Enemies of Lebanon (3 of 3): The Clergy Elie Aoun/December 27/2019 ايلي عون: اعداء لبنان (الجزء الثالث).رجال الدين
In the 1920s, the Soviet premier Joseph Stalin gave orders to infiltrate Catholic seminaries by young communist agents who have “neither faith nor morals.”
A number of the 1920s infiltrators (many of whom were practicing homosexuals) achieved stature and influence at various levels of leadership within the Catholic church and began affecting change in theological arenas, as well as introducing “new philosophies or approaches” to the church’s teachings. In the 1960s and 1970s, they began to recruit the next generation of young seminarians who were very much like them – homosexuals and social activists with an emphasis on socialism. The intent was for the new recruits to take over once the original infiltrators had died.
The new group (not necessarily communist agents as the original group) was imputed with socialist ideas as well as homosexualism, or willing to turn a blind eye to it among the clergy. In the meantime, many good men were blocked from getting into seminaries, or eventually from getting ordained.
This brief background clarifies the status of what the church institution is going through today. At least half of its clergy are poorly formed in the faith, and the laities are suffering as a consequence.
When we speak against “the clergy,” we do not mean all clergymen and we are not opposing the “church” but the infiltrators within its institution.
By acknowledging this reality (that the church has been infiltrated), we better understand why certain clergymen are morally bankrupt, theologically twisted, and politically socialist/Marxist/unpatriotic.
Those clergy (with “no faith and morals” as Stalin envisioned it) exert their influence to support politicians of their own kind. Being morally corrupt, they protect political corruption (and most likely are beneficiaries of it).
The enemies of religion know that the best way to undermine a community is by infiltrating its clergy – because the clergy are the least suspected. That is what has happened. The church and the community are being destroyed from within – while many good hearted Christians are blindly serving the institution that is actually destroying them.
The Muslim clergy have similar dilemma. From Tehran to the southern suburbs of Beirut, there are those who see more glory in leading people to their destruction than to pursue policies that would elevate them.
Unknown for many people, one of the largest embassies in the Vatican is that of Iran, and the most important Iranian ambassador is the one to the Vatican. What takes place between these two entities is worth the work of an investigative journalist.
The dominant politics of the clergy can be summarized in two terms (both of which are unpatriotic): (1) globalism and (2) open-borders (Arabs and Africans into Europe; Mexicans into the U.S., and various refugees into Lebanon).
Recently, Pope Francis called for migrants to be integrated into society. This explains the Catholic social justice programs to assist refugees to settle in the host countries. The so-called Catholic social justice movement is barely distinguishable (at least in principle) from the communist manifesto.
The Pope also said that nationalism is an “attitude of isolation.” He ridiculed those who say “Us first. We … We …”, saying that “these are frightening thoughts.” In other words, to say “America first” or “Lebanon first” would be a frightening thought.
The Pope claims that nationalism is a reminder of Hitler. However, Hitler was not a nationalist, but a globalist. He deceptively used nationalist slogans in his quest towards regional and global domination.
Pope Francis again warns against nationalism, says recent speeches sound like ‘Hitler in 1934’ – The Washington Post
Pope Francis called for a united Europe in an interview published by Italian daily La Stampa on Friday, saying recent political rhetoric has echoed that of Nazi Germany. “I am concerned because …
www.washingtonpost.com
According to a Cardinal (who was quoted in the 1980s), one reason for the deteriorating situation of Lebanese Christians is Vatican politics. When the Vatican is infiltrated with a communist ideology and homosexuals, it becomes understandable why the cause of Christians is suffering — not only in Lebanon but also other parts of the Arab region and globally.
In my humble opinion, the solution is not to simply attack those who are our enemies. Instead, it is to know the truth, to speak it so that it can be a guide to others, and then to focus on what we can do as individuals – what positive achievements we can accomplish for ourselves and our country.
Enemies of Lebanon (2 of 3): The Secret Societies ايلي عون: اعداء لبنان – الجزء الثاني Elie Aoun/December 10/2019
In a speech on press freedom, U.S. President John F. Kennedy stated that the responsibility of the press is not to amuse or entertain but to educate, to state the dangers and opportunities. In that same speech, he spoke in opposition “to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings.”
He added: “We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy … It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations.”
President Kennedy was not a conspiracy theorist. What he stated was a fact, not a theory. His assassination was the price he paid for his courage – for rejecting the rule of those who rule behind the scenes.
It is against this “highly efficient machine” that both the U.S. and Lebanon struggle.
During the 2004 presidential election, both George W. Bush and John Kerry were members of “Skull and Bones.” Regardless for whom of the two candidates the Americans voted, they were voting for the same secret society.
During the 2016 U.S. election, the vice presidential candidates on both sides were Jesuits. Regardless for whom Americans voted, they were voting for a Jesuit vice president.
Many view the Jesuit Order as a religious or educational institution, but that is not the complete story. According to the CIA’s E. Howard Hunt, “the Jesuits form the greatest intelligence service in the world, and always have.” Anyone who investigates their true history would know of their criminality and involvement in the usurpation of nations.
Whether in the U.S. or in Lebanon, often an individual is selected for a certain position based on that person’s affiliation – not patriotism or qualification.
The secret societies do not reward honest patriotic individuals, but rats who are willing to sell their soul and country for the sake of political advancement. Where is the benefit and logic in undermining the country where those who lead the secret societies and their descendants live? For money and power that will eventually vanish?
The Jesuit-educated leaders of the Kataeb and Lebanese Forces along with the freemason leaders of FPM and Al Marada do not and cannot achieve any constructive measure for the country. The same can be said of the Jesuit/Freemason Saad Hariri and Druze leaders, and the Freemason Shiite leadership.
These “leaders” are neither Christians nor Muslims. Their political logos and hand-signs have no basis in either the Bible or the Quran. They know exactly their pagan and “dark” source.
The fact that all these politicians have the same affiliation could not have been a mere coincidence. This fact proves that Jesuitism and freemasonry play a role in ruling and destroying Lebanon. Their loyalty is to their agenda, not a country. It is a waste of time to expect from them anything different than the “fruits” that have already been given.
The Jesuit educational system is not the means through which positive improvements can take place. Whether the reader wishes to believe or not, national independence and wellbeing are not a part of the Jesuit agenda. A good Jesuit/Freemason politician, who decides to become patriotic, gets assassinated.
Our objective is not to fight them. Rather, it is to know the truth and then focus on our strengths and that which we can do ourselves – focus on what we can build, rather than what we oppose. Eventually, evil carries the seed of its own defeat.
What type of cabinet Lebanon needs? A cabinet with no Jesuits and no freemasons.
The heads of the Jesuit intelligence network and freemasonry are guilty in undermining Lebanon. If they wish to “redeem” the names of their secret societies, they must remove their “dirty” stooges from power. The “prestige” of Jesuitism and freemasonry is down the drain, along with other undesirable objects.
Enemies of Lebanon (01 of 03): The Monetary System أعداء لبنان (01من03): النظام النقدي Elie Aoun/November 30/2019
The Lebanese government does not own the Lebanese Pound (or Lira). If it owned the currency, it would not borrow it and pay interest on it.
One main reason why the monetary system is an enemy because the Lebanese government abandoned its exclusive privilege to issue money and vested that privilege in the Bank of Lebanon (Decree 13513, Article 47).
In other words, the government gave the Bank the right to issue money, loan that money back to the government, and then charge it interest – at a time when the government could have issued its own money without paying any interest.
The “Bank of Lebanon” was created pursuant to Lebanese Law Decree 13513 of August 1, 1963 (Code of Money and Credit).
The Decree was signed by President Fouad Chehab and Prime Minister Rachid Karameh (who was also acting as a Finance Minister).
The Lebanese Parliament did not vote on or approve the creation of the Bank.
Not only does the Bank charge interest on the Bank’s loans to the State, the Bank does not pay interest to the State on the State’s deposits in the Bank (Article 86).
Not only has the government abandoned to the Bank its exclusive authority to print money, the government has also exempted the Bank from all taxes, imposts and rates whatsoever, already enforced or likely to be enforced for the benefit of the State, municipal corporations or other organizations (Article 118).
WHO OWNS THE LEBANESE CURRENCY?
The name “Republic of Lebanon” is not printed on any of the Lebanese currency notes. What is printed is the name “Banque du Liban” (Bank of Lebanon). Some may ask, is not the Bank owned by the Lebanese government? The answer is no.
Firstly, Decree 13513 does not say that the Bank is a branch of the Lebanese government. Instead, the Decree’s Article 13 states that the Bank is a juridical person of public law (a legal entity similar to a corporation) vested with financial autonomy.
Secondly, the Decree is written in a manner that reflects a relationship between two independent entities (rather than the Bank being a branch of the government).
For example, Article 74 requires of the government to provide a protection (military guard) for the Bank’s establishment free of charge. No such language would have been used in the Decree if the Bank is a branch of the government.
Thirdly, Article 113 dictates how net profits are shared between the Bank and the government – such as 50/50 basis on certain occasions and even 80/20 (80% to the Treasury; 20% to the Bank) under some other conditions. It is doubtful that this profit-sharing formula has been properly implemented. If the Bank is a part of the government, all the net profits would have been the government’s share, not divided with the Bank.
The questions are: If the Bank is a legal entity, who owns that entity?
In what manner has its profits been used or distributed since 1963 until now? Would the government revoke Article 47 and restore its exclusive privilege to issue money without paying interest for it?
Why opening a new bank requires applying for registration with the Central Bank (Article 135) and not with the Ministry of Finance?
Apparently, no politician would have the courage to discuss these issues.
