, but it, too, is needy and its
strong ties with the United States give it the financial security it needs in
order to function.
It is clear to all countries and businessmen participating in the conference
that the burden of funding the plan, which is expected to total nearly $70
billion, will fall on the Gulf states. The United States hasn’t even stated how
much it will agree to put toward realizing its plan. The European Union has made
it clear that any plan that does not offer a realistic diplomatic solution and
contradicts the principle of two states is not worthy of discussion. Trump aide
and son-in-low Jared Kushner visited the EU only on June 4, the day before EU
foreign ministers convened to discuss the Palestinian problem. The EU countries
have learned from previous conferences, like the one in Warsaw in February and
the one convened by the White House in March 2018, that they are meant to serve
as an ATM for Trump’s ideas, with no input. Many EU leaders believe it would be
a mistake to go to Bahrain, which they see as an attempt to bypass the
negotiations that must precede any discussion of funding and investment.
To the Palestinians, the decision by Arab states to attend the conference
despite Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ great efforts at dissuasion is more
proof, if any were needed, that the “Palestinian problem” helps these countries
to strengthen their ties with the United States and Israel and create a map of
Arab hegemony in the Middle East. Abbas believes these countries prefer to
maintain a status quo that promises them American backing without having to pay
a political price in the form of recognizing and establishing relations with
Israel, which would be expected of them in the event the peace process were to
end in an agreement.
Even if Abbas were to accept Trump’s invitation, in order to at least get the
generous aid the plan is expected to offer, bitter experience has taught him
that there is no one he can count on for assistance. For example, at this year’s
Arab League summit the Arab states pledged $100 million a month to the
Palestinian Authority to offset the tax payments that Israel is withholding. Not
a single dollar has been paid. Qatar agreed to give the PA $480 million, but
only in installments.
The Bahrain conference cannot and is not meant to replace negotiations or to
propose a solution that circumvents negotiations. It’s doubtful that it will
even result in concrete agreements regarding the extent and time frame for the
economic aid. Trump will be able to add this event to his resume of paltry
efforts invested in the peace process, which he trampled on when he recognized
Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, moved the U.S. embassy there and accepted
Israel’s annexation of the Golan Heights.
Washington Times: ‘War College Cancels Speaker on Islam’
Raymond Ibrahim/Washington Times/June 13/2019
Note: The following report by national security columnist Bill Gertz on the US
Army War College’s surrender to CAIR’s slander campaign appeared in the
Washington Times, June 12, 2019:
A Muslim activist group has pressured the U.S. Army War College into postponing
a speech by Ray Ibrahim, an expert on the historical roots of Islamic terrorism,
after the group falsely labeled him as a racist and “Islamophobe,” he said.
The Philadelphia chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a
group critics say is linked to the Islamist international group Muslim
Brotherhood, protested the speech in a letter to the college superintendent,
Army Maj. Gen. John S. Kem, and provost James G. Breckenridge. Purporting to
represent the “Muslim community” in Pennsylvania, CAIR stated that it opposed
Mr. Ibrahim’s planned June 19 speech on “Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries
of War Between Islam and the West,” which is also the title of his latest book.
The group asserted that Mr. Ibrahim’s publicly stated view — that Muslim
hostility for and terrorization of the West is not an aberration but a
continuation of Islamic history — has the potential to instigate hatred against
Muslims.
“We also do not believe that there is any benefit to the U.S. in promulgating
the inaccurate thesis that Islam is our enemy, as this stereotype only alienates
millions of Muslim-Americans,” the May 28 letter states.
Mr. Ibrahim, in an interview, denied the CAIR allegations and said the group set
up straw man arguments against him in a smear campaign that involved taking his
statements out of context.
The War College initially informed Mr. Ibrahim that the lecture could proceed
despite the opposition. But after CAIR organized a publicity campaign alleging
Mr. Ibrahim was a white nationalist, the college buckled to the group’s
pressure.
Mr. Ibrahim, an Egyptian by ethnicity, vehemently denied he is a racist. “They
are playing the race card,” he said.
After the Army announced it was postponing the speech, Jacob Bender, CAIR-Philadelphia
executive director, issued a statement urging full cancellation. “A postponement
is not enough — the college should reject hate,” he said.
Robert Martin, a spokesman for the Army War College, said Mr. Ibrahim’s speech
was postponed so the Army education unit can “pair Mr. Ibrahim’s military
history insights in close proximity with another historical perspective, at a
time when [the Army War College] curriculum has addressed historical analysis of
influences on conflict.” He did not respond when asked about the pressure from
CAIR.
Mr. Ibrahim said the speech was canceled and the college’s claim of a
postponement is not correct.
His 352-page book covers nearly 14 centuries in great detail, and CAIR provided
no documentation for any research shortcomings in its campaign against him. “The
history I present in ‘Sword and Scimitar’ is ironclad, verifiable and beyond
well documented, with about a thousand endnotes, it is heavily based on primary
sources, many of which are Muslim, and from eyewitnesses,” Mr. Ibrahim said.
CAIR and its affiliates have been known to engage in similar coercive campaigns
against people and organizations it views as anti-Islamic.
The group forced NPR to fire commentator Juan Williams over comments he made
about Muslims. Nike, also under pressure from CAIR, was forced to destroy 38,000
basketball shoes after the group claimed Muslims were offended by the word “Air”
in stylized letters on the sneakers that appeared similar to the Arabic word for
Allah.
CAIR was first identified as a member of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine
Committee and an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2008 federal terrorism funding
case against the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development in Texas. Five
former leaders of the Muslim charity were found guilty of funneling more than
$12 million to the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas….
With No Progress In Indirect U.S.-Iran Contacts, Tehran
Sends Threatening Messages Via Its Proxies In Gaza
MEMRI/June 14/2019
In recent statements and speeches, Yahya Al-Sinwar, head of Hamas's political
bureau in Gaza, and Ziyad Al-Nakhalah, secretary-general of the Palestinian
Islamic Jihad (PIJ), threatened new confrontations with Israel and praised Iran
for its support of their organizations. Some of their statements were delivered
at a rally organized by the Palestinian factions in Gaza on the occasion of Qods
Day, an annual event that was initiated by the Iranian regime and is held on the
last Friday of Ramadan.
Coming at this time, these statements by the leaders of Hamas and the PIJ
highlighting Iran's support and its contribution to their fighting abilities are
more than just a threat aimed at Israel. They constitute a threatening message
sent by Iran, via its proxies, to the U.S. and its allies, in light of the lack
of progress in the indirect contacts between Iran and the U.S. over the nuclear
issue.
As part of these threatening messages, Hamas leader in Gaza Al-Sinwar stressed
the increase in the number and quality of the organization's rockets, and its
intention to stage massive attacks on targets in central Israel in the next
confrontation. He also declared that Hamas plans to provide the participants of
the weekly March of Return protests on the Gaza-Israel border with military
training. He praised Iran for the financial and technical assistance it has
extended to Hamas, which has enabled it to develop its military capabilities.
"All the Arabs have sold out Palestine, but not the Islamic Republic of Iran,
which continues to support our people against the Israeli enemy," he said.[1]
PIJ leader Al-Nakhalah said, in an interview with Hizbullah's television
channel, that the Palestinian resistance is capable of striking strategic
targets in the heart of Israel with its locally-manufactured rockets, including
rockets with half-ton warheads, stressing that the PIJ utilizes Iranian weapons
and expertise and is closely assisted by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards
Corps (IRGC). IRGC Qods Force commander Qassem Soleimani "knows the men of the
[Palestinian] resistance, and they know him well," he said. He added that the
PIJ would be part of any regional confrontation between the resistance axis and
Israel, and that "the Arab regimes have relinquished Palestine," so their
leaders are unfit to lead the Arab nation, whose rights they have
relinquished.[2]
Both leaders slammed the Trump administration's Middle East peace plan known as
the "Deal of the Century" as well as the U.S.-led "Peace to Prosperity" economic
workshop scheduled to be held in Bahrain on June 25-26, 2019 to discuss the
economic dimensions of the peace plan.[3] This is in line with Iran's position
on the Deal of the Century and with Iran's efforts, reported recently in the
Arab press, to unite the resistance axis against it.[4]
It should be noted that on Qods Day, similar statements were made in Iran
regarding this country's support of the Palestinian armed struggle. In a speech
at a Qods Day march in Ahwaz, capital of the Khuzestan Province, Yahya Rahim
Safavi, advisor to Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said: "The [Iranian]
Islamic Revolution's support for Jerusalem is not [merely] tactical, but is born
of faith that is anchored in the Quran. It follows from the aspirations of the
[Islamic] Revolution and is a major and immutable strategy. We will continue
this support until the occupying [Israeli] regime is expunged... Palestine's
courageous fighters are now continuing the struggle they started using trees and
stones, as well as rockets... Khamenei said that the Zionist regime will cease
to exist within 25 years. The countdown to this regime's demise has already
begun. Trump's Deal of the Century is a plot to save the Zionist regime using
the money of the countries of the region... The strategy of arming the West
Bank, which Khamenei underscored, is now being implemented."[5]
The following are excerpts from Al-Sinwar's and Al-Nakhalah's recent statements.
Statements By Hamas Leader In Gaza Yahya Al-Sinwar
In The Next Confrontation, We Will Double The Number Of Rockets Fired At Tel
Aviv And Its Environs
On May 28, 2019, Yahya Al-Sinwar attended an iftar (Ramadan dinner) in honor of
young people who participate in the March of Return protests on the border, whom
Hamas calls "revolutionary youths," from central and southern Gaza.[6] The event
was organized by the Supreme National Council for Return Marches and Breaking
the Siege, which organizes the marches on behalf of Hamas and the other Gaza
factions.[7] Addressing the participants, Al-Sinwar declared that in any future
confrontation, Hamas's military wing, the 'Izz Al-Din Al-Qassam Brigades, will
direct massive rocket fire at Tel Aviv, saying: "In the 2012 war we fired 17
rockets at Tel Aviv and its environs and in the 2014 war we fired 107 rockets.
[Ahead of] any future confrontation, we have more [rockets] than before, even
twice as many as we fired [in the past]."[8]
Return March Protesters Will Undergo Military Training
Al-Sinwar also stated that Hamas intends to provide the "revolutionary youths"
with military training, saying: "A plan will be formulated to bring the
revolutionaries into military training camps, in preparation for the liberation
campaign."[9] It should be noted that the violent character of the protests on
the border, and the presence of militiamen among the protesters, turn them into
volatile events that often trigger rounds of fighting between Israel and the
Gaza factions.[10]
Without Iranian Assistance, We Wouldn't Have The Capacity To Fire Rockets At Tel
Aviv
On May 30, 2019, Al-Sinwar attended the International Conference in Support of
the Palestinian Intifada.
The conference was held by the Gaza factions on the occasion of Qods Day, which
is marked in many Arab countries, as well as by Muslims in the West, with mass
marches against Israel. Hamas's mouthpiece Al-Risalah reported that, at the
event, Iran extended a grant of over $500,000 to "1,700 families of [Gazan]
martyrs whose benefits have been cut [by the Palestinian Authority]."[11]
Coming against the backdrop of the recent Arab and Islamic summits in Saudi
Arabia, at which decisions were taken against Iran,[12] and the economic
workshop associated with the Deal of the Century, scheduled to take place in
Bahrain in late June, Al-Sinwar's address at the event, which included threats
against regional leaders and incitement directed at the Bahraini people, clearly
expressed Hamas's support for Iran and its axis. Al-Sinwar stressed Iran's
central role in enhancing the military capabilities of Hamas and other
Palestinian organizations, noting the progress they have made over the years:
"In 2008-2009, the resistance fired several dozen locally-manufactured Grad
rockets [into Israel]. In the 2012 war it managed to develop its means and
bombard Tel Aviv with 18 Fajr rockets, and in 2014 it fired over 170 Fajr
rockets at Tel Aviv. All this was with the support of the Islamic Republic of
Iran."[13]
He added: "We will continue to develop our capabilities to fight the occupation.
Iran assisted us with rockets and supported us financially and technically in
developing the rockets of the resistance that were fired at Tel Aviv. Without
its support, the resistance would not have attained such military capabilities
at a time when the [Arab] nation has deserted us... Nobody should blame us for
our gratitude towards Iran, for it behooves us to thank everyone who helps us
realize the goals of our people and our nation." Al-Sinwar advised the Arab
leaders to take an example from Iran and support the Palestinian resistance if
they wish to stay in power.[14]
The Arabs Have All Sold Out Palestine; Only Iran Continues To Support Us
Al-Sinwar stated further: "This is a decisive moment, and the Arab leaders,
kings and rulers must stand united against the Deal of the Century. The Arabs
have all sold out Palestine, and only the Islamic Republic of Iran continues to
support our people against the Israeli occupation."[15] He said that Hamas's
next "genuine campaign" will take place in the West Bank, in order to thwart the
Deal of the Century: "We are willing to be the fuel that will cause this deal to
collapse, and we will not hesitate to achieve this at the cost of the lives of
our leaders and our sons. This deal will not come to pass as long as we have a
single drop of blood still flowing in our veins... In the next stage, our
genuine campaign will be over the [West] Bank, because the occupation's
expansionist dreams focus on [the West Bank]. We urge Fatah to talk [to us] with
one voice, and to join forces [with us] in foiling and thwarting the Deal of the
Century. Our people in the [West] Bank can cause the deal to collapse, at a cost
to the enemy... We know who our friends are and who our enemies are... Whoever
supports the resistance and Jerusalem is a friend, and whoever wants to sell
Jerusalem is an enemy." In the same address, Al-Sinwar called on the Bahraini
people to declare the days of the economic workshop a period of mourning, and
said: "Stay home, put up black banners [as a sign of mourning] and do not go out
into the streets. Declare to the world that you support Jerusalem and that you
will not stab your Palestinian brothers in the back."[16]
In another speech before Gaza dignitaries, at a June 3, 2019 event titled
"United against the Deal of the Century," Al-Sinwar renewed his attack on the
Arab leaders and what he called the campaign in the Arab media in favor of
normalizing relations with Israel, saying: "Arabs, shrieking like crows, are
spreading Zionist propaganda and saying that Jerusalem now belongs to the Jews
and the Zionists and that we have no right to it. We in Palestine feel that we
have been deserted by the official Arab regimes, which possess weapons and
capabilities while we in Gaza dig into the soil with our fingernails so that our
jihad fighters will be able to defend themselves."[17] Al-Sinwar expressed
amazement at what he called the efforts of some Arab countries to appease
Israel, "that cowardly entity that fears young men who emerge from tunnels and
crush the heads of its soldiers."[18]
Statements By Islamic Jihad Leader Ziyad Al-Nakhalah
Arab Leaders Are Unfit For Their Roles And Belong To Enemy Camp
At the International Conference in Support of the Palestinian Intifada, held, as
noted, on May 30, 2019 to mark Qods Day, PIJ secretary-general Ziyad Al-Nakhalah
stressed, in a recorded speech, that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud 'Abbas's
opposition to the Deal of the Century was a manifestation of "the failure of the
plan for a [peace] arrangement with the Zionist entity" and was also a reason to
convene "a national meeting of all our people's [political] power elements, by
means of which we will return to the [original] PLO plan and to its national
charter that calls for liberation and [the right of] return."
In his speech, Al-Nakhalah, like Al-Sinwar, condemned Arab leaders, stating: "We
have always said that the Arab regimes have relinquished Palestine, and we say
today as well that the leaders, kings, and presidents of the [Arab] countries
are unfit to lead [the Arab] nation, that they are abandoning its rights, and
are relinquishing the holy sites. How can they be leaders accepted by their
people while they act this way?! We will all shout together, in their faces: Get
away from us, you belong to the enemy camp."
Underlining also the increased strength of the Palestinian resistance, Al-Nakhalah
said: "Every day, the world is witness to the resistance of our people – through
the Marches of Return at the Gaza border, through the unceasing clashes against
the settlement [enterprise] in the West Bank, and through the bold resistance
that imposes a new equation on the Zionist enemy in every battle that it wages
against it and proves that the time when Israel imposed what it wanted is over.
With the daring of its fighters, and with the development of its capabilities,
the resistance has proven, in its battles in recent years, that it can act in
ways no one expects. We are not far off from the equation of 'if you shell Gaza,
we will
The Resistance Can Crush Israel With Over 1,000 Rockets A Day; We Will Use
Rockets With Half-Ton Warheads
In an interview the same day, May 30, with Hizbullah's Al-Manar TV, Al-Nakhalah
pointed out the increased strength of the PIJ's military wing, saying: "The
Palestinian resistance has fighters willing to fight and freely give their lives
on the battlefield, [a fact] that lends great value to [even] the simplest
weapon on the battlefield... Under the shadow of the siege, most of the weapons
in Gaza are manufactured by the resistance. The occupation thinks that the siege
will impact the resistance – on the contrary, the resistance is manufacturing
and developing its own weapons, such that they reach Tel Aviv and all Israeli
cities." He added: "The resistance is capable of crushing the Zionist cities
with over 1,000 rockets a day for months... In every future clash with the
occupation, the resistance will use rockets with half-ton warheads...
"The resistance is capable of attacking strategic centers and facilities in the
Zionist entity... The resistance will have no 'red lines' in any future
confrontation. Israel needs to understand this equation full well. It must not
carry out violations against the Palestinian civilians. Any aggression against
Gaza will be followed by the shelling not only of Tel Aviv, but of all the
Israeli cities, regardless of the outcome..."
Al-Nakhalah went on to say that IRGC Qods Force commander Qassem Soleimani
"knows the men of the resistance, and they know him well," and that Iran is
committed to supporting the Palestinian resistance and developing its
capabilities so that it can fight Israel. He said that this aid "can help
develop the resistance to the point of achieving liberation, not only standing
fast in the face of the occupation," and added:
"The claim that Iran is an enemy [of the Arabs] is untrue. On the contrary, it
is standing against Israel, and it is the only country that is supporting the
Palestinian people as they confront it... Without Iran and its support for the
Palestinian people by all means at its disposal, the situation would be
completely different. Palestine would become Israel, and the Palestinians would
become slaves of the Israelis... The resistance is fighting with some of Iran's
weapons and knowhow... The resistance axis is a single axis in the confrontation
with the [Israeli] aggression, and all the [resistance] organizations that
comprise it share all its knowhow and capabilities..."
He stated further that the PIJ is part of the regional battle against the
Zionist enemy, and clarified that the West Bank is a central part of the agenda
of the resistance movements and that "day and night, work is ongoing to develop
the resistance capabilities there..."[20]
A few days later, senior PIJ official Muhammad Shalah said that the resistance
in Gaza would not be capable of facing the Israeli enemy without support from
Iran, Syria and Hizbullah, and called for joining the resistance axis because it
was "the quickest way to expel the American-Zionist occupation from the region."
He also condemned the upcoming economic workshop in Bahrain, and the
"treasonous" Arab leaders planning to attend it.[21]
[1] Moqawmh.ps, May 30, 2019. For additional statements by Al-Sinwar praising
Iran's support of Hamas, see MEMRI Inquiry & Analysis No. 1389, Hamas Supporters
Deeply Divided Over Movement's Links With Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards
Corps (IRGC), April 4, 2018.
[2] Paltoday.ps, May 30, 2019.
[3] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 8098, Arab Writers Urge Palestinians Not To
Reject 'Deal Of Century' Out Of Hand, Make Most Of Economic Workshop In Bahrain,
May 31, 2019.
[4] Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), June 3, 2019; raialyoum.com, June 5, 2019.
[5] Farsnews.com, May 31, 2019.
[6] Palsawa.com, May 29, 2019.
[7] On the marches, see MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 7476, The 'Great Return
March' Campaign: An Initiative Sponsored By Hamas, Whose Goal Was To Breach The
Border Fence, Penetrate Israeli Territory, May 18, 2018.
[8] Gazaalaan.net, May 28, 2019.
[9] Gazaalaan.net, May 28, 2019.
[10] Hamas often describes the protests as "nonviolent," but at the same time
the organization, and Al-Sinwar himself, have admitted that many of the
protesters are members of its military wing in civilian clothing. See MEMRI TV
Clip No. 6576, Hamas Leader in Gaza Yahya Sinwar: Our People Took Off Their
Military Uniforms and Joined the Marches; We Decided to Turn the Bodies of Our
Women and Children into a Dam Blocking Arab Collapse, May 16, 2018. Hamas
official Mahmoud Al-Zahhar stated that calling the marches "peaceful resistance"
is "terminological deception," for "this is a peaceful resistance bolstered by a
military force and by security agencies," i.e., by Hamas's military wing. See
MEMRI TV Clip No. 6573, Senior Hamas Official Mahmoud Al-Zahhar on Gaza
Protests: This Is Not Peaceful Resistance, It Is Supported by Our Weapons, May
13, 2018. Hamas political bureau head Isma'il Haniya likewise explained that the
Return Marches combine "popular resistance" and "military resistance," with the
latter defending the former. Hamas.ps, June 7, 2018.
[11] Alresalah.ps, May 28, 2019. PIJ official Khader Habib thanked Iran for its
willingness to help the Palestinians despite all the difficulties it is facing,
adding that, "since the beginning of the [Islamic] Revolution, it did not
withhold assistance from our people and from its resistance for a [single] day."
Al-Akhbar (Lebanon), May 30, 2019.
[12] In the last days of May 2019, three regional summits were held in Mecca.
Two of them, emergency summits of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and of the
Arab League, were convened by Saudi Arabia to present a united Gulf front
vis-à-vis Iran in response to recent incidents: the attack on the Saudi oil
facilities by the Iran-backed Houthi rebels and the Fujairah attack on the oil
tankers, two of which were Saudi. A third summit, which had been scheduled in
advance, was held under the aegis of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).
FIX
[13] Moqawmh.ps, May 30, 2019.
[14] Palinfo.com, May 30, 2019.
[15] Moqawmh.ps, May 30, 2019.
[16] Palinfo.com, May 30, 2019.
[17] Filastin (Gaza), June 3, 2019.
[18] Hamas.ps, June 3, 2019.
[19] Paltoday.ps, May 30, 2019.
[20] Paltoday.ps, May 30, 2019.
[21] Alwatan.sy, June 3, 2019.
In Light Of Impasse In Indirect Iran-U.S. Negotiations,
Upsurge In Iranian Terrorism Anticipated On Various Fronts
By: A. Savyon and Y. Carmon*/MEMRI/June 14/2019
Introduction
In the past month, Iran has escalated its violent activity against the Gulf
states – Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) – with the aim of
bringing the U.S. into negotiations with it on Iran's own terms: indirect
negotiations aimed at lifting the U.S. sanctions on it. For the U.S., the aim of
the negotiations is completely different; it is demanding changes to the JCPOA
nuclear deal and a halt to Iran's expansion and subversive activity in the
region, as well as limitations on Iran's development of its ballistic missile
capability.
The U.S. response to Iran's military escalation (see below) was twofold: it
dispatched aircraft carriers to the region and decided to beef up its forces in
the Gulf, while at the same time it expressed willingness to conduct indirect
negotiations with Iran and took conciliatory measures to make this possible.
These measures included delaying the aircraft carriers' entrance into the
Persian Gulf, delaying the implementation of the sanctions on Iran's
petrochemical industry, and the June 2, 2019 announcement by Secretary of State
Mike Pompeo that the U.S. was willing to negotiate with Iran without the
preconditions that he had previously released.
Indirect Iran-U.S. negotiations via intermediaries are apparently already
underway, but have led nowhere for either Iran or the U.S. due to the
unbridgeable gap between the sides' demands and goals.
Although the U.S. rejected Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif's April 24, 2019
proposal for negotiations for a prisoner exchange deal, it apparently did
negotiate, and U.S. permanent resident and Lebanese citizen Nazar Zaka, detained
by Iran since November 2015 on accusations of spying, was released June 11,
2019. Additionally, indirect negotiations are underway in the matter of
determining the marine border between Israel and Lebanon, with Israel's and
Hizbullah's participation, which require indirect American and Iranian
involvement.
These conciliatory U.S. measures have been presented by Iran as shows of
weakness. Iranian President Hassan Rohani said in a speech at an athletes'
conference in Tehran on June 1: "The same enemy who up to a year ago declared
'my aim is to destroy the regime of the Islamic Republic [of Iran]' announced
clearly today that it does not want to do a thing against the [Iranian] regime.
The same enemy who up to a few months ago stated that it is the greatest
military power in the world, and that if it wanted it could break Iran's armed
forces, announced today that it has no intention of fighting. Up to a few months
ago, the Persian Gulf was a place where its aircraft carriers sailed freely, but
today nothing is heard from its navy, and it has anchored in international
waters, 300 and 400 miles [from the Persian Gulf]. During this time, we have
shown that we are not submitting to the bullying and greedy superpowers. We are
men of reason and negotiation, provided we sit around the negotiating table
fully respected and in the framework of international law, not on orders to
negotiate. If that is the case, we will not obey..."[1]
The head of the Iranian judiciary Ebrahim Raisi stated on June 3, 2019: "We see
how America is begging to negotiate with Iran. This is further proof of the
correct and clear-sighted position of [Supreme] Leader [Khamenei], who has said
time and again: 'In the face of the excessive demands of the enemy, resistance
is the only way for the Iranian nation to achieve victory.' Today America needs
negotiations, and if we insist on our principles positions, the enemy will
retreat, as the recent positions of U.S. officials indeed demonstrate."[2]
On June 2, 2019, Gen. Yahyah Safavi, advisor and aide to Iranian Supreme Leader
Ali Khamenei and commander of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC),
said: "America is only boasting politically and militarily, and in fact two
weeks ago it began to retreat. We are ready for war. Today we are the superpower
in the Middle East."[3]
Against the backdrop of the unbridgeable gap between Iran's and the U.S.'s
positions, and following the failure of the various mediation channels used by
Iran with the U.S. (see below), the IRGC-affiliated Javan daily published on its
June 11 front page a cartoon depicting German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas, who
had recently visited Tehran in an effort to bridge between the sides, as Hitler
carrying out the orders of his American and Israeli masters. This depiction of
Maas' visit reflects the unlikelihood that indirect negotiations, whether on the
JCPOA, on the issues of Iran's expansion in the region and its missiles, or on
the continuation of the sanctions, will succeed, and also expresses the Iranian
regime's frustration at its failure to compel the Trump administration to change
its position vis-à-vis Iran.
In light of the impasse, Iran is expected to escalate its violent activity.
Signs that it is doing so can be seen in the upsurge of activity in various
sectors, including in the Iran-Israel conflict in the Syrian and Gaza arenas.[4]
Also anticipated is an escalation in the conflict between Iran and the Gulf
states, that is, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. On June 4, Amir Abirabdollahian,
special aide to the Majlis speaker, tweeted about Saudi Arabia:
"If #Saudi rulers do not stop aiding & abetting the #US in its economic war
against #Iran, they must wait for its new and shocking decision. The clock is
ticking so fast for the continuity of Saudi-#Emirati-#Israeli dirty policies."
In its May 22, 2019 editorial, the regime-affiliated Kayhan daily called for
destroying the Saudi regime.[5] Indeed, the Houthi militia is continuing to
attack targets on Saudi soil. On June 12, 2019, the Houthis announced that they
had attacked the Abha civilian airport, situated some 200 km from the
Yemen-Saudi border, with a cruise missile; before that, on June 9, they attacked
the Najran airport, in southwestern Saudi Arabia, with drones. Houthi spokesman
Yahyah Sari'a also reported, on June 5, that 20 outposts along the Saudi border
had been attacked and taken over by his forces.[6]
At a June 10 joint press conference with German Foreign Minister Maas, at the
conclusion of Maas' Tehran visit, Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif warned: "The
tension in our region is because of America's economic war on Iran. The only way
to reduce the tension in the region is to stop this economic war. You cannot
expect the economic war on the Iranian people to continue [while] the people who
began it or support it are protected."[7]
On June 12, Zarif's deputy Abbas Araghchi also conveyed a warning, in his
meeting with Special Envoy for the Singapore Foreign Minister Zainul Abidin bin
Mohamed Rasheed. He said: "America has entered into an economic war with Iran,
and this is the root of the rise of the tension in the region. The American
economic sanctions are in fact aimed against the security of the entire region;
therefore, it is impossible to expect tranquility and security in the region
without a ceasefire in [this] economic war [against us]."[8]
This morning (June 13, 2019), the escalation reached a new peak with the attack
on two oil tankers near the Strait of Hormuz.[9]
The Iran Condition For Negotiations: The Lifting Of The Sanctions
As noted above, in all its contacts with the U.S. since as early as 2015, the
Iranian regime aims to get the sanctions on it lifted.[10] This was stressed
most recently in statements by Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on May 29 ,
when he said: "The problem is [not the negotiations themselves but rather]
setting the topic of the talks. We are not negotiating on every topic. I want to
be clear: We will not negotiate on topics considered to be the honor of the
revolution. We will not negotiate with anyone on our defensive capabilities.
Because negotiation means a deal... not only sitting and talking... When they
say [to us], 'give up and abandon the defensive options that strengthen you, it
is impossible to negotiate on such a thing... This [is the essence of]
negotiating with America; America's strategy is pressure, and negotiation is
only secondary to pressure.
"The way to fight this [American] stratagem... is for the other side [i.e. Iran]
to have means of pressure as well, and utilize them. This is the only way... to
stop the other side. We have the means of counter-pressure against the American
pressure. These means are not military or anything like that, despite what they
say and what they want to publicize. If a time comes when [military means]
become necessary, we possess [such means], but this is not what we are
considering [at the moment]. We have [other] means of pressure. The steps that
the Supreme Council for National Security has taken and also announced
[regarding the issues of uranium enrichment and heavy water] is one of them...
That is, stopping [America's pressure] is not limited [to the steps being
carried out] at the moment. The current steps are sufficient for now, [but] in
the next stage, when the need arises, we can use other means of pressure..."[11]
Addressing the cabinet on May 29, 2019 the occasion of Qods Day, Iranian
President Rohani said: "[The Americans] talk a lot, and there are many ups and
downs in their talk. The steadfastness of the [Iranian] people has occasionally
forced them to contradict themselves. Our yardstick is not what they say but
what they do. When they stop their injustice towards the Iranian nation, lift
the cruel sanctions, keep their promises and return to the negotiation table –
which they themselves left and destroyed – they will not find their way blocked.
The Iranian nation is alert and clever, and its yardstick is action."[12]
Iran's Modus Operandi: Using Terror And Diplomacy Simultaneously
Iran's usual mode of operation is to make simultaneous use of two means: its
terror capabilities – which it calls "defense policy" (see Zarif's statements in
the ABC interview below), implemented either by its own forces or by its proxies
in the Middle East – and its diplomatic capabilities, to achieve its aims and
improve its political and regional standing. This policy of employing terror,
directly or via proxies, in varying degrees of intensity in order to achieve
diplomatic aims, is Iran's regular strategy, as has been demonstrated again by
the events of the past month in several arenas: in the UAE (the May 12 attack on
the oil tankers), in Saudi Arabia (the May 12 Houthi attack on the Aramco oil
facilities, as well as the May 26 Houthi attack on the aircraft hangars in Jizan
on the Red Sea[13]), in Gaza (the activation of the Islamic Jihad to stage
attacks on Israel on May 3, the day on which the U.S. retracted its exemption
from sanctions for several countries still buying oil from Iran), and in Iraq
(the May 19 firing of rockets at the Green Zone in Baghdad, which houses foreign
embassies). Alongside its use of terror, Iran has proposed to negotiate a
non-aggression pact with the Gulf states it has attacked.[14]
Both the terror and the diplomacy vis-à-vis the Gulf states are aimed at
changing the policy of the U.S., which Iran is unable to confront directly. The
goals of the terror attacks of the past month are the following: pressuring the
U.S. to indirectly negotiate with Iran,[15] extracting an American commitment to
refrain from attacking it, and securing the alleviation or lifting of the
sanctions. The first two goals have in fact been achieved, but as for the
sanctions, it seems that U.S. President Trump is unlikely to succumb to the
Iranian pressure, and therefore Iran can be expected to renew its terror
attacks, carried out by its proxies and targeting its Arab rivals and their
global oil trade.
This strategy explains the repeated Iranian attempts to initiate negotiations
with the U.S. on Iran's own terms via various mediators – including Oman, Qatar,
Iraq, Kuwait, Japan, Switzerland and Germany.[16] Foreign Minister Zarif visited
Japan on May 17 and Baghdad on May 26, while his deputy Abbas Araghchi visited
Oman and Kuwait and met with their respective foreign ministers.[17]
Furthermore, German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas visited Tehran on June 10 and
Japanese Prime Minister Abe Shinzo came there two days later to mediate and
convey messages.
Iran's strategy was explicitly articulated by President Rohani's advisor
Hessameddin Ashna, who said on May 21: "We want [to achieve] two things
simultaneously. First, we will not allow a war to break out in this region.
Second, we will not agree to remain under [U.S.] sanctions. Our answer to the
U.S. is 'no to war and no to sanctions.' The U.S., which fears a war [with us],
wants to force us to negotiate [with it]... The reply we gave [the Americans],
and what our foreign policy [in the nuclear and diplomatic domains] and our
defense strategy [a hint at the terror attacks attributed to Iran] accomplish,
are the following: achieving a situation where America can neither frighten us
with war nor maintain its sanctions [on us]."[18]
Iranian Threats
Iranian officials complement the diplomatic pressure with harsh threats directed
against the U.S. For example, Foreign Minister Zarif used threatening language
in a June 2, 2019 interview with ABC: "We don't differentiate between economic
war and military war. The U.S. is engaged in war against us, and a war is
painful to our participants. We have a very clear notion that in a war, nobody
wins. In war, everybody loses the loss of some will be greater than the loss of
others…
"'All options are on the table' belongs to the time when the use of force was
legal, and that is about 100 years ago. What we say is that we exercise our
self-defense. Self-defense is allowed. President Trump has announced that he is
engaged in a war and economic war against Iran, and we have an obligation to
defend our people against that economic war."[19]
Khamenei aide and advisor and former IRGC commander Yahya Safavi said on June 2:
"The Americans have 25 military bases in the region, including the CENTCOM air
command in Qatar, the ground forces command in Kuwait and the naval command in
Bahrain. These bases house over 20,000 troops. The Americans know very well that
this military force is in range of Iran's missiles. Moreover, in the Persian
Gulf, all of the American navy [vessels, and the vessels of other] foreign
[countries], are within range of the IRGC's surface-to-sea missiles. These
missiles have a range of 300 km, i.e., can span the distance between the Iranian
shore and the opposite shore.
"Trump has turned security into an economic [issue], and he will never launch
any war unless it is economically profitable. Trump knows that any war against
Iran will result in a military defeat [for the U.S.] and will also be very
costly in economic terms. The very first bullet fired in the Persian Gulf will
cause the price of oil to skyrocket to over $100 [a barrel], and America, Europe
and America's allies, such as Japan and South Korea, will not be able to bear
oil prices of $100 [per barrel]...
"If Trump asks the opinion of the U.S. army [generals], who have learned the
lessons of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, they will certainly prevent him from
fighting in Iran, for they know that Iran has a strategy of surprises and it
will deliver a shocking blow [to the U.S.]. They know very well that Iran has
kept many of its military strategies under wraps, and can deliver a shattering
blow to foreign forces.
"The war being waged today is an economic and psychological one. The withdrawal
from the nuclear agreement, and the oil sanctions, are actually [a kind of] war.
I hope we will win this war as well, using the same strategy of resistance, soft
war and internal unity.
"The strength of America, the Zionist regime and some of the Arab countries is
steadily waning. The reactionary countries in the region [i.e., the Arab Gulf
states] must know that the Americans have never been loyal to any of their
slaves, such as the [Iranian] Shah, [Tunisian president] Zine El Abidine Ben
Ali, [Egyptian president] Hosni Mubarak, [Libyan president] Mu'ammar Qaddafi,
etc., and they will not be loyal to their slaves in the future. The Americans
will definitely leave the Middle East, as Khamenei said...
"Iran will be the neighbor of the states in the region forever, and if they are
wise, they will not capitulate to America, which calls them 'milk cows' and
extracts money from them.
"Iran always seeks to maintain friendly relations with the countries of the
region, and Khamenei, too, has been stressing the unity of the Islamic nation
for years. Our strategy is non-aggression towards our neighbors. Iran is even
willing to sign a non-aggression pact with the neighboring countries. Foreign
Minister [Zarif] mentioned this [only] recently. My suggestion is to sign a
non-aggression pact with some of the countries and form a coalition with others.
I hope that the countries of the region will regard America and the Zionists as
their enemies, instead of Iran..."[20]
Responding to the dispatching of the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier to the
Persian Gulf, IRGC navy commander Alireza Tangsiri said on May 13: "We are
absolutely ready [for its arrival], and if the enemy missteps, our first move
will be to attack and destroy all the American gear and infrastructures in the
region."[21]
* A. Savyon is director of MEMRI's Iran Media Project; Y. Carmon is the
president and founder of MEMRI.
[1] President.ir/fa, June 1, 2019.
[2] Mashreghnews.ir, June 3, 2019.
[3] Farsnews.com, June 2, 2019.
[4] A video released May 30, 2019 by the Palestinian Islamic Jihad's Al-Quds
Brigades showed drones attacking an Israeli tank. Saraya.ps.
[5] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 8082, Iranian Regime Mouthpiece 'Kayhan'
Announces A War To Bring Down Saudi Regime And Reduce Saudi Oil Exports To Zero;
States: America Has No Desire, Or No Capability, To Support Saudi Arabia And The
UAE, May 22, 2019).
[6] Almasirah.net, June 5, 2019.
[7] Tasnim (Iran), June 10, 2019.
[8] Isna.ir, June 12, 2019.
[9] Alarabiya.net, June 13, 2019.
[10] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 6151, Khamenei Declares That He Will Not
Honor The Agreement If Sanctions Are Merely Suspended And Not Lifted, September
4, 2015; Inquiry & Analysis No. 1196, Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei's Letter
Of Guidelines To President Rohani On JCPOA Sets Nine Conditions Nullifying
Original Agreement Announced July 14, 2015, October 22, 2015; Special Dispatch
No. 6191, Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei, Iranian Officials Speak Out Against
Iranian Approval Of JCPOA, October 18, 2015; MEMRI Daily Brief No.65, MEMRI:
'The Emperor Has No Clothes', October 30, 2015.
[11] Farsi.khamenei.it, May 29, 2019.
[12] President.ir/fa, May 29, 2019. It is important to note that the Iranian
regime does not rule out negotiations with the West, providing it can ensure
compliance with its demands in advance. This is what happened during the Obama
administration, when the Iranian regime announced it would not negotiate with
the U.S. over its long-range missiles, but eventually did enter negotiations in
which it demanded in advance, and received, American approval for missiles with
a range of up to 2000 km. See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 6100, Leaks From The
Negotiation Room: Iran, Russia vs. U.S. In Verbal Clash Over Iran's Ballistic
Missiles, July 10, 2015.
[13] In late May the Houthi Al-Masirah channel also reported a Houthi suicide
drone attack on Saudi military infrastructure. Fars (Iran), May 26, 2019.
[14] Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif repeated this proposal to the Gulf
states during his May 25, 2019 visit to Baghdad. ISNA (Iran), May 26, 2019.
[15] Iran refuses to hold direct and open negotiations with the U.S., since this
is perceived as capitulation, based on the ideology of the Islamic Revolution
(which regards the U.S. as the "Great Satan") as well as from a political
perspective. Secret and indirect negotiations are Iran's customary solution in
times of crisis. The open nuclear negotiations came only after lengthy secret
contacts during which the Obama administration accepted Iran's position in full,
namely recognized Iran's right to enrich uranium, which was an Iranian
precondition for launching the open negotiations. See MEMRI Special Dispatch
No.6131, Iranian Senior Officials Disclose Confidential Details From Nuclear
Negotiations: Already In 2011 We Received Letter From U.S. Administration
Recognizing Iran's Right To Enrich Uranium, August 10, 2015.
[16] There have been numerous reports in the regional and global media about
mediation efforts by countries inside and outside the region, including reports
on a secret visit by Qatari Foreign Minister Muhammad Bin 'Abd Al-Rahman Aal
Thani in Tehran in mid-May; willingness by Iraq and Kuwait to mediate between
Iran and the U.S. in order to ease the tensions (Al-Hayat, London, May 27, 2019,
arabi21.com, May 25, 2019, raialyoum.com, May 21, 2019, aljazeera.net, May 17,
2019), a visit by the Omani foreign minister in Tehran and contacts between him
and the Americans (elaph.com, May 21, 2019), and a report by the Iraqi
Almaalomah news agency on a visit by Iraqi Prime Minister 'Adel 'Abd Al-Mahdi in
Qatar and Kuwait as part of the mediation efforts between Iran and the U.S. This
last report also mentioned mediation efforts by Russia, Qatar, Iraq,
Switzerland, Oman and Japan (almaalomah.com, May 20, 2019). The online daily
raialyoum.com reported on May 26 that Zarif's deputy Abbas Araghchi will relay a
message to the Arab countries that Iran is interested in dialogue with them to
resolve the problems, and also relay Iran's replies to proposals presented by
Qatar's foreign minister during his visit to Tehran.
[17] Tasnim (Iran), May 26, 2019, ILNA (Iran), May 27, 2019.
[18] Tasnim (Iran), May 21, 2019.
[19] Abcnews.go.com, June 2, 2019.
[20] Fars (Iran), June 2, 2019.
[21] Fars (Iran), May 13, 2019.
The Suppressed Plight of Palestinian Christians
Raymond Ibrahim/Gatestone Institute/June 13/2019
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/14358/palestinian-christians-persecution
"Fatah regularly exerts heavy pressure on Christians not to report the acts of
violence and vandalism from which they frequently suffer, as such publicity
could damage the PA's image as an actor capable of protecting the lives and
property of the Christian minority under its rule.... That image could have
negative repercussions for the massive international, and particularly European,
aid the PA receives." — Dr. Edy Cohen, Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies.
Considered another way, the bread and butter of the PA and its supporters, media
and others, seems to be to portray the Palestinians as victims of unjust
aggression and discrimination from Israel. This narrative could be jeopardized
if the international community learned that Palestinians themselves were
persecuting fellow Palestinians — solely on account of religion.
"Far more important to the Palestinian Authority than arresting those who
assault Christian sites is keeping such incidents out of the mainstream media.
And they are very successful in this regard. Indeed, only a handful of smaller
local outlets bothered to report on these latest break-ins. The mainstream
international media ignored them altogether." — Dr. Edy Cohen, Israel Today.
As Justus Reid Weiner, a lawyer and scholar well-acquainted with the region
explains, "The systematic persecution of Christian Arabs living in Palestinian
areas is being met with nearly total silence by the international community,
human rights activists, the media and NGOs... In a society where Arab Christians
have no voice and no protection it is no surprise that they are leaving."
Christianity is on the verge of disappearing in the place of its birth,
including Bethlehem (pictured). According to lawyer and scholar Justus Reid
Weiner, "The systematic persecution of Christian Arabs living in Palestinian
areas is being met with nearly total silence by the international community,
human rights activists, the media and NGOs... In a society where Arab Christians
have no voice and no protection it is no surprise that they are leaving." (Image
source: Daniel Case/Wikimedia Commons)
At a time when Christians throughout the Muslim world are suffering from a
variety of persecution, the plight of Palestinian Christians is seldom heard.
It exists. Open Doors, a human rights group that follows the persecution of
Christians, notes that Palestinian Christians suffer from a "high" level of
persecution, the source of which is, in its words, "Islamic Oppression":
"Those who convert to Christianity from Islam, however, face the worst Christian
persecution and it is difficult for them to safely participate in existing
churches. In the West Bank they are threatened and put under great pressure, in
Gaza their situation is so dangerous that they live their Christian faith in
utmost secrecy....The influence of radical Islamic ideology is rising, and
historical churches have to be diplomatic in their approach towards Muslims."
That said, while reports of the persecution of Christians emanate regularly from
other Muslim majority regions around the world — Pakistan, Egypt, and Nigeria as
three examples — little is mentioned of those Christians living under the
Palestinian Authority.
Why is that? Is it because they experience significantly less persecution than
their coreligionists around the Muslim world? Or is it because of their unique
situation — living in a hotly contested arena with much political and media
wrangling in the balance?
"The Persecution of Christians in the Palestinian Authority," a new report by
Dr. Edy Cohen, published by the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies on May
27, goes a long way in answering these questions.
First, it documents three recent anecdotes of persecution of Christians, none of
which was reported by the so-called "mainstream media":
"On April 25, the terrified residents of the Christian village of Jifna near
Ramallah ... were attacked by Muslim gunmen ... after a woman from the village
submitted a complaint to the police that the son of a prominent,
Fatah-affiliated leader had attacked her family. In response, dozens of Fatah
gunmen came to the village, fired hundreds of bullets in the air, threw petrol
bombs while shouting curses, and caused severe damage to public property. It was
a miracle that there were no dead or wounded...
"The second incident occurred during the night of May 13. Vandals broke into a
church of the Maronite community in the center of Bethlehem, desecrated it, and
stole expensive equipment belonging to the church, including the security
cameras.
"Three days later it was the turn of the Anglican church in the village of Aboud,
west of Ramallah. Vandals cut through the fence, broke the windows of the
church, and broke in. They desecrated it, looked for valuable items, and stole a
great deal of equipment.
"According to its Facebook page, this is the sixth time the Maronite church in
Bethlehem has been subjected to acts of vandalism and theft, including an arson
attack in 2015 that caused considerable damage and forced the church to close
for a lengthy period."
These three attacks, which occurred in the span of three weeks, fit the same
pattern of abuse that Christians in other Muslim majority regions habitually
experience. While the desecration and plundering of churches is prevalent, so
too are Muslim mobs rising against Christian minorities, whenever the latter —
perceived as dhimmis, or third-class, tolerated "citizens" who are often
expected to be grateful they are tolerated at all — dare speak up for their
rights, as occurred the Christian village of Jifna on April 25:
"[T]he rioters called on the [Christian] residents to pay jizya—a head tax that
was levied throughout history on non-Muslim minorities under Islamic rule. The
most recent victims of the jizya were the Christian communities of Iraq and
Syria under ISIS rule."
Moreover, as often happens when Muslims attack Christians in Islamic nations,
"Despite the [Christian] residents' cries for help" in Jifna, "the PA police did
not intervene during the hours of mayhem. They have not arrested any suspects."
Similarly, "no suspects were arrested" in the two church attacks.
Palestinian Christians, in short, are suffering from the same patterns of
persecution — including church attacks, kidnappings and forced conversion — as
their co-religionists in dozens of Muslim nations. The difference, however, is
that the persecution of Palestinian Christians has "received no coverage in the
Palestinian media." In fact, Cohen explains, "a full gag order was imposed in
many cases":
"The only thing that interests the PA is that events of this kind not be leaked
to the media. Fatah regularly exerts heavy pressure on Christians not to report
the acts of violence and vandalism from which they frequently suffer, as such
publicity could damage the PA's image as an actor capable of protecting the
lives and property of the Christian minority under its rule. Even less does the
PA want to be depicted as a radical entity that persecutes religious minorities.
That image could have negative repercussions for the massive international, and
particularly European, aid the PA receives."
Considered another way, the bread and butter of the PA and its supporters, media
and others, seems to be to portray the Palestinians as victims of unjust
aggression and discrimination from Israel. This narrative could be jeopardized
if the international community learned that Palestinians themselves were
persecuting fellow Palestinians — solely on account of religion. It might be
hard to muster sympathy for a supposedly oppressed people when one realizes that
they themselves are doing the oppressing of the minorities in their midst.
So sensitive to this potential difficulty, "PA officials exert pressure on local
Christian to not report such incidents, which threaten to unmask the Palestinian
Authority as yet another Middle East regime beholden to a radical Islamic
ideology," Cohen writes in another report.
"Far more important to the Palestinian Authority than arresting those who
assault Christian sites is keeping such incidents out of the mainstream media.
And they are very successful in this regard. Indeed, only a handful of smaller
local outlets bothered to report on these latest break-ins. The mainstream
international media ignored them altogether."
Notably, a similar dynamic sometimes exists concerning Muslim refugees. Although
West European politicians and media present them as persecuted and oppressed, in
need of a welcoming hand, Muslim migrants themselves sometimes persecute and
oppress Christian minorities among them — whether by terrorizing them in refugee
camps, or drowning them in the Mediterranean.
The sad and simple fact, by all counts, is that Christianity is on the verge of
disappearing in the place of its birth, including Bethlehem. As Justus Reid
Weiner, a lawyer and scholar well-acquainted with the region, explains:
"The systematic persecution of Christian Arabs living in Palestinian areas is
being met with nearly total silence by the international community, human rights
activists, the media and NGOs... In a society where Arab Christians have no
voice and no protection it is no surprise that they are leaving."
*Raymond Ibrahim, author of the new book, Sword and Scimitar, Fourteen Centuries
of War between Islam and the West, is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the
Gatestone Institute and a Judith Rosen Friedman Fellow at the Middle East Forum.
© 2019 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Refugees in Turkey: Mistreated by Ankara, Ignored by the UN
Sirwan Mansouri/Gatestone Institute/June 13/2019
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/14368/refugees-turkey-unhcr
Turkey, which is located between the Middle East and Europe, was one of the
first countries to establish a UNHCR regional office in 1960, and was given
economic incentives to do so. Every year after that, the Turkish government
received a large budget with which to provide aid to refugees.
The UNHCR, the organization that is supposed to advocate for the rights of
refugees, has done the opposite. It has placed their care in the hands of an
indifferent and hostile Turkey, which they leave to its own terrible devices.
Perhaps the UN has washed its hands of the misery of refugees in Turkey -- who
have become virtual slaves -- but the rest of the international community must
hold Ankara accountable for its inexcusable treatment of people who escaped
danger in their countries of origin, only to be abused by the authorities that
vowed -- and took money -- to protect and resettle them.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the organization that
is supposed to advocate for the rights of refugees, has done the opposite. It
has placed their care in the hands of an indifferent and hostile Turkey, which
they leave to its own terrible devices. Pictured: The Adiyaman refugee camp in
Turkey. The UNHCR has provided "technical support" to the Turkish government for
maintaining the camp.
Over the past half century, the Geneva-based United Nations High Commissioner
for Refugees (UNHCR) has created and managed mechanisms to protect people whose
lives are in danger at the hands of repressive regimes by providing them with
political asylum in other countries. The war-torn Middle East has been home to
the highest number of such asylum-seekers.
Turkey, which is located between the Middle East and Europe, was one of the
first countries to establish a UNHCR regional office in 1960, and was given
economic incentives to do so. Every year after that, the Turkish government
received a large budget with which to provide aid to refugees.
With an increase in cuts to UN refugee budgets, Turkey was able to provide even
less money to asylum-seekers under its auspices. When the Syrian Civil War began
in 2011, a huge number of refugees flowed into Turkey from Syria and Iraq.
Initially, Turkey seems to have believed that this situation could be
financially lucrative, as the UN would have to increase its refugee budget for
Ankara. This is not what happened, however. In fact, UN assistance to Turkish
mediators, such as the Human Resources Development Fund (UNHCR) and the
Association for Solidarity with Asylum Seekers and Migrants (SGDD-ASAM), was
even severely reduced, and in 2018, it was cut off completely.
This has led Ankara to provide even less help than before to those refugees who
arrived in Turkey prior to the war in Syria. Furthermore, many of the UNHCR
quotas for the resettlement of refugees in third countries (such as in Europe),
which formerly belonged to Iranians, Afghans and Iraqis, were allocated to
Syrians.
Given that Turkey bars refugees from the labor market, many refugees --
including those with university degrees, have no choice but to work in menial
jobs. To make matters worse, many employers take advantage of these refugees by
not paying them.
Not permitted to work in the first place, these refugees do not complain to
authorities, for fear of being fined or fired. The same fear of complaining goes
for female refugees, who are often sexually abused by their Turkish employers.
Living in poverty and despair -- and ignored by the Turkish government and the
UNHCR -- these refugees often engage in anti-social behavior, including drug
addiction, theft, and sex-trafficking. Many have sold their organs. Turkish
immigration offices and police, instead of helping these refugees, instill fear
in them, thereby adding to their frustration.
The UNHCR, the organization that is supposed to advocate for the rights of
refugees, has done the opposite. It has placed their care in the hands of an
indifferent and hostile Turkey, which they leave to its own terrible devices.
The heaviest blow to non-Syrian refugees in Turkey was dealt by the UNHCR on
September 9, 2018, when it announced that its "registration activities for
applicants for international protection in Turkey [would end the following day],
as part of the transition of refugee status determination responsibility to the
Turkish Directorate General for Migration Management (DGMM)."
The UN, in other words, has delegated all registration of asylum-seekers in
Turkey to Turkish immigration authorities.
Perhaps the UN has washed its hands of the misery of refugees in Turkey -- who
have become virtual slaves -- but the rest of the international community must
hold Ankara accountable for its inexcusable treatment of people who escaped
danger in their countries of origin, only to be abused by the authorities that
vowed -- and took money -- to protect and resettle them.
Sirwan Mansouri is an Iranian Kurdish journalist based in the Middle East.
© 2019 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Iran thinks it can pressure the US. It can’t
Dr. John C. Hulsman/Arab News/June 13/2019
Confusion surrounds the attack on the two tankers in the Gulf of Oman on
Thursday, with the stricken ships ablaze just south of the Strait of Hormuz and
their 44 crewman rescued by the Iranian navy.
Precisely what weapons were used to cripple the Japanese and Norwegian-owned
tankers is unclear, although it has been reported on US television that
eyewitnesses saw shell-like projectiles before one of the ships was struck above
the waterline.
Predictably, following the incident, the global price of oil spiked by 4.5
percent, due both to the lingering uncertainty about the nature of the attack
and the fact that it is the second such outrage in a month, following the May 12
incident in which four ships were damaged off the coast of Fujairah. But while
the foreground remains murky, the background is far clearer. Despite their
expected denials, there is little doubt that Iran lies behind the attack, either
directly or through the sponsorship of its Houthi militia allies, fighting Saudi
forces for control of Yemen.
Simply put, Tehran had the motive, means, and opportunity to perpetrate the
crime. And the Iranians always act for a reason.
From Tehran’s perspective, there are reasons a-plenty for staging the attacks,
as Iran’s fragile economy becomes ever-more constrained by American sanctions
and the “maximum pressure” the Trump administration is bringing to bear on the
republic.
Tehran is hoping that, just short of war, it can make itself such a nuisance on
the international stage that the Europeans will plead its case with the US to
halt the unremitting pressure on the greatly threatened regime.
The timing of yesterday’s attack is particularly suspect. Japanese Prime
Minister Shinzo Abe — who is both personal friends with the volatile Trump while
still maintaining a good relationship with the Iranian leadership — is presently
on a mission to Tehran, where he is attempting to defuse the increasing tensions
between the US and Iran.
Striking a Japanese-owned tanker while Abe is attempting to negotiate some sort
of rapprochement between the two countries is an especially effective way for
hard-liners in the Iranian government — think the Iranian Revolutionary Guards
leadership who both economically and politically benefit from the conflict — to
derail any effort to defuse tensions.
But at a broader, strategic level, this slow-moving crisis already has a sort of
inexorable logic. On May 8, 2018, Donald Trump overturned the key foreign policy
legacy of the Obama administration, declaring US determination to withdraw from
the Iran nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
Scorning the accord, the Trump administration made clear that it had no
intention of trying to woo Iran, to bring it in from the geostrategic cold,
using trade and a relaxation of sanctions to entice it to behave as a status quo
power and to halt its nuclear program.
Rather, the Trump administration views the JCPOA as the dangerous result of the
Obama administration’s wishful thinking. Instead, the president and his senior
advisers feared that continuing with the accord would lead to an economically
strengthened Iran, now with debilitating sanctions removed, which could
patiently out-wait the rest of the world.
Within the course of a generation, and without straying from the terms of the
agreement, this economically emboldened Tehran would instead simply resume its
nuclear program once the JCPOA’s time limits ran out, and waltz into the nuclear
club with few questions asked.
Determined to avoid this happening, the White House has dramatically altered US
policy on Iran, returning it to its traditional post-1979 stance of animosity.
Trump has placed “maximum pressure” on the Iranian leadership, re-imposing US
sanctions, threatening European countries and businesses (which still adhere to
the JCPOA) with the potential loss of access to the vast US market if they
continued doing business with Iran, and announcing his intent of sanctioning the
whole of the Iranian energy industry, the life-blood of the country.
This latter initiative, even if only partially achieved, would drive a stake
through the heart of the Iranian body politic. With unemployment running at over
12 percent, growth set to nosedive by 1.6 percent of GDP in 2018-19, and a
further negative 3.8 percent in 2019-20, any further economic perils could well
call into question the continued existence of the Iranian regime itself.
All this explains Iran’s defiant response. Tehran is hoping that, just short of
war, it can make itself such a nuisance on the international stage that the
Europeans would plead its case with the US to at least halt its unremitting
pressure on the greatly threatened regime.
Iran is illustrating that the price to be paid for its continued ostracism will
be an increasingly high one for the global economy, since it can disrupt global
energy supplies at will while claiming a semi-plausible deniability.
This is brinksmanship of the first order and signals a major global political
risk for the foreseeable future.
However, while Tehran may think counter-pressure will work with the anti-Iran
hawks in the Trump administration, more likely their folly will merely confirm
the administration in its thinking that Tehran is a revolutionary power that
must be destroyed.
*Dr. John C. Hulsman is the president and managing partner of John C. Hulsman
Enterprises, a prominent global political risk consulting firm. He is also
senior columnist for City AM, the newspaper of the City of London. He can be
contacted via https://www.chartwellspeakers.com.
The terrorism of Iran and its militias must be confronted
Dr. Hamdan Al-Shehri/Arab News/June 13/2019
The Houthis’ targeting of Abha Airport with a missile, injuring 26 civilians, is
clear and explicit evidence of the group’s terrorism. This targeting of a
civilian airport makes us re-evaluate the comprehensive Yemeni peace process at
all levels. First is the mechanism for dealing with the Houthis — the rules of
engagement should now be expanded, making the military option the only option.
Not only have the Houthis rejected the Stockholm agreement and its
implementation, but Wednesday’s escalation in targeting vital facilities within
Saudi Arabia threatens the security of the Kingdom’s citizens and residents.
This escalation from the Houthi side is considered a war crime and evidence that
the militia is playing the role of Iran in the war and fighting on Tehran’s
behalf. This is what the Arab League has always warned of. The re-evaluation
this time should include the role of the UN and the international community,
which has not done its job properly. The Houthis’ attacks on civilians inside
Saudi Arabia have reached record levels.
Why should we re-evaluate the UN’s role in Yemen? Because Security Council
resolution 2216 has, since 2015, called for the Houthis to withdraw from the
Yemeni cities they occupy, hand over their heavy weapons, and engage in
political negotiations to end the coup against the legitimate government. But
the UN and its envoys, including incumbent Martin Griffiths, have not worked to
implement the resolution. Instead they have emptied the resolution of its value
and entered into negotiations with the Houthis, which has led to a prolonging of
attempts to restore the legitimate government and slowed the liberation of
Hodeidah port. Comically, Griffiths praised the Houthi leadership personally and
even gave them gifts of four-wheel drive cars.
Why has the international community not confronted Iran over its use of
sectarian terrorist militias?
Iranian terrorist militias such as the Houthis must be dismantled and
eliminated. The Daesh “caliphate” was eradicated by the international community
forming a coalition to defeat it — this should be no different.
The question remains: Why has the international community not confronted Iran
over its use of sectarian terrorist militias? They have ballistic weapons and
drones and have used them to target international waterways and global
interests, oil pipelines inside Saudi Arabia, and oil tankers in the region’s
waters. They have targeted international airports and carried out terrorist acts
inside Yemen, including kidnappings, extrajudicial killings, starving the
civilian population and the theft of international aid. Why is there so much
patience and so many cover-ups of the Houthis’ crimes? This was also the case
for some members of Hezbollah in the UK in 2015, when it was discovered they
were storing materials involved in the manufacture of bombs in London but it was
not disclosed at the time.
If the international community wants to defeat terrorism, it must confront it in
all its forms. Militias must be forced to disarm. It should be unacceptable for
militias to use weapons to destabilize the security and stability of other
countries.
Iran is responsible for them and legally should bear the consequences of all the
violations and terrorist attacks carried out by these militias. They are armed
and trained on the basis of being sectarian terrorists in the mold of Iran’s
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and they serve the interests of Iran in the
region and beyond. Therefore, Tehran must be held accountable for the actions of
such militias. This issue should be as important as preventing Iran from
acquiring nuclear weapons.
*Dr. Hamdan Al-Shehri is a political analyst and international relations
scholar. Twitter: @DrHamsheri