LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
February 02/19
Compiled & Prepared by: Elias Bejjani
The Bulletin's Link on the
lccc Site
http://data.eliasbejjaninews.com/eliasnews19/english.february02.19.htm
News
Bulletin Achieves Since 2006
Click Here to enter the LCCC Arabic/English news bulletins Achieves since 2006
Bible Quotations For today
I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me
will never walk in darkness but will have the light of life
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 08/12-20: “‘I am the light
of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness but will have the
light of life.’Then the Pharisees said to him, ‘You are testifying on your own
behalf; your testimony is not valid.’Jesus answered, ‘Even if I testify on my
own behalf, my testimony is valid because I know where I have come from and
where I am going, but you do not know where I come from or where I am going. You
judge by human standards; I judge no one. Yet even if I do judge, my judgement
is valid; for it is not I alone who judge, but I and the Father who sent me. In
your law it is written that the testimony of two witnesses is valid. I testify
on my own behalf, and the Father who sent me testifies on my behalf.’Then they
said to him, ‘Where is your Father?’ Jesus answered, ‘You know neither me nor my
Father. If you knew me, you would know my Father also.’He spoke these words
while he was teaching in the treasury of the temple, but no one arrested him,
because his hour had not yet come.
Titles For The Latest English LCCC Lebanese & Lebanese Related News published
on February 01-02/19
Guterres Says U.N. Resolutions 'Remain Essential to Stability of Lebanon,
Region'
U.S. Urges Govt. to Ensure Some Ministries Don't 'Provide Support to Hizbullah'
US urges new Lebanese government to block Hezbollah
France Welcomes Formation of Lebanon Govt.
Macron welcomes new Lebanese Cabinet
Mogherini: EU to Work Closely with Lebanon's New Government
Hariri Says He is 'Proud 'of New Female Ministers
Lebanon Appoints Four Women Ministers, Khairallah Changes Ministry Name
Lebanon's New Cabinet: Up to the Challenge?
Mrad: I’ll Back My Group and Partake in Strong Lebanon Bloc Meetings
Berri Says No One Has 11-Minister Veto Power in Govt.
Qassem Says Hizbullah Won't Bow to U.S. Pressure, Urges Active Govt.
STL Registrar Ends Working Visit to Lebanon
Karami: I Honestly Don't Know How Minister Bassil Does His Counting
Moody's: Fiscal Consolidation Very Challenging for New Lebanon Government
Sayegh Says New Government Dominated by Hezbollah
US Official: We Want to Prevent Hezbollah from Using Lebanese Banks
The USA Administration Adopts the 'Dr. Walid Phares' Plan for Syria
Litles For The Latest English LCCC Miscellaneous Reports And News published
on February 01-02/19
Pope Francis in Historic Arabian Peninsula Visit
Saudis, UAE, Yemen Ask UN to Pressure Huthis
Venezuela Opposition Leader Says Family Threatened by Maduro Agents
Iran marks 40th anniversary of Islamic Revolution
US Senate opposes troops’ withdrawal from Syria, Afghanistan
Russia-Turkey-Iran Summit on Syria Scheduled for Mid-February
Turkish Military Delegation in Russia to Discuss US Pullout from Syria
Washington Makes New Warning on Trade With Iran After Europe’s SPV Registration
US Holds Syrian Regime Responsible for Journalist Colvin’s 2012 Death
Egypt-Kuwait Joint Military Drills Kickoff
US Consulate Employee in Istanbul to Go on Trial over Failed Coup
Erekat: We Should Restore Gaza, Carry Out Elections
Abbas Reiterates Call for Multilateral Mechanism to Sponsor Peace Process
UN May Postpone Libya Elections Conference
Saudi Arabia, 5 Arab States Discuss Regional Crises at Jordan Meeting
Titles For The Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous
sources published
on February 01-02/19
Lebanon's New Cabinet: Up to the Challenge/Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January
01/19
US Official: We Want to Prevent Hezbollah from Using Lebanese Banks/Asharq Al-Awsat/February
01/2019
The USA Administration Adopts the 'Dr. Walid Phares' Plan for Syria/Rebecca
Bynum/New English Review/February 01/2019
Why Tehran Crosses Only 'Pink Lines'/Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/February 01/19
What Microsoft Can Teach Facebook About Playing Nice/Alex
Webb/Bloomberg/February 01/19
The Palestinians: Who Really Cares?/Bassam Tawil/Gatestone Institute/February
01/19
Belgium Welcomes Multiculturalism/Judith Bergman/Gatestone Institute/February
01/19
Israel, Syria and the world through Iranian eyes/Smadar Perry|/YnetNews/January
02/19
Latest LCCC English Lebanese & Lebanese Related News
published
on February 01-02/19
Guterres Says U.N. Resolutions 'Remain Essential to Stability
of Lebanon, Region'
Naharnet/January 01/19/U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres on Friday
welcomed the announcement of the formation of a new government of Lebanon and
congratulated Prime Minister Saad Hariri and “Lebanon’s political leadership.”
“The Secretary-General looks forward to working closely with the new Government
to continue to address urgent political, security, humanitarian and economic
challenges, including in the follow-up to the international conferences of
support to Lebanon held last year,” a spokesperson for the U.N. chief said. “The
Secretary-General reiterates the commitment of the United Nations to support
Lebanon’s strengthening of its sovereignty, stability and political independence
in accordance with the Taif Accord and the Baabda Declaration, and its effective
implementation of Security Council resolutions 1701 (2006), 1559 (2004) and
other relevant resolutions which remain essential to the stability of Lebanon
and the region,” the spokesperson, Stéphane Dujarric, added.
U.S. Urges Govt. to Ensure Some Ministries Don't
'Provide Support to Hizbullah'
Naharnet/January 01/19/The United States said Friday that it “welcomes”
Lebanon's announcement of the formation of a cabinet as it urged the new
government to ensure the resources and services of Hizbullah-held ministries “do
not provide support” to the Iran-backed party. Congratulating President Michel
Aoun and Prime Minister Saad Hariri on “this historic occasion,” the U.S. State
Department commended Lebanese leaders for “working collectively to overcome the
political obstacles that prolonged this process.”“We look forward to engaging
with the new Lebanese government to strengthen further our bilateral
relationship. In this regard, the Secretary (of State Mike Pompeo) looks forward
to traveling to Lebanon,” the Department added in a statement. It however
announced that it is “concerned that Hizbullah, a U.S.-designated Foreign
Terrorist Organization, will continue to occupy ministerial positions and was
allowed to name the Minister of Public Health.” “We call on the new government
to ensure the resources and services of these ministries do not provide support
to Hizbullah,” the State Department urged. And calling on all parties in the new
government to “uphold Lebanon's policy of disassociation from regional conflicts
and its international obligations, including those contained in U.N. Security
Council Resolutions (UNSCR) 1559 and 1701,” the Dept. welcomed Lebanese leaders’
“recent statements committing to abide by UNSCR 1701” and said it appreciates
“their recent efforts to avoid escalating tensions along the Blue Line.”
Separately, the Department hoped Lebanon’s new government will “take urgent
action to implement meaningful measures necessary to improve Lebanon’s difficult
economic situation.” It also reiterated that the United States “reaffirms its
strong support for Lebanon’s security, stability, and sovereignty and will
continue to stand with the Government of Lebanon and the Lebanese people as they
build a stable and prosperous future.”The health portfolio makes it difficult
for donors to avoid Hizbullah, which is under multiple U.S. sanctions. A donor
meeting in Paris last year pledged $11 billion in low-interest loans and aid for
Lebanon, hoping to avert disaster amid political and economic instability and
the influx of 1.5 million refugees from neighboring Syria. Hizbullah is allied
with President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, where Israel says it has carried out
hundreds of strikes on the group and its regional backer Iran. But Hizbullah is
also a major political party within Lebanon, which has a complex political
system designed to ensure representation for all religious factions.
US urges new Lebanese government to block
Hezbollah
AFP, Washington/February 02/19/The United States on Friday called on Lebanon to
deprive Hezbollah of all official funds after the Shiite militant movement took
a record three cabinet posts in a long-delayed government. The United States
stressed that it was ready to work with Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri’s new
government, welcoming the breakthrough in the eight-month deadlock and saying
that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo hoped to visit Lebanon. “Nevertheless, we
are concerned that Hezbollah, a US-designated Foreign Terrorist Organization,
will continue to occupy ministerial positions and was allowed to name the
minister of public health,” State Department spokesman Robert Palladino said.
“We call on the new government to ensure the resources and services of these
ministries do not provide support to Hezbollah,” he said in a statement. But the
health portfolio makes it difficult for donors to avoid Hezbollah, which is
under multiple US sanctions. A donor meeting in Paris last year pledged $11
billion in low-interest loans and aid for Lebanon, hoping to avert disaster amid
political and economic instability and the influx of 1.5 million refugees from
neighboring Syria. Hezbollah is allied with President Bashar al-Assad of Syria,
where Israel says it has carried out hundreds of strikes on the militants and
their patron Iran. But Hezbollah is a major political party within Lebanon,
which has a complex political system designed to ensure representation for all
religious factions. Palladino welcomed signals from Lebanese leaders that they
would abide by UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which established a
ceasefire in 2006 after Hezbollah attacks triggered a devastating Israeli
offensive on Lebanon.
France Welcomes Formation of Lebanon Govt.
Naharnet/January 01/19/French President Emmanuel Macron welcomed the formation
of Lebanon’s new government and affirmed commitment to Lebanon’s sovereignty and
stability, a statement from the Elysee Palace said on Friday. “President
Emmanuel Macron reaffirms his commitment to the sovereignty, stability and
security of Lebanon, underlining the importance of the policy of dissociation
and the fight against terrorism,” read the statement. Macron expressed his hopes
for the “full success of Prime Minister Saad Hariri and the ministers in their
future work in the service of the Lebanese people alongside President Michel
Aoun, Speaker Nabih Berri and all the forces that make up the Lebanese society
in all its diversity." Macron reiterated his commitment to the sovereignty,
stability and security of Lebanon, stressing the importance of the policy of
dissociation policy and combating terrorism. On Thursday, Lebanon announced a
government line-up ending an eight-month wait that had heightened fears of a
major economic collapse. The new cabinet, unveiled during a press conference at
the presidential palace, includes 30 ministers from Lebanon's rival political
clans. The new line-up is to see four women take up office, including at the
head of the interior and energy ministries.
Macron welcomes new Lebanese Cabinet
The Daily Star/February 01/19/BEIRUT: French President Emmanuel Macron Friday welcomed the formation of
Lebanon’s new government, reaffirming his commitment to the country. "President
Emmanuel Macron reaffirms his commitment to the sovereignty, stability and
security of Lebanon, underlining the importance of the policy of dissociation
and the fight against terrorism," a statement from the Elysee Palace said.
Lebanon Thursday formed a 30-member national unity government led by Prime
Minister Saad Hariri. The eight-month political deadlock paralyzed state
institutions and threatened to put in jeopardy over $11 billion in grants and
soft loans pledged by international donors at the CEDRE conference France hosted
in April. “France has stood by the Lebanese people and officials in the past few
months to facilitate the conditions of this formation, in the spirit of the
partnership and friendship that joins our country,” the statement said. It also
expressed France’s desire to follow up on Lebanon's implementation of economic
and social reforms linked to the CEDRE conference. Macron wished Hariri, the
cabinet ministers, President Michel Aoun and Speaker Nabih Berri success in
their future work. France’s expression of support comes after the long-awaited
Lebanese government was welcomed by the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon, the EU’s top
diplomat, the commander of UNIFIL, the U.K. ambassador to Lebanon, the Deputy
United Nations Special Coordinator for Lebanon and others.
Mogherini: EU to Work Closely with Lebanon's New
Government
Kataeb.org/January 01/19/The European Union High Representative Federica
Mogherini on Thursday hailed the formation of a new government in Lebanon,
deeming it as a positive step that is of crucial importance for the country's
stability. "The Lebanese people and the international community have high
expectations for the new government, whose success will be determined by its
capacity to address the challenges the country faces, particularly by adopting
the necessary institutional, economic and social reforms," Mogherini said in a
statement. "The European Union continues to support Lebanon and most recently
pledged its strong political and financial support at the three international
conferences for Lebanon held in 2018 in Rome, Paris and Brussels," she stressed.
"We will continue to work closely with the new government and ensure close
coordination to implement the mutual commitments in the fundamental areas of
security, economic recovery, and addressing the impact of the Syrian conflict,"
the EU official concluded.
Hariri Says He is 'Proud 'of New Female
Ministers
Naharnet/January 01/19/One day after resolving the government formation
gridlock, Prime Minister Saad Hariri said he was proud of the women ministers
that were named to allocate four ministries in the new government. “I am proud
of Lebanese women, proud of the four female ministers in the government, proud
of the first female interior minister in the Arab world, proud of the future and
proud of Lebanon," Hariri said via Twitter. On Thursday, Lebanon announced a
government line-up, ending an eight-month wait that had heightened fears of a
major economic collapse. The new line-up is to see four women take up office,
including at the head of the interior and energy ministries. The women who will
take office are: Nada al-Bustani as Energy Minister, Raya al-Hassan as Interior
Minister, Violet Khairallah as State Minister for Social and Economic
Rehabilitation of Youth and Women, and May Chidiac as State Minister for
Administrative Development Affairs.
Lebanon Appoints Four Women Ministers, Khairallah Changes Ministry Name
Naharnet/January 01/19/In an unprecedented move in Lebanon’s history, the newly
formed 30-minister government that saw the light after nine months of delay
includes four women ministers, including at the head of the interior and energy
ministries. The line-up of Prime Minister Saad Hariri's new government was
announced on Thursday. The women who will take office are: Nada al-Bustani as
Energy Minister, Raya al-Hassan as Interior Minister, Violet Khairallah as State
Minister for Social and Economic Rehabilitation of Youth and Women, and May
Chidiac as State Minister for Administrative Development Affairs. Following
contacts with Hariri, Khairallah later announced that she managed to modify her
ministry's name to become "State Ministry for the Affairs of the Economic
Enabling of Women and Youth." She had told LBCI TV on Friday that the initial
name of her ministry had provoked angry reactions in protest against the word “rehabilitation.”Khairallah
explained that her ministry will work to provide employment opportunities for
young people and women, and would cooperate with the National Commission for
Lebanese Women, mainly because she is a member.
Lebanon's New Cabinet: Up to the Challenge?
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 01/19
Lebanon's new cabinet includes three posts for Hizbullah, an Iran-backed group
subject to U.S. sanctions. The incoming government will need to carry out vital
reforms to stave off an economic crisis. How different from its predecessors is
this administration, announced on Thursday after an eight-month delay, and can
it handle the challenges?
What does Hizbullah gain?
Hizbullah, which is listed as a terror organization by the United States, has
gained three places in the new cabinet -- a record number for the party.
Iran-backed Hizbullah, which has a huge arsenal of weapons, is a staunch ally of
President Bashar al-Assad's regime in neighboring war-torn Syria. The United
States has slapped a series of sanctions on the group. Key Washington ally
Israel has in recent months moved to destroy a network of tunnels built by
Hizbullah into Israeli territory. Imad Salamey, a professor of political
sciences at the Lebanese American University, said Hizbullah was seeking
security in the new government. "The party is in need for national protection
and national support due to the financial sanctions and military threat by
Israel," he said. Lebanese newspaper al-Akhbar, which is close to Hizbullah,
added that Prime Minister Saad "Hariri, with his Western facade, could be a
safety catch and source of help faced with the American sanctions." Hizbullah's
new portfolio at the head of the health ministry will make it hard for
international donors to avoid them, Salamey said. And it will be an interesting
post for the group, says Karim Bitar, of the Paris-based Institute for
International and Strategic Affairs think-tank. "The health ministry is one of
those juicy ministries that can allow you to distribute services to voters," he
said.
Has anything changed?
Lebanon is governed by a complex system which aims to maintain a precarious
balance of power across religious and political communities. The new cabinet
gives roles to 30 ministers from Lebanon's rival political clans, including four
women. While Hizbullah has three positions, its ally the Free Patriotic Movement
of President Michel Aoun has landed 10 portfolios. Fellow Shiite party AMAL also
holds three. Hariri's al-Mustaqbal Movement takes five posts.
The women in the new cabinet include Raya al-Hassan, a former finance minister
from the premier's grouping, as head of the interior ministry. Nada Bustani,
from the Free Patriotic Movement, is to become energy and water minister. May
Chidiac, a former journalist and vocal critic of Hizbullah and the Syrian
regime, is to be minister of administrative planning.
But analysts say there is little hope for major change. "Power relations overall
remain unchanged," Bitar said. "We've been watching rather ridiculous
bargaining," he said of eight months of wrangling over cabinet positions. "We
saw community leaders swap positions last minute, demanding ministries more
conducive to handing out services to their allies," Bitar added.
Will there be reforms?
Finally formed, the cabinet will now have to tackle key reforms to save a
service-based economy on the brink of collapse. On Thursday, Hariri said the
government would have a lot on its plate. "The next government will be forced to
take difficult decisions to decrease previous allocations in the general
budget," he said. A conference dubbed CEDRE in the French capital in April
pledged aid worth $11 billion (9.5 billion euros), promising to stave off an
economic crisis.
But the protracted arguments over the cabinet's makeup threatened to scupper
that aid, further damaging the ailing economy. Lebanon is one of the world's
most indebted countries, with public debt estimated at 141 percent of Gross
Domestic Product in 2018, according to credit ratings agency Moody's. Annual
economic growth averaged 9 percent over the last two full years before the war
broke out in Syria, but has since plummeted to little more than one percent in
recent years. At the Paris conference, Lebanon committed to reforms including
slashing public spending and overhauling the electricity sector. In exchange,
the international community has pledged major aid and loans, mostly for
infrastructure projects that need to be signed off by the new government. But
Bitar said the announcement of a new government would only briefly relieve
pressure over the economy. "This Lebanese political class is genetically
incapable of proceeding with necessary structural reforms, because it abusively
milks the current system" for its own benefit, he said.
Mrad: I’ll Back My Group and Partake in Strong
Lebanon Bloc Meetings
Naharnet/January 01/19/Newly named State Minister for Foreign Trade Affairs
Hassan Mrad of the Consultative Gathering, assured on Friday that he is going to
vote in accordance with the group in the government despite being appointed as
part of the Free Patriotic Movement-led Strong Lebanon bloc. "I am going to
represent the Gathering in the new government and will vote in its favor, but i
will also participate in the meetings of the Strong Lebanon bloc,” he told LBCI.
The issue of representing the Hizbullah-backed Consultative Gathering, a
grouping of six Sunni MPs, had delayed the formation of the government for the
past four months. But an agreement was reached lately and culminated in forming
the country’s government after nine months of delay. There were also
disagreements over the distribution of portfolios and previous disagreements
over Christian and Druze representation that had also hindered the formation
process before being eventually resolved.
Berri Says No One Has 11-Minister Veto Power in
Govt.
Naharnet/January 01/19/Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri announced Friday that “no
one has 11 ministers” in the new government. “There are names who enjoy
confidence and good reputation and no one has 11 ministers,” Berri told LBCI
television, referring to the so-called one-third-plus-one veto power that
requires any camp to have at least 11 ministerial seats. “The obstacles that
delayed the government's formation were domestic and did not manage to change
anything in it,” the Speaker added. “There is no need anymore for the
legislative session that I was intending to call for and in parliament we have
finalized 5/6 of the laws required by the CEDRE conference,” Berri went on to
say. Free Patriotic Movement chief MP Jebran Bassil had announced Thursday that
his bloc has “more than 11” ministers in the new government.
Qassem Says Hizbullah Won't Bow to U.S.
Pressure, Urges Active Govt.
Naharnet/January 01/19/Hizbullah deputy chief Sheikh Naim Qassem announced
Friday that his party will not bow to the growing U.S. pressure. “Hizbullah will
not bow to pressures or sanctions. These sanctions will not affect the party's
stances but will rather make them firmer,” Qassem said. “In the end, we will
overcome this course and we will reach victory, God willing, the same as we
triumphed on several fronts,” Hizbullah number two added. “We will not abandon
our land nor accept that it remain occupied by Israel. We have the right to
defend this land and we won't accept to be followers of America no matter what
the temptations and pressures might be, because we have the right to be
independent in our country,” Qassem said. Turning to the issue of the new
government, which was formed on Thursday, the Hizbullah leader said it was
“normal” for it to be a “national unity government.”
“We defended this choice, because Lebanon's structure can only bear a national
unity government,” he added. Qassem also called on the government to address the
economic and social issues, to fight corruption, to grant contracts based on
tendering and to implement developmental projects in all regions.
A senior U.S. official had warned Hizbullah on Thursday not to exploit its newly
gained clout in the new government to channel funds from the health ministry.
Billingslea spoke to local journalists at the U.S. Embassy in Beirut at the end
of a two-day visit during which he met with Lebanon's president, prime minister,
central bank governor and other officials. "If we see that Hizbullah exploits,
and they will exploit whatever ministry they are given, to funnel money and
other terrorist agendas, then we have significant problems with that,"
Billingslea was quoted as saying. He declined to elaborate what the U.S.
Treasury would do in that case. The new health minister, Jamil Jabaq, is not a
member of Hizbullah but is believed to be close to the group's leader, Sayyed
Hassan Nasrallah, and was his personal physician at one point. The 30-seat
government has seen an increase in the number of ministries affiliated with
Hizbullah, which is under tightening sanctions from the U.S. The group has been
affected recently by the U.S. sanctions as well as those imposed on its main
baker Iran.
STL Registrar Ends Working Visit to Lebanon
Naharnet/January 01/19/Special Tribunal for Lebanon Registrar Daryl Mundis has
met with Prime Minister Saad Hariri on a working visit to Beirut this week, the
STL said on Friday. He also met with the Prosecutor General Samir Hammoud and
members of the diplomatic community. “This mission is part of regular visits the
Registrar undertakes to update the Lebanese officials on the work of the
Tribunal,” the court said in a statement. The Registrar is responsible for all
aspects of the STL's administration including the budget, fundraising, human
resources and providing security. His responsibilities also include court
management, oversight of the Victims’ Participation Unit, witness protection and
language services.
Karami: I Honestly Don't Know How Minister Bassil Does His Counting
Naharnet/January 01/19/MP Faisal Karami of the Consultative Gathering on Friday
hit out anew at Free Patriotic Movement chief MP Jebran Bassil over the latter's
announcement that his bloc has “more than 11” ministers in the new government.
“I honestly don't know how Minister Bassil does his counting,” Karami said in
response to a reporter's question. He also denied the presence of disputes among
the Gathering's members. Reciting a statement issued after the Gathering's
weekly meeting, Karami said: “Minister Hassan Mrad has openly declared and today
he declares again that he will exclusively represent the Gathering in the
government.” “He will attend (the Gathering's) meetings and will vote (in
cabinet) based on the decision of its members,” the statement added. “We value
the decision of the president of the republic who insisted on respecting the
results of the parliamentary elections in representing all components of
parliament,” the statement said, adding that “it would be logical for Minister
Mrad to cooperate with the President and take part in the Strong Lebanon bloc as
the representative of the Consultative Gathering,” the statement said.The issue
of representing the Hizbullah-backed Consultative Gathering, a grouping of six
Sunni MPs, had delayed the formation of the government for around four months.
Previous disagreements over Christian and Druze representation had also hindered
the formation process before being eventually resolved.
Moody's: Fiscal Consolidation Very Challenging
for New Lebanon Government
Reuters/February 01/19/Lebanon formed a new national unity government on
Thursday, ending nine months of wrangling, and Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri
said bold moves were needed without delay to address chronic problems facing the
heavily indebted state."We expect the new Lebanese government to implement some
fiscal consolidation measures in order to unlock the $11 billion CEDRE five-year
investment package committed by international donors during the Paris IV
conference in April 2018," Moody's analyst, Elisa Parisi-Capone, said in a note.
"As long as deposit growth remains weak, potentially because of lingering
uncertainty about the capacity of the government to shore up macroeconomic
stability, Lebanon's fiscal and external positions will remain amongst the
weakest across the sovereigns that we rate." Moody's currently rates Lebanon
Caa1, which is a warning the country has substantial debt risks.Lebanon Dollar
Bonds Rally 3-4 Cents after New Government Agreed
Sayegh Says New Government Dominated by
Hezbollah
Kataeb.org/Reuters/February 01/19/Kataeb's Deputy-President Salim Sayegh on
Friday said that the form of the new government is not surprising given the
whole approach and standards based on which it was established, saying that it
is now the time to question the motives and reasons that hindered its formation
for nine months and, consequently, inflicted tremendous losses on the country.
"We cannot consider that our problems have ended just with the formation of a
new government," Sayegh told Al-Markazia news agency. "The new government is
that of Hezbollah given that 18 out of 30 ministers are allied with the party.
Therefore, Hezbollah has its grip tightened on the majority of the government,
which will give it an advantage when deciding on major strategic issues."Sayegh
stressed that the Kataeb party does not only disagree with Hezbollah on
momentary, transient issues, but also mainly on the whole concept of state
building, adding that Hezbollah wants to establish a state that meets its goals
and serves its own interests. "The major lesson that we can be drawn from the
government formation is that the concept of the 'strong president' is only
validated by the alliance with Hezbollah," he said. Sayegh stressed that the new
government is far from being one of national unity given that almost 50% of the
Lebanese did not cast their ballots in the parliamentary elections and,
therefore, are not represented in the Cabinet. The Kataeb official stressed that
the party has chosen to opt out of the government because its positions and
viewpoints have not been taken into consideration, assuring that the party will
maintain its political positioning. "We will carry on with our course of action
and our opposition will be a smart, not absolute, one. This means that we will
provide alternative solutions whenever we can, and will use all means available
in the democratic system," he noted.
US Official: We Want to Prevent Hezbollah from Using Lebanese Banks
Asharq Al-Awsat/February
01/2019
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/71706/%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%AF-%D9%88%D8%B2%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AE%D8%B2%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%B1%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%A4%D9%88%D9%86-%D9%85%D9%83/
/Preventing Hezbollah from accessing the Lebanese banking sector is a US
priority, a senior official told a group of journalists in a roundtable
interview at the American Embassy in Beirut on Thursday. Assistant Secretary for
Terrorist Financing in the US Department of the Treasury Marshall Billingslea
said that his country’s efforts began to materialize in preventing the party
from using Lebanese banks to a large extent, and in reducing the amount of funds
that it receives from Iran for financing “terrorist activities.”The official
lashed out at Hezbollah, calling it “the Iranian cancer that is destroying the
Lebanese democracy.” He ruled out, on the other hand, reports that the United
States was targeting the Lebanese banking sector and intending to cut its
support to the army. “Our support for the Lebanese army and the financial sector
in Lebanon is constant. “General [Joseph] Votel was here to support military
relations and I am here to pursue the means to strengthen relations and the
ability of the Lebanese government and banks to combat money laundering,” he
affirmed. The US would have “significant problems” with Hezbollah using
ministerial portfolios to funnel funds in support of its “terrorist agenda,”
Billingslea warned, noting that his government would keep a close eye on “what
role Hezbollah will play” in the Cabinet. Emphasizing the US government’s
commitment to Lebanon’s financial stability and its overall satisfaction with
the banking sector’s compliance with US sanctions and regulations, he urged
Lebanese officials to ensure that Hezbollah “stays away from the banking
sector.” “We believe that it is necessary to enact legislation to prevent the
existence of anonymous accounts in banks and that the Government will be able to
counter these activities. I have discussed with Lebanese officials and
specialists the need to create such legislation,” he noted. Billingslea
underlined that the government must have the ability to block and freeze
accounts that are associated with Hezbollah’s illicit activities. Commenting on
foreign reports about the economic collapse in Lebanon, he stressed that the
Lebanese economy was not collapsing. “There are pressing financial and economic
issues that need to be addressed,” he said, maintaining the need for the new
government to implement “reforms to tackle corruption.”
The USA Administration Adopts the 'Dr. Walid Phares' Plan for Syria
Rebecca Bynum/New English Review/February 01/2019
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/71716/rebecca-bynum-the-usa-administration-adopts-the-dr-walid-phares-plan-for-syria/
Writing in the Wall Street
Journal, Gordon Lubold and Michael R. Gordon reveal that the Trump
Administration is actively trying to gather a number of units from Europe and
our Arab allies to form a separation zone along the Syrian Turkish border, just
such a plan as Walid Phares laid out on January 16.
The Phares plan is a solution to the Turkish demand to establish a security zone
inside northern Syria, mainly in Kurdish territories. Phares advised that the
projected Turkish plan to move its forces into Syrian territory would trigger a
wider war and proposed instead a multi-national force to establish narrow
corridor along the border to prevent PKK militants from entering Turkey and to
remove the rationale for Turkish forces to enter the Kurdish areas of Northern
Syria.
The Trump Administration, according to the Wall Street Journal, believes that
such a plan is the best response to address the security concerns of our two
allies, NATO member Turkey and anti ISIS ally, the Syria Democratic Forces (SDF).
In fact this is a strategic response to the endless confrontation between Turks
and Syrian Kurds.
Dr Walid Phares, a former foreign advisor to Presidential candidate Trump during
the 2016 campaign, had argued that the response to a clash between the Erdogan
Government and the SDF is to simply separate them from each other. Such a
concept would answer the Turkish concerns about PKK infiltration from Syria and
stop terrorists from penetrating Turkey. The plan would also secure the Kurds,
who rightly fear an advancing Turkish army and militias into their lands.
The plan cited areas with special status, zones of deployments and even areas
where the Kurds would pull back their artillery but not their police forces.
Specifically, the “Phares plan for disengagement between Turkish and SDF forces
along the Turkish Syria border” contained the following elements:
1.Both sides accept a US-led initiative and/or a UN led initiative calling for
cessation of hostilities between the two parties and a start of Peace Talks.
2.The deployment of a Peace and Monitoring Force, either a multinational force
or a UN force operating under Chapter 7 along the border where both parties are
deployed.
3.Both the Turkish forces and SDF forces allow the international force to deploy
on all observation and passage points between the two parties and to deploy
units in the hills and adjacent areas on both sides of the border.
4.The SDF pull back heavy weapons from the border area but maintain police and
light weapons.
5.All individuals or parties traveling from the SDF zones into Turkey should be
searched by the international forces.
6.A special security status would be granted to Kobani - to be discussed later.
7.All PKK centers inside Syria should be removed by the SDF.
8.Afrin should be transferred to the international forces.
9.Manbej should be transferred to the responsibility of an Arab force.
10. The small Christian area inside Qamishli should be transferred to a European
force for protection from ISIS terrorists.
Phares’ plan was the only one that was offered from the private sector in
Washington. It was praised by supporters in northwestern Syria and Phares sent
the plan to National Security Advisor Bolton and Secretary of State Pompeo. A
few weeks later, the WSJ revealed that almost the exact plan has been adopted by
the Trump Administration.
As I wrote many months ago, Walid Phares didn't land a position in the
Administration in 2017, but his ideas landed in the White House. And the "Phares
plan for Syria" is just the latest example.
Latest LCCC English Miscellaneous Reports & News published
on February 01-02/19
Pope Francis in Historic Arabian Peninsula Visit
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January
01/19/Pope Francis is set for a historic trip to the UAE, the first ever papal
visit to the Arabian Peninsula, as he seeks to boost the Vatican's outreach to
Islam. The Argentine pontiff's trip to the United Arab Emirates "couldn't have
come at a better time", said Bishop Paul Hinder of the Apostolic Vicariate of
Southern Arabia -- which encompasses the UAE, Oman and Yemen. "With advanced
communication tools at everyone's disposal, we are better informed, and this can
be put into a broader perspective when we couple it with dialogue," he told AFP.
Pope Francis, who has made strengthening ties between the two largest religions
a cornerstone of his papacy, will head to Abu Dhabi on Sunday. During his
three-day visit, the pope will take part in an interfaith conference and meet
Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayeb, the imam of Cairo's Al-Azhar, Sunni Islam's most
prestigious seat of learning.
While Hinder said there were no plans "at the moment" for a papal visit to other
Gulf countries, the pope's trip to the UAE is widely seen as a stepping stone to
broader interreligious dialogue in the region.
'Peace and love'
The UAE -- which has made no secret of its focus on soft power -- prides itself
on its religious tolerance and cultural diversity. It has been criticised by
human rights groups for its involvement in a bloody Saudi-led military
intervention in Yemen. It was also criticised for upholding a 10-year prison
term against human rights activist Ahmed Mansoor on December 31 -- two weeks
after the UAE declared 2019 the Year of Tolerance. Abu Dhabi Crown Prince
Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, who invited the pope to the UAE, on Thursday
described the pontiff as "the man of peace and love". "We are hopeful that
generations to come will prosper in peace and security," he said in a tweet
anticipating the meeting between the pontiff and Sheikh Ahmed. In a video
message to the Emirati people on Thursday, Pope Francis said: "I am happy ... to
write on your dear land a new page in the relations between religions,
confirming that we are brothers although different."On the last day of his trip,
Pope Francis will lead a mass in Abu Dhabi to be attended by more than 130,000
people -- the largest gathering ever in the UAE, according to local media.
'Second chance'
Catholics attending the open-air mass queued for hours at St Mary's Catholic
Church in Dubai on Wednesday to collect their tickets. Parishes across the
country were allocated a certain number of passes with St Mary's Catholic Church
receiving 41,000 tickets, according to priest Lennie Connully. He said more than
50,000 members of the congregation had asked to attend the historic mass at
Zayed Sports City stadium, adding: "We are still trying to give to all...
because there may be extras in other parishes." More than 2,000 buses will be
transporting worshippers from across the country to Abu Dhabi, with most
departing in the early hours of Tuesday morning -- way ahead of mass that is
scheduled for 10:30 am (0630 GMT). For Filipina Mylene Lao Estipona, 43, a
cancer survivor, the time-consuming journey to see Pope Francis is a small price
to pay for a life-long dream. She said her faith gave her a "second chance" at
life and the strength to beat cancer. "I thank God that I have a ticket. I
really prayed, and it's an answered prayer," said the dental hygienist, who has
been living in the UAE for 13 years.
'People's pope'
The UAE has the largest number of Catholic churches in the region with eight.
Oman, Kuwait and Yemen each have four, while Qatar and Bahrain have one each.
Gulf kingpin Saudi Arabia bans all non-Muslim places of worship. Nearly 80
percent of the population of the UAE is Muslim, while Christians constitute
around nine percent, according to the CIA World Factbook. The UAE authorities
control all religious activities and suppress any group that uses religion for
political ends, notably Islamists. "We do not want the pulpits to become a
platform for disseminating hate and extremism and instigating violence, as we
have seen in many countries, including in Europe," a UAE official told AFP on
condition of anonymity. According to Hinder, nearly one million Catholics live
in the emirates, the majority from the Philippines and India. Pope Francis, who
made history when he was named the first Latin American pontiff in 2013, is
known as the "people's pope", listening to and warmly embracing people from
different walks of life. "Latin culture is an exuberant culture, an outgoing
culture, quite different from European culture," Connully said.
Saudis, UAE, Yemen Ask UN to Pressure Huthis
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 01/19/Yemen's government and its allies
Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates asked the UN Security Council on
Thursday to turn up the pressure on Huthi rebels to uphold a ceasefire deal. In
a letter sent to the council, the three governments accused the Huthis of
violating the ceasefire in the port city of Hodeida 970 times since it came into
force on December 18. They asked the council to "impress upon the Huthis, and
their Iranian backers, that they will be held responsible if their continued
failure to comply... leads to the collapse of the Stockholm agreement," said the
letter seen by AFP. Yemen's Saudi-backed government and the Huthis agreed to the
ceasefire and a redeployment of forces from Hodeida during UN-brokered talks in
Sweden last month. But deadlines for the pullback of forces and a prisoner swap
have slipped, fueling worries that the Stockholm agreement may be in jeopardy.
UAE minister of state for foreign affairs Anwar Gargash met with UN
Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Thursday to discuss problems in
implementing the Stockholm deal. "We understand that we need to exercise
patience, but it can't be infinite," Gargash told reporters after this meeting.
Gargash raised concerns of a flareup on the ground, triggered by a Huthi
provocation. "We do not want to launch an offensive" in Hodeida, said the
minister. "What we want is for the UN and the international community to exert
influence and to do that work" and create pressure on the Huthis to comply with
the ceasefire deal, he said. The Huthis have accused the Saudi-led coalition of
violating its commitments under the Stockholm agreement. The council met behind
closed doors to hear a report from UN envoy Martin Griffiths who has wrapped up
a new round of shuttle diplomacy. For nearly four years, Yemen's Iran-backed
Huthi rebels have been locked in a war with a regional pro-government alliance
led by Riyadh. The conflict has triggered what the UN calls the world's worst
humanitarian crisis, with millions of people at risk of starvation.
Venezuela Opposition Leader Says Family Threatened by Maduro Agents
Agence France Presse/Naharnet/January 01/19/Venezuela's opposition leader Juan
Guaido said Thursday elite security forces went to his home to threaten his
family, blaming the government of Nicolas Maduro as international support grew
for his bid to oust the embattled president. The move heightened fears for the
security of the 35-year-old National Assembly leader, who declared himself
acting president last week in a bold challenge to Maduro's authority. The
police's special action force, FAES, had gone to his home to interview his wife
Fabiana Rosales, Guaido said during a speech at Caracas university.
"At this moment the dictatorship believes that it will intimidate us," Guaido
said, his wife at his side. Earlier, European lawmakers recognized Guaido as the
acting head of state -- another step forward in his bid to force out the
socialist leader who has presided over the oil-rich country's economic collapse.
Several opposition leaders have been jailed in recent years as Maduro cracked
down on growing dissent in the Latin American country, where resistance has
escalated with Guaido's spectacular self-proclamation. Previously unknown to the
public at large, he has become the standard bearer of the opposition to Maduro,
whether on the streets or on social networks. Deprived almost entirely of
coverage on mainstream media, Guaido has deftly used the social networks to woo
support, but even that avenue is increasingly being cut off, and there is an
explicit ban against talking about him. The dramatic turn against Maduro's
leftist regime culminated quickly, but it came after weeks of behind-the-scenes
diplomacy including a hushed meeting in Washington with Guaido, who was quickly
recognized by Washington as Venezuela's president. Henrique Capriles, 46, a
former presidential candidate and an opposition leader in recent years, said the
opposition was unaware Guaido would declare himself the country's leader on
January 23. "That surprised a lot of political figures (but) I don't say that as
a criticism," Capriles said. While marshaling international support, Guaido is
seeking to maintain street pressure against Maduro, and has called more mass
protests for Saturday. Venezuela's Supreme Court -- dominated by regime
loyalists -- has frozen his assets and ordered him not to leave the country.
EU lawmakers' support
On Thursday, lawmakers at the Brussels-based European Parliament voted to accept
Guaido as "legitimate interim president of the country" -- and urged the
European Union to follow suit. Four major European powers -- Britain, France,
Germany and Spain -- have said they would do so if Maduro fails to call
presidential elections by the weekend. The US on Thursday urged all European
countries to recognize Guaido, but Maduro has told the "imperialists" to wait
until 2025 for new elections. Guaido was at the main Caracas university to
present his "rescue plan" for a country in economic meltdown. "We are going to
address the humanitarian emergency, stop inflation in its tracks, reactivate the
oil industry and move towards the restoration of access to public goods and
services," he said to cheers. Part of the plan unveiled by the opposition leader
and his economic advisor Jose Guerra is to end exchange controls in force since
2003 and renegotiate Venezuela's estimated $150 billion debt. With his wife at
his side on the podium, Guaido said he had a 20-month old daughter at home and
would be holding FAES accountable for "whatever they do to my baby." He told
officials: "Do not cross the red line."
But the National Police tweeted it is "totally false" that there had been any
search of Guaido's family. US Vice President Mike Pence said on Twitter that
"the world is watching – and we will not tolerate harm to those who are fighting
for freedom and democracy in Venezuela."
The United States, which immediately recognized Guaido's self-proclamation,
along with a dozen Latin American countries, Canada and Australia, has warned
Maduro of "serious consequences" if he targets opponents.
On the streets
The two sides have held competing rallies in the streets. On Thursday workers
from Venezuela's state oil company PDVSA -- hit by new US sanctions this week --
held an "anti-imperialist" march in support of Maduro. "Yankee go home," said
one of their signs. A day earlier, thousands led by Guaido protested in various
cities, banging pots, blowing whistles and horns, and carrying banners that
read: "Armed forces, regain your dignity" and "Maduro usurper."Guaido wrote in a
New York Times op-ed published on Wednesday that "clandestine meetings" had been
held with members of the armed forces and security forces, who he is trying to
woo with an amnesty offer. But Guaido's moves to court the military are fraught
with risk. Last week fewer than 30 soldiers rose up against Maduro,
precipitating protests that, according to the United Nations, ended with more
than 40 dead and hundreds detained.
So far, the military high command has remained loyal to Maduro. US National
Security Advisor John Bolton on Thursday said Maduro should accept Guaido's
amnesty officer. The last 10 days of political upheaval have exacerbated the
general disarray in Venezuela, which has the world's largest proven oil reserves
but has suffered hyperinflation and shortages of basic necessities. The UN says
2.3 million have fled the country, unleashing a migration crisis in South
America.
Iran marks 40th anniversary of Islamic Revolution
The Associated Press, Tehran/Friday, 1 February 2019/Iran is celebrating the
40th anniversary of its Islamic Revolution that toppled the US-backed shah,
overturned 2,500 years of monarchical rule and brought hard-line Shiite clerics
to power. The anniversary starts every year on February 1 - the day Ayatollah
Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979 returned from France after 14 years in exile to become
the supreme leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Across the country on
Friday, sirens rang out from trains and boats and church bells chimed at 9:33
am. - the exact time Khomeini’s chartered Air France Boeing 747 touched down 40
years ago at Tehran’s International Mehrabad airport. The 10-day anniversary
festivities, known as the “Ten Days of Dawn,” end on February 11, the date Shah
Mohammad Reza Pahlavi’s government collapsed.
US Senate opposes troops’ withdrawal from Syria,
Afghanistan
Reuters, Washington/Friday, 1 February 2019/In a rebuke of President Donald
Trump, the Republican-led US Senate advanced largely symbolic legislation on
Thursday opposing plans for any abrupt withdrawal of troops from Syria and
Afghanistan. The Senate voted 68-23 in favor of a non-binding amendment, drafted
by Republican Majority Leader Mitch McConnell saying it was the sense of the
Senate that militant groups in both countries continue to pose a “serious
threat” to the United States. The procedural vote to cut off debate meant that
the amendment would be added to a broader Middle East security bill likely to
come up for a final Senate vote next week. The amendment acknowledges progress
against ISIS and al-Qaeda in Syria and Afghanistan but warns that “a precipitous
withdrawal” without effective efforts to secure gains could destabilize the
region and create a vacuum that could be filled by Iran or Russia. It calls upon
the Trump administration to certify conditions have been met for the groups’
“enduring defeat” before any significant withdrawal from Syria or Afghanistan.
Trump has decided to withdraw 2,000 US troops from Syria on the grounds that
ISIS militants no longer pose a threat, saying on Twitter on Wednesday, “We have
beaten them” as he disputed Senate testimony by his director of national
intelligence, Dan Coats, on Tuesday that the group still posed a threat. Trump
said earlier on Thursday he would bring American troops home if a peace deal
were reached to end 17 years of war in Afghanistan. The United States and the
Taliban have sketched the outlines for an eventual peace accord, a US special
envoy said on Monday, but there was no sign the insurgent group had accepted key
US demands.
Russia-Turkey-Iran Summit on Syria Scheduled for Mid-February
Moscow – Raed Jabr/ Asharq Al-Awsat/Friday
01 February/19/Russian media reports revealed a number of preparations were
underway for another Sochi summit for the presidents of the Astana Syria talks
guarantor states, Russia, Turkey, and Iran. The next summit is expected to take
place on February 14. Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu, according to
Turkish dailies, confirmed that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan will be
in Sochi for the upcoming summit on Syria.Turkey’s top diplomat said that the
question of forming a Syria committee tasked with drafting a new constitution
for the war-torn country will be one of the main topics tackled at the
trilateral meeting, noting that candidates put forth by the Syria regime do not
represent the country’s secular community. Cavusoglu added that both Iran nor
Russia admitted that the names proposed by the Bashar Al-Assad regime were
unacceptable, thus a request for changing them would be made. Russian media also
reported that at the upcoming meeting, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Turkish
President Erdogan and Iranian President Hassan Rouhani are expected to discuss
the situation in the Syrian de-escalation zone Idlib and the withdrawal of the
American forces from Syria. The Sochi summit will take place right before the
next round of Syria talks to happen at the Kazah capital, Astana, which for the
first time will see the first participation of the newly-assigned UN Special
Envoy to Syria. More so, Russian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova
warned against the deteriorating situation in Syria’s northern Idlib province,
currently overrun by extremist Turkey-guaranteed Syrian factions. “Tensions
around the Idlib de-escalation zone are not on the decline,” Zakharova pointed
out. “The militants of the al-Nusra allied Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, who are
running the show there, do not only shell nearby settlements on a daily basis,
but are also actively building up their contingents near the contact line with
the Syrian government forces,” she noted. The diplomat voiced serious concerns
over incoming reports that the terrorists “have not abandoned efforts to stage a
chemical attack against civilians.”Zakharova noted that according to reports, a
group of activists from the notoriously bogus humanitarian group, the White
Helmets, has prepped some Idlib hospitals in order to film these anticipated
provocations.
Turkish Military Delegation in Russia to Discuss US Pullout from Syria
Ankara - Saeed Abdelrazek/Asharq Al-Awsat/Friday, 1 February, 2019/A delegation
from Turkey’s Defense Ministry headed on Thursday to Russia to discuss the
latest developments in Syria. The delegation headed by Defense Minister Hulusi
Akar and Intelligence Chief Hakan Fidan went to discuss the safe zone and the US
withdrawal from Syria, media reports said. Turkish President Recep Tayyip
Erdogan discussed with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Moscow last
week the US withdrawal from Syria, the safe zone in the country’s north and the
latest developments in Idlib. Moscow expressed discomfort towards the return of
Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) – previously known as al-Nusra Front – to control the
agreed-upon de-escalation zone in Idlib. The Sochi deal, signed between Erdogan
and Putin on Sep. 17, was not completely implemented, according to Moscow. The
Turkish delegation’s visit followed a meeting of the Turkish National Security
Council which affirmed Ankara’s standpoint from preserving the status-quo in
Idlib, and swiftly implementing the roadmap in Manbij and other agreements on
the area east of the Euphrates. Certain members of the US-led coalition fighting
ISIS, support militants from HTS in Idlib and are aspiring to strike the
Russian-Turkish agreement on the de-escalation zone, said Turkish Foreign
Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu. “Certain partners from the coalition support HTS…
First, for the termination of the Idlib memorandum. Second, there are countries
that are making great efforts to prevent the establishment of a constitutional
committee just because we are doing it”, Cavusoglu told the Hurriyet newspaper.
He specified that some Western countries from the coalition were provoking HTS
militants to violate the provisions of the Idlib memorandum by paying them.
Cavusoglu noted that the countries of origin of foreign fighters from HTS were
unwilling to take them back.
Washington Makes New Warning on Trade With Iran After Europe’s
SPV Registration
London- Adel Al-Salmi/Asharq Al-Awsat/Friday, 1 February, 2019/Hinting at
chances for escalated tensions hitting Euro-American relations, the United
States warned on Thursday European entities of the consequences of breaching
economic sanctions in Iran. Hours later, German. French and British foreign
ministers announced in a joint presser that they were ready to launch the
much-anticipated Special Purpose Vehicle, a first-of-its-kind state-owned trade
intermediary. The SPV will facilitate doing business with Iran without facing US
sanctions. The SPV, called INSTEX, or Instrument in Support of Trade Exchanges,
is registered in France with a German managing director. “INSTEX will support
legitimate European trade with Iran, focusing initially on the sectors most
essential to the Iranian population – such as pharmaceutical, medical devices,
and agri-food goods,” the foreign ministers of Britain, Germany and France –
Jeremy Hunt, Heiko Maas and Jean-Yves Le Drian – said in a joint statement.
Nevertheless, US officials dismissed the idea that the new entity would have any
impact on efforts to exert economic pressure on Tehran, and launched a fresh
warning at anyone thinking of trading with the cleric-led regime. Britain,
France, and Germany – the European signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal with
Iran– launched the device, which has been in preparation for months, at a
meeting of EU foreign ministers in Bucharest. Their move is designed to reassert
their commitment to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the official
name for the Iran nuclear deal. On the other hand, Tehran considered the
official launch of the European Mechanism “a first positive step” within the
basket of pledges made by Europeans and said it anticipated the vehicle's
implementation fully and without shortage.
European sources, however, said the trade support tool might not hold the
capacity to back large-scale business transactions Iran desired. Iran has
threatened to pull out of the deal unless the European powers enable it to
receive economic benefits. The Europeans have promised to help companies do
business with Iran as long as it abides by the deal. Washington says that,
although Iran has met the terms, the accord was too generous, failing to rein in
Iran’s ballistic missile program or curb its regional meddling. New US sanctions
have largely succeeded in persuading European companies to abandon business with
Iran, and Washington said it did not expect the SPV to change that. “We do not
expect the SPV will in any way impact our maximum economic pressure campaign,” a
US State Department spokeswoman said. “The United States questions the efficacy
of the SPV and remains committed to fully enforcing its sanctions,” said a
senior Trump administration who spoke on condition of anonymity.
US Holds Syrian Regime Responsible for Journalist Colvin’s 2012 Death
Asharq Al-Awsat/Friday, 1 February, 2019/The United States held the Syrian
regime responsible for the 2012 death of American journalist Marie Colvin,
slapping it with a $302 million judgment. In a verdict unsealed late Wednesday
night, US District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson concluded the Syrian military
had deliberately targeted the makeshift media center in the city of Homs where
Colvin and other journalists were working. Sustained artillery barrages against
the apartment building housing the media center killed Colvin and French
photographer Remi Ochlik on February 22, 2012. The civil lawsuit filed in US
federal court by Colvin’s family in 2016 accused officials in Bashar Assad’s
regime of deliberately targeting rockets against a makeshift broadcast studio
where Colvin and other reporters were living and working. Colvin’s family was
represented by the San Francisco-based Center for Justice and Accountability,
which focuses on human rights litigation. The group’s executive director, Dixon
Osburn, said the lawsuit was the first seeking to hold the Syrian regime liable
for war crimes. Since it was filed, there has been some similar legal action in
Europe, including Germany. “It’s the first proving ground that the Assad regime
has engaged in war crimes. He has engaged in a brutal set of crimes against
humanity,” Osburn said in an interview. The judge wrote that “a targeted attack
on a media center hosting foreign journalists that resulted in two fatalities
and multiple injuries ... is an unconscionable act.” The judge ruled that
additional damages would be calculated at a later date. Colvin’s sister,
Cathleen Colvin, said in a statement she hoped the ruling will “serve as a
deterrent against future attacks on the press and on civilians.”“Marie dedicated
her life to fighting for justice on behalf of the victims of war and ensuring
that their stories were heard. This case is an extension of her legacy, and I
think she’d be proud of what we achieved,” she added. The lawsuit described the
attack as part of a plan orchestrated at the highest levels of Assad’s regime to
silence local and international media “as part of its effort to crush political
opposition.” Some of the evidence supporting the lawsuit was provided by two
defectors from the regime. Lawyers for the family included as evidence a copy of
an August 2011 fax that they said was sent from Syria’s National Security Bureau
instructing security bodies to launch military and intelligence campaigns
against “those who tarnish the image of Syria in foreign media and international
organizations.” Jackson wrote in the ruling that the day before the attack, an
informant provided the location of the media center to the Syrian regime. That
night, Colvin had given live interviews to CNN and two British broadcasters, the
BBC and Channel 4.There is evidence that Syrian officials celebrated after the
attack, Jackson added. In a 2016 interview with NBC News quoted by CNN, Assad
said Colvin herself was at fault in her death. “It’s a war and she came
illegally to Syria, she worked with the terrorists, and because she came
illegally, she’s responsible of everything that befell her,” Assad said. Colvin,
who had covered conflicts around the world for Britain’s Sunday Times, wore a
signature black patch over her left eye after being blinded by a grenade in Sri
Lanka in 2001. The 2018 film "A Private War" was based on her life. Technically
foreign governments are immune from jurisdiction in US courts through the
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. However, that immunity is lifted for crimes
against American citizens by governments classified as a "state sponsor of
terrorism."Washington Post reporter Jason Rezaian is using a similar approach to
sue the Iranian government, which jailed him for more than 500 days on espionage
charges.
Egypt-Kuwait Joint Military Drills Kickoff
Cairo- Asharq Al-Awsat/Friday 01 February/19/The Egyptian and Kuwaiti forces
started two simultaneous joint military drills in Kuwait code-named
"Al-Yarmouk-4" and "Sabah-1" that will last for several days in Kuwait, the
Egyptian military spokesman said in a statement on Thursday.
Being held for the first time between Egypt and Kuwait, "Sabah-1" started with
theoretical and practical courses ahead of sailing as well as coordination of
efforts to carry out a mock operation to restore and secure an island of
strategic importance, according to Egypt's army spokesman Tamer al-Refaie. As
for "Al-Yarmouk-4" military drill, it includes performing a number of offensive
and defensive air operations targeting vital sites to enhance the combat
capabilities of the two countries. "The drills contribute to supporting the ties
of military cooperation between the armed forces of both countries to confront
all joint challenges that may face the region," Refaie said. Meanwhile, the
Kuwaiti military said in a statement that the mock battles involve elite
personnel, F-18 warplanes from the Kuwaiti air forces and F-16 jet fighters from
the Egyptian counterparts. Earlier in January, Egypt and Bahrain held three-day
joint air-naval drills dubbed "Hamad-3" at an air base in the south of the Gulf
country. Egypt regularly holds joint military exercises with Arab, African and
Western states to boost military collaboration and exchange military expertise
with them.
US Consulate Employee in Istanbul to Go on Trial over Failed Coup
Asharq Al-Awsat/Friday, 1 February, 2019/A Turkish employee at the US Consulate
in Istanbul is set to go on trial in March on charges of espionage and links to
the failed 2016 coup against the government. Turkey's official Anadolu news
agency said Friday the first hearing against Metin Topuz would be on March 26.
Topuz, a translator and fixer for the Drug Enforcement Agency at the Istanbul
consulate, is accused of links to US-based Turkish cleric Fethullah Gulen, whom
Ankara blames for the 2016 coup attempt.Topuz denies the allegations. In
January, Turkish prosecutors said they were seeking a life sentence against the
suspect. A 78-page indictment seen by The Associated Press said he was in "very
intense contact" with police officers who led a 2013 anti-corruption
investigation that implicated top government officials. The indictment said
Topuz told authorities he had been in touch with several police officers with
alleged links to Gulen for narcotic investigations. The prosecutor said this was
a "reflexive acknowledgment of his crimes" and claimed Topuz's communication
with the officers was "beyond the limits of consular work." The indictment
includes telephone calls, text messages, CCTV frame grabs with suspected police
officers, along with testimonies from four witnesses and two suspects. He is
also accused of privacy violations and illegally recording personal data.
Topuz's arrest increased tensions between the two NATO allies in 2017 and led to
the suspension of bilateral visa services for more than two months. Relations
hit rock bottom last summer when US President Donald Trump sanctioned two
Turkish officials and increased tariffs on aluminum and steel imports, causing a
huge loss in the Turkish lira's value, to pressure the country to release an
imprisoned American pastor. Pastor Andrew Brunson was convicted in October for
terror links but later allowed to leave the country. Two other local consular
employees are under investigation in Turkey. Jailed translator Hamza Ulucay is
accused of terror group membership with alleged links to outlawed Kurdish armed
groups, and staff Mete Canturk was placed under house arrest. Ties have been on
the mend since, but a host of issues remain as irritants, including US support
for Kurdish groups in Syria Turkey considers terrorists, Turkey's pledge to buy
Russian missile defense systems and Gulen's continued residence in Pennsylvania.
The Turkish government launched a massive crackdown against Gulen's network
following the 2016 coup and arrested more than 77,000 people and sacked more
than 130,000 public employees through emergency decrees. Critics say the purge
went beyond the suspects of the coup with the arrest of journalists, lawmakers
and activists.
Erekat: We Should Restore Gaza, Carry Out
Elections
Ramallah- Asharq Al-Awsat/Friday, 1 February, 2019/Secretary-General of the
Palestinian Liberation Organization’s (PLO) executive committee Saeb Erekat said
the coming Palestinian government shall restore Gaza Strip and carry out general
elections. “We want from this government to work on holding general elections,
do everything possible to restore Gaza Strip and end division and join efforts
with other Palestinian parties to together impede the implementation of the Deal
of the Century,” Erekat told a press conference in Ramallah. He called on Hamas
Movement to participate in the upcoming legislative elections, stressing that it
was not possible to have a Palestinian State without Gaza. PA President Mahmoud
Abbas met with the head of the PA Central Elections Commission Hanna Nasser and
asked him to go to Gaza, carry out an “honest dialogue” with Hamas and urge it
to agree to parliamentary elections, Erekat explained. He hoped that these
attempts succeed and elections take place soon. “We need to return to ballot
boxes,” he said. On the other hand, Erekat condemned Hamas’s questioning of
Abbas’s legitimacy along with that of the PLO, the Executive Committee, the
National Council, and the Palestinian factions. He pointed out that while the
Palestinian leadership decided to face the US-Israeli project aimed at gaining
control over Jerusalem, Aqsa Mosque and the Church of the Resurrection, former
Legislative Council member Ahmed Bahr has sent a written letter to several
countries questioning the President’s legitimacy. “We have a Palestinian
national project, represented by the PLO and the State of Palestine, to restore
Palestine and put it again on the map, with Jerusalem as its capital on the 1967
borders.” In return, stressed Erekat, there is a partisan project of the Muslim
Brotherhood, and it has become even more important than the Palestinian cause.
“There is a call for holding general elections in the West Bank, including
Jerusalem and Gaza Strip, and whoever rejects these elections and insists on the
continuation of the coup in Gaza Strip has become a tool in the Deal of the
Century, whether he likes it or not.” Erekat did not talk about the Palestinian
government’s structure, noting that what is more important is its program.
Abbas Reiterates Call for Multilateral Mechanism to Sponsor Peace Process
London - Kifah Ziboun/Asharq Al-Awsat/Friday, 1 February, 2019/Palestinian
Authority President Mahmoud Abbas called for the establishment of a multilateral
mechanism - hinting that the United States be part of it - to launch a new peace
process. During a joint press conference in Ramallah on Thursday with visiting
Maltese President Marie-Louise Coleiro Preca, Abbas said: “The United States is
no longer exclusively qualified to play the role of mediator. We call for an
international peace conference and the establishment of a multilateral mechanism
to move forward.” “The European Union and the members of the Security Council
have an important role to play so that the Palestinian people can enjoy their
freedom and independence in their own state with East Jerusalem as its capital,
along with the state of Israel in security and good neighborliness,” he added.
The Palestinian president accused the United States of encouraging Israel to
“act as a state above the law.” “What encourages Israel to act as a state above
the law is the US administration's support and its blind bias towards the
[Israeli] occupation,” he emphasized. Abbas had announced his plan for a
multilateral mediation for the peace process before the Security Council last
year. He called for an international peace conference that would bring about a
multilateral-international mechanism, which he said would help both sides in the
negotiations to solve all permanent issues, including the status of Jerusalem,
based on the Oslo Agreement. Palestinian presidential spokesman, Nabil Abu
Rudeina said on Thursday that peace, stability and security would not be
achieved through “the so-called deal of the century and Israel’s actions that
violate all resolutions of international legitimacy.” “The main address for
achieving peace is the seat of the presidency in the city of Ramallah. The
address is President Mahmoud Abbas - not as a person - but as the symbol of the
homeland, the people and the constants of the Palestine Liberation Organization,
which we will not abandon,” he affirmed.
UN May Postpone Libya Elections Conference
Cairo, London – Khaled Mahmoud and Asharq Al-Awsat/Friday, 1 February, 2019/The
United Nations will likely delay a planned conference on elections in Libya
until later this year until it receives the support of the country’s rival
factions, informed sources revealed Thursday according to Reuters. The national
meeting is central to a UN and Western roadmap for a vote in Libya as a way out
of its eight-year war since the ouster of former ruler Moammar al-Gaddafi. But
big players and their allied armed groups wield considerable power under the
status quo, and there is mistrust between rival governments and parliaments.
More delay in the UN-sponsored conference, where Libyans from all walks of
society are supposed to decide details of their elections such as the
presidential or parliamentary system, would also probably push back an actual
vote. Under a French plan, Libya was meant to hold elections last December 10,
but that was shelved due to divisions among rival leaders and a spike in
violence in the capital Tripoli. In a new push, UN Libya envoy Ghassan Salame
wanted a conference in “the first weeks of 2019” with potential polls by June.
But momentum for that has been lost due to resistance from major parties backing
the parallel governments in Tripoli and the east who benefit from access to oil
revenues and jobs for armed groups in the absence of police. Sources familiar
with the UN plans told Reuters the conference could still happen by the end of
February, but a delay until at least March looked more likely. “Salame won’t
announce a venue and date ahead until he thinks there is enough support from all
sides,” one source said. The UN mission in Libya said it was seeking a
successful meeting but no date was set yet. “We plan for the conference to
happen as soon as possible,” it said in a statement to Reuters. Diplomats say
the conference is a “last joker” in the pack for Salame who has toiled since
September 2017 for elections. Meanwhile, the US administration renewed its
support for the Tripoli-based Government of National Accord of Fayez al-Sarraj.
During a visit to Misrata Wednesday, US Ambassador to Libya Peter Bodde stated
that Washington remains committed to a stable, unified Libya able to counter
terrorism and deliver security and prosperity for all Libyans. The envoy held
talks in the city with Interior Minister Fathi Bashaga, Central Military Zone
Commander Major-General Mohammad Haddad and other military officials, said the
US embassy in Libya in a statement. The meeting was held shortly after a vague
Interior Ministry warning over militias operating in Tripoli. It said that it
opposes any armed group that violates the security arrangements in place in the
capital, adding that they will be held accountable for their actions. The
ministry did not identify any of the militias it was referring to in its
warning.
Saudi Arabia, 5 Arab States Discuss Regional Crises at Jordan Meeting
Dead Sea (Jordan) – Mohammed al-Daama/ Asharq Al-Awsat/Friday, 1 February,
2019/The foreign ministers of six Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia, met on
the shores of the Dead Sea in Jordan in order to discuss the region’s crises and
efforts to confront them. The meetings included Saudi State Minister for Foreign
Affairs Adel al-Jubeir, Jordan’s FM Ayman Safadi, Egyptian FM Sameh Shoukri, the
United Arab Emirates’ FM Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Bahraini FM Sheikh
Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa and Kuwaiti FM Sheikh Sabah Al Khalid Al Sabah. The
closed-door meetings were a "consultation between brothers and friends", Safadi
said in a terse statement shortly after the meeting. They were a forum "to
exchange views on our regional issues and ways of cooperation to overcome
regional crises and achieve security and stability," he said, without providing
any details. He explained that the meetings were open and did not have an agenda
and sought mechanisms to achieve joint Arab interests. “The discussions were
positive and fruitful. We addressed all issues that we must work together on to
achieve our common goal of security and stability,” Safadi said. Thursday’s
meeting was held two weeks before a planned US-Polish conference on the Middle
East. US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said the conference will look at
"making sure Iran is not a destabilizing influence", although a senior US
official has insisted it is "not an anti-Iran meeting."It will be held amid
Washington’s proposal to establish a strategic Middle East alliance, or Arab
NATO, that would seek to achieve peace in the turbulent region. The Dead Sea
meeting also came amid debate over the return of Syria to the Arab League, which
suspended Damascus's membership in November 2011, as the country appears on the
verge of ending its eight-year conflict. Several Arab states, including Lebanon
and Tunisia, have called for Syria's return. In December, Sudanese President
Omar al-Bashir made the first visit to Damascus by an Arab leader since 2011,
and the UAE reopened its embassy.
Latest LCCC English analysis & editorials from miscellaneous sources published
on February 01-02/19
Why Tehran Crosses Only 'Pink Lines'
Amir Taheri/Asharq Al Awsat/February
01/19
Talk to any senior European Union official and you are sure to hear the Islamic
Republic in Iran designated as “a threat to regional stability.” German
Chancellor Angela Merkel endorses Israeli Premier Benjamin Netanyahu’s
assessment of Iranian behavior as “unacceptable.”
French President Emmanuel Macron insists that Iran should carry out UN
resolutions by closing its ballistic missile project. And, yet, EU’s policy on
Iran, assuming such a thing exists, is plagued by contradictions.
The EU’s spokesperson for foreign policy, Ms. Federica Mogherini has devoted
most of her immense energies operating as a lobbyist for the Islamic Republic.
She has visited more than 30 countries to present the Islamic Republic as the
poor little lamb facing the American big bad wolf. To show what a special place
the mullahs have in her heart, when in Tehran, she wears the full Khomeinist
hijab, but when she visits other Islamic capitals she unleashes her peroxide
blonde hair in full evidence.
In private, EU officials dismiss that as childish symbolism. The problem is that
symbolism does matter as much in politics as in poetics.
For example, when, just weeks after leaving office, German Foreign Minister
Sigmar Gabriel heads a delegation of European businessmen to Tehran and praises
the Islamic Republic as a rock of stability in the Mideast, some in the
Khomeinist leadership will see that as an endorsement of Tehran’s reckless
adventurism. For almost two years the EU has fostered the illusion in the
Islamic Republic that it can continue doing as it pleases without risking any
bad consequence. When the Trump administration unveiled a series of measures to
force Tehran to modify aspects of its behavior, the EU rejected the American
position but followed all the sanctions that Washington imposed on Iran. At the
same time, however, the EU appointed a team to find ways of circumventing those
same sanctions. This duality, not to say duplicity, led to the idea of creating
an “alternative system of trade financial transactions” to help the Islamic
Republic sell its oil to Europe and buy European goods and services. German
Foreign Minister Heiko Maas promises Tehran it would be” accommodated” in the
global trading system.
The idea that the Islamic Republic merits special favorable treatment was
invented by former US President Barack Obama. He created a parallel UN Security
Council in the shape of the so-called 5+1 group of powers. The idea was to allow
Tehran to ignore six UNSC resolutions that it did not like. Obama also ignored
the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) by exempting Iran from its terms and
conjuring the so-called Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (CJPOA) which clearly
states it is tailor-made only for Iran.
The EU’s special favorable treatment of the Islamic Republic includes keeping
mum about over 20 EU citizens currently held as hostages in Tehran. It is also
indicated by the mere rap-on-the wrist response of the Europeans to the Islamic
Republic’s latest terrorist operations in four European countries.
Ironically, a more credible exposure of the destructive role that the Islamic
Republic plays in Europe has come from Tehran’s former Ambassador in Berlin Ali
Majedi. Majedi is no defector or dissident. He is back in Tehran at the end of
his Berlin mission, starting his retirement.
However, he told reporters in Tehran that he had seen that the Europeans had
“extensive evidence” about Iran’s “destructive activities” which could not be
attributed to “undisciplined elements” in Tehran. Europeans, including British
Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt, delude themselves in believing that by “working
with Iran” they could prevent the Islamic Republic from “crossing the red
lines.”
The problem is that the Islamic Republic does not cross those real or imaginary
“red lines”. Like the now-defunct Soviet Union in its time, the Islamic
Republic’s strategy is to cross only “pink lines”, which constitute 99 percent
of the norms of international behavior, whenever possible.
The Islamic Republic has no troops in Yemen but manages to keep that tragedy
going by helping Houthi rebels hang on to the patch of territory they hold.
The last of Iranian military advisers have left Iraq. But they have left behind
thousands of Iraqi military who lived in Iran for decades and hold dual
nationality to lead pro-Tehran militias. Tehran sets the tune in Beirut not
through Iranian troops but by hiring local manpower from all communities,
notably the Hezbollah.Of the estimated 80,000 troops that Tehran has in Syria,
less than 10 percent are Iranians, others being mercenaries from a dozen
countries including Afghanistan, Pakistan and Syria itself. The Islamic Republic
has crossed no red-line in Afghanistan but it hires thousands of armed men from
all communities, most recently from among the Taliban as well. In the EU
countries, Tehran is careful not to cross “red lines”. But, it crosses ”pink
lines” when it can through mosques, hussainiyahs, religious endowments and fake
charities. In Britain alone, the Islamic Republic controls at least a dozen
tax-exempt “charities”, often used for financing violent groups across the globe
or simply for money laundering.
Part of the EU’s soft spot for the Islamic Republic may be inspired by endemic
anti-Americanism which is present in most European political circles, left and
right. We saw one example of this latent anti-Americanism last week over the
crisis in Venezuela. When members of the Organization of American States (OAS)
almost unanimously rejected Nicolas Maduro’s claim to the presidency and
endorsed Juan Guaido as Interim President of Venezuela, EU officials and media
tried to portray this as another example of the US throwing its weight around.
Thus, they began by saying they won’t follow that policy. Once they realized
that the anti-Maduro front covered virtually the whole of the Americas and was
not another instance of “bullying by Trump” they used duplicity to cover their
mistake. They gave Maduro eight days to organize new presidential elections or
risk seeing the EU back Guaido’s claim as the OAS, including the US, had done.
It was obvious that Maduro won’t accept what would amount to admitting the
legitimacy of his presidency. It was obvious that no election could be organized
in eight days. It was also obvious that even if an election were held by an
illegitimate regime it would have no legitimacy. Anti-American demagoguery had
produced a laughable policy.
On Venezuela as on the Islamic Republic in Iran, the European Union must remove
its anti-US, nowadays presented as only anti-Trump, glasses to see reality.
What Microsoft Can Teach Facebook About Playing
Nice
Alex Webb/Bloomberg/February 01/19
As another European Commission mega-fine on Alphabet Inc. nears, it prompts the
question: can the Google parent ever free itself from the specter of penalties
from the region’s regulators? The same goes for Amazon.com Inc. and Facebook
Inc., each of which is facing scrutiny for how they handle data. They could do a
lot worse than looking to a fellow West Coast tech giant for a playbook. It
wasn’t all that long ago that Microsoft Corp. was the European Commission’s
nemesis. For most of the first decade of the millennium, the firm was under fire
over the way it bundled products with its then-dominant Windows operating
system. It became the subject of what were then record fines. Fast forward to
2019, and Microsoft is firmly in regulators’ good books. That’s the result of a
concerted effort to turn things around. Silicon Valley, take note.
For a long time, Microsoft’s approach to the Commission was antagonistic. Its
attitude seemed to be that “these European bureaucrats just don’t understand
technology, they’re wrong.” That pig-headedness was well exemplified by the 860
million-euro ($982 million) fine officials imposed in 2008 for failing to comply
with an earlier ruling.
About five years ago, the company’s attitude started to shift. It realized that,
more than just obeying the letter of the law, it had to be seen as a positive
actor. It turned up the soft diplomacy: having top executives such as President
Brad Smith meet more regularly with policy makers, and hosting drinks parties in
Brussels. It helped that, in 2014, Satya Nadella succeeded Steve Ballmer as CEO,
bringing with him an approach characterized more by humility than hubris. It
went further. The technology industry was rattled in 2013 by Edward Snowden’s
revelations of the extent of US surveillance. Perhaps opportunistically,
Microsoft pushed to redefine itself as a privacy advocate and lock arms with the
Commission in objecting to US demands for access to data. Google needs to find
similarly common ground, and it could start by toning down moves that seem like
threats, such as when it said last week it might shutter Google News in Europe
in response to a planned copyright law which might force it to pay publishers
more. Playing nice would help burnish the firm’s standing in Brussels as the
investigation into alleged anticompetitive behavior in digital advertising winds
down.
Amazon is meanwhile in focus for the way it might use data to imitate products
that third-party vendors sell on its site in order to squeeze them out. The
volume of criticism of Facebook is soaring amid concerns over the spread of
false information on its platform, and its granular data on user habits.
Microsoft also offered remedies which made it seem more cooperative. For
Internet Explorer, it decided to let Windows users choose which browser they
wanted to use, after the regulator criticized how it linked the two products.
That sort of industrial solution plays well in Brussels.
But in this case, it also fed a fundamental change in the company’s business.
The browser option helped Google’s Chrome steal market share from Explorer. That
would make it all the more urgent for Microsoft to find revenue elsewhere.
Personal computing now accounts for less than half of sales, and the shift
toward other businesses can be explained in part by regulatory pressure.
For Google and Facebook, this makes it even more important that they find
revenue streams that don’t rely on targeted ads. That business accounts for
almost all of the two companies’ sales, and depend on mining user data in a way
that is drawing official scrutiny. Facebook sometimes appears guilty of the
mindset that was once symptomatic of Microsoft, namely thinking that regulators
are dumb and don’t understand its business. When Chief Executive Officer Mark
Zuckerberg was quizzed by members of the European Parliament about privacy
issues last May, he proved evasive and tried to unilaterally end the meeting
when the line of questioning became difficult. Lawmakers were outraged.
Perhaps Zuckerberg recognizes he needs outside help: After reportedly trying to
lure Smith from Microsoft, he ultimately hired former British deputy prime
minister Nick Clegg to head global lobbying efforts. He faces a colossal
challenge to change the company’s image given the pervasive European ill will
towards the company’s founder and his lieutenant, Sheryl Sandberg. As dire as
relations might look for the tech firms, there’s still scope to turn them
around. In 2014, former European Commissioner for Competition Neelie Kroes
tweeted a selfie of herself with Smith with the words “A selfie with Brad Smith
from @Microsoft ? I never would have believed if you predicted it 10yrs ago.”If
Microsoft can do it, and become the world’s most valuable company once again in
the process, so could they.
The Palestinians: Who Really Cares?
Bassam Tawil/Gatestone Institute/February 01/19
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13655/palestinians-lebanon
Protests by the Palestinians in Lebanon are unlikely to draw any attention from
the international community, including so-called pro-Palestinian groups that are
active especially on university campuses in the US and Canada, among other
places.
The real "pro-Palestinian" groups are those who are willing to raise their
voices against the mistreatment of Palestinians at the hands of their Arab
brothers. The real "pro-Palestinian" groups are those who are prepared to defend
the rights of women and gays living under Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The real
"pro-Palestinian" groups are those that are prepared to advocate for democracy
and free speech for Palestinians living under the repressive regimes of the
Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The real
"pro-Palestinian" groups are those who are prepared to condemn Lebanon for its
racist and discriminatory measures against Palestinians, living and dead.
Hiding at a university campus and spewing hatred against Israel does not make
one "pro-Palestinian." Rather, it makes one just an Israel-hater. Will the
"pro-Palestinian" groups listen to the urgent messages coming from the people in
Lebanon they claim to represent?
A Palestinian who tries to bring a bag of cement or other construction materials
into a refugee camp is subjected to arrest, interrogation, trial by military
court and a fine. This inhumane and unjust practice is taking place in Lebanon.
(Source of construction image: iStock)
A Palestinian who tries to bring a bag of cement or other construction materials
into a refugee camp to build a house is subjected to arrest, interrogation,
trial by military court and a fine.
Is this happening in the Gaza Strip? No. Is it happening in the West Bank? No.
This inhumane and unjust practice is taking place in an Arab country where more
than 500,00 Palestinians live: Lebanon. Moreover, this ban on the entry of
construction material is punishing not only the living, but also the dead.
Palestinians say that because of the prohibition, they cannot even find enough
stones and cement to build graves.
The wretched condition of the Palestinians living in Lebanon is often ignored by
both the international community and the Western main stream media. The only
Palestinians the international community seems to care about are those residing
in the West Bank and Gaza Strip -- those whose grievances can be blamed on
Israel.
Most of the Palestinians in Lebanon live in 12 refugee camps, where they suffer
from poverty, overcrowding and violence, as well as Lebanon's discriminatory and
apartheid laws and measures that deny them basic rights.
The Lebanese authorities claim that the ban on the entry of building materials
into the camps is designed to guarantee the Palestinians' "right of return" to
their former villages and towns inside Israel. The Lebanese authorities tell the
Palestinians, "We do not want you to build new homes in our country: that would
compromise your [purported] right of return!"
The Lebanese authorities know full well that Israel will never allow hundreds of
thousands of Palestinians to move to Israel as part of a "right of return." For
Israel, that would mean that Jews would become a minority in their own country,
and that there would then be three Palestinian states: Gaza, Israel and the West
Bank.
This minor detail, however, has not stopped Lebanon and other Arab countries
that play host to Palestinian refugees and their descendants from continuing to
lie to them and feeding them false hopes that one day they will go back to the
homes of their fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers in Israel.
The prohibition of construction material for Palestinians in Lebanon is only one
example of the discrimination they have been facing in this Arab country for the
past few decades.
Palestinians in Lebanon are also banned by law from working in selected
professions, including medicine, engineering, nursing, accounting,
pharmaceuticals and teaching. In Lebanon, Palestinians are considered foreigners
and are consequently barred from owning, selling or bequeathing property.
Housing renovations inside Palestinian camps require prior permission from the
Lebanese security authorities due to concerns that the material may be used for
military purposes. If the permit is granted, the army usually imposes tight
measures, such as counting the number of cement bags or checking the quantity of
stones that the Palestinian wishes to bring into the camp.
A Palestinian who is caught smuggling construction material into a camp is
arrested, interrogated and faces a fine of 100,000 Lebanese pounds ($66).
According to a recent report in the Palestinian Information Center, the ban on
the entry of construction material has been in effect for the past 22 years.
"This is an inhumane measure," the report said. In 2004, according to the
report, the ban was temporarily lifted for a few months before it was reinstated
and expanded to additional Palestinian communities in Lebanon.
In addition to cement, the Palestinians are also banned from bringing into their
camps water pipes, electrical wires, aluminum, doors, tiles, windows and glass
slabs and paint.
In the past two years, the Lebanese authorities began building a concrete wall
with watch towers around two Palestinian camps: Ain al-Hilweh and Rashidiyeh.
The Lebanese authorities have justified building the wall for security reasons
and presumably to prevent the expansion of the Palestinian camps. Palestinians
refer to these walls, which have turned their compass into closed ghettos, as
the "walls of shame."
Jamal Khatib, secretary-general of the Islamic Factions in Ain al-Hilweh, called
on the Lebanese authorities to lift the ban. "Some of the houses have collapsed,
and injured women and children," he said.
Mohammed al-Shuli, a Palestinian human rights activist, said that the ban on the
entry of construction material has become a "nightmare" for all refugees.
Recently, Palestinians in Ain al-Hilweh were forced to remove stones from their
houses to build a grave for a deceased resident, Khaled Zaiter. The man's body
was held in a morgue for several days before the camp residents managed to take
enough stones from their own homes to build a grave for him. "Burying a dead
Palestinian in Ain al-Hilweh camp has become a painful and traumatic
experience," said Abdel Raheem Maqdah, a Palestinian community leader in
Lebanon.
Protests by the Palestinians in Lebanon are unlikely to draw any attention from
the international community, including so-called pro-Palestinian groups that are
active especially on university campuses in the US and Canada, among other
places.
The real "pro-Palestinian" groups are those who are willing to raise their
voices against the mistreatment of Palestinians at the hands of their Arab
brothers. The real "pro-Palestinian" groups are those who are prepared to defend
the rights of women and gays living under Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The real
"pro-Palestinian" groups are those that are prepared to advocate for democracy
and free speech for Palestinians living under the repressive regimes of the
Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The real
"pro-Palestinian" groups are those who are prepared to condemn Lebanon for its
racist and discriminatory measures against Palestinians, living and dead.
Hiding at a university campus and spewing hatred against Israel does not make
one "pro-Palestinian." Rather, it makes one an Israel-hater. Will the
"pro-Palestinian" groups listen to the SOS messages coming from the people they
claim to represent in Lebanon? Probably not. In all probability, they will just
continue pushing their anti-Israel agenda as Palestinians in Lebanon continue to
cut stones from their own homes to build graves for their dear ones.
*Bassam Tawil is a Muslim Arab based in the Middle East.
© 2019 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Belgium Welcomes Multiculturalism
Judith Bergman/Gatestone Institute/February 01/19
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13606/belgium-multiculturalism
The report notes that the texts used call for gays to be stoned to death or
thrown off buildings, and described Jews as "corrupt, evil and treacherous
people".... The writings, the report continued...called for "war" on all people
who do not follow Sunni Islam — From a recent report by the Belgian State
Security Service.
"[T]he most important principle of jihad is to fight unbelievers and
aggressors... Armed jihad becomes an individual duty for every Muslim." — From a
teaching manual used in Belgian mosques, according to a leaked intelligence
report.
Such manuals, noted the report, are widely available "thanks to the unlimited
financial and technological means of the proselytizing apparatus of Saudi Arabia
and other Gulf states." The manuals, the report added, were found not only in
Belgium but also in neighboring countries.
In May, Benjamin Herman, a criminal who converted to Islam in prison, murdered
three people (including two police officers) in Liège, Belgium while out on a
48-hour leave. He then shot and wounded four more police officers while shouting
"Allahu Akbar." Pictured: The city center of Liège. (Image source: iStock)
Belgium, in its well-intended welcome of newcomers from the Middle East, is now
facing a persistent terrorist threat and a "wave of jihadism", according to a
new report published by the Belgian State Security Service (VSSE) on November
30. The main reason for these recent acquisitions, notes the report, is the
ongoing Islamic radicalization of inmates in Belgian prisons and the risk of
terrorist convicts engaging in terrorist acts once they have served their
sentences and are back out on the street.
"In the coming years," states the report, "the VSSE will be brought to pay
particular attention to monitoring detainees convicted of acts of terrorism
[after they are] released into freedom". The authors of the report do not reveal
how many radicalized prisoners there are in Belgium; only that in September
2018, there were 130 inmates sentenced for terrorism or "in preventive detention
in the context of a terrorism record".
"Taking into account the persistent recidivist tendency among former terrorism
detainees, never mind radicalized common criminals, Belgium will continue to
face a latent terror threat for some time to come," the report lets drop.
The Belgian intelligence services do not appear to consider Islam a factor in
generating Islamic terrorism. Instead, the report offers up other explanations
why Islamic terrorism is committed internationally: "... Real or perceived
discrimination, political instability, poor economic conditions, unemployment,
level of development."
Benjamin Herman, for example, was a criminal who converted to Islam in prison;
then -- despite being on a state security list as a suspected radical -- last
May, while out on a 48-hour leave from prison in the Belgian city of Liège, he
murdered three people, including two police officers. He spared one woman,
apparently because she was Muslim. Herman then shot and wounded four more police
officers while shouting "Allahu Akbar." Interior Minister Jan Jambon said at the
time of Herman's possible motives:
"There are signs that allow us to speak of radicalization in prison. But it can
also be because he had no prospects anymore in our society, as he also committed
a murder the night before."
In 2017, a leaked confidential report remarked that there were 51 organizations
in Molenbeek -- an area in Brussels that has been called the "Jihadi capital of
Europe", and that has fostered or harbored various jihadists, including several
who were behind the 2015 Paris attacks.
Brussels itself was the site of an attack in March 2016, when Muslim terrorists
killed 31 people and wounded around 300 people in the bombings of Brussels
Airport and the Maalbeek metro station. There also seems to be an ongoing
process of Islamization currently taking place in Belgium. Another area in which
radicalization has been increasing, according to a separate confidential
intelligence report leaked in May to the media, is apparently from mosques where
jihad is preached. A number of them, including the Saudi-financed Great Mosque
in Brussels, seem to have been training imams to promote armed jihad,
Jew-hatred, and persecuting members of the LGBT community. The report notes that
the texts used call for gays to be stoned to death or thrown off buildings, and
described Jews as "corrupt, evil and treacherous people". The writings, the
report continued, were "inspired mainly by classical Islamic law from the Middle
Ages", and called for "war" on all people who do not follow Sunni Islam. "The
most important principle of jihad," one teaching manual said, "is to fight
unbelievers and aggressors... Armed jihad becomes an individual duty for every
Muslim."
Such manuals, noted the report, are widely available "thanks to the unlimited
financial and technological means of the proselytizing apparatus of Saudi Arabia
and other Gulf states." The manuals, the report added, were found not only in
Belgium but also in neighboring countries, both in hard copy and online. Another
way that Islamization is spreading in Belgium is the removal of Christian
traditions, for fear of "causing offense". In Bruges, the organizers of the
Christmas market changed its name to "Winter Market" in order "not to offend
other beliefs", the Belgian news outlet HLN disclosed.
Christmas lights will now be replaced by "winter lights". According to Pieter
Vanderyse, the organizer of Bruges' Winter Market, "If we use the word
Christmas, it will be associated with a religion, but we want to be more
neutral. We have no idea where the commotion comes from, this is the second year
the name has changed".
Also according to HLN, other Belgian cities, such as Brussels, Antwerp, Ghent
and Hasselt, have also changed their Christmas Markets to "Winter Markets",
"Winter Lands" or "Winter Fun". One might speculate, however, that, in addition
to being afraid of "causing offense", the organizers were also afraid of jihad.
Christmas markets in Europe have become repeated targets of jihad. In 2016, a
terrorist, Anis Amri, killed 12 people at a Christmas market in Berlin after
pledging allegiance to ISIS. More recently, on December 2, 2018, a man wielding
a hatchet and shouting "Allahu Akbar" ["Allah is the greatest"] visited a
Christmas market in the German city of Witzenhausen, where he threatened several
Christmas shoppers .
The growing desire to appease newcomers from the Middle East is not limited to
commercial establishments, such as Christmas markets. The Catholic Church has
also weighed in. At the funeral service in Liège for the two police officers
that Benjamin Herman murdered, the Bishop of Liège, Jean-Pierre Delville,
apparently innocent of Islam's tenets, said:
"We know that, if Islam has been invoked as the reason to kill, it is because it
has been manipulated and held hostage by terrorists and violent people. So, we
must help Islam get rid of such manipulative and perverted interpretations, by
promoting dialogue and friendship all the time."Belgium has its own Islamic
party, named ISLAM ("Integrité, Solidarité, Liberté, Authenticité, Moralité"),
which has, as its goal, creating an Islamic State, including the separation of
men and women in buses. In the 2012 municipal elections, the party won two
seats, one of them in Molenbeek. In the 2018 municipal elections, the party lost
its seat in Molenbeek, winning less than 2% of the vote, so perhaps its appeal
may be declining.
Belgium has also seen the growth of a possibly largely imported anti-Semitism.
The Chief Rabbi of Brussels has not worn a skullcap in public since 2001, when
he was attacked by a group of young Arab men. When a Belgian public broadcaster
asked to film the Chief Rabbi and other members of the Jewish community walking
on the street while wearing their skullcaps, they declined, saying that they
feared for their safety. In 2014, a Muslim terrorist killed four people at the
Brussels Jewish museum.
Half of all Muslim teens in Belgium hold anti-Semitic views, according to a 2013
study conducted for the Flemish government among almost 4,000 high school
students in Antwerp and Ghent. Among Muslims, 50.9% of respondents agreed with
the statement "Jews foment war and blame others for it," compared to 7.1% among
non-Muslims. The statement "Jews seek to control everything" received a 45.1%
approval rating among Muslims, compared to a 10.8% approval among non-Muslims.
Approximately 35% of Muslims agreed with the statement that "Jews have too much
clout in Belgium," compared to 11.8% of non-Muslims
According to the main Belgian anti-Semitism watchdog, the Belgian League Against
Antisemitism, Belgian Jews live "in a permanent stage of siege".
"The presence of military on the street in front of Jewish sites is somewhat
reassuring," said the president of the Belgian League Against Antisemitism, Joël
Rubinfeld, last May. Over "the last two or three years," he said, his
organization had dealt with a dozen cases of Jewish school students subjected to
anti-Semitic bullying, as well as a broader trend of Jewish parents unwilling to
risk sending their children to public schools.
"This is what they call a double punishment: on the one hand, they are victims
of these antisemitic acts, of bullying, or even sometimes of physical violence,
and on the other hand, it is they, and not the aggressors, who have to leave
their school."
Rubinfeld also said that it has been difficult to convince Belgian politicians
that the country has a serious problem with antisemitism. "Already in 2008-2009,
I told them: 'If you do not do it for my children, do it for your children.'" He
added that it has been difficult to convince Belgian politicians that the
country has a serious problem.
Is it possible that Belgium has a few of them?
*Judith Bergman, a columnist, lawyer and political analyst, is a Distinguished
Senior Fellow at Gatestone Institute.
© 2019 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do
not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No
part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied
or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
Israel, Syria and the world through Iranian eyes
سمدار بيري/يديعوت أحرونوت/إسرائيل وسوريا والعالم من خلال عيون إيرانية
Smadar Perry|/YnetNews/January 02/19
http://eliasbejjaninews.com/archives/71720/smadar-perry-ynetnews-israel-syria-and-the-world-through-iranian-eyes-%d8%b3%d9%85%d8%af%d8%a7%d8%b1-%d8%a8%d9%8a%d8%b1%d9%8a-%d9%8a%d8%af%d9%8a%d8%b9%d9%88%d8%aa-%d8%a3%d8%ad%d8%b1%d9%88%d9%86/
Smadar Perry has an illuminating
conversation with an well-placed academic in Iran, who shares his thoughts on –
and interest in – Israeli society, as well as the true powerbrokers of the
Middle East, his own country and America's reversal on the nuclear agreement.
"Let's put our cards on the table," he says. "Even if you keep bombing, blow
things up or try something else, you won't be able to oust the Iranian forces,
call them 'experts,' call them 'advisers,' or simply 'Quds.' I believe that in
Israel you know exactly what is going on, exactly who is in Syria. You have
maps, you exchange information with foreign sources, and I assume you also have
agents there. In any case, neither side is going to give in. I assume that
Israel will continue bombing, so we will be more careful and there will be
surprises from our side."
What kind of surprises?
"I really don't know, and even if I did, I wouldn't tell," he answers. "I really
love my country."
The speaker is a very senior figure in Tehran's political and academic life, who
holds an important university post. The dialogue between us takes place on the
explicit condition that not one of clue as to his identity is revealed, and
certainly not in an Israeli newspaper. So what can I say? He has an excellent
reputation in his country, and he cultivates a wide professional and personal
circle of friends. His wife comes from a privileged family, and they have three
children. The eldest, surprisingly, in studying in the United States and comes
and goes on family visits to Tehran, without any problems or fear of arrest.
"Don't forget that our upper echelons studied in higher education institutions
in America or Europe," he says in fluent English. "I studied in the United
States and returned immediately after. I assume my son will finish his studies
and will not stay a moment longer." The unnamed Iranian academic is an
impressive man by all accounts, a fascinating interlocutor who knows just what
he can say and what to omit.
Syrian foothold
"Look," he says, analyzing the situation to Israel's north, "there is a close
daily relationship between certain elements in Iran and senior Syrian army
personnel, and you cannot bring in people or deliver shipments without prior
coordination. So it's not right to say that Syria is 'Iran's playground,' or
that things are happening on the ground without consultations with the Syrian
commanders. It is certainly true though that the level of coordination is
diminishing because of the fear of leaks to the Israeli side. Those in the know
in Iran are taking into account that you're keeping a very close watch on
Syria."
"But what do you want with a failing state like Syria?" I ask. "You don't even
have a common language or mutual interests."
"Who cares about the internal situation there?" he quickly replies. "We need a
foothold inside Syria, to have entry channels, bases of power. Even the cautious
dialogue we have with the Russians is very important. Ask me who is stronger in
Syria, the Iranians or the Russians, and I will tell you that the Russians are
stronger, but we are the allies that Assad trusts."
Once again, the Iranian street has awakened, and over the past year they still
pinned their hopes on the West, after a wave of demonstrations that followed the
collapse of the rial. They included harsh slogans against the regime,
criticizing their involvement in Syria, Gaza and Lebanon.
"Within Iran, there is a clear division of roles and powers: The people are not
permitted and are unable to follow the events in Syria. There is simply a
process that goes over their heads, between Qassem Suleimani, commander of the
Quds Force, and his group of senior commanders, and the office of the Supreme
Leader Khamenei. Suleimani, who is a very powerful and fascinating figure, has
direct access to the leader's office, and it is there that he decides on affairs
in Syria, among other things."
And what about the Russians? "There is almost total separation between the
Iranian forces and the Russian forces inside Syria, and the Russians are
primarily located next to the seaports. The Iranians, shall we say, are
increasing the Syrian army, but also taking care of other interests. Please note
that there is a language barrier – the Russian don’t speak Persian or Arabic at
all. And yet, they manage. They have either learned the language or speak
English. "
The Russians, he immediately hastens to add, are very careful not to approach us
or disturb the Iranians there. "Each side keeps to its own territory." How much
of the information ultimately arrives at the Syrian president's palace? Now he
laughs. "I believe that Bashar Assad has sent people to spy on both the Russians
and the Iranians. Everyone gathers information on everyone else, for no side can
afford to be taken by surprise."
My interlocutor shifts the conversation to he topic of Saudi Arabia. "What has
been happening there since the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi is very good
for Iran, and we believe the time is coming when Saudi Arabia will try to make
an unofficial move in our direction. By the way, it is true that the number of
executions in Iran is greater, but there has been no international outcry about
this like there was in the case of the Saudi journalist," he says with
satisfaction.
"I enjoy watching President Trump try to get close to them, while the media and
the Democrats find more and more evidence that makes it clear he should keep his
distance. This gives me a glimmer of hope that in the end the Americans will
have to turn to the Iranians and begin a relationship with us."
What about the possibility of an open confrontation between Iran and the IDF on
Syrian soil?
"Firstly, there is no immediate reason for war. Secondly, both sides are more
comfortable continuing what they are already doing. You will continue to strike
from the air, and we will continue to establish ourselves inside Syria. Here and
there Russian forces have comments regarding our presence, and we know how to
deal with that. You also get comments from them, and are careful not to release
it when you do. As it seems you have lost the upper hand in your Russia
connections. Note that the Russians tried to distance us from the Israeli border
a few months ago, but since then they have not mentioned it. Sometimes our side
changes the deployment of forces, such as what happened on the Syrian Golan. Or,
for example, we carefully go out with the Iranian experts and take care that
they will not be recognized on the ground."
I ask him what he knows about Israel, and his eyes widen.
"I know who your politicians are, listen to reports about your military plans
with great interest, but I am most interested in learning about life in Israel,
how the society is structured, Sephardi versus Ashkenazi," he says, exhibiting
an impressive amount of knowledge. "Adults and young people, trends, culture,
even your legal world fascinates me." He does not see a big difference between
young people in Iran and young people in Israel.
"In Tehran, like in Tel Aviv, we like contemporary music, good food and parties,
and I more and more recognize a desire to shake off the old generation. The
young girls, for example, go out in the street dressed modestly, and when they
go to parties and private events it turns out that underneath they were wearing
modern clothes."
The gray man
According to my interlocutor, about a quarter of Iran's population officially
belongs to the conservative stream, while another quarter, mainly young, are
affiliated with the liberal and rebellious stream. "Among them are the 'gray
ones,' some of whom favor the old-fashioned, traditional one, and some who
follow the new, albeit with less flamboyance. They hold demonstrations against
the establishment that are mainly related to the harsh living conditions, but
that does not mean that the demonstrators are part of the modernists. They are
protesting against terms of employment and salaries. "
What stream do you belong to? It is an obvious question.
"I would say that I am religious-modern, in the gray realm. I pray, I follow the
commandments of religion, without becoming extreme, and keep in close contact
with my children and their contemporaries, but I also have an open line to the
other side too."
My interlocutor tells me that it is allowed to be critical of the regime in Iran
to criticize: "All of them, except for Supreme Leader Khamenei or the senior
commanders of the security services," he says. The establishment, he explains,
has total control and ensures that no one takes them by surprise. "There are
informants everywhere. I believe they even know where and when the young
people's secret parties take place and only make arrests only when they cross
the line." In his eyes, the regime's hand does not rest too heavily on the
shoulders of its citizens. "Yes, in Iran they jail people who brutally fight
against the system, but many times they are released quietly, with a commitment
not to repeat the act that led to their arrest. Yes, there are also innocent
people in prisons. In general, you are likely to be thrown in jail if you are
seen as a threat to the regime. It's just as bad as being a drug dealer."
Meanwhile, Iran's balance of power has shifted again. President Hassan Rouhani
and Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif have suddenly vanished. You don't see
or hear from them and Supreme Leader Khamenei is essentially saying, "I told you
so."
My companion concedes that "not everything is good in Iran, and there is great
disappointment, especially among the young people, and the feeling that the move
with the Americans (the Iranian nuclear deal) has failed."
Now it's the turn of the military commanders to set the tone, I say.
I completely agree with you. The regime is keeping (Rouhani and Zarif - SP) in
its pocket for a situation in which there are developments in the dialogue with
the American administration. Look, Trump's announcement that he was renouncing
Obama's policy and banning anyone doing business with us, was a painful slap in
the face, It's true that Iran can handle the sanctions, but life is much more
difficult. It is not a good situation. "
Looking West
Instead of the United States and European countries, he explains, we got China.
Oil exports to China stand at 700,000 barrels a day, about a third of the
country's oil.
"But I do not like them," he admits. "We have no common language, they have no
interest in trying to solve our problems in the world or in really getting close
to us. The just want to do business at a good price and to get some sort of
foothold. I prefer the Americans, and I believe they will come, on their own
terms."
He breaks off for a moment, to quote a passage from a poem written by the
Iranian poet Azita Ghahreman (who now lives in Sweden):
We stand back to back
to contemplate darkness
and the chirping of rain,
the rain eases
a new season dawns
we turn our heads
to contemplate Spring
but find we no longer know one another.
"Did you understand that?" he asks. "In my opinion, this is the precise essence
of life in Iran: At one point you are up and one point you are down. You have to
preserve your optimism at all times, look around you and look for solutions."
"And do you see yourself in it?"
"My situation is good within Iran, I have full freedom of movement, my family is
well placed and I can contribute to the poor."
Most importantly, he adds, Iran is a beautiful country. "As you move away from
the center of Tehran, you come across breathtaking beauty and warm, wonderful
people. My children flee Tehran at every opportunity, go skiing in the winter
and visit cafes and markets in the spring and summer. If only we were a little
more Western, it would be perfect."