LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
February 22/19
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
The Bulletin's Link on the
lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/eliasnews19/english.february22.19.htm
News Bulletin Achieves Since
2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations For today
And the one who sent me is with me; he has not left me
alone, for I always do what is pleasing to him.’ As he was saying these things,
many believed in him
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 08/25-30: “They said to him,
‘Who are you?’ Jesus said to them, ‘Why do I speak to you at all? I have much to
say about you and much to condemn; but the one who sent me is true, and I
declare to the world what I have heard from him.’ They did not understand that
he was speaking to them about the Father. So Jesus said, ‘When you have lifted
up the Son of Man, then you will realize that I am he, and that I do nothing on
my own, but I speak these things as the Father instructed me. And the one who
sent me is with me; he has not left me alone, for I always do what is pleasing
to him.’ As he was saying these things, many believed in him.”
Titles For The Latest
English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News published on February 21-22/19
Constitutional Council Annuls Tripoli MP's Elections Win
First Government Session Stumbles amid Syria Ties Divergences
Hezbollah hits back at US criticism of its role in Lebanon
Hariri Receives Letters from Saudi King, Crown Prince
Aoun Ends Cabinet's 1st Session after Heated Debate on Syria
Aoun: Dissociation is from events, not the displaced
Jarrah says Cabinet approved most items on agenda
Jamali after meeting Hariri announces she will run in byelection
Future bloc: Constitutional Council's decision political par excellence
Loyalty to Resistance bloc: For governmental agreement over priorities
Bogdanov, Amal Abou Zaid talks refugee dossier
Al-Jadeed, PSP Drop Lawsuits against Each Other
Shots Fired as Families of Prisoners Try to Storm al-Qobbeh Jail
Karami Urges Constitutional Council to Give Jamali's Seat to Taha Naji
Mustaqbal Slams 'Treachery' against Hariri after Jamali's Seat Revoked
Jumblat Slams 'Campaign to Stir Tensions' with Hariri, Meets Him after Rift
Report: Russia Offers to Build Power Plant in Lebanon
Hankache Calls for Halting Bisri Dam Project
Report: Banks Started Reducing Interest Rates
Lebanon's Speaker to Question Government over Illegal State Hires
Litles For The Latest
English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published on February 21-22/19
Car bomb kills 20, including oil workers, near anti-ISIS base in east Syria
2,500 foreign children languishing in northeast Syrian camps
More than 150 ISIS militants handed over to Iraq from Syria
Syria Forces Negotiating to Free Civilians from IS Holdout
Iran Informs Amman it Will Release 3 Detained Jordanians
Iran: Infiltration to Missile Program Thwarted
Iran announces ‘Velayat-97’ navy drill in key Strait of Hormuz
Kurds Demand Deployment of Int’l Observers on Turkey-Syria Border
UAE Denies Change in Qatar Shipping Ban
Israel’s Netanyahu to meet Putin in Moscow next week
Delegation from Congress, US-Jewish Organization Visits West Bank
Iraq Says Ready to Cooperate with Neighbors in Combating ISIS
Trump Extends National Emergency with Respect to Libya
Algeria: Cautious Calm Ahead of Nationwide Marches
US: Efforts to Remove Sudan from Terror List Under Threat
Venezuela's Guaido to Leave for Colombia as Aid Standoff Hardens
Titles For The Latest
LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published on
February 21-22/19
What Ails Europe's Economy/Ferdinando Giugliano/Bloomberg View/February 21/19
Google and Facebook’s Next Big Fight/Lionel Laurent/Bloomberg View/February
21/19
Iranian leaders can only blame themselves for deadly attacks/Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Arab
News/February 21/19
Venezuela crisis about survival, not politics, for nation’s poor/Nick Paton
Walsh/Arab News/February 21, 2019
What Washington—and Iran—Should Take Away from the Warsaw Conference/Dennis
Ross/The Washington Institute/February 21/19
Saudi Arabia's powerful prince tours Asia — with purpose/Simon Henderson/The
Hill//February 21/19
Turkey: Uniting an "Army of Islam" to Defeat Just One Country/Uzay Bulut/Gatestone
Institute/February 21/19
Palestinians: "The Slap of the Century"/Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone
Institute/February 21/19
The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese
Related News published on February 21-22/19
Constitutional Council Annuls Tripoli MP's
Elections Win
Kataeb.org/Thursday 21st February 2019/The Constitutional Council
on Thursday has annulled the win of Tripoli MP Dima Jamali in the parliamentary
elections, eight months after the polls were held. The annulment was based on an
appeal submitted by unsuccessful candidate Taha Naji. In a press conference on
Thursday, the Constitutional Council head, Judge Issam Sleiman, called for
holding by-elections within a period lc two months in the electoral district of
Tripoli and Minieh-Doniyeh to fill the vacant Sunni post following the annulment
verdict. Speaking following the government session, Interior Minister Rayya
Al-Hassan pointed out that the by-elections will be held two months after the
relevant decree is published in the official Gazette. MP Dima Jamali will
continue assuming its role until a new lawmaker is elected in the by-elections,
Sleiman pointed out. “Following a thorough examination, the Constitutional
Council has found that there is no reason to annul the election results in
Beirut's first and second districts,” he added, also pointing out that the
Council has rejected the appeal contesting the election results in Metn given
that it was based on mere media reports. Sleiman also stated that the two
appeals challenging the election results in North Lebanon's second district have
also been rejected because it was presented after the legal deadline. After
meeting with Prime Minister Saad Hariri later in the day, Jamali announced that
she will run again for the same parliamentary seat.
First Government Session Stumbles amid Syria Ties
Divergences
Kataeb.org/Thursday 21st February 2019/The government on Thursday held its first
official session since gaining the Parliament's vote of confidence last week,
having the ties with Syria as the first major controversial issue to be put on
the table. Earlier this week, divergences regarding the normalization of ties
with the Syrian regime have resurfaced in the wake of State Minister Saleh Al-Gharib's
visit to Damascus to discuss the refugees' return and the statements made by
Defense Minister Elias Bou Saab regarding Syria at the Munich Security
Conference. Bou Saab once again defended his stances as totally compliant with
the Lebanon's dissociation policy, saying that he had represented PM Saad Hariri
at the Munich conference at that the latter didn't object to what he said there.
Likewise, State Minister for Refugee Affairs, Saleh Al-Gharib, said that
visiting Syria is not an accusation or a wrongdoing. During the session, a
heated debate reportedly erupted between the ministers, thus prompting President
Michel Aoun to adjourn the meeting. Information Minister Jamal Jarrah, however,
denied that Aoun had ended the meeting because of the debate, noting that the
latter adjourned the session due to time constraints. Finance Minister Ali
Hassan Khalil told reporters that he had outlined the need to consolidate ties
with Syria to the "utmost extent" for the sake of Lebanon, as clearly stipulated
by the Constitution. According to a statement issued following the government
session held at the Baabda Palace, President Aoun reiterated the need for Syrian
refugees to return to their country, adding that this issue must not be linked
to reaching a political solution. “President Aoun asserted that we must rely on
ourselves to find all ways possible to ensure the return of the displaced," it
added.
Hezbollah hits back at US criticism of its
role in Lebanon
Reuters, Beirut/Thursday, 21 February 2019/Hezbollah hit back against US
condemnation of its role in Lebanon on Thursday, calling it a “violation of
sovereignty”, after the United States expressed concern over the organization’s
expanding influence. After meeting Lebanon’s prime minister on Tuesday, the US
ambassador said the United States was worried about the “growing role” in the
cabinet of Hezbollah, an armed Shi’ite group backed by Iran and listed as a
terrorist organization by Washington.“The negative American position on
Hezbollah, and which American ambassadors are eager to repeat after meeting any
official in Lebanon, is rejected and condemned,” Hezbollah’s lawmakers said in a
statement.
Violation of national sovereignty
They said US stance “violates national sovereignty and ignores a legitimate
right in international law - the right to self defense and to resist every
threat and aggression” and was biased towards “the terrorist entity” - a
reference to Israel. Hezbollah controls three of the 30 ministries in Prime
Minister Saad al-Hariri’s new cabinet, the largest number it has ever held. They
include the Health Ministry, which has the fourth-largest budget in the
state.Set up in 1982 by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, Hezbollah last fought a
major war with Israel, its life-long enemy, in 2006. Its regional clout has
expanded through deployments of fighters to other Mideast conflicts, including
the war in neighboring Syria, where it has fought in support of President Bashar
al-Assad.Together with groups and individuals that see its arsenal as an asset
to Lebanon, Hezbollah won more than 70 of the 128 seats in parliament in an
election last year. Hariri lost more than a third of his MPs.
Hariri Receives Letters from Saudi King,
Crown Prince
Naharnet/February 21/19/Prime Minister Saad Hariri has received letters
congratulating him on the formation of the government from Saudi King Salman bin
Abdul Aziz, his office said. The monarch wished Hariri “success in his
governmental missions,” the office said in a statement. The premier also
received similar letters from Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Colombian
President Iván Duque Márquez, Slovak Prime Minister Peter Pellegrini and Polish
Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki. Hariri's government held its first session on
Thursday after winning a vote of confidence last week in parliament.
Aoun Ends Cabinet's 1st Session after Heated Debate on Syria
Naharnet/February 21/19/President Michel Aoun on Thursday ended the Cabinet's
first session after the ordinary agenda was discussed and after a heated debate
erupted over the thorny issue of the relation with Syria. “The President
stressed the need for the return of Syrian refugees to their country without
linking the issue to the political solution and we can only approach the issue
in a serious manner,” Information Minister Jamal al-Jarrah said after the
session. State Minister for Administrative Development Affairs May Chidiac of
the Lebanese Forces said “the President ended the session when a heated debate
erupted without giving the ministers who requested to speak the permission to do
so.”“Everyone supports the return of the refugees, but does the Syrian regime
really want them to return?” Chidiac asked. “We are dismayed over the
normalization of tied with Syria and Prime Minister Saad Hariri was also
dismayed over everything, including the issue of the Tripoli parliamentary vote
appeal,” the minister added. State Minister for Refugee Affairs Saleh al-Gharib
meanwhile said that he visited Syria to “serve the interest of Lebanon and the
Lebanese” and “with the knowledge of all the relevant parties.”“Nothing will
deter us from performing our duty in order to turn the page on the past,” he
added. “We clarified that we did not go to Syria to be part of an axis,” Gharib
said, expressing keenness on “governmental solidarity.” “We stressed that we
reject the intimidation campaign against us in the media and Syria's visit is
not an accusation. We said that we would visit Syria and this is what happened,”
he went on to say. Defense Minister Elias Bou Saab meanwhile reiterated that
Hariri had tasked him to represent him at the Munich security conference. “I put
him in the picture of the conference and I did not violate the government's
Policy Statement,” Bou Saab stressed. “The LF's ministers announced their stance
on the issue of the relations with Syria and criticized my stance in Munich, but
I was not allowed to respond because President Aoun ended the session,” the
minister added. Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil of the AMAL Movement
meanwhile said that he stressed the need to “expand relations with Syria to the
maximum level, primarily for the sake of Lebanon and because the constitution
calls for that.”Thursday's was the Cabinet's first meeting since gaining a vote
of confidence in Parliament last week. Aoun chaired the meeting in the presence
of Hariri. As per custom, the two held a closed-door meeting before the session.
Before the session, Chidiac had said that she was going to raise the issue of
Gharib's controversial visit to Syria.
Gharib visited Syria early this week, a move that raised controversy.
Discussions in Syria focused on the issue of the return of Syrian refugees.
Aoun: Dissociation is from events, not the
displaced
Thu 21 Feb 2019/NNA - President Michel Aoun maintained that dissociation is from
the events taking place in Syria and not from 1.5 million displaced Syrians
present on the Lebanese soil. In his word to the Cabinet which convened at
Baabda palace Thursday, Aoun said Lebanon must establish special ties with Syria
as a neighboring country."Our relation with Syria is different from that with
Turkey or Iran for instance," he said. "I frankly tell you that the foreign
states do not want to host refugees, nor do they allow us to bring them back
home. How is this possible? I do not accept anything that harms Lebanon's
interest," he continued. "I do not accept to have on my soil this huge number of
displaced," he stressed. "How can we possibly coordinate the transfer of 1.5
million individuals without communicating with the Syrian state?" he wondered.
"I am aware of Lebanon's best interest; I am the one who determines it as I am
in charge and this is my competence," Aoun said. "I have established national
balance in order to restore stability and rebuild Lebanon. This is my concept of
the national best interest and I am responsible towards my people," he
concluded.
Jarrah says Cabinet approved most items on agenda
Thu 21 Feb 2019/NNA - Information Minister, Jamal Al Jarrah, on Thursday
announced that the Cabinet has approved during today's session most items on its
agenda. The Council of Ministers met on Thursday in an ordinary session at
Baabda Presidential Palace under the chairmanship of President, Michel Aoun and
in the presence of Prime Minister, Saad Hariri, and cabinet members. Reading out
Cabinet decisions in the wake of the meeting, Minister Jarrah said that
President Michel Aoun stressed the need for the return of the displaced Syrians
without awaiting a political solution. "The Head of State emphasized that we
must rely on ourselves to find all possible means to ensure the return of the
displaced Syrians," Minister Jarrah quoted the President as saying during
Cabinet session. "The foreign countries have not done any serious work so far to
help in this file," the president noted. Jarrah said that the President's stance
comes in line with his presidential oath to preserve laws and the safety of the
Lebanese territories and the Lebanese people, as well as to seek solutions to
ease displacement burden on Lebanon.
Jamali after meeting Hariri announces she will run in
byelection
Thu 21 Feb 2019 /NNA - The President of the Council of Ministers Saad Hariri
received this afternoon at the Center House MP Dima Jamali, whose election has
been invalidated today by the Constitutional Council. She said after the
meeting: "After hearing the ruling of the Constitutional Council, we must all
respect it, knowing that there were political interventions. But what was issued
became a reality. I would like to thank Prime Minister Hariri for renewing his
confidence in me by inviting me to the Center House to ask me to run again in
the name of the Future movement for the Sunni seat in Tripoli. I therefore
reiterate my thanks to him for the trust he has given me."Jamali added: "I know
that my legitimacy stems from the Lebanese people as a whole and from the people
of Tripoli in particular, who elected me and placed their confidence in me the
first time. I am sure that they will grant me this trust again, because they saw
what we did during a short period in parliament for the capital of the
north."Jamali concluded: "I hope to continue to serve Tripoli through Parliament
after the parliamentary by-election. I will continue the battle and hope for the
best."In reply to a question about she means by political interference, Jamali
said: "Sure, there were political interventions and this is not strange to
Lebanon. These interventions have found responsiveness."
Future bloc: Constitutional Council's decision political par excellence
Thu 21 Feb 2019/NNA - The Future parliamentary bloc on Thursday deplored a fresh
decision by the Constitutional Council to nullify the election of MP Dima
Jammali, saying that the resolution is "political and vengeful.""The bloc is
keen to put the Lebanese public opinion in the picture of the backdrops of the
Constitutional Council's decision, which are political and vengeful par
excellence, to say the least," the bloc said in a statement. The statement added
that the bloc sensed "political betrayal" that targeted Prime Minister Saad
Hariri. Future bloc held today an urgent meeting at the Center House, under the
chairmanship of MP Bahiya Hariri.
Loyalty to Resistance bloc: For governmental agreement over
priorities
Thu 21 Feb 2019/NNA - The Loyalty to the Resistance parliamentary bloc on
Thursday called the new government to reach an agreement in order to determine
the priorities that must be tackled to shun dangers and fulfill citizens'
pressing needs. In a statement issued following its weekly meeting, the bloc
highlighted the necessity to reduce the budget deficit, as well as to resolve
vital issues such as electricity and waste management. Moreover, the bloc
welcomed House Speaker Nabih Berri's invitation to hold extraordinary Parliament
sessions. The bloc met at its headquarters in Haret Hreik, under the
chairmanship of MP Mohammad Raad.
Bogdanov, Amal Abou Zaid talks refugee dossier
Thu 21 Feb 2019/NNA - Foreign Ministry's Representative on the joint
Lebanese-Russian committee for the return of Syrian refugees to their homeland,
Amal Abu Zaid, met this Thursday with the Russian President's Special Envoy for
the Middle East, Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov. Talks between the
pair reportedly touched on means to seek opportunities and ensure a suitable
environment for the return of the displaced Syrians to their country. Bogdanov
stressed his country's unyielding stance in support of the unity and sovereignty
of Lebanon, expressing Moscow's determination to follow up on the process of the
return of displaced Syrians to their homeland as soon as possible.
Al-Jadeed, PSP Drop Lawsuits against Each Other
Naharnet/February 21/19/Al-Jadeed television and the Progressive Socialist Party
announced Thursday that they would drop the lawsuits that they had filed against
each other in the wake of the grenade attack on the TV network. The announcement
was made during a visit to the network's building by Industry Minister Wael Abu
Faour of the PSP, where he met with al-Jadeed's chairwoman Karma Khayyat. The
young man who carried out the grenade attack, Mazen Lamaa, had turned himself in
a few days ago, confessing that he was behind the assault and that his cousin
who was with him in the car had not been aware of his intentions. PSP leader
ex-MP Walid Jumblat had met with Druze clerics in Mukhtara weeks ago and urged
them to find a settlement regarding Lamaa, who said that he hurled the grenade
in protest at a satirical show that “insulted” the Druze community. Khayat on
Thursday thanked the PSP and Jumblat for “the civilized manner in which the
culprit was handed over and in which the attack on al-Jadeed was approached.”
Shots Fired as Families of Prisoners Try to Storm al-Qobbeh
Jail
Naharnet/February 21/19/Security forces fired in the air on Thursday to prevent
angry relatives from storming the al-Qobbeh prison in Tripoli. The National News
Agency said the families burned tires outside the prison after a number of
inmates staged a riot that involved starting a fire inside the facility. Al-Jadeed
television reported later that the situation was brought under control. No
injuries were reported during the incidents according to NNA.
Karami Urges Constitutional Council to Give Jamali's Seat
to Taha Naji
Naharnet/February 21/19/The National Dignity List led by MP Faisal Karami on
Thursday criticized the Constitutional Council for not declaring the win of Taha
Naji after invalidating the 2018 election of Dima Jamali in Tripoli's
parliamentary elections. In a statement recited by Karami, the list said the
ruling “violated all constitutional and legal rules and the simplest standards
of justice and fairness.”Describing the decision to revoke Jamali's membership
of parliament as correct, the list said the council erred when it declared the
vacancy of Tripoli's fifth Sunni seat. “It is our right to draw this council's
attention to the fact that it does not have jurisdiction to come up with new
explanations when the text -- which stipulates the win of the candidate who gets
the highest fraction (in the proportional counting) of votes -- is clear,” the
list added. “Accordingly, the Constitutional Council's ruling in this regard is
invalid and marred by essential flaws,” it said. “The members of the
Constitutional Council, who are among Lebanon's top judges, should have declared
the win of the candidate who won the challenge instead of ordering
by-elections,” the list went on to say. “We renew our appeal against the
Constitutional Council's ruling and call on it to abide by the legal text that
is in line with logic and the constitution,” it urged. And blaming the council
for the constitutional “heresy,” the Karami-led list said “the biggest
responsibility fall on the political authority,” which has “begun its work by
the biggest corruption process that violates the constitution, the law and
reason.”“The arguments of the Constitutional Council have confirmed Taha Naji's
victory but political influence has turned the Constitutional Council into a
tool for stealing this win,” the list added.
Mustaqbal Slams 'Treachery' against Hariri after Jamali's Seat Revoked
Naharnet/February 21/19/Al-Mustaqbal parliamentary bloc on Thursday decried
“political treachery” against it and against Prime Minister Saad Hariri, after
the Constitutional Council invalidated Dima Jamali's membership of parliament.
In a statement issued after an emergency meeting, the bloc regretted the
Council's ruling but announced that it will deal with it “according to the
applicable legal and constitutional framework.”Slamming what it called “the
political par excellence motivations” behind the Council's ruling, the bloc
lamented “political interference” in the Council's work.“A member of the Council
reversed his signed report and his vote in a previous session following clear
political interference, so that the Council could garner the seven votes needed
to revoke Jamali's parliamentary membership,” Mustaqbal added.
“The bloc, which senses that a political treachery operation has targeted it and
PM Saad Hariri in person, stressed that the ways of backstabbing and using the
highest judicial posts to settle political scores will not deter it from its
decision to protect the Constitutional Council from intruders,” the bloc
emphasized. Adding that it will stand by Jamali in Tripoli's upcoming
parliamentary by-election to fill the vacant seat, Mustaqbal underscored that
the lawmaker “proved within a few months her competence and special presence,
which were lauded by citizens in her city in particular and in Lebanon in
general.” Earlier in the day, the Council revoked Jamali's membership of
parliament without giving her seat to Taha Naji, who had appealed her win.
Jumblat Slams 'Campaign to Stir Tensions' with Hariri, Meets Him after Rift
Naharnet/February 21/19/Prime Minister Saad Hariri and Progressive Socialist
Party chief ex-MP Walid Jumblat held talks Thursday evening at the Center House,
after the latest war of words between them was contained. “We will discuss
topics that we disagree on and others that we agree on,” said Jumblat upon his
arrival at the Center House. Commenting on leaks and media reports that preceded
the meeting, Jumblat said they were “part of a systematic campaign to stir
tensions.”“I'm not responsible for them,” he added. According to LBCI
television, Hariri will host Jumblat over dinner. A PSP delegation had visited
the Center House weeks ago in a bid to pacify the rhetoric between the
once-close allies. In a recent interview with An-Nahar newspaper, Hariri
emphasized that there is no “dispute” with Jumblat and that the PSP leader “does
not know how much I'm on his side.”“There is a war on me as well, not only on
Walid Jumblat, and the dispute between us emboldens the others while accord
between us deters them,” Hariri added. Jumblat had escalated his rhetoric
against Hariri and Free Patriotic Movement chief MP Jebran Bassil in the wake of
the formation of the new government. The PSP leader criticized the manner in
which the Cabinet was formed, decrying perceived “unilateralism” and disregard
for the Taef Accord and the premiership post, which sparked an unprecedented
exchange of tirades with Hariri on Twitter. Jumblat was reportedly dismayed
after Hariri failed to tell him that Ghassan Atallah would become the new
minister of the displaced during their meeting on the eve of the government's
formation and also did not tell him that the third Druze seat, which Jumblat
ceded, would go to Saleh al-Gharib, an ally of Damascus.
Report: Russia Offers to Build Power Plant in Lebanon
Naharnet/February 21/19/Lebanon’s problematic electricity file is one of the
government's focal issues amid reports claiming that a Russian proposal to build
a power plant could end the suffering of Lebanese, al-Joumhouria daily reported
on Thursday. Ministerial sources told the daily, the government is keen on
finding a permanent solution and that Lebanon’s various political parties have
adamantly vowed that there will be “no turning back.”They said “a serious debate
on finding a near solution for the electricity file has started, putting an end
for dubious tenders adopted over the past years that wasted large amounts of
treasury and were the main reason for the serious deficit it suffers.”Well-informed
sources said the Russian proposal aims to build a power plant that supplies
Lebanon with 24/24 electricity. “The plant can be established in a short period
of time,” they said. According to the sources, this offer includes willingness
to build an atomic energy plant, similar to a plant built by the Russians in
Turkey at no cost. Lebanon suffers a severe shortage in electricity. The sector
is a substantial drain on the state’s treasury.
According to the World Bank, it is responsible for 40 percent of Lebanon’s
public deficit.
Hankache Calls for Halting Bisri Dam Project
Kataeb.org/Thursday 21st February 2019/Kataeb MP Elias Hankache on Thursday
called for halting the controversial Bisri dam project, urging the relevant
authorities to pay heed to the viewpoint of environmentalists and experts. "This
project must be stopped just by knowing that it jeopardizes swathes of green
spaces and puts at stake at least 50 archeological sites," Hankache told Voice
of Lebanon radio station. The World Bank’s Inspection Panel announced in
December that it had completed reviewing a request for inspecting the Water
Supply Augmentation Project, which includes the Bisri Dam and of which the World
Bank is a primary financer. Although supporting water management plans, the
lawmaker rejected the radom establishment of dams.
Report: Banks Started Reducing Interest Rates
Kataeb.org/Thursday 21st February 2019/Several Lebanese banks have cut the
interest rates on deposits by an average of 2% after the recent political
breakthrough has calmed fears over the national currency, The Daily Star
reported. “A handful of big banks have offered their special clients lucrative
return on their deposits. But these offers were confined to customers who
deposited large amount of money and for longer maturity,” the newspaper quoted
one banker as saying, noting that some banks had offered interest rates of up to
15% for deposits in Lebanese pound and up to 10.25% for those in dollar. The
banker noted the cost of these "illogical" rates has become a burden on the
lenders, especially since the margin of profits was extremely low. "I can’t
understand the rationale behind offering very high interest rates. I think some
of these banks have decided to gradually reduce the interest rates on deposits
after realizing that the margin of profits from these operations was
insignificant,” another banker said, warning of an economic recession should the
high interest rates persist. “Above all the private sector and merchants will
become the first casualties from the high interest rates policy. Merchants are
already struggling to pay their debts to the banks,” the banker stressed.
Lebanon's Speaker to Question Government over Illegal State Hires
Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 21 February, 2019/Lebanese Speaker Nabih Berri
received on Wednesday the final report released by the Central Inspection
Authority on random employments made in government agencies and institutions.
During a meeting earlier this week with a delegation from the Press Syndicate,
Berri revealed that around 5,000 people were hired in the public sector in 2018
alone, stressing that the number excluded the security forces. The speaker was
quoted by his visitors as saying that this issue would not go unnoticed,
expressing his intention to hold parliamentary sessions to question the
government on the mass state hiring. In this regard, the head of the
parliamentary finance committee, MP Ibrahim Kenaan, said on Wednesday that he
delivered to Berri the final report released by the Central Inspection on the
issue of employment.
During the meeting, the two officials also discussed financial issues. “I
carried with me the final report released by the Central Inspection on the issue
of employment. It is now in the hands of Speaker Berri,” Kenaan said. “We are
fully concerned with accountability, and we have no ceiling but that of the
law,” he added. A member of the finance and budget committee, Free Patriotic
Movement MP Salim Aoun, said that according to the available data, “5,000 people
were hired in 2018, a thousand of them by a cabinet decision, while contracts
were signed with 4,000 others in secret in several ministries.”
He added that the committee would study the report in detail next week and
submit its recommendations to the government. Kenaan emphasized that the workers
were hired on a contractual basis, not as permanent employees, but said they
would be treated fairly taking into account the laws in force on one hand, and
the situation of the workers on the other.
Latest LCCC English
Miscellaneous Reports & News published
on February 21-22/19
Car bomb kills 20, including oil workers, near anti-ISIS base in east Syria
AFP, Beirut/Thursday, 21 February 2019/A car bomb on Thursday
killed 20 people including 14 oil workers near a base used by US-backed forces
battling the ISIS group in east Syria, a war monitor said. “The car bomb was
detonated remotely in the village of Shheel” close to an oil field acting as a
base for the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) forces fighting ISIS, the
Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said. Six conscripts from the
Kurdish-led SDF were also killed as they escorted the workers in vehicles from
the Omar oil field, it said.
2,500 foreign children languishing in
northeast Syrian camps
AFP-Beirut/Thursday, 21 February 2019/More than 2,500 foreign children from 30
countries who have fled the ISIS’s last redoubts are living in desperate
conditions in camps in northeastern Syria, Save the Children said Thursday. The
charity urged their countries of origin to “take action to ensure the safety of
their citizens” as US-backed forces battle the extremist group in the final
sliver of territory it holds near the Iraqi border. “They need specialized help
to recover from their experiences and return to normality, together with their
families,” the charity said. “This is impossible in overwhelmed displacement
camps in a volatile war zone. The international community must act now before it
is too late.”It said the children, including 38 unaccompanied minors, were from
families “with perceived or actual associations” with ISIS. They were separated
from others in the camps, affecting their access to aid and services.
“Harsh winter conditions have left the camps in a desperate state, with children
facing life-threatening risks,” it said. The children are “victims of the
conflict and must be treated as such”, said Sonia Khush, Save the Children’s
Syria response director. “All states whose nationals are trapped in Syria must
take responsibility for their citizens.”The charity said the children had
already been deprived of adequate medical care and food for months, or even
years while in ISIS-held areas even before having reached the displacement
camps. “While some states have begun to do so, many countries -- including
several European countries -- have yet to take steps to ensure the safety of the
children and their families,” said Khush.
Life-threatening dangers
“Given the life-threatening dangers these children and their families face in
Syria, this is unconscionable.”Save the Children urged countries to repatriate
the children and their families “for the purposes of rehabilitation and/or
reintegration, in full compliance with international law, including the right to
a fair trial where appropriate”. After years of battling extremists and with all
but a sliver of land left under ISIS control, US-backed forces have detained
hundreds of foreigners suspected of being ISIS militants, as well as related
women and children. Syria’s Kurds, whose fighters have been at the forefront of
the battle, have long urged their home countries to take them back, but many
nations have been reluctant. US President Donald Trump has urged European
governments to take back their citizens who fought for the extremist group in
Syria, but his administration said on Wednesday it would refuse entry to a
US-born ISIS member who wants to return from Syria. The country’s conflict has
killed more than 360,000 people and displaced millions since it started in 2011
with the repression of anti-government protests.
More than 150 ISIS militants handed over to Iraq from Syria
The Associated Press, Outside Baghouz, Syria/ Thursday, 21 February
2019/US-backed Syrian forces fighting the ISIS group in Syria handed over more
than 150 Iraqi members of the group to Iraq, the first batch of several to come,
an Iraqi security official said on Thursday. The official said the ISIS
militants were handed over to the Iraqi side late on Wednesday, and that they
were now in a “safe place” and being investigated. The transfer marks the
biggest repatriation from Syria of captured militants so far - an issue that
poses a major conundrum for Europeans and other countries whose nationals have
been imprisoned as foreign fighters in Syria. The SDF is holding more than 1,000
foreign fighters in prisons it runs in the country’s north, many of them Iraqis
and Europeans. The Kurdish-led Syrian force - and more recently President Donald
Trump - have called on these countries to take back their nationals. SDF says it
cannot afford to keep the captured foreigners in Syria, but few of their
countries want them back. Earlier this month, Iraqi Prime Minister Abdul-Mahdi
said Iraq will take back all Iraqi ISIS militants in Syria, as well as thousands
of their family members. The Iraqi security official, who spoke Thursday on
condition of anonymity in line with regulations, said the SDF are holding more
than 20,000 Iraqis suspected of ISIS membership in prisons in northern Syria,
adding that they will be transferred back home in batches.
Final standoff
The handover came as the US-backed Syrian force is involved in a standoff over
the final sliver of land held by the ISIS group in southeastern Syria, close to
the Iraqi border. A few hundred people - many of them women and
terrified-looking children - were evacuated Wednesday from the group’s tiny tent
camp on the banks of the Euphrates River, signaling an imminent end to the
territorial rule of the militants’ self-declared “caliphate” that once stretched
across a third of both Syria and Iraq. Some 300 ISIS militants, along with
hundreds of civilians believed to be mostly their families, have been under
siege for more than a week in the tent camp in the village of Baghouz in eastern
Syria. It is not clear how many civilians remain holed up inside, along with the
militants. More trucks were sent in Thursday to the tip of a corridor leading to
the camp to evacuate more people, but Associated Press journalists on the ground
outside Baghouz said no civilians emerged. “We thought more civilians will come
out today and we sent 50 trucks over,” said an SDF commander who goes by his nom
de guerre, Aram. “We don’t know why they are not coming out.” It was not
immediately clear whether the 150 Iraqis repatriated late Wednesday were among
those recently evacuated from Baghouz or militants who had been captured
earlier. The Baghouz enclave’s recapture by US-backed Syrian fighters would
spell the territorial defeat of ISIS and allow Trump to begin withdrawing
American troops from northern Syria, as he has pledged to do, opening a new
chapter in Syria’s eight-year civil war. Few believe, however, that ending the
group’s territorial rule will end the threat posed by an organization that still
stages and inspires attacks through sleeper cells in both Syria and Iraq.
Syria Forces Negotiating to Free Civilians
from IS Holdout
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 21/19/US-backed Syrian
forces are negotiating to evacuate civilians from the Islamic State group's last
redoubt which now faces "inevitable defeat", the international coalition against
the jihadists said Thursday. Hundreds of people including women and children
were trucked out of the last patch of IS territory on Wednesday, but the Syrian
Democratic Forces (SDF) said that a large number of civilians remained inside.
The Kurdish-led SDF, backed by the warplanes of the US-led coalition, have
trapped IS fighters in less than half a square kilometre (a fifth of a square
mile) in the village of Baghouz. "Coalition forces, to include the US, continue
to support the SDF as they negotiate having innocent civilians released and
their fighters returned with the inevitable defeat in Baghouz," coalition
spokesman Sean Ryan told AFP. There was no immediate comment from the SDF, which
has previously identified the remaining civilians as mostly wives and children
of IS fighters. Thousands of people -- mostly women and children related to IS
members -- have streamed out of Baghouz in recent weeks. The Syrian Observatory
for Human Rights, a Britain-based war monitor, said Wednesday that there were
negotiations "for the surrender of the last IS fighters". It said there were
"reports of a deal" but the details were unclear. At the height of its rule, IS
imposed its brutal interpretation of Islamic law on a territory roughly the size
of Britain. But the jihadists have since lost almost all their territory and
hundreds of foreigners suspected of being IS fighters, as well as related women
and children, are being held by the SDF.
Iran Informs Amman it Will Release 3 Detained Jordanians
London - Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 21 February, 2019/Jordan’s Ministry of
Foreign Affairs announced on Wednesday that Iran has informed the senior
Jordanian diplomat about its decision to release three Jordanian detainees, who
were held by Tehran around two months ago on charges of “mistakenly” entering
the country's territorial waters while on a fishing trip off the UAE. Sufian
Qudah, Jordan's Foreign Ministry spokesman, said in a statement that the Iranian
Foreign Ministry has informed the Jordanian embassy of the decision. The
Jordanians will only be fined for illegally entering Iranian waters and in
compensation for a damage to an Iranian security boat, the statement explained.
Qudah expressed Jordan’s appreciation for the Iranian government’s decision,
adding that the Jordanian embassy in Tehran is coordinating with Iran’s Foreign
Ministry to settle the payment of the fines and ensure the three citizens'
return to Jordan. On Monday, Jordanian Lower House Speaker Atef Tarawneh called
on Iranian authorities to release the three men. He raised the case during a
meeting with Iranian Ambassador to Amman Mojtaba Ferdosipour, according to Petra
news agency. Jordan’s Foreign Ministry said in January that the Jordanians
accompanied by Emirati and Egyptian friends had entered Iranian waters “by
mistake” during a boat trip on December 27.
Iran: Infiltration to Missile Program Thwarted
London - Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 21 February, 2019/Commander of the IRGC
Aerospace Force, Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, said on Wednesday that
Iran has thwarted an attempt to infiltrate its missile program through a range
of indigenous equipment and spare parts. IRGC news agencies also quoted
Hajizadeh denying recent claims made by US officials that Washington has managed
to sabotage Tehran’s missile program, describing them as “a very big lie”. While
Hajizadeh did not elaborate on the nature of the equipment and spare parts that
the “enemy” used in trying to penetrate the program, he pointed out that the
threat “turned into an opportunity after detecting the plot.”Meanwhile, Iranian
President Hassan Rouhani said relations with the United States had rarely been
so bad. “The struggle between Iran and America is currently at a maximum.
America has employed all its power against us,” Rouhani was quoted as saying in
a cabinet meeting by the state broadcaster IRIB, as reported by Reuters. “The US
pressures on firms and banks to halt business with Iran is one hundred percent a
terrorist act,” he said. The Iranian president stressed that his country was
ready for cooperation and interaction with the world, “but the states doing
business with us must be careful not to pursue excessive demands, because the
Iranian nation does not retreat from its principles and does not favor such
demands when it comes to outstanding issues involving its national interests.”
Commenting on the recent US-organized conference in Warsaw, Poland, Rouhani said
that Washington’s attempts to persuade other countries to oppose the nuclear
deal had led to “a humiliating political defeat” for the US at the UN Security
Council.
Iran announces ‘Velayat-97’ navy drill in
key Strait of Hormuz
AP, Tehran/Thursday, 21 February 2019/Iran’s navy says it will hold an annual
drill in the strategic Strait of Hormuz as pressure mounts on the country months
after the United States re-imposed sanctions on Iran, targeting its vital oil
sector. The strait is located at the mouth of the Arabian Gulf and is crucial to
global energy supplies, with about a third of all oil traded at sea passing
through it. Iranian Adm. Hossein Khanzadi told state TV on Thursday the 3-day
maneuvers will start on Friday. He said submarines, warships, helicopters and
surveillance planes will participate in the drill, dubbed as “Velayat-97.” The
exercise will include missile launches from the vessels. Iran regularly holds
maneuvers in the strait. On Sunday, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani inaugurated
a new domestically-built submarine armed with cruise missiles at a time of
rising tensions regionally and internationally.
Kurds Demand Deployment of Int’l Observers on Turkey-Syria Border
London - Ibrahim Hamidi/Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 21 February, 2019/The
political wing of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, backed by the US-led
international coalition against ISIS, renewed its demand for European countries
to deploy an international observer force on the Turkish-Syrian border to
protect Kurds from Ankara. Co-chair of the Syrian Democratic Council – the
political arm of the SDF-- Ilham Ahmed is leading a Kurdish delegation touring
Washington, Paris and London to persuade western countries not to betray the
Kurds by leaving them exposed to the threat of a Turkish attack.
Ahmed told Asharq Al-Awsat that she will be meeting with high-profile
“decision-makers” to discuss developments in northeast Syria, the
long-threatened Turkish offensive, as well as the status of foreign ISIS
militants captured by the SDF, recent battles in the town of Baghuoz, and the
final offensive against the extremist organization’s last pocket on the
Syrian-Iraqi border.”Ahmed reiterated her call to Western allies on presenting
"logistical support and protection" that will allow the trial of ISIS militants
detained by the SDF in the eastern Euphrates region. She also made general
demands to compensate for the US withdrawal, including a continued no-fly zone,
the deployment of European observers on the Turkish border and military support
to fight terror sleeper cells in east Syria. “The SDF have not received any
response from Western countries yet,” Ahmed said.“If they do not agree to
receive them (foreign ISIS members captured by the SDF), we will keep them
and will need logistic and judicial support to maintain the stability of the
region,” she added. Ahmed also demanded that about 1,000 to 1,500 international
troops remain in Syria to fight ISIS and expressed hope that the United States,
in particular, would halt plans for a total pullout. US President Donald Trump
had made a shock announcement last December on planning to withdraw some 2,000
American troops in Syria. It is believed that Ahmed is looking to secure
political support for establishing autonomy in Kurdish-controlled areas, which
make up one-third of Syrian territory (185,000 square kilometers). But Ahmed
faces rejection by several countries for reasons, one of which is international
law recognizing the Syrian government as legitimate. Europe is also unlikely to
support Kurdish autonomy near the Syrian-Turkish border given that Ankara, a
NATO member, perceives Kurdish entities in Syria as ‘terrorists.’ The SDF claim
having cornered remaining ISIS militants in Baghouz near the Iraqi border.
Foreign fighters and families have featured prominently among those who have
fled the town, which had been a collection point for extremists who had escaped
from other areas across Syria and Iraq. Ahmed said a final SDF assault on the
last ISIS redoubt would finish within days. Plans requiring “time and patience”
were being drawn up to eradicate sleeper cells, she said.
UAE Denies Change in Qatar Shipping Ban
Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 21 February, 2019/The UAE Federal Transport Authority
– Land & Maritime has stressed in a circular that its policy regarding access to
Qatar at UAE ports and border crossings has not changed. The periodic circular
is issued in line with official decisions, the UAE news agency, WAM, said on
Thursday. The Authority clarified that the news reports regarding export and
import to and from Qatar are “inaccurate” and “misconstrued.” According WAM, the
Authority also pointed out that it is responsible for regulating the land and
maritime transport sector in the UAE. “Any regulatory procedures in this
connection are under its jurisdiction. Any information in this regard are issued
only by the Authority and none else.”The statement came after reports that the
UAE has eased the ban on the shipping of goods between it and Qatar enforced
under a political and economic boycott of Doha.
Israel’s Netanyahu to meet Putin in Moscow
next week
Reuters, Jerusalem/Thursday, 21 February 2019/Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on February
27, Netanyahu’s office said in a statement on Thursday. The two leaders had
spoken by phone and discussed “regional developments”, according to a separate
statement released earlier in the day.
Delegation from Congress, US-Jewish Organization Visits West Bank
Ramallah - Kifah Zboun/Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has said
peace with Israel is on the verge of collapsing. “These days, peace is on the
verge of collapsing, and we count on you very much to make efforts whether in
the US administration and in Congress or even with Israelis to convince them
that peace is of interest for the US, the world and us,” Abbas told a delegation
from US J Street (A US-Jewish organization) and several Democratic congressmen
on Tuesday. After Abbas congratulated the elected Congress members and welcomed
them in Ramallah alongside the Jewish lobby, he expressed regret that relations
with the United States have reached this point. He also told them that his doors
are still open for talks if the US administration changes its stances on the
two-state solution and Jerusalem. During his four meetings with US President
Donald Trump, Abbas affirmed he was always optimistic, adding that he asked
Trump in their last meeting if he believes in the two-state solution and 1967
border and the latter’s answer was “yes." “He told me ‘of course, and I am ready
to announce that now,’” Abbas said. “I asked him if he agrees on the fact that
security needed by Palestinians and Israelis could be provided by NATO forces,
and his answer was ‘yes,’” Abbas further noted. “However, two weeks later, he
announced transferring the US embassy to Jerusalem, declared Jerusalem as the
capital of Israel, agreed on 1967 settlement in the Palestinian territories and
then cut the aid provided to UNRWA, which has been given since 1949 to this day
following a UN resolution. We were surprised,” Abbas explained. He then added
that he informed Trump of his country’s decision to cut relations with the US if
it doesn’t recognize the two states based on the 1967 borders and with East
Jerusalem as the capital of Palestine. “We haven’t received a response, and we
stick to our stance.”Abbas also accused the United States of being biased to
Israel and not heeding Palestinian demands.
Iraq Says Ready to Cooperate with Neighbors in Combating
ISIS
Baghdad - Hamza Mustafa/Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 21 February, 2019/Iraq is
ready to cooperate with regional countries on military training and combating
ISIS’ ideology, head of Iraqi National Security Falih al-Fayyadh has announced.
He reiterated that there are no foreign forces or military bases in Iraq,
asserting that Baghdad refuses to be a tool or a platform for attacks on other
nations. Fayyadh was delivering a speech on behalf of Prime Minister Adel Abdul
Mahdi at the opening of the Fourth International Conference to Fight ISIS Media
and Ideology. Iraq cooperates with other countries in the war on terrorism, he
said. Referring to the controversial presence of foreign troops on Iraqi soil,
Fayyadh said the International Coalition in Iraq is cooperating in the field of
training and consultation. “We will not accept military bases and there are no
ground forces on Iraqi territory.”
Spokesman for the Conference, Haidar Jabr al-Aboudi, told Asharq al-Awsat that
Baghdad is grateful for the countries that supported it in the war against ISIS
remnants. He assured that the unity of the Iraqi people will prevent the return
of extremism through ISIS remnants. “Iraq is a pillar in the region’s
stability,” and mutual coordination and cooperation between Baghdad and the
international community in security and information falls in line with Iraqi
sovereignty, said the spokesman. The Conference was held as the risk of ISIS’s
re-emergence has created controversy, especially after the organization executed
six out of 15 people who were abducted in al-Karbala province in the desert
between Najaf and Al-Anbar provinces. Top official of Binaa Alliance and MP of
Fatah Bloc Naim al-Aboudi ruled out an ISIS return. In a statement to Asharq Al-Awsat,
Aboudi asserted that the current situation, which enjoys military, social,
political and media cohesion against ISIS and other terrorist organizations,
differs from 2014 when the group proclaimed its self-styled “caliphate” in Iraq
and Syria. He called for security forces to be more mobilized in order to carry
out pre-emptive operations and fight the extremist ideology.
However, head of Reform and Reconstruction Alliance Ammar al-Hakim warned of the
consequences of the terrorist organization’s return. In a statement, Hakim
reiterated the importance of securing all Iraqi territories and called for
improved intelligence assessment to bring the perpetrators to justice for their
heinous crimes. For its part, Iraq’s High Commission for Human Rights (IHCHR)
urged intensified efforts to monitor ISIS movements. The Commission indicated
that the resurgence of ISIS is a real challenge for security forces to expose
sleeper cells which use caves and tunnels to hide in desert areas.
The statement added that in the past few days, 19 people have been abducted in
Umm al-Jadaan on the road between Arar and Nukhaib.
Trump Extends National Emergency with Respect to Libya
Cairo - Khalid Mahmoud/Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 21 February, 2019/US President
Donald Trump has extended the national emergency with respect to Libya declared
in 2011 till after February 25, 2019, in a letter sent to Congress. The letter,
published by the White House website, indicated that the foregoing
circumstances, the prolonged attacks against civilians, and the increased
numbers of Libyans seeking refuge in other countries caused a deterioration in
the security of Libya and posed a serious risk to its stability. “The situation
in Libya continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national
security and foreign policy of the United States, and measures are needed to
protect against the diversion of assets or other abuses by members of Gaddafi’s
family, their associates, and other persons hindering Libyan national
reconciliation.” Meanwhile, the eastern-based commander of the state Petroleum
Facilities Guards (PFG), Naji al-Maghrabi, announced the implementation of the
plan to secure el-Sharara oilfield after taking its control from army forces in
a bid to encourage state oil firm National Oil Company (NOC) to restart
production that has been halted since December. He asserted that PFG members are
keen on adhering to Libyan National Army (LNA) commander Khalifa Haftar’s
instructions in coordinating with the oilfield’s officials. The PFG commander
indicated that his guards had been appointed to secure Sharara oilfield, adding
that the facility was very secure and that the NOC should resume work. “We call
on NOC to lift the force majeure,” said Maghrabi. NOC, chaired by Mustafa
Sanallah in the west of Libya where the internationally recognized government is
based, has said it will not reopen the field without a new security arrangement
and once other conditions are met, such as ensuring its workers are safe. “NOC
has sent an inspection team to assess security at Sharara and to verify that all
armed militia have left the field prior to force majeure being lifted,” a
spokesman said by text message sent to Reuters. The field, which had been
producing about 315,000 barrels per day (bpd), was closed after a group of state
guards and tribesmen seized it, making financial and other demand. NOC declared
force majeure, a waiver on its contracts. In related news, LNA forces increased
their military presence south of the country, where the 73rd Infantry Brigade
relocated three military battalions to support the forces in their fight against
terrorist groups and criminal gangs. Military sources said that the army was
preparing to launch an attack on Merzek town, where there is a combination of
Chadian opposition groups, extremist militias affiliated with what was known as
the “Council of Benghazi Revolutionaries” and similar militias led by Ibrahim
al-Jadran, former oilfield commander of the central region. Commander of the
southern force Hasan Moussa said in a televised statement that the situation is
relatively calm in Merzek, following air strikes targeting three different
locations that killed one person and injured two others.
LNA jets have raided various outposts of extremists and Chadian groups in Merzek
and Um al-Aranab, some 240 km south of the southern Libyan city of Sabha. LNA
spokesman Brigadier Ahmed al-Mismari announced that his forces have taken full
control of all the airports and oil fields in the south, pointing out that there
is coordination with all neighboring countries regarding the military offensive
in the area.
Algeria: Cautious Calm Ahead of Nationwide Marches
Algiers - Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 21 February, 2019/Algeria is witnessing
cautious calm ahead of popular rallies due to be held after Friday prayers. A
movement launched an initiative to organize popular rallies in the capital and
various other states to protest President Abdelaziz Bouteflika’s candidacy for a
new presidential term, after having stayed 20 years in power. The Mouwatana or
the Citizens’ Democracy movement – which comprises a group of opposition
political activists – has called for protests to be held on Friday. At the same
time, many opposition parties announced their withdrawal from the presidential
race scheduled for April 18, calling on Algerians to boycott the polls “which
will not bring anything new except the appointment of the incumbent president
for a fifth term.”The movement aims to “enact real change and gather citizens in
protest for introducing change into the system of governance and to prepare
necessary conditions needed for peaceful means of a transitional period which
preserves the country and the people.”“Upcoming presidential elections will be a
sorting tool to reshape the new balance of power and make a significant impact
on the future of the country,” said the authors of the initiative, mainly top
Algerian writers, lawyers and political activists. A few days ago, crowds of
Algerian populists took to street, calling on Bouteflika to go back on his
decision to run for the presidency. Residents of the state of Bejaia and Khorata
(300 km east of the capital) and the state of Bordj Bou Arreridj (200 Km from
Algiers) marched in peaceful rallies raising different slogans, with other
marches taking place in Tizi Ouzou and other Algerian states. Demonstrators
hoisted black flags, expressing their utmost rejection of the country’s
political situation, while thousands of police and security officers were
deployed in the streets and neighborhoods of the capital, especially after news
emerged about plans for a “million-people march.”According to local sources, the
organizers of the demonstrations belong to local cultural and social
organizations, with the absence of partisan members and human rights activists,
although the region is a stronghold of opposition parties and large human rights
organizations such as the Algerian League for the Defense of Human Rights.
US: Efforts to Remove Sudan from Terror List Under Threat
Khartoum - Ahmed Younis/Asharq Al-Awsat/Thursday, 21 February, 2019/“Excessive
violence” used by Sudanese security forces to suppress anti-government protests
could threaten talks to remove Sudan from Washington’s state sponsors of
terrorism list, a senior US official said on Wednesday.
Cyril Sartor, senior director for Africa at the US National Security Council,
said that the US-Sudan negotiating process “which could eventually lead to the
lifting of state sponsors of terrorism designation... is being threatened by the
current developments.”In an interview with AFP at the end of a four-day visit to
Khartoum, Sartor said: “It is absolutely unacceptable for security forces to use
excessive violence to crack down on demonstrators, to use detention without
charge, certainly unacceptable to use brutality, torture... and needless to say
there’s no reason anyone should be killed.” Meanwhile, several cities are
preparing for a march organized by the Sudanese Professionals’ Gathering and its
allied forces, where opposition leaders are expected to participate publicly for
the first time since the protests began in December. “All political leaders of
the political forces will participate in the march against President Omar al-Bashir.
It is set to kick off from several areas in the center of the capital Khartoum,”
Communist Party Secretary Mohammad Mokhtar al-Khatib told Asharq Al-Awsat.
Spokesman for the Professionals’ Gathering, Mohammed Yusuf Ahmed Mustafa, said:
“We expect the authorities to confront us in a violent manner, with arrests and
beatings, but we will not halt the demonstrations or stop exercising our freedom
of expression, which is guaranteed by the constitution and not restricted by any
Sudanese law. We are determined to follow the peaceful path.”“Despite our
insistence on peaceful assembly, we are certain that the authorities will treat
us in a violent manner, like criminals,” Mustafa noted, in remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat.
Venezuela's Guaido to Leave for Colombia as
Aid Standoff Hardens
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/February 21/19/Venezuelan
opposition leader Juan Guaido made plans to head for the border with Colombia to
personally bring in US-supplied food and medicine in defiance of the
military-backed government, raising fears of possible weekend confrontations.
Guaido, who has set a Saturday deadline for bringing in the aid, planned to
depart at 6:00 am Thursday in a caravan of buses with members of the
opposition-controlled National Assembly, forcing a high-stakes showdown with
President Nicolas Maduro. On Maduro's orders, the military has beefed up border
security and barricaded a major border bridge to prevent the supplies from
entering the country from Cucuta, Colombia, where tons of supplies are
stockpiled. Although it was unclear exactly what Guaido intends to do, he says
he has enlisted hundreds of thousands of volunteers in recent days to help bring
in and distribute the aid. On Wednesday, he rallied bus drivers to go to the
borders to collect aid for Venezuelans suffering shortages. "Even though they
point guns at us -- and all of us have received threats, rubber bullets and even
live ones -- we are not afraid," Guaido said, standing on the back of a truck in
a throng of supporters. "We will stay out in the street with our chests bared,
demanding freedom for all of Venezuela."Shipments of food and medicine for the
crisis-stricken population have become a key focus of the power struggle between
Maduro and Guaido. The 35-year-old leader of the Venezuelan legislature
proclaimed himself acting president January 23, and has since won the backing of
more than 50 countries. He wants to oust Maduro, set up a transitional
government and hold new elections. "This could be very soon, between six and
nine months, once Maduro's current usurpation ends," Guaido told Mexican
television station Televisa.
A million volunteers
Guaido, who says 300,000 people could die without an influx of aid, says he aims
to rally a million volunteers to start bringing it in by Saturday. Addressing
supporters he listed the planned transit points of entry at the Brazilian and
Colombian borders, the island of Curacao and the seaports of Puerto Cabello and
La Guaira. However the pro-Maduro military has already blocked the Tienditas
bridge across the Colombian border, and Vice President Delcy Rodriguez confirmed
the government was shutting down air and sea links between Curacao and
Venezuela. The military said in a decree that it was banning vessels from
sailing out of Venezuela's ports until Sunday to avoid actions by "criminal"
groups. Amnesty International's Americas director Erika Guevara urged
authorities to "not only recognize this serious crisis... but also to guarantee
access" for those bringing in aid.
Underlining the swell of international support for Guaido, British entrepreneur
Richard Branson plans to hold a pro-aid concert just inside Colombia on Friday,
while Maduro's government stages a rival concert on its side of the border,
around 1,000 feet (300 meters) away. US officials say the aid will reach
thousands of Venezuelans and last for a few weeks. Further details of how the
opposition aims to distribute it were scarce. Private bus driver Jose Figueroa,
60, said he planned to leave Caracas in the coming days in a convoy of some 30
vehicles.
Foreign 'aggression'
"The government is leading us to war. It will be very difficult. The situation
is extremely tense," he said, as drivers parked their buses and pick-up trucks
at a rally in central Caracas. "But a bullet will kill you more quickly than
hunger."Wednesday's rally gathered just a couple of dozen buses and pick-up
trucks in Guaido's support. The pro-opposition drivers had planned to hold their
rally at a major crossroads further west but found the avenue blocked by a far
bigger demonstration. Hundreds of state bus drivers rallied in the red shirts of
the pro-government "Chavismo" movement, in a gathering convened by the
authorities. They yelled their loyalty to Maduro -- himself a former bus driver
-- and the memory of his predecessor, the father of Venezuela's socialist
"revolution," Hugo Chavez. State-employed bus driver Julio Arocha, 53, admitted
he was "negatively affected" by the crisis, "economically, psychologically", but
was getting by thanks to state food handouts.
Catalyst for change
Like Maduro, Arocha blamed the crisis on foreign "aggression." "The aggression
is intensifying. The word 'humanitarian' is a euphemism," he said. Despite
sitting on the world's biggest oil reserves, Venezuela is gripped by an economic
and humanitarian crisis, with acute shortages of food and medicine. "Even if the
February 23 deadline does not serve as a catalyst (for regime change), Maduro
will likely pay a cost either way," wrote Eurasia Group analyst Risa
Grais-Targow in a note this week. "Barring the entrance of food and medicine
into the country will prompt additional international condemnation and
isolation, while it will also probably fuel opposition protests and deepen
popular demand for change."
Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on February 21-22/19
What Ails Europe's Economy?
Ferdinando Giugliano/Bloomberg View/February 21/19
In the space of just two years, the euro zone has gone from the world economy’s
hero to zero.
In 2017, the bloc expanded at the fastest rate in a decade, as it benefited from
a combination of booming global trade and ultra-easy monetary policy. Now, the
currency union has become the prime concern for those who worry about a wider
downturn. The International Monetary Fund cut its forecasts for global growth
mainly due to downward revisions for the euro area.
But look closely at the map, and the picture is much more heterogeneous than
you’d think. Italy and Germany – ironically the sick man and the powerhouse of
the bloc – are in trouble, with the former now officially in recession and the
latter only narrowly missing one. But, elsewhere, there is no shortage of
countries still growing at a decent clip. The monetary union may be down; it
isn’t out.
The euro zone’s most consistent surprise is Spain, which grew by 0.7 per cent in
the fourth quarter, marginally up from the 0.6 percent expansion seen in each of
the previous three quarters. The country may be headed for an election after
Pedro Sanchez’s minority government failed to secure sufficient support for its
budget, but the political uncertainty has had relatively little impact. In 2018,
the country expanded by less than 3 percent for the first time in four years,
but growth still came in at a decent 2.5 percent.
France’s economic performance is even more surprising. The bloc’s second-largest
economy has been jolted by the protests of the gilets jaunes, which shook the
political system and dented investor confidence. Yet it expanded by 0.3 percent
at the end of last year, in line with the previous quarter and marginally faster
than in the first two quarters of the year.
Other countries, from north to south, also tell a more positive story. Growth in
Finland rebounded from 0.5 percent in the third quarter to 0.9 percent in the
final stretch of the year. Portugal expanded by 0.4 percent, pretty much in line
with the other three quarters. The Netherlands also bounced back after a poor
third quarter, posting a rate of expansion of 0.5 percent.
Policy makers across Europe will take a very close look at the economic
indicators at the start of this year to understand whether the downturn will
worsen. The European Central Bank can take heart from the euro zone labor
market, which continues to strengthen both in terms of employment and of wages.
This should offer continuous support to domestic demand. However, the central
bank has to balance this with risks from abroad, including a slowdown in China
and the trade war between Beijing and Washington. All of this has important
knock-on effects on business confidence, with entrepreneurs putting investment
on hold as they wait for greater clarity.
Europe’s uneven picture suggests that there is a problem with the growth model
of some countries as opposed to the bloc as a whole. In Italy, the fiscal plans
of the new populist government have pushed up bond yields, contributing to a
reduction in the flow of credit. Domestic demand fell in the fourth quarter,
showing that consumers and entrepreneurs are being cautious. Meanwhile,
Germany’s export-driven growth model is facing its biggest test in decades as
Berlin discovers it is vulnerable to the global trade outlook and China’s
economic fortunes. But unlike Italy, the country has scope to boost growth by
raising public investment: Such spending would provide short-term relief and
help to re-balance the economy towards domestic demand.
The world is right to look at Europe’s slowdown and wonder what is going on.
But, as often in the past, it’s hard to find a single explanation. The strength
of Europe is its variety; it can also be its weakness.
Google and Facebook’s Next Big Fight
Lionel Laurent/Bloomberg View/February 21/19
For many people, it probably sounds a little rich to hear the European Union
accuse Silicon Valley of being a graveyard of innovation. But that’s where we
are in 2019. Regulators are hitting the likes of Alphabet Inc.’s Google and
Facebook Inc. with a flurry of antitrust fines and data-privacy probes, implying
that they regard tech billionaires as more John D. Rockefeller than Nikola
Tesla.
The end-game, according to Brussels’ top data watchdog, is to make sure new
startups aren't blown out of the water by Big Tech (or gobbled up), which should
ultimately benefit consumers by allowing them more choice.
Tackling this so-called “kill zone,” where fledgling tech companies are acquired
or copied out of existence by deep-pocketed incumbents, is a prime ambition for
European Data Protection Supervisor Giovanni Buttarelli, nicknamed “Mr GDPR”
after the data-privacy law. When I met him in Brussels recently, Buttarelli
checked off the barriers to entry for a startup: It needs to first outbid the
likes of Amazon.com Inc., Facebook and others for engineering talent; then sell
its product through an app store probably run by Google or Apple Inc.; and
finally compete against big players with established networks and huge cash
piles. And even it clears all these hurdles, it’s still vulnerable to being
taken out.
There’s a connection between this dominance of Big Tech – which is proven by the
decline in venture-capital financing for upstarts, as my colleague Noah Smith
has written – and harm to consumers. The EU view is that the “free” price tag of
social media and apps is not a public good if it’s underpinned by a business
model that hoovers up data from users without consent. And if the profits from
that are spent on blocking competition, there’s less chance of a market-based
alternative. Google and Facebook rebut this view, insisting that a disruptive
rival could unseat them anytime. But regulators have given up waiting for one.
The recipe for fixing things, according to Buttarelli, is threefold. He wants
more competition through antitrust enforcement, more data protection through
GDPR, and more fairness and transparency for customers from the tech giants
themselves.
None of this would destroy Facebook or Google. GDPR is estimated to have
inflicted a negative impact of 2 to 3 percent on the two companies’ total ad
revenues, according to Bank of America analyst Justin Post. The running total of
EU antitrust fines against Google is about 6.7 billion euros ($7.5 billion),
while the company’s yearly sales are more than $100 billion. Still, Eric Leandri,
co-founder of French search engine Qwant, says he’s confident that recent fines
against Google on competition and data-privacy grounds – which the US firm is
appealing – will have had a chilling impact.
Defenders of the Silicon Valley faith will grumble about mission creep in
Brussels. It’s certainly true that regulators need to be careful not to muddy
the waters with inconsistent or unclear regulation. The recent German
competition ruling against Facebook uses data privacy as its main argument, but
without a prior ruling on GDPR infringement. That’s a potential problem because
it’s hard to separate the need to enforce user privacy with the need to
safeguard competition. Indeed, both things might be in conflict one day, says
Ariel Ezrachi, a competition specialist at Oxford University. Imagine the right
to keep your data private under one law alongside the need to share your data in
a competitive market under another.
Another thing not covered in Buttarelli's plan is where investment comes from.
It was no surprise when Sweden’s music-streaming giant Spotify Technology SA
decided to list its shares on the New York Stock Exchange last year. If Europe
fails to unify its fragmented capital markets, especially after Brexit, the
fruits of Buttarelli's labor will end up in America regardless.
Iranian leaders can only blame themselves for deadly
attacks
د. ماجد ربيزاده : لا يمكن للقادة الإيرانيين إلا لوم أنفسهم على هىجمات المعارضة
المميتة في الداخل
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh/Arab News/February 21/19
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/72359/dr-majid-rafizadehiranian-leaders-can-only-blame-themselves-for-deadly-attacks-%D8%AF-%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%AC%D8%AF-%D8%B1%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%87-%D9%84%D8%A7-%D9%8A%D9%85%D9%83%D9%86/
This week, one of the top stories in Iran’s state-controlled Persian outlets has
been linked to the recent suicide attack on the Islamic Revolutionary Guard
Corps (IRGC) in the volatile southeastern province of Sistan and Baluchistan.
According to Fars News Agency, 40 members of the IRGC were on the bus that was
targeted on Feb. 13 and at least 27 were killed.
The timing of the attack is significant as it occurred during the month that the
Islamic Republic has been celebrating the 40th anniversary of it coming to
power.
But this attack is not an isolated incident — the number of attacks on the
Iranian regime and its military bases appears to be increasing. On Jan. 29, at
least four police officers were wounded by a handmade stun grenade and another
explosive device, also in Sistan and Baluchistan Province.
In September 2018, during a military parade in the southwestern city of Ahvaz,
gunmen opened fire, killing at least 25 people and wounding 55 more. This was
considered one of the deadliest ever attacks against Iran’s military inside the
country. The military parade was being carried out by members of the IRGC and
its elite Quds Force.
In addition, in 2017, a pair of attacks shocked the capital of Tehran, where at
least 12 people were killed at the Iranian Parliament and Ayatollah Ruhollah
Khomeini’s mausoleum, which is one of Iran’s most sacred places. In addition,
IRGC chief Maj. Gen. Mohammed Ali Jafari admitted that several other attacks
have been prevented. Addressing a large crowd at a funeral following the most
recent attack, he stated: “Just in the past year, six or seven suicide attacks
were neutralized, but they were able to carry out this one.”
In these situations, the Iranian regime immediately reacts by resorting to its
modus operandi of blaming other state or non-state actors, without providing any
evidence or proof. Iranian leaders generally point fingers at the US, the Gulf
states, particularly Saudi Arabia, extremists, and Israel. This time, Jafari
accused Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
Both the moderates and hard-liners in Iran reiterate the same message announced
by Khamenei and play the blame game.
During last year’s deadly attack in Ahvaz, without providing any evidence,
Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei accused other countries in the region, particularly
the Gulf Arab states. He said in a statement on his website: “This crime is a
continuation of the plots of the regional states that are puppets of the US, and
their goal is to create insecurity in our dear country.”
Both the moderates and hard-liners in Iran reiterate the same message announced
by Khamenei and play the blame game. The reason for this strategy is to deflect
attention from the regime’s support for terrorist and militia groups across the
region.
By blaming other nations for the latest attack, the Iranian leaders are also
attempting to deflect media attention away from the dire situation of the people
in Sistan and Baluchistan. The majority of the population in the province is
Sunni and they have long been neglected and discriminated against by the Iranian
regime. They are plagued by severe socioeconomic deprivation and suffer from one
of the highest rates of poverty in Iran.
In these scenarios, the regime also immediately vows to take revenge through
hard power and military forces. Jafari threatened last week that: “The
treacherous Saudi and UAE governments should know that Iran’s patience has ended
and we will no longer stand your secret support for these anti-Islam criminals.”
It is ironic that the Iranian leaders accuse other countries of harboring
radical forces, all while the regime is the top state sponsor of terrorism year
after year. It cooperated with and harbored Al-Qaeda members and it arms,
supports, trains and funds terror and militia groups across the region,
including in Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon and Syria.
With the Iranian regime’s widespread military adventurism across the Middle
East, its continuing support for militia groups that commit egregious human
rights violations in foreign countries, and widespread suppression and
oppression of its own citizens, it should not come as a shock to Tehran’s
leaders that discontent toward the IRGC and the Quds Force is reaching a new
level.
The ruling mullahs will more than likely attempt to buttress their unfounded
arguments that extremist groups are the country’s rivals, or that Iran is
fighting extremism and terrorism in the region. This is to assist the
hard-liners in further justifying the deployment of more forces and intensifying
their involvement in the region. As Jafari demanded more power for the military,
he stated: “We will avenge the blood of our martyrs from the Saudi and UAE
governments and ask the President (Hassan Rouhani) ... to leave our hands free
more than ever for reprisal operations.”
In a nutshell, as a top state sponsor of terrorism, the Iranian regime has no
one to blame but itself for the recent attacks on the IRGC.
*Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a Harvard-educated Iranian-American political scientist.
He is a leading expert on Iran and US foreign policy, a businessman and
president of the International American Council. Twitter: @Dr_Rafizadeh
Venezuela crisis about survival, not politics, for nation’s poor
Nick Paton Walsh/Arab News/February 21, 2019
Carolina beckons us into the hilltop slum where she and her extended family
live. The drive up has taken us past burned-out police stations, overturned
rubbish bins, the remains of tire fires — the tell-tale signs that the poor of
Caracas, once President Nicolas Maduro’s support base inside Venezuela, are
turning.
Inside her three-room apartment, she shows me a tiny bowl of scrambled egg.
“This is for four persons,” she says. She opens the fridge and, along with mold
and aging condiments, are two bottles of soda, but little else. This is life now
for the Venezuelan poor. Maduro used to feed them; and they supported him back.
But now — like every other constant of Venezuelan life — that is collapsing.
The fury here is not political or bound in the geopolitical tussle that the
nation’s fate has become. It’s about food, like it really is elsewhere too. The
night before we arrived, the special police forces of Maduro were inside their
community and shots were fired. They have continued to return all afternoon,
causing Carolina to twitch. She shows us video of the raids the night before,
and the tire fires and pot-banging (a local sign of loud protest) that preceded
them. “My hand was shaking,” she says, apologizing for the wobbly footage.
This is an often-untold element of Venezuela’s crisis, which often focuses on
the mild, simmering bourgeois anger in the streets in support of self-declared
interim president Juan Guaido, recognized by much of the West and Venezuela’s
neighbors.
But the slums, which once benefited from the largesse of Hugo Chavez and his
successor, Maduro, have fallen the hardest. The deaths in clashes with police
now often evade the headlines and meld into the 80 murders a day blighting
Venezuela nationwide.
The fury here is not political or bound in the geopolitical tussle that the
nation’s fate has become. It’s about food, like it really is elsewhere too. One
cousin, named Ronny, said: “We can’t hold it in anymore. We are being crushed.
We are beggars now, always begging. This isn’t political, it’s survival. People
are killing each other for a kilo of rice, or flour, or water.”On the other side
of town, near a richer street of restaurants, a gang of children roams, settling
on a pile of trash near the river to scavenge for food.
They are united by the bleached hair they all sport as their gang’s sign.
Fourteen-year-old Uzmaria is the most vocal, as two of the older boys play-fight
with knives — not for innocent amusement but for practice in self-defense. “We
gather stuff, we beg, a piece of chicken skin to take home,” Uzmaria says. “My
brother got killed in July by another gang. He just disappeared and then they
found the body in the river.”
As the sun drops over Caracas’ once glittering infrastructure, one of the boys
plays with a stick as a rifle. “Maduro,” he yells as he takes fake aim. “I am
hungry,” he cries before seizing up with a wheezing cough....
• Nick Paton Walsh is senior international correspondent at CNN.
What Washington—and Iran—Should Take Away
from the Warsaw Conference
Dennis Ross/The Washington Institute/February 21/19
The moderator of a landmark Middle East panel explains why the conference may
signal growing Arab-Israeli strategic convergence, firmer European action on
Iran, and further stalemate in Syria.
“Takeaways” is the classic Washington term used to encapsulate the outcomes of
high-profile diplomatic gatherings. Last week, I was invited to moderate a panel
at the “Ministerial to Promote a Future of Peace and Security in the Middle
East,” cohosted in Warsaw by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Polish foreign
minister Jacek Czaputowicz on February 13-14. The panel included three senior
Arab officials—Saudi minister of state for foreign affairs Adel al-Jubeir,
Emirati foreign minister Abdullah bin Zayed, and Bahraini foreign minister
Khalid bin Ahmed al-Khalifa. Afterward, I interviewed Israeli prime minister
Binyamin Netanyahu, who also attended the event. These and other conversations
yielded several interesting—and in many cases promising—takeaways.
First, the event was marked by a variety of convergences that should make Iran
take notice. From the outset, Secretary Pompeo acknowledged the participants’
clear differences of opinion on certain regional issues, urging everyone to
discuss these rifts openly and honestly as they worked to advance common
positions. Regarding Iran, European ministers reemphasized that they would not
walk away from the nuclear deal, yet they also embraced the need to counter
unacceptable Iranian behaviors, including ballistic missile tests and
threatening military actions in the Middle East.
Second, the Europeans were alarmed by the strikingly similar stories they have
heard from Arab ministers and Netanyahu in describing Iran’s efforts to
destabilize the region and exploit conflicts, whether by smuggling arms into
Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, using Shia militias to coerce governments, providing
missiles to Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis, encouraging terrorism and
subversion, deploying missiles on bases in Syria and western Iraq, or developing
factories to build precision guidance capabilities for thousands of rockets in
Lebanon and Syria. In essence, those on the frontlines of regional conflicts
told their European friends that Iran will not stop fomenting trouble abroad
unless its costs for doing so become far more acute. Interestingly, Arab
ministers noted that sanctions are only part of the solution; in their view,
creating consequences for Iran also entails unifying their own efforts,
portraying a solid, collective front of opposition, and doing much more to tell
the Iranian public about the costs of their government’s adventures.
Third, the Arab-Israeli strategic landscape appears to be changing, even if the
“new Middle East” envisioned by the late Shimon Peres is not yet in the offing.
The Warsaw meeting was not like other international gatherings or peace
conferences involving top Arab and Israeli officials. Beginning with Madrid in
1991 and stretching to Annapolis in 2007, past meetings involved each side
giving set-piece speeches with no real discussion or engagement. Warsaw was
different: it was about moderated questions and comments, with all participants
sitting in closed settings and listening to each other directly, including Arab
foreign ministers and Israel’s prime minister.
For example, during a discussion of how to counter Tehran’s low-cost tactic of
using Shia militias abroad, I noted that Israel had carried out more than 200
operations against Iranian and proxy forces attempting to embed themselves in
Syria. When I asked one of the Arab ministers for his reaction, he stated that
Israel was exercising its “right of self-defense.” Netanyahu was present for
that remark and other notable statements by the seven Arab ministers in
attendance, consistently agreeing with their analysis in later comments he made
to me and others. This may not be normalization, but it is creating a new
normal.
Fourth, while the Palestinians made clear that they do not want any “new normal”
to emerge so long as nothing is happening to advance peace or alter Israel’s
occupation, they lost out by boycotting the conference. Ironically, if PA
officials had simply shown up, all of the Arab and European ministers would
necessarily have raised Palestinian concerns, and not just in passing. Instead,
the issue was just an afterthought at best, subordinated to higher-priority
threats. Although the Palestinians reaffirmed their reputation as masters of
defiance, they once again failed to advance their national movement—the fatal
flaw of any strategy based exclusively on defiance.
Fifth, the participants showed consensus on several key Syria items. Everyone
favored implementing UN Security Council Resolution 2254, which calls for
ceasing hostilities, drafting a new constitution, and implementing a political
transition over eighteen months. No surprise there, but I was struck by another
point of consensus: that Russian and Iranian interests in Syria diverge, and
that those differences can be exploited to limit Iran’s presence and perhaps
even advance Resolution 2254. But I am deeply skeptical that these differences
can be widened anytime soon, even if one ignores the fact that Bashar al-Assad
has no intention of stepping aside, and that Moscow has shown no sign of
curtailing its support for him. So long as Syria is undergoing even low-level
insurgency, Russia will need Iranian/Shia boots on the ground.
These doubts do not detract from the other Warsaw takeaways. In the end,
however, the conference’s true test will be whether it results in tangible
European steps to take tougher action against Iran’s regional meddling.
Participants discussed certain measures toward that end (e.g., universally
designating all of Hezbollah as a terrorist organization rather than
distinguishing between its political and military “wings”), but no conclusions
were reached. It remains to be seen whether the working groups proposed in
Warsaw are willing to convene soon and make progress on sensitive issues. In any
case, unless Iran’s decisionmakers begin to see the costs—and not just the
benefits—of foreign interference by the Qods Force and other organs, there is
little prospect of the regime altering its behavior.
*Dennis Ross is the counselor and William Davidson Distinguished Fellow at The
Washington Institute.
Saudi Arabia's powerful prince tours Asia —
with purpose
Simon Henderson/The Hill//February 21/19
The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill
Saudi Arabia’s effective leader, Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman, this week is
visiting Asia — and what a trip it is turning out to be.
On Sunday, MbS, as he is known, arrived in Islamabad, Pakistan, for a two-day
visit. For unexplained reasons, he arrived a day late. And he did leave Monday,
but he was actually in Pakistan less than 24 hours.
His late arrival meant that his itinerary was changed at the last moment. He is
still due to go to India and China, but visits to Malaysia and Indonesia have
been cancelled. (Saudi officials prefer to use the word “postponed.”)
His arrival in Pakistan, and intended next stop in India, was overshadowed by a
terrorist attack in Indian Kashmir, a Muslim majority area, in which 44 Indian
paramilitaries died. Pakistan displayed injured innocence to India’s accusations
of Pakistani involvement, but New Delhi is considering a military response. In
the meantime, India increased tariffs on Pakistani goods by 200 percent and
Islamabad on Monday withdrew its ambassador “for consultations.” We are not
talking a nuclear exchange between the the two South Asian giants — at least,
not yet.
The trip to Pakistan was, in publicity terms, a lovefest between MbS and Prime
Minister Imran Khan, the cricketer-turned-politician elected last year. The
Saudi prince, whose authority in the kingdom apparently is total, declared he
feels “at home in Pakistan.” Khan, whose rule is circumscribed by his powerful
military, was suitably grateful for the reported $20 billion in Saudi financial
aid and contracts. Additionally, according to the Pakistani media, Riyadh picked
up the tab for the whole trip, which included eight containers of MbS’s personal
belongings for his overnight stay and 3,500 pigeons procured from local markets
to be released on his arrival.
It is notable that MbS had a side meeting with Gen. Qamar Javed Bajwa, head of
the Pakistani army, who was accompanied by Gen. Asim Munir, the director-general
of the feared Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), the agency topping many
people’s list as likely responsible for the Kashmir attack. In the past, Saudi
Arabia has taken more than a passing interest in Pakistan’s nuclear weapon
program, so it may be ominous that the official statement issued at the end of
the trip said: “Both sides noted with satisfaction their strong defense and
security ties, and agreed to further enhance cooperation in this field to
advance shared objectives.”
When announced last week, MbS’s trip was depicted as a “pivot to Asia,” both
commercially and because the countries there are less likely than the United
States and Europe to ask pesky questions about Jamal Khashoggi, the journalist
murdered on Oct. 2 at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, Turkey. Both India and
China are economic giants. While Pakistan wanted financial support, New Delhi
and Beijing want greater commercial links — oiled, if that is the word, by Saudi
energy supplies.
But India will be disturbed by any enhancement in the Riyadh-Islamabad
relationship, especially if the kingdom is not appearing to be any restraint on
nefarious activities in Kashmir or Afghanistan. As it is, New Delhi insisted
that MbS could not fly directly from Pakistan, forcing the Saudi leader to go
back to Riyadh for a night. Iran, no less, also complained last week of
Pakistani involvement in an attack on revolutionary guards near their mutual
border.
The visit to China arguably should be a stand-alone item. Beijing’s political
support for Pakistan stretches back decades and is notably less fickle than
Washington’s. Commercially, also, there are strong links. Pakistan is notionally
part of the Chinese “One Belt, One Road” vision, though their land border is
high in an extension of the Himalayan mountains. The road climbs to over 15,000
feet, so the long sea voyage remains the more viable.
But China is the end of the week. There is a lot to get through before then.
*Simon Henderson is the Baker Fellow and director of the Bernstein Program on
Gulf and Energy Policy at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
Turkey: Uniting an "Army of Islam" to
Defeat Just One Country
Uzay Bulut/Gatestone Institute/February 21/19
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13559/turkey-army-of-islam
At the conference, Adnan Tanriverdi, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's
top military advisor, delivered a speech detailing the inner workings of the
"Islamic Confederal State" that Tanriverdi's Strategic Research Center for
Defenders of Justice (ASSAM) aims to establish with 61 Muslim countries.
Judging by an article Tanriverdi penned in 2009, the purpose of this joint
Islamic force is to defeat Israel, which "should be made to get engaged [in war]
and the length of the war should be extended."
Erdogan and his chief military advisor are obviously engaging in projection. It
is Turkey that has ethnically cleansed itself of Greeks, Assyrians and
Armenians, and that is now targeting Syrian Kurds. It is the Turkish
government's continued aggression against various peoples in Israel, Syria,
Iraq, Cyprus and other countries that is a threat to world peace; not Israel. It
is Turkey, not Israel, whose destabilizing foreign policy needs to change.
In 2016, Necati Yılmaz, an MP from the opposition Republican People's Party
(CHP), submitted a written parliamentary motion to then-Turkish Prime Minister
Binali Yıldırım, questioning the activities and international connections of
"SADAT International Defense Consultancy," which is headed by Turkish President
Recep Tayyip Erdogan's chief military advisor, Adnan Tanriverdi. Pictured:
Necati Yılmaz. (Image source: Wikimedia Commons)
Istanbul recently hosted the second "International Islamic Union Congress,"
sponsored mainly by the Strategic Research Center for Defenders of Justice
(ASSAM), which is headed by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's chief
military advisor, Adnan Tanriverdi, a retired lieutenant general and an Islamist
.
At the conference, Tanriverdi delivered a speech detailing the inner workings of
the "Islamic Confederal State" that ASSAM aims to establish with 61 Muslim
countries. In his address, Tanriverdi said that a "rapid deployment force"
should be created. Judging by an article Tanriverdi penned in 2009, the purpose
of this joint Islamic force is to defeat Israel, which "should be made to get
engaged [in war] and the length of the war should be extended."
"If Israel has to call all of its reserve soldiers to duty," he explained,
"there will be no one left at home or in their businesses. It cannot continue
like that for a long time."
Tanriverdi also suggested how this could be accomplished:
"The Defense Ministers of Islamic Countries should be invited to an urgent
meeting, at which possibilities for 'defense cooperation' should be examined;
Turkey, Iran, Syria, the Iraqi Resistance Organization and Palestine should be
the core of this cooperation."
Within this context, he said, a "'rapid Deployment Force of Islam,' which will
consist of an amphibious brigade, an armored brigade and an aero-landing
brigade, should be encouraged."
He went on:
"A peace force of Islamic countries should be deployed in Gaza... International
efforts should continue, and the use of military force in Islamic countries
should be encouraged. A joint military operation by our ground, naval and air
forces should be carried out in the international waters of the Eastern
Mediterranean. Aid convoys from Turkey, accompanied by Turkish warplanes, should
land at the Gaza port. The resistance movements in Gaza should be supported with
anti-tank and low-altitude anti-aircraft weapons.
"An aid fund should be formed by Islamic countries; the monthly budget of the
legitimate Palestinian government should be paid from this fund and every adult
individual in [the Palestinian territories] should be paid a monthly salary...
Egypt should be pressured to open the Rafah border crossing. Syria should be
encouraged to enhance its military presence on the Israeli border."
Tanriverdi also claimed that: "Turkish states, throughout history, prevented 21
crusades through which the West targeted Islam. Turkey did not get involved in
the invasions following World War II, the establishment of the State of Israel
and the US invasion of Iraq, which we could call the 22nd, 23rd and 24th
crusades. It is Turkey's duty to rectify this. Avoiding this responsibility
would be contrary to our historic mission, our commitment to the civilization to
which we belong and to Turkey's survival."
Tanriverdi's views are the impetus for the founding in 2012 of his company,
"SADAT International Defense Consultancy." On its official website, Tanriverdi
writes:
"The Turkish Armed Forces give services of training, consultancy and equipment
to 22 friendly Turkish and Muslim countries. But it is impossible for them to
respond to all the needs of 60 Islamic countries in the defense sector.
"In order to give services in needed fields, to prevent dependence on
crusader-minded colonialist countries, to help form an environment of defense
industry and defense cooperation among Islamic countries, and to serve the
Islamic alliance, SADAT was formed by 23 founding shareholders and with the
support of 64 army officers and non-commissioned officers who have successfully
served the Turkish armed forces and who are respectful of the religious
sensitivities of Islamic countries."
Four years after SADAT's establishment, Necati Yılmaz, an MP from the opposition
Republican People's Party (CHP), submitted a written parliamentary motion to
then-Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım, questioning SADAT's activities and
international connections. The motion read, in part:
"SADAT states on its official website that that it tries to 'help establish a
military force in the Islamic world that will be self-sufficient.' With what
countries does SADAT have connections? Is there any other country to which SADAT
gives military and intelligence training? Does it have camps in other countries?
"Is it true that Sadat has connections with al-Nusra, al-Qaeda and ISIS? Is it
true that Sadat has trained ISIS militants?"
Yıldırım did not answer the motion during his tenure, but allegations about
SADAT's providing military training to jihadist organizations abroad and to some
pro-Erdogan groups in "secret military camps" in Turkey have not subsided.
Tanriverdi and other SADAT officials have repeatedly denied the accusations,
going as far as to sue some newspapers that published pieces repeating them.
In an interview last January with the pro-government newspaper, Habertürk,
Tanriverdi called claims about SADAT "slanderous" and "imaginary." Replaying
SADAT's "founding objective," he insisted that it "engages with the state organs
of friendly nations and provides them with services of corporate consultancy,
training and equipment in line with their laws in their own countries."
He continued: "With very pure and decent feelings, we just want to transfer the
experiences of our armed forces to Islamic countries. That is all. We also want
the Islamic countries to get united."He failed, however, to remind readers that
SADAT's objective is to unite against the West and Israel. He also omitted
comments from his 2009 article entitled "Palestine too should have an army",
such as:
"The states whose peoples are Muslim should either protect Palestine with their
own armed forces or form a modern armed force for Palestine to deal with
Israel."
Although Tanriverdi's dream of an "army of Islam" to fight Israel has yet to be
realized, his company, SADAT, seems to be aiding Palestinian-Arab jihadist
organizations targeting Israel. In February 2018, for instance, Israel's
internal security service, the Shin Bet, said that Hamas was funneling terror
funds to the West Bank and Gaza through Turkey. The Shin Bet statement also
accused Turkey of aiding Hamas' military build-up via SADAT. Kamil Tekeli, a
Turkish law professor who was arrested in Israel in mid-January, told his
interrogators that SADAT sends money and arms to Hamas. Tekeli, after being
interrogated, was deported back to Turkey, according to the Israeli media. The
Turkish Foreign Ministry, however, rejected the Shin Bet's accusations.
Tanriverdi's statements and his company nevertheless appear to reflect Erdogan's
worldview.
"We as Turkey and myself -- as long as I am in charge -- can never have a
positive view of Israel," Erdogan said in 2014. "The obvious reality is that
Israel is the country that threatens peace in the world and in the Middle East."
More recently, on December 15, Erdogan repeated one of many hostile claims he
has made over the years -- comparing Israel to the Nazis.
Erdogan and his chief military advisor are obviously engaging in projection. It
is Turkey that has ethnically cleansed itself of Greeks, Assyrians and
Armenians, that refuses to recognize the religious rights of the Alevi minority
and that is now targeting Syrian Kurds. It is the Turkish government's continued
aggression against various peoples in Israel, Syria, Iraq, Cyprus and other
countries that is a threat to world peace, not Israel. It is Turkey, not Israel,
whose destabilizing foreign policy needs to change.
*Uzay Bulut, a Turkish journalist, is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at Gatestone
Institute and is currently based in Washington D.C.
© 2019 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Palestinians: "The Slap of the Century"
Khaled Abu Toameh/Gatestone Institute/February 21/19
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13787/palestinians-slap-of-the-century
Under the current circumstances, when Arabs are being widely shamed and
condemned for sitting in the same room with an Israeli prime minister, it is
hard to see how the Trump administration will be able to convince Arab states
and leaders to normalize their relations with Israel. Some of these Arab leaders
may be privately telling US administration officials things they like to hear
about peace and coexistence with Israel. The very same leaders, however, are
fully aware of the opposite sentiments, not only in the West Bank and Gaza
Strip, but throughout the Arab world.
All that is left for the Trump administration to do is to try and persuade the
Arab states to abandon the Palestinians, and to continue focusing on the
regional threat from Iran. If the US completes its pullout from Syria, Iran will
successfully complete its long-desired "land-bridge" to the Mediterranean
through Yemen, Syria and Lebanon. This encirclement of the area will position
Iran, via its proxies, to be the hegemon controlling the region, as it has
clearly been trying to bring about. Russia, of course, is standing in the wings,
thanks to the gift that then US President Barack Obama handed Putin in 2011 by
pulling American troops out of Syria.
For decades now, not only Palestinian leaders but Arab ones as well, have been
radicalizing their people against Israel. Using every available platform,
including mosques, media outlets and United Nations organizations, these
leaders, with the collaboration of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, have
demonized Israel. They have poisoned the hearts and minds of their people with
the hate that exists towards Israel all over the Arab world. To promote
normalization with Israel, a leader must prepare his people for the possibility
of peace with Israel. Meanwhile, Arab leaders are doing the exact opposite --
which is why some of them are currently being denounced as traitors and pawns in
the hands of Israel and the US. It would be wise for President Trump's advisers,
if they wish to grasp what is really going on in the Arab world, to listen to
the voices of the Arab street.
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas called David Friedman, the US
Ambassador to Israel, a "son of a dog" in a televised speech, on March 19, 2018.
(Image source: MEMRI video screenshot)
The US administration is now saying that it will announce its plan for peace in
the Middle East, also known as the "Deal of the Century," after the April 9
election in Israel . The unseen plan has already been rejected by Palestinian
leaders, who continue to denounce it as a "conspiracy aimed at eliminating the
Palestinian cause and rights."
In light of the Palestinians' vehement opposition to the "Deal of the Century,"
it is already clear that the plan will not solve the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict. Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas will hardly accept
a plan that he has repeatedly referred to as a US "conspiracy" and the "Slap of
the Century." In one of his recent speeches, Abbas said: "We will not accept the
'Deal of the Century' and we will not accept a situation where the US is the
sole broker in the peace process."
Abbas has turned US President Donald Trump and his senior advisers into enemies
of the Palestinians. Abbas and Palestinian Authority officials have been
boycotting the US administration since December 2017, when Trump recognized
Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Abbas and his associates have since been using
harsh language to condemn Trump's senior advisers, especially US Ambassador
David Friedman, and special envoys Jared Kushner and Jason Greenblatt. Abbas
himself has called Friedman a "son of a dog." Palestinian officials and media
outlets regularly refer to Kushner, Friedman and Greenblatt as "Zionist
extremists" and "settlers."
Palestinian leaders have incited their people against the Trump and his advisers
to the point where it would be almost impossible for them even to be seen
meeting with any US official. In recent months, Abbas has been quoted as saying
that he does not intend to end his life as a "traitor." The comment also means
that it would also be impossible to accept any peace plan presented by the
current administration.
Abbas knows that the American plan will not give him everything he is asking
for. He wants, among other things, a full Israeli withdrawal to the 1949
armistice lines, including east Jerusalem.
His rivals in Hamas and other Palestinian groups, on the other hand, want to see
Israel replaced by an Islamic state, where some Jews may be permitted to live as
a minority under Muslim rule.
In short, Hamas rejects Israel's existence on what they claim to be totally
Muslim-owned land.
Anyone who thinks that the Palestinians may change their mind about the "Deal of
the Century" -- either before or after the Israeli election -- is living in an
illusion. There is no reason why Abbas should not be taken seriously when he
says he does not intend to end his life as a "traitor." One has to give him
credit for at least being honest. He is all too aware that the moment he
accepted the "Deal of the Century," he would go down in history and in the eyes
of Palestinians -- as well as many Arabs -- as having sold them out, and, of all
people, to the "colonizers."
All that is left for the Trump administration to do is to try and persuade the
Arab states to abandon the Palestinians and to continue focusing on the regional
threat from Iran. If the US completes its pullout from Syria, Iran will
successfully complete its long-desired "land-bridge" to the Mediterranean
through Yemen, Syria and Lebanon. This encirclement of the area will position
Iran, via its proxies, to be the hegemon controlling the region, as it has
clearly been trying to bring about. Russia, of course, is standing in the wings,
thanks to the gift that then US President Barack Obama handed Putin in 2011 by
pulling American troops out of Iraq.
The US could also agree to urging the Arab and Muslim world to continue
normalizing its ties with Israel. This mission, though, could easily turn out to
be "mission impossible."
Arab foreign ministers who attended the recent US-sponsored conference in Poland
on peace and security in the Middle East are now facing strong condemnations
from many Arabs. The ministers are being denounced for appearing in public with
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during the Warsaw summit. They are
being accused by Arabs of promoting normalization with the "Zionist enemy."
Earlier this week, Palestinian and Arab activists launched an online campaign,
under the title, "Normalization is Treason," to condemn the Arab officials who
participated in the Warsaw summit.
Notably, Abbas's Fatah faction and Hamas have joined one another in the campaign
against the Arabs who reportedly support normalization with Israel and have
begun using the exactly same language to voice their condemnation.
Mahmoud al-Aloul, deputy chairman of Fatah (headed by Abbas), said that Arab
normalization with Israel is a "stab in the back of the Palestinians."
PLO Secretary-General Saeb Erekat also condemned attempts to promote
normalization between the Arab states and Israel as a "stab in the back of the
Palestinians."
Hamas's military wing, Izaddin al-Qassam, has also endorsed the rhetoric of its
political rivals, Aloul and Erekat. Abu Obaidah, a spokesman for Hamas, warned
that normalization with Israel is a "stab in the back of the Palestinian
resistance. Normalization is a betrayal of the blood of thousands of our
martyrs."
While Fatah and Hamas clearly agree that normalization with Israel is a stab in
the back, one group of Palestinian Islamic scholars begs to differ. The scholars
disagree with the phrase "stab in the back" not because they support peace and
normalization with Israel. Instead, these scholars believe that normalization
between Arabs and Israel is a "stab in the heart" -- the front, not the back --
of the Palestinians
Under the current circumstances, when Arabs are being widely shamed and
condemned for sitting in the same room with an Israeli prime minister, it is
hard to see how the Trump administration will be able to convince Arab states
and leaders to normalize their relations with Israel. Some of these Arab leaders
may be privately telling US administration officials things they like to hear
about peace and coexistence with Israel. The very same leaders, however, are
fully aware of the opposite sentiments, not only in the West Bank and Gaza
Strip, but throughout the Arab world.
For decades now, not only Palestinian leaders but Arab ones as well, have been
radicalizing their people against Israel. Using every available platform,
including mosques, media outlets and United Nations organizations, these
leaders, with the collaboration of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, have
demonized Israel. They have poisoned the hearts and minds of their people with
the hate that exists towards Israel all over the Arab world. To promote
normalization with Israel, a leader must prepare his people for the possibility
of peace with Israel. Meanwhile, Arab leaders are doing the exact opposite --
which is why some of them are currently being denounced as traitors and pawns in
the hands of Israel and the US. It would be wise for President Trump's advisers,
if they wish to grasp what is really going on in the Arab world, to listen to
the voices of the Arab street.
*Khaled Abu Toameh, an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem, is a
Shillman Journalism Fellow at Gatestone Institute.
© 2019 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.